{"meta":{"query_hash":"724760f9b037","filters":{"venue":"Research Ethics"},"cohort_total":47,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":47,"exported":47,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/724760f9b037","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Research+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1976141823","doi":"10.1177/1747016112445435","title":"Social science and ethics review: A question of practice not principle","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Meta-ethics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Research ethics; Applied ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Information ethics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.6629785079412129,"score_gpt":0.7460695818609354,"score_spread":0.08309107391972248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976141823","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031675855,0.010334109,0.00071312377,0.8256366,0.00083033333,0.002023568,0.000012030182,0.00008981232,0.15719283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8462212,0.0867507,0.0077220844,0.056492362,0.0014205328,0.00020080122,0.000005717514,0.000051082414,0.0011355374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9289522,0.05687326,0.0009593726,0.0004967796,0.01106251,0.0016558855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6603543,0.31123573,0.0008267558,0.0009817358,0.025659127,0.00094233034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.52557033,0.00012093937,0.00029578217,0.00023222886,0.0055942326,0.00002284716,0.0005809494,0.0013909468,0.00009603117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.87425154,0.00010642789,0.000029834604,0.0015303788,0.0055311457,0.0012310697,0.0011452322,0.058010377,0.00021719851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008114388,0.0001499643,0.0006280729,0.008484253,0.000012300138,0.0000026516714,0.06679387,3.7588816e-8,0.0018056595,0.91335475,0.0073394515,0.001347845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042206736,0.00014964415,0.0052625593,0.0052539706,0.000060994225,0.000012321591,0.013034519,0.000037955535,0.00042738038,0.016335588,0.9587978,0.00020517147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044764316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004009989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9514584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005266141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010171962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010452120","doi":"10.1177/1747016112461731","title":"Good intentions and dangerous assumptions: Research ethics committees and illicit drug use research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Incentive; Public relations; Informed consent; Illicit drug; Population; Psychology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Criminology; Drug; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Psychiatry; Environmental health; Engineering","score_opus":0.9437146307990955,"score_gpt":0.7360995700310963,"score_spread":0.20761506076799918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010452120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57825303,0.014842682,0.0002703723,0.37935242,0.0004702014,0.004323658,0.0001400676,0.0002816768,0.022065906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8682329,0.09595681,0.004656742,0.00092075206,0.0010874458,0.000436669,0.00005015549,0.00017532891,0.0284832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92901003,0.03373072,0.0014685321,0.001874411,0.028505668,0.005410651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2767416,0.6740279,0.00015640196,0.0041067116,0.040181994,0.0047853556],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.38834667,0.00039588986,0.00076341745,0.0027550354,0.005393106,0.0011307923,0.0011368328,0.004095848,0.00027454906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6011747,0.00035350927,0.00017199875,0.0039268965,0.016461054,0.0009728793,0.004806295,0.12603648,0.00057844183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070047006,0.002251529,0.13067055,0.0053983936,0.00035901627,0.0001985397,0.052565787,0.0000010305631,0.00785154,0.774351,0.021272318,0.004379816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048375246,0.0035606432,0.16218182,0.009565672,0.00014803716,0.0005042385,0.07785564,0.00040395127,0.0038561302,0.3272937,0.40844685,0.001345788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005065515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007874979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6522684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008612892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006248158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092966289","doi":"10.1177/1747016114531980","title":"The Ottawa statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomized trials: A short report","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Western University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Statement (logic); Informed consent; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Research design; Cluster (spacecraft); Identification (biology); Randomized controlled trial; Cluster randomised controlled trial; Psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Sociology; Social science; Pathology","score_opus":0.9026774175548228,"score_gpt":0.7135437916802408,"score_spread":0.18913362587458193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092966289","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017337805,0.00055230776,0.020315321,0.9439557,0.00024685726,0.007209776,0.00000518116,0.0000372108,0.010339833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740955,0.010973607,0.003905986,0.005688705,0.00041138497,0.00063071185,0.0000066925804,0.0000589714,0.0042284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.764645,0.20272441,0.0064037316,0.0016608747,0.022427736,0.002138259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.016107526,0.97617495,0.0003221015,0.0018665607,0.0050920243,0.0004368265],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.80156904,0.0001930767,0.0012814605,0.00016356957,0.0007947233,0.00015767473,0.0006216398,0.0016684125,0.00009444404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9306571,0.00008245521,0.00033070255,0.000406146,0.0076821814,0.000032293046,0.0005222164,0.029006505,0.00002858917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.113540255,0.0003049153,0.00010755264,0.0009163182,0.0008093951,0.00013834788,0.0033694657,0.000033131528,0.0020359396,0.8384802,0.035636894,0.004627623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.075991765,0.003594545,0.00018054337,0.0020318083,0.0002529521,0.00010362396,0.002155202,0.010822106,0.013003375,0.81675375,0.07480612,0.00030421233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016567767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016098563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9567577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012793094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003807518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113859811","doi":"10.1177/1747016113488858","title":"Public deliberation to develop ethical norms and inform policy for biobanks: Lessons learnt and challenges remaining","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Biobank; Political science; Corporate governance; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Public engagement; Public policy; Law; Politics; Engineering; Management; Economics; Bioinformatics; Biology","score_opus":0.9344429354460383,"score_gpt":0.691832575104417,"score_spread":0.2426103603416213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113859811","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058019724,0.0011584192,0.00080869737,0.93190676,0.000039931976,0.0017025952,0.0000079492975,0.00006711648,0.006288785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91776174,0.05296198,0.017559333,0.0074723396,0.00061329,0.0006384289,0.000027087419,0.00007273795,0.0028930858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941716,0.0005019914,0.00056800165,0.0006692477,0.0029454536,0.0011437141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87019324,0.104724385,0.00011145483,0.001156841,0.021284018,0.002530056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042914204,0.00018452773,0.0003724987,0.00078187435,0.0007598187,0.00040867022,0.00029546078,0.002544,0.000040077623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45899487,0.00014906704,0.000043138585,0.0010744906,0.001233913,0.0002686939,0.0009107715,0.014680963,0.000097415315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012784466,0.00006400007,0.00036678437,0.0019914606,0.000050776584,0.000005787857,0.008933431,5.40025e-7,0.0014207353,0.8369025,0.0005963588,0.1495398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031560522,0.0042602504,0.08085483,0.0021707795,0.000022317497,0.000092542214,0.00978214,0.0017706782,0.0013312572,0.7923913,0.10352271,0.00064516877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050572795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030036315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9244344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027170428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064179893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145177063","doi":"10.1177/1747016113481145","title":"The betrayal of research confidentiality in British sociology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Doctrine; Law; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Betrayal; Discipline; Criminology","score_opus":0.8581578964113781,"score_gpt":0.7378586250440586,"score_spread":0.12029927136731944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145177063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8413482,0.0017874197,0.000024960835,0.13981171,0.00016913525,0.0017452858,0.000010021136,0.000029173558,0.015074144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791343,0.012711457,0.00020998661,0.00027022825,0.00026674577,0.00021645465,0.000007435062,0.00003191908,0.0071514803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97552663,0.010974994,0.0011273613,0.0007094345,0.009685131,0.001976469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52608067,0.44687343,0.00012358888,0.0021805014,0.023945829,0.0007959627],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20285371,0.000102690945,0.0004275213,0.00041421736,0.0008004501,0.0001989353,0.0011856456,0.0020702286,0.000746059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37365547,0.000088159606,0.00014073541,0.0013439022,0.017842267,0.00010541966,0.0011201439,0.042693757,0.0005228784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000809579,0.0020343456,0.18857421,0.005788046,0.0003228753,0.0005392989,0.021709194,0.0000046298715,0.020000955,0.6976694,0.0325417,0.030005792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012288162,0.00095623767,0.21990517,0.001024889,0.000004364181,0.000024624613,0.011887161,0.00014983975,0.0017428134,0.75874764,0.00421422,0.00011422768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04938007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051833216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44944593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034881462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072754915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149400202","doi":"10.1177/1747016114523421","title":"The ethics of metaphor as a research tool","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Dignity; Interpretation (philosophy); Research ethics; Qualitative research; Engineering ethics; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychology; Informed consent; Vulnerability (computing); Participant observation; Conceptual metaphor; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Social science; Medicine; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.9859485521153608,"score_gpt":0.8450221242589507,"score_spread":0.14092642785641007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149400202","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25301683,0.0061297882,0.00070722116,0.36859408,0.0010155715,0.003725637,0.000027486809,0.00021351664,0.36656988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728043,0.00484466,0.0020738672,0.000243857,0.000646436,0.00035126114,0.0000017345019,0.000055203756,0.018978676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7957666,0.1689357,0.0008550842,0.00079082843,0.029722074,0.0039297105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79712045,0.17856519,0.00012323803,0.0015830946,0.02099812,0.0016099056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5867722,0.00014490623,0.0003100019,0.0005336043,0.0052955844,0.000558025,0.0026393328,0.0010003747,0.00013294195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6918441,0.00010658422,0.00013220831,0.004314317,0.014830003,0.00035056882,0.0011445503,0.016731154,0.0007975818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023405996,0.00012953252,0.00040461298,0.00006230102,0.0000494051,0.000026625863,0.20212448,0.0000046904224,0.0013113788,0.7785214,0.011519694,0.0056118257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023484856,0.00042056965,0.00016700957,0.00006647631,0.000004638074,8.231994e-7,0.09564112,0.00011827887,0.004590252,0.2375051,0.66113394,0.00011693328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017997613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009057065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7197875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008272932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03326575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151718518","doi":"10.1177/1747016114523772","title":"PAeDS-MoRe: