{"meta":{"query_hash":"a7db77786895","filters":{"venue":"Review of International Studies"},"cohort_total":47,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":47,"exported":47,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a7db77786895","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Review+of+International+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1477329059","doi":"10.1017/s0260210515000388","title":"Benchmarking global supply chains: the power of the ‘ethical audit’ regime","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Audit; Benchmarking; Supply chain; Business; Corporate governance; Accountability; Corporate social responsibility; Quality audit; Product (mathematics); Power (physics); Accounting; Industrial organization; Public relations; Marketing; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.044771833186627134,"score_gpt":0.3407887744242592,"score_spread":0.29601694123763206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1477329059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19500534,0.21782385,0.05479749,0.25887278,0.00296804,0.000351739,0.00016082767,0.00020377964,0.2698162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96050394,0.026884882,0.0040737097,0.0066514676,0.00054654205,0.000069994516,0.000033337707,0.000038632643,0.0011976165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8026215,0.1563874,0.0060709445,0.004441431,0.02743982,0.003038867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65362865,0.25804606,0.02677966,0.021509146,0.038183033,0.001853482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12690742,0.00034705584,0.0007394679,0.005457367,0.0020389878,0.012624586,0.0014665452,0.002255437,0.0013410758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1526248,0.00039623358,0.00041363636,0.007512177,0.025252424,0.009757924,0.006100458,0.0034276831,0.0001878927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093473114,0.00005931339,0.020836493,0.0035767192,0.00015257053,0.00027666552,0.027075993,0.0030176397,0.00062360143,0.5429953,0.011012082,0.3902802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008347033,0.0005242809,0.04553449,0.033372805,0.00027561278,0.00076414715,0.07863739,0.0034327186,0.0033394422,0.26944026,0.5643369,0.00025838712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053129005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006443488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12690742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070289676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014265798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6711586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982741811","doi":"10.1017/s0260210509990556","title":"Global norms, domestic institutions and the transformation of immigration policy in Canada and the US","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration policy; Liberalization; Political science; Political economy; Bureaucracy; Normative; Autonomy; Politics; Human rights; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.011771862728306728,"score_gpt":0.31123923661332326,"score_spread":0.29946737388501654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982741811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24319011,0.30020484,0.00073024177,0.0524204,0.00072277087,0.00006266115,0.00071013015,0.000044940025,0.40191394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9047574,0.08521892,0.0004258869,0.002004582,0.000099432786,0.0000173083,0.00014317597,0.000012898464,0.0073204553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979596,0.0003489831,0.000049941078,0.00016180956,0.000766564,0.00071296224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971336,0.0005711244,0.0002582542,0.000079037876,0.0015470696,0.00041089355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025919098,0.00024410221,0.00038276543,0.004503862,0.0074463882,0.007917292,0.00088818313,0.00072946545,0.0029395756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036178469,0.00014014095,0.0001936898,0.01085949,0.013381117,0.0011870238,0.0015612429,0.0011088433,0.000103251565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007725306,0.00005785966,0.037243307,0.0013717589,0.00007662147,0.0005457492,0.058101933,0.0019098695,0.00040352545,0.64786035,0.03494503,0.2174068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001984997,0.000035726196,0.15005134,0.003601365,0.00010323306,0.00018646139,0.10573826,0.00050268945,0.0005492392,0.02707101,0.7120348,0.000106076164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13778412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13778412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18978007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995115514","doi":"10.1017/s0260210511000428","title":"Checks and balances of risk management: precautionary logic and the judiciary","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Law; Parliament; Opposition (politics); Rule of law; Precautionary principle; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.05550848651119762,"score_gpt":0.36908959308050276,"score_spread":0.31358110656930516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995115514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14875138,0.009772694,0.087393,0.087415054,0.0010201231,0.0002042413,0.000066238295,0.000086967186,0.66529024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888123,0.0005310206,0.004260678,0.002096711,0.00025732262,0.000043965483,0.00000615799,0.000017465425,0.0039742524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745933,0.014500194,0.0010224169,0.002088742,0.004950695,0.0028446629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95537335,0.03154291,0.0036620577,0.0027789136,0.0055463393,0.0010964626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027422909,0.0005702048,0.0007554003,0.0037010394,0.007254868,0.015983237,0.0029495978,0.0071322224,0.003657524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035490226,0.00060182245,0.00087909633,0.0019611733,0.058966022,0.008105077,0.0052246964,0.00999728,0.0004469378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010356374,0.000011305881,0.00023066935,0.000011710758,0.000006995235,0.0000812711,0.0010160239,0.0007657468,0.000045677603,0.9951508,0.0007025614,0.0019668734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020277932,0.000021002546,0.0005979356,0.0001904426,0.0000134868405,0.000042948002,0.0010296267,0.0031253323,0.00026550278,0.9854232,0.009242479,0.000027744998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014525193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01096842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027422909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015661972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011239075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14502794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040783895","doi":"10.1017/s0260210511000271","title":"Highways, heroes, and secular martyrs: the symbolics of power and sacrifice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Politics; Repatriation; Sacrifice; State (computer science); Torture; Power (physics); Sociology; Liberalism; Law; Demise; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Political science; History; Art; Psychoanalysis; Human rights","score_opus":0.07224408503712453,"score_gpt":0.3482669301324941,"score_spread":0.27602284509536956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040783895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26966465,0.05532165,0.0011243722,0.019424401,0.0006367084,0.000017437367,0.00014343308,0.00003311522,0.6536343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98055685,0.007763787,0.000117128715,0.00033865182,0.000060522092,0.0000031987925,0.000013926562,0.000007875414,0.011138027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894327,0.00033655524,0.0000132070345,0.00006659296,0.00035509167,0.00028526253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988518,0.0004707335,0.00014321867,0.000055730463,0.00030219974,0.00017635965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012067311,0.00045173027,0.00029413938,0.00209419,0.010228636,0.008168737,0.0007001047,0.00087337807,0.0051363646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002308501,0.00014362329,0.0001004014,0.002900531,0.04076054,0.0017843881,0.0022737042,0.0012100905,0.00022112041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057621874,0.000016182546,0.0047788415,0.00032816254,0.0000168412,0.0005089445,0.3843445,0.00017481184,0.00041124944,0.5412074,0.01533554,0.05281987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005991696,0.000029724011,0.0154423695,0.00086509564,0.000018416007,0.00032323334,0.5199463,0.00010938436,0.00028146463,0.022050414,0.44089174,0.000035843026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76828617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87947273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76828617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018680815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018025104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46615684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053879904","doi":"10.1017/s0260210509990489","title":"‘I don't even know what gender is’: a discussion of the connections between gender, gender mainstreaming and feminist theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Gender mainstreaming; Mainstream; Mainstreaming; Gender studies; Political science; Legislation; Politics; Sociology; Feminist legal theory; Law; Gender equality","score_opus":0.07285152472473966,"score_gpt":0.40249744626582973,"score_spread":0.32964592154109007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053879904","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020494917,0.060659166,0.010963842,0.6763363,0.003637238,0.000042935797,0.000056688878,0.000035753434,0.22777317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83991677,0.023151575,0.003500502,0.09598409,0.004973587,0.00023054497,0.00003710283,0.00015112227,0.03205467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800648,0.016333243,0.00017228973,0.0009259136,0.0016464124,0.0008572379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799345,0.018211735,0.0004850807,0.00025328272,0.00061882683,0.0004965943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016661126,0.00078090385,0.0008468852,0.0029090673,0.01703297,0.013573311,0.002628007,0.010349611,0.0060041784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01079302,0.00047255543,0.00055790483,0.0027590955,0.11178432,0.016611239,0.00571795,0.011779824,0.0006754211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005227555,0.0000105335575,0.00009184296,0.000047853653,0.0000018575503,0.000098273726,0.04219761,0.00003987017,0.000033175056,0.9470545,0.007753487,0.0026658876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000125066545,0.000026191245,0.00043719236,0.0008864365,0.000004926956,0.0001791992,0.08584419,0.00035912322,0.00015609208,0.5707791,0.34129384,0.0000211066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013307606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011157821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01703297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014363685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045353374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10421634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056078505","doi":"10.1017/s0260210508008139","title":"Fishing in the mild West: democratic peace and militarised interstate disputes in the transatlantic community","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Proposition; Context (archaeology); Political science; Impossibility; Political economy; Mistake; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.10838019474847804,"score_gpt":0.4006110354149285,"score_spread":0.29223084066645044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056078505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83174425,0.0011316013,0.0052062743,0.024602307,0.00012991639,0.000043485634,0.000026986147,0.000012403172,0.13710283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868697,0.00009059432,0.00011689245,0.00022922756,0.000025940835,0.0000056014064,0.0000026433495,9.786224e-7,0.00084107247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963773,0.0023162705,0.00011460325,0.00022262147,0.00026861622,0.000700553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98784363,0.008123586,0.002050066,0.00064207683,0.0004976513,0.0008430063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006027857,0.00018554305,0.0003587363,0.001301775,0.010647879,0.007952144,0.0012155327,0.0040437197,0.006979053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011131342,0.00022228724,0.00023387164,0.0014283933,0.031395238,0.0076880953,0.006541666,0.0047696983,0.00023121593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005192941,0.00008825744,0.0033551867,0.000036135352,0.000010044315,0.0011151355,0.045294646,0.00047633823,0.00015719655,0.943117,0.0011863777,0.005111728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047259105,0.000082571525,0.006860639,0.00017480075,0.0000148114905,0.0005399005,0.16785435,0.004085991,0.00044815274,0.78724974,0.032596875,0.000044939836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007655363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009305778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010647879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003970182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018634241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03187877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084310489","doi":"10.1017/s0260210509008468","title":"The