{"meta":{"query_hash":"70189db4e3b6","filters":{"venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/70189db4e3b6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Res+Publica+Revista+de+Historia+de+las+Ideas+Pol%C3%ADticas"},"results":[{"id":"W2108180159","doi":"10.5209/rev_rpub.2014.v17.n2.46699","title":"Jean-Luc Nancy sobre la soberanía y la retirada del Dios cristiano","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Nothing; Philosophy; Deconstruction (building); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Relation (database); Interpretation (philosophy); Humanities; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.010082662699887316,"score_gpt":0.2990572924036336,"score_spread":0.28897462970374627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108180159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1262093,0.053456053,0.002557259,0.12893924,0.0025370303,0.000029576771,0.000066350585,0.000089501606,0.6861157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8187162,0.013214636,0.0008112578,0.0059164222,0.0010752992,0.000030430843,0.00002810729,0.00006225696,0.16014542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942577,0.00029666498,0.000007635458,0.000068380556,0.00010940674,0.00009218078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959975,0.00021807333,0.000035360878,0.000022723978,0.000059146307,0.00006498634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011347363,0.00027302862,0.00019075641,0.00048175993,0.0044844253,0.0027298478,0.00023920629,0.0013182209,0.0030334222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018231441,0.00011650044,0.00010916515,0.00044213713,0.004835914,0.0009953196,0.0014640857,0.003017833,0.00038502383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006228135,0.000014276719,0.0018480858,0.00007415757,0.0000037157722,0.00063953985,0.03503804,0.00032430724,0.0005260061,0.89226025,0.04088791,0.028321443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007061538,0.000008994985,0.0021444566,0.00014779712,0.0000021653861,0.00018035648,0.0026853338,0.0001723776,0.00027411975,0.019187931,0.9751762,0.000013204408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04127247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06303351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04127247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00613852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036249612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08206445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2415666287","doi":"10.5209/rev_rpub.2016.v19.n1.52220","title":"Kari Palonen y José María Rosales (eds.), \"Parliamentarism and Democratic Theory. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives\", Opladen/Berlin/ Toronto, Barbara Budrich Publishers, 2015, 324 pp.","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.019283274276638698,"score_gpt":0.3034540891215282,"score_spread":0.28417081484488954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2415666287","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014773041,0.9348866,0.003100185,0.029745217,0.003586475,0.000022001554,0.00023226166,0.00011553712,0.026834572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016576713,0.94952476,0.002186423,0.0013981994,0.0019788092,0.000055074466,0.00025538867,0.0000913114,0.027933257],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986082,0.00042906016,0.00012465112,0.00016929545,0.0005072211,0.00016160078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771094,0.0014028635,0.00027123847,0.00006750127,0.0003847521,0.0001626313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030225972,0.0016800386,0.0014850738,0.0029192872,0.0019203457,0.005795492,0.0018108634,0.0022661875,0.015267679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044063735,0.0012889274,0.0006681268,0.004906153,0.0024650323,0.011357463,0.0018086832,0.0033388787,0.012402409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021661111,0.000086586246,0.0011720969,0.0032894367,0.00005601566,0.00024845364,0.008253754,0.00067158724,0.0004010877,0.055704143,0.664011,0.26588923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038996448,0.000026330235,0.005636814,0.0024943866,0.00009429921,0.0004470963,0.0058222637,0.00039788062,0.00060459774,0.03928131,0.9451036,0.00005244459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0113407215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022804225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015267679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026605914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005461815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05107546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557614419","doi":"10.5209/rpub.53879","title":"Contractarian Libertarianism of Jan Narveson. Is It Still Libertarianism?","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Social contract; Law and economics; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Morality; Political philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.021814354961587516,"score_gpt":0.3120924097632771,"score_spread":0.2902780548016896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557614419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030999206,0.05316575,0.018777087,0.3555267,0.003844096,0.00007306334,0.00013640037,0.00007534512,0.53740233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7947555,0.021406021,0.007628956,0.05069299,0.001878237,0.00013181221,0.000098074066,0.00015391872,0.12325448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710125,0.0010401245,0.00007196226,0.0005532521,0.0010314619,0.00020197933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986707,0.00059924345,0.000119317585,0.000107774205,0.00038468486,0.00011830474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003499542,0.00031761112,0.00045602955,0.00056808186,0.0057669985,0.0055637457,0.0009043304,0.0025686547,0.0029398943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004979351,0.00025817423,0.00029061682,0.00088465307,0.016342059,0.005562234,0.0018341839,0.005767783,0.0005949107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007588041,0.0000071623767,0.00009555767,0.0000168402,0.000001502933,0.000021546915,0.0014466937,0.000081014245,0.000039986644,0.9878423,0.008121192,0.0023185497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008566758,0.0000129035325,0.00053578406,0.00016440365,0.000004244632,0.00010104255,0.0017960174,0.00052997016,0.00017835657,0.6472049,0.34943825,0.00002561445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045897868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040848732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045897868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010056526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008011884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09126145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200502634","doi":"10.5209/rpub.77483","title":"El pensamiento republicano en el postkantismo. Dos modelos","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02898785190792283,"score_gpt":0.3612103051210746,"score_spread":0.3322224532131518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200502634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03850129,0.0024171057,0.011109608,0.013532422,0.00029983543,0.000050283357,0.00010941976,0.00005138564,0.93392867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80407995,0.001951268,0.002622662,0.00137686,0.00018187669,0.000099925244,0.00008061575,0.00005143745,0.18955553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986727,0.00059270003,0.000028846951,0.00019956229,0.00022345377,0.00028281813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950266,0.00012778322,0.00008914217,0.00007613261,0.00009345949,0.0001109112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012548713,0.00048149732,0.00022937109,0.0013707444,0.00432584,0.005689459,0.0008136092,0.0021204655,0.014212128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001419374,0.00030002368,0.0005279865,0.0016924564,0.011218787,0.005244366,0.0036986435,0.0026278256,0.0018523566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051527327,0.000006398873,0.00014055052,0.000007265187,9.977374e-7,0.00002457071,0.0011399298,0.00014615276,0.000016999535,0.9961357,0.00073142484,0.0016448257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035896617,0.00004529491,0.0011570858,0.0001316301,0.00001139414,0.00013140232,0.005511376,0.0017588432,0.00012611713,0.7177713,0.2732975,0.000022137378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0103629725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013557099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014212128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059852386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038535877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0475443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288069545","doi":"10.5209/rpub.83136","title":"J. L. Villacañas, Neoliberalismo como teología política. Habermas, Foucault, Dardot, Laval y la historia del capitalismo contemporáneo, Barcelona, NED Ediciones, 2020, 280 pp.","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.008612311335508075,"score_gpt":0.2763726671861261,"score_spread":0.267760355850618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288069545","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049210765,0.9242067,0.00087627664,0.05244012,0.0034301847,0.000009132105,0.00018733315,0.00004907806,0.018309044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028048048,0.9178014,0.0017777021,0.011126864,0.0055810986,0.000053339685,0.00018002781,0.0000998981,0.035331625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906355,0.00030798977,0.0000729937,0.00014231833,0.00032321806,0.000089932895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757403,0.001731919,0.00014431743,0.00007370591,0.00036127094,0.00011465941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019570105,0.0018043487,0.0010893558,0.0032605878,0.0030375621,0.005462346,0.001679275,0.005725546,0.010903058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030293756,0.001131315,0.00072788494,0.004973309,0.0054313387,0.009716667,0.0014156933,0.0048462558,0.0050770184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011475704,0.00006899512,0.00070197927,0.0010777564,0.000048385824,0.00016876365,0.003913834,0.00046272695,0.00021463925,0.14347744,0.7788079,0.07094293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051072213,0.00001966748,0.0039100954,0.0017524987,0.00003973008,0.00019493714,0.0022980592,0.0002808246,0.000316885,0.09235171,0.89874303,0.00004145206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056307063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12938915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056307063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005330435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004702396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11195868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288069547","doi":"10.5209/rpub.76612","title":"De la comunidad a lo común: desplazamientos teóricos, éticos y políticos","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Social and Economic