{"meta":{"query_hash":"209756de067f","filters":{"venue":"Review of Economics of the Household"},"cohort_total":27,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":27,"exported":27,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/209756de067f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Review+of+Economics+of+the+Household"},"results":[{"id":"W1972006922","doi":"10.1007/s11150-014-9251-z","title":"Child health and parental paid work","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Psychology; Work (physics); Paid work; National Longitudinal Surveys; Coping (psychology); Work hours; Mental health; Division of labour; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Domestic work; Economics; Labour economics; Working hours; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry; Wage","score_opus":0.033662338183721975,"score_gpt":0.26099295215606577,"score_spread":0.2273306139723438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972006922","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002176171,0.9976246,0.00004828481,0.0012423334,0.00024264304,0.0000012457895,0.000011617412,5.7485164e-7,0.0006111435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024229488,0.9961718,0.00005560012,0.00039910985,0.0007184416,0.0000031200013,0.000014587002,7.406512e-7,0.00021369147],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993331,0.00026606314,0.00007146113,0.000097410484,0.00017767069,0.00005436907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99601376,0.0030470998,0.0002731922,0.00007043126,0.00045849342,0.00013697578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019749047,0.0005528374,0.0013175142,0.0033283387,0.00045483635,0.001966696,0.0008867076,0.0016697135,0.003064384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050835717,0.00040843734,0.0005063841,0.0059746723,0.0018152006,0.0016888622,0.0010110129,0.0021609787,0.000429453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014609392,0.00019251891,0.00462093,0.014726174,0.00029135292,0.00020234658,0.00044303003,0.0008442827,0.00018274633,0.04252474,0.05267639,0.8831493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004202421,0.00015681682,0.039195415,0.04337665,0.0003082265,0.0010379357,0.0018522767,0.00043373895,0.00012628688,0.052667975,0.8607257,0.00007699911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0099353865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0141501315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0099353865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018065666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029025231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019755125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010392029","doi":"10.1007/s11150-005-6695-1","title":"Combining Stated and Revealed Preference Data to Construct an Empirical Examination of Intrahousehold Bargaining","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Economics; Bargaining power; Microeconomics; Consumption (sociology); Construct (python library); Revealed preference; Econometrics; Aggregate (composite); Computer science","score_opus":0.1569246611593818,"score_gpt":0.3213782689395091,"score_spread":0.1644536077801273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010392029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87408984,0.0028975054,0.09784791,0.00096323196,0.00006535519,0.00017658444,0.0028812478,0.00006199973,0.021016324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804735,0.001384438,0.012761979,0.00019062463,0.000053464726,0.00014715266,0.0016961243,0.000018190303,0.003274509],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99214464,0.0054787635,0.000365184,0.00041860426,0.0013289527,0.00026385975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.868469,0.10642748,0.011291616,0.007867587,0.005308079,0.00063617725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0152368415,0.0005466403,0.0012074526,0.0022890791,0.0008408168,0.0029676205,0.0020272338,0.0014736932,0.008906546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07573285,0.0004407964,0.0007846779,0.0061384994,0.0014742456,0.006628966,0.0017091573,0.0024983624,0.0015031297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003092801,0.002933173,0.39159343,0.0016671222,0.0013523203,0.00040761282,0.005285732,0.03446998,0.003434296,0.3611715,0.005659711,0.18893228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003547094,0.0031035794,0.26966986,0.0008442674,0.0007830419,0.0011811142,0.018592384,0.2583482,0.009309984,0.41696912,0.020373026,0.00047076945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004254995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005872051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0152368415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011499724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093746686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08058107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019356614","doi":"10.1007/s11150-013-9175-z","title":"The effect of parental labor supply on child schooling: evidence from trade liberalization in India","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Pennsylvania State University","keywords":"Economics; Liberalization; Labour economics; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Free trade; International economics","score_opus":0.015482875496486814,"score_gpt":0.2555471482598624,"score_spread":0.2400642727633756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019356614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9185229,0.067701794,0.00020424915,0.004533337,0.000061475395,0.000006880766,0.0011807278,0.000008983663,0.007779664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772807,0.021298386,0.000061114435,0.00027002138,0.000049202743,0.0000036134782,0.00028865872,0.0000036965525,0.0007446896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989937,0.00034998078,0.00007112627,0.000107539214,0.0001614923,0.00031619257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908302,0.005530394,0.0022100776,0.00038302955,0.0006444279,0.00040190833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010324538,0.00022422003,0.00042735474,0.0010777819,0.00053930667,0.0012854371,0.00077274145,0.00053683994,0.0038705748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004653272,0.00021289222,0.0006781982,0.0040441095,0.0014939272,0.000554099,0.0013677458,0.0009908217,0.00026359895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005326987,0.00017656884,0.9383917,0.0012100262,0.0009681132,0.0010218475,0.0020131278,0.0015688917,0.00044042408,0.0062500876,0.0017717347,0.045654807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013454515,0.000063014326,0.9929529,0.00024878196,0.00043493242,0.00010950421,0.0016565437,0.000084166626,0.0002013073,0.00080491824,0.0034205567,0.000009916972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094856724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13711168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094856724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012188305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022247233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18860924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023182788","doi":"10.1007/s11150-009-9054-9","title":"Poverty and its persistence: a comparison of natives and immigrants in Sweden","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Immigration; Economics; Persistence (discontinuity); Demographic economics; Hazard; Educational attainment; Panel data; Econometrics; Geography; Economic