{"meta":{"query_hash":"ca5068b3cda4","filters":{"venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles"},"cohort_total":83,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":83,"exported":83,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ca5068b3cda4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revue+d%27%C3%A9tudes+constitutionnelles"},"results":[{"id":"W1022707983","doi":"","title":"The Court's Mulligan: a commennt on Canada (attorney general) v. Hislop","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Dissent; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Political science; Majority opinion; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Mulligan; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027721448784000135,"score_gpt":0.25956184668630367,"score_spread":0.23184039790230354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1022707983","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025983771,0.053509593,0.00028884012,0.45811304,0.010444096,0.0008973614,0.00021877103,0.00013535368,0.45040917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96962845,0.013645885,0.00014154335,0.006221923,0.0027016015,0.00003267397,0.000015770376,0.000009819326,0.0076023173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705774,0.00029144212,0.00058504305,0.00050361437,0.0006942978,0.00086784293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980685,0.00070517824,0.00024399252,0.0003592744,0.00030861952,0.00031439486],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005668033,0.00041293007,0.00044859826,0.00004743905,0.005700297,0.00019892046,0.00062491605,0.0001929196,0.00013974356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004014679,0.00034180438,0.00020720223,0.00055248215,0.0036971716,0.00019191975,0.000080958045,0.00042486558,0.00017757594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033443597,0.00017311583,0.00029361865,0.00001074323,0.00012833107,0.00008119592,0.00058946403,0.0008268792,0.000015827924,0.9159229,0.06632354,0.015600968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032413608,0.0001054391,0.0014988207,0.00036169353,0.00009772118,0.000025797515,0.0022679442,0.00012734445,0.000034670637,0.019839784,0.974871,0.0004456747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44168508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7764248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9436447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013655407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036632586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W163287952","doi":"","title":"From centralization to sovereignty-association: the canadian labour congress and the constitutional question","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Politics; Constitutional monarchy; Sovereignty; Law; Philosophy; Monarchy","score_opus":0.014777713453276537,"score_gpt":0.2264600803921833,"score_spread":0.21168236693890677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W163287952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18124834,0.009356369,0.0028257885,0.24903008,0.011122172,0.004064064,0.0019227496,0.0003722276,0.5400582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99244255,0.0010380932,0.0000822417,0.0013572188,0.00072571327,0.000031702635,0.000033186414,0.0000037466766,0.0042855605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987387,0.00029306114,0.00019280483,0.00019762831,0.000304569,0.0002732192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989394,0.00031982746,0.000102233316,0.00014685855,0.00023536208,0.00025633207],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058267475,0.00009106315,0.00014115853,0.00014618452,0.006954863,0.00046726622,0.00021647819,0.00012379033,0.00054875814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009832212,0.000081267426,0.00005590561,0.0003024356,0.0046421452,0.00021615939,0.000023013074,0.0001470817,0.00011640759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010949912,0.000007656001,0.0036497205,0.0000030054941,0.0000294673,0.000009807731,0.00633429,0.0002044559,0.0000016293807,0.9799757,0.009649296,0.00012399924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046190168,0.0000035501037,0.005057988,0.000044814897,0.00003651777,0.000013782381,0.0018704612,0.000036103484,0.0000020652265,0.007933351,0.9844039,0.0001355694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91552156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99236333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9747546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019470658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036823796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99806666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W166688865","doi":"","title":"Sex work by law: Bedford's impact on municipal approaches to regulating the sex trade","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Law; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Economic Justice; Sex work; Sex offender; Criminology; Supreme court; Sociology; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.1187161819420112,"score_gpt":0.2926210342613091,"score_spread":0.1739048523192979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W166688865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5680447,0.0014873748,0.00016658896,0.003105956,0.0003837895,0.0007489318,0.000008022366,0.00024338922,0.42581126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970307,0.00013897565,0.0005615589,0.00024651535,0.00037176698,0.00003649467,0.000010970542,0.00001761239,0.0015854489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982528,0.00029239967,0.00029930455,0.0003620878,0.00028248798,0.0005109386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989565,0.0003088612,0.00010816486,0.00039178683,0.000018456582,0.00021622815],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007649601,0.00023859832,0.00027652297,0.000064233354,0.001978262,0.00013862058,0.00053892896,0.00022345684,0.00019242546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001261732,0.0001611524,0.00017028516,0.0005096109,0.0011527479,0.00013626047,0.000065394684,0.0003148755,0.000082780345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069375106,0.00021943197,0.0034541113,0.000011946517,0.00018694604,0.000009143667,0.24379319,0.0024550268,0.000032383967,0.7423781,0.0021954575,0.005194872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012570613,0.0005339779,0.0031257877,0.0013474112,0.00034578907,0.000039497234,0.3815735,0.00091318355,0.002967828,0.010923877,0.5949294,0.0020426866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022257597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036232703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73145425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013854999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009696364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17783591","doi":"10.1126/science.13.319.211","title":"Challenging English-Canadian Orthodoxy on Democracy and Constitutional Change","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Orthodoxy; Democracy; Elite; Conversation; Law; Humanities; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.07178905838013909,"score_gpt":0.3030945892290276,"score_spread":0.2313055308488885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17783591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18215847,0.009638367,0.0010634356,0.090885825,0.0029348114,0.0027943493,0.00014366925,0.00090482086,0.70947623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946542,0.0023305116,0.00058940885,0.0009820975,0.001203468,0.000029344705,0.000013566753,0.0000048946795,0.00019255617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843603,0.00012673046,0.00023814537,0.0003834486,0.0002741157,0.0005415454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989262,0.00023058655,0.00008184049,0.0001362133,0.00022619197,0.00039892967],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004262758,0.0002214189,0.00026681976,0.00013902648,0.003603062,0.00014269626,0.00018881398,0.00016861816,0.00012347313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009888947,0.00021003888,0.00008858028,0.00024015961,0.003210172,0.0004312675,0.000029742821,0.00022817016,0.000066588946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064054866,0.000037188827,0.0027674793,0.000010982061,0.000027591079,0.00002570308,0.010487907,0.00004027522,0.000012593296,0.9810936,0.00020579199,0.0052844933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010907907,0.00014660398,0.033401597,0.00072296115,0.00010498334,0.000030092766,0.02500392,0.00014997642,0.000036095087,0.008954375,0.9291778,0.0011807691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061218264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020467483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97213924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040839278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030828593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W182430000","doi":"","title":"Manitoba and the (long and winding) road to the natural resources transfer agreement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Terminology; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Elite; Law and economics; Natural resource; Law; Political economy; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013617557659299733,"score_gpt":0.22702303567181079,"score_spread":0.21340547801251106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W182430000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9215929,0.010570776,0.0005616172,0.017798068,0.00078633265,0.0007447797,0.000011361286,0.00004074797,0.047893435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968278,0.0007352859,0.000032754273,0.0005196405,0.0003878612,0.000009187464,9.4974087e-7,0.0000031708776,0.0014833745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991914,0.000088944355,0.00014877782,0.0001681301,0.00018147696,0.0002212563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953717,0.00016691226,0.000023297585,0.00011768595,0.000038162656,0.00011678054],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011155206,0.00007629475,0.00010990155,0.00013111741,0.0027430728,0.00040140402,0.00018102214,0.000047554066,0.000042688727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001311089,0.00005747319,0.000045984812,0.00018410414,0.0025711386,0.000107661304,0.00003351621,0.00012997663,0.000019787072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053962904,0.0000127719295,0.0014347325,0.000019274017,0.000038922964,0.00001947468,0.04891376,0.000013091104,0.000023655028,0.92806715,0.0010403764,0.020362813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040001262,0.000010561585,0.021986827,0.00006829755,0.000049764807,0.000020684098,0.024242599,0.000007810374,0.0000052134064,0.000295211,0.9527806,0.00013239772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097857825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94357556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95174026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019047104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013098196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99855524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W190033593","doi":"","title":"\"A rather vexed question...\": the Federal-Provincial debate over the constitucional responsibility for Métis Scrip","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Political science; Obligation; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02413818042145314,"score_gpt":0.28353202520390886,"score_spread":0.2593938447824557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W190033593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54249966,0.010621607,0.046607424,0.06321383,0.013928522,0.008525409,0.00093615754,0.0007787395,0.31288865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99184746,0.00012243434,0.00039335305,0.0009987452,0.001213119,0.000064647866,0.000013650513,0.000010811314,0.005335809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824136,0.00029372177,0.00035073323,0.0003231949,0.00032121304,0.000469755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817723,0.0009755499,0.00014372535,0.00032671742,0.00022285151,0.0001539087],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003603566,0.00014246913,0.00017955086,0.00016379182,0.0070031597,0.00053350494,0.00042954774,0.00015301282,0.00036084992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016002897,0.00011730318,0.00020007743,0.00030565323,0.004894209,0.00022059627,0.000047966594,0.00022030476,0.000066357745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108147105,0.000044868684,0.0009256415,0.000014778108,0.000030498884,0.000009393372,0.0026801415,0.000032519674,0.00009288647,0.98157656,0.012518669,0.0019658653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036761048,0.00001845251,0.0063340603,0.00004800101,0.000044220717,0.000014919,0.002484126,0.000026414486,0.000015413785,0.0066562155,0.9838036,0.00018698702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06421754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8567963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009140013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002915902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W192887305","doi":"","title":"The Charter in the Administrative Process: Statutory Remedy or Refounding of Administrative Jurisdiction?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Jurisdiction; Law; Administrative law; Statutory law","score_opus":0.15176508418999007,"score_gpt":0.42895055652382563,"score_spread":0.27718547233383556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W192887305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5835792,0.0018130683,0.0025389495,0.017746642,0.0014378377,0.0022579639,0.00004051647,0.00012604013,0.3904598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983522,0.00049111125,0.00015799807,0.00008444055,0.00029257088,0.000040615938,0.0000027792362,0.0000044052263,0.0005738484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982923,0.00026374546,0.0004607958,0.000229989,0.00040491245,0.00034825376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976099,0.0016771167,0.0002269645,0.00021386778,0.00020033581,0.000071828304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031000383,0.00013075862,0.00017368296,0.000062863444,0.0012903755,0.00010749998,0.00044384066,0.00008504196,0.000052673702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010594747,0.000076888835,0.000067694615,0.00046953032,0.0022457654,0.0003179035,0.000020000902,0.00023295508,0.000009332477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020974521,0.0001122093,0.002090672,0.00004865155,0.000021039501,0.000050418053,0.04994004,0.0000070762217,0.00009170692,0.94596016,0.00018867022,0.0012796129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041425345,0.00038014943,0.008145014,0.0007158067,0.00007197669,0.000058648402,0.61752874,0.000017665847,0.00071805826,0.0057711205,0.3658482,0.00033033686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029076252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03326423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94018906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013905711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011460835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99246556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21238772","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.073","title":"Dismembering Canada? Stephen Harper and the foreign relations of canadian provinces","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Massachusetts Dartmouth","keywords":"Federalism; Negotiation; Delegation; Autonomy; Political science; Decentralization; Cooperative federalism; Foreign policy; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.012183349458239923,"score_gpt":0.19819322550284704,"score_spread":0.18600987604460711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21238772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045974415,0.0028985504,0.0001018772,0.018917417,0.00028969927,0.00055716326,0.00007815623,0.000028807348,0.9311539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967077,0.00039313175,0.00011807836,0.00018711714,0.00009161205,0.000006678125,0.0000035873993,0.000002306282,0.002489823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934113,0.00005995614,0.00016213807,0.00011696,0.00013452442,0.0001853157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994873,0.000100604644,0.0000652054,0.000112468275,0.00006379533,0.00017065709],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026062634,0.00005863726,0.00012526484,0.00027934724,0.0016272349,0.00012277551,0.00014765617,0.000047263096,0.00013388727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022837601,0.000057951715,0.00003676252,0.00032224762,0.0014953484,0.00015414931,0.000008617539,0.00008085697,0.0000032601943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000369348,0.000004128841,0.00041783607,0.0000068993036,0.000010542333,0.000004788889,0.0029282048,0.00012951376,0.0000036255462,0.9922512,0.0029799512,0.0012596216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027279806,0.000006804386,0.0047669765,0.00006875164,0.00003896627,0.0000058028068,0.006366685,0.000053704454,0.0000025852448,0.0048940117,0.983398,0.00012490725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99921685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069291634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00661898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219669053","doi":"","title":"Eagle