{"meta":{"query_hash":"918ba1645900","filters":{"venue":"Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/918ba1645900","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+Direitos+Fundamentais+%26+Democracia"},"results":[{"id":"W3023222327","doi":"10.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd.v25i11829","title":"ISLAMIC JURISDICTION: SHARIE‘A COURTS AND THE FUTURE OF PUBLIC POLICY","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Islam; Sharia; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.018913112091535587,"score_gpt":0.2947364436912928,"score_spread":0.27582333159975725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023222327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09040113,0.028466308,0.0026915206,0.35321203,0.0013453817,0.000020229641,0.00005223683,0.00002761712,0.5237836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97427565,0.004539646,0.00046312434,0.011408715,0.00073306507,0.000013088627,0.000012126689,0.0000059232234,0.00854856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960069,0.0022256495,0.00008085994,0.00027191537,0.0005878264,0.00082681584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970239,0.0017403316,0.0003101873,0.00022101127,0.00038330717,0.0003213068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006441745,0.00014980555,0.00026069573,0.0010709547,0.0060629877,0.009821575,0.0006988498,0.005049346,0.004259082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005412085,0.00020245869,0.00024174579,0.0012028975,0.025065761,0.0060677193,0.002617711,0.0057030595,0.00031977746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005880293,0.000008643619,0.00014538836,0.000009698394,0.0000013364825,0.00002383425,0.0010182677,0.000063061525,0.000024706178,0.99358094,0.0022016733,0.0029167086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020776566,0.000018731616,0.0014281848,0.0002744934,0.0000070946558,0.00005237904,0.0034953626,0.0004336761,0.00009689448,0.90796465,0.08619253,0.00001527297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009367981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009892742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009821575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077998415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007940796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056592107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121227752","doi":"10.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd.v25i31874","title":"CANADIAN LIVING TREE DOCTRINE OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitution; Doctrine; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Metaphor; Constitutional law; Law; Objectivity (philosophy); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02341220341272064,"score_gpt":0.2873373079858172,"score_spread":0.26392510457309654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121227752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011590092,0.0015834422,0.014161333,0.010925797,0.00033473328,0.00004658751,0.00029352392,0.00009240642,0.96097213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88369405,0.0024849044,0.013089683,0.0032407164,0.00028852938,0.00009444113,0.0002725569,0.000098976285,0.09673617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940071,0.0007997813,0.00014906508,0.00083919783,0.0031276476,0.0010772102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976699,0.0006149361,0.00010679706,0.00023149222,0.0011662267,0.00021058881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026594312,0.00040955847,0.0004667898,0.0023336567,0.012625811,0.0066679204,0.0018383887,0.002474076,0.00870821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005557839,0.00028697937,0.00053836644,0.0031229774,0.019914223,0.002694127,0.0026847927,0.0048263217,0.000711127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.276134e-7,4.1616283e-7,0.000031031628,0.0000043932696,6.5833746e-7,0.000011650373,0.00031975075,0.00006676476,0.00002222244,0.99742943,0.0009944625,0.0011182141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022102786,0.000007675118,0.0013660843,0.000115462724,0.000025590043,0.000117285366,0.001149515,0.0015644089,0.000300664,0.66415936,0.33111417,0.000057798323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8847938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91742986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11520618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050115373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06607152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3636142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}