growth","score_opus":0.08242143355303584,"score_gpt":0.27267711799756833,"score_spread":0.1902556844445325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023182788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940509,0.0042365617,0.00002785706,0.00047275756,0.000019328068,0.0000015082381,0.000093225986,9.1338035e-7,0.0010969151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99584514,0.003422819,0.000016997348,0.000057689194,0.000027736682,0.0000036000015,0.00014364831,0.00000216236,0.00048024335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994435,0.00015152102,0.000060494207,0.000060245493,0.00007855395,0.00020574513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991991,0.0002328446,0.00022158452,0.000024034347,0.00014958809,0.00017290413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060199224,0.00016507096,0.0005253797,0.0022031164,0.0011249095,0.0027325593,0.0004192149,0.0006610678,0.0017731974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019478915,0.00015606002,0.0004249895,0.0038716267,0.0011678231,0.0012042979,0.0023490633,0.00056333083,0.0002113813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040031076,0.00015194032,0.9227257,0.0003087472,0.00028395746,0.0013899845,0.034172054,0.00032728782,0.00025506344,0.003258973,0.0015403403,0.035185724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000742267,0.00009200477,0.9286445,0.00024190263,0.00010916421,0.0007472385,0.06603444,0.00014204119,0.000045192,0.000884519,0.00303589,0.00001571685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046513416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.086039186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046513416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077992404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013292182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09248537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042927130","doi":"10.1007/s11150-011-9129-2","title":"Time with sons and daughters","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Consumption (sociology); Quality (philosophy); Economics; Wage; Raising (metalworking); Girl; Time allocation; Demographic economics; Psychology; Labour economics; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04811698425667615,"score_gpt":0.2347307916467698,"score_spread":0.18661380739009364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042927130","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010979742,0.93533915,0.0007729834,0.019661512,0.0014655741,0.0000069413923,0.00015969726,0.000003778994,0.031610552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08936008,0.89038205,0.00037342714,0.0021881536,0.0035628593,0.000021490949,0.00010075752,0.000011245852,0.013999994],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993344,0.0003297009,0.000030300893,0.00009203647,0.00014238515,0.00007117733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807286,0.0013669241,0.0002072736,0.000059475115,0.00015282845,0.00014069014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010006079,0.00031925595,0.0006815864,0.0009328493,0.00064508273,0.0018709056,0.00064411917,0.0011258706,0.008117864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052062776,0.00019724086,0.000246479,0.0022852207,0.0020528282,0.002587381,0.0009727474,0.0011151636,0.00068027485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000227512,0.00014239686,0.009251796,0.0021317215,0.00011561348,0.00056517427,0.0016323105,0.0012378152,0.00021669199,0.34024042,0.06399181,0.58024675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025797863,0.000090384085,0.023135437,0.004593871,0.00006683281,0.0012547583,0.0048394557,0.00033808372,0.00017854421,0.1383778,0.82706845,0.000030529674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005490037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010371592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008117864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001915817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016111057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027156949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072637281","doi":"10.1007/s11150-004-5646-6","title":"The Effect of Child Benefit Policies on Fertility and Female Labor Force Participation in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Endogeneity; Economics; Cointegration; Labour economics; Total fertility rate; Labour supply; Demographic economics; Population; Econometrics; Demography; Family planning; Research methodology; Sociology","score_opus":0.020378744492779134,"score_gpt":0.26250480988123936,"score_spread":0.24212606538846024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072637281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7412661,0.16925487,0.00046100313,0.048168603,0.0003437629,0.000063979474,0.009299845,0.000040556784,0.031101277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9238317,0.06259664,0.00030620053,0.0018848059,0.00012030491,0.000020070122,0.0011133312,0.000018954046,0.010107977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977563,0.0003893623,0.0000623993,0.00013176548,0.00065072445,0.0010093995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950702,0.0014886111,0.00045443568,0.00008786278,0.0019840165,0.0009147588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020955259,0.00027207963,0.0007202767,0.0019558028,0.0028895207,0.002046614,0.0014110733,0.0010092523,0.0051169447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008210163,0.0002408832,0.0008309322,0.0045139305,0.0015047322,0.0004866509,0.0010139795,0.0014722568,0.00015078521],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001150707,0.00032205027,0.70049614,0.0013121386,0.00091328274,0.00081037433,0.0028035599,0.010389715,0.00045036984,0.05484896,0.041468933,0.18503381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007904236,0.0000830853,0.94660187,0.00056545035,0.00035879383,0.00011016371,0.0029698159,0.0018117031,0.0002595922,0.002775961,0.044327326,0.000057309368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99737537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078172855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078172855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12197484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5671864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077299147","doi":"10.1007/s11150-008-9040-7","title":"Marriage market imbalances and labor force participation of Canadian women","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Boom; Economics; Explanatory power; Negative correlation; Positive correlation; Demographic economics; Baby boom; Marriage market; Labour economics; Similarity (geometry); Power (physics); Demography; Population","score_opus":0.03809126849676088,"score_gpt":0.25023104935330753,"score_spread":0.21213978085654667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077299147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73263055,0.19714646,0.00021238255,0.025839819,0.0002203685,0.000042728083,0.0049404944,0.000009806871,0.038957447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8845516,0.10689415,0.00015851157,0.0010537615,0.00013608033,0.000014395464,0.00088522024,0.0000061347528,0.0063001574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925333,0.00008981874,0.000027015196,0.0000680702,0.00028561492,0.00027609634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987657,0.00023304812,0.0002208253,0.000024884344,0.0005419306,0.00021358082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011824364,0.00022927269,0.00036808118,0.0034351398,0.0032994857,0.0021202485,0.00097610895,0.0008524408,0.004625185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036850348,0.00018476642,0.00035502206,0.009196883,0.0016783056,0.00075938035,0.0007826829,0.0006954144,0.0001373439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040322152,0.00021557076,0.64650154,0.0010553851,0.00027804633,0.000828572,0.013128725,0.0016534778,0.00051916845,0.045724988,0.02813046,0.2615609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010004749,0.000021411375,0.9508771,0.00046631112,0.00005574611,0.00011100615,0.011196804,0.00033324258,0.000058810376,0.002009201,0.03482389,0.00003654424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99253017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99646086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03578143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03578143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04370155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25961363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085600981","doi":"10.1007/s11150-013-9195-8","title":"Stand