{"meta":{"query_hash":"64f0271b4d95","filters":{"venue":"Research in public policy analysis and management"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/64f0271b4d95","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Research+in+public+policy+analysis+and+management"},"results":[{"id":"W2486768049","doi":"10.1016/s0732-1317(06)15022-8","title":"The Administrative State in a Globalizing World: Some Trends and Challenges","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research in public policy analysis and management","topic":"Global History, Politics, and Ideology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Humanity; Globalization; Political science; State (computer science); World order; Quarter (Canadian coin); Order (exchange); Human rights; Political economy; Law; History; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.193086008779671,"score_gpt":0.4354140278643115,"score_spread":0.2423280190846405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2486768049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022747863,0.205823,0.0014680829,0.30442005,0.0031197653,0.000016153686,0.00016692793,0.000081031445,0.4621571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5612663,0.29121387,0.0030993253,0.028993934,0.007006868,0.00010229175,0.00035862316,0.0002104037,0.10774835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864763,0.0005719656,0.00004717461,0.00013110346,0.0003916793,0.00021049005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883515,0.00059042004,0.00010456665,0.0000752027,0.00020746278,0.00018723299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021758925,0.0003324762,0.00031365533,0.0024696162,0.005966451,0.016498802,0.00089821784,0.0027593265,0.0056533697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015966386,0.00023498657,0.00027759472,0.0095077455,0.011641779,0.014067912,0.003523581,0.0052445303,0.0006537666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004489097,0.000020000452,0.0006079427,0.000113211245,0.0000030142683,0.00006698908,0.016883057,0.00008184232,0.000035321405,0.90243536,0.04145585,0.03829278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003669953,0.000013290706,0.0025686962,0.00046469716,0.000004644532,0.00014671744,0.036180865,0.00015968217,0.00005782995,0.115279965,0.8451075,0.000012409988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013357536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027734207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016498802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071698353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005904437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052020967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487026749","doi":"10.1016/s0732-1317(05)14002-0","title":"Path Dependence and Self-Reinforcing Processes in the Regulation of Ethics in Politics: Toward a Framework for Comparative Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research in public policy analysis and management","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Legislature; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Element (criminal law); Path (computing); Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.1895429695249246,"score_gpt":0.40264047752432347,"score_spread":0.21309750799939886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487026749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22124392,0.01658893,0.22976416,0.012222077,0.00016816943,0.00045528807,0.00021616458,0.000080817736,0.5192604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9328752,0.006114999,0.052781902,0.0004897738,0.00008663253,0.0007215268,0.00015227118,0.00006475217,0.006712951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943427,0.004667255,0.000086352906,0.00026400108,0.000390376,0.00024936764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99080056,0.0074172677,0.0005924405,0.00057087245,0.00041609816,0.00020272401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007298676,0.00038231577,0.0005574955,0.0030443363,0.0027525758,0.0062966174,0.0011897009,0.0013934864,0.004011381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077207102,0.0003446698,0.0005526285,0.004451035,0.02029889,0.010300204,0.0030075281,0.003032538,0.0002337767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051485085,0.000017268425,0.00044161765,0.000032910742,0.0000044364674,0.000019696201,0.0033793515,0.00037840405,0.000054651126,0.99104357,0.00014490647,0.0044779656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000908135,0.0000475679,0.004096452,0.00020910145,0.000015093444,0.00009878845,0.010546588,0.003861041,0.00019620721,0.9530077,0.02789812,0.000014132484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026450346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029316144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007298676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006149625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002249376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044618845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489154034","doi":"10.1016/s0732-1317(01)11014-6","title":"Chapter 28. Revitalizing health-care systems with new public management in quebec and Canada: A case against the classical approach","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research in public policy analysis and management","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public health care; Health care; Healthcare system; Public administration; Medicine; Political science; Public health; Nursing; Health policy; Law","score_opus":0.10750727710334342,"score_gpt":0.3677358087472564,"score_spread":0.260228531643913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489154034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018244537,0.059724435,0.003404811,0.16354686,0.0034734174,0.00027167922,0.0010708019,0.00018409667,0.7500794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1750984,0.028564606,0.0062555852,0.03152903,0.0005257034,0.00014640814,0.00040595245,0.000120393124,0.75735384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853337,0.00027184913,0.000023192722,0.00009346704,0.0005468884,0.00053123344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906844,0.00018068441,0.000032702985,0.000038532795,0.0005060461,0.00017352239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014793961,0.00051269704,0.00036197668,0.0017514352,0.012459183,0.008592798,0.0019862195,0.0036775004,0.014170775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021319117,0.00035222902,0.00062417693,0.003958384,0.005787326,0.0021880714,0.0011110726,0.0033772225,0.0006390334],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017690652,0.00004333671,0.0014220467,0.00016008662,0.000016668544,0.00016505872,0.005817078,0.001387327,0.00022744252,0.5456001,0.3974266,0.047716543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013141336,0.000009668951,0.0048242286,0.00032106467,0.000017750068,0.000051544353,0.0039541847,0.000656798,0.00020724136,0.017479623,0.97243315,0.00003161863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83236754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16763243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20365207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9654284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2505634363","doi":"10.1016/s0723-1318(04)13017-x","title":"17. MEASURING AND MANAGING FOR PERFORMANCE: LESSONS FROM AUSTRALIA","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research in public policy analysis and management","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treasury; Commonwealth; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Political science; Commission; Administration (probate law); Law","score_opus":0.3618387056037437,"score_gpt":0.4918028690271817,"score_spread":0.12996416342343797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2505634363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013207175,0.051976703,0.014903384,0.079398714,0.0012539165,0.00012188737,0.000080962054,0.0000910682,0.8389662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37124437,0.10489598,0.053648453,0.016059712,0.0012149333,0.00036834952,0.00018005827,0.00035438457,0.4520337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965078,0.0017062101,0.0001812531,0.00023439972,0.0011088724,0.00026149253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966216,0.0014744647,0.00014758694,0.00020816112,0.0012995884,0.00024857564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075986246,0.000738941,0.00047477146,0.0015384591,0.0025317566,0.008257747,0.0012594194,0.0016852787,0.0030972327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007586455,0.00028624703,0.00028811433,0.0027548112,0.007177137,0.009038281,0.003006096,0.0033380666,0.00096735224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011473886,0.00004936596,0.0013508027,0.00033770132,0.000007883864,0.0001546967,0.02298959,0.0008145047,0.00013849464,0.709025,0.04739961,0.2177208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005600241,0.00005228501,0.0060094944,0.0016265071,0.000012259705,0.00015921448,0.011232332,0.0012423979,0.000379654,0.19918309,0.7800705,0.000026684991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09518441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11547807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09518441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014121371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0152730215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18926078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}