{"meta":{"query_hash":"724760f9b037","filters":{"venue":"Research Ethics"},"cohort_total":47,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":47,"exported":47,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/724760f9b037","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Research+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1976141823","doi":"10.1177/1747016112445435","title":"Social science and ethics review: A question of practice not principle","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Meta-ethics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Research ethics; Applied ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Information ethics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.6629785079412129,"score_gpt":0.7460695818609354,"score_spread":0.08309107391972248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976141823","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042670875,0.009738334,0.0076917903,0.97304916,0.0030337553,0.000055684926,0.0000090232725,0.000029246643,0.005966278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13975349,0.01624393,0.03338324,0.7633983,0.04058913,0.0014672034,0.0000495255,0.00025695493,0.0048582605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.3758676,0.4972795,0.02341869,0.020894676,0.0744526,0.008086975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24647045,0.6711332,0.0140609555,0.022586878,0.035446882,0.010301617],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.48622295,0.0014823483,0.007640297,0.007155478,0.018212143,0.034409516,0.010036817,0.08503362,0.004330439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.51438576,0.0021554695,0.0036613923,0.006752607,0.20120463,0.06341572,0.022295788,0.07981137,0.0024897393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040016104,0.0000423632,0.00015838844,0.0005993795,0.0000632043,0.00012698912,0.0045319283,0.00015165494,0.000072582,0.94291604,0.04049205,0.010805348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016243583,0.000070614675,0.00013829612,0.0015797771,0.000019252175,0.00021283091,0.002000111,0.00037274044,0.000092200404,0.9145753,0.080717206,0.000059179798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058927727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035232576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.513777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018277848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05620735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63357854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010452120","doi":"10.1177/1747016112461731","title":"Good intentions and dangerous assumptions: Research ethics committees and illicit drug use research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Incentive; Public relations; Informed consent; Illicit drug; Population; Psychology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Criminology; Drug; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Psychiatry; Environmental health; Engineering","score_opus":0.9437146307990955,"score_gpt":0.7360995700310963,"score_spread":0.20761506076799918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010452120","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005315438,0.009298024,0.008644786,0.9564342,0.0055869813,0.00007049585,0.000006372813,0.000040753246,0.014602965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3552521,0.009180938,0.013920189,0.6011213,0.01154085,0.0006526269,0.000019911373,0.00020485077,0.008107215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.41839936,0.51721305,0.014568954,0.008532387,0.033073716,0.00821248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34180203,0.59659547,0.01764373,0.010206748,0.02339234,0.010359659],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2610724,0.00087976176,0.001988905,0.0022202788,0.028550576,0.024897743,0.007018027,0.057206087,0.002078714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3698241,0.0014347886,0.0017041261,0.0030504179,0.12303809,0.028071666,0.0141518945,0.04942034,0.0012769994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004184995,0.000028970098,0.00042313946,0.0004683628,0.000024399247,0.000727649,0.15975845,0.00025779236,0.00014565351,0.7688377,0.05948623,0.00979987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007452267,0.00007678525,0.0006605193,0.0033240928,0.00003600826,0.0010498773,0.09330129,0.0008438934,0.0004546966,0.44209498,0.45786342,0.00021992986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007496888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008012646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9427939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0116584655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035899553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9112293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092966289","doi":"10.1177/1747016114531980","title":"The Ottawa statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomized trials: A short report","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Western University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Statement (logic); Informed consent; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Research design; Cluster (spacecraft); Identification (biology); Randomized controlled trial; Cluster randomised controlled trial; Psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Sociology; Social science; Pathology","score_opus":0.9026774175548228,"score_gpt":0.7135437916802408,"score_spread":0.18913362587458193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092966289","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022809051,0.128266,0.3302977,0.24716134,0.07406415,0.09381859,0.034649163,0.0032279529,0.086234175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021468017,0.07547412,0.5774796,0.08418393,0.011796034,0.16568851,0.015019733,0.0019187058,0.046971347],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.56775564,0.27610114,0.0776581,0.0059170714,0.06592007,0.006648023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3814423,0.37455267,0.042780016,0.03875854,0.15045606,0.0120104365],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28452507,0.0027442283,0.0067052925,0.0070150434,0.004651903,0.009732114,0.0074248784,0.014445843,0.01312982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43465844,0.0048119146,0.0061124284,0.008961508,0.010994043,0.004507661,0.005430885,0.023099529,0.013448972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026546859,0.00015577179,0.0012405484,0.013264211,0.0006359633,0.00032599797,0.0015565997,0.0014084806,0.00043235213,0.061791543,0.79429764,0.1222363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018219628,0.00053600024,0.005020653,0.026355747,0.0007828157,0.0006243309,0.00039847373,0.0011469122,0.00093100383,0.031556405,0.9302722,0.00055358146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06600368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09137535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98555416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022526938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14902468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.882308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113859811","doi":"10.1177/1747016113488858","title":"Public deliberation to develop ethical norms and inform policy for biobanks: Lessons learnt and challenges remaining","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Biobank; Political science; Corporate governance; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Public engagement; Public policy; Law; Politics; Engineering; Management; Economics; Bioinformatics; Biology","score_opus":0.9344429354460383,"score_gpt":0.691832575104417,"score_spread":0.2426103603416213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113859811","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007155127,0.016149327,0.07756619,0.8620869,0.0021753502,0.0004280023,0.00009502835,0.00017448128,0.034169637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.569711,0.033716656,0.22653805,0.15045182,0.003615447,0.0038878024,0.00038426067,0.00057108415,0.011123816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7242755,0.23386785,0.007121318,0.008393729,0.014057927,0.01228356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4757151,0.4526183,0.011681302,0.02417981,0.023341637,0.0124639],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.36104196,0.0016650598,0.0025100817,0.0049747583,0.014624909,0.04847561,0.010449547,0.02481957,0.00893057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29855922,0.0015400838,0.0028731618,0.005200539,0.08186033,0.061522562,0.027645878,0.035182185,0.002400205],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044231147,0.00013577794,0.0012055254,0.0007865501,0.000058310994,0.00027963237,0.026773134,0.0021683136,0.0000949995,0.89996594,0.021121824,0.04736576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003388929,0.000023565586,0.00028668513,0.0022598046,0.000013873403,0.00006053831,0.017245306,0.0013617887,0.00020329117,0.91380596,0.064649455,0.00005580419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012986623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012740934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97518045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028297955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10638295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.787949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145177063","doi":"10.1177/1747016113481145","title":"The betrayal of research confidentiality in British sociology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Doctrine; Law; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Betrayal; Discipline; Criminology","score_opus":0.8581578964113781,"score_gpt":0.7378586250440586,"score_spread":0.12029927136731944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145177063","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0769613,0.03384971,0.0063616023,0.75314057,0.003681,0.00005929212,0.000025572583,0.000072035604,0.125849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9215892,0.005031475,0.0014506016,0.05949449,0.0006423649,0.000059845133,0.000006969517,0.000076000826,0.011649083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8783763,0.09794935,0.00246811,0.003395024,0.01252928,0.005281933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8857462,0.08649956,0.0066713537,0.0057708207,0.007805984,0.0075061386],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05269933,0.00026959274,0.0007395448,0.002065141,0.033842273,0.018958773,0.0012366099,0.009389813,0.002750948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06902536,0.0010941213,0.0003316825,0.0027539807,0.089227766,0.0077563985,0.009983594,0.014290018,0.0005773688],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000343981,0.000018749768,0.0017114215,0.00022203675,0.000018678058,0.00056341,0.42779732,0.00010040704,0.0003977122,0.5220976,0.031942368,0.015096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036773177,0.00006072715,0.004437723,0.0013917151,0.000018240833,0.0010263034,0.14938843,0.00036926364,0.00037816234,0.1525258,0.69025844,0.0001084487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15582499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1545585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9906102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03136549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027739583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30983597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149400202","doi":"10.1177/1747016114523421","title":"The ethics of metaphor as a research tool","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Dignity; Interpretation (philosophy); Research ethics; Qualitative research; Engineering ethics; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychology; Informed consent; Vulnerability (computing); Participant observation; Conceptual metaphor; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Social science; Medicine; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.9859485521153608,"score_gpt":0.8450221242589507,"score_spread":0.14092642785641007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149400202","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032103706,0.03449409,0.38406175,0.4022203,0.008647093,0.0017398531,0.00020361865,0.00037959125,0.13614997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6954708,0.011297947,0.22933435,0.037654966,0.0028350954,0.008774824,0.0000961846,0.00050022814,0.014035704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.42800197,0.5417878,0.006501018,0.006059026,0.015316357,0.0023338539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.58647525,0.35281482,0.008599237,0.031717174,0.015044554,0.005348882],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25928214,0.0016046873,0.0029771875,0.0045848866,0.014521516,0.025377868,0.0045073293,0.013916689,0.003314246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22028796,0.0017511843,0.0013052897,0.00455401,0.17127532,0.027996162,0.020284576,0.01847268,0.001650094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059443002,0.000035612622,0.00023347992,0.0005440566,0.000016594593,0.00023828888,0.09180578,0.00022127242,0.00032098196,0.8899419,0.005921874,0.010660659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077885285,0.00011721205,0.00021944546,0.003364758,0.00002356992,0.001077399,0.042049553,0.0015043007,0.00078357704,0.7127193,0.23796576,0.00009718879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019430565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010506766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7407179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009477858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018866722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.913437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151718518","doi":"10.1177/1747016114523772","title":"PAeDS-MoRe: A framework for the development and review of research assent protocols involving children and adolescents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital","funders":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital Foundation","keywords":"Operationalization; Relevance (law); Informed consent; Citation; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.37726604351071896,"score_gpt":0.6055227104397988,"score_spread":0.2282566669290798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151718518","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032812757,0.10079468,0.48074538,0.05753871,0.005530338,0.3171847,0.009758112,0.0021688074,0.022998005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004842368,0.018654697,0.8356273,0.0026807336,0.0002760755,0.13455187,0.0023387985,0.00011784411,0.00091029576],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.3084762,0.44077262,0.20651898,0.011567597,0.029048892,0.0036157225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3126044,0.4859455,0.052332442,0.03414127,0.10519593,0.009780468],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.574248,0.007134161,0.012962556,0.100410156,0.010122826,0.024982167,0.016630257,0.012099519,0.009526084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5477629,0.009090481,0.017688422,0.05390368,0.016281508,0.031589236,0.03208479,0.01304896,0.005985744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000508991,0.00034009127,0.0024237533,0.32106635,0.0022917588,0.0011298556,0.036775723,0.0038210826,0.0009910859,0.13034698,0.05203388,0.4482705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082618877,0.00035409615,0.0016115977,0.42164662,0.0027671747,0.001001727,0.013555405,0.0021821454,0.0010092317,0.10399374,0.45055887,0.0004931542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010633482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027728826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42575198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038543966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19876151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52502805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155777518","doi":"10.1177/1747016114552685","title":"Exploring ethical frontiers of visual methods","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Visual research; Engineering ethics; Confidentiality; Visual methods; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Visual arts; Law","score_opus":0.5932582166892093,"score_gpt":0.628617095756932,"score_spread":0.035358879067722726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155777518","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014857648,0.013909497,0.43400857,0.36302295,0.003921468,0.0016511206,0.0001927096,0.00022863477,0.16820742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5618964,0.00908424,0.35283992,0.05044459,0.0025794692,0.006713487,0.00018704939,0.0005466293,0.015708199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.38564467,0.5571236,0.010369445,0.008714409,0.033474464,0.004673457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.29785135,0.6091217,0.011071515,0.039567973,0.035693,0.0066944584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.44675347,0.0011565534,0.0013524676,0.0053712586,0.014446236,0.032471728,0.0044621904,0.011053271,0.0072135464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46512192,0.0015897184,0.0014433861,0.0038801502,0.09817571,0.02683371,0.023754237,0.018011924,0.0014859255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028202587,0.000026572625,0.0003317281,0.00033131868,0.000011507357,0.000113619804,0.03815763,0.00025997715,0.00015351763,0.93000025,0.0064337905,0.024151832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036823127,0.000034798595,0.00022345468,0.0022716578,0.000012851008,0.00021751989,0.015955111,0.0010976003,0.0004145669,0.8563171,0.12337784,0.00004062103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046567074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042583076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98894674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0155165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04675923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68225145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170104746","doi":"10.1177/174701611000600305","title":"Ethical Issues in Socio-Historical Archival Research: A Short Skit","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; York University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Narrative; Qualitative research; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Comparative historical research; Historical method; Ethical issues; Research method; Sociological research; Epistemology; Social science; History; Engineering; Literature","score_opus":0.8053528758101043,"score_gpt":0.7315629167550886,"score_spread":0.07378995905501573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170104746","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024081605,0.106066406,0.25893053,0.5036585,0.037014466,0.010180643,0.0005977402,0.00060622947,0.058863897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2120875,0.1408355,0.41183785,0.09163941,0.033574488,0.023291549,0.0010063397,0.0012201779,0.08450716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92206913,0.06184459,0.0050481837,0.0010017306,0.008949255,0.0010871339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76684517,0.19991052,0.0060267956,0.008942135,0.015499496,0.0027759306],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08737508,0.0020283628,0.0015748559,0.004460327,0.015336735,0.012149991,0.0022817217,0.010490541,0.003382616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078223854,0.001492914,0.0010274173,0.004424373,0.024213653,0.01649638,0.013668911,0.013644367,0.002065254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001309714,0.0003931614,0.0012785908,0.0038388097,0.000045597713,0.0028514136,0.2752711,0.001052297,0.0045202244,0.29849124,0.16933006,0.24279654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023927469,0.0003044329,0.0013872274,0.007240273,0.000016465807,0.002072048,0.10707479,0.0014660365,0.0014371474,0.093225,0.7856418,0.00011087589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045371545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008876249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98950946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008611802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011910908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46208912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312872714","doi":"10.1177/174701610800400212","title":"Written Consent: Sometimes More Trouble than it is Worth?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Research ethics; Psychology; Internet privacy; Law; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.8700218989740885,"score_gpt":0.6795600486951501,"score_spread":0.19046185027893847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312872714","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00095638016,0.029973239,0.02129494,0.923046,0.01564395,0.00015936366,0.00007551094,0.00020382764,0.0086468235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.086494334,0.052875172,0.056680754,0.75495684,0.032447416,0.0013260578,0.00037538327,0.0009345852,0.013909418],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.4992252,0.41348973,0.029823218,0.008142863,0.046087258,0.0032317133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.31214187,0.56072384,0.023486918,0.052239366,0.043282293,0.008125715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30288917,0.0016035441,0.004116238,0.003040534,0.0059722117,0.015056199,0.005734277,0.022494812,0.009883719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5783376,0.0014886885,0.0016362009,0.0042904746,0.07392148,0.03924126,0.011070345,0.03744855,0.007189182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004409918,0.00008239601,0.0014237787,0.0047684745,0.0002981013,0.0016052913,0.028207803,0.00027627056,0.0009760686,0.22999403,0.47798762,0.25393924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018598943,0.00015477157,0.0010115288,0.026269697,0.000111414,0.0044049467,0.014685155,0.000370113,0.0006553381,0.37646663,0.5754014,0.00028285073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035562483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028436047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9775052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065006563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018362872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85966176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2396231016","doi":"10.1177/1747016116650235","title":"Are research ethics guidelines culturally competent?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Mainstream; Interpreter; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Informed consent; Power (physics); Public relations; Subject (documents); Ethical code; Psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law","score_opus":0.909567698881051,"score_gpt":0.7704003056718381,"score_spread":0.1391673932092129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2396231016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070857937,0.017390281,0.03247912,0.8907322,0.008511299,0.0008590863,0.00012990739,0.00013126232,0.042681023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30259323,0.02250275,0.096982494,0.5553195,0.009459119,0.0056890496,0.00038464804,0.0004658838,0.0066034077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.29367194,0.58791476,0.04853865,0.010413173,0.04983317,0.0096283285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.18391551,0.610157,0.032976516,0.05674581,0.095457904,0.020747263],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.44343203,0.0008998703,0.0030344476,0.003373201,0.00814715,0.020843333,0.006451256,0.023654845,0.0036586467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6902628,0.0023642967,0.0017895843,0.0049796463,0.06371451,0.028542737,0.012391292,0.033522747,0.0023165122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011342657,0.0002932863,0.0037913567,0.0029227291,0.00019115367,0.0005484972,0.084259726,0.00053850416,0.0006696589,0.736258,0.085300654,0.08511306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020588179,0.00015111236,0.0028851472,0.014751405,0.00010655226,0.0006789465,0.038784355,0.00048202267,0.00048716628,0.6051097,0.3361657,0.00019206753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008908841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008772899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9763452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01112389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08250688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6863474},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2399705302","doi":"10.1177/1747016116649992","title":"Evaluating the efficacy of the education and training program of the TCPS 2","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Modalities; Medical education; Political science; Research ethics; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.9261742110490973,"score_gpt":0.7771917464788358,"score_spread":0.14898246457026143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399705302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94343543,0.00043461513,0.004609806,0.0020345782,0.00043985818,0.037660632,0.0003898301,0.00025543736,0.010739731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85872203,0.0010518967,0.038608313,0.0012666946,0.00026424348,0.094801,0.0005516917,0.00005630986,0.004677902],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9667631,0.021270636,0.002112106,0.0020571572,0.0055203023,0.0022766711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8780448,0.08058546,0.010219833,0.008427517,0.010908445,0.011813957],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052188326,0.0011154748,0.0012971418,0.0020557048,0.0023810645,0.0018302301,0.0034809457,0.0029537305,0.006527399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14714809,0.0012651344,0.0011397337,0.001404237,0.0022906808,0.0023822812,0.0056438325,0.0042423746,0.0012233001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023743303,0.27379128,0.03159326,0.0050726086,0.00041991464,0.00039561297,0.014193113,0.0057094535,0.002279311,0.0024881242,0.007954587,0.6323594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05375511,0.6249626,0.23688576,0.004409963,0.0018062586,0.00041758502,0.014150158,0.012771297,0.010222217,0.0029215228,0.037335146,0.0003623626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005480431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072235726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053396686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019436581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2760015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2416251886","doi":"10.1177/1747016115626496","title":"Opportunities, challenges