soaring on the emergent winds of indigenous legal authority","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Environmental ethics; Economic Justice; Indigenous rights; Political science; Colonialism; Sociology; Order (exchange); Human rights; Law and economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.052145942076425984,"score_gpt":0.2883170905806425,"score_spread":0.2361711485042165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219669053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88266605,0.00970309,0.00014694409,0.02982439,0.0035999247,0.0014971002,0.00004868437,0.00009213569,0.07242167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873333,0.0023767333,0.00034338704,0.00017932501,0.00093379605,0.000101405916,0.000005324997,0.00001338187,0.008713366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997318,0.00041730146,0.0006312426,0.00042455786,0.0005297917,0.0006790762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982416,0.0005080496,0.00035566706,0.000332918,0.0003722518,0.00018950924],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000692354,0.0003418467,0.00048338997,0.000052493426,0.0025560192,0.00015386753,0.0005862447,0.00027119447,0.0018636045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006531473,0.00025190393,0.00032683002,0.00052618067,0.0036943334,0.0004645617,0.00020884484,0.0004705807,0.000862438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008056282,0.00034081005,0.004786754,0.00013030552,0.00027792488,0.0000073398796,0.02884124,0.00063397083,0.0002715354,0.95606875,0.0025099807,0.006123337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008132182,0.00038467822,0.035098594,0.0016759452,0.00047208366,0.00002333751,0.100316234,0.0006374083,0.0017030033,0.007212606,0.85025555,0.0014073659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029138504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003056668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9488561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049694715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031375847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W223141162","doi":"","title":"Failing to walk the rights talk? post-9/11 security policy and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Torture; Judicial deference; Deference; Deportation; Rhetoric; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013679765522098774,"score_gpt":0.26011318358274443,"score_spread":0.24643341806064567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W223141162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9210911,0.00026015032,0.000049430437,0.015007205,0.00046911844,0.00040943216,0.000056326022,0.00001764469,0.06263961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974777,0.000016071835,0.000042019896,0.00043640105,0.0008412147,0.000012635821,0.000003876474,0.0000032725613,0.0011668204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989357,0.00014778676,0.0002093202,0.000117640666,0.00030999316,0.00027958694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897355,0.00044153453,0.00008821061,0.00014939225,0.00022502118,0.00012229991],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071507454,0.000096573705,0.00015018845,0.000042990498,0.0014798817,0.000059719343,0.0003056483,0.000044789787,0.00010435122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003138322,0.000054781493,0.000054834574,0.00008725839,0.0011613484,0.00016179735,0.000061073166,0.0000900478,0.0000053838185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015531636,0.000018629424,0.000292331,0.0000085820075,0.000025886025,0.000001271733,0.008448498,0.00003068628,0.000015946745,0.99076974,0.00035968705,0.000013233702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057654723,0.000016217155,0.002209719,0.00012396461,0.00006008329,0.000027839995,0.003660691,0.00008029443,0.0003941431,0.12286801,0.869716,0.0002664894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69179773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9263106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86935633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017932642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090494286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293334144","doi":"","title":"Natural resources transfer agreement, the transfer of authority, and the promise to protect the first nations' right to a traditional livelihood","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Jurisprudence; Ethnology; Context (archaeology); Livelihood; Law; Sociology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026181664907399205,"score_gpt":0.2113834170481368,"score_spread":0.18520175214073759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293334144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6266887,0.0028863503,0.002270123,0.34904623,0.0004680035,0.0032279617,0.00015089259,0.000060320024,0.015201408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765205,0.00016996237,0.000036619575,0.0004936153,0.00047368006,0.00017893211,0.0000046523414,0.0000051213824,0.0009853862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887437,0.0000776972,0.0003563953,0.00021291462,0.00027596237,0.000202666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990212,0.0005519198,0.000024648525,0.00014867209,0.00019016655,0.00006339994],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005986503,0.00016657167,0.00024633802,0.00006453064,0.006287432,0.00012204494,0.00028902935,0.00003603097,0.00019065343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012726052,0.00007052923,0.00021484347,0.00020023831,0.0013104015,0.00007993076,0.000036366437,0.00018774725,0.00001225148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094915595,0.00006522788,0.000019519977,0.00004141716,0.00017774201,0.0000015805895,0.14509372,0.000036088084,0.000035873596,0.85339093,0.00066154613,0.0003814011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011228295,0.00015301196,0.00095748156,0.00021185374,0.00042185117,0.000014102548,0.020974604,0.00006147341,0.00014011578,0.0038343656,0.9717685,0.00033981274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047234833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042214233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97110695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014934143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023735189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99500626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233723973","doi":"","title":"Building Indigenous Governance from Native Title: Moving Away from 'Fitting In' to Creating a Decolonized Space","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Indigenous; Colonialism; Sovereignty; Transitional justice; Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Business; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.019532823961770095,"score_gpt":0.29038575393883803,"score_spread":0.27085292997706795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W233723973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8658472,0.00044171364,0.005077067,0.001455237,0.00018177858,0.00057771965,0.00005127281,0.00008668687,0.12628138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97896725,0.000077331315,0.019975811,0.000108641485,0.00030438756,0.00007932556,0.000005646499,0.0000075785224,0.00047403964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999155,0.000050869403,0.00019076273,0.00024303902,0.00013353817,0.00022679589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992265,0.00038208213,0.0001042615,0.00013148233,0.00006759288,0.000088072185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015847391,0.00009046196,0.0001459875,0.000035818462,0.0005197575,0.00013643476,0.00021594531,0.00007110165,0.0004797563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005795777,0.00009613334,0.000038477516,0.00027284157,0.000118359414,0.00018846628,0.00007702986,0.00012843666,0.00038957852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031141865,0.000049331273,0.009887005,0.000006660351,0.000025006706,0.0000059962617,0.017729847,0.00039747907,0.0023542268,0.9618454,0.00024436583,0.007451566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014777721,0.000045146313,0.1116881,0.0019864375,0.00008891055,0.000003437523,0.029822255,0.004638548,0.002261859,0.045339134,0.80101573,0.0016326527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038658075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0081862835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9165063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027013908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024382258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9677436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W241631712","doi":"","title":"Les principles constitutionnels non écrits","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Legitimacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Supreme court; Constitutional interpretation; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Constitutional theory; Action (physics); Constitutional law; Sociology; Law and economics; Constitution; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06245597291703775,"score_gpt":0.27449069955288075,"score_spread":0.212034726635843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W241631712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03339692,0.10354983,0.0041241036,0.008650769,0.015995141,0.00083245523,0.0003304293,0.00022141128,0.8328989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9219483,0.0093322415,0.0010137124,0.00023660723,0.0036795333,0.00004469385,0.000033705714,0.00002435471,0.06368682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710995,0.000282604,0.00062727777,0.00046017912,0.0004047313,0.0011152828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804544,0.00023249094,0.00027265324,0.0004051359,0.00023142007,0.0008128616],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008834605,0.00034907085,0.00047616175,0.00054076675,0.0040289764,0.0004870516,0.00045968342,0.00051501533,0.004231268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034414907,0.0004957336,0.0003249242,0.00077997067,0.011151398,0.0013976782,0.00011791314,0.0004523562,0.0028331417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009138007,0.00033295795,0.0031413834,0.00032456586,0.00010106678,0.000032817767,0.008580907,0.0002799602,0.00008264408,0.9684502,0.0058710016,0.012793382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034396636,0.000024287581,0.0019482673,0.00080074434,0.00022449766,0.0001430397,0.003960198,0.00005099444,0.00003472043,0.0004105032,0.9914664,0.0005924017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16280994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33414832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9855954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026217655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023859493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508132334","doi":"","title":"Le transport interprovincial sur le territoire local: vers un nécessaire équilibre","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Constitution; Parliament; Balance (ability); Law; Jurisprudence; Administration (probate law); Public administration; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.03145731946424208,"score_gpt":0.2142368271095542,"score_spread":0.18277950764531212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508132334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08416143,0.031163728,0.18380596,0.09262893,0.02900988,0.0018066529,0.00051235367,0.0011044324,0.5758066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895735,0.00018419897,0.00054895773,0.0009716379,0.0034594624,0.000025305002,0.00030711986,0.000051193398,0.0048786234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976144,0.000039990242,0.0007492733,0.00064711925,0.00041055225,0.00053865224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985468,0.00007375008,0.00032540696,0.00036083837,0.0005810489,0.000112182584],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003819554,0.00044773272,0.0005144097,0.00020955052,0.0005695237,0.0004507824,0.0006770363,0.00030755022,0.00020347389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032189026,0.00051851204,0.00030030764,0.00032567358,0.003180632,0.002440759,0.00017184936,0.00034046685,0.00037235834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013913687,0.0007223863,0.007045142,0.00081565627,0.00020184366,0.00025594694,0.0002841564,0.004681429,0.000035520687,0.970294,0.009462523,0.006062242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025416214,0.00004767452,0.0009254868,0.0013195863,0.00024379365,0.0000710464,0.0023678925,0.013645918,0.00011770273,0.011630813,0.96630716,0.0007813308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012954212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008479141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9586632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028837606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021734003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581998729","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court in Canada's constitutional order","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Constitutional court; Majority opinion; Constitutional law; Original jurisdiction; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.027541976877775282,"score_gpt":0.249645461380737,"score_spread":0.22210348450296172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581998729","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030650977,0.09657668,0.0056532044,0.42676562,0.01930855,0.0014485857,0.0007783902,0.00012443916,0.41869354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97505647,0.018636698,0.00013581166,0.0004962555,0.0011182653,0.0000746239,0.00000618691,0.000008401872,0.0044672657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967497,0.00032984745,0.00073303335,0.00052154966,0.0006918292,0.00097404275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970969,0.0016791064,0.00020825808,0.00027859627,0.00049138814,0.00024575833],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000780984,0.0003553657,0.00042333474,0.00007121699,0.0027255455,0.00009108689,0.0005801704,0.00017530458,0.00061448116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012144836,0.0002417597,0.00013728246,0.0008283274,0.017526576,0.0003691557,0.00016863785,0.00027042266,0.00032669588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003250465,0.00007928542,0.024919234,0.000016229751,0.00011893605,0.00008838403,0.00020239702,0.00023262257,0.000026182754,0.95511824,0.006550244,0.012615746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006740062,0.000017725119,0.005172992,0.0008570438,0.000058300262,0.000055551856,0.0029099407,0.00004089414,0.000018147895,0.030363116,0.9593843,0.00044794756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8276157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99149007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95283407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031576492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01968021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625873439","doi":"","title":"Daviault Dialogue: The Strange Journey of Canada's Intoxication Defence","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03053669851787179,"score_gpt":0.26747058029491566,"score_spread":0.23693388177704386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625873439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7552544,0.021681316,0.061031982,0.042888474,0.008334705,0.0007937914,0.00017728965,0.00008043716,0.10975762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943016,0.0030261353,0.00021962306,0.00019297731,0.0007475435,0.000015352663,0.0000118923135,0.0000064881856,0.0014783873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982356,0.0003807107,0.0004458926,0.00025892587,0.000355715,0.00032315555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826854,0.0005922516,0.00030331424,0.00034603442,0.0003508593,0.0001389695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077807176,0.00016479596,0.0002720069,0.000067055116,0.0011453424,0.00006907561,0.00044195578,0.00012067024,0.00026712465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008055496,0.00014268984,0.00016313978,0.00075728894,0.0015857165,0.00018131878,0.000044872897,0.00022669858,0.000025240166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009996112,0.00012628373,0.0010538956,0.00014567675,0.000101847414,0.0000034604568,0.007845724,0.0039991075,0.00014764207,0.9271257,0.0014775572,0.057963092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003809512,0.00012322018,0.0034715126,0.0009825933,0.0022487505,0.00006529608,0.27189684,0.008443606,0.00046329596,0.0037698094,0.7074701,0.000684019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6148845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95600337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92335594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002814434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001496691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88091636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626293412","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: