{"meta":{"query_hash":"5a8b5b1a8a85","filters":{"venue":"Religion and Human Rights"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5a8b5b1a8a85","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Religion+and+Human+Rights"},"results":[{"id":"W1967229705","doi":"10.1163/187103211x592604","title":"Is the Law Empowering or Patronizing Women? The Dilemma in the French Burqa Decision as the Tip of the Secular Law Iceberg","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Ambivalence; Sociology; Legislation; Dilemma; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0840956502407824,"score_gpt":0.3645352413234768,"score_spread":0.2804395910826944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967229705","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0544057,0.03727629,0.003812827,0.6478639,0.0020342583,0.000019967305,0.000048575675,0.000051113086,0.25448737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86532444,0.0062170485,0.0010679879,0.072787985,0.00179629,0.000024906702,0.000019886993,0.000064608364,0.05269694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889521,0.005923492,0.00016261998,0.00096625614,0.001638952,0.0023566769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950482,0.003340715,0.00029609093,0.00020019083,0.00074582035,0.0003688438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009873444,0.0005125453,0.0005941245,0.0010620301,0.016145471,0.017494692,0.0013880474,0.012914667,0.005301359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0118671805,0.00036237843,0.00055210677,0.0008341256,0.037306808,0.0061993264,0.0030886068,0.006273002,0.00090251066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027197375,0.000011817995,0.0007177437,0.0000539583,0.000009457192,0.0003558744,0.024263673,0.00011745114,0.00018160544,0.9416125,0.019219555,0.013429279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021397645,0.000057696725,0.0027456866,0.00055948074,0.00001994792,0.00040870736,0.037697826,0.00030061047,0.00040985062,0.11399578,0.8437067,0.00007628566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18493085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1483701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18493085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024360301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01190252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36770886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069256681","doi":"10.1163/187103212x624229","title":"The Islamic Veil and its Discontents: How Do They Undermine Gender Equality","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Human rights; Rhetoric; Gender equality; Face (sociological concept); Relation (database); Law; Sociology; Point (geometry); Political science; Gender studies; Social science; History","score_opus":0.20111648687785838,"score_gpt":0.3931843780641265,"score_spread":0.1920678911862681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069256681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5402978,0.0065261973,0.0051479368,0.08748271,0.0009171931,0.000034625547,0.00003103589,0.000042533527,0.35952002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940246,0.00055991195,0.00024861455,0.0019900044,0.00008370588,0.000009761931,0.0000027880892,0.000011940009,0.003068714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99003285,0.007306925,0.00015499562,0.00036040397,0.0011101082,0.0010347671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98701143,0.00843212,0.0018735104,0.00097147276,0.00095705246,0.0007544485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009111088,0.00027583266,0.00045055107,0.0012640848,0.008340864,0.010630848,0.0012983598,0.0036194061,0.004076796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019673618,0.00021686741,0.00025693685,0.0011298314,0.043545913,0.0071138097,0.0068818512,0.0035497437,0.00038644325],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008298193,0.00008875517,0.004432199,0.00017307178,0.000020170573,0.0003016436,0.31059483,0.000120082426,0.00056514255,0.6369113,0.0048642824,0.041845623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028949167,0.00016724726,0.007881931,0.0013287236,0.00003312568,0.00052201835,0.5810054,0.0003491172,0.0015198411,0.19267716,0.21444008,0.000046432087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048078015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068527358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010630848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003803258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023950236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048184633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612204118","doi":"10.1163/18710328-12111134","title":"Pluralism, Autonomy and Resistance: A Canadian Perspective on Resolving Conflicts between Freedom of Religion and lgbtq Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Appeal; Human rights; Pluralism (philosophy); Autonomy; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Covenant; Democracy; Political science; Freedom of