{"meta":{"query_hash":"3cfee02d323d","filters":{"venue":"Review of Policy Research"},"cohort_total":120,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":120,"exported":120,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3cfee02d323d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Review+of+Policy+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W1487795408","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00477.x","title":"Confronting the Governance Challenges of Developing Nigeria's Extractive Industry: Policy and Performance in the Oil and Gas Sector<sup>1</sup>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Resource curse; Petroleum industry; Revenue; Economics; Economic policy; Oil boom; Sustainability; Natural resource economics; Natural resource; Business; Development economics; Political science; Finance; Market economy; Macroeconomics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.16957895713464233,"score_gpt":0.33761685269895536,"score_spread":0.16803789556431303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487795408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68923026,0.0719432,0.002456503,0.10421072,0.00046038264,0.00009823439,0.00013264698,0.000019561438,0.13144854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97442675,0.02229961,0.0003100829,0.0007128313,0.000053609587,0.000015159426,0.000014222912,0.0000020603698,0.002165603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992962,0.00042237042,0.000025366404,0.00003103869,0.00008689481,0.00013820501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818784,0.0008718586,0.00046444946,0.000026820595,0.00027796376,0.00017109327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019206208,0.0001477456,0.0001796314,0.00043082825,0.0010684971,0.0049343924,0.00024507043,0.0013972451,0.0014909364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002363298,0.00009541973,0.00007436756,0.00090811105,0.0016479533,0.0013581086,0.00084368116,0.0010699526,0.00011153262],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026487623,0.000355414,0.053242058,0.0020680584,0.00007284614,0.0025553715,0.006217099,0.026514545,0.0035163495,0.7623996,0.01870799,0.12408578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011850436,0.00052257587,0.18760042,0.0111918915,0.00019766245,0.00081960065,0.13058485,0.026994657,0.0075017908,0.25126317,0.3830967,0.00010809668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01907026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03157993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01907026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038218067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006823441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037918508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516893061","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00472.x","title":"Inside UN Climate Change Negotiations: The Copenhagen Conference","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Negotiation; Treaty; Political science; Political economy of climate change; Politics; Global governance; Climate change; Climate governance; Corporate governance; Thriving; Political economy; Economy; Economics; Sociology; Geography; Law; Management","score_opus":0.1462436890679437,"score_gpt":0.4367775063790189,"score_spread":0.2905338173110752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516893061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04062423,0.17962052,0.0053972825,0.20847216,0.02769684,0.00015070433,0.0013497068,0.00016313886,0.5365255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78350616,0.045635357,0.0037808092,0.014778909,0.003439527,0.00015299686,0.00061148574,0.00038468506,0.1477101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881484,0.0040509454,0.0005203336,0.0011597628,0.0038314832,0.0022891553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99414635,0.003112389,0.0004893394,0.00033627107,0.00065551733,0.0012602002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014672428,0.0007708428,0.0007426795,0.0009378832,0.007075232,0.019903393,0.0012985355,0.006369175,0.00880496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014814582,0.0008930078,0.0007251463,0.0016996145,0.0063044066,0.006717712,0.007885401,0.008070019,0.0015972119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038054623,0.00012880572,0.0012226732,0.0010763173,0.00007728634,0.0005279612,0.010799762,0.006362284,0.00082283793,0.6065177,0.29680687,0.07527702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020261346,0.000023106018,0.0016927093,0.0006011735,0.000012616624,0.00004014816,0.003545463,0.000321221,0.0005172774,0.023729242,0.9694399,0.000056855035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047604118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062007386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047604118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016666431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023931513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12092394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534128863","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00488.x","title":"Socio‐economic Considerations in Biosafety and Biotechnology Decision Making: The Cartagena Protocol and National Biosafety Frameworks","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Davis; International Development Research Centre; Auburn University; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Biosafety; Scope (computer science); Legislation; Inclusion (mineral); Business; Protocol (science); Political science; Biotechnology; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Biology; Social science; Medicine","score_opus":0.14837621452082284,"score_gpt":0.4341113237279314,"score_spread":0.28573510920710854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534128863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0158869,0.018093461,0.10964591,0.3324278,0.006067913,0.019095348,0.007560471,0.00060321635,0.49061897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17925191,0.023607507,0.44722366,0.11734273,0.0021379788,0.083499804,0.007857654,0.00043481885,0.13864397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.76771635,0.17099547,0.015782585,0.003779976,0.035309788,0.00641572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7464058,0.18548205,0.010837945,0.015440781,0.03869567,0.0031377762],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.24318105,0.0016567041,0.0019055995,0.0063123093,0.008307281,0.014970287,0.006523145,0.0231115,0.009259659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2014319,0.0024192284,0.0022313911,0.009127461,0.013800996,0.011198879,0.007956679,0.01485408,0.0034451887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016712552,0.00015432546,0.0009584759,0.0009510223,0.000035864276,0.00033138998,0.0030159997,0.0018916792,0.0007035298,0.83370423,0.12253383,0.035552528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015658807,0.00016129669,0.0037141657,0.006832784,0.00008240868,0.00021301725,0.0024142298,0.0027507837,0.0016092242,0.21438818,0.7673516,0.00032565772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046672173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05860293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24318105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023344457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.092650786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9332925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535889184","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12113","title":"Assessing Intergovernmental Institutions and Transnational Policy Networks in North American Resource Management: Concluding Remarks","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Regional science; Environmental resource management; Public administration; Business; Environmental planning; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.15455652498323325,"score_gpt":0.4927463781452797,"score_spread":0.33818985316204647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535889184","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062047128,0.6306234,0.009044459,0.23242278,0.002535071,0.00022706865,0.00046706508,0.000050657072,0.062582456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.625019,0.33771738,0.0132632945,0.01569699,0.0020252147,0.00024547262,0.0004475629,0.000029772787,0.0055553894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918498,0.004776887,0.00027382502,0.00057743804,0.0019159935,0.0006060052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520285,0.027183948,0.00368621,0.00093325705,0.014825464,0.0013426072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02854604,0.00082388136,0.0014060517,0.006691653,0.0025442604,0.009232782,0.0025648093,0.0025680477,0.0024666323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03414473,0.00042173266,0.00081417,0.014526737,0.0047895364,0.0071180174,0.0037591974,0.0033561192,0.00017866184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018018305,0.0001959794,0.09946762,0.009611746,0.0012522662,0.0005646791,0.016761098,0.011849503,0.00050828606,0.4597173,0.07722524,0.3226661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062695355,0.00015939101,0.13415919,0.029573405,0.0012802202,0.00015097977,0.14064646,0.009118889,0.00072147703,0.43896753,0.24494751,0.00021221704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34005585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6034026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6599442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018111086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041258782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.676153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539830661","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00480.x","title":"The Contours of “Cap and Trade”: The Evolution of Emissions Trading Systems for Greenhouse Gases","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Emissions trading; Greenhouse gas; Negotiation; Kyoto Protocol; Corporate governance; International trade; Perspective (graphical); Commercial policy; Economics; Climate policy; International economics; Business; Natural resource economics; Political science; Finance; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.4107626649687229,"score_gpt":0.4033376780598844,"score_spread":0.007424986908838471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539830661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5254173,0.0070543434,0.07543078,0.029922573,0.00023305988,0.00008990522,0.00020611152,0.00011269106,0.36153322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962807,0.0004355768,0.0021114775,0.000253967,0.00002759367,0.000011382866,0.000012393385,0.000012556454,0.00085438835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689925,0.0018035704,0.00010406285,0.00039968154,0.00053439994,0.00025902461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604154,0.0021269664,0.0006120713,0.00044458784,0.0006093294,0.00016549607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004658759,0.0001604413,0.00031793377,0.0016129921,0.0016109186,0.010209112,0.0008297611,0.0021637895,0.0033096091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0094674155,0.00023406999,0.00038522648,0.0019802293,0.0127744945,0.0073921527,0.0029301208,0.0024165337,0.0002286913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038746028,0.000014705549,0.0027277116,0.000036265268,0.000015659036,0.00006546494,0.0018928004,0.004036936,0.00070831453,0.9786471,0.00046111655,0.0113550965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001929832,0.000056412668,0.023400376,0.0002549881,0.000024316736,0.00014954463,0.0069853636,0.01400588,0.0016154936,0.8904158,0.06301618,0.00005639863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039943266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027285796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010209112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00662976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021880558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048102558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539905548","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12110","title":"Bilateral and Trilateral Natural Resource and Biodiversity Governance in<scp>N</scp>orth<scp>A</scp>merica: Organizations, Networks, and Inclusion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Technocracy; Bureaucracy; Typology; Corporate governance; Natural resource; Biodiversity; Political science; Environmental governance; Diversity (politics); Environmental resource management; Public administration; Environmental planning; Business; Sociology; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Law","score_opus":0.026837008222683558,"score_gpt":0.29021442595461894,"score_spread":0.2633774177319354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539905548","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024187462,0.8383254,0.001391366,0.037910093,0.0016797737,0.000042361222,0.00016391913,0.000022818193,0.096276894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3073999,0.67009085,0.0015220725,0.003441779,0.0016129032,0.00007503301,0.00025311374,0.000014162766,0.015590232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987796,0.0005072172,0.000071944596,0.0001462433,0.00034727104,0.0001477665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769825,0.00094678544,0.00051129045,0.00011642011,0.0004819446,0.0002453042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017444652,0.0001862405,0.00033154374,0.0021624803,0.0010268335,0.0048318217,0.00043785668,0.0010789689,0.0032355448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017342428,0.00013567891,0.0001671265,0.0055567846,0.003284809,0.0023253474,0.0015564464,0.0010895929,0.00021409486],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054788805,0.00009684074,0.016886514,0.0049120826,0.000091371425,0.0005309467,0.009341945,0.0008322217,0.0005641341,0.43566087,0.09893199,0.43209636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008711595,0.000026253154,0.027239671,0.0058653983,0.000049145303,0.00027257352,0.013542209,0.0002836236,0.00019072085,0.033404265,0.91909885,0.000018525261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04159891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.119797826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044861436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007254902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082713544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550341078","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12074","title":"Civic Hackathons: Innovation, Procurement, or Civic Engagement?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Framing (construction); License; Procurement; Civic engagement; Open government; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Open innovation; Raw data; Private sector; Public administration; Open data; Sociology; Business; Political science; Economics; Marketing; Computer science; Economic growth; Engineering","score_opus":0.3128059596065792,"score_gpt":0.5588870627281234,"score_spread":0.2460811031215442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550341078","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04916056,0.18842126,0.012857914,0.43659964,0.0028199232,0.00011717307,0.00010973055,0.00010644542,0.30980736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8321589,0.123482004,0.0022572312,0.02463077,0.0022371719,0.00015154528,0.00006624647,0.000050729803,0.014965387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.990767,0.005698784,0.0002331016,0.0007964931,0.0013375569,0.0011670602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98125815,0.012264433,0.00233125,0.0010897014,0.0017962952,0.0012602191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007935734,0.0005324091,0.00080936286,0.0030171417,0.003160518,0.0151812835,0.001368613,0.0072602206,0.008341385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0134290885,0.00030488582,0.000553545,0.0050040837,0.033313975,0.016115548,0.005579637,0.0059108953,0.0011178128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015817408,0.000066999106,0.0016879089,0.0006944321,0.000018912551,0.00012503516,0.003504054,0.00037063216,0.00007663976,0.9270274,0.01482154,0.051590674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017031527,0.000049489965,0.0040269494,0.0051653823,0.000019922167,0.00026370984,0.027788872,0.0008838369,0.00032303255,0.6197331,0.34167367,0.000054991135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002550085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027672076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0151812835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068037026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006424717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049364567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558671649","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12028","title":"The <scp>W</scp>orld <scp>B</scp>ank as <scp>K</scp>nowledge <scp>B</scp>ank: Analyzing the Limits of a Legitimate Global Knowledge Actor","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Legitimacy; Dimension (graph theory); State (computer science); Business; Political science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.09631323762348089,"score_gpt":0.4552035316517073,"score_spread":0.3588902940282264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558671649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055344477,0.08391904,0.007828955,0.29216358,0.0016366557,0.00007945965,0.0005257051,0.0000836289,0.5584185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8452711,0.0565352,0.0033399488,0.014399058,0.000382549,0.00012171124,0.0002393933,0.00009703388,0.07961404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966491,0.0017211798,0.00013889692,0.00033676767,0.00069220015,0.00046191676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933461,0.003302904,0.0006813335,0.00031875496,0.0018500439,0.00050088094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003470242,0.00020061318,0.00038854717,0.002309727,0.0038355158,0.016744342,0.0007362078,0.0038873707,0.017211454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068073543,0.0002451894,0.0002590261,0.0032096792,0.0112319235,0.008438486,0.0027280932,0.002731541,0.0014091167],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043360462,0.000024968303,0.0021803116,0.00040484234,0.000019097019,0.00026561605,0.004066944,0.0008363741,0.00022697516,0.85725045,0.09986093,0.034820154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010715179,0.000023220131,0.007025126,0.0031015205,0.00003354603,0.00014136937,0.022425586,0.0016371431,0.00077379594,0.2460189,0.71875477,0.000054263553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068609886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10670815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068609886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0131182335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013623137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13642108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570295576","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12108","title":"Interagency Trust and Communication in the Transboundary Governance of <scp>P</scp>acific Salmon Fisheries","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada; IBM Center for the Business of Government","keywords":"Civil servants; Collective action; Corporate governance; Commission; Social capital; Business; Fishery; Public administration; Political science; Finance; Biology","score_opus":0.07717223280108018,"score_gpt":0.36989724427657256,"score_spread":0.29272501147549235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570295576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62397337,0.2539235,0.005083232,0.025266303,0.00049254147,0.000080497484,0.00016359772,0.000025196785,0.09099177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627858,0.03509262,0.00050512556,0.00036588253,0.00006494312,0.000020888087,0.0000278432,0.000002794334,0.0011341245],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99306196,0.004942561,0.00029252638,0.00037358553,0.00081484194,0.0005145698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97679955,0.01166516,0.0065743523,0.0005637848,0.0032049268,0.0011921957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007504985,0.00016723921,0.00031711673,0.0025302216,0.0014242396,0.004396609,0.0006470414,0.0010324455,0.0036083334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0154972,0.00019111762,0.000269993,0.0035952611,0.0031595614,0.0031703988,0.0019155408,0.0007844327,0.00017208699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022169428,0.00029304757,0.26976618,0.0067277737,0.0009034424,0.0013656424,0.049038213,0.0032853577,0.001121331,0.15664059,0.015667364,0.49496943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036746067,0.00019840882,0.6311909,0.0140416995,0.00046335842,0.00065178296,0.124159336,0.002873814,0.00066444464,0.04462613,0.18096627,0.00012709225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035835814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05600049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035835814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038849823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069090487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07125443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605825163","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12000","title":"Policy Capacity and the Ability to Adapt to Climate Change:<scp>C</scp>anadian and<scp>U</scp>.<scp>S</scp>. Case Studies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Corporate governance; Extant taxon; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Energy sector; Adaptation (eye); Business; Regional science; Public economics; Political science; Environmental resource management; Public administration; Economics; Natural resource economics; Economic growth; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.20546183627720913,"score_gpt":0.4790632424736642,"score_spread":0.2736014061964551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605825163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7142525,0.0118567385,0.002176953,0.030313553,0.000158037,0.00007001289,0.00013375537,0.00002168621,0.24101685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933149,0.0035435923,0.0005746708,0.00033130136,0.000017782744,0.00002842295,0.0000214288,0.0000029588512,0.0021649844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980001,0.0014728167,0.000042222364,0.000112621965,0.0001652059,0.00020696557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605584,0.0027726232,0.0005020191,0.00021712617,0.00031280244,0.00013965079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003424718,0.00013955728,0.00016653554,0.0010206326,0.0025589617,0.003191374,0.0004913997,0.00091969816,0.0032074966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004437543,0.00013510893,0.00020471583,0.0024238199,0.0047874297,0.0024540727,0.0019099452,0.0006950367,0.00013336785],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115352996,0.00045372377,0.14554246,0.0009681841,0.00010534238,0.0017818597,0.05716605,0.006883026,0.0010395295,0.58221,0.028437706,0.17529684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050997707,0.00021699701,0.20646098,0.002795806,0.00011317767,0.0010413046,0.2989502,0.0056774113,0.0016638881,0.112291805,0.37064105,0.000096392716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034302212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0725464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049253656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048304666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06820506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1641945033","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12107","title":"The International Joint Commission, Water Levels, and Transboundary Governance in the <scp>G</scp>reat <scp>L</scp>akes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Corporate governance; Commission; Political science; European commission; European union; Operations research; Business; Engineering; Law; Management; International trade; Economics","score_opus":0.17303171448691454,"score_gpt":0.4249896411147762,"score_spread":0.25195792662786165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1641945033","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05190816,0.6221583,0.0018684487,0.07029708,0.0010686315,0.000017638844,0.000104511535,0.000016479325,0.25256076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7472767,0.2320741,0.0010061241,0.002902963,0.00045543537,0.000026867829,0.00006221469,0.000012819006,0.01618267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833566,0.0008526285,0.00006982225,0.00017800597,0.0003843873,0.00017946967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840766,0.00071878685,0.0003645015,0.000076810014,0.0003035254,0.00012865957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024913338,0.0001761294,0.00024270004,0.0022198395,0.0013241419,0.005428897,0.00032623418,0.0014571283,0.0023575916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024418125,0.00014099975,0.00014935654,0.006086521,0.0067741517,0.0023751175,0.0013981175,0.0012247546,0.00011701347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014681174,0.000021193438,0.0032859794,0.00029153557,0.00002586028,0.00014625535,0.0030411344,0.0008517047,0.000109498535,0.9096312,0.012383452,0.07019754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008576808,0.000033942128,0.021997241,0.0022323716,0.000031814056,0.00012009911,0.01030598,0.00047183767,0.00026207,0.10268878,0.86181545,0.000031839794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054647278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08128413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94535273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006945594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008981078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10865837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1672096170","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12057","title":"Examining the <scp>C</scp> anadian Government's Resistance to Including Socioeconomic Concerns in Genetically Modified Seeds Regulation: A Policy Transfer and Multilevel Approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Policy transfer; Parliament; Competition (biology); Government (linguistics); Typology; Harm; Public economics; Resistance (ecology); Economics; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Public administration; Biology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.17278395375531996,"score_gpt":0.4298490163493949,"score_spread":0.2570650625940749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1672096170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48164573,0.027413806,0.014845057,0.22950694,0.00060322636,0.00030148996,0.00023597645,0.000031794174,0.24541594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866109,0.0041979006,0.002130382,0.00457015,0.00006612733,0.00010944389,0.000016563978,0.000005052735,0.0022936158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895419,0.0073787677,0.00019484201,0.0006090834,0.00143335,0.0008420109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96956015,0.025327677,0.0024850564,0.0006350054,0.001617428,0.00037462715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016672207,0.00014857049,0.00039368725,0.0023975896,0.003937559,0.0070915455,0.0012475877,0.004165979,0.0031783641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018720396,0.00020195048,0.00044791002,0.003526552,0.009344283,0.00313866,0.0036194234,0.003398143,0.000121759156],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044715278,0.00010250522,0.009895108,0.00070064375,0.00010163024,0.0002655114,0.0073599406,0.0029290817,0.00038757522,0.9283258,0.0056213434,0.04426628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102649574,0.00038941458,0.138127,0.007866234,0.00043721593,0.00025643618,0.07577759,0.01952767,0.0023445084,0.48005348,0.27494922,0.00016852416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034276824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066020176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018107112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013298924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13137692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1685667633","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00525.x","title":"The Role of Social Scientists in Accelerating Innovation in Regenerative Medicine","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Regenerative medicine; Field (mathematics); Business; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.32066689357328326,"score_gpt":0.5400983916284168,"score_spread":0.2194314980551335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1685667633","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034558307,0.11499459,0.03664303,0.60598695,0.0030360883,0.00027319958,0.00006427006,0.00006922435,0.20437437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9047931,0.04424755,0.013507372,0.027106907,0.003464756,0.0004254908,0.000020967913,0.000033811157,0.0064000906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91783357,0.06892727,0.0014565703,0.002344401,0.0075421953,0.0018961094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7330633,0.23565526,0.012225279,0.005182184,0.010725657,0.0031483283],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09363635,0.00055827876,0.0008300819,0.005219234,0.003618067,0.011276537,0.0013986476,0.009928331,0.0049516005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07555109,0.0004293392,0.0008178147,0.0022847184,0.039423566,0.008989573,0.008056709,0.004392585,0.0004773183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021692103,0.00004555213,0.0010333644,0.00063468603,0.00003818009,0.00010010747,0.0016570305,0.0010605045,0.00022504534,0.97252065,0.0033335553,0.019329697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046518253,0.00007251127,0.0015884341,0.0015831039,0.000024970814,0.00011005206,0.0025334542,0.0011105848,0.00043861248,0.9276033,0.06485848,0.000030007785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017411661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021423143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99638194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007326755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012942476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49520224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1729052875","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12004","title":"Climate Change Adaptation and Policy Capacity in the Canadian Finance Sector: A Meso Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Climate change; Corporate governance; Adaptation (eye); Climate change adaptation; Policy analysis; Political economy of climate change; Adaptive capacity; Climate policy; Economics; Public economics; Environmental resource management; Business; Regional science; Political science; Finance; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.5108321546268554,"score_gpt":0.3954663454492771,"score_spread":0.11536580917757827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1729052875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8433158,0.0063835173,0.004845544,0.019256396,0.0000756829,0.0001832448,0.0040039555,0.000056652254,0.12187916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99551636,0.0013626098,0.0005911593,0.0001485264,0.000012573916,0.000019731315,0.00025802178,0.000004328777,0.0020866825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891436,0.0001823762,0.000017502613,0.000065909946,0.00029984533,0.0005199798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977112,0.00055741303,0.00020204911,0.00007953338,0.0010172856,0.00043258275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013178224,0.0002549566,0.00041947534,0.0031771134,0.0022910153,0.0034063917,0.0005942494,0.00042077253,0.004456746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037495135,0.00017543432,0.0005637782,0.0048969844,0.0015211565,0.00092522975,0.0017493165,0.00086945354,0.000103283965],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015149829,0.00011809101,0.323922,0.00018501077,0.00035545413,0.00052589783,0.0019912813,0.108883046,0.00070975325,0.50098115,0.020659802,0.04151705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035391968,0.00004228014,0.7388557,0.00038940448,0.0002849981,0.0000717494,0.00912006,0.12060241,0.0004908562,0.05024213,0.07976639,0.00009861451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98211414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98347694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056752913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056752913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057611912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41177315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1830545159","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00537.x","title":"Advances in Biometric Encryption: Taking Privacy by Design from Academic Research to Deployment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Biometric Identification and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Privacy Analytics (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Biometrics; Software deployment; Computer security; Encryption; Computer science; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Key (lock); Context (archaeology); Privacy by