{"meta":{"query_hash":"5a8b5b1a8a85","filters":{"venue":"Religion and Human Rights"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5a8b5b1a8a85","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Religion+and+Human+Rights"},"results":[{"id":"W1967229705","doi":"10.1163/187103211x592604","title":"Is the Law Empowering or Patronizing Women? The Dilemma in the French Burqa Decision as the Tip of the Secular Law Iceberg","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Ambivalence; Sociology; Legislation; Dilemma; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0840956502407824,"score_gpt":0.3645352413234768,"score_spread":0.2804395910826944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967229705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768619,0.00018191632,0.0000037960278,0.0027781657,0.00017384843,0.00050831726,0.0000031660957,0.000016577907,0.019472344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99300385,0.000063135136,0.0000102576,0.0053632753,0.00015972779,0.00002763339,0.0000010231477,0.000008192033,0.001362903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981668,0.0004880296,0.00029593272,0.0002023598,0.0005206092,0.00032628127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885356,0.00033367905,0.00014812534,0.00052211573,0.00009561017,0.0000469336],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010759756,0.00014454099,0.00013046275,0.000019701698,0.002808552,0.00019052766,0.00077584386,0.00008892176,0.00017432241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003873029,0.00004361466,0.0000965973,0.00013896648,0.0011116008,0.00013133863,0.00009819231,0.00023679122,0.000013542284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005345928,0.00002022146,0.00023655224,0.0000030663018,0.000013384722,0.0000014752396,0.33487576,0.0000014559698,0.000026635607,0.66298777,0.0018103819,0.000017978957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041392812,0.00006467552,0.018362556,0.00009210853,0.000048390022,0.0000117027,0.03690223,0.000026354317,0.000815083,0.16441843,0.7786282,0.0002163547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12146694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23423219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7768178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012502323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006149349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069256681","doi":"10.1163/187103212x624229","title":"The Islamic Veil and its Discontents: How Do They Undermine Gender Equality","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Human rights; Rhetoric; Gender equality; Face (sociological concept); Relation (database); Law; Sociology; Point (geometry); Political science; Gender studies; Social science; History","score_opus":0.20111648687785838,"score_gpt":0.3931843780641265,"score_spread":0.1920678911862681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069256681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98402655,0.0016302826,0.0000058491837,0.002500294,0.0002406927,0.00024170855,0.000005645456,0.000046011064,0.011302945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811092,0.00052307517,0.0000050209915,0.00051410514,0.0004100489,0.0000065622667,0.000007518875,0.000007287285,0.017417174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878055,0.00023958257,0.00015837856,0.00017974811,0.00026342846,0.0003782882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994386,0.000095454656,0.00008614585,0.00014666164,0.000090160225,0.00014297811],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045082727,0.00012737027,0.00012046599,0.00002754521,0.0019745613,0.00027688607,0.000116733696,0.000090610614,0.000018722001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031698528,0.00007138378,0.000041722127,0.000027687458,0.00034517734,0.00032744562,0.00003907684,0.0000956634,0.000016534097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002378749,0.000024496858,0.0016283029,0.000007861405,0.000017956369,3.1280817e-7,0.04217388,5.4516114e-8,0.00017348364,0.9522247,0.0037142865,0.000032317377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011847974,0.00004667257,0.11828385,0.00004584457,0.00010314294,0.000011097227,0.019459616,0.000029941431,0.00044857626,0.19495197,0.66472584,0.0007086676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003704519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019351665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7572727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013520417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003273234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612204118","doi":"10.1163/18710328-12111134","title":"Pluralism, Autonomy and Resistance: A Canadian Perspective on Resolving Conflicts between Freedom of Religion and lgbtq Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Appeal; Human rights; Pluralism (philosophy); Autonomy; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Covenant; Democracy; Political science; Freedom of