{"meta":{"query_hash":"c7b5ab54a0e3","filters":{"venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c7b5ab54a0e3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+Iberoamericana+de+Argumentaci%C3%B3n"},"results":[{"id":"W1515318643","doi":"10.15366/ria2013.7.002","title":"Innovative scaffolding: Understanding innovation as the disclosure of hidden affordances","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Humanities; Sociology; Psychology; Art; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.05996419812226983,"score_gpt":0.3234070340521073,"score_spread":0.26344283592983747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515318643","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.141515,0.0076276567,0.55135554,0.027113613,0.0004070497,0.0000872383,0.00014434736,0.00025953155,0.27149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95723236,0.0023884224,0.034968395,0.00055936095,0.00011473024,0.000090922214,0.000041462565,0.000039394956,0.0045649773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845827,0.0006572125,0.00007862484,0.00028775743,0.0003636188,0.00015445438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99544793,0.0029676706,0.0005101266,0.0006741877,0.00021249446,0.0001874599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002612368,0.00056500634,0.00045714245,0.0020607568,0.0013233147,0.008471794,0.0016489052,0.0037826085,0.0037799769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007355756,0.00026854684,0.0007251885,0.001420765,0.02607534,0.019293997,0.004524077,0.0021895939,0.00030134752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000087593235,0.000009950626,0.00035916804,0.00006449608,0.0000062973763,0.00010867881,0.0043070093,0.0008037502,0.0004438815,0.98793286,0.00016860956,0.005786681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063829684,0.000017443286,0.00042701914,0.00009086302,0.0000075444877,0.00014910723,0.0015241419,0.0023344178,0.00045547838,0.9845403,0.010433992,0.000013411258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015055685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001058519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008471794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002531422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014355718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018366873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248609351","doi":"10.15366/ria2011.1.002","title":"The Argumentative Uses of Emotive Language","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Chrysler (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Emotive; Argumentation theory; Persuasion; Argumentative; Defeasible estate; Dialectic; Epistemology; Computer science; Informal logic; Exploit; Counterfactual thinking; Psychology; Negation; Linguistics; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Programming language; Computer security","score_opus":0.018768220101578057,"score_gpt":0.3272689275505183,"score_spread":0.3085007074489402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248609351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31981042,0.009302245,0.17541522,0.007163301,0.0005222029,0.00019159149,0.00023555662,0.00048785456,0.4868716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718544,0.0013849688,0.013959212,0.0005214565,0.0001499043,0.0000965807,0.00007244668,0.000172653,0.011788441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866644,0.00972663,0.0005457594,0.00062697026,0.00194735,0.0004889331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758369,0.018371556,0.0016674645,0.0020211083,0.0018238341,0.00027920792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075814375,0.00089901936,0.00042551936,0.0043438254,0.0023909016,0.009002446,0.0011860676,0.0018062149,0.004615288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021259766,0.00042644682,0.0005986069,0.003191585,0.009662862,0.009193729,0.0045272047,0.0018716307,0.00083526096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107828004,0.000038874095,0.0035162785,0.0005234178,0.00003510525,0.00059352146,0.100410625,0.0003861786,0.0032150277,0.8364788,0.0023841949,0.052310016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056493773,0.00019022722,0.016439738,0.0023991116,0.00018328069,0.0029857587,0.10553929,0.0064468835,0.011256005,0.3978212,0.45654434,0.00013764267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006588629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008975352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009002446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019214894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010415432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04009497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734940893","doi":"10.15366/ria2017.14.001","title":"Cumulative Arguments in Artificial Intelligence and Informal Logic / Argumentos acumulativos en inteligencia artificial y lógica informal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Argument map; Computer science; Graph; Key (lock); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Epistemology; Theoretical computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045137551829843525,"score_gpt":0.3119781662286736,"score_spread":0.26684061439883006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734940893","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04790239,0.0030774001,0.788887,0.0058635385,0.0003295871,0.00011320787,0.00016231458,0.00031844637,0.15334612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8201283,0.0013597904,0.16205826,0.00057475653,0.00030224034,0.00030901146,0.00014855957,0.00014684239,0.0149722025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963689,0.002228759,0.00024774758,0.00032018233,0.0006060016,0.00022843633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99299777,0.0047756,0.0006501567,0.00069888326,0.00060536625,0.00027227015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00475102,0.00089241285,0.00054178666,0.0031461525,0.0020558145,0.0066875243,0.0012383473,0.0025898793,0.0061838226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010422149,0.00038857845,0.0012935558,0.002614399,0.010625964,0.01166494,0.0030828714,0.0031762559,0.0007348141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027095623,0.000003523732,0.00005323572,0.000011883763,0.0000019341076,0.000018480016,0.00021525685,0.0006809241,0.000050185386,0.9974763,0.00012624114,0.0013593473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008190541,0.000008380761,0.00009038585,0.00003608371,0.0000070832543,0.00003604646,0.00012609582,0.004881926,0.00015310201,0.98440033,0.010245903,0.000006533053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016776051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013178067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066875243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038366201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013302306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02783674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176057492","doi":"10.15366/ria2021.22.005","title":"Argumentos fuertes","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación","topic":"Education and Teacher