together or alone? Family structure and the business cycle in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Business cycle; Recession; Unemployment; Percentage point; Demographic economics; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Unemployment rate; Demography; Stock (firearms); Geography; Sociology; Keynesian economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03989158781387251,"score_gpt":0.30982502810665735,"score_spread":0.2699334402927848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085600981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54888076,0.17209513,0.0013091562,0.1295639,0.0006868049,0.00008758524,0.0052000913,0.000041578653,0.142135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91154546,0.07291427,0.0003625998,0.0016640337,0.00012070579,0.000013333372,0.00046047807,0.000018170465,0.012901002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990538,0.00009337325,0.00002233872,0.00006228945,0.00037250944,0.00039566655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693704,0.00052479625,0.00026514818,0.00005646855,0.0012786958,0.00093795266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010247144,0.00021304736,0.00048754702,0.0022294512,0.0052323723,0.0049811564,0.0012668504,0.000945361,0.006696701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058843396,0.0002196386,0.00033660958,0.0081057325,0.0032670503,0.0015082145,0.001253818,0.0012235723,0.00021080567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032984867,0.00022464762,0.18665071,0.0005472187,0.00017283666,0.0011926491,0.0072571347,0.010401546,0.00021024594,0.4662018,0.08636859,0.24044286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090500136,0.00007481697,0.524304,0.0023462952,0.00019734084,0.00042529227,0.04224086,0.012276396,0.0003240848,0.06674733,0.35074684,0.00022623039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119274035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119274035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12533182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86539775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129794990","doi":"10.1007/s11150-008-9047-0","title":"Who cares and how much: exploring the determinants of co-residential informal care","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Continuance; Scale (ratio); Panel survey; Panel data; Demographic economics; Health care; Economics; Public economics; Business; Psychology; Labour economics; Economic growth; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06394548169892805,"score_gpt":0.27421437239154334,"score_spread":0.21026889069261528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129794990","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19688495,0.66669154,0.009450801,0.09496508,0.000575469,0.00004924259,0.0005772367,0.000009218676,0.030796433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6678013,0.32582882,0.0010359198,0.0019147703,0.0009405637,0.000033587672,0.000110212204,0.000010060132,0.0023247183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989594,0.000611855,0.000031489337,0.00008158681,0.00017687489,0.00013885665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921244,0.006270624,0.0007308412,0.00010941889,0.00041209027,0.00035275775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018534121,0.00033892292,0.0007886942,0.0012331265,0.00063638587,0.0029977302,0.00087933766,0.0012831216,0.0032407222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009252159,0.00027181464,0.000358091,0.0037786933,0.0029961173,0.0039378754,0.001211951,0.0015159739,0.00016421756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027693762,0.00050109584,0.15735869,0.0019011864,0.00038004655,0.0008041313,0.00285805,0.00784223,0.00030138623,0.4810211,0.015041287,0.33171389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032363692,0.00015827025,0.2632981,0.0048879534,0.00025243274,0.0014496926,0.02353676,0.007875144,0.00024059911,0.5998544,0.09831642,0.000097888835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017657857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025997402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017657857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029386405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002776022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035110116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134752135","doi":"10.1007/s11150-015-9293-x","title":"A behavioral portfolio approach to multiple job holdings","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Loss aversion; Portfolio; Wage; Prospect theory; Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Economics; Behavioral economics; Job loss; Business; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Unemployment; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.14945922551930674,"score_gpt":0.24844855542535652,"score_spread":0.09898932990604978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134752135","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12523325,0.030466842,0.7424769,0.022048723,0.00096879486,0.00014383325,0.0013248916,0.00021978791,0.077116914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86900645,0.021723486,0.045005765,0.0013077972,0.0019272863,0.00017081348,0.00051470177,0.00006782889,0.060275897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919707,0.00032083286,0.0000381982,0.00013812014,0.00017690043,0.00012884161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975842,0.0013751982,0.0003759081,0.00018371928,0.00022447931,0.00025644287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018173081,0.0007119081,0.0011201921,0.0013634054,0.00072150194,0.0026127645,0.0019788172,0.00218786,0.010823547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054822583,0.00048083023,0.0008477124,0.0022414685,0.001541907,0.004015233,0.0013097922,0.0025292172,0.0008002994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028376848,0.00013860886,0.0054069585,0.00008302391,0.00009653609,0.00021008203,0.00015019542,0.024172587,0.00024289916,0.93104124,0.0044774204,0.03395198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013171899,0.00004189256,0.004279382,0.000073201474,0.000042393163,0.00020141035,0.00015969563,0.06291737,0.000090175214,0.9245473,0.00760679,0.000027338214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004505261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004723724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010823547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015450765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010966653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03620839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167291112","doi":"10.1007/s11150-012-9143-z","title":"In sickness and in health: an examination of relationship status and health using data from the Canadian National Public Health Survey","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Overweight; Mental health; National Health Interview Survey; Cohabitation; Body mass index; Self-rated health; Environmental