{"meta":{"query_hash":"4bfd3333ba19","filters":{"venue":"Research on economic inequality"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4bfd3333ba19","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Research+on+economic+inequality"},"results":[{"id":"W146822264","doi":"10.1016/s1049-2585(04)12005-x","title":"ON INTERMEDIATE MEASURES OF INEQUALITY","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research on economic inequality","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Colorado Boulder; University of Guelph; Colorado State University","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Inequality; Mathematics; Affine transformation; Class (philosophy); Unit (ring theory); Log sum inequality; Kantorovich inequality; Linear inequality; Pure mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.2565438907638194,"score_gpt":0.4305883728812433,"score_spread":0.1740444821174239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W146822264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0446277,0.00013109305,0.000023873892,0.0011716506,0.0013584313,0.0011241051,0.0010622011,0.00011644978,0.9503845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9192075,0.0007041821,0.000016745564,0.0004478828,0.0014957585,0.000042853288,0.000103265076,0.00009549297,0.07788628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909429,0.002350916,0.0018696728,0.0012285913,0.002298391,0.0013095286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993333,0.0028007296,0.0009025943,0.0016802364,0.0007260873,0.00055738294],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025819516,0.00061877735,0.0014356124,0.0007988138,0.0007511475,0.00015153227,0.0015855429,0.0011433659,0.0052215285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002620428,0.000611963,0.00062793825,0.0001138349,0.0022114369,0.00027119083,0.00035154706,0.002357095,0.0023687033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046903855,0.00019646746,0.00024535894,0.00024608694,0.00011895611,0.000011326098,0.0024507837,0.000047826205,0.0000052322616,0.9873294,0.004386964,0.004492538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012019103,0.0011176799,0.0014945164,0.0006829569,0.000029232495,4.0964488e-7,0.0006657695,0.000012903591,0.00027987652,0.8592448,0.13430749,0.0009624391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013621242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006725504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87457985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049482766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033312282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492042301","doi":"10.1016/s1049-2585(06)13010-0","title":"Bayesian Assessment of Lorenz and Stochastic Dominance In Income Distributions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research on economic inequality","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stochastic dominance; Dominance (genetics); Econometrics; Bayesian probability; Null hypothesis; Economics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Welfare economics","score_opus":0.09719643064759076,"score_gpt":0.4266349907453919,"score_spread":0.32943856009780115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492042301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042971887,0.00018763375,0.0016189376,0.0009940517,0.00040371076,0.0012598616,0.0021160478,0.000036236357,0.9504116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690746,0.0002449531,0.00006377255,0.000024350795,0.00037294874,0.0000442311,0.00012479596,0.000028031887,0.030022286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959715,0.0008484721,0.0010773108,0.00066789286,0.000704011,0.00073079433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970676,0.0014884067,0.00040797686,0.0006201373,0.00020977484,0.00020610682],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101689985,0.00028872368,0.0008123081,0.00044180756,0.0004488274,0.000088215165,0.000491072,0.00048699975,0.0005026617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000362797,0.00030694215,0.00014831868,0.000096127755,0.0013755582,0.00018979635,0.00023634569,0.001112644,0.000047883004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004812299,0.000091972244,0.0038551,0.00011968302,0.000022484963,0.0000052710925,0.0002880311,0.00011356795,0.0000015339444,0.9935023,0.00095576537,0.0009961247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027309107,0.0008906954,0.16195714,0.0014755151,0.00004519399,0.0000018759913,0.000853804,0.0031753483,0.000025612722,0.74816245,0.07892521,0.0017562218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018353792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01811193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92610276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027632576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014424784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2501516968","doi":"10.1016/s1049-2585(07)15009-2","title":"Aging and Inter-Generational Fairness: A Canadian Analysis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research on economic inequality","topic":"demographic modeling and climate adaptation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Baby boom; Microsimulation; Life expectancy; Economics; Population ageing; Cohort; Social security; Entitlement (fair division); Population; Wage; Public policy; Demographic economics; Public economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.5571337178990133,"score_gpt":0.5138067546694236,"score_spread":0.04332696322958973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2501516968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06661238,0.00028573585,0.006318777,0.002438476,0.00043155818,0.00044300826,0.00091845245,0.00004313586,0.9225085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89344764,0.00016426967,0.00015272983,0.00030840494,0.0002951251,0.000011157434,0.00021324067,0.000026622882,0.105380826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957706,0.00032621724,0.0011029434,0.0010534038,0.0012081941,0.0005386796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957874,0.0019884475,0.0002728918,0.0008655087,0.00057552493,0.0005102658],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0241674,0.0002457044,0.00058431784,0.004830586,0.00043294742,0.00062605453,0.0005691849,0.00033091696,0.0028073227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057214283,0.00022190748,0.00027691945,0.00029353975,0.00026645156,0.00018346634,0.00013625297,0.0007428738,0.0009436732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004920959,0.000014677086,0.0038654634,0.000013598765,0.0004730672,0.00002348382,0.00030072438,0.0028835798,0.0000015999781,0.93008953,0.0034838577,0.05880122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047836438,0.0001995411,0.007432305,0.00010158189,0.00015628285,0.0000065185736,0.0006783456,0.13131697,0.000009813235,0.58547825,0.27321836,0.0009236474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03482589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4064593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8268353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065465015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071528705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}