{"meta":{"query_hash":"a7db77786895","filters":{"venue":"Review of International Studies"},"cohort_total":47,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":47,"exported":47,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a7db77786895","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Review+of+International+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1477329059","doi":"10.1017/s0260210515000388","title":"Benchmarking global supply chains: the power of the ‘ethical audit’ regime","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Audit; Benchmarking; Supply chain; Business; Corporate governance; Accountability; Corporate social responsibility; Quality audit; Product (mathematics); Power (physics); Accounting; Industrial organization; Public relations; Marketing; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.044771833186627134,"score_gpt":0.3407887744242592,"score_spread":0.29601694123763206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1477329059","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18162103,0.39017364,0.000046479065,0.27597234,0.0061491067,0.001693218,0.000074363204,0.000069072696,0.14420076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788596,0.013990792,0.000016293898,0.0064473907,0.0005949758,0.000009272978,0.0000040014297,0.0000044632625,0.00007321742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987269,0.000047357993,0.00037460565,0.00012349262,0.0005931897,0.00013443563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822253,0.000081456106,0.00037405573,0.00018517357,0.001128183,0.000008576706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011908566,0.00011489809,0.00029024426,0.000017709692,0.00010284593,0.000029772611,0.0005154908,0.00004189927,0.0000325738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036525337,0.00005922069,0.00022009846,0.00030542957,0.00030689486,0.00016436305,0.00039138726,0.00012929767,0.00000711147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050902618,0.00024036708,0.14390856,0.00557665,0.000982824,0.0000046502055,0.0019592752,0.000023386798,0.0000023407058,0.5543873,0.28402397,0.008839799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007275055,0.000050987575,0.21052706,0.010298263,0.00041540622,0.0000058928804,0.01776589,0.00006263142,0.00000780635,0.046430156,0.71335775,0.00035067298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034177204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051590214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7972386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014818175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055705863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4372688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982741811","doi":"10.1017/s0260210509990556","title":"Global norms, domestic institutions and the transformation of immigration policy in Canada and the US","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration policy; Liberalization; Political science; Political economy; Bureaucracy; Normative; Autonomy; Politics; Human rights; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.011771862728306728,"score_gpt":0.31123923661332326,"score_spread":0.29946737388501654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982741811","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4224289,0.4279579,0.000026134368,0.11259943,0.0009190531,0.0008876064,0.00014179977,0.000004604136,0.035034552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65479064,0.34489003,0.0000051245197,0.00025226918,0.000026664775,0.000009417865,0.0000010973232,3.263927e-7,0.000024421244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955165,0.000049884806,0.00017243577,0.00003257134,0.00015651833,0.00003693255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996732,0.000106393,0.00008119422,0.000030797273,0.00009628515,0.00001214219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046864245,0.000025158912,0.000112524336,0.000037953425,0.00016513337,0.0000113602555,0.00007660331,0.0000081456255,0.000008476873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068766106,0.000016022426,0.00002100273,0.00013174299,0.0009959425,0.000081778635,0.000011879135,0.00003647108,1.9418603e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014585405,0.000004299693,0.001954095,0.00027623135,0.000037683065,2.402613e-7,0.004505196,0.0000033996096,6.9131556e-7,0.97551084,0.00067055924,0.017022163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015888266,0.000007582592,0.22206631,0.0013728538,0.00008952357,0.00000938314,0.004695441,0.000046956276,9.068573e-7,0.008015964,0.76200694,0.000099326055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9957085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9674949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029393655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008639554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36695915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995115514","doi":"10.1017/s0260210511000428","title":"Checks and balances of risk management: precautionary logic and the judiciary","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Law; Parliament; Opposition (politics); Rule of law; Precautionary principle; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.05550848651119762,"score_gpt":0.36908959308050276,"score_spread":0.31358110656930516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995115514","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015129577,0.8221761,0.0000048458264,0.007089967,0.000118133765,0.00022834398,0.000020708761,0.0000050692324,0.16884387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1459459,0.85278875,0.00016885778,0.0010166962,0.000028108374,0.000011577553,0.0000013101685,7.532552e-7,0.000038063637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923986,0.00017668947,0.00021153718,0.00007763924,0.00022882487,0.000065449254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994033,0.00018729371,0.0001907033,0.000044691515,0.00015431052,0.000019711426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015832973,0.000043317887,0.00019010218,0.000016047425,0.000122033525,0.0000026550517,0.0001369727,0.000013402427,0.00007422885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059398916,0.000026336877,0.000034451416,0.00007930688,0.00062405714,0.00006930891,0.00009776553,0.000041286887,0.0000011847804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015583435,0.000036434867,0.00709614,0.002891869,0.0002579675,6.969741e-7,0.0050921226,2.0365626e-8,3.5440106e-8,0.9562699,0.006510143,0.021829057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008196792,0.00006637654,0.18351161,0.022311345,0.0003002374,0.0000045704746,0.00965755,0.0000060784064,0.0000033152817,0.33276755,0.45037434,0.00017735704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015253546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016278774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6235024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013346514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014493005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.230589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040783895","doi":"10.1017/s0260210511000271","title":"Highways, heroes, and secular martyrs: the symbolics of power and sacrifice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Politics; Repatriation; Sacrifice; State (computer science); Torture; Power (physics); Sociology; Liberalism; Law; Demise; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Political science; History; Art; Psychoanalysis; Human rights","score_opus":0.07224408503712453,"score_gpt":0.3482669301324941,"score_spread":0.27602284509536956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040783895","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059808347,0.89568853,0.000005908473,0.0027848692,0.00027459022,0.00020703266,0.000012130556,0.0000094916595,0.041209113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48872527,0.51079684,0.000065136875,0.00027583318,0.000027556918,0.0000053523204,3.692481e-7,0.0000017810795,0.000101867205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993309,0.00007814292,0.00019194986,0.000091317626,0.00023719628,0.000070487906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942493,0.000082367944,0.00011840407,0.00007338644,0.00027983545,0.000021062586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005424452,0.00005901457,0.0001827751,0.000016785567,0.00009368668,0.0000065116983,0.00015574426,0.000017893482,0.000056425695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027987198,0.000037828024,0.00004550406,0.00005576563,0.000348944,0.00004170937,0.00008390605,0.000038520597,0.0000017206772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001972456,0.00015677205,0.022818819,0.00328381,0.0012675123,0.0000047118874,0.15580457,4.426277e-8,0.0000992465,0.7730604,0.022217484,0.021266911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019750754,0.000068738234,0.04314106,0.002604676,0.00013451952,0.000005723541,0.030152505,0.0000013377946,0.00016949164,0.006098785,0.91726685,0.00015882947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044895918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015906713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89504933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010435634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018848166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1542582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053879904","doi":"10.1017/s0260210509990489","title":"‘I don't even know what gender is’: a discussion of the connections between gender, gender mainstreaming and feminist theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Gender mainstreaming; Mainstream; Mainstreaming; Gender studies; Political science; Legislation; Politics; Sociology; Feminist legal theory; Law; Gender equality","score_opus":0.07285152472473966,"score_gpt":0.40249744626582973,"score_spread":0.32964592154109007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053879904","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30587608,0.50932485,0.0005097407,0.04553498,0.00747188,0.0022453505,0.00026649196,0.00006512807,0.1287055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81815857,0.18052928,0.0001226321,0.00029675674,0.00021767922,0.000015019457,0.0000039651813,0.000005587948,0.00065053534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987842,0.00017606383,0.00032860786,0.00016227014,0.00042281166,0.00012607973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989855,0.0002725311,0.00025193242,0.00014538359,0.00030268074,0.00004191881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008733577,0.00009291085,0.00022052905,0.000042030635,0.00033104912,0.000030748884,0.00022625679,0.00004564015,0.00010631423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054683,0.000050314757,0.00012930043,0.00011112929,0.00050230254,0.00014475234,0.0001695321,0.00011672213,0.0000019697256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009301092,0.00018669401,0.17377202,0.0033880416,0.0017702917,0.0000013746655,0.08755182,0.0000018009237,0.0008220174,0.63988924,0.006597522,0.08600985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074274605,0.00004049727,0.25289324,0.0056368685,0.00069553213,0.000017534321,0.21596733,0.000015209581,0.0018893082,0.155594,0.3659867,0.0005210141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007929262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000867653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5122825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003497523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072059534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25461957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056078505","doi":"10.1017/s0260210508008139","title":"Fishing in the mild West: democratic peace and militarised interstate disputes in the transatlantic community","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Proposition; Context (archaeology); Political science; Impossibility; Political economy; Mistake; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.10838019474847804,"score_gpt":0.4006110354149285,"score_spread":0.29223084066645044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056078505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68557703,0.18604822,0.00006375254,0.060375407,0.0001311466,0.0007834507,0.000021398666,0.000010318493,0.066989236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72171474,0.27703232,0.000058037807,0.001047208,0.000037517537,0.000027377682,0.00000485257,0.0000019101049,0.00007603389],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984331,0.0006616121,0.00034328832,0.000074831005,0.00038058532,0.00010657625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998219,0.0014597006,0.00009570741,0.00009787992,0.00011661921,0.000011050872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021103546,0.000075859214,0.00017719218,0.0000703799,0.00034066482,0.000015234559,0.0004962906,0.000019382544,0.000017451832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012532369,0.00004362007,0.00006445366,0.0002103626,0.00039927274,0.00015192629,0.000038718197,0.00024011705,0.0000026154175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003187607,0.00052345236,0.08710334,0.0015263397,0.00028641944,0.00003035912,0.57225305,0.000026736163,0.000006166803,0.30475977,0.026930146,0.006522367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010059349,0.00016503636,0.7499425,0.013181682,0.00008995593,0.00005218878,0.117163286,0.00029793,0.0000051134916,0.04241091,0.07533311,0.00035240385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034051295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00574831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6628391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007169407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031957657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.514756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084310489","doi":"10.1017/s0260210509008468","title":"The