A framework for the development and review of research assent protocols involving children and adolescents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital","funders":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital Foundation","keywords":"Operationalization; Relevance (law); Informed consent; Citation; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.37726604351071896,"score_gpt":0.6055227104397988,"score_spread":0.2282566669290798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151718518","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050618608,0.29508695,0.004835014,0.508252,0.00020693395,0.14004444,0.000044292505,0.000107071355,0.000804668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7146796,0.22344658,0.03865763,0.006210599,0.001633422,0.014882134,0.00003539047,0.00011368002,0.0003409795],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99438244,0.001600005,0.00050331955,0.0004021527,0.0024689704,0.0006431132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830568,0.012988097,0.00008886338,0.0006163556,0.0028957594,0.00035413695],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05582146,0.00012562405,0.00035832607,0.00018467451,0.0007076966,0.000063139996,0.00027434598,0.0004865064,0.000008212865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058587175,0.00008190991,0.000043007007,0.0006121247,0.000913275,0.00004140787,0.0004326256,0.006633543,0.0000031401826],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061907276,0.00057156314,0.15939711,0.3959277,0.00022832879,0.00001315652,0.045880225,3.8693463e-7,0.00010228646,0.19865966,0.0078965295,0.19070399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029727707,0.0026511014,0.22993395,0.31789863,0.000097257944,0.000050305553,0.003361397,0.00048566086,0.0013397365,0.042817127,0.3978364,0.00055567187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001923708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043972337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66406095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010910934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017998012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155777518","doi":"10.1177/1747016114552685","title":"Exploring ethical frontiers of visual methods","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Visual research; Engineering ethics; Confidentiality; Visual methods; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Visual arts; Law","score_opus":0.5932582166892093,"score_gpt":0.628617095756932,"score_spread":0.035358879067722726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155777518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5158057,0.00078617997,0.020283295,0.22124079,0.0039357473,0.0010283185,0.0000079567735,0.0004255454,0.23648642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703132,0.00091458403,0.027751284,0.00016884219,0.00031630023,0.000039413026,0.0000010213215,0.000014737034,0.00048065494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894356,0.0077404687,0.0002434327,0.00024768044,0.0017460253,0.00058680034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886701,0.009539974,0.00005872057,0.00024720642,0.0012413852,0.00024259159],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03629467,0.00007586611,0.00018349267,0.0004914454,0.0011886994,0.000104209525,0.0005277459,0.00045578336,0.00015284908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038640402,0.00007718457,0.00011879427,0.0008940075,0.0024105264,0.00029836237,0.00018758659,0.0054628486,0.000053539257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078312914,0.0001803167,0.0017652585,0.00007803699,0.00008479999,0.0000029252024,0.15509373,0.000021474892,0.006206958,0.80947095,0.0137404045,0.013276815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030538812,0.0007026611,0.0073943883,0.00013217433,0.000023362409,8.9127184e-7,0.26420236,0.00074159866,0.0058466005,0.0884933,0.6318022,0.00035504732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048862244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054433323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72097766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008398011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034565938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170104746","doi":"10.1177/174701611000600305","title":"Ethical Issues in Socio-Historical Archival Research: A Short Skit","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; York University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Narrative; Qualitative research; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Comparative historical research; Historical method; Ethical issues; Research method; Sociological research; Epistemology; Social science; History; Engineering; Literature","score_opus":0.8053528758101043,"score_gpt":0.7315629167550886,"score_spread":0.07378995905501573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170104746","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07060579,0.0004844806,0.00062143494,0.8107429,0.00072098454,0.0012137814,0.000015638458,0.00015466611,0.115440324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94991386,0.007391378,0.022063272,0.0007907356,0.0033055719,0.0003341878,0.000011154363,0.00010446157,0.016085366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8693516,0.106741,0.0009118559,0.001356815,0.017170332,0.00446836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8874889,0.10508735,0.000047010395,0.0010096956,0.004854358,0.0015126808],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.41614753,0.00023770552,0.00052528444,0.0014364348,0.0040818397,0.000567189,0.0020923386,0.002915117,0.0005043337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3110537,0.00022501961,0.00019856486,0.003662523,0.015187309,0.00031852958,0.0009090723,0.08332247,0.0004352304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009386977,0.00024946456,0.0014101001,0.00010696448,0.000014979047,0.0001183278,0.19375907,8.68764e-7,0.003555873,0.77480966,0.013865644,0.012015193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016915309,0.00018317172,0.001523922,0.00008354111,0.0000014401037,0.0000015653912,0.023680322,0.00006271333,0.00018229673,0.4602822,0.51361406,0.00021561516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03876664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047967143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8793081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017339651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008540538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312872714","doi":"10.1177/174701610800400212","title":"Written Consent: Sometimes More Trouble than it is Worth?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Research ethics; Psychology; Internet privacy; Law; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.8700218989740885,"score_gpt":0.6795600486951501,"score_spread":0.19046185027893847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312872714","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1587444,0.0016106432,0.00009468997,0.7511425,0.00017127412,0.0011669071,0.00004040342,0.00017148141,0.08685769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7805577,0.037571806,0.002576614,0.014168011,0.00073473883,0.0001030706,0.000036301342,0.000113257396,0.16413848],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855643,0.001323707,0.0007383566,0.00093780685,0.009814997,0.0016208183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8981403,0.09251454,0.00008962733,0.0019920878,0.005965765,0.0012976598],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030316424,0.00025133794,0.00058906456,0.0006163082,0.0010368966,0.00009193035,0.00087213685,0.002047367,0.0019361476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15447053,0.0002144311,0.0002956595,0.0015495747,0.005216333,0.00014113185,0.0008490797,0.027344156,0.0021064254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002966538,0.0028488028,0.16678965,0.0058974563,0.0009617254,0.0065544145,0.06738323,0.000008809669,0.005415699,0.07667215,0.6620995,0.0024020239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014105049,0.0065885102,0.08264646,0.007429023,0.00017881836,0.0015378249,0.026077444,0.0014221783,0.031819206,0.23426642,0.5919745,0.0019545776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009913499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008382729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73697454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028997366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012295751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2396231016","doi":"10.1177/1747016116650235","title":"Are research ethics guidelines culturally competent?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Mainstream; Interpreter; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Informed consent; Power (physics); Public relations; Subject (documents); Ethical code; Psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law","score_opus":0.909567698881051,"score_gpt":0.7704003056718381,"score_spread":0.1391673932092129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2396231016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065007284,0.00098059,0.0012095809,0.9255511,0.0015333686,0.0015806569,0.000058034653,0.00030161,0.062284343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69386405,0.046791866,0.015727336,0.07273902,0.0110749835,0.001303367,0.00004095839,0.0004232323,0.15803522],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8447196,0.13194044,0.0018296412,0.0013235983,0.016354073,0.0038326401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43955183,0.50262046,0.00059074775,0.0024266585,0.05335772,0.0014526007],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.38644558,0.0003188135,0.000546827,0.00064673374,0.012296315,0.00011240761,0.0024224324,0.004995463,0.002536209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8470115,0.00019473291,0.00013863681,0.0019140727,0.0057729827,0.0005730719,0.0027821427,0.14135994,0.014249838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002708875,0.00017218683,0.005443349,0.0017239023,0.00007851311,0.0001999359,0.02828405,0.0000014501749,0.0061785206,0.42170584,0.53354037,0.0024010139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009817505,0.00015963969,0.002177883,0.0049410877,0.000009062113,0.000006637295,0.042053178,0.00003962487,0.0001916732,0.2091493,0.7400056,0.00028457225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015713418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042957054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85281205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012437147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009527182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983756},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2399705302","doi":"10.1177/1747016116649992","title":"Evaluating the efficacy of the education and training program of the TCPS 2","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Modalities; Medical education; Political science; Research ethics; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.9261742110490973,"score_gpt":0.7771917464788358,"score_spread":0.14898246457026143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399705302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79760456,0.00038832938,0.0000113571205,0.19617526,0.00013746577,0.0015297426,0.000003220486,0.000010645777,0.0041394252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99489015,0.0007030363,0.0006950861,0.00027000965,0.00017891574,0.0000806058,3.4251465e-7,0.000017158,0.0031646732],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99114645,0.0032261184,0.00044033278,0.00026290255,0.0045337686,0.00039044803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80393744,0.18885252,0.00022576239,0.0018586494,0.0049504633,0.00017518032],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06162598,0.00007460341,0.00017472579,0.00006274126,0.00041654677,0.000024488336,0.00073597895,0.00041799192,0.00003971033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4459301,0.000025939189,0.00011205439,0.0006963005,0.0041336664,0.000034139408,0.00067749363,0.00629014,0.0000042354927],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031002105,0.0007814444,0.01330345,0.0013275533,0.00009456532,5.164129e-7,0.03311431,0.000002594644,0.052599482,0.10756321,0.00038100593,0.79052186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004399823,0.0047005205,0.49694017,0.01827642,0.00015721051,0.00004172099,0.020935714,0.00083171827,0.04423544,0.40212604,0.007104967,0.0002502669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012758288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016872451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7902716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007837469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009238746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2416251886","doi":"10.1177/1747016115626496","title":"Opportunities, challenges