{"meta":{"query_hash":"33095379b2a9","filters":{"venue":"Regional & Federal Studies"},"cohort_total":47,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":47,"exported":47,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/33095379b2a9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Regional+%26+Federal+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1958517529","doi":"10.1080/1359756042000245151","title":"The growth of English regionalism? institutions and identity","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Scottish History and National Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Regionalism (politics); Political science; Identity (music); State (computer science); Political economy; Perspective (graphical); Economic geography; Regional development; Development economics; Sociology; Geography; Regional science; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.10453435696065506,"score_gpt":0.30971934151570935,"score_spread":0.2051849845550543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958517529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5353565,0.0106812855,0.0020802058,0.06275423,0.00022190287,0.000010100008,0.00007683003,0.000034589877,0.38878432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99486405,0.0009391873,0.00011420734,0.00027761768,0.000038375027,0.000002564612,0.00000556102,0.000004087114,0.0037542835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794954,0.000720952,0.0000712381,0.00017297138,0.00024568228,0.000839589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976776,0.0004945269,0.00051081716,0.00021409166,0.00041012833,0.0006928332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002766797,0.00007983211,0.00020647621,0.0006958111,0.0024935377,0.006959919,0.00051130616,0.00061686954,0.0047656097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029782422,0.00011584497,0.0001242615,0.000861084,0.012823006,0.0051339725,0.0033317967,0.00095455704,0.00038796567],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003103592,0.000019219417,0.0073412964,0.000071831724,0.0000068879417,0.00028453977,0.046499867,0.00017944569,0.0003184097,0.9194695,0.0026967512,0.023081291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037454876,0.00013217641,0.09307985,0.0006258145,0.000023590503,0.000651029,0.16632272,0.0006578446,0.0008657106,0.21414675,0.5233933,0.000063828316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028703634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04113226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028703634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063756816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035344653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057073116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965113155","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2013.818981","title":"The Dynamics of Intra-jurisdictional Relations in the Inuit Regions of the Canadian Arctic: An Institutionalist Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Federalism; Institutionalism; Historical institutionalism; Political science; Arctic; Economic geography; The arctic; Regional science; Political economy; Geography; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0462865786998451,"score_gpt":0.3383852358080453,"score_spread":0.2920986571082002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965113155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88892204,0.0009813431,0.002114886,0.004842886,0.000044886136,0.00004823223,0.00009441016,0.000026851909,0.10292433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696594,0.00018431594,0.00027953341,0.000088281806,0.0000028966701,0.000007789405,0.000015961723,0.000007688756,0.0024477104],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965629,0.0010595954,0.000051232844,0.00028326578,0.0003811009,0.0016619946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980361,0.0005251699,0.0002779398,0.00011945723,0.00041313682,0.00062823086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024502408,0.00027303357,0.00040799333,0.0020938662,0.03475916,0.008158976,0.0023716176,0.001148669,0.0033534917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035737068,0.00030476783,0.00034184064,0.0026578293,0.026695117,0.0024415094,0.005468888,0.001956908,0.00013475459],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051766816,0.000025892925,0.018629367,0.000059057347,0.000018007386,0.0009947213,0.8361227,0.0010668241,0.0011166591,0.13088103,0.001539451,0.00949454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006104416,0.000016452837,0.0294064,0.000114489194,0.000021383534,0.0002079446,0.907326,0.0007939792,0.00028993667,0.0063921656,0.055364694,0.00006044312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9743866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98803526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92884743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07115257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06134571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51625043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996568273","doi":"10.1080/13597560500115261","title":"Introduction: Europe's constitutional future – Federal lessons for the European Union","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Commonwealth; European union; Law; Convention; State (computer science); European integration; Public administration; Politics; International trade","score_opus":0.07086744922421404,"score_gpt":0.3475950220808713,"score_spread":0.2767275728566573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996568273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027513637,0.09568808,0.002302465,0.38168544,0.024243113,0.000026844851,0.0007679796,0.00013415542,0.49240056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28472197,0.09910858,0.00455688,0.18600754,0.049700275,0.00022447445,0.0015748327,0.00045871508,0.3736467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991297,0.00026990238,0.000033991786,0.00014996808,0.00027103626,0.00014544613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886984,0.0007563363,0.00005224305,0.00008328963,0.00015574256,0.00008243823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013897305,0.00057532167,0.00041384008,0.0014951157,0.004076918,0.007520145,0.00095678604,0.0071636024,0.033765327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036231328,0.00028870525,0.0005980452,0.0024641284,0.0041576726,0.009473861,0.00238164,0.007138235,0.0044026994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010251726,0.000010936743,0.00010816014,0.00008856055,0.0000019754416,0.000053697586,0.0012644044,0.000110193214,0.00003967421,0.5550357,0.42430094,0.018975483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026794476,0.000005133446,0.0004445876,0.0004745102,0.000001499569,0.00005846536,0.0009822698,0.000054755397,0.00003093128,0.08874894,0.9091888,0.0000073515757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078063915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00831649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033765327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004045237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016487091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112956226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997059776","doi":"10.1080/13597560308559449","title":"The Regional Dimensions of Federal Intergovernmental and Interpersonal Transfers in Canada, 1981–2001","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Per capita; Transfer payment; Convergence (economics); Economics; Equalization (audio); Government (linguistics); Social security; Interpersonal communication; Transfer (computing); Public economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Demography; Statistics; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.05592891322451726,"score_gpt":0.23660510639282908,"score_spread":0.18067619316831182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997059776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92792743,0.001993247,0.0004115756,0.006233188,0.000054780765,0.0000704715,0.00396979,0.000058888894,0.059280626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932847,0.00047637793,0.00011885984,0.00015257233,0.0000129269865,0.000011755594,0.0005870613,0.000006931238,0.005348775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758935,0.00018068278,0.000056957582,0.0001518142,0.0006736903,0.001347558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955818,0.00040316037,0.0006735633,0.00013215879,0.0024310518,0.0007783042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013268327,0.00024854956,0.00052484515,0.0018462208,0.0039262758,0.0024126158,0.0009278865,0.0005418228,0.0042682365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008079162,0.00018146654,0.00034742843,0.004910177,0.0014350333,0.0007183049,0.0017073993,0.0012490787,0.00026591064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096398615,0.0003745727,0.6610962,0.0002931974,0.0003536651,0.00071728695,0.01518039,0.032520745,0.0013177246,0.10860175,0.043357357,0.13522308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024714722,0.000022441205,0.9617072,0.000050021146,0.00006675312,0.000048241953,0.006233737,0.002271923,0.00030493317,0.001498395,0.02774181,0.000029773544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99564123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99761295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11732164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11732164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07261497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85123205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030046523","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2012.742072","title":"On the Boundary: Local Authorities, Intergovernmental Relations and the Governance of Border Infrastructure in the Detroit–Windsor Region","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Politics; Metropolitan area; Corporate governance; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Geography; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.021221165576420443,"score_gpt":0.3254083575664584,"score_spread":0.30418719199003796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030046523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87816334,0.0014136577,0.0007387844,0.012910231,0.000022856708,0.000031908257,0.000051844545,0.000014238173,0.10665319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949085,0.0002408853,0.00011783232,0.00021835204,0.000003798421,0.00000770209,0.00001341915,0.0000026291782,0.0044868886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988226,0.0005351956,0.000024568311,0.000097880686,0.00012319739,0.00039648486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845505,0.0005163544,0.0003137629,0.00006587512,0.00017773361,0.00047123723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017581409,0.000076691926,0.00012598145,0.0005775611,0.0065185362,0.0043766377,0.0006737656,0.00071977713,0.0027721399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022328247,0.0001215828,0.00008079449,0.0012139786,0.0076332074,0.0017836781,0.0025652484,0.0007732021,0.00011278479],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013572625,0.00010232187,0.17983676,0.00019079079,0.000039241513,0.0017982487,0.22111663,0.0029342703,0.0017200782,0.5242894,0.015652938,0.05218352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029530795,0.000052765667,0.34724322,0.00043227736,0.000032478732,0.000207752,0.45313412,0.0015009273,0.0005512253,0.024672998,0.17207922,0.00006355286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6588047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8744696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3411953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015923807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013804379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6864093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060912777","doi":"10.1080/13597560008421110","title":"Constitutional ambiguity and federal trust: Codification of federalism in Canada, Spain and Belgium","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Ambiguity; Political science; Law; Federal state; Public administration; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048579553410766016,"score_gpt":0.307049059344809,"score_spread":0.258469505934043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060912777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9468364,0.0010640334,0.0007363508,0.00836414,0.000042560765,0.000037592927,0.00026152414,0.00002356866,0.04263375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99747235,0.0001265765,0.00016342083,0.000158924,0.0000053484837,0.000006766632,0.000067114925,0.000006419692,0.0019929952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922801,0.0018181072,0.00036858232,0.00053484604,0.0017673679,0.0032309887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96845776,0.013982452,0.0029821876,0.0017026998,0.0107525205,0.0021223794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0114869485,0.00020030583,0.0009845729,0.002748725,0.008240228,0.01421732,0.0021337394,0.0027384562,0.003177151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051291954,0.00029300162,0.0004645116,0.0052561555,0.007813401,0.0036171249,0.0037794327,0.003306968,0.000121939716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012909631,0.00029860815,0.1832413,0.00018713278,0.00023778234,0.000826938,0.06135206,0.015789146,0.000577775,0.6658924,0.012794692,0.057511155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040740534,0.00013885071,0.5576344,0.00078370154,0.00055279396,0.00019161434,0.15533003,0.024852855,0.0022753964,0.13267072,0.12470945,0.0004528041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9740685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9795695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13310009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13310009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11433682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96571326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063369987","doi":"10.1080/1359756042000245179","title":"Moreno's