Missing the Forest for the Trees in Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Causation; Law; Political science; Charter; Section (typography); Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04576770244883175,"score_gpt":0.28317856793729074,"score_spread":0.237410865488459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626293412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54322976,0.001981487,0.04650526,0.33908826,0.0014393234,0.004221908,0.00022117283,0.00013141842,0.06318142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750626,0.000105710635,0.0003915724,0.001237482,0.00041645186,0.00015944924,0.0000073567826,0.0000060337948,0.00016967239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991256,0.00009755283,0.00022032381,0.00016692549,0.0001241031,0.0002655171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985191,0.001007032,0.00008457699,0.00025819062,0.00005754472,0.00007354047],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005839447,0.000096517484,0.00011780376,0.000019996794,0.002111215,0.00012320622,0.00034356155,0.00003749611,0.000018992789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026726746,0.00006222928,0.000059431197,0.00017337232,0.0004292319,0.00008313859,0.000044902394,0.00010706982,0.0000029472296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031490463,0.000016505512,0.003764999,0.0000075229477,0.000011720176,0.0000069836356,0.0012897275,0.0039162342,0.000010982445,0.9853244,0.0014443872,0.004203434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022249004,0.0000057095313,0.0009773321,0.000030872005,0.000027236463,0.000030949443,0.005655872,0.011581804,0.000018696866,0.0029027667,0.9784274,0.00011887496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8436732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9824216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003105366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097313547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736401150","doi":"","title":"Conceptual Precision and Parliamentary Systems of Rights: Disambiguating “Dialogue”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Parliamentary procedure; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.03630339283605489,"score_gpt":0.2698295430549229,"score_spread":0.23352615021886802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736401150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89734423,0.0079761455,0.0014707494,0.00091833656,0.0010753416,0.001061818,0.000052549818,0.000109142,0.08999167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984287,0.0006521183,0.0003802159,0.000042011343,0.00034713052,0.00006480509,0.000010203905,0.0000034034695,0.00007139646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874496,0.0001432255,0.00036762678,0.00023717505,0.0002696892,0.0002373076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990491,0.00038626048,0.00015303596,0.00010436761,0.00019913069,0.00010807057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032173505,0.00013038151,0.0002803477,0.00005862217,0.0010467044,0.0000742642,0.00014805136,0.00008677411,0.000114353694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028132324,0.00011271145,0.00006019858,0.00016755941,0.0034742905,0.00033856797,0.00007948184,0.0000841408,0.000046467238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006058308,0.000049493578,0.00998929,0.0000138373,0.000048818834,0.0000021519327,0.0030105463,0.000080039186,0.00024439517,0.9849927,0.0004129045,0.0011498075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038075442,0.00052123854,0.040679295,0.004509071,0.0005515948,0.00008013635,0.34477273,0.00066801964,0.00084421254,0.26343784,0.3375239,0.0026043958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056790657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037361775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7215548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007677866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016466925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737262796","doi":"","title":"Mutations et limites de l'identitaire au Québec","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Oppression; Identity (music); Sovereignty; Politics; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03343803331656561,"score_gpt":0.2515676503858552,"score_spread":0.2181296170692896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737262796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112927295,0.104036026,0.0014551418,0.13144252,0.0054859733,0.00058857905,0.00028843732,0.0002824985,0.64349353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8810213,0.0072237244,0.00049285137,0.0005898869,0.00081303495,0.000028859213,0.000013878957,0.000016525099,0.109799944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982855,0.00025847447,0.00034794817,0.00033518212,0.0002290161,0.00054389297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881226,0.00028824425,0.00014745172,0.00024559503,0.0001303915,0.000376074],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003663585,0.00018220616,0.00024485195,0.0003874506,0.003068655,0.0005400361,0.00031757297,0.00023130793,0.0052101347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060277263,0.00027852473,0.00023768729,0.00060545746,0.00488148,0.0007214016,0.000044698423,0.00028120636,0.0027678995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017954106,0.00020172252,0.0028162547,0.00011832476,0.00007385709,0.00009867304,0.034394097,0.00066356116,0.000018888148,0.92764115,0.02427876,0.009692884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020691613,0.00002448743,0.0013521094,0.00032806813,0.00016362465,0.000077796576,0.007858029,0.00040564217,0.0000030950341,0.0015449557,0.9877095,0.0003257627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90599656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96343076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049505364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055483268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737595584","doi":"","title":"Liberty Rights, the Family and Constitutional Politics","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Law; Charter; Politics; Humanities; Family law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041895456404184336,"score_gpt":0.29038305600300246,"score_spread":0.2484875995988181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737595584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34365594,0.0132312495,0.0036919706,0.03603921,0.0017381223,0.0013602905,0.00007905102,0.00046889452,0.59973526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99356693,0.0025508432,0.0005328911,0.00048840925,0.000716433,0.000031061383,0.0000074554105,0.0000038130197,0.0021021885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998607,0.0001580934,0.00025412487,0.0002728716,0.0002990843,0.0004088162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897945,0.00042934963,0.000085536616,0.00015491931,0.00019281698,0.00015790222],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003586503,0.00017561564,0.00020808275,0.00003518679,0.0043324335,0.00017369057,0.00025199173,0.00012008115,0.000109593275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037872538,0.00011540321,0.00008908928,0.00023243902,0.014507106,0.00026729796,0.00009741424,0.00018845183,0.000080413665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042627075,0.00003566997,0.004839559,0.000007895939,0.000050531682,0.000014708803,0.0034748625,0.000029287865,0.000033491153,0.9894048,0.0017573057,0.00034764557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026737357,0.000011159706,0.0047199214,0.000064289845,0.00005214806,0.00004070463,0.0071393773,0.000036595287,0.000009320557,0.010568962,0.9768634,0.00022677903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026069786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014617459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019266894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025761753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737671693","doi":"","title":"Jean Chrétien's Quebec Legacy: Coasting Then Stickhandling Hard","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Economic history; History; Political science","score_opus":0.03402436715252795,"score_gpt":0.2199523210745476,"score_spread":0.18592795392201966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737671693","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.374715,0.13876791,0.014218886,0.41306832,0.01112374,0.0013712137,0.0004397163,0.00073800026,0.045557205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429485,0.0066194017,0.0007991639,0.00025622424,0.0034388024,0.00003026218,0.00005233429,0.000030773223,0.045824517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763757,0.000074881296,0.00070418534,0.00058004557,0.00031521547,0.000688123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862534,0.00021958062,0.00028249875,0.00027593883,0.00035327382,0.00024337156],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023582294,0.00048615955,0.0007171499,0.00009871869,0.008651681,0.0007299005,0.00032052773,0.00019500537,0.0007812431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033682864,0.00042234015,0.000546854,0.00018480283,0.002356224,0.0006580691,0.00016470933,0.00043828855,0.00044656103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015087838,0.00025368194,0.000055184642,0.00031673792,0.00043595556,0.00008450567,0.04501537,0.014346163,0.000042606425,0.9360801,0.0004809137,0.002873685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001232782,0.00012728634,0.00004147461,0.002036178,0.00093199336,0.00002639859,0.037330586,0.0001872208,0.000034947236,0.011952088,0.9451495,0.00094957906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078149214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106142454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94466853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004363933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042386254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737906729","doi":"","title":"The structural conception of rights and judicial balancing","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Rhetoric; Adjudication; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027079022674977072,"score_gpt":0.26357582417521647,"score_spread":0.23649680150023938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737906729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74094903,0.01744099,0.0003978745,0.005119875,0.0017472099,0.0005373227,0.00002778061,0.00011894953,0.23366097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977004,0.0014884315,0.00010574534,0.000034500925,0.0005308703,0.000008313453,0.0000012933664,0.000001889564,0.00012859066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913967,0.00008079853,0.00022467738,0.00014952492,0.00020398763,0.00020133454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993853,0.00024527864,0.00010578477,0.00007832645,0.00012777207,0.000057521916],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022742737,0.000090081216,0.00015327011,0.000029882074,0.0026611013,0.000049618564,0.00012833299,0.000058239995,0.00006798773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020245582,0.00006633249,0.000053870514,0.0001569571,0.0035367971,0.00014073148,0.000040811254,0.00008094088,0.0000141532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058357114,0.000008479938,0.003391782,0.0000038133262,0.000026471234,0.0000020155344,0.0021086382,0.000014288593,0.00007124758,0.9912558,0.00029336053,0.002818265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001417212,0.00013090666,0.01609736,0.00062391337,0.00021690187,0.00005091413,0.026660055,0.00091578654,0.00030192835,0.44607994,0.5066364,0.000868688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002705181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005429498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54517585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053266114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006198942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738154899","doi":"","title":"The Partial Commencement of Acts: A Constitutional Criticism of the Lieutenant Governor in Council's \"Line-Item Veto\" Power","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Separation of powers; Supreme court; Veto; Legislation; Legislature; Doctrine; Political science; Democracy; Enumerated powers; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Compromise; Politics; History","score_opus":0.04802638586106917,"score_gpt":0.27901913326385525,"score_spread":0.23099274740278608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738154899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4078463,0.013271561,0.0007925557,0.061079793,0.0030062152,0.0023729035,0.0005088981,0.00009759964,0.5110242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669784,0.0024111962,0.000059722082,0.00025461704,0.0001554365,0.000050300318,0.000002242652,0.000003253456,0.00036536274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768406,0.00020746386,0.00065293064,0.00023303491,0.0008458876,0.00037662077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983309,0.00073156494,0.00019868976,0.000243097,0.00042385413,0.0000719152],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011102555,0.00016606961,0.00030909566,0.000024706842,0.0014100823,0.000040005925,0.0004993336,0.00009569804,0.00016215935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001059985,0.00010719624,0.00017293116,0.0004227929,0.010466969,0.00015033277,0.000094974435,0.00017832569,0.000020153204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007535657,0.0002012921,0.004497729,0.000016054186,0.00005878026,0.0000054934894,0.0015581177,0.00042272845,0.00015376731,0.9918366,0.00040470497,0.00076934265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007701027,0.000061918974,0.0036124506,0.00065774296,0.000059056627,0.000011604229,0.005281066,0.000073293086,0.0003912192,0.01192122,0.97692406,0.00023628127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023553667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007883555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97991544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041117225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025625252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738171322","doi":"","title":"Mondialisation, démocratie et Questions Nationales Candiennes","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Globalization; Federalism; Democracy; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Multinational corporation; Political economy; Nation state; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.06083005922536525,"score_gpt":0.29806957259860073,"score_spread":0.23723951337323548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738171322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079246946,0.088612065,0.0039059012,0.34386688,0.011181759,0.0009941636,0.000543015,0.00032841752,0.47132084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93208873,0.016352199,0.0010525777,0.00081670395,0.0015101499,0.000052765427,0.000018319937,0.000012052553,0.048096508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976982,0.00034864273,0.00045307263,0.00046271738,0.00051937083,0.000518025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984519,0.0004722486,0.0003098171,0.00020903924,0.0003112782,0.00024570926],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060430286,0.0002483634,0.00027925937,0.00009028046,0.0017559421,0.0002663512,0.00039479963,0.00023468547,0.0028184801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000998998,0.0002742697,0.00018002425,0.0009937155,0.0029684568,0.0011272923,0.000054630676,0.00022085758,0.0006305595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017689385,0.0001846376,0.0035351038,0.000029918623,0.000034659966,0.000010641816,0.013796875,0.0010557587,0.000012491411,0.9468529,0.030920547,0.0035646753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027790377,0.000042304524,0.004769301,0.00035730668,0.000071648756,0.000021352913,0.0074840444,0.0016422531,0.000009415051,0.024096558,0.9607602,0.00046773723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019423109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.097127154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9298396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047978852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062956655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738323090","doi":"","title":"Searching for Multinational Canada: The Rhetoric of Confusion","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Solidarity; Political