contradictions of regionalism in North America","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Regionalism (politics); Regionalisation; Prosperity; Political science; Politics; Economic integration; Free trade; General partnership; Free trade agreement; International trade; Economy; Geography; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.038097907184921245,"score_gpt":0.37735649531262644,"score_spread":0.3392585881277052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084310489","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087494075,0.43749538,0.0033629949,0.17634945,0.0006308082,0.000017355605,0.000092551614,0.0000292764,0.29452804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91437423,0.07773477,0.0006172746,0.0042951596,0.00021366033,0.000014465828,0.000022332475,0.0000068942645,0.0027212105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654716,0.0016513506,0.000087350236,0.00036836902,0.00085679645,0.0004890048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725866,0.0012031166,0.00037374572,0.00014451484,0.00081918103,0.00020071995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036730221,0.0001553804,0.00037794566,0.0031955512,0.0030081044,0.0054110377,0.00069227116,0.0011303336,0.0017580154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036870786,0.00019454751,0.00020706176,0.0051586637,0.022796772,0.002563464,0.002078268,0.0015078398,0.000088421475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060404036,0.0000053587423,0.0018680658,0.00027765814,0.000025696392,0.00012947225,0.01130685,0.0005563725,0.00013367414,0.9587818,0.008423595,0.018485362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015625401,0.000016442631,0.021798272,0.0024078966,0.000041522784,0.00022690072,0.034099016,0.00035856428,0.00014656527,0.35864502,0.582212,0.0000322033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27841237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3353703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72158766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019265115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015179529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5535836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101790397","doi":"10.1017/s0260210514000217","title":"Arguing with law: strategic legal argumentation, US diplomacy, and debates over the International Criminal Court","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Framing (construction); Persuasion; International law; Diplomacy; Jurisdiction; Argumentation theory; Universal jurisdiction; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03423166311405146,"score_gpt":0.36203641368949574,"score_spread":0.3278047505754443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101790397","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08071279,0.39484668,0.0044566826,0.15169136,0.00090297544,0.000031666874,0.00003776113,0.000036884918,0.3672832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93506795,0.05491345,0.0008198584,0.005839661,0.0005195051,0.00004033176,0.000022026168,0.000019741343,0.00275744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787102,0.01692308,0.00047997886,0.00095293415,0.0019439114,0.0009899582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96817565,0.02726886,0.0020360048,0.0006143138,0.0012141899,0.00069096667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0234328,0.0004738559,0.000809263,0.008715083,0.0056063426,0.019631816,0.0021297217,0.007955914,0.0030401913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021205137,0.00035859505,0.00046863355,0.008610243,0.06753678,0.012249517,0.004997948,0.005868133,0.0002707106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009306032,0.000021333495,0.0004580834,0.00028258096,0.000014438269,0.0001782823,0.029878307,0.00015323042,0.00005448312,0.95302415,0.0032144247,0.012711405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038071055,0.00004158342,0.002925123,0.0058525484,0.000042202835,0.00034953677,0.0940514,0.0006048042,0.00024620592,0.67910576,0.21669959,0.0000430881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009930884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010238015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0234328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010620406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008326926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123925984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117963221","doi":"10.1017/s0260210509990349","title":"Managing national security and law enforcement intelligence in a globalised world","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Intelligence, Security, War Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law enforcement; Incentive; Public relations; Political science; Adversary; Cultural intelligence; Business; Law; Computer security; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0509828421387299,"score_gpt":0.419498233905851,"score_spread":0.3685153917671211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117963221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26576054,0.11691313,0.010792162,0.0735059,0.00065825233,0.00011883793,0.000060367372,0.00012631004,0.5320645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92962545,0.046636105,0.0035535642,0.004067645,0.00028680824,0.000045420093,0.00005111942,0.000024012787,0.015709998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979012,0.0010775625,0.000080483915,0.00019025423,0.00038126635,0.0003692243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982095,0.0006078956,0.000564713,0.00009349251,0.00028690323,0.00023751336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042828303,0.00036064145,0.00033196312,0.0017694581,0.0024473462,0.013233471,0.0008450876,0.00241081,0.0037257914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002014095,0.00018632328,0.0001912226,0.0035989368,0.005219586,0.009429098,0.0049032993,0.001319773,0.00067312474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066486806,0.00030654363,0.024050673,0.0027507197,0.00020877883,0.0022163107,0.049127724,0.008850894,0.0021125597,0.44482544,0.04325225,0.42223164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004126413,0.00023308366,0.019378189,0.0032886278,0.00010596722,0.0016328633,0.17260107,0.0023200165,0.00096516235,0.152102,0.6472646,0.00006719467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047688135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009308245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013233471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032064235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005889575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023264289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151186456","doi":"10.1017/s0260210513000144","title":"Postnational discourse, deliberation, and participation toward global risk governance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Normative; Ambiguity; Politics; Global governance; Political science; Corporate governance; Key (lock); Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.033026875947647,"score_gpt":0.4082039370296059,"score_spread":0.3751770610819589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151186456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25219262,0.10482083,0.0372682,0.0933682,0.0006790577,0.00015589346,0.00008992767,0.00010662058,0.5113186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98237604,0.012750979,0.0013939233,0.0006875378,0.00011477954,0.000048792608,0.000020557007,0.00001133871,0.0025961658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801701,0.01618558,0.00045490198,0.0007255606,0.0017166438,0.00074718485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807365,0.0144288875,0.0018829742,0.0010307028,0.0014134371,0.0005073948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018849725,0.00037749248,0.00033512386,0.0034316857,0.0023802128,0.010037618,0.0013297779,0.0026524805,0.0026657803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012326878,0.00024135842,0.00028636932,0.0034550647,0.025972456,0.0077648996,0.005386749,0.0023798053,0.00028350388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019406989,0.000056690085,0.0020019757,0.00057434116,0.000022851804,0.0002597057,0.09559889,0.0006238727,0.00039999193,0.8597313,0.0025471768,0.03816384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002067558,0.00004881848,0.006147849,0.0031569067,0.00003830027,0.00033468302,0.14949305,0.0011392585,0.0010925502,0.55495507,0.28353503,0.000037808062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002140135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017976364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018849725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004148154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004562013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09968811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162144451","doi":"10.1017/s0260210502006198","title":"Interview with Kal Holsti","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; International relations; State (computer science); Economic history; Law; History","score_opus":0.09278574581865115,"score_gpt":0.3867156434161707,"score_spread":0.29392989759751953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162144451","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13522607,0.027330827,0.0018849117,0.67009157,0.028009081,0.0015495318,0.0037561366,0.00038881463,0.13176309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3487016,0.020553594,0.002863775,0.31741282,0.0033424927,0.0035999944,0.0011317751,0.00039489893,0.30199912],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984731,0.0005860113,0.000095781295,0.00019569632,0.00030688356,0.00034246343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99492985,0.0016492769,0.00031063796,0.00011711671,0.0012094041,0.0017837374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034322469,0.00053413864,0.0012360582,0.0013071651,0.008668853,0.002845942,0.0005418995,0.0031141036,0.024424873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013799375,0.00080061366,0.0003029428,0.0013331827,0.0016399325,0.0028539032,0.0023206407,0.013979471,0.007948993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017523547,0.00017133882,0.001801374,0.00038250498,0.0000072230846,0.0023407417,0.11848985,0.000089777044,0.0012368602,0.0032538949,0.85168236,0.020368645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017614087,0.000084551815,0.0034830843,0.0003974398,0.0000055496594,0.0011500028,0.17097978,0.00008692154,0.0003391837,0.00054109853,0.8228571,0.000057718804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023185786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03816048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024424873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052756807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005513312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081709385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273035276","doi":"10.1017/s0260210515000479","title":"Regionalism and diffusion revisited: From final design towards stages of decision-making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Politics; Negotiation; Positive economics; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Management science; Law and economics; Public relations; Economics; Epistemology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.08369662298012959,"score_gpt":0.4023075516361235,"score_spread":0.3186109286559939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273035276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19274227,0.03477005,0.3508312,0.051499166,0.00061301386,0.00083891436,0.00021118602,0.0003299579,0.3681642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738376,0.0026389374,0.020684358,0.00046089856,0.000044491444,0.0001844812,0.000042047912,0.000054866454,0.002052247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9400929,0.048688523,0.0019532815,0.0037629376,0.003902975,0.0015994057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9214187,0.056951713,0.0056994352,0.008708757,0.0059167612,0.0013046602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049125373,0.00064616016,0.0011465068,0.003471669,0.0029900814,0.0142292995,0.0036971555,0.0037386334,0.005359713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056446668,0.00080279395,0.0014252926,0.003655372,0.059210144,0.0150207,0.00792848,0.0055748816,0.00044459582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022000437,0.000018245179,0.0011217665,0.00059858966,0.000025892681,0.00010898773,0.015678594,0.0014337765,0.000236038,0.95761985,0.0004320061,0.022704253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027648783,0.00007642014,0.0025451344,0.0011061698,0.000043683423,0.0001991358,0.020635268,0.0029046105,0.0009407645,0.912213,0.05926217,0.000045904562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034338178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024212454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049125373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009479224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00666297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25980294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332193879","doi":"10.1017/s0260210516000073","title":"The