{"meta":{"query_hash":"c16fd651767d","filters":{"venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação"},"cohort_total":12,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"exported":12,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c16fd651767d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+Eletr%C3%B4nica+de+Estudos+Integrados+em+Discurso+e+Argumenta%C3%A7%C3%A3o"},"results":[{"id":"W2776255614","doi":"10.17648/eidea-14-1755","title":"Lógica informal: uma visão geral","year":2017,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03932475904167591,"score_gpt":0.30035015044804086,"score_spread":0.26102539140636494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776255614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026714139,0.07990562,0.10627802,0.27062577,0.0055815256,0.00005253874,0.00028473855,0.00045432322,0.5101033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85563004,0.030325182,0.019652078,0.017915145,0.008639746,0.00016530426,0.00020826307,0.0005148859,0.066949405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905201,0.0062993923,0.00025680228,0.0010448878,0.0013453475,0.00053339207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836377,0.010486522,0.0009581709,0.0024108235,0.0016237682,0.0008829904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008369836,0.00084733113,0.0009608663,0.003891668,0.007202041,0.019052463,0.0019033245,0.0049270205,0.014672627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013237301,0.00041335906,0.0008083416,0.004112774,0.04830528,0.03571991,0.009361752,0.008309953,0.0018351427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068760182,0.0000038273365,0.00009569399,0.00004590428,0.0000027602914,0.000020496074,0.0029136047,0.00004737237,0.000036510894,0.98950547,0.003225634,0.004095837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008440509,0.000014634996,0.0002692449,0.000244369,0.000009312965,0.00013921602,0.0058123744,0.0004312915,0.00013501053,0.73307574,0.25984472,0.000015591493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063040867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005132022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019052463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0086871935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054681725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0630303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778476027","doi":"10.17648/eidea-14-1690","title":"Resenha de Renaissances de la Rhétorique. Perelman aujourd’hui, de Angenot, Bernier & Côté","year":2017,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.04445974141142468,"score_gpt":0.35120839968513323,"score_spread":0.30674865827370856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778476027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044577487,0.08930399,0.013308817,0.15294178,0.009291178,0.00010668939,0.0002929094,0.0004642896,0.6897129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7003671,0.01863311,0.004475988,0.010351789,0.0022183352,0.00008365045,0.0001501998,0.0005219961,0.26319793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944788,0.002781124,0.00015859566,0.0006357377,0.0015031259,0.00044258163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913051,0.0045255865,0.00049774925,0.0007855434,0.0021548667,0.0007312042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006995129,0.00066008,0.0004215699,0.0024863132,0.009896419,0.012288603,0.0008887533,0.0022100937,0.010114416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011553613,0.00038410877,0.00040017883,0.0015649482,0.017504316,0.007502432,0.004737475,0.005521454,0.002392713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011532333,0.00003935146,0.0016334815,0.0006715491,0.000028805602,0.000522677,0.16935594,0.00019035519,0.0028182555,0.5343802,0.1689556,0.12128847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010240133,0.000020236963,0.0022115514,0.0005270596,0.00001452262,0.0001685726,0.018653177,0.00015179548,0.0009548855,0.019355135,0.9579102,0.000022589425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064304024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12334393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064304024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017556442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0125782965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12785947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901785170","doi":"10.17648/eidea-16-2226","title":"Fascismo, populismo: as utilizações contemporâneas de duas categorias políticas nas mídias","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação","topic":"Brazilian cultural history and politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04402644591291658,"score_gpt":0.36068019510911403,"score_spread":0.31665374919619743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901785170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37011373,0.03704862,0.0035141155,0.056617435,0.00064420473,0.00005121216,0.00025069347,0.00004003662,0.53172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875299,0.0034213169,0.00048974174,0.0008779825,0.00006982388,0.000020200963,0.00002906149,0.000018925864,0.0075430474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964701,0.0021428226,0.00009722789,0.0003629358,0.00043520282,0.00049175456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687755,0.0014896072,0.0006352121,0.00029439398,0.00038233204,0.00032099415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046901824,0.00032369312,0.00028694107,0.0034147776,0.007936064,0.0067170914,0.000574933,0.00114933,0.003660382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083236545,0.00025011424,0.00023900771,0.006158876,0.020318367,0.004799281,0.0038641323,0.001955143,0.0002759208],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003300067,0.000009762099,0.01170486,0.00013009914,0.000009777481,0.00024629926,0.29338127,0.00005174676,0.00022749831,0.66267544,0.0048401956,0.026690057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000984707,0.000041668427,0.06477131,0.0011553847,0.000022650496,0.0005056333,0.29758886,0.00025543963,0.0003039051,0.08252758,0.5527799,0.00003772727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046858672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06403571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046858672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008849229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005025585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093171835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943671348","doi":"10.17648/eidea-18-2283","title":"A