and ethical issues associated with conducting community-based participatory research in a hospital setting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Casey House; Carleton University; York University; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Community-based participatory research; Confidentiality; Popularity; Context (archaeology); Health care; Space (punctuation); Public relations; Sociology; Research ethics; Nursing; Medicine; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.9876213550820785,"score_gpt":0.7915481589456984,"score_spread":0.19607319613638008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2416251886","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.495776,0.00014275336,0.000015001325,0.5019941,0.000045623372,0.0007671752,0.000030922685,0.000056328798,0.0011721372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99150413,0.0012950726,0.0002515766,0.0059551275,0.000118920325,0.0005627334,0.000006663568,0.00003792033,0.00026782893],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90492445,0.08888543,0.0007433644,0.0003999065,0.0028322001,0.0022146553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8288571,0.1670185,0.00017841086,0.0005828393,0.0027263847,0.0006367559],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23217282,0.00015011585,0.00030918163,0.0007323432,0.004011326,0.000042938063,0.00049752183,0.00091277965,0.00009337018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10063296,0.000106234394,0.000016457689,0.00081735966,0.002758995,0.00022988117,0.0005538799,0.020072088,0.000057408044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001463683,0.00024566223,0.035108846,0.002442221,0.00003082462,0.00011113795,0.89397174,9.305849e-7,0.0009716116,0.048962463,0.00612791,0.011880272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005581954,0.002837756,0.053018186,0.01264348,0.000007017453,0.0000024154053,0.8168373,0.00020538663,0.00042966116,0.018998021,0.08883067,0.00060815894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026144036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010174943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4960389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087530474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008151195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529103505","doi":"10.1177/1747016116673135","title":"Research ethics by design: A collaborative research design proposal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Toronto East General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Research ethics; Research design; Process (computing); Compliance (psychology); Ethical issues; Information ethics; Knowledge management; Sociology; Computer science; Management science; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.9282068780613373,"score_gpt":0.7457461906723061,"score_spread":0.1824606873890312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529103505","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037152835,0.004502971,0.0578848,0.89321965,0.0004694843,0.013703489,0.00021215963,0.00047887242,0.02581328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66071725,0.090721294,0.0804356,0.002390671,0.0027961675,0.004273628,0.00006185438,0.00086399226,0.15773953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.74435806,0.16630892,0.0026343076,0.004661211,0.07213884,0.009898672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09553774,0.7901195,0.00020230438,0.0047990074,0.10564904,0.003692359],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.62721974,0.00063322135,0.0011905087,0.003161418,0.0051994543,0.00081664615,0.00357823,0.008878494,0.0012795086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7663397,0.00043409932,0.00026454945,0.012250007,0.024909675,0.0005954618,0.0035152351,0.13075274,0.0058877617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011017202,0.0026981393,0.00057012256,0.002830789,0.00049772375,0.0015493728,0.02312336,0.000012491323,0.203073,0.3073888,0.4398184,0.007420585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00587168,0.016340286,0.00022495697,0.007422055,0.000035884797,0.000080228165,0.013821431,0.00036706877,0.18052986,0.6717824,0.102599606,0.0009245724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090195675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084040477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89082897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037044093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11418635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549062016","doi":"10.1177/1747016116677635","title":"Graduate students’ experiences with research ethics in conducting health research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University; Interior Health","funders":"Athabasca University","keywords":"Research ethics; Curriculum; Engineering ethics; Graduate students; Qualitative research; Medical education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.9896698563797172,"score_gpt":0.823892782082878,"score_spread":0.1657770742968392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549062016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64424896,0.00082581915,0.00008503318,0.348016,0.00016790722,0.002429715,0.000009576535,0.00009693686,0.004120063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672316,0.017568192,0.0014143556,0.0011020557,0.0006625837,0.0010109975,0.000008229772,0.00016373549,0.010838281],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8020627,0.078457184,0.0031801518,0.0046225474,0.10061195,0.011065455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.32060388,0.6239139,0.0002808046,0.004854327,0.046618734,0.0037283874],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.593692,0.00041512106,0.0010484589,0.0035927263,0.003441842,0.0005819754,0.0032050845,0.002979794,0.0004211289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.56738675,0.0002632776,0.00014698367,0.008527194,0.018248575,0.0005014104,0.0034044578,0.118714325,0.00083606463],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064944853,0.004564539,0.09610929,0.008248053,0.00033490814,0.0032540483,0.6963719,0.0000058240107,0.009193476,0.146817,0.012659289,0.015947185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010855684,0.019974902,0.018308671,0.03511117,0.000011794157,0.00020177975,0.73880523,0.00007124402,0.016631395,0.14554828,0.013363582,0.001116233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069768745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018640194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5454567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030766798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04448201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588113643","doi":"10.1177/1747016117693828","title":"Revisions to the Common Rule: A proposal in search of evidence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect; Criticism; Subject (documents); Empirical evidence; Scientific evidence; Public relations; Field (mathematics); Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.948464032356229,"score_gpt":0.7742134374355288,"score_spread":0.17425059492070016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588113643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22128715,0.00061472633,0.000065606764,0.76689786,0.0000945165,0.0021025941,0.000011781097,0.000017581997,0.008908168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98553336,0.007564505,0.0018587866,0.000666227,0.00021272764,0.000087577,0.0000016577673,0.00002995779,0.004045185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.985122,0.0035776205,0.00076387846,0.00061955163,0.00886967,0.00104728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81741494,0.16797748,0.00014533784,0.0059044,0.007699637,0.0008581985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15019998,0.00012144975,0.00042291725,0.00037219355,0.0010458842,0.00019870621,0.0025573855,0.00083027856,0.00017794277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5987241,0.000069476024,0.00011253523,0.00078792765,0.0031121692,0.00015618795,0.002889463,0.024059493,0.000390959],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051244446,0.0020777695,0.3931914,0.0135462945,0.00017678589,0.0011962631,0.03829754,0.00008771619,0.026825901,0.41421598,0.012536103,0.0927238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023242035,0.0048842863,0.74929,0.04368459,0.000035230027,0.000048147835,0.0045056622,0.0015986271,0.01819804,0.16205117,0.012940968,0.0004390768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039573726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009108537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76623166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024027051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009125909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626646765","doi":"10.1177/1747016113510654","title":"Between the accountable and the auditable: Ethics and ethical governance in the social sciences SchragZachary M, Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965–2009. USA: Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.StarkLaura, Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and the Making of Ethical Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011.van den HoonaardWill C, The Seduction of Ethics: Transforming the Social Sciences. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2011. <sup>1</sup>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Engineering ethics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.19740550591045475,"score_gpt":0.4784404928850635,"score_spread":0.28103498697460877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626646765","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029341906,0.02194552,0.00016078445,0.9247055,0.00027773372,0.005813219,0.0006489102,0.000024378289,0.017082071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6979864,0.29603904,0.00019029013,0.005070417,0.00056757475,0.000023153894,0.000007771232,0.00002202068,0.00009330822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.902143,0.08595079,0.0011064059,0.0010696095,0.008365294,0.0013649148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83013695,0.16378722,0.0014758345,0.0010109704,0.003413949,0.0001750814],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2730872,0.00041548203,0.001047908,0.00009166298,0.033281326,0.00023420114,0.004164382,0.0036295874,0.00024921176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03602203,0.00020383377,0.00023190105,0.0008130213,0.14042507,0.0010974384,0.0026837022,0.055317663,0.000002582239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018338413,0.00009278693,0.00030297495,0.0015608721,0.00018222112,0.0000034840614,0.2567267,0.000032321437,0.000019066867,0.71597093,0.02249376,0.00078099314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018223241,0.0011221911,0.034934636,0.0068753865,0.0015570018,0.000053684435,0.46802226,0.007000444,0.000040314775,0.065031566,0.39595327,0.0011860165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31462818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052706316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91963506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045245778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00861856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757021329","doi":"10.1177/1747016117733296","title":"Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":378,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Oppression; Decolonization; Participatory action research; Sociology; Sovereignty; Context (archaeology); Traditional knowledge; Economic Justice; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Political