shifting salience of democratic governance: Evidence from the United Nations General Assembly General Debates","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Democracy; General assembly; Corporate governance; Political science; Global governance; International relations; Politics; European union; Political economy; Development economics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.08223612171012384,"score_gpt":0.4095639951127557,"score_spread":0.32732787340263186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332193879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93187207,0.0033089456,0.00051047106,0.0059859063,0.00012387776,0.000061625935,0.0003453272,0.000008512317,0.057783216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99677294,0.0011634304,0.00015174117,0.00058264215,0.00006913707,0.000045504767,0.00022909239,0.000017234213,0.0009681981],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755764,0.016356973,0.0011142041,0.0014193663,0.0041022617,0.0014306903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8386323,0.11524032,0.022119164,0.006914524,0.014861801,0.002231927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02828661,0.00019635895,0.00043688458,0.008371741,0.0046969787,0.0067342906,0.0012473583,0.0015897509,0.0045435964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10087382,0.00042251614,0.00022309898,0.013982837,0.011356424,0.0061196857,0.0065131714,0.0024762447,0.00032672347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028307328,0.00012443049,0.17392026,0.0007181886,0.00006832301,0.00035069327,0.73798895,0.00015011501,0.00044676353,0.034957506,0.006226407,0.044765256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001906959,0.00007444155,0.41281316,0.0013485269,0.000031085052,0.00012892742,0.5094166,0.00019090071,0.00036446564,0.0039694156,0.07159519,0.00004827181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03423112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03847486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03423112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005461512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034084741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14959568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569289010","doi":"10.1017/s0260210516000425","title":"Best practices in global governance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Yale University","keywords":"Best practice; Corporate governance; Scrutiny; Politics; Multi-level governance; Political science; Terminology; Global governance; Dominance (genetics); Polycentricity; Public administration; Public relations; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.14889681141693803,"score_gpt":0.5085796796242007,"score_spread":0.3596828682072627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2569289010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01986925,0.14346682,0.12136563,0.17113596,0.0019505377,0.0003906021,0.00024632967,0.000314175,0.54126066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8142373,0.08855407,0.07032222,0.0134654045,0.0009396459,0.00055419264,0.00026347087,0.00017605479,0.01148765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9384522,0.040857594,0.003626138,0.0038921966,0.011302023,0.0018699791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9445853,0.03353331,0.0052360226,0.009725428,0.005697683,0.0012221322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043415893,0.0009295399,0.0011901995,0.0074809385,0.0047577824,0.018701464,0.0026175529,0.006269029,0.003275222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043855924,0.0006043913,0.0008441424,0.0099333795,0.061472498,0.015137544,0.008553793,0.0066739805,0.000753009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032339485,0.000017908227,0.00048671235,0.00049224484,0.000020140082,0.00007215123,0.0060963426,0.0006746977,0.000082817154,0.9591397,0.0033733665,0.029540682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062884637,0.00001788774,0.0007199673,0.004224979,0.000015671858,0.0001197007,0.008102398,0.00030005578,0.0002107698,0.79157346,0.19468218,0.000026559152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005788871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004621687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043415893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010517611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017659588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22960794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603286930","doi":"10.1017/s0260210517000092","title":"International law and its discontents: Exploring the dark sides of international law in International Relations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Adelaide","keywords":"International law; Law; Political science; Municipal law; Public law; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Public international law; Sociology","score_opus":0.18647830348479952,"score_gpt":0.3972932085727175,"score_spread":0.21081490508791798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603286930","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011857426,0.79808974,0.0029301336,0.1260268,0.0011726855,0.000016038603,0.000016714706,0.000010796024,0.059879616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55849206,0.41984516,0.0011262596,0.014018374,0.003222356,0.000047441106,0.000022274337,0.000020753907,0.0032052784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98714113,0.00999423,0.00025243926,0.00051865086,0.0015820884,0.00051155454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9494649,0.0448373,0.00213162,0.0009539948,0.0017936523,0.00081852294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016388353,0.00039741516,0.0010149751,0.008525745,0.0040534446,0.01361427,0.0014262892,0.0064049494,0.0026030738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016514834,0.0003876725,0.0004168166,0.009449581,0.051024985,0.015925929,0.0059081586,0.007163806,0.00020192738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060451944,0.000024997487,0.0004424577,0.0007169445,0.000016770473,0.00009580424,0.012415584,0.00018728958,0.000070257585,0.9580901,0.003882043,0.024051636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001045909,0.000046123558,0.0032608814,0.010744708,0.000024809477,0.00025124138,0.0329546,0.00053878844,0.000117383,0.7503062,0.20170781,0.00003701801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052802116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007812998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016388353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005774465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066929874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086670935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604875496","doi":"10.1017/s0260210517000109","title":"The political economy of currency internationalisation: the case of the RMB","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Renminbi; Currency; Reserve currency; Internationalization; Liberian dollar; Economics; International economics; China; Devaluation; International trade; Political science; Exchange rate; Monetary economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0810464477066077,"score_gpt":0.36141426866593623,"score_spread":0.28036782095932855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604875496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40517738,0.014969154,0.005851665,0.054403238,0.00032956497,0.00005667492,0.00007128933,0.000040300565,0.5191007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914526,0.0020889433,0.0001827099,0.0007781116,0.00008393749,0.000013740184,0.000007676273,0.0000071770587,0.005385128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998417,0.00074794405,0.000042565367,0.00011829297,0.00018066411,0.00049340515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980381,0.00079229655,0.0004711496,0.00015985116,0.00028333956,0.0002553552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003970078,0.0002231211,0.00048370752,0.0012670573,0.0033145074,0.007281867,0.0007841954,0.0029959492,0.009853228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00524844,0.00025848064,0.00035836166,0.0015679342,0.008806421,0.0040152827,0.0031879977,0.0035484955,0.00045473338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026315794,0.000012247368,0.0010579148,0.00003679286,0.000009392084,0.00036995966,0.0011952734,0.00079345726,0.00007572464,0.99051076,0.0020376435,0.0038744293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014311621,0.00010024086,0.020242833,0.0008804366,0.00008551526,0.0004288625,0.013090293,0.012406548,0.0007530207,0.76698613,0.18480425,0.00007867651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021320136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014425199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021320136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073189423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030884892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05310291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738206696","doi":"10.1017/s0260210517000316","title":"Embedding regional actors in social and historical context: Australia-New Zealand integration and Asian-Pacific regionalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security","funders":"H2020 European Research Council","keywords":"Regionalism (politics); Regionalisation; Political science; Regional integration; Corporate governance; Agency (philosophy); Economic geography; Contingency; Economy; Economic integration; Political economy; International trade; Economic system; Geography; Politics; Economics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.26945648716582205,"score_gpt":0.3564773921935244,"score_spread":0.08702090502770238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738206696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.605899,0.120933324,0.0055581112,0.028649941,0.00034889823,0.000057163397,0.00022315733,0.000025389361,0.2383051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762477,0.021013454,0.0004965895,0.00022552443,0.000059992657,0.000012478866,0.000020767795,0.000003894818,0.0019196708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884343,0.0007314195,0.000042873104,0.00009444276,0.00017644229,0.00011140733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815077,0.00068509014,0.0005648715,0.00009744874,0.00031272075,0.00018909028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026093905,0.00015090719,0.0002552494,0.001809632,0.00109795,0.004275197,0.0004163224,0.0006584913,0.0025420203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003154234,0.0001628008,0.00020084938,0.00420134,0.0071180887,0.0030948927,0.0025365911,0.0009899042,0.000093370036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007894041,0.00006181897,0.041676447,0.0021235838,0.00019430037,0.00328063,0.15581894,0.0030951004,0.0014618943,0.6815352,0.00644508,0.10422813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000140485,0.00007756228,0.31782195,0.003728065,0.0002408681,0.0009891436,0.16271369,0.0027354716,0.00048405054,0.09595904,0.41515633,0.000079737256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12172675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16330147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12172675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058074747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032184648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24203646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770334058","doi":"10.1017/s0260210517000511","title":"(De)securitisation dilemmas: Theorising the simultaneous enaction of securitisation and desecuritisation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forces College","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Simultaneity; Politics; Dichotomy; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Sociology; International relations; Positive