health; Obesity; Gerontology; Psychology; Medicine; Population; Geography; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.5255709740447981,"score_gpt":0.40345965611011614,"score_spread":0.122111317934682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167291112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8598853,0.087036915,0.0013406626,0.010193161,0.00027890503,0.00019285701,0.031226002,0.000027443819,0.009818811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95970076,0.027396994,0.0008952698,0.00062164763,0.00013514535,0.00007270119,0.009994423,0.000011487759,0.0011715979],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99557805,0.0013366967,0.0003592723,0.00032554672,0.0017420333,0.00065847405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922111,0.0017076044,0.0018280608,0.0003173434,0.0029541883,0.0009817597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064192857,0.00049119483,0.0009982992,0.0069590327,0.0018724111,0.0019745296,0.0020666213,0.0009727668,0.0014686958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017027095,0.0005110915,0.0014720333,0.025700694,0.000980012,0.0013766165,0.0022105572,0.0012833623,0.00014186934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028886334,0.000038694943,0.9862715,0.00015391308,0.00024518752,0.000045067754,0.00066506147,0.0001982448,0.000019498182,0.0006979915,0.0018718836,0.009764045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017445908,0.000009533373,0.9969689,0.00010499713,0.000049193386,0.000019761028,0.0009327464,0.0001935452,0.000006940625,0.00010865488,0.0015956808,0.000008388367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97962385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99114615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020376146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01430608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025326919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10379839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2440133034","doi":"10.1007/s11150-016-9339-8","title":"Matching, marriage, and children: differences across sexual orientations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Sexual orientation; Fertility; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Same sex; Social psychology; Constant (computer programming); Demographic economics; Demography; Economics; Population; Sociology; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.050442482710347916,"score_gpt":0.33754999689052767,"score_spread":0.28710751418017977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2440133034","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28115615,0.588515,0.0067088385,0.059440974,0.00058649946,0.00006638144,0.001011118,0.000015837624,0.06249932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6655141,0.3251195,0.0012051067,0.00209333,0.0008899355,0.000034695142,0.00025542846,0.000011501347,0.004876319],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907947,0.00054018927,0.00003875981,0.000068317764,0.00018793682,0.00008541878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964379,0.0025738385,0.00045685007,0.00012100462,0.0002142592,0.00019611715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021407777,0.00017013193,0.0007539784,0.0014136671,0.0006112617,0.0020515888,0.00043833337,0.0009580974,0.009664547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009193776,0.00021359857,0.0003202824,0.003320731,0.0026501531,0.0020588562,0.0010475492,0.0009769547,0.00025704296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003951144,0.00045853612,0.16727118,0.0010644292,0.0003656595,0.00033249983,0.0013112198,0.0020446302,0.0002817536,0.33194432,0.010712281,0.4838184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006523051,0.000280677,0.4888006,0.003284477,0.0002548542,0.0009892808,0.009704918,0.0019627581,0.00029614312,0.3892374,0.1050581,0.00006559551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012917111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022089066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012917111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016633279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011133532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03233111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737155383","doi":"10.1007/s11150-017-9399-4","title":"Returns to scale in food preparation and the Deaton–Paxson puzzle","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Essex; McMaster University","keywords":"Economics; Scale (ratio); Returns to scale; Food preparation; Politics; Food processing; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Food science; Chemistry; Physics","score_opus":0.043528550114557286,"score_gpt":0.2930200108019808,"score_spread":0.24949146068742353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737155383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6408981,0.032857534,0.076061904,0.0680931,0.00049367634,0.00011471993,0.0010486826,0.00024386008,0.1801884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800394,0.0055503473,0.003596086,0.0018113548,0.0004667041,0.000073552066,0.00013137769,0.000040222338,0.008290899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990011,0.00032648194,0.00004833562,0.00029616672,0.00015670573,0.00017119657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99096924,0.004891302,0.00214349,0.0013171271,0.00032339504,0.00035539173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029973597,0.00046616592,0.00092635304,0.0008411759,0.0011272685,0.002616378,0.0010027078,0.0019945474,0.011005004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011840321,0.00029941218,0.0010765827,0.0016028968,0.005136238,0.0054495824,0.0022269452,0.0022371002,0.00079264364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026554987,0.0000938594,0.010911821,0.00015507005,0.00008183878,0.000500356,0.0005532118,0.007062507,0.00077618187,0.92057186,0.0042838007,0.054744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050503233,0.00005711142,0.015193982,0.00005486457,0.000021167856,0.00019476832,0.00037201037,0.0031353312,0.00027277012,0.9622498,0.018371202,0.000026435606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025569093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016003477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011005004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00195389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043000828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036815464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754364761","doi":"10.1007/s11150-017-9390-0","title":"Program participation in a targeted land distribution program and household outcomes: evidence from Vietnam","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; World Bank Group","keywords":"Ethnic group; Hectare; Distribution (mathematics); Survey data collection; Household income; Demographic economics; Business; Baseline (sea); Socioeconomics; Economics; Economic growth; Geography; Agricultural economics; Political