{"meta":{"query_hash":"1229125c38c7","filters":{"venue":"Review of Central and East European Law"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1229125c38c7","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Review+of+Central+and+East+European+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1967488272","doi":"10.1163/1573035053683209","title":"Rights of Private Property in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and in the Civil Code of Quebec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Central and East European Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Political science; Law; Contradiction; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Private property; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021656405054679508,"score_gpt":0.2652328119427474,"score_spread":0.2435764068880679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967488272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4644217,0.023111928,0.000035378645,0.051349603,0.000048629794,0.002457392,0.00008921342,0.000010263266,0.45847592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916878,0.007758369,0.000023846833,0.00038270195,0.0000365619,0.000003201637,0.0000018018342,0.0000028486706,0.00010291405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865663,0.000604683,0.0003435589,0.0000907301,0.00018975152,0.00011467188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995694,0.000034715922,0.00019149133,0.00016033184,0.000021840675,0.000022207823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010475897,0.000060669896,0.00016433197,0.0000075284593,0.00013658879,0.000019937761,0.00027047817,0.000013631586,0.000012710724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025565054,0.00002347258,0.00004480995,0.0001584594,0.00035989963,0.00006593927,0.000039280687,0.00007468345,7.0876615e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009262594,0.00013388752,0.0018026753,0.00094417343,0.000007014379,4.4792753e-7,0.009107252,0.000014235248,0.00017713588,0.9806363,0.00020181506,0.0069658007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030490453,0.000027633041,0.093999185,0.0026897877,0.000037155412,0.0000021971118,0.00038834027,0.00008385452,0.0001481256,0.0008634767,0.90136236,0.00009295256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033074182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11899019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009378322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033698896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89708596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051725122","doi":"10.1163/1573035053683236","title":"The Civil Code of the Russian Federation from Foreign and Comparative Law Perspectives: An Introduction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Central and East European Law","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative law; Law; Political science; Russian federation; Civil law (Civil law); Civil code; Private law; International law; Context (archaeology); Public law; Legal history; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03126963510541714,"score_gpt":0.2869251870934526,"score_spread":0.25565555198803547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051725122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051437415,0.047826137,0.00004980527,0.018116113,0.00017836031,0.0004918684,0.000050585626,0.00002139032,0.8818283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97840005,0.020106414,0.0000411575,0.0005832002,0.0005870044,6.9104476e-7,0.0000060408843,0.0000048210277,0.0002706447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985929,0.0007214664,0.00023493623,0.00014331263,0.00019081324,0.00011658331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955565,0.000038630216,0.00014889495,0.000117619056,0.00007857967,0.00006061494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055365637,0.00007481546,0.00014085542,0.000004743823,0.00049189053,0.000075632415,0.00015731915,0.00001044245,0.000049361195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003487107,0.000042441137,0.000049935086,0.00004689207,0.0006762228,0.00024011926,0.000031345233,0.000078286204,0.0000034365116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012183064,0.000024408582,0.00003723987,0.00003588867,0.000015330952,1.337192e-7,0.0022105398,0.0000034732263,0.000054289274,0.9958273,0.00014178692,0.0016373808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019541504,0.000052506017,0.0068624844,0.0005391815,0.000039378745,0.0000015609577,0.0017367753,0.0001107073,0.00010574588,0.001298445,0.9889674,0.000090392794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000177492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029710422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022231587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016304739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37832743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081651053","doi":"10.1163/1573035053683218","title":"General Concepts of Private Law Relating to Private Property in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and in the Civil Code of Quebec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Central and East European Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Code (set theory); Law; Russian federation; Political