Design; Password","score_opus":0.36748250865886833,"score_gpt":0.5532340390646809,"score_spread":0.1857515304058126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1830545159","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014013959,0.4192881,0.21458945,0.2430369,0.0029408208,0.00020641132,0.00013361363,0.0005936997,0.10519706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2864962,0.49428722,0.17842963,0.015728192,0.004732816,0.00042747767,0.00015930543,0.00026215104,0.019477008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893049,0.005057302,0.0009717232,0.0008228885,0.003320551,0.000522595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786309,0.011388463,0.001831768,0.0027319372,0.004712798,0.0007040589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017971981,0.00089275936,0.00088242645,0.0033138206,0.0011742058,0.007329409,0.0017294069,0.0046029105,0.0047437814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02074177,0.0007157735,0.0006513803,0.0031371166,0.0052521303,0.015896065,0.0029362766,0.006251785,0.0022264514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005440852,0.00010434014,0.0013694532,0.0013478063,0.00003471773,0.00018865669,0.00052016584,0.0027824368,0.0021669932,0.6151064,0.014247163,0.36207747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036878413,0.0003896452,0.001779569,0.0033998443,0.00005526431,0.0015112227,0.0013713496,0.011631246,0.009055635,0.40411356,0.56654894,0.00010691282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095347135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006363419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017971981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036682507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028194687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09504604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1847366112","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12002","title":"Assessing Policy Capacity for Climate Change Adaptation: Governance Arrangements, Resource Deployments, and Analytical Skills in<scp>C</scp>anadian Infrastructure Policy Making","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Athabasca University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Adaptation (eye); Corporate governance; Climate change; Business; Policy analysis; Climate change adaptation; Resource (disambiguation); Set (abstract data type); Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Economics; Public administration; Political science; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.1711081032074001,"score_gpt":0.4978718367641782,"score_spread":0.32676373355677807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1847366112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8641082,0.00047431537,0.0029964535,0.008832591,0.000029404448,0.00015594404,0.000072555915,0.00002838828,0.12330224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769825,0.00019392023,0.00087347615,0.00009309515,0.000004592563,0.000033699762,0.000016980375,0.0000026074517,0.0010833422],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995574,0.0026678278,0.00012701709,0.00027824,0.0006165124,0.0007363707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881913,0.0065869293,0.0019004507,0.0006863587,0.001456169,0.0011787593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008458867,0.00016808587,0.0001656283,0.0015574574,0.0031693336,0.0069867373,0.0007350728,0.0008155587,0.0044644447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016466059,0.00024346464,0.00017962369,0.0021697464,0.004750675,0.003516663,0.0046242257,0.0010535847,0.00021941861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016376877,0.0005919075,0.42336214,0.00050545647,0.00009525783,0.0009971826,0.04242969,0.03127156,0.0030760206,0.35610822,0.007137183,0.1342617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055271812,0.0002420303,0.50192463,0.0011817781,0.00005557515,0.000391729,0.22399391,0.03356814,0.0030666543,0.10604813,0.12934846,0.0001236303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032994762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056716107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010452639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021159317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07583958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1857107429","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00562.x","title":"Comparative Climate Change Policy and Federalism: An Overview","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Climate change; Political science; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Climate governance; Collective action; Multi-level governance; Politics; Public administration; Political economy; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.6415822739146815,"score_gpt":0.6412556742447083,"score_spread":0.000326599669973171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1857107429","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002993439,0.9827328,0.0006373481,0.009144686,0.00059448066,0.000004727722,0.00001811262,0.00000774847,0.0065608104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020018434,0.97308445,0.00075128145,0.0034921477,0.0020034744,0.000041433097,0.0000550133,0.000011203821,0.00054252805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919606,0.005319409,0.00039766036,0.00056356634,0.0013701409,0.0003886257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98929614,0.008672666,0.0006532935,0.00028888133,0.000946438,0.0001424934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008815837,0.00056960434,0.002639483,0.010094527,0.0013508777,0.005357525,0.0014284471,0.0045163287,0.0048331493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012553134,0.0005343999,0.0011170305,0.014927426,0.00431817,0.0060244435,0.0024735841,0.0030394401,0.0007045802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000898981,0.000090054265,0.00086905307,0.017204016,0.00031349523,0.000119652555,0.00073782867,0.001741069,0.00030784757,0.6277672,0.05315809,0.2976018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003070212,0.00009907448,0.003960416,0.021703154,0.00015668424,0.00021128471,0.00088584074,0.00061758666,0.00020058441,0.17391677,0.79818267,0.00003518891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070843166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006768488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010094527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071114423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070239175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051597416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883482663","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00564.x","title":"Carbon Taxation and Policy Labeling: Experience from American States and Canadian Provinces","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Association for Canadian Studies in the United States","keywords":"Carbon tax; Greenhouse gas; Politics; Climate policy; Fossil fuel; Economics; Public economics; Face (sociological concept); Natural resource economics; Economic policy; Political science; Sociology; Ecology; Law","score_opus":0.1790354154537329,"score_gpt":0.4050568908987393,"score_spread":0.22602147544500642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1883482663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8411785,0.008157728,0.0005310975,0.020382125,0.0001484981,0.00012504103,0.0009738321,0.000037823,0.12846534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821567,0.0057166866,0.00043748607,0.0014461024,0.000016524775,0.000013277852,0.00025437376,0.00001688509,0.009941983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994822,0.00077617576,0.00011979489,0.00024628628,0.0024937852,0.0015420192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889576,0.0025108887,0.0006045159,0.0002809435,0.006225498,0.0014206511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004824286,0.0002340164,0.0003889168,0.0018423655,0.018806318,0.004545499,0.0012543846,0.0012035077,0.0023339975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011140383,0.00026297945,0.00034050792,0.009113939,0.0038267276,0.0008653278,0.0018302196,0.0018297274,0.00014810711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074971607,0.00049381115,0.29715377,0.0007543513,0.00012584878,0.0022116457,0.23277736,0.0049934983,0.0017340214,0.097276546,0.077303424,0.28442606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006825517,0.00014854227,0.21830827,0.000601532,0.00011980537,0.00041872612,0.21998249,0.0016985876,0.001685112,0.0035109129,0.55322933,0.00022846545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99762636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99843866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16015922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16015922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20442036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9740963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897310778","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00565.x","title":"A Tale of Two Taxes: The Fate of Environmental Tax Reform in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":195,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental tax; Tax reform; Economics; Public economics; Political science","score_opus":0.1899363618446781,"score_gpt":0.3750546729418997,"score_spread":0.1851183110972216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897310778","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17077176,0.060277693,0.0009912119,0.64121324,0.0018940093,0.00015520919,0.0021311967,0.0000894691,0.12247628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9006793,0.03015086,0.0010286686,0.043528378,0.00047539762,0.00005742536,0.0005298479,0.000059293736,0.02349096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904,0.0010514531,0.00021264734,0.00066826906,0.004824384,0.0028432207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752505,0.0031713904,0.0011161478,0.000756055,0.016623426,0.0030825473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074996124,0.00029600368,0.0009029592,0.0034907945,0.010197377,0.009873769,0.0020364725,0.003557747,0.0047686277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022664852,0.0003160061,0.0005403622,0.007192633,0.0070155216,0.0027769317,0.002134685,0.0048570577,0.0002538723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035204453,0.00015336317,0.032591667,0.0005737213,0.00019777253,0.0004685034,0.0035640753,0.0042101056,0.0005944421,0.64334476,0.17894554,0.1350039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036403706,0.00016678535,0.13503328,0.0016065723,0.00048652792,0.00014423569,0.01607853,0.005009557,0.0017192999,0.07312804,0.76583,0.00043321433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2412339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2412339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36898887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88006115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1904050547","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12086","title":"The Role of Institutions and Capital in Intersectoral Collaboration: Infection and Immunity Research and Development Collaboration in <scp>V</scp>ancouver","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Simon Fraser University; Vancouver Coastal Health","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Capital (architecture); Business; Knowledge translation; Health care; Public relations; Economic growth; Knowledge transfer; Political science; Knowledge management; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.31350514064126256,"score_gpt":0.5681635438190275,"score_spread":0.2546584031777649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1904050547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.887171,0.024094058,0.0054050484,0.018972397,0.00012465284,0.0004043599,0.0003196542,0.000023716226,0.063485056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958982,0.0019229015,0.0010121481,0.00033297393,0.00001084655,0.00008927273,0.000027181453,0.000003664946,0.00070296373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9350635,0.05232426,0.0016482394,0.001844655,0.00479844,0.004320849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8761653,0.08635002,0.018092595,0.00380927,0.008495137,0.007087732],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038278185,0.0002626602,0.0010110105,0.0036522837,0.009358547,0.015922425,0.0019112598,0.0012133527,0.00396561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058762603,0.0003826337,0.0003800472,0.0071911216,0.010171794,0.0047992263,0.009393699,0.001412495,0.00015094849],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038135386,0.0003321739,0.39087415,0.0032451113,0.00056029094,0.0009543348,0.2653317,0.0013490571,0.0003913213,0.13432649,0.00492354,0.19733047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007185288,0.00014460148,0.4065808,0.0066533396,0.0003599975,0.00024420646,0.50150067,0.0016019103,0.000524783,0.033938754,0.048281964,0.000097138254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29340515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44461042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9906415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03461216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07502196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58339465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921506045","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00571.x","title":"The Role of Experts in the European Union's Research Policy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"European union; Internationalization; Political science; Field (mathematics); Process (computing); Policy analysis; Science policy; Public administration; Business; International trade; Computer science","score_opus":0.2424825139313559,"score_gpt":0.5732017780320003,"score_spread":0.33071926410064445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921506045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31849062,0.049819577,0.024759963,0.21538371,0.0011961918,0.00030289785,0.00011440237,0.00007332058,0.3898594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982263,0.005067361,0.0024163881,0.005615976,0.0002807803,0.000099086785,0.000018174056,0.000011927501,0.004227209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8680127,0.105574384,0.0032885803,0.0053244526,0.009856078,0.007943787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77972496,0.192546,0.008230506,0.004519299,0.00840675,0.0065725194],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12714593,0.00038448538,0.001010607,0.004758202,0.006444633,0.013528884,0.0018666879,0.010569371,0.003349933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.112379014,0.00048235955,0.00046137272,0.0043251296,0.015798694,0.008629436,0.009365574,0.0041617006,0.00029531168],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019282672,0.00014667245,0.007981929,0.000616345,0.000071590366,0.000496532,0.0149150025,0.0038552734,0.00055099843,0.88509965,0.0074798954,0.07859334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001761433,0.00024216772,0.020102093,0.0044500446,0.00011342532,0.00041492248,0.031216988,0.0038271432,0.0013362214,0.63525754,0.30270767,0.00015554334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005726472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004187484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87285405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01048634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017641323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926541814","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12053","title":"The Inclusion of Nonsafety Criteria within the Regulatory Framework of Agricultural Biotechnology: Exploring Factors that Are Likely to Influence Policy Transfer","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Coercion (linguistics); Agricultural biotechnology; Incentive; Competition (biology); Agriculture; Process (computing); Politics; Public economics; Inclusion (mineral); Biotechnology; Business; Economics; Political science; Sociology; Biology; Law; Social science; Market economy; Ecology","score_opus":0.11787545492134752,"score_gpt":0.3700428058849692,"score_spread":0.25216735096362164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1926541814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5818833,0.02704661,0.051061664,0.097984426,0.00039569472,0.00062351866,0.00017687374,0.00004891786,0.24077898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99397224,0.0023649174,0.0014283934,0.0013828386,0.00007009565,0.00009736525,0.000011323702,0.0000072097982,0.0006656211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91860974,0.057387564,0.0028151101,0.003697214,0.0123146195,0.005175788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67462647,0.27390593,0.03523943,0.004141731,0.010698664,0.0013877613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06779163,0.00039206457,0.0009965161,0.0028894888,0.0025892202,0.010446481,0.0022503105,0.004654295,0.004747892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14304703,0.00043774443,0.0008606509,0.003307323,0.012257209,0.007916417,0.00427779,0.0050569554,0.00026725847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021434843,0.00040189966,0.027682412,0.0014481889,0.00023761102,0.0007830993,0.0066644712,0.006724105,0.0016322117,0.8872833,0.0014695426,0.06545877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015427597,0.00051914435,0.103661,0.0041561285,0.00058704225,0.00038577913,0.025725093,0.008601504,0.006117322,0.7824772,0.06740671,0.00020872563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049981424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041215485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06779163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009505581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010384932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3585207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933418130","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12003","title":"Dispersed Capacity and Weak Coordination: The Challenge of Climate Change Adaptation in<scp>C</scp>anada's Forest Policy Sector","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptation (eye); Climate change; Business; Climate change adaptation; Environmental resource management; National forest; Resource (disambiguation); Public administration; Economics; Political science; Forestry; Geography; Ecology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09504134009362822,"score_gpt":0.3506825431747595,"score_spread":0.25564120308113125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933418130","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13641298,0.15378366,0.005297001,0.4646812,0.0012161544,0.00012418895,0.0001710514,0.000085068095,0.23822871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367236,0.04237133,0.0012822829,0.01064757,0.0005912769,0.000067867564,0.00005043826,0.000018454079,0.008247263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942756,0.0028187449,0.00014813432,0.00046336232,0.0013094862,0.0009845806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861829,0.0065896614,0.0017846217,0.0005748805,0.0030666052,0.0018013138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010073935,0.00015054042,0.0003598258,0.0016165437,0.004266824,0.011544871,0.001567517,0.0022652014,0.003241178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009244592,0.00023984733,0.00020038876,0.0030300163,0.008558104,0.004328049,0.0035563987,0.0026157694,0.0002473682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006879782,0.00015863938,0.010016981,0.001387694,0.000092503265,0.0005303123,0.0069174105,0.004722609,0.0010950754,0.7412334,0.054173548,0.17960303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007112697,0.00009048874,0.031756897,0.0024558038,0.000046320776,0.00019608896,0.028126098,0.0021929122,0.00070347445,0.24404456,0.6902468,0.000069519476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1160538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15831749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019578824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03850312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23075658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1962573975","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00494.x","title":"Public Managers as the Missing Variable in Policy Studies: An Empirical Investigation Using Canadian Data","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Public policy; Public administration; Conceptual framework; Subject (documents); Empirical research; Policy making; Political science; Affect (linguistics); Policy analysis; Public relations; Public economics; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.85832264097383,"score_gpt":0.6419960300804769,"score_spread":0.21632661089335314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1962573975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96147436,0.005158006,0.003482543,0.0083644455,0.000074756164,0.000384335,0.0097570475,0.00003879124,0.011265757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99136096,0.0014213318,0.0026334438,0.00045334097,0.00003157605,0.00018899901,0.0026398976,0.000015676243,0.0012548479],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97157425,0.011426834,0.0015317101,0.002500268,0.009749717,0.0032172056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73653007,0.1836624,0.037876017,0.00894854,0.026910333,0.006072598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03760904,0.00041304354,0.0010961608,0.0064860997,0.008640444,0.005884552,0.003495266,0.0016177762,0.0043737814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20029746,0.0006929804,0.00054090435,0.029339202,0.0040194667,0.0028156813,0.0032280965,0.0026735135,0.00027947515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016926209,0.00017498263,0.9426275,0.00038040086,0.000117587515,0.000296796,0.012511942,0.0015250887,0.00007037675,0.014439029,0.008331904,0.0193552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075214695,0.000100052544,0.90213937,0.001193984,0.00028017245,0.00019620599,0.049310144,0.010113495,0.0004420023,0.0038081948,0.032222185,0.000118994285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97586423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9777425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045733638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045733638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08042289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33182234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965172011","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00522.x","title":"Governing Climate Change – By Harriet Bulkeley and Peter Newell; Making Climate Change Work for Us: European Perspectives on Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies – Edited by Mike Hulme and Henry Neufeldt","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"demographic modeling and climate adaptation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Adaptation (eye); Work (physics); Climate change adaptation; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Engineering; Psychology; Oceanography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3687313615273331,"score_gpt":0.46601227312712906,"score_spread":0.09728091159979596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965172011","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022524194,0.91142184,0.0015305595,0.044382963,0.012816281,0.00003441449,0.00028915075,0.00007976102,0.029219821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007867277,0.7505513,0.0034315023,0.015137808,0.006776651,0.00014946121,0.0006003009,0.00032332193,0.21516237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833435,0.00039196518,0.00009244818,0.0003806573,0.00066579325,0.00013482338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878055,0.00060326717,0.00014472847,0.00006377525,0.0002623187,0.00014537822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018111322,0.002718364,0.0015204288,0.0022828488,0.0018591707,0.0061141574,0.0016626241,0.0042146053,0.024797685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033254183,0.0012693476,0.00078421895,0.004465725,0.003668263,0.009523641,0.0032365308,0.006988852,0.015248084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001607847,0.00002006578,0.000051265128,0.0005592578,0.0000144067935,0.000034377037,0.0006704105,0.00017087498,0.00015817932,0.012379665,0.9209369,0.0649884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003076831,0.000003975849,0.00018035583,0.0006275951,0.0000035280684,0.000053217736,0.00022045836,0.000038010374,0.000069171976,0.0065997825,0.9921915,0.00000926105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017110616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025713326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024797685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004266289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005578589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08295649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972647489","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12071","title":"The Power of Narrative in Environmental Networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 240 pages. ISBN: 9780262519571, $22.00 paperback. by RaulLejano, MrillIngram, and HelenIngram, 2013.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Citation; Power (physics); Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Literature; Physics","score_opus":0.02474671107870554,"score_gpt":0.3169901095194232,"score_spread":0.29224339844071767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972647489","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016171144,0.7375329,0.009994443,0.028155738,0.0011140035,0.000028505285,0.00069752295,0.00045092148,0.22040881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1276175,0.6915032,0.016777238,0.0049237465,0.0026631092,0.00051920285,0.0011268257,0.00043076076,0.15443848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889404,0.00056047266,0.00009499206,0.00016479312,0.00020628964,0.000079468504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953361,0.0035371112,0.0003409941,0.00029636422,0.00028925334,0.00020009949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016059445,0.0015434097,0.001528721,0.003821629,0.0015692045,0.007500706,0.0014572934,0.0027970965,0.03724806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049744514,0.0016840871,0.00060672505,0.00534113,0.0085401265,0.01899625,0.0021815586,0.0025740748,0.007684684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003779863,0.000036615642,0.0007311126,0.002316685,0.00007764427,0.00029676832,0.0046768454,0.0023330888,0.00021165301,0.46690762,0.33856624,0.18380797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013376922,0.000009726563,0.0011932286,0.0013567016,0.000028690109,0.00024244767,0.0021243999,0.0005858293,0.000100164114,0.40332356,0.59099936,0.00002239606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008586671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01738683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03724806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039298823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002537839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124607146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973227185","doi":"10.1046/j.1541-1338.2003.00040.x","title":"Science Teacher Education: From a Fractured System to a Seamless Continuum","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hatch (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); State (computer science); Mathematics education; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.27284722719860116,"score_gpt":0.5862059719621865,"score_spread":0.31335874476358533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973227185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33536875,0.011157776,0.099780984,0.27718,0.00077258,0.0002620844,0.00057855016,0.0008737496,0.2740256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840216,0.0010567888,0.0102130035,0.0016138203,0.000048115788,0.000099370365,0.000072585004,0.0000263184,0.0028484059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865801,0.0073416033,0.0007018684,0.0011861012,0.0030956957,0.001094601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99112016,0.003252771,0.0010583617,0.0011529293,0.0020300043,0.001385756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008752381,0.00019171387,0.00047036327,0.0047082785,0.006075051,0.018793445,0.0021029746,0.0031577686,0.0053057615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0148689775,0.0005529156,0.00044402806,0.0052261287,0.026128573,0.01529193,0.012988977,0.0044615255,0.000913892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002840201,0.000052866162,0.0041794884,0.00009760906,0.000008665527,0.00009352069,0.005751605,0.0010748606,0.00011162155,0.9600987,0.0038712583,0.024631387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004312788,0.00007556657,0.0051178345,0.00031284933,0.00001021087,0.00019779522,0.01957303,0.004073188,0.00013509949,0.91750735,0.052915476,0.000038540747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007848549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055473573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018793445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013189143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011388676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09569436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973903001","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00465.x","title":"The Politics of Climate Change: A Survey - Edited by M.T. Boykoff
Environmental Change and Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice - Edited by P.G. Harris
Climate Change and Foreign Policy: Case Studies from East to West - Edited by P.G. Harris","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Politics; Kyoto Protocol; Foreign policy; Environmental politics; Greenhouse gas; Political science; Global warming; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.21576309279005282,"score_gpt":0.39881826583419183,"score_spread":0.183055173044139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973903001","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024586995,0.96984977,0.0004027774,0.010524427,0.0016230722,0.000025472073,0.0013379521,0.000044816465,0.013733117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010645854,0.9693615,0.0006065249,0.0021213372,0.00064055255,0.00003603055,0.0013750473,0.000056855366,0.015156233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992188,0.00017135772,0.00010698991,0.00012649425,0.00027485762,0.00010151361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998365,0.00075020886,0.00017087087,0.000065369415,0.00048097275,0.0001676516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012577585,0.0012321332,0.0012630112,0.0037753615,0.00084850146,0.0038907938,0.00085794117,0.00248856,0.013377874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002237277,0.0010713985,0.0005665751,0.015326009,0.0011154653,0.0076332972,0.0018901925,0.002351373,0.0068432367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048702193,0.000063141735,0.0030661493,0.004215636,0.000030657735,0.00016343706,0.0030140062,0.00063798233,0.00037327368,0.0064689144,0.68452775,0.29739043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049538853,0.000028605955,0.010668744,0.004427806,0.000010740859,0.0003445087,0.0026523005,0.00008467173,0.00008249699,0.0020231318,0.9796444,0.000027541579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026198715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03805105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026198715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028591484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039560874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052092433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975230713","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00228.x","title":"TESTING ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS OF CAPITAL CONTROL LIBERALIZATION*","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Liberalization; Government (linguistics); Capital control; Capital (architecture); Context (archaeology); Ideology; Capital account; Control (management); Public economics; International economics; Macroeconomics; Economic system; Capital flows; Market economy; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.20853896090952748,"score_gpt":0.38389296813378226,"score_spread":0.1753540072242548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975230713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736278,0.0008064297,0.0032644772,0.0048712105,0.00005410605,0.00003318305,0.0006663354,0.00003576615,0.016640643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993888,0.000097142794,0.00014452467,0.00007193626,0.000016982664,0.0000067310957,0.00010025569,0.0000013099921,0.00017220754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582505,0.002224299,0.00024825384,0.00070934795,0.0005005023,0.0004925736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9045575,0.062099133,0.02659205,0.0034694332,0.0023169888,0.00096487906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074489336,0.00029659376,0.0004977069,0.0016682143,0.0005256773,0.0020375592,0.0007762223,0.00092313,0.0076267263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040567234,0.00016271314,0.00065450545,0.0021934165,0.0025249813,0.0015911069,0.0015309411,0.0011319758,0.00022454649],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008813335,0.00015503129,0.899263,0.00020579365,0.00056899316,0.0005884212,0.0017426108,0.010447172,0.0002384754,0.061768048,0.0018478547,0.02229321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034926273,0.0005105657,0.7706848,0.00020044578,0.00062378414,0.00035875643,0.013031612,0.05816756,0.002774031,0.14260527,0.010623203,0.000070810536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011029809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008303593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011029809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021300167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014740307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03939414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977858354","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00297.x","title":"TILTING TOWARD MARKETIZATION: Reform of the Canadian Pension Plan","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Marketization; Social security; Government (linguistics); Earnings; Context (archaeology); Income Support; Allowance (engineering); Investment (military); Economics; Liability; Business; Public economics; Labour economics; Finance; Political science; China; Market