association; Politics","score_opus":0.01974110969968116,"score_gpt":0.30850085325676896,"score_spread":0.2887597435570878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612204118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5508208,0.00047780745,0.0000028522297,0.0017882792,0.00007198668,0.0001780964,0.00003977107,0.000021307189,0.44659907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99426955,0.00016991455,0.00011791338,0.00013149575,0.00028455455,0.0000031694178,0.0000058100422,0.0000054843795,0.0050120982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897563,0.000073909774,0.00018330556,0.00028619598,0.0002028951,0.00027807438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895567,0.00012465847,0.00017313789,0.00021729323,0.00014467085,0.00038456466],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020153521,0.00013429513,0.00024207185,0.00012171255,0.004032121,0.00018515094,0.00014996748,0.00012579997,0.000011449393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004148173,0.000113946895,0.000033784054,0.000032290503,0.0022462136,0.0001712678,0.000031558106,0.00013672691,0.0000027937995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009399083,0.000005131365,0.0016886586,0.000006213357,0.000016747395,0.000010199139,0.0035723036,8.049576e-8,0.0000053338786,0.99254835,0.0021296386,0.000007954641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037677988,0.00006742222,0.013328967,0.00016557102,0.000036404348,0.0000016529003,0.0001625497,0.0000011276878,0.000026835176,0.18822524,0.7974066,0.00020080814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8022664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7484244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8043231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023119642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039003012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902882691","doi":"10.1163/18710328-13021142","title":"Bent Out of Shape: Fictions of Yoga and Religion before the Courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Salient; Sociology; Aesthetics; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017101551915940226,"score_gpt":0.3073530642958906,"score_spread":0.2902515123799504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902882691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83773786,0.0001935592,0.000031827167,0.0009151063,0.00017151663,0.00011686092,0.000016115617,0.00001658764,0.16080059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975336,0.00013189092,0.000035278114,0.00010623459,0.00022673166,0.0000026780833,0.00000286012,0.0000021163023,0.0019585865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994619,0.000041259846,0.0001444369,0.000091199596,0.00015681665,0.00010437035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960923,0.000042160293,0.00008823664,0.000087095184,0.00011278676,0.000060459617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001291776,0.000052679716,0.000097869626,0.000031958658,0.0009083534,0.00001330581,0.00006596933,0.00004678917,0.000057200916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009390299,0.00003406939,0.000030431695,0.000038305643,0.0020601437,0.00004012839,0.000020290263,0.000046346904,0.000003780342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030973317,0.000014818024,0.0006157664,0.000004461823,0.000007686226,2.986713e-7,0.0025852022,1.0055599e-7,0.000020156527,0.990578,0.006108699,0.000061728984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012953646,0.00015365255,0.0027267176,0.000042742286,0.00003291914,0.0000019092931,0.00018994091,0.000008283617,0.00011158732,0.10304661,0.89349604,0.000060064664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004995921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0090335775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8875314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013613407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000069448055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75906855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221061441","doi":"10.1163/18710328-bja10025","title":"Law and Religion: A Comparative Approach to the Management of Religious Intolerance in Brazil and Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Religious diversity; Diversity (politics); Pluralism (philosophy); Phenomenon; Religious freedom; Accommodation; Sociology; Globalization; Cultural diversity; Law; Religious pluralism; Reasonable accommodation; Cultural pluralism; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Anthropology; Philosophy; Economic freedom","score_opus":0.01515773720254099,"score_gpt":0.28347647220919003,"score_spread":0.26831873500664905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221061441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58230513,0.0010699256,0.000016186585,0.0014126445,0.000061379564,0.000331272,0.000014702381,0.000009862999,0.41477892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975075,0.00020422215,0.00011193776,0.0013792202,0.000027059941,0.000024959105,0.0000035076598,0.000002077728,0.0007394974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992217,0.00009778307,0.00014273362,0.00016608491,0.00023260749,0.00013911357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972576,0.000040114603,0.00004767508,0.00008407512,0.000021652617,0.00008072023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016817813,0.000069287285,0.00013614212,0.000029724799,0.0010938941,0.000022639204,0.00009550681,0.000015060225,0.0000034313337],"category_scores_gemma":[7.153637e-7,0.00005340963,0.00001084671,0.00010090398,0.0004790193,0.000026739393,0.00008075417,0.00009144061,2.7012084e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001089126,0.000016679214,0.00015585519,0.000011982516,0.000009308923,0.0000055623254,0.0033784565,0.0000320103,7.72773e-7,0.9879415,0.008423585,0.000013404847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022162782,0.000040977644,0.0007765761,0.000022006436,0.00001081475,0.0000066547655,0.0013718427,0.000011920769,0.0000032387954,0.019451637,0.9779824,0.00010029426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.818635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7993129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96955884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007384452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010853158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84134597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}