science; Neutrality; Rhetoric; Sociology; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.031797257178273024,"score_gpt":0.25730782732754776,"score_spread":0.22551057014927472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738323090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19371502,0.095092654,0.012080376,0.17758456,0.026436724,0.003948575,0.0016368239,0.000103006656,0.48940226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659419,0.0032782569,0.00030731125,0.00019420382,0.00084531016,0.000025285475,0.000020883248,0.0000074390878,0.02937943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881375,0.00012787236,0.00028883188,0.00018649551,0.00029489803,0.00028817778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871933,0.0005763959,0.00016276365,0.00014048093,0.00027713645,0.00012388748],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052299513,0.00009693782,0.00017595947,0.00013630891,0.0021254553,0.00009593016,0.00027480937,0.00009123966,0.0005273599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048630952,0.000108688386,0.00011689978,0.00037798643,0.0023191406,0.0001537159,0.000034390152,0.00014140901,0.000013296632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110408755,0.000049109072,0.00020910188,0.00010288962,0.000035863726,0.000008746335,0.002251101,0.00091730023,0.000044667093,0.974231,0.008657248,0.01348193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002386192,0.000014875595,0.0007857676,0.00018246382,0.000049748633,0.000017900149,0.0020612995,0.0007705931,0.0000059885883,0.0012466015,0.9945014,0.000124706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9668152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99883604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015897653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007486405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738553523","doi":"","title":"Speculation: Alternatives to secession","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"European Socioeconomic and Political Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatism; Political science; Secession; Humanities; Alliance; Speculation; Ethnology; Economy; Economic history; Economics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.07868492630212694,"score_gpt":0.24686569204326642,"score_spread":0.1681807657411395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738553523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096480995,0.116538584,0.012634132,0.038088616,0.006041512,0.00052627374,0.0006175216,0.000101454374,0.7289709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8926875,0.010028156,0.002453036,0.0012371232,0.0016953107,0.000019585977,0.000013440898,0.000028629438,0.0918372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795777,0.00005270998,0.00081096124,0.0006165086,0.00004169943,0.0005203833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893075,0.00017304407,0.00025572936,0.0003359586,0.000059350576,0.00024515516],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025981286,0.000290727,0.00055029854,0.00015959887,0.00045692525,0.00015065793,0.00028844655,0.00014353306,0.0074991044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025223393,0.0003766016,0.00022000336,0.00021406265,0.0006380481,0.00032266538,0.00018461356,0.00022192737,0.0185193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004946945,0.00016490305,0.018449524,0.00010841609,0.0001330574,0.000023950868,0.0018211338,0.0008176037,0.0000032300863,0.9622867,0.011624093,0.004562423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042438178,0.00007147305,0.0053224373,0.00035380456,0.000026348696,0.000026657728,0.0005159051,0.0023879067,0.000022868819,0.008830663,0.9815017,0.00051586627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009083072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033603374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9698776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035256852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015098202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738620536","doi":"","title":"Anti-terrorism, the Charter, and International Law","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Charter; Political science; International human rights law; Law; Fundamental rights; Terrorism; Reservation of rights; Guard (computer science); Duty; Ex post facto law; Right to property; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04597458160345978,"score_gpt":0.297171645317838,"score_spread":0.2511970637143782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738620536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23270108,0.049459387,0.001305631,0.24719428,0.010674961,0.00059619267,0.000107094966,0.00013203343,0.45782936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809691,0.0035530874,0.00018428294,0.00046549484,0.002137091,0.000013440761,0.000011736948,0.0000072583935,0.012658557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873567,0.00012738885,0.00029578546,0.0003106661,0.00021553005,0.00031497967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928856,0.00022269094,0.00011749469,0.00018400286,0.00010648752,0.00008078731],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042043533,0.00017318502,0.00019205833,0.00003327123,0.0011125609,0.00026262505,0.00035254107,0.00012721086,0.000338307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053419124,0.00014773835,0.00009919218,0.00016251205,0.004041246,0.00049171865,0.000098525314,0.00017885119,0.0001753702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054803922,0.00008454837,0.0016415064,0.000043562533,0.00002823956,0.00002360991,0.0013563719,0.000087156615,0.00008914327,0.9915377,0.0023714888,0.0027312206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018219663,0.000019796622,0.0017265837,0.00034228634,0.00008754598,0.00011468204,0.0031063007,0.00027073553,0.000041443276,0.017257893,0.9766321,0.00021841512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006417885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007956574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97427976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096731084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011362227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739100633","doi":"","title":"La Nation Quebecoise et la Minorite Nationale Canadienne-Francaise","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"French; Humanities; Vision; Political science; Dynamism; Theme (computing); Sociology; Ethnology; Art; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.02715354916946068,"score_gpt":0.23343761441735328,"score_spread":0.2062840652478926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739100633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05415673,0.040564124,0.0003588802,0.02459168,0.004673896,0.0004532392,0.00046225713,0.00013303755,0.87460613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8355703,0.0095739355,0.00028629944,0.00043429993,0.00074642675,0.000033595956,0.000036505746,0.000017536699,0.1533011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980001,0.00055558304,0.00035234098,0.0003821024,0.0002710264,0.00043884388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856293,0.00047955956,0.00016813203,0.00020824313,0.00021306348,0.00036806986],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007922589,0.00019546052,0.00024190001,0.0005279747,0.001398551,0.0005173867,0.00028186233,0.0003520411,0.004252085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049957,0.0002982511,0.00017990677,0.0006560595,0.0033228404,0.0007513945,0.000033358065,0.0003307174,0.0009349126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030524827,0.00016442803,0.0002402356,0.0001183872,0.000049966544,0.00012545718,0.013521266,0.0002908032,0.000014368496,0.9454343,0.017487537,0.022550201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035074318,0.000012640398,0.0006789684,0.00028290972,0.00007405084,0.00009027799,0.0017361799,0.00045286847,0.0000011302584,0.002218118,0.99377096,0.00033115796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6055128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.986517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97628343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019342973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013562358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740039160","doi":"","title":"We Are All Potential Terrorists Now: The Reconstituitive Effects of the Anti-Terrorim Act and the USA Patriot Act","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Politics; Prison; Legislation; Patriot Act; Terrorism; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01746272603832043,"score_gpt":0.2771627599884758,"score_spread":0.25970003395015534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740039160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9609299,0.0026679032,0.00044696266,0.028093016,0.002093165,0.0013281399,0.0000499947,0.00006783277,0.0043231016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943927,0.003381457,0.000023499608,0.000780194,0.0010273245,0.00005551368,0.0000023464254,0.000012943512,0.00032400872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972009,0.0008158167,0.0005065241,0.00042660758,0.000465536,0.00058463844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975534,0.0011961926,0.00038874263,0.00055037066,0.00014837255,0.00016293341],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088786264,0.00031265448,0.00046235864,0.000064395266,0.0014299636,0.0001638933,0.00093395356,0.00020845566,0.00006842617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006865838,0.00016936561,0.0003202465,0.00027269198,0.006094344,0.00034261888,0.00020923879,0.000453419,0.0000499803],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005280532,0.0009969084,0.13801904,0.00087050966,0.0011022482,0.00013137917,0.33574665,0.0004964594,0.0013314892,0.48237234,0.0033746837,0.035030242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011933588,0.00037792895,0.2933112,0.007689946,0.002692355,0.00056830066,0.27143952,0.0017750895,0.004783946,0.007752229,0.3945199,0.0031559847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009812124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007873223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4746201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014563037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042013518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740105340","doi":"","title":"Federalism, Pluralism, and Constitutional Faith: Canada in Question","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Humanities; Federalism; Ethnology; Political science; Politics; Nothing; Pluralism (philosophy); Faith; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Law; Anthropology; Theology","score_opus":0.02056909318842353,"score_gpt":0.22311052790483904,"score_spread":0.2025414347164155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740105340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26856557,0.017595906,0.0012222594,0.054894,0.004569099,0.0014103868,0.0003284112,0.00033148716,0.6510829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943235,0.0019181252,0.00012993156,0.0003144424,0.00019370535,0.000014810831,0.000011815304,0.0000035853886,0.0030900724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989748,0.000106569685,0.00021659565,0.00022861826,0.00021317869,0.00026023318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995073,0.00009104003,0.00005924713,0.000094457304,0.00006765386,0.00018027618],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001806657,0.00009689618,0.00015576265,0.000238107,0.0012977518,0.00026177513,0.0001139417,0.000093928145,0.0005595687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025157598,0.00013293851,0.00003137975,0.00023636295,0.004623502,0.00029002322,0.000020053008,0.00014091193,0.00002299265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020583386,0.000021606937,0.0022801373,0.0000140584725,0.000006662028,0.00008051831,0.0012468167,0.00008862503,0.000009096707,0.9886125,0.0069586835,0.0006792347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027124144,0.000005137459,0.001315093,0.00011004826,0.000010324254,0.000032323485,0.00121433,0.000090238726,0.0000013817458,0.00078532594,0.9959602,0.00020439817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94652957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98900145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014730836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740259405","doi":"","title":"Les Procédures de modification constitutionnelle dans les fédérations","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Political science; Law and economics; Democracy; Normative; Law; Authoritarianism; Public administration; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05856938562781288,"score_gpt":0.3098007958848562,"score_spread":0.2512314102570433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740259405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21109071,0.016742362,0.04616967,0.014562666,0.0012602474,0.0010748303,0.0004754899,0.0003138888,0.7083101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9441485,0.0045259227,0.0013781262,0.00014746806,0.0013832698,0.00013115375,0.00003661985,0.00002002267,0.04822896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969516,0.0004701126,0.000722658,0.00059626723,0.0003950967,0.0008642635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998437,0.0003063455,0.00023183002,0.00040015733,0.0002136956,0.00041099882],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005959313,0.0003641185,0.00040629096,0.0000717185,0.0027868424,0.00022079393,0.00046701526,0.00049489806,0.0029172383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043704433,0.00039933802,0.00024818373,0.0005682379,0.004783203,0.00057534437,0.000036813908,0.0003664343,0.00075538864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000143725,0.0003455489,0.00551429,0.00017863985,0.00006918539,0.00001927315,0.0049895695,0.0077676675,0.00030218827,0.9626638,0.001350509,0.016784938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042608913,0.000044601325,0.004599937,0.0008970444,0.00013851846,0.000148424,0.0030867562,0.002754474,0.00019159834,0.007891285,0.9792514,0.00056990096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049980238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01600623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97790086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009980163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012951161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740690038","doi":"","title":"Some Observations on the Queen, the Crown, the Constitution, and the Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Commonwealth; Parliament; Law; Majesty; Throne; Monarchy; Political science; Separation of powers; Dominion; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Politics; History","score_opus":0.06133075550446539,"score_gpt":0.29283464028520007,"score_spread":0.2315038847807347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740690038","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07878776,0.0029519214,0.00051132013,0.73013085,0.0019555192,0.0020216682,0.000099212055,0.00009028923,0.18345144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99237424,0.0012271674,0.000010967294,0.0029187414,0.0010998098,0.00011774254,0.0000010967402,0.00000402927,0.0022461822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984605,0.00040773416,0.00025840243,0.00021280577,0.00033572534,0.0003248435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967436,0.00198269,0.00026870926,0.0007890439,0.00014036127,0.00007556738],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018729614,0.00014196937,0.0001744754,0.0000102510585,0.013307914,0.0008000941,0.0010128504,0.00007991073,0.00002883543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037614745,0.000055872195,0.00010783932,0.000071352995,0.013823674,0.00029142993,0.00013094186,0.00026314682,0.000050909293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011279777,0.000016709288,0.0012891748,0.0000053482595,0.000032664997,0.000001869999,0.0014046852,0.000038160302,0.000004963876,0.99241555,0.004657669,0.000121933546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003854219,0.000008052676,0.023434015,0.00015309917,0.00004700392,0.000009347742,0.002095406,0.00010256263,0.000012995986,0.0774579,0.8961641,0.00013008092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014569724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004611468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91495764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007579107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041856462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99199235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740894130","doi":"","title":"Post-Colonial Federalism: Social Citizenship and New Identities","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Citizenship; Political