{"meta":{"query_hash":"7dc3c55afe77","filters":{"venue":"Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7dc3c55afe77","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+Direito+Estado+e+Sociedade"},"results":[{"id":"W2031808727","doi":"10.17808/des.36.204","title":"\"A quem cabe a escolha?\" Sobre a importância de distinguir os métodos alternativos de interpretação jurídica","year":2014,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.026726691247520622,"score_gpt":0.32022987930486624,"score_spread":0.2935031880573456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031808727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11698727,0.014732235,0.06564888,0.09398639,0.0015773666,0.00007058293,0.00028281976,0.00019337298,0.7065211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697555,0.003022734,0.009742563,0.0021470874,0.00048318724,0.00007566505,0.00006011558,0.00007784314,0.014635371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99135524,0.0055407337,0.0003182642,0.0006858519,0.0016372598,0.00046267486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896488,0.006494181,0.0011297923,0.001364306,0.0010455544,0.0003173418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010404563,0.00048357886,0.00054657826,0.0033560488,0.006513452,0.013093533,0.0015487736,0.0022876225,0.0047434773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015242213,0.0002458315,0.0005412687,0.0034292177,0.049120497,0.008493431,0.0045679756,0.0048966943,0.00049925136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074135546,0.0000033982278,0.00049588183,0.000029727302,0.0000024301653,0.000022406199,0.0075739115,0.000067438166,0.00006008517,0.9869332,0.0011921345,0.0036120242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018011024,0.000038943384,0.0032418715,0.00033332303,0.00002148155,0.00016849737,0.028773164,0.000929374,0.0004643049,0.8416739,0.124298915,0.00003823993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056132986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012227687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013093533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042216815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048534684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05502522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044593457","doi":"10.17808/des.39.179","title":"Quem é 'O Povo'? Sobre o Sujeito Impossível da Democracia","year":2014,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade","topic":"Social and Political Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04057859767432984,"score_gpt":0.34458806467485326,"score_spread":0.3040094670005234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044593457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018735847,0.012853342,0.019410115,0.10052911,0.0027482598,0.000030639818,0.00009507034,0.00013066415,0.84546685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83899605,0.0077247196,0.0044937995,0.012063322,0.00198253,0.00008042862,0.00008525252,0.00026141762,0.13431257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947101,0.003022959,0.00010080278,0.0007098723,0.000862984,0.00059329614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621564,0.0025100424,0.00024680566,0.00042856522,0.00041904772,0.00017988865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049713673,0.0008693778,0.0005459889,0.0015792684,0.01151046,0.01718799,0.0014589459,0.004248557,0.0131704565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007816033,0.000358141,0.0006408515,0.0016514561,0.03631791,0.009765622,0.0065382835,0.007492113,0.0019408994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008924007,0.0000028826764,0.00015631686,0.00003433093,0.0000029421853,0.00008711038,0.008196943,0.00008306417,0.00006737624,0.9820479,0.006096208,0.0032158843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007897392,0.000011995343,0.0005800163,0.00028351252,0.000010132389,0.00021899607,0.014504473,0.00047024057,0.00034428417,0.57468,0.40886614,0.000022384535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063699083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012248466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01718799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005557517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036515812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044059575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066770190","doi":"10.17808/des.45.433","title":"Aspectos Transnacionais da Luta Contra a Violência Doméstica e Familiar no Brasil / Transnational Aspects of the Fight Against Domestic and Intra-Family violence in Brazil","year":2015,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro; Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; York University","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.020920120219811447,"score_gpt":0.2905297913342558,"score_spread":0.2696096711144444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066770190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78697956,0.009019249,0.0010366787,0.014279407,0.00013315705,0.00006144674,0.00015721863,0.000019034987,0.18831432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99431723,0.0014813324,0.00014246396,0.00017051844,0.0000076484785,0.000010043155,0.000012248149,0.0000048265592,0.0038536857],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991084,0.00037328943,0.00004801625,0.00009601396,0.00016055682,0.00021371663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886453,0.00039278867,0.00030423273,0.00010827339,0.00013140346,0.00019871932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014207298,0.00015930393,0.00020282349,0.0012648568,0.004642027,0.0033220507,0.00045532067,0.0007559878,0.0058956533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026695405,0.0002015269,0.00019636586,0.0017397932,0.0061254106,0.0016271337,0.0028509018,0.001010131,0.00016690548],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003049782,0.000035167915,0.052306853,0.00039475862,0.00001861246,0.0013482494,0.5696266,0.00018082368,0.0014406234,0.3128701,0.003120141,0.058627483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058466594,0.000039063678,0.16256368,0.0013146477,0.000031199037,0.0014059102,0.59058535,0.0003512663,0.0005062266,0.013703138,0.2294586,0.00003505675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14304158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28805953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14304158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00614755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048689162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.284418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961465142","doi":"10.17808/des.54.799","title":"A