contradictions of regionalism in North America","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Regionalism (politics); Regionalisation; Prosperity; Political science; Politics; Economic integration; Free trade; General partnership; Free trade agreement; International trade; Economy; Geography; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.038097907184921245,"score_gpt":0.37735649531262644,"score_spread":0.3392585881277052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084310489","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005407552,0.686646,0.000006908928,0.2720397,0.00026896008,0.00024191619,0.00010107071,0.000005724342,0.03528221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16063027,0.835267,0.000019358517,0.0032894763,0.000079035046,0.0000064881847,0.000001112721,7.884825e-7,0.0007064408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942434,0.00004252799,0.00020818973,0.00004668099,0.00021019585,0.0000680966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940777,0.00020172798,0.00016414517,0.000052559873,0.0001583723,0.0000154282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020135584,0.000030862524,0.00012735605,0.000019017962,0.00008423555,0.0000027993788,0.00016822906,0.0000069474927,0.000011768401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010103153,0.000021929127,0.000055770306,0.00018253099,0.00024834782,0.000039524646,0.000007970962,0.00003296152,0.0000018159384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009126921,0.000052779913,0.0029550379,0.00015144612,0.00012645377,0.0000024222304,0.0051351916,0.000005797578,0.0000025867976,0.6084708,0.29270092,0.09038746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041308744,0.0000092615655,0.04117849,0.0007423027,0.0000047530943,2.6032092e-7,0.00025875904,7.7047474e-7,0.0000012297737,0.0011427943,0.95659816,0.00002190782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006193334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040394723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6638972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007040794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000622602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9771156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101790397","doi":"10.1017/s0260210514000217","title":"Arguing with law: strategic legal argumentation, US diplomacy, and debates over the International Criminal Court","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Framing (construction); Persuasion; International law; Diplomacy; Jurisdiction; Argumentation theory; Universal jurisdiction; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03423166311405146,"score_gpt":0.36203641368949574,"score_spread":0.3278047505754443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101790397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.561585,0.034182176,0.00011879639,0.020301584,0.0015052361,0.00066509325,0.0000429707,0.00006917582,0.38152996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964086,0.030913075,0.00027102252,0.0026040873,0.0005601702,0.000036771085,0.000018893263,0.000009149069,0.0015008614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840105,0.000099246354,0.00034190275,0.00019482386,0.0008244868,0.00013848589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985548,0.00030071914,0.0002602148,0.00008940859,0.0007572605,0.000037559275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007453817,0.00013207947,0.00021874072,0.00004510146,0.00041194828,0.000107936285,0.00042411292,0.000022137343,0.00020592553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015828789,0.00007944725,0.00007005128,0.000041032054,0.00057203264,0.0003018927,0.00008332718,0.00009297184,0.000011265649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014874985,0.00002979749,0.0008013339,0.00015711821,0.00027825427,0.0000021003173,0.00064267527,0.0000023234031,0.000017857194,0.99685556,0.00094262726,0.00025548018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010080335,0.00019114408,0.018606339,0.0066801086,0.00033132243,0.00003490044,0.0021205144,0.00016040794,0.00023777368,0.14213522,0.828017,0.00047722834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007873773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017766906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85472035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106371146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005322171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3239765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117963221","doi":"10.1017/s0260210509990349","title":"Managing national security and law enforcement intelligence in a globalised world","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Intelligence, Security, War Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law enforcement; Incentive; Public relations; Political science; Adversary; Cultural intelligence; Business; Law; Computer security; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0509828421387299,"score_gpt":0.419498233905851,"score_spread":0.3685153917671211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117963221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006148946,0.18226816,0.00006533327,0.008384442,0.00030757292,0.00040889013,0.000012126548,0.000022837092,0.80791575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67273486,0.32496312,0.00018432821,0.0018369479,0.00008565866,0.000011879021,0.0000035153573,0.0000020332755,0.00017764152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998319,0.00010097647,0.00047831621,0.00019854413,0.00072725967,0.00017593273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990461,0.00014455804,0.00016646666,0.00006527176,0.00053886673,0.00003874782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012826384,0.00011228159,0.00026748196,0.00011493981,0.00011568637,0.000025504487,0.00029554826,0.000023618777,0.00016219336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005018276,0.00010492624,0.00006581251,0.00036084664,0.00028812734,0.0002055028,0.00007460286,0.00009883062,0.000009641732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005707319,0.000044453453,0.00024902137,0.0002641523,0.000039328646,0.0000031453014,0.0019511206,0.000007642924,0.0000017038636,0.9895876,0.0004868092,0.0073593115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014626945,0.00006627231,0.00069185096,0.00893339,0.000026419915,0.0000032368662,0.0044560703,0.00020026707,0.00019838572,0.75158817,0.23339073,0.0002989176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008796342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042236713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8077381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029808216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006253876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4278768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151186456","doi":"10.1017/s0260210513000144","title":"Postnational discourse, deliberation, and participation toward global risk governance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Normative; Ambiguity; Politics; Global governance; Political science; Corporate governance; Key (lock); Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.033026875947647,"score_gpt":0.4082039370296059,"score_spread":0.3751770610819589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151186456","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19309899,0.3684818,0.0007925922,0.22420774,0.0030408243,0.0016971738,0.00028376598,0.00010492781,0.20829216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5758396,0.42124325,0.0010068272,0.00078020175,0.00019160577,0.00007848275,0.000024178018,0.0000031791476,0.0008327001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986936,0.00007876654,0.00035390176,0.00014418153,0.0006175683,0.00011197824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983442,0.00011873418,0.00028711924,0.00004507012,0.0011657877,0.00003909304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041347524,0.00008687744,0.00016492157,0.000018811801,0.00016802509,0.00003697432,0.00016125703,0.000023250961,0.00050431595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014672191,0.00007265916,0.000053072556,0.00011504704,0.00019687433,0.00045578805,0.000065556975,0.000043361775,0.000055213768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070828487,0.00007353532,0.071541995,0.0003395415,0.00036300483,7.7848256e-7,0.0018566945,0.000005389668,0.0000088476,0.8133926,0.053762697,0.05864786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030682053,0.00003140056,0.8437089,0.0027830526,0.000062775194,0.000002008271,0.0009867508,0.000077866825,0.000045551973,0.022633914,0.1291084,0.00025255862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003843641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019444959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79075867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001686346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073745425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5521906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162144451","doi":"10.1017/s0260210502006198","title":"Interview with Kal Holsti","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; International relations; State (computer science); Economic history; Law; History","score_opus":0.09278574581865115,"score_gpt":0.3867156434161707,"score_spread":0.29392989759751953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162144451","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015832705,0.78626186,0.000042121956,0.038681414,0.00032790532,0.00020755189,0.00001294924,0.000026835252,0.17285606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042212497,0.95317507,0.0002442142,0.0023830256,0.00009975551,0.000010524394,0.0000026225,0.0000031575503,0.0018691096],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991512,0.00007373042,0.00019781134,0.00009739158,0.00037979856,0.00010010568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935,0.000059829115,0.00011335042,0.00007029725,0.00037862672,0.000027889788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037747444,0.0000665072,0.00021450953,0.000022612614,0.000080844635,0.000010293893,0.00023950846,0.000015659833,0.00042926805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038544033,0.00004763238,0.00007426137,0.00012864519,0.00019696259,0.00010209524,0.00005312668,0.000050155133,0.000059182137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010116202,0.0003783052,0.0043021375,0.006535699,0.0012771173,0.000031177595,0.011578725,0.0000045862816,0.000004046932,0.26486832,0.5185256,0.19248419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074789954,0.00003086594,0.0002370853,0.006130221,0.00002945248,0.0000020287916,0.0010769019,0.0000124364715,0.0000011202458,0.00021818579,0.9921184,0.00006852206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054753633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037411205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4735928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066743305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010874055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47001842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273035276","doi":"10.1017/s0260210515000479","title":"Regionalism and diffusion revisited: From final design towards stages of decision-making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Politics; Negotiation; Positive economics; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Management science; Law and economics; Public relations; Economics; Epistemology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.08369662298012959,"score_gpt":0.4023075516361235,"score_spread":0.3186109286559939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273035276","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09685577,0.8105999,0.013287861,0.049567375,0.0018712434,0.000997419,0.00024973377,0.00006087129,0.026509814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29335895,0.69826645,0.0073158075,0.00033269817,0.00015288309,0.000010310478,0.000003577525,0.0000045878355,0.00055470027],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855536,0.00010072055,0.0004112549,0.00015975272,0.0006856337,0.0000872957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977557,0.0011473607,0.00030612765,0.00006766797,0.00070034584,0.000022813923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007786263,0.00008932003,0.00028045865,0.00007316745,0.00009133414,0.000009106592,0.00024891947,0.000027878217,0.00038783552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029716038,0.000055707278,0.00007716805,0.00008827576,0.00021737635,0.00015672507,0.00014380696,0.0000300937,0.000006929295],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013078569,0.00010387363,0.020401172,0.00078953477,0.0007286277,0.000014895927,0.003078292,4.9453587e-7,0.0007938991,0.22896063,0.043717332,0.7012805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011398041,0.00012202261,0.114345506,0.1951276,0.0001519101,0.000006066864,0.0011299943,0.000009716841,0.0009783335,0.13559501,0.5508142,0.0005797935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007067328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019646774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70070064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008377908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006535667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42465273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332193879","doi":"10.1017/s0260210516000073","title":"The