{"meta":{"query_hash":"209756de067f","filters":{"venue":"Review of Economics of the Household"},"cohort_total":27,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":27,"exported":27,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/209756de067f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Review+of+Economics+of+the+Household"},"results":[{"id":"W1972006922","doi":"10.1007/s11150-014-9251-z","title":"Child health and parental paid work","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Psychology; Work (physics); Paid work; National Longitudinal Surveys; Coping (psychology); Work hours; Mental health; Division of labour; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Domestic work; Economics; Labour economics; Working hours; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry; Wage","score_opus":0.033662338183721975,"score_gpt":0.26099295215606577,"score_spread":0.2273306139723438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972006922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85962236,0.11033236,0.000021702252,0.007365104,0.0008065555,0.00072401843,0.00006793296,0.000029673784,0.021030277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.711438,0.28549492,0.00018085472,0.00273902,0.00007358494,0.0000026381379,0.0000021192022,0.000009542007,0.000059343827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913365,0.00015876428,0.00035629407,0.00013019821,0.00005814663,0.00016297687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991551,0.000066608096,0.0003685578,0.00029888857,0.000018029434,0.000092829134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010970947,0.00007982958,0.00034747442,0.000018213292,0.00015709149,0.000010517876,0.000321978,0.00003900018,0.000005914832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109681074,0.00006269051,0.000118218064,0.00009629142,0.00019630985,0.000054990884,0.00007493662,0.00007474857,0.0000015890628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017359856,0.00025624686,0.5118331,0.007798363,0.00014377249,1.0599915e-7,0.0075752377,0.0002489158,0.0000026355572,0.38679835,0.011689553,0.07363635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087501825,0.00021285845,0.21167818,0.01386924,0.00012957114,0.000004166187,0.0035454778,0.00014965674,0.000012602057,0.011603994,0.7572326,0.0006866165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024107023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021812887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74554306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041147287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010093139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25564447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010392029","doi":"10.1007/s11150-005-6695-1","title":"Combining Stated and Revealed Preference Data to Construct an Empirical Examination of Intrahousehold Bargaining","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Economics; Bargaining power; Microeconomics; Consumption (sociology); Construct (python library); Revealed preference; Econometrics; Aggregate (composite); Computer science","score_opus":0.1569246611593818,"score_gpt":0.3213782689395091,"score_spread":0.1644536077801273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010392029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939209,0.0022785175,0.000054264732,0.00018893021,0.000104824794,0.00045489223,0.00031513444,0.00001758149,0.0026649465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98271185,0.014661582,0.0022443149,0.0002682259,0.000037153874,0.0000033992017,0.000033166092,0.000015823674,0.000024466352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998407,0.0003002134,0.0007184897,0.0002715356,0.00012168015,0.00018106161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835473,0.00018667716,0.0005705462,0.0007098869,0.00010505358,0.00007310083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002023421,0.00011823029,0.00048168216,0.000062406405,0.00009762309,0.000019235637,0.00080265495,0.00007318164,0.0000051501934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002973562,0.00010401607,0.000047286674,0.0002316548,0.00030710673,0.00025825258,0.00024367412,0.00009718705,3.1222334e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008867873,0.0010128475,0.6437239,0.010085458,0.00034406167,0.0000026797154,0.020956635,0.0041258642,0.0031196314,0.24692827,0.004573952,0.06503799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015921555,0.00039007879,0.9570129,0.008104811,0.00045512852,0.000007845459,0.007042403,0.0047279107,0.000533289,0.010297351,0.00888793,0.0009481901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065669883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061365124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.313289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004456367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019457488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42416522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019356614","doi":"10.1007/s11150-013-9175-z","title":"The effect of parental labor supply on child schooling: evidence from trade liberalization in India","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Pennsylvania State University","keywords":"Economics; Liberalization; Labour economics; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Free trade; International economics","score_opus":0.015482875496486814,"score_gpt":0.2555471482598624,"score_spread":0.2400642727633756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019356614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9280401,0.06445404,1.0278145e-7,0.0055870307,0.00028903672,0.00067327014,0.0000557831,0.0000054591546,0.0008951773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7514376,0.24814695,0.000008217339,0.0002974985,0.000067340465,0.000015335272,0.0000044550984,0.0000072652556,0.000015298614],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888843,0.00032316128,0.000441377,0.00012631214,0.000094774856,0.00012591237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865526,0.00047571593,0.00046599642,0.00034715686,0.000018535226,0.00003732727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007507696,0.00008969807,0.00028904693,0.00002662896,0.0001371307,0.000021705158,0.00058565696,0.000049948394,0.000036900587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041009608,0.000056312478,0.0001338913,0.00014958992,0.00013177072,0.00022324413,0.000026750988,0.00009611564,0.0000037731425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030575415,0.00011522359,0.96891654,0.0011735033,0.00006551818,4.206812e-8,0.0033604598,0.00021837176,0.000027984708,0.008417249,0.0072328583,0.010441665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023485493,0.000069451846,0.97151226,0.008831966,0.00004857744,1.9133763e-7,0.00020222898,0.00002059397,0.0019675433,0.0010308216,0.015964828,0.000116695635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031209746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067537697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18369292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071765244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011628782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4718001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023182788","doi":"10.1007/s11150-009-9054-9","title":"Poverty and its persistence: a comparison of natives and immigrants in Sweden","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Immigration; Economics; Persistence (discontinuity); Demographic economics; Hazard; Educational attainment; Panel data; Econometrics; Geography; Economic