{"meta":{"query_hash":"47705260249a","filters":{"venue":"Review of Law & Economics"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/47705260249a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Review+of+Law+%26+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W1986908688","doi":"10.1515/1555-5879.1409","title":"Mitigating Judgment Proofness: Information Acquisition vs. Extended Liability","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Law & Economics","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Moral hazard; Credit rationing; Business; Loan; Portfolio; Liability; Limited liability; Ex-ante; Private information retrieval; Information asymmetry; Finance; Economics; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Interest rate; Incentive","score_opus":0.02221182001526822,"score_gpt":0.24712624607561098,"score_spread":0.22491442606034276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986908688","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42104468,0.0018791445,0.4870163,0.015347585,0.0002411143,0.00032019618,0.00049117755,0.00038185585,0.073277995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869338,0.00037801388,0.005447445,0.00027466586,0.00014626565,0.00007969081,0.000029774306,0.000017715749,0.0066926614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958807,0.0022183135,0.00015455656,0.00056389975,0.00055279175,0.0006297119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957358,0.03094135,0.0058094356,0.003043301,0.001318818,0.0015290169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060753706,0.0009948153,0.0021657539,0.0008838519,0.000950629,0.0035720635,0.0026156402,0.0047928304,0.009629732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031306826,0.00073377736,0.0011363492,0.0005686453,0.005514002,0.0059978506,0.0036734792,0.0038437666,0.000816965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035495355,0.0003448155,0.0021505689,0.00027254113,0.00011273351,0.001073432,0.00040747508,0.22283016,0.002332987,0.75074375,0.003634464,0.015742179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025209677,0.00026067146,0.0006335606,0.00006304033,0.000061778584,0.0002606747,0.00008978502,0.4291891,0.0005852927,0.56693286,0.001621455,0.00004976501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017700123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063197874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009629732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018100723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016480923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03221464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590619783","doi":"10.1515/rle-2015-0035","title":"The Economics of Scams","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Law & Economics","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect; Competition (biology); Enforcement; Imperfect competition; Law enforcement; Economics; Business; Computer security; Criminology; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Law; Sociology; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.045098674866337125,"score_gpt":0.3330216901649726,"score_spread":0.28792301529863545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590619783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.316136,0.009539768,0.032407,0.03929849,0.00024693282,0.00011778849,0.000478173,0.0000855401,0.60169035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884885,0.0013692353,0.00045423306,0.0004779051,0.00012414478,0.00002310207,0.00002591722,0.0000066565754,0.009030248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858934,0.00058633444,0.00003515508,0.00011971304,0.0003985711,0.00027096827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948702,0.0020907247,0.0011672439,0.0004981761,0.0008612995,0.00051248894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013803553,0.00017726056,0.00025787263,0.0010370377,0.0010537816,0.00302024,0.00041328598,0.0017631248,0.007931215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006419268,0.00021012098,0.00027211182,0.0006303681,0.004883197,0.0024463476,0.0013965751,0.0013548982,0.00033304945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001945552,0.000030199579,0.0040147356,0.000030558567,0.000021239874,0.00012377897,0.00015315494,0.0069313794,0.00014265512,0.97282076,0.005065262,0.010646929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035989142,0.00009685945,0.018599449,0.00023935067,0.000024634854,0.00033083008,0.0010456322,0.016255198,0.00029941555,0.8870677,0.07597141,0.000033429005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058827577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004080217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007931215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002870951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013637961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02653253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604341886","doi":"10.1515/rle-2015-0015","title":"What Can We Make of Unsubstantiated Child Abuse Reports? A New Approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Law & Economics","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bayesian probability; Psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Child abuse; Econometrics; Criminology; Computer science; Poison control; Economics; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Environmental health; Geography","score_opus":0.05365108985203504,"score_gpt":0.31271578874998773,"score_spread":0.2590646988979527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604341886","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035690594,0.102801114,0.17473726,0.6337233,0.0069423886,0.00023826651,0.0019260636,0.0002633246,0.043677703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78667223,0.08930322,0.053701993,0.04025373,0.020217968,0.00046501536,0.00073360343,0.00021721332,0.008434968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9579736,0.027138878,0.0025907385,0.0041807876,0.0071214307,0.0009945197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7038894,0.23863512,0.014614652,0.01692505,0.023058807,0.002876937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07364414,0.0011712388,0.003001645,0.017755566,0.0035666195,0.01640361,0.0055953404,0.00945055,0.006304095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28791186,0.0019173083,0.001947554,0.0077494886,0.02473194,0.044055123,0.006533165,0.012455265,0.0011152825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023027527,0.00022765412,0.027303599,0.0012839504,0.00074177264,0.0008688509,0.004827624,0.0043641534,0.00026218678,0.72703135,0.026721856,0.20613667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002269744,0.00004349764,0.005174841,0.0014873467,0.00016616835,0.00036106145,0.002121557,0.0053721946,0.00020137556,0.95255727,0.032405704,0.00008619649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01161086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010217491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07364414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007059158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052388413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38947207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614933388","doi":"10.1515/rle-2016-0054","title":"The Selection of Litigation against Government Agencies: Evidence from China","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Law & Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Selection (genetic algorithm); Settlement (finance); China; Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Civil litigation; Relevance (law); Identification (biology); Law; Process (computing); Political science; Business; Economics; Law and economics; Finance; Computer