retórica da qualificação e as controvérsias de rotulagem","year":2019,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030945797899959385,"score_gpt":0.33248299701666845,"score_spread":0.30153719911670906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943671348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113289125,0.041899167,0.018314498,0.18855277,0.00240196,0.00006784356,0.00014762046,0.00007515724,0.6352519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704717,0.007571556,0.0015242825,0.0054131756,0.0009400406,0.00004615847,0.000032360724,0.00006724888,0.013933503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806834,0.0122549,0.0005980421,0.0019021151,0.003127669,0.0014337093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97228223,0.019758582,0.001981554,0.0033485943,0.0020201977,0.0006088812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019334657,0.00051157334,0.0007762919,0.0036429188,0.012142839,0.023784645,0.002462051,0.005839017,0.005489139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032836273,0.00037902198,0.00054165005,0.0046159457,0.08378245,0.014987158,0.006663219,0.007855105,0.0005333496],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044279595,0.0000043089176,0.00019677193,0.000036955786,0.0000021380872,0.000030540716,0.011840849,0.000048158214,0.00003256196,0.9832919,0.001786219,0.002725102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011909037,0.00002418297,0.0016904216,0.00090198556,0.000017557097,0.00014707136,0.05350939,0.00039928206,0.00040208318,0.7110687,0.23179284,0.000034549113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008721594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012142564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023784645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010416529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009411092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10225266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972243658","doi":"10.17648/eidea-19-2448","title":"Argumentos de raciocínio prático: uma abordagem modular","year":2019,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação","topic":"Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009850292815088499,"score_gpt":0.24330138291424597,"score_spread":0.23345109009915746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972243658","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041290667,0.0013127637,0.90824157,0.004505304,0.00020250391,0.00023679035,0.00029339423,0.00097610784,0.04294083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47229114,0.0011851474,0.4995043,0.00092205335,0.00030951764,0.00055100344,0.00045416705,0.00077876606,0.024003847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99345946,0.0032087122,0.00035867858,0.0012589399,0.0013594184,0.00035471105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98471975,0.008094565,0.00089108176,0.0042533455,0.0014527662,0.0005884495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008451951,0.001504915,0.0012152455,0.0023148223,0.0018892671,0.008228354,0.0029327758,0.002947069,0.011113725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017613018,0.0014325414,0.0035119955,0.0016676506,0.0092971,0.021110289,0.008434042,0.005168364,0.001681061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007772738,0.000038292615,0.0010603581,0.00023280541,0.00005732854,0.00026842978,0.004636835,0.004739215,0.0022127493,0.96671706,0.0011452421,0.018813984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045951732,0.00010664665,0.0009038541,0.00032625796,0.00014290387,0.00041176396,0.001342852,0.039754994,0.0021683334,0.89362526,0.061112106,0.00005913456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019437519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019785743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011113725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021072598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027004145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044698715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027929525","doi":"10.17648/eidea-20-2708","title":"Revisitando o Triunvirato lógica/dialética/retórica","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação","topic":"Linguistics and Education Research","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.06280398198211072,"score_gpt":0.3138465958498712,"score_spread":0.25104261386776044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027929525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052344196,0.03478395,0.19889487,0.100084454,0.003840251,0.0001543536,0.00037092675,0.00033568562,0.60919136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8623756,0.015961697,0.04925258,0.011909319,0.0024,0.00031719575,0.0003344204,0.00064468564,0.056804426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898784,0.00611988,0.0004916287,0.0012287957,0.0017126977,0.0005686179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989778,0.0059357993,0.0009278265,0.00129132,0.0015476336,0.0005192798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075520393,0.00088043086,0.0008552957,0.0056451517,0.004760228,0.017423023,0.0020292394,0.0030095335,0.00858598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010359648,0.00056011067,0.0009815267,0.005725424,0.030750938,0.02165637,0.007921432,0.008001643,0.0021466448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011977783,0.0000107517335,0.00029284344,0.000085039545,0.0000059666777,0.000063316686,0.006758918,0.000057420093,0.00018133901,0.98463124,0.0017840251,0.0061171427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018186087,0.000033933662,0.00095420645,0.0005327339,0.000030198209,0.00042283133,0.014599338,0.0012748069,0.00072706863,0.70243233,0.27894557,0.000028780372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004616458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005088817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017423023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076566087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006016491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05555284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282964797","doi":"10.47369/eidea-22-1-3413","title":"Rhetoric