{"meta":{"query_hash":"daaedbf292a3","filters":{"venue":"Revista de Economia Contemporânea"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/daaedbf292a3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+de+Economia+Contempor%C3%A2nea"},"results":[{"id":"W2013884543","doi":"10.1590/s1415-98482007000100001","title":"Argentina’s quarter century experiment with neoliberalism: from dictatorship to depression","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Economia Contemporânea","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Quarter (Canadian coin); Deindustrialization; Depression (economics); Great Depression; Dictatorship; Latin Americans; Poverty; Debt crisis; Debt; Population; Development economics; Economics; Economy; Political science; Politics; Geography; Economic growth; Political economy; Sociology; Keynesian economics; Demography; Finance","score_opus":0.01952329207924922,"score_gpt":0.2348142906438385,"score_spread":0.21529099856458928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013884543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58112454,0.010941626,0.0013166764,0.08850249,0.000766451,0.000038856666,0.00020289756,0.00004070746,0.3170658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822613,0.002874889,0.00023058748,0.001967843,0.00025739375,0.000017467439,0.00004940843,0.00001951706,0.012321595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993375,0.00024300518,0.000018609666,0.00008591172,0.00008838326,0.0002265859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941885,0.00012313663,0.00012970692,0.000047609916,0.00010241559,0.0001782139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014056801,0.0001615632,0.00028584778,0.00024327276,0.0022219105,0.0033639066,0.00027677734,0.0012108848,0.002744886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001921559,0.00013573974,0.00012733738,0.0003644354,0.0034070327,0.001532698,0.0013124845,0.0022758804,0.00022313408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006741989,0.00022732881,0.030848468,0.00019173334,0.00004906288,0.0014477348,0.026130794,0.0010303656,0.001697622,0.8204727,0.0460558,0.07117423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023470761,0.00030975926,0.13556908,0.0005003568,0.00003831197,0.00050191075,0.012511939,0.0018010286,0.0010725221,0.09963546,0.74775654,0.0000682848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022098254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022270564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022098254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00614605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001868945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044592857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022754525","doi":"10.1590/s1415-98482013000100007","title":"Uma análise de custo-benefício do museu da imagem e do som da cidade do Rio de Janeiro","year":2013,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Economia Contemporânea","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"EcoMetrix","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.05944180071932123,"score_gpt":0.2292466895067895,"score_spread":0.16980488878746827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022754525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821389,0.00075520383,0.0007172208,0.00033608827,0.000012389628,0.000027407232,0.0015809353,0.000017186898,0.014414658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99485815,0.0005751191,0.00052550825,0.000019368777,0.000008189064,0.000021002965,0.00050544937,0.000009929674,0.0034772835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929976,0.0001728912,0.000033951077,0.000105113926,0.00026500365,0.00012321747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972626,0.00093154976,0.00082320935,0.00023398876,0.0005214213,0.00022713534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086184044,0.00016495358,0.00024357517,0.002099642,0.00054639933,0.0017105897,0.00055250863,0.00025054291,0.0033702767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005130812,0.00016628182,0.00029365686,0.0050568786,0.00076022785,0.00063943025,0.001477198,0.00028395996,0.00024503213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008996425,0.000030384384,0.93405044,0.0002592348,0.0001636017,0.00037683567,0.011385097,0.0010700955,0.0009398435,0.007050521,0.0018540666,0.042729963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018060417,0.000023035158,0.97525907,0.000044416298,0.000049692302,0.00008665979,0.009158582,0.00035715458,0.00020557718,0.00027246945,0.014532362,0.000009206444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07835049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19389679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07835049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016204547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012768174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15578884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001473873","doi":"","title":"O AUMENTO DA LUCRATIVIDADE EXPANDE A ACUMULAÇÃO DE CAPITAL? UMA ANÁLISE DE CAUSALIDADE DE GRANGER PARA PAÍSES DA OCDE // DOES INCREASING PROFITABILITY RISE CAPITAL ACCUMULATION? A GRANGER CAUSALITY ANALYSIS ON OECD COUNTRIES","year":2009,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Economia Contemporânea","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Granger causality; Welfare economics; Econometrics; Economy","score_opus":0.0506683652911484,"score_gpt":0.3187959115201949,"score_spread":0.2681275462290465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001473873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98785365,0.0008850633,0.0013819464,0.00037237635,0.0000147697265,0.000029686888,0.0012617926,0.000043150438,0.008157642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983119,0.00028262642,0.00020387204,0.000029793551,0.000009629311,0.000017589547,0.0003422449,0.000008631345,0.00079361815],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841285,0.0006191359,0.000102272694,0.0002639151,0.00025795866,0.00034397456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742725,0.015568041,0.007211383,0.0010562588,0.0011334347,0.00075831945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037484786,0.00049221754,0.00066902523,0.0045252773,0.00042535207,0.0033242002,0.00045003023,0.0004471144,0.007410116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015077138,0.00016949752,0.0015234773,0.0071011507,0.0015806117,0.0012837003,0.001565689,0.0008816499,0.0004324967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024477605,0.00003236847,0.9703169,0.000109955996,0.0005364667,0.00043273414,0.0009797612,0.0048299306,0.00025387565,0.006031054,0.0008435787,0.015388592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041296433,0.00022658498,0.9740692,0.000104721636,0.0006044658,0.00024559727,0.004592297,0.0056940783,0.00078741886,0.004824643,0.008777941,0.000031789303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03281695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0125993965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03281695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014186592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012522622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06525189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312569788","doi":"10.1590/198055272623","title":"PUBLIC BANKS AND BANKING COMPETITION","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Economia Contemporânea","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of Energy Research and Development","keywords":"Panel data; Competition (biology); Subsidy; Business; Private sector; Financial system; Oligopoly; Margin (machine learning); Monetary economics; Finance; Economics; Market economy; Economic growth","score_opus":0.038799830196099706,"score_gpt":0.21975105591394872,"score_spread":0.18095122571784902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312569788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94855726,0.0010995215,0.0048626508,0.0050855223,0.000028217037,0.000025801046,0.0003271263,0.00003565325,0.039978188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988098,0.000083254454,0.00008774692,0.00007815396,0.000013415397,0.0000038378,0.000023783974,0.0000021981218,0.00089775585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870574,0.000511454,0.00007228168,0.0002574599,0.00022851836,0.00022464704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98754466,0.005570309,0.005072588,0.00045402162,0.00069276884,0.0006656057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015664971,0.00010864591,0.00046696514,0.00048433864,0.0004912915,0.0028296125,0.00024276393,0.00095525396,0.009405647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009329353,0.00016511393,0.00026832597,0.0007411308,0.0017737276,0.0012956088,0.0010638883,0.0009988748,0.00050490326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052761723,0.00073661155,0.49556622,0.0002644677,0.00033020746,0.0006636453,0.0032001191,0.06059037,0.0037714313,0.37026078,0.010308389,0.05378017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025082479,0.00045641093,0.546316,0.00023314092,0.00016617413,0.00041181396,0.0045177774,0.06829573,0.0014475925,0.35184705,0.025946999,0.0001103318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061934246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072798743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009405647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017420409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013598625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031464994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}