{"meta":{"query_hash":"c7b5ab54a0e3","filters":{"venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c7b5ab54a0e3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+Iberoamericana+de+Argumentaci%C3%B3n"},"results":[{"id":"W1515318643","doi":"10.15366/ria2013.7.002","title":"Innovative scaffolding: Understanding innovation as the disclosure of hidden affordances","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Humanities; Sociology; Psychology; Art; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.05996419812226983,"score_gpt":0.3234070340521073,"score_spread":0.26344283592983747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515318643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9423012,0.00039083607,0.0007399953,0.007599123,0.00042322313,0.001087777,0.0002249854,0.0002458772,0.046986993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958451,0.0016813116,0.00013794827,0.0013958804,0.00018007793,0.000062581814,0.0000719975,0.000059515565,0.0005656232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641305,0.0004121423,0.00089496817,0.000681745,0.0008243613,0.0007737189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748546,0.0006262787,0.0010301399,0.00054640265,0.00021825235,0.000093459406],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010353673,0.00040237093,0.0005253465,0.000636709,0.0006223469,0.00036923093,0.0006316314,0.000104361934,0.00013342006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079569244,0.00032255598,0.00013569303,0.011671468,0.0008469583,0.0004769176,0.000257336,0.00036873453,0.00018600021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082007944,0.0000861487,0.006618687,0.00026058286,0.0000953101,0.000030869327,0.0016422691,0.000019574803,0.036768097,0.94207036,0.002139223,0.010186843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003280912,0.0023504028,0.017963203,0.0045304457,0.00076916436,0.00018306961,0.06886203,0.0027435815,0.22497576,0.63482183,0.036619205,0.0029004063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021264833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000045729653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30724856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005342832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032086996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248609351","doi":"10.15366/ria2011.1.002","title":"The Argumentative Uses of Emotive Language","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Chrysler (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Emotive; Argumentation theory; Persuasion; Argumentative; Defeasible estate; Dialectic; Epistemology; Computer science; Informal logic; Exploit; Counterfactual thinking; Psychology; Negation; Linguistics; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Programming language; Computer security","score_opus":0.018768220101578057,"score_gpt":0.3272689275505183,"score_spread":0.3085007074489402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248609351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692674,0.0017408248,0.00035620068,0.00048864126,0.00027290432,0.00047910394,0.00012727566,0.00016245345,0.027105194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919179,0.00033305396,0.00015108968,0.00055871456,0.00011376796,0.000104390834,0.00007638908,0.000038609327,0.006706101],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804157,0.00044953043,0.00037849153,0.0003293605,0.000285064,0.0005160038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861187,0.00044158654,0.0002919927,0.00048213027,0.000062686246,0.00010976626],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005174236,0.00020081061,0.00030919941,0.0001262034,0.00019454655,0.000058291997,0.0003204488,0.000050621184,0.0009365774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108108434,0.0001475844,0.00017067963,0.00089035585,0.00029078324,0.000081386555,0.00007474078,0.00016463813,0.0007744626],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000733235,0.00072754174,0.031183954,0.00020408131,0.002943212,0.0005975895,0.17800777,0.000008459513,0.028360104,0.11379479,0.10921894,0.53422034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035315577,0.0011229152,0.24435514,0.00025826052,0.0007873775,0.00010771945,0.6493349,0.000078188525,0.021321144,0.0043625175,0.073446214,0.0012940688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00099267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033941993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53292626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098574186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004599587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734940893","doi":"10.15366/ria2017.14.001","title":"Cumulative Arguments in Artificial Intelligence and Informal Logic / Argumentos acumulativos en inteligencia artificial y lógica informal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Argument map; Computer science; Graph; Key (lock); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Epistemology; Theoretical computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045137551829843525,"score_gpt":0.3119781662286736,"score_spread":0.26684061439883006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734940893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8413462,0.00010916981,0.15508276,0.00071349076,0.00031279665,0.001251283,0.00002391247,0.00033878733,0.0008216069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99430984,0.00019679322,0.00438418,0.0005265421,0.00013433483,0.0001395548,0.000054447897,0.000027538186,0.00022674217],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957384,0.00031785178,0.0013957146,0.0007571955,0.0007298346,0.0010610122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981105,0.00030888553,0.00052175653,0.00062769605,0.000093000854,0.0003381767],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014118605,0.0004819367,0.0006119605,0.0007544868,0.00030560768,0.00054316263,0.0008478068,0.00016501806,0.00008788572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022878517,0.00046789175,0.00014329691,0.0021524788,0.00014209806,0.0016423259,0.00065699324,0.00040172716,0.0004415202],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024893272,0.00060671754,0.056558885,0.00036523273,0.00029200222,0.00027207524,0.036432583,0.010458121,0.007597098,0.2563925,0.00064656424,0.6301293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007022059,0.00075611734,0.1690347,0.00038219642,0.00006097944,0.00007467521,0.004253244,0.7998449,0.007370509,0.00951384,0.0061981645,0.001808431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006790915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012780588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7893868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034509465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016469562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176057492","doi":"10.15366/ria2021.22.005","title":"Argumentos fuertes","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación","topic":"Education and Teacher