{"meta":{"query_hash":"3339bdfabed7","filters":{"venue":"Reviews in Fisheries Science"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3339bdfabed7","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Reviews+in+Fisheries+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W1996920091","doi":"10.1080/10641260500433531","title":"Fish Farms and Sea Lice Infestations of Wild Juvenile Salmon in the Broughton Archipelago—A Rebuttal to","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","topic":"Parasite Biology and Host Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Raincoast Conservation Foundation; University of Victoria; University of Alberta","funders":"Division of Ocean Sciences; University of Kent","keywords":"Lepeophtheirus; Fishery; Rebuttal; Archipelago; Biology; Juvenile; Louse; Larva; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Geography; Zoology; Ecology; Aquaculture; Archaeology","score_opus":0.027255140483834844,"score_gpt":0.31909665583612856,"score_spread":0.29184151535229375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996920091","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19055742,0.7326533,0.00028076844,0.0668616,0.0020931265,0.000009862927,0.0012329288,0.000017967765,0.0062930216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55740994,0.4109156,0.0011547967,0.022691004,0.0038144724,0.00002206295,0.00078339956,0.00001700505,0.0031917999],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993697,0.00009781966,0.00010625254,0.00018769118,0.00017910576,0.00005952247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936167,0.002514298,0.0016473066,0.0005248307,0.0013554053,0.00034153988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023903956,0.00031976282,0.0004654357,0.0020842636,0.00070253416,0.0022771116,0.0011596627,0.0016072004,0.0024741783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048484826,0.0002187896,0.00057018176,0.0030695582,0.0018509307,0.0025595387,0.0012845963,0.001675809,0.00028063045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046202829,0.000077950994,0.52287835,0.009876063,0.0014375477,0.0016365054,0.01214554,0.00042898324,0.0020850883,0.0057541463,0.042515073,0.4007027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016664455,0.0001358952,0.8767774,0.015563719,0.0014712852,0.0012741046,0.01334083,0.00024257266,0.00043112223,0.003517067,0.08712008,0.00010927269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24994321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40971068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7500568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020576762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028965864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49697673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019454757","doi":"10.1080/10641260500320845","title":"Modern Trends in<i>Aeromonas hydrophila</i>Disease Management with Fish","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","topic":"Aquaculture disease management and microbiota","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Aeromonas hydrophila; Aquaculture; Biology; Aeromonas; Antibiotics; Bacterial disease; Disease; Disease management; Pathogen; Biotechnology; Pathogenic bacteria; Vaccination; Shrimp; Bacteria; Microbiology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Medicine; Immunology","score_opus":0.020626251181179372,"score_gpt":0.2487700934968964,"score_spread":0.22814384231571705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019454757","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058743123,0.8190664,0.008780521,0.0567021,0.0022224826,0.00008324043,0.0005530108,0.0003374781,0.053511534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18910047,0.7678088,0.00821039,0.0112623535,0.0030597409,0.00009426328,0.00075742503,0.000051593972,0.019655015],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944264,0.00009579205,0.000076984725,0.00014004532,0.00017355941,0.00007089656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895275,0.00014505636,0.00025243883,0.00003486203,0.00037743765,0.00023745868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008885361,0.00045124072,0.00023369332,0.0014054311,0.00032158828,0.0012182756,0.0006335706,0.001052136,0.0048985602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001044672,0.00014081728,0.0003166192,0.0014366987,0.0010929019,0.001492489,0.00082086044,0.0008932763,0.0013364644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003850083,0.0001944998,0.028534232,0.0049895123,0.00007300284,0.0010232275,0.0010109382,0.0007330077,0.021998953,0.014819869,0.054464012,0.87177384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017498991,0.00060560607,0.060429618,0.0014418267,0.00008470102,0.005890745,0.0012909749,0.0007605693,0.005618263,0.0033919932,0.92040014,0.00006800954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036981674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004610349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048985602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015590873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013914952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016387284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020651263","doi":"10.1080/10641260701689022","title":"Manipulations of Stocking Magnitude: Addressing Density-Dependence in a Juvenile Cohort of Common Snook (<i>Centropomus undecimalis)</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Mote Marine Laboratory and Aquarium; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission","keywords":"Stocking; Juvenile; Biology; Fishery; Hatchery; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Animal science; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.07065704506401609,"score_gpt":0.2886362910974457,"score_spread":0.2179792460334296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020651263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99972373,0.000011963258,0.00006971704,0.0000070168117,0.0000013366874,0.000012163117,0.000029115457,0.00000309997,0.00014193835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998108,0.00003012233,0.00089376763,0.000042215375,0.0000030769431,0.00006535079,0.000121381294,0.0000031232526,0.00073297054],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997545,0.000037158043,0.000017463755,0.0000905262,0.00005489817,0.00004542416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991374,0.0001328361,0.00035681625,0.00007846671,0.000105374645,0.00018900895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002228375,0.0003365897,0.00013923283,0.00022612132,0.0002640515,0.00021574505,0.00044017873,0.00019444198,0.00075416884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055111566,0.00020754641,0.00014768235,0.00007644885,0.0002691428,0.0002623636,0.0003402712,0.00035289198,0.00008741377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016871754,0.0017907706,0.15256427,0.00007777429,0.000052742686,0.00015877442,0.00040166674,0.00035888085,0.8325365,0.00009955141,0.00013734295,0.010134581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007055524,0.007039206,0.9029328,0.000011757894,0.00006803964,0.00014767695,0.00039516616,0.0019274536,0.08643432,0.000057120047,0.0008956672,0.000020262705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008172934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045544855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008172934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007430094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003774279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01625073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049247140","doi":"10.1080/16226510390856510","title":"The Effects of Biotelemetry Transmitter Presence and Attachment Procedures on Fish Physiology and Behavior","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":362,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Future Earth","funders":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration","keywords":"Biotelemetry; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Transmitter; Telemetry; Physiology; Fishery; Biology; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.018893773217387232,"score_gpt":0.267844039195709,"score_spread":0.24895026597832176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049247140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9414077,0.048697416,0.002401867,0.0002854652,0.000090519425,0.00005377382,0.00016220396,0.000036248344,0.0068647596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91871744,0.06671249,0.0055657905,0.00023364481,0.000102838574,0.00013304304,0.00023972218,0.000018570008,0.008276448],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954224,0.00013074835,0.000040212937,0.000082458486,0.00017538125,0.00002907696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898916,0.00046853095,0.00031056112,0.0000416574,0.00014933918,0.000040703624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074844406,0.00033980465,0.0002755782,0.00037896147,0.00019121841,0.00027902998,0.00022972366,0.0002959856,0.0016715132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012473179,0.00013038107,0.00024224947,0.0002896045,0.00027208222,0.00022179692,0.00027541877,0.00023618492,0.00036772518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023075829,0.0007664765,0.13112505,0.0034792325,0.00036624848,0.0006231,0.0010442825,0.00056159945,0.29997534,0.00041272744,0.0011473128,0.55819106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035768022,0.008281428,0.90917206,0.0004446496,0.0003416166,0.0012896982,0.0006766409,0.00036956483,0.067444466,0.00033825784,0.0115669295,0.000038922404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017767432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037785782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99925154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029021257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002936577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0055918097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061962941","doi":"10.1080/10641260500448893","title":"The Effects of Water Temperature, Salinity and Currents on the Survival and Distribution of the Infective Copepodid Stage of the Salmon Louse (<b> <i>Lepeophtheirus salmonis</i> </b>) Originating on Atlantic Salmon Farms in the Broughton Archipelago of British Columbia, Canada ()—A Response to the Rebuttal of","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","topic":"Parasite Biology and Host Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"North Pacific Marine Science Organization; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Lepeophtheirus; Stage (stratigraphy); Salinity; Louse; Biology; Fishery; Distribution (mathematics); Zoology; Ecology; Aquaculture; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.01030530791116051,"score_gpt":0.25747861479554307,"score_spread":0.24717330688438255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061962941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74270767,0.03580045,0.00094015966,0.19572933,0.005009061,0.000025926242,0.00273595,0.00006521058,0.01698629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9211539,0.017574301,0.000678439,0.03960915,0.0034471755,0.000015241674,0.00085235987,0.00003751993,0.016631939],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956876,0.00009769062,0.000030197069,0.000102863436,0.00011277608,0.00008777399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611425,0.0012231076,0.000728577,0.00019531146,0.00133448,0.00040416192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016508554,0.00030075855,0.00033131812,0.000272368,0.00087181956,0.0015580041,0.0010016718,0.0014907357,0.0026734995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031760081,0.00016551305,0.00030595856,0.0007589759,0.0020588082,0.00076322537,0.0004214393,0.0014841018,0.0008963797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015354672,0.00015007204,0.5641862,0.0014232742,0.0005344641,0.0017083599,0.006058005,0.002013683,0.029269334,0.004999871,0.26396018,0.12416116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021258369,0.0002108677,0.9527505,0.00015855875,0.0001266856,0.00037862296,0.0045110406,0.000498919,0.0023581067,0.0025379395,0.03634231,0.00010523239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27076378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47286776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72923625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027690926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018395083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5383755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085549845","doi":"10.1080/10641260500341494","title":"Ecology