Solidarity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013458249570645571,"score_gpt":0.3137762946012974,"score_spread":0.30031804503065185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288069547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18438831,0.014967765,0.009752342,0.12602724,0.001589751,0.000051722625,0.00009165943,0.000049351293,0.6630818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522211,0.00387234,0.0008974113,0.0026093305,0.00042895426,0.00003593334,0.000027759135,0.00003030783,0.03987691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756974,0.001291026,0.000050553543,0.00024771073,0.00046706057,0.00037381166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981394,0.0011154938,0.00023707081,0.00013808135,0.00020988574,0.00016007088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002766755,0.00034583596,0.00027923062,0.0014099026,0.0074894656,0.010882939,0.00070951896,0.0026055262,0.0059398357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036672647,0.00016221045,0.00021474724,0.001990509,0.025429942,0.0061643776,0.0032245587,0.003554782,0.000441295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010417171,0.000009769559,0.00050902326,0.000025933865,0.0000015104881,0.00006975277,0.015318933,0.0000708552,0.00007019226,0.9773014,0.0018979314,0.0047142347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018381976,0.00003748997,0.004868824,0.0005163853,0.000014736017,0.00021992992,0.073723465,0.00056032947,0.00081720034,0.4009364,0.5182535,0.00003341701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010503587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016540978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010882939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008309155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064877192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060287416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391827801","doi":"10.5209/rpub.92078","title":"The Possibility of the Possibility of Something New: The Subject and Fidelity to the Event in Love and Politics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Event (particle physics); Political philosophy; Politics; Fidelity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.022900002874534062,"score_gpt":0.34506093093939944,"score_spread":0.32216092806486535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391827801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21990037,0.008353586,0.033362918,0.07261478,0.0009919524,0.000086423584,0.00006052558,0.000063912084,0.6645655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99204624,0.00066612224,0.0008972489,0.00065389177,0.00024170242,0.000028298613,0.0000075235853,0.000021865428,0.0054370323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927609,0.0050631184,0.00014759005,0.00063187385,0.0007830286,0.0006135263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99300754,0.0050091227,0.00046637666,0.0007992278,0.000342283,0.00037542704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007044137,0.00019683299,0.0005192858,0.001044561,0.009605636,0.014459719,0.00082716235,0.0034295989,0.004243446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011377221,0.00036418953,0.00051368563,0.0007944972,0.08405427,0.01398022,0.0060088793,0.005752698,0.00028923393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074448776,0.0000042986558,0.00018785115,0.000010427077,0.0000012715687,0.000082607185,0.014790661,0.00004008957,0.00005388579,0.98366505,0.00022640705,0.00093003304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012140899,0.000033883334,0.0010481118,0.00011983712,0.0000068917257,0.00037986875,0.033825107,0.0003268904,0.00031743583,0.8959729,0.06793714,0.000019799309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017804228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014933349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014459719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004099947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020764857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03725338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413141885","doi":"10.5209/rpub.100865","title":"El dispositivo ontológico y la política de los gestos en el proyecto Homo Sacer de Giorgio Agamben","year":2025,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.007902786983268514,"score_gpt":0.34888000556419263,"score_spread":0.3409772185809241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413141885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03412033,0.017945725,0.025058314,0.045514848,0.00074690446,0.00004344298,0.0001356275,0.0001420001,0.8762929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7515733,0.010298419,0.008475401,0.005083287,0.0004817806,0.00016182537,0.00012184226,0.00021798904,0.22358617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979038,0.0011155742,0.000037702084,0.00038987974,0.0003280023,0.00022506191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990521,0.00049917924,0.000100642574,0.00012165692,0.00013284756,0.00009364946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001432171,0.00077883597,0.00043148713,0.0012659547,0.0040257233,0.0065570143,0.00061675964,0.0025208546,0.006860818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022969937,0.00039385725,0.00047422733,0.0010411156,0.021429535,0.0061174645,0.0031306841,0.0042309826,0.0016022262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010666028,0.000003823097,0.00012430888,0.000020580319,0.0000019333354,0.000052206356,0.0023676755,0.00010776417,0.0000885105,0.99180883,0.0032154326,0.002198192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017511513,0.000022490676,0.0015090536,0.00021828261,0.000014801657,0.00019708854,0.0023432113,0.0005566026,0.0003538157,0.6520978,0.3426403,0.000029038058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01386164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012486464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01386164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032580053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04862225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}