{"meta":{"query_hash":"08a03d80b396","filters":{"venue":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/08a03d80b396","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revista+de+la+Facultad+de+Derecho"},"results":[{"id":"W3048489946","doi":"10.22187/rfd2020n49a13","title":"Naturaleza y derecho. Pensar lo real más allá de la causalidad y la imputación","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","topic":"Ethics and bioethics in healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05367462916119515,"score_gpt":0.41547028855207485,"score_spread":0.3617956593908797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048489946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7826199,0.05485818,0.0044435114,0.10559063,0.00063064555,0.003295391,0.0016894892,0.0014386775,0.04543357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93088084,0.044608194,0.007885877,0.013664969,0.0017168771,0.000058405392,0.0002608129,0.00024118825,0.0006828489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98903334,0.005350507,0.0013156731,0.0013795282,0.001175276,0.0017456906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98840517,0.007544023,0.00053645036,0.00090290053,0.00078008376,0.0018314036],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070809904,0.0009952052,0.0014733446,0.00019391779,0.00052909605,0.0016427805,0.00093860057,0.0041283756,0.0002174042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008938026,0.0009184388,0.00061756483,0.00090571796,0.001056008,0.00018918129,0.00041909728,0.0092076445,0.00023413035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017794085,0.0009697915,0.26651007,0.029860737,0.0020787623,0.014047946,0.030156454,0.00012009259,0.04816846,0.48115644,0.06073691,0.0644149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004070416,0.0008467849,0.031255767,0.006070247,0.0014145514,0.00247897,0.0026708588,0.0029668447,0.0045281616,0.0060732393,0.9356259,0.0019982622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019602107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045078144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.874889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001094647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032753602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142040922","doi":"10.22187/rfd2020n49a15","title":"Novedades en el certificado de antecedentes judiciales y sus impactos en las tareas de cuidados","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","topic":"Labor Law and Work Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016034473254399356,"score_gpt":0.34633980970146006,"score_spread":0.3303053364470607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142040922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9551601,0.004665697,0.011720332,0.018071158,0.00015752805,0.0009793686,0.0009512163,0.0006003202,0.0076942774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98631924,0.0077945767,0.0019210386,0.0021186427,0.001314555,0.00003780282,0.00006622509,0.00011416893,0.00031375448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937398,0.0023913234,0.00072549214,0.0007761875,0.00069037435,0.001676838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99599177,0.0019195384,0.0003643574,0.00037362493,0.00022173555,0.0011289658],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022203072,0.0006320964,0.000845089,0.000105309766,0.0007327856,0.0018628598,0.0012770746,0.0009962969,0.00022032912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036118194,0.00061564834,0.0004644664,0.0011346912,0.0006345941,0.00035867898,0.00022902216,0.0011450046,0.00018026466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007086621,0.0010942259,0.48228812,0.001670354,0.0013211672,0.0013440386,0.09445983,0.0009345477,0.07118977,0.28323364,0.02466388,0.037091747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034286755,0.0004589632,0.09779001,0.0024524517,0.0017357343,0.00026817515,0.02231705,0.016305879,0.007635208,0.011159386,0.83280057,0.00364792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004988897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033590785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80813664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015535669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018944436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392608476","doi":"10.31054/2314.3061.v14.n2.43655","title":"LA GUERRA EN UCRANIA Y LA VIGENCIA DE LA DEFINICIÓN DE LA AGRESIÓN","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012356621032670465,"score_gpt":0.3642432815222869,"score_spread":0.3518866604896164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392608476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76555824,0.0014843096,0.0019722432,0.0015358531,0.00015376853,0.0007027674,0.00079908007,0.0008863191,0.22690743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98146015,0.008993753,0.0037205187,0.0011142367,0.0005156695,0.00010527886,0.000097666925,0.00018364133,0.0038090837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812726,0.013338962,0.0008993045,0.0009639264,0.0010326876,0.0024925314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980988,0.016625237,0.00032268764,0.00070982485,0.00019646308,0.0011577391],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012500286,0.00075391645,0.0009766582,0.00027773168,0.000777031,0.0021242555,0.0016454896,0.0023514777,0.00024445367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012422506,0.00078583026,0.0006383944,0.0018076353,0.0020146742,0.0003119237,0.0004706977,0.0020996009,0.0011885845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010131542,0.00051826105,0.056986548,0.0009381522,0.00038198044,0.002121362,0.019059666,0.00022465402,0.0024351382,0.86795527,0.014696147,0.03458148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012767526,0.00010302837,0.21384361,0.0010407926,0.00055394974,0.00038291758,0.005177056,0.0038809213,0.00015365619,0.056488283,0.7156786,0.0014204772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004333857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003048919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.811467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015413113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026690417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412750316","doi":"10.22187/rfd2022n54a5","title":"¿Cómo