growth","score_opus":0.08242143355303584,"score_gpt":0.27267711799756833,"score_spread":0.1902556844445325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023182788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8863463,0.11041216,0.0000022722465,0.0008626136,0.000051475687,0.00023655455,0.00026851284,0.0000021255655,0.0018179748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8867765,0.11270235,0.0000885855,0.00039156468,0.000005979494,0.0000018943364,0.0000014746075,0.000006551182,0.00002510931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986257,0.000030239295,0.0010021387,0.00020866373,0.000018874296,0.00011437636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986476,0.000075568394,0.00094394665,0.00027599934,0.000025788338,0.000031124957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089836767,0.00011288604,0.000856995,0.00008405917,0.000020709344,0.0000074967857,0.0002450893,0.000054707416,0.000007784619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017517581,0.00009779911,0.00012410799,0.00012645088,0.00006172202,0.000121475845,0.00007996329,0.000089154644,4.2322517e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006397242,0.00045928033,0.3483284,0.0074266824,0.00013397247,3.8773348e-7,0.00091556716,0.00013769093,0.00014104856,0.6356191,0.00016604339,0.0066078585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019642636,0.00038766573,0.85886794,0.00744644,0.000084992775,0.0000068490526,0.00037392284,0.010321679,0.0010892467,0.11465549,0.0040608356,0.0007406994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012744093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006065619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5209636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039167353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015699341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3988132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042927130","doi":"10.1007/s11150-011-9129-2","title":"Time with sons and daughters","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Consumption (sociology); Quality (philosophy); Economics; Wage; Raising (metalworking); Girl; Time allocation; Demographic economics; Psychology; Labour economics; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04811698425667615,"score_gpt":0.2347307916467698,"score_spread":0.18661380739009364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042927130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9449392,0.010415554,0.000007399199,0.00056654296,0.00012248888,0.00035843678,0.00005148358,0.00001409486,0.043524824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8006128,0.19639778,0.001251803,0.0009882745,0.000038832717,0.0000057854286,0.0000013936228,0.000020695777,0.00068259623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994796,0.000049557668,0.00020521243,0.00010505608,0.00004272069,0.00011787744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940205,0.000027488912,0.00022660616,0.00027088172,0.000027052009,0.00004591951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044949932,0.000069419235,0.00024344854,0.000017898219,0.00007119199,0.0000051364514,0.00030304835,0.00003454382,0.000023988543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002638657,0.00004781099,0.0000703722,0.00006973615,0.00030540608,0.00008053285,0.000052244697,0.000046043835,0.0000025195452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112609865,0.0008409242,0.27604854,0.01201899,0.0010988103,0.0000035362984,0.059447028,0.0002522839,0.00021731926,0.60777646,0.019977098,0.022206426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004627988,0.0012391284,0.33538193,0.033291046,0.0032247168,0.00004823435,0.03314629,0.00097591605,0.0012051397,0.063986026,0.5186741,0.004199549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026811697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021242078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5437904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019644463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009492858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19496755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072637281","doi":"10.1007/s11150-004-5646-6","title":"The Effect of Child Benefit Policies on Fertility and Female Labor Force Participation in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Endogeneity; Economics; Cointegration; Labour economics; Total fertility rate; Labour supply; Demographic economics; Population; Econometrics; Demography; Family planning; Research methodology; Sociology","score_opus":0.020378744492779134,"score_gpt":0.26250480988123936,"score_spread":0.24212606538846024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072637281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98925704,0.008034973,3.0650233e-7,0.0014183767,0.00010548118,0.0003848385,0.000053351094,0.0000032378953,0.0007424254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643485,0.035251416,0.0000053910344,0.0003562141,0.0000098697565,0.000008766104,6.9407383e-7,0.0000070633746,0.00001211596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922174,0.00009577895,0.000362319,0.00009537147,0.000077164375,0.00014764933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917686,0.00021155363,0.00027743488,0.0002758778,0.000025650788,0.000032630818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008323494,0.00007581421,0.00028902528,0.000014929739,0.000098328,0.0000064320748,0.0002602169,0.000029054247,6.829577e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021130158,0.00004843496,0.000064981155,0.00011599359,0.00014460261,0.00004414862,0.000040024177,0.00006266733,9.249465e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007610048,0.00008014744,0.88906443,0.0030951097,0.0000730284,1.614115e-7,0.002700287,0.018860143,0.00002042246,0.07966819,0.000059242917,0.006302753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032003538,0.0000776906,0.99428934,0.0013372534,0.00004198439,1.0614845e-7,0.00045640644,0.000047329104,0.00068978954,0.0015927232,0.0010585673,0.00008876102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4154606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8452167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4297561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019907436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026085885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5884319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077299147","doi":"10.1007/s11150-008-9040-7","title":"Marriage market imbalances and labor force participation of Canadian women","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Boom; Economics; Explanatory power; Negative correlation; Positive correlation; Demographic economics; Baby boom; Marriage market; Labour economics; Similarity (geometry); Power (physics); Demography; Population","score_opus":0.03809126849676088,"score_gpt":0.25023104935330753,"score_spread":0.21213978085654667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077299147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980713,0.008108238,5.51439e-7,0.0004647812,0.00013920164,0.000251635,0.00013911058,0.0000060371303,0.010177449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76329815,0.23591739,0.000092034075,0.00036633655,0.000022653687,0.000007826289,0.0000010127732,0.0000081819335,0.00028640864],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991981,0.00009599734,0.00035562392,0.000101788275,0.000059022354,0.0001894665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992131,0.000072159026,0.00032610033,0.0002330283,0.000054366265,0.00010127406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007742378,0.00006936008,0.0003097878,0.00006532876,0.000089367124,0.0000044630137,0.00026051508,0.000046692607,0.000027971071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015414912,0.00005815345,0.00006518807,0.00020284664,0.00025677576,0.00009073835,0.000030514228,0.000041199517,3.3302592e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028689437,0.00012363499,0.8756573,0.005835203,0.00020012636,0.0000012158273,0.019308655,0.00030675757,0.00009809364,0.08682951,0.008395716,0.003215049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062256696,0.00010890439,0.8698302,0.0020314057,0.00012957104,0.0000028796787,0.0040835575,0.00032117486,0.00019242824,0.007875391,0.114365146,0.00043680708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015309369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037120458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22780915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007468172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031964973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085600981","doi":"10.1007/s11150-013-9195-8","title":"Stand