economics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04524497009583099,"score_gpt":0.42221678016148967,"score_spread":0.37697181006565866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770334058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16921774,0.052595362,0.105202645,0.109733045,0.0013992876,0.00017899934,0.00004177055,0.000076239514,0.5615549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981294,0.0060674865,0.0065852026,0.0014358186,0.00016209517,0.00007502102,0.000013956143,0.000026987922,0.0043395013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833592,0.012858653,0.00040064784,0.0008931404,0.0016806852,0.0008076454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98408544,0.011362313,0.0020036118,0.0009390672,0.0009589385,0.00065069966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017382521,0.0007145165,0.0007153166,0.00291944,0.0037539154,0.009058195,0.0022142036,0.0047821593,0.0033303401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017639464,0.0005000281,0.00060508586,0.002616435,0.07827347,0.016419929,0.008494789,0.0053696465,0.0004118844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073644146,0.00000812292,0.0003972863,0.00010751453,0.0000060391244,0.00013322617,0.01730485,0.00033863858,0.00006188695,0.9764789,0.00039236224,0.0047636265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014177513,0.000026451084,0.00072562764,0.000622328,0.000010291269,0.00039984897,0.030262083,0.0013257037,0.00015731413,0.9217276,0.0447071,0.000021463251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016815837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002040001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017382521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056522894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054220837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09192866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896912381","doi":"10.1017/s0260210518000323","title":"Feminist everyday political economy: Space, time, and violence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":219,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; Queen's University; University of Warwick; University of Cambridge; McGill University","keywords":"Everyday life; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Politics; Capitalism; Reproduction; Gender studies; Feminist philosophy; Power (physics); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.040155286162193715,"score_gpt":0.3827455498781789,"score_spread":0.34259026371598517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896912381","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040836986,0.61629206,0.0039404295,0.07556578,0.0013013976,0.00002641554,0.00012684574,0.000019884254,0.26189014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7789687,0.20401369,0.0007900219,0.0043326556,0.0010731241,0.00005403538,0.00006423491,0.000024324108,0.010679286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966204,0.0023802733,0.000068354384,0.00019517957,0.00043278246,0.00030300807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967451,0.0024209425,0.00034607417,0.00012167454,0.00020850998,0.0001575906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030125182,0.00035833602,0.00044932702,0.0025198464,0.0023202687,0.0069600074,0.0007094017,0.0016059323,0.0056900084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003469591,0.00018728671,0.00024620513,0.0032122063,0.025854692,0.0061655897,0.003070171,0.0021500047,0.00034495397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012555306,0.000013943895,0.0010394787,0.0006788772,0.000011624535,0.00016396405,0.03617767,0.00018498514,0.00009991199,0.91702425,0.008291103,0.036301542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004933184,0.000020007137,0.004237786,0.0050851516,0.0000106475,0.00042936543,0.079917625,0.00013421894,0.00017975594,0.19717203,0.7127874,0.000021066897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006818318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065344004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069600074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004978295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024183607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036120236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899053955","doi":"10.1017/s0260210518000414","title":"Domestic entanglements: Family, state, hierarchy, and the Hobbesian state of nature","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Hierarchy; State (computer science); Depiction; State of nature; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Focus (optics); Political science; Philosophy; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04213408353734483,"score_gpt":0.4267178140193888,"score_spread":0.384583730482044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899053955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14295638,0.13541424,0.022906967,0.04262078,0.0009974149,0.00003131098,0.00009237746,0.00003984659,0.65494066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768554,0.01637691,0.00083484285,0.0007786635,0.0003397085,0.000024237917,0.000024436313,0.000014441493,0.004751407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756205,0.0017477478,0.000054221655,0.0002167733,0.0002647149,0.00015454077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764085,0.0016659615,0.00024109808,0.00017790296,0.00015072431,0.00012359061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032147358,0.00019668648,0.000398085,0.0022147442,0.0026199927,0.004888791,0.00052616023,0.0012268692,0.0041916217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003369854,0.00012973804,0.00018424937,0.002008635,0.029338488,0.0066980077,0.0028271235,0.0017565901,0.0002894604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003848171,0.0000040130553,0.00017439843,0.00005208455,0.0000022289055,0.00003653171,0.008733825,0.000059441707,0.000036458376,0.98416615,0.00065716734,0.0060739517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006416725,0.00002068614,0.0028219582,0.00070595223,0.000008606538,0.00022411345,0.025770124,0.00024248021,0.00012473922,0.79502773,0.17502953,0.00001757327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029258248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025293361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004888791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00272291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010875454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019756138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905747802","doi":"10.1017/s0260210518000505","title":"The changing practices of frontline diplomacy: New directions for inquiry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Diplomacy; Scholarship; Political science; Privilege (computing); Politics; International relations; Public administration; Foreign policy; State (computer science); Public relations; Criticism; Sociology; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.13733707383372737,"score_gpt":0.5160918980999303,"score_spread":0.3787548242662029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905747802","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04173953,0.6061576,0.014148465,0.26823035,0.0025780224,0.00013608324,0.00015489198,0.00007219645,0.06678295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56747866,0.39703357,0.01195124,0.016893202,0.0019406339,0.000356919,0.000122005295,0.00005427476,0.0041694907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98755753,0.009275915,0.0003833666,0.0009899553,0.0011255898,0.00066773564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9416497,0.04930034,0.002311392,0.0025612619,0.003164076,0.001013179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020007962,0.00057968847,0.0013028833,0.0047235717,0.0026803482,0.01283123,0.0025105583,0.005379835,0.007301665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024416223,0.00042983165,0.0007533288,0.006758833,0.028929127,0.03508334,0.0047589634,0.0066749323,0.00084180327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065085434,0.00022269781,0.0038567088,0.005945227,0.000037848244,0.00025526414,0.11208281,0.00033669846,0.00027894843,0.6701777,0.010508492,0.19623256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026578104,0.00010703215,0.00604453,0.022601133,0.000035794572,0.00024269598,0.31211957,0.0006678578,0.0001836813,0.34605297,0.31185827,0.00005982224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055686627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055421563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020007962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073594414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011518064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1058135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942396545","doi":"10.1017/s0260210519000135","title":"I am uncertain, but We are not: a new subjectivity of the Anthropocene","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Anthropocene; Subjectivity; Humanity; Subject (documents); Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Certainty; Existentialism; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06680825570180253,"score_gpt":0.4077719949127692,"score_spread":0.3409637392109667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942396545","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009032573,0.7885914,0.0037226372,0.11535148,0.0027423126,0.000015362675,0.000023926998,0.000020710035,0.08049958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3876916,0.57770234,0.0012418422,0.020486666,0.0063614952,0.0000554187,0.00003853413,0.000050606235,0.006371461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98959094,0.007879153,0.0002589492,0.00047963456,0.0014346526,0.00035673968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905668,0.007339305,0.00093294465,0.0003024256,0.00049054023,0.00036791395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068376227,0.0003997777,0.00090405217,0.002491739,0.0021314877,0.009742741,0.0011383529,0.0037167347,0.003243086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070844805,0.000292509,0.00038335173,0.0031826242,0.037362974,0.011440898,0.005082913,0.0060598277,0.00039120027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028470942,0.000019136665,0.00048902037,0.0016303477,0.00002857654,0.00038145136,0.038466834,0.000105948966,0.00017236556,0.8770171,0.014395742,0.06726495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012125353,0.000026888527,0.0019344531,0.008479587,0.00002730719,0.0008096731,0.030579092,0.00012207088,0.00013636016,0.27884272,0.67899746,0.000032316057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028921375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038608506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009742741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034087414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004587368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036161244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981180407","doi":"10.1017/s0260210519000305","title":"Internationalists, sovereigntists, nativists: Contending visions of world order in Pan-Africanism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Sovereignty; Solidarity; Political science; Psychological nativism; Politics; Reactionary; Multilateralism; Ideology; Political economy; Universalism; Order (exchange); International relations; Nationalism; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06329356193706334,"score_gpt":0.4085466271384346,"score_spread":0.3452530652013712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981180407","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097429566,0.4926315,0.011263623,0.11605625,0.0013472624,0.000038059257,0.000041192503,0.000026451371,0.28116614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89969534,0.09071376,0.0019103084,0.0029268318,0.0005883761,0.0000438706,0.000019558516,0.000011799361,0.0040901615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957984,0.0032587973,0.00010878907,0.00019174753,0.00040083393,0.00024136211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588543,0.0031380164,0.00044861552,0.0001329671,0.00023800244,0.00015688766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007911606,0.00035781713,0.00048296733,0.0040167244,0.0030528654,0.008057413,0.0006320414,0.002299852,0.0015008558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004688676,0.0002534689,0.00026386903,0.0040534507,0.032995623,0.009902789,0.0038106544,0.0033950536,0.00010012748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006689701,0.0000049994333,0.0003668252,0.00017516506,0.000004834087,0.00007462513,0.01733487,0.00006117521,0.00005751452,0.97434944,0.00067483,0.0068891034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009473838,0.000020687397,0.0030119084,0.0023359992,0.000016090233,0.0002278023,0.065398455,0.0002412427,0.00017604137,0.7624844,0.16606025,0.000017690583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030186854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003947266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008057413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003312262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028517842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04184109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012317091","doi":"10.1017/s0260210520000017","title":"Democratising food: The case for a deliberative approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo; University of Sheffield","keywords":"Deliberation; Political science; Food sovereignty; Food security; Deliberative democracy; Scope (computer science); Food systems; Sustainability; Status quo; Economic