economy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.21494224305986798,"score_gpt":0.44258798500328184,"score_spread":0.22764574194341386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977858354","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085904725,0.18459581,0.0014724893,0.45417118,0.0017441126,0.00023245033,0.0008111244,0.00007977796,0.27098826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84601325,0.104367696,0.002215261,0.01726963,0.00077693816,0.00006500882,0.00026528846,0.00002320998,0.029003661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940387,0.0008107154,0.00013087466,0.00025683685,0.0031833083,0.001579628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945028,0.00063653867,0.00029013678,0.00012678125,0.0036373525,0.0008063961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005878343,0.0002627624,0.00031966926,0.0037668806,0.0051257205,0.005997961,0.0012773412,0.0016162504,0.0031496182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008501599,0.00017436319,0.00029075262,0.005390892,0.005196618,0.0014496269,0.0014122059,0.0014894891,0.00013229593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007169403,0.000055221182,0.006037254,0.00078724907,0.00003289248,0.00022020789,0.0056286165,0.002898371,0.00056321576,0.6983383,0.10273751,0.18262953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007582272,0.00007505951,0.044721633,0.0013585478,0.00006508888,0.00008139868,0.008873486,0.0018226162,0.00078105886,0.027181378,0.9148672,0.00009665853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99087137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1839136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1839136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29451963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9465445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977933947","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00446_1.x","title":"Transatlantic Environment and Energy Politics: Comparative and International Perspectives – Edited by Miranda A. Schreurs, Henrik Selin, and Stacy D. VanDeveer","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Energy (signal processing); Sociology; Media studies; Political economy; Economic history; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.1324103334202961,"score_gpt":0.3786391035723303,"score_spread":0.24622877015203423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977933947","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040916537,0.9550971,0.00028855543,0.011520926,0.0024052993,0.0000036063855,0.000062981206,0.0000138295145,0.030198475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014641094,0.9361989,0.00074593554,0.0032903824,0.002897582,0.000022594815,0.0002067165,0.00006673479,0.041930128],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936086,0.00024296314,0.000036922822,0.00009751776,0.00017522088,0.000086524415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992132,0.0004455731,0.00007718478,0.000037835678,0.00013774262,0.000088450935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011878597,0.0019128607,0.0012855595,0.0028322146,0.0015742343,0.006604312,0.0010954234,0.003511937,0.023907432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013642755,0.0010020904,0.0006369891,0.008409688,0.002919133,0.00882263,0.0026147983,0.0040422087,0.006202215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005866194,0.000077437675,0.00073017075,0.0024187185,0.00005948166,0.00026911066,0.0058327653,0.00053879095,0.0005129437,0.1251267,0.6807132,0.18366201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005778424,0.000012583813,0.001307607,0.0019896685,0.00001057159,0.0003526084,0.002438594,0.00007282268,0.00006592534,0.022544136,0.9711883,0.00001140495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0087200105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0152375335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023907432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025866036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029561862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07997829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981081566","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00425.x","title":"The Limits and Opportunities of Networks: Municipalities and Canadian Climate Change Policy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Politics; Corporate governance; Political science; Collective action; National Policy; Public administration; Political economy of climate change; Action (physics); Economics","score_opus":0.3328283058154319,"score_gpt":0.5069907018077751,"score_spread":0.17416239599234318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981081566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34658408,0.03400858,0.0040335087,0.15765527,0.0002843952,0.000115838964,0.0008821869,0.00006603246,0.4563701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867012,0.007896466,0.00053012586,0.0008450138,0.000036432117,0.000021710817,0.00006300641,0.000008315843,0.0038977172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942545,0.0018225354,0.00011845341,0.00042831345,0.0014609268,0.001915296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98717076,0.0048729945,0.0013324681,0.00043262925,0.0043016206,0.0018894911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062053227,0.00025066524,0.00047878327,0.0030832507,0.012176357,0.009197912,0.0013856131,0.0012535391,0.007874557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018883644,0.0002843853,0.0003124728,0.006288555,0.0094930455,0.003942762,0.005045256,0.0013236918,0.0001750188],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010487878,0.000035833804,0.0289742,0.0005857937,0.00005523668,0.00025237503,0.020284595,0.0050212243,0.00016141083,0.82130164,0.015517448,0.10770545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068023066,0.00006545676,0.12624827,0.003101242,0.00022363296,0.0001569825,0.10217042,0.007901764,0.0005184295,0.26986068,0.48951888,0.00016614758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97895354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12440929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12440929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13125059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9026568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983524894","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00106.x","title":"Regulating Finance: Who Rules, Whose Rules?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Finance; State (computer science); Power (physics); Process (computing); Liberalization; Economic system; Market economy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06039097049471589,"score_gpt":0.36859588619835365,"score_spread":0.3082049157036378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983524894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10967138,0.021053215,0.07791891,0.34111702,0.001052585,0.00013537885,0.00033310783,0.00014979257,0.44856855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774039,0.005580222,0.0024787057,0.006345865,0.00040878195,0.00005574817,0.00004642749,0.000024043302,0.00765637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936515,0.0037642617,0.00021324275,0.00077410997,0.0010894256,0.0005075113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915951,0.0049268333,0.001188465,0.00070830283,0.0011859572,0.00039538616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009338753,0.00019714158,0.00046364762,0.0011277061,0.0014215615,0.011216862,0.00068917073,0.0025590067,0.002784838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011925378,0.00021581214,0.00024313873,0.0012942521,0.017431332,0.006513619,0.0018001709,0.0033596586,0.00041048936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004171465,0.000015084441,0.0010454216,0.000027198721,0.000005855623,0.000018668625,0.0007593478,0.0005664812,0.00008654558,0.98748857,0.0026841834,0.007298326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009060236,0.000010290325,0.001726489,0.00021120528,0.000007916781,0.000022181046,0.0016936029,0.0014332077,0.00033114132,0.9387575,0.055782225,0.000015190691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006318809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004362701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011216862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005000804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050722803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049388647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995569612","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00390.x","title":"Trans‐System Social Ruptures: Exploring Issues of Vulnerability and Resiliency<sup>1</sup>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Social vulnerability; Focus (optics); Sociology; Psychological resilience; Political science; Political economy; Social system; Economic system; Positive economics; Economics; Social science; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.17765926936516868,"score_gpt":0.4895397499448452,"score_spread":0.31188048057967654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995569612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38514927,0.054917384,0.05018335,0.20909993,0.0017751053,0.0002108449,0.00042326775,0.00010348424,0.29813725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881848,0.007124734,0.001324035,0.0010534998,0.00017120656,0.000055440276,0.00003669197,0.000009496941,0.0020401212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689037,0.002265453,0.00009253323,0.00016100371,0.00029281346,0.00029777485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925995,0.00528442,0.0009621194,0.00028980864,0.00052147795,0.0003427472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004231469,0.00034546867,0.0004916935,0.0018893424,0.003597819,0.0075408574,0.0010361228,0.002492019,0.0047880067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073544374,0.0001640235,0.0005533598,0.0025878453,0.01681579,0.0075909225,0.006787174,0.0027828405,0.00022704553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036791982,0.000034841454,0.008769477,0.00041812717,0.000035284815,0.0008562799,0.04514568,0.0024554553,0.00028519562,0.9089654,0.006986514,0.02601092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007778209,0.00007444011,0.01484087,0.0011121589,0.000031355,0.00097062427,0.25083393,0.0040201345,0.0004286495,0.6288906,0.09873431,0.00005514085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005407715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006862848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075408574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004774964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036081586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0346449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004107264","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00209.x","title":"How Big Is a Policy Network? An Assessment Utilizing Data From Canadian Royal Commissions 1970–2000","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Consistency (knowledge bases); Metaphor; Work (physics); Replication (statistics); Estimation; Computer science; Big data; Management science; Sociology; Operations research; Political science; Data science; Epistemology; Economics; Management; Data mining; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.3425485529370437,"score_gpt":0.5675117602292045,"score_spread":0.22496320729216074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004107264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90688694,0.0029805826,0.0027503166,0.005937161,0.000036194277,0.00024315395,0.023907496,0.000085397,0.05717274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920339,0.0011924953,0.0011168598,0.000079284095,0.000009665441,0.00004805802,0.0034602587,0.0000143045,0.002045223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99409866,0.000979601,0.00029428894,0.00054370455,0.0032260083,0.0008578328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9545716,0.012897553,0.005962815,0.0016121934,0.021856073,0.00309985],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008806358,0.00027817945,0.0006465698,0.012237091,0.004536782,0.005351613,0.0016642816,0.00071814336,0.0037161328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056550678,0.00033335315,0.00030815587,0.036686003,0.0025973173,0.002975505,0.0020954201,0.0009741371,0.0002385806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016785413,0.00006224977,0.799332,0.00048799376,0.00021004552,0.00027208208,0.017717019,0.016792703,0.00023202648,0.06975792,0.025219763,0.06974838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009990381,0.000028013532,0.93478703,0.00022507587,0.00009382325,0.00005709879,0.015190384,0.011218871,0.00023017223,0.0037648964,0.034334775,0.00005977617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99124056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09388577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05235408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68119216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004475956","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00273.x","title":"Culture without the State? Reinvigorating Ukrainian Culture with Diasporic Efforts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Diaspora, migration, transnational identity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diaspora; Ukrainian; State (computer science); Cultural policy; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.07835465759076891,"score_gpt":0.48615780799506997,"score_spread":0.40780315040430104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004475956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8325025,0.014978392,0.0027860217,0.019631727,0.00020436349,0.000058433252,0.000036509766,0.00003019457,0.12977187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952166,0.0029981108,0.00033228687,0.00034190607,0.0000107018595,0.0000147127,0.000004914925,0.0000023095797,0.001078576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652797,0.002589404,0.00010749212,0.00012572017,0.00022077224,0.00042869465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978282,0.0008722201,0.0005483351,0.0002502859,0.00024742493,0.00025349934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049786214,0.00017194642,0.0002929466,0.0008289017,0.0030274447,0.0052990867,0.000568684,0.00061756984,0.0015947395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00416683,0.00009223395,0.00017798512,0.0014582332,0.0067985714,0.002931291,0.0059268395,0.00079981075,0.00014385273],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010122551,0.00025346174,0.038122207,0.0013710428,0.000108320775,0.0010957689,0.2338388,0.0007413328,0.001865608,0.51850706,0.0036604789,0.20033468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002398278,0.00025227948,0.05536993,0.0023736223,0.00010818597,0.00063991087,0.6308122,0.0006079414,0.0029381767,0.04847935,0.2583585,0.000035893194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076485123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015725017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076485123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033393183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077144625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026329815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009383502","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00265.x","title":"TRANSPORTATION AT THE MILLENNIUM: In Search of a Megaproject Lens","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Megaproject; Activity-based costing; Context (archaeology); Profiling (computer programming); Task (project management); Regional science; Business; Economics; Computer science; Marketing; Sociology; Geography; Management; Archaeology","score_opus":0.45010860330191493,"score_gpt":0.5330628042613572,"score_spread":0.08295420095944228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009383502","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052842524,0.34635302,0.024184851,0.3929245,0.0033345518,0.000066133434,0.0007292467,0.000099815086,0.17946531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7099376,0.23970516,0.014017969,0.016864786,0.0025474709,0.000280989,0.0003214944,0.00010353731,0.016221002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734664,0.0018923351,0.00008522355,0.00014838991,0.00040803707,0.0001192757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953738,0.0022973465,0.00051501615,0.00021076038,0.0011082174,0.0004948684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048191426,0.00048676576,0.0004261989,0.008831876,0.0019310004,0.009691785,0.0011431337,0.0019000075,0.005603444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073169675,0.00030294913,0.00027077924,0.009451612,0.0059640277,0.0108870715,0.003764657,0.0037470954,0.0003850673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018952442,0.000019113517,0.0019868128,0.00039718352,0.000020968202,0.000115623,0.0030654976,0.0007911468,0.00007778694,0.9222483,0.025301557,0.045956988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009196467,0.000054168035,0.011346865,0.0028462077,0.000038851882,0.00022070133,0.03019613,0.0015474628,0.00015207427,0.33932725,0.6142283,0.000032823067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013120401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02658534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013120401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009456506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055075735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06861204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016711156","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00223.x","title":"Child Care Subsidies and Employment Behavior Among Very‐Low‐Income Populations in Three States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Subsidy; Welfare; Quarter (Canadian coin); Earnings; Welfare reform; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economics; Work (physics); Spell; Child care; Income Support; Single mothers; Psychology; Finance; Medicine; Sociology; Accounting","score_opus":0.09718968068876964,"score_gpt":0.45433444096140524,"score_spread":0.3571447602726356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016711156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994974,0.000072706025,0.000046276196,0.00003321985,0.0000011842626,0.000005069301,0.00021763779,0.0000011140746,0.00012538128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999506,0.00006569438,0.000049049195,0.000017538918,0.0000017510066,0.000010130517,0.00028944563,3.922577e-7,0.00005991578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990761,0.00045910882,0.000059424736,0.0001087403,0.00012455788,0.00017198267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685246,0.0008534124,0.0016263261,0.000120343604,0.00025648708,0.00029096848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015018471,0.00012146461,0.00029726556,0.0011226166,0.0007221874,0.0007882073,0.0004222997,0.00034106168,0.0009179206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035253628,0.00020715693,0.0004658876,0.0016760597,0.00044565002,0.00024950667,0.0009023744,0.0005237754,0.00008317697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041669213,0.00006759131,0.9976993,0.000006768146,0.000062166335,0.0000121467565,0.00026757806,0.00011028872,0.00007283843,0.000072372015,0.00011725749,0.0014700507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035640908,0.000034445777,0.99897814,0.00000670146,0.000033194236,0.000008740683,0.0005841113,0.00017126056,0.00003876819,0.000023768687,0.000115425515,0.0000019946099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.107773796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1788286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107773796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00099164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091023213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21429294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023569675","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00197.x","title":"Considering Knowledge Uptake within a Cycle of Transforming Data, Information, and Knowledge","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo; Canadian Water Network","keywords":"Knowledge management; Realm; Mandate; Heuristic; Computer science; Business; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0886709696056273,"score_gpt":0.4114040458666199,"score_spread":0.32273307626099257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023569675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5632884,0.0018616581,0.22579049,0.029851502,0.000112642665,0.001130989,0.000109165565,0.0001665497,0.17768864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848145,0.00019073198,0.013409854,0.00022382174,0.000014668912,0.00015480159,0.0000228942,0.00001351473,0.001155045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9669962,0.021441104,0.0013037401,0.0020042157,0.005203465,0.0030511916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9071119,0.07089925,0.006870034,0.0056859716,0.0071140593,0.0023187858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028114056,0.00048196706,0.0007369849,0.0034663314,0.0053202286,0.017789703,0.00212467,0.006554294,0.0034204472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06655255,0.0008064389,0.00073665805,0.0027661116,0.022085872,0.02082987,0.007881399,0.0033576633,0.0003527566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001289316,0.00027695845,0.014680383,0.00026286172,0.0000629439,0.0014790163,0.031578835,0.010070127,0.0012271225,0.886479,0.0007697632,0.052984025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045302102,0.00024979256,0.0054790257,0.00038679127,0.000056332618,0.00042161,0.03715467,0.026332412,0.003206172,0.8996385,0.026941786,0.00008767431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006505666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042773797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028114056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013942625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012527148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14868307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024103874","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00378.x","title":"The Power of Pills: Social, Ethical and Legal Issues in Drug Development, Marketing and Pricing – By Jillian Clare Cohen, Patricia Illingworth, and Udo Schuklenk","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pill; Drug pricing; Politics; Political science; Power (physics); Ethical issues; Medicine; Business; Law; Pharmacology; Engineering; Engineering ethics","score_opus":0.07567575780615235,"score_gpt":0.41578370577721196,"score_spread":0.3401079479710596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024103874","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028711895,0.72984385,0.0009024645,0.22788323,0.01652769,0.00004106111,0.000051695853,0.00005772245,0.024405112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015215633,0.73668194,0.0027400733,0.07073485,0.03818385,0.00014252486,0.0001286716,0.00022109423,0.13595141],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943105,0.0020114211,0.00034508633,0.00067355606,0.00235128,0.00030812534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932247,0.004296888,0.0006317734,0.0002647755,0.0009984473,0.0005833609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006414285,0.0021896763,0.0012696553,0.0017497452,0.0018477399,0.008465957,0.0019800663,0.0066759125,0.012314333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008128936,0.0012276769,0.00071053964,0.0023800987,0.009868718,0.015504411,0.0034092665,0.013935377,0.0073665613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003143336,0.000027071781,0.00007590949,0.0005288553,0.00001741611,0.000053702366,0.000828866,0.00011632202,0.0001963173,0.027056815,0.8950725,0.07599477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009816168,0.00002439299,0.00022699944,0.0009834806,0.0000042369343,0.00017503076,0.000423548,0.00012932744,0.0000788323,0.017513778,0.9804125,0.000018107321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004579695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005750786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012314333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037219066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005014167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04119551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026372297","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00585_2.x","title":"Carbon Coalitions: Business, Climate Politics, and the Rise of Emissions Trading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 240 pages. ISBN 9780262516334, $22.00 paper. by JonasMeckling. 2011.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Politics; Political science; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.1441860366095183,"score_gpt":0.3552586548610758,"score_spread":0.2110726182515575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026372297","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015134694,0.9004687,0.0016186121,0.034021705,0.0011147673,0.000006910677,0.0003227934,0.00013458142,0.0607985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.093885556,0.81434184,0.003339288,0.0043541375,0.0039315782,0.00007554074,0.00076567434,0.00014503897,0.07916141],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993749,0.00018046152,0.000035962395,0.000103797494,0.00022266265,0.00008225463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998473,0.000864332,0.00022597164,0.00007985139,0.00014675087,0.0002101051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008787622,0.0012046989,0.0012047642,0.0025077178,0.000930637,0.0054585757,0.0010535417,0.0035563363,0.030687686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025754329,0.00090765906,0.0004776596,0.007021786,0.0034329747,0.010233986,0.0016686042,0.002523878,0.005549883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061967075,0.00004314224,0.0010769548,0.0009748446,0.00007928598,0.0001355882,0.00078387343,0.0017661239,0.00026568014,0.15534054,0.65493125,0.18454073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022364587,0.00001529966,0.0046962583,0.0011555074,0.000040405335,0.00022585367,0.0008771715,0.00084471714,0.00015114428,0.27211317,0.7198273,0.000030762778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010625438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02490487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030687686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029060398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021652407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10266054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027228947","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00233.x","title":"THE TROUBLE WITH HEDGE FUNDS","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hedge fund; Alternative beta; Hedge accounting; Global assets under management; Volatility (finance); Fund of funds; Economics; Business; Institutional investor; Financial market; Public fund; Open-end fund; Financial system; Financial economics; Finance; Corporate governance; Public economics; Market liquidity","score_opus":0.10364102762576553,"score_gpt":0.3563485124792289,"score_spread":0.25270748485346334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027228947","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03246385,0.09001003,0.010187984,0.65007466,0.003002286,0.000037051363,0.00013931154,0.00013148582,0.21395327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8085096,0.051717937,0.004516689,0.078282796,0.0068729687,0.000114441216,0.00006415776,0.000096997355,0.049824376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967085,0.0015368134,0.00013676811,0.0003749686,0.00096857833,0.00027436743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947977,0.0028456992,0.0005947024,0.00056448835,0.0008773412,0.00032006914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066553657,0.00021788984,0.0004807514,0.00090301177,0.001788174,0.007002406,0.0007743417,0.0053122025,0.0039409306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015894283,0.000254305,0.0003003396,0.0008914465,0.009558564,0.008091323,0.0023201175,0.0060213297,0.00087425153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028404102,0.000011532666,0.0004767571,0.00005124102,0.000014217925,0.00004480156,0.00045748675,0.0002134043,0.00011215574,0.93877184,0.029593132,0.03022515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027294807,0.000037233647,0.00061531446,0.0003107213,0.000009917232,0.00014701356,0.00080203434,0.00031927603,0.0002911281,0.64184946,0.35557577,0.000014891888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024737148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018580465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007002406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001868294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025189344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035197377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033433060","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00103.x","title":"The Policy Sciences and the Unmasking Turn of Mind<sup>1</sup>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Politics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14219706868250423,"score_gpt":0.5335203705251741,"score_spread":0.39132330184266984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033433060","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039168343,0.08977657,0.029740853,0.62854713,0.0030241453,0.000065850494,0.000059847418,0.00010297003,0.20951422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93950427,0.025840221,0.006021945,0.021020673,0.001437237,0.00009467697,0.000021769909,0.00004393501,0.006015307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9713135,0.023981502,0.00050850486,0.0007867552,0.002667867,0.0007418081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.939463,0.050723426,0.0037123766,0.0022145764,0.0030448888,0.0008417895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023607777,0.00030809565,0.0006653319,0.0031075354,0.0028958141,0.010818535,0.00095416745,0.0049928357,0.0036951802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033612553,0.00034681475,0.0004340643,0.0027873816,0.038732905,0.009524145,0.004284077,0.0060456395,0.00048585856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012452742,0.000011287491,0.00024003666,0.00015766297,0.0000072396915,0.00007350788,0.002409333,0.00022779724,0.00014540838,0.98183167,0.0030564673,0.011827194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048976744,0.000015484118,0.000445892,0.0004289267,0.000008338617,0.00006146855,0.0029110936,0.00034773874,0.00023273594,0.94938076,0.046152838,0.000009802156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020140046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028825265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023607777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007836931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009284609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124851346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039625755","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00156.x","title":"Bioethical Policymaking for Advanced Medical Technologies: Institutional Characteristics and Citizen Participation in Eight OECD Countries<sup>1</sup>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Deliberation; Public administration; Political science; Parliament; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Public institution; Public policy; Economic growth; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.12712481296607173,"score_gpt":0.5426952586423637,"score_spread":0.415570445676292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039625755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969445,0.00011722768,0.00009408242,0.0001222478,0.000002782059,0.000026884389,0.00018515921,0.000003220874,0.0025039297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992944,0.00007147214,0.00017686741,0.000022901824,0.000001918675,0.00002329551,0.00013052148,0.0000015994294,0.00027710482],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941216,0.0031771727,0.0006696176,0.0002924528,0.0006825004,0.0010566344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634758,0.017766355,0.009699383,0.0013001836,0.005237337,0.0025209552],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009830324,0.00016598559,0.00026482425,0.002938388,0.0016797148,0.0026894761,0.0003838635,0.00039166506,0.0015690969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015396424,0.00019068332,0.00032019996,0.004218401,0.0015203565,0.0008451842,0.001925289,0.00034767378,0.00014913568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014908402,0.000089209614,0.9743978,0.000079941216,0.000032701104,0.00030274355,0.010387079,0.00037770634,0.000268437,0.0009407142,0.0005065621,0.012468038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009865766,0.000079958256,0.95744354,0.000066188804,0.000021626367,0.0001254886,0.03654089,0.00025490558,0.00031638824,0.00013868112,0.004985686,0.000016742382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032188404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04163095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037372962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003018764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0640021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063403086","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00096.x","title":"Same Governance, Different Day: Does Metropolitan Reorganization Make a Difference?