and ethical issues associated with conducting community-based participatory research in a hospital setting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Casey House; Carleton University; York University; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Community-based participatory research; Confidentiality; Popularity; Context (archaeology); Health care; Space (punctuation); Public relations; Sociology; Research ethics; Nursing; Medicine; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.9876213550820785,"score_gpt":0.7915481589456984,"score_spread":0.19607319613638008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2416251886","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06895853,0.012130074,0.2844019,0.58193827,0.0045848237,0.010455076,0.00014137369,0.0003407158,0.03704927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5660752,0.005913824,0.34248495,0.046559785,0.0021533924,0.033713125,0.0000712474,0.00018793007,0.002840474],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.10235392,0.8603347,0.011250962,0.0058257855,0.016220275,0.0040143575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.17582262,0.7257831,0.021824168,0.036268227,0.025121905,0.0151799135],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.68901247,0.0016932735,0.0027788351,0.004284447,0.026317729,0.02886052,0.009613329,0.01598795,0.00280706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.56003904,0.0026242838,0.0017178555,0.0048621907,0.078612186,0.019935692,0.02233492,0.02297464,0.001224831],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058784016,0.0011317865,0.008830294,0.0046498748,0.00022355442,0.003905643,0.5808355,0.0028785074,0.0021212953,0.2372068,0.013694088,0.14393477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034477797,0.0010474535,0.0029786956,0.012876328,0.00010539581,0.004766381,0.4753227,0.006073885,0.0017348673,0.38763058,0.106785834,0.0003331463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005010439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009713768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31098753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0103347935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062477678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38350302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529103505","doi":"10.1177/1747016116673135","title":"Research ethics by design: A collaborative research design proposal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Toronto East General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Research ethics; Research design; Process (computing); Compliance (psychology); Ethical issues; Information ethics; Knowledge management; Sociology; Computer science; Management science; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.9282068780613373,"score_gpt":0.7457461906723061,"score_spread":0.1824606873890312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529103505","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003939751,0.0017582024,0.59486777,0.23203264,0.018857094,0.1307564,0.00054537057,0.0006674109,0.0165753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019167896,0.0012474408,0.79423827,0.02892389,0.0023475587,0.1496369,0.00025609534,0.00017322559,0.004008728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.3058091,0.5762653,0.039383255,0.01504506,0.056491677,0.00700557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27834395,0.53766435,0.015989043,0.055162117,0.088573545,0.024267016],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.60213095,0.0025317194,0.003840278,0.0069311056,0.011205936,0.022681443,0.009375715,0.039594825,0.010384128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63077176,0.0037065852,0.0055695185,0.005171319,0.029666558,0.019816041,0.022179097,0.027564185,0.007757008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003400029,0.00069822435,0.0004131467,0.0059607727,0.00019710549,0.0012426468,0.04633287,0.0022748003,0.0012803295,0.72959864,0.08972505,0.12193643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013413009,0.0008760418,0.00027630254,0.009742096,0.00017510746,0.0015461656,0.011472684,0.005496969,0.0016900164,0.36953753,0.59747964,0.00036630523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011376992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010893065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010879885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091190934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49064344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549062016","doi":"10.1177/1747016116677635","title":"Graduate students’ experiences with research ethics in conducting health research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University; Interior Health","funders":"Athabasca University","keywords":"Research ethics; Curriculum; Engineering ethics; Graduate students; Qualitative research; Medical education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.9896698563797172,"score_gpt":0.823892782082878,"score_spread":0.1657770742968392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549062016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879226,0.000702669,0.0019914992,0.003475022,0.000119421944,0.000093338305,0.000016281028,0.000044779896,0.0056344047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942268,0.0005584682,0.001463886,0.001169137,0.000047794587,0.00008889457,0.000025165882,0.000019669556,0.0024001983],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97170275,0.019398509,0.0010403895,0.0011591993,0.0033728238,0.0033262887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603646,0.015825089,0.0037326063,0.001571707,0.0046643144,0.013841684],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024949072,0.00058456353,0.0007578401,0.00089322473,0.0061531523,0.007913092,0.001426635,0.003037152,0.0026418061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046816807,0.00078299537,0.00075378583,0.000730202,0.008686052,0.0030674548,0.00986121,0.0063539236,0.0006935856],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013916029,0.0006448295,0.026221512,0.0002748461,0.000029650075,0.0018699564,0.92614156,0.00018349303,0.0027201048,0.0027609884,0.0041052345,0.034908567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004913614,0.0014116521,0.020862004,0.0003548395,0.000035873287,0.00406759,0.91957533,0.00038791285,0.0017369727,0.0022908675,0.049106937,0.000120839446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010380702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023912531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99696285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029095197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045241006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1319449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588113643","doi":"10.1177/1747016117693828","title":"Revisions to the Common Rule: A proposal in search of evidence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect; Criticism; Subject (documents); Empirical evidence; Scientific evidence; Public relations; Field (mathematics); Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.948464032356229,"score_gpt":0.7742134374355288,"score_spread":0.17425059492070016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588113643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010182306,0.004621855,0.051081587,0.848828,0.08592744,0.0013593581,0.00015220829,0.0005664173,0.006444871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017708795,0.0030944147,0.16709441,0.7485825,0.050083715,0.005717255,0.00030700522,0.0005285,0.006883441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.3508275,0.28270233,0.1307862,0.048814844,0.17044982,0.01641935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.15129966,0.5784271,0.0306507,0.07101176,0.14399414,0.024616743],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.62085223,0.0051644226,0.012859333,0.017056618,0.013715319,0.03803321,0.037583504,0.17300998,0.005485858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8314491,0.007862808,0.026576178,0.010290223,0.06884713,0.054311693,0.03448686,0.17620187,0.008224868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007152083,0.00047049843,0.001120671,0.003613007,0.0008310638,0.0018116267,0.0044675083,0.002128696,0.00079848,0.50200456,0.39338708,0.08865154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014431037,0.00075578934,0.0008686825,0.009764821,0.0008698249,0.0018567238,0.000980792,0.0049643675,0.0011116734,0.46222058,0.51423615,0.00092746195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008045056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060973912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021828007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09808561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46755677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626646765","doi":"10.1177/1747016113510654","title":"Between the accountable and the auditable: Ethics and ethical governance in the social sciences SchragZachary M, Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965–2009. USA: Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.StarkLaura, Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and the Making of Ethical Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011.van den HoonaardWill C, The Seduction of Ethics: Transforming the Social Sciences. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2011. <sup>1</sup>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Engineering ethics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.19740550591045475,"score_gpt":0.4784404928850635,"score_spread":0.28103498697460877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626646765","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004834288,0.10967801,0.017483523,0.8001376,0.004658063,0.000063433916,0.00012812843,0.00008979866,0.062927194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6615889,0.091913536,0.026766254,0.17421992,0.012915386,0.0005156059,0.00026218823,0.00042775532,0.03139046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9110215,0.06858935,0.004008033,0.002517789,0.011880803,0.001982609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9148057,0.06431159,0.0051976126,0.005125935,0.008128399,0.0024307505],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048122965,0.00081632374,0.00093023846,0.0031128414,0.0061221453,0.021761613,0.0019061309,0.011300742,0.0068508172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08375757,0.0009102022,0.0005049038,0.0057394826,0.060993366,0.036940623,0.008486158,0.013752109,0.0020118991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045340756,0.000018793427,0.0007270576,0.00021830687,0.000016366192,0.00018272466,0.014615713,0.00014615197,0.00013294819,0.80466557,0.13101617,0.048214786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027716762,0.000027006492,0.0018404925,0.0019358611,0.00001304185,0.00026458668,0.014678957,0.00032198234,0.00027239718,0.7106137,0.26994896,0.00005532417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0142127825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01713009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008685333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022564149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25450158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757021329","doi":"10.1177/1747016117733296","title":"Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":378,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Oppression; Decolonization; Participatory action research; Sociology; Sovereignty; Context (archaeology); Traditional knowledge; Economic Justice; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Political