shifting salience of democratic governance: Evidence from the United Nations General Assembly General Debates","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Democracy; General assembly; Corporate governance; Political science; Global governance; International relations; Politics; European union; Political economy; Development economics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.08223612171012384,"score_gpt":0.4095639951127557,"score_spread":0.32732787340263186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332193879","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22544008,0.590905,0.00030964983,0.16949676,0.0010178277,0.0004911013,0.00014749203,0.00002836448,0.012163722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27149513,0.7248907,0.00023006844,0.00085470744,0.00030530774,0.000029232602,0.0000011815576,0.0000038256258,0.0021898195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998257,0.00023589107,0.00045179093,0.00013605852,0.00073290267,0.00018634589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99330586,0.005315075,0.00045236276,0.0001637569,0.00073046953,0.000032463504],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001019639,0.000092455535,0.00020711993,0.000024213437,0.00043562579,0.000021983602,0.000775265,0.000022114686,0.00003685694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019388875,0.00004156037,0.000108533786,0.00048109225,0.00067681394,0.00020616608,0.00014508689,0.00005785829,0.000007984469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009545359,0.000024896452,0.021166252,0.0001799996,0.00027256476,8.509043e-7,0.0015705526,0.0000036744768,0.0008802166,0.94930583,0.014758112,0.011827508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026503424,0.00004696367,0.18613832,0.027756551,0.0001420156,9.73183e-7,0.0006971259,0.000101324214,0.0023818559,0.011226758,0.77096564,0.0002774612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005011391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025256574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93807906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011419951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011400089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569289010","doi":"10.1017/s0260210516000425","title":"Best practices in global governance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Yale University","keywords":"Best practice; Corporate governance; Scrutiny; Politics; Multi-level governance; Political science; Terminology; Global governance; Dominance (genetics); Polycentricity; Public administration; Public relations; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.14889681141693803,"score_gpt":0.5085796796242007,"score_spread":0.3596828682072627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2569289010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005188439,0.16947532,0.0000019127572,0.05465764,0.0012824798,0.00015622794,0.00001741675,0.0000067820956,0.7692138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24434596,0.75075257,0.00030538515,0.00037093915,0.00018486503,0.000015358451,0.0000018156197,0.00000173412,0.004021361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990242,0.00003778555,0.00024372252,0.00011212066,0.0004906592,0.000091487105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985707,0.00008531355,0.0008330885,0.00009403495,0.00040111272,0.000015772132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006911014,0.0000582555,0.00016620163,0.000011939372,0.00019923062,0.00003760909,0.000597603,0.000017497285,0.00015658347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071477243,0.00004997925,0.000052027,0.000043250417,0.00018828221,0.00041923748,0.00013612205,0.000042482374,0.000055991313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012308597,0.000100597455,0.18098249,0.00064222387,0.00019220638,0.000013758338,0.00065288215,3.7143874e-7,0.0000039235556,0.75856245,0.015941005,0.04289577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014270081,0.000009281442,0.12369127,0.009041926,0.000010929976,9.0499856e-7,0.0003969264,0.0000014104537,0.000015385005,0.0031543698,0.863444,0.00009091778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001752717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039175833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.847503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021552152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000849866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85570097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603286930","doi":"10.1017/s0260210517000092","title":"International law and its discontents: Exploring the dark sides of international law in International Relations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Adelaide","keywords":"International law; Law; Political science; Municipal law; Public law; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Public international law; Sociology","score_opus":0.18647830348479952,"score_gpt":0.3972932085727175,"score_spread":0.21081490508791798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603286930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0532206,0.018319998,0.000023442652,0.043572694,0.008431456,0.0006548501,0.00025111545,0.00003506227,0.8754908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9021804,0.089594424,0.00020345437,0.0008027643,0.0006988555,0.000117769654,0.00004529821,0.00001513519,0.0063419393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970343,0.0001320558,0.00097328547,0.00035815904,0.0012864503,0.0002157404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967721,0.00046223358,0.00089268945,0.00028947424,0.001525912,0.000057590707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013198073,0.00021888902,0.00042839607,0.00016575391,0.0007165632,0.00017488953,0.0020481134,0.000056341563,0.00062198064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018470563,0.0001660549,0.00021497178,0.000054081993,0.0010823442,0.0016284401,0.00063238875,0.0002357657,0.00002976225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003221312,0.000104373124,0.0034277935,0.00011212614,0.0005987888,0.000006913813,0.0017541853,0.0000075752896,0.00005149377,0.99223274,0.00066761597,0.0010041706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016488902,0.000063107465,0.036990054,0.01358502,0.00013843439,0.000017050508,0.0025843692,0.00017239324,0.0005864418,0.10032772,0.8432984,0.00058815995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001801775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045984136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.891905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029825215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064465865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6810252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604875496","doi":"10.1017/s0260210517000109","title":"The political economy of currency internationalisation: the case of the RMB","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Renminbi; Currency; Reserve currency; Internationalization; Liberian dollar; Economics; International economics; China; Devaluation; International trade; Political science; Exchange rate; Monetary economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0810464477066077,"score_gpt":0.36141426866593623,"score_spread":0.28036782095932855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604875496","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033210114,0.536818,0.00003979831,0.13388942,0.002606436,0.000466454,0.0006044219,0.0000041745134,0.29236117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93721086,0.06179244,0.000016431755,0.00066131656,0.00013901714,0.000018989802,0.0000014255022,0.0000032565495,0.00015625259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990204,0.000021529804,0.0007173336,0.000095774616,0.00005139634,0.00009359041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979568,0.00021478778,0.0010917395,0.00038510308,0.00033911376,0.000012452455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005934232,0.00007591257,0.00029388187,0.000021073127,0.00026324557,0.000023523844,0.00077391136,0.000016809623,0.000036594618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017306925,0.000039953164,0.00022679628,0.000040931627,0.00047588674,0.0000894235,0.00027125273,0.00006116537,0.00000906421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016356638,0.000016074702,0.008763299,0.00022840286,0.00012790052,4.2909338e-7,0.00009552896,4.5434925e-7,2.6562634e-7,0.98446417,0.005064538,0.001237307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001709281,0.00002731856,0.042847645,0.0013736705,0.00003176448,0.000030559713,0.00046425554,0.000037490034,0.00013619555,0.31062415,0.6441603,0.00009575618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047019758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010255608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90400076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046340818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019256362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20719256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738206696","doi":"10.1017/s0260210517000316","title":"Embedding regional actors in social and historical context: Australia-New Zealand integration and Asian-Pacific regionalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security","funders":"H2020 European Research Council","keywords":"Regionalism (politics); Regionalisation; Political science; Regional integration; Corporate governance; Agency (philosophy); Economic geography; Contingency; Economy; Economic integration; Political economy; International trade; Economic system; Geography; Politics; Economics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.26945648716582205,"score_gpt":0.3564773921935244,"score_spread":0.08702090502770238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738206696","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43479878,0.44116595,0.000096207834,0.10976257,0.0019616291,0.000539695,0.00015257769,0.000021604626,0.011501007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75286084,0.24440335,0.00024712487,0.00022669967,0.00020943588,0.000009066999,0.000010253773,0.000006181874,0.0020270403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999114,0.000008254101,0.00050986774,0.00022576425,0.0000405778,0.00010157578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992761,0.00003680452,0.0005091208,0.000096194635,0.000045286364,0.000036467838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029409825,0.000110422225,0.00045331815,0.00008972395,0.000110410714,0.00004263972,0.00015618891,0.000049493017,0.000030941726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030156868,0.00011112809,0.00007298272,0.000027082939,0.00009770866,0.00025704116,0.00007211933,0.000089436486,0.000009002893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042069816,0.000073607305,0.45117217,0.0007718228,0.0003657068,0.000006597056,0.0016514567,5.9787254e-7,0.000008929677,0.3622154,0.1663849,0.01730673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007458332,0.00004116455,0.44289616,0.0019560442,0.000017299904,0.000018211655,0.00029444054,0.0000332328,0.000008752797,0.028896114,0.5248373,0.0002554727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076018757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019920121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35845238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023755137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008466763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4531672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770334058","doi":"10.1017/s0260210517000511","title":"(De)securitisation dilemmas: Theorising the simultaneous enaction of securitisation and desecuritisation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forces College","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Simultaneity; Politics; Dichotomy; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Sociology; International relations; Positive