{"meta":{"query_hash":"70189db4e3b6","filters":{"venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/70189db4e3b6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Res+Publica+Revista+de+Historia+de+las+Ideas+Pol%C3%ADticas"},"results":[{"id":"W2108180159","doi":"10.5209/rev_rpub.2014.v17.n2.46699","title":"Jean-Luc Nancy sobre la soberanía y la retirada del Dios cristiano","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Nothing; Philosophy; Deconstruction (building); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Relation (database); Interpretation (philosophy); Humanities; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.010082662699887316,"score_gpt":0.2990572924036336,"score_spread":0.28897462970374627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108180159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055618454,0.0052528908,0.0029526951,0.012954962,0.0016684403,0.00061955536,0.00016646323,0.00053792563,0.97028524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972115,0.0022385682,0.00120929,0.0022826497,0.0039443746,0.00007514698,0.000030411198,0.00013289577,0.017971689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98744786,0.0067146085,0.0011342772,0.0011811372,0.0010805858,0.0024415243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98936814,0.00649248,0.0005186656,0.0014721795,0.00040788265,0.0017406673],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006633686,0.00077009737,0.0012638757,0.000292269,0.001428547,0.0012322334,0.0017902262,0.0018127351,0.00083427783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022733456,0.00079413666,0.0006852534,0.00084084115,0.0027893335,0.0005326161,0.000355993,0.0017409846,0.00061730674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015025164,0.00028086454,0.00070832553,0.00024791944,0.00014557887,0.000115803305,0.0006538846,0.0000020426687,0.000037596787,0.93994236,0.054062158,0.0036532297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007972736,0.000120490484,0.0008314946,0.00022720594,0.0002633261,0.000052177358,0.00012162825,0.00016125341,0.000020535988,0.26866284,0.72808295,0.0006587986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017435839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053682834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96655315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018085494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021513668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2415666287","doi":"10.5209/rev_rpub.2016.v19.n1.52220","title":"Kari Palonen y José María Rosales (eds.), \"Parliamentarism and Democratic Theory. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives\", Opladen/Berlin/ Toronto, Barbara Budrich Publishers, 2015, 324 pp.","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.019283274276638698,"score_gpt":0.3034540891215282,"score_spread":0.28417081484488954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2415666287","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011388699,0.49429792,0.00094998063,0.31911322,0.0032983795,0.0020670786,0.00040478996,0.0007027826,0.16777715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666336,0.014501183,0.00074089784,0.0016967319,0.0040040426,0.00011614235,0.000024429162,0.00015767959,0.012125291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98995364,0.00326103,0.0014035393,0.0017328248,0.0015276883,0.0021212567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99050444,0.004281219,0.0006473912,0.0011877799,0.00061944395,0.0027597367],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005665971,0.0009850619,0.0014965258,0.00024928866,0.0014565731,0.0027340811,0.0012099848,0.001586258,0.0005805243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010398781,0.0008344953,0.00041524682,0.00053822715,0.003828952,0.0032380593,0.0005518486,0.0013566712,0.00006480764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030982075,0.00029241407,0.0027688625,0.00021229178,0.00026933692,0.00007654227,0.004303982,5.0489824e-8,0.000115311,0.7181726,0.27198485,0.0014939449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015292098,0.00034630252,0.0017570634,0.00035836207,0.0004127035,0.000058246365,0.0022333413,0.000023424007,0.000006184689,0.21111317,0.7811524,0.0010095383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024010066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009236226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9552449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011964763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002933729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557614419","doi":"10.5209/rpub.53879","title":"Contractarian Libertarianism of Jan Narveson. Is It Still Libertarianism?","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Social contract; Law and economics; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Morality; Political philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.021814354961587516,"score_gpt":0.3120924097632771,"score_spread":0.2902780548016896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557614419","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097711414,0.028753659,0.0009907628,0.60426426,0.0076845293,0.0048848973,0.0016965918,0.0009524811,0.2530614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94831115,0.0035716528,0.0018576342,0.0021863787,0.0030571993,0.00010941114,0.000017497749,0.00015269394,0.040736392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908072,0.0016374623,0.0019312421,0.0014039133,0.0018116792,0.0024085096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919613,0.0025599168,0.0014717274,0.0013690058,0.001137365,0.0015006681],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029178392,0.0010171828,0.00184414,0.00028503936,0.0012355903,0.0011289035,0.0020134992,0.0013284953,0.00293044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009810513,0.00078581204,0.00097546674,0.0010245763,0.002072875,0.001251677,0.00047695683,0.0008591544,0.0005466056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002601933,0.0004416987,0.003910982,0.00026185947,0.0007666581,0.000064923566,0.024989543,3.674506e-7,0.0030053614,0.71771914,0.24457371,0.004005544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019054476,0.00028251982,0.006162537,0.0007240874,0.00061419705,0.000017351811,0.0014161533,0.000018224244,0.00024725104,0.005857985,0.98168516,0.0010691137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030228224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019369485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8505997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050111054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021944053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200502634","doi":"10.5209/rpub.77483","title":"El pensamiento republicano en el postkantismo. Dos modelos","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02898785190792283,"score_gpt":0.3612103051210746,"score_spread":0.3322224532131518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200502634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029051326,0.017027859,0.0015756199,0.33218387,0.0044582416,0.0012782875,0.0008230141,0.0009995158,0.61260223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97089875,0.0024035783,0.0018559593,0.007088395,0.0058598598,0.000060650276,0.00013554326,0.0001766694,0.01152059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877679,0.0035239975,0.0015764249,0.0017468932,0.00230715,0.0030776663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904534,0.0023933095,0.0005688078,0.002209304,0.0016353665,0.0027397978],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050922083,0.0008565225,0.0013460206,0.0004576791,0.0015811494,0.0025862034,0.0019580524,0.0018189454,0.0010918524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023551827,0.00096396933,0.00091701123,0.002197098,0.0015505402,0.0011359478,0.00074015156,0.0024378735,0.00047185828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011692869,0.0005552857,0.00062025455,0.0003783852,0.00022943794,0.0003945617,0.0031209139,0.000007368311,0.0005948256,0.9428395,0.05057891,0.0005636384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067480386,0.00013176534,0.00074685056,0.00028909973,0.000361163,0.000104401464,0.00042918697,0.0005320991,0.00008787064,0.23636505,0.7593982,0.00087947183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048345085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018596345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94184744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053667985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009019638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288069545","doi":"10.5209/rpub.83136","title":"J. L. Villacañas, Neoliberalismo como teología política. Habermas, Foucault, Dardot, Laval y la historia del capitalismo contemporáneo, Barcelona, NED Ediciones, 2020, 280 pp.","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.008612311335508075,"score_gpt":0.2763726671861261,"score_spread":0.267760355850618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288069545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023971545,0.115166135,0.0005345488,0.33132154,0.02291109,0.0049108462,0.003893354,0.0022404867,0.49505046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932049,0.0050765555,0.00094264187,0.011785183,0.008951731,0.0007699161,0.0005929613,0.00038859746,0.03944341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827942,0.0059116343,0.00258257,0.0022328324,0.002424547,0.0040541864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894465,0.0029950207,0.0013123478,0.0021772939,0.000650009,0.003418802],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070130043,0.0014640852,0.0023989324,0.0005699917,0.003634625,0.0014806828,0.0033142336,0.001359265,0.0043306025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005219,0.0017049233,0.0012275896,0.0015769717,0.0029617322,0.0010512819,0.0016201113,0.0032194725,0.000401734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002902745,0.00042687825,0.0005393989,0.00016702156,0.000264354,0.00044816834,0.0018687189,0.0000055007263,0.00011503605,0.55000556,0.4451301,0.0007389885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002787405,0.00043759434,0.0005408581,0.00013659045,0.0006347442,0.0003655301,0.0010963161,0.00026365617,0.000013496316,0.034135457,0.95782465,0.0017636907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037477527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061011617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9080775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012749679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070676147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288069547","doi":"10.5209/rpub.76612","title":"De la comunidad a lo común: desplazamientos teóricos, éticos y políticos","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Social and Economic