science; Politics; Law; Anthropology; Ecology","score_opus":0.45847129241015433,"score_gpt":0.6055265106912358,"score_spread":0.14705521828108142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757021329","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09800751,0.043698393,0.23291716,0.3554968,0.00674622,0.0035836748,0.000094456744,0.0011561394,0.25829974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9044422,0.004547721,0.04930053,0.026751406,0.0015658252,0.0041827518,0.00001947548,0.0005932398,0.008596904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.19150712,0.7200956,0.018731218,0.018086597,0.045479327,0.006100234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24128048,0.5848024,0.042054057,0.09413841,0.027433649,0.010291058],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.56397516,0.001451621,0.0037972562,0.009085746,0.02720262,0.039345413,0.006228956,0.012583479,0.006861854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5694252,0.0031616194,0.001989012,0.0062777568,0.2696949,0.051000766,0.061062757,0.020905023,0.0020197683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018197393,0.00020407411,0.004941647,0.002435215,0.0002593565,0.0003221768,0.43776476,0.0005566143,0.00079520897,0.4825835,0.0055497964,0.06440574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045686704,0.0009993154,0.0048958454,0.015790593,0.0003107506,0.0014563906,0.17333765,0.0027284587,0.0026780113,0.52111787,0.27570164,0.0005267394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008190172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061315037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02560783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043619175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5376963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762274663","doi":"10.1177/1747016117733506","title":"Pragmatic clinical trials and the consent process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics; University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions; University of Saskatchewan; University of Calgary","keywords":"Waiver; Informed consent; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Flexibility (engineering); Political science; Psychology; Public relations; Law; Business; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.980525196242898,"score_gpt":0.8479461696890097,"score_spread":0.1325790265538883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762274663","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010971563,0.024714874,0.33415744,0.47314063,0.0046144826,0.016326338,0.00046044687,0.0002665514,0.13534771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39666185,0.011647904,0.4384243,0.10613384,0.0033801214,0.033015583,0.00039965948,0.00021357056,0.01012319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.18214886,0.760535,0.01772827,0.009795285,0.026911136,0.0028814417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.17929101,0.7246697,0.026366338,0.04034588,0.02271109,0.006615985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.62005925,0.0016054835,0.0030696385,0.0041377232,0.007544109,0.014055669,0.006392393,0.021750804,0.007365292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7187756,0.002054204,0.0019937681,0.0050025126,0.063320726,0.019681308,0.0137992,0.018143287,0.0020057056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017268886,0.00004377532,0.00056225056,0.00084916246,0.000081523904,0.00018715848,0.0056827115,0.0007837891,0.000103870894,0.9444557,0.010125908,0.036951467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004427023,0.00012080886,0.00035385494,0.0022433884,0.00003703814,0.00019561173,0.0008742226,0.001123975,0.00016337707,0.9349152,0.05945994,0.000069927606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009879618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00792838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37994075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017996911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.106277965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46853465},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2782102453","doi":"10.1177/1747016117750208","title":"Ethics review and freedom of information requests in qualitative research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Vetting; Transparency (behavior); Government (linguistics); Bureaucracy; Political science; Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Public relations; Qualitative research; Citizenship; Sociology; Research ethics; Law; Social science; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8226387391353674,"score_gpt":0.7699121586614852,"score_spread":0.052726580473882234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782102453","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057402607,0.008221659,0.63894755,0.18466055,0.0036888036,0.026800571,0.00046488005,0.00028000452,0.07953343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5720455,0.0031103499,0.30877385,0.029134994,0.0012052754,0.07936696,0.00021196254,0.00027506085,0.005876156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.09720507,0.85564995,0.018936703,0.00844653,0.017125737,0.0026360191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.10111667,0.7864802,0.030377325,0.04962004,0.029242544,0.003163241],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6671078,0.0013439582,0.0029030805,0.008241997,0.016883058,0.016094392,0.0049161757,0.0096472325,0.005617141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7059426,0.002765212,0.0016711242,0.010327494,0.10891926,0.022239204,0.020582566,0.011532971,0.0012765136],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013075276,0.000070779075,0.0017937359,0.0027265486,0.000058670863,0.00047788996,0.44297403,0.00047689318,0.00068330165,0.5168195,0.0070142522,0.02677354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034029738,0.0001602316,0.0014823687,0.009773968,0.00007115397,0.0010858425,0.11206561,0.0028309193,0.0019999128,0.7032776,0.1666953,0.0002167454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004886943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00581882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33289218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02167756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055220168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41051537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894910408","doi":"10.1177/1747016118798877","title":"Examining the use of consent forms to promote dissemination of research results to participants","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Sunnybrook Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Order (exchange); Reciprocal; Information Dissemination; Dissemination; Public relations; Psychology; Medical education; Ideal (ethics); Medicine; Political science; Business; Alternative medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.9542201912913564,"score_gpt":0.713385792098791,"score_spread":0.24083439919256533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894910408","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36455742,0.0023492177,0.19400486,0.020022009,0.0013032645,0.3684034,0.0013611544,0.001124784,0.04687392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45640406,0.002311375,0.28007686,0.005361078,0.00018852204,0.25058883,0.0007605108,0.0003338602,0.0039749406],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.24106292,0.62270737,0.080511525,0.0046412176,0.04459895,0.0064780097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1148856,0.65753424,0.06517488,0.06046695,0.09858663,0.003351675],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6831669,0.0016825966,0.0013201948,0.007976485,0.007922939,0.0077409423,0.0039779316,0.005038766,0.006076756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.80145437,0.0022044615,0.001958213,0.007066137,0.010861985,0.011688668,0.006461432,0.0077412394,0.0026290058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018339254,0.002408386,0.038744777,0.010356677,0.0002018635,0.0020765068,0.5099998,0.0013166732,0.0086530335,0.040181287,0.020550756,0.36367643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020109743,0.008794685,0.086314276,0.028731171,0.00035107537,0.0032324218,0.37094864,0.008428803,0.028794866,0.042266253,0.4193274,0.00079942454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056773303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007122042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99496126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01097498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058724016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39071167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969465980","doi":"10.1177/1747016119868900","title":"A reflection on research ethics and citizen science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services; University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Warrant; Research ethics; Harm; Engineering ethics; Confusion; Institution; Institutional review board; Term (time); Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.9464113414639415,"score_gpt":0.7884269297242767,"score_spread":0.1579844117396647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969465980","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011883858,0.0031539323,0.0048454124,0.9770717,0.005705307,0.000061581064,0.000015267973,0.00002274407,0.007935672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08840724,0.0042876336,0.015738215,0.87021935,0.00555059,0.0004486488,0.000017333356,0.00016536063,0.015165709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7361857,0.19829012,0.011495203,0.014751074,0.029523382,0.0097544845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68806356,0.25537735,0.006209207,0.009808397,0.028142348,0.012399183],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20561902,0.0013259307,0.0024848601,0.0018585674,0.024422402,0.02602908,0.0055227764,0.05805585,0.0029350605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17632094,0.0015614659,0.0031584352,0.0024103331,0.12274245,0.03338826,0.017899154,0.105936974,0.0010168876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003796476,0.0000440501,0.0003090043,0.00036838264,0.000022225597,0.00057033123,0.11586243,0.0002660784,0.00048463084,0.73333263,0.1417505,0.006951723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004517507,0.00004834446,0.00020210298,0.001190187,0.000016440032,0.0004454542,0.020306163,0.00034072905,0.00040080058,0.11381649,0.8630836,0.00010456575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06020081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047317762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9419441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037021525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07451509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9796132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979464758","doi":"10.1177/1747016119869847","title":"Improving dissemination of study results: perspectives of individuals with cystic fibrosis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; University of Guelph","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Recall; Psychology; Medicine; Focus group; Qualitative research; Medical education","score_opus":0.3792453037823527,"score_gpt":0.6152022783020771,"score_spread":0.23595697451972436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979464758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73374414,0.010349226,0.006299963,0.22409298,0.0015222084,0.00054122886,0.00012445083,0.00011658584,0.02320916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95223224,0.0045838705,0.0043805996,0.03520624,0.0006154099,0.00030048372,0.000047440615,0.00007561609,0.0025582276],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.80764693,0.16964766,0.0046422756,0.0025469102,0.008690204,0.0068259034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7176635,0.20117745,0.019282116,0.008080277,0.026927648,0.026869014],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11660448,0.0007590566,0.0012203935,0.00211813,0.020697007,0.014939062,0.0028413704,0.009339905,0.0032829724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22531497,0.0011820495,0.0016531132,0.0015469335,0.019505003,0.011387377,0.016931135,0.013970785,0.0006814003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004909908,0.00006274414,0.004319877,0.00031454727,0.000027913744,0.0011301559,0.97587204,0.00003520675,0.00064181467,0.0012098484,0.0027065962,0.013630117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028144997,0.00023966908,0.002003735,0.00084763975,0.00003963789,0.0016631089,0.95861393,0.000095628166,0.00039373653,0.0018513068,0.03416546,0.000058041365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004833874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005226067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88339555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049777566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014745937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6166708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096789464","doi":"10.1177/1747016120969743","title":"Moral injury and the need to carry out ethically responsible research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Moral injury; Beneficence; Dignity; Shame; Harm; Psychology; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Confidentiality; Social