science; Statistics; Agriculture","score_opus":0.06552112118407909,"score_gpt":0.2870741512966511,"score_spread":0.221553030112572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754364761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98174757,0.00978267,0.0003623302,0.00194674,0.000033918834,0.000083826795,0.00087114185,0.0000032868754,0.005168526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937768,0.004813674,0.00014379743,0.00025722358,0.000021163367,0.000054600278,0.00038962602,0.000002492768,0.0005405546],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973348,0.0018104784,0.00009051817,0.00022808064,0.0003035137,0.00023268073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873833,0.005534826,0.0050979867,0.0003097777,0.00092084316,0.000753327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003915945,0.0001504107,0.0002640739,0.0007159328,0.0003123873,0.0006202979,0.0005897246,0.0003019362,0.002793395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011064899,0.00015083957,0.00029433856,0.001770932,0.0008006121,0.0005972366,0.00075342355,0.00048043206,0.00016561944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003183152,0.0006047403,0.9226156,0.0012840191,0.0005879805,0.00015419222,0.0022180781,0.0006620493,0.00008021603,0.0020851367,0.0016905827,0.06769913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060200156,0.0005158922,0.98871255,0.0009926806,0.00024540088,0.000051446077,0.0029859717,0.0005616117,0.0001227698,0.0006003988,0.0051414617,0.000009716934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04267346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046930257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04267346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001158287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014188234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08485019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885483693","doi":"10.1007/s11150-018-9430-4","title":"The effect of violent crime on teenage pregnancy in Mexico","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Pregnancy; Teenage pregnancy; Demography; Violent crime; Domestic violence; Psychology; Demographic economics; Poison control; Injury prevention; Medicine; Criminology; Medical emergency; Economics; Sociology; Population; Biology","score_opus":0.05164055306964382,"score_gpt":0.37346958833604915,"score_spread":0.32182903526640533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885483693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48456123,0.46338385,0.0003434215,0.034337256,0.00044001994,0.000023715424,0.0011592937,0.000009204597,0.015742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6452352,0.3509503,0.00021428827,0.0007889686,0.00068852055,0.000022021459,0.00025939543,0.000005412135,0.0018360572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973184,0.00011760881,0.00001853679,0.000024189076,0.000044742326,0.00006302151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805176,0.0008854664,0.0007562125,0.000033771747,0.00014843154,0.0001242895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005784428,0.00014142336,0.00026628358,0.001353858,0.00053117314,0.0010269989,0.0003598318,0.00055706524,0.0036368023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033795342,0.00018588603,0.00044630453,0.002022649,0.00049850665,0.00051332614,0.0007670968,0.0007706104,0.00005100201],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027322143,0.00038525622,0.76051176,0.0036011648,0.0008753461,0.0013822189,0.0017465464,0.0020980833,0.00020289092,0.040039644,0.0099300295,0.17895387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015680835,0.00009187627,0.9680158,0.0026374152,0.00043112884,0.00036923,0.0029175659,0.00057310757,0.000081169186,0.002276355,0.022577561,0.000013127505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09216704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14243074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09216704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002369945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001826728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18326116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894713174","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09535-6","title":"Gender inequality as a barrier to economic growth: a review of the theoretical literature","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Inequality; Economics; Gender inequality; Human capital; Capital (architecture); Fertility; Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Development economics; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Population; Geography","score_opus":0.06009120244544467,"score_gpt":0.3301604575159813,"score_spread":0.2700692550705366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894713174","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013600792,0.9985727,0.00005618085,0.0006763929,0.000093882016,0.0000016742616,0.000009972473,0.0000011554416,0.00045204573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011707264,0.9984775,0.00004044965,0.00013484298,0.000111414534,0.0000028269326,0.00000786669,5.225924e-7,0.000053883694],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993819,0.00020345044,0.000073798794,0.00013159546,0.00016185406,0.000047419202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995777,0.0035303356,0.00024014946,0.000042427844,0.00032559034,0.00008442187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021047995,0.0008033518,0.001751828,0.0033700815,0.00056527485,0.0018601649,0.0010333261,0.001653491,0.0046775844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045413603,0.00039882227,0.0007087631,0.0044774464,0.0016305293,0.0021886732,0.0011806402,0.0016095126,0.00077300175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009032711,0.00008234273,0.0014636753,0.060818374,0.0002347194,0.00017229919,0.0003427484,0.0005179348,0.00022799305,0.0327694,0.019161753,0.8841184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023641827,0.00015177861,0.009853741,0.1329704,0.0008304122,0.001349734,0.0016112883,0.0003988121,0.00034427457,0.038186993,0.8141965,0.00008243707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032460592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033637148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046775844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013004744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033879492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015648127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969564122","doi":"10.1007/s11150-019-09461-2","title":"What influence do empowered women have? Land and the reality of women’s relative power in Peru","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; NorQuest College","funders":"Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers","keywords":"Empowerment; Power (physics); Economics; Women's empowerment; Renting; Demographic economics; Bargaining power; Psychological intervention; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Microeconomics; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.02030273015303596,"score_gpt":0.2615294270317667,"score_spread":0.24122669687873072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969564122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4157701,0.17341322,0.0039692773,0.15818085,0.00028885328,0.00002995039,0.00035013902,0.000024684778,0.24797297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96480155,0.030255016,0.00020920933,0.0010619675,0.00020767096,0.000018500263,0.000031912892,0.0000087015,0.0034053829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819285,0.0012417834,0.000027832206,0.00012583248,0.00018220468,0.00022956012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766076,0.0016583501,0.00031845408,0.00008849477,0.00017089534,0.00010297126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002516944,0.00021643467,0.00044188643,0.0010926031,0.0019200442,0.0053239116,0.0007803351,0.0014295378,0.0042346385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005388921,0.00020966689,0.00015703864,0.002627957,0.012798222,0.0062866663,0.003409686,0.0012587346,0.00021088205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007596857,0.000039466926,0.018183265,0.0011424039,0.000043833807,0.0008214749,0.11286088,0.00040250545,0.00060528883,0.76548135,0.004499753,0.095843755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018379156,0.00013304006,0.0669809,0.0031404523,0.000056060875,0.00078400754,0.274712,0.0005452634,0.0005478221,0.2883556,0.3646762,0.000050330826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005698524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011501951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005698524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002770046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016113428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02009821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996548621","doi":"10.1007/s11150-019-09474-x","title":"Household consumption decisions: will expanding sports betting impact health?