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Consolidation (business); Corporate governance; Metropolitan area; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Political economy; Variety (cybernetics); Local government; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.08397530024431066,"score_gpt":0.48019129935215865,"score_spread":0.396215999107848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063403086","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13953818,0.03679057,0.0012066984,0.7585044,0.0024551575,0.000023723476,0.0001036874,0.000030078876,0.061347537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622531,0.011159935,0.00022373178,0.020478817,0.00114668,0.000013583606,0.000041989075,0.000018316921,0.0046639247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947466,0.0029845056,0.00013354052,0.0004773902,0.0008159133,0.0008419963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942585,0.0022040417,0.0010360449,0.0004158844,0.0013141187,0.00077145343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050483975,0.000104184415,0.00047184157,0.0007997021,0.0026803382,0.005120094,0.0011553405,0.0027208303,0.0034551125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014252166,0.00013675791,0.0002542662,0.0017881059,0.0115712425,0.005381333,0.0014736728,0.0018996539,0.00032836382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021734195,0.00008715781,0.020712692,0.0008147794,0.000116621806,0.0008096015,0.025566878,0.000649356,0.00055895356,0.8080547,0.07183474,0.070577204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057629768,0.00010233378,0.07037431,0.0014828523,0.00014440916,0.00034480554,0.17692555,0.00050943164,0.00081437774,0.2190129,0.53015804,0.00007323153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04029314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.088381775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04029314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007456831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072328765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080117166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075022196","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12084","title":"Cities, Networks, and Global Environmental Governance: Spaces of Innovation, Places of Leadership. New York: Routledge. 240 pages. ISBN 9780415537513, $130.00 hardcover. by SofieBouteligier, 2013.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Corporate governance; Library science; Sociology; Environmental governance; Media studies; Political science; Management; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.05918455375015663,"score_gpt":0.3150312046686871,"score_spread":0.2558466509185305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075022196","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003119966,0.81314826,0.0060539045,0.03651073,0.0017140065,0.00003479186,0.0009786149,0.00033567657,0.13810405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.111567535,0.69746715,0.005071435,0.0032924605,0.0014004331,0.00020643874,0.0010058089,0.00027928763,0.17970955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928063,0.00025959758,0.000056438726,0.00011782208,0.00018620722,0.00009926346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875593,0.0006623892,0.00022470418,0.00010247834,0.00012185723,0.00013272943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008915751,0.0012794805,0.0012302306,0.0023137212,0.0010568162,0.0068490854,0.0011344975,0.0025425015,0.030733326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025872802,0.0011256626,0.0005287452,0.0067464686,0.0060539977,0.01281436,0.0028395809,0.00195642,0.0054169665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036337595,0.000036195306,0.0013271,0.0019796682,0.000059227266,0.00025097412,0.004785248,0.002211404,0.00033630827,0.29762444,0.47547814,0.21587494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011147266,0.0000161917,0.0029850744,0.0017399593,0.000021801761,0.00018336956,0.004459445,0.0003397945,0.00009872405,0.168176,0.8219446,0.000023920562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022421725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044704337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030733326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003870696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004278304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102813184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078893569","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00189.x","title":"Assessing Instrument Mixes through Program‐ and Agency‐Level Data: Methodological Issues in Contemporary Implementation Research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Legislature; Management science; Corporate governance; Order (exchange); Computer science; Operations research; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Management; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.9301423656304716,"score_gpt":0.7668616643538254,"score_spread":0.16328070127664618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078893569","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21336329,0.014137335,0.6869717,0.02511279,0.0003784153,0.0038399843,0.0030428313,0.00044050097,0.052713137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7319662,0.0026625898,0.25447375,0.0013179794,0.00021039597,0.0070672985,0.0008955454,0.00014362943,0.0012626252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.34034666,0.5518585,0.026733803,0.011711299,0.06558293,0.0037669092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.18266934,0.66877985,0.045459133,0.048897907,0.05255934,0.0016344404],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.45240423,0.001233902,0.0038936757,0.02393685,0.004316503,0.02015561,0.0072647547,0.003921253,0.0044206507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.67850035,0.0026712345,0.002457368,0.050288077,0.02001035,0.022502294,0.014431682,0.0051926826,0.00053074723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054153346,0.0006028488,0.17082399,0.004967637,0.0025779223,0.00009288678,0.017580267,0.014225289,0.00064252474,0.4062714,0.0041276366,0.37754607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005444859,0.001240309,0.19510797,0.013696923,0.002249707,0.00027501152,0.05201421,0.08320224,0.0053342357,0.5895476,0.056103192,0.0006841874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02763662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026394323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54759574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017852291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018953266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6752831},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2079630797","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00439_2.x","title":"Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance – Edited by Jennifer Clapp and Doris Fuchs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Power (physics); Politics; Corporate social responsibility; Global governance; Sustainability; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.04557153358676704,"score_gpt":0.37662450008420123,"score_spread":0.3310529664974342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079630797","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038860512,0.72913104,0.0043282425,0.07019205,0.0039780997,0.000047084715,0.00015205222,0.000091512295,0.18819386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14240283,0.6594411,0.004378593,0.009294059,0.003925801,0.000117174815,0.00035514732,0.00015313114,0.17993203],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999281,0.00023009193,0.00003285563,0.00009378032,0.00022841372,0.00013396642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944276,0.00023565396,0.000092960996,0.000040282506,0.00009616891,0.00009215923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009789654,0.00088304834,0.00048662748,0.0011026401,0.0011950942,0.004951006,0.0007971499,0.0024480901,0.008539113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013118065,0.00062222785,0.00032683188,0.0024582937,0.0035968602,0.0059736324,0.001895875,0.0023656636,0.0021949837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022260218,0.00004581609,0.000706912,0.00069230824,0.000028942151,0.0001923779,0.0048467624,0.0012436948,0.00033977322,0.2402015,0.54305947,0.20862019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038914927,0.000007949888,0.0014257396,0.0010361621,0.0000046607147,0.000108447835,0.0012652277,0.0001847214,0.00009027698,0.06331465,0.9325478,0.000010467196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012014157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013644483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012014157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037414848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049000387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028566182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100047906","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12091","title":"When the High Road Becomes the Low Road: The Limits of High‐Technology Competition in<scp>F</scp>inland","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Innovation Policy and R&D","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"University of Georgia; University of California Berkeley","keywords":"Competition (biology); Argument (complex analysis); Prosperity; Capitalism; Globalization; Politics; Economics; Business; Economic system; Industrial organization; Market economy; International trade; Economy; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.08513948563484267,"score_gpt":0.3564663308165357,"score_spread":0.27132684518169303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100047906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3997166,0.0040758452,0.0020762272,0.025619738,0.00014580031,0.000018447494,0.00014348568,0.000016687996,0.5681872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98959535,0.00082364166,0.00030407522,0.0011211112,0.00002201294,0.0000102526,0.000025379835,0.000006224473,0.00809181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991485,0.00023216142,0.000018834484,0.00011511472,0.0001132152,0.00037218572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918395,0.00031177525,0.00016836906,0.000038938448,0.00012606799,0.00017089593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011151455,0.00009093984,0.00027024123,0.00080185506,0.0042486098,0.008575775,0.00041458756,0.0015105021,0.0064899665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016315457,0.00013555335,0.0001792866,0.0010146981,0.0048426026,0.0034106567,0.0019572591,0.0014243034,0.00028077417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058002137,0.000041166088,0.0043956023,0.00005439461,0.000008002138,0.00049812207,0.0036487486,0.00063199404,0.0002696577,0.9655457,0.009687748,0.015160785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005449357,0.00010863934,0.04526219,0.000882654,0.000032414562,0.00066163356,0.046131674,0.0026332855,0.0012999234,0.5452789,0.35758516,0.000069024165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03961072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07290554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03961072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004274832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045042923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078760326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107390460","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00255.x","title":"Does Spatial Variation in Heterogeneity Matter? Assessing the Adoption Patterns of Business Improvement Districts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Scope (computer science); Preference; Business; Public economics; Space (punctuation); Collective action; Spatial heterogeneity; Quality (philosophy); Economics; Marketing; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.04756947645967354,"score_gpt":0.4247996479840605,"score_spread":0.377230171524387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107390460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975769,0.00036351947,0.00041818552,0.00019059987,0.0000035643836,0.000012102647,0.0002532202,0.0000040983728,0.0011778462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996314,0.00007295562,0.000081536964,0.000009062834,0.0000030173987,0.0000041547314,0.000112040434,9.3890446e-7,0.00008493799],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481046,0.002989339,0.00030097994,0.00086487795,0.00063294533,0.0004014595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710696,0.0121323615,0.011304949,0.0024365918,0.0022067444,0.00084974477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004563057,0.00010025349,0.00045159142,0.0016694552,0.0004503124,0.0012951,0.00062329415,0.00042523307,0.0023251262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02008603,0.00021130915,0.0003889309,0.0040808734,0.0010083959,0.0008175191,0.00074760895,0.0003658325,0.00019573944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006578646,0.000028545599,0.99219394,0.00003317751,0.00016884174,0.000033488854,0.00044082085,0.0006466104,0.0001104627,0.0005678657,0.00021200394,0.0054984847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008325462,0.000057258796,0.99535865,0.00002505429,0.00006808754,0.000031255684,0.002115868,0.0010079134,0.0001238942,0.0003571782,0.0008393121,0.0000072513967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021461342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031625513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021461342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000823826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005449927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042672813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114378722","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00126.x","title":"Border Security Technologies: Local and Regional Implications","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Interdependence; Globalization; Context (archaeology); Politics; Democracy; Political science; International trade; Public administration; Political economy; Business; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.10113101596003073,"score_gpt":0.5226076017386453,"score_spread":0.4214765857786146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114378722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09150588,0.12248798,0.0026197052,0.19634618,0.0003110511,0.000078168305,0.00035859135,0.00005718588,0.5862353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9213747,0.06213742,0.0008207412,0.0037177226,0.00020751439,0.000025665755,0.00008417211,0.000009408134,0.011622721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975853,0.00095097185,0.000055212644,0.00020668807,0.00062710745,0.00057476136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949372,0.002042521,0.00046916198,0.00013987787,0.001984962,0.0004261699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029534271,0.0002700069,0.00027276247,0.003005849,0.0043111905,0.008127245,0.001052353,0.0014542658,0.01034054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006512517,0.00016626723,0.00032037983,0.0055851294,0.0071710544,0.002479079,0.002446357,0.0017394,0.0002752416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044750606,0.00006615168,0.013466365,0.0007617161,0.000035166984,0.0005666335,0.0064517683,0.0033799931,0.00048715013,0.8566178,0.020702964,0.09741946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040770494,0.00017801725,0.12943883,0.00441945,0.00027022217,0.00082895794,0.09246991,0.0022774474,0.0015215283,0.15993166,0.6085102,0.00011300441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5155731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66073143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48442692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02825121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019943198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9745596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115881843","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12001","title":"Policy Capacity for Climate Change in<scp>C</scp>anada's Transportation Sector","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Policy analysis; Climate change; Government (linguistics); Macro; Business; Policy studies; Regional science; Public policy; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.21096404262184174,"score_gpt":0.48769662704977307,"score_spread":0.27673258442793136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115881843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74319524,0.008987638,0.014562374,0.035754327,0.00014395085,0.00023197831,0.0005626589,0.00019467245,0.19636716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513054,0.0017644054,0.0017326218,0.00019096072,0.000013337113,0.00003493999,0.000056708603,0.000005007488,0.0010715823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577737,0.0022494735,0.00019318487,0.00027595687,0.00083217875,0.0006719512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98847735,0.0048634443,0.0020381832,0.00072974974,0.0033508274,0.0005405221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071118837,0.00021032803,0.0002678503,0.0018103411,0.0024391667,0.008156924,0.0008911917,0.00091933465,0.003361107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013832613,0.00021495658,0.00028459038,0.0050802226,0.0033228542,0.0039763185,0.0032580362,0.0013405253,0.00019806367],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001909749,0.00032748427,0.17519224,0.0018359047,0.00021803976,0.0002980907,0.012282644,0.04588472,0.004263053,0.5452222,0.007586578,0.20669813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007519003,0.00024774595,0.31127074,0.0029265198,0.00022868143,0.00016886397,0.06560461,0.043482836,0.005976204,0.27288568,0.2969298,0.00020321473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12442819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16372047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9807804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019219585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039144583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24740785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116374424","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00416.x","title":"Policy Changes on Canada's Rivers: Different but not Isolated","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Political science; Public administration; Context (archaeology); Political economy; Sociology; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.12043935710261278,"score_gpt":0.4770383203935075,"score_spread":0.35659896329089474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116374424","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1814079,0.06657427,0.003635143,0.47199062,0.0013060456,0.00013044883,0.0011731408,0.00009455221,0.2736879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92372245,0.039326437,0.0021646172,0.024623465,0.0002581279,0.000032170847,0.00019155272,0.000022503165,0.00965874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928712,0.0016510051,0.00022043861,0.0006054372,0.002997689,0.0016542217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99006236,0.0030047398,0.0007374612,0.0002529973,0.0048755975,0.0010668786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049015875,0.00025207325,0.000583209,0.0022115998,0.007907557,0.0073781745,0.0016731452,0.00272334,0.004264187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012224035,0.0001354784,0.00046683606,0.0052988003,0.009678659,0.0023477292,0.0023286517,0.003075668,0.00015012328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011884403,0.00018522705,0.035489812,0.00216193,0.00026562146,0.00075749884,0.015388845,0.014630025,0.0016896009,0.61416227,0.06590652,0.24924378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006912995,0.00010326378,0.15439884,0.004275014,0.00033445787,0.00018051288,0.056788694,0.0037112685,0.0018087158,0.113722116,0.6643417,0.00026624496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9813887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9889473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10373034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10373034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1844098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75261986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124293971","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00306.x","title":"Universities and State Policy Formation: Rationalizing a Nanotechnology Strategy in Pennsylvania","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"University-Industry-Government Innovation Models","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Salient; Strengths and weaknesses; Process (computing); Political science; Public administration; Nanotechnology; Computer science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10822572554533336,"score_gpt":0.36167153843536265,"score_spread":0.2534458128900293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124293971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42879152,0.0038336823,0.041031346,0.15335517,0.000215952,0.00024297854,0.00009191658,0.00011890331,0.37231857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99265313,0.0006819119,0.0022779822,0.0011453922,0.000038152546,0.000035282646,0.000007653072,0.0000055422997,0.003155013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98859274,0.0081642205,0.00027978898,0.0006693766,0.0011222768,0.001171534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97229946,0.021144344,0.0030434958,0.00073841657,0.002056377,0.0007178316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0138691,0.0001877267,0.00026488534,0.0018962122,0.004306731,0.010512591,0.0009983482,0.005563294,0.0035041529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020310936,0.00029238244,0.00036023767,0.00182134,0.009994203,0.0060660457,0.005120007,0.0030847918,0.00026487626],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009051541,0.000031384276,0.0015516718,0.000023302184,0.0000064686783,0.000056560755,0.0017734866,0.0025866672,0.00007230568,0.985889,0.0011903367,0.006809809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033824144,0.000100992096,0.0049952418,0.0002280389,0.000033233668,0.00007300583,0.010180104,0.014025805,0.0017123059,0.8685813,0.09996403,0.00007215205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012349819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013928538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015335144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015335144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015577132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111264765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126446231","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00277.x","title":"The Development of Renewable Electricity Policy in the Province of Ontario: The Influence of Ideas and Timing","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Renewable energy; Electricity; Bidding; Renewable portfolio standard; Feed-in tariff; Politics; Economics; Portfolio; Electricity retailing; Energy policy; Natural resource economics; Economy; Business; Electricity market; Political science; Finance; Microeconomics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.08685700496197471,"score_gpt":0.43422217659275086,"score_spread":0.3473651716307762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126446231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44834277,0.052497804,0.0022193696,0.1282398,0.0006761408,0.0002823217,0.0017997881,0.00006564148,0.36587632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690299,0.013753769,0.0006535753,0.0011199653,0.00006605221,0.00002690026,0.00015305869,0.000010323913,0.01518639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961033,0.00066051405,0.000139306,0.00016810274,0.0018004366,0.001128462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991085,0.0016685686,0.0012125927,0.00017156644,0.0043385783,0.001523747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003322439,0.00013868426,0.00025534022,0.0019970539,0.0056550503,0.005510599,0.0009905031,0.00078410644,0.0027300657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009515401,0.00023521631,0.0002416672,0.0045458633,0.00409824,0.0011380352,0.0013990653,0.0009304535,0.00011643059],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036548235,0.0000887816,0.08996973,0.002163658,0.0001325528,0.0015612261,0.032421745,0.009318627,0.0018959846,0.68165165,0.047372773,0.13305777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011525616,0.000083823295,0.2138451,0.0016155845,0.0000972446,0.00014970104,0.02758629,0.00236153,0.0011587996,0.02086395,0.7319794,0.00014325473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78668416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21331584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26953375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9124421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147092186","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00229.x","title":"POLITICS, INSTITUTIONS, CONSTRUCTIVISM and the EMERGING INTERNATIONAL REGIME for FINANCIAL REGULATION","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Constructivism (international relations); Politics; Institution; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Finance; Political economy; Sociology; International relations; Law","score_opus":0.16981767040067558,"score_gpt":0.3982328237963347,"score_spread":0.2284151533956591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147092186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21310051,0.057092447,0.05792971,0.17945038,0.0005457142,0.000064774234,0.00012267374,0.000080392354,0.49161336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99125504,0.004457702,0.0015224606,0.001431017,0.00016728215,0.000025245063,0.000014993824,0.0000068006457,0.0011194228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940148,0.004243931,0.00013617208,0.0004449784,0.00086154515,0.0002985901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913351,0.0051974594,0.00179972,0.00074682344,0.00063156,0.00028938288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008869087,0.00013717715,0.0002976033,0.0017391078,0.0014226028,0.007964338,0.00053570315,0.0016673189,0.0014683392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059516984,0.00011402416,0.00020567612,0.0018162006,0.027353646,0.0035297158,0.0020896122,0.002735482,0.00011836429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028858296,0.000004129591,0.00039189516,0.000010859997,0.0000026299444,0.000006959112,0.00032408006,0.00024081884,0.000032884327,0.99649966,0.00029399173,0.0021891452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008891001,0.000010775384,0.0020096272,0.00013315082,0.000004417201,0.00003100868,0.0013349642,0.00085346453,0.000090975365,0.97045916,0.025054706,0.000008864485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015702957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016055591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008869087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004053356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025994256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046904743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149578887","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00513.x","title":"Accountability in the Green Economy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Citation; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6094243154538546,"score_gpt":0.4535377412971381,"score_spread":0.15588657415671647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149578887","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034757273,0.4119266,0.006256572,0.49102503,0.011550848,0.000022440447,0.0001493278,0.00007399485,0.07551945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35847202,0.49234352,0.002575601,0.084005736,0.030751407,0.00008693805,0.00024314369,0.0001260667,0.031395603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191225,0.004187773,0.00026760309,0.00053233944,0.0023480437,0.00075209484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777809,0.012184708,0.001988819,0.0012811951,0.005572592,0.001191701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010328723,0.0004189133,0.0007414246,0.0026393398,0.0017605718,0.0064635044,0.000825659,0.0059397006,0.00375184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025075784,0.00020581107,0.00043133783,0.003230319,0.0076257125,0.006103917,0.002039409,0.005263678,0.0006333131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022854803,0.000039770446,0.00078212604,0.00047603826,0.00004041566,0.00004638794,0.00022349053,0.0015032525,0.000118829135,0.74824774,0.15812594,0.09037308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016178456,0.000014673222,0.0025481307,0.0014320733,0.000027357037,0.00004617735,0.00025014728,0.00066856405,0.00017840475,0.44806728,0.5467301,0.000020858433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010443317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011333501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010443317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006915886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016536774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0546242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151696530","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00175.x","title":"Hedonic Estimation and Policy Significance of the Impact of HOPE VI on Neighborhood Property Values","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Property value; Mile; Quarter (Canadian coin); Property (philosophy); Residential property; Unit (ring theory); Public housing; Order (exchange); Public economics; Economic growth; Economics; Sociology; Regional science; Geography; Mathematics; Finance; Demography; Archaeology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.0923524661742904,"score_gpt":0.39242464077542305,"score_spread":0.30007217460113267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151696530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890816,0.00039788772,0.0029791489,0.00041126646,0.000020989144,0.0000454475,0.00042058757,0.000022172972,0.0066208737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989611,0.00011051163,0.00033219685,0.00001478281,0.000007125569,0.000012985186,0.00014797683,0.0000014197811,0.00041196038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982652,0.0011068686,0.000060064613,0.00015951802,0.0002687077,0.00013962245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846638,0.011165897,0.0024940276,0.00048637093,0.00077576714,0.00041415222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035085063,0.00020148771,0.00035478204,0.00083119667,0.00017467835,0.0012094969,0.00048359844,0.00033097304,0.0036574495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017221184,0.00014256638,0.00038265597,0.0011567986,0.0005113729,0.00080928375,0.00068506616,0.00073578913,0.00020068933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014383864,0.00084278366,0.8025301,0.00023518123,0.00074974034,0.00019178155,0.0003259217,0.075700715,0.0014696404,0.017778728,0.0029197203,0.09581719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071285984,0.0013051755,0.83794534,0.00006380364,0.00030819388,0.00003187526,0.001525319,0.14513914,0.0019102652,0.008713713,0.0029469156,0.000039029735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011894818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008912617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011894818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012482282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061619474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023651183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155294372","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00581.x","title":"Cognizance and Consultation of Randomized Controlled Trials among Ministerial Policy Analysts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec; Université Laval","keywords":"Randomized controlled trial; Political science; Randomized experiment; Psychology; Public relations; Public administration; Medicine","score_opus":0.5457738126704711,"score_gpt":0.6909429540534592,"score_spread":0.1451691413829881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155294372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6061338,0.014483663,0.04663624,0.28682327,0.0014574411,0.0023150886,0.00024349807,0.0002781562,0.041628897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795211,0.0010152855,0.01139349,0.0067583523,0.00031004497,0.0005805332,0.000028791601,0.000019153804,0.00037335043],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.21362135,0.7176023,0.029218644,0.008466208,0.026361478,0.0047300514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.047418416,0.8686725,0.048408613,0.013751335,0.01699951,0.0047495617],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6124612,0.0007372979,0.0018406389,0.008592847,0.0055868668,0.01444699,0.0034978844,0.0074791824,0.0035062279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8236942,0.0015154883,0.0012169054,0.003906593,0.009563898,0.0076310867,0.007802931,0.008589473,0.00034712668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00407647,0.0012911124,0.15053119,0.007937045,0.0020634248,0.0027066993,0.39683065,0.0034495906,0.006452054,0.053720906,0.025586158,0.34535474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029050363,0.003218945,0.26380515,0.022927929,0.0020873977,0.00405628,0.23169348,0.045419652,0.010089569,0.23727214,0.1748209,0.0017034624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062775873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064168926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3875388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0130322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035922896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47790438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157046796","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00486.x","title":"Science and International Environmental Nonregimes: The Case of Arctic Haze","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Haze; Arctic; The arctic; Object (grammar); Environmental science; Atmosphere (unit); Political science; Meteorology; Geography; Oceanography; Computer science; Geology","score_opus":0.20229679002810433,"score_gpt":0.49329861832498667,"score_spread":0.29100182829688237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157046796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41198468,0.0074696033,0.010425299,0.036755327,0.00040753683,0.00006491558,0.00007399986,0.000021728034,0.53279686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927978,0.0010221285,0.000654778,0.0004997962,0.00006309275,0.000023020919,0.00000849646,0.000004611206,0.0049263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99529266,0.002214772,0.00015397203,0.00041759122,0.00069891434,0.0012220767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954294,0.0026582016,0.00069808436,0.00041064923,0.000559317,0.00024438903],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063613546,0.00028596172,0.00048361204,0.0013628671,0.009418597,0.0058760387,0.000734309,0.003864896,0.0032445784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005166091,0.00021954019,0.00084611133,0.0014596866,0.01442648,0.0043514604,0.0056293416,0.003801797,0.00015552167],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017375136,0.000017820046,0.0011597926,0.000030805113,0.000008340529,0.0005098698,0.002490919,0.0006104507,0.00011877443,0.992782,0.00049225934,0.001761605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005676208,0.00013583752,0.012239734,0.00044319374,0.00009168054,0.0011271104,0.034488905,0.004015947,0.0016254345,0.79150796,0.15417624,0.00009126599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022210822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021239724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068983673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046964413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05005145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158687433","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00496.x","title":"Climate