Justice; Democracy; Politics; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09147359015003784,"score_gpt":0.3015435000842151,"score_spread":0.21006990993417726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012317091","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02291529,0.050972495,0.08553537,0.45324904,0.0019987167,0.0002691733,0.000060568982,0.00012994738,0.38486937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9292799,0.011600925,0.01932317,0.027362581,0.0009087262,0.00047507006,0.000037748534,0.00010865645,0.010903206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90818864,0.07544189,0.0016094004,0.0032862136,0.0072454205,0.0042285267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91710025,0.069403514,0.0034518025,0.005009102,0.003265356,0.001769997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06314855,0.0006217302,0.0008305348,0.0033059805,0.0069166,0.01744268,0.0028013627,0.008693807,0.0033402517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036551133,0.0005267449,0.0011885726,0.0025629655,0.07554982,0.015558775,0.011132554,0.010859332,0.0007230737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007492962,0.000014838613,0.00006520528,0.00016973879,0.000012515711,0.00005590675,0.005289587,0.00035246176,0.000046629317,0.9864878,0.0020379352,0.0054599717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001658997,0.000012003947,0.000102294085,0.00061470526,0.000006549459,0.00004786793,0.005225485,0.00024577882,0.00012287388,0.9036683,0.089924805,0.000012829078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017113254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019697684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06314855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0106424345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010974535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33396542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036446203","doi":"10.1017/s0260210520000169","title":"The quiet failures of early neoliberalism: From rational expectations to Keynesianism in reverse","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Sheffield; University of Cambridge; London School of Economics and Political Science; Leverhulme Trust; University of Ottawa; National Archives and Records Administration","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Performative utterance; Political economy; Recession; Politics; Inflation (cosmology); Political science; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Keynesian economics; Sociology; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06409731817871613,"score_gpt":0.3658503264481557,"score_spread":0.30175300826943957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036446203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06351598,0.2614601,0.036230117,0.21781471,0.0019129273,0.000032028427,0.00009357147,0.00009888161,0.41884172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93521464,0.05017416,0.0019559239,0.006374301,0.0007397679,0.000032821037,0.000022428647,0.0000709554,0.005415043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99291503,0.0046438626,0.00026932653,0.0006111649,0.0011517612,0.00040886574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98742336,0.008968086,0.0009263133,0.0012105069,0.0012525085,0.00021914963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0115802605,0.00025554188,0.00057000516,0.0020683215,0.0015375371,0.0060196803,0.00097606296,0.0018395924,0.0018638462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01584055,0.00029492224,0.00025479766,0.002050489,0.040114395,0.010782594,0.0025121004,0.0068450905,0.0004803279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015298556,0.0000040873156,0.00011010245,0.00007951662,0.0000059383156,0.000029508938,0.0021088717,0.00017609798,0.00003378654,0.9889298,0.0011302992,0.0073766615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070737883,0.000012195572,0.00031931733,0.00037238034,0.000004547406,0.000030193229,0.001214172,0.00022094695,0.00016755222,0.94360566,0.054035917,0.000010183847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058912416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034871222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0115802605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068792934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037425712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061242998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136562299","doi":"10.1017/s0260210521000103","title":"The radical Right, realism, and the politics of conservatism in postwar international thought","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Communism, Protests, Social Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Liberalism; Realism; Battle; Politics; Identity (music); Narrative; Political radicalism; Political science; Field (mathematics); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Political economy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.04202403404491383,"score_gpt":0.40385126307532293,"score_spread":0.3618272290304091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136562299","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08964012,0.55903137,0.0037085486,0.13102111,0.0014361924,0.000019074556,0.000027331382,0.000028049632,0.21508822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9465383,0.046839412,0.00034362747,0.0027591393,0.0007593287,0.000013855299,0.000009364224,0.000008402518,0.0027286503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948507,0.0040490325,0.0000785035,0.00021302966,0.0004903223,0.0003184569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99313885,0.0052986494,0.00063466857,0.0003027823,0.00033408837,0.00029094974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008458291,0.00020236065,0.0003840244,0.002819604,0.0023303353,0.007283156,0.00071069575,0.0021523547,0.00155535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004071506,0.00015520937,0.00019562675,0.0030941379,0.04402981,0.0054157698,0.0025919543,0.0034335929,0.000109909466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010422961,0.000014607522,0.00041367536,0.00022585326,0.000008540928,0.000066203145,0.016907338,0.0001274191,0.000061485414,0.9695431,0.002425129,0.010196221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017883853,0.000025032743,0.004158126,0.0033855208,0.000010710513,0.00013580073,0.03698228,0.00032620455,0.00014256028,0.7855393,0.16925696,0.00001964835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036084275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045184065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008458291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005689904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040471973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044732213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144377955","doi":"10.1017/s0260210521000115","title":"Framing, truth-telling, and the limits of local transitional justice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Transitional justice; Legitimacy; Accountability; Scholarship; Political science; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics; History","score_opus":0.05568960338683913,"score_gpt":0.37923949351950537,"score_spread":0.3235498901326662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144377955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22350362,0.11427898,0.02238965,0.08103458,0.0005610332,0.00013153713,0.0001054842,0.00006960248,0.5579256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99232435,0.005115264,0.000541038,0.00060398155,0.00008818475,0.000028841452,0.00000801171,0.000005724373,0.0012846799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891695,0.008410529,0.00028878925,0.0005643127,0.0008623283,0.0007046029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720258,0.022217581,0.0024611454,0.0017004266,0.0011635559,0.0004313817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014362455,0.0002725389,0.0004434879,0.0031380723,0.003913959,0.009942645,0.0014845005,0.0021766475,0.0045764265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0192025,0.00025294503,0.00021341696,0.0025982216,0.06350947,0.0074955896,0.005620343,0.002851238,0.00022690766],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019298626,0.0000136806775,0.0009185124,0.00050265307,0.00000947106,0.00018753945,0.057443928,0.00034353754,0.00015651796,0.9059793,0.0009674575,0.033458114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020265301,0.000081405014,0.0060393047,0.0071162195,0.000035097077,0.0002927537,0.09275495,0.0009193049,0.00088985666,0.7490941,0.14270702,0.00004965958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006739434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053750766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014362455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009054212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005034071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07595682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171871281","doi":"10.1017/s0260210521000309","title":"Nearly modern IPE? Insights from IPE at mid-century","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Framing (construction); Discipline; Carr; Epistemology; Sociology; Work (physics); Political science; Environmental ethics; Social science; History; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03713235512299644,"score_gpt":0.37249981152919476,"score_spread":0.3353674564061983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171871281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21308576,0.047741245,0.0052826134,0.07468473,0.001132573,0.00003779252,0.00011920054,0.000047912978,0.65786815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770826,0.010527874,0.0003153892,0.0019777704,0.0004576677,0.000018405028,0.000027860951,0.000022930122,0.00956953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987895,0.00055313495,0.000037801532,0.0001516768,0.00018050878,0.00028741726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838233,0.0009295412,0.00016692097,0.00012972523,0.0001400659,0.00025135017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036937355,0.0002912509,0.00040675528,0.002487049,0.004974187,0.011187311,0.0007529584,0.002586772,0.0063557667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004367826,0.00018571172,0.00016127524,0.003126474,0.027442979,0.013752341,0.0056183925,0.005557818,0.00053486694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001791373,0.00002253106,0.0008465794,0.00010587689,0.0000031936368,0.00031988218,0.124354124,0.000066425055,0.000076487595,0.8564784,0.004465136,0.013243483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001016137,0.00004215444,0.0054224944,0.0012883331,0.0000070791007,0.0006504722,0.15781668,0.00028209062,0.0002767651,0.28590518,0.54827917,0.000019363551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033448471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035047925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011187311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006274744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002469944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045526683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182546944","doi":"10.1017/s0260210521000395","title":"The Legon School of International Relations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge; King's University College","keywords":"Scholarship; International relations; Sociology; Equity (law); Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Value (mathematics); Social science; Mathematics education; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.053286641396157526,"score_gpt":0.30962911400075416,"score_spread":0.25634247260459664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182546944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009223021,0.22887975,0.0021414459,0.105886795,0.003220951,0.000032297758,0.00010950727,0.000065266046,0.65044105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56356835,0.18359773,0.0021302856,0.014592964,0.0034990045,0.00015300889,0.00015436123,0.00011738044,0.23218684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986487,0.0007800335,0.000032929107,0.00015473021,0.00018252412,0.00020105571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987184,0.00069856306,0.00022556334,0.000089982364,0.00009314316,0.00017439513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013462924,0.0004326218,0.00033345612,0.0017763544,0.0034044485,0.008169579,0.00040200746,0.0022053185,0.014054401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019542053,0.0001934445,0.00014953695,0.0031992793,0.011264252,0.0045516565,0.002273504,0.0028179595,0.0015820868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002060937,0.0000210091,0.00082027685,0.00038396395,0.0000032682174,0.0002869021,0.012677665,0.000090092755,0.000120662095,0.8699076,0.0680878,0.047580034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005200095,0.000013579257,0.0009217561,0.0013041024,0.0000020912692,0.00016671189,0.0062644393,0.000047860198,0.000055933062,0.062951304,0.9282634,0.0000036437993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010658674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010414244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014054401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006602745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004353537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047906518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186811130","doi":"10.1017/s0260210521000413","title":"Feminist foreign policies (FFPs) as