and interdisciplinarity: a conversation with Christopher Tindale","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Conversation; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019329345287582227,"score_gpt":0.24026521531395129,"score_spread":0.22093587002636905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282964797","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07771794,0.022166397,0.00582122,0.80788636,0.006246896,0.0001336305,0.000047288897,0.000060326904,0.07992001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80813074,0.016442582,0.0063028936,0.12966321,0.0022667944,0.00036399567,0.000034984063,0.00024971066,0.03654502],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795877,0.014922689,0.00027816414,0.0013614492,0.0023342364,0.0015157518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541962,0.038252622,0.0011609519,0.00046608897,0.002727172,0.0031969887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019437794,0.00086338614,0.0014869269,0.0030705724,0.029593496,0.014441248,0.0032764613,0.01210903,0.0027604618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04233735,0.0010217187,0.0006232659,0.0041651167,0.039285395,0.018918602,0.007915724,0.02481949,0.0004618572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039089417,0.000053587853,0.0005212077,0.00015692055,0.000010397162,0.0016941633,0.7460017,0.00017801601,0.000426218,0.17716241,0.06593303,0.00782328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001963807,0.000048636542,0.000591219,0.0009759273,0.0000113026035,0.0014601571,0.4784383,0.00046789952,0.0003042184,0.015760427,0.5018164,0.00010593696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03580085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047531486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03580085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0159004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0133320205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11536604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282968968","doi":"10.47369/eidea-22-1-3409","title":"O caso SLĀV em Montreal (2018): racionalidade(s) e justiça reparadora","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação","topic":"Education, sociology, and vocational training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dawson College; Cegep de Trois-Rivieres; Cegep de Thetford; Cegep de Saint Hyacinthe; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.11440613864193974,"score_gpt":0.4158423888035879,"score_spread":0.3014362501616482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282968968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17198606,0.025483564,0.002267063,0.15608026,0.0028758328,0.00007458668,0.0006233962,0.00016967293,0.64043957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78209406,0.0058457986,0.00047524445,0.0059923436,0.00030043419,0.00003113985,0.00012847375,0.000090862326,0.20504175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989987,0.0002732229,0.000011188267,0.00012417581,0.00022988833,0.00036283003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896157,0.00019579784,0.00007586026,0.000054274584,0.00035214715,0.00036037504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010203307,0.00041203384,0.00021932847,0.0010469691,0.021639654,0.009417767,0.0011554682,0.0018603137,0.017228933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020695087,0.00022400571,0.00020211961,0.001918336,0.012996045,0.0024164256,0.0028024684,0.0028192997,0.00091524],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058426896,0.000033827408,0.009494044,0.00019654156,0.000022102871,0.0013546787,0.18615943,0.0003902901,0.0009706662,0.38762614,0.3520054,0.061688468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005879171,0.000011057613,0.010854516,0.00018225091,0.0000095450205,0.00013323744,0.07196442,0.00016499264,0.00025747568,0.0049525984,0.91142637,0.00003758106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96230996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98590404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057862926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057862926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04035746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41982687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282971955","doi":"10.47369/eidea-22-1-3415","title":"Retórica e interdisciplinariedad: una conversación con Christopher Tindale","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação","topic":"Education and Teacher Training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Windsor; Rhetoric; Philosophy; Art; Theology","score_opus":0.026440920937529155,"score_gpt":0.3501689270234883,"score_spread":0.32372800608595914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282971955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072848597,0.028458793,0.0029013655,0.9381672,0.007527264,0.000025000936,0.000025175885,0.000027996088,0.015582462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35414857,0.11601129,0.013851542,0.39472696,0.016791493,0.00022747231,0.000059796523,0.0004953823,0.10368755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866397,0.008891344,0.00034320352,0.0014110999,0.0019516506,0.0007630593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960346,0.031713605,0.0008680876,0.00059898844,0.004095844,0.002377459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016117869,0.0006325144,0.0009938816,0.0019938906,0.0117977895,0.011408209,0.0019795387,0.007236712,0.003619623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027672894,0.0006907932,0.00047277962,0.002655934,0.018364904,0.02100293,0.005754255,0.017174842,0.0005804725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083906,0.00008933469,0.0013419385,0.000453342,0.000017466336,0.0023463282,0.17652687,0.00044218963,0.0007358074,0.24526028,0.53017265,0.04252987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010041608,0.000029537974,0.0005639981,0.0008544892,0.00000887291,0.00095745263,0.057713516,0.00042929922,0.0004280209,0.03283296,0.90610355,0.00006834906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022855598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046089202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022855598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008367355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012490999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08524048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282972898","doi":"10.47369/eidea-22-1-3410","title":"L’affaire