Change Regionalism in North America","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Multi-level governance; Climate change; Corporate governance; Political science; Environmental governance; Regionalism (politics); Sovereignty; Negotiation; Democracy; Political economy of climate change; European union; Political economy; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.13232602186818138,"score_gpt":0.374049498573118,"score_spread":0.2417234767049366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158687433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1886005,0.041991293,0.0008911681,0.06625499,0.0012039809,0.00003297003,0.00035456097,0.00006662581,0.7006039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9239038,0.01498585,0.00093502435,0.010351741,0.0004132345,0.000071763796,0.0002834983,0.00004095292,0.049014054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995431,0.00012859635,0.000009475832,0.00010460654,0.0000666278,0.00014765414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996861,0.00007394393,0.000053256004,0.000021197455,0.0000821946,0.0000832908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006305532,0.00013725304,0.00015825593,0.00069047435,0.0050466615,0.002641016,0.0003969911,0.00068801834,0.0060567725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006606253,0.000110324654,0.00017871875,0.0013561106,0.0025106287,0.001210653,0.0022303977,0.0013804947,0.00028422268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011367113,0.00011924908,0.03401973,0.0006580701,0.000061791674,0.0016317085,0.105045535,0.0011970114,0.0024172503,0.544173,0.18346962,0.1270934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063826114,0.000014739423,0.042911436,0.00020912505,0.00001327127,0.00019600827,0.021224031,0.0001404867,0.00013665561,0.008283233,0.9268469,0.000017708457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24346362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5004149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75653636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007913728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049771545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.484093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229611050","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12156","title":"Institutional Change Through Policy Learning: The Case of the European Commission and Research Policy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European Commission; York University","keywords":"Framing (construction); Policy learning; European commission; Corporate governance; Foundation (evidence); Commission; Political science; Institutional change; Public administration; Research policy; Empirical research; Public relations; Business; Economics; Management; European union; Epistemology","score_opus":0.4003690990395499,"score_gpt":0.5720726382239324,"score_spread":0.17170353918438247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229611050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4074632,0.012175287,0.015597372,0.1356331,0.00032073536,0.00017415991,0.00007248605,0.000113598595,0.42845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926359,0.0008073978,0.0015561827,0.0017611886,0.00004227054,0.000036737925,0.000009317851,0.000011982033,0.0031390851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9274748,0.05862505,0.0013033883,0.00293348,0.0031934192,0.006469786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94341964,0.043103814,0.003869523,0.003998459,0.0026812607,0.0029272593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060941584,0.00045003236,0.0008218865,0.0028270776,0.018845556,0.025118403,0.0029782506,0.015575618,0.0035841186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053850375,0.00049855706,0.00082600454,0.005382556,0.03538071,0.014370099,0.012515645,0.0065826834,0.00029252016],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060135393,0.0000978393,0.0018908335,0.000081574195,0.000022487548,0.0020054798,0.025938353,0.0034191732,0.00009659989,0.9503001,0.003233888,0.01285342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016297343,0.00015716362,0.008852452,0.001236249,0.00011654619,0.0012932052,0.09183672,0.009745807,0.0010262341,0.6158657,0.26952565,0.00018129803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03716074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027821418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060941584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035313483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022615008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32229382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263733877","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12150","title":"Diversifying Nature Protection: Evaluating the Changing Tools for Forest Protection in <scp>C</scp>anada and <scp>N</scp>orway","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Klima- og miljødepartementet; Norsk institutt for naturforskning; Nature Conservancy of Canada; Norges Forskningsråd; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Data Protection Act 1998; Legislation; Business; Government (linguistics); Certified wood; Diversity (politics); Environmental resource management; Certification; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Political science; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.18210951248166898,"score_gpt":0.42222363227778614,"score_spread":0.24011411979611716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263733877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96413976,0.0018398206,0.0017112606,0.0027917693,0.000039287104,0.00035336398,0.00018834158,0.000012953176,0.028923322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966041,0.0005251771,0.0016731943,0.00020343461,0.0000051615993,0.00008885569,0.00007570549,0.000004217526,0.0008202572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810339,0.009065766,0.00055775756,0.001057134,0.00587379,0.0024116633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9462616,0.025151184,0.0095581915,0.0021090119,0.011278908,0.0056411377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033914614,0.00023954957,0.00047255997,0.0016329647,0.003762576,0.006391587,0.0015741085,0.0008953021,0.0018770848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04788233,0.00021954231,0.00037430984,0.0026424683,0.0066341893,0.0036502958,0.0030215138,0.001413532,0.000086111926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011930726,0.0013627338,0.60260946,0.0016165257,0.00035584669,0.00037252033,0.02788449,0.0123718595,0.0020476996,0.08413673,0.005204209,0.26084492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012718333,0.0012295055,0.8754073,0.0018947775,0.00018475493,0.00007847757,0.05840212,0.006494867,0.0016429357,0.010364687,0.044066202,0.00010724566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55682975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8289238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44317025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04590928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055446345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8915603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316075008","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00475.x","title":"Editor's Notes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.5372111298195977,"score_gpt":0.43997756689736195,"score_spread":0.09723356292223578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316075008","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007625877,0.0031889684,0.00044228503,0.12839472,0.84608245,0.00013521826,0.00074345584,0.00031672686,0.020619903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030661214,0.008043254,0.0029837636,0.23675166,0.46747535,0.0005641308,0.001158904,0.0006732115,0.27928364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98241156,0.0017229437,0.0018732457,0.0027266403,0.009777259,0.0014883473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9094971,0.013384961,0.0051654554,0.0057431096,0.058359172,0.007850241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01479916,0.0020526296,0.00196034,0.0031512834,0.0039963094,0.008906748,0.006733808,0.011956359,0.17568517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11943216,0.000918313,0.0024253929,0.0026651223,0.0020898369,0.0056779683,0.0035385604,0.012423854,0.12497499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071032073,0.000004358271,0.00001814563,0.000069227295,0.0000021171675,0.000025124022,0.00001414684,0.000008088695,0.000022999759,0.0005097841,0.99369544,0.0056235017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000094186225,0.000006322018,0.000073800285,0.0001723268,0.000003380504,0.000053410935,0.00003440592,0.000022455992,0.000054398653,0.00052726694,0.9990343,0.000008577691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034825387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067972415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17568517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004468609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015673893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5877254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343478888","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12174","title":"Willingness to Pay for Solar Lanterns: Does the Trial Period Play a Role?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Context (archaeology); Subsidy; Payment; Product (mathematics); Market liquidity; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Business; Public economics; Marketing; Finance; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.054609393946941205,"score_gpt":0.4066004141479802,"score_spread":0.351991020201039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343478888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79526573,0.11611876,0.012404654,0.024247179,0.0020928022,0.0017897411,0.0006720944,0.000081628445,0.047327373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810559,0.010914929,0.0019292983,0.0020113578,0.00037238398,0.00064082845,0.00017083615,0.00002884967,0.0028755881],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.97852135,0.016700119,0.0009002141,0.0009262765,0.0023404027,0.00061167433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7513953,0.22059661,0.018440936,0.003326565,0.004355557,0.0018849735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04305949,0.0003536302,0.0020792414,0.00050787686,0.0004930722,0.0023738232,0.0023592296,0.0029870577,0.025093801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12623985,0.00035866772,0.0022807915,0.0009894642,0.0018400983,0.0026362713,0.00070634804,0.0026833136,0.0010524688],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05518735,0.010200541,0.06327284,0.028821021,0.0085883895,0.00045723168,0.0019010104,0.011393223,0.0056217266,0.077183194,0.015421243,0.7219522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024267124,0.060669523,0.4319616,0.035029303,0.030341037,0.00093767047,0.008176417,0.04296745,0.020585183,0.16799374,0.17623532,0.000835631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013097435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001198408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04305949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017215089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022497175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22772306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476994262","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12183","title":"Trade and Industrial Policy as Levers for Sustainable Energy Technology Adoption? Experiences from Urban<scp>L</scp>atin<scp>A</scp>merica","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Sustainable energy; Business; Empirical evidence; Energy (signal processing); Clean energy; Economics; Industrial organization; Environmental economics; Renewable energy; Engineering","score_opus":0.06163405666764773,"score_gpt":0.3632921946095964,"score_spread":0.3016581379419487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476994262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9512585,0.0016162079,0.00021673026,0.0053250417,0.000021974649,0.000019467978,0.000024546143,0.0000028372606,0.04151468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99507505,0.0016189734,0.00007018313,0.00025682795,0.0000075990088,0.000009507008,0.000011237067,0.000003418631,0.0029472932],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980981,0.0011732253,0.000037371105,0.00008700999,0.0001621988,0.00044213686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978516,0.0015032123,0.0002659316,0.00007088293,0.00012453378,0.00018378938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032553957,0.00014311323,0.00031288416,0.000741632,0.0053036683,0.0060028955,0.0004936685,0.0011678042,0.004290395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002584872,0.00022486295,0.0001911156,0.002104972,0.0048542907,0.0026689058,0.003172123,0.0017433454,0.00020184286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013085899,0.00059798674,0.055149075,0.0004641071,0.000031945026,0.0032310414,0.76235324,0.00080025994,0.0014101899,0.12216643,0.004536742,0.049128115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015396625,0.000064458814,0.026349092,0.00029085705,0.000012062474,0.00019580085,0.8714021,0.00024374177,0.0004743596,0.0030752474,0.097860456,0.000016459639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027130831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069228105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027130831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060876636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003923524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05394584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477311739","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12179","title":"Subnational Responses to Fracking in Canada: Explaining Saskatchewan's “Wild West” Regulatory Approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Political science; Public administration; Environmental regulation; Regulatory reform; Business; Public economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.037254317138832024,"score_gpt":0.32653067510681855,"score_spread":0.2892763579679865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477311739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67159414,0.011255683,0.0029606654,0.040907532,0.00024065825,0.00025818418,0.0031449508,0.00008714411,0.26955098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97798526,0.0054543857,0.0009890684,0.003065514,0.000012174395,0.000041600808,0.0004082042,0.00001504011,0.012028791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975222,0.0002769782,0.00008169474,0.00028435542,0.0007415885,0.0010931871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950128,0.000834706,0.00043850255,0.00017336868,0.002957608,0.0005829205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020742964,0.00026555924,0.00021692719,0.0027296608,0.00780244,0.003386592,0.0016903783,0.0007476438,0.004305721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003922093,0.0002728873,0.00034959186,0.00486032,0.0046768147,0.0006949185,0.0018729432,0.0013552203,0.000165224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026012005,0.00013601937,0.3657946,0.0011326709,0.00026044823,0.0029741472,0.03354102,0.011041326,0.0062119695,0.37771982,0.065109454,0.1358184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004979801,0.000056729845,0.6262211,0.0012752942,0.00018725108,0.00026087367,0.080967106,0.0040994347,0.0032263268,0.013378084,0.2700216,0.00025643982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8550107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1449893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18337929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99169123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519077949","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12187","title":"Media in the Policy Process: Using Framing and Narratives to Understand Policy Influences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Framing (construction); Scholarship; Policy analysis; Cohesion (chemistry); Public relations; Political science; Public policy; Empirical research; Process (computing); Sociology; Epistemology; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.25372630184924877,"score_gpt":0.5790860605257608,"score_spread":0.32535975867651207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519077949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26527646,0.050033942,0.11827669,0.1727984,0.001340058,0.0005031627,0.0007784074,0.00017235878,0.39082062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689878,0.0150112165,0.010880183,0.0016869776,0.00023790459,0.00022697721,0.000114642506,0.00006318095,0.0027909651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97258514,0.024052113,0.0005811129,0.0007477759,0.0013677891,0.00066610635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8828125,0.10599019,0.005452588,0.0025045502,0.0023946813,0.0008454885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03220069,0.00084793894,0.0005474336,0.009199659,0.004536211,0.016822571,0.0015878818,0.0034560894,0.005025373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05367738,0.0006074978,0.0005588284,0.0072574066,0.026620148,0.026138306,0.00814061,0.0039567375,0.00040187314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004894266,0.00003531052,0.0036399623,0.00056986633,0.000037834816,0.00030199994,0.10966236,0.0011192509,0.00027341142,0.852595,0.001930787,0.02978526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028867466,0.000039218325,0.0034897672,0.006136589,0.000075802855,0.00018934427,0.16339289,0.0028097082,0.0012189612,0.67911094,0.14343362,0.00007432287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005987364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045525706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03220069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0097661195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006294112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1702956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520322156","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12188","title":"Open Data for Science, Policy, and the Public Good","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Social Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Open data; Transparency (behavior); Open government; Accountability; Open science; Public policy; Political science; Democracy; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Science policy; Open research; Space (punctuation); Public relations; Public participation; Politics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5723920137215006,"score_gpt":0.6100907361421334,"score_spread":0.03769872242063277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520322156","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038604832,0.38726214,0.017930478,0.4757292,0.002216241,0.00008111339,0.00017027043,0.00007267193,0.1126774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37774318,0.55182236,0.023869867,0.03405685,0.0051001934,0.00039740716,0.00017091584,0.0001034209,0.006735785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9092078,0.071307555,0.003494107,0.0025613287,0.011709771,0.001719294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76506656,0.20182711,0.0072438978,0.012818135,0.0104085645,0.002635794],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07333122,0.00057497085,0.001421445,0.008440868,0.005634642,0.022637196,0.0016084411,0.010551748,0.004901506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08288958,0.00062527036,0.0007588888,0.011706303,0.04195894,0.023835016,0.010351281,0.008898603,0.00085745205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009251896,0.000017264685,0.00018840694,0.00064820657,0.000014314918,0.000044070606,0.0013520754,0.00031969062,0.00006993471,0.9623539,0.0072631394,0.027719876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000132739015,0.000021374963,0.0004141229,0.0071704066,0.000015484835,0.00007179993,0.0033219128,0.0004695389,0.00021491277,0.69963473,0.28862146,0.00003095067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008062617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064294916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99839157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015821911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031271156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3878172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547859870","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12201","title":"Mitigating Mistrust? Participation and Expertise in Hydraulic Fracturing Governance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Credibility; Negotiation; Legislature; Citizen journalism; Corporate governance; Spillover effect; Government (linguistics); Public participation; Uncertainty; Public administration; Political science; Process (computing); Public trust; Public relations; Business; Economics; Law; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.03137518567613678,"score_gpt":0.36603395833412156,"score_spread":0.33465877265798477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547859870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70523155,0.0044654473,0.026970852,0.09672026,0.00017405275,0.00018265899,0.00004657491,0.000048027792,0.16616054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984865,0.00017827617,0.00032424345,0.00046779952,0.000019238976,0.000012452681,0.0000021161775,0.0000021060223,0.0005071474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9368354,0.046380624,0.0015211173,0.0026186502,0.0059938957,0.0066502434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8415543,0.11301181,0.022919094,0.0073812245,0.0096307695,0.005502912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05655947,0.0002243203,0.0005886194,0.0022515003,0.00708747,0.008462043,0.0021029047,0.004943429,0.003693218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.102476805,0.00034644658,0.0003160317,0.0018731537,0.025734581,0.0074039637,0.01143853,0.0026995055,0.0002380775],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021782599,0.00021248247,0.09409192,0.0010741277,0.00020529961,0.0020443227,0.18794475,0.006798434,0.002238015,0.5401866,0.008186405,0.15679988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013506012,0.000239252,0.08023536,0.0027002753,0.00015833724,0.00072179467,0.13471453,0.00869824,0.0023734225,0.6503362,0.11950238,0.00018523929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038608354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04772424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05655947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011509836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020360049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29911864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550129958","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12222","title":"Cultural Politics and the Transatlantic Divide over GMOs. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. x + 256 pages. ISBN 9780230284579, $105.00 hardcover. Hannes R. Stephan. 2015.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Media studies; Citation; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.058854223602212936,"score_gpt":0.3445139314492197,"score_spread":0.2856597078470068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550129958","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037911013,0.7519436,0.0011244981,0.057410996,0.0020004064,0.00001272045,0.00025923585,0.000077798504,0.18337971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15618005,0.5623901,0.0027800102,0.016244562,0.0027213409,0.000107012915,0.00040175146,0.00021304296,0.2589622],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931824,0.00025767603,0.000050562285,0.00007828089,0.000217472,0.0000778234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900264,0.0006145189,0.00011342399,0.00007804108,0.00011477905,0.00007663855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011367357,0.0009319413,0.00054862275,0.0010720044,0.0011309771,0.0035584436,0.000562512,0.0023324003,0.017543327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022836146,0.0005478515,0.00031328233,0.0024350155,0.0051409695,0.0060247555,0.0019568745,0.002035433,0.002999843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008521584,0.000031660937,0.0007882285,0.0014362178,0.00004086884,0.00046251522,0.006371507,0.0006692177,0.0014320682,0.25139868,0.42650554,0.31077832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007829788,0.0000141217515,0.0022274118,0.0012234822,0.000011719207,0.00026142577,0.0036028211,0.000098491604,0.00030600955,0.08994265,0.9022925,0.000011599631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010292856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025884543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017543327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026677763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023198086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058688223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552384097","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12210","title":"Advocacy Coalitions in Ontario Land Use Policy Development","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Homophily; Government (linguistics); Urban sprawl; Conurbation; Perspective (graphical); Empirical evidence; Negotiation; Public administration; Sociology; Political science; Land use; Economics; Law; Economy; Social science","score_opus":0.2732391128957728,"score_gpt":0.5208284229355058,"score_spread":0.247589310039733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552384097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5074722,0.015854212,0.0047525563,0.054536004,0.00013096388,0.0001792817,0.00025343703,0.000042148422,0.41677916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99394494,0.0027698823,0.00049965526,0.0002587387,0.000014161638,0.000026744006,0.000024455469,0.0000027641242,0.0024586448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622524,0.0014710039,0.0000997263,0.00027591095,0.0011414475,0.0007866983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918085,0.003610631,0.0015499525,0.00025976714,0.0015685386,0.0012026184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007418714,0.00017571976,0.0002482829,0.0031135366,0.00655949,0.0042221425,0.0011509806,0.0011692157,0.0046725036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117943045,0.00020563416,0.00017878282,0.0038853735,0.010298687,0.002086008,0.0041545825,0.0008200383,0.00014057284],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007052565,0.00009214847,0.056736834,0.0005319275,0.00006873043,0.0003834466,0.06713458,0.004007187,0.0004286365,0.73424804,0.010495046,0.12580276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009768468,0.00005969699,0.19970383,0.0014351333,0.00007736889,0.00010889826,0.09629997,0.0062169842,0.00059000374,0.1872757,0.5080591,0.000075675154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7777716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8653105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22222841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07527595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05926297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5461678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559417282","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12218","title":"Judicialization of Environmental Policy and the Crisis of Democratic Accountability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Polity; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Politics; Sanctions; Law and economics; Political science; Supreme court; Public administration; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.08035788296295691,"score_gpt":0.4559302898582831,"score_spread":0.37557240689532617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559417282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34115243,0.022507586,0.019802295,0.23432381,0.00089374656,0.00013067575,0.00014215737,0.000110844696,0.38093647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937942,0.0012870607,0.0005582345,0.0027426279,0.00023329686,0.000023444227,0.0000102381855,0.0000076157194,0.0013433394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97653586,0.015484738,0.00075456337,0.0015225948,0.0031525965,0.0025496182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9471375,0.03190095,0.00950014,0.003337131,0.006778762,0.0013455773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023715798,0.00016956379,0.0005182926,0.0012098731,0.0036374845,0.0064572454,0.0009158485,0.0030853725,0.0025523931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036946323,0.00020487167,0.000365712,0.0012319362,0.016463997,0.0029107025,0.002949717,0.004563949,0.00015325258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027261705,0.00004250649,0.0039913184,0.00012728856,0.000018623501,0.00014297005,0.00186505,0.0010330576,0.000478942,0.97211534,0.0041000415,0.016057562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009625356,0.00017720446,0.02915791,0.0011192907,0.00005521192,0.00023084348,0.0043640416,0.0043621343,0.0019885679,0.8131208,0.14525455,0.000073162046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00783312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008783812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023715798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007928049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009700645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1254226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559586647","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12216","title":"Holding Polluting Countries to Account for Climate Change: Is “Loss and Damage” Up to the Task?