resolução online de litígios (ODR) na administração pública: o uso da tecnologia como estímulo à transparência","year":2019,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade","topic":"Brazilian Legal Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05086427877232072,"score_gpt":0.35136215564138035,"score_spread":0.3004978768690596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961465142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43077964,0.005768226,0.12645864,0.016878001,0.0005535952,0.0010044123,0.0020188498,0.0027046944,0.41383395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412029,0.002547566,0.028708547,0.000922078,0.0002215748,0.00034517216,0.0005716542,0.0003104694,0.025170086],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9695798,0.015245057,0.0012599004,0.0026544423,0.010167477,0.0010933621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85347885,0.093554184,0.013987634,0.018775338,0.017197767,0.0030062126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020893686,0.0007698492,0.000816603,0.0069472254,0.004056865,0.019302588,0.002138721,0.0027956008,0.01998641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10000472,0.0006586039,0.0010647045,0.007845979,0.004233527,0.014659501,0.005305718,0.0027442717,0.004586101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006580315,0.0006381687,0.08974704,0.0020559595,0.00021319134,0.0008460637,0.0471013,0.006020471,0.0044075954,0.2390783,0.029704422,0.57952946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025154286,0.0013292658,0.13387626,0.0042384756,0.0006822415,0.0022404266,0.0776167,0.07208324,0.017332599,0.19319327,0.4965963,0.0005596845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0139295915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010905809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020893686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007549831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007538752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11049765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158873967","doi":"10.17808/des.0.1463","title":"Brazilian Supreme Court, judicial self-restraint, and educational policy: the homeschooling case (RE 888815)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade","topic":"Brazilian Legal Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionality; Political science; Tribunal; Law; Judicial activism; Premise; Judicial opinion; Judicial restraint; Judicial review; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01904481221684351,"score_gpt":0.3312485021090445,"score_spread":0.312203689892201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158873967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61007684,0.0058728866,0.0054004793,0.05083114,0.00026326062,0.00016928534,0.00019297421,0.0000442007,0.3271489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99257445,0.0003798954,0.00053658,0.0023930669,0.00003613089,0.000028651584,0.000013575909,0.0000060488314,0.004031492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927327,0.0033861913,0.00033016596,0.00078363647,0.0014195989,0.0013477124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886509,0.0070379013,0.0015118293,0.00062150473,0.0016920709,0.00048579075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008510663,0.00023945022,0.00029707374,0.0011868825,0.008437996,0.0044702236,0.0009619944,0.0031988716,0.0025520434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02093255,0.00024993595,0.00036634205,0.0018011034,0.009332456,0.0022850067,0.0023670709,0.0035777078,0.00016582172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015899612,0.00006086115,0.0075752535,0.00009239719,0.000012896765,0.0012438743,0.046524163,0.0003043139,0.0008313702,0.92231345,0.007456435,0.013569015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114938535,0.00022227393,0.09422091,0.002052313,0.00022579372,0.0016932383,0.10414498,0.0041465354,0.005771454,0.29763463,0.4894901,0.00028285247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17488232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21955574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17488232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00915442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0118608745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3477288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243712329","doi":"10.17808/des.28.303","title":"Notícias e Informações","year":2014,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade","topic":"Brazilian Legal Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026418449141333372,"score_gpt":0.3161422629338145,"score_spread":0.28972381379248113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243712329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07098378,0.18757407,0.0067646066,0.08663089,0.011914472,0.00082456355,0.010531121,0.00029886817,0.6244776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5229156,0.26481047,0.012755321,0.014744405,0.0050784117,0.0016022562,0.007265251,0.00042280165,0.17040555],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99205714,0.0035949082,0.0008283419,0.0006724206,0.0024491216,0.00039816662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655196,0.02181402,0.0025419872,0.0031867947,0.005770204,0.0011673882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009363345,0.0004376633,0.0006952301,0.006984607,0.004786812,0.006365413,0.0009976827,0.0011568789,0.029285543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04349363,0.00040147032,0.00047791738,0.014007618,0.0039079334,0.00458685,0.0024988162,0.0021676032,0.0045212945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015190196,0.00027874694,0.013329813,0.006314933,0.000060241473,0.0007941011,0.16290128,0.00036573355,0.0013695854,0.21583427,0.25254875,0.3460506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004268324,0.0000255012,0.0058447444,0.003006847,0.00001599504,0.00020646883,0.02459874,0.000053118354,0.00020407527,0.005450539,0.9605715,0.000018122939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019696435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026928825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029285543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071166693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010056706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09796995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}