psychology; Autonomy; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.7539514315881478,"score_gpt":0.6299975630098864,"score_spread":0.1239538685782614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096789464","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013119645,0.011332514,0.03188878,0.90717334,0.005011702,0.0005301098,0.00002990276,0.00010352559,0.030810546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5413578,0.017744467,0.077848494,0.342902,0.0065662903,0.0027728062,0.00008949789,0.0002245202,0.010494008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5351438,0.37852198,0.015074547,0.013735802,0.047490302,0.010033565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3117176,0.52108645,0.033031292,0.04974456,0.041265495,0.04315462],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.37425604,0.0008035984,0.0024100626,0.0023743096,0.01817403,0.0268448,0.0044466318,0.026175769,0.0047148503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36984402,0.0012096295,0.0015024099,0.0017908588,0.16309969,0.028730612,0.021217054,0.053045046,0.0018464696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012453145,0.0003405528,0.0038742097,0.0015817841,0.00012817315,0.0011986024,0.15297273,0.0005553474,0.0012041276,0.6897262,0.056720782,0.09157289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008209943,0.00032471327,0.002265859,0.0044497075,0.00004390051,0.001975429,0.060027182,0.000653333,0.00079499895,0.67900884,0.25013998,0.00023389436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044664037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004864621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010708645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091791004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7716537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129501706","doi":"10.1177/1747016121994011","title":"Identifying and addressing nonrational processes in REB ethical decision-making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Heuristics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Population; Decision-making; Ethical decision; Management science; Psychology; Political science; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering ethics; Business; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.6625705175875278,"score_gpt":0.7134502216898961,"score_spread":0.050879704102368306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129501706","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15741207,0.0043436694,0.69853294,0.08289,0.0015522359,0.0056874487,0.00006897063,0.00041364584,0.04909905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66649365,0.0013888348,0.31798145,0.0078070946,0.00042054825,0.0037804956,0.000038603015,0.00013221362,0.0019570345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.2704298,0.64933264,0.023993663,0.011180532,0.039949253,0.005114081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1329542,0.7321389,0.05498853,0.040362906,0.036021143,0.0035342737],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5656987,0.001001037,0.0012778967,0.004846964,0.010246648,0.016610561,0.0039535966,0.0055654314,0.0023216964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.670866,0.0013617974,0.0013724772,0.0031649333,0.0357132,0.015476066,0.015718583,0.010657699,0.0007212204],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023635577,0.0002664708,0.017500624,0.0023226198,0.00022703379,0.00090479176,0.33412477,0.0022554742,0.0028865444,0.3898607,0.0061898264,0.24322481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017848788,0.00042138388,0.011448794,0.0059528146,0.0002017578,0.0013216899,0.11513496,0.014538324,0.01138901,0.72261316,0.11634368,0.0004558974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024232792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053506177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43430132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012364786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046619292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53557086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137260078","doi":"10.1177/17470161211003021","title":"Queer considerations: Exploring the use of social media for research recruitment within LGBTQ communities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"Mount Saint Vincent University","keywords":"Social media; Harassment; Queer; Public relations; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Political science; Gender studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.9052681565015958,"score_gpt":0.5311391777554012,"score_spread":0.37412897874619455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137260078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7319384,0.0023590343,0.046882246,0.103813484,0.00058449194,0.0040658237,0.00021808087,0.0001557845,0.10998257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97115165,0.00102722,0.009182072,0.0077931066,0.00011714658,0.0017116874,0.00004847722,0.00007535386,0.008893271],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8642982,0.12109801,0.0018763983,0.0027806289,0.0060496726,0.003897042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7611497,0.20260061,0.015188327,0.0054865023,0.010526316,0.005048521],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10335149,0.000689673,0.00046975614,0.002977782,0.027945835,0.016908104,0.003886839,0.0058284136,0.008968062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20893212,0.0008499564,0.0007563435,0.0022010303,0.024158482,0.018257542,0.009879178,0.0071827965,0.0009715234],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040251376,0.000060416165,0.0042166268,0.00016985826,0.000010074673,0.0005732556,0.96930045,0.000041381383,0.00030352618,0.013581848,0.0011892316,0.0105131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033451917,0.00009335438,0.0031247935,0.00065491797,0.000022715572,0.000466202,0.9522289,0.00045541202,0.0005177219,0.008790532,0.03357444,0.000037567694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033266164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07482203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8966485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015315823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023516543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54658145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212272605","doi":"10.1177/17470161211059993","title":"Equality and Equity in Compensating Patient Engagement in Research: A Plea for Exceptionalism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Exceptionalism; Research ethics; Equity (law); Political science; Doctrine; Compensation (psychology); Interpretation (philosophy); Normative; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.9783687622030315,"score_gpt":0.7665734900477272,"score_spread":0.21179527215530425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212272605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019625891,0.0034276766,0.030219102,0.89812124,0.0021900714,0.0002702834,0.000032711043,0.000043070133,0.04606992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6697917,0.0017452439,0.019811606,0.29729703,0.0035007207,0.001349771,0.000039471375,0.000077578865,0.0063867997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.62847745,0.28405717,0.014697053,0.020249467,0.03415959,0.018359283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66676307,0.23296857,0.021172507,0.03575367,0.01699769,0.02634448],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.31089458,0.0006995225,0.0024487122,0.0016948001,0.013588387,0.022729645,0.0056130085,0.031622257,0.0049337395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27023658,0.0011271359,0.0024115879,0.0013967542,0.11877572,0.027188612,0.036075093,0.031426553,0.00086760893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012104076,0.00012957919,0.0025389676,0.0002237604,0.00006447029,0.00041722597,0.018973159,0.00026821997,0.00030964395,0.945619,0.011453802,0.019881058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013653183,0.0002387804,0.0018907405,0.0013052563,0.000050874736,0.0007898684,0.008771923,0.00058934325,0.0005842307,0.90829164,0.077245116,0.00010575344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023044006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003127391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96837777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009368193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034551907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8497897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242130756","doi":"10.1177/1747016113510668","title":"The Ottawa statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomized trials: A short report","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Statement (logic); Research ethics; Research design; Engineering ethics; Cluster (spacecraft); Randomized controlled trial; Cluster randomised controlled trial; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Political science; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; Pathology","score_opus":0.9072127411373186,"score_gpt":0.7100848200719752,"score_spread":0.1971279210653435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242130756","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023364038,0.13242641,0.33091846,0.24194174,0.07200349,0.09714705,0.035386506,0.0032125507,0.08462749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0218567,0.07415611,0.5860358,0.07744057,0.010991466,0.16650377,0.014624146,0.0018629319,0.046528593],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.57075214,0.2740512,0.07769309,0.005791866,0.065211944,0.006499807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.382208,0.37362602,0.04270363,0.038224395,0.15148452,0.011753414],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28203914,0.0027880946,0.006786106,0.007057484,0.004644019,0.009416133,0.0074677337,0.014099343,0.012991648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42838523,0.004903458,0.006060572,0.009136937,0.010606142,0.00447183,0.005320493,0.022545027,0.012915164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027830836,0.00015116154,0.0012986755,0.01376971,0.0006613307,0.00033069277,0.0015632722,0.0014572701,0.00043802802,0.059859946,0.7949794,0.12270741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001969768,0.00054703647,0.0053695138,0.026698675,0.000859343,0.0006328598,0.00040570853,0.0012328987,0.0009811927,0.031093264,0.9296337,0.0005760065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068205744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09457984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71796083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022981137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1507664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8853736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289524090","doi":"10.1177/17470161221116552","title":"Ethics review and conversation analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Warrant; Research ethics; Informed consent; Normative; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Data collection; Conversation analysis; Resource (disambiguation); Preference; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Epistemology; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Alternative medicine; Business; Communication; Engineering","score_opus":0.5176638388297126,"score_gpt":0.520446981172352,"score_spread":0.002783142342639433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289524090","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020704387,0.008875297,0.33786637,0.19202644,0.015855437,0.10424184,0.0032463404,0.0013542643,0.31582966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20554845,0.007193716,0.33850977,0.06747245,0.005134245,0.22905938,0.0028054903,0.0019594177,0.14231706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.5748183,0.34816858,0.024763506,0.014700786,0.029597122,0.007951703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5522081,0.23495881,0.012064709,0.06266432,0.12408453,0.014019572],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.27166194,0.0012082222,0.0020545598,0.008138076,0.011653033,0.013694308,0.005405985,0.008141384,0.027286094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3815773,0.0015067626,0.0014841465,0.007162395,0.015332759,0.009914976,0.011352817,0.01433032,0.011208309],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000275427,0.00018328128,0.0010774486,0.003073252,0.000047620797,0.0016318277,0.14335954,0.0005500553,0.0010889438,0.4588094,0.25511643,0.13478673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006109607,0.0000533437,0.00031404293,0.002777988,0.000013502559,0.00045771064,0.021832924,0.00048279486,0.00061062607,0.047931198,0.92541176,0.000052891333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047052004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057031917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013503815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08309443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8981705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311012291","doi":"10.1177/17470161221141275","title":"Promising practices and constraining factors in mobilizing community-engaged research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Sociology; Community engagement; Focus