{"meta":{"query_hash":"7b8c28396fde","filters":{"venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7b8c28396fde","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Research+in+Organizational+Behavior"},"results":[{"id":"W1202183704","doi":"10.1016/j.riob.2015.07.002","title":"Riding the Fifth Wave: Organizational Justice as Dependent Variable","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Organizational justice; Variable (mathematics); Social psychology; Perception; Psychology; Construal level theory; Organizational behavior; Economic Justice; Empirical research; Dimension (graph theory); Sociology; Epistemology; Organizational commitment; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.11173718424975766,"score_gpt":0.35172262387469055,"score_spread":0.2399854396249329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1202183704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97625923,0.000117768526,0.0029171351,0.0014183997,0.00027812595,0.0003740701,0.0075630634,0.00009389505,0.01097826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9364613,0.00009535261,0.0022737677,0.0007581076,0.00012515768,0.0015601272,0.014580396,0.000076983604,0.04406872],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959694,0.0012456134,0.00033007847,0.00032545146,0.0009674771,0.0011619496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976395,0.0082412325,0.005068998,0.0034116255,0.0037650485,0.0031180547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005160776,0.00047081048,0.00079157,0.0012604618,0.002205986,0.0030250251,0.0023073854,0.0027423238,0.025107475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018526481,0.00036733277,0.0010031249,0.0015358544,0.000873463,0.0022429288,0.0030099854,0.004723937,0.00427985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069966307,0.0015407826,0.94086117,0.000087563756,0.00037987492,0.00018486138,0.0028353226,0.0008393203,0.0009892667,0.0048347153,0.025241146,0.021506434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013002711,0.00091974204,0.9641845,0.0001000093,0.00023808827,0.00009414422,0.00684699,0.0030199084,0.0026715412,0.0023365149,0.019386752,0.00007170699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0382041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036592238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0382041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073437515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003207082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08399284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014360443","doi":"10.1016/s0191-3085(04)26003-8","title":"NORMAL ACTS OF IRRATIONAL TRUST: MOTIVATED ATTRIBUTIONS AND THE TRUST DEVELOPMENT PROCESS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":263,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Hong Kong; Northwestern University","keywords":"Attribution; Irrational number; Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Trustworthiness; Interpersonal relationship","score_opus":0.07552139476198756,"score_gpt":0.39754742767557055,"score_spread":0.322026032913583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014360443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9309315,0.0002690173,0.03389844,0.0039055226,0.00005518658,0.000074439,0.000035396897,0.00003830297,0.030792145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848264,0.000030289768,0.0011977077,0.00004895334,0.0000075932107,0.000012321214,0.0000064065766,0.0000048647366,0.00020925209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939786,0.003942342,0.00021578377,0.00046181044,0.001062746,0.0003387201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9434928,0.030437632,0.0117052505,0.007519429,0.0037837317,0.003061104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010996449,0.00028678653,0.00030051492,0.0011002802,0.0014769855,0.0039926386,0.0006910583,0.0017814508,0.0029144029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07145633,0.00041027574,0.00029903333,0.00063668465,0.0074200733,0.0042201863,0.00228294,0.002874077,0.00015689975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007323135,0.0013596882,0.2316774,0.00018122763,0.0002986611,0.0007570137,0.030080669,0.0055507054,0.003606246,0.650431,0.0015964085,0.07372864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009912481,0.0002274104,0.14918254,0.00008669515,0.00008623767,0.0005422415,0.0071612922,0.024211038,0.0012790195,0.8145268,0.0024958076,0.00010180553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001230765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014201779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010996449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014507255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013770309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058155477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095468191","doi":"10.1016/j.riob.2013.10.002","title":"Underestimating our influence over others at work","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dehumanization; Psychology; Wrongdoing; Social psychology; Objectification; Industrial and organizational psychology; Cognitive bias; Face (sociological concept); Cognition; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.11829946795814675,"score_gpt":0.45064006788851224,"score_spread":0.33234059993036547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095468191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9479079,0.0008635891,0.009489746,0.00402003,0.000085251064,0.000027571301,0.00015384154,0.000019915076,0.03743219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972096,0.0002170121,0.00089476054,0.0006851436,0.000081686514,0.000020437781,0.00004280143,0.000009903822,0.00083865173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98844403,0.008778838,0.00033806195,0.00084462314,0.0012694781,0.00032493414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.782044,0.16297191,0.02562799,0.020312656,0.006023681,0.00301978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013285991,0.00042152047,0.00035422842,0.0009890967,0.0011143008,0.0026197135,0.00066114654,0.0013288492,0.0038249523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07880572,0.00034748425,0.0003498516,0.0008701825,0.0023881283,0.0022592668,0.0010358834,0.0018688393,0.00049482274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007156177,0.0010107434,0.8676608,0.00027774912,0.00085068267,0.00022054205,0.013706343,0.0030796863,0.005787467,0.038102888,0.002426466,0.06616096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008741941,0.0005647995,0.92193234,0.00018321107,0.0004857104,0.0005967922,0.009441489,0.0066036987,0.0066309236,0.04331612,0.010095924,0.00006155916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044461777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039099013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013285991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006823803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007055565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07026392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899703783","doi":"10.1016/j.riob.2018.10.002","title":"Moral Utility Theory: Understanding the motivation to behave (un)ethically","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Moral disengagement; Morality; Psychology; Moral reasoning; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Social cognitive theory of morality; Incentive; Expected utility hypothesis; Process (computing); Social psychology; Ethical decision; Moral development; Decision