science; Politics; Law; Anthropology; Ecology","score_opus":0.45847129241015433,"score_gpt":0.6055265106912358,"score_spread":0.14705521828108142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757021329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9290549,0.0030140867,0.0000015244068,0.008617986,0.00017871596,0.0028161474,0.000007335156,0.000028491328,0.056280814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92635703,0.06527506,0.00006757364,0.000009376028,0.000557176,0.00008499414,0.0000034150742,0.000041073115,0.007604277],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9625332,0.027106885,0.00035403325,0.0009682875,0.0054814746,0.003556167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682006,0.02496759,0.00007099763,0.0008887813,0.004973074,0.0008989596],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24875015,0.00016356283,0.00032236433,0.0017494919,0.06723838,0.0017176553,0.0015049565,0.0010543203,0.00004625013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009921231,0.00014862622,0.000028348612,0.001483251,0.0074248225,0.00079751236,0.00016712332,0.010406842,0.00010546664],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016173565,0.00026917044,0.020502802,0.0006328855,0.000014190461,0.00009134277,0.6908496,3.4330145e-7,0.00009779919,0.28591424,0.00007402257,0.0013918421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014661492,0.0013871592,0.36526582,0.0014429119,0.000003870061,0.000013074859,0.06989652,0.000049297647,0.0014640191,0.19225529,0.36619267,0.0005632199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44636986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87311816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6209531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015662534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049221292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762274663","doi":"10.1177/1747016117733506","title":"Pragmatic clinical trials and the consent process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics; University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions; University of Saskatchewan; University of Calgary","keywords":"Waiver; Informed consent; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Flexibility (engineering); Political science; Psychology; Public relations; Law; Business; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.980525196242898,"score_gpt":0.8479461696890097,"score_spread":0.1325790265538883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762274663","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083141565,0.0014304372,0.00014668191,0.8645617,0.00035294035,0.003382685,0.000011177909,0.00004719173,0.04692567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576791,0.031282283,0.0004731481,0.002083276,0.0008840138,0.00016298104,0.0000029756902,0.000032644984,0.007399597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.955186,0.031160917,0.0024435853,0.000983669,0.0090559935,0.0011698115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.054979723,0.9337486,0.0005747703,0.0034248692,0.006327481,0.0009445249],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.59554416,0.0001362509,0.0010022734,0.00010990027,0.0019934224,0.0005752031,0.0010788286,0.0014518177,0.0001439033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.96630293,0.00007199416,0.0002507067,0.00016134472,0.01718554,0.000098427416,0.0010284947,0.02880186,0.00018617851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008651492,0.0008134059,0.04471844,0.008438815,0.0007171857,0.00035153766,0.008826785,7.4077116e-7,0.0001397455,0.89973944,0.008143391,0.019459018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014491879,0.00092322065,0.018751223,0.0028271985,0.00013560509,0.00006442763,0.0027473888,0.0015229726,0.00024407463,0.94945824,0.008650126,0.00018361876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002704331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076687976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9025877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005298379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009283273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998445},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2782102453","doi":"10.1177/1747016117750208","title":"Ethics review and freedom of information requests in qualitative research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Vetting; Transparency (behavior); Government (linguistics); Bureaucracy; Political science; Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Public relations; Qualitative research; Citizenship; Sociology; Research ethics; Law; Social science; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8226387391353674,"score_gpt":0.7699121586614852,"score_spread":0.052726580473882234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782102453","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011537131,0.024291672,0.0039045955,0.78449607,0.00027977585,0.0041652895,0.00011180314,0.000091041096,0.17112266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46238527,0.4894917,0.041459464,0.0030284524,0.0007775874,0.00036166943,0.000034090557,0.00006266999,0.0023991002],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.80070627,0.18538141,0.0011986685,0.00055320386,0.010239063,0.0019213721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83817154,0.1373612,0.00021567589,0.00070277177,0.022952054,0.0005967593],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5452964,0.00013297742,0.0004320811,0.001055456,0.0017915991,0.00017936109,0.00077621144,0.0009970417,0.00017079613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4450229,0.00012265937,0.000054451757,0.0042023635,0.021884896,0.0010549655,0.0004920511,0.013401384,0.0001295705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003128242,0.00003064061,0.00006375889,0.0018106664,0.000009249064,0.0000015058957,0.5012445,1.1779022e-7,0.000058291665,0.49231628,0.0019819227,0.0024518073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003403188,0.00065079104,0.00047393583,0.0036374063,0.0000059417816,7.1767073e-7,0.31261256,0.00003910972,0.00020603067,0.5134875,0.16834264,0.00020301291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026971022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018670334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7814676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040592335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063397596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894910408","doi":"10.1177/1747016118798877","title":"Examining the use of consent forms to promote dissemination of research results to participants","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Sunnybrook Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Order (exchange); Reciprocal; Information Dissemination; Dissemination; Public relations; Psychology; Medical education; Ideal (ethics); Medicine; Political science; Business; Alternative medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.9542201912913564,"score_gpt":0.713385792098791,"score_spread":0.24083439919256533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894910408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9784179,0.00002001914,0.00011205795,0.014542733,0.00024356968,0.004240785,0.00015889901,0.000014937029,0.0022490988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99447054,0.00008008245,0.0010216088,0.00068711804,0.00015970379,0.00043659122,0.000034090535,0.000019042844,0.0030912026],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886386,0.005434673,0.0010657177,0.00036025044,0.003037707,0.0014630535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9660822,0.028065884,0.00016977443,0.000801384,0.004304348,0.00057638815],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052704915,0.00009674262,0.0002151198,0.00043652806,0.0016116836,0.00001572404,0.00042675473,0.00025144595,0.00008514688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040588036,0.00006313217,0.000024020641,0.0014694231,0.00061835366,0.00009405166,0.0007350655,0.002422217,0.00034266518],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00632744,0.00082101556,0.037340976,0.008654605,0.000053265478,0.000007399101,0.7896122,0.00002239249,0.026814464,0.014583335,0.097835064,0.017927898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031194985,0.031365532,0.10857573,0.0628151,0.00002766725,0.0000012190635,0.19716413,0.0022389265,0.17545225,0.0063421456,0.41223574,0.0006620682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025206124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004339223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.592448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032369947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017204485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969465980","doi":"10.1177/1747016119868900","title":"A reflection on research ethics and citizen science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services; University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Warrant; Research ethics; Harm; Engineering ethics; Confusion; Institution; Institutional review board; Term (time); Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.9464113414639415,"score_gpt":0.7884269297242767,"score_spread":0.1579844117396647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969465980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5724685,0.0003597828,0.000045225675,0.23434523,0.00041017382,0.0019800186,0.000007667556,0.00012825952,0.1902551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96565473,0.007866268,0.0009674882,0.0019893541,0.0004036815,0.00006835786,0.0000049768787,0.000065665976,0.022979505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96211475,0.007003711,0.00061871606,0.0017749291,0.02611583,0.0023720714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62586105,0.34391287,0.00008985776,0.0030690376,0.025258528,0.0018086763],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.36553523,0.0002014384,0.00041006578,0.002135534,0.0026903378,0.00046177465,0.0010479081,0.002713404,0.0003399045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.54482377,0.00017102038,0.00008862107,0.0046106605,0.010860359,0.00024373089,0.0016673857,0.109041445,0.0021136957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020468705,0.00057214696,0.008494363,0.0036483323,0.00005895898,0.000175513,0.016010968,0.0000074480845,0.09014837,0.8710628,0.002396559,0.0053776735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044623255,0.015847428,0.028333273,0.0075746663,0.00002198549,0.00015652848,0.013176448,0.0022140837,0.042139124,0.83588165,0.049474977,0.0007175117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000668152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005371004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39318615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011042304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021117108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979464758","doi":"10.1177/1747016119869847","title":"Improving dissemination of study results: perspectives of individuals with cystic fibrosis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; University of Guelph","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Recall; Psychology; Medicine; Focus group; Qualitative research; Medical education","score_opus":0.3792453037823527,"score_gpt":0.6152022783020771,"score_spread":0.23595697451972436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979464758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887114,0.0002608028,0.00011194828,0.004919492,0.000026692636,0.0018102725,0.00006677882,0.000021319907,0.004071266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945536,0.00031011392,0.0026674294,0.00001075932,0.000050288916,0.000033064483,0.000011288031,0.00003240586,0.0023310136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899588,0.0014651543,0.00070559775,0.0005720502,0.00683171,0.00046666292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8605168,0.12917744,0.00026635296,0.0012593827,0.008557314,0.00022274801],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.051311214,0.00012503815,0.00046911815,0.0005401936,0.00011031963,0.000031404714,0.00043440424,0.00058746425,0.000089838715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2881463,0.00009260151,0.00007652738,0.0012262331,0.0011681253,0.00011534153,0.0004162961,0.007764443,0.00002564692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011048552,0.007520142,0.47206342,0.014968548,0.0008411389,0.00006915742,0.3040206,0.000050198065,0.14894481,0.036203526,0.00026411406,0.004005756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008211551,0.04290735,0.3801189,0.012207842,0.00018921493,0.000013106825,0.4893882,0.0006771952,0.056731474,0.009025547,0.00010543429,0.00042418667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006079518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024531063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23683508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001802772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027630224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99452466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096789464","doi":"10.1177/1747016120969743","title":"Moral injury and the need to carry out ethically responsible research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Moral injury; Beneficence; Dignity; Shame; Harm; Psychology; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Confidentiality; Social