together or alone? Family structure and the business cycle in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Business cycle; Recession; Unemployment; Percentage point; Demographic economics; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Unemployment rate; Demography; Stock (firearms); Geography; Sociology; Keynesian economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03989158781387251,"score_gpt":0.30982502810665735,"score_spread":0.2699334402927848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085600981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9273154,0.06308566,2.5442523e-7,0.006315022,0.00044626195,0.0018017568,0.00018902266,0.0000046205823,0.0008419582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.888486,0.10358179,0.000087153516,0.007612199,0.00004544832,0.000042559022,0.0000016335059,0.000022851564,0.000120357916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998309,0.00033699113,0.00085882423,0.00015325953,0.00007725669,0.0002646562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814504,0.00049887865,0.0005946491,0.0005786531,0.000123373,0.000059423135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006010331,0.00013340499,0.0006716995,0.000020493639,0.00009986979,0.0000035215003,0.00040861228,0.0000699722,0.00012203151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002501299,0.00006641067,0.000044287408,0.00015024422,0.000110669134,0.000078075886,0.00019414557,0.00025672716,0.0000045327993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010164444,0.00015222645,0.29138702,0.21543227,0.0004331184,0.0000065330696,0.004772995,0.0031010867,0.00011533175,0.022142768,0.43042937,0.03101084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004791981,0.00004170532,0.75070095,0.039035,0.00015005455,0.0000093621475,0.0027634471,0.00037393288,0.00006415546,0.0073642447,0.19418654,0.0005186039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7711785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74381334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45931396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032121222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016589281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29428673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129794990","doi":"10.1007/s11150-008-9047-0","title":"Who cares and how much: exploring the determinants of co-residential informal care","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Continuance; Scale (ratio); Panel survey; Panel data; Demographic economics; Health care; Economics; Public economics; Business; Psychology; Labour economics; Economic growth; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06394548169892805,"score_gpt":0.27421437239154334,"score_spread":0.21026889069261528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129794990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98702276,0.0111166015,9.0355775e-7,0.00019041459,0.000292937,0.00018543802,0.00004801521,0.0000027891779,0.0011401529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88120496,0.11849562,0.000019309535,0.00010135411,0.000068206355,0.000007637596,0.0000011582842,0.000006266563,0.00009546128],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993721,0.00006524919,0.00027735,0.00007857789,0.00010023884,0.00010647646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927324,0.000070458205,0.00033260655,0.0002094884,0.00009039781,0.000023824841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035769833,0.00007094171,0.00025671968,0.000024511832,0.00022504579,0.00001437326,0.00036273917,0.000027705966,0.0000033039414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009845213,0.000048364906,0.00014991083,0.0000495646,0.00028477862,0.00020821787,0.00009726199,0.000053953903,1.9804592e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084850144,0.00011931575,0.5004233,0.021489486,0.00047194646,0.000006293967,0.12369973,0.0019376065,0.00095250556,0.27120277,0.012946428,0.06666574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030701954,0.000823591,0.36244398,0.050639704,0.0011889164,0.00009896326,0.11943557,0.004072638,0.087480545,0.002261355,0.36526683,0.0032176943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039055815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017325607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3523204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000269349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012402894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19722636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134752135","doi":"10.1007/s11150-015-9293-x","title":"A behavioral portfolio approach to multiple job holdings","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Loss aversion; Portfolio; Wage; Prospect theory; Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Economics; Behavioral economics; Job loss; Business; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Unemployment; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.14945922551930674,"score_gpt":0.24844855542535652,"score_spread":0.09898932990604978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134752135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91967005,0.036258552,0.00020845939,0.0005179842,0.0007741293,0.0009877458,0.00074443454,0.000028085307,0.040810592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98117346,0.014238338,0.0025639806,0.0011068202,0.00008700228,0.00004981736,0.000009127363,0.000060223818,0.0007112368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786824,0.000018095387,0.0013928396,0.00041457693,0.00002439871,0.00028187735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975719,0.000038641014,0.0010783022,0.0010787318,0.000048298687,0.00018413225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013670922,0.00021492019,0.0010455409,0.00012977576,0.000038678118,0.000021593158,0.0009044202,0.000090485126,0.000031651784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018649746,0.00020419795,0.00043316136,0.00016614734,0.00009986818,0.00021564697,0.00033123087,0.0001256353,0.000050154176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004820242,0.00044513444,0.037857253,0.0018757785,0.0001431462,3.4012513e-7,0.0005317069,0.0044044275,0.000018107405,0.9342002,0.01934393,0.0011317289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040811156,0.0006064841,0.009456612,0.003689088,0.00026124303,0.00006279175,0.00049760786,0.0027224964,0.0018905649,0.13451204,0.83983225,0.0023877346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038347702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012187889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8204883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001459088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006477134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83269507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167291112","doi":"10.1007/s11150-012-9143-z","title":"In sickness and in health: an examination of relationship status and health using data from the Canadian National Public Health Survey","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Overweight; Mental health; National Health Interview