{"meta":{"query_hash":"24f5d5a5442f","filters":{"venue":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/24f5d5a5442f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+Brasileira+de+Direito+Processual+Penal"},"results":[{"id":"W3095256180","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v6i3.412","title":"The authority to order search in a comparative perspective: a call for judicial oversight","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control; Uniwersytet Wrocławski; McGill University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.14768825182116055,"score_gpt":0.43816610989112104,"score_spread":0.2904778580699605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095256180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010451894,0.012159089,0.02444753,0.0908368,0.00043966234,0.000056963938,0.000097359945,0.00003690274,0.86147386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9328247,0.0060025468,0.008640156,0.008690561,0.0008983569,0.00014395372,0.00007151811,0.000093279516,0.042634897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867574,0.007349476,0.00040056385,0.0014888007,0.002273212,0.0017305705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799156,0.013190379,0.00095530646,0.0020578217,0.0028592788,0.0010215093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015297395,0.00059416075,0.0011697793,0.0036927266,0.0071207546,0.020974427,0.0042130984,0.013223842,0.014967136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025981994,0.0005242277,0.0011790488,0.002747204,0.046760418,0.024681775,0.0054969876,0.0087882,0.0009501712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033052233,0.0000018795597,0.000021591008,0.00000931543,0.0000014227604,0.00002138198,0.00030171676,0.000114416696,0.000007816316,0.998285,0.0005780986,0.00065395323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018093451,0.000008811773,0.00009115489,0.000108101376,0.000005658141,0.000048436195,0.00081540557,0.00045648176,0.00003831074,0.9725884,0.025812823,0.00000827671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02496768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01952229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02496768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021901049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016102467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15890396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138597088","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.537","title":"Editorial of dossier “Admissibility of Evidence in Criminal Process. Between the Establishment of the Truth, Human Rights and the Efficiency of Proceedings”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","topic":"Legal processes and jurisprudence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Uniwersytet Wrocławski; Narodowym Centrum Nauki; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Balance (ability); Criminal justice; Popularity; Political science; Populism; Economic Justice; Criminal procedure; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.05556194452531137,"score_gpt":0.37032075583060103,"score_spread":0.31475881130528965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138597088","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008073507,0.010350521,0.0002666587,0.05843072,0.92678416,0.000029509574,0.000092755145,0.000059074362,0.0039058789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014660798,0.0054308684,0.0002166711,0.023693679,0.9592359,0.000029349098,0.00004866639,0.00005514645,0.00982373],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897141,0.0022173773,0.0012736272,0.0013751691,0.004922374,0.0004973237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9554341,0.029420527,0.0017941649,0.0011117526,0.010045002,0.0021944258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008484208,0.0031970371,0.003422836,0.0066269035,0.0050170445,0.007369972,0.0043446915,0.014817957,0.010605606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035342664,0.0010541757,0.0031540033,0.0020730016,0.0068905484,0.004539936,0.002169287,0.016638141,0.007221627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003574753,0.000012287053,0.000034518176,0.00025836963,0.000010254622,0.00013392029,0.000057211564,0.00004117247,0.000075383774,0.0017307895,0.99389476,0.003715514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019222074,0.000017670804,0.0002847591,0.00043919883,0.000018632645,0.00019816584,0.000057344987,0.00011951312,0.00010807691,0.0014973859,0.99722594,0.000014155976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071543907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010955805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014817957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076528885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004155186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0555259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390237321","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.873","title":"Intersecções entre o Eficientismo Processual Penal e o Neoliberalismo","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Authoritarianism; Premise; Neoliberalism (international relations); Pace; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Process (computing); Democracy; Ambiguity; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.0328664267125104,"score_gpt":0.25678000447730454,"score_spread":0.22391357776479415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390237321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10369727,0.020232033,0.11992154,0.034723952,0.00032492517,0.00015622079,0.00008933602,0.00014532523,0.7207094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97889334,0.0030524174,0.010652002,0.0010686265,0.00018414664,0.000091936316,0.000020416413,0.000037069793,0.00599996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883591,0.0050021266,0.0004898004,0.0013801347,0.0037601665,0.0010086895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770822,0.0125809675,0.0029033595,0.004436378,0.0021262527,0.00087091106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0138372,0.00038016096,0.00067091227,0.0033589911,0.0026850968,0.008874949,0.0012417247,0.001960452,0.004014278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02250471,0.00042352022,0.00047352086,0.0027670301,0.03371884,0.0069347857,0.005001603,0.0035941561,0.00035889156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034055627,0.000008929014,0.0003865797,0.000034918285,0.000004813159,0.000012940866,0.00078832364,0.00016205598,0.000044246557,0.9923268,0.00011591542,0.0061112447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000138084415,0.000031055664,0.004000894,0.0002933593,0.000015529158,0.00008032482,0.0009272946,0.00075720873,0.000219341,0.95215595,0.04149032,0.000014932209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031879642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0138372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007439248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007965966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07317901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}