{"meta":{"query_hash":"d670cc8d267c","filters":{"venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d670cc8d267c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Review+of+higher+education%2F%C2%98The+%C2%9Creview+of+higher+education"},"results":[{"id":"W1580452002","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2015.0025","title":"Rethinking Higher Education: Participation, Research & Differentiation by George Fallis (review)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Institution; Mandate; Context (archaeology); Negotiation; Public relations; Political science; Public service; Autonomy; Public policy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09884842843684098,"score_gpt":0.45210259268840397,"score_spread":0.353254164251563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580452002","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009122985,0.8089868,0.0000070331425,0.13804047,0.00856612,0.0032056083,0.000026345839,0.00007190328,0.040183444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015242279,0.72749734,0.0010690606,0.032425452,0.002084803,0.003058413,0.0011542116,0.00007893363,0.21738948],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989009,0.0031144724,0.0027853998,0.0009446103,0.0033040761,0.0008423923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870282,0.0005673548,0.0025391784,0.001951751,0.0072534126,0.00066012185],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007129771,0.00060038664,0.0013033709,0.000302067,0.0007212815,0.00011402579,0.001672658,0.0002644511,0.014257179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009155243,0.00049603626,0.00041575287,0.003662003,0.00068251154,0.0009578416,0.00015763124,0.0006533357,0.0008071458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005763029,0.0017965677,0.002607471,0.03022449,0.00007372359,4.5309264e-8,0.0017374983,1.5246961e-7,0.00001467506,0.05097544,0.8961205,0.016443659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014265104,0.00003667753,0.025786104,0.07685299,0.00038616682,0.0000016975987,0.00016045399,4.4938204e-8,0.000027014135,0.0077195973,0.8884207,0.00046590588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002010539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008403341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17720604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013520054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015225094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988310705","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2012.0028","title":"Imag(in)ing the University: Visual Sociology and Higher Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Higher education; Sociology of Education; Reproduction; Visual research; Sociology of knowledge; Social science; Epistemology; Visual arts; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.025780301139383652,"score_gpt":0.33073773214248336,"score_spread":0.3049574310030997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988310705","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056648795,0.90433294,4.1649747e-7,0.0316431,0.005214674,0.0010959014,0.000009151331,0.000024531711,0.05201441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49484378,0.3255887,0.00009081533,0.02977589,0.00410778,0.00022274215,0.00021885386,0.000055142307,0.14509629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975127,0.00075132184,0.00080837775,0.000310265,0.00028433,0.00033302206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776417,0.00026619865,0.00078134786,0.0005601218,0.00051408994,0.00011406054],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010248531,0.00032478487,0.00064724305,0.00013255539,0.00035161767,0.000033301436,0.00046204234,0.000083546416,0.009018666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003620574,0.00020651662,0.00023009616,0.00027460378,0.0007584942,0.0005814421,0.000085717234,0.000281179,0.00016152485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066227476,0.0010709028,0.000864993,0.01965643,0.00006268891,4.483397e-8,0.0038448158,3.0799495e-8,0.000029737683,0.6873736,0.27001798,0.017072212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009067048,0.000040548504,0.020121459,0.017191593,0.00040794714,0.000004960676,0.0012264772,5.12449e-8,0.000009835158,0.0033635085,0.9573081,0.0002348425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014426335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010848626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68729013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014948664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092776015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005118522","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2004.0030","title":"Tenuous Ties: The Limited-Term Full-time Faculty in Canadian Universities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Higher Education Research Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Term (time); Full-time; Perception; Higher education; Sociology; University faculty; Occupational mobility; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Demographic economics; Medical education; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.023370829940511508,"score_gpt":0.3881218600645481,"score_spread":0.3647510301240366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005118522","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006792757,0.71261394,3.395954e-7,0.23118165,0.0020681403,0.0024875663,0.00004912293,0.00003495799,0.04477155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1465364,0.7020878,0.0004134495,0.021885557,0.0013597696,0.0012319046,0.00040435934,0.00007010028,0.12601061],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955804,0.001100233,0.0011135638,0.00045047372,0.0010513833,0.0007039714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579287,0.00038127566,0.00080384745,0.0010563988,0.00159439,0.00037120908],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024391778,0.0003606843,0.0007830047,0.00036412323,0.0006975485,0.00006705892,0.001503186,0.00012666252,0.0051877047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024165919,0.00024883318,0.00031193672,0.002593483,0.0012031492,0.00046691697,0.000090600544,0.0003883111,0.00036341118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010466327,0.0016736735,0.005997093,0.036453772,0.00024346357,0.0000011209912,0.014766861,0.0000052581786,0.00002751286,0.14197499,0.7890298,0.009816031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011407422,0.00004016859,0.061408475,0.027821183,0.00018442521,0.0000027458584,0.0024724323,4.4408658e-8,0.0000055296055,0.00085163245,0.9068466,0.00025270478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12212023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01718774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20929609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020320958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020672668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057073710","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2013.0005","title":"Higher