multiple ethnoterritorial concurrence model: A re-formulation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Concurrence; Federalism; Politics; Multinational corporation; Regionalism (politics); Political science; Relation (database); Public administration; Political economy; Economic geography; Regional science; Sociology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.13280898748720069,"score_gpt":0.3888670403829764,"score_spread":0.25605805289577577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063369987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06045783,0.0036954263,0.28780255,0.06762616,0.0008805847,0.0003507924,0.00029860274,0.00012709014,0.5787609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9397795,0.0008953308,0.02706451,0.0033213205,0.000536712,0.0003241381,0.000090532274,0.00007736306,0.027910583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860299,0.007973254,0.0003791854,0.0016627625,0.0028300015,0.0011248894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875097,0.0063100485,0.0010902364,0.0021928737,0.0021401513,0.00075701624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014357523,0.00065425225,0.0012726095,0.002168892,0.003992889,0.006222333,0.003061949,0.0041966266,0.010461857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017085582,0.00047496386,0.0019819527,0.0022424273,0.013505994,0.007408191,0.0055227475,0.004700328,0.00097464543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034056798,0.00000794054,0.00010351998,0.000008828574,0.000004311642,0.000037438393,0.00041012545,0.00050422194,0.000016221207,0.9973001,0.0006444181,0.00095948594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022514952,0.000012368136,0.0002515571,0.00004690139,0.000011498163,0.000092015805,0.00060227345,0.0076784184,0.000041224717,0.9724806,0.01874472,0.000015859614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013443109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011585261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014357523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009208934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050437534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075930715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083442356","doi":"10.1080/13597560802223912","title":"Intergovernmental Relations Post-devolution: Active Labour Market Policy in Canada and the United Kingdom 1996–2006","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"York University; Scottish Government","keywords":"Devolution (biology); Political science; Kingdom; Public administration; Regional policy; Geography; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.045551989651138956,"score_gpt":0.31560734150615105,"score_spread":0.2700553518550121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083442356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81050456,0.007897994,0.00050519174,0.048456963,0.00055145944,0.00032483635,0.0043685753,0.000095175434,0.12729518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96184444,0.0017197505,0.00026548863,0.0018466458,0.00003526505,0.00007034828,0.0011650037,0.000022004626,0.03303106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.990054,0.00073055027,0.00026453807,0.00043367172,0.0027759958,0.005741186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841389,0.0012635435,0.0011462874,0.0003079077,0.008668473,0.004474947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033263222,0.00034527524,0.0005197661,0.002773548,0.016281936,0.0071107424,0.0026684336,0.0023808687,0.007195621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014084087,0.00047419252,0.00048601654,0.007231692,0.003713482,0.0015720273,0.0038886226,0.0033476749,0.0004859938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012970204,0.00044654583,0.24153493,0.0013722971,0.00039855426,0.0033343895,0.14214113,0.0072900853,0.002373568,0.20121843,0.22096834,0.17762466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008056125,0.000060973944,0.61250913,0.0005712649,0.00007734131,0.00010830192,0.08085644,0.0010174016,0.000661747,0.0016323016,0.30225056,0.00017405664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99871135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3467741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3467741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32734576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7576494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083863924","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2014.992886","title":"From Sub-state Nationalism to Subnational Competition States: The Development and Institutionalization of Commercial Paradiplomacy in Scotland and Quebec","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Institutionalisation; Political science; Competition (biology); Openness to experience; State (computer science); Diplomacy; Public administration; Political economy; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.10324106539234333,"score_gpt":0.3972588119008309,"score_spread":0.29401774650848755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083863924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9393681,0.0003122933,0.0004119214,0.0024529032,0.000014125265,0.000024483199,0.000066665496,0.0000152298835,0.057334222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972914,0.00006249191,0.00006181182,0.00008602592,0.0000015123267,0.0000037453437,0.000013949256,0.0000030754225,0.0024759676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979892,0.0004017577,0.00003442149,0.00018389644,0.00023827601,0.0011524678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967618,0.0006713863,0.00037890827,0.0001997429,0.00082759367,0.0011605119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002059354,0.00012839082,0.00021286157,0.0010820864,0.00928199,0.005937868,0.001061532,0.0006311051,0.0042646774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032073471,0.00020892273,0.00020624777,0.0016325659,0.01116977,0.0012769372,0.0033002084,0.0012342945,0.000119780736],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002487879,0.00013760314,0.20358884,0.00011094864,0.00007266183,0.0031098253,0.32185572,0.0012498524,0.0031286895,0.39548874,0.009239352,0.06176898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004571968,0.00012096979,0.5666,0.000234728,0.00005082215,0.0003973261,0.27605307,0.0022314743,0.0009037828,0.0075209048,0.14570434,0.00013683455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.957382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98216677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060209684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060209684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03434513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4368539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088384035","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2011.530018","title":"The Canadian Political Career Structure: From Stability to Free Agency","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Agency (philosophy); Ideology; Work (physics); Political science; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.25245249879507337,"score_gpt":0.37099761701463324,"score_spread":0.11854511821955988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088384035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30738854,0.005590835,0.0021125262,0.13893679,0.00060303556,0.00013730061,0.001984675,0.00010222736,0.54314405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96037,0.001581774,0.00076898595,0.0019135061,0.000067881316,0.00002971979,0.0003219692,0.00004185514,0.034904342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920547,0.0007325573,0.000118068754,0.0005579668,0.0028341138,0.0037025746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98839265,0.0005669609,0.00040556063,0.00031152606,0.0042170044,0.0061062933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041180956,0.00026552,0.0004538201,0.006317321,0.03072357,0.01005004,0.002006791,0.001385567,0.0127464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011113692,0.00036417446,0.00032042136,0.007509746,0.010609805,0.0024254,0.0043764967,0.002456088,0.0009440963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022556978,0.000062009036,0.0751804,0.00014549232,0.000029643898,0.00023474947,0.04638068,0.00039479914,0.00047999286,0.6112977,0.09498452,0.17058441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004710937,0.00006728627,0.3190669,0.0004325335,0.000030951403,0.0001570964,0.051308494,0.00073500467,0.0002761959,0.037412528,0.59035563,0.000110239926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9898369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99635065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17614515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17614515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22163059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95555484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095508000","doi":"10.1080/1359756042000245188","title":"Exploring the paradox of autonomy: federalism and secession in North America","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Autonomy; Federalism; Political science; Independence (probability theory); State (computer science); Political economy; Economic system; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.15395936791522508,"score_gpt":0.34524885191443594,"score_spread":0.19128948399921086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095508000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7658656,0.0031234587,0.0015487686,0.049663465,0.00006950054,0.000013618704,0.000041793228,0.000010012216,0.17966373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987496,0.00019588738,0.0000726571,0.00038856122,0.000011254667,0.000002766436,0.000003735855,0.0000010330418,0.0005743036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997869,0.0009658247,0.0000485567,0.00019127814,0.00033368633,0.0005916833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952089,0.0028570234,0.00074353523,0.00019325568,0.0005666052,0.0004306774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029693325,0.0000768694,0.00029698538,0.0012914385,0.007668505,0.0053674895,0.0007134577,0.0017614026,0.0026400303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057248916,0.00015791708,0.00024774633,0.0014105083,0.020224819,0.003028483,0.0035591507,0.0023880156,0.000053036274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024930485,0.000025015555,0.011333303,0.00003680413,0.000015475762,0.00034389945,0.04351735,0.000742838,0.00019418,0.93274045,0.0026205292,0.008405245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064805725,0.00005415651,0.1004316,0.0004602021,0.00006548733,0.00040360566,0.16071841,0.005076164,0.00039193916,0.6247005,0.10755222,0.00008100437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36219266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4842558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63780737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019204391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010249037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72016895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113176335","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2015.1011137","title":"Two Political Worlds? Multi-level Campaign Integration in Canadian Constituencies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Multinomial logistic regression; Phenomenon; Survey data collection; Political science; Survey