economics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04524497009583099,"score_gpt":0.42221678016148967,"score_spread":0.37697181006565866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770334058","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2756024,0.5710595,0.0009284223,0.07873027,0.0023980162,0.0018530899,0.00015992325,0.00007324722,0.06919507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6289545,0.37054238,0.00007505043,0.00021710923,0.00016572962,0.000011007979,0.0000059154263,0.00000257852,0.0000257118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862146,0.00028091174,0.0003764163,0.00012805579,0.00045646116,0.0001366749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798715,0.0005947212,0.00059253146,0.0001503809,0.0006355017,0.00003972124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023001446,0.00007753554,0.0002176918,0.000034658377,0.00075141806,0.0000763805,0.0002829738,0.000049629838,0.000059192447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075508854,0.00006270589,0.00006396033,0.000060680937,0.0005377278,0.00039130528,0.000073881165,0.00008760705,0.0000016177289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001503322,0.000057509373,0.0028224583,0.002010893,0.00013297898,0.000002367273,0.020651538,0.00000481163,0.000034712502,0.7982486,0.0012287997,0.17479028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008386997,0.00019760458,0.02988162,0.022391682,0.00018937963,0.000033960703,0.021985956,0.0004608418,0.00033445764,0.16522208,0.75803274,0.00043097665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033875094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011191759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75680393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015179379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009794899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90396607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896912381","doi":"10.1017/s0260210518000323","title":"Feminist everyday political economy: Space, time, and violence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":219,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; Queen's University; University of Warwick; University of Cambridge; McGill University","keywords":"Everyday life; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Politics; Capitalism; Reproduction; Gender studies; Feminist philosophy; Power (physics); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.040155286162193715,"score_gpt":0.3827455498781789,"score_spread":0.34259026371598517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896912381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004324033,0.21559487,0.0000059211566,0.016062824,0.000408226,0.00017972516,0.000016982196,0.000019955949,0.76338744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6408557,0.35309598,0.00013713358,0.0037021611,0.00069470727,0.000012792022,0.00000215937,0.0000044826907,0.0014948463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993115,0.00005503216,0.00018863063,0.00013244356,0.0001712971,0.00014110515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993602,0.00012697942,0.00008105741,0.00006581852,0.00031057556,0.00005535784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004352213,0.00006647649,0.0001991261,0.000024352572,0.0001456994,0.00001600437,0.0001701792,0.000020976326,0.00023211354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005005082,0.000055971952,0.000051082876,0.000053920932,0.00065427256,0.000053981454,0.00009507045,0.000035188445,0.00008797635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036191807,0.000031337575,0.00447689,0.00044116998,0.00014732397,0.000001140662,0.00212912,4.751717e-9,0.0000049263294,0.97484875,0.011669426,0.0062463046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067060406,0.000036971163,0.0019899963,0.0023123906,0.000025467505,0.0000021013175,0.0014496347,0.0000030601414,0.000049083887,0.010401149,0.9835757,0.0000873999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015486074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000729948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97190624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054284825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005759835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25414804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899053955","doi":"10.1017/s0260210518000414","title":"Domestic entanglements: Family, state, hierarchy, and the Hobbesian state of nature","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Hierarchy; State (computer science); Depiction; State of nature; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Focus (optics); Political science; Philosophy; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04213408353734483,"score_gpt":0.4267178140193888,"score_spread":0.384583730482044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899053955","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026630653,0.75418466,0.00005277593,0.08134405,0.0011538111,0.000727368,0.00021289945,0.00002127308,0.13567251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5358526,0.46146193,0.00006984489,0.0022658242,0.00012595892,0.00000808683,0.000001422327,0.000002244349,0.00021205636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989007,0.00018289546,0.00028190826,0.00009135255,0.0004294175,0.000113730544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861,0.00058376597,0.00014288591,0.00007429705,0.00055739237,0.000031666757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011769821,0.00006372987,0.00023276148,0.000026318174,0.0001432589,0.0000079129,0.00022568449,0.00002148663,0.000025083582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020450493,0.000037981397,0.000059153772,0.000106657986,0.0023065065,0.00007452971,0.00011358883,0.00012685281,0.000003849129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042275205,0.000047075704,0.0004656112,0.0012678301,0.0004662828,0.0000018071985,0.0071748113,1.2337625e-7,0.000008746594,0.97400653,0.0034292806,0.0130896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006952124,0.00010873612,0.00495568,0.00636771,0.00009340029,0.0000014812623,0.0015243207,0.0000040131777,0.00007812377,0.69538826,0.29064253,0.00014055346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018918759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010849532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.509222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039789717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048595448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8498419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905747802","doi":"10.1017/s0260210518000505","title":"The changing practices of frontline diplomacy: New directions for inquiry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Diplomacy; Scholarship; Political science; Privilege (computing); Politics; International relations; Public administration; Foreign policy; State (computer science); Public relations; Criticism; Sociology; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.13733707383372737,"score_gpt":0.5160918980999303,"score_spread":0.3787548242662029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905747802","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017628606,0.6056943,0.0036797714,0.037350327,0.0027887132,0.001118264,0.00006688089,0.00004438508,0.34749448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10250292,0.8757837,0.0031768798,0.0005208195,0.0038802677,0.00009447157,0.000010564402,0.000010709087,0.014019663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991115,0.000046973968,0.00033132406,0.000086209344,0.00031362462,0.00011040504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707997,0.00083701214,0.0006677276,0.0000783108,0.0013148884,0.000022080967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009706507,0.00005623556,0.00015135619,0.00007178988,0.00043171068,0.000013365249,0.00025311075,0.000018684766,0.000070455586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007373552,0.00003779627,0.00011630629,0.00018651932,0.00039070862,0.00014580209,0.000062215986,0.000034233726,0.000008656803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013488744,0.000024552412,0.00026871613,0.00014076121,0.00034833385,4.9966257e-8,0.0039193463,4.447339e-7,0.000009120925,0.93658036,0.029552845,0.029141998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092020084,0.000038021462,0.0003713486,0.0012576838,0.00004587665,4.7216028e-7,0.0023580035,0.000020841286,0.000082609644,0.01860108,0.97708905,0.000042985033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018482227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024288023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94753623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071488495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012235634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88273627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942396545","doi":"10.1017/s0260210519000135","title":"I am uncertain, but We are not: a new subjectivity of the Anthropocene","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Anthropocene; Subjectivity; Humanity; Subject (documents); Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Certainty; Existentialism; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06680825570180253,"score_gpt":0.4077719949127692,"score_spread":0.3409637392109667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942396545","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35941976,0.47332972,0.0000034822413,0.092659555,0.0041700476,0.0012646788,0.000092635586,0.000050357496,0.06900976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6795978,0.31816712,0.000058532187,0.0003173208,0.00009967798,0.00000768579,6.407211e-7,0.000003788093,0.0017474445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872005,0.000113017966,0.00033060467,0.00015162719,0.00056502194,0.00011969042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982936,0.000291168,0.00048101405,0.00017713568,0.0007303962,0.000026733233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038583804,0.000094892246,0.00033748755,0.000058821162,0.00015949272,0.000010467254,0.0004748416,0.000024886462,0.00065566297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013559548,0.00006442289,0.00027560786,0.00026731173,0.00043635536,0.00015490585,0.00017245239,0.00009895695,0.000036968766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117114185,0.0009020418,0.599336,0.008286492,0.0035923019,0.0000045251413,0.01207954,0.00003562427,0.001086627,0.120964535,0.23959029,0.014004881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057038845,0.00018650928,0.35750368,0.033113796,0.00026945365,0.0000057279144,0.03642822,0.0000072452435,0.0020748961,0.0043306067,0.5650584,0.000451034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022668447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004028218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32546815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009111666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007735797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.717905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981180407","doi":"10.1017/s0260210519000305","title":"Internationalists, sovereigntists, nativists: Contending visions of world order in Pan-Africanism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Sovereignty; Solidarity; Political science; Psychological nativism; Politics; Reactionary; Multilateralism; Ideology; Political economy; Universalism; Order (exchange); International relations; Nationalism; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06329356193706334,"score_gpt":0.4085466271384346,"score_spread":0.3452530652013712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981180407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029363386,0.32574043,0.000020515121,0.031193484,0.0014093352,0.0009855552,0.00015107408,0.000039436047,0.6110968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80923545,0.18712482,0.00020504065,0.0004026256,0.00010673976,0.000023611627,0.000009399785,0.000004964666,0.00288732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982688,0.00010187532,0.0006009432,0.0001958937,0.000683289,0.00014920428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980391,0.00051597547,0.0003895729,0.000086582586,0.0009397523,0.000029006673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061959325,0.0001245494,0.0005232103,0.00011599493,0.00008112791,0.000008758971,0.00037840081,0.000024491606,0.000664319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015952205,0.00009127893,0.0001264067,0.00056671264,0.00032015008,0.00015378855,0.00018863466,0.00011081316,0.000027651582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012044796,0.00010774422,0.025639923,0.0008300113,0.00033859955,0.0000024525757,0.0022592598,0.0000015010153,0.000054248703,0.9644211,0.0029643772,0.0033687348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008935688,0.000107868975,0.048369687,0.026482143,0.00007436993,0.0000020867333,0.006676812,0.000010711359,0.00009076338,0.054326136,0.8624721,0.0004937615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005508434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007204727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.910095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021905651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048219397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7273827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012317091","doi":"10.1017/s0260210520000017","title":"Democratising food: The case for a deliberative approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo; University of Sheffield","keywords":"Deliberation; Political science; Food sovereignty; Food security; Deliberative democracy; Scope (computer science); Food systems; Sustainability; Status quo; Economic