{"meta":{"query_hash":"3be65f6ca51c","filters":{"venue":"Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3be65f6ca51c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+Latinoamericana+de+Opini%C3%B3n+P%C3%BAblica"},"results":[{"id":"W3135255819","doi":"10.14201/rlop.23664","title":"Covid-19 and Presidential Popularity in Latin America","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Presidential system; Politics; Framing (construction); Political science; Latin Americans; Pandemic; Aside; Criticism; Opposition (politics); Political economy; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Phenomenon; Development economics; Public administration; Sociology; Economics; History; Law; Disease; Medicine","score_opus":0.038017816720209874,"score_gpt":0.36226326897401295,"score_spread":0.3242454522538031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135255819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96599734,0.0013480255,0.00013553337,0.00269414,0.00005105733,0.0000097997445,0.00020003006,0.000012160996,0.029552016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809426,0.00033800947,0.000035295434,0.00011446501,0.00006655414,0.0000060449343,0.000082472085,0.0000068859813,0.0012559718],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990119,0.00038947733,0.000044187196,0.00010265114,0.00012352677,0.00032832328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919206,0.0025557068,0.003533312,0.00031992875,0.0009228462,0.00074769364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026800577,0.00013105178,0.00032296288,0.0015085945,0.0012652719,0.0028081147,0.00033630454,0.00063132856,0.0063106013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105925845,0.00009875528,0.00014465244,0.0023775334,0.001522866,0.0010410954,0.0015119525,0.00075777806,0.00045720694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005087895,0.00026248128,0.87298775,0.00019829853,0.000087937646,0.00063410285,0.04041259,0.0004545566,0.001399932,0.02454654,0.0052533965,0.053253707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030442638,0.000099927674,0.94767493,0.00008522117,0.000020126769,0.00013491813,0.027591588,0.00047007776,0.00019167103,0.0028343368,0.020845989,0.000020802032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010959981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01339469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010959981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014595927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007968803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021792352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283377937","doi":"10.14201/rlop.25882","title":"Against all Odds: Forecasting Brazilian Presidential Elections in times of political disruption","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Universidad de Salamanca; Strong","keywords":"Presidential system; Popularity; Odds; Presidential election; Politics; Econometrics; Political science; Economics; Political economy; Statistics; Logistic regression; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029742753922552583,"score_gpt":0.3366011051907244,"score_spread":0.3068583512681718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283377937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97222835,0.0008250119,0.017271888,0.0021680666,0.00009608051,0.000044590022,0.0012035163,0.00021101128,0.0059514805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954137,0.0001590278,0.0030384422,0.000052803636,0.000038536877,0.0000128453385,0.0007056341,0.000014287477,0.0005647154],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995776,0.00020052315,0.000020536174,0.00008614799,0.000044392793,0.000070765156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726856,0.0019329353,0.0003016845,0.0001243311,0.00024711317,0.00012530672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025577631,0.00066132646,0.0006571881,0.0010296818,0.00041431692,0.0013389814,0.0005996673,0.0005992302,0.0013816252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012532876,0.0002794882,0.0006588067,0.0010537374,0.00025063034,0.0010056348,0.0005410629,0.0008242049,0.00031545133],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057736447,0.00022602697,0.41792324,0.00016513556,0.00048090407,0.0002925885,0.00091162825,0.4391686,0.0008737511,0.009073013,0.007022995,0.12328473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031237534,0.00006173593,0.040301993,0.0000359058,0.00006398411,0.000027219681,0.0004272832,0.9526662,0.00025234677,0.0044690478,0.0016446572,0.00001838624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10910653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09306448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10910653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008910227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009544493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21694297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392961157","doi":"10.14201/rlop.31348","title":"Can Latin American Voters see the Future?