Education in a Global Society (review)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Internationalization; Higher education; Political science; Commercialization; Management; Sociology; Economics; Law; International trade","score_opus":0.019966085210091217,"score_gpt":0.38591424973756583,"score_spread":0.3659481645274746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057073710","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006354709,0.84841806,0.0000017128606,0.080785446,0.010892571,0.0028669504,0.00002117746,0.000048805723,0.056329813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011265432,0.8342505,0.0016442381,0.06851421,0.0023254969,0.0017563633,0.00026548078,0.000048760936,0.07992948],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932852,0.0011915055,0.0024287798,0.0006667122,0.0015843329,0.0008434865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99398893,0.00024376911,0.002264462,0.0014048982,0.0016423608,0.0004555966],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033969248,0.00060300354,0.0013412345,0.00010839832,0.0003279793,0.00004093782,0.001279003,0.00022927734,0.015746558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018835631,0.00049443205,0.0006857553,0.0032249305,0.00047166334,0.0010191483,0.0001114947,0.00039161608,0.0005180079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000309122,0.0024550904,0.015738929,0.052572843,0.00006374159,3.3423557e-8,0.0006117718,6.984033e-8,0.0000042537235,0.06714196,0.81686497,0.044543248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001010082,0.000015150418,0.17881389,0.09660222,0.0003081788,0.000002970272,0.00016806222,1.4533126e-8,0.0000058811665,0.0010979839,0.7225067,0.00037793766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014371967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036070975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16307497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015939996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015116367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066164321","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2003.0046","title":"May Babies and Posttenure Babies: Maternal Decisions of Women Professors","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Work (physics); Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.06251840604826825,"score_gpt":0.38400872717872964,"score_spread":0.3214903211304614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066164321","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107587956,0.8166792,0.0000033500953,0.063460656,0.0024695839,0.0017060925,0.00003753925,0.000023688941,0.008031976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42267653,0.5602284,0.00074540044,0.005428463,0.00030475453,0.00019058137,0.000044835324,0.000017445982,0.010363563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696016,0.0006842906,0.0010324483,0.00031217322,0.0006854503,0.00032547527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685514,0.00022150742,0.0010708722,0.0006379885,0.0010254198,0.00018905742],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022358613,0.0002261681,0.0007385178,0.000115310584,0.00028839588,0.000023763421,0.00067174,0.000100513396,0.0027940532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002929607,0.00017051591,0.00020642781,0.0008015239,0.0006035472,0.0003626482,0.0000927871,0.0001661769,0.000042964006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003600293,0.0036606553,0.037871312,0.17603284,0.00036898933,3.332485e-7,0.033747707,0.0000015344405,0.00010589508,0.51778173,0.17909823,0.051294778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016818466,0.00006667372,0.1626378,0.053138968,0.00030577683,0.0000028210914,0.003397965,1.0775138e-8,0.000060915936,0.011657542,0.76832294,0.00024041446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013768657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024934285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5892247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033756247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024858208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067742002","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2005.0058","title":"The Community College Baccalaureate: Emerging Trends and Policy Issues (review)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Higher Education Research Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Townsend; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Gerontology; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.02916822323916062,"score_gpt":0.45402417040353293,"score_spread":0.4248559471643723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067742002","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016099172,0.6052762,1.8188206e-7,0.3637398,0.000913564,0.0012391901,0.000019191923,0.00003008165,0.028620817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008339693,0.855239,0.00032366446,0.019837156,0.0016172063,0.0011171714,0.00007955815,0.000037574857,0.11340903],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922356,0.00377285,0.0017164004,0.00041513657,0.0012479869,0.00061202416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935868,0.0011535265,0.0013417114,0.0016305913,0.001976488,0.000310907],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