{"meta":{"query_hash":"7b8c28396fde","filters":{"venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7b8c28396fde","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Research+in+Organizational+Behavior"},"results":[{"id":"W1202183704","doi":"10.1016/j.riob.2015.07.002","title":"Riding the Fifth Wave: Organizational Justice as Dependent Variable","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Organizational justice; Variable (mathematics); Social psychology; Perception; Psychology; Construal level theory; Organizational behavior; Economic Justice; Empirical research; Dimension (graph theory); Sociology; Epistemology; Organizational commitment; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.11173718424975766,"score_gpt":0.35172262387469055,"score_spread":0.2399854396249329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1202183704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95194966,0.00032794464,0.0015460142,0.013692821,0.002655669,0.0023766544,0.00006378337,0.0005142521,0.026873214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99384326,0.000013769374,0.00055257534,0.0014790699,0.0014920664,0.00008619729,0.00041217345,0.000108816326,0.0020120908],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606025,0.00011500834,0.000487309,0.0005086322,0.0022297907,0.000599021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99601054,0.00028619575,0.000120153025,0.0003620625,0.0031312522,0.00008980595],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020263842,0.00024035238,0.00019618873,0.0006851355,0.00078051863,0.0007116163,0.0005734973,0.00016030957,0.0074607236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027141129,0.00020447682,0.000030065132,0.0053633167,0.00016201298,0.0011579362,0.0005390711,0.00059645594,0.0047486047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003708219,0.00043727993,0.5342177,0.000043986358,0.000013121282,0.000085796135,0.00022723361,0.00050663686,0.0019243874,0.45174235,0.010555885,0.00020850288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052584163,0.000086682434,0.79931927,0.00015440384,0.00044222313,0.00036754404,0.006885732,0.0024638267,0.0018183286,0.055298213,0.12628613,0.0016192312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000581635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009832932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39644414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000510373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000888592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99602634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014360443","doi":"10.1016/s0191-3085(04)26003-8","title":"NORMAL ACTS OF IRRATIONAL TRUST: MOTIVATED ATTRIBUTIONS AND THE TRUST DEVELOPMENT PROCESS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":263,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Hong Kong; Northwestern University","keywords":"Attribution; Irrational number; Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Trustworthiness; Interpersonal relationship","score_opus":0.07552139476198756,"score_gpt":0.39754742767557055,"score_spread":0.322026032913583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014360443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99450374,0.000104216204,0.000041599127,0.002991227,0.000052439053,0.00047951908,0.000012022196,0.000014544468,0.0018007206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992799,0.00005598888,0.00011478982,0.000023342203,0.00011880223,0.000076344295,0.000054535343,0.0000074162926,0.0002688598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821925,0.00020214375,0.00021658161,0.00014366292,0.000932859,0.00028547848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881244,0.00024275355,0.000043715594,0.000055951466,0.0007548302,0.0000903221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014359958,0.000061796905,0.00010180195,0.000108119086,0.0008955986,0.000053400883,0.00020428067,0.00009677382,0.00034608154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006820227,0.0000495051,0.000015339614,0.0015627225,0.0009257324,0.00017253272,0.00006908642,0.00022755143,0.000016173526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060811413,0.0003399071,0.30242586,0.000012056709,0.000010402087,0.000004952214,0.036803547,0.0001314102,0.00016551417,0.6596302,0.00004566296,0.00036970747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001804197,0.000028895565,0.9736411,0.000041471234,0.000008692505,0.0000026141204,0.0074702976,0.000013391131,0.002045596,0.013809814,0.001000548,0.00013337556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028240102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056002336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67121524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019474118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014834569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6888311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095468191","doi":"10.1016/j.riob.2013.10.002","title":"Underestimating our influence over others at work","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dehumanization; Psychology; Wrongdoing; Social psychology; Objectification; Industrial and organizational psychology; Cognitive bias; Face (sociological