strategic narratives: Norm translation in Sweden, Canada, France, and Mexico","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Riksbankens Jubileumsfond","keywords":"Narrative; Feminism; Gender studies; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.08467629992205902,"score_gpt":0.38715788164222087,"score_spread":0.3024815817201618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186811130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42609572,0.092792735,0.005443525,0.07338304,0.0010037945,0.00026206428,0.00059868325,0.00008319332,0.40033716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648962,0.02364468,0.0017772187,0.0020746626,0.000064861524,0.00017083815,0.0001608219,0.000031009862,0.0071796984],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932853,0.004764755,0.00016568595,0.00024928284,0.00097276847,0.0005622676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98976046,0.0072233775,0.00071241334,0.00022179337,0.0016861625,0.00039573346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015248549,0.0004676948,0.000393191,0.0041193804,0.00843715,0.010767534,0.0011238471,0.0013708737,0.0022182474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011532563,0.0002085752,0.00021266945,0.006668072,0.014131977,0.003601349,0.0037639937,0.0020770915,0.000082703846],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003281964,0.000030643943,0.005271695,0.0007985276,0.000019698911,0.0004727565,0.52932346,0.00047309411,0.00016881984,0.38850737,0.012674053,0.062227022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060746374,0.000015845497,0.0068973475,0.0031440868,0.000019358346,0.000093283204,0.67788595,0.00029319208,0.00029155493,0.0103160115,0.30101135,0.00002588055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5560362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62389976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44396383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058171302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06139139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8931568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204953282","doi":"10.1017/s0260210521000486","title":"Against ontological capture: Drawing lessons from Amazonian Kichwa relationality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Camosun College","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Anthropocentrism; Epistemology; Normative; Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Transformative learning; Space (punctuation); Environmental ethics; Political science; Ecology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11721173662748152,"score_gpt":0.44145445583694853,"score_spread":0.324242719209467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204953282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3681689,0.034761768,0.02303679,0.15575631,0.0009374618,0.00014800207,0.00010684143,0.00007990371,0.4170041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98826236,0.0051637925,0.0017108916,0.0019231312,0.00010746612,0.000050312858,0.000019922807,0.0000388586,0.0027233332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954782,0.0031325764,0.00011363512,0.00038330723,0.0005413252,0.00035092258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874506,0.009754267,0.0006134041,0.0009962647,0.0009007797,0.0002847131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011283009,0.00046398808,0.00067008956,0.0024497001,0.0074492753,0.009140032,0.0021088717,0.0024070723,0.0035133658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013486529,0.00036482545,0.00024254575,0.0026973742,0.033331174,0.017458411,0.0056700236,0.0055109723,0.0003660036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003032592,0.00003066154,0.0009172599,0.00025929054,0.000012841304,0.0005515466,0.247453,0.00012497156,0.00033950838,0.7309116,0.0018881005,0.017480902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026708092,0.000044688157,0.00261103,0.0014710888,0.00004577016,0.00037390218,0.4409632,0.0010797397,0.0007335598,0.42032072,0.13229743,0.00003220877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032765742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0629205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032765742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00862276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005576553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06515008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200427352","doi":"10.1017/s0260210521000516","title":"Feminist foreign policies (FFPs) as strategic narratives: Norm translation in Sweden, Canada, France, and Mexico - ADDENDUM","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Addendum; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Foreign policy; Action (physics); Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.09738543933848717,"score_gpt":0.40546748433466195,"score_spread":0.30808204499617475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200427352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55302334,0.023719119,0.002887695,0.05389987,0.001201401,0.00034106418,0.0043376605,0.00008936853,0.36050045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962993,0.011652754,0.0021258786,0.0017175538,0.000107035885,0.00044663923,0.0009143355,0.00008842744,0.019954508],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703074,0.001843594,0.000088225424,0.00014656279,0.00048477965,0.00040608027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905408,0.006545176,0.0005327738,0.00033175174,0.001767436,0.00028198882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0090872785,0.00032738355,0.00033207104,0.0027167068,0.00489527,0.0062135374,0.0007303398,0.00078487874,0.005834529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013780581,0.00018786441,0.0001878019,0.006533518,0.0047944183,0.0023811257,0.002690922,0.0017886712,0.00023428677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001550508,0.00006899064,0.0068316013,0.0010390878,0.000020329395,0.00037275752,0.58156264,0.00042396114,0.0003228859,0.22226124,0.056058872,0.13088258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013249727,0.000034284356,0.022817958,0.0023184135,0.000023275763,0.00007406205,0.6612683,0.00016233201,0.00072642276,0.0049580573,0.30758104,0.000022662134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40796912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4905481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5920309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040085953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028377138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81118894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307460009","doi":"10.1017/s0260210522000468","title":"‘When They Fight Back’: A cinematic archive of animal resistance and world wars","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Acadia University; University of Victoria","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Politics; Humanity; Biopower; Adversary; Human animal; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Hostility; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.04656557117840551,"score_gpt":0.3755100062593532,"score_spread":0.32894443508094773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307460009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22591111,0.28351903,0.00567918,0.05530119,0.007761079,0.0002712524,0.0028305054,0.0004091677,0.41831747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8324701,0.10721969,0.00323529,0.0063304226,0.0065196943,0.0002555797,0.0012397338,0.0003111014,0.04241843],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869365,0.000867263,0.000043135326,0.00007466,0.0002281406,0.00009326121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909678,0.00722205,0.00076141953,0.00041061032,0.00034410614,0.00029407357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029576581,0.00062043,0.00044952473,0.005105023,0.0026789848,0.0052554226,0.0009343873,0.00183044,0.011554609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067406367,0.00029036563,0.00029228625,0.0048345895,0.005194126,0.0046905456,0.0030425538,0.0028172506,0.0015670521],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000347458,0.00016965868,0.0026112127,0.007389765,0.000118523894,0.0027547504,0.6019925,0.0003182692,0.002944646,0.07571595,0.17825298,0.12738425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025712025,0.00007137538,0.0070413104,0.0042169914,0.000058376736,0.0017167624,0.07565896,0.00012885324,0.00058018725,0.0030229706,0.9074489,0.000029640287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014344825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005915837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011554609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014594092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007847067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03865397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310026328","doi":"10.1017/s0260210522000523","title":"IR's <i>Roads to Freedom</i>: Rereading Jean-Paul Sartre's trilogy as an International Relations text","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Existentialism; Diplomacy; Argument (complex analysis); Mediation; Utterance; International relations theory; International relations; Reading (process); Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; History; Law; Art history; Social science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0630846912529484,"score_gpt":0.4058854279286574,"score_spread":0.342800736675709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310026328","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015741006,0.5180089,0.0039599338,0.3187627,0.027648933,0.00007334805,0.00017566695,0.000083479405,0.11554602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54307014,0.3366795,0.0033566845,0.061710186,0.021791218,0.00035013832,0.0001927989,0.00030628976,0.032543063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993148,0.0052006743,0.0002463819,0.00029083397,0.0009043977,0.0002097135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98176944,0.014538885,0.0013799601,0.0003650752,0.0015355068,0.00041115476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008376948,0.0005725589,0.0007759199,0.004885823,0.0031517565,0.009434337,0.0012935281,0.0031596378,0.0034333414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013565161,0.00024136118,0.0003867115,0.0043039466,0.015582243,0.007823847,0.0030585437,0.0076090805,0.0007244867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006505259,0.00004824746,0.00054128905,0.0039083166,0.000035035628,0.0010449642,0.19434103,0.00026102588,0.0006406217,0.5218428,0.21055903,0.06671258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009169849,0.000028896691,0.0008217469,0.0048014834,0.000009906039,0.00034995502,0.057009075,0.0000704672,0.00018291594,0.013887513,0.92281073,0.000018244686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012046043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013523858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012046043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007337195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006425018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053235352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327596667","doi":"10.1017/s0260210523000037","title":"Chelsea Manning, national security, and the cishetero/homonormative logics of protection","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University; Centre for Social Innovation","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Queer; Relation (database); HERO; Transgender; Identity (music); Monster; Gossip; Law; Sociology; Secrecy; Political science; Gender studies; History; Aesthetics; Literature; Art; Art history; Computer science","score_opus":0.11352792865040708,"score_gpt":0.4151594024500068,"score_spread":0.30163147379959976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327596667","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014911788,0.81298876,0.0009624606,0.065959856,0.00071110786,0.000010989496,0.000029539055,0.000013621367,0.104411975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49459663,0.48577026,0.0006787559,0.010568697,0.001318086,0.00005161677,0.000025167905,0.000016066495,0.006974833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958105,0.0032087646,0.00009813034,0.00019911525,0.0004507775,0.00023273625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933564,0.005248299,0.0006044797,0.00014450436,0.00040961432,0.00023659137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043237824,0.00040645993,0.0006066042,0.0033626456,0.0035291607,0.0062938225,0.00079528877,0.0027941216,0.0039549395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004203515,0.000168261,0.00022469126,0.0036444147,0.03148773,0.006573591,0.0023858515,0.0032121667,0.0003889107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026663898,0.00002412354,0.0009008306,0.0013912722,0.000023188188,0.0004257899,0.060573123,0.00009988655,0.00011137307,0.86002886,0.016256556,0.060138375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013622631,0.00004521889,0.0055344566,0.014420926,0.000033256954,0.000977763,0.13222706,0.00013753296,0.00023655909,0.2994426,0.5468858,0.000045175184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009936409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014836924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009936409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038376206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004718026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027843952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383262609","doi":"10.1017/s0260210523000165","title":"Pluriversal