{"meta":{"query_hash":"6c670a95b33b","filters":{"venue":"Revista de Investigações Constitucionais"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6c670a95b33b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+de+Investiga%C3%A7%C3%B5es+Constitucionais"},"results":[{"id":"W2474818816","doi":"10.5380/rinc.v2i3.44531","title":"La dynamique de la déférence: création et évolution des modèles auto-restrictives de contrôle juridictionnel dans le droit comparé","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Investigações Constitucionais","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04194855851301822,"score_gpt":0.30323807438990885,"score_spread":0.26128951587689064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474818816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5300935,0.0030423522,0.13906859,0.011088513,0.00017104983,0.00010708456,0.00027670158,0.00018917717,0.31596297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99007004,0.00033354812,0.0033654012,0.000099280995,0.00002046791,0.000026554166,0.00002795146,0.000020627183,0.00603614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980178,0.0008224597,0.000058333222,0.00029601887,0.0005630344,0.00024248532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942735,0.0026890591,0.00081061467,0.0008877662,0.00084913534,0.0004899079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038120374,0.00037825617,0.0004634057,0.0017588825,0.0027065226,0.0074566365,0.0015382782,0.0011550395,0.005710221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008834264,0.00035987896,0.0006439166,0.0015409845,0.012904076,0.004447341,0.0028125206,0.0017912553,0.00024727083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017491559,0.000012538621,0.0022255867,0.000031413187,0.000013892204,0.00005670444,0.005023093,0.005183413,0.00017478994,0.9826172,0.00027650656,0.0043673473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000650667,0.000084083564,0.0117409155,0.00024112123,0.00007147692,0.00021230185,0.00933963,0.040562037,0.00070155924,0.8837662,0.053121526,0.00009405272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060073927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046822052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060073927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009612348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007278406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11944848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755337014","doi":"10.5380/rinc.v4i3.51532","title":"Consumer law in Constitution: a big mistake? The specific case of aviation in Brazil","year":2017,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Investigações Constitucionais","topic":"Comparative International Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention","keywords":"Convention; Law; Constitution; Consumer protection; Consumer Protection Act; Consumer Bill of Rights; Political science; Civil aviation; Mistake; Agency (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Business; Law and economics; Economics; Aviation; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.11112205526518826,"score_gpt":0.3678322223661904,"score_spread":0.25671016710100214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755337014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22659205,0.028886218,0.00599214,0.1877431,0.00054193096,0.00007061857,0.00012377951,0.000022843687,0.5500274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98243135,0.0042341533,0.0008008855,0.0054931915,0.00011494342,0.000026900314,0.00002557307,0.00001898538,0.0068540913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961151,0.0021519046,0.00013475427,0.00044777337,0.0006763756,0.0004740276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957848,0.0031013247,0.0003490368,0.0002772589,0.00036217153,0.000125382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061775898,0.0002467972,0.0004288529,0.0012097538,0.00649912,0.004743347,0.0009783226,0.003844035,0.0036285454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010757081,0.00025304343,0.00050357747,0.0023374155,0.019214937,0.0071280333,0.0033187792,0.003992191,0.0002073767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036164404,0.000007995848,0.00066002534,0.00005515978,0.0000038584653,0.00040588365,0.018204212,0.00006485139,0.00014542218,0.97471285,0.001871916,0.0038641498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000382843,0.00005515968,0.011113595,0.0017927284,0.00007467754,0.0015771309,0.07077242,0.001087085,0.0010651544,0.40850553,0.5038495,0.00006868741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083482504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11961106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083482504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00972741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057130996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16599315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914022561","doi":"10.5380/rinc.v5i3.60973","title":"Constitutionalizing abortion in Brazil","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Investigações Constitucionais","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Precept; Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Abortion; Legislature; Political science; Constitutional right; Sociology","score_opus":0.051675179560512846,"score_gpt":0.3375328817825602,"score_spread":0.2858577022220473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914022561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16101928,0.029288214,0.028054379,0.06293935,0.00068880216,0.0004215553,0.00037273933,0.00013837902,0.71707726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97350556,0.004858449,0.005315486,0.006293044,0.00021476812,0.00016895519,0.00006528891,0.000039625946,0.009538698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924522,0.0034889313,0.0003533296,0.0009885946,0.001796007,0.00092098914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948795,0.0030413605,0.00037815937,0.0006440977,0.0007498679,0.0003068778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011324101,0.00032528446,0.0005580266,0.0013700462,0.005582042,0.0055113044,0.0009817592,0.002621775,0.002410199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014769412,0.0004313512,0.000645358,0.0011895559,0.01344782,0.0024763448,0.0053550834,0.0036975334,0.00020162838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057548996,0.000006630738,0.0004673895,0.00005878759,0.0000074376694,0.00012319922,0.004331754,0.00023787982,0.00051557325,0.9878044,0.00088450784,0.005556712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066786,0.0001115681,0.005693192,0.0013040748,0.00013995897,0.00045600443,0.0043032067,0.0020359338,0.0015544503,0.6373702,0.34686625,0.000098229284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07850965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09417448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07850965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012118902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015860649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15610534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309309855","doi":"10.5380/rinc.v9i2.86385","title":"Does