science; Doctrine; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.02681407542268926,"score_gpt":0.2904121342181522,"score_spread":0.26359805879546294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081651053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7476631,0.0078039,0.00004568956,0.030394344,0.000035587,0.0019776071,0.000056884506,0.0000089414525,0.21201396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540734,0.0031963687,0.00012689627,0.0010963018,0.00005175044,0.0000054183456,0.00000233088,0.000005125546,0.000108466455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983328,0.0007203599,0.00045264256,0.00012135441,0.0002178007,0.00015506348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947953,0.000042587155,0.00023675011,0.0001805478,0.000026593463,0.000033962755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012948016,0.00007736796,0.00020027685,0.00000797392,0.00016896827,0.000027559925,0.00029484095,0.000017554246,0.000009029474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005501046,0.000034394834,0.000048721944,0.00019708266,0.00037801976,0.000083581006,0.00007222224,0.00009951925,7.453934e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075351904,0.000055654316,0.0022824565,0.000518737,0.0000052471055,3.3847826e-7,0.008455443,0.000077680124,0.00060432556,0.9836484,0.00007164557,0.0042724903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053400133,0.000061251194,0.1008533,0.004833842,0.000050782524,0.0000034424681,0.00071470416,0.0002852756,0.00039400914,0.0006456172,0.89143753,0.0001862184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003232351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06590721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98300284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014881008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033871864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95113754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794396534","doi":"10.1163/15730352-04301003","title":"Transparency in the Work of Judicial Councils: The Experience of (East) European Countries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Central and East European Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Political science; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Judicial independence; Judicial reform; Autonomy; Openness to experience; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.042851493836499395,"score_gpt":0.2897973172270954,"score_spread":0.246945823390596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794396534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07053348,0.052822933,0.000019120665,0.0020999212,0.00023429033,0.00032607498,0.00003210727,0.000010728732,0.87392133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9326318,0.065991364,0.000012821502,0.0009968632,0.0002390862,0.0000010866692,0.00000136647,0.0000074227014,0.00011818415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757385,0.0010926517,0.0004985288,0.0001361681,0.00049641175,0.00020236438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992681,0.000074533666,0.0002351828,0.00015938941,0.00022541586,0.000037389837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020946846,0.000101245016,0.0002374395,0.000011812581,0.00021433023,0.00001889352,0.0005362882,0.000008093105,0.00009704805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014521736,0.00005582561,0.000082506886,0.00021744771,0.0022764436,0.00010014979,0.000040600695,0.00007564579,0.000015636062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008782764,0.000163039,0.0059886286,0.0013141484,0.000054145275,0.000013287849,0.15363282,0.000001146666,0.00004049586,0.8249942,0.0034441145,0.010266161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018036069,0.000102309634,0.039690338,0.004319039,0.000038674618,0.0000020193836,0.0032349564,7.9661453e-7,0.000020071506,0.00010436039,0.952201,0.00010606121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021713263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003258699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9487569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011496247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003252625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83876514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038105679","doi":"10.1163/15730352-bja04502003","title":"Artur Kozak’s Juriscentrist Concept of Law: a Central European Innovation in Legal Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Central and East European Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research University Higher School of Economics; Queen's University; Narodowym Centrum Nauki; Queen's University Belfast; Sveučilište u Zagrebu","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Legal realism; International law; Legal history; Philosophy of law; Postmodernism; Legitimacy; Sociology; Political science; Sociology of law; Epistemology; Comparative law; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021567156588886537,"score_gpt":0.26177462603544377,"score_spread":0.24020746944655724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038105679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013393067,0.071849756,0.00008415207,0.009298781,0.00028771805,0.0006927792,0.00008958422,0.000070513044,0.90423363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681314,0.024692075,0.00006558841,0.0064488966,0.00036195552,6.6208133e-7,0.00002928384,0.00001564244,0.0002544724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728256,0.0012659088,0.00060220354,0.0002178039,0.0002813408,0.0003501958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999327,0.000025253763,0.00027803774,0.000106849104,0.000108832864,0.00015400467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010606737,0.00013678,0.00033183192,0.000004813031,0.00014000309,0.00003458947,0.00025203024,0.000032463755,0.00015936539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014263584,0.00010981628,0.00011918967,0.00037699516,0.0007085593,