psychology; Autonomy; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.7539514315881478,"score_gpt":0.6299975630098864,"score_spread":0.1239538685782614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096789464","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10751598,0.001690816,0.00014313248,0.8154304,0.00020709806,0.0027437252,0.00006662409,0.0001366176,0.07206563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850733,0.000414836,0.000519515,0.006809989,0.00044521,0.00075129425,0.000008020776,0.00010615141,0.005871653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96352357,0.02614779,0.00064653147,0.001188181,0.006042047,0.0024519127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612913,0.033554547,0.000047024303,0.0015286207,0.0023041652,0.0012743534],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057127964,0.00026475082,0.00049927394,0.00076193793,0.001394969,0.0005342759,0.0021483705,0.0009344579,0.0011247377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06879888,0.00019549883,0.0001133558,0.0029400443,0.004905117,0.00012276576,0.0023572308,0.018447682,0.0039335187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010656373,0.00017551232,0.0014902897,0.0002705674,0.00017770777,0.00017104979,0.24326459,0.000005538137,0.0021381422,0.5980181,0.13519701,0.0084351385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015977433,0.008024661,0.034585424,0.00082134857,0.00005914135,0.0000668687,0.17256725,0.0019356464,0.0036006887,0.40347543,0.35708034,0.0018057873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027131576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060600345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87755734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014972387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019951803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129501706","doi":"10.1177/1747016121994011","title":"Identifying and addressing nonrational processes in REB ethical decision-making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Heuristics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Population; Decision-making; Ethical decision; Management science; Psychology; Political science; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering ethics; Business; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.6625705175875278,"score_gpt":0.7134502216898961,"score_spread":0.050879704102368306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129501706","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2078753,0.010393085,0.03875236,0.6772597,0.001976503,0.001685878,0.000028251428,0.00022881749,0.06180011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96281976,0.0032736284,0.024996575,0.007968852,0.0005021679,0.00008516849,0.000010220651,0.000037398357,0.0003062033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97436744,0.01946249,0.0007677767,0.0006445715,0.003835185,0.0009225181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57071257,0.42231798,0.00018465187,0.00057586806,0.0058510313,0.00035790922],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.082966134,0.00012692892,0.00025892773,0.00030171472,0.0031593267,0.00015420617,0.000327216,0.0023886526,0.00071570923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.68531233,0.00012242247,0.000025161018,0.0015291423,0.00087635295,0.00038396186,0.001072002,0.07106587,0.00016993658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006683039,0.0005299372,0.04653135,0.02089843,0.00008591678,0.002736309,0.43742025,0.00005708461,0.004195872,0.44054645,0.0112474235,0.035082668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009097563,0.000045153978,0.011139166,0.020032175,0.000011201982,0.000042255866,0.07503851,0.00095547765,0.00016131409,0.8739341,0.017441675,0.00028921416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000111199646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004363272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7549445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000302426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011217492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137260078","doi":"10.1177/17470161211003021","title":"Queer considerations: Exploring the use of social media for research recruitment within LGBTQ communities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"Mount Saint Vincent University","keywords":"Social media; Harassment; Queer; Public relations; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Political science; Gender studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.9052681565015958,"score_gpt":0.5311391777554012,"score_spread":0.37412897874619455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137260078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42040485,0.0019748006,0.17975862,0.38335446,0.0044087376,0.007008893,0.00014554057,0.00056913024,0.002374989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471339,0.0009886982,0.04863979,0.00041677055,0.00037409918,0.0015224277,0.000018903196,0.00003080724,0.0008746339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922066,0.0048280284,0.00030639092,0.0002356392,0.0018963483,0.0005270378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645363,0.030301817,0.00005009176,0.0007501321,0.00427632,0.00008531015],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017666543,0.000084357824,0.00014660977,0.00023370014,0.0023018606,0.0006974345,0.0005856064,0.00015645716,0.000024318215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015356249,0.00006768384,0.00006962548,0.0009068404,0.00070453895,0.00051982445,0.0006692677,0.0027553346,0.00001618475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028132901,0.0000834931,0.000015194705,0.000112883026,0.00004862328,0.000018827872,0.21478182,0.00015933099,0.0029328123,0.7672413,0.0065616006,0.008016001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011098238,0.0005472304,0.000631089,0.0005207514,0.000014956248,0.000056343353,0.11163973,0.02058225,0.27124178,0.37225705,0.22093333,0.00046566536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041627066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028705003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52672905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013467297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001668894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212272605","doi":"10.1177/17470161211059993","title":"Equality and Equity in Compensating Patient Engagement in Research: A Plea for Exceptionalism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Exceptionalism; Research ethics; Equity (law); Political science; Doctrine; Compensation (psychology); Interpretation (philosophy); Normative; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.9783687622030315,"score_gpt":0.7665734900477272,"score_spread":0.21179527215530425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212272605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97158164,0.0006701851,0.00012114458,0.015250021,0.00029114255,0.003963585,0.0001256378,0.000017946528,0.007978688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931082,0.0007107305,0.0015793528,0.0020896979,0.00013382683,0.0015720974,0.00027254876,0.000019824914,0.00051370624],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9721804,0.022268614,0.0009902415,0.000561678,0.0023130404,0.0016859833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97395086,0.023854919,0.000091975184,0.00036620037,0.0013854773,0.00035057197],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.085998766,0.00011520239,0.00026645765,0.00039538456,0.0018430185,0.000029949102,0.00019127793,0.00036682832,0.00027904543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008183284,0.00011402358,0.00003142079,0.0008091045,0.00024939256,0.000094425646,0.0014840155,0.0073524867,0.000054042022],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009085795,0.001621385,0.22906089,0.025650382,0.000020947055,0.0000788459,0.37794673,0.000038951075,0.001537191,0.33054382,0.0037617434,0.028830536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009568428,0.002218336,0.13273557,0.014198229,0.000005294571,0.0000018900441,0.35644773,0.004738463,0.0008983681,0.28384203,0.19467503,0.00067065057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051439255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027001703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19091327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015400932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030887995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242130756","doi":"10.1177/1747016113510668","title":"The Ottawa statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomized trials: A short report","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Statement (logic); Research ethics; Research design; Engineering ethics; Cluster (spacecraft); Randomized controlled trial; Cluster randomised controlled trial; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Political science; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; Pathology","score_opus":0.9072127411373186,"score_gpt":0.7100848200719752,"score_spread":0.1971279210653435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242130756","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031548873,0.0007599739,0.0045967693,0.9449606,0.00018981434,0.011156505,0.0000047090234,0.000032451728,0.0067502917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623494,0.017423395,0.0044143605,0.006153645,0.00033262555,0.0018349029,0.000007385624,0.00006664641,0.0074176057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.86551315,0.10935904,0.005154389,0.001244667,0.016963696,0.0017650825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.016721917,0.9731607,0.00032796964,0.001862728,0.007420035,0.00050666893],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.68482786,0.00019934296,0.0012244157,0.00016764308,0.00075707387,0.00023196705,0.0006280148,0.0017045444,0.00033927703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8875275,0.000083321895,0.0003286827,0.0004373536,0.007869737,0.00005546548,0.00056666025,0.029792026,0.00008231672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.114743486,0.0006668642,0.00023547931,0.0015994563,0.0019126353,0.0003653162,0.0075775646,0.000034887013,0.0065467376,0.6859063,0.17287892,0.0075323805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06918264,0.0029235163,0.00038059658,0.0020013414,0.00022212874,0.00012187795,0.0048549334,0.006655779,0.013380787,0.8726089,0.027334815,0.00033269345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053186313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013340505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93880695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014903203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004626908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289524090","doi":"10.1177/17470161221116552","title":"Ethics review and conversation analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Warrant; Research ethics; Informed consent; Normative; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Data collection; Conversation analysis; Resource (disambiguation); Preference; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Epistemology; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Alternative medicine; Business; Communication; Engineering","score_opus":0.5176638388297126,"score_gpt":0.520446981172352,"score_spread":0.002783142342639433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289524090","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071373545,0.11013945,0.00013438599,0.6552159,0.00022428118,0.0012028047,0.00028801564,0.0002274815,0.22543031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96262234,0.026416115,0.00006274378,0.003994272,0.00008005414,0.00013131104,0.00014561803,0.00001495364,0.0065325727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507976,0.0031194433,0.00019789614,0.00019392291,0.0011861968,0.00022279368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995862,0.0027273104,0.000067833316,0.0005510125,0.00072878675,0.00006302985],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011351801,0.00007461731,0.00018550584,0.0002720808,0.0019400535,0.00025089158,0.00039708213,0.00006496252,0.0069872444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015122615,0.00006811666,0.000064863525,0.00039294077,0.0008574198,0.00016924573,0.00046249194,0.0042123576,0.00004162357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049371997,0.00003215141,0.000054822412,0.00044550732,0.00017712911,0.0000030669366,0.2308249,0.000012796118,0.0000058533888,0.7631408,0.005026669,0.0002713753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016695223,0.00008529771,0.00015376268,0.00007718628,0.00037649524,0.0000024542232,0.21758844,0.00022541173,0.000008060605,0.01959613,0.7615379,0.00018187528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012730525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026031425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000815063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045287647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311012291","doi":"10.1177/17470161221141275","title":"Promising practices and constraining factors in mobilizing community-engaged research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Sociology; Community engagement; Focus group; Knowledge management; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8689081218063074,"score_gpt":0.6349223159119336,"score_spread":0.2339858058943738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311012291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446953,0.00031624862,0.0000029203698,0.012821717,0.000069782414,0.00052348746,0.0000029778437,0.00007460488,0.041492995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986067,0.00047707662,0.00020304303,0.000110783396,0.000046164387,0.000102932405,0.00000887017,0.000020484298,0.0004239438],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6323241,0.3630649,0.00024997676,0.00026245517,0.003099786,0.0009987924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84779614,0.15083069,0.00011713502,0.0004890804,0.0005676361,0.00019933778],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4555415,0.00009843926,0.00017075986,0.0006993431,0.059777617,0.00052851223,0.0011107578,0.00017639667,0.0002228599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12921642,0.00011043137,0.000027450837,0.0020667543,0.0016311905,0.0003202182,0.0018982101,0.089931935,0.0000065547506],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003093966,0.00018497364,0.013697443,0.00008596754,0.000012752035,0.000014030515,0.97420233,0.00007713697,0.0006676668,0.008587951,0.00007681635,0.0023619593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023641741,0.00018312156,0.00249464,0.00009218017,0.0000019475983,0.0000013181641,0.9491935,0.00013599951,0.000071279,0.002826454,0.044655625,0.00010753282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10079182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030498598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3263251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006470844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017721811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9871923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362697889","doi":"10.1177/17470161231164530","title":"Cannabis, research ethics, and a duty of care","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley; Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Cannabis; Harm; Research ethics; Duty; Duty of care; Psychology; Effects of cannabis; Political science; Criminology; Engineering ethics; Law; Psychiatry; Engineering","score_opus":0.3646539138534396,"score_gpt":0.5654747881828157,"score_spread":0.20082087432937612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362697889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4910736,0.0070121484,0.0000072919947,0.48616973,0.00017216713,0.0019842777,0.00012803407,0.00017303499,0.013279722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9451046,0.0108075,0.00010824696,0.00028941277,0.0003904568,0.000252661,0.000082148756,0.00009549453,0.04286946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855339,0.004112604,0.00047803338,0.00078027166,0.007322481,0.0017727215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855492,0.002311513,0.00004458612,0.0010802996,0.0101625975,0.00085176417],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04638829,0.00019623539,0.0005023967,0.0018352008,0.0012405108,0.00011809983,0.00047326862,0.0011032139,0.00019139772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04028049,0.00017024238,0.00014079537,0.004386711,0.0035808908,0.00009542882,0.0011468708,0.019174831,0.00019247187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014841054,0.00031758353,0.009156899,0.01635842,0.00018880534,0.0009379527,0.13872147,0.000011024983,0.036293034,0.033916235,0.74495786,0.017656595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024731301,0.0035343526,0.055917572,0.0015304644,0.000029649747,0.00009105297,0.0976926,0.00040858772,0.023480248,0.0061593535,0.80828047,0.0004024991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054448424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001741853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48588032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040390564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007909468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362697961","doi":"10.1177/17470161231166600","title":"Research Responsibility Agreement: a tool to support ethical research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Engineering ethics; Harm; Sociology; Research ethics; Economic Justice; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.9320193979545133,"score_gpt":0.7806733284161768,"score_spread":0.15134606953833651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362697961","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3630412,0.00012098579,0.00006633041,0.55888087,0.0003762755,0.0055725067,0.000089667636,0.0004943409,0.07135784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86515135,0.004481278,0.0024201209,0.004413679,0.0016572758,0.001494532,0.00012022044,0.0002514399,0.12001013],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7744881,0.07837733,0.004290226,0.007344097,0.11941055,0.016089702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27232024,0.6373981,0.00011233714,0.010225471,0.0739834,0.005960442],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7117449,0.00045435785,0.0010554321,0.0074075665,0.0039793923,0.0007261585,0.0034422153,0.007852641,0.0032646155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8040493,0.00041358717,0.00042000163,0.026988458,0.009692236,0.00022039065,0.0095702745,0.17707513,0.05636657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010048192,0.0016103408,0.0048895953,0.005263449,0.0002479843,0.005069581,0.021675736,0.000022409704,0.026958048,0.43426594,0.47632772,0.013621025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029840148,0.013643291,0.03254439,0.002718965,0.00002059039,0.00007292274,0.013590242,0.00047040824,0.008950941,0.5377521,0.38649315,0.00075899524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001474271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035007703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55902076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027146738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03918618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366688244","doi":"10.1177/17470161231169205","title":"Systemic disruptions: decolonizing indigenous research ethics using indigenous knowledges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Harm; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Traditional knowledge; Political science; Public relations; Law; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.5412341569337655,"score_gpt":0.5964559282507289,"score_spread":0.055221771316963375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366688244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9651116,0.0038553018,0.00009247675,0.004226997,0.001764343,0.003443918,0.00003273847,0.0004898782,0.02098274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86638945,0.11199961,0.00041863244,0.000059040645,0.0029685856,0.00009625886,0.000059859725,0.00012367706,0.01788491],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662698,0.02136964,0.0007711492,0.0009078002,0.0063621,0.0043195058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96689075,0.023511138,0.00016706299,0.0009164416,0.0076242196,0.00089039945],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12947936,0.00026249696,0.00041079122,0.002436363,0.078798935,0.000792611,0.0015921843,0.0022689484,0.00009079737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005184364,0.00024894206,0.00013206163,0.008002924,0.0031806729,0.00048451382,0.000063773114,0.01339495,0.0024417131],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017006863,0.00017551113,0.0013406794,0.0007439519,0.00003397446,0.00006146111,0.9190372,0.00006053132,0.000067678055,0.07781708,0.00014984679,0.00049503986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032909814,0.00031340998,0.00095985807,0.0012296404,0.000021379255,0.000039941096,0.49926242,0.00018537237,0.00022796601,0.030786386,0.46602264,0.00062190666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28753293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7772386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4897057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042141783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19155304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378083064","doi":"10.1177/17470161231174734","title":"Deception and informed consent in studies with incognito simulated standardized patients: empirical experiences and a case study from South Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Deception; Waiver; Popularity; Context (archaeology); Health care; Research ethics; Empirical research; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Law; Psychiatry; Geography","score_opus":0.8727288311649408,"score_gpt":0.6396184292881465,"score_spread":0.23311040187679433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378083064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99022007,0.0009024262,0.000040525436,0.0071520554,0.00007385336,0.0013555937,0.00015504878,0.000042481162,0.000057953577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852496,0.000584511,0.0001666925,0.0003752854,0.000038484683,0.000236979,0.000016715034,0.000017192642,0.00003916802],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954121,0.001550634,0.0016494521,0.0005545321,0.00037020067,0.0004630599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98011845,0.0186507,0.00037835177,0.00025538678,0.0003937083,0.00020341271],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02723621,0.00014990474,0.0006771371,0.00069920474,0.00045405162,0.00015454655,0.00010161467,0.00018066248,0.000025242109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043596,0.0001450166,0.000019961702,0.00075599056,0.000506813,0.00031753976,0.00021411049,0.0007248261,0.000079615755],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010485303,0.00008624916,0.4216274,0.00016042702,0.00006456101,0.00005482421,0.57719195,0.00003920415,1.1494949e-7,0.000063493906,0.0005352023,0.00007172174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037454064,0.0007057643,0.053442996,0.0001978735,0.000005209392,0.0000047075764,0.93528616,0.0031659687,8.408093e-7,0.0022735482,0.0009427043,0.00022880679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025389756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068192086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3681844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041723863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006427959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9644602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380609532","doi":"10.1177/17470161231180829","title":"Who owns your consent? How REBs give away participants’ agency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Autonomy; Informed consent; Context (archaeology); Permission; Public relations; Qualitative research; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.9205153017155312,"score_gpt":0.719668062793361,"score_spread":0.20084723892217016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380609532","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07239871,0.0011626852,0.0017966992,0.8399414,0.0012240235,0.001634374,0.00013903761,0.00069496955,0.08100814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5737371,0.12586528,0.0040149423,0.0006013093,0.0019183524,0.00043907514,0.000031744057,0.0001524973,0.2932397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95423055,0.034893624,0.00039459593,0.00068922,0.0063363086,0.0034556766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92981464,0.06511418,0.00009523011,0.00059928774,0.0031328152,0.001243863],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16306685,0.00018670833,0.00033412856,0.0004924593,0.006009057,0.00092243124,0.0010068138,0.0008022653,0.00018377058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22162054,0.00017115661,0.00016701655,0.003487574,0.0075499993,0.00036595477,0.00051775714,0.0059769563,0.0013636294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007205247,0.000065790715,0.0005405033,0.00022779283,0.00008405841,0.00018622499,0.30439118,0.0000043379296,0.002837265,0.6052421,0.074735776,0.01161295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028475234,0.00020311009,0.0011614846,0.00019000878,0.000005904114,3.655693e-7,0.16002294,0.0002813692,0.0010422288,0.24734136,0.58917683,0.00028963565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034791834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0085488465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83934003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039915642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007188479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385278104","doi":"10.1177/17470161231189843","title":"Protected from harm, harmed by protection: ethical consequences of the exclusion of pregnant participants from clinical trials","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Pregnancy and Medication Impact","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Inclusion and exclusion criteria; Autonomy; Medicine; Pregnancy; Clinical trial; Beneficence; Economic Justice; Inclusion (mineral); Clinical research; Alternative