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Goods and services; Consumer Expenditure Survey; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Consumer spending; Public economics; Consumer expenditure; Demographic economics; Advertising; Business; Psychology; Economy; Sociology; Aggregate expenditure","score_opus":0.05588817241798101,"score_gpt":0.31779098232697245,"score_spread":0.26190280990899145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996548621","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00694572,0.9713747,0.0006370202,0.016851893,0.0005667039,0.000010054655,0.00018404782,0.0000027657054,0.003427034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052784286,0.9413184,0.0005566984,0.002817915,0.0016362534,0.000019199328,0.00010301864,0.000005464799,0.0007587781],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940515,0.00030053474,0.000034251207,0.00007826754,0.00012093446,0.000060936396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957378,0.003311138,0.00036314403,0.00006649154,0.00037888667,0.00014260481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023036485,0.0005001068,0.0013293156,0.00096958014,0.00022503539,0.0018588417,0.0008497645,0.0015257929,0.0039425744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006294279,0.0002550186,0.0006944567,0.0018841997,0.0013400574,0.0015094854,0.000762336,0.0022787482,0.00025234956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007913575,0.0004862195,0.017078793,0.0093444465,0.0016062185,0.00017786543,0.00016876297,0.005185928,0.00044368132,0.059417468,0.024328424,0.88097084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030771125,0.00087892904,0.1628611,0.0406457,0.0023317204,0.0011036333,0.0021707679,0.0053042416,0.0008477924,0.14425181,0.6391027,0.00019389752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006525432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009821074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006525432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017589679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014558301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013189256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022831647","doi":"10.1007/s11150-018-9425-1","title":"Are time and money equally substitutable for all commodity groups in the household’s domestic production?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Elasticity of substitution; Commodity; Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.06869059926659916,"score_gpt":0.29083101718032867,"score_spread":0.22214041791372952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022831647","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17327613,0.6121519,0.027461763,0.054848634,0.0017269895,0.00004085081,0.0010290318,0.000038062328,0.1294266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7309372,0.25130266,0.003957212,0.0029425889,0.0020092346,0.0000659663,0.00022138898,0.000041534255,0.008522191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931765,0.00027133222,0.000025660875,0.0001391467,0.000115122355,0.00013123258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983485,0.0011020404,0.00018832572,0.00012763515,0.00013431837,0.00009923784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016022741,0.00055620255,0.0013555179,0.00099338,0.00066442677,0.0030293236,0.0016018105,0.0019258399,0.008164261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030522936,0.00037357473,0.0005562124,0.0023272408,0.0074563017,0.0114711225,0.0014941436,0.0011073083,0.00080338016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002890858,0.00004815497,0.002756408,0.0009116868,0.00011208524,0.00016584992,0.00040550044,0.0018580786,0.0012027428,0.8774663,0.0029112925,0.11187285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045142016,0.000110801644,0.0112124905,0.0013754085,0.00011001132,0.00033879088,0.0029179654,0.0013842831,0.00069942494,0.87769777,0.10405817,0.00004967644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005594523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005704066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008164261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022324156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017146628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02731216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042086603","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09515-w","title":"The usual suspects: do risk tolerance, altruism, and health predict the response to COVID-19?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social distance; Altruism (biology); Preference; Compliance (psychology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economics; Order (exchange); Test (biology); Distancing; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Actuarial science; Social psychology; Time preference; Public economics; Microeconomics; Medicine; Disease","score_opus":0.0957986529106418,"score_gpt":0.35966463277520727,"score_spread":0.2638659798645655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042086603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5830632,0.0840058,0.01154354,0.29932588,0.0026377935,0.00013907389,0.0021125162,0.000077425466,0.017094688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9378979,0.022391057,0.0031508505,0.029976971,0.0029045534,0.00011768911,0.0004759523,0.000025667388,0.003059297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681807,0.002120613,0.0001279022,0.0005608459,0.0002367588,0.00013585907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95164555,0.035778113,0.0063965283,0.0034024182,0.001713295,0.0010641546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008819837,0.00051355833,0.0010397512,0.00067573274,0.0005594837,0.001919749,0.0014384544,0.004006929,0.0068781245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048805255,0.0004156901,0.00065862964,0.00080458604,0.0045434064,0.002504814,0.00074461097,0.004014897,0.0010383584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030703796,0.0022959749,0.5506277,0.0018583124,0.004160841,0.0003972904,0.0018207034,0.0034350664,0.0013102272,0.12754601,0.029360017,0.27411753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003495794,0.00093526515,0.5219492,0.0013303781,0.0010128911,0.00037329795,0.0042726863,0.01009878,0.0009089945,0.43985096,0.018735243,0.00018281092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033308454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027827388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008819837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060121506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090625184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04664427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087018321","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09508-9","title":"The gender gap in citations of articles published in two demographic economics journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Economics; Demography; Demographic economics; Positive