Survey; Cohabitation; Body mass index; Self-rated health; Environmental health; Obesity; Gerontology; Psychology; Medicine; Population; Geography; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.5255709740447981,"score_gpt":0.40345965611011614,"score_spread":0.122111317934682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167291112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94170094,0.043429036,0.000004727846,0.013265252,0.00012890626,0.0005129131,0.00087156746,0.0000016478007,0.000084991894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95789427,0.040833198,0.0002273255,0.00088477484,0.000021848526,0.0000015646364,0.00012702018,0.0000065532236,0.0000034710758],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745935,0.001441022,0.0006393181,0.00012955918,0.00010268951,0.00022805313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982662,0.0005898038,0.00066950754,0.00027635047,0.00004700946,0.00015109342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01673133,0.00005826273,0.00027427258,0.00010360615,0.0002577833,0.000017830049,0.00026656248,0.0000476672,0.000002311425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072609365,0.000046456236,0.000015088667,0.00027077598,0.00017331057,0.00046352606,0.00006590609,0.00013472869,9.213638e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.326986e-7,0.00004131814,0.9524277,0.00030993175,0.0000053178983,4.109603e-9,0.0031583316,0.0001806251,7.197552e-8,0.041550998,0.000096919954,0.0022279778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008727812,0.000006679844,0.99568707,0.0005262443,0.0000017549157,1.4380579e-7,0.0004147716,0.0013421885,2.8492565e-8,0.0009161154,0.0009786835,0.000039067894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6816535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95586765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27421415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052140513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025798911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5798778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2440133034","doi":"10.1007/s11150-016-9339-8","title":"Matching, marriage, and children: differences across sexual orientations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Sexual orientation; Fertility; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Same sex; Social psychology; Constant (computer programming); Demographic economics; Demography; Economics; Population; Sociology; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.050442482710347916,"score_gpt":0.33754999689052767,"score_spread":0.28710751418017977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2440133034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98002434,0.014737809,0.0000061018636,0.002130863,0.00049666624,0.00029820294,0.0004613133,0.000010880112,0.001833851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8953413,0.10127753,0.00005041966,0.00085800956,0.00016716674,0.000016155045,0.0000027319238,0.000020856705,0.0022658603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900776,0.00010011103,0.00048171714,0.00018755496,0.00003756284,0.00018531657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883246,0.00012796343,0.00044326767,0.0005222201,0.000016818723,0.000057261463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036154196,0.00010896719,0.00034685558,0.000026957803,0.00008968169,0.000010588562,0.00034754144,0.000055624572,0.00012754003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003302389,0.00006507468,0.00009174617,0.00005242395,0.00019385765,0.0000873887,0.00011826734,0.00006763072,0.00002351122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023200431,0.00020209889,0.83028305,0.006808624,0.00024769115,3.176758e-7,0.001155415,0.0000012462984,0.00004398855,0.10373885,0.013036111,0.04445942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006241442,0.00007927094,0.9855062,0.00085969025,0.00012224609,0.00002303072,0.000059099,2.3371385e-7,0.000021195616,0.009429084,0.0031018676,0.00017394597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013580668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029659946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15522316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001950163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037142305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26536685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737155383","doi":"10.1007/s11150-017-9399-4","title":"Returns to scale in food preparation and the Deaton–Paxson puzzle","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Essex; McMaster University","keywords":"Economics; Scale (ratio); Returns to scale; Food preparation; Politics; Food processing; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Food science; Chemistry; Physics","score_opus":0.043528550114557286,"score_gpt":0.2930200108019808,"score_spread":0.24949146068742353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737155383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97714615,0.008283143,0.0000039876663,0.0035376626,0.00021577204,0.0007153031,0.000029368115,0.0000047807976,0.010063829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91837585,0.08085182,0.00013672121,0.00044252444,0.00004005567,0.000013714674,5.5477574e-7,0.000006853264,0.0001318944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992583,0.00011698178,0.00031195203,0.00013109621,0.000059277143,0.00012242024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988929,0.000067191024,0.0003683822,0.0006024938,0.00003150315,0.000037551887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014800635,0.000069332484,0.0002879414,0.000019686222,0.00026068703,0.000043097785,0.0006325437,0.000048041496,0.000002894356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028494096,0.000045781784,0.000095596646,0.000048617512,0.00027490204,0.00013623253,0.00013835709,0.00006400081,0.0000011271774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019751175,0.0002793167,0.25999463,0.004343461,0.00018983864,3.1094527e-7,0.050884012,0.0012650423,0.00009121572,0.6633818,0.0044466,0.014926237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005822299,0.00046221164,0.5648974,0.013480375,0.0005364596,0.000007124836,0.011449125,0.0023351465,0.0010911871,0.108498186,0.28989407,0.0015263607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006472257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0168325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55488366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042816482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007210119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.939293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754364761","doi":"10.1007/s11150-017-9390-0","title":"Program participation in a targeted land distribution program and household outcomes: evidence from Vietnam","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; World Bank Group","keywords":"Ethnic group; Hectare; Distribution (mathematics); Survey data collection; Household income; Demographic economics; Business; Baseline (sea); Socioeconomics; Economics; Economic growth; Geography; Agricultural economics; Political