se da por cierto un hecho en la práctica judicial? Cuestiones epistemológicas y teóricas y análisis del caso uruguayo","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","topic":"Legal processes and jurisprudence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017968514787423905,"score_gpt":0.3458827266443183,"score_spread":0.3279142118568944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412750316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8174094,0.029073812,0.007282003,0.030394204,0.0009381859,0.0034807026,0.0015834,0.0013457529,0.10849253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98637474,0.005538012,0.0020052404,0.0014644802,0.00068135536,0.00025281857,0.00005694111,0.00011106686,0.0035153404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98996496,0.0047147465,0.0010796111,0.0012214514,0.0016167902,0.0014024416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947212,0.0027358783,0.0007069181,0.0007130806,0.0003753598,0.0007475976],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055779917,0.00068581203,0.00096675917,0.00025185605,0.0027765948,0.0023120227,0.001656045,0.0006328173,0.0013132015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035563125,0.0006936733,0.00048930646,0.002555994,0.00079526636,0.00062720606,0.0007507048,0.001760348,0.00019171306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010924301,0.0048688673,0.095782824,0.003560969,0.00158796,0.0078983605,0.14294502,0.0012725797,0.0036360447,0.42180502,0.09541716,0.22013277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009157571,0.00022094825,0.008052939,0.0003302236,0.00051797094,0.00060128205,0.007612037,0.00079331576,0.00018573823,0.004989505,0.9746703,0.0011100164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007635799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007988299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8792531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001440664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018381636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412750579","doi":"10.22187/rfd2022n54a4","title":"Los casos difíciles de relación de dependencia según la dogmática y la jurisprudencia del tribunal de lo contencioso administrativo","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","topic":"Administrative Law and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.015025941511095502,"score_gpt":0.344416906137192,"score_spread":0.3293909646260965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412750579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93020076,0.0047053755,0.011939686,0.0025317848,0.0001220991,0.0012099232,0.0030262803,0.00033164947,0.045932468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98657,0.0023831357,0.0036017143,0.0012942,0.00050358544,0.00034744022,0.000057321802,0.000115424824,0.0051271524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98641413,0.0074758455,0.0010981595,0.0011713033,0.001613889,0.002226642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926295,0.0043036556,0.00090330694,0.00065360405,0.00030984456,0.001200056],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066688894,0.00088289863,0.0011074027,0.000120152115,0.0020830897,0.0016501833,0.0017559229,0.0010188001,0.00079123455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004172223,0.0009485701,0.00067124085,0.0009564226,0.0013586758,0.0004510463,0.00039972283,0.0027577963,0.00006687879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011463562,0.0021334093,0.17339458,0.0007969632,0.000752426,0.010035134,0.030247523,0.0002503899,0.01244577,0.7221136,0.038328636,0.008355236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026623278,0.000704858,0.075865485,0.00068790134,0.0007316708,0.0027479772,0.01458603,0.00089712214,0.0025846362,0.0074273874,0.8891802,0.0019244079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033598964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013752601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85085154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035259258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010542137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412750588","doi":"10.22187/rfd2022n53a3","title":"La reparación del daño como elemento de la justicia restaurativa en la violencia de pareja dentro del contexto familiar, desde la perspectiva de la Ley General de Víctimas: Caso Nuevo León, México","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","topic":"Legal processes and