{"meta":{"query_hash":"d670cc8d267c","filters":{"venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d670cc8d267c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Review+of+higher+education%2F%C2%98The+%C2%9Creview+of+higher+education"},"results":[{"id":"W1580452002","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2015.0025","title":"Rethinking Higher Education: Participation, Research & Differentiation by George Fallis (review)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Institution; Mandate; Context (archaeology); Negotiation; Public relations; Political science; Public service; Autonomy; Public policy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09884842843684098,"score_gpt":0.45210259268840397,"score_spread":0.353254164251563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580452002","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000032276894,0.98037684,0.000037540893,0.0141543895,0.0043945606,0.000015355923,0.000026458169,0.000006955754,0.00095568324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008407437,0.9769713,0.0001460505,0.016850913,0.0028857312,0.00004625442,0.00008293233,0.000008612022,0.0021673883],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99400336,0.0019151244,0.00070398685,0.00057055353,0.0024548837,0.00035217995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886397,0.004196468,0.0016190208,0.00023116612,0.004406965,0.0009066891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060900473,0.001452674,0.0020444258,0.005036114,0.0011739491,0.005690872,0.002424792,0.0041015185,0.014123829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017762344,0.0006334785,0.0012851127,0.008314886,0.0026034317,0.0061935303,0.0029420112,0.006689688,0.0048420792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000457669,0.000020659707,0.00018506715,0.034634206,0.000096284,0.000087503526,0.00036854716,0.000073796116,0.00012890651,0.003325177,0.69281304,0.268221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022264938,0.000019860454,0.0006996373,0.041125126,0.00007137444,0.0002170362,0.00023814927,0.000017809301,0.000036744965,0.00096402783,0.9565651,0.000023044156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014624607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026967835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014624607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005468453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013960285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0472489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988310705","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2012.0028","title":"Imag(in)ing the University: Visual Sociology and Higher Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Higher education; Sociology of Education; Reproduction; Visual research; Sociology of knowledge; Social science; Epistemology; Visual arts; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.025780301139383652,"score_gpt":0.33073773214248336,"score_spread":0.3049574310030997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988310705","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034253825,0.599095,0.004866419,0.051525295,0.0029570532,0.000023178454,0.000047379468,0.000055269684,0.30717662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7081281,0.24266562,0.0024494173,0.005784157,0.0037161168,0.000043655007,0.00004780479,0.000056964505,0.037108075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990206,0.00070143683,0.000027822629,0.00006011832,0.00013253753,0.000057431425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847597,0.0010245445,0.00015905734,0.00008762478,0.00011728948,0.00013559457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001378962,0.0003210029,0.00023146563,0.0030855017,0.002178588,0.0090096,0.00032636765,0.0014062679,0.005783445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021643364,0.000118987264,0.00015282298,0.0032275687,0.008055474,0.005848219,0.0023418586,0.001226226,0.0006543919],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031259962,0.00003967773,0.0032951846,0.00136576,0.00001874447,0.0004044501,0.04187294,0.0002696969,0.00041126023,0.55819523,0.043870583,0.35022524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008088161,0.000040563016,0.0045529394,0.0019423132,0.0000147169785,0.0010524216,0.05241706,0.00018624694,0.0002289518,0.16753592,0.77200204,0.000018788256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034166898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006899351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0090096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016739882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019082578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019347548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005118522","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2004.0030","title":"Tenuous Ties: The Limited-Term Full-time Faculty in Canadian Universities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Higher Education Research Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Term (time); Full-time; Perception; Higher education; Sociology; University faculty; Occupational mobility; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Demographic economics; Medical education; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.023370829940511508,"score_gpt":0.3881218600645481,"score_spread":0.3647510301240366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005118522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9276612,0.03143222,0.0002455984,0.012837397,0.00013612684,0.00004205655,0.00038989555,0.000007710566,0.027247818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98604286,0.010848198,0.00013773737,0.00070396514,0.000021090586,0.000008870829,0.000088824745,0.0000037009604,0.002144896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99539053,0.00044186716,0.00015818267,0.00030528998,0.0025604777,0.001143653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907318,0.0012771406,0.0017427407,0.00014592256,0.0023843658,0.003717987],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032774953,0.0001947877,0.00043820994,0.004634359,0.013633687,0.0052478,0.0017827224,0.0007802433,0.0029761135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01109262,0.00020893049,0.00019586005,0.011345432,0.0053163366,0.0019714395,0.0036852395,0.0011308909,0.00012216294],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024249443,0.00010237677,0.40783766,0.0015416603,0.00008717295,0.0018712811,0.30288264,0.0003865811,0.001298641,0.023526967,0.015665086,0.24455748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001039151,0.000050214257,0.6489935,0.0009182409,0.0000489083,0.0005001379,0.28796354,0.00012402088,0.00016729659,0.001602935,0.059553042,0.00006774371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9762358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054910187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.092190094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3984031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057073710","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2013.0005","title":"Higher