Justice; Democracy; Politics; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09147359015003784,"score_gpt":0.3015435000842151,"score_spread":0.21006990993417726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012317091","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31966498,0.589297,0.00041975782,0.083733164,0.00040927864,0.0026328685,0.0003465404,0.0000748345,0.0034215641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8210602,0.16083062,0.0042379457,0.0122641325,0.00087217364,0.00038343048,0.0001538952,0.0000017526023,0.00019585819],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993528,0.000036958656,0.00024997746,0.00014178515,0.00013742769,0.0000810382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929315,0.00022538501,0.00013242706,0.000016667553,0.0003061086,0.000026274422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015542797,0.00009259422,0.00020329129,0.0000018290025,0.00014870835,0.000014049044,0.00017586093,0.00001530005,0.000022565395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031334502,0.000022109165,0.00010368951,0.00012065266,0.00003261273,0.00005266091,0.000091321745,0.000043140153,0.000003074999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008410756,0.0002041921,0.0016272548,0.004297583,0.002454647,0.00004172995,0.003301588,0.000022545546,0.0008944655,0.05593999,0.42531916,0.50581276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007760875,0.0013190618,0.016924689,0.006095071,0.00036742014,0.00062861084,0.013125757,0.0005456706,0.0031006604,0.011969507,0.9441451,0.0010023641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005575426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003051841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51882595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019285042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037151797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11437594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036446203","doi":"10.1017/s0260210520000169","title":"The quiet failures of early neoliberalism: From rational expectations to Keynesianism in reverse","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Sheffield; University of Cambridge; London School of Economics and Political Science; Leverhulme Trust; University of Ottawa; National Archives and Records Administration","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Performative utterance; Political economy; Recession; Politics; Inflation (cosmology); Political science; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Keynesian economics; Sociology; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06409731817871613,"score_gpt":0.3658503264481557,"score_spread":0.30175300826943957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036446203","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11804436,0.221992,0.00007387948,0.59955287,0.0010555958,0.00061869534,0.00018950681,0.000024163886,0.058448926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8250442,0.15921259,0.0011594875,0.011873945,0.00073529116,0.000082734055,0.000015444846,0.0000075482717,0.0018687099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993208,0.000057465648,0.0002948424,0.0000836695,0.00016740343,0.00007578668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994452,0.00025495165,0.00008718932,0.000039420513,0.00012806375,0.000045181987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016387028,0.000043456093,0.00016889202,0.000015229137,0.00010286322,0.000006508816,0.00019306224,0.000012450433,0.0001465518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007666396,0.000032176114,0.00006620564,0.00006974161,0.00015286697,0.000069888454,0.000035527846,0.00003349132,0.00003696326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004498194,0.000054430457,0.0028480073,0.0002667754,0.00024382536,0.0000026044893,0.0684591,0.000011560256,0.000071932416,0.7990503,0.12382255,0.0051239464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012907368,0.000031602052,0.0065989774,0.00079376716,0.000014407583,7.609254e-8,0.0068107187,0.000005242688,0.000033669872,0.0055680573,0.9799388,0.000075629425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016974692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008297018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85611624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050683582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053429772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25660768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136562299","doi":"10.1017/s0260210521000103","title":"The radical Right, realism, and the politics of conservatism in postwar international thought","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Communism, Protests, Social Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Liberalism; Realism; Battle; Politics; Identity (music); Narrative; Political radicalism; Political science; Field (mathematics); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Political economy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.04202403404491383,"score_gpt":0.40385126307532293,"score_spread":0.3618272290304091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136562299","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019164236,0.775442,0.000011504595,0.17674822,0.0010139096,0.00058004394,0.000051203977,0.000011543039,0.026977323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1005606,0.8959995,0.00027819758,0.0019014485,0.00014821859,0.00004097133,0.000007707172,0.000004731208,0.0010586537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815226,0.00054094224,0.0004987801,0.00010152659,0.0005894205,0.00011705102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997259,0.0016775965,0.00027371812,0.00014393195,0.0006247259,0.000021010217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017215015,0.00007514926,0.00027745453,0.000024154004,0.0002907587,0.000023095401,0.00050569064,0.000027680035,0.000053828648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037380448,0.000045730805,0.00009247033,0.00014886426,0.0014553461,0.00007337078,0.0003647589,0.00012103344,0.0000015013795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013151716,0.00005155569,0.007276955,0.00025252093,0.00032773256,0.000004865995,0.005159507,1.5600959e-7,0.000009487871,0.97686344,0.00396463,0.0060759895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080010033,0.0000112285215,0.016532838,0.0045672827,0.00004282452,0.0000035038759,0.0060509136,0.000008819164,0.000096128024,0.046479207,0.92531556,0.00009160268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020055023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019012755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9303842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117483214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012153585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53622836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144377955","doi":"10.1017/s0260210521000115","title":"Framing, truth-telling, and the limits of local transitional justice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Transitional justice; Legitimacy; Accountability; Scholarship; Political science; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics; History","score_opus":0.05568960338683913,"score_gpt":0.37923949351950537,"score_spread":0.3235498901326662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144377955","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031503104,0.9614558,0.00079329114,0.008536301,0.0008119174,0.000115419956,0.000023183258,0.00000665665,0.025107086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17185006,0.8264371,0.00021719869,0.0008645347,0.00016459005,0.0000073034003,0.0000035125677,0.0000020807765,0.00045357767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991616,0.00014614295,0.00023094202,0.00008640893,0.000318669,0.000056219757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986111,0.000709012,0.00011474557,0.00004876166,0.00049835054,0.000018010847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076327194,0.000046672474,0.00021978455,0.000009037651,0.00017069648,0.0000046373534,0.00009892269,0.000022005175,0.0001308413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008663518,0.00003392073,0.00013190934,0.000083582265,0.00095717,0.000046678517,0.000021841228,0.000059609443,0.0000019696656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021147707,0.000065411914,0.00014686155,0.0032887151,0.0004143713,0.000004146284,0.019823514,0.000006865747,0.000012847078,0.9544305,0.009086645,0.012698927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006052975,0.000015896887,0.0007115935,0.0050438195,0.0003828308,0.0000047626286,0.026253939,0.000023843739,0.0001733922,0.0033659115,0.96329707,0.00012162664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028844901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000076926146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95421046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004170494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000836889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35267326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171871281","doi":"10.1017/s0260210521000309","title":"Nearly modern IPE? Insights from IPE at mid-century","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Framing (construction); Discipline; Carr; Epistemology; Sociology; Work (physics); Political science; Environmental ethics; Social science; History; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03713235512299644,"score_gpt":0.37249981152919476,"score_spread":0.3353674564061983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171871281","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09322043,0.864015,0.000004121449,0.0074009974,0.0010526946,0.00008542287,0.000044626788,0.000017015962,0.034159724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13532032,0.8603891,0.0002062763,0.0024129092,0.00030247317,0.000010405966,0.000049244936,0.0000035994972,0.0013056742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988217,0.00021296182,0.00027601497,0.0001944127,0.00038014297,0.00011477002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880284,0.00025716765,0.0001454549,0.00010949653,0.0006460533,0.000038983442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020220538,0.000088865425,0.00029372924,0.000015222094,0.00022605811,0.000010221587,0.00022391429,0.000061356644,0.0004337375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010480913,0.00007425003,0.0001601304,0.00009690197,0.00031963625,0.00011452611,0.00018199792,0.00007856193,0.00009044377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007533108,0.00062411,0.029697804,0.0028204755,0.0060483124,0.00024683276,0.11812311,0.0000050552017,0.0023895993,0.5607201,0.20618886,0.07306041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016320634,0.00001100645,0.0047732377,0.0022333977,0.00006392509,0.0000012113392,0.0020725192,0.0000011692617,0.00016320815,0.019560436,0.9708313,0.00012539687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024964137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059917755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7646424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017118017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006760104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47491214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182546944","doi":"10.1017/s0260210521000395","title":"The Legon School of International Relations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge; King's University College","keywords":"Scholarship; International relations; Sociology; Equity (law); Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Value (mathematics); Social science; Mathematics education; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.053286641396157526,"score_gpt":0.30962911400075416,"score_spread":0.25634247260459664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182546944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039546547,0.3761569,0.000040663374,0.017791709,0.0020630923,0.000086525026,0.0000974657,0.000012186151,0.603356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13771987,0.60372734,0.00021631701,0.0019670795,0.0010576792,0.000051670057,0.000094124065,0.000014363727,0.25515154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908906,0.000037243102,0.00044080758,0.00008780536,0.000280109,0.000064960506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984151,0.000255027,0.00016101859,0.000105451465,0.0010397551,0.000023609276],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015640381,0.0000647597,0.00018582965,0.000021360494,0.0001184851,0.000016139807,0.00020503293,0.000010709486,0.0019975384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011345692,0.000040869305,0.0001447964,0.00003078905,0.00022460776,0.00009919546,0.0000947952,0.00007177134,0.0000909244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037829816,0.000047519567,0.00035143073,0.00026912606,0.00032140742,0.0000017636368,0.00026022023,8.8835486e-7,0.000007082525,0.9315164,0.06489784,0.0023225462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064243395,0.000012242306,0.00029824843,0.0012327345,0.000025298717,0.0000014013154,0.0004738092,0.00002019494,0.000016559856,0.004015805,0.99379563,0.000043819222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002607425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007958473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9288978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006736106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049778184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186811130","doi":"10.1017/s0260210521000413","title":"Feminist