group; Knowledge management; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8689081218063074,"score_gpt":0.6349223159119336,"score_spread":0.2339858058943738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311012291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57722527,0.005061364,0.16877267,0.1068363,0.00067057635,0.003933223,0.000083274506,0.00046036448,0.1369569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95226824,0.0008574959,0.041458435,0.0013447402,0.0000691647,0.0021182187,0.000030754174,0.00007017782,0.0017828229],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6767443,0.27952838,0.0079905875,0.010518263,0.015364391,0.009854028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7689176,0.16346595,0.016409824,0.019941958,0.016831517,0.014433179],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17533222,0.0012900376,0.00095820276,0.005580388,0.028525017,0.032166507,0.005852823,0.007021906,0.0039537204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19774134,0.0019284711,0.0011283219,0.0038867653,0.049929496,0.02415,0.024402143,0.0076006134,0.001062321],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017130766,0.0004801087,0.016480984,0.0012760103,0.00009197727,0.0013476589,0.7020973,0.00058548374,0.0016761668,0.19562407,0.0018778972,0.07829106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010814163,0.00039809974,0.004275125,0.0027723555,0.00006590384,0.0009979851,0.74356073,0.0015211088,0.0016754791,0.18332468,0.061180543,0.000119855846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003975956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007043653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8246678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008293401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028504245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92725646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362697889","doi":"10.1177/17470161231164530","title":"Cannabis, research ethics, and a duty of care","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley; Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Cannabis; Harm; Research ethics; Duty; Duty of care; Psychology; Effects of cannabis; Political science; Criminology; Engineering ethics; Law; Psychiatry; Engineering","score_opus":0.3646539138534396,"score_gpt":0.5654747881828157,"score_spread":0.20082087432937612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362697889","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01740848,0.011908337,0.0321309,0.8974868,0.005140211,0.00069133186,0.0000485015,0.00006624812,0.035119228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53675574,0.0076686786,0.045424066,0.3908348,0.006263755,0.0031890871,0.00006345297,0.000116580726,0.009683824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.47670606,0.4427911,0.018958464,0.016583815,0.03538696,0.009573544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43462256,0.41253543,0.026916567,0.058473475,0.031128924,0.036323015],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.39561298,0.00080633984,0.0025671732,0.0024624646,0.020603927,0.02315478,0.005505897,0.025616689,0.0031290073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37938422,0.0017133957,0.0011299008,0.002271009,0.14911635,0.0201893,0.019616652,0.028559797,0.0012399441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012881418,0.00015826865,0.0025947727,0.00046925727,0.00007460042,0.00050393457,0.060175307,0.00022342267,0.000449579,0.88228595,0.025691058,0.027245136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019369568,0.0003419044,0.0017934323,0.0043551987,0.00005662166,0.0010950817,0.033595715,0.00060929375,0.00048113315,0.73945135,0.21782838,0.00019828092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071586324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008054494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9743833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014801455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07726336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7453168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362697961","doi":"10.1177/17470161231166600","title":"Research Responsibility Agreement: a tool to support ethical research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Engineering ethics; Harm; Sociology; Research ethics; Economic Justice; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.9320193979545133,"score_gpt":0.7806733284161768,"score_spread":0.15134606953833651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362697961","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037456271,0.00039655383,0.89906037,0.013627764,0.0018527491,0.00530217,0.001412958,0.018602485,0.055999454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029645583,0.0005115841,0.9266831,0.0033480905,0.0005607892,0.011755997,0.0015155243,0.005029145,0.020950116],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7966905,0.15368484,0.01821966,0.0070148082,0.021451969,0.0029381197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49501058,0.38458484,0.01900131,0.04620252,0.04282996,0.012370841],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18917656,0.0021715858,0.0015985948,0.011296901,0.0067088474,0.016386153,0.0053114346,0.006197567,0.038259253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3345637,0.0023925537,0.0019974788,0.006499178,0.0089834,0.03215468,0.024865171,0.009935603,0.02647482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045710045,0.00069079833,0.0019974355,0.0027063303,0.000096090174,0.00125104,0.08047945,0.0017240873,0.0038865914,0.2666215,0.2159312,0.42415848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016963045,0.00016025742,0.00052238494,0.0015773585,0.0000393515,0.00062496465,0.006661825,0.0038722833,0.0020570573,0.1012072,0.8828491,0.00025854015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009306663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015669253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051108575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018435687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366688244","doi":"10.1177/17470161231169205","title":"Systemic disruptions: decolonizing indigenous research ethics using indigenous knowledges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Harm; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Traditional knowledge; Political science; Public relations; Law; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.5412341569337655,"score_gpt":0.5964559282507289,"score_spread":0.055221771316963375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366688244","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18236196,0.008338726,0.26222286,0.342304,0.0041191727,0.0015863221,0.000027090868,0.00044863523,0.19859119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9465297,0.0016198594,0.029519511,0.012474528,0.00042400448,0.00077607867,0.000009537671,0.00012939695,0.008517381],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7565276,0.21998547,0.0032770373,0.0044438364,0.01004501,0.005721076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8190292,0.14242594,0.007853132,0.014670897,0.010718471,0.00530233],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17360866,0.0006604852,0.0011331064,0.0022554486,0.020907566,0.019200852,0.0032702754,0.00749117,0.0019998015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10545451,0.000882162,0.0010079637,0.0017433289,0.1504518,0.020841178,0.025637036,0.018426504,0.00042961718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014934417,0.000037498492,0.0004121803,0.00019216492,0.000012574336,0.00041101387,0.61286676,0.0003065631,0.00039458083,0.3708923,0.0022251082,0.012234303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038222985,0.00010990455,0.0006076384,0.0012448503,0.000025154583,0.0007262229,0.39499518,0.0017151687,0.00090049254,0.45298904,0.14657047,0.00007768563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068256557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009694756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01782211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044485867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9181413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378083064","doi":"10.1177/17470161231174734","title":"Deception and informed consent in studies with incognito simulated standardized patients: empirical experiences and a case study from South Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Deception; Waiver; Popularity; Context (archaeology); Health care; Research ethics; Empirical research; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Law; Psychiatry; Geography","score_opus":0.8727288311649408,"score_gpt":0.6396184292881465,"score_spread":0.23311040187679433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378083064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660609,0.0029351106,0.0041887434,0.016532293,0.00011627185,0.0008737316,0.000055393197,0.0000068976315,0.009230672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99092054,0.0019912848,0.0025086321,0.0028956574,0.00007797771,0.0006677999,0.00002767044,0.000013361702,0.0008970953],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8776028,0.11235202,0.0028433579,0.0013443772,0.0023912257,0.0034661565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73656315,0.22647914,0.017975725,0.0081206625,0.00481209,0.006049224],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09695137,0.0007906307,0.0009514521,0.0018502834,0.015508328,0.008303672,0.0030654853,0.0057677203,0.004462879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19343999,0.000866831,0.0008401721,0.0025408876,0.022526816,0.00822229,0.01213991,0.00820426,0.00046454414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018166505,0.00050215854,0.014898657,0.0005879227,0.000044920293,0.01443551,0.93628377,0.000296511,0.00027371806,0.018849421,0.0016574924,0.0119884135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010806513,0.00045265234,0.005566275,0.002500865,0.000027428541,0.008607947,0.95075756,0.00043825898,0.00042465044,0.0073045464,0.023735492,0.00007628971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056902813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012513854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006561346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01058203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.512734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380609532","doi":"10.1177/17470161231180829","title":"Who owns your consent? How REBs give away participants’ agency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Autonomy; Informed consent; Context (archaeology); Permission; Public relations; Qualitative research; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.9205153017155312,"score_gpt":0.719668062793361,"score_spread":0.20084723892217016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380609532","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16600807,0.007778392,0.18509273,0.53113484,0.0055402336,0.0032849456,0.00015643764,0.00051740475,0.100486934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88510394,0.0028940346,0.044704504,0.046640992,0.0005631046,0.0036579508,0.000080546815,0.0004020031,0.015952919],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.55325073,0.4089413,0.008285668,0.008526866,0.012565469,0.008429921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7862341,0.15955018,0.011965619,0.01441704,0.017756023,0.010077138],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18683317,0.0011359882,0.001779406,0.0022840633,0.023081345,0.016161999,0.004461597,0.016791826,0.0051635876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31715277,0.0016995061,0.0016062075,0.00198917,0.053565282,0.026593313,0.015211477,0.01524991,0.0025595205],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075899196,0.000051990628,0.0011428518,0.00032093257,0.000026538442,0.0024192822,0.82231605,0.00024772703,0.0010668933,0.1469677,0.010522898,0.014841193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004703729,0.00010482179,0.0005415418,0.0019769955,0.000027344764,0.0025974603,0.6214362,0.00089366414,0.0010521475,0.11699089,0.25413677,0.00019516467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009550396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070036235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009105149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014790596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9880801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385278104","doi":"10.1177/17470161231189843","title":"Protected from harm, harmed by protection: ethical consequences of the exclusion of pregnant participants from clinical trials","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Pregnancy and Medication Impact","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Inclusion and exclusion criteria; Autonomy; Medicine; Pregnancy; Clinical trial; Beneficence; Economic Justice; Inclusion (mineral); Clinical research; Alternative