theory; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.5254640248887166,"score_gpt":0.42881824105791766,"score_spread":0.09664578383079891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899703783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3531648,0.003849134,0.20903371,0.041262195,0.00039414153,0.00012478976,0.0001663534,0.00006969529,0.39193517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874887,0.00053217413,0.0085352445,0.0008426769,0.00010267266,0.00006464094,0.000029380913,0.000014735153,0.0023897267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980732,0.0010938166,0.000046935413,0.00015743697,0.0004720459,0.00015660125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936592,0.0037441587,0.0008860458,0.0003610062,0.0006706482,0.00067895366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034352723,0.00034543872,0.0002999556,0.0010806317,0.00085316884,0.0038557134,0.0009286671,0.0019778672,0.0057243705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013551334,0.00019786756,0.0003044748,0.00080799847,0.006659638,0.004553552,0.0012874483,0.0025648386,0.0003704738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003678737,0.00017432237,0.006264415,0.000086176915,0.000021941805,0.00008938772,0.0027277502,0.0010377206,0.00066601794,0.96255475,0.0016341906,0.02470653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011407332,0.000036762303,0.0070687328,0.0000616467,0.000010701664,0.000109427245,0.0013054223,0.0035534804,0.0003087925,0.9831051,0.004415157,0.0000132391115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010425717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014454267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057243705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014840892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016142543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0191499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902194800","doi":"10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.001","title":"From surviving to thriving in the gig economy: A research agenda for individuals in the new world of work","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":542,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Thriving; Foregrounding; Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Public relations; Coping (psychology); Proactivity; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.20761968862306027,"score_gpt":0.46030356840261416,"score_spread":0.25268387977955387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902194800","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2171132,0.036751587,0.0066424045,0.6097844,0.0019953933,0.00008974564,0.00013300584,0.000065704924,0.12742452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489147,0.029122928,0.0026477794,0.013394034,0.00085996726,0.0000998967,0.000059055918,0.0000362532,0.0048653465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633324,0.002066146,0.000081577215,0.00025398497,0.00047238788,0.00079260365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98373324,0.007184064,0.0012121878,0.0008324411,0.0017460466,0.0052920184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008661271,0.00045872747,0.00083832926,0.0019205969,0.007005719,0.022453558,0.0019491406,0.0043529067,0.007508243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011612704,0.00023239461,0.00038184374,0.0034894715,0.020761041,0.031416878,0.006232703,0.0060464414,0.0006538047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119240314,0.00056345586,0.017990967,0.00083534303,0.000041543437,0.00036209027,0.08967299,0.00039344787,0.00036997857,0.7734899,0.019642783,0.09651823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019159745,0.00017998213,0.0087640695,0.0014578893,0.0000366344,0.00026239533,0.5031547,0.00052222365,0.0002995277,0.3628025,0.122450344,0.000050626877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040815887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007988762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022453558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033633967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014221945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045805693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310711912","doi":"10.1016/j.riob.2022.100177","title":"Why, how, and when divergent perceptions become dysfunctional in organizations: A Motivated cognition perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Dysfunctional family; Perception; Perspective (graphical); Cognition; Psychology; Social cognition; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08321103962626215,"score_gpt":0.391612573641648,"score_spread":0.30840153401538584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310711912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96493685,0.00024232076,0.010905663,0.0048334384,0.000030297939,0.000027574775,0.00002246477,0.000028098832,0.018973295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819,0.00003932531,0.0013500776,0.00018266364,0.000009633609,0.000009489284,0.000007856276,0.000006173888,0.00020483635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717003,0.0013859702,0.00007796421,0.0003455162,0.0006450058,0.00037553243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98703617,0.0062993346,0.0026628238,0.0013603227,0.0012818413,0.0013595718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004509876,0.00036647197,0.0003601738,0.0013354238,0.0012145888,0.0052010026,0.00089696195,0.0022441093,0.0018646466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018834222,0.0003674107,0.0004367774,0.00073989865,0.0051053497,0.00378104,0.0020684602,0.0023641752,0.00013301327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009388774,0.0031530557,0.32985184,0.0003446913,0.00040300077,0.0011996841,0.06032147,0.0056676907,0.024227083,0.42424116,0.0018902564,0.1477611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014154143,0.0006261575,0.36645365,0.00016261423,0.00016281984,0.00062965526,0.03335869,0.013665777,0.0039066407,0.5776351,0.003097338,0.00015996615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018294235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016899512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052010026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00144966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015468738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023850799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404508215","doi":"10.1016/j.riob.2024.100210","title":"Mobilization capacity: Tracing the path from having networks to capturing resources","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilization; Tracing; Path (computing); Political science; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Computer network; Law","score_opus":0.09032588724929494,"score_gpt":0.38390247993116366,"score_spread":0.29357659268186875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404508215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4046347,0.0029440746,0.3643,0.023682697,0.00014896874,0.00036125205,0.0007230132,0.00044256507,0.2027627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95699406,0.0009543504,0.03839831,0.000277471,0.000030088975,0.00016980626,0.00011455487,0.000079929334,0.0029813426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700767,0.0015279104,0.00010469854,0.0005135736,0.00049401436,0.00035203405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96103716,0.026237335,0.004588429,0.0045534275,0.0019820512,0.0016015472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0084163435,0.00070537906,0.00047870164,0.0038213278,0.0031694707,0.0063475743,0.0013377711,0.0016794571,0.011127395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044645905,0.00067397655,0.00049391726,0.0032566306,0.014725674,0.025718104,0.008344079,0.002405661,0.0008064989],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006575042,0.000051304,0.016159803,0.00022635717,0.00004618952,0.00013669368,0.008565288,0.0052335495,0.0007751225,0.92530584,0.0012767605,0.042157356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002490276,0.00009780706,0.012096253,0.00046152194,0.000057833597,0.00034120443,0.009543901,0.014750143,0.0015315554,0.9341063,0.026922692,0.00006591622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053848256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045497473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011127395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042941696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028010616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044510365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}