concept); Cognition; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.11829946795814675,"score_gpt":0.45064006788851224,"score_spread":0.33234059993036547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095468191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910592,0.00007033751,0.0000017653258,0.0021356684,0.00008464873,0.00065678277,0.0000049289038,0.000049571277,0.005937132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958816,0.000028676084,0.00075026165,0.00008282019,0.00007587186,0.00023086749,0.000009016081,0.000029491557,0.0029113602],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797225,0.0002300264,0.000252269,0.00029758184,0.00068648974,0.0005613776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991098,0.00018247675,0.000050286173,0.00016060204,0.0003305534,0.00016626556],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007275723,0.00010379256,0.00012557229,0.00019499562,0.00066977536,0.0001867384,0.00035635167,0.000098801356,0.0016503633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004001808,0.00011273969,0.000023528191,0.0011352764,0.00031600386,0.00044595436,0.00032550227,0.0002407696,0.0015983597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002823645,0.00009834718,0.98610955,0.0000024920926,0.0000026254047,0.000005520313,0.002657503,0.00003711293,0.0040114485,0.004995085,0.0018166674,0.0002608411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029417794,0.000024780013,0.98751146,0.00004519184,0.0000037576763,9.3634446e-7,0.008857965,0.000011937972,0.00095190626,0.0015669877,0.0005011532,0.00022977311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071236547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014344945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062004616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015689138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022685395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899703783","doi":"10.1016/j.riob.2018.10.002","title":"Moral Utility Theory: Understanding the motivation to behave (un)ethically","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Moral disengagement; Morality; Psychology; Moral reasoning; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Social cognitive theory of morality; Incentive; Expected utility hypothesis; Process (computing); Social psychology; Ethical decision; Moral development; Decision theory; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.5254640248887166,"score_gpt":0.42881824105791766,"score_spread":0.09664578383079891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899703783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96914244,0.0000053503504,0.003858944,0.022660859,0.00027003023,0.000663755,0.000026825359,0.000049102753,0.0033227073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976252,0.0000050694644,0.00021068363,0.0015325329,0.0001834047,0.000052873063,0.000011404042,0.0000185311,0.00036032274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970278,0.00078626047,0.0002230427,0.00046492828,0.0010652073,0.0004327751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998368,0.0009081498,0.000031745363,0.0002704541,0.00028550523,0.00013610718],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021930134,0.0001060502,0.00009209463,0.00024565254,0.00071735884,0.000080225305,0.0005070639,0.00010278695,0.0018271188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021324074,0.00007977703,0.000024581615,0.0017033882,0.0007746999,0.00013733142,0.00024439895,0.0004820757,0.0005284823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016935293,0.0006376694,0.19056816,0.000005909613,0.0000035551027,0.000035995305,0.0010165541,0.000009971363,0.07483695,0.7296721,0.0015846161,0.0014591967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035396806,0.00022095049,0.7724003,0.000027285045,0.0000051436914,0.000024920728,0.00030210108,0.00008634874,0.030011151,0.19622323,0.00020630518,0.00013829557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011721887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015631578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5818321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030010517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119579185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902194800","doi":"10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.001","title":"From surviving to thriving in the gig economy: A research agenda for individuals in the new world of work","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":542,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Thriving; Foregrounding; Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Public relations; Coping (psychology); Proactivity; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.20761968862306027,"score_gpt":0.46030356840261416,"score_spread":0.25268387977955387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902194800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95050436,0.00004312147,0.00017411364,0.023011154,0.000091186244,0.0022063192,0.000041425603,0.000009247044,0.023919076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985327,0.000009160364,0.00041455717,0.00016422209,0.0003474613,0.00020319477,0.00003661565,0.000011514017,0.00028057906],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703974,0.0010436005,0.00038642547,0.00023088645,0.0007677252,0.00053162785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952543,0.0040950817,0.000039226434,0.00020451227,0.0003386723,0.00006825015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013631126,0.00007208267,0.00012923586