science; Federalism; Sociology; Ethnology; Politics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05106684700111322,"score_gpt":0.24331366476908672,"score_spread":0.1922468177679735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740894130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18803714,0.1329306,0.00019530518,0.1782341,0.012208737,0.0008225885,0.0005956804,0.00028889746,0.48668694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69671667,0.009357127,0.00017431681,0.00096376083,0.004002483,0.000010137771,0.000012962072,0.000019094623,0.28874347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815184,0.00020714803,0.00037235685,0.0004110472,0.0003008003,0.00055681885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990173,0.00013290497,0.00015880883,0.00014059534,0.00013916573,0.00041125368],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024033221,0.0002309429,0.00036532906,0.00034371964,0.004428586,0.0013779335,0.00025567735,0.0003629927,0.0061856247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023458022,0.00035362167,0.00020412593,0.00036585145,0.0059360517,0.0005000216,0.00007411637,0.0003023105,0.00083889073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081152,0.0000447766,0.00012318183,0.00012205559,0.00007902363,0.000099173296,0.022343246,0.000005457252,0.00003036407,0.8092624,0.1597296,0.00815262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000599662,0.00004925513,0.00076306786,0.00019030645,0.00019158574,0.00013586872,0.0035792305,0.000040046216,0.000002642694,0.014930821,0.97902405,0.000493485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15397258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53399223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8192944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094939413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009266307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741181913","doi":"","title":"Citoyenneté incorporée et nouvel espace des nations","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Political science; Phenomenon; Globalization; Theme (computing); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04091930509820593,"score_gpt":0.24445210784344948,"score_spread":0.20353280274524355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741181913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020433143,0.07130849,0.0027402334,0.04209555,0.0063720993,0.00061201805,0.000356517,0.00024711626,0.85583484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7306405,0.030521395,0.0018635993,0.0005112022,0.0009899553,0.00003571788,0.000017809412,0.000022720278,0.23539712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980723,0.0002706587,0.00038831288,0.00042364158,0.0003075165,0.0005375514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985537,0.00032116618,0.0001973499,0.0002995363,0.00022866316,0.000399569],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041536297,0.00022848524,0.00029835783,0.00071668305,0.0036416566,0.00060651964,0.000381016,0.00029287685,0.0057695624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006284303,0.00034114494,0.00022764114,0.0013408638,0.0076656747,0.00083608733,0.00006916963,0.00033752018,0.00237693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029666778,0.00023302369,0.0002918025,0.00013892369,0.000062442545,0.000060645187,0.015885761,0.00062242197,0.000024967472,0.94301355,0.031722583,0.007940908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027604218,0.000030386991,0.00027159447,0.00044914693,0.00010460665,0.0000612973,0.003908804,0.00031181803,0.0000033929832,0.004047324,0.9901391,0.00039648416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.096948676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8572628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018640364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011291098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741567171","doi":"","title":"Citizen Supplicants?: Alain Carins' Citizens Plus and the Politics of Aboriginal/Constitutional Scholarship","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Politics; Scholarship; Humanities; Political science; Context (archaeology); Elaboration; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03733390591740756,"score_gpt":0.29782038788227494,"score_spread":0.2604864819648674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741567171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6676784,0.017018707,0.0010953735,0.03145675,0.0010396991,0.002335286,0.00039237054,0.00032811047,0.2786553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993283,0.003918072,0.00072139915,0.00020186217,0.00043748587,0.00005533049,0.000007773245,0.0000067968354,0.0013682853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980475,0.00029639853,0.00042186282,0.00032418166,0.0004446935,0.000465366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983362,0.0007609973,0.00018247003,0.00021988468,0.00032049837,0.00017996177],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007019262,0.0002195345,0.0004336342,0.000065065586,0.0024093809,0.00012980889,0.0003649453,0.00015210806,0.00026863726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009591637,0.00016346438,0.00015945065,0.0003109701,0.01482364,0.0002432395,0.00009349606,0.00028394847,0.000037211135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014572095,0.00003520977,0.0062333867,0.00003903373,0.000098857745,0.00000793916,0.008704924,0.000063885556,0.00004199861,0.9840388,0.0004891717,0.00023227594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009409271,0.00009049345,0.015694618,0.00086522236,0.0007171149,0.00016996336,0.048772387,0.00092012604,0.00034498153,0.042323805,0.87909454,0.0015974805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002036576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009693402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94171494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031709418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027898542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741982816","doi":"","title":"La Cas Du Québec à la Lumière du débat Taylor-Habermas","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02625474254448615,"score_gpt":0.2543178263570074,"score_spread":0.22806308381252124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741982816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18121468,0.043630134,0.00087159255,0.14207712,0.0049793064,0.0005630427,0.000116305615,0.0002505586,0.6262973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642315,0.012506059,0.00028140546,0.00042051522,0.0025035979,0.000031437077,0.000003104899,0.000019345658,0.020003058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970011,0.0005849616,0.0004895172,0.0006179176,0.00056253216,0.00074396515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978599,0.000967544,0.0003307519,0.00029914724,0.00017025627,0.00037239472],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089456094,0.00036141695,0.00044726557,0.00006176828,0.0017103022,0.00034348515,0.00072433916,0.0004597033,0.0034499571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000928339,0.00037709935,0.00032566837,0.00093411555,0.007453585,0.00077745144,0.00014925352,0.0004094848,0.0013544147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000551622,0.00030119636,0.02647306,0.00006715786,0.000059947488,0.00024352997,0.027790083,0.00027122305,0.000017054555,0.8845215,0.033081528,0.027168207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040715933,0.00003898377,0.005233101,0.00027169145,0.00009603299,0.00017040547,0.00931643,0.0012130043,0.000010804944,0.0010249373,0.9817039,0.0005135725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19817242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3262204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94862235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007458308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093890715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742216822","doi":"","title":"The Nisga'a Treaty: What Future for the Inherent Right to Aboriginal Self- Government?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Humanities; Political science; Indigenous; Ethnology; Government (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014206437386537119,"score_gpt":0.24348467876509064,"score_spread":0.22927824137855352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742216822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023485169,0.12617186,0.0036023795,0.3821544,0.027214918,0.008295013,0.0005182726,0.0007293818,0.42782858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.824201,0.101882555,0.0007006092,0.0019978248,0.007955345,0.0005428112,0.000008155348,0.000032953747,0.06267875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885106,0.00006929598,0.0001762642,0.00021727319,0.000325595,0.00036051928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910146,0.00031949708,0.000074187905,0.0002631183,0.00007475154,0.00016698852],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003659628,0.00011263617,0.00012231,0.000047075675,0.0061608586,0.001323376,0.00043035278,0.000080319645,0.00047769785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071196344,0.00008518137,0.00013450727,0.00023637345,0.00080708053,0.00032645874,0.000022270055,0.00011421829,0.00017641076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010851122,0.000052352916,0.00005568668,0.000012745693,0.000057810583,0.0000058975875,0.00798513,0.000030341673,0.000005805577,0.90229803,0.06718203,0.022303335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017087226,0.000020960526,0.00007790287,0.000042023927,0.00006078476,0.0000046092778,0.011733337,0.000046103683,0.0000053960725,0.000316004,0.98739195,0.0001300347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006722437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5666705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92020994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011644983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035871795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742267879","doi":"","title":"The Purpose of Canadian Equality Rights","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Fundamental rights; Identity (music); Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07338972501701502,"score_gpt":0.29192099156510964,"score_spread":0.21853126654809463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742267879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11601681,0.0071211187,0.000054887183,0.022616705,0.0011338997,0.00094047165,0.000058313646,0.0001296166,0.8519282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949823,0.001907496,0.00018851181,0.000056464556,0.00021848762,0.000021771164,0.0000019395973,0.0000030557783,0.0026199701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987254,0.00019791184,0.00027765136,0.00017520675,0.00024283762,0.00038098145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989726,0.00033012225,0.000110610235,0.0001846561,0.00020673004,0.00019526965],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050271064,0.00011307241,0.00018188225,0.0000718942,0.0035248161,0.00008233147,0.0003421941,0.00009416003,0.00026775934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057100214,0.000076861346,0.0001066629,0.0004758571,0.0021577845,0.0001518291,0.000037060294,0.00011700472,0.00011582788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017297994,0.00002477961,0.0012527788,0.000009817588,0.000038576094,0.0000035952944,0.0097292485,0.000018700208,0.00002285476,0.9851807,0.0024407033,0.0012765593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001206201,0.00000915866,0.0012433114,0.000043527383,0.000022158467,0.0000016459448,0.0056010913,0.000031407188,0.000057411333,0.0017476756,0.9909813,0.0001407258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42341885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85820526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9885406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026673902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013174234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99777246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742655197","doi":"","title":"The construction of Nunavut and its impact on collective identity in the canadian eastern arctic","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Collective identity; Government (linguistics); Arctic; The arctic; Sociology; Political science; Geography; Gender studies; Genealogy; Ethnology; History; Law; Politics; Aesthetics; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.050447222636410556,"score_gpt":0.3472969963767047,"score_spread":0.29684977374029414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742655197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9620078,0.0013242406,0.00000906089,0.0027479362,0.0005122906,0.0011066302,0.00003560726,0.000009472812,0.03224695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985802,0.0007774154,0.000012365146,0.00022057234,0.00010177304,0.0000914634,0.0000020283442,0.000004793484,0.00020939727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861765,0.0003322058,0.0003085035,0.00015383816,0.00009984951,0.00048798122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986906,0.000751712,0.00014845312,0.00015684443,0.00018909866,0.00006326341],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006463557,0.000113714465,0.00020054098,0.000107727305,0.0063951015,0.000025706335,0.00014936137,0.00011635587,0.00012278612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039058365,0.00006803269,0.000048200374,0.0002764615,0.0004713873,0.00008189987,0.000042900476,0.00035518498,0.00007701607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050693798,0.00006950873,0.32167077,0.00013633806,0.00010559061,0.000017149612,0.058647152,0.0001511953,0.0000065925747,0.6185011,0.00033473616,0.00030918134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031395173,0.00086553406,0.68593955,0.0012049555,0.00019390223,0.00028011057,0.27265254,0.004181206,0.000014466582,0.012848861,0.018018315,0.00066103094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07738295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94514877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8677658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081933575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007215858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99489844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743130901","doi":"","title":"Cultural Myths and Political Realities or Why Québec Will Never Separate","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Mythology; Politics; Compromise; Political science; History; Art; Law","score_opus":0.04169517575311155,"score_gpt":0.2592332488909252,"score_spread":0.21753807313781365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743130901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033439226,0.11723772,0.00014786533,0.18274717,0.0046111397,0.0006383213,0.0005423819,0.00022549063,0.6604107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67341614,0.016351504,0.00018258509,0.0025128508,0.0014675729,0.000019073228,0.0000108732465,0.000016023116,0.30602336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812543,0.00020631314,0.00035977006,0.00039680328,0.00022938188,0.00068227237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998805,0.0002046102,0.000098139775,0.00020065559,0.00013771339,0.00055390614],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017718766,0.00022657617,0.00034435265,0.00019749321,0.0017529866,0.0006107822,0.00020711665,0.0002609834,0.00642155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003009198,0.00025389742,0.00014108107,0.00033336753,0.009498943,0.0013352388,0.00005803296,0.0002480576,0.0005366781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010912117,0.000068888934,0.000149593,0.00013898908,0.000056624373,0.00010374607,0.009573652,0.000014239001,0.000004795553,0.8899518,0.09795109,0.0019756325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028623125,0.00004376258,0.00010385195,0.0002696305,0.00012475817,0.00018678163,0.012110629,0.00015360332,0.000001605417,0.0011640914,0.98519015,0.00036491713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7132991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93689555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88878775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015963833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012241284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743247351","doi":"","title":"Capturing Proceeds from Criminal Notoriety: A Case Study","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Parliament; Law; Legislation; Political science; Mandate; Criminal law; Legislature; Cabinet (room); Constitution; History; Politics","score_opus":0.06359759635595999,"score_gpt":0.30414136980302,"score_spread":0.24054377344706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743247351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640125,0.012297738,0.00011836373,0.005923286,0.0031257314,0.0024589396,0.00004793153,0.00021199271,0.011803508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908472,0.00071702566,0.0015475218,0.00014350326,0.0025823987,0.00039964344,0.000009183014,0.000025914564,0.003727632],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967409,0.00035085902,0.0007121238,0.00081442855,0.0005326946,0.0008490382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979368,0.0004371512,0.00029411708,0.00032002127,0.00060625013,0.0004056492],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038609782,0.0005368922,0.000664845,0.00006522153,0.0028479097,0.0005019737,0.0004336807,0.0003214758,0.0014016359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052415894,0.0005024758,0.00026424642,0.00053881103,0.0026228717,0.0011252965,0.00029112582,0.00051530363,0.0011114497],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031657328,0.0027788524,0.063463815,0.00053729984,0.0015529776,0.004663839,0.66572165,0.00031239237,0.00028357323,0.23761979,0.0035147376,0.019519428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001199128,0.00019110747,0.0059649274,0.000581756,0.0010243552,0.000534765,0.9179755,0.0003729032,0.00005102693,0.0008775837,0.07012985,0.0010971352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29292023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033040334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25987992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008393928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003248354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743531098","doi":"","title":"Canada, Criminal