science; Statistics; Agriculture","score_opus":0.06552112118407909,"score_gpt":0.2870741512966511,"score_spread":0.221553030112572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754364761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927467,0.004084517,1.3189197e-7,0.0019833671,0.000087999426,0.00080071646,0.00025855948,0.000017593758,0.000020376552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951602,0.04812422,0.000059940518,0.0000587676,0.00003641539,0.000054151566,0.000042650787,0.000001186997,0.000020673568],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921685,0.00003605953,0.00038839027,0.00016964221,0.000052928495,0.00013614258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918,0.000058771835,0.0004996626,0.00019945642,0.000020433787,0.000041676194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031599635,0.00010379156,0.0003515003,0.0000037645905,0.00012754698,0.000045444704,0.00036026532,0.00006265668,0.000006256193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009933865,0.000021611508,0.00012338528,0.00004188484,0.000119489094,0.00019549223,0.000119479424,0.00006974049,5.3192815e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016982996,0.0002916949,0.60428214,0.00047550135,0.000028962773,3.5425532e-7,0.000020258103,0.000013191387,0.0002683778,0.00006796444,0.00006642323,0.39446816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013848027,0.00011953251,0.98521775,0.0023178728,0.00003456186,5.0203926e-7,0.00000368352,0.00011873878,0.00031531573,0.0003323078,0.011307219,0.00009406387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009746285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015037896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3943741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017366681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008622411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14733532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885483693","doi":"10.1007/s11150-018-9430-4","title":"The effect of violent crime on teenage pregnancy in Mexico","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Pregnancy; Teenage pregnancy; Demography; Violent crime; Domestic violence; Psychology; Demographic economics; Poison control; Injury prevention; Medicine; Criminology; Medical emergency; Economics; Sociology; Population; Biology","score_opus":0.05164055306964382,"score_gpt":0.37346958833604915,"score_spread":0.32182903526640533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885483693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93253595,0.05576175,6.3667034e-7,0.00030213466,0.00055045384,0.0014245106,0.000038797803,0.000008257599,0.009377505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8497027,0.14996016,0.000006520692,0.00011009518,0.00006390562,0.000053537686,7.1827e-7,0.000018072235,0.00008428011],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981518,0.000602271,0.0008467418,0.00012990192,0.00006265356,0.00020663829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997728,0.0007666648,0.0007739436,0.00065810635,0.000045158515,0.000028163126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014668698,0.00011750678,0.0007934719,0.000030112282,0.00015550571,0.0000018488533,0.00051622244,0.00008730371,0.00002650348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026874742,0.00006112244,0.00020480264,0.000096756645,0.00017433189,0.00003506377,0.00015757856,0.00020124929,0.00001698325],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006176965,0.00068397424,0.4185296,0.13827841,0.0005754844,0.000001688562,0.013140388,0.000113416696,0.00038522438,0.1831097,0.0036620195,0.2409024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049950094,0.0032544786,0.17544627,0.6454804,0.00056807214,3.1068757e-7,0.0038169161,0.00013891752,0.055619974,0.00790319,0.1017732,0.0010032695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001938044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040776405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50720197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006402769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006965676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24925008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894713174","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09535-6","title":"Gender inequality as a barrier to economic growth: a review of the theoretical literature","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Inequality; Economics; Gender inequality; Human capital; Capital (architecture); Fertility; Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Development economics; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Population; Geography","score_opus":0.06009120244544467,"score_gpt":0.3301604575159813,"score_spread":0.2700692550705366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894713174","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012931637,0.98520184,0.000002654143,0.00090553355,0.0010647026,0.0025385288,0.0015523289,0.000012656832,0.008592451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011712085,0.99482924,0.00014111855,0.0042986535,0.0002343701,0.00008512018,0.00003421444,0.00007483555,0.00018530907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939527,0.0020839607,0.0026033472,0.00063906657,0.0002798597,0.000441081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943339,0.0005771393,0.00233276,0.002242839,0.00029928918,0.00021406311],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047053765,0.0005593458,0.004200947,0.00008971126,0.0001635511,0.000047752732,0.0029508583,0.00045056237,0.0002579613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021393187,0.00034692205,0.0032079152,0.00070264173,0.0007328699,0.00011744084,0.00082516146,0.00061161665,0.000017283535],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018714213,0.000063878215,0.0000557687,0.40940374,0.00033941443,6.300426e-7,0.00054849946,0.0000032416658,8.674885e-8,0.5658796,0.003930849,0.019772405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052779225,0.000013312225,0.000012619454,0.30599463,0.0010534971,0.00000745066,0.000062045314,7.0338433e-7,9.323261e-7,0.0033350992,0.68917996,0.00028697483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012171814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059722533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6852491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038179194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029957306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969564122","doi":"10.1007/s11150-019-09461-2","title":"What influence do empowered women have? Land and the reality of women’s relative power in Peru","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; NorQuest College","funders":"Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers","keywords":"Empowerment; Power (physics); Economics; Women's empowerment; Renting; Demographic economics; Bargaining power; Psychological intervention; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Microeconomics; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.02030273015303596,"score_gpt":0.2615294270317667,"score_spread":0.24122669687873072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969564122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816681,0.013555805,3.1442536e-7,0.00095743587,0.00018946645,0.00062167493,0.000038334543,0.0000037441803,0.0029650957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8151928,0.18416351,0.000013805799,0.00046180803,0.000007280175,0.000014663752,4.426811e-7,0.000007771572,0.00013792464],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857056,0.000332796,0.0005683143,0.00018217626,0.00010387609,0.00024229214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984582,0.00030981092,0.0005894694,0.0005200933,0.0000675796,0.00005486248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036281883,0.000109556044,0.000606336,0.000035481193,0.000053823773,0.00002619845,0.000503493,0.000077467914,0.000026016347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002830814,0.00007067411,0.00010910367,0.00012917994,0.00055785733,0.00036393467,0.00014348199,0.00013481264,0.0000014765009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015497151,0.00014342122,0.70525384,0.0027786172,0.000179293,2.797073e-7,0.16060299,0.0008845791,0.000022680213,0.12907338,0.000089549656,0.0008164172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003705072,0.0001975046,0.7971857,0.00788255,0.000090192545,0.0000020240884,0.09242193,0.00013918725,0.000025010788,0.07221024,0.025533414,0.00060716906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000849786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039369543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1706077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002408339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016943934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28820068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996548621","doi":"10.1007/s11150-019-09474-x","title":"Household consumption decisions: will expanding sports betting impact health?