research; Sociology; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Epistemology; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.3572233922147063,"score_gpt":0.4511521819581607,"score_spread":0.09392878974345442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113176335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98100764,0.0002219715,0.00024459796,0.00045617798,0.0000048637057,0.00002553718,0.00022614517,0.000006020579,0.017807003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881065,0.00007237881,0.00014281426,0.00003137817,0.0000017374617,0.0000071549666,0.00011582648,0.0000021897254,0.0008158629],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646497,0.00043173681,0.00008655224,0.00034929102,0.0010442766,0.0016230766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976801,0.00043442677,0.0005287606,0.00016931647,0.0005955133,0.00059189694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022465214,0.00021730209,0.00052676466,0.0044082026,0.008545248,0.0053252047,0.0010800275,0.0005963171,0.0069116103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006005642,0.00028986833,0.00034822043,0.0076720617,0.0026570624,0.001615339,0.004270533,0.000899146,0.0002377613],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016538755,0.00010775868,0.8361029,0.000075512326,0.00009949326,0.00032056015,0.09473911,0.00036083075,0.001277654,0.01889114,0.0016971837,0.046162423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057098396,0.000023708124,0.89520663,0.00006898198,0.00003710809,0.00005715274,0.09460172,0.00053405133,0.00021762491,0.000840961,0.008379797,0.000026498717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95978653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9840857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040213466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024567425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02191751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17824996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119726544","doi":"10.1080/13597560902753644","title":"The Paradox of Federalism: Some Practical Reflections","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Democracy; Economic Justice; Political science; Political economy; Law and economics; Cooperative federalism; Fiscal federalism; Public administration; Set (abstract data type); Economic system; Sociology; Economics; Law; Decentralization","score_opus":0.15372438097773466,"score_gpt":0.46242972837858654,"score_spread":0.30870534740085187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119726544","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061223693,0.009766534,0.0030324263,0.917797,0.0016127826,0.000013147227,0.000034891393,0.000034611978,0.061586186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.749187,0.019446101,0.005790568,0.18981433,0.007769143,0.00014347155,0.00007306673,0.00012561017,0.027650682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401444,0.0035363918,0.00012452758,0.0004350031,0.00092108344,0.000968593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991833,0.0058722943,0.00030470002,0.00039080347,0.0010194309,0.0005798425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010649149,0.00048062284,0.00084790384,0.0017001007,0.01082748,0.009928874,0.0027834387,0.00885658,0.006658203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01753724,0.00035531528,0.0006313256,0.0019029431,0.03773863,0.015586383,0.005862156,0.014707108,0.0005071428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009818069,0.000012872348,0.00015781756,0.000029672472,0.0000038821127,0.00012032628,0.0021373248,0.0003311004,0.000031238564,0.9761909,0.017867787,0.0031071643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020102994,0.000010368693,0.00035132142,0.00012289798,0.0000037792663,0.00010308092,0.009074639,0.0005344525,0.00006705921,0.861377,0.12830898,0.000026275922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09715441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.097692475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09715441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019472634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011251312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19317782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123612222","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2013.765866","title":"The Politics of Representative Bureaucracy in Multilingual States: A Comparison of Belgium, Canada and Switzerland","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Representation (politics); Politics; Public administration; Diversity (politics); Political science; Public service; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05545050828908337,"score_gpt":0.38618830808617166,"score_spread":0.3307377997970883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123612222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723838,0.00067056826,0.00017084036,0.00093961495,0.000012251136,0.000013662361,0.00008032504,0.000012359948,0.025716614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862635,0.0001230418,0.00004405748,0.00004722064,0.0000015379081,0.000004226568,0.000028379694,0.0000044102353,0.0011208475],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959859,0.0007194761,0.00007827667,0.00020912435,0.0008772782,0.0021299275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974226,0.0004488514,0.00035191447,0.0000822844,0.0009078911,0.0007864639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018035071,0.00017072246,0.0003675039,0.0029581336,0.008494122,0.0057621286,0.0006724845,0.00067276944,0.0026417961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004599528,0.00017984459,0.00028513602,0.0047124634,0.005435822,0.00090337015,0.002351513,0.0009142512,0.00012540829],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084139354,0.00020726326,0.29352948,0.00024710753,0.00016913482,0.0021958852,0.32865298,0.004549034,0.0036793975,0.2854041,0.00783012,0.0726941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037579095,0.00006520314,0.74230146,0.00018452696,0.00006381827,0.00025211892,0.2044648,0.0017470538,0.0007560917,0.002909967,0.04710971,0.00010768363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9701623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.986553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9399736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060026407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038359404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4355241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146544875","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2010.523637","title":"Small Worlds in Canada and Europe: A Comparison of Regional Party Systems in Quebec, Bavaria and Scotland","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Context (archaeology); Nationalism; Cleavage (geology); State (computer science); Competition (biology); Stateless protocol; Economy; Political economy; Regional science; Geography; Sociology; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06635713957824148,"score_gpt":0.3124318298686812,"score_spread":0.2460746902904397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146544875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95692277,0.002050278,0.00023484248,0.0010455301,0.000030070156,0.000046993762,0.000822588,0.000015423062,0.03883138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961325,0.0005896316,0.00011130647,0.0000967911,0.0000044218846,0.000009544615,0.00037714728,0.000007124493,0.002671632],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996662,0.00034029334,0.00007967069,0.00019278572,0.0009197625,0.0018054754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959502,0.00048959814,0.0004068379,0.000097871365,0.0019648955,0.0010904702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014890459,0.00027013742,0.00050010486,0.005653528,0.008860189,0.005754569,0.001186597,0.00048908935,0.004593504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003999712,0.00018876596,0.0004063722,0.011753209,0.003259255,0.0010189755,0.0022857187,0.0006634197,0.00021430849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061288924,0.00013422532,0.67537564,0.00033694017,0.00037971637,0.0021138007,0.11829534,0.0015927823,0.0017200366,0.06769761,0.01718446,0.114556514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016684999,0.000025576066,0.9070186,0.00011708555,0.00005202363,0.00013829126,0.061692636,0.00053867314,0.00016499778,0.00040983298,0.029776536,0.00004906516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.079438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04065459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5763657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152877979","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2010.507401","title":"How Centralized Federations Avoid Over-centralization","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Decentralization; Centralized government; Government (linguistics); Central government; Point (geometry); Cooperative federalism; Devolution (biology); Public administration; Political science; Local government; Economic system; Business; Economics; Market economy; Politics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.15627031486884527,"score_gpt":0.34153673172102833,"score_spread":0.18526641685218306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152877979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56488746,0.0010089658,0.046014145,0.01746398,0.00032234617,0.0001495656,0.00012196506,0.00065860624,0.36937293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99254096,0.00007878278,0.001295968,0.00023006726,0.000027208458,0.00002250366,0.00003067414,0.00003083222,0.00574306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99326694,0.002985098,0.00020082535,0.0010589592,0.0007134279,0.0017748154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987934,0.0024517023,0.0025693262,0.0032886202,0.0017697886,0.0019866822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086746365,0.00021007149,0.0004892442,0.0014368239,0.0073993253,0.00855308,0.0013916834,0.0020128223,0.017055115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022222865,0.00030441006,0.000578138,0.0012923214,0.008956004,0.008835362,0.006978373,0.0015845282,0.0017090036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012042462,0.000093852104,0.013430483,0.00008661221,0.000045444198,0.000330528,0.011022776,0.0043997834,0.00079300284,0.92853594,0.009449312,0.031691927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012784556,0.00017288119,0.02057693,0.00027487116,0.00007340566,0.00035486554,0.019802121,0.011473979,0.001397778,0.8095304,0.13615227,0.000062740015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006476556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005878287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017055115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005817513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054487376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057055056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156006567","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2011.530021","title":"Party Careers in Federal Systems. Vertical Linkages within Austrian, German, Canadian and Australian Parties","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Politics; Federal election; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Federalism; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.13526375622386386,"score_gpt":0.3401614909153013,"score_spread":0.20489773469143743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156006567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97634125,0.0004688764,0.00031558058,0.0005413562,0.000013935985,0.0000150630185,0.0002850677,0.000008181612,0.022010548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970023,0.00009467961,0.0001252133,0.000024952189,0.0000036948738,0.0000054929274,0.0001332285,0.0000021666135,0.0026082674],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798006,0.0005649462,0.00008641575,0.00015242168,0.00031748475,0.00089866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901653,0.0021290057,0.0025965865,0.00043170297,0.0014776652,0.003199746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022945679,0.0000880998,0.00016456649,0.0029107095,0.0038216019,0.0016458334,0.00030431984,0.00048383707,0.010748966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010578211,0.00017446064,0.00027082418,0.003168145,0.0009890066,0.001153887,0.0030605188,0.0006383422,0.00085179723],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029234347,0.0001898714,0.8636534,0.00010570202,0.000046663878,0.000186044,0.027802844,0.00066900667,0.0014048582,0.03243545,0.0024553372,0.07075843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054564516,0.000060398022,0.98441917,0.000054433985,0.000007230941,0.00007822087,0.0079204235,0.0003443342,0.00009508787,0.0017040424,0.005304079,0.0000072036432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048673965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16381487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.951326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029244325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003035745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09678131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289581466","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2016.1147220","title":"In Memoriam Frank Delmartino (1939—2015)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Jewish Identity and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic