{"meta":{"query_hash":"998c24ab70aa","filters":{"venue":"Revista de Direito Público Contemporâneo"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/998c24ab70aa","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+de+Direito+P%C3%BAblico+Contempor%C3%A2neo"},"results":[{"id":"W3183595221","doi":"10.47096/rdpc.v1i2.98","title":"A artificialidade da dicotomia entre teoria externa e teoria interna: a teoria externa é autossuficiente à solução de conflitos entre direitos fundamentais?","year":2021,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito Público Contemporâneo","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04229182219110581,"score_gpt":0.3258737187484526,"score_spread":0.2835818965573468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183595221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37231418,0.0041923374,0.09744152,0.02084203,0.00072162255,0.00019393278,0.00026330576,0.00020464894,0.50382644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529293,0.0011520798,0.015315668,0.0008205668,0.000087313194,0.000119135795,0.0000812245,0.00006248782,0.029432192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433845,0.0020578837,0.00033578704,0.0009971729,0.0016624779,0.0006082318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98694545,0.004491528,0.0026183652,0.0021510774,0.0027517185,0.001041855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051519605,0.00041778505,0.00037038996,0.0015503665,0.004273598,0.007968781,0.001284527,0.0021945825,0.012444613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011272789,0.0004701526,0.0005570313,0.0014295413,0.019174015,0.004914865,0.004408085,0.002573185,0.001393769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106305924,0.000084177074,0.017530236,0.00041346293,0.000026352518,0.0003443284,0.021294126,0.0012888,0.006144177,0.9007986,0.0026524249,0.049316984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006079778,0.0003995078,0.06263416,0.0016218548,0.00012317301,0.0016718316,0.07499586,0.0047744806,0.01320635,0.3972384,0.44310838,0.00016513884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008017836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015052615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012444613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009264884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0416314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184789679","doi":"10.47096/rdpc.v1i2.124","title":"O papel da Suprema Corte Canadense em prol da defesa dos direitos da pessoa migrante: subvertendo o estado de exceção pelas vias do ativismo judicial","year":2021,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito Público Contemporâneo","topic":"Brazilian Legal Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03900755513500707,"score_gpt":0.3159948481973024,"score_spread":0.2769872930622953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184789679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8514349,0.008786281,0.0014788508,0.006992746,0.00011759159,0.00006483875,0.00029906732,0.000022681648,0.13080303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835802,0.0022539708,0.00045166604,0.0003022004,0.00002484021,0.00001774459,0.000058113128,0.0000074141312,0.013303846],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988803,0.00029135554,0.00004348998,0.00018829151,0.00034324505,0.00025330557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955722,0.0016594814,0.00089916616,0.00026856767,0.0012242114,0.0003764204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018006689,0.00024005827,0.00024107666,0.0014376191,0.0032316765,0.005424764,0.00077115983,0.0009864973,0.01238617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054829237,0.00020088613,0.00022769242,0.0018724565,0.0049280236,0.002143336,0.0024166475,0.0009357971,0.00073376374],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066500297,0.0001696512,0.24180397,0.0029316284,0.00011124545,0.0065134196,0.36778846,0.0010090024,0.013833877,0.15519056,0.008677767,0.20130543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020857735,0.00033695935,0.33675253,0.0023980907,0.00014954571,0.0027488777,0.4626737,0.00065731496,0.005428106,0.020760603,0.16799292,0.00008045058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047366526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09872396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9526335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004109904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061271004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09418166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}