foreign policies (FFPs) as strategic narratives: Norm translation in Sweden, Canada, France, and Mexico","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Riksbankens Jubileumsfond","keywords":"Narrative; Feminism; Gender studies; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.08467629992205902,"score_gpt":0.38715788164222087,"score_spread":0.3024815817201618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186811130","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06688714,0.58917546,0.0000037562575,0.013903505,0.00025578425,0.00021630336,0.000029189774,0.00000788896,0.32952097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6629883,0.33513257,0.00005198151,0.0011658791,0.00007387242,0.000017085587,0.0000068787785,0.000002843593,0.00056055264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889386,0.000101913865,0.00031664656,0.00014758004,0.0004174426,0.0001225802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936527,0.00014489038,0.00011862399,0.00005621423,0.00028093596,0.000034068125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033377143,0.00008920204,0.00026831025,0.000032356962,0.00014103444,0.000020877946,0.0001266262,0.000025460298,0.00009919855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023344984,0.00008022457,0.000048582257,0.00018388864,0.00015790013,0.00006808371,0.000026886319,0.00006369814,0.0000014765179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013788894,0.00013234638,0.04586639,0.0027972495,0.0005098818,0.000039680173,0.119750075,0.0000052976116,0.000106835774,0.81562036,0.0056287553,0.009529355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041346694,0.000044010674,0.013596415,0.004362713,0.000036695074,0.0000085666925,0.318663,0.0000073440224,0.00020587633,0.019316515,0.6430638,0.00028163393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.090858445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6213538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7963038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008707409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043461376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9151956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204953282","doi":"10.1017/s0260210521000486","title":"Against ontological capture: Drawing lessons from Amazonian Kichwa relationality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Camosun College","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Anthropocentrism; Epistemology; Normative; Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Transformative learning; Space (punctuation); Environmental ethics; Political science; Ecology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11721173662748152,"score_gpt":0.44145445583694853,"score_spread":0.324242719209467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204953282","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008272599,0.6864381,0.00011220252,0.103339136,0.00095980655,0.00014121502,0.000056183144,0.000036734964,0.20064403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30302182,0.69239223,0.00073053397,0.0028608588,0.00029330663,0.0000127608055,0.000031840027,0.0000029774128,0.0006536644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839896,0.00023915846,0.00041286406,0.0002551487,0.0005335853,0.00016025531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983775,0.00050469185,0.00019932071,0.00010278583,0.0007665928,0.000049082853],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004140065,0.000110317604,0.00042408286,0.0000126663745,0.0005041022,0.000017575236,0.00022504435,0.00006293435,0.0015370377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034054527,0.0000785418,0.00019866883,0.00016555513,0.00069175905,0.00009735184,0.00019236533,0.00012539569,0.00003258551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013701345,0.00033337894,0.028969672,0.00044687465,0.0014624674,0.000088404406,0.0050525567,0.0000038828807,0.00006809996,0.86598414,0.04748673,0.05009008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014023915,0.000013111966,0.03448922,0.0025123965,0.00005566647,8.2616026e-7,0.007872957,0.000003030632,0.000054290165,0.008177673,0.9465167,0.00016387178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009153036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019367323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89902997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016917948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007765944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200427352","doi":"10.1017/s0260210521000516","title":"Feminist foreign policies (FFPs) as strategic narratives: Norm translation in Sweden, Canada, France, and Mexico - ADDENDUM","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Addendum; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Foreign policy; Action (physics); Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.09738543933848717,"score_gpt":0.40546748433466195,"score_spread":0.30808204499617475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200427352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08147244,0.42389423,0.000008932649,0.022591822,0.00047183645,0.00033570037,0.0000598854,0.000009223396,0.47115594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7770494,0.2210746,0.000104134495,0.0007742569,0.00010457638,0.000017414042,0.000014265514,0.0000031543016,0.0008581917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989524,0.00009751664,0.00030782426,0.00013205929,0.00039388458,0.00011632079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993892,0.00013663854,0.000120360004,0.000051198076,0.00026941946,0.000033227396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026544178,0.000073354226,0.00021074989,0.000035297035,0.00012390678,0.000019584091,0.000088544846,0.000022809234,0.000075605756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022181061,0.000064124935,0.000039742634,0.00015597689,0.00014057662,0.000064702566,0.000023969447,0.000052007388,0.0000010962827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006999692,0.00009374895,0.03361002,0.001960588,0.00038168102,0.00002977118,0.04595218,0.000015375368,0.00017557031,0.9056403,0.0081208395,0.004012946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007554454,0.000062221254,0.02802166,0.0071131596,0.000068338355,0.000014948358,0.5358243,0.0000299325,0.0010516745,0.061214063,0.3653947,0.00044954644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.108996615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42668793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8444262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009280995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000418221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89693666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307460009","doi":"10.1017/s0260210522000468","title":"‘When They Fight Back’: A cinematic archive of animal resistance and world wars","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Acadia University; University of Victoria","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Politics; Humanity; Biopower; Adversary; Human animal; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Hostility; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.04656557117840551,"score_gpt":0.3755100062593532,"score_spread":0.32894443508094773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307460009","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037957095,0.6655779,0.0000028917295,0.04228749,0.0006721976,0.0009815275,0.00028213457,0.000034268538,0.2522045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7222024,0.26904792,0.0018234113,0.0006493883,0.0000892405,0.00012586564,0.000011209395,0.000009520588,0.0060410174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871045,0.0001693818,0.00039597918,0.0001410817,0.00048080957,0.000102301085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988083,0.00045324076,0.00034426327,0.00009491397,0.00027488306,0.000024373247],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005553483,0.0000801984,0.00030508882,0.0001510327,0.00027007327,0.000008776113,0.00030994642,0.000005900006,0.0016556957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062273367,0.00007020367,0.00012321111,0.00016637362,0.000289276,0.0001011565,0.0002509282,0.00009779262,0.0000061714913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019554807,0.00038227902,0.008001306,0.0073707923,0.0018123151,0.0000095591195,0.040966984,0.000005815014,0.00038892793,0.3888979,0.5511779,0.00079068093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026315916,0.00018368573,0.010063325,0.007749028,0.00014606785,0.0000036102308,0.025087979,0.0000048131833,0.0000292516,0.020564461,0.9356899,0.00021469365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002901944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011567241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68424535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055281726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025856021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310026328","doi":"10.1017/s0260210522000523","title":"IR's <i>Roads to Freedom</i>: Rereading Jean-Paul Sartre's trilogy as an International Relations text","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Existentialism; Diplomacy; Argument (complex analysis); Mediation; Utterance; International relations theory; International relations; Reading (process); Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; History; Law; Art history; Social science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0630846912529484,"score_gpt":0.4058854279286574,"score_spread":0.342800736675709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310026328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03315505,0.22803175,0.0002189215,0.14788362,0.009938092,0.0015329127,0.00034447754,0.00019606814,0.5786991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6888649,0.26790726,0.0009906596,0.007626152,0.0015949478,0.0004127364,0.00016494401,0.000033594737,0.032404825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758524,0.00031343824,0.0005339381,0.000328636,0.0010218065,0.00021693078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984826,0.00032569026,0.0002691799,0.00019767942,0.00062336307,0.00010147902],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012862447,0.00014340313,0.00034426892,0.00018559354,0.0006334693,0.000035809666,0.0008449205,0.000031303185,0.004769557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002149599,0.00014445846,0.00017816616,0.00036222168,0.00014969338,0.00027075768,0.00040749396,0.00018149045,0.0001764206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086027605,0.00063535006,0.012157451,0.00035269465,0.0013909176,0.00003382838,0.039754894,0.00028214132,0.000110940855,0.63134277,0.26724532,0.04660769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018785715,0.000102050784,0.0013691215,0.00035100713,0.000044161294,0.0000064522933,0.007885674,0.000019098637,0.000008928095,0.0022715128,0.9875996,0.00015451731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010205337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008910859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7203543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034408708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014013755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99614024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327596667","doi":"10.1017/s0260210523000037","title":"Chelsea Manning, national security, and the cishetero/homonormative logics of protection","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University; Centre for Social Innovation","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Queer; Relation (database); HERO; Transgender; Identity (music); Monster; Gossip; Law; Sociology; Secrecy; Political science; Gender studies; History; Aesthetics; Literature; Art; Art history; Computer science","score_opus":0.11352792865040708,"score_gpt":0.4151594024500068,"score_spread":0.30163147379959976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327596667","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05749197,0.5703432,0.00011942073,0.05937732,0.0017072093,0.0027774032,0.00010077522,0.0001350182,0.30794767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5905376,0.40870714,0.000016398753,0.0002616202,0.00011038591,0.0000670254,0.000004111642,0.00000240387,0.00029332348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998787,0.00017139765,0.00028260003,0.000097241464,0.0005795391,0.00008225109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986379,0.00020573729,0.00024540277,0.000047380257,0.0008483073,0.000015269108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017690264,0.000064970445,0.00021681361,0.000054812735,0.00016726727,0.0000137982,0.0001903191,0.000023676723,0.00003220215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001608251,0.0000433834,0.00008779473,0.00021648765,0.00048205254,0.00010632977,0.00013341903,0.00006866908,0.000007442324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008049068,0.00013905516,0.004652068,0.006595313,0.0015694163,0.0000024266226,0.16278096,0.000009601455,0.000031667423,0.77154267,0.025705094,0.026891232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018090742,0.00014706777,0.01498181,0.007944354,0.00017425651,0.0000085158035,0.060306955,0.000501993,0.0002964204,0.23783836,0.6755742,0.0004170226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016663628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083634906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6498691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004382992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038057377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19253428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383262609","doi":"10.1017/s0260210523000165","title":"Pluriversal