history; History","score_opus":0.0754910344690111,"score_gpt":0.38276463424051177,"score_spread":0.30727359977150065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289581466","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002597676,0.024592957,0.00015441753,0.4743424,0.49756667,0.000007352193,0.00016180119,0.000029748682,0.0028848785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0114115635,0.013077285,0.00030103422,0.5349289,0.3715972,0.000056311954,0.00019149661,0.00013273346,0.06830344],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974515,0.0005759671,0.00021637256,0.0006593464,0.0007215976,0.00037520073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99576205,0.0017445966,0.00047934675,0.00022484911,0.0010732517,0.0007159906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003349855,0.0014376746,0.0013818581,0.0014284743,0.0062854835,0.008127287,0.0017608728,0.010975953,0.009480016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01795219,0.0004693779,0.0009781357,0.0011983208,0.0040601664,0.0056882827,0.0071849693,0.016793583,0.005954458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018826564,0.000004695822,0.000116320465,0.000047490797,0.000008279277,0.00011219892,0.00035192128,0.000010909943,0.000035865753,0.0026929053,0.99280167,0.003798824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062622794,0.000004412998,0.00047461194,0.00021426637,0.000008567761,0.00008381793,0.00044415105,0.000020137282,0.00006264367,0.0016399374,0.9970283,0.000012896185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013788425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022562174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013788425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004562459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003082578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03310305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297512465","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2016.1157072","title":"Theory and Practice of Paradiplomacy: Subnational Governments in International Politics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; International relations; Public administration; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05601905657464998,"score_gpt":0.4285035870061228,"score_spread":0.3724845304314728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297512465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03116004,0.014256198,0.04423125,0.040643543,0.00067085016,0.000079456724,0.000033864115,0.00009545025,0.8688293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647329,0.007878032,0.005864025,0.0027773958,0.0003230977,0.00018095743,0.00002967959,0.000066150176,0.01814789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99286723,0.005255664,0.0001698831,0.0005534494,0.000511543,0.00064233405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566686,0.0030734236,0.00042243314,0.00040777892,0.00017732402,0.00025219895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005721079,0.00043281238,0.000563764,0.0017467296,0.0056860447,0.011355889,0.0018158979,0.0032518515,0.005218368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005684106,0.00036003272,0.00046296307,0.0044549326,0.048723128,0.011813678,0.0075150863,0.005073938,0.0007134424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001178249,0.000002524259,0.000087139604,0.000013658788,5.779709e-7,0.000020549842,0.00541542,0.000051955136,0.000006753476,0.9921334,0.0006576068,0.0016092797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009911744,0.000016297377,0.00063015136,0.00037532693,0.0000043774453,0.00018537657,0.029721355,0.0008258098,0.000080987884,0.7677139,0.20042728,0.00000920751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002569455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029336503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011355889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067087645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005412552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048675776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395066296","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2016.1181061","title":"Devine intervention? Lessons in systemic retrenchment from Canada’s most generous welfare state","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Retrenchment; Bureaucracy; Welfare state; Social Welfare; Welfare; State (computer science); Welfare reform; Revenue; Political science; Economics; Public administration; Political economy; Politics; Market economy; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.0627673717780396,"score_gpt":0.3583462000801314,"score_spread":0.2955788283020918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395066296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40561092,0.00877331,0.0071800076,0.3636503,0.0011933879,0.00046813523,0.0003740957,0.00018867315,0.21256122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96388584,0.0015267914,0.0013229189,0.022037158,0.000093605195,0.00008851939,0.00006226615,0.000043796415,0.010939127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867278,0.002611845,0.00033871032,0.0014651229,0.0025915753,0.0062649827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99005544,0.0023145068,0.0005821936,0.00071705546,0.0030827264,0.0032479896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0140082035,0.00043315822,0.0010570588,0.0015405752,0.025871037,0.015242736,0.002828191,0.005602612,0.0044560516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018905725,0.00036938937,0.00069916726,0.0023431827,0.026100934,0.0049227397,0.009748065,0.0101562645,0.0001782589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009567551,0.00015143848,0.013159732,0.0002782072,0.00010935931,0.0011211676,0.043682884,0.0019454963,0.0008317889,0.8612822,0.023165856,0.054176174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028413677,0.00027206604,0.06765226,0.0020843225,0.00026031703,0.00038739084,0.14988123,0.0029630961,0.002236081,0.28072414,0.4928379,0.00041703862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96027267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9779042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16027659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16027659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37744725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9739601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626867127","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2017.1343723","title":"Secondary foreign policy activities in Third sector cross-border cooperation as conflict transformation in the European Union: The cases of the Basque and Irish borderscapes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; FP7 Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities; Queen's University Belfast; European Commission","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Irish; European union; Political science; Economy; Political economy; International trade; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06370091825188805,"score_gpt":0.42964325859647756,"score_spread":0.3659423403445895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626867127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7767944,0.0017878002,0.0006532819,0.0031959862,0.00006277953,0.00004098793,0.000021714368,0.000007647004,0.21743548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953524,0.00047382616,0.00013081213,0.00028993332,0.000009761092,0.000021383103,0.000016332526,0.000003406096,0.003702173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918577,0.0045336685,0.0001077962,0.0002160513,0.00043270196,0.0028519207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957755,0.0022131328,0.0007214996,0.00023139136,0.00043207034,0.00062637345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006942037,0.00040033908,0.00029894095,0.002073339,0.010983758,0.010053597,0.00093996536,0.0026669176,0.0050778375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004238549,0.00017106139,0.00045392133,0.0026987202,0.008536385,0.002693275,0.007065823,0.0024227065,0.0002290426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003181405,0.00036653396,0.03822996,0.00040247804,0.00008340568,0.010397779,0.35110202,0.002279301,0.0007443267,0.5432356,0.006929976,0.045910496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058464055,0.0001402782,0.051672857,0.0007286083,0.00005223206,0.0019959281,0.76193804,0.0009397096,0.0010408533,0.012637737,0.16874164,0.000053672866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029417085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039522674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029417085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008820876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004989274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06400025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964391679","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2019.1650030","title":"The Canadian contribution to a comparative law of secession","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.07245477312303857,"score_gpt":0.38208657757559006,"score_spread":0.3096318044525515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964391679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003383736,0.078698725,0.0015984848,0.2302728,0.006304029,0.000035885398,0.0010322819,0.00006412228,0.6786099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4715424,0.089131,0.008038305,0.08549687,0.009111055,0.00017288202,0.0011485316,0.00025621557,0.33510283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883796,0.0013492208,0.00020041986,0.0007949319,0.0075233723,0.0017524632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99128145,0.0017548399,0.00019558813,0.00054540124,0.0054680253,0.0007546396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005222154,0.0007075907,0.0007556205,0.007585414,0.020716954,0.010630678,0.0023575455,0.0063145263,0.015632192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01254013,0.0005352826,0.00067132676,0.010159885,0.020235216,0.0042925715,0.0030895846,0.006077735,0.00090514804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010111929,0.00000665363,0.00033253318,0.00007444797,0.00000841933,0.000041269162,0.0016820019,0.00014867508,0.000034313165,0.7114663,0.26876497,0.01743037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060528887,0.0000038295057,0.0018821746,0.00028579665,0.000012965557,0.000028335482,0.0010443067,0.00014442917,0.000043435037,0.049040716,0.9474853,0.000022603816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98774326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99406034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17277128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17277128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22398174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95946807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971330309","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2019.1658082","title":"The price of federation: Comparing fiscal equalization in Australia, Canada, Germany and Switzerland","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Point (geometry); Economics; Equalization (audio); Compensation (psychology); Payment; Transfer payment; Central government; Value (mathematics); Fiscal federalism; Public economics; Russian federation; Local government; Macroeconomics; Economic policy; Political science; Public administration; Finance; Decentralization; Market economy; Welfare","score_opus":0.057213195034289135,"score_gpt":0.32998780368297614,"score_spread":0.272774608648687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971330309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98191833,0.0002588589,0.000082900646,0.0005978303,0.000012295258,0.000022352317,0.00019236395,0.0000122536785,0.016902847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735945,0.00010206858,0.000062476036,0.00004796764,0.0000037587606,0.000006358956,0.0001749392,0.0000035948974,0.002239287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970638,0.00032859342,0.00006985271,0.00011490434,0.00094441645,0.0014783108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963509,0.00035107415,0.00053399033,0.00012756274,0.0018509001,0.00078563613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00181323,0.00017893838,0.00034566174,0.0031295693,0.003138244,0.0020065936,0.0005632347,0.00031147196,0.0022422415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007551875,0.00011956038,0.00020834088,0.0037068427,0.0024341447,0.0011176963,0.0025531542,0.00063240656,0.00010234357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013701811,0.00023081037,0.79003125,0.00017881695,0.00017727858,0.0007187956,0.027582325,0.004393325,0.0010099087,0.06321711,0.010360172,0.10073008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016246386,0.00007530816,0.97477394,0.00003270253,0.000020768544,0.000040220613,0.01338199,0.0007133985,0.0002920844,0.00039152778,0.010240757,0.000021110372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92887235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.956434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07112765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029521117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025547177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21419168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035769280","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2020.1781097","title":"Multinational federalism: challenges, shortcomings and promises","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Multinational corporation; Panacea (medicine); Democracy; Politics; Law and economics; Autonomy; Political science; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Economic system; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.19392037248045027,"score_gpt":0.3680952548928899,"score_spread":0.17417488241243964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035769280","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011746834,0.027933413,0.0034234843,0.8918204,0.0014041098,0.000014536533,0.000057737885,0.00006303294,0.063536495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85993165,0.04990583,0.0095815435,0.04851874,0.006036861,0.00014702274,0.00015044342,0.000108117245,0.02561986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923535,0.0042006588,0.00018334549,0.0005247321,0.0018242738,0.0009134532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853932,0.0068974667,0.0007561481,0.0013782461,0.002880507,0.0026944312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021241046,0.00025044594,0.00060867256,0.0009496604,0.0053080143,0.00987556,0.0017519948,0.004674127,0.008145917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024285618,0.00021800373,0.00038016096,0.0023284701,0.012367402,0.011742923,0.005604759,0.006781589,0.0010584091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020935633,0.00004884654,0.0009945463,0.00012551453,0.000008478661,0.000047584683,0.0010225243,0.00047732808,0.000056336557,0.91171426,0.032092154,0.053391583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017978104,0.0000390092,0.0018965208,0.00075692375,0.000007832203,0.000112770016,0.0059812223,0.0015494894,0.0001097095,0.67961544,0.3098889,0.000024289604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010837612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017200382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021241046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066574463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01643304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11233479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048917554","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2020.1801648","title":"When faced with elite polarization, citizens take sides: The 2017 election in Catalonia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Elite; Polarization (electrochemistry); Political economy; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10975694201181938,"score_gpt":0.3586845744988342,"score_spread":0.2489276324870148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048917554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916482,0.00016044632,0.000033729408,0.00049888995,0.000027650647,0.0000073375795,0.00005064306,0.0000013668229,0.007571691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983374,0.00007301309,0.00002251029,0.000116200325,0.000016632495,0.000004092206,0.00007858175,0.0000026226783,0.0013489376],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982651,0.0007050169,0.000044187782,0.00014655516,0.00016406295,0.000675086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809855,0.0005921446,0.00047826642,0.0001146836,0.0003388588,0.00037748963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029463645,0.00015317982,0.00033519158,0.00060387084,0.0018936384,0.0031707725,0.00035530122,0.0007064275,0.0032743053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029732042,0.0001019032,0.00015768701,0.0006309613,0.0013967841,0.0006082124,0.0019629595,0.00087479275,0.0005852813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020846853,0.00039721627,0.8074921,0.00037236168,0.00015154545,0.0016550679,0.085621506,0.0010865458,0.0028325233,0.012720348,0.021113846,0.06447216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037459806,0.0001351413,0.87385875,0.00009607166,0.00002063651,0.00008655297,0.104897596,0.00041124856,0.00021713831,0.0008605396,0.019347187,0.000031718555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055102065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.101560846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055102065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028982908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001148535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109562635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3103214139","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2020.1843021","title":"Unified voters in a divided society: Ideology and regionalism in Belgium","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Regionalism (politics); Politics; Political economy; Political science; Electoral geography; Survey data collection; Federal election; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.18991263517570814,"score_gpt":0.3995915815983938,"score_spread":0.20967894642268567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3103214139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980831,0.000099928104,0.000083623185,0.00007367815,0.000002329217,0.0000014137484,0.00002443133,0.0000011488028,0.0016302412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996339,0.000018916573,0.00004496276,0.0000071970944,0.0000014366046,0.0000010620586,0.000026210793,0.000001499063,0.00026476782],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841416,0.0008512148,0.00003701714,0.00017441649,0.00014154884,0.00038161737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988741,0.00032647376,0.00038329186,0.000045637844,0.0001342848,0.0002360805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015930914,0.000116477335,0.00037966462,0.0014635567,0.0012433088,0.0021786047,0.00023375638,0.00035609966,0.0026247045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028650956,0.00011768196,0.00021286908,0.001848316,0.0012454274,0.0005478716,0.0011660047,0.00038322966,0.0002535165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079283555,0.00018003015,0.9012844,0.000076683595,0.00018756738,0.00041897563,0.049551755,0.0011343531,0.0018425524,0.010200113,0.0012364179,0.03309428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020052348,0.00009065507,0.9530946,0.000037834037,0.000029310195,0.000102842496,0.03978035,0.0008217277,0.00019238133,0.00086100015,0.0049533085,0.000016015998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076322876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16399698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076322876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019445356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007580561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15175724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163322927","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2021.1919875","title":"The conditions and potentials of federalizing trade policy: Comparing Canada and the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Liberalization; Political science; Free trade; International trade; Procurement; Economics; State (computer science); Institutionalisation; Federal state; International economics; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.05690686015076986,"score_gpt":0.3366891825495427,"score_spread":0.2797823223987729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163322927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8076818,0.0029222958,0.0005286429,0.014369415,0.00005095408,0.00006932815,0.0005642521,0.000021650258,0.17379169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975189,0.0005473341,0.00022122015,0.00045520262,0.000008169678,0.000010092671,0.00009731538,0.000003015712,0.0011387524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98936087,0.0010968758,0.00022457,0.0004206036,0.00291845,0.0059786183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98850024,0.0030015383,0.0015204748,0.00046993754,0.0047925925,0.0017151693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046246797,0.00020869735,0.00055175216,0.003955126,0.011552681,0.008817838,0.0009982383,0.0015543611,0.0031355051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0152456,0.00028468753,0.0006736696,0.0062587652,0.009082959,0.0020946176,0.0032200238,0.0020558047,0.00008776967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007118026,0.0001672163,0.20784557,0.00026014703,0.0002509605,0.00075636466,0.017040543,0.011767095,0.0013769177,0.7068875,0.010573905,0.042362105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018363941,0.00020503189,0.7323283,0.0007754447,0.00054489,0.00020184624,0.11031735,0.00807705,0.002143547,0.04740812,0.09749325,0.00032156653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9879842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1288456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1288456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14130577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9348447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168230224","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2021.1932829","title":"The federalization of trade politics in Switzerland, Germany and Austria","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Jurisdiction; Political science; Preference; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07216694892590443,"score_gpt":0.3555064090582227,"score_spread":0.2833394601323183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168230224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935694,0.00026050347,0.00021360755,0.00027445625,0.0000044402773,0.000006231199,0.000027797452,0.000003903809,0.0056398152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997397,0.000037869406,0.000040100615,0.000011592022,0.0000017187169,0.0000032407283,0.000014026857,5.890536e-7,0.00015129441],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967182,0.0014954293,0.00013808635,0.0003149361,0.00029082,0.0010424046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719065,0.0010574978,0.0010859095,0.00018053927,0.00019086906,0.00029450608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031524443,0.000105461346,0.00024317071,0.0019186584,0.0014899586,0.0029168136,0.0002542165,0.00063354976,0.0015282757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048350715,0.00015204941,0.00026043042,0.0027925156,0.0026184716,0.0013497459,0.0020685468,0.0005232764,0.000095258],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010758628,0.0003124529,0.71497566,0.00017409558,0.00014569248,0.0011750757,0.040136416,0.0067778924,0.004088498,0.16487175,0.0016505194,0.064616166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002586666,0.00013301645,0.9697646,0.00007037446,0.000037786493,0.00012298128,0.017777912,0.002081382,0.0006372374,0.0041574324,0.0051703486,0.000021087064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020038806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0436314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020038806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043013967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016855419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039844334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221131043","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2022.2049252","title":"The symbolic state. Minority recognition, majority backlash, and secession in multinational countries <b>The symbolic state. Minority recognition, majority backlash, and secession in multinational countries</b> , by Karlo Basta, Montreal &amp; Kingston, London, Chicago, McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2021, 272 pp., $37.95, ISBN: 0228008050","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Multinational corporation; State (computer science); Political science; Backlash; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01779885209459187,"score_gpt":0.2694670566280108,"score_spread":0.2516682045334189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221131043","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005372793,0.6924619,0.00034652423,0.09145967,0.0073583047,0.000006490053,0.00014728417,0.000048484846,0.20279856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28510848,0.4414251,0.00050538563,0.008715911,0.008786483,0.00003637142,0.0002726221,0.00009726324,0.25505242],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942374,0.00023220322,0.00002481421,0.000047864774,0.00017759635,0.00009378549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995788,0.00019025737,0.000082606326,0.000020157342,0.00004979023,0.0000783985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072359,0.00043675012,0.0002833485,0.00066143234,0.001413921,0.004479481,0.00043312478,0.0010729163,0.01357909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016157243,0.00020462998,0.00016622523,0.0023825397,0.005496725,0.005144177,0.0014403358,0.001289757,0.0024838357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028346356,0.000021402462,0.00087168446,0.0002649683,0.000006028247,0.00005338874,0.0043503395,0.00012419045,0.00007625139,0.14299043,0.75058,0.100633085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008017783,0.0000150808455,0.0039160484,0.00058643473,0.0000056756976,0.00009742708,0.006052692,0.0001276509,0.00006518714,0.030740738,0.95837635,0.0000087193375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02644306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04825512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02644306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036394622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038681796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05257827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249765997","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2010.507407","title":"Book