jurisprudence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016916499748683183,"score_gpt":0.3815200532511337,"score_spread":0.3646035535024505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412750588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94323593,0.009616261,0.021702373,0.00082753814,0.00012808197,0.0011062042,0.00051902694,0.0004262767,0.02243829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730677,0.014286092,0.008389383,0.001235235,0.0006538394,0.00043300664,0.000059505986,0.00018804587,0.0016872097],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758033,0.01740263,0.0012674537,0.0014976538,0.0014628391,0.0025660945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893861,0.0073980563,0.0008298959,0.00081749394,0.0004418807,0.0011266158],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012048152,0.0010402629,0.0012032535,0.0002713313,0.0022983307,0.0028987494,0.002138081,0.0012458509,0.00023888276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007202512,0.0011138716,0.00062252366,0.0012805061,0.0014639478,0.0007197907,0.0007720142,0.003135745,0.000038795086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001591083,0.003032654,0.44391948,0.0019443997,0.0013252575,0.00910418,0.15040249,0.008622385,0.03787773,0.26791912,0.038180627,0.036080595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044729277,0.00045668212,0.07945153,0.001603869,0.0016481463,0.0028325494,0.073837005,0.014504183,0.0028326574,0.011476235,0.803942,0.002942161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020939933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012409627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76576144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060678986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057353256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412750617","doi":"10.22187/rfd2022nesp1a5","title":"Violencia obstétrica y acceso a la justicia: análisis desde una perspectiva de género","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","topic":"Gender, Violence, Rights in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Gender violence; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Gender studies","score_opus":0.015181714533931134,"score_gpt":0.3496068720040804,"score_spread":0.3344251574701493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412750617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7197189,0.012663036,0.016230652,0.0036724787,0.0007346247,0.002621677,0.00070173043,0.0013479468,0.24230896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813163,0.007306325,0.008126971,0.0010572097,0.0006404815,0.00029545574,0.000028041744,0.00014271983,0.0010864845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98673785,0.0070632864,0.00092764164,0.0014192449,0.0017168408,0.0021351504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993779,0.0033545918,0.00076554087,0.0009222566,0.00033718528,0.0008414497],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043967813,0.00080680865,0.0010542934,0.00044432655,0.0030153522,0.0016778477,0.0024954667,0.00069265196,0.0024753069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004185352,0.0008160043,0.0006365623,0.00338555,0.0014996014,0.00037560883,0.00085944426,0.0023340506,0.00015970677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004922857,0.0035444342,0.09645919,0.0011180656,0.0014035503,0.0023381275,0.1539901,0.0065389657,0.006119052,0.4493182,0.05483458,0.22384346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001864192,0.00039044558,0.04397028,0.0008915819,0.0013014184,0.0004233861,0.08154957,0.0036940228,0.00059055636,0.022928141,0.8397907,0.002605686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026067947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001681523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78495616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047236704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002764277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412750618","doi":"10.22187/10.22187/rfd2023n56a7","title":"Proyección del futuro del gobierno de los daños a partir de la consideración de su evolución histórica","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","topic":"Environmental and Ecological Studies","field":"Energy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0182113316058123,"score_gpt":0.2909159747008661,"score_spread":0.2727046430950538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412750618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757849,0.009127731,0.0016346072,0.002079942,0.0000883054,0.0007803119,0.00030075217,0.0006491222,0.009554354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97522473,0.011838361,0.0044028005,0.0024137353,0.00043546618,0.00062744285,0.000109227345,0.00017541986,0.004772798],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927941,0.0021694216,0.0009705035,0.0011073992,0.00051133096,0.0024472577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952081,0.002834033,0.00037114468,0.0006528386,0.00007762522,0.00085624546],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021461926,0.00092623,0.0011408326,0.00015394863,0.0010014336,0.00085821067,0.000729582,0.001113715,0.00075049704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026010314,0.000839389,0.00057272665,0.00076498714,0.0010279306,0.00019904328,0.00069783576,0.001285985,0.0011793649],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043085878,0.0014486929,0.7358433,0.0015683626,0.0013452767,0.004069186,0.004087256,0.00646724,0.025673442,0.019674182,0.16387448,0.035517726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015203888,0.00021460743,0.4135084,0.00044888025,0.00058416324,0.0006055518,0.00072756625,0.0056212978,0.002566165,0.0055522234,0.5674252,0.0012256126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013398202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016914985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40355068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027997496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000402697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}