sovereignty and the state of IR","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Discipline; Decolonization; Political science; State (computer science); Colonialism; Law; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0940294946018996,"score_gpt":0.420409992206253,"score_spread":0.3263804976043534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383262609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11171943,0.07241462,0.007507369,0.03642314,0.00026013065,0.000025580272,0.00006664964,0.000027431615,0.7715556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98518777,0.0072827903,0.00037955047,0.001093074,0.000063953485,0.000007477317,0.000018665742,0.0000066933358,0.005959965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955065,0.0021088934,0.00018999634,0.0005753452,0.0008423615,0.000776908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946208,0.0029209573,0.00057620637,0.0005742054,0.0010058421,0.00030202168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008180459,0.00013672753,0.00030434915,0.0018519475,0.0034925218,0.00783602,0.0009609775,0.0015482354,0.0025052011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063430495,0.00016885517,0.00017914716,0.002331647,0.042213153,0.004726482,0.003952018,0.003455753,0.00015873442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003844334,0.0000029885844,0.00034653378,0.00008155661,0.0000033723063,0.00003374055,0.00667627,0.0000904359,0.00006323386,0.9842355,0.0007209505,0.0077415337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016474023,0.000032607368,0.01566649,0.0032450818,0.00002606886,0.00020464366,0.029650388,0.0006105501,0.0003018841,0.6817142,0.26848385,0.00004783958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15328899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1256951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15328899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016121583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013024456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30479348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383262819","doi":"10.1017/s026021052300013x","title":"Decolonising Development Studies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","keywords":"Decolonization; Modernization theory; Colonialism; Inequality; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Knowledge production; Socioeconomic status; Social science; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Knowledge management; Computer science","score_opus":0.10337591293929677,"score_gpt":0.4366233792450756,"score_spread":0.33324746630577884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383262819","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043697465,0.39627832,0.046338804,0.20977007,0.0072419806,0.0006461863,0.00022271328,0.00026033932,0.29554418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7257094,0.17692402,0.02464594,0.026299024,0.003950406,0.0012606679,0.00019400161,0.00024445713,0.040772155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97393394,0.020952007,0.0010362242,0.0013262542,0.0019988408,0.00075278967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94475883,0.041440196,0.0034484207,0.0058987895,0.0036183626,0.00083542435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032397214,0.00057771883,0.0010225805,0.0070730085,0.0034949274,0.009677612,0.0020150815,0.0023028979,0.0044903453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032214943,0.00037249952,0.0006161025,0.006151114,0.038708862,0.011315696,0.015005322,0.0058035194,0.0006305355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023799097,0.00002913019,0.0011743297,0.0024391143,0.000030636264,0.00013299096,0.040989347,0.00023420465,0.00037299376,0.873229,0.008970545,0.072373845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018164526,0.00005657675,0.0012392438,0.008404434,0.000021547143,0.00026983538,0.032149304,0.00024165382,0.00048087348,0.1408866,0.81621253,0.000019302286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036091425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032397214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009009775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010887416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17133486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396664231","doi":"10.1017/s0260210524000263","title":"On the horizon: The futures of IR","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Horizon; Political science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Financial economics; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.05946111971212962,"score_gpt":0.432896513982823,"score_spread":0.37343539427069333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396664231","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007054339,0.69149,0.0019474388,0.17226861,0.117854476,0.000021575452,0.00008991821,0.00008627408,0.015536246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022524202,0.68626195,0.0028750694,0.05154848,0.21760294,0.0001359864,0.00024126761,0.00023522576,0.018574893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99493563,0.0027970434,0.00028822487,0.00042800212,0.001218484,0.00033269753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784098,0.015586067,0.0012140705,0.0007005451,0.0029686901,0.001120831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067141275,0.0008456603,0.0013818692,0.0033509906,0.0020318099,0.012453699,0.0014536987,0.0040350584,0.008585299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02048286,0.0003946014,0.00093442074,0.0033118543,0.004564159,0.015782755,0.0033840295,0.008371055,0.0031595882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051791554,0.000026698757,0.00028082056,0.0034282112,0.00006022484,0.00014690761,0.0036167833,0.00014653624,0.00030165943,0.11894502,0.7305732,0.14242214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037229477,0.00002379513,0.00031149946,0.00284703,0.000019963674,0.00008901378,0.0019378674,0.000044111184,0.00004877194,0.024905613,0.969751,0.000017595848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001083324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017875402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012453699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027537306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004435258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035508096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402516545","doi":"10.1017/s0260210524000457","title":"Thinking freedom relationally: Life projects and care as an ethical orientation for International Studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Orientation (vector space); Political science; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Philosophy; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.10000010628228384,"score_gpt":0.3812148644088613,"score_spread":0.2812147581265775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402516545","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025996534,0.42571056,0.014378405,0.18804924,0.0024082481,0.00005727768,0.00003043176,0.000035983092,0.34333333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.804834,0.170905,0.0027915135,0.010987407,0.0024022206,0.00009603385,0.000028577584,0.000031128307,0.00792412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877273,0.009875077,0.0002535347,0.00041643262,0.0011633016,0.00056437415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900209,0.007439136,0.00080696057,0.00041498186,0.0006723357,0.00064568536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009730161,0.0004005009,0.0005200781,0.00329496,0.0049954113,0.015410546,0.0010449492,0.0042121625,0.0036221724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007077477,0.00020680051,0.00033926475,0.0046351794,0.074374765,0.013388868,0.006296584,0.0066974615,0.00031474687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029454416,0.000011041052,0.00013850992,0.00015150371,0.0000022067998,0.000055247707,0.01891869,0.00008366687,0.00003120097,0.9692616,0.0020127932,0.009330609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066374755,0.000026892776,0.001028713,0.0032353753,0.0000069426405,0.00031903957,0.07625025,0.00021671208,0.00009922815,0.5480919,0.3706943,0.000023999772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038324527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045508035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015410546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008985701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00653471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0651961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402893328","doi":"10.1017/s0260210524000627","title":"<i>De jure</i> and <i>de facto</i> inclusivity in global governance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Durham University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"De facto; Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.02059227900212972,"score_gpt":0.39879222323856656,"score_spread":0.3781999442364368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402893328","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08407831,0.3901552,0.02968737,0.11318184,0.0008647434,0.00011892349,0.00012997385,0.000056845358,0.38172674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91712195,0.07265271,0.002687002,0.0035476312,0.000604113,0.00009436012,0.0000508435,0.00002214103,0.0032191915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97872967,0.015714046,0.00089764496,0.0014082775,0.0024219502,0.0008284037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9539489,0.03507191,0.005496031,0.0023989119,0.0022524456,0.0008318049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017091084,0.0003011258,0.0005539868,0.0042080083,0.0018414074,0.0147726545,0.0011869175,0.0035874357,0.0031271633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02204508,0.0003031907,0.00041839646,0.0057346085,0.04618727,0.014452762,0.0060935807,0.0036749314,0.0003617888],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009989318,0.000017743296,0.0017226661,0.0006976665,0.000015230642,0.00006953827,0.007120689,0.00022602454,0.00012602867,0.9566614,0.0013968148,0.03193619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012179725,0.00005316588,0.011387608,0.009725635,0.000040219602,0.00039605895,0.031165458,0.00071952405,0.0004683133,0.76778525,0.17819405,0.000052527594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00275037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030959535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017091084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005797451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046896706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090387344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404020878","doi":"10.1017/s0260210524000470","title":"‘Homes for Ukraine’ and the politics of private humanitarian hospitality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Political and Social Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hospitality; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Tourism","score_opus":0.055355897988467746,"score_gpt":0.43265749209435356,"score_spread":0.3773015941058858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404020878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40991756,0.28693557,0.0011834684,0.07651865,0.00095308985,0.000022232736,0.000108922024,0.000026846408,0.22433363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816736,0.01567414,0.000054003136,0.001182157,0.000060457918,0.0000051141596,0.0000097232205,0.000003808663,0.0013368953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970951,0.0020458854,0.00007276475,0.00015285442,0.00020273592,0.00043064024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980476,0.001083922,0.00037581846,0.000097860524,0.00017535247,0.00021934533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025801715,0.00012730861,0.00028478607,0.00075610424,0.0047919573,0.0052547767,0.0004629695,0.0013044986,0.0027902434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025437642,0.00013615728,0.00014655896,0.0014387416,0.01753908,0.003639905,0.0043336763,0.0015709349,0.00018425024],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034339297,0.000037807644,0.00437226,0.0010057987,0.000031419775,0.0008264224,0.1370816,0.00035963807,0.00017922018,0.7948064,0.0131839765,0.048081186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011886942,0.000055627897,0.030805398,0.0043701003,0.00002038656,0.00077173015,0.37073204,0.00021297221,0.00023032662,0.05480156,0.5379398,0.000048186535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024569148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02723565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024569148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074153054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047680372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053802073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406338345","doi":"10.1017/s0260210524000925","title":"Conspiracy