Solidarity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013458249570645571,"score_gpt":0.3137762946012974,"score_spread":0.30031804503065185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288069547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52753365,0.023422375,0.0008838535,0.060180124,0.0079813,0.0038659389,0.0013467198,0.0017515459,0.3730345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876657,0.0007440396,0.0006108511,0.0027779716,0.0027008683,0.00039395518,0.000059417052,0.00015643936,0.0048907474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881421,0.00569146,0.0012311565,0.0011258894,0.0012505531,0.002558865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935606,0.0025081406,0.00084114185,0.0012627362,0.00024626887,0.0015811254],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007592281,0.00072389306,0.0012175736,0.00050275243,0.00421759,0.0033683293,0.0024747555,0.00075824285,0.003012768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043818946,0.0009023861,0.00076715247,0.0017091654,0.0015803422,0.0005217667,0.001029312,0.002156094,0.00027739795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002313398,0.0009894578,0.019240998,0.00015704152,0.00026909186,0.00014510276,0.008880122,0.000032805106,0.000151178,0.8334555,0.13317688,0.0032704533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013519407,0.00022103428,0.0039620413,0.00008075335,0.00039535912,0.00012236559,0.0043302365,0.0007751385,0.000011685608,0.022374103,0.96541977,0.00095555326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015452423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014171774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8322429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014818026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058160275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391827801","doi":"10.5209/rpub.92078","title":"The Possibility of the Possibility of Something New: The Subject and Fidelity to the Event in Love and Politics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Event (particle physics); Political philosophy; Politics; Fidelity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.022900002874534062,"score_gpt":0.34506093093939944,"score_spread":0.32216092806486535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391827801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91862184,0.00601908,0.00009777902,0.06782932,0.0009180555,0.0009468852,0.00019649613,0.000040878407,0.0053296895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965641,0.0001196515,0.000059475635,0.0011272674,0.0005636028,0.00002180287,0.0000041479893,0.000028309114,0.0015116658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503493,0.0019915868,0.0010934146,0.000552804,0.00052089186,0.0008063929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933689,0.0033284915,0.00041231074,0.0023654113,0.00024278741,0.00028206204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006779997,0.00027796192,0.00052539684,0.00016613003,0.0003553443,0.00016938553,0.0010992127,0.0002190347,0.000038133516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005782053,0.00014776715,0.0002802804,0.0012585026,0.00083213905,0.00008103576,0.0003753263,0.0007028156,0.000013920978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029770524,0.00018973442,0.092524834,0.00018382742,0.00032209133,0.0000053903022,0.020567153,0.000014602531,0.00018025767,0.8321249,0.05213859,0.0014509115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006430294,0.00013612476,0.5227862,0.00007782564,0.0002669926,0.00002572881,0.0016616778,0.00021369779,0.000055138105,0.23806122,0.2358048,0.0002675772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00824328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013688384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5940637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005426363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000608449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99836093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413141885","doi":"10.5209/rpub.100865","title":"El dispositivo ontológico y la política de los gestos en el proyecto Homo Sacer de Giorgio Agamben","year":2025,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.007902786983268514,"score_gpt":0.34888000556419263,"score_spread":0.3409772185809241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413141885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06505629,0.010590517,0.00394837,0.03237715,0.0013277238,0.0017957994,0.0004340178,0.00077388005,0.88369626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742154,0.0009952999,0.0010702556,0.0034611232,0.0021724051,0.00022226942,0.000028196626,0.000115017436,0.01772002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874751,0.0056846864,0.0011699416,0.0012838218,0.0009408751,0.0034455971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99153996,0.0043790233,0.00040964747,0.0014546438,0.00039551128,0.0018212474],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056853024,0.0008810495,0.0013571689,0.0005264213,0.0013839181,0.001199312,0.002034925,0.0020615628,0.0005884889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012098914,0.0009159089,0.0007902161,0.0013370538,0.002306663,0.00054112164,0.0005259957,0.0020251793,0.00018540396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003819536,0.0006532429,0.0078754295,0.00043331424,0.00043977887,0.000275786,0.0019226588,0.000004812073,0.00025673836,0.96640396,0.020139266,0.0012130721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010839343,0.00014797722,0.016631266,0.0005334842,0.00075598375,0.00009303526,0.00034764083,0.0002612512,0.00012976133,0.35412088,0.62509525,0.0007995532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004446351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027525122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9091591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008680423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075677373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}