Education in a Global Society (review)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Internationalization; Higher education; Political science; Commercialization; Management; Sociology; Economics; Law; International trade","score_opus":0.019966085210091217,"score_gpt":0.38591424973756583,"score_spread":0.3659481645274746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057073710","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006979839,0.9953864,0.000028120961,0.0014220274,0.0013906356,0.000011842602,0.000059270693,0.0000073264578,0.0016245035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005820974,0.9964367,0.000047150545,0.0012138317,0.00068961666,0.000013647711,0.000090232745,0.0000027528372,0.0009240009],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922,0.00013592951,0.0001272443,0.00010751106,0.0003296792,0.0000795492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980178,0.00075029634,0.0003165873,0.00004427781,0.0006670461,0.0002039551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010494551,0.001109483,0.0020834673,0.0039093234,0.00055950263,0.0030663933,0.0014328525,0.0017894121,0.029058095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003913528,0.0005050898,0.001003828,0.008143756,0.0006272816,0.0028960565,0.0014279404,0.0021615196,0.007496391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004407736,0.000028406394,0.00031118342,0.055315685,0.0001624268,0.00009193144,0.00012583948,0.00009492449,0.00011518466,0.00085841416,0.363794,0.57905793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025450781,0.000033803255,0.0020890199,0.046815053,0.00021077487,0.00048284847,0.0001921026,0.000029017485,0.0000578024,0.00032840975,0.9497163,0.000019308754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035830357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072091394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029058095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013697272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042950483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09720904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066164321","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2003.0046","title":"May Babies and Posttenure Babies: Maternal Decisions of Women Professors","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Work (physics); Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.06251840604826825,"score_gpt":0.38400872717872964,"score_spread":0.3214903211304614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066164321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665481,0.011654264,0.00028527417,0.0078113596,0.00008367296,0.000013682728,0.00005228964,0.000004034452,0.0135472985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857568,0.008472841,0.00021087733,0.00068871304,0.000023896364,0.000007665591,0.000020057289,0.000004117159,0.0048151547],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987557,0.0006236813,0.000024365027,0.00006745284,0.00024829677,0.00028052652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815947,0.0007431565,0.0003608148,0.00003985498,0.00025221525,0.0004444311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002352764,0.00011398198,0.00023622632,0.0004524094,0.0033695514,0.0016565709,0.00041899693,0.000553868,0.0024112905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074664787,0.00014810613,0.000109007975,0.00055516977,0.001780649,0.00063657213,0.0014972399,0.0007248237,0.0002084925],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042930566,0.000102428,0.27384862,0.0002512647,0.00003472983,0.004821185,0.47657624,0.00011998457,0.003640877,0.01272117,0.0071225488,0.22033167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012797635,0.00019989126,0.22330879,0.00048292076,0.00004203933,0.0030892813,0.67049193,0.00011660966,0.0011394578,0.001996277,0.09907487,0.00004510028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12735216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3565164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12735216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047019613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053986623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2532218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067742002","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2005.0058","title":"The Community College Baccalaureate: Emerging Trends and Policy Issues (review)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Higher Education Research Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Townsend; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Gerontology; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.02916822323916062,"score_gpt":0.45402417040353293,"score_spread":0.4248559471643723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067742002","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000065458946,0.99394387,0.000014500705,0.0040372075,0.00085320446,0.000007375912,0.000049349743,0.0000039891356,0.0010250759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00069607375,0.996192,0.000046488363,0.0017699961,0.0006552638,0.00001443686,0.00008762534,0.000002173023,0.0005359053],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826115,0.00032779478,0.00022152731,0.00020636627,0.00079030567,0.00019278185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99331725,0.0021678305,0.0009453756,0.00008470709,0.002571104,0.000913744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