{"meta":{"query_hash":"24f5d5a5442f","filters":{"venue":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/24f5d5a5442f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+Brasileira+de+Direito+Processual+Penal"},"results":[{"id":"W3095256180","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v6i3.412","title":"The authority to order search in a comparative perspective: a call for judicial oversight","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control; Uniwersytet Wrocławski; McGill University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.14768825182116055,"score_gpt":0.43816610989112104,"score_spread":0.2904778580699605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095256180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7669272,0.014053987,0.014432933,0.15894525,0.0009898073,0.01174377,0.0006902779,0.00031978608,0.03189703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947874,0.00008093873,0.00025187535,0.0013762786,0.0015046251,0.00014109019,0.0000070645415,0.00003033272,0.0018203771],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546546,0.00068475876,0.00060631067,0.0009844311,0.0010465058,0.0012125449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964155,0.0012939139,0.00018856146,0.0002245934,0.001087126,0.0007903353],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001956711,0.0004083005,0.00072326756,0.00008331221,0.0016700039,0.0009238545,0.0011763575,0.00021908121,0.00012522405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029741977,0.0003496313,0.00022873288,0.0018104219,0.00046113794,0.00044609277,0.00028590273,0.00073872134,0.0001499073],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006242458,0.00063660694,0.02494031,0.0015900054,0.00021782397,0.00012349943,0.50530356,0.00034523712,0.00050378946,0.38819548,0.070308335,0.0015929157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003838123,0.0042564124,0.07138863,0.0021548872,0.0006739274,0.000021166234,0.3421467,0.017227883,0.00055780396,0.0017177686,0.55280364,0.0032130461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004047965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063132206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48249534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074908306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027091736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138597088","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.537","title":"Editorial of dossier “Admissibility of Evidence in Criminal Process. Between the Establishment of the Truth, Human Rights and the Efficiency of Proceedings”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","topic":"Legal processes and jurisprudence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Uniwersytet Wrocławski; Narodowym Centrum Nauki; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Balance (ability); Criminal justice; Popularity; Political science; Populism; Economic Justice; Criminal procedure; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.05556194452531137,"score_gpt":0.37032075583060103,"score_spread":0.31475881130528965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138597088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995267,0.0018353399,0.000017366754,0.0002226536,0.0006002196,0.0006074351,0.000019072831,0.000008822241,0.0014221162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749637,0.000047372458,0.000037600224,0.000011247067,0.0023213443,0.000022868795,9.597953e-7,0.000009307635,0.000052905933],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628353,0.00035171895,0.0010344703,0.00042822663,0.0015368824,0.00036514542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570125,0.0013523054,0.0010489576,0.00031695774,0.0014794141,0.00010110538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038949964,0.00020513409,0.00064446824,0.000056813522,0.00047138176,0.00012794706,0.0012375617,0.0001521619,0.000037883157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054715103,0.000101457066,0.00016352338,0.0013912431,0.0024911633,0.0005143,0.00024127644,0.00039553686,1.798359e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012084766,0.0011277089,0.7491124,0.016626338,0.00013857166,0.0000039929905,0.11341069,0.000024505942,0.0047976607,0.11140454,0.00088458706,0.0012605278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057740165,0.0010948009,0.6661507,0.012738578,0.0015234128,0.000017477976,0.027123086,0.00015889246,0.24437796,0.035681013,0.0041251117,0.001234933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019520537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024892815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2395803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006670265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014470371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9178795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390237321","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.873","title":"Intersecções entre o Eficientismo Processual Penal e o Neoliberalismo","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Authoritarianism; Premise; Neoliberalism (international relations); Pace; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Process (computing); Democracy; Ambiguity; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.0328664267125104,"score_gpt":0.25678000447730454,"score_spread":0.22391357776479415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390237321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9158486,0.0026926203,0.0012881531,0.00048135407,0.0012626613,0.0008599904,0.00059860887,0.00063196104,0.07633601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918115,0.00016861332,0.00012181288,0.0006929887,0.0013803212,0.00012965758,0.00022555797,0.00012368677,0.0053458386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570006,0.000062414496,0.0016060338,0.0012342161,0.00017899653,0.0012182489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791837,0.00012793615,0.0008745164,0.0005295439,0.00013682288,0.0004127865],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013444539,0.00047466205,0.0011641689,0.0005570283,0.00041687058,0.00086850114,0.0009730399,0.00030030703,0.001116307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033247482,0.0006268401,0.00038301008,0.0009635838,0.00029370392,0.00083370827,0.0002876827,0.00040953324,0.00457288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016385598,0.00034053082,0.30914536,0.0018336094,0.00030258062,0.00015797158,0.004761363,0.00019590306,0.0001335966,0.6538975,0.027064145,0.0020035298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008786624,0.0012291659,0.3050554,0.0021384247,0.00030128032,0.0005652619,0.0044636643,0.030311894,0.001270138,0.14485705,0.49292004,0.008101056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005131823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007359746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5090405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031222025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030100005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}