Appeals and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in the 1880s","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Dominion; Law; Criminal justice; Administration of justice; Humanities; Judicial review; Administration (probate law); Art","score_opus":0.03505024835232204,"score_gpt":0.2223802239238744,"score_spread":0.18732997557155237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743531098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45599702,0.007880159,0.000054738834,0.0669761,0.0013064021,0.0012649974,0.00008582323,0.000021948234,0.4664128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99718195,0.00084839296,0.0000072310563,0.0009796922,0.00018960465,0.00001357466,7.04095e-7,0.0000023152404,0.00077652506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987637,0.00029902667,0.00020280304,0.00011323074,0.00044006718,0.00018116421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992269,0.00032612964,0.00009832487,0.00020318832,0.00010309743,0.000042311978],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012892687,0.00006639165,0.00014581611,0.0000425975,0.0016202499,0.00011635534,0.00044294744,0.000047247606,0.00006147451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005928332,0.000044890712,0.00005445737,0.00028226257,0.0044079293,0.00006862391,0.000037364756,0.0001610633,0.0000026680314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019209472,0.000019780713,0.0022375712,0.000016878887,0.000010471605,0.000011701355,0.01456155,0.000035361485,0.0000037810407,0.9693542,0.013091874,0.00063759973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036720396,0.000004075566,0.0100465445,0.00006434164,0.000043450436,0.000020189475,0.012863483,0.000013665192,7.3900793e-7,0.0017461608,0.9747582,0.00007191934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96760803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077401474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074564386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743980511","doi":"","title":"Adverse Effect Discrimination: Proving the Prima Facie Case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Prima facie; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04223672470172506,"score_gpt":0.32492945458745726,"score_spread":0.2826927298857322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743980511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31078315,0.00027099255,0.0036282241,0.02042473,0.0007933044,0.0013566578,0.00002609278,0.00036761072,0.6623492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962862,0.000058928166,0.00045053192,0.00030846364,0.00053299643,0.000063992295,0.000009769838,0.000007506709,0.0022816223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850535,0.00035495183,0.00027525568,0.00025852193,0.00029901776,0.00030689404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905264,0.0003486949,0.00011173429,0.00024766038,0.00011713489,0.00012213048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011582113,0.00014812325,0.00015819147,0.00006612531,0.0019561509,0.00016300897,0.0002721987,0.000088187044,0.00028244554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006499133,0.00011239709,0.00012803795,0.00024566386,0.0011305843,0.0005548632,0.000061020448,0.00014430868,0.00022746195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007744829,0.00006388343,0.00035460104,0.000040637082,0.000017522616,0.000067631394,0.012500663,0.00018067964,0.000025603664,0.96244377,0.0002988565,0.023998393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009410868,0.00007541186,0.00091478653,0.00021632477,0.00019542131,0.00038959231,0.030359741,0.0008024282,0.00045919232,0.0020211625,0.9630291,0.0005957833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005941061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008761077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9627302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021897929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024085991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744442049","doi":"","title":"La Politique De la Reconnaissance et Les Nationalismes Au Canada","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Confusion; Meaning (existential); Foundation (evidence); Restructuring; Political science; Character (mathematics); Multinational corporation; Sociology; Political economy; Epistemology; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.02759956260623948,"score_gpt":0.25314730151036485,"score_spread":0.22554773890412538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744442049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017496817,0.030246666,0.00019753232,0.04935544,0.0016410237,0.00016106243,0.0003418051,0.00005434612,0.9005053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.942022,0.011674503,0.00024258571,0.00073400553,0.0008319713,0.000020714635,0.000011250208,0.000012987544,0.04444998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978188,0.0009420309,0.0002785273,0.00028314718,0.00024153707,0.00043595172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983281,0.00096215855,0.00013374594,0.00016185651,0.00011552075,0.00029861528],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007994124,0.000164275,0.00021661234,0.00018842064,0.0016265444,0.0003164628,0.00028051695,0.00031904381,0.0029381965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007678443,0.0002459388,0.00011239192,0.00032409382,0.005150389,0.00032726664,0.000029758805,0.00040376195,0.000072359726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016313758,0.00006439266,0.0011344344,0.00011815598,0.000040634543,0.00012669513,0.0061538224,0.00032925923,0.0000050768435,0.9300441,0.058417823,0.0035639622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015884549,0.0000064693963,0.0019019154,0.00039643855,0.00003852369,0.00014207448,0.0025825892,0.00010268479,0.0000036422798,0.0033062885,0.991087,0.00027349067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9326692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049252384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010187776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744841385","doi":"","title":"A Passive Internationalist: Jean Chretien and Canadian Foreign Policy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign policy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.014585884640393992,"score_gpt":0.24136722598770813,"score_spread":0.22678134134731415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744841385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031170672,0.0015576974,0.0006362741,0.031221174,0.00044996772,0.00048265458,0.0002057058,0.00010866227,0.9341672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957879,0.0007326358,0.00017497667,0.00047264155,0.0004781413,0.000014517812,0.000015352894,0.000005659845,0.0023181762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924976,0.000029512616,0.00013336298,0.00018551954,0.00013689062,0.00026492952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993241,0.000041066738,0.000050782186,0.00010044819,0.00009276701,0.0003908364],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012506005,0.000077850134,0.00010609106,0.00061740953,0.0014809046,0.00031652377,0.00016876418,0.00008672338,0.00022686229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043445837,0.00010594543,0.00004992084,0.00025500846,0.0015749489,0.00022330614,0.000020206096,0.00009014188,0.000075855656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016514509,0.000009626255,0.0002738157,0.000009217675,0.000014991016,0.000035078734,0.004002928,0.00008702701,0.000004779448,0.9937939,0.0005744081,0.0011925512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027374626,0.000011381871,0.0009936597,0.000087588814,0.000014562415,0.00001925117,0.0027681107,0.000005446522,0.0000037756279,0.05162509,0.94402575,0.00017162805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9693642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96461725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024164845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00576586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745694497","doi":"","title":"The Judicial Conceptualization of Culture after Delgamuukw and Van der Peet","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Sovereignty; Law; Politics; Conceptualization; Context (archaeology); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Political science; Sociology; Legal culture; History; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.013735468596793558,"score_gpt":0.2657368160699835,"score_spread":0.25200134747319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745694497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32962614,0.033183936,0.0008766905,0.007856866,0.0007800487,0.001225874,0.0000910454,0.00024385167,0.62611556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891366,0.0063461643,0.00024181906,0.00024569288,0.00027948155,0.000019895053,0.0000072005355,0.0000041546205,0.0037189957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991849,0.000114017486,0.00018218611,0.00015690167,0.00018526839,0.00017674938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995423,0.000078680576,0.000064051346,0.0001112642,0.0001407684,0.000062967774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023673364,0.00009196851,0.00012338058,0.000004004926,0.0011226643,0.00008450586,0.00014419717,0.00015058552,0.00048819988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114388764,0.0000655756,0.000071165705,0.00017500321,0.0022848293,0.00017789844,0.000014343602,0.00009340548,0.000017960101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023811459,0.000029785437,0.0014771655,0.000015351283,0.00003887473,0.0000021564028,0.035860073,0.00017852194,0.000023936638,0.956071,0.0023608007,0.003918517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002549734,0.000018843499,0.0004511684,0.00009059148,0.000060383732,0.000006057168,0.019242708,0.000032128948,0.000042862353,0.013967706,0.9656794,0.00015319555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010266271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011448092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9633186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038600432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014471792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.863474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746322026","doi":"","title":"Legal Modesty and Political Boldness: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in Chaoulli V. Quebec","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Victory; Law; Politics; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Health care; Dispose pattern; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology","score_opus":0.019684977224863873,"score_gpt":0.2691515264457322,"score_spread":0.24946654922086833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746322026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94780296,0.0016609613,0.0003530044,0.014482705,0.00030458512,0.0004818438,0.000036037058,0.000035066143,0.034842808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890196,0.00012440169,0.00024058977,0.000073742056,0.00020031529,0.000017077156,0.0000036192728,0.0000043458367,0.00043397048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856573,0.00012512904,0.00033014503,0.00021600771,0.00035367347,0.0004093013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907595,0.00048373375,0.00007918115,0.0001241312,0.00014484889,0.00009214594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040606948,0.00013435881,0.00025322507,0.000033284723,0.00075104367,0.00006423807,0.00020291399,0.000091274225,0.000022958977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000508619,0.00009576106,0.000049831746,0.0001931436,0.0016242126,0.00016677861,0.00007612045,0.00014031952,0.00000144668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010584458,0.00004334571,0.015107343,0.000017426442,0.000011191704,0.0000098530045,0.0010154225,0.0003635586,0.000049571354,0.98245907,0.0006185107,0.0002940984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020723501,0.000053930686,0.41783884,0.0009250485,0.00013371432,0.000037038,0.07398497,0.0021197214,0.00043437476,0.019631581,0.4816186,0.0011498111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99494267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9628275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005381348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095192774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5984479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747512870","doi":"","title":"Royal succession, abdication, and regency in the realms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abdication; Parliament; Dominion; Law; Humanities; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.04576666992306225,"score_gpt":0.33130244826572774,"score_spread":0.2855357783426655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747512870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5763666,0.0040379358,0.00013379866,0.05718891,0.00061497855,0.0009620293,0.000012071365,0.00009864895,0.36058503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996361,0.0020394332,0.00023638224,0.000099259145,0.0002943019,0.00004905236,0.0000030945146,0.0000031664742,0.00091429043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989404,0.00016744855,0.00020843843,0.00023482271,0.00021997039,0.00022891007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991794,0.00018710164,0.00016525622,0.00029852104,0.00010685814,0.000062833526],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077910256,0.00010758828,0.00015146167,0.000026270642,0.0044014915,0.00030309538,0.00054637453,0.00009054018,0.000054973825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014694629,0.00007246433,0.00004205689,0.000080164864,0.002015364,0.00028693792,0.000096736454,0.0001403706,0.000023233875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000498058,0.000043288237,0.11399221,0.00001959242,0.000013049171,0.000009033411,0.019361207,0.000011718413,0.000019351393,0.862602,0.0013733724,0.002550216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047792814,0.000018043138,0.6388042,0.00025796515,0.000039009956,0.0000069584535,0.031025838,0.000053367214,0.000018866458,0.005492893,0.32348648,0.0003184507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010027607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019081902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85710907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081936894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010124926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748666452","doi":"","title":"An Elusive Search for Community: Globalization and the Canadian National Identities","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Humanities; Political science; Ideology; Welfare state; National identity; Ethnology; Politics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048764536349920666,"score_gpt":0.28166993655341666,"score_spread":0.23290540020349598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748666452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06150074,0.0054254,0.0023394502,0.027385445,0.0013803224,0.0023062697,0.000762358,0.00016898937,0.89873105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964174,0.0006837376,0.00008581602,0.0004499607,0.0002453017,0.00003121497,0.000030855048,0.000003960022,0.0020517374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991228,0.00028023214,0.000116715906,0.00009937134,0.00019513055,0.00018578053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920106,0.00019853906,0.000036000052,0.00010662262,0.00029533714,0.00016242386],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089524325,0.000055427885,0.000091571346,0.00023883289,0.008065286,0.00076651876,0.00021618915,0.00007238703,0.00022636898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003368145,0.00006204828,0.000041027757,0.00018603787,0.0031933691,0.0003248849,0.000014431974,0.00011033724,0.000022169363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003967509,0.000014070389,0.00018629948,0.00001543548,0.00001368428,0.0000010152456,0.015379135,0.0001308104,0.0000018032471,0.9801057,0.0036049502,0.00054315024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007468045,0.000019292576,0.0005771811,0.00004367499,0.000037964455,0.0000137886345,0.018607108,0.0016134374,0.0000017981192,0.019004483,0.959152,0.00018250769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88903016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99835265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9611012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009932808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011724647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750460237","doi":"","title":"Obsèques Prématurées: la Disparition des Minorities Francophones et Autres Illusions