{"meta":{"query_hash":"1783f20be1c0","filters":{"venue":"Research in Science & Technological Education"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1783f20be1c0","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Research+in+Science+%26+Technological+Education"},"results":[{"id":"W1980928526","doi":"10.1080/02635140500266401","title":"The role of student‐generated analogies in promoting conceptual understanding for undergraduate chemistry students","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Science & Technological Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Mathematics education; Concept learning; Class (philosophy); Science education; Psychology; Chemistry; Conceptual change; Pedagogy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.30471758911055086,"score_gpt":0.5604003811435063,"score_spread":0.25568279203295546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980928526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870176,0.00017327123,0.004999326,0.0002052737,0.000010615009,0.00007409938,0.000007658372,0.000050207043,0.007461957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896605,0.0001517458,0.009402059,0.000039347276,0.000006573909,0.000041955118,0.000011544823,0.0000062679883,0.000679882],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99617934,0.0025007485,0.00010805939,0.00024683148,0.000827224,0.00013773517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97750705,0.016995816,0.0021251163,0.0011933609,0.0010570418,0.0011215901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037485713,0.00036256484,0.00027156936,0.00085733476,0.00049050053,0.0019052178,0.0007519768,0.00054894184,0.0020070567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034363292,0.00019370143,0.0001923199,0.00037634754,0.0007935265,0.0011078122,0.0018929718,0.0008120965,0.0001977923],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010965783,0.008917726,0.08657005,0.00094769447,0.00016501271,0.00063883205,0.03096246,0.0054605477,0.042272136,0.010767427,0.0015061082,0.81069547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012615974,0.046154957,0.5094674,0.0010646217,0.000885492,0.006061813,0.058841046,0.05264641,0.14399765,0.1008021,0.07829496,0.00052194856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029766798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006145692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037485713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041910977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008764747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019824564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994446026","doi":"10.1080/02635140120046268","title":"Children's Ideas about Strengthening Structures","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Science & Technological Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Advanced Education; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Vocabulary; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.15450504331016426,"score_gpt":0.5318894232065857,"score_spread":0.3773843798964215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994446026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843278,0.0006252672,0.0010896802,0.0009230079,0.000014539644,0.000027153788,0.000060034206,0.000020593823,0.012911859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959525,0.00069447997,0.00078314816,0.00011136768,0.0000060936263,0.00003229624,0.000058101028,0.000007171232,0.002354861],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808735,0.000636452,0.00012440127,0.00019257063,0.0006881575,0.00027094985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99516284,0.0024041769,0.0013146275,0.0002081264,0.0005377915,0.0003724733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037459384,0.0004338831,0.00029197015,0.0017187372,0.001533869,0.003912948,0.0006252624,0.0013564716,0.0029949725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009352908,0.0004968515,0.0004955258,0.00076720427,0.004787409,0.0027317565,0.0018889972,0.002174755,0.0003329745],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008462938,0.00016845655,0.15823121,0.00038046355,0.000034165456,0.0010690113,0.786432,0.00046224537,0.0063379244,0.018031059,0.0011842852,0.027584467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041370302,0.0004954996,0.246742,0.00060675584,0.00010995508,0.00295154,0.67649573,0.0005726991,0.0026899285,0.010777141,0.058404703,0.0001127276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033110944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004476014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003912948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015482495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009769115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019810677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775368746","doi":"10.1080/02635143.2017.1409704","title":"The impact of a professional development model for a mobilized science curriculum: a case study of teacher changes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Science & Technological Education","topic":"Mobile Learning in Education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Education University of Hong Kong; University of Hong Kong; National Research Foundation Singapore","keywords":"Science education; Professional development; Curriculum; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Faculty development; Curriculum development; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.17568301885048068,"score_gpt":0.5332507488098178,"score_spread":0.35756772995933717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775368746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888644,0.00008748144,0.0047210148,0.0012442974,0.000033238044,0.00027309873,0.000019909905,0.00004752126,0.0047089863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908399,0.0001576831,0.005541946,0.0001720911,0.000013279786,0.0002524618,0.00002310309,0.00002673562,0.002972756],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99089783,0.0057999287,0.00037431586,0.00065533473,0.0013607664,0.000911821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98867947,0.0055876663,0.0012881098,0.0012175335,0.0012298377,0.0019974394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006648585,0.0003941756,0.00041595745,0.0011275089,0.0053442544,0.002869245,0.0022297194,0.0026006151,0.0019016151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021188218,0.0005667714,0.00052215066,0.0008482016,0.0037074978,0.0019310325,0.003561932,0.0030492623,0.0004879838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032167582,0.007690885,0.03971592,0.0005614218,0.000030305155,0.02133331,0.8178688,0.0022346678,0.00937764,0.005977892,0.0023893535,0.092498176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039893427,0.005112515,0.053283464,0.000541761,0.000096672185,0.01563904,0.8037369,0.012538768,0.013518733,0.0027668297,0.09219327,0.00017306939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047101914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009324643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006648585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005844145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039512804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042402446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982497301","doi":"10.1080/02635143.2019.1682988","title":"A systematic review of the design work of STEM teachers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Research in Science & Technological Education","topic":"Educational Environments and Student Outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Western University","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Curriculum; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Design education; Instructional design; Engineering ethics; Engineering design process; Design and Technology; Research design; Design brief; Mathematics education; Computer science; Pedagogy; Design technology; Sociology; Engineering; Psychology; Systems engineering","score_opus":0.39086871575087423,"score_gpt":0.5617704629790171,"score_spread":0.1709017472281429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982497301","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008516727,0.9967715,0.0004462882,0.0002800579,0.00015004307,0.00043412694,0.00036366546,0.000011471044,0.00069110247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006841161,0.9902868,0.0012195915,0.00034735008,0.00004049782,0.0007939212,0.00027417214,0.000007854567,0.0001885695],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825714,0.0067672743,0.006219889,0.0010063947,0.0031009193,0.00033409125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9544406,0.033008676,0.0055094096,0.0010382503,0.0054965704,0.0005064339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01359221,0.0017098619,0.004919151,0.01806753,0.0013949183,0.0031478384,0.0024192205,0.0021263903,0.0043567587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059584655,0.0012732557,0.003704874,0.017294195,0.0015910025,0.0035841372,0.0023113724,0.0015261561,0.000631842],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007551675,0.000023244242,0.000326736,0.9189877,0.0014343647,0.0001754928,0.0009981083,0.00008764843,0.0002540447,0.0005717053,0.002988201,0.0740772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052899566,0.00010109456,0.0012239426,0.9352931,0.0070645986,0.00038209037,0.000768116,0.00003288382,0.00020446489,0.0003578635,0.054494057,0.000024981122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009624322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033171456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01806753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005210161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027803335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07188338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391251672","doi":"10.1080/02635143.2024.2304583","title":"“The strawberry in the pot that became something” – entanglements of bodies, materials, and affect in science activities supported by a community organization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Science & Technological Education","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Science education; Sociology; Science learning; Aesthetics; Psychology; Pedagogy; Art; Communication","score_opus":0.18401859534183956,"score_gpt":0.5208077183802744,"score_spread":0.33678912303843483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391251672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95950854,0.0002748905,0.0024302755,0.0014331333,0.000040362786,0.000029352064,0.000014598189,0.000017941222,0.03625084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819547,0.00007751684,0.00026983573,0.00006723273,0.000009187001,0.000010702368,0.0000049011915,0.000007926391,0.0013572108],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976802,0.0014161182,0.000044135617,0.0002574053,0.0002963593,0.00030578015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997844,0.0010492067,0.00038624686,0.00017783095,0.00013380694,0.00040893257],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021570965,0.00022148713,0.00021138755,0.0008514609,0.005598095,0.0063139903,0.00054230023,0.0007486641,0.002607124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035424968,0.0002269412,0.00022532674,0.0004596804,0.020297348,0.0042881225,0.0053729075,0.0013298626,0.00018337078],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007558355,0.00008023514,0.013972748,0.00008290233,0.000012899499,0.0006497897,0.94231915,0.00014215436,0.0041610817,0.022532394,0.0006662644,0.015304781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008400139,0.0001666714,0.046600353,0.00011338309,0.000020556288,0.00061946135,0.90340704,0.0003211444,0.0011482349,0.00898787,0.03856914,0.00003775695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003470519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004423319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99440193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015392951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009087096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011407912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}