sovereignty and the state of IR","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Discipline; Decolonization; Political science; State (computer science); Colonialism; Law; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0940294946018996,"score_gpt":0.420409992206253,"score_spread":0.3263804976043534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383262609","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0120301,0.42277694,0.000009268499,0.16762102,0.00077922404,0.0004799797,0.00011818652,0.00004376508,0.39614153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38367367,0.6152478,0.000012563562,0.0007289963,0.000058805614,0.0000040504447,8.108288e-7,0.0000010606439,0.00027223153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993564,0.00009390019,0.0001571004,0.00004893586,0.00027899104,0.000064693384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989091,0.00075145124,0.000076200486,0.00003783221,0.00021024211,0.000015137625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010483229,0.000031376658,0.00015238735,0.00001584451,0.000078493315,0.0000028020188,0.00012405524,0.000009340881,0.000030982894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021901908,0.000018735613,0.000053872944,0.0000941184,0.0009961398,0.00005334626,0.00008861789,0.000045777368,0.000008578964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063988437,0.000004316096,0.000053372776,0.000471906,0.00009376095,3.7174658e-7,0.002074746,6.127115e-7,5.007174e-7,0.99375373,0.0014353087,0.0021049886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022966458,0.0000116271385,0.001130169,0.0020887698,0.000031884116,1.9747121e-7,0.0010257466,0.000010497007,0.000019413914,0.92674524,0.068663694,0.00004309444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015781129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018274131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3958693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015979316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026083273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36703187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383262819","doi":"10.1017/s026021052300013x","title":"Decolonising Development Studies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","keywords":"Decolonization; Modernization theory; Colonialism; Inequality; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Knowledge production; Socioeconomic status; Social science; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Knowledge management; Computer science","score_opus":0.10337591293929677,"score_gpt":0.4366233792450756,"score_spread":0.33324746630577884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383262819","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041565597,0.93245316,0.000021716292,0.012529242,0.0024462685,0.00036399442,0.0000041311187,0.00015197639,0.010463901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025638245,0.96898353,0.0014481322,0.00065022375,0.00019651819,0.00007507412,0.0000057655234,0.0000070321753,0.0029954906],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998484,0.00007312384,0.000458054,0.00016478523,0.0006228057,0.00019721978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876976,0.00028547583,0.00018105721,0.00007172443,0.0006555917,0.00003637522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014075745,0.00010405206,0.00034047113,0.00010293211,0.00034438964,0.000012167023,0.00024976692,0.000022684646,0.0000666492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018683373,0.00008499071,0.00010175361,0.00035163233,0.00018528945,0.00009674883,0.00020669666,0.000048556612,0.00016933556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010704917,0.00008950381,0.006364697,0.0047810087,0.0032372563,0.000039978742,0.13703556,0.0000056397384,0.00001503616,0.0079362495,0.70533687,0.1351475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008245423,0.0000084886815,0.007576701,0.005364886,0.00002242397,6.387233e-7,0.019583419,6.7284464e-7,0.00007910918,0.00044780073,0.9667157,0.000117700845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003954163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021804983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26137882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003019373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018160387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34658206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396664231","doi":"10.1017/s0260210524000263","title":"On the horizon: The futures of IR","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Horizon; Political science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Financial economics; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.05946111971212962,"score_gpt":0.432896513982823,"score_spread":0.37343539427069333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396664231","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028501241,0.66441244,0.0000028534657,0.21871774,0.0010257126,0.00018564737,0.000019089352,0.000010885783,0.11277551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2705353,0.72667015,0.0000065461204,0.0021745928,0.00030464368,0.000013020427,9.107321e-7,0.0000014233377,0.00029340087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991044,0.00016350434,0.00018098998,0.000063110645,0.00041875622,0.000069271126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998853,0.0008041873,0.000064319,0.000069014175,0.00019656264,0.000012890203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015838419,0.000040743103,0.00011663789,0.0000135848895,0.000163088,0.0000144769,0.0003045705,0.000013567881,0.0002640355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014777257,0.000017686723,0.000089198526,0.00017140384,0.00022580268,0.00003801854,0.00004423396,0.00007511302,0.000018801371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.764472e-7,0.00000822219,0.000011884626,0.00048228697,0.00008075382,2.8460852e-7,0.0020348283,1.3361506e-7,3.123024e-7,0.82398885,0.15451045,0.0188811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009483738,0.000024752499,0.00021609949,0.0030547285,0.000010044404,2.733744e-7,0.0022183093,0.0000010969588,0.0000054461098,0.008328356,0.9861124,0.000019014127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004058207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030348866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8316019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043859058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079425394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28910035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402516545","doi":"10.1017/s0260210524000457","title":"Thinking freedom relationally: Life projects and care as an ethical orientation for International Studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Orientation (vector space); Political science; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Philosophy; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.10000010628228384,"score_gpt":0.3812148644088613,"score_spread":0.2812147581265775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402516545","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002806451,0.9253385,0.0001997229,0.027236119,0.0069592237,0.0006699088,0.0003177346,0.00011710923,0.03635523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41300526,0.5554687,0.0027683377,0.00997122,0.0064184805,0.0006269525,0.0008442135,0.00006587435,0.010830958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866116,0.000045844685,0.0004721755,0.00026071767,0.00045952792,0.00010059587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977298,0.0004908273,0.000104980696,0.000070817456,0.0015560479,0.000047528443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036256388,0.00013924953,0.0002977353,0.00008717778,0.00019036018,0.00008014532,0.00017747068,0.000044360688,0.000113374525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019590177,0.00010221082,0.000118086165,0.00003465585,0.0002829907,0.00031460967,0.00009791498,0.00016575279,0.000012012106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017316219,0.000023284565,0.00005874859,0.0036391183,0.0005837291,0.0000026464338,0.023559477,0.0000016449601,0.0000011199197,0.95478004,0.013785566,0.0035472843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019909005,0.00017377328,0.000053192794,0.006187124,0.00012702124,0.0000029939667,0.012667137,0.00041267456,0.000002404225,0.0366521,0.9433571,0.00016539345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003581403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000776352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9295715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015167703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007749947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41680363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402893328","doi":"10.1017/s0260210524000627","title":"<i>De jure</i> and <i>de facto</i> inclusivity in global governance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Durham University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"De facto; Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.02059227900212972,"score_gpt":0.39879222323856656,"score_spread":0.3781999442364368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402893328","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06796418,0.7192493,0.000058497677,0.021615457,0.0009833914,0.0002571631,0.00013906565,0.000049000286,0.18968394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59182864,0.40516952,0.00011977276,0.00094410894,0.00019907889,0.0000134388,0.0000022942784,0.000003007201,0.0017201664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990973,0.000069545626,0.00021738885,0.00013838912,0.0003501419,0.00012726797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999569,0.00015598848,0.00006351051,0.000041458155,0.00014166476,0.000028399952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007557139,0.00007240003,0.00017573616,0.000017151253,0.000085375184,0.00003565105,0.00019305339,0.000025528954,0.000098405115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035370767,0.000058872534,0.00006281003,0.00007322779,0.00018202577,0.00015437635,0.000095077645,0.00007424988,0.000009839937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030726653,0.00002043453,0.0018833575,0.0007602149,0.000065714325,0.000012472834,0.0008696915,7.4933473e-7,0.000006009672,0.98692226,0.0047012772,0.0047547235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082851046,0.000012779202,0.010913764,0.0083932495,0.00001942602,0.0000062218414,0.00007410713,0.00002252994,0.000024127752,0.08746466,0.89288384,0.000102443184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079465646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016330441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89945763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005237753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013328296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24007523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404020878","doi":"10.1017/s0260210524000470","title":"‘Homes for Ukraine’ and the politics of private humanitarian hospitality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Political and Social Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hospitality; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Tourism","score_opus":0.055355897988467746,"score_gpt":0.43265749209435356,"score_spread":0.3773015941058858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404020878","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011291335,0.92453957,0.000030405346,0.042511743,0.00045329647,0.00037551226,0.00007081805,0.00001562089,0.020711685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4541965,0.5436479,0.00011856796,0.00036527566,0.0003352727,0.00002993188,0.0000025027498,0.0000029889159,0.0013010609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993736,0.00006427982,0.00022012577,0.00006735423,0.0001897695,0.00008486871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896204,0.00069688563,0.000052615727,0.00003863303,0.00023258638,0.000017257857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082300487,0.000044848824,0.00022420513,0.000014408108,0.00013175009,0.000014105231,0.00012671514,0.000014452312,0.000014169132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021727888,0.000026271146,0.0001053178,0.00005024094,0.00087794295,0.00004970134,0.000053416214,0.000028254017,9.0975783e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014366333,0.00000751275,0.0001028392,0.0016868896,0.00016950551,1.4556096e-7,0.004390046,7.18393e-9,6.884942e-7,0.9899759,0.0011287781,0.0025362375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013201279,0.000023157516,0.001205632,0.0036411756,0.000097985365,1.5950427e-7,0.0038596387,0.000004257857,0.000026227359,0.3014528,0.68949825,0.000058711634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041035214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005789996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6885231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032542404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028758688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32348174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406338345","doi":"10.1017/s0260210524000925","title":"Conspiracy