Nationalists","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Ethnology; Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.029742632846835704,"score_gpt":0.2478335561691683,"score_spread":0.2180909233223326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750460237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07761703,0.25497139,0.0009141351,0.03039455,0.01086584,0.0008000924,0.0013681919,0.0004223334,0.62264645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8242213,0.061467834,0.0013546584,0.00040803564,0.0011427398,0.000064638865,0.00007129404,0.00002265601,0.11124685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976977,0.0005885118,0.00044721112,0.0004157569,0.00038920878,0.00046159758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848527,0.0005677076,0.00017747394,0.00022660801,0.00026335937,0.00027960064],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048225676,0.00025698732,0.0003402273,0.00048307516,0.003808809,0.00082765525,0.00028221039,0.00035681872,0.008819019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071491266,0.00035544895,0.00025712195,0.00066713215,0.009205723,0.0011796214,0.000066038076,0.0003681936,0.0007496473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043622135,0.00030689343,0.00033861527,0.00042856665,0.00006868665,0.00006663973,0.026402935,0.0002116062,0.000039481532,0.91885674,0.047531318,0.005744182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028190596,0.000023394636,0.002637534,0.001301092,0.00009503481,0.00008003154,0.0063863774,0.00020805196,0.0000062224344,0.010426125,0.97812325,0.0004309748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10598902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6597656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93059194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011070247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006955375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760854242","doi":"","title":"Enduring Eliminatory Logics, Market Rationalities, and Territorial Desires: Assesing the Harper Government´s Legacy Concerning Aboriginal Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Marketization; State (computer science); Treaty; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Context (archaeology); Colonialism; Sociology; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law; Politics; China; Public administration","score_opus":0.024365008147911628,"score_gpt":0.28572592786791196,"score_spread":0.2613609197200003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760854242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6650824,0.0027181082,0.0029297513,0.0026562116,0.007677366,0.0011863325,0.00007670121,0.00019293654,0.31748018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98519975,0.003802127,0.0004940923,0.00004154201,0.004221537,0.000011474476,0.0000046511827,0.00000864184,0.0062162085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808544,0.00040069353,0.00032454132,0.00032197507,0.00044990497,0.000417418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848586,0.00085856643,0.0001842111,0.00018535487,0.00014414915,0.00014186688],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010935694,0.00016963015,0.00017827,0.000041061285,0.0088253,0.00027089304,0.00023740639,0.00013382008,0.000273383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005340317,0.00010334354,0.000057105924,0.00009432634,0.0015115013,0.00077350077,0.0000044903136,0.00013365231,0.000015730571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022673441,0.000040841405,0.002579124,0.000031691714,0.000027611928,0.0000059807207,0.025257226,0.0000026792181,0.000033744374,0.9713569,0.00023591628,0.00040561013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033245937,0.000019194174,0.0013550486,0.00027154383,0.00003326431,0.000016014968,0.004966906,0.00000740526,0.00015869705,0.004583866,0.98804635,0.00020926085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008871499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10735343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98781043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007033804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005796982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762342677","doi":"","title":"a Failed Discourse of Distrust Amid Significant Procedural Change: The Harper Government´s Legacy in Immigration and Refugee Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Immigration; Refugee; Immigration law; Government (linguistics); Immigration policy; Political science; Law; Politics; Sociology; Public administration; Political economy","score_opus":0.02491421388405214,"score_gpt":0.2832272938847591,"score_spread":0.25831308000070696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762342677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819839,0.0004480382,0.0011935416,0.008583767,0.00021162123,0.00088115316,0.00006468671,0.00003776126,0.0065955273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982554,0.00077939255,0.00008504923,0.00008419308,0.00024670677,0.000118961696,0.000010690199,0.0000060284337,0.0004135973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987621,0.0001512109,0.00033751756,0.00024269191,0.000305155,0.00020134303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993642,0.00013248148,0.00018255894,0.00016951168,0.00009248322,0.000058761434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044974827,0.0001321788,0.00017764574,0.000035867815,0.0004100438,0.000097725315,0.00016001961,0.000085035645,0.00006398981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002771336,0.000077423676,0.000055175795,0.00018023486,0.0013707931,0.0009685992,0.000024720879,0.0000744254,0.00000686366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031755608,0.000075780525,0.008251478,0.000025652622,0.00001199689,0.0000010241017,0.010243182,0.0000024210512,0.0035164428,0.9744404,0.00009765688,0.0033022352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005978926,0.0007801115,0.12736133,0.00477995,0.00040950935,0.000031846,0.3106061,0.0014756975,0.023768207,0.021735389,0.5005826,0.0024903845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020355436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0825061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95270497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018385483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015554705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93423575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767351204","doi":"","title":"Harper's Legacy on Federalism: \"Open Federalism\" or Hidden Agenda?","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Cooperative federalism; Charter; Dual federalism; Public administration; New Federalism; Government (linguistics); Political science; State (computer science); Open government; Political economy; Sociology; Politics; Law; Open data","score_opus":0.09872695523220752,"score_gpt":0.3350872457046306,"score_spread":0.23636029047242307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767351204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052073516,0.007553154,0.0018968502,0.27181286,0.01074614,0.002178324,0.00094822823,0.00027641642,0.6525145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79255766,0.0023657181,0.00040208225,0.0026420972,0.0025305944,0.000080457234,0.000006800723,0.000030045476,0.19938453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602765,0.0005628361,0.0007643731,0.00088747294,0.00056947133,0.0011882203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974713,0.0008348474,0.00036729107,0.0005776315,0.00019282111,0.0005561224],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007675796,0.00048618682,0.0007332865,0.000067586974,0.0020134307,0.0012667583,0.0012372072,0.00042307292,0.0038631486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010969803,0.00033843846,0.000281655,0.00040291896,0.0025568197,0.0018045458,0.00033809504,0.00025446812,0.0029281583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008754843,0.00026914277,0.00033875142,0.00010547057,0.000114132585,0.00018779807,0.0010146246,0.0000072020935,0.00011969825,0.9361134,0.043345705,0.018296497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001223029,0.00016049918,0.000698018,0.0029885948,0.000058209807,0.00007471932,0.0008283218,0.000013857025,0.0001717464,0.007366784,0.98576427,0.00065195205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03233106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016320232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9424186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097533804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013712227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909059062","doi":"","title":"An Autonomy-Based Approach to Section 15(1) of the Charter","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Charter; Section (typography); Plaintiff; Law; Test (biology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.031028321625016623,"score_gpt":0.26764931251597757,"score_spread":0.23662099089096095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909059062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6738052,0.006537229,0.03149989,0.022441978,0.008471376,0.0031750894,0.00019057433,0.00030102176,0.25357765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908078,0.000033450826,0.0039435164,0.00025280507,0.0017785616,0.000053617903,0.00001534608,0.000011805089,0.0031031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979284,0.00031129376,0.0004918691,0.0004328617,0.00037265447,0.0004629439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998867,0.00013034564,0.00024789403,0.00033268917,0.000288741,0.00013334205],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000578367,0.00026337526,0.000348233,0.000065081585,0.0013411153,0.00009024605,0.00044938183,0.00027014932,0.00009397364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108204724,0.00020699164,0.00025465194,0.0007700215,0.0024395874,0.0003055988,0.00007043289,0.00024150121,0.00005184623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002059828,0.0007902549,0.009001111,0.00020313702,0.0000749243,0.0000015953626,0.009914445,0.03077285,0.0015741693,0.94383675,0.0014183313,0.0023918308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009657991,0.00016148122,0.067438826,0.00073003036,0.00034005134,0.000012936883,0.016889522,0.0054595456,0.0023523963,0.00093050336,0.9037152,0.0010036916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009468019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004714115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94290626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068335375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041717253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909747325","doi":"","title":"Th e Protective Function of the Constitutional Amending Formula","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Parliament; Legislature; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Politics; Power (physics); Enumerated powers; Interpretation (philosophy); Separation of powers; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.05151756309056284,"score_gpt":0.29775353075041033,"score_spread":0.2462359676598475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909747325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102018625,0.00093869836,0.015665635,0.0062660887,0.0036514562,0.0016306366,0.00010189152,0.00013995983,0.869587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988502,0.00014369917,0.00014396114,0.00006897661,0.00049461,0.00006010639,0.0000024095548,0.0000033097479,0.0002326835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987385,0.00009200589,0.0002759164,0.00024531435,0.00038065488,0.00026757244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881446,0.000119785196,0.0003731701,0.00032510233,0.00029979268,0.0000676893],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047570857,0.0001418502,0.00022322506,0.000053459764,0.0073963273,0.000118116615,0.00052858476,0.000102970465,0.00008445983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011710473,0.00011000772,0.00018433286,0.00014104151,0.010978904,0.0004300097,0.00019094576,0.0001688429,0.000026951113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027764825,0.00005355885,0.010611136,0.000013602065,0.00008090592,0.000001817514,0.0006582858,0.000094548275,0.00032370372,0.9868603,0.00009821368,0.0011762165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019477127,0.00013339784,0.13950102,0.0016409468,0.00044422617,0.000036869373,0.013952483,0.00009587121,0.0018717363,0.41903967,0.42029688,0.0010391597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017483233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027471185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89683163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018254078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089098787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911083342","doi":"","title":"Spending Power, Social Policy, and the Principle of Subsidiarity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; Welfare state; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); State action; Social policy; Action (physics); Public administration; Economics; Welfare; Law; European union; Economic policy; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05304713381432047,"score_gpt":0.34606081555692536,"score_spread":0.2930136817426049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911083342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53193575,0.00030281313,0.00006369353,0.016325785,0.00041312655,0.00036848837,0.00002319354,0.000042162766,0.450525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980526,0.0002742357,0.000057327405,0.000067564615,0.0011820158,0.0000071435716,0.0000011172547,0.000004193798,0.00035380758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990872,0.00015232511,0.00019116861,0.00015638491,0.00020339842,0.00020952761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992707,0.00014745157,0.00023303882,0.00020093126,0.000079843965,0.000068070716],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008382802,0.00009153238,0.00023449831,0.00004014051,0.0045346864,0.00020515728,0.00042683983,0.00010406242,0.0000308283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001406735,0.00007178175,0.00011581641,0.00008047465,0.0057501295,0.00027804452,0.00016733026,0.00013115144,0.000008493955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030361974,0.000025286907,0.0037136492,0.0000146636385,0.00002614309,0.0000023747355,0.008276491,7.9290555e-7,0.00002853798,0.987597,0.000014730775,0.00026995412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003977086,0.000045062076,0.0873869,0.0001951943,0.0001540484,0.000011384142,0.008961101,0.00003485826,0.00029141305,0.5610467,0.33722427,0.0006719437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043559577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019762316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46611685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006930743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035355793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99695563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911163197","doi":"","title":"Placing Vulnerability at the Centre of Section 15(1) of the Charter: A Case Comment on Inglis V British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Charter; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Section (typography); Law; Order (exchange); Vulnerability assessment; Political science; Public administration; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Psychological resilience; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.059604692739547493,"score_gpt":0.2800088711088762,"score_spread":0.22040417836932868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911163197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782495,0.00027912302,0.00001787608,0.008449071,0.00056275004,0.00069790444,0.00011847024,0.000023710776,0.011601606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907404,0.000079408084,0.000036149504,0.00012275526,0.00012202642,0.000015538331,0.000004948594,0.0000041911485,0.0005409482],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981698,0.00059177156,0.0004578291,0.00020188346,0.0003688695,0.00020985387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844116,0.0004016991,0.00037027066,0.00025444635,0.00045404906,0.00007837131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011278628,0.00009689375,0.000287521,0.000016107118,0.0012875156,0.00007926132,0.0002327891,0.000094201496,0.00011778571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013440356,0.00008100855,0.00015614823,0.00027997934,0.0022513848,0.00013405831,0.00017571705,0.0001470703,0.000002001694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002073427,0.0018773677,0.56347966,0.00084516197,0.00081539317,0.0000759388,0.24671444,0.0014183172,0.0007939581,0.1308028,0.03899611,0.013973489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030766423,0.0002726152,0.046127573,0.0015979909,0.0003119451,0.00023552668,0.26625708,0.00017470683,0.0011372508,0.00054016453,0.6795958,0.0006726621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06273236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41620597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6405997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047600246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017202216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99026597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911209324","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of