science; Payment","score_opus":0.04661389579998683,"score_gpt":0.2498799181973859,"score_spread":0.20326602239739905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614933388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974298,0.00027462124,0.00015583365,0.00023980638,0.0000053825433,0.000021609925,0.0002456082,0.0000035704338,0.0016238334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991609,0.00013651686,0.000039826846,0.000052199197,0.000011152986,0.000008246621,0.00023921371,0.0000013696256,0.00035057537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935389,0.0014831091,0.00061212276,0.0011154023,0.0022218628,0.0010285735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95903736,0.010189659,0.020834653,0.0024985566,0.0052610226,0.0021786252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063181114,0.00029869168,0.00066799467,0.004337136,0.0019425276,0.001592829,0.0012168492,0.00060153514,0.0034495725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016389336,0.00027309242,0.00071288884,0.0059501072,0.0019670124,0.0008567921,0.0015890041,0.0007304024,0.00032115963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069189315,0.0000868138,0.98546475,0.000058217756,0.00019046298,0.00048109327,0.0019097909,0.00040011163,0.00016455569,0.001498003,0.0009402105,0.008736771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014544587,0.000047136782,0.99692327,0.000015741783,0.000068238674,0.00008086421,0.0007724359,0.00085633877,0.00012894561,0.00021765666,0.0008631242,0.000011512982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1438591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17602223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1438591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003545014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034720928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28604347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256305878","doi":"10.1515/rle-2015-0032","title":"Malice Aforethought","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Law & Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Malice; Deterrence (psychology); Property (philosophy); Criminology; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04006126741161607,"score_gpt":0.24232207662672448,"score_spread":0.20226080921510842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256305878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00660862,0.00800129,0.002746419,0.092179954,0.016638162,0.00006376383,0.0008053754,0.00046997383,0.87248653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060033083,0.0025929033,0.00077652687,0.028189594,0.002318679,0.000050548748,0.00025056436,0.00013339939,0.9056547],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998754,0.0003447602,0.00008052282,0.00021127271,0.0003660355,0.0002434897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983046,0.00047159148,0.00019329744,0.00026310724,0.00051529525,0.0002521502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010342337,0.00047997385,0.0005468378,0.0006444268,0.0036768597,0.0033195538,0.0009513548,0.003174481,0.16648959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005450717,0.00020572986,0.00033328735,0.00040034784,0.00193447,0.0026561513,0.0033168588,0.004437998,0.07072229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047455746,0.000033669363,0.00092728966,0.000120242075,0.00001215156,0.0009136027,0.001438218,0.00012384666,0.00032395788,0.33700624,0.6069886,0.052064747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003620606,0.000010807103,0.00037428288,0.00010945254,0.0000030988479,0.00043132377,0.00031336036,0.000074127915,0.00020124456,0.008709213,0.9897613,0.000008111881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031627228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00635864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16648959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014285096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017653166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55696315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317852402","doi":"10.1515/rle-2021-0033","title":"Increase in Mortality Rates of African-American Women Following Mandatory Arrest Laws: A Study in Unintended Effects","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Law & Economics","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Unintended consequences; Deterrence theory; Law; Officer; Deterrence (psychology); Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0349091035713791,"score_gpt":0.3672787620123839,"score_spread":0.3323696584410048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317852402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998406,0.00036737756,0.000047104353,0.00020814595,0.000014148958,0.000016767695,0.00025549583,0.0000013383315,0.000683595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891555,0.00034073277,0.000036433703,0.000080883445,0.000026247966,0.000023870916,0.00017157155,9.1927456e-7,0.0004038451],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993881,0.0002759838,0.000042620664,0.00006538426,0.00008757411,0.00014025944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793845,0.000372657,0.0010334327,0.00010387609,0.0003286349,0.00022292031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080446946,0.00016159879,0.00017327892,0.00081448036,0.0007116185,0.0004243691,0.00037455666,0.00051463937,0.0019957295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035006977,0.00016795147,0.00037411685,0.00085837254,0.00029150484,0.00038304302,0.0004921422,0.0007674525,0.00033008854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001869625,0.00046363243,0.99113595,0.000044320837,0.0000579148,0.00022301,0.0010050484,0.000028793344,0.00022842376,0.00008547979,0.0004811892,0.0060592634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037370057,0.00030376916,0.9974131,0.000018582885,0.000020961512,0.00010466054,0.0013852231,0.000056171237,0.00013002452,0.00002955111,0.0005300464,0.000004270909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01031839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012217699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01031839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052331854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005273173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020516694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411063445","doi":"10.1515/rle-2024-0041","title":"The Impact of Tax Culture on Tax Rate Structure Preferences: Results from a Vignette Study with Migrants and Non-Migrants in Germany","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Law & Economics","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Vignette; Demographic economics; Economics; Tax rate; Public economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.02424283890420943,"score_gpt":0.2704684298197566,"score_spread":0.2462255909155472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411063445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997433,0.000018803634,0.000023870994,0.000031252133,0.0000011993931,0.00000512293,0.000010963492,3.4115158e-7,0.00016520021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99942005,0.00006792312,0.000099384255,0.00003947732,0.0000016851648,0.000012840877,0.000037801125,9.5249595e-7,0.0003199919],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855655,0.0011484964,0.00004376254,0.00005334641,0.00008170049,0.00011618362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699163,0.0015816452,0.0007125737,0.00014793461,0.00021221557,0.00035382298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028248536,0.00022235147,0.0002609673,0.0006151528,0.0015937657,0.0013498013,0.00027830625,0.0007051263,0.0018880159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007001033,0.0001894179,0.00023657773,0.000646001,0.0009284725,0.0008215327,0.0010523234,0.0009249045,0.00024386423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001577525,0.004568176,0.5125885,0.00029254105,0.00011551931,0.0031913156,0.43768126,0.00097297423,0.0031103378,0.0032708766,0.0023229884,0.030308014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106495165,0.0021602158,0.5247136,0.000102274746,0.000057135607,0.0012380457,0.4618587,0.0011449921,0.0010240597,0.000637068,0.006850407,0.00010696623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053750635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009811615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053750635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010999218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042403652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014939427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}