{"meta":{"query_hash":"1eadc1f48811","filters":{"venue":"Revista Brasileira de Monitoramento e Avaliação"},"cohort_total":1,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1,"exported":1,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1eadc1f48811","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+Brasileira+de+Monitoramento+e+Avalia%C3%A7%C3%A3o"},"results":[{"id":"W4247116822","doi":"10.4322/rbma201509003","title":"Um modelo alternativo ao estudo experimental para inferir causalidade em avaliações do impacto de projetos sociais","year":2015,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Brasileira de Monitoramento e Avaliação","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.0681883687573619,"score_gpt":0.36119692177673374,"score_spread":0.29300855301937184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247116822","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05173565,0.0015808474,0.9167057,0.0032519891,0.00072277524,0.01274295,0.0009096251,0.00034925254,0.012001173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43164018,0.0013762859,0.50647616,0.0015633289,0.00020876604,0.055637106,0.00031641626,0.00009121335,0.0026905374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7402505,0.22867449,0.006090168,0.012581029,0.010772758,0.0016309896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4849051,0.46901456,0.018110128,0.021728164,0.0054510706,0.0007909152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17089961,0.003305423,0.0036392459,0.0042360444,0.0027957787,0.006168521,0.0055243555,0.00444872,0.010532241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25089568,0.0016357306,0.008148919,0.005312813,0.010441533,0.010849426,0.006116406,0.0046413215,0.0008599537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005537809,0.0049052723,0.035578202,0.015113057,0.005710035,0.00040534858,0.014204496,0.059098754,0.0034085028,0.7279334,0.0022490786,0.12585601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071665137,0.015823472,0.009675449,0.0036849861,0.005838485,0.00034932524,0.0041414206,0.21382579,0.0052273762,0.707201,0.02656858,0.00049759337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003378012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003063855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17089961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005661267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008373913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9038144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}