{"meta":{"query_hash":"996137fd266b","filters":{"venue":"Revista Jurídica"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/996137fd266b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+Jur%C3%ADdica"},"results":[{"id":"W3018150967","doi":"10.21902/revistajur.2316-753x.v1i58.3823","title":"THE CRIMINAL WRONGDOING IN THE CRIME OF TAX EVASION","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Jurídica","topic":"Brazilian Legal Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"First Nations University of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Tax evasion; Wrongdoing; Criminal law; Political science; Covert; Evasion (ethics); Law and economics; Devaluation; Criminology; Law; Economics; Sociology; Currency; Public economics","score_opus":0.0512269103318077,"score_gpt":0.344975993481116,"score_spread":0.2937490831493083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3018150967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5108053,0.015572585,0.00013465305,0.14514281,0.00031408985,0.0014483427,0.000013772659,0.00012962932,0.3264388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983899,0.00033175357,0.000086370375,0.0006508042,0.00025210142,0.0000069363473,7.5068874e-7,0.0000068448103,0.0002745677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836826,0.0005234493,0.00024220375,0.0001516523,0.0004824146,0.0002320068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916977,0.00040588577,0.00010357356,0.00020891901,0.00004426882,0.00006761207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013050595,0.00007277405,0.00014270139,0.000016919075,0.00038339637,0.00014578906,0.00067680766,0.000047444217,0.000087405075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012179655,0.000042778924,0.000071685696,0.00038202628,0.00039480423,0.000108680564,0.00005512477,0.00019949951,0.000058540263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009496424,0.00009392125,0.004517493,0.00023118444,0.00002187756,0.000037991213,0.15890595,0.0000026072364,0.0012183483,0.7284142,0.05199238,0.054469105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093643124,0.000051751816,0.0051839375,0.000074370524,0.000022700611,5.6085975e-7,0.01808846,0.000038620015,0.00010472265,0.0002716329,0.9759915,0.00007810754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010544049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031133785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92399913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046770754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013688249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29488137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3018509096","doi":"10.21902/revistajur.2316-753x.v1i58.3828","title":"THE COMMUNICATIVE ACTION TO HABERMAS: THE NECESSARY ADOPTION OF THE THEORY BY THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Jurídica","topic":"Brazilian cultural history and politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; University of Toronto; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Communicative action; Veto; Security council; Political science; Action (physics); Power (physics); Order (exchange); Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Politics; Social science; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.06467542894365606,"score_gpt":0.3044491869569267,"score_spread":0.2397737580132706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3018509096","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14815927,0.02534855,0.00013905423,0.58372384,0.0009981829,0.0029498953,0.0002900671,0.00017672192,0.2382144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906088,0.0013535009,0.000006892841,0.005486696,0.00020623156,0.000024636187,0.0000037679479,0.000007497502,0.0023019537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966549,0.002206587,0.0002202346,0.0001273385,0.0005849415,0.00020599981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786514,0.001086782,0.0002101436,0.00054405147,0.00020459892,0.00008926536],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00223851,0.000102049264,0.000121969584,0.0000029281928,0.002943575,0.00010323139,0.0013564695,0.0000690659,0.000093416005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010308707,0.000041629046,0.000120834164,0.00035491877,0.0014820154,0.00011454611,0.00015334248,0.00041533023,0.000044997534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007946487,0.000038484897,0.00013784388,0.00003280388,0.00005407446,2.0595859e-7,0.13471553,0.0000034141083,0.00021896852,0.5602113,0.2920638,0.012444082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005384028,0.000021122893,0.0005283399,0.000024944902,0.000039547824,5.020265e-7,0.016482944,0.0000118577545,0.000081603815,0.003287155,0.97940356,0.00006456094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000285861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044900193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84244955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023658175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032224765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99835443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019283501","doi":"10.21902/revistajur.2316-753x.v2i55.3412","title":"THE DIGITALIZATION OF BRAZILIAN CITIES: A STUDY BASED ON INFORMATION FROM THE MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Jurídica","topic":"Smart Cities and Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Information and Communications Technology; Cyberspace; Christian ministry; Digital divide; Political science; Humanities; Information society; Citizenship; Urbanization; Population; Sociology; Geography; Economic growth; The Internet; World Wide