medicine; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.7981434410998176,"score_gpt":0.6341796684872538,"score_spread":0.16396377261256379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385278104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8159758,0.0016002301,0.00062529545,0.17586401,0.0005591593,0.0045999875,0.00051438244,0.00011686871,0.0001443118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953082,0.0031816987,0.00017996633,0.00038715426,0.0002164592,0.0003335671,0.000063595435,0.000018901816,0.00031044777],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823156,0.0126145845,0.001474999,0.00042469258,0.0026653733,0.00050472165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762687,0.020652367,0.0005709948,0.0009223632,0.0011490867,0.00043650137],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.040414214,0.00013230956,0.0007659284,0.00013169006,0.00024022024,0.000015950121,0.00040782543,0.0011798015,0.00035930463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23095475,0.00007759955,0.00024013678,0.001080577,0.0024981278,0.00005292688,0.0002806272,0.006015232,0.00004958805],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021113749,0.00054917485,0.0041493396,0.00058869034,0.00040186333,0.000023197164,0.009521094,0.000002380081,0.9501188,0.00024345817,0.014509408,0.01778126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053315205,0.0011298452,0.06899923,0.012682619,0.00021597029,0.0000041594035,0.0017953836,0.0012373562,0.88914907,0.011131611,0.008139794,0.00018345535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018856341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043533702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19054054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060419145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003456054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389832860","doi":"10.1177/17470161231218173","title":"Needs and preferences of REB members in the development of a new TCPS 2 training program in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Robarts Clinical Trials; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographics; Training (meteorology); Medical education; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.8997131653263873,"score_gpt":0.6755732538506436,"score_spread":0.22413991147574375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389832860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9700483,0.00013367507,0.000002734356,0.023422174,0.00002213464,0.0007351824,0.0000023162336,0.000008700824,0.005624764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99652666,0.0011910071,0.0015917468,0.00007417167,0.000020533882,0.00006122422,0.000005363164,0.000010329507,0.00051895075],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99321634,0.000958787,0.00068305444,0.00023916883,0.004302002,0.00060065545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486115,0.050045427,0.0000640535,0.00037252673,0.00068966317,0.00021680661],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043679737,0.00007597866,0.00028582543,0.0005057014,0.00006441396,0.000014990694,0.00039789264,0.00034076654,0.000032877855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0714656,0.000052830794,0.000021258084,0.0025316367,0.0005620615,0.000028182183,0.000209329,0.007093361,0.0000014784575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040822304,0.0002387186,0.1256654,0.0047861356,0.00007771553,0.0001284874,0.53534126,0.000029411212,0.000899105,0.008943142,0.0009237394,0.32255867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002453344,0.0011639311,0.45299295,0.0057441364,0.000010474361,0.0000063244156,0.46990204,0.0013434577,0.002913672,0.056754485,0.0064999503,0.00021524922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65952164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32958204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023392311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049214877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390583869","doi":"10.1177/17470161231223594","title":"COVID-19 human challenge trials and randomized controlled trials: lessons for the next pandemic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Clinical trial; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Randomized controlled trial; Medicine; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Virology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Engineering","score_opus":0.986597454763469,"score_gpt":0.8006001352746288,"score_spread":0.18599731948884024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390583869","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021755314,0.09163388,0.004226054,0.8682238,0.0015858904,0.030091675,0.00020922816,0.00032109593,0.0015328522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7054367,0.23163423,0.00027823265,0.020279886,0.0054995953,0.028791532,0.00006346512,0.00016158765,0.0078547895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.57887626,0.410397,0.005298862,0.0010130986,0.0026297376,0.0017850413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.055257622,0.9399888,0.0010734443,0.00090494327,0.0017106417,0.0010645719],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.809593,0.00032997943,0.005206703,0.000531222,0.006133208,0.00041522048,0.00064515526,0.0015819694,0.0010429154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9033729,0.00017028501,0.00097425986,0.00045972262,0.0013520296,0.00034619824,0.00040259623,0.012843607,0.00016674091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.1393403,0.000111140755,0.000031591557,0.010715666,0.0018972375,0.000021788042,0.08525639,0.0000029680516,0.00038321628,0.7213518,0.03049022,0.01039765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.2736788,0.00023273326,0.000013449196,0.0011794537,0.00071560254,0.000003182888,0.035080943,0.0017659919,0.000004178638,0.15221454,0.53485066,0.000260422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044888863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043273345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8479439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007385597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018167226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402950882","doi":"10.1177/17470161241269154","title":"Community-led approaches to research governance: a scoping review of strategies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Global Health and Surgery","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Sociology; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental science","score_opus":0.9157198261708849,"score_gpt":0.6876227615237697,"score_spread":0.2280970646471152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402950882","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000013113763,0.9569799,0.000004494831,0.010940415,0.00018389376,0.006410263,0.0001199459,0.000052948,0.02530687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000014432448,0.9964861,0.0002320781,0.00041431165,0.0003243009,0.0008826115,0.0001796261,0.00010322621,0.0013632617],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.97447294,0.015972408,0.0016449607,0.00065813155,0.005437756,0.0018138088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795821,0.014802669,0.000205428,0.002105766,0.0022975176,0.001006569],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.104478255,0.00042487233,0.0034899507,0.00089440093,0.0005882805,0.00013696545,0.0009888046,0.0012055053,0.00012874232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033794865,0.00030842266,0.00064204424,0.0053239004,0.000911044,0.00009107978,0.0012996177,0.030755512,0.0007693052],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026772768,0.00010880249,2.7830941e-7,0.78548694,0.000082998864,0.0000873196,0.0005374947,3.7337983e-8,1.0496015e-7,0.016063007,0.02064703,0.1769592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047399008,0.00024402574,5.072303e-7,0.5389018,0.000114609604,0.00003640606,0.00047417937,7.864814e-7,3.7819356e-7,0.000579061,0.45949367,0.000107183696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011030016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028933122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43884662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090781227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037411507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403187240","doi":"10.1177/17470161241288649","title":"“Dear John”: Overriding institutional axiology by privileging Indigenous relational ethics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiology; Indigenous; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.6981611830080889,"score_gpt":0.6661478696372294,"score_spread":0.03201331337085955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403187240","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029467182,0.023523659,0.17046247,0.60103387,0.003216432,0.0021288004,0.00040307493,0.0008978356,0.16886666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242051,0.032784145,0.02191173,0.002057476,0.0035798268,0.00023413819,0.00020808507,0.0001279614,0.014891504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9671845,0.024802865,0.00045201994,0.0007302932,0.0052240156,0.0016063498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93013304,0.067174695,0.000053933258,0.00029502847,0.0018230956,0.00052022195],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15331931,0.00018880713,0.00025314084,0.0006148163,0.0065330323,0.0006310953,0.00069680717,0.001705544,0.00048189933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0957425,0.00018278116,0.0001414738,0.001941517,0.007336645,0.000675362,0.00035524336,0.019853653,0.0004790851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016458907,0.00003825269,0.00014394046,0.0002242912,0.000056566903,0.00004323263,0.19447888,0.00003845248,0.000709293,0.79584163,0.005069819,0.0033392014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010126219,0.00008905148,0.00012304973,0.00031671935,0.0000054094085,0.0000054506922,0.01055622,0.0005849489,0.00009347198,0.2184909,0.7694328,0.00020073981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047112694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014534076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89473796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012478927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019501528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410543065","doi":"10.1177/17470161251335709","title":"Picturing informed consent: Exploring participatory visual methods to enhance meaningful consent conversations with young people","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Toronto Metropolitan University; McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Informed consent; Citizen journalism; Visual research; Psychology; Visual methods; Participatory action research; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science; Visual arts; Alternative medicine; World Wide Web; Cognitive science; Art; Anthropology","score_opus":0.8577231489267905,"score_gpt":0.7451852201053167,"score_spread":0.11253792882147373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410543065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77496964,0.00023873376,0.15321858,0.025436904,0.00079734693,0.0023840286,0.000010543093,0.00037999038,0.042564243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687138,0.00056740874,0.024248526,0.00043725444,0.00016061762,0.0012906597,0.0000025891657,0.000034821653,0.00454429],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780509,0.015307602,0.0005879585,0.0007010289,0.0031986944,0.0021538225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94032866,0.05579127,0.000099363366,0.0006099878,0.0020589987,0.0011117357],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.048240628,0.00024374298,0.00042930272,0.00085905864,0.002850743,0.0006024123,0.00077226816,0.00030845084,0.00017872946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15698247,0.00023740818,0.00008986477,0.0032134259,0.0017820763,0.00080179615,0.0005825554,0.002791796,0.0001372775],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065238564,0.00036417006,0.052333593,0.0009750306,0.00034665753,0.000051950694,0.7247018,0.00036913465,0.01148014,0.19758931,0.0020129448,0.009122834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017165956,0.0011877335,0.038171545,0.003201183,0.00013896724,0.0000046021228,0.4619136,0.0021038079,0.25038722,0.010367344,0.22920065,0.0016067617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007252902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09761087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26278824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016486576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019066133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410717485","doi":"10.1177/17470161251339785","title":"Amplifying voices, dismantling silences: Ethical praxis in multimodal child-centered research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Mitacs; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Praxis; Multimodality; Multimodal