022552065,0.0009323371,0.0020802815,0.00416042,0.00088950817,0.0048536826,0.0018432724,0.0026112252,0.021206748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010151627,0.00045841053,0.0010490478,0.010305061,0.0011245989,0.0033457775,0.0016949076,0.0034979144,0.003875875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006422696,0.00003384639,0.00056449726,0.04187362,0.000121330595,0.000064607295,0.00010752679,0.000070990536,0.00006625639,0.001844225,0.38193285,0.57325596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006636839,0.000057069374,0.004890815,0.08961992,0.0002924434,0.0004198081,0.0005322995,0.000052687952,0.00005553251,0.0010707168,0.90291065,0.000031657168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025045497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046998683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025045497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004153052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018805698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070943594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068235037","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2013.0073","title":"Difficulties for University Students with Mental Health Problems: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Mental Health Treatment and Access","field":"Psychology","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Psychology; Stigma (botany); Higher education; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.021491229539399734,"score_gpt":0.4089846265293063,"score_spread":0.38749339698990654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068235037","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28703892,0.5327839,0.028289137,0.094537,0.011193023,0.011550543,0.002576292,0.0001268252,0.031904306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75493085,0.19522633,0.025834654,0.010361773,0.0013977892,0.009029696,0.0006392479,0.00010702574,0.0024726032],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94502413,0.039801132,0.008111548,0.0015571726,0.004332932,0.0011729851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7701697,0.20690957,0.0071048983,0.0028708356,0.012297513,0.00064755185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06992211,0.0018418912,0.0026450255,0.018634485,0.004914613,0.011551216,0.0025321227,0.0029165999,0.0013021717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1359023,0.00078309287,0.0015791865,0.011193896,0.010417753,0.008298106,0.0057152426,0.0039922195,0.00015271138],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011736496,0.000035776375,0.0027538307,0.042226896,0.00035862133,0.001972457,0.8729864,0.00015632961,0.000657691,0.021869473,0.006469982,0.05039526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021736776,0.000066116794,0.0027586408,0.07661121,0.00047633704,0.00071729725,0.84153426,0.00015893679,0.00064274017,0.009529086,0.06743406,0.000049517632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044825994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008984915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06992211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011817057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016549995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36978787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070296496","doi":"10.1353/rhe.0.0166","title":"Toward a Spiritual Praxis: The Role of Spirituality among Faculty of Color Teaching for Social Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Higher Education Research Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Praxis; Social justice; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Sociology; Higher education; Qualitative research; Psychology; Social science; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.04536216072885375,"score_gpt":0.45478939891328324,"score_spread":0.4094272381844295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070296496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794897,0.00414447,0.00029336818,0.007340212,0.000051885974,0.000029364597,0.000006370679,0.0000058015316,0.0086389575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99598867,0.0020228955,0.00018870732,0.00075196463,0.000010056365,0.000009610549,0.0000029185362,0.000002125533,0.0010229342],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979044,0.0011992948,0.00005566412,0.00011507648,0.00036700815,0.00035853995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947917,0.002355207,0.0010164218,0.000118320335,0.0007397158,0.0009785541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004025993,0.00012081749,0.00021760873,0.001016612,0.0063645956,0.0036438014,0.0007299797,0.00078098045,0.0015335155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008131244,0.00015631766,0.00012567824,0.0011647979,0.0060835998,0.0014338332,0.0030726152,0.0013366948,0.00006608201],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025468102,0.00009745935,0.049484305,0.00035528495,0.000017422366,0.0006082317,0.8777959,0.000020542233,0.0014896087,0.0055315285,0.0014856894,0.06308857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047483877,0.000047156045,0.031182352,0.00030677667,0.000017475799,0.00029564867,0.9513384,0.00002524741,0.00025082714,0.00068262307,0.015836088,0.000012672684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07306663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28079158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07306663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064902618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024663908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14528263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2442239230","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2016.0032","title":"Civic Pedagogies in Higher Education: Teaching for Democracy in Europe, Canada and the USA by Jason Laker, Concepcion Naval, and Kornelija Mrnjaus","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Peace and Human Rights Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Human rights; Citizenship; Sociology; State (computer science); Higher education; Human rights education; Diversity (politics); Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.033107976216283634,"score_gpt":0.3696162151476172,"score_spread":0.3365082389313336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2442239230","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023296298,0.69906235,0.0005353788,0.11126375,0.014735422,0.00005270084,0.00031216908,0.00009215336,0.17161645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060222466,0.6693391,0.0016693483,0.017748736,0.0037336454,0.00010532591,0.000653266,0.00018381764,0.24634434],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814594,0.0002561829,0.000051725125,0.0001695112,0.0010195646,0.0003570191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968839,0.00049499026,0.00012520357,0.000060834456,0.001624504,0.0008104372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001517171,0.000998235,0.0008375324,0.0023684774,0.0067964536,0.008755389,0.0011510453,0.0024686756,0.011960648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00356193,0.00038726136,0.00034429066,0.008009611,0.004910951,0.004052363,0.002211901,0.0040670866,0.0023263488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009184708,0.000020116613,0.0003862887,0.0004086338,0.0000070112937,0.00004052,0.0028953673,0.00015481691,0.00006192395,0.022917898,0.8946438,0.07845457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002323383,0.000003107281,0.0015416252,0.0010208316,0.0000054426673,0.00003808426,0.0022164506,0.00003472575,0.000034502827,0.001588841,0.99350125,0.000012675959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81155646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9228878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18844354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042155586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11801335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37910664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973935712","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2019.0108","title":"University Commons Divided: Exploring Debate & Dissent on Campus by Peter MacKinnon","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Academic freedom; Sociology; Media studies; Commons; Politics; Political science; Law; Social science; Higher education","score_opus":0.03538248607831444,"score_gpt":0.34615021734421475,"score_spread":0.3107677312659003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973935712","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009780459,0.31511852,0.0008672047,0.45058158,0.07981423,0.00009775285,0.0005126961,0.00013779197,0.15189217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044492017,0.34363762,0.0017935969,0.12082191,0.067948334,0.000583549,0.0008333076,0.0010403881,0.4188493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99470466,0.0018145397,0.00022697836,0.00068219966,0.002117646,0.0004539465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856125,0.0067124045,0.00089349016,0.00025703892,0.0034054837,0.003119039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00445862,0.0018217944,0.0011423564,0.0034559616,0.008416841,0.010542363,0.0018946835,0.004778362,0.060762405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01819838,0.000718217,0.0005802388,0.0057327845,0.007760929,0.010681466,0.006722817,0.011642905,0.022479214],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009331861,0.0000074322434,0.000050854196,0.00019216714,0.0000022972235,0.000034531,0.0017152099,0.000028515844,0.000021078346,0.0065446207,0.9777364,0.013657525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029968562,0.0000033933807,0.00022975593,0.0007341095,0.0000017725366,0.000051446055,0.0019538251,0.000015374744,0.0000174285,0.0023170295,0.9946589,0.000013937268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027419575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03661497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060762405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008257333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009021647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2032705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297147906","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2022.0014","title":"Exploring the Impact of GRE-Accepting Admissions on Law School Diversity and Selectivity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Racial diversity; Standardized test; Test (biology); Racial bias; Race (biology); Law; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics education; Ethnic group; Racism; History; Gender studies","score_opus":0.1192802836214255,"score_gpt":0.4393192091846614,"score_spread":0.3200389255632359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297147906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7650899,0.12878887,0.006854575,0.039260205,0.0014234585,0.0006207484,0.0025759235,0.00008769104,0.055298667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686886,0.02263276,0.0021317701,0.0034090257,0.0003644579,0.00031545685,0.00045692126,0.000023749442,0.0019772733],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9703048,0.018811135,0.0018526157,0.0014317003,0.0057869516,0.0018128757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87356246,0.08354119,0.02631633,0.0028847482,0.009938747,0.0037565997],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019799372,0.00028278932,0.0007426006,0.002554002,0.00093571475,0.0027369407,0.0014120647,0.00094933517,0.007913443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11184361,0.00020860882,0.0016527583,0.0043568476,0.0017399788,0.0021000968,0.0030364608,0.0018008865,0.00052729266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005527966,0.0005879447,0.45991173,0.010208914,0.001862662,0.00023456804,0.0040256185,0.0017773773,0.0005931055,0.028704448,0.008655627,0.48288518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008106024,0.0009558052,0.9385398,0.007714299,0.0012027005,0.00014730632,0.0048793363,0.00081230147,0.0008477726,0.0075012064,0.037260354,0.00005794297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015690064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033389885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98020065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030362643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009205381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10471028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}