association; Politics","score_opus":0.01974110969968116,"score_gpt":0.30850085325676896,"score_spread":0.2887597435570878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612204118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04920319,0.0104574375,0.0051566027,0.28635693,0.00088842993,0.00011401266,0.000088623114,0.000037769703,0.6476971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9247776,0.005739944,0.0037947905,0.025334869,0.0003154682,0.000051948187,0.00004121874,0.00007820406,0.039865855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98564714,0.0046783746,0.00028391762,0.0011124489,0.0038053242,0.0044729044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98835456,0.005136457,0.00058801915,0.00048082974,0.0025877655,0.002852303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010459788,0.0007241978,0.00092039595,0.0047363304,0.060394697,0.025107097,0.0047265203,0.012892073,0.0066696615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013979458,0.0005848397,0.00085086765,0.005119339,0.09519788,0.008841921,0.009113159,0.016262624,0.000359269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009805617,0.000014824577,0.000586537,0.000035607107,0.000006840699,0.00023800238,0.046245478,0.00020520356,0.00010409321,0.9391582,0.008519373,0.0048760436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052556126,0.00002955775,0.004455511,0.0008060051,0.00005136452,0.0003670211,0.15629046,0.0015690847,0.0003175906,0.3940101,0.44186908,0.00018165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9801893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19512397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19512397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20930901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93354213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902882691","doi":"10.1163/18710328-13021142","title":"Bent Out of Shape: Fictions of Yoga and Religion before the Courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Salient; Sociology; Aesthetics; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017101551915940226,"score_gpt":0.3073530642958906,"score_spread":0.2902515123799504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902882691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14917925,0.0149214575,0.005444302,0.26547825,0.0019455876,0.000051430812,0.00006785333,0.00006749662,0.56284434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661374,0.0018923926,0.0006774194,0.011853459,0.00054000143,0.000033383556,0.000010384378,0.000027749915,0.018827744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960141,0.0025494904,0.00007229403,0.00030255903,0.0005102359,0.00055135175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936515,0.0052204533,0.00029046432,0.0002854785,0.00033973152,0.0002123235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038854065,0.00024313568,0.00032031874,0.00093124463,0.018830337,0.0062819105,0.0011643243,0.0061282185,0.0033327404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009010217,0.00028278204,0.00030636485,0.00070104044,0.05170807,0.0039952677,0.0031523097,0.009854141,0.000256809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011003568,0.000018765011,0.00031296964,0.000027874696,0.000002627815,0.00030919557,0.06466611,0.000109093155,0.00008472605,0.92049307,0.011024341,0.0029402545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003399175,0.00006951161,0.0023236568,0.000990812,0.000025702746,0.0004473958,0.09339887,0.0009448572,0.0008801672,0.21420144,0.6866236,0.0000600816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038726095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056409106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038726095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008226246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036384817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07700133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221061441","doi":"10.1163/18710328-bja10025","title":"Law and Religion: A Comparative Approach to the Management of Religious Intolerance in Brazil and Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Religious diversity; Diversity (politics); Pluralism (philosophy); Phenomenon; Religious freedom; Accommodation; Sociology; Globalization; Cultural diversity; Law; Religious pluralism; Reasonable accommodation; Cultural pluralism; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Anthropology; Philosophy; Economic freedom","score_opus":0.01515773720254099,"score_gpt":0.28347647220919003,"score_spread":0.26831873500664905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221061441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6108443,0.007414984,0.0019904554,0.033458225,0.00016107666,0.00024978988,0.0002344206,0.000025436324,0.34562126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919091,0.001573039,0.00055913045,0.0007929548,0.000012808441,0.00003242686,0.000024232224,0.0000071111945,0.0050890846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963127,0.0012755111,0.00006692486,0.00020113976,0.00076542265,0.0013783739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951088,0.0020733466,0.00033024268,0.00013399655,0.0015149527,0.00083858706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035319636,0.0002773754,0.0005093842,0.005304762,0.021229345,0.0085012,0.0020595097,0.0022228146,0.0047447043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008129767,0.00023036677,0.00032329652,0.0075470195,0.015588227,0.0025487621,0.0044038245,0.0022691241,0.00007927581],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004485984,0.000113292896,0.016574843,0.0002749153,0.000031896358,0.0014589605,0.2193124,0.0009310319,0.0004893952,0.72555196,0.0057479027,0.029468523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020564363,0.00006630539,0.051378455,0.00089672056,0.00009593887,0.00032826068,0.74840444,0.0022527198,0.00047674635,0.030312022,0.16568924,0.00007853209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99552935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18786412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18786412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16533175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9419625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}