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Loss and damage; Bureaucracy; Technocracy; Mechanism (biology); Convention; Accountability; Climate change; Conference of the parties; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Developing country; Business; Political science; Economics; Kyoto Protocol; Economic growth; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.35484988667667827,"score_gpt":0.4512230386395494,"score_spread":0.0963731519628711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559586647","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021182764,0.35609192,0.01927614,0.5250218,0.0071864314,0.00006415937,0.0002714826,0.000078387595,0.070826955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6102639,0.30361807,0.0058898306,0.06116011,0.0072637442,0.00011725397,0.0001794854,0.000069766924,0.011437932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98198974,0.011084763,0.0006898069,0.0010066818,0.00418254,0.0010464271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97099674,0.014106813,0.005999671,0.00242373,0.0057214107,0.00075162214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018775305,0.00032356847,0.000889587,0.0022679402,0.0013683784,0.0072086276,0.0015143789,0.0046352213,0.0034730579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030586276,0.00029172417,0.0007146714,0.0033698909,0.0122537585,0.009489907,0.0031461662,0.005194171,0.00049340626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007438667,0.000059243703,0.0034204784,0.0019089071,0.00025052432,0.00014091414,0.0006905301,0.0035074984,0.0003537885,0.8046448,0.04693855,0.13801034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054155367,0.00013376688,0.008145283,0.005367943,0.00016578479,0.0001669247,0.0016871664,0.0015495952,0.00076737185,0.40114906,0.5806955,0.00011737889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009536374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071628396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018775305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036718845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009488697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09929448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590357018","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12235","title":"Mobilization in the European Public Sphere: The Struggle Over Genetically Modified Organisms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wageningen University and Research; European Commission","keywords":"Mobilization; Public sphere; Political science; Genetically modified organism; Political economy; Economics; Biology; Law; Politics; Genetics","score_opus":0.1767206533821695,"score_gpt":0.40825635727824755,"score_spread":0.23153570389607805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590357018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3325731,0.095419884,0.0032048055,0.18826483,0.0011038842,0.00006910385,0.00010983328,0.000034687833,0.3792199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717022,0.015621581,0.00025584048,0.0070842085,0.00026547213,0.000028777553,0.00003414256,0.000008512098,0.0049992064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880102,0.0073497705,0.00028485004,0.0009034515,0.0017516679,0.0017001177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98752683,0.008656409,0.0020334446,0.00035393637,0.00071360497,0.0007157404],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01615733,0.00036269345,0.0005423752,0.0035151895,0.004069469,0.012448493,0.0009340806,0.0075435066,0.007519248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012617236,0.00021478142,0.00040270647,0.0057013836,0.013921808,0.007457529,0.0066256505,0.0028882104,0.00051861705],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017497259,0.00018106961,0.006947151,0.0007862347,0.00006404692,0.00092814723,0.031689543,0.00062537834,0.0007993296,0.8478959,0.0128538245,0.097054414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013072074,0.0001928476,0.031432997,0.0043187886,0.00007345739,0.00089205854,0.13654387,0.000691288,0.0014777941,0.17899905,0.64515096,0.00009618432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025804327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018471148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99593055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006937695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006114178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08544916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590583097","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12236","title":"Climate Adaptation in Canada: Governing a Complex Policy Regime","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Adaptation (eye); Corporate governance; Perspective (graphical); Collective action; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Public administration; Political science; Action (physics); Climate change adaptation; Climate change; Economics; Politics; Management; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.1837720184241708,"score_gpt":0.4403403886035817,"score_spread":0.2565683701794109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590583097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40375713,0.033026926,0.021742491,0.17211933,0.00044712317,0.00089352555,0.0017969685,0.00024428862,0.3659722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97784495,0.0067123696,0.004888921,0.0025335609,0.000033336128,0.00009580722,0.00014203778,0.000019203722,0.0077298987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949679,0.0012215475,0.00013991153,0.00050510035,0.001563832,0.0016017052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930568,0.0018215885,0.0006406567,0.00034464186,0.0028330113,0.0013032928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049713487,0.00026690634,0.00048285408,0.0021537521,0.01147142,0.008910382,0.0021236208,0.0016037128,0.002865665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067710243,0.0002714063,0.00035712722,0.005286209,0.012260564,0.001522573,0.0034735613,0.0021842187,0.00011670937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005715626,0.00011871289,0.055748474,0.00089894177,0.00012609798,0.0007784657,0.021717753,0.017207365,0.0019466332,0.7440464,0.028123148,0.12923086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005919898,0.00007893231,0.20249365,0.002601904,0.0001679628,0.00024375944,0.04850048,0.012132468,0.0015674611,0.1441331,0.58776915,0.0002518738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21158949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21158949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37301943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91444445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610935337","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12246","title":"A Concurrent Analysis of Three Institutions that Transform Health Technology‐Based Ventures: Economic Policy, Capital Investment, and Market Approval","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Investment (military); New Ventures; Modernization theory; Capital (architecture); Economics; Value (mathematics); Business; Industrial organization; Venture capital; Entrepreneurship; Economic system; Public economics; Finance; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.6301883544447817,"score_gpt":0.5934895481347838,"score_spread":0.03669880630999789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610935337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8607229,0.0014568716,0.006838565,0.009444341,0.000052932093,0.00034598156,0.0006671937,0.000027199701,0.12044403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970625,0.00031225113,0.0005500693,0.00011533268,0.000008967367,0.000041986597,0.00006647253,0.0000054325133,0.0018370738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543434,0.0016859644,0.000137838,0.00028710542,0.0012050746,0.0012496042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743671,0.01564054,0.0040156734,0.0005778044,0.003925727,0.0014730901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007167147,0.00014606716,0.00037273165,0.0021915263,0.0032146545,0.0066969767,0.0006332349,0.0007833917,0.0044633597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030360602,0.00016661019,0.00026774334,0.0035181236,0.0046416894,0.0024012304,0.0022808241,0.001533777,0.00012575148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029563616,0.00018577567,0.13126525,0.0003213086,0.00007334685,0.0005417505,0.02058072,0.004830802,0.0006877379,0.7598814,0.0053673373,0.075968854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010515694,0.00012557379,0.5979396,0.00083368615,0.00022058,0.00012908732,0.10795884,0.014516302,0.0016714311,0.14378187,0.13260631,0.00011155405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30320165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3805065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30320165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040607598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6028736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746050179","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12258","title":"Nondemarcated Spaces of Knowledge‐Informed Policy Making: How Useful Is the Concept of Boundary Organization in IR?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coproduction; Boundary-work; Science policy; USable; Boundary object; Sociology; Knowledge production; Work (physics); Epistemology; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Politics; International relations; Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Political science; Public relations; Social science; Computer science; Negotiation; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.09198736192291157,"score_gpt":0.4433848888708083,"score_spread":0.3513975269478967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746050179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04256445,0.04399949,0.31792665,0.16535375,0.0016749509,0.00015508613,0.00009292208,0.00015907951,0.42807373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96025276,0.008577065,0.024020365,0.0027010597,0.00066526013,0.00032958592,0.000041877818,0.00007472537,0.0033371213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95208126,0.040909603,0.0011700187,0.001720546,0.0029003348,0.0012182756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9476308,0.039615076,0.0037755303,0.0053589614,0.002372373,0.0012471519],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03272763,0.0005272115,0.0011755197,0.0049222303,0.0052220006,0.024343511,0.0036470247,0.0065070093,0.0055520018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037226815,0.0007356296,0.00094716734,0.0051680696,0.08566449,0.03656147,0.011402665,0.00659528,0.0007367079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036393067,0.0000043362297,0.000053465963,0.00004890243,0.0000030155784,0.000012967075,0.0012233872,0.00018292762,0.00001419807,0.9956708,0.0002680101,0.0025143663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065251133,0.0000053536755,0.000099500045,0.00022424092,0.000004088775,0.000022952876,0.0028549465,0.00050638936,0.000051251605,0.9835089,0.012709633,0.0000060928846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020551053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001375513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007905938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007350825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17308229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748826504","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12259","title":"The Role of Scientific Excellence in the Changing Meaning of Maize in Mexico","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Meaning (existential); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Perspective (graphical); Social science; Public administration; Epistemology; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11808652894189602,"score_gpt":0.4089934117584894,"score_spread":0.2909068828165934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748826504","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27724472,0.31502336,0.007219643,0.23277313,0.0010155649,0.00004974579,0.00019552343,0.0000433255,0.16643499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94288486,0.05241274,0.0012205181,0.00175124,0.0002695996,0.000028951481,0.00002803332,0.000008574356,0.0013954422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957825,0.002948209,0.0001129183,0.00032107756,0.0005767476,0.00025859236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993537,0.004390883,0.0011592665,0.00021205802,0.0005363705,0.00016439967],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009300043,0.0002805847,0.0005089893,0.0024696328,0.003677394,0.007534487,0.0008374306,0.0024004139,0.0012666688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071853227,0.00016972848,0.0002667977,0.004185806,0.019120526,0.005096812,0.0031848366,0.002681344,0.00006519563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007510044,0.000025634281,0.0029396382,0.0012546044,0.00003676265,0.0003865895,0.07452234,0.00045861377,0.000729891,0.874672,0.0036576206,0.041241128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040194896,0.00007936973,0.03179847,0.0075972658,0.0001413327,0.0004467919,0.12225915,0.00080660847,0.0010017169,0.3347798,0.5009555,0.000093750874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010922596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012156751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99632263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0103656715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006200807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075208545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751532661","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12255","title":"Narrowing the Climate Field: The Symbolic Power of Authors in the IPCC's Assessment of Mitigation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Centrality; Dominance (genetics); Field (mathematics); Climate change; Habitus; Politics; Political science; Boundary-work; Symbolic power; Sociology; Power (physics); Regional science; Environmental resource management; Social science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.6767643617733674,"score_gpt":0.686713871062316,"score_spread":0.009949509288948555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751532661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6615942,0.023071878,0.014220859,0.102139674,0.001222418,0.000047596695,0.000084733525,0.0000471766,0.19757141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99654084,0.001777914,0.00040325618,0.0005253421,0.00015047746,0.000010790778,0.00000706768,0.000007998769,0.0005762941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96328884,0.027942417,0.00089316175,0.0014401367,0.0053866324,0.001048906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8379995,0.136918,0.012205,0.00393715,0.007145968,0.0017943927],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030981498,0.00028108057,0.0004351151,0.0059099817,0.006070423,0.012055749,0.0010127409,0.0023671056,0.0027116772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07520913,0.0002728142,0.00021809978,0.005983293,0.027388401,0.013289561,0.008156102,0.0028842443,0.00021485414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016267998,0.000038592007,0.020747678,0.0005253648,0.000049524017,0.00035582727,0.38192388,0.0005550292,0.0010019847,0.49179038,0.0052859886,0.097563066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004641655,0.00009959704,0.02958574,0.0020518797,0.0000887171,0.00040269576,0.4819475,0.0009054756,0.0013899464,0.33563867,0.14773904,0.00010430366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023933926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028658502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99392956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042533386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043740664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16384774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751666626","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12257","title":"Is a Melting Arctic Making the Arctic Council Too Cool? Exploring the Limits to the Effectiveness of a Boundary Organization","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Circumpolar star; Boundary-work; Arctic; Nexus (standard); Credibility; Indigenous; Boundary (topology); Legitimacy; Political science; Work (physics); Planetary boundaries; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Ecology; Engineering; Oceanography; Sustainable development; Social science; Geology","score_opus":0.35676426898570845,"score_gpt":0.4936330742207326,"score_spread":0.13686880523502415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751666626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39205775,0.1337622,0.009720443,0.07169091,0.0011307247,0.00014302181,0.00010843917,0.00004494633,0.39134154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739358,0.02218059,0.0011044407,0.00092281844,0.000112411144,0.000039433275,0.0000142451145,0.000009985586,0.001680405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800356,0.0147123905,0.00058590196,0.0010079755,0.0021920851,0.0014660987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97268516,0.01869468,0.0033744765,0.0009033559,0.003214655,0.0011276819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019783333,0.00023120975,0.00072855677,0.0030743612,0.0064916085,0.013049378,0.0019128468,0.0032453663,0.0035900003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025353536,0.00034441476,0.00040591104,0.0029930994,0.02249546,0.006523312,0.004694124,0.0018529888,0.00031225898],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117544456,0.00006520085,0.009859459,0.0023467923,0.00010592847,0.00074530026,0.04822302,0.0020320846,0.00056184543,0.8685009,0.003984387,0.06345742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043878408,0.0002395632,0.04139659,0.014487999,0.0003212697,0.0004839505,0.37969622,0.0016722389,0.0012392235,0.19592628,0.36438322,0.000109551904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031493686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03521961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031493686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009774378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014536803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10462552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754980057","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12264","title":"Water Policy Reform in Southern Alberta: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press. 272 pages. ISBN 9781487500535, $45.00 cloth. B.Timothy Heinmiller. 2016.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.04662304864148491,"score_gpt":0.3233867709611937,"score_spread":0.2767637223197088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754980057","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064641004,0.6890318,0.0013720323,0.17357326,0.0027037668,0.000084387066,0.00084604876,0.00017549288,0.12574908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25125593,0.5459709,0.004315226,0.0076966295,0.0009212208,0.00020356194,0.0016301823,0.00012242462,0.18788388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984017,0.0003785555,0.000044117776,0.00006807286,0.00068625313,0.00042128583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988206,0.000306962,0.00008205478,0.00003555109,0.00041703452,0.00033786517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030529303,0.0009723133,0.0008019154,0.0022710802,0.00438051,0.005327094,0.0020757131,0.0033475696,0.009816433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031951792,0.00065102155,0.00035376474,0.008746505,0.004868089,0.001967666,0.0019382548,0.0023083768,0.0008086344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007277712,0.00005542635,0.0025872237,0.0018582171,0.000059080663,0.0002891778,0.00643132,0.003908041,0.0004595854,0.09964768,0.7027012,0.18193038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023659999,0.0000182535,0.013232064,0.0016324271,0.00006167963,0.00006195489,0.008927458,0.000766705,0.0003322631,0.018188477,0.9567226,0.000032324708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94837016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9795234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06757559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06757559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13467097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4902975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767665785","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12273","title":"Boundary Concepts for Boundary Work Between Science and Technology Studies and International Relations: Special Issue Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"University-Industry-Government Innovation Models","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"SAINT; Sociology; Boundary (topology); Session (web analytics); Humanities; Library science; Art history; Art; Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.133647575268335,"score_gpt":0.4485865198661324,"score_spread":0.31493894459779737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767665785","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038502712,0.40817425,0.051064808,0.22553863,0.15334561,0.00018181889,0.00032789304,0.00029236273,0.15722433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17143351,0.30449158,0.02980386,0.06686687,0.3430176,0.0014332274,0.001021135,0.0011946075,0.08073766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958644,0.001811746,0.00036788394,0.0005395981,0.0010745184,0.00034184306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98570377,0.01062312,0.0006344519,0.0006559677,0.0018129683,0.0005697418],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00834897,0.000976447,0.001839962,0.009633133,0.0035000506,0.012440558,0.0021939217,0.00960786,0.024424402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0171474,0.00063772284,0.0015913404,0.008232355,0.0139834145,0.026274692,0.006907874,0.012603978,0.0036602656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017018932,0.000033180022,0.00012873343,0.00063268683,0.000008283913,0.00006085908,0.0014377236,0.00009251846,0.00014159206,0.82985324,0.13507679,0.032517463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017009352,0.000032690503,0.000459135,0.0023916669,0.00001574175,0.00019869239,0.0019342955,0.00025490014,0.00013250708,0.43791276,0.5566181,0.00003249933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011335679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096396194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99649996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037595278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029818523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081707776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783294600","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12277","title":"Over a Decade of Scholarship on the Politics and Policy of Science and Technology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.15935138935851667,"score_gpt":0.5451591202517839,"score_spread":0.38580773089326725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783294600","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024057934,0.7482531,0.0055301883,0.15700704,0.016432285,0.000027016345,0.00016014052,0.00007012862,0.07011429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051550437,0.88148123,0.0025676573,0.027745137,0.025610002,0.00007088819,0.00018052249,0.000118911405,0.010675218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854498,0.0060509797,0.0010761032,0.0017656777,0.004887909,0.0007696095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88525575,0.09271898,0.0049119955,0.0047401763,0.009647695,0.0027254142],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01360353,0.0009427265,0.0021523396,0.008186958,0.0044492814,0.015835036,0.0016272538,0.0076220003,0.01606843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041196413,0.00068966247,0.0009755377,0.018480454,0.011050862,0.014635256,0.0051455568,0.0092162425,0.0043085692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107330896,0.000088859844,0.0011926553,0.009543518,0.00010550738,0.00020011034,0.0046774927,0.0008027876,0.0003420952,0.5640719,0.13851428,0.28035352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011783861,0.00003524529,0.0011433375,0.009150438,0.00002958803,0.00015041798,0.0023238533,0.00022749702,0.00013824603,0.07180442,0.91496104,0.000024081455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047709364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006879991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01015567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018197486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07368481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790886770","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12285","title":"Issue Proximity and Policy Response in Local Governments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Structuring; Local government; Political science; Public economics; Economics; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.10228281172402287,"score_gpt":0.5293169230332962,"score_spread":0.4270341113092734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790886770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88702303,0.0034281241,0.008088953,0.017062817,0.00011618558,0.00013891836,0.00015839185,0.00009497852,0.08388851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975719,0.00071499235,0.0004793459,0.0002855082,0.000012323024,0.00003253429,0.000026506425,0.000009862651,0.000866912],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854299,0.010674237,0.00043234476,0.0009978386,0.0012181245,0.0012476211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96764785,0.020433933,0.006013317,0.0014560043,0.0026522854,0.0017965293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009580393,0.00024794176,0.00053686503,0.0023174435,0.0030852156,0.0060929283,0.0012530348,0.0019828726,0.0124451695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04839323,0.00032283206,0.0004285819,0.00395515,0.0064160936,0.0053740996,0.007983224,0.0021597678,0.0008117782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004902312,0.0011460023,0.29579592,0.0030742448,0.00042375166,0.0016781638,0.23189342,0.010679403,0.0017948645,0.20843239,0.010455524,0.23413609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010451976,0.0003448838,0.23572583,0.002440327,0.00024886374,0.00038168623,0.418947,0.0057757115,0.0019176545,0.20033322,0.13361463,0.00016565438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00816518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008235043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0124451695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006570496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003947926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05066657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797802742","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12287","title":"Agenda‐Setting at the Energy‐Water Nexus: Constructing and Maintaining a Policy Monopoly in U.S. Hydraulic Fracturing Regulation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Monopoly; Hydraulic fracturing; Conceptualization; Nexus (standard); Public administration; Politics; Public policy; Scholarship; Hegemony; Economics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Market economy; Engineering","score_opus":0.024427594904419002,"score_gpt":0.33771916276746466,"score_spread":0.3132915678630457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797802742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4619427,0.03512478,0.0414185,0.16834322,0.0007590644,0.00022133176,0.00010809479,0.0000863504,0.29199594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921669,0.0025919515,0.0022160276,0.0014980505,0.00007096649,0.00007020689,0.000014859305,0.00001448395,0.001356644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97183615,0.02159419,0.0008582735,0.0015193346,0.00265753,0.0015345878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94022524,0.049965516,0.0039423164,0.0016168343,0.003343137,0.0009069273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047876544,0.00032080925,0.00057658285,0.0049623298,0.010126186,0.013293683,0.00183539,0.0038264277,0.0018125795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0333784,0.0005242017,0.00036823069,0.00504926,0.042877775,0.012113628,0.006294753,0.0058059497,0.00015748851],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032210857,0.000032536882,0.0017909195,0.00024022594,0.000016488593,0.00020268872,0.07991607,0.0004857728,0.0008523652,0.89260787,0.0018270592,0.021995759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042604675,0.00010144839,0.010421863,0.0030132718,0.00007257529,0.00017712192,0.20083019,0.0022661956,0.0038661666,0.5310969,0.24798954,0.00012214427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013201623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018246438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047876544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01886982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019226614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25319844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890438172","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12309","title":"Do Administrative Traditions Matter for Climate Change Adaptation Policy? A Comparative Analysis of 32 High‐Income Countries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving","keywords":"Operationalization; Bureaucracy; Adaptation (eye); Mediation; Climate change; Construct (python library); Political science; Climate change adaptation; Public administration; Public economics; Economics","score_opus":0.42210807044931375,"score_gpt":0.5881640124188736,"score_spread":0.16605594196955986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890438172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980902,0.00033460135,0.0001086819,0.00013519684,0.0000036166543,0.0000075176395,0.000088304776,8.310605e-7,0.0012309485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968064,0.00013015828,0.000059900198,0.000015799662,0.0000017624645,0.000006369471,0.000065831555,5.7699305e-7,0.000038970553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966949,0.0020556655,0.00021358645,0.0002528374,0.00029062442,0.0004923599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872925,0.0051118187,0.005181408,0.0007338578,0.0008889165,0.000791495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041010315,0.00011591558,0.00036379587,0.0017296005,0.0012023126,0.001584182,0.0003821409,0.00031201672,0.0020533507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009374781,0.00018511275,0.0003121033,0.004316522,0.0015815008,0.0009636841,0.0015790662,0.00054563663,0.0000980893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010667776,0.00010935804,0.97799164,0.00014234374,0.00028230518,0.00018117222,0.004507311,0.00088884064,0.00018436096,0.0058803065,0.00036208695,0.009363547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011252551,0.000047240115,0.98714674,0.00010357488,0.00006587319,0.00003891629,0.010356728,0.00031380248,0.00009663432,0.00044784497,0.0013612824,0.00001000107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027182324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014309033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014825658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028017998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890445188","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12307","title":"Responses to the Clean Power Plan: Factors Influencing State Decision‐Making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Plan (archaeology); Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Clean Air Act; Public administration; Power (physics); Action plan; Political science; Renewable energy; Business; Public economics; Economics; Engineering; Air pollution; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.1832777712545188,"score_gpt":0.550334321556354,"score_spread":0.36705655030183515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890445188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97826666,0.00024811056,0.00071335625,0.0049046497,0.000033038556,0.000043511485,0.000112766495,0.000007986217,0.015670083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991073,0.00015336869,0.000086745844,0.00018553967,0.000009868123,0.000010108857,0.000041931864,0.000002689723,0.00040241712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943053,0.0038114577,0.0001995686,0.0003469291,0.00057126925,0.0007653407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646417,0.02461873,0.0061568776,0.0007871504,0.0021183938,0.0016771137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006596231,0.00011300549,0.00018085522,0.00067716686,0.0011137059,0.0032140284,0.0004962717,0.0011481675,0.006003072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031054718,0.0001749649,0.0002652986,0.0010811286,0.0016640979,0.001296794,0.0012004765,0.0017527597,0.0004598568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005099174,0.00118412,0.85710657,0.00022556714,0.000295626,0.00044473368,0.03642554,0.0066575697,0.0012353831,0.021928502,0.008024617,0.06596193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004528974,0.00019472682,0.8844027,0.00025763304,0.00007187029,0.000065663946,0.07369222,0.005905237,0.00065767823,0.014467162,0.020160599,0.000079292455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013409367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02027288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013409367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016565511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016008888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03488463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903574831","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12318","title":"Politics, Science, and Termination: A Case Study of Water Fluoridation Policy in Calgary in 2011","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Water fluoridation; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Science policy; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.12360546832924203,"score_gpt":0.5322894178530488,"score_spread":0.4086839495238068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903574831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95536053,0.0008222297,0.0008866656,0.011157477,0.000059899176,0.00018000859,0.00005156486,0.000007797932,0.03147378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99068916,0.00071225537,0.0005062314,0.0011566405,0.000021661277,0.00007889517,0.000028650615,0.0000071839354,0.006799377],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919674,0.003920707,0.00016458383,0.00035530282,0.0009094763,0.0026824756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98783267,0.008267089,0.0011104837,0.00030214243,0.00085532473,0.0016322843],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007862994,0.00025284712,0.00072793703,0.0014559992,0.034150973,0.007551875,0.0020284343,0.005410317,0.0034985193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010734616,0.0004356071,0.00034816968,0.0035550501,0.013862697,0.0019483094,0.006564983,0.0067299344,0.00016703889],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023653124,0.00095692655,0.09081635,0.0003268939,0.000060144775,0.024788722,0.7069427,0.0037115484,0.00092492485,0.11842449,0.0112772975,0.041533485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004748531,0.00012369559,0.05451944,0.00034077704,0.000030103469,0.0006470581,0.88544196,0.0014019375,0.0003941432,0.0051680547,0.05183611,0.000049300685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67572016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86334836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96584904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06546913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047160603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65237916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905709414","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12325","title":"Patterns of Local Policy Disruption: Regulatory Responses to Uber in Ten North American Cities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Sharing Economy and Platforms","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Function (biology); Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public policy; Regional science; Business; Public administration; Geography; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.07848198485844864,"score_gpt":0.3973423916918929,"score_spread":0.31886040683344424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905709414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967476,0.0000999627,0.00011325055,0.0004224084,0.00000333161,0.000019534053,0.00011203729,0.0000066952703,0.0024751201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990706,0.00011220505,0.000069041685,0.00007098212,0.0000024363308,0.000022120565,0.0001054805,0.0000030422698,0.0005442593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760014,0.000891802,0.00014498281,0.00028026555,0.0005343586,0.0005485212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987334,0.0027035924,0.0062868865,0.00052241015,0.0021275443,0.00102549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025183978,0.00015378512,0.00023344616,0.0024811388,0.0022167999,0.0025526201,0.0008601505,0.0005882327,0.002864973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007197954,0.00022797743,0.00019067059,0.0058002826,0.0025584642,0.0012706649,0.0028536832,0.00087273377,0.00018102895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016802261,0.00021915324,0.9144751,0.00016538343,0.000057028396,0.00038111553,0.05371397,0.001310166,0.0010145156,0.004762355,0.0028764624,0.02085671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000590814,0.00004503216,0.85884815,0.00004463568,0.00001294413,0.000027207785,0.13497365,0.0005895707,0.0002859626,0.0003466813,0.004795025,0.000025280611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13980682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3268522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13980682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069357404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036386547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2779861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909047292","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12320","title":"Autonomous