of the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow (Cyprinidae: <b> <i>Hybognathus amarus)</i> </b> Inferred from Specimens Collected in 1874","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"New Mexico State University; National Museum of Natural History; University of Windsor; Texas A and M University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Minnow; Biology; Ecology; Detritus; Periphyton; Cyprinidae; Macrophyte; Algae; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.013084652419330527,"score_gpt":0.20915425288790113,"score_spread":0.1960696004685706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085549845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980221,0.00007743429,0.000036210753,0.000016611519,0.0000019257511,0.0000034876832,0.000073916715,0.0000029221333,0.0017653956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99886763,0.000110738874,0.00017927427,0.000024451818,0.0000033805848,0.0000074460763,0.0002457925,0.0000030687427,0.0005582608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991465,0.000009795196,0.0000059891336,0.000028744771,0.000019187173,0.000021667563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983394,0.000008994608,0.00008309142,0.0000061468486,0.000038667382,0.000029151259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010045666,0.0001457633,0.00012067403,0.00083707564,0.00038805944,0.00035023535,0.00021843109,0.00020756858,0.0009893337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023376821,0.00023192844,0.00014523014,0.0002919757,0.00038198262,0.00018348289,0.0002729542,0.00017819194,0.00035413812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007295565,0.000026255817,0.9621647,0.000035271176,0.000030979456,0.00031022343,0.0016550007,0.000106329375,0.026973663,0.00006962399,0.00032732548,0.008227663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.538735e-7,0.000015689788,0.9990996,0.0000043707296,0.0000035227947,0.000078867655,0.0001938342,0.000031438896,0.00014077782,0.000004209909,0.0004258407,0.000001237646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0363849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10164101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0363849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007180651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022651815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07234627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141829972","doi":"10.1080/10641260802618375","title":"The Ecology of Body Size and Depth Use by Bloater (<i>Coregonus hoyi</i>Gill) in the Laurentian Great Lakes: Patterns and Hypotheses","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Ecology; Diel vertical migration; Coregonus; Trophic level; Animal ecology; Abundance (ecology); Foraging; Fishery","score_opus":0.020769530177444914,"score_gpt":0.2327144862268803,"score_spread":0.21194495604943536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141829972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99890244,0.0004507552,0.00005763114,0.00008935258,0.0000014510549,0.0000018026115,0.00004119674,0.0000027230903,0.00045257897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932337,0.00023633245,0.00013806345,0.000035761153,0.000009252825,0.0000034333443,0.00006335398,0.0000014566533,0.0001888987],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998541,0.00003305152,0.000010905285,0.00005188262,0.000019576402,0.000030525243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936646,0.00019385066,0.00027222384,0.00001723278,0.0000643828,0.00008597093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003535611,0.00015764838,0.00015704283,0.001081023,0.0002795825,0.00050572836,0.00037627487,0.00032914453,0.00088624057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072266976,0.00016824751,0.00016082774,0.00065206044,0.0013903792,0.0005130512,0.0003659863,0.0001622386,0.000118792734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004360849,0.000011832031,0.9918705,0.000025928333,0.000021677717,0.00006077504,0.00095707714,0.00006256202,0.0016635291,0.00009972501,0.00006739551,0.0051154196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.6491473e-7,0.000016843716,0.9995153,0.0000017032623,0.0000019014587,0.000023437096,0.00030257643,0.000055077733,0.000022813361,0.000019793126,0.000038899394,0.000001358459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019704685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04493175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9802953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005366655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002797681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03918004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151108603","doi":"10.1080/10641260601149432","title":"Understanding the Complexity of Catch-and-Release in Recreational Fishing: An Integrative Synthesis of Global Knowledge from Historical, Ethical, Social, and Biological Perspectives","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":701,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Fishing; Perspective (graphical); Discipline; Variety (cybernetics); Recreational fishing; Sociology; Catch and release; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.23181729389054959,"score_gpt":0.3446848113089154,"score_spread":0.11286751741836579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151108603","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14109594,0.65313035,0.04992887,0.08261143,0.0011803708,0.00009920154,0.00016293667,0.000050923445,0.07173997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53886706,0.44319284,0.010374446,0.0044207866,0.001201185,0.000104685874,0.00010400363,0.00003218065,0.0017029159],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958683,0.0025222017,0.0003313055,0.0004839716,0.000531735,0.00026250095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806487,0.016825074,0.0011782948,0.0004950603,0.0005976469,0.00025531283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010918146,0.0007607289,0.0012176451,0.0041197874,0.002739992,0.009144668,0.0013319725,0.0029600607,0.0014569979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011069686,0.0004141795,0.0006065241,0.0055857254,0.016603857,0.014104661,0.0034874356,0.0032653112,0.00011462954],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011020018,0.00010193366,0.02541036,0.010496491,0.00024709068,0.002558307,0.15209505,0.004918243,0.0015092711,0.33123016,0.005965288,0.46535757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010270755,0.00022165642,0.06413205,0.014854647,0.00022754866,0.0031843684,0.21438491,0.0032020644,0.00096808805,0.4337826,0.26485687,0.00017501102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005742896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013820266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010918146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032801977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042797485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057741344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156536068","doi":"10.1080/20016491101717","title":"Additive Effects of Chlorinated Biocides and Water Temperature on Fish in Thermal Effluents with Emphasis on the Great Lakes","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Chlorine; Biocide; Environmental science; Toxicity; Effluent; Predation; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Environmental chemistry; Toxicology; Biology; Ecology; Chemistry; Fishery; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.013246711530401347,"score_gpt":0.22290112219897934,"score_spread":0.20965441066857798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156536068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7370379,0.2579194,0.0014774146,0.0005420272,0.00013733534,0.000047783553,0.00024902273,0.000029647139,0.0025594642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7972658,0.19584657,0.002632573,0.0005005152,0.00019052482,0.00003230283,0.0002062496,0.000017211883,0.0033081912],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961406,0.000085327185,0.000057472455,0.00006828044,0.00014023574,0.000034617624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941957,0.00016046583,0.00016000372,0.000013256827,0.00021916331,0.000027469334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054044387,0.00038153824,0.00044387573,0.0010994913,0.00022624164,0.0004194981,0.0002938661,0.0003328704,0.00058710435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004894613,0.00016182855,0.0006584561,0.00083284976,0.00031029145,0.0003093097,0.0004318564,0.0002018319,0.000080343336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014744364,0.0002406125,0.18987909,0.028069364,0.0024303456,0.0043685148,0.0022911427,0.0031849192,0.4134931,0.0005443205,0.0016996947,0.35232443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042728137,0.0057124496,0.7497486,0.0024248231,0.005897217,0.003911246,0.0024849765,0.001469028,0.16370039,0.00051649206,0.06393206,0.00016002292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037298503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012543704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066749955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055194704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007416308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171950631","doi":"10.1080/10641262.2010.531793","title":"Advancing the Science and Practice of Fish Kill Investigations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fish kill; Aquatic ecosystem; Biology; Ecology; Fishery; Algal bloom","score_opus":0.026066929575306444,"score_gpt":0.2826344529684273,"score_spread":0.2565675233931209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171950631","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071500605,0.13143337,0.11491035,0.6862115,0.021061333,0.0015082224,0.00045933112,0.0006770901,0.03658872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1238915,0.3184205,0.40248078,0.11343185,0.025483588,0.0029905506,0.00062240334,0.0005465269,0.012132432],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7231878,0.16693193,0.035061464,0.010784198,0.06169502,0.0023395543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.314621,0.4192776,0.045219768,0.03772327,0.17186451,0.011293808],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2452404,0.0015728013,0.002448456,0.013493021,0.0033768886,0.011169554,0.0086528445,0.011689098,0.005925162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48026767,0.0013783014,0.0015783252,0.007659192,0.018423129,0.018067488,0.010237788,0.012457623,0.004948859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015708701,0.00018313194,0.015385278,0.011841333,0.00017710697,0.0011232676,0.014698389,0.0010421203,0.0014724111,0.027738798,0.17760895,0.74857205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008349457,0.0002251335,0.01789442,0.0334007,0.00016025263,0.002046146,0.021144852,0.0016548474,0.0021402044,0.11299525,0.8079702,0.0002843816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009316202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011654065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2452404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007774435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029564492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93075293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}