SLĀV à Montréal (2018): rationalité(s) et justice réparatrice","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação","topic":"Education, sociology, and vocational training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Cegep de Saint Hyacinthe; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1243925425154734,"score_gpt":0.42440397050291023,"score_spread":0.30001142798743685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282972898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119826324,0.025767962,0.0037441994,0.25982535,0.0015218038,0.00005435525,0.00024943682,0.00008824975,0.5889223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89521754,0.0047393753,0.00048731623,0.0092688985,0.00025300722,0.000026250731,0.000047580786,0.000061856445,0.089898184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976494,0.000769921,0.000024538773,0.00024546485,0.0005524013,0.00075835723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982097,0.0005464119,0.00013540749,0.00008168544,0.000520058,0.00050680013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020498186,0.00043313226,0.0002519632,0.000958579,0.021485494,0.011279642,0.0011964667,0.0030111563,0.013777231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042469236,0.00018027931,0.00023576731,0.0016173273,0.03059356,0.002839075,0.0031220824,0.004356608,0.0006895104],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002339054,0.00001941329,0.0033824816,0.00006461088,0.0000111463505,0.0002746836,0.061443213,0.00019967085,0.00021811083,0.8530201,0.05788027,0.023462933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021990194,0.000023856202,0.013857296,0.00039301126,0.00001811298,0.00012237547,0.08043261,0.00038412944,0.0004098489,0.07016744,0.8340908,0.00007854036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92710793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9573246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07289207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05906123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053809322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42852122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282976928","doi":"10.47369/eidea-22-1-3414","title":"Retórica e interdisciplinaridade: uma conversa com Christopher Tindale","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020613032399165888,"score_gpt":0.2858351992799027,"score_spread":0.2652221668807368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282976928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01012435,0.022411367,0.0022614566,0.9436276,0.0062882286,0.000028263583,0.000023016379,0.000026928436,0.015208795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42858595,0.0838096,0.013464438,0.36323154,0.016370123,0.0002333391,0.000050888746,0.00046362157,0.09379051],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98659676,0.008605864,0.00026898057,0.0017021607,0.0019064896,0.00091970386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96025753,0.030521626,0.00090682274,0.00055966916,0.004419042,0.0033352433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018340083,0.0007091752,0.0011689088,0.0019996187,0.017424973,0.011139117,0.0024819933,0.007685258,0.0037529205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02988386,0.0007226907,0.00048914814,0.0028607694,0.02028489,0.020586455,0.0064903754,0.022232102,0.00053929095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066366454,0.00009673693,0.0011138621,0.00033456745,0.000017961675,0.0025484913,0.23486006,0.00054245355,0.0007145843,0.24724248,0.4795901,0.032872345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009866673,0.000037356906,0.00053369696,0.00072628795,0.000009828001,0.0011582923,0.084250405,0.0006450855,0.00047862146,0.03124846,0.8808207,0.000081397346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032397218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06503568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032397218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012592257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0154874325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09699279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313212274","doi":"10.47369/eidea-22-3-3530","title":"A argumentação no tribunal do júri: emoção e empatia do advogado de defesa em casos de homicídio","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação","topic":"Brazilian Legal Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.020886135366757718,"score_gpt":0.3166038351814267,"score_spread":0.295717699814669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313212274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85144204,0.0012425992,0.003603967,0.0041070115,0.00018316247,0.00006852126,0.00011684807,0.000033231485,0.13920258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932075,0.00022743871,0.0005948674,0.00024060076,0.000020020972,0.000035600817,0.000036430265,0.00003454794,0.0056029186],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716103,0.0014661048,0.00010531896,0.00034807867,0.0005745065,0.00034503196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942676,0.004001587,0.0006481598,0.00037895594,0.0004033205,0.00030022644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002949658,0.0005680635,0.0006481147,0.0019069006,0.0073140278,0.007985603,0.0011305123,0.0025696554,0.009022641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013856558,0.0004455534,0.0003359032,0.0016573329,0.014892093,0.0066246563,0.007222133,0.0049369712,0.0010022164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007778695,0.00003548037,0.007813126,0.00019544321,0.000010467573,0.0019254403,0.9050249,0.00007324516,0.0020755467,0.07301336,0.0021869058,0.0075682974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021582055,0.00004498224,0.021841541,0.00040882317,0.000030366078,0.0016778142,0.8955519,0.0005215044,0.0011533444,0.023939647,0.054752663,0.000055724508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008811892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01375958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009022641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042604594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018462182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030911982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}