Training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027363800854354164,"score_gpt":0.3453785493712474,"score_spread":0.31801474851689326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176057492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65753615,0.013098358,0.00070441444,0.04674566,0.0012246371,0.00071933866,0.00008468255,0.00036291158,0.27952385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97074777,0.0058138394,0.0022743733,0.0049400046,0.0007759503,0.000050549173,0.00006704589,0.000059509657,0.01527098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591315,0.0010159499,0.00058505073,0.0007370159,0.00071069767,0.0010381211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978511,0.00029796505,0.00035927782,0.00064843544,0.00018484537,0.00065838604],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093608256,0.00037650924,0.0005592545,0.00011508797,0.0006951962,0.0010101486,0.00048092197,0.00015332316,0.0059566717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039722785,0.00043619762,0.00031306662,0.0013626536,0.00048011902,0.0003097338,0.00012562219,0.0004203365,0.0007174988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003438965,0.0021432412,0.2675509,0.00044577234,0.0010010536,0.00029565787,0.06323948,0.000008182731,0.005804268,0.34258163,0.03997938,0.27691606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055931637,0.00007115879,0.014612133,0.0002789512,0.00023149034,0.000023889304,0.048017506,0.00004176161,0.00080575695,0.0004770959,0.934268,0.00061294617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017219177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007226932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8942886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007756426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015411964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389685108","doi":"10.15366/ria2023.27.004","title":"El género Statement of Purpose y la enseñanza de la argumentación en lengua inglesa","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación","topic":"Linguistics and Education Research","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020740999463517724,"score_gpt":0.34644301298838265,"score_spread":0.32570201352486494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389685108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9525149,0.0018467704,0.000100470956,0.0016371496,0.00047614667,0.00093353237,0.0007989497,0.00018726657,0.04150481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825588,0.0071828826,0.00044048825,0.0004832076,0.00093454326,0.0001701279,0.00022730252,0.00013300072,0.007869667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946317,0.0013935867,0.0011603327,0.00066670065,0.00089154113,0.0012561075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963385,0.0015151208,0.0005830948,0.00077031367,0.00028279828,0.000510195],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030424993,0.00054067245,0.0008038981,0.0006124296,0.00052888197,0.0013789015,0.0007135474,0.00016755964,0.0027578408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058803154,0.0005475324,0.0003283547,0.00048582006,0.0010295078,0.00016740488,0.0003859508,0.00062557677,0.00041395734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001796127,0.001630237,0.0362183,0.0025171791,0.0011852921,0.00033378953,0.05997109,0.00014033895,0.003734691,0.79701227,0.068586566,0.028490612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008577579,0.0003436804,0.0063567595,0.00053430966,0.00025684666,0.000017655622,0.016027072,0.0004505836,0.0011632611,0.0016511987,0.9717127,0.00062819285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004078366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002520562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9031261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008297247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009637539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399796951","doi":"10.15366/ria2024.m2.011","title":"La razón sensible","year":2024,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación","topic":"Social Issues and Policies in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012621308491159973,"score_gpt":0.3592203752632432,"score_spread":0.3465990667720832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399796951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14715087,0.031530727,0.00075756287,0.016004737,0.00201809,0.0009447118,0.00020785959,0.0009494932,0.80043596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566732,0.026235878,0.0016268572,0.0019372877,0.001980143,0.000039776696,0.00002004784,0.000115877134,0.011370923],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563015,0.0012097193,0.00056708377,0.0006927413,0.00074119825,0.001159094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975956,0.0011000872,0.0002017391,0.0005289803,0.00006560573,0.00050796894],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012163456,0.00046549606,0.00068563095,0.00019266902,0.0006167928,0.0018415397,0.0005733565,0.00027716503,0.0022457193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021804028,0.0004781729,0.0004648754,0.0021131653,0.001836933,0.00030492156,0.00019493693,0.0006379096,0.0012241738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026174765,0.00016972469,0.0035745346,0.0005882704,0.0005398171,0.00034988034,0.034035135,0.000016249693,0.0005501093,0.40353093,0.095176056,0.46144313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014115733,0.00011979391,0.00056831085,0.0005562964,0.00025585556,0.000024337194,0.01314409,0.00046112714,0.00004328895,0.0007169662,0.98341566,0.0005530911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018292747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003580772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8882396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009059357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006869163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410696164","doi":"10.15366/ria2025.m5.002","title":"Diálogos de indagación como estrategia para mitigar los riesgos deliberativos del discurso populista","year":2025,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación","topic":"Cultural and political discourse analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Logos Bible Software; Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.01772048425124797,"score_gpt":0.3554205698735853,"score_spread":0.33770008562233733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410696164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8864446,0.005532221,0.0017371419,0.03704735,0.00031154696,0.0014806506,0.0009487283,0.00027628618,0.06622145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735725,0.0035534734,0.00052471185,0.0054634665,0.0004524899,0.00013873696,0.00018377432,0.000053337495,0.016057538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99350274,0.001320947,0.00115603,0.0010838761,0.00086287624,0.0020735175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969527,0.00040470972,0.00047812398,0.0008562239,0.00023466971,0.0010735305],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073981425,0.00084726384,0.0013234027,0.0002482108,0.0014610571,0.0016144194,0.0011532379,0.00036489544,0.0013905166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026065574,0.0007481163,0.0008221636,0.0021920581,0.0018977073,0.00060662674,0.00026583648,0.00077713554,0.0002815968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000154759,0.0010900226,0.106662124,0.0006529406,0.0017836572,0.00020460809,0.0044138166,0.000058778758,0.0020735445,0.82452637,0.035685487,0.022693861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031584094,0.0007116564,0.09140992,0.0030678343,0.006936822,0.000048268303,0.041747823,0.0022188947,0.0022420574,0.025261117,0.8188148,0.004382353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029207215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014543728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79926527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013815856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013890401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}