Reviews","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Social Science and Policy Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Regional science; Sociology","score_opus":0.2504153129175236,"score_gpt":0.5206845987095372,"score_spread":0.2702692857920136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249765997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029619376,0.08284578,0.0012265731,0.00812011,0.039916173,0.00023423068,0.0046660807,0.0016636996,0.8610312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00088389125,0.032373823,0.00075531664,0.0040908875,0.0077213044,0.000089056884,0.0031484645,0.0003713617,0.950566],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902046,0.000061597646,0.000048916223,0.00013493354,0.00066736806,0.000066688866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971522,0.0003364865,0.0001623054,0.00021755886,0.0016602995,0.00047126456],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006459163,0.0013132866,0.001166079,0.0043751854,0.0007606521,0.0042834403,0.0015071593,0.0017617086,0.66511893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045253825,0.00055159105,0.0007444967,0.0047102002,0.00039298472,0.0021919997,0.001395307,0.0018766561,0.6958375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005952638,0.00000985502,0.000019154131,0.00027237262,0.0000023744508,0.000015835025,0.0000059647764,0.000019336198,0.00016616318,0.00052919355,0.94649506,0.052458733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002738005,0.000004965931,0.00007907255,0.00016590282,0.0000020352074,0.00003741048,0.000006577748,0.000006587473,0.000038122766,0.00021263781,0.9994413,0.0000025989052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025083811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055991835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66511893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010208464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015115393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47766715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251449236","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2012.708972","title":"Corrigendum","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.1462205906117903,"score_gpt":0.3731943700932394,"score_spread":0.22697377948144912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251449236","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015740553,0.0029221622,0.00048741783,0.06521519,0.88940334,0.00006804804,0.0023144518,0.000650678,0.03878124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0052909423,0.0048305695,0.0014859652,0.089240946,0.10226642,0.00026338207,0.0022977227,0.00094815786,0.79337585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947202,0.00076240883,0.00045241506,0.0008717036,0.0026617055,0.0005315056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763435,0.0023354113,0.00050079357,0.0015594886,0.018576866,0.00068389106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026342047,0.0015859967,0.0023846568,0.0054473137,0.006042356,0.006189543,0.0037556437,0.005269211,0.16186863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040754873,0.00074124767,0.0018511984,0.0039717476,0.001804182,0.0018784978,0.0028408668,0.0051166606,0.11537885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035712271,0.0000019696063,0.000018003238,0.000030201005,0.0000018570852,0.000017816586,0.000009594212,0.000011532626,0.0000053734543,0.0005710474,0.9961521,0.0031768046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000080236105,0.000008795664,0.0004900789,0.00018683077,0.0000182703,0.000049887793,0.00007609454,0.00010364769,0.0000653122,0.0013099915,0.9976642,0.000018793791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1427151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19133708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16186863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012432382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007755162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5415045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285729055","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2022.2100768","title":"Introduction: Federalism and international trade policy. The rise of constituent units’ engagement in North America and Europe","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Federalism; Regionalism (politics); Scholarship; Politics; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06955589016371937,"score_gpt":0.32732914105506783,"score_spread":0.25777325089134845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285729055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02681,0.17790748,0.0059499224,0.29151538,0.04008948,0.00007360427,0.000991613,0.00016491459,0.45649758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5311345,0.14240684,0.0060970606,0.08951818,0.061076205,0.00031682363,0.0012715844,0.00027024932,0.16790852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899095,0.00041003837,0.000042244053,0.00020711693,0.00025552392,0.00009406387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980572,0.0014053902,0.00018760492,0.00007881317,0.00015977664,0.000111116206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092455343,0.0003614758,0.00029590182,0.0011271009,0.0035707564,0.0044962363,0.00056350074,0.0034002413,0.013998085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002810915,0.00016730763,0.00039491843,0.0027876573,0.0042150957,0.0032133136,0.0021697907,0.0043315184,0.0015617954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039390787,0.000050918716,0.0035233605,0.0005800658,0.000010341165,0.00028542336,0.012915602,0.00041953457,0.00029038076,0.48121333,0.43828908,0.062382516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045681177,0.00003341739,0.0047646486,0.0008337863,0.000007304693,0.00030021975,0.0033390454,0.00017070722,0.00011566028,0.04600891,0.9444061,0.00001554859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004799889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007738847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013998085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018886826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015999912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04682827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319841864","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2022.2160975","title":"De/centralization in Mexico, 1824–2020","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Leverhulme Trust; James B. Pendleton Charitable Trust","keywords":"Decentralization; Elite; Ideology; Authoritarianism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Public administration; Politics; Law; History; Democracy","score_opus":0.07428593391729693,"score_gpt":0.37509774593600914,"score_spread":0.3008118120187122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319841864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97409564,0.0013075295,0.00023321896,0.0007146396,0.00003102743,0.00002672498,0.00846285,0.000023772456,0.01510455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98390967,0.0012306694,0.00030690763,0.000056500037,0.00005426725,0.00004116208,0.010331846,0.000010722195,0.004058292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997701,0.000019567404,0.000010799718,0.000049088176,0.000028507382,0.00012195992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994288,0.00004247421,0.00032181348,0.00003318942,0.000120832876,0.000052885833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051924476,0.00020088536,0.00020255813,0.0016781107,0.0006961096,0.0010784551,0.00032882116,0.00025388077,0.002508511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010776011,0.000105219566,0.00021537779,0.0029880563,0.00042790076,0.00065354706,0.0009269994,0.00048208283,0.00021275382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034674496,0.000094908326,0.9064556,0.00029939183,0.00015360865,0.0006356667,0.0070690084,0.0024550308,0.0008307325,0.014569691,0.016246157,0.050843492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004970084,0.000018116258,0.9657534,0.000038520222,0.000014841072,0.000057437454,0.0024184287,0.00024799127,0.00015181814,0.0002596927,0.031029705,0.00000515213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10921048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10571326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10921048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027832694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011462119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21714962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360616575","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2023.2189241","title":"Blame, hope, or gratitude? Voting decisions during the pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Blame; Gratitude; Pandemic; Voting; Democracy; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Dimension (graph theory); Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.24390338727575048,"score_gpt":0.4446495811752465,"score_spread":0.20074619389949602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360616575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523559,0.00038175093,0.00015886112,0.016309824,0.00009167498,0.000012473951,0.00010283249,0.000006368956,0.030580353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988323,0.00007602273,0.000020953796,0.00033084012,0.000011060592,0.000001788144,0.000011026511,0.0000016532836,0.0007143578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975667,0.0012152193,0.00004342413,0.000103504404,0.0002127527,0.0008584521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99480826,0.0018721791,0.001132992,0.00022047639,0.00074833794,0.0012178012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038936222,0.00008452579,0.00020422961,0.000393001,0.0042089517,0.003032717,0.00041992444,0.00089322904,0.003534685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015205034,0.00012345884,0.000116174735,0.0006337793,0.0037669577,0.0015184192,0.0010589724,0.0020015894,0.0002691346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005925171,0.00019749741,0.58678734,0.00011292534,0.00008733196,0.00036724706,0.24346046,0.00056552776,0.0008312181,0.035843164,0.029861605,0.10129318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003197562,0.00007200863,0.55229855,0.00014972678,0.000028845774,0.00012665648,0.3920045,0.000725078,0.0003416918,0.005066619,0.049080383,0.000073996955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3163174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5222389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3163174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047985404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042931605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6289525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383878375","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2023.2233422","title":"Is Quebec independence still key in making sense of Canadian elections? A longitudinal analysis (2000–2021)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Key (lock); Public administration; Computer science; Statistics; Computer security; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10245404336555683,"score_gpt":0.3693121845910334,"score_spread":0.2668581412254766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383878375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96528274,0.0011430859,0.00032495375,0.0066025667,0.00007176908,0.0000545714,0.009528392,0.000024253306,0.016967673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926709,0.0002800174,0.00016371353,0.0002654349,0.00001548985,0.0000189396,0.0027388632,0.000009181872,0.0038374516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858344,0.00015872745,0.00003940983,0.00017408743,0.0003000755,0.00074427266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99528486,0.0003779388,0.000771421,0.00027102392,0.002343416,0.0009514038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028995962,0.00025096943,0.0003683174,0.0016987029,0.004060878,0.002621037,0.0010760655,0.0007013311,0.0048707654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059077633,0.00017050642,0.000596803,0.003284625,0.0011224145,0.0013541147,0.0013092029,0.0014235942,0.00050022407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010157355,0.000060484886,0.9670401,0.00003427844,0.00007195853,0.00008789335,0.005501143,0.00033376177,0.00024202562,0.0023530524,0.007600873,0.016572718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003375415,0.0000139468375,0.9845031,0.000043226122,0.00002207029,0.000014619868,0.005091791,0.00046820825,0.0000820776,0.00011674448,0.009621534,0.000019416615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99702686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030669816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030669816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04081869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22252613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390057201","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2023.2295407","title":"Power of the weak? Framing