Brazil need a notwithstanding clause?","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Investigações Constitucionais","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial activism; Raising (metalworking); Law; Democracy; Style (visual arts); Legislative process; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.03916241969176692,"score_gpt":0.29943269193167044,"score_spread":0.2602702722399035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309309855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31438437,0.013159134,0.0042053796,0.24005592,0.00063784834,0.00012702508,0.00050800625,0.00006293657,0.42685938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798508,0.0033484357,0.00078920095,0.007861481,0.00012207308,0.000021769547,0.00010576883,0.000016813188,0.007883547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873513,0.00033157296,0.000047433547,0.00019964424,0.00035008998,0.00033619854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783796,0.00095317326,0.00031944606,0.00017802296,0.0005078348,0.00020355229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021864532,0.00015274168,0.00036393234,0.0006378672,0.003997906,0.0042780624,0.00057694514,0.0018815276,0.0054892534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067606,0.00015239835,0.00026254452,0.001160008,0.0051641655,0.003510639,0.0011849542,0.0018531336,0.00038151388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012381335,0.000017468243,0.005020154,0.00014402562,0.0000071617983,0.00037448257,0.006109953,0.0000745984,0.0007526154,0.9664051,0.004808069,0.016273959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038002952,0.000079881676,0.043552253,0.0013116659,0.000079398334,0.00066803856,0.034375664,0.0007264745,0.00089067855,0.25346953,0.66474,0.00006835328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15761897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26893568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15761897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066872234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010524228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31340307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390600274","doi":"10.5380/rinc.v10i2.89148","title":"Constitutional Law Around the Globe: Fundamental Rights, the Freedom of Speech and “Hate Speech” in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Investigações Constitucionais","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Political science; Free speech; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.028766733335975576,"score_gpt":0.2664595713257438,"score_spread":0.23769283798976826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390600274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28738853,0.025763925,0.0026113985,0.07711914,0.00044988963,0.00008203571,0.0006663086,0.000040831903,0.60587794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97929525,0.005289084,0.0005598295,0.0018851239,0.000043264,0.00001584701,0.00009481429,0.000016981086,0.012799767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942602,0.00087162334,0.00010784421,0.00049605686,0.0021872385,0.0020770046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939797,0.00239243,0.0004090673,0.00022370789,0.0018569761,0.0011381102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035114167,0.00030056536,0.00051151257,0.0042580003,0.028495204,0.012997018,0.0016164352,0.0021071716,0.0055759526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010752694,0.00028974895,0.00035997885,0.009927781,0.032902393,0.0043999376,0.0038686616,0.00414908,0.00014827047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016231208,0.00001101527,0.0034633118,0.000059397014,0.000009664372,0.00015309424,0.032861106,0.0004694415,0.00013059675,0.94005775,0.0073991762,0.015369285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003122582,0.000029641084,0.0788205,0.0011102568,0.00008137585,0.00019391632,0.15202567,0.0026064536,0.00063835405,0.21614617,0.54804915,0.0002673283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99700004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99814093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20855422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20855422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24292128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91796494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404331321","doi":"10.5380/rinc.v11i3.93874","title":"Constitutional Law around the globe: judicial review in Canada and the “leave to appeal” to the Supreme Court","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Investigações Constitucionais","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Globe; Political science; Medicine; Ophthalmology","score_opus":0.02623933458475329,"score_gpt":0.2795685213300442,"score_spread":0.25332918674529087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404331321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25879475,0.04804862,0.003621324,0.19766422,0.0010245129,0.00015860856,0.00053421105,0.00008387012,0.49006987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96356964,0.007811596,0.00074361305,0.009691779,0.0002584717,0.000031057494,0.00009093481,0.000043828924,0.017759105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789225,0.0036952544,0.00034984667,0.0019557471,0.009258873,0.0058178524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729546,0.011045698,0.0019447975,0.00080617575,0.008550143,0.004698468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011062057,0.00028208678,0.000803162,0.005690449,0.029728236,0.02340248,0.0027055407,0.0044028484,0.0055066673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0417514,0.00047114183,0.00045273907,0.010065241,0.036018096,0.0071572424,0.0052507627,0.0066918368,0.0002768842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003654804,0.00003950271,0.008035396,0.00010070338,0.000029640272,0.00037130906,0.031141283,0.00054223585,0.00021347876,0.89949405,0.0265055,0.03349027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008134738,0.000070470225,0.08194148,0.0016769279,0.00011433855,0.0003345124,0.08710896,0.0022225147,0.0006692622,0.16450626,0.6609777,0.00029615872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9840088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99080807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17787945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17787945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28770697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9535433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}