medicine; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.7981434410998176,"score_gpt":0.6341796684872538,"score_spread":0.16396377261256379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385278104","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025803223,0.02420213,0.10917606,0.77441686,0.008362054,0.006709238,0.00043260693,0.00019424621,0.05070362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37974244,0.010631117,0.15366136,0.4139756,0.00939324,0.023893846,0.0002155516,0.0002476528,0.008239151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.2958274,0.6239334,0.033069123,0.011178115,0.03249893,0.0034931346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24861667,0.62297314,0.0340762,0.06401857,0.021416273,0.00889921],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5474469,0.0011867004,0.0029575976,0.0020088416,0.006121719,0.010512115,0.004276245,0.02611278,0.0034549548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.65010726,0.0014802297,0.0027194086,0.0023771508,0.037117615,0.00925431,0.008260934,0.023667853,0.001776861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027557157,0.00056686933,0.008226581,0.0048818444,0.0010728133,0.0043029613,0.06211413,0.0009892842,0.0021931124,0.60792875,0.09105779,0.21391015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021043946,0.0013399853,0.007373297,0.022707516,0.000687454,0.0073634177,0.011277794,0.0037175287,0.0028223416,0.65553963,0.28463367,0.000433028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014986863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028361913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045077596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025818616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5580786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389832860","doi":"10.1177/17470161231218173","title":"Needs and preferences of REB members in the development of a new TCPS 2 training program in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Robarts Clinical Trials; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographics; Training (meteorology); Medical education; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.8997131653263873,"score_gpt":0.6755732538506436,"score_spread":0.22413991147574375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389832860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97021455,0.00042968054,0.0002636833,0.02212383,0.00016163233,0.0001999995,0.00010808361,0.000017952878,0.006480738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98752195,0.00073965313,0.001234235,0.0056322645,0.000034715893,0.00016766222,0.00009780032,0.00001853788,0.0045531173],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891322,0.0030469808,0.00039851817,0.00045341707,0.0022340692,0.004734685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9445666,0.004033441,0.0021293412,0.0003868562,0.010395885,0.0384879],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011934647,0.00017569229,0.00036117973,0.0009698647,0.012522724,0.004075474,0.001611632,0.0014252715,0.004035022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020712504,0.00048819513,0.00032146476,0.0011305662,0.0026066331,0.001561564,0.0034921467,0.0026757368,0.0003600636],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004093852,0.0013638913,0.37694356,0.00044333198,0.00004565661,0.004005344,0.42727122,0.0003944498,0.0028421383,0.003053176,0.039483603,0.14374436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035356952,0.00030948527,0.19485362,0.0006044577,0.000015835953,0.00068418693,0.74883384,0.0007381826,0.00035477383,0.00038120596,0.053073846,0.00011522049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8347776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9453086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99857473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0421687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1450465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33239084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390583869","doi":"10.1177/17470161231223594","title":"COVID-19 human challenge trials and randomized controlled trials: lessons for the next pandemic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Clinical trial; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Randomized controlled trial; Medicine; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Virology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Engineering","score_opus":0.986597454763469,"score_gpt":0.8006001352746288,"score_spread":0.18599731948884024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390583869","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011639561,0.20262225,0.01109459,0.7607696,0.02022209,0.000479629,0.00030278813,0.00019754587,0.003147548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07594473,0.18671732,0.08271165,0.5506826,0.09326547,0.0068720435,0.00060673564,0.00054574164,0.0026536556],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.4637617,0.4712421,0.023688963,0.009781263,0.027656835,0.003869144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.10009754,0.8253718,0.014769161,0.022742564,0.029446822,0.007572111],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5592405,0.0027738633,0.012219333,0.00596407,0.0030088224,0.015355829,0.009197868,0.03386879,0.011622604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7384305,0.0030281432,0.009081157,0.0049430793,0.030238267,0.030435832,0.008469183,0.039347984,0.0031503472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007252321,0.00078551454,0.0035764095,0.019944377,0.0041789464,0.0006167359,0.0022189992,0.004202486,0.00031582374,0.30470702,0.29870817,0.35349324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012018847,0.001748741,0.0028701555,0.053569306,0.0017097521,0.00046440325,0.0012346604,0.004886843,0.00041937295,0.7166961,0.20389733,0.0004845014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008911029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008510603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022600848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04820424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.543535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402950882","doi":"10.1177/17470161241269154","title":"Community-led approaches to research governance: a scoping review of strategies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Global Health and Surgery","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Sociology; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental science","score_opus":0.9157198261708849,"score_gpt":0.6876227615237697,"score_spread":0.2280970646471152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402950882","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032174602,0.9879303,0.002740343,0.0051912344,0.0005491267,0.0010972098,0.000076451266,0.000028359034,0.0020651943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057529686,0.97904485,0.009733012,0.0015663183,0.00013078407,0.003270993,0.00013392295,0.000025996065,0.00034127754],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.8431935,0.10202274,0.03218294,0.0046064635,0.016029678,0.0019646934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64128655,0.29115173,0.016988674,0.006655433,0.04107376,0.0028438708],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18129314,0.0030718413,0.006701076,0.052766506,0.0049136616,0.014417771,0.006058874,0.0069352915,0.004076289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28016898,0.0026840793,0.005591099,0.050528616,0.007933392,0.014490417,0.012500596,0.0058525456,0.0011221311],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099884914,0.00009684198,0.00076084706,0.47345063,0.0010945806,0.0003434594,0.010267456,0.0007646722,0.00031904623,0.02489564,0.014037567,0.4738694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002960143,0.000056514527,0.00048636986,0.86704606,0.00090798805,0.00019566946,0.0041148462,0.0001921024,0.00017586075,0.0069063306,0.11984819,0.00004038634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015939627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033359095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81870687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021276098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07998173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95878124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403187240","doi":"10.1177/17470161241288649","title":"“Dear John”: Overriding institutional axiology by privileging Indigenous relational ethics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiology; Indigenous; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.6981611830080889,"score_gpt":0.6661478696372294,"score_spread":0.03201331337085955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403187240","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21089624,0.00823009,0.1060547,0.377303,0.0034382846,0.0007822056,0.00009674239,0.00021877453,0.29298005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949842,0.0012638508,0.014500876,0.022103399,0.00022801367,0.0004365253,0.000017675684,0.00012063182,0.011487076],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8590495,0.11554505,0.0023246473,0.0052031158,0.011493323,0.006384418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9097127,0.061743423,0.005682286,0.006735328,0.011013518,0.00511286],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10740026,0.0005143265,0.00080009276,0.0020632981,0.043343004,0.024690254,0.004009459,0.0063181864,0.002954788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084295444,0.0008131089,0.00062586006,0.0026794332,0.17705637,0.01723432,0.014846364,0.01276225,0.0004492182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009771851,0.000009223471,0.0006499147,0.00010294369,0.0000042974766,0.0002954262,0.7008492,0.00004510833,0.00022581391,0.29101297,0.0027931286,0.0040023113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012172128,0.000023802186,0.0008913018,0.00091527874,0.000017548036,0.00055893546,0.7267844,0.00033682497,0.0006737087,0.101004206,0.16871612,0.000065759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13738231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2186404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9936818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03943535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0789806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56799364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410543065","doi":"10.1177/17470161251335709","title":"Picturing informed consent: Exploring participatory visual methods to enhance meaningful consent conversations with young people","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Toronto Metropolitan University; McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Informed consent; Citizen journalism; Visual research; Psychology; Visual methods; Participatory action research; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science; Visual arts; Alternative medicine; World Wide Web; Cognitive science; Art; Anthropology","score_opus":0.8577231489267905,"score_gpt":0.7451852201053167,"score_spread":0.11253792882147373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410543065","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23544635,0.0053042127,0.63275415,0.023562206,0.0011490972,0.01005271,0.00042470096,0.00082754885,0.0904791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6802374,0.0020006932,0.29822046,0.003037549,0.00017029571,0.008042505,0.00016857884,0.00031793813,0.0078045325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.850455,0.13929006,0.0018610599,0.0030666096,0.0030362445,0.0022909783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84908944,0.13221265,0.0044566407,0.0073004845,0.0039154217,0.0030252296],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10850336,0.0016930543,0.0006425618,0.0034763454,0.008895189,0.009510346,0.0034537385,0.003332636,0.00728749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10059793,0.0010246626,0.0014263543,0.0020960714,0.01759659,0.013098982,0.016714474,0.0042001195,0.0013444889],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013290168,0.00013925626,0.0017711405,0.0013008582,0.00003056479,0.0014592163,0.8802028,0.00069938786,0.0026797077,0.0419706,0.002693488,0.06692013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002851708,0.00058666395,0.0024128328,0.0053106775,0.000096190415,0.00229245,0.5913542,0.0043186517,0.00554819,0.12525076,0.26235044,0.00019381952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001989701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004018497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004505789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0098549165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57382745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410717485","doi":"10.1177/17470161251339785","title":"Amplifying voices, dismantling silences: Ethical praxis in multimodal child-centered research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Mitacs; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Praxis; Multimodality; Multimodal