strategies in fiscal redistribution negotiations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Negotiation; Framing (construction); Redistribution (election); Political science; European union; Political economy; Normative; Bargaining power; Economics; Law and economics; Politics; Law; International economics","score_opus":0.06766101090223366,"score_gpt":0.3820049731158048,"score_spread":0.31434396221357114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390057201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45597398,0.0012502584,0.052858066,0.01675295,0.00031422154,0.00025304614,0.00004620121,0.00008590585,0.4724654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916189,0.00015472203,0.0028111795,0.00032445096,0.000027875807,0.000049831437,0.000008744159,0.000025019115,0.0049792794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97700197,0.016343908,0.0004576738,0.0012039673,0.00240035,0.0025920605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896979,0.0063835215,0.0012451977,0.00074871664,0.0009132573,0.0010113793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019442469,0.001048224,0.0006665667,0.00359826,0.019558419,0.013799447,0.0020724798,0.0033791922,0.0054721073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024717534,0.0005692472,0.0005401323,0.0022135845,0.032288667,0.009640042,0.011918329,0.0046495586,0.0006432545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069287176,0.000041355906,0.0032547156,0.00008544645,0.000023346976,0.00068533176,0.23044576,0.0004997925,0.0011331509,0.74240226,0.001341732,0.020017846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006478011,0.00008657334,0.0037071442,0.0005610405,0.00009115799,0.00046178544,0.3508877,0.0037678601,0.0020069934,0.51529044,0.12296286,0.0001116447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021805793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024563534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021805793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012260674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007166971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10282284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391106318","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2024.2306546","title":"Evidence of subnational government sovereign boundary percolation in Nigeria","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Conceptualization; Extant taxon; Foreign direct investment; Political science; Government (linguistics); Boundary (topology); Sovereign state; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.08888409049947309,"score_gpt":0.3659344816981393,"score_spread":0.2770503911986662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391106318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774121,0.0010908899,0.00033280958,0.00074439065,0.000010810439,0.000011092774,0.0001513721,0.000003709241,0.020242868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992329,0.0003797207,0.000053203796,0.000042013995,0.0000029967875,0.0000044451926,0.00007327504,0.0000014973087,0.00021004153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984725,0.0004962651,0.00015632197,0.00022144346,0.00028180465,0.00037159925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98886395,0.0048841396,0.00428237,0.00068256527,0.0007958336,0.0004910799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020026157,0.00008775251,0.00027428908,0.002404503,0.0015001519,0.0025941988,0.0002994176,0.0005571656,0.0032550169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011622522,0.00022205,0.00013428717,0.0045377794,0.003648425,0.0034550074,0.003464673,0.0011684,0.00018235062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025409836,0.00008664303,0.75385046,0.0005571791,0.000048187005,0.0015790053,0.114127815,0.0009343661,0.00084730436,0.06341307,0.0021373783,0.06216453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013775922,0.00007192546,0.7695444,0.0011243387,0.000036631325,0.00070906145,0.18583977,0.0007826475,0.00066623377,0.009148815,0.032032628,0.00002971093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011825167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024696223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011825167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013744177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019413631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023512661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391475374","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2024.2312172","title":"Sleeping dogs: Quebec and the stabilization of Canadian Federalism after 1995","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Economic history; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.03183657810330392,"score_gpt":0.2741324238247166,"score_spread":0.24229584572141266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391475374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6517376,0.011416601,0.000649728,0.20698011,0.0008369133,0.000053123247,0.0021797207,0.00004555557,0.1261007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547077,0.0021187607,0.0002952258,0.009252094,0.000071208604,0.000017099472,0.00023408333,0.000018645964,0.033285104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979996,0.00022488377,0.00003502679,0.00014806581,0.00036980657,0.0012226735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963632,0.00038912398,0.00031105912,0.000089094945,0.0016242565,0.0012232495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022596214,0.0001855993,0.0003110316,0.0011932526,0.022420831,0.0060499446,0.0017828362,0.0025923192,0.010769836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003919203,0.00024640147,0.0003037514,0.0031803907,0.0062941206,0.0018600116,0.002303414,0.0036398463,0.00025838552],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000309783,0.00013676423,0.17704022,0.00027419114,0.00012535484,0.0012474157,0.1551458,0.00094332127,0.0012496642,0.31698465,0.25718424,0.08935859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028388258,0.0000464064,0.2879509,0.00033568515,0.00006207979,0.00013882616,0.13720518,0.00044469853,0.000478373,0.003070656,0.57008284,0.00015599016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99978787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8144102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18558982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1416326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94460034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391685071","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2024.2314081","title":"Multilingual federalism in times of crisis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Politics; Federalism; Diversity (politics); Corporate governance; State (computer science); Multilingualism; Political science; Political economy; Linguistic diversity; Survey data collection; Cultural diversity; Language policy; Sociology; Linguistics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07290959189877579,"score_gpt":0.3930796115911487,"score_spread":0.3201700196923729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391685071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99419266,0.0000994,0.00006556313,0.0007619217,0.0000033093384,0.0000022688878,0.000032268334,0.0000018747221,0.0048407787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996319,0.000049086724,0.000013265284,0.00005743797,0.0000033744295,0.0000016412298,0.000015361826,7.5605254e-7,0.00022729683],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987394,0.00060295104,0.00003266622,0.000076858545,0.00009248586,0.0004556731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805534,0.00044519707,0.0008130184,0.000092933726,0.00018336273,0.0004102067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011021916,0.00004841785,0.00021942343,0.0006859802,0.002003234,0.0016846996,0.0001599281,0.0003410698,0.0028808236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003300847,0.0000886141,0.00009095249,0.0012100148,0.0012264088,0.00094119937,0.0015963225,0.0006192807,0.00013974876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015247226,0.00013766185,0.8345014,0.00007730574,0.000041224615,0.00076299417,0.10867798,0.00060212286,0.00063488627,0.021868913,0.004514848,0.028028263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079550055,0.000043427703,0.89252627,0.00004941762,0.000011862638,0.00016690827,0.09198578,0.0004517039,0.00015251312,0.002141409,0.012451979,0.000010728095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04848937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11097804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04848937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021709423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001309612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09641427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396870008","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2024.2350937","title":"Commonsense sovereignty: a practice theory of Flanders’ paradiplomacy to the European Union","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; European union; Political science; Public administration; Law; Economics; International trade; Politics","score_opus":0.10243511762354791,"score_gpt":0.3842334663665087,"score_spread":0.2817983487429608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396870008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17953189,0.0023196784,0.15933946,0.024791652,0.0001687087,0.00019745633,0.000041014442,0.00010949363,0.63350064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99322563,0.00017051163,0.0030620205,0.00034772666,0.00002633018,0.0000701327,0.000009329738,0.0000150933965,0.003073177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764407,0.017615449,0.0005201376,0.002089637,0.0014837437,0.0018502489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98687035,0.009486399,0.0010051705,0.0015339667,0.0006277441,0.00047644638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01949877,0.00046134283,0.0006177889,0.0026304666,0.006316594,0.012040232,0.0024417834,0.0047823614,0.0034593577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01867028,0.0003765539,0.000586542,0.0021954912,0.08708132,0.012242831,0.009845034,0.0040662736,0.0003168964],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000396261,0.000008881088,0.0002380742,0.000016738817,0.0000021381675,0.00004859662,0.026772235,0.00021064623,0.000040619718,0.96994317,0.00014210433,0.0025728988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002991901,0.000054300785,0.0009504884,0.00029171014,0.0000103592965,0.00015963239,0.04916705,0.0014360347,0.00019303236,0.8944137,0.05327409,0.00001966033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009490885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006044648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01949877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012173594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007140899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103120565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399356172","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2024.2362400","title":"Federalism, centrism, and the crisis of the Nigerian academy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"African Education and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Political economy; Public administration; Economic history; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.07565774951059517,"score_gpt":0.3921251999634103,"score_spread":0.3164674504528151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399356172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5531214,0.015520295,0.0037962992,0.059720986,0.0004806479,0.000038114682,0.000040410836,0.000022912369,0.3672591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960504,0.0011621193,0.00017780662,0.00049225043,0.00004522829,0.00000646604,0.0000040591954,0.0000022319202,0.002059343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998579,0.00064820715,0.00008278604,0.00010004452,0.00017431474,0.0004157568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984723,0.00062536704,0.0004120992,0.00007408687,0.00016177307,0.00025441693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002251649,0.00014214992,0.000220595,0.0012379191,0.009562813,0.0073478157,0.00026095932,0.0013686704,0.0023950315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002807474,0.00018612617,0.00012177216,0.0011669646,0.01516221,0.0038840743,0.0042698965,0.0027358283,0.00011352326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026049003,0.000014272602,0.0032916488,0.000050368606,0.0000027667854,0.000287822,0.016767416,0.00023639947,0.00019645043,0.9682397,0.0013152469,0.009571764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022329688,0.000086971144,0.036023535,0.0009195006,0.000015200508,0.001016607,0.112679936,0.0012077966,0.0008129854,0.6293663,0.21779244,0.0000563888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010049418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01839635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010049418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008884421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073715006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06446123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402422341","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2024.2398426","title":"Exploring