economics; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.11383839249101184,"score_gpt":0.31136142172821907,"score_spread":0.19752302923720721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087018321","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016432665,0.9508648,0.00019108673,0.016764594,0.0046917624,0.0000351111,0.002630524,0.000022697943,0.008366791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11237135,0.8642598,0.0005784792,0.0069015995,0.009778463,0.000060253453,0.0025997662,0.00004540234,0.0034049856],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898756,0.0023742095,0.0023296042,0.0011284293,0.003634488,0.0006576991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81106067,0.13050973,0.020910773,0.0017387556,0.031466983,0.004313121],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012095974,0.0005723695,0.0018538313,0.069284,0.00082961295,0.005841575,0.00088973826,0.0027949705,0.00905499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095072314,0.00039435824,0.0011383459,0.055624977,0.0014967702,0.003365603,0.0018453968,0.0011012466,0.000996724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010420189,0.00018178573,0.0747833,0.1568845,0.006464818,0.0010810979,0.0052228794,0.00037235467,0.0020483609,0.016687365,0.17356844,0.56166303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029515527,0.00032697764,0.35151958,0.12184192,0.008894339,0.0019853432,0.006332649,0.0002581717,0.0009774269,0.012048541,0.49536172,0.00015808847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005025116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013446594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002773693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007616148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06397039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093091791","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09512-z","title":"Gender differentiated economic responses to crises in developing countries: insights for COVID-19 recovery policies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Welfare; Panel data; Development economics; Demographic economics; Economic recovery; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Macroeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.21651565960434124,"score_gpt":0.319627015857171,"score_spread":0.10311135625282977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093091791","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2815673,0.17275037,0.018209502,0.37051672,0.0028551007,0.00015891755,0.005017682,0.000059860402,0.14886452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9133125,0.070267774,0.0010180135,0.007094592,0.0011230638,0.000052309493,0.0003769115,0.000022419255,0.006732468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904186,0.00047666155,0.000022145914,0.000054564807,0.00009697044,0.0003078292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804175,0.0011018881,0.00032164587,0.000055234534,0.00024207984,0.00023742592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024187614,0.00042255805,0.0006214553,0.0012306443,0.0007165,0.002445339,0.0004903514,0.0015946878,0.008179968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005259575,0.00019435468,0.0004497804,0.0021854849,0.0022639527,0.0031023796,0.0017266703,0.0021940197,0.00028422594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026160965,0.0001593178,0.031487092,0.00067255803,0.00017634299,0.0008702652,0.0020780256,0.015003685,0.00036441296,0.83328587,0.033888288,0.08175252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008084539,0.00021530909,0.09273389,0.0025981676,0.00012492572,0.0005550912,0.0266082,0.00870562,0.00047426086,0.6992065,0.16860133,0.00009580889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018236523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02156725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018236523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035829486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028261864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036260724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121024457","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09539-2","title":"Consumption and geographic mobility in pandemic times. Evidence from Mexico","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Consumer Retail Behavior Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Consumption (sociology); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Tourism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Pandemic; Demographic economics; Consumer spending; Percentage point; Geography; Statistics; Finance; Macroeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.08324849980121427,"score_gpt":0.26158949803351583,"score_spread":0.17834099823230157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121024457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98149157,0.0076781097,0.0000978134,0.0027470866,0.000026184274,0.00000923148,0.0017954429,0.000002483141,0.006152096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98955476,0.008531804,0.000063808846,0.00013089269,0.000047176127,0.0000074981945,0.0007980599,0.000001817861,0.00086423126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991035,0.000030687475,0.0000046270798,0.000013045833,0.00000898349,0.00003235431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986915,0.00046402751,0.00060247007,0.00004100521,0.00010490477,0.00009610056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033302087,0.00012938138,0.00015101803,0.0007600254,0.00045489488,0.0006475374,0.0002548008,0.00046298673,0.0036659965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001569978,0.00013169569,0.00023163781,0.0019965216,0.0005145658,0.00056006236,0.0006127733,0.00036738618,0.00013406659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041853858,0.00009875428,0.96746284,0.00024237952,0.00019301473,0.00040126874,0.0024018094,0.0005045843,0.00013535067,0.0025625115,0.0041163773,0.021462705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012482464,0.00004143774,0.98927724,0.000112475325,0.000081057224,0.00010229174,0.0052650888,0.00021489632,0.00004282959,0.00034231713,0.004501891,0.0000060918915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10621917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10859732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10621917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006741834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033577098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21120179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292615750","doi":"10.1007/s11150-022-09619-5","title":"How to measure parenting styles?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology; Parenting styles; Style (visual arts); Persistence (discontinuity); Cognition; Measure (data warehouse); Sample (material); Cognitive style; Latent semantic analysis; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.05972772264672964,"score_gpt":0.2579626395257931,"score_spread":0.19823491687906347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292615750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93361104,0.004782071,0.043647185,0.0021489102,0.00041581836,0.0002603747,0.0067252875,0.00018258026,0.008226674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97135913,0.0013054514,0.02163171,0.0003396962,0.00012887316,0.00047841266,0.0034957621,0.000039709677,0.001221181],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964908,0.0020512019,0.0003148345,0.00045748948,0.0005365233,0.00014916473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98036283,0.009085526,0.0054026446,0.0015884928,0.0026558926,0.0009045764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057787644,0.0006115332,0.00058026006,0.0019021635,0.0003937533,0.0015379032,0.0008991358,0.0007071606,0.001863244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025498742,0.00027124098,0.00077510916,0.0024641496,0.00043015752,0.0015499892,0.0008043783,0.001464725,0.0007567836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043720753,0.00008631558,0.95671487,0.00011072987,0.0002642942,0.000020163869,0.00050446606,0.00069665135,0.00024015775,0.00053266593,0.0018523588,0.03893369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058546325,0.000152746,0.9856346,0.00026147702,0.00007287629,0.000104340994,0.0015755539,0.00483585,0.000487506,0.002782692,0.0040580262,0.000028608114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033140779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055393344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057787644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049770495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045283526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030561388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390953963","doi":"10.1007/s11150-023-09688-0","title":"Estimating