{"meta":{"query_hash":"7c323656db0d","filters":{"venue":"Revista de Direito do Consumidor"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7c323656db0d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+de+Direito+do+Consumidor"},"results":[{"id":"W3041185076","doi":"","title":"A regulamentação dos danos civis aos passageiros de transporte aéreo: uma análise crítica da resolução 400/2016 da ANAC e Das convenções de Varsóvia e Montréal","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito do Consumidor","topic":"Brazilian Legal Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Political science; Welfare economics; Compensation (psychology); Action (physics); Law; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.03940406273451605,"score_gpt":0.32302951088868254,"score_spread":0.28362544815416646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041185076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81846195,0.105097115,0.004227677,0.043220967,0.0013450861,0.0073784185,0.003130009,0.0018067717,0.015331967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811356,0.005866539,0.0011575398,0.0033713316,0.0013333403,0.00025497164,0.00012386196,0.0002872835,0.0064695543],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884155,0.0026207415,0.001997389,0.0022409048,0.0016599565,0.0030655516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99320847,0.0009953089,0.0009778776,0.0016016357,0.0003666722,0.002850042],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002370138,0.00137247,0.0021084952,0.00025237404,0.0013659893,0.0022800236,0.00230559,0.0010405171,0.0041074646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016311031,0.0014824901,0.001001309,0.0016287096,0.0020844068,0.00095116807,0.00034333454,0.001462569,0.0010390473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033874959,0.0025958777,0.21133947,0.0072147064,0.0040137684,0.014576559,0.24906431,0.0001301809,0.043432135,0.026887456,0.37194902,0.065409005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005259738,0.0006768075,0.021826629,0.0032094663,0.0025480923,0.000099781384,0.013718825,0.007518918,0.0020523453,0.0005220853,0.9390552,0.0035120873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008188325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00114916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5671062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013648488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023162737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046532319","doi":"","title":"Relações de consumo e o transporte aéreo: a posição do Supremo Tribunal Federal quanto às antinomias constitucionais","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito do Consumidor","topic":"Brazilian Legal Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Tribunal; Convention; Political science; Legislation; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04629106661440598,"score_gpt":0.32259255787702024,"score_spread":0.2763014912626143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046532319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8968581,0.057244968,0.00045217352,0.020044679,0.0010612891,0.0026250395,0.0015182333,0.00085059303,0.019344935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885452,0.003863298,0.0005263201,0.002343159,0.001169733,0.000065123175,0.00010259662,0.00015812526,0.0032264614],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990798,0.0017820826,0.0018551938,0.0018643019,0.0013049076,0.0023955372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99453264,0.0011100223,0.00079850026,0.0008220598,0.000490496,0.0022462967],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020683745,0.0011569413,0.0020272601,0.00021181724,0.0016479265,0.00220082,0.0016019968,0.0009561805,0.0034700697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020386307,0.0012745047,0.001003619,0.0013354128,0.0023068225,0.0008106764,0.0001968845,0.0014928393,0.0015145064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020327696,0.0010176277,0.60012025,0.00289644,0.0018089782,0.0040847114,0.109802686,0.000032298845,0.0067680534,0.15639973,0.107374996,0.0076614353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047454024,0.00041602604,0.023050418,0.0021551407,0.0012795451,0.00020888967,0.014953972,0.000630955,0.0015628912,0.00018863255,0.94795436,0.0028537642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017728606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006401127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8405794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006549161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031787374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046889528","doi":"","title":"Prevenção e tratamento do superendividamento dos Consumidores: empréstimos hipotecários no Canadá e no Quebec","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito do Consumidor","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.024508582120990396,"score_gpt":0.2494421863788077,"score_spread":0.2249336042578173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046889528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83888274,0.05758483,0.0007850042,0.0010860029,0.0071956175,0.0037027923,0.008032293,0.0004238693,0.08230686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89713997,0.00539557,0.00066175865,0.001808177,0.002483341,0.00027123626,0.0002604256,0.0003347659,0.09164478],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99047947,0.00033587104,0.003156033,0.0026625555,0.00039247193,0.0029735889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99356925,0.00039554416,0.0016702908,0.002509662,0.00064221537,0.0012130098],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018494822,0.0015556758,0.0027872748,0.00076863426,0.001080148,0.002401355,0.0016828441,0.0010084421,0.010642553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045974765,0.0018813696,0.0008628714,0.00099807,0.001283564,0.00077402213,0.0004868512,0.0010093417,0.018466884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013573563,0.0025274553,0.1270008,0.0051763216,0.0035761024,0.0010680553,0.01519578,0.00001564184,0.0020988744,0.17954911,0.6265184,0.035916075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029336405,0.00046755068,0.0069888313,0.0013789304,0.00028430735,0.00007252707,0.00019900616,0.00073124445,0.0002864713,0.00013433323,0.9842777,0.0022454096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03392196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008399397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35775933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001911116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014337791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047320569","doi":"","title":"Nota sobre Jurisprudência Canadense Histórica em defesa do consumidor sobre matéria bancária","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito do Consumidor","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economy; Welfare economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01802794365747756,"score_gpt":0.25457472749546933,"score_spread":0.23654678383799177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047320569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46721235,0.04852072,0.0012383127,0.011272584,0.013710273,0.0058105085,0.001894235,0.002394907,0.4479461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96086395,0.0022201221,0.00027983665,0.0047236765,0.0058659376,0.00019738548,0.0002761056,0.0003507001,0.025222288],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927279,0.00022125314,0.001777033,0.0018238166,0.001116733,0.002333284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943527,0.00034122862,0.0013685938,0.0019122107,0.0015461912,0.00047908456],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010967293,0.0013793797,0.0015461225,0.00085467263,0.0019445624,0.0045428267,0.0013614083,0.0007829929,0.0091506895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010370167,0.0014713731,0.00082997157,0.0020302697,0.000872283,0.0012220441,0.0007802496,0.0009959325,0.01403187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004558756,0.00074927433,0.012443353,0.0025687956,0.00095372746,0.0004315271,0.0004259319,0.0000032320684,0.0009167813,0.09077257,0.84754884,0.042730078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020977776,0.00005689105,0.019256353,0.0011985535,0.0013558328,0.00008419093,0.0011844488,0.0010790649,0.000030999956,0.00015946521,0.97181237,0.0016840653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001087496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016223321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4936516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010266321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011386955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088419429","doi":"","title":"Tribunal de Québec impõe condenação histórica a fabricantes de cigarros, Proc. nº 500-06-000076-980:","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito do Consumidor","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039891438599252003,"score_gpt":0.3425671799231405,"score_spread":0.3026757413238885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088419429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89213604,0.061862912,0.0020871453,0.01949771,0.0009909007,0.0024300735,0.0005211054,0.00071625045,0.019757846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662189,0.0016807435,0.00030386585,0.0015396782,0.0016518716,0.00013242505,0.000020581116,0.00009730334,0.02835464],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929785,0.0009630727,0.0011815099,0.0012798089,0.0010638749,0.0025332097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474204,0.0014476269,0.00072399515,0.00090589654,0.000764128,0.0014163444],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030271527,0.00079147436,0.0011944887,0.000198312,0.0018254068,0.0012673936,0.0016385543,0.00055855047,0.0025886323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035897526,0.00079599145,0.0005950927,0.0010892726,0.0028214946,0.00045511583,0.00033132386,0.00076936866,0.0015373529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013720029,0.001541683,0.27141535,0.002732191,0.0009364885,0.0012067595,0.08144767,0.0000041794833,0.019714983,0.062234897,0.49631312,0.061080668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082973525,0.00042070964,0.007000221,0.0013227212,0.0007829922,0.00020141675,0.005616341,0.00043714247,0.0009553176,0.00044007506,0.9807743,0.0012190224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047216993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010754753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4844612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027368132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070767347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089964778","doi":"","title":"O diálogo das fontes no transporte aéreo internacional de passageiros: ponderações sobre a aplicabilidade da Convenção de Montreal e/ou do CDC","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito do Consumidor","topic":"Comparative International Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Law; Constitution; Political science; Supreme court; Convention; Art","score_opus":0.03996510406748728,"score_gpt":0.3611188895409663,"score_spread":0.32115378547347906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089964778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.907752,0.01412375,0.0025539848,0.008323716,0.0015937884,0.0017442857,0.0012951642,0.00038949962,0.06222382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804631,0.0013400123,0.00031633142,0.00079646416,0.0020957873,0.0002181723,0.000045272056,0.000088022025,0.014636844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936917,0.0009842253,0.0012241052,0.0013154286,0.00115651,0.0016280306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952253,0.0016928666,0.0006475438,0.0006306854,0.0010669585,0.0007366611],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016535926,0.0008642525,0.0012075679,0.00020983977,0.0011823269,0.0013307687,0.0014997921,0.0004074401,0.001939754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013482383,0.0008542147,0.0007271702,0.0005225832,0.0024016171,0.00044259478,0.00030132118,0.0008012794,0.00092731393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002062879,0.0019280681,0.6295083,0.0008062673,0.003768947,0.000862139,0.07118312,0.000020193082,0.0083464105,0.18137412,0.07683027,0.023309276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023425801,0.0005482712,0.1898871,0.001662117,0.0006231665,0.00010264867,0.006169795,0.0013197731,0.0008314056,0.0031434614,0.7916425,0.0017272178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047424873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051298314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7148122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015059111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010343705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091932250","doi":"","title":"A aplicação das convenções internacionais de varsóvia e montreal em detrimento do código de defesa do consumidor: uma crítica à decisão do supremo tribunal federal em face do princípio da proibição do retrocesso","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito do Consumidor","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Face (sociological concept); Humanities; Economics; Welfare economics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.037033231495709265,"score_gpt":0.2919652232545401,"score_spread":0.25493199175883086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091932250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91328305,0.03755598,0.017008139,0.004132754,0.0016915072,0.0044255443,0.0016031337,0.0010260863,0.019273829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882176,0.0021092275,0.0009698212,0.0030337602,0.0028069883,0.0002379136,0.00041373007,0.0003471724,0.0018637961],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891609,0.00046777754,0.0028388014,0.0028201805,0.0019943647,0.00271796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930875,0.0011562897,0.0018907825,0.0014689078,0.0015021036,0.0008944726],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017866155,0.0019135269,0.0023053908,0.00062930194,0.001168537,0.012773583,0.0029329911,0.00092702714,0.002756209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046091545,0.0019727808,0.0011319317,0.0012039919,0.000975932,0.0016801654,0.0013637973,0.0016966572,0.001588788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072226287,0.0041756895,0.53417414,0.011037543,0.005933781,0.003645738,0.013368413,0.00024114626,0.0025085576,0.2312183,0.124075584,0.062398504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030279629,0.0010914529,0.089386314,0.0149996495,0.00662881,0.0011240199,0.016309712,0.029254192,0.002055257,0.016914206,0.780856,0.011100767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003968669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009769919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6567804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016496888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010601368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}