affordable housing policy in federal states: social housing and housing allowances in Australia, Austria, Canada, and Germany","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affordable housing; Public housing; Economic growth; Political science; Business; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.16426141749715253,"score_gpt":0.3005246096833713,"score_spread":0.13626319218621877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402422341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98730344,0.0005027437,0.00032337065,0.002017767,0.000009805654,0.000021948976,0.00013649858,0.000005189494,0.009679302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983693,0.00016169716,0.00014460448,0.00012559262,0.0000027407812,0.000008199694,0.000050493945,0.0000010734968,0.0011364069],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997546,0.000524886,0.00006203562,0.00014601309,0.00030649485,0.0014145315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977977,0.00052723114,0.00048457365,0.00007128041,0.000553042,0.0005662199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024295799,0.000107150554,0.00046322885,0.0013075119,0.0020651233,0.0028429353,0.0005812434,0.0007626914,0.0012829694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004773344,0.00019878983,0.00041113043,0.0015915199,0.002108077,0.0014042082,0.0020633955,0.0011388834,0.000051840914],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043235536,0.00050382095,0.49708998,0.0002277299,0.00031982418,0.0010661299,0.019858237,0.014932832,0.0011596897,0.41545305,0.0065634837,0.04239288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048218822,0.00009800851,0.92738825,0.00019390165,0.00015364724,0.000074317446,0.026719796,0.015591799,0.00081635173,0.010392332,0.018460626,0.00006275824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90778863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94635713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037157983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020792384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2696013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403195831","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2024.2410728","title":"Disrupting the national education policy framework: covid-19 measures during the pandemic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Social and Political Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Higher education; Economic growth; Public administration; Regional science; Geography; Economics; Virology; Outbreak; Medicine","score_opus":0.22386964316781718,"score_gpt":0.5174716417631321,"score_spread":0.2936019985953149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403195831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7348445,0.0028545393,0.0011951391,0.11050174,0.000510249,0.00030227736,0.0006745488,0.00006176466,0.1490552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926564,0.00045773495,0.00041575334,0.002891155,0.00002725671,0.000028703043,0.000092152535,0.000007231007,0.0034236503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929421,0.0012533917,0.00015758559,0.0002605755,0.001556136,0.0038301772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422693,0.0010979858,0.00057768816,0.00017728943,0.002103841,0.0018162335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006232036,0.00020180072,0.00031926204,0.0012471017,0.012625009,0.0071416833,0.001462536,0.0018662694,0.0016808618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011748979,0.00022667048,0.00032677082,0.0019139535,0.006914321,0.0015924892,0.0030539103,0.0040203696,0.000094938885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045883073,0.0002633499,0.14221472,0.0006714322,0.00013552576,0.002296648,0.3250568,0.0069975173,0.0036570656,0.33594415,0.07281638,0.10948757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035960686,0.00017301438,0.34955794,0.0004620018,0.000048145317,0.0001594125,0.3244422,0.0012974658,0.0009233552,0.0074400916,0.31530002,0.00016046663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9802413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9802413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16623777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20139647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.967046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408132873","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2025.2471749","title":"Political elite careers in Pakistan","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Politics; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06821456718164651,"score_gpt":0.44767246271603284,"score_spread":0.37945789553438636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408132873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99711406,0.000086069784,0.000018895556,0.00008656865,0.000003984657,0.000008559792,0.000914631,0.0000012700979,0.0017658918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974668,0.00015635914,0.00004122071,0.000021455662,0.000005793965,0.000013847891,0.0009966383,8.9498997e-7,0.0012970493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999276,0.00008560115,0.00004023939,0.000078577206,0.00011262634,0.000407033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977603,0.0002965089,0.000850311,0.00007020882,0.0003337162,0.0006888814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000807793,0.00013031346,0.00021584032,0.0032916572,0.0023370008,0.0011074861,0.00027672958,0.0003102811,0.004983374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022826435,0.00017041377,0.0001543385,0.003550027,0.0003985304,0.0005446367,0.0010301087,0.00060194207,0.0008519873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007509806,0.00006960945,0.98382044,0.000021827578,0.000006600714,0.00013916043,0.0045076995,0.000072572664,0.000076051074,0.00036445883,0.0009561197,0.009890437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006274402,0.000045820376,0.9907573,0.000018107254,0.0000029802711,0.00008089124,0.0061678793,0.00009175204,0.000035935445,0.00007966037,0.002708645,0.0000046697487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063553244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106196806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063553244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012835279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016334476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12636667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413897362","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2025.2548495","title":"The end of the ‘consociational mood’? Generational differences in sense-making of regionalization among Belgian Dutch-speakers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS","keywords":"Mood; Political science; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04671604727452841,"score_gpt":0.33096161858383605,"score_spread":0.2842455713093076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413897362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964598,0.000104245184,0.0001757728,0.0002870585,0.000007154687,0.0000036175295,0.000009440657,0.0000012186949,0.0029517098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967694,0.000030991763,0.00003231996,0.000021742031,0.0000013447822,0.0000016237777,0.0000053934764,0.0000016439466,0.00022811492],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985146,0.0009587507,0.00005094361,0.00012285403,0.00015588611,0.00019692736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885726,0.000505587,0.00031226478,0.00007820628,0.00013082233,0.00011588956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023619304,0.0000825343,0.00014797921,0.00029019127,0.000842933,0.0026611695,0.00018965555,0.00034208057,0.0016833785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041316464,0.000105784056,0.00010705475,0.00029992213,0.0021663546,0.0009993736,0.0009954514,0.00055674487,0.00011187605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018249497,0.000047579695,0.09901638,0.00004591597,0.000032773038,0.00030699567,0.87088364,0.000102721286,0.0037621863,0.007537311,0.000545563,0.017536446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011670477,0.00006308254,0.24699052,0.00005627241,0.00001740175,0.00024692703,0.7409367,0.00028279182,0.00058755587,0.0019384687,0.008834722,0.000033871824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01712106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024902323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01712106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008571244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047613904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034042776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414958692","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2025.2567846","title":"Power-sharing between adoptability and durability insights from Lebanon and Iraq","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Durability; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.06680450961197237,"score_gpt":0.3646198753053526,"score_spread":0.29781536569338024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414958692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446889,0.00045362013,0.0009635949,0.0038232994,0.000016502594,0.000030356474,0.000026912021,0.000004372001,0.049992505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984195,0.00010573243,0.000118169795,0.00013642063,0.00000839567,0.00001137926,0.000007795183,0.000004511407,0.0011880859],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625313,0.0023835157,0.00008116893,0.00019761414,0.000276461,0.00080814667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995843,0.0028030165,0.0005932812,0.00016802468,0.00039931329,0.00019328736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069568446,0.00026028146,0.0003104036,0.0019633267,0.011577254,0.005218846,0.0010266585,0.0011891106,0.0044952077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063034473,0.00021615913,0.00012784424,0.0027030383,0.015715763,0.0036716282,0.0036139386,0.0021370903,0.00016683737],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049726255,0.00004136854,0.009317434,0.00005828583,0.000008712298,0.0015980853,0.88061297,0.00025171592,0.00074292783,0.09322152,0.0007560416,0.0133412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000090909725,0.000030122033,0.0153480265,0.000122043704,0.0000064577857,0.0001226074,0.9503651,0.00024267352,0.00021616234,0.008353997,0.025168031,0.000015714624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062078066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08807257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062078066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012325601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033312407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12343347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415967622","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2025.2584367","title":"Nationalism and the transformation of party systems: the cases of Puerto Rico and Québec","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regional & Federal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Transformation (genetics); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.04636052463154744,"score_gpt":0.33287610495081166,"score_spread":0.2865155803192642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415967622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89212835,0.0009916091,0.00031720733,0.006584427,0.000028279333,0.00007029921,0.00013077204,0.000009180159,0.099739924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949891,0.00025706328,0.00010570139,0.0003299691,0.0000050024187,0.00001347933,0.000029311459,0.0000036204674,0.0042668018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791473,0.0006748948,0.000023652825,0.00009954565,0.00018471527,0.0011023656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852246,0.00042881083,0.00015819428,0.00012976804,0.00043664267,0.0003241769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019296198,0.00017101246,0.00024344653,0.0007894818,0.012405521,0.0030114655,0.0012166232,0.001384115,0.0028931624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003458638,0.000114368915,0.00025410648,0.0017185508,0.0052715433,0.00095454114,0.002082615,0.002023188,0.00012125341],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032294827,0.00030789443,0.17396384,0.000269741,0.0001526377,0.014408583,0.31819525,0.004329768,0.0024812361,0.39506072,0.029445209,0.061062116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001332738,0.000085641965,0.23846997,0.0003318129,0.00014386207,0.0014557509,0.49579912,0.004877813,0.001324557,0.009237789,0.2480072,0.0001331898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98235774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99204093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045268495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045268495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0184302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3284474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}