theory, anti-globalism, and the Freedom Convoy: The Great Reset and conspiracist delegitimation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sovereignty; Legitimacy; Politics; Globalism; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Realm; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03571938359984408,"score_gpt":0.40620591171598996,"score_spread":0.3704865281161459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406338345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35268682,0.0020609766,0.009907184,0.043779895,0.00042687854,0.000038692408,0.000035605673,0.000043412703,0.59102064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938444,0.00015984468,0.0002155169,0.00088904676,0.000034859575,0.0000071604904,0.000005260409,0.000017192726,0.0048268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951568,0.0026334145,0.00006055129,0.0004494864,0.0008494368,0.00085033476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99501,0.002878436,0.00062889076,0.00047095542,0.00043790662,0.0005737357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00510227,0.00043130326,0.0002922857,0.0012028178,0.014259812,0.009585589,0.00093577534,0.0024953994,0.005863315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054014795,0.00019194765,0.00026927935,0.0009187926,0.08971571,0.00542507,0.006106142,0.0047472585,0.00034797835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016236349,0.000019636129,0.002488739,0.000033261873,0.000006577393,0.00032331666,0.17899887,0.00018520905,0.00017939557,0.80855703,0.0033170548,0.005874674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000285961,0.000038934144,0.010687726,0.00056878186,0.000019889598,0.00038014,0.33857933,0.0015045464,0.0007224764,0.30256328,0.3448421,0.00006425758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074341826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08745525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92565817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013620606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066722934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14781821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406625474","doi":"10.1017/s0260210524000846","title":"Are Indigenous conceptions of sovereignty as non-interference patriarchal?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Victoria; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Political science; Gender studies; Interference (communication); Sociology; Political economy; Law; Politics; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.05180563313122656,"score_gpt":0.4580190326250609,"score_spread":0.40621339949383434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406625474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16819228,0.30769676,0.009820565,0.105240874,0.00092813524,0.000032761902,0.00005240162,0.000035432444,0.40800083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94573534,0.04647274,0.00072734035,0.0026522293,0.00046070025,0.000023887404,0.0000113213155,0.000008399065,0.003908103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954792,0.002919817,0.00012478486,0.0003559084,0.0007503818,0.00036978457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99540436,0.0031823101,0.00046018505,0.0003173874,0.00043912925,0.00019664844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005184462,0.00017047163,0.00044437507,0.0011610752,0.002295307,0.006662238,0.000991275,0.0020372393,0.0018485509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00489074,0.00017513148,0.00027755607,0.0016911059,0.04663281,0.008059605,0.0030760816,0.0033874966,0.00017177271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073662477,0.000017479888,0.00069395715,0.000356165,0.00001158194,0.0001506581,0.08178549,0.00009520527,0.00015625349,0.89754784,0.0011039904,0.018074065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001095624,0.000052649015,0.008291234,0.002865554,0.000029982517,0.00054593367,0.12626597,0.0003925828,0.00035172876,0.6313486,0.22979957,0.000045123455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011460426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00923405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011460426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034327735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035658756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027418375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409377735","doi":"10.1017/s026021052500021x","title":"Strangely inspired: Recovering a neo-Strangean approach to power, authority and knowledge for IPE","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.04009456808818415,"score_gpt":0.32042654701970147,"score_spread":0.2803319789315173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409377735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053231813,0.047641777,0.19437623,0.23775457,0.0028504499,0.00008028275,0.00015550651,0.00016612935,0.46374324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96025,0.010083457,0.011207,0.0053237765,0.00095408416,0.00006411936,0.000036315992,0.000058354566,0.0120228175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952472,0.0031952297,0.00015795896,0.0003845672,0.0007669568,0.00024824208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918943,0.005021479,0.0005501567,0.0009223945,0.0011091797,0.0005024304],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074226474,0.0003911822,0.00059940957,0.0037476236,0.0030455277,0.010341579,0.0011693521,0.0030302987,0.0038295228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010388824,0.00027528516,0.00042062413,0.0025892106,0.040802825,0.019961994,0.005024255,0.004145637,0.0005887221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031139305,0.000002362271,0.00006889033,0.000033728058,0.0000018926683,0.000037393063,0.001705392,0.0001307639,0.000018232233,0.9936173,0.0011319033,0.0032489395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001942842,0.00000418293,0.00010085438,0.000113397626,0.0000018180624,0.00005594035,0.0011872103,0.0004566814,0.000042847332,0.9592257,0.03880305,0.000006397279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020209278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029162227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050493246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033592896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039255142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409620229","doi":"10.1017/s0260210525000221","title":"The International Studies Conference, peaceful change, and the transformation of international studies in the United States during the prewar and wartime years","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; International relations; International studies; Economic history; Political economy; Law; History; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10135706822122054,"score_gpt":0.32954047257828195,"score_spread":0.22818340435706141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409620229","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01630141,0.86489993,0.00025884624,0.051028118,0.0023820656,0.000010073217,0.00004412482,0.000009694176,0.06506572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5667267,0.41517076,0.0003364124,0.008384259,0.0029759172,0.00006146944,0.00007600727,0.000021374404,0.006247092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934278,0.0048348755,0.0001652943,0.000337724,0.0007260136,0.00050814886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912298,0.0054774634,0.0010739033,0.00028293734,0.0011985148,0.0007373738],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007676063,0.00021160957,0.0003596492,0.0046543125,0.0037197324,0.010598663,0.00056597765,0.002205645,0.0029318335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077228583,0.00020465067,0.00024427706,0.008343381,0.012561453,0.004847259,0.002830381,0.0035513076,0.00024443594],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048289752,0.00008799146,0.005665071,0.0019242183,0.00004377331,0.0002689531,0.03868327,0.00037751943,0.00020375078,0.76499885,0.06136051,0.1263378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075948424,0.000031939337,0.0154378675,0.0048667546,0.00001883722,0.0001333377,0.044477258,0.00006441766,0.000113372764,0.027240671,0.9075862,0.000021678901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015431724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021208847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99628025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008686643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008927144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06302631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416193908","doi":"10.1017/s0260210525101551","title":"Failure-proof or failure-prone? The paradoxes of global biodiversity institutions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Biodiversity; Environmental governance; Focus (optics); Biodiversity conservation; Global governance; Core (optical fiber)","score_opus":0.040784155990083754,"score_gpt":0.31268623441460125,"score_spread":0.2719020784245175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416193908","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10401284,0.3408006,0.037556816,0.33943594,0.001285551,0.00007612578,0.00016374174,0.00016231123,0.17650607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92200756,0.06652558,0.0034522528,0.0057458505,0.0006281691,0.000050828323,0.00002954178,0.000030406027,0.0015298533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99226075,0.004428152,0.00025705295,0.00069353805,0.0018202482,0.0005403537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594564,0.028312411,0.0054696044,0.002330665,0.0030443135,0.0013866363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020036198,0.00033211408,0.0008499666,0.0047137407,0.0015144402,0.009040424,0.0016179619,0.0030022485,0.0029057774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029642895,0.00031059748,0.0003210993,0.0041837296,0.033483785,0.01766077,0.0060859704,0.003682156,0.00035755918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017455412,0.000019039762,0.0019346171,0.00068649865,0.00003287549,0.00016978469,0.005508647,0.0008755012,0.0001294068,0.9347279,0.0047795204,0.05111866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009407744,0.00002080736,0.0026360953,0.0016337392,0.000015398291,0.0002135837,0.008519445,0.0006445104,0.0001157367,0.9212723,0.06489235,0.000026651014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015854947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016811858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020036198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004073533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033220742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10596287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416673026","doi":"10.1017/s0260210525101514","title":"Analysing recognition multidirectionally: Canada, United Nations membership, and the Algerian question","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); State (computer science); Resistance (ecology); Process (computing)","score_opus":0.03684401437528586,"score_gpt":0.29175433553912716,"score_spread":0.2549103211638413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416673026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33136404,0.11663558,0.00068528217,0.07777169,0.0005539939,0.000030824656,0.00032511455,0.000011824071,0.47262165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801978,0.013287659,0.00012284727,0.0022607122,0.00011585435,0.000008532343,0.000049458635,0.000007505103,0.0039497497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956857,0.0012236604,0.00009792453,0.00032008,0.001070724,0.0016019553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989449,0.0058055273,0.0011421476,0.00022360434,0.002574926,0.0008048302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006562502,0.00021832532,0.00039804817,0.005963222,0.010942462,0.011040393,0.0012572812,0.0023027775,0.005714316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008294602,0.00018226838,0.00018703919,0.014964689,0.02948814,0.005578306,0.003225693,0.0027292115,0.00017436635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040304738,0.00003372472,0.019909963,0.00034585522,0.00003336473,0.00054967555,0.11723404,0.00045024825,0.00008607992,0.8012055,0.018161416,0.041949823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012691016,0.000020013586,0.09080413,0.0032685194,0.000046757,0.0002474527,0.42388448,0.0006481115,0.0002813718,0.056968745,0.42372572,0.000092049144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8787522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9165033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12124783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.063914105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041145343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46373147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}