a model of inefficient cooperation and consumption in collective households","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inefficiency; Consumption (sociology); Liberian dollar; Economics; Microeconomics; Resource (disambiguation); Econometrics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.06411727310721312,"score_gpt":0.29163007155463794,"score_spread":0.22751279844742484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390953963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5740164,0.001214257,0.41133347,0.0036189673,0.00007583188,0.00015206532,0.00081294356,0.00019093683,0.008585224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538053,0.00092446187,0.029662184,0.000179204,0.00008601115,0.00026598183,0.0005341722,0.00006816024,0.014474655],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982128,0.0011186196,0.00005620802,0.00029422063,0.00007307859,0.00024510323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983307,0.014696829,0.0010618954,0.00034951902,0.0003073058,0.00027743552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046266625,0.0009864409,0.00299126,0.0010509333,0.0008830198,0.0030309572,0.0022844763,0.0033652019,0.0055775605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014471969,0.0015531146,0.0014582278,0.0020455574,0.0023938036,0.0024293708,0.0019629821,0.002294068,0.0004930323],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009414833,0.0001337356,0.007308693,0.000070992646,0.000172367,0.00013251994,0.00030417228,0.9188009,0.00014801952,0.06573839,0.0010829604,0.0060131736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043295153,0.000039815666,0.0014768442,0.00002003469,0.000041765594,0.000020973817,0.00023180006,0.9428779,0.0000656547,0.054709267,0.00044760597,0.000024988536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0360789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028143223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0360789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032557237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024486654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071737766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414077554","doi":"10.1007/s11150-025-09804-2","title":"Health shocks and household allocation of time and spending","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus","funders":"Australian Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Spouse; Shock (circulatory); Life expectancy; Consumption (sociology); Household income; Workforce; Survey data collection; Alcohol consumption; British Household Panel Survey","score_opus":0.06464026021454505,"score_gpt":0.382249288010048,"score_spread":0.31760902779550293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414077554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97623855,0.009107634,0.0009664317,0.0028946043,0.00006031639,0.000027005091,0.0026686685,0.0000112623475,0.0080255745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954157,0.0028482277,0.00010618701,0.00013536603,0.000040296127,0.000010501262,0.0005617245,0.0000018533724,0.0008800195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996171,0.00017033773,0.000027722113,0.000047491605,0.000057221216,0.00008005916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984341,0.00032319102,0.0008495847,0.00006645164,0.00015417501,0.00017247246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046700297,0.00012333858,0.00025802807,0.0011829163,0.00017742442,0.00077721494,0.00023768807,0.0004175796,0.0031566506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028536913,0.00011146182,0.00022944021,0.0026639719,0.000382818,0.00046979307,0.000684489,0.000357282,0.0002949324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014521863,0.00010212711,0.938307,0.00023596006,0.00042332287,0.00023635352,0.0010222851,0.0043027946,0.00054206024,0.008368578,0.0027225183,0.043591764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018280964,0.000025180776,0.99445665,0.00006214271,0.000012884173,0.000050066297,0.00064588414,0.0009851732,0.00003748316,0.0017480791,0.0019684578,0.0000062099375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016597115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014238774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016597115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007848642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002478673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033001006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416606253","doi":"10.1007/s11150-026-09855-z","title":"Beyond the Gender Binary: Wage Inequality and Occupational Segregation among Transgender and Nonbinary Workers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; York University; University of Manitoba","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Occupational segregation; Transgender; Earnings; Census; Wage; Gender pay gap; Inequality; Black male","score_opus":0.11277046561374825,"score_gpt":0.2980721512549539,"score_spread":0.18530168564120564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416606253","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04931135,0.8763669,0.0032550062,0.05504795,0.0011584364,0.000014239148,0.00021901324,0.000005766737,0.014621297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31467113,0.6704176,0.0009987014,0.0061482666,0.005461838,0.000032248256,0.00013772797,0.000011624904,0.0021208466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998809,0.00060486543,0.000051909166,0.0001397526,0.00025291715,0.00014163251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943374,0.004439421,0.0004660198,0.00009214445,0.00041896547,0.0002460126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028233577,0.00048964913,0.0011334465,0.002626866,0.001030433,0.0034192754,0.0010180658,0.0019536586,0.0036365897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066465316,0.00025635643,0.00040136473,0.004744801,0.0067055523,0.0051920475,0.002788413,0.002351268,0.00019322937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025126452,0.00030780287,0.034445252,0.0028099264,0.00024998985,0.00039706886,0.0038633633,0.001378593,0.00039004258,0.54033387,0.014852432,0.40072048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025418494,0.0002099331,0.11774641,0.009991418,0.0001975906,0.0007672862,0.018259574,0.0019302935,0.00022759182,0.7337621,0.11678519,0.0000971641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010677476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01764129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010677476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002343322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021713628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021230698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}