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Université Laval","keywords":"Latin Americans; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013605107407816314,"score_gpt":0.31499000131562044,"score_spread":0.3013848939078041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392961157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7994458,0.0020731525,0.0007680766,0.02832734,0.0003477336,0.000040440053,0.0010489756,0.000028100327,0.16792044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99178314,0.0010746289,0.00013972797,0.0011660494,0.00013439466,0.000016574482,0.00027003017,0.0000061877754,0.0054092016],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997278,0.00009548078,0.000007324315,0.000041099465,0.00004803085,0.000080283724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989498,0.00028508276,0.00031603547,0.00005359316,0.00024018147,0.00015524919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012236987,0.00017477466,0.00019124612,0.00067233137,0.00084909756,0.0024329524,0.0001948124,0.0006323053,0.010535168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004305663,0.00009347899,0.00017961187,0.0007531497,0.00049589435,0.0017156425,0.00052661134,0.00070606807,0.0012083753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004233532,0.00015314015,0.8225727,0.00019628361,0.00006878871,0.00046360475,0.017715167,0.00046059463,0.00040977504,0.017808706,0.025164198,0.114563555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007002052,0.00017169505,0.7195162,0.00048702702,0.00010842239,0.000313571,0.07912255,0.0026608491,0.00028379602,0.014892879,0.18231496,0.000058026682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01941667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03199716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01941667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087322254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005662099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0386073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415909083","doi":"10.14201/rlop.32263","title":"The Conflicting Cue Effect: Confusing Messages and the Limits of Elite Influence in Brazil’s Covid-19 Vaccination Campaign","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Politics; Government (linguistics); Unintended consequences; Preference; Negative information; Public health; Control (management)","score_opus":0.023338942694293995,"score_gpt":0.40116972077003055,"score_spread":0.37783077807573656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415909083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948041,0.00005689712,0.0001913479,0.0003462211,0.000005098369,0.00001734556,0.000011988306,0.0000016379142,0.004565342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996737,0.000025673837,0.00008322418,0.00009008983,0.000005198803,0.0000089768355,0.0000069516745,0.0000014428463,0.00010460136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99408853,0.004216165,0.00013568645,0.00041471416,0.0006417151,0.00050318066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97217304,0.020710362,0.004301863,0.001437445,0.0006116155,0.0007657181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005985426,0.00023176553,0.00043124534,0.00059343124,0.0013981588,0.002259469,0.00033993428,0.0009486276,0.0022182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034732275,0.00030307684,0.00021802742,0.00040950713,0.0028127427,0.0009864264,0.002077062,0.001085855,0.00012867185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004370746,0.0025732827,0.6073412,0.0005207038,0.00027979282,0.0006605516,0.25914702,0.0007323476,0.028777367,0.0132811535,0.00091477914,0.08140114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033223303,0.0018589624,0.89787364,0.0002290842,0.00025861675,0.00019270726,0.07569193,0.0045319754,0.0037254756,0.009395645,0.0058196746,0.000090009744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008366591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010048004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008366591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001019683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089935045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0316543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125686971","doi":"10.14201/rlop.32143","title":"Citizens’ Electoral Expectations in Imperfect Democracies: Insights from Five Central American Countries","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Imperfect; Presidential system; Politics; Presidential election; Motivated reasoning","score_opus":0.01429821462497103,"score_gpt":0.32858463307542063,"score_spread":0.3142864184504496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125686971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990853,0.000038019632,0.000033595847,0.00004438215,0.00000151261,0.0000030311762,0.00021657842,0.0000016476841,0.0005758282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987754,0.000039649425,0.00006592719,0.000016637714,0.0000032138662,0.0000054116476,0.0009053649,0.0000015922419,0.00018674388],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995161,0.00021505867,0.000034876502,0.00007577703,0.000057037993,0.000101089005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697876,0.0013013986,0.0007252769,0.00031205907,0.00039098447,0.00029146587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020373468,0.00020691572,0.00046837964,0.0012540784,0.0007787629,0.0012988676,0.00038425415,0.0004126185,0.0014633455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042832633,0.00016642331,0.00037207274,0.0021228662,0.00059371605,0.0005145935,0.0012077654,0.0006829375,0.00025834437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031344435,0.00023996382,0.9823109,0.000031864995,0.00009570842,0.00015316319,0.0035375191,0.0030076383,0.00022889582,0.001014772,0.0014179595,0.007648179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003428046,0.000105732615,0.9851297,0.00002886737,0.000044074524,0.00004099048,0.0063228444,0.0057246923,0.00016257429,0.00047676315,0.0019136312,0.000015808722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07044301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09115741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07044301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067487254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047496657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14006597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}