therapy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Psychotherapist; Art; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.41144391333502495,"score_gpt":0.5912267293246217,"score_spread":0.17978281598959678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410717485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6793303,0.0008293134,0.0007378765,0.2470007,0.0005769358,0.0018873251,0.000021721495,0.00014599919,0.06946985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99657637,0.0013879846,0.00026318184,0.00032802034,0.00035934898,0.000094380055,0.000015003189,0.000014134406,0.00096159754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98510337,0.008862078,0.0004675907,0.0006437127,0.0034294093,0.0014938315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98687565,0.01123532,0.000047836777,0.00040932532,0.0011681836,0.00026367055],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04796419,0.00013129158,0.0002306061,0.00085671945,0.003686428,0.00054049626,0.00084315724,0.001087052,0.00014481184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022325264,0.0001147494,0.00007316515,0.0029077323,0.0021284749,0.00026826884,0.00036720413,0.011603448,0.00010248989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019423115,0.00045098417,0.045402154,0.0002853767,0.00003720043,0.00003746754,0.23470308,0.0001736009,0.00018070202,0.70721614,0.0012996248,0.01001945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035041615,0.00042343198,0.12685767,0.006362729,0.000023433999,0.0000022246436,0.10797509,0.013123653,0.0010688092,0.3096603,0.429924,0.0010745076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042288836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10830167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4286244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052100734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021844504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414258633","doi":"10.1177/17470161251346253","title":"Rethinking ethical reflexivity and oversight in health research through an ecosystem approach: A workshop report","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fogarty International Center; Medical Research Council; South African Medical Research Council; National Institutes of Health; UK Research and Innovation; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Research ethics; Reflexivity; Scrutiny; Accountability; Agency (philosophy); Bioethics; Context (archaeology); General partnership; Scope (computer science)","score_opus":0.9220719719747945,"score_gpt":0.745732954893545,"score_spread":0.17633901708124955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414258633","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104730606,0.0028339012,0.0024588625,0.78779423,0.0003101832,0.004006908,0.000017416916,0.0002332391,0.097614676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499659,0.016842086,0.016847154,0.0066790218,0.00040880006,0.0002375224,0.000056415774,0.00008960484,0.008873472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9248321,0.041544195,0.0032404952,0.004027985,0.021349914,0.0050052763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.585858,0.38712692,0.0004394329,0.0073180813,0.015456394,0.0038011756],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.44307482,0.00031765376,0.0010776673,0.0016047439,0.0016914223,0.0003816849,0.0010652792,0.006290606,0.000051510102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.52535135,0.00028678725,0.0001478643,0.0052831005,0.003672272,0.00038998705,0.0023233911,0.120296136,0.000030541923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016986538,0.0012170777,0.006856781,0.01463839,0.000118033444,0.0021097695,0.03831768,0.00002079289,0.00038433666,0.9275403,0.005363517,0.0017346551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026479647,0.0015444128,0.003984433,0.0133032845,0.000013576686,0.00030501198,0.0146343205,0.003151001,0.0003273283,0.9103834,0.049322803,0.0003824632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030904203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015579651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84523535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023991754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031886384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414932649","doi":"10.1177/17470161251380888","title":"Reframing payment practices for co-research for children and young people","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Public Health Ontario; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Arts and Humanities Research Council; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Payment; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Equity (law); Commodification; Incentive; Typology; Financial compensation","score_opus":0.5447250875786909,"score_gpt":0.664233150346106,"score_spread":0.1195080627674151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414932649","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06590913,0.0013224628,0.0010923692,0.9104798,0.0002690642,0.0033976326,0.00006448167,0.00006573134,0.017399317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98458374,0.005605168,0.0010257995,0.000415582,0.00040898344,0.000576092,0.000031697986,0.000013095004,0.0073398617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547756,0.0018327038,0.00021274727,0.00033688988,0.001371264,0.00076885935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827026,0.013952908,0.0000704101,0.00018620801,0.0029486287,0.00013926109],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.051511552,0.00006281242,0.00012485175,0.00034051455,0.0033805373,0.00032662932,0.00030928227,0.00036294194,0.000019433372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042652752,0.000060649218,0.000027931203,0.00083476846,0.0005535076,0.00017871536,0.00010139633,0.0016561963,0.00000616356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007111969,0.00007528028,0.005249556,0.0004049435,0.000031410105,2.803404e-7,0.05756393,1.05110644e-7,0.00009020102,0.878852,0.0227801,0.03488104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004721823,0.00020823618,0.00848899,0.00013341435,0.0000039155984,3.601166e-7,0.09668056,0.00007916651,0.00022710962,0.03791942,0.85568106,0.000105567786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061504287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052448075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9186746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024467605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002761559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99791694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415762304","doi":"10.1177/17470161251392249","title":"Barriers to Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Canadian Research Ethics Board membership: Challenges and opportunities for reform","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Tokenism; Excellence; Mandate; Champion","score_opus":0.9187151411400475,"score_gpt":0.683498438943917,"score_spread":0.23521670219613044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415762304","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100054726,0.004757662,0.00001086334,0.8167264,0.000119801065,0.0019979593,0.000047590656,0.000033339245,0.07625169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8892077,0.098061666,0.00039565808,0.0063473703,0.00010254006,0.0001313319,0.000009176424,0.000033105865,0.0057114204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841165,0.0039592567,0.0005837957,0.0011320651,0.007752881,0.0024554974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8503461,0.1331059,0.000048762922,0.0013607338,0.00959699,0.0055415216],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24896346,0.00020958332,0.00050264574,0.0027088355,0.009281942,0.00013428886,0.0010514614,0.0028947608,0.00004673533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3621902,0.00019898947,0.00006644752,0.0009670131,0.0033038133,0.00017252131,0.060806874,0.02766427,0.000004940743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012589836,0.00007670301,0.0038053524,0.008469273,0.00008401841,0.0002982051,0.14111607,9.775246e-7,0.00014586152,0.81984675,0.0012973187,0.023600493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001816127,0.001616724,0.0061257104,0.004067589,0.00002195572,0.000006412656,0.08213738,0.00026756892,0.00037848754,0.83736175,0.06590929,0.0002909807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3027474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9172333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.810379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031320334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028393902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416409781","doi":"10.1177/17470161251396228","title":"Conducting creative research: Research ethics and research conduct in art and design","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Artistic and Creative Research","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Emily Carr University of Art and Design; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Research ethics; Indigenous; Information ethics; Bridge (graph theory); Ethics of technology; Adaptation (eye); Creativity","score_opus":0.9317462045734879,"score_gpt":0.6339675005177997,"score_spread":0.2977787040556882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416409781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080655605,0.008980612,0.0004357383,0.10838337,0.00017116647,0.0050683967,0.00009026207,0.00013509946,0.79607975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8723183,0.00797606,0.0006043968,0.00018066005,0.00048173213,0.00064167316,0.00002010235,0.0000837081,0.117693365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.908097,0.07551707,0.0009484547,0.001939253,0.009224016,0.004274156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7954195,0.18399718,0.00007278313,0.0012358486,0.018454388,0.0008202692],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28372282,0.00037556226,0.0006899419,0.0052004093,0.011343243,0.0021919757,0.0011520941,0.001031166,0.0012709367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13457339,0.0003331011,0.00006571922,0.0030031565,0.030627495,0.0007265707,0.0028829386,0.047360763,0.00045396888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043325583,0.00023173392,0.00050063245,0.00070761854,0.00007892225,0.00015678079,0.1555602,0.0000029215787,0.0011711965,0.7986369,0.038626637,0.0038931645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011467565,0.0011357281,0.00050895364,0.0016932732,0.000007843484,0.00001058209,0.48295283,0.0007707096,0.0024337578,0.25399446,0.25497591,0.00036917216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009675097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070188707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7916627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008816081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061373534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115170368","doi":"10.1177/17470161251406930","title":"Whose Data, Whose Ethics? Rethinking Ethical Accountability in Research Using Publicly Available Indigenous Data","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Accountability; Research ethics; Interpretation (philosophy); Obligation; Human rights; Operationalization","score_opus":0.761292527785612,"score_gpt":0.638879658298733,"score_spread":0.1224128694868789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115170368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61176234,0.0057871076,0.0003680343,0.1674062,0.0030977307,0.007281831,0.0005113319,0.0003740219,0.20341139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8474318,0.10043031,0.008515014,0.0030518975,0.0040926253,0.000068065194,0.001656024,0.00019262756,0.034561668],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9221212,0.05566894,0.0016159405,0.0033725472,0.011881461,0.005339887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9042531,0.07034009,0.0003018512,0.011183877,0.012725394,0.0011956352],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.431676,0.00028548393,0.00053615397,0.0018279394,0.03467998,0.0018399709,0.00867062,0.004959665,0.00042198997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03299062,0.0002728229,0.000053600073,0.007306887,0.0059094275,0.0022310782,0.00082043215,0.048085507,0.00035376425],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009278599,0.000494041,0.004481892,0.00070084154,0.000029448227,0.000024506284,0.79780835,0.000005288435,0.000015746322,0.19259717,0.0032530606,0.00049685297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034219513,0.00006321662,0.000605901,0.00075867376,0.000011304868,0.000002314036,0.07055399,0.00088212267,0.000053300446,0.08171886,0.84467256,0.00033556533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8808125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9836894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8414195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003658138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34458318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}