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Goods and services; Consumer Expenditure Survey; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Consumer spending; Public economics; Consumer expenditure; Demographic economics; Advertising; Business; Psychology; Economy; Sociology; Aggregate expenditure","score_opus":0.05588817241798101,"score_gpt":0.31779098232697245,"score_spread":0.26190280990899145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996548621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97964185,0.017814385,0.0000031639117,0.0006122214,0.0002653774,0.0011714924,0.00009008143,0.000034326247,0.00036708545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92083454,0.077620655,0.00027368517,0.0010691289,0.00008855389,0.0000073670917,0.0000099421295,0.00005131946,0.00004482844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981233,0.00008303734,0.00097045116,0.00032830014,0.00019068061,0.00030426544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713683,0.00032857075,0.0012164578,0.0011089012,0.0000511263,0.00015813948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010237882,0.00023704399,0.0013100056,0.00009513912,0.000054676933,0.000009851414,0.0003078718,0.00007746667,0.00006890004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020602292,0.00016952542,0.0006664348,0.0001496921,0.00008655416,0.00026002983,0.00021902312,0.0002674798,0.000015556498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065520806,0.00206021,0.96119624,0.016710382,0.0002639703,0.0000018118707,0.000058845548,0.00056898704,0.0007534027,0.001763895,0.0020021957,0.014554511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016878811,0.00053616957,0.92650217,0.0604374,0.00039675387,0.000074901036,0.00002947523,0.00022778488,0.003981325,0.0017697524,0.0038922357,0.0004641498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000576969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000041269814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059806272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026042497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017916462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69130456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022831647","doi":"10.1007/s11150-018-9425-1","title":"Are time and money equally substitutable for all commodity groups in the household’s domestic production?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Elasticity of substitution; Commodity; Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.06869059926659916,"score_gpt":0.29083101718032867,"score_spread":0.22214041791372952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022831647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846644,0.009619176,0.00001536507,0.0024998665,0.0004705349,0.001367271,0.00022926388,0.000019115438,0.0011150109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564596,0.041466553,0.00032085512,0.0013436648,0.00023120527,0.00003568948,0.000005996747,0.00002052766,0.00011591179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872875,0.00020311684,0.0004793443,0.0002372578,0.000101732636,0.00024978223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848896,0.00022615712,0.00058236497,0.000568453,0.000087532186,0.000046537818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025945986,0.00013411217,0.00044071767,0.000040264527,0.00024889465,0.000031656004,0.00070422346,0.00007619993,0.000004445186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050666893,0.000093799936,0.00012985327,0.00017847618,0.00055321865,0.00017366966,0.00008819912,0.00010860804,0.0000025033214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003641761,0.003404548,0.28971168,0.029393202,0.0010859261,0.0000059289596,0.04991479,0.009813986,0.00060358783,0.5073562,0.10002071,0.008325211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004239922,0.0007750835,0.40539238,0.0135580525,0.0018063929,0.000053660882,0.010342952,0.0036317639,0.00033734954,0.102683485,0.45442036,0.0027586017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037468606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029414133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40467277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007217718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010992998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38250506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042086603","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09515-w","title":"The usual suspects: do risk tolerance, altruism, and health predict the response to COVID-19?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social distance; Altruism (biology); Preference; Compliance (psychology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economics; Order (exchange); Test (biology); Distancing; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Actuarial science; Social psychology; Time preference; Public economics; Microeconomics; Medicine; Disease","score_opus":0.0957986529106418,"score_gpt":0.35966463277520727,"score_spread":0.2638659798645655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042086603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6874549,0.11898103,0.0000024997746,0.18928106,0.00037536884,0.0020303584,0.00032705773,0.000031663603,0.0015160904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6524639,0.33072907,0.00007890816,0.016493049,0.00010935558,0.000048684848,5.5972544e-7,0.000018589346,0.000057904508],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981007,0.0006061426,0.0006678155,0.00026220194,0.00009780368,0.00026533418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789345,0.0006429426,0.0006985566,0.0004904035,0.000028737752,0.0002459149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040060966,0.0001448397,0.00048565393,0.0000173607,0.0009183887,0.00005243272,0.0009112642,0.000036091536,0.000013020588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010002911,0.000085461776,0.00018026211,0.00016274015,0.0006876596,0.00008835048,0.00039386164,0.00015662378,0.0000057587094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025503174,0.00048767778,0.1677326,0.00574768,0.00083027495,0.0000036499725,0.13929479,0.003464159,0.0002791672,0.26629394,0.36846375,0.044851985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005593543,0.00035952544,0.0074568614,0.0007974258,0.00008775478,0.0000022328366,0.0069299997,0.000035762747,0.00020517717,0.0016519116,0.9816352,0.00027875442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016506759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012002034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61317146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027993947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049884786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7063596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087018321","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09508-9","title":"The gender gap in citations of articles published in two demographic economics journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Economics; Demography; Demographic economics; Positive