0.00021235543,0.000068285386,0.00019125771,0.000013639647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021392772,0.000060398103,0.00014709005,0.0013014312,0.000018057892,0.000015776344,0.0122626815,0.0000027676585,0.00008504944,0.9772653,0.002417697,0.0064023873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045064578,0.000049776725,0.0014048739,0.0022193324,0.000040819312,0.0000019220386,0.0010911934,0.0000031592313,0.00008708039,0.0004194573,0.99406254,0.00016917275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000933614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033696706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99164486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002164483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046905257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4478178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246267805","doi":"10.1163/1573035053683263","title":"Objects of Private Property in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and in the Civil Code of Quebec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Central and East European Law","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Property (philosophy); Tangible property; Code (set theory); Context (archaeology); Object (grammar); Political science; CLARITY; Intangible property; Law and economics; Property rights; Private property; Immovable property; Law; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Epistemology; Geography; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","score_opus":0.014742921394862532,"score_gpt":0.19974422561311161,"score_spread":0.1850013042182491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246267805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96046627,0.010774911,4.0263993e-7,0.012020637,0.000032281907,0.0006287377,0.000038616476,0.0000033137085,0.016034827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98262864,0.016791051,0.0000045479205,0.00041190168,0.00004461268,0.0000010525316,0.0000054063203,6.769282e-7,0.00011209575],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901104,0.00030370484,0.00032861737,0.00009497642,0.0001433362,0.00011834347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970895,0.000024494613,0.00016798767,0.00006395585,0.000014981099,0.000019656447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005474478,0.000078833575,0.00020241774,0.0000032859625,0.00007067927,0.000014166986,0.00020544272,0.000017955446,0.000014414543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009913197,0.000010039295,0.000057542526,0.00012570487,0.00018543434,0.00004866715,0.00003963851,0.00006930635,3.4330543e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003345772,0.0019631058,0.053374883,0.01575819,0.000115722956,0.000019066094,0.017992329,0.00007309743,0.03882099,0.16790728,0.0012202143,0.70242053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042708384,0.00021100388,0.76230013,0.0054469192,0.00003811479,0.000022626438,0.00033409122,0.00006865136,0.0009886194,0.00027380005,0.22973758,0.00015139263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078382395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038723134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70892525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003606081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000064402234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97881764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W832122363","doi":"10.1163/15730352-40012001","title":"Understanding Russia’s Low Rate of Acquittal: Pretrial Screening and the Problem of Accusatorial Bias","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Central and East European Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Eesti Teadusfondi","keywords":"Acquittal; Discretion; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.24749195321097,"score_gpt":0.32619949215944577,"score_spread":0.07870753894847576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W832122363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124710076,0.2997305,0.0022879096,0.023908986,0.0022743423,0.0047786543,0.00010468829,0.00011176877,0.54209304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674227,0.03198951,0.00013898782,0.00012430082,0.0002825301,6.27e-7,0.0000012945918,0.0000067774145,0.000033232576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981526,0.00087506365,0.0003975393,0.00012345934,0.0002596123,0.00019168542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992215,0.00014637865,0.00031288894,0.00009400512,0.000094407034,0.00013081571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036893063,0.00008662367,0.00034174687,0.000012897718,0.00011327857,0.000030768755,0.00016725044,0.000019957604,0.00001226476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033881064,0.000052968066,0.0000825871,0.00013475887,0.00092566176,0.00017665619,0.00008468482,0.00006190444,8.27685e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004564363,0.000026943333,0.00034670264,0.0038408397,0.00003676257,0.0000029845723,0.004889121,0.0000046850278,0.000034542598,0.9821174,0.0010065357,0.0072370097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012970466,0.000882642,0.0020291952,0.07847002,0.0013742984,0.000024901377,0.011711878,0.00012469185,0.0004324892,0.024004294,0.86697143,0.0010037096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046086276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058444683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95811313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014702981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34106392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}