Web; Art; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.008470836511988008,"score_gpt":0.21669743785444245,"score_spread":0.20822660134245444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019283501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851373,0.00046265626,0.00085952354,0.0006489373,0.0000960414,0.0006170934,0.00015753876,0.00015645685,0.011864456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997011,0.000121909725,0.000054193068,0.000030189623,0.000005808912,0.000018473878,0.00004666853,0.0000060158295,0.000015683238],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948794,0.00002296969,0.00025596964,0.000036633297,0.00013347944,0.00006300633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850273,0.00044752515,0.00008665096,0.0009163132,0.000039093327,0.000007701251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010749584,0.00006191491,0.00010569401,0.000026190843,0.00006253494,0.000051330186,0.0004453747,0.00003308212,0.000016555154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000974921,0.00003813473,0.000038004997,0.00014379718,0.000097797725,0.00009105813,0.000054572323,0.00007389271,0.000009960013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002461234,0.00084716314,0.4655577,0.0017523367,0.0010280235,0.000001005502,0.022210937,0.01883778,0.0007931099,0.19156122,0.04837625,0.24878834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014286594,0.00063373864,0.14342318,0.00072662026,0.0001107444,6.1731674e-7,0.047203276,0.11702431,0.0013154158,0.0008392455,0.68687874,0.0004154492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027122682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000085989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6385025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001725997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016574708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15550892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020761700","doi":"10.21902/revistajur.2316-753x.v1i54.3753","title":"JUDICIALIZAÇÃO E ATIVISMO JUDICIAL EM PERSPECTIVA: UMA ANÁLISE A PARTIR DAS EXPERIÊNCIAS DAS SUPREMAS CORTES DO BRASIL E DO CANADÁ","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Jurídica","topic":"Brazilian Legal Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão","keywords":"Supreme court; Tribunal; Political science; Humanities; Constitutional court; Law; Philosophy; Constitution","score_opus":0.049188175709094825,"score_gpt":0.3545068244506242,"score_spread":0.30531864874152936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020761700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80447114,0.06751884,0.00030584147,0.056478992,0.003350164,0.0046597146,0.0008255237,0.0014688247,0.060920984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98696697,0.0018780541,0.00011156207,0.0032829389,0.0052503957,0.000107627326,0.000053774234,0.00024647856,0.0021022041],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885557,0.0017991635,0.0018234086,0.0025798022,0.0028373662,0.0024045072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938687,0.0005533809,0.0010770472,0.0013642411,0.0006276844,0.002508949],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013170772,0.0013318703,0.0023568063,0.00027024883,0.0021900253,0.0022471584,0.0022410841,0.00086627336,0.008084737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040682964,0.0014349506,0.0008820762,0.0033777999,0.002030126,0.001111092,0.00067513756,0.0014238528,0.0014966769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051729276,0.00069454144,0.021473734,0.0005758982,0.00066232047,0.00095204124,0.5322905,0.000008524382,0.0006379655,0.06501987,0.36240074,0.014766584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017699483,0.00086476916,0.010360211,0.0013297413,0.00083857734,0.000019744792,0.14684097,0.00046090578,0.00035963047,0.0008682126,0.83348984,0.0027974376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017871918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012418815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47108912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011941135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027615163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020798370","doi":"10.21902/revistajur.2316-753x.v3i56.3586","title":"A PESSOA JURÍDICA COMO SUJEITO DE DIREITOS HUMANOS","year":2019,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Jurídica","topic":"Brazilian Legal Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Open Text (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Human rights; Humanities; Subject (documents); Political science; Fundamental rights; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.022105700971131608,"score_gpt":0.33232783957872947,"score_spread":0.31022213860759784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020798370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6085406,0.036432102,0.00011387581,0.018388126,0.0038237395,0.0040134126,0.0002291277,0.0009758562,0.32748315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86042005,0.0030126804,0.00011076635,0.0011928341,0.0016889987,0.000054049808,0.00003127399,0.00013761166,0.13335173],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99239993,0.0013667721,0.0011176567,0.0013968836,0.0017381347,0.0019806447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958793,0.00054879155,0.00065548153,0.0016335053,0.0002541384,0.001028776],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022511114,0.0007476062,0.0013497382,0.00025899603,0.0010062368,0.0010771815,0.0021281787,0.00081503263,0.013213977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007102769,0.00078203925,0.0006584374,0.0013481077,0.0009006102,0.000654199,0.00046642782,0.0012269544,0.015331462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034974373,0.0017908938,0.11145455,0.0034377065,0.00087978033,0.00047575095,0.09232819,0.000009247982,0.00453989,0.2077044,0.54658794,0.030441893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077675085,0.0002655139,0.008621864,0.0011911306,0.00017723633,0.000010989102,0.003387608,0.00018297607,0.00021179306,0.00027327013,0.9838995,0.0010014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012525776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007001594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43731153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068639196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012241795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}