economics; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.11383839249101184,"score_gpt":0.31136142172821907,"score_spread":0.19752302923720721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087018321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96769387,0.022211133,0.000009715246,0.006829016,0.0001804495,0.0004205688,0.000043787975,0.0000056666727,0.0026058226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78768307,0.21121773,0.00017596128,0.00086311874,0.000034160068,0.0000071747263,8.4399517e-7,0.000010907985,0.000007014626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981833,0.00027199907,0.0010742694,0.00016310668,0.00007952511,0.00022781653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838674,0.00033837926,0.00076449115,0.0003511734,0.00008304785,0.000076150165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024313764,0.00010400545,0.00045605432,0.00009695381,0.000098879704,0.00004200506,0.0008308357,0.00004935385,0.000015714173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006623581,0.000077705095,0.00024632132,0.0005613638,0.00029919797,0.0002566508,0.00009523401,0.00017311006,9.36894e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023918336,0.00019668826,0.6689588,0.0013956276,0.00015510719,4.574566e-7,0.009882417,0.017342206,0.00009387508,0.29596314,0.0009437374,0.005044085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027980383,0.00010335774,0.66670144,0.0036557545,0.00030197893,0.0000030285248,0.025909323,0.0076580737,0.00024729216,0.27127802,0.0204343,0.00090939866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040965003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052741203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18900661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006286279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029242804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3168722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093091791","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09512-z","title":"Gender differentiated economic responses to crises in developing countries: insights for COVID-19 recovery policies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Welfare; Panel data; Development economics; Demographic economics; Economic recovery; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Macroeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.21651565960434124,"score_gpt":0.319627015857171,"score_spread":0.10311135625282977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093091791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9130883,0.045028962,0.0018161718,0.034047503,0.00062164513,0.0023697072,0.0024528122,0.000048964917,0.0005259031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7334447,0.17965518,0.0007831803,0.08572166,0.00011702339,0.00010851845,0.000018833081,0.00008509338,0.00006584352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723,0.00005941541,0.0018326199,0.00050272,0.000027072649,0.00034816095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971635,0.0007440638,0.0012213243,0.0006334851,0.00003090721,0.00020675393],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008703546,0.0002754337,0.0012857623,0.00032210033,0.00007518419,0.000036302183,0.00083855836,0.000116656556,0.000063442865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025933972,0.00027062584,0.00036309595,0.00025367815,0.000089753274,0.00024008886,0.0002801384,0.00011277017,0.000037675025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018944874,0.00026987324,0.15110916,0.0660951,0.0011787384,0.0000030779352,0.009694131,0.041936316,0.00014607613,0.6532918,0.07335156,0.0010296796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016261393,0.00017456422,0.015638571,0.001794403,0.00006358357,0.0000036197323,0.00009468498,0.00078425463,0.001002279,0.020105954,0.9579202,0.000791744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042341315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014842262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88456863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008542172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070727133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121024457","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09539-2","title":"Consumption and geographic mobility in pandemic times. Evidence from Mexico","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Consumer Retail Behavior Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Consumption (sociology); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Tourism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Pandemic; Demographic economics; Consumer spending; Percentage point; Geography; Statistics; Finance; Macroeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.08324849980121427,"score_gpt":0.26158949803351583,"score_spread":0.17834099823230157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121024457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8308518,0.16833678,7.143016e-7,0.0003633053,0.000095169315,0.00023673414,0.000013753069,0.000010029328,0.00009173901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7848488,0.2148188,0.000036143134,0.00025071573,0.00001284743,0.00001236184,0.0000030600802,0.000008785153,0.000008466592],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990887,0.00002735388,0.0004994929,0.00023284044,0.000050472052,0.000101151636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892753,0.00013702174,0.00040989165,0.0004621331,0.00005761664,0.0000057946836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005962556,0.00011268573,0.00044827207,0.000056167868,0.00003134494,0.000020993682,0.0002164875,0.000036038135,0.000070069764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024640755,0.000093687355,0.00013682016,0.00014586232,0.00013952213,0.00031364372,0.00040517643,0.000094976946,0.0000060962393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000379572,0.00003105981,0.9889988,0.0022442513,0.000022568367,3.490918e-7,0.0000044676253,0.0000046771543,0.00011659999,0.00019298619,0.00003236362,0.008348132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018165108,0.000001597625,0.99002707,0.0066701854,0.00021160214,0.0000010872017,0.000011385891,0.00008418974,0.00010591287,0.00052752445,0.0020647713,0.000113005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075208937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012971788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046482027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021822201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023763729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38204595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292615750","doi":"10.1007/s11150-022-09619-5","title":"How to measure parenting styles?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology; Parenting styles; Style (visual arts); Persistence (discontinuity); Cognition; Measure (data warehouse); Sample (material); Cognitive style; Latent semantic