therapy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Psychotherapist; Art; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.41144391333502495,"score_gpt":0.5912267293246217,"score_spread":0.17978281598959678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410717485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4419588,0.014308489,0.29489684,0.12428456,0.0012846581,0.0017065282,0.00020139848,0.0006414548,0.12071735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94024605,0.0029162883,0.045514815,0.0040302393,0.00015751683,0.0017026903,0.000044226617,0.00022024469,0.0051679825],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8698655,0.11706786,0.0017960274,0.0042490144,0.004435742,0.0025859391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90385485,0.0770735,0.0048428094,0.0073828856,0.0030857825,0.0037602172],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.108333595,0.0012588731,0.0013839838,0.0030226603,0.023869779,0.02587811,0.004869196,0.005831147,0.0031098847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08551245,0.0014994186,0.0009855429,0.0020148589,0.13232614,0.022973137,0.033540796,0.010556699,0.00075105403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016224185,0.000015281876,0.0005331171,0.00015043726,0.000008506569,0.00032918772,0.9427152,0.00006906357,0.00051646505,0.04824706,0.0004164993,0.0069829216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025577792,0.00007949746,0.0008022355,0.0012382874,0.000029069024,0.0010614269,0.81286687,0.0005050481,0.0015885655,0.1141507,0.06758426,0.00006838675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053251516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009122245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8916664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012018425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019280372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5729296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414258633","doi":"10.1177/17470161251346253","title":"Rethinking ethical reflexivity and oversight in health research through an ecosystem approach: A workshop report","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fogarty International Center; Medical Research Council; South African Medical Research Council; National Institutes of Health; UK Research and Innovation; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Research ethics; Reflexivity; Scrutiny; Accountability; Agency (philosophy); Bioethics; Context (archaeology); General partnership; Scope (computer science)","score_opus":0.9220719719747945,"score_gpt":0.745732954893545,"score_spread":0.17633901708124955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414258633","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057465006,0.019553764,0.18909335,0.64793164,0.03668903,0.0025085362,0.00013701087,0.00046263798,0.04615908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6570137,0.019083697,0.17928487,0.08950147,0.0067811552,0.0043767337,0.00030079958,0.00077175256,0.042885825],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8578211,0.11364314,0.004781592,0.004558878,0.012671747,0.0065235123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8436036,0.12138531,0.0032167376,0.007056817,0.01298697,0.011750397],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21884543,0.0012493571,0.00084372534,0.0014357653,0.011168333,0.024041757,0.005554353,0.016502162,0.0043103574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10428522,0.0013285966,0.0024811223,0.0010163287,0.019121645,0.02142224,0.033351425,0.027245466,0.0012979871],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020640662,0.00068052113,0.0021310055,0.0031938057,0.00016657669,0.0058383374,0.49578547,0.0022876244,0.007183278,0.24013335,0.09420715,0.1481864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101631675,0.00024693753,0.00094495143,0.0037345623,0.00006911306,0.0017897148,0.13447528,0.0017042314,0.0034353253,0.0921818,0.7610926,0.00022391393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026770057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00412832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7811546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009418033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046409193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9633027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414932649","doi":"10.1177/17470161251380888","title":"Reframing payment practices for co-research for children and young people","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Public Health Ontario; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Arts and Humanities Research Council; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Payment; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Equity (law); Commodification; Incentive; Typology; Financial compensation","score_opus":0.5447250875786909,"score_gpt":0.664233150346106,"score_spread":0.1195080627674151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414932649","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23323572,0.009873197,0.19370449,0.3492921,0.0032390838,0.0019809946,0.0001895996,0.00032976738,0.20815504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91566175,0.0022885352,0.0533786,0.017180216,0.00069915794,0.0020044474,0.0000460255,0.0001159292,0.008625429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6942971,0.2414777,0.01110561,0.011297928,0.027340911,0.014480773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8532398,0.097040996,0.014660625,0.0120968325,0.0129883895,0.009973328],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1693935,0.0008642433,0.0011682003,0.0027827255,0.013042883,0.021369977,0.0054004774,0.012069513,0.0051909317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19420916,0.0013064407,0.0013772309,0.0020605586,0.030401723,0.022570368,0.029728984,0.011246809,0.0010829495],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082667146,0.0000871118,0.007849912,0.00027570175,0.000045463268,0.0010542967,0.12837085,0.0005251803,0.00061073725,0.79590815,0.008489459,0.056700416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015315755,0.0003647209,0.011328246,0.004382378,0.000082770894,0.004089011,0.14277506,0.003285614,0.001327372,0.38544777,0.44642657,0.00033735545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007886132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009523727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8306065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02274151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02651309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8958491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415762304","doi":"10.1177/17470161251392249","title":"Barriers to Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Canadian Research Ethics Board membership: Challenges and opportunities for reform","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Tokenism; Excellence; Mandate; Champion","score_opus":0.9187151411400475,"score_gpt":0.683498438943917,"score_spread":0.23521670219613044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415762304","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028630638,0.008555297,0.0050945114,0.91743124,0.0020414274,0.00032401283,0.000094229414,0.000081821025,0.037746795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7854943,0.013215738,0.020637846,0.15583046,0.0012266636,0.00083183066,0.00022378397,0.00020513765,0.02233421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7945373,0.08397344,0.008770757,0.011696228,0.055769417,0.04525289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5937137,0.16311924,0.014929401,0.012711932,0.092014015,0.12351173],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23398913,0.0007612326,0.002043038,0.005199989,0.060103238,0.046003886,0.009902709,0.013022151,0.007313325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.269737,0.001665752,0.0015599226,0.007487077,0.058314122,0.020187257,0.033882864,0.025345366,0.00069207617],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079770114,0.0002526747,0.014178804,0.001377549,0.00008420527,0.0010880227,0.15388599,0.0010345619,0.00053255516,0.560557,0.09102063,0.1759082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108598266,0.00014966507,0.025906645,0.006400192,0.00007231279,0.0004769969,0.2636254,0.0025123581,0.0004303546,0.1552146,0.54456145,0.00054139254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9366874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9614035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2752998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.68138474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94462776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416409781","doi":"10.1177/17470161251396228","title":"Conducting creative research: Research ethics and research conduct in art and design","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Artistic and Creative Research","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Emily Carr University of Art and Design; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Research ethics; Indigenous; Information ethics; Bridge (graph theory); Ethics of technology; Adaptation (eye); Creativity","score_opus":0.9317462045734879,"score_gpt":0.6339675005177997,"score_spread":0.2977787040556882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416409781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015293346,0.038721163,0.3626268,0.3687766,0.0060186307,0.0025771465,0.00017780437,0.0005191148,0.20528951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5325324,0.029390367,0.35019004,0.051619798,0.004201323,0.0073746913,0.0002323868,0.0008320258,0.023626972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.48396948,0.45813182,0.011847857,0.010084783,0.03138735,0.0045786663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46420184,0.44320437,0.013205935,0.046964798,0.021542815,0.010880238],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34816062,0.001263131,0.002951086,0.004373192,0.018131074,0.053152584,0.0045827567,0.013147856,0.0048838714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25036752,0.001601607,0.0012153451,0.006287688,0.1706947,0.02670598,0.02055515,0.022214763,0.002301576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003770723,0.000061366765,0.00058214116,0.0010565874,0.00003366067,0.0001725891,0.08777492,0.00033405478,0.00033645733,0.85530514,0.010821187,0.043484163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055772518,0.000094667994,0.00066450133,0.0049068755,0.000027133756,0.0004979249,0.04245148,0.0006845763,0.00071294536,0.70837104,0.24143714,0.0000959299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007605319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007222482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98685217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016547572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083832614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.803834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115170368","doi":"10.1177/17470161251406930","title":"Whose Data, Whose Ethics? Rethinking Ethical Accountability in Research Using Publicly Available Indigenous Data","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Accountability; Research ethics; Interpretation (philosophy); Obligation; Human rights; Operationalization","score_opus":0.761292527785612,"score_gpt":0.638879658298733,"score_spread":0.1224128694868789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115170368","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016249388,0.00784155,0.07017148,0.8629532,0.0038839907,0.00030289713,0.000093376366,0.00011040812,0.03839378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6594429,0.012636456,0.10729941,0.2034368,0.0043593803,0.0016460195,0.0001496435,0.00069132185,0.01033817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5013311,0.40325522,0.017673254,0.019048804,0.049025718,0.009665837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.32180506,0.5886064,0.011284495,0.033999857,0.0378542,0.006449898],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.49249482,0.00082352455,0.0022494337,0.003763663,0.024305537,0.04480265,0.008712534,0.016448477,0.001876031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44662133,0.001769469,0.0016146816,0.004974234,0.2041736,0.06089321,0.02642281,0.046419676,0.0007263757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020400163,0.000028181581,0.0010702981,0.0003966786,0.000035683646,0.00020881779,0.34039918,0.00022430626,0.00028025996,0.6216993,0.011136677,0.02450024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003614094,0.000036581958,0.0012394167,0.0046524135,0.00008022761,0.0002196664,0.10690183,0.0009878254,0.0009151684,0.7075069,0.17725585,0.00016801193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06693298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087062955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9835515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02482962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10568554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62584424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}