Local Climate Change Policy: An Analysis of the Effect of Intergovernmental Relations Among Subnational Governments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions","keywords":"Climate change; Local government; Corporate governance; Climate governance; Autonomy; Intervention (counseling); Government (linguistics); Climate change mitigation; Political science; Political economy of climate change; Greenhouse gas; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.04794921549692891,"score_gpt":0.45703102359914066,"score_spread":0.40908180810221173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909047292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733088,0.00056609476,0.0009593458,0.0016433201,0.000014237518,0.00007210405,0.00019751753,0.000012925818,0.023225583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999046,0.00016417657,0.00008377685,0.00005117588,0.00000485565,0.000020020514,0.000033753367,0.000002448873,0.0005936758],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99264306,0.0049546733,0.00011378514,0.0003883201,0.00067095057,0.0012292329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752841,0.017838096,0.0030075617,0.0005849209,0.0017539856,0.0015313089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061817598,0.00016199853,0.00075337937,0.0014412353,0.0015649103,0.0032366002,0.0010773368,0.0008643035,0.008116106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017649505,0.00015893797,0.00063586875,0.003417591,0.0018808122,0.0014312154,0.00213784,0.0013582226,0.00027534788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015331716,0.0018832496,0.5541927,0.00096058875,0.0020835705,0.0013317122,0.021712484,0.12451784,0.0020360465,0.19883722,0.007329847,0.0835816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020460736,0.0005567401,0.8411241,0.0003016592,0.00091215543,0.00006130141,0.0454387,0.057068143,0.00065820344,0.034890063,0.018723592,0.000060819846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17648596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16619666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17648596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011987053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00616739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3509174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911564895","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12333","title":"Censors Get Smart: Evidence from Psiphon in Iran","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Politics; Variety (cybernetics); Control (management); Blocking (statistics); Analytics; Political science; Command and control; Internet privacy; Computer security; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Data science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.10839368428645872,"score_gpt":0.425306262922028,"score_spread":0.31691257863556926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911564895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840074,0.00094206934,0.00038937767,0.0010207767,0.000020158377,0.000032720898,0.0005595695,0.00000689022,0.0130209755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987023,0.0004964266,0.000082168386,0.00011449521,0.000023721932,0.000008590163,0.00022435679,0.0000034431882,0.00034440585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676526,0.0012476859,0.0001665262,0.00032468123,0.0009391667,0.0005567733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788972,0.008779657,0.007834236,0.001171921,0.0028525097,0.0004645512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004170597,0.00018711446,0.0002873668,0.001940252,0.0010164096,0.0016445036,0.00067951257,0.00079390616,0.0049788738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016449047,0.00017656188,0.0002179258,0.0039994954,0.0018057775,0.0012034407,0.00093361613,0.0013445108,0.00042265188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040944398,0.00035628074,0.9108224,0.0004885084,0.00013892089,0.0008789948,0.015725909,0.00051218364,0.00034027034,0.009477775,0.0062787393,0.054570593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024573214,0.00018920423,0.941862,0.0003310608,0.00008934836,0.0003749543,0.03592802,0.0008336964,0.00043664366,0.0015242258,0.018381646,0.000024632152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030771239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036264583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030771239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013586378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015657144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061184227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941567467","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12343","title":"A Bridge in Flux: Narratives and the Policy Process in the Pacific Northwest","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Public administration; Cohesion (chemistry); Agency (philosophy); Public policy; Political science; Opposition (politics); Bridge (graph theory); Public relations; Sociology; Politics; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.08676447093443009,"score_gpt":0.5030293425483768,"score_spread":0.41626487161394676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941567467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51532036,0.016098017,0.006811079,0.11208892,0.00032239014,0.00021568978,0.00016744883,0.000050058658,0.34892616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830341,0.008328313,0.001345304,0.0009985797,0.0000379002,0.00011334382,0.00004656783,0.000020386258,0.00607567],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98491687,0.012341453,0.00031532365,0.00043613417,0.0012879142,0.0007022539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701867,0.024810303,0.0019429415,0.0006352083,0.0013011441,0.0011237774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024902849,0.0003670937,0.00036328813,0.0042366255,0.016773194,0.016448824,0.00183925,0.0030162712,0.0038713508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02705754,0.0004071867,0.00021553514,0.0057895216,0.028842991,0.022009805,0.008905961,0.003669722,0.00022462638],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026462256,0.00006152753,0.0032593552,0.00023638018,0.000010037955,0.000512173,0.6237326,0.0004810466,0.00008456147,0.3265603,0.00453877,0.040496796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071734144,0.000015255372,0.002904898,0.0014730478,0.0000071482154,0.00008508675,0.8118153,0.0004271233,0.00019707468,0.05623444,0.12681332,0.000020115787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07199254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063982606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07199254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022700021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027192337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16470093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956048699","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12357","title":"Technology Innovation as a Response to Climate Change: The Case of the Climate Change Emissions Management Corporation of Alberta","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Subsidy; Climate change; Corporation; Revenue; Government (linguistics); Clean technology; Economics; Technological change; Business; Sustainable development; Element (criminal law); Natural resource economics; Economic policy; Finance; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.255227534098922,"score_gpt":0.426473608133369,"score_spread":0.17124607403444697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956048699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74121857,0.0027924834,0.0013933871,0.026130937,0.00009549417,0.000093359035,0.00009581008,0.00002798651,0.22815189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96121943,0.0013677506,0.00045016716,0.0011561189,0.00002652239,0.000015461846,0.000032317184,0.000004670265,0.035727527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998021,0.000385942,0.000022001459,0.00010960978,0.00045902957,0.0010024713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975885,0.001109716,0.00013793277,0.000071650495,0.00046255765,0.0006296227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016177762,0.00018394973,0.0001737319,0.0010508427,0.0126287,0.0054868176,0.0012291623,0.0027712844,0.0036275252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022139414,0.00017483716,0.00024813143,0.0016258903,0.005134876,0.0010869814,0.0022951553,0.0018516022,0.00015115605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003226556,0.00032891304,0.066655956,0.00019117583,0.00006965111,0.022362135,0.036575638,0.014441403,0.003647805,0.7681136,0.026594006,0.06069705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018244778,0.0002680088,0.12417737,0.00034987187,0.00015184926,0.001988555,0.15078159,0.016203443,0.0036588258,0.050865624,0.65115595,0.00021655447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9292901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96580964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070709884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059560936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055660684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4321469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980018282","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12332","title":"Regulating Autonomy: An Assessment of Policy Language for Highly Automated Vehicles","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Ohio Sea Grant College, Ohio State University; U.S. Department of Transportation","keywords":"Enthusiasm; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Intervention (counseling); Politics; Automation; Public relations; Public policy; Moral responsibility; Business; Political science; Engineering; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.15440160442015052,"score_gpt":0.6346340662197679,"score_spread":0.4802324617996174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980018282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6660208,0.019809501,0.021052614,0.09076181,0.00054744235,0.0007747205,0.001250595,0.000088649394,0.19969384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923036,0.002012983,0.0030535888,0.001345493,0.00007782264,0.00027519045,0.00019506406,0.000026510563,0.00070970616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9363229,0.03916876,0.0045602145,0.0022691374,0.015803702,0.0018752638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5562729,0.35924497,0.032643825,0.006942269,0.042781215,0.0021147016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08397308,0.0002987837,0.000570351,0.0072687417,0.0040341597,0.014304621,0.0020298073,0.0026337786,0.0035270783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18855634,0.00047926573,0.0004833406,0.008225129,0.011239012,0.009734513,0.0039052947,0.0038528922,0.00033895051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024458356,0.00019979125,0.03598303,0.0027687892,0.00009063039,0.0004365871,0.13148417,0.0026920373,0.0011437404,0.75281924,0.007625126,0.06451233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009919822,0.00035712027,0.09525221,0.015011952,0.00026118406,0.00039854308,0.37123147,0.011584891,0.0042160694,0.23108137,0.27024856,0.00025745033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016217312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013480205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08397308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02209808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021016346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4440974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013926913","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12373","title":"The Political Viability of Carbon Pricing: Policy Design and Framing in British Columbia and California","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Revenue; Politics; Opposition (politics); Economics; Public economics; Voting; Elite; Carbon tax; Political science; Finance; Climate change; Law","score_opus":0.19825809881026596,"score_gpt":0.3699682312093579,"score_spread":0.17171013239909194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013926913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89997995,0.0035170084,0.000723899,0.0070304326,0.00006232669,0.00019958052,0.00030873925,0.000029847266,0.08814817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99328256,0.0008523933,0.00037807773,0.00039528418,0.000011804539,0.0000668529,0.000085445194,0.000007459926,0.0049199513],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940024,0.0029406801,0.00010199099,0.00043151408,0.0011322566,0.0013911093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98458475,0.00859195,0.00087378937,0.00045958508,0.0042161415,0.001273813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074045737,0.00020573987,0.00042605776,0.0016657686,0.0052228207,0.004999283,0.0014686239,0.0009613823,0.0035374407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019550947,0.000260979,0.00016145063,0.0039589386,0.00359384,0.00083239,0.0017148677,0.0014285349,0.00016389733],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002987842,0.0014698071,0.27773565,0.0015414909,0.00047229938,0.0009978949,0.042067554,0.028030368,0.0040244823,0.19355544,0.05737914,0.38973793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000583239,0.00046088488,0.7304366,0.0010555929,0.00061002583,0.00006821936,0.08165011,0.014594592,0.0027177015,0.023740096,0.1437304,0.0003525347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9541219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9743636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073744185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073744185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045805924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.535054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090108952","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12401","title":"Problem Uncertainty, Institutional Insularity, and Modes of Learning in Canadian Provincial Hydraulic Fracturing Regulation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Salience (neuroscience); Politics; Nova scotia; Policy learning; Commission; Political science; Uncertainty; Legitimacy; Public administration; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.09537674300979532,"score_gpt":0.43338108316546137,"score_spread":0.33800434015566605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090108952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9334111,0.0006259654,0.0025688664,0.004942891,0.000015381707,0.00013236619,0.00020577532,0.000024145478,0.05807347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990483,0.00007823765,0.00018457713,0.000041504572,9.845775e-7,0.000008118157,0.000018064968,0.000002081351,0.0006180988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896237,0.0024020602,0.00029506718,0.0007429825,0.0033177081,0.0036184413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97594255,0.009020384,0.004011502,0.0012479606,0.007453886,0.002323746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009326991,0.00019417038,0.0003745745,0.00321524,0.008019941,0.006460196,0.0015976029,0.0008059507,0.002882369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027674615,0.00026485758,0.00036622785,0.0036078757,0.011308933,0.0014440673,0.004344908,0.0014408907,0.00008398195],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028096087,0.00027339335,0.5713203,0.000331466,0.00014383315,0.0005165212,0.07679907,0.024456412,0.0013691608,0.20242052,0.004675831,0.11741248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004646321,0.000089308916,0.76850325,0.0004623264,0.00006917844,0.000096315336,0.1356951,0.015629688,0.0013504556,0.030811373,0.047078513,0.00016806938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96949726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98168844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8253423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1746577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13563329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9572801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125201229","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00563.x","title":"Public Attitudes toward Climate Science and Climate Policy in Federal Systems: Canada and the United States Compared<sup>1</sup>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public administration; Public opinion; Legislation; Federalism; Corporate governance; Public policy; Politics; Business; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.612327257039181,"score_gpt":0.5533408714801941,"score_spread":0.05898638555898694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125201229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863673,0.0003832032,0.000078614095,0.0039003354,0.000018657638,0.000021088572,0.00019392265,0.000004834946,0.009031952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874264,0.000272734,0.00003447555,0.00026606908,0.0000048613974,0.000005484023,0.00006614833,0.0000012561861,0.0006063257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971271,0.0004093151,0.000049726783,0.00016590524,0.0011882199,0.0010598383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932429,0.0013990246,0.0010892446,0.00010649376,0.0027206081,0.0014418398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029746918,0.0001346734,0.00026319717,0.0013895789,0.005795783,0.0036116554,0.0007251066,0.00079652196,0.0028190718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068654716,0.00011180342,0.00025273432,0.0036947993,0.0038399547,0.0006784694,0.0013997055,0.0010217368,0.00009535715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002802522,0.00030602692,0.7905097,0.00020214032,0.00009806052,0.0002611991,0.1301009,0.0010141137,0.001349488,0.014839918,0.010598302,0.05043989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014226072,0.000046162597,0.845089,0.000107325315,0.000031056483,0.000025233867,0.14318931,0.00045634038,0.00032225752,0.0006056177,0.010069036,0.000044509106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99338466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052559763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052559763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064714044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38134956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191796123","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12440","title":"Climate and transportation policy sequencing in California and Quebec","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Emissions trading; Government (linguistics); Economics; Carbon price; Climate policy; Climate change; Natural resource economics; Public economics; Business; Ecology","score_opus":0.05047654089434348,"score_gpt":0.3809072109686305,"score_spread":0.330430670074287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191796123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8195327,0.015178936,0.0021281876,0.013603738,0.00022222118,0.00022566944,0.012231413,0.00011855856,0.13675852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892351,0.0025335392,0.0007524795,0.00078294263,0.00001181804,0.00003620464,0.0014677844,0.000010014127,0.0051701646],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892503,0.00016972201,0.00003726634,0.0001524088,0.00036903235,0.00034651134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958418,0.00068057864,0.00048192622,0.00009884887,0.0024054751,0.0004913023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013150496,0.0001812267,0.00020175744,0.001629298,0.0024183171,0.002269066,0.0010393269,0.0004599377,0.0045216293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040339567,0.00011601267,0.00029669108,0.004118086,0.0011016525,0.0006132953,0.00053061324,0.00077932223,0.00011276243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034091738,0.0002819125,0.65162295,0.0011521726,0.0005877259,0.001051146,0.00565303,0.029277839,0.0024028628,0.081256084,0.07098052,0.15539287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004877168,0.00006361924,0.8974466,0.000534634,0.00015648504,0.000089208756,0.00792743,0.0057850983,0.0006383396,0.0014040874,0.085788146,0.00011777263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99853265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08669353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08669353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62900853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194536865","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12445","title":"Decarbonization and climate change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Work (physics); Political science; Public relations; Engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.17602089917500585,"score_gpt":0.5162178176933266,"score_spread":0.3401969185183208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194536865","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006603655,0.60579777,0.00170381,0.27682176,0.05304142,0.00003333952,0.00025056198,0.00007358869,0.055674024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21820994,0.54163,0.0032692591,0.11775124,0.071454816,0.0001425767,0.00045271387,0.00023659035,0.046852883],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949268,0.0029283222,0.00019389177,0.0004717881,0.0011524023,0.00032681116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909066,0.0060421736,0.0008660368,0.0003568903,0.0013717553,0.00045648316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037980822,0.00051726925,0.0005319772,0.0015996904,0.0017811813,0.006712957,0.00064903323,0.0031028017,0.00586215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012054711,0.00021454626,0.00068007654,0.0022010324,0.0033422858,0.0031528864,0.0019358333,0.0042916075,0.0013265446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001419078,0.00006203124,0.003675619,0.0031933645,0.00020561261,0.00022922874,0.005270499,0.0006640599,0.0008013484,0.28720602,0.5260399,0.17251037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007661713,0.000021222544,0.0024880683,0.001113442,0.000033443932,0.000091025766,0.0010804079,0.000113917056,0.00017388242,0.0292083,0.96565264,0.000015979167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035337987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049488074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006712957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028103336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051577855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020390451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195244527","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12439","title":"Bridging the ideological gap? How fairness perceptions mediate the effect of revenue recycling on public support for carbon taxes in the United States, Canada and Germany","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Revenue; Ideology; Politics; Public economics; Greenhouse gas; Carbon tax; Opposition (politics); Economics; Appeal; Tax revenue; Public support; Business; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5056507335118894,"score_gpt":0.5461812399247336,"score_spread":0.04053050641284417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195244527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9824638,0.0011853615,0.00018503382,0.0014328234,0.000038348768,0.000026989137,0.00016333695,0.000003634001,0.014500768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998281,0.00052266876,0.00007830307,0.00018332936,0.0000065760605,0.000009504006,0.00007584734,0.000003082014,0.00083979056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981206,0.00058161304,0.0000338273,0.000189376,0.00054721674,0.0005273917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924499,0.002963823,0.0013565781,0.0002707253,0.0021567978,0.000802287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034108204,0.00025402196,0.0004773376,0.0011004783,0.0028896816,0.0034996716,0.00066770124,0.00070855033,0.0043722787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011910981,0.00016015457,0.00041097152,0.0016853254,0.0024061874,0.00073120784,0.001128316,0.00095874205,0.00016775908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012113077,0.00047622243,0.8665695,0.00041231836,0.000506477,0.0003005973,0.036948644,0.0009906972,0.001452361,0.017545775,0.0062936014,0.06729247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040403393,0.000038937058,0.9613866,0.00019437661,0.00015026907,0.000019448107,0.030719688,0.00072211167,0.00031456578,0.0017341699,0.0046447716,0.00003461684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91168207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91838336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08831793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012094368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019137532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17767608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199853562","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12448","title":"Holding out the promise of Lasswell's dream: Big data analytics in public policy research and teaching","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Data Quality and Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Big data; Scope (computer science); Policy analysis; Public policy; Curriculum; Corporate governance; Analytics; Policy Sciences; Political science; Policy studies; Public relations; Education policy; Sociology; Data science; Public administration; Higher education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Economics; Management; Data mining","score_opus":0.9023683653060873,"score_gpt":0.6734491997677207,"score_spread":0.22891916553836666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199853562","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036655043,0.05408391,0.026701702,0.89798754,0.005553368,0.00006425992,0.00016074935,0.00017527195,0.01160775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45247188,0.1951213,0.1630836,0.15034655,0.019892273,0.0007911303,0.0004162246,0.0006039813,0.01727306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9429155,0.043852992,0.002129927,0.0018367441,0.007897121,0.0013677871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6311038,0.3124955,0.0068144836,0.015603709,0.024476158,0.009506322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1256978,0.0006514694,0.0012442933,0.008263829,0.005014584,0.023333648,0.0019541013,0.005665219,0.007935419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19440728,0.0009327689,0.0012120041,0.008345019,0.018461293,0.040486872,0.011650419,0.015023522,0.0017936083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067443056,0.000095713236,0.006766094,0.002167476,0.00014264535,0.00017855053,0.00631471,0.0011292051,0.0003441461,0.5344439,0.19912072,0.24922934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003949313,0.000066985915,0.0031342774,0.008914304,0.000051666873,0.00015738305,0.010365221,0.0029808804,0.00047322232,0.55104536,0.42263448,0.00013663445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009462748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016269667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1256978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006209249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024189027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6647615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241526669","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12087","title":"Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Innovation Policy and R&D","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Politics; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Sociology; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.14498540728662915,"score_gpt":0.4160784833656265,"score_spread":0.27109307607899735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241526669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011644972,0.014871934,0.008176257,0.030965257,0.02030995,0.00024978412,0.009128101,0.0010717318,0.91406244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010030464,0.013245145,0.0045030634,0.015597452,0.007055224,0.0003361371,0.00883665,0.00050886313,0.93988687],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848676,0.00023835526,0.00006239461,0.00030684826,0.00072297436,0.00018265244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723476,0.0005189801,0.0001590174,0.0003770689,0.0012963229,0.00041391814],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017018556,0.000731519,0.00047309,0.0019593523,0.001281607,0.0044954405,0.0015849967,0.0020482321,0.44507048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073178518,0.0002446024,0.0005695117,0.0019114371,0.00097518455,0.0027402423,0.0024657336,0.002037311,0.29636958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003391792,0.000021928041,0.00026068927,0.00024824028,0.0000042575657,0.000046577446,0.00010463768,0.00008254842,0.00017443197,0.050187387,0.8113629,0.1374725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026124605,0.000005075072,0.00017360602,0.00009995526,0.0000014106937,0.00003020825,0.000037825084,0.000012424013,0.000043751843,0.0045516677,0.9950389,0.0000024602161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037195736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035936795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44507048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018356862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003556669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7915396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247604351","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00527.x","title":"Editor's Notes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credit card; Debit card; Government (linguistics); Cash; Business; Database transaction; ATM card; Function (biology); Faith; Marketing; Computer security; Finance; Payment; Computer science","score_opus":0.2682251820881102,"score_gpt":0.5147452224702969,"score_spread":0.24652004038218667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247604351","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007635674,0.0043568816,0.00026105525,0.23599842,0.7258604,0.00019851574,0.0010183997,0.000222588,0.032007337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002703648,0.007127907,0.0015729475,0.4648718,0.29312503,0.0007464669,0.0007399223,0.00039217886,0.22872004],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815633,0.0021968682,0.0019225745,0.002614655,0.009614825,0.002087749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9369121,0.016052408,0.003756846,0.004170405,0.033153158,0.005954943],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017447585,0.0016420283,0.0020226855,0.0030969605,0.0050151334,0.009507776,0.0067243143,0.020159192,0.17942153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10287941,0.0010816806,0.0027040064,0.002629836,0.0024576576,0.0049896385,0.003493961,0.01710914,0.09066786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006977619,0.000005604039,0.000020928876,0.000097266,0.000002452661,0.00003676444,0.000016995175,0.000008373693,0.000014337709,0.0007850496,0.9957813,0.0032240532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010223203,0.0000051736884,0.0001059876,0.00024654702,0.000003134214,0.00003060412,0.00003415462,0.000014417853,0.000028030188,0.00041788467,0.9990963,0.0000076238553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009331883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0133491615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82057846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066116625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025789645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60022485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250542317","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00561.x","title":"Editor's Notes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Headline; Oil sands; Globe; Climate change; Newspaper; Political science; Environmental science; Geography; Advertising; Business; Archaeology; Geology; Law; Oceanography","score_opus":0.04388472598871102,"score_gpt":0.3950145749989711,"score_spread":0.35112984901026006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250542317","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017243547,0.0063364725,0.0004911152,0.19990112,0.67272687,0.00017423926,0.0014884691,0.00046064425,0.11824868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002818024,0.006635418,0.0011458464,0.21687664,0.15446086,0.00035402257,0.0010806517,0.00060834154,0.6160202],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943153,0.0005268949,0.00044893887,0.00083117647,0.003000555,0.0008771374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824677,0.0032999539,0.00067726255,0.000981729,0.0100320885,0.0025411688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051000724,0.0015777721,0.0011926147,0.0025054098,0.004859935,0.0076636733,0.0043269675,0.011432569,0.2826346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03600245,0.000674481,0.0016890246,0.0018052248,0.0015553952,0.0043333014,0.0029994836,0.010981027,0.13486916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005642001,0.0000043925907,0.000015191851,0.000043186894,8.741389e-7,0.000036675247,0.000017625678,0.000006588415,0.00002060177,0.00082735735,0.9940118,0.005009978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041070043,0.00000278341,0.000051030598,0.00009749727,0.000001151488,0.000033093886,0.000031337113,0.000008777021,0.000027944867,0.00031418403,0.99942434,0.0000038261596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010765015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021585489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2826346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050210594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0142627545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9455069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283577133","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12493","title":"Framing <scp>market‐based</scp> versus regulatory climate policies: A comparative analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Framing (construction); Mandate; Politics; Economics; Public economics; Content analysis; Greenhouse gas; Regulatory reform; Business; Public administration; Political science; Market economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.32610833888049795,"score_gpt":0.43944907419025164,"score_spread":0.11334073530975369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283577133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80997574,0.004309714,0.0027342727,0.0030502842,0.00008340691,0.00066300505,0.00060136477,0.000009367192,0.17857279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949039,0.0017207067,0.0007333652,0.00026677691,0.000029817493,0.00028924661,0.00015017956,0.000011372851,0.0018946783],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841015,0.011013374,0.000389669,0.00041425732,0.0030834984,0.000997652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92245144,0.06232837,0.005451221,0.0010030551,0.008003947,0.0007621459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022568202,0.0003002297,0.00050855894,0.004672335,0.0028561403,0.00558669,0.00089440215,0.001156971,0.014090562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047041748,0.00020882075,0.0005095675,0.0063668336,0.0050129257,0.0044735055,0.0024006914,0.0011981284,0.00050069153],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018982367,0.0013491557,0.09077816,0.0058658053,0.0006971684,0.00055069756,0.42028627,0.0015259403,0.0017299306,0.34732336,0.0077351094,0.12026016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027439135,0.0010614715,0.21199797,0.005599166,0.0008974404,0.00015306685,0.6753907,0.0020078078,0.0015832842,0.019086812,0.08183971,0.00010814574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06755266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09933837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06755266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02468364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007837358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17909318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297825334","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12500","title":"Doing more among institutional boundaries: Platform‐enabled government in China","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Enforcement; Restructuring; Business; China; Workflow; Data sharing; Public administration; Knowledge management; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Finance; Management","score_opus":0.05790143345088219,"score_gpt":0.42860827564057546,"score_spread":0.3707068421896933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297825334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822449,0.0003833761,0.001678371,0.0028076444,0.000018388331,0.00008667783,0.00004410883,0.000028051136,0.0127085615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999009,0.00008614113,0.0003052754,0.00007655926,0.0000025911106,0.000012282459,0.000014389259,0.0000015271859,0.00049223844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997809,0.0007477046,0.000108615226,0.0002188454,0.000331846,0.0007840496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970396,0.0007914209,0.0007513036,0.00042318305,0.00029631678,0.0006981694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034437778,0.00015506544,0.00026753254,0.0018376784,0.0051532043,0.004054785,0.00092189113,0.00095469074,0.0026808123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027115818,0.00020941693,0.00030964398,0.002786812,0.004547823,0.003125064,0.00494581,0.0008273472,0.00010805822],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017139266,0.0006739198,0.33439893,0.0007554774,0.00012428775,0.00763724,0.06439347,0.016999522,0.0052076606,0.41769025,0.005779344,0.1461685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015053147,0.0005401634,0.5826682,0.00070645526,0.00014216521,0.0010079172,0.12799628,0.05431994,0.0035613845,0.13547479,0.09321454,0.00021769217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04816046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06357551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04816046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008666058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021754704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095760286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304788912","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12510","title":"What are the roles of regional and local climate governance discourse and actors? Mediated climate change policy networks in Atlantic Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Ocean Frontier Institute","keywords":"Politics; Corporate governance; Political science; Local government; Climate change; Civil society; Multi-level governance; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.40014690175710255,"score_gpt":0.5242552130650867,"score_spread":0.12410831130798416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304788912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77059966,0.018231712,0.0014597974,0.028578863,0.00020949844,0.00009025913,0.001071474,0.00004608983,0.17971253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921295,0.0041495967,0.00022660372,0.0004971573,0.00002267785,0.00001865525,0.00013137938,0.000012053193,0.0028122892],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963815,0.0010847531,0.00007565841,0.0003675092,0.0011126653,0.0009778455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900041,0.003969022,0.0012319712,0.0003034961,0.0030242202,0.0014671587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051454515,0.00027400343,0.00050783885,0.0043512294,0.009190619,0.011865738,0.0017240158,0.0010285445,0.006399575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01176034,0.00027802432,0.00024432153,0.008447875,0.007967379,0.0031749427,0.0037368345,0.0013142601,0.000235504],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001490202,0.000092344846,0.2048837,0.0012952003,0.0002520094,0.0008136518,0.4887786,0.0012522535,0.0011465425,0.13790129,0.025439596,0.13799573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027307336,0.000023841243,0.30346474,0.0019861162,0.00017018912,0.00009971572,0.48805088,0.0013914071,0.0004931603,0.011270462,0.19290878,0.00011352109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98247886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98972553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09250003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09250003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08935613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6711378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306882821","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12513","title":"Narratives, evidence and public policy in crisis situations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Political science; Politics; Public policy; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.3056817878035042,"score_gpt":0.5662488911252306,"score_spread":0.2605671033217264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306882821","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006399866,0.59872204,0.0017040742,0.35051507,0.04006072,0.000053883454,0.00024072368,0.000041003397,0.008022439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04488076,0.73616785,0.006414543,0.15131609,0.053970035,0.00065883284,0.00060761644,0.00022566336,0.0057587144],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94143957,0.043376334,0.0047290623,0.001963655,0.0071012294,0.0013900516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6778925,0.28508857,0.01315616,0.0056528216,0.015560524,0.0026494355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05238079,0.0010473052,0.0026792868,0.0073804967,0.0040142946,0.02010466,0.0031933922,0.013372634,0.009269782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20166071,0.00081794104,0.0020118505,0.008141515,0.010320829,0.02869433,0.0071574193,0.014715404,0.0021042859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011541074,0.000047742964,0.0007190184,0.025057908,0.000400692,0.00034801237,0.01425424,0.0003706246,0.00019158862,0.33792582,0.49685574,0.123713225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002169203,0.00002096769,0.000647922,0.031478595,0.0001231051,0.0001741363,0.0060378513,0.000092491646,0.000114404014,0.06487064,0.8963676,0.000050520353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024461765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003818533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05238079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0098088905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01894102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27701938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382467672","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12564","title":"Policy advisory systems and public policy making: Bibliometric analysis, knowledge mapping, operationalization, and future research agenda","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research; Hamad Bin Khalifa University","keywords":"Operationalization; Externalization; Policy analysis; Political science; Publishing; Scopus; Public policy; Bibliometrics; Public relations; Library science; Sociology; Public administration; Computer science; Psychology; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.33716383787605764,"score_gpt":0.580891066240051,"score_spread":0.2437272283639934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382467672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6342491,0.086407915,0.038426798,0.087154835,0.0008801537,0.00071991613,0.0057141315,0.00061166065,0.1458354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770831,0.011794517,0.008349578,0.0003357773,0.00047290453,0.00018192633,0.0009974984,0.00002965889,0.0007551284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9481082,0.032694396,0.0033951323,0.0024650118,0.011507951,0.0018293405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7922911,0.15339798,0.024816811,0.006834237,0.020012112,0.002647731],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052339207,0.0009299275,0.0020276054,0.07975431,0.0028645124,0.026461812,0.0019285107,0.0017625164,0.0047153495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15455677,0.00047212417,0.0010854205,0.19534013,0.0063277287,0.022022039,0.004798333,0.0012808351,0.00047062608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015135393,0.0003304014,0.41529402,0.005339984,0.0009592282,0.00021849378,0.01315948,0.0061658043,0.00029319985,0.22861733,0.011549368,0.31792137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005703723,0.00021960835,0.42348212,0.009947645,0.0006855315,0.000539393,0.11341475,0.055565372,0.0015288437,0.31035924,0.08392103,0.00027949788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009756842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057593533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9476608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008095361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013414888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2767995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386420634","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12433","title":"Issue Information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; University of Denver; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; University of Oklahoma; Reed College; University of Bern; Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México; George Mason University","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.18947437854206714,"score_gpt":0.582615297827933,"score_spread":0.3931409192858658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386420634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002787056,0.0010682329,0.0010327358,0.0089227045,0.037377708,0.00071356114,0.045176994,0.0016731294,0.90375626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009481719,0.00060007116,0.0004156427,0.0018816626,0.0043771793,0.00028982878,0.011136385,0.00055740523,0.9797936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970047,0.00036589164,0.0002796344,0.00036029203,0.001737349,0.00025209988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98839045,0.0028187206,0.0007255267,0.0014842519,0.0046210154,0.0019599956],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024496815,0.0014801599,0.0020694367,0.006993201,0.0020691375,0.011353507,0.0025077965,0.004937859,0.881844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019180406,0.00090501865,0.0009148656,0.0077128136,0.0009636359,0.005632821,0.0032179905,0.0029664245,0.80390066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022003942,0.000019795005,0.000035942467,0.00021490974,0.000001384384,0.000013862633,0.000013860016,0.000023182047,0.00006692726,0.001623719,0.9795162,0.01844822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019310497,0.00001571324,0.00031393947,0.00014836666,0.0000018310024,0.000015634912,0.000027714506,0.000052881987,0.00006400313,0.0015837098,0.9977506,0.000006307221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020368872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038893486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118156016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019523705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038591323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16853523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387099093","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12577","title":"Tackling climate change on the local level: A growing research agenda","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Regional science; Political science; Economic geography; Environmental resource management; Geography; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.5213076602375816,"score_gpt":0.5193538638810548,"score_spread":0.0019537963565268157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387099093","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013389713,0.26179194,0.002118605,0.4342072,0.28873688,0.000035189092,0.00008385412,0.00007766859,0.011609573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02445983,0.45044392,0.0026491645,0.09337018,0.4180953,0.00010736004,0.00021301815,0.00030056306,0.010360737],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932805,0.0026143868,0.00052729854,0.0011210161,0.0019618191,0.0004951436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9263317,0.055686098,0.0023358462,0.0012505583,0.010999997,0.0033958252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010028964,0.00068764604,0.0017627345,0.002194285,0.0034914052,0.014107789,0.0029114003,0.008540002,0.011323904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027697707,0.00041126116,0.0013673987,0.0036191035,0.0060464814,0.014519236,0.0051615746,0.014261407,0.0028323103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000541663,0.00006327212,0.0010984173,0.007103382,0.000067711546,0.0003595528,0.008449126,0.00028916323,0.0004236883,0.059551187,0.7223893,0.20015112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005762062,0.000027878967,0.0006386802,0.0030048687,0.000038282145,0.00013027969,0.003297793,0.00014162065,0.00009384678,0.009172101,0.9834141,0.00003484499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00296664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060646143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014107789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039749704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009273694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053038836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391387460","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12599","title":"Introduction to the <i>Special Issue</i> on energy regionalism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Global Energy Security and Policy","field":"Energy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regionalism (politics); Political science; Regional science; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.052042160369110906,"score_gpt":0.414093708692496,"score_spread":0.3620515483233851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391387460","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006062295,0.044552818,0.00094369246,0.16978937,0.6637931,0.00008424854,0.0010474367,0.00028715646,0.11889599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0063357893,0.041059304,0.0007867159,0.072596155,0.73959035,0.00017180464,0.0014909866,0.00064333016,0.13732556],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862814,0.00025937564,0.000084458596,0.0002671855,0.0005511772,0.00020970411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99463344,0.0020587966,0.00033395138,0.00037416833,0.0015401914,0.0010593891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015311437,0.0014030915,0.0012037365,0.0032915792,0.0030616494,0.010753555,0.0020895924,0.004764744,0.079772174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00562459,0.000500499,0.0013576703,0.0028866616,0.0022633055,0.006042989,0.0041185296,0.0077771945,0.033559777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034159077,0.000007390396,0.00005562401,0.00008095847,0.0000021682247,0.000013173297,0.000040712242,0.000013697645,0.00004198552,0.0021739977,0.991351,0.0062158615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002120834,0.000008036191,0.0003982409,0.0002740946,0.0000031004176,0.000032602366,0.00009235623,0.00001936178,0.000020896938,0.0014394383,0.99770397,0.0000057579864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030064532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074965474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079772174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032220369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032475838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26686454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401395650","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12628","title":"Information and expertise in public policy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Political science; Public policy; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Public administration; Social science; Library science; Sociology; Law; Art; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1669695662218569,"score_gpt":0.5435675365951234,"score_spread":0.3765979703732665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401395650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012878182,0.07476012,0.008190904,0.23371413,0.0012612798,0.00006961334,0.0007184425,0.00012288125,0.6682844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8277671,0.097871296,0.005955987,0.020514928,0.004070563,0.0001717792,0.0008172509,0.000118037904,0.042713113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867823,0.007976603,0.00072452513,0.0010575718,0.0023775168,0.0010814973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9351528,0.05264368,0.0032875494,0.0031566594,0.0034597584,0.0022995586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012517748,0.0004113017,0.00088218425,0.007786704,0.004337902,0.017385624,0.0012565306,0.007070601,0.03789192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04539761,0.0004440666,0.00057113305,0.012317081,0.012598898,0.022159098,0.009686687,0.0035656863,0.0045241476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002957308,0.000038141716,0.0016798505,0.00070750486,0.00003197341,0.00025055095,0.005568495,0.00077642314,0.00007296004,0.84581417,0.05292568,0.09210481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018977084,0.000014651994,0.0014207541,0.0020322679,0.000020270858,0.00018856616,0.0033639206,0.000563145,0.00012565216,0.6391142,0.35310942,0.00002816795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071677007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003918211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03789192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009533304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010566713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12676114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408962312","doi":"10.1111/ropr.70010","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Southwestern University of Finance and Economics; International Development Research Centre; University of Denver; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; University of Oklahoma; Reed College; University of Bern; Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México; George Mason University","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.09736387003285374,"score_gpt":0.4909919536232273,"score_spread":0.39362808359037355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408962312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016788606,0.002835667,0.0008074956,0.009962994,0.024278225,0.0007346864,0.025269073,0.0013371406,0.9346069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00049153354,0.0011140275,0.00040999003,0.0030080203,0.0023945372,0.00021323805,0.006144973,0.00024653715,0.98597705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976484,0.00027371812,0.00013781087,0.00024592434,0.0015026783,0.00019148918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99122787,0.0018236205,0.00044878735,0.00075008976,0.004425319,0.0013242465],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025670815,0.0010832595,0.0016248339,0.006466115,0.0018289821,0.00816883,0.0024225588,0.004854998,0.83482176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017395826,0.0007153977,0.0010181973,0.0052005313,0.00077809376,0.0031665703,0.002253678,0.0026770933,0.7639883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011673732,0.0000134559,0.000019830359,0.00015242597,0.000001019451,0.0000070395404,0.0000048122565,0.000015861942,0.00002934801,0.0012265,0.9809934,0.0175246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014887742,0.00000797799,0.00018173533,0.00016874472,0.0000018997953,0.00000826842,0.000014176277,0.00003008617,0.000037751735,0.0009717823,0.99855894,0.0000036976585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005825475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013122684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16517824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002556429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069194436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23560673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410211723","doi":"10.1111/ropr.70020","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Southwestern University of Finance and Economics; International Development Research Centre; University of Denver; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; University of Oklahoma; Reed College; University of Bern; Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México; George Mason University","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.09736387003285374,"score_gpt":0.4909919536232273,"score_spread":0.39362808359037355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410211723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016788606,0.002835667,0.0008074956,0.009962994,0.024278225,0.0007346864,0.025269073,0.0013371406,0.9346069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00049153354,0.0011140275,0.00040999003,0.0030080203,0.0023945372,0.00021323805,0.006144973,0.00024653715,0.98597705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976484,0.00027371812,0.00013781087,0.00024592434,0.0015026783,0.00019148918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99122787,0.0018236205,0.00044878735,0.00075008976,0.004425319,0.0013242465],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025670815,0.0010832595,0.0016248339,0.006466115,0.0018289821,0.00816883,0.0024225588,0.004854998,0.83482176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017395826,0.0007153977,0.0010181973,0.0052005313,0.00077809376,0.0031665703,0.002253678,0.0026770933,0.7639883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011673732,0.0000134559,0.000019830359,0.00015242597,0.000001019451,0.0000070395404,0.0000048122565,0.000015861942,0.00002934801,0.0012265,0.9809934,0.0175246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014887742,0.00000797799,0.00018173533,0.00016874472,0.0000018997953,0.00000826842,0.000014176277,0.00003008617,0.000037751735,0.0009717823,0.99855894,0.0000036976585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005825475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013122684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16517824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002556429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069194436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23560673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412760243","doi":"10.1111/ropr.70047","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Duke Kunshan University; Southwestern University of Finance and Economics; Université de Lyon; Reed College; Concordia University; Michigan Technological University; Ohio State University; International Development Research Centre; Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México; University of Denver; Georgia Institute of Technology; George Mason University","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.09736387003285374,"score_gpt":0.4909919536232273,"score_spread":0.39362808359037355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412760243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016788606,0.002835667,0.0008074956,0.009962994,0.024278225,0.0007346864,0.025269073,0.0013371406,0.9346069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00049153354,0.0011140275,0.00040999003,0.0030080203,0.0023945372,0.00021323805,0.006144973,0.00024653715,0.98597705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976484,0.00027371812,0.00013781087,0.00024592434,0.0015026783,0.00019148918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99122787,0.0018236205,0.00044878735,0.00075008976,0.004425319,0.0013242465],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025670815,0.0010832595,0.0016248339,0.006466115,0.0018289821,0.00816883,0.0024225588,0.004854998,0.83482176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017395826,0.0007153977,0.0010181973,0.0052005313,0.00077809376,0.0031665703,0.002253678,0.0026770933,0.7639883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011673732,0.0000134559,0.000019830359,0.00015242597,0.000001019451,0.0000070395404,0.0000048122565,0.000015861942,0.00002934801,0.0012265,0.9809934,0.0175246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014887742,0.00000797799,0.00018173533,0.00016874472,0.0000018997953,0.00000826842,0.000014176277,0.00003008617,0.000037751735,0.0009717823,0.99855894,0.0000036976585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005825475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013122684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16517824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002556429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069194436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23560673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413165338","doi":"10.1111/ropr.70044","title":"The State of Policy Capacity Problems in Africa: The Viewpoint of Historical Institutionalism From Ghana","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalism; State (computer science); New institutionalism; Political science; Economic system; Economics; Development economics; Political economy; Politics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1620654297573198,"score_gpt":0.45604535458122514,"score_spread":0.29397992482390534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413165338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33720043,0.1249818,0.007625581,0.3200812,0.00076684187,0.00010317356,0.00024445474,0.000033230102,0.20896329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754367,0.020299166,0.0006171899,0.0019980664,0.00011648956,0.00003497444,0.000020983873,0.000009235955,0.0014672573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979475,0.0015273852,0.000047664988,0.00010147606,0.00010367633,0.00027232387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245775,0.005525447,0.0010720094,0.00021076834,0.0004314,0.00030273083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047787726,0.00025163166,0.0003501756,0.001607726,0.0029768492,0.004640496,0.0007097908,0.0016878254,0.002991405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006738495,0.00025424364,0.00012105759,0.0028580136,0.021454047,0.0066696582,0.0029711865,0.002798632,0.00014054791],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028505216,0.000030253115,0.003207369,0.0005645858,0.000010277243,0.0021085625,0.07500195,0.0007885648,0.00024463635,0.8966269,0.004191486,0.017196987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021762342,0.000050051975,0.009099165,0.005387406,0.000026800837,0.001269867,0.21918504,0.0010700952,0.0007503857,0.40047434,0.36262122,0.000043944834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017032899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017190559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017032899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010925569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053904443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07927096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414135937","doi":"10.1111/ropr.70055","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Duke Kunshan University; Southwestern University of Finance and Economics; Université de Lyon; Reed College; Concordia University; Michigan Technological University; Ohio State University; International Development Research Centre; Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México; University of Denver; Georgia Institute of Technology; George Mason University","keywords":"","score_opus":0.09736387003285374,"score_gpt":0.4909919536232273,"score_spread":0.39362808359037355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414135937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016788606,0.002835667,0.0008074956,0.009962994,0.024278225,0.0007346864,0.025269073,0.0013371406,0.9346069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00049153354,0.0011140275,0.00040999003,0.0030080203,0.0023945372,0.00021323805,0.006144973,0.00024653715,0.98597705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976484,0.00027371812,0.00013781087,0.00024592434,0.0015026783,0.00019148918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99122787,0.0018236205,0.00044878735,0.00075008976,0.004425319,0.0013242465],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025670815,0.0010832595,0.0016248339,0.006466115,0.0018289821,0.00816883,0.0024225588,0.004854998,0.83482176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017395826,0.0007153977,0.0010181973,0.0052005313,0.00077809376,0.0031665703,0.002253678,0.0026770933,0.7639883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011673732,0.0000134559,0.000019830359,0.00015242597,0.000001019451,0.0000070395404,0.0000048122565,0.000015861942,0.00002934801,0.0012265,0.9809934,0.0175246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014887742,0.00000797799,0.00018173533,0.00016874472,0.0000018997953,0.00000826842,0.000014176277,0.00003008617,0.000037751735,0.0009717823,0.99855894,0.0000036976585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005825475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013122684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16517824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002556429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069194436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23560673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416458680","doi":"10.1111/ropr.70066","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Duke Kunshan University; Southwestern University of Finance and Economics; Université de Lyon; Reed College; Concordia University; Michigan Technological University; Ohio State University; International Development Research Centre; Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México; University of Denver; Georgia Institute of Technology; George Mason University","keywords":"","score_opus":0.09736387003285374,"score_gpt":0.4909919536232273,"score_spread":0.39362808359037355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416458680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016788606,0.002835667,0.0008074956,0.009962994,0.024278225,0.0007346864,0.025269073,0.0013371406,0.9346069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00049153354,0.0011140275,0.00040999003,0.0030080203,0.0023945372,0.00021323805,0.006144973,0.00024653715,0.98597705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976484,0.00027371812,0.00013781087,0.00024592434,0.0015026783,0.00019148918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99122787,0.0018236205,0.00044878735,0.00075008976,0.004425319,0.0013242465],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025670815,0.0010832595,0.0016248339,0.006466115,0.0018289821,0.00816883,0.0024225588,0.004854998,0.83482176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017395826,0.0007153977,0.0010181973,0.0052005313,0.00077809376,0.0031665703,0.002253678,0.0026770933,0.7639883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011673732,0.0000134559,0.000019830359,0.00015242597,0.000001019451,0.0000070395404,0.0000048122565,0.000015861942,0.00002934801,0.0012265,0.9809934,0.0175246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014887742,0.00000797799,0.00018173533,0.00016874472,0.0000018997953,0.00000826842,0.000014176277,0.00003008617,0.000037751735,0.0009717823,0.99855894,0.0000036976585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005825475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013122684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16517824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002556429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069194436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23560673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}