theory, anti-globalism, and the Freedom Convoy: The Great Reset and conspiracist delegitimation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sovereignty; Legitimacy; Politics; Globalism; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Realm; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03571938359984408,"score_gpt":0.40620591171598996,"score_spread":0.3704865281161459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406338345","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033076733,0.56593,0.00027492785,0.11680002,0.0008495553,0.0024047855,0.00007395517,0.000044523535,0.2805455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.541397,0.45205733,0.000032537748,0.0057074684,0.00005223073,0.000017488954,0.000003827414,0.0000019768993,0.00073016714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998882,0.00034511276,0.00032425666,0.0000809062,0.0002879749,0.00007975732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981954,0.0010518963,0.0001991359,0.00010464794,0.00042960615,0.000019301742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002721116,0.000073632735,0.00022661054,0.00003429727,0.00043370444,0.00007805276,0.00019637939,0.000017327982,0.0000682901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047532325,0.00003671336,0.00004199021,0.00014196624,0.0014063697,0.00019310482,0.000109795226,0.00005856206,0.0000042343254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021474982,0.000012623435,0.0014652024,0.00032451827,0.00022762684,3.4009034e-7,0.007890777,5.792268e-7,3.7703916e-7,0.94573355,0.026998919,0.017324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021246346,0.00004107486,0.019197531,0.005003528,0.00027941962,0.0000075646312,0.04010912,0.000106815416,0.000009864802,0.022797465,0.91015786,0.00016514935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022869057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013901897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9229361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030923813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055899476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56904066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406625474","doi":"10.1017/s0260210524000846","title":"Are Indigenous conceptions of sovereignty as non-interference patriarchal?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Victoria; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Political science; Gender studies; Interference (communication); Sociology; Political economy; Law; Politics; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.05180563313122656,"score_gpt":0.4580190326250609,"score_spread":0.40621339949383434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406625474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042882472,0.38343918,0.0006382452,0.021484166,0.0032094794,0.0011822485,0.00013734798,0.00005991832,0.5469669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5054015,0.4914971,0.00006984031,0.0009862235,0.000048115766,0.0000259511,0.0000027154774,0.0000018158262,0.0019667745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895835,0.00008951553,0.00042187748,0.00012032314,0.00030737426,0.00010257707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812716,0.0002989423,0.00042368387,0.00010910892,0.0010155583,0.000025535877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038386488,0.000076969794,0.00032267818,0.00006273065,0.00018681384,0.00000922304,0.00031253885,0.0000363429,0.0003766838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016283962,0.00006572312,0.00023468198,0.00023877349,0.00034537358,0.00008277693,0.00008898811,0.000094565934,0.00003014942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004927731,0.00063027797,0.040688254,0.006530934,0.003485116,0.0000071291047,0.053722896,0.000012812117,0.0002287208,0.69965667,0.1656515,0.029336402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008290612,0.00014666258,0.022285504,0.06275337,0.00033468174,0.000003753371,0.12708648,0.000011338069,0.00106824,0.032502692,0.75253373,0.0004444618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068391004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019654898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.667154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014242303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015805388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41244236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409377735","doi":"10.1017/s026021052500021x","title":"Strangely inspired: Recovering a neo-Strangean approach to power, authority and knowledge for IPE","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.04009456808818415,"score_gpt":0.32042654701970147,"score_spread":0.2803319789315173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409377735","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071783094,0.5642062,0.00822437,0.011971825,0.0017222145,0.0022708413,0.00004619582,0.00012923652,0.40425086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5622517,0.39728048,0.015512297,0.01513911,0.0018979711,0.00078166527,0.00018853508,0.00007586643,0.0068723834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991774,0.000005733469,0.00032577294,0.00022730458,0.00015011607,0.00011367892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992044,0.00006861108,0.00009488739,0.00008027831,0.00054540887,0.0000064271217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039503057,0.0001406149,0.0003269626,0.0001687637,0.00014470184,0.000045576773,0.00020184681,0.00001849609,0.00002313142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006244628,0.000119965545,0.000077588535,0.00036597476,0.00004094546,0.00022502712,0.00035780336,0.000037784866,0.0000087082235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063963525,0.000296352,0.0145895155,0.04563713,0.0015736625,7.1158803e-7,0.00027544412,0.000010466896,0.00006277015,0.6643725,0.2254123,0.047705173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039309595,0.000016925922,0.023692217,0.004635867,0.00018349507,2.3683918e-7,0.0003651064,0.000102753445,0.000016219132,0.0031404416,0.9672611,0.00019259562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002657912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003855562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74184877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037535003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009257083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48920527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409620229","doi":"10.1017/s0260210525000221","title":"The International Studies Conference, peaceful change, and the transformation of international studies in the United States during the prewar and wartime years","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; International relations; International studies; Economic history; Political economy; Law; History; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10135706822122054,"score_gpt":0.32954047257828195,"score_spread":0.22818340435706141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409620229","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12699611,0.7310777,0.000008678849,0.124923505,0.0016978809,0.0010643458,0.00016362833,0.00001958074,0.014048595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38908154,0.6080836,0.0000040227224,0.0012163265,0.000094696705,0.00015434246,0.000014456015,0.0000032775197,0.0013477035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864805,0.00016227493,0.00057827035,0.00012517902,0.00037816574,0.00010804536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770266,0.0013045094,0.00020944567,0.00011362109,0.0006594264,0.0000103391085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090056827,0.0001373643,0.00033181132,0.0000885786,0.00028404803,0.00005598163,0.0004518469,0.000014766832,0.000015519978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059308065,0.000056258552,0.00008704666,0.00008151088,0.001539166,0.00017324103,0.00020746292,0.00013822365,0.0000012850664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009887822,0.00006124732,0.0007177625,0.0011261443,0.0020639761,0.0000016479082,0.08013477,0.000003540738,0.0000016878364,0.90660626,0.0045796856,0.004604397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011857579,0.00005772598,0.0066169337,0.004537312,0.00018129664,0.0000046761998,0.078867346,0.0006603997,0.000009110256,0.01813866,0.8895861,0.00015471679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001727579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005165474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8884676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069173904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014455267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56711215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416193908","doi":"10.1017/s0260210525101551","title":"Failure-proof or failure-prone? The paradoxes of global biodiversity institutions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Biodiversity; Environmental governance; Focus (optics); Biodiversity conservation; Global governance; Core (optical fiber)","score_opus":0.040784155990083754,"score_gpt":0.31268623441460125,"score_spread":0.2719020784245175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416193908","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34541485,0.21842815,0.000040954186,0.42726254,0.00069999334,0.0014725052,0.0006370983,0.000037509413,0.0060064094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92882895,0.06848902,0.0002668501,0.0021094338,0.000033989672,0.00004693903,0.000033838918,1.1559413e-7,0.00019083389],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993283,0.000043501488,0.00029153135,0.00012608134,0.00013304103,0.00007754144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993279,0.00013568685,0.0001221572,0.000044637796,0.00035717353,0.000012431037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027293546,0.00007710681,0.00022398756,0.000005476632,0.00013923767,0.0000069962207,0.00032733864,0.000024182928,0.0001326822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035846094,0.000022834995,0.00010876353,0.00024484022,0.0002583408,0.00005769207,0.00021011083,0.000039811854,0.000005508032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014425782,0.0005970785,0.32896245,0.005894315,0.0021509058,0.000005239217,0.0002902516,0.000007154909,0.00025882042,0.1654157,0.20056939,0.29570445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009399587,0.00005198998,0.1200236,0.0013359343,0.000048611313,0.000002121008,0.0017240486,6.3909835e-7,0.00037643543,0.0011894882,0.8750693,0.00008379085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008968626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001092896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6744999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000927141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004926841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14527771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416673026","doi":"10.1017/s0260210525101514","title":"Analysing recognition multidirectionally: Canada, United Nations membership, and the Algerian question","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); State (computer science); Resistance (ecology); Process (computing)","score_opus":0.03684401437528586,"score_gpt":0.29175433553912716,"score_spread":0.2549103211638413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416673026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025260423,0.30305618,0.00011174986,0.09573148,0.0022384443,0.0004902128,0.00022098796,0.00004536503,0.59557956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42584747,0.5362819,0.00020247693,0.009322425,0.00044897423,0.00013661988,0.00028380522,0.00001037663,0.027465986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993161,0.00009488574,0.00028824108,0.00008664913,0.0001608843,0.00005324958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998787,0.00044783356,0.00009955895,0.000049014703,0.00060185994,0.000014775449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026241367,0.00006726351,0.00018558545,0.00018578573,0.00023476582,0.000016566006,0.00006895938,0.000009269833,0.00014358269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008826629,0.00004278502,0.00005563661,0.0001817769,0.00023383686,0.0000659356,0.00003028572,0.00005632042,0.0000015963592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010563632,0.000014766942,0.00004429864,0.00046631135,0.00033067772,3.881502e-7,0.00033133588,0.0000011215504,4.5827846e-7,0.9860642,0.008623872,0.004112001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002159935,0.000005248692,0.00018359153,0.0028234068,0.00010283261,7.029404e-7,0.0006383594,0.00031697884,0.0000042183287,0.007093165,0.98855376,0.00006172908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09258235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27158487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011793394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057235662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9134602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}