005813763,0.0004451652,0.0010923863,0.00025994293,0.0018675479,0.000059505677,0.001597411,0.00010255888,0.004319477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094314065,0.00029018125,0.00036909032,0.0032745786,0.0014402925,0.0004626434,0.00021114887,0.00057110155,0.00011075011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024959909,0.0006074052,0.00054683397,0.033108167,0.00009098107,3.0074727e-8,0.0010603769,5.2641184e-8,0.000003449661,0.06398796,0.7792492,0.12134305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008039498,0.000032611988,0.032374058,0.05480903,0.0003158555,0.000002713587,0.00068386015,7.1469806e-8,0.000007623225,0.00076316675,0.9106811,0.0002495174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026360692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025058066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34390262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048263487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003739303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068235037","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2013.0073","title":"Difficulties for University Students with Mental Health Problems: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Mental Health Treatment and Access","field":"Psychology","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Psychology; Stigma (botany); Higher education; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.021491229539399734,"score_gpt":0.4089846265293063,"score_spread":0.38749339698990654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068235037","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051468736,0.9109418,0.000009653529,0.070008434,0.0024483548,0.008309514,0.00010736372,0.00003201658,0.0029960028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44153664,0.4624436,0.0025901098,0.023348283,0.0005654176,0.008216618,0.0004561349,0.00010676543,0.060736433],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973734,0.000587598,0.0008877253,0.00042800524,0.00039469745,0.0003285473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997126,0.00058348605,0.0008713179,0.0006328881,0.0006154536,0.00017089333],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005043111,0.00030749518,0.0007986437,0.000103107326,0.00023572761,0.000021978109,0.00061547634,0.000059193488,0.007905309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053402095,0.00020109072,0.00021057823,0.00044002794,0.00026885822,0.00027698022,0.000057736896,0.00012757472,0.00012929329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054826145,0.006168075,0.004448254,0.17917052,0.0003226335,9.083084e-8,0.001515368,3.208304e-8,0.0000052985006,0.019875856,0.7395724,0.04886663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000345532,0.0005721245,0.14439383,0.32251543,0.0007472826,0.000011496481,0.0017398387,1.371481e-7,0.000016211943,0.00028663996,0.5289702,0.00040128417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054881966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000076216347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4484982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003869308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005721641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070296496","doi":"10.1353/rhe.0.0166","title":"Toward a Spiritual Praxis: The Role of Spirituality among Faculty of Color Teaching for Social Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Higher Education Research Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Praxis; Social justice; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Sociology; Higher education; Qualitative research; Psychology; Social science; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.04536216072885375,"score_gpt":0.45478939891328324,"score_spread":0.4094272381844295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070296496","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035751715,0.72081864,0.0000114022505,0.19036059,0.00678101,0.0092654405,0.00024758815,0.000059263482,0.036704347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8355207,0.12521352,0.0036403842,0.007288524,0.004292613,0.0043723327,0.00033261732,0.00009102105,0.019248322],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99423033,0.0014972618,0.001971618,0.00047105912,0.0013510633,0.00047868217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912239,0.0012966543,0.002697012,0.0009463788,0.003665532,0.00017052847],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061408086,0.00036148384,0.0011830766,0.00014508513,0.00076961913,0.000037893242,0.0015764901,0.00017562878,0.0014162135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020798622,0.0002449321,0.00060854515,0.001124585,0.001979325,0.00038771605,0.00013815067,0.00056772615,0.00001618518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021615955,0.0029232053,0.0057046646,0.09100519,0.00030135803,2.9521232e-8,0.012153639,2.217233e-7,0.00047596666,0.35001,0.5058673,0.031536784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013862138,0.000064408574,0.06266426,0.010593833,0.00087968644,7.1708945e-7,0.0038005235,2.4357897e-7,0.00017446984,0.0028542737,0.918597,0.00023198554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014458775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000115574636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7997689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018005825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048295856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2442239230","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2016.0032","title":"Civic Pedagogies in Higher Education: Teaching for Democracy in Europe, Canada and the USA by Jason Laker, Concepcion Naval, and Kornelija Mrnjaus","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Peace and Human Rights Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Human rights; Citizenship; Sociology; State (computer science); Higher education; Human rights education; Diversity (politics); Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.033107976216283634,"score_gpt":0.3696162151476172,"score_spread":0.3365082389313336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2442239230","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033848464,0.7793614,0.0000013994021,0.17429468,0.0031601312,0.0026881213,0.000020125246,0.000015251035,0.0066103893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30114204,0.5814263,0.00019261533,0.012202126,0.0010509142,0.0012797051,0.00010820776,0.000043878837,0.102554195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958939,0.0013604587,0.001269574,0.0005377221,0.0005428968,0.0003954527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99626964,0.0010463157,0.0010732596,0.0006690494,0.00079171296,0.00014999203],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025590041,0.000350798,0.00079140835,0.00014606096,0.00044614845,0.000064598404,0.0006333449,0.00010137472,0.0013907624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039390946,0.00020659718,0.00010700433,0.00073790684,0.00081048923,0.0005854377,0.000059672726,0.00025173454,0.000012053994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023348155,0.0007166236,0.011956905,0.014249556,0.000040539013,8.5647734e-8,0.0024681967,8.149171e-8,0.000033350698,0.22851339,0.67699105,0.06500685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003742648,0.000022765791,0.07337505,0.0244348,0.00016884884,0.0000023898606,0.00045700654,8.305815e-8,0.0000074581408,0.0051740827,0.89571625,0.00026697197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07462071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04129191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26729357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043928486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071674907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973935712","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2019.0108","title":"University Commons Divided: Exploring Debate & Dissent on Campus by Peter MacKinnon","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Academic freedom; Sociology; Media studies; Commons; Politics; Political science; Law; Social science; Higher education","score_opus":0.03538248607831444,"score_gpt":0.34615021734421475,"score_spread":0.3107677312659003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973935712","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009661922,0.8086516,0.0000041522385,0.057884153,0.0078731915,0.0021789933,0.000057833622,0.000051190564,0.11363696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13011827,0.7134947,0.00022426913,0.011333229,0.0010102114,0.00013161478,0.00028275108,0.000042722007,0.1433622],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996956,0.0008520942,0.00078165805,0.00036633006,0.0006702991,0.00037363925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970934,0.00040697074,0.0008955547,0.0008989957,0.00050536427,0.00019970705],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010825413,0.00028113372,0.0006519645,0.0001051218,0.0002459821,0.000020055699,0.0008962453,0.000112251466,0.003855903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009295164,0.0002245196,0.00028893375,0.00077966717,0.00037531313,0.00035245717,0.00007383666,0.00032149066,0.0004547659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055481737,0.00060836086,0.004893353,0.022209967,0.00006275159,8.115927e-8,0.00084244466,3.3466682e-7,0.000024488772,0.20226915,0.75753593,0.011547592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007796997,0.000026283062,0.00855497,0.030963339,0.00024428812,0.0000012083465,0.00020302752,3.295205e-8,0.000017663187,0.0007102469,0.95896965,0.00023132177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011146367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029729588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2015589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031294758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001250793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297147906","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2022.0014","title":"Exploring the Impact of GRE-Accepting Admissions on Law School Diversity and Selectivity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Racial diversity; Standardized test; Test (biology); Racial bias; Race (biology); Law; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics education; Ethnic group; Racism; History; Gender studies","score_opus":0.1192802836214255,"score_gpt":0.4393192091846614,"score_spread":0.3200389255632359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297147906","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10950365,0.59733367,0.0000017939221,0.21597816,0.005678136,0.0038458756,0.000055434844,0.000059976766,0.0675433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85556287,0.12842163,0.0001158629,0.008974388,0.00044101223,0.0005928177,0.000042512285,0.000019006733,0.005829871],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630773,0.0016166191,0.0008055206,0.00029448138,0.0007473416,0.00022832864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99595815,0.0007788938,0.0014012549,0.0007056695,0.00096997386,0.00018605618],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028954826,0.00020532332,0.0004669058,0.0001298672,0.002410862,0.000035128465,0.00068877585,0.00003335152,0.009472234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089987594,0.00014041159,0.00026771906,0.0020963612,0.0003025572,0.0007979032,0.0002706164,0.00054010755,0.000014505151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031539472,0.0048368988,0.017376462,0.019434763,0.00030434268,1.08623226e-7,0.013078835,0.000010986129,0.00010565396,0.43835962,0.46153265,0.04492813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069476526,0.000086990956,0.1385045,0.007295476,0.00025527755,0.0000028749132,0.0013905186,2.2388599e-7,0.00001538143,0.0013403606,0.85086256,0.00017636066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009180862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033692333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74605924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004593382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049701724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99888784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}