,0.0007150099,0.0004047834,0.00036999135,0.000977939,0.000072662,0.00041150165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014980156,0.000056900746,0.000025858706,0.0054252995,0.00032065256,0.00052509253,0.000089457055,0.0003617478,0.00006757101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030511834,0.00026868077,0.79442996,0.000009466774,0.000004610385,0.0000027443955,0.12244824,0.000020408952,0.000029181705,0.06483634,0.006353583,0.011566255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060812564,0.00011886619,0.83734083,0.00027354076,0.00000401097,2.9099837e-7,0.034733973,0.000011260887,0.00031373074,0.055079795,0.07133893,0.0001766774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039030765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05759705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08771427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026054922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086034223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9595994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310711912","doi":"10.1016/j.riob.2022.100177","title":"Why, how, and when divergent perceptions become dysfunctional in organizations: A Motivated cognition perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Dysfunctional family; Perception; Perspective (graphical); Cognition; Psychology; Social cognition; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08321103962626215,"score_gpt":0.391612573641648,"score_spread":0.30840153401538584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310711912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98140204,0.00018885071,0.00001977905,0.015544302,0.0001783558,0.0010237461,0.00019190015,0.00005517028,0.0013958748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978802,0.0001597257,0.0002119049,0.00015814738,0.00007407192,0.0005472437,0.0002338909,0.000030326793,0.00070444914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974112,0.00066275196,0.0002297321,0.00044094102,0.00084684463,0.0004085633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987132,0.00019734135,0.000048583508,0.00010531184,0.0008124713,0.00012307035],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009429896,0.00011999808,0.00015231143,0.00071795343,0.001897857,0.00013314678,0.00023060334,0.000066704095,0.0070930086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005354639,0.00015263574,0.000020342555,0.0023785955,0.00047372023,0.00039703306,0.00053660985,0.00046283833,0.000034188557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020882304,0.00092232024,0.9232559,0.0000034912496,0.000010433341,0.00002365526,0.02641733,0.00004897486,0.0037119465,0.04340192,0.0021272085,0.00005589138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012533814,0.00017422589,0.7483903,0.000019757663,0.000021690868,0.000012693536,0.23653834,0.000050458028,0.00019407124,0.010947693,0.002025176,0.00037218278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00591175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005317785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.210121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003123728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047400242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404508215","doi":"10.1016/j.riob.2024.100210","title":"Mobilization capacity: Tracing the path from having networks to capturing resources","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilization; Tracing; Path (computing); Political science; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Computer network; Law","score_opus":0.09032588724929494,"score_gpt":0.38390247993116366,"score_spread":0.29357659268186875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404508215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99230963,0.0011172912,0.0009036221,0.003096187,0.0005113146,0.00061211834,0.000016914264,0.00012796762,0.0013049477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974867,0.00013375706,0.00010169446,0.0000913312,0.001578786,0.00010320984,0.00002899108,0.000033268137,0.00044226318],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997309,0.00057564396,0.0002195011,0.00034643032,0.0010502986,0.00049912307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839675,0.0010329565,0.000019368035,0.00014032195,0.00025628763,0.0001543026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021525675,0.000097853896,0.00010589877,0.00019054399,0.0010594389,0.00059036486,0.0003717439,0.00015366981,0.00046756738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005058271,0.00008207066,0.000036022968,0.0027564699,0.00024241857,0.0002401146,0.0001356085,0.00056419324,0.000079359976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041863383,0.0003504208,0.34610057,0.000044856355,0.000047336125,0.0002160325,0.49430823,0.012160765,0.0025242586,0.0943732,0.0061406665,0.043691803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063625706,0.0001887676,0.7331404,0.0018215388,0.00012555448,0.000009240746,0.16250998,0.017466757,0.0008483339,0.032216124,0.04951168,0.0015253667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006688113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046937726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38703984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045035247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020906073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}