analysis; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.05972772264672964,"score_gpt":0.2579626395257931,"score_spread":0.19823491687906347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292615750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7655743,0.10750085,0.000042875978,0.07128717,0.0074926256,0.0025488473,0.0010107721,0.00006157042,0.044481028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98616225,0.005340355,0.00009899565,0.0058623203,0.00014591198,0.000035812845,0.000011223883,0.00002128683,0.0023218605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992298,0.00007884589,0.00032145446,0.00016201651,0.00008115064,0.00012677067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932474,0.000021216574,0.0002919024,0.0003027429,0.000021543665,0.00003787741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045150553,0.00008482888,0.00027182893,0.000030952957,0.00010005904,0.000006585434,0.0004111633,0.000015937805,0.00019488874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025528374,0.00006771997,0.0002269909,0.000120755045,0.000020616053,0.00002370527,0.00019339136,0.000106496,0.0000060586517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016117016,0.0016368597,0.029945144,0.009341812,0.0008562223,0.000002258462,0.0016750083,0.00061227893,0.00035921863,0.24016415,0.55481464,0.16043125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003101543,0.000042670465,0.030965136,0.002639077,0.000047687787,0.000007709193,0.0003221091,0.0000012429413,0.000092492264,0.00075621536,0.9646284,0.00018708521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009815956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036021274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4098138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004209226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037656886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27615404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390953963","doi":"10.1007/s11150-023-09688-0","title":"Estimating a model of inefficient cooperation and consumption in collective households","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inefficiency; Consumption (sociology); Liberian dollar; Economics; Microeconomics; Resource (disambiguation); Econometrics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.06411727310721312,"score_gpt":0.29163007155463794,"score_spread":0.22751279844742484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390953963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98149234,0.01599445,0.0005628482,0.00017346622,0.00018938108,0.00045742883,0.000077102224,0.0000115221765,0.0010414511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9356234,0.06284543,0.0013270957,0.00009320891,0.000015264952,0.000009124812,0.0000015170286,0.000010193584,0.0000747818],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918056,0.00008174371,0.00044296784,0.00013624236,0.0000618691,0.00009660586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994778,0.00010795502,0.00019470831,0.00015129107,0.000045436438,0.0000228021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009648816,0.00007293676,0.00028391063,0.00005737686,0.000055559143,0.000014751267,0.0001477631,0.0000523919,0.0000020717898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013913008,0.000061227496,0.000069468006,0.00020276361,0.00018060673,0.000101235164,0.000050086448,0.00007352515,3.0377376e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020999387,0.00024817395,0.034137312,0.017641982,0.00011082391,4.4128774e-7,0.021559648,0.7247819,0.0007732095,0.19413091,0.00050077046,0.0060938625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030674043,0.000049156468,0.0046217954,0.008615619,0.00011111185,0.000001110079,0.0005593928,0.9814709,0.00016036573,0.0035623778,0.00034572725,0.00019572591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020789092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003900294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.256689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011804908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003016992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24967848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414077554","doi":"10.1007/s11150-025-09804-2","title":"Health shocks and household allocation of time and spending","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus","funders":"Australian Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Spouse; Shock (circulatory); Life expectancy; Consumption (sociology); Household income; Workforce; Survey data collection; Alcohol consumption; British Household Panel Survey","score_opus":0.06464026021454505,"score_gpt":0.382249288010048,"score_spread":0.31760902779550293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414077554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82890123,0.15854764,0.000009430535,0.00663793,0.0004222699,0.0018671482,0.00024865806,0.0000257991,0.0033399025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6949249,0.30161852,0.00042288515,0.0026463817,0.000031486965,0.000014402601,0.0000064270325,0.000020724832,0.00031428327],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980023,0.00027677315,0.0012285901,0.00020411222,0.000059028567,0.00022922341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978438,0.00036891873,0.0011189578,0.0005343416,0.000059776947,0.00007417526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016334847,0.00012926933,0.0008400938,0.00008402186,0.00013764786,0.0000022241504,0.0002494649,0.00009334008,0.00001394746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020669594,0.000104531304,0.00008108547,0.00014006176,0.00011415041,0.000075686,0.00027722202,0.00019587758,0.00000312632],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021278676,0.0003746407,0.24983485,0.46436107,0.00046811727,5.347869e-7,0.002066282,0.00048049222,0.00052473205,0.13867962,0.10323585,0.03976102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037305653,0.0005872778,0.5091923,0.32150042,0.00063659454,0.000014014456,0.00093591964,0.001066164,0.0016491009,0.00984796,0.14993961,0.00090010016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063635595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014700012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25935742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014331448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032812636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42626628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416606253","doi":"10.1007/s11150-026-09855-z","title":"Beyond the Gender Binary: Wage Inequality and Occupational Segregation among Transgender and Nonbinary Workers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; York University; University of Manitoba","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Occupational segregation; Transgender; Earnings; Census; Wage; Gender pay gap; Inequality; Black male","score_opus":0.11277046561374825,"score_gpt":0.2980721512549539,"score_spread":0.18530168564120564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416606253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98081344,0.009749926,0.000020132617,0.003543309,0.00014945965,0.00041710708,0.00006656899,0.000007736145,0.0052323425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97132695,0.02747319,0.000082135295,0.0009841786,0.000015567275,0.0000042324486,0.0000039941765,0.0000034409998,0.00010631576],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900514,0.00031988128,0.00032437465,0.00015694027,0.000083965155,0.00010967811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992506,0.00017492991,0.00024693142,0.00024936395,0.00004469911,0.000033456883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018626396,0.000083905456,0.00023369933,0.000031741456,0.0002982161,0.00001850552,0.00027075145,0.00006305767,0.000018822218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008457394,0.000059547318,0.00010756574,0.00014926589,0.00051110703,0.0001906894,0.00011611971,0.0000964236,3.3528593e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054056938,0.00012328423,0.72313637,0.0040222197,0.00026130784,2.1948799e-7,0.0069828844,0.00021569815,0.000021829277,0.25245738,0.0062393006,0.0064854175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003506695,0.000019207238,0.96618426,0.0007552638,0.00021176143,3.9694018e-7,0.0031452382,0.00008430868,0.0000734967,0.023172036,0.005840759,0.00016261791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006769038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029302426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24304786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039603077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013996266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24282691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}