Training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027363800854354164,"score_gpt":0.3453785493712474,"score_spread":0.31801474851689326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176057492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03547224,0.0131623745,0.03956122,0.020824378,0.006885018,0.00048145454,0.0010253951,0.0013787256,0.8812093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7528653,0.02705852,0.039842244,0.0070097297,0.008220237,0.002084408,0.002785353,0.0011009254,0.15903334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98215944,0.008224303,0.0008742452,0.0021494648,0.004757354,0.001835237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799737,0.010853615,0.002291547,0.0023981263,0.003812896,0.0006700526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018845946,0.0036642062,0.0032812033,0.0076510166,0.007861741,0.016919179,0.0024215232,0.00767212,0.02702595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051537838,0.0008665872,0.0036698773,0.0051796883,0.010842863,0.016124776,0.008718404,0.012430175,0.0098605305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035142014,0.00012313534,0.001095333,0.0006896065,0.000089676556,0.0011393443,0.0064516035,0.00040046766,0.00069835474,0.92646736,0.013308089,0.049185526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020837397,0.00012904864,0.0016205572,0.002251042,0.0001680967,0.0010237137,0.0065715425,0.0018406772,0.0015774019,0.31580782,0.6687344,0.000067432375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004090371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027722663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02702595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009817458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026392054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099668086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389685108","doi":"10.15366/ria2023.27.004","title":"El género Statement of Purpose y la enseñanza de la argumentación en lengua inglesa","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación","topic":"Linguistics and Education Research","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020740999463517724,"score_gpt":0.34644301298838265,"score_spread":0.32570201352486494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389685108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39433074,0.008136153,0.09950833,0.028014584,0.0025791253,0.0010420226,0.0008028088,0.00051649107,0.46506974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9151447,0.004216455,0.045380276,0.0009502163,0.00036617403,0.0007753605,0.00037904672,0.00017154624,0.03261605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98800665,0.009304726,0.00039335334,0.0003365261,0.0015804606,0.00037820128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843465,0.009354482,0.001686789,0.0013620865,0.0026052601,0.00064489205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014889799,0.00072895957,0.0005762022,0.0030613958,0.00257484,0.00565648,0.00073044415,0.0017352179,0.0027511993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017926686,0.00025814938,0.0005258146,0.0018534113,0.0067653153,0.0041511194,0.003551591,0.0024627494,0.0007949683],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004888834,0.00022863016,0.0074336636,0.0012169868,0.000024215324,0.0017051459,0.293347,0.00058837654,0.0051166913,0.5194382,0.013376936,0.15703523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010355694,0.00026526913,0.01241046,0.0026467745,0.000039677696,0.0019143025,0.12901403,0.0017444724,0.00404836,0.067970164,0.779742,0.00010092774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027113343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003963541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014889799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003854254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045788535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07874566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399796951","doi":"10.15366/ria2024.m2.011","title":"La razón sensible","year":2024,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación","topic":"Social Issues and Policies in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012621308491159973,"score_gpt":0.3592203752632432,"score_spread":0.3465990667720832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399796951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011096964,0.013025866,0.058107488,0.0641872,0.003931937,0.00013511663,0.00070473255,0.0007776805,0.848033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7449867,0.009899814,0.043917384,0.02257372,0.0050186943,0.0007790438,0.0009905135,0.00086535455,0.1709687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98753685,0.0062816264,0.00050817966,0.0019979263,0.0027492582,0.0009261071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934818,0.0026279292,0.0007374256,0.0013415213,0.0015091439,0.00030209473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008809914,0.0014635266,0.0013187038,0.0019595583,0.004436972,0.011929228,0.0013663202,0.0050716354,0.018762365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018835464,0.0005162285,0.0019495998,0.0013963671,0.018262576,0.009833727,0.004565403,0.011612622,0.0055405903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003300397,0.000010702392,0.0002470171,0.000074556825,0.00001542556,0.00007320414,0.0013172957,0.00011264187,0.00016562875,0.98092973,0.0077978517,0.009222859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053512314,0.000036850306,0.0008616714,0.00034195403,0.000030829044,0.00034897125,0.0016267609,0.00070751715,0.00046154042,0.5217186,0.47377178,0.000040054223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006788009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050089317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018762365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008231332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031124684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06276643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410696164","doi":"10.15366/ria2025.m5.002","title":"Diálogos de indagación como estrategia para mitigar los riesgos deliberativos del discurso populista","year":2025,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación","topic":"Cultural and political discourse analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Logos Bible Software; Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.01772048425124797,"score_gpt":0.3554205698735853,"score_spread":0.33770008562233733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410696164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11668379,0.0076765744,0.16914193,0.0573446,0.0007814261,0.00074689667,0.00019212796,0.00034138365,0.6470912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95038164,0.0020703366,0.024787804,0.00240491,0.00028045214,0.0006341571,0.00005718231,0.00014016234,0.019243348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716006,0.02407599,0.00039004552,0.0012286281,0.0017995277,0.0009051981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728655,0.02157536,0.001623528,0.0019701389,0.0012510616,0.00071442354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02370423,0.0010144095,0.0008443491,0.0033050713,0.008759611,0.012900135,0.0018739464,0.005030328,0.0054617114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026615052,0.0004355166,0.0007489556,0.0032022474,0.03261018,0.016671035,0.011065113,0.005685066,0.0006988891],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000401247,0.00004338817,0.00075444335,0.00015611258,0.000012996058,0.00014165875,0.07592899,0.0003122986,0.00033367507,0.90961266,0.001936746,0.010726951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008070183,0.000055062952,0.0012875828,0.00084413233,0.00005749997,0.0001719345,0.08423744,0.0028104421,0.0011587968,0.64735895,0.26189327,0.000044128356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033349462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005051814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02370423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00627184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007231665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12536144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}