{"meta":{"query_hash":"3e18fff1bf7a","filters":{"venue":"Revista Chilena de Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3e18fff1bf7a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+Chilena+de+Derecho+del+Trabajo+y+de+la+Seguridad+Social"},"results":[{"id":"W2765536711","doi":"10.5354/rdtyss.v8i15.47381","title":"El Derecho a la Protección de la Vida Privada de los trabajadores en la provincia de Quebec","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Chilena de Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Arbitration; Political science; Welfare economics; Law; Right to privacy; Law and economics; Humanities; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010251114274048224,"score_gpt":0.341576889098214,"score_spread":0.33132577482416575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765536711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6624003,0.0062783672,0.0026836176,0.03241072,0.00020204193,0.000111491136,0.00044185139,0.00006817202,0.29540336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960706,0.00096632424,0.00036014392,0.0016830958,0.0000216654,0.000016549297,0.000038923747,0.000008534053,0.036198772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790406,0.0005073995,0.000037278205,0.00019746873,0.0006189934,0.00073491794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783224,0.0007998796,0.00018192375,0.00010705777,0.0008074986,0.00027133225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024044812,0.00020915872,0.00020028274,0.0008272569,0.012620052,0.004488453,0.0010274079,0.0016735761,0.00517035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039273575,0.00021660292,0.00017209831,0.0010313606,0.005837586,0.0005669362,0.0013036832,0.0020232226,0.00018288988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002448856,0.00013002996,0.10586323,0.00029721143,0.00007528371,0.004270223,0.0986158,0.003339666,0.0051572616,0.60524607,0.07234118,0.10441903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007984048,0.00007720235,0.24884602,0.0006787612,0.00008253012,0.0005419549,0.09743076,0.003393515,0.0017482426,0.010377137,0.63661075,0.00013330138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9866606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99130344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055229783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055229783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06392235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40072203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390509565","doi":"10.5354/0719-7551.2023.64956","title":"Transnational judicial dialogue and worker protection in the gig economy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Chilena de Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Deliberation; Political science; Legitimacy; Judicial review; Gig economy; Order (exchange); Law; Labour law; Externality; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01912096724554852,"score_gpt":0.27434033551629683,"score_spread":0.2552193682707483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390509565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35226506,0.025859285,0.010344716,0.026290866,0.00023588726,0.00015420168,0.00010873266,0.000044004802,0.5846973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877166,0.003178595,0.001003856,0.0013617922,0.000042532596,0.000050886843,0.000020261203,0.0000066879124,0.0066187936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99405044,0.003952505,0.00019545517,0.00036860644,0.000683716,0.0007492462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921713,0.0058038533,0.00074736646,0.00044890956,0.0005137765,0.00031469337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007493031,0.00019122899,0.00025458445,0.0020021896,0.003379918,0.008127525,0.0006780412,0.0022803003,0.005125027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010155086,0.0001651303,0.00022878898,0.0023310503,0.009050477,0.0064127715,0.0067405985,0.0017576002,0.0003326271],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053269236,0.000079661826,0.0069172205,0.0007531273,0.000020923633,0.0012887063,0.05791131,0.0004341589,0.00069382397,0.86021215,0.0032572602,0.06837836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005792606,0.00015467986,0.023580134,0.0048166206,0.00007669573,0.0008423251,0.22971556,0.0012895503,0.0018355949,0.32371223,0.41386372,0.000054945584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004315653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00687092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008127525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004580682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070269876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039627433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}