the \"No Hierarchy of Constitutional Rights\" Doctrine","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Constitution; Hierarchy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.019014728724406037,"score_gpt":0.2685540167596146,"score_spread":0.24953928803520856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911209324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32884428,0.03853031,0.005251187,0.0063370927,0.0062308866,0.0011599094,0.0021113392,0.00011170469,0.6114233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962043,0.0007179406,0.00056829106,0.00006716774,0.00088810286,0.00001813605,0.000064818225,0.0000044870626,0.0014667689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969882,0.0003868991,0.0010070294,0.00045945434,0.00071105827,0.0004473795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975441,0.00039098805,0.00060009793,0.00043836303,0.0009044312,0.0001220335],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048102858,0.00031024232,0.0008222119,0.0003072361,0.0014885509,0.000038266764,0.00066954613,0.00023527199,0.00079938717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001957975,0.00025213716,0.00073917175,0.0028281177,0.028875861,0.00037160583,0.00012990976,0.00022799901,0.000045274537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034071814,0.00068713725,0.033729598,0.000056931793,0.0010770119,0.000007385244,0.00040090497,0.015633104,0.00041749227,0.94738436,0.00033527205,0.00023676004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001491726,0.00023191853,0.08372135,0.0012850268,0.0094180005,0.000037894406,0.0025876046,0.00316422,0.0014581386,0.18866546,0.7066562,0.0012824519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028470313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014735888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75871885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002571416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012625966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912097679","doi":"","title":"\"Providing Essential Services of Reasonable Quality to All Canadians\": Understanding Section 36(1)(c) of the Constitution Act, 1982","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Underpinning; Law; Section (typography); Order (exchange); Political science; Quality (philosophy); Sanitation; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.110776023013309,"score_gpt":0.2567147494172821,"score_spread":0.14593872640397312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912097679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6199445,0.0050305175,0.033920094,0.0055545433,0.004766537,0.0013288527,0.001178791,0.000113529226,0.32816264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899536,0.000078792385,0.00034186512,0.00017990633,0.00017293243,0.000020131494,0.000018515904,0.0000061488695,0.00018634133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985008,0.000041372532,0.00074611703,0.00034420288,0.000111627676,0.00025584546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884033,0.00007488322,0.0004930465,0.00028927415,0.00016201986,0.00014042636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063892576,0.00017490955,0.00044335713,0.00016983903,0.0003271186,0.00004645045,0.00029112803,0.00010540134,0.000031240128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025821192,0.00016488432,0.0001575377,0.00045527023,0.0005973641,0.00031141008,0.00013350144,0.00012620288,0.000026273437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050212002,0.00006241543,0.029841065,0.00017095465,0.00012238794,0.0000014799222,0.00085608626,0.0038049568,0.0003643429,0.964469,0.00023183295,0.000025234922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006383837,0.0004361976,0.035806403,0.0029848542,0.00044396234,0.00021521962,0.029945122,0.0036214073,0.010365046,0.22456895,0.6822702,0.0029587888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02903495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013913887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7399001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059138023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041052568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97743076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913374802","doi":"","title":"All I Really Needed to Know about Federalism, I Learned from Insurance Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Constitution; Public law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06509475405411932,"score_gpt":0.3207575643447488,"score_spread":0.2556628102906294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913374802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18476477,0.002263908,0.00063563563,0.06237737,0.0019365054,0.0006738818,0.000199601,0.00030807132,0.74684024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919173,0.0022267215,0.0007679568,0.002969682,0.0012677487,0.00006136333,0.000021381733,0.000011032693,0.00075681944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981133,0.000117562595,0.00035215,0.00051749323,0.00039704173,0.00050250266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985298,0.00019007313,0.00021556378,0.00049381383,0.00028292724,0.0002878063],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039557432,0.00024167086,0.00039317444,0.00005606378,0.006603788,0.0006868839,0.0008350132,0.00016726064,0.00014151837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094649027,0.0002457138,0.00015679539,0.00011895919,0.0028416398,0.00051067217,0.00024225115,0.00019192358,0.00048658723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000506007,0.000070600414,0.0041339486,0.000006578303,0.00009345065,0.000030850442,0.002866079,0.00008264081,0.00033264185,0.9874063,0.0024969133,0.0024293873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049817015,0.00002571023,0.0114206,0.00039023135,0.000046939942,0.0000031749485,0.003161284,0.000006398267,0.00015559475,0.039805546,0.9440287,0.00045766152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1566541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.124391295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9476008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017668292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004385368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952624205","doi":"","title":"Reframing the Constitutional Questions on the 2008 Prorogation: Debates, Dialogue, and Boundary Drawing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02362546378898004,"score_gpt":0.2682723839868981,"score_spread":0.2446469201979181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952624205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118233934,0.0060882755,0.03960049,0.12460226,0.0032029292,0.0024434538,0.00017250548,0.0004427373,0.7052134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973714,0.00021973538,0.0001397094,0.00079070946,0.0008195758,0.00006282786,0.000006237904,0.0000041339563,0.00058570714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986114,0.00033892365,0.00023608323,0.00023013417,0.00028275748,0.00030070543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821514,0.0012549424,0.000108006214,0.000210827,0.0001042876,0.00010682288],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010920718,0.00012428542,0.00014152909,0.00002558044,0.0038245253,0.0002606798,0.00023080278,0.00008792212,0.000047875474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022190493,0.00007794318,0.0000568727,0.00017238077,0.0052467464,0.00018638196,0.00004674668,0.00020280428,0.00005676521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031223612,0.000021496982,0.001066091,0.00001041191,0.000014099348,0.0000017539652,0.0008425575,0.00008903462,0.000018794874,0.9963839,0.0007062201,0.0008424931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014161441,0.00001942287,0.0032555158,0.0002865557,0.00001985793,0.00002162636,0.0007738772,0.00025966746,0.000021044341,0.023153724,0.9718967,0.00015041063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015762179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022979865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9732302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012545625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004569825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99747235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978324001","doi":"","title":"Is Originalism Bad for Women? the Curious Case of Canada's \"Equal Rights Amendment.\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Ratification; Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Constitution; Political science; Law; Original meaning; Meaning (existential); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027682851914534415,"score_gpt":0.29895921376263684,"score_spread":0.27127636184810244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978324001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91371346,0.0012687522,0.0014577259,0.02220156,0.0017496503,0.0018602926,0.00025515142,0.00011592584,0.057377465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971417,0.00007993825,0.00030680516,0.00038428558,0.00043777807,0.00013115606,0.0000037212646,0.0000057045295,0.001508902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985301,0.00016210531,0.0003139176,0.00025458043,0.0002757996,0.0004634909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998582,0.0006288933,0.00019222802,0.00019460253,0.00026060521,0.00014165264],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006483932,0.0001688833,0.00029196023,0.000025362182,0.0025635988,0.00006146697,0.00028481698,0.00007698462,0.00010834526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043535786,0.00011457064,0.00010259829,0.00017129257,0.0011579848,0.00011156166,0.00004899811,0.00010351249,0.0000055867567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147687015,0.000041636333,0.00024104303,0.000052531395,0.000104940686,0.000022395283,0.027291602,0.00006502344,0.00003341231,0.9651766,0.0064867386,0.00046932412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047623718,0.000041951196,0.00007767527,0.000056347282,0.000050390194,0.00003149854,0.016849307,0.00009178066,0.00018478282,0.007394412,0.97451407,0.00023153762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50073606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81071067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96802735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059483066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005254378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99873495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993318716","doi":"","title":"The Charter at 30: A Reflection","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitutionalism; Transformative learning; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Politics; State (computer science); Constitutional law; Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.05762100584181712,"score_gpt":0.3022370486789722,"score_spread":0.2446160428371551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993318716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041989453,0.19519655,0.00069344166,0.047693677,0.02557481,0.0007076412,0.000057730605,0.00018296651,0.6879037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95168763,0.018713,0.0000839128,0.00041108357,0.008165723,0.00007885798,0.0000072584075,0.000010862993,0.020841692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976787,0.00029499037,0.0004187174,0.0003002622,0.0003890854,0.000918276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867094,0.00044924012,0.00019041251,0.00023469958,0.00019451062,0.0002602054],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009250454,0.0002712387,0.000271845,0.000045797482,0.0073680175,0.00012323151,0.00028342387,0.00023315557,0.0008802953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031294642,0.00022016357,0.00023021513,0.00048289212,0.0061853114,0.0005128762,0.00018447013,0.0002676737,0.0028018102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002237841,0.00014277436,0.00570759,0.000021397618,0.00015193259,0.000004365408,0.003134351,0.000020537658,0.000083307394,0.9726896,0.010555898,0.007465825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018661194,0.000027595526,0.0022447715,0.00017913901,0.0001345413,0.000057983227,0.0031813607,0.000016274971,0.00004126456,0.0067371186,0.98689574,0.0002976025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014301602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038443422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9763398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008126068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033224365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99797463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994570748","doi":"","title":"Between Despair and Denial: What to Do About the Canadian Senate","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Institution; Oligarchy; Clientelism; Politics; Law; Art; Democracy","score_opus":0.024725012347201834,"score_gpt":0.2565780905670746,"score_spread":0.23185307821987275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994570748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64035845,0.022965254,0.0002507495,0.16393119,0.0020229255,0.0016164924,0.000106300584,0.00022628524,0.16852234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944544,0.0015127404,0.00019550639,0.0009936473,0.0008839806,0.000015976513,0.0000025919626,0.0000067711803,0.0019343916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990138,0.00009353445,0.000159793,0.00021607759,0.00016731184,0.00034951026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990853,0.000090854584,0.000040812865,0.00017425987,0.000079949925,0.00052879506],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004912568,0.00009193593,0.00013430252,0.00031409645,0.0037017239,0.0016262743,0.00025902165,0.00010634528,0.00013650785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018731784,0.000098802586,0.000052448322,0.00028509978,0.0014301141,0.0004746088,0.0000311252,0.00013572989,0.00022833639],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003232001,0.0000095330715,0.00577205,0.000015886711,0.000035833793,0.000017620061,0.021241276,0.00011010557,0.000009461454,0.9104835,0.008700955,0.05360057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000776379,0.000004829618,0.005454771,0.00010029788,0.000025171043,0.000006225454,0.003267593,0.000003134504,0.0000041505227,0.00029720055,0.9906153,0.00014369506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8219667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98191434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001184485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021474466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003446422","doi":"","title":"“Our Time has Come”: Reconciliation in the Wake of Manitoba Metis Federation Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Wake; Law; Political science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.04242219489150786,"score_gpt":0.21400494660337582,"score_spread":0.17158275171186796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003446422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97011775,0.00008711732,0.0002718527,0.002515807,0.0006391809,0.0004590195,0.000016102658,0.000044210803,0.025848962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971376,0.000009376424,0.00015496105,0.00074517954,0.0015425318,0.000018666722,0.00014318351,0.000009018462,0.00023946977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989474,0.000034211123,0.0004003832,0.00022603219,0.00021292405,0.00017904895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991458,0.00004101724,0.0002697605,0.0002389072,0.0002938246,0.000010702457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035204008,0.00015638098,0.00021541757,0.00012822449,0.00055018143,0.00027107412,0.00025260122,0.00006126573,0.00015422753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042368294,0.00012314689,0.000042100834,0.0002611044,0.00016784549,0.00049473095,0.000051429077,0.00009352356,0.00012965026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025217343,0.000080936865,0.008138283,0.00011310274,0.000030567247,0.00001812703,0.00013719985,0.00018751505,0.0011686914,0.9753715,0.013954114,0.0007747556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017909132,0.00006091673,0.049745146,0.0004481225,0.0001938288,0.000040929648,0.0020233218,0.014916811,0.00084403704,0.025763232,0.903247,0.00092574797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16944198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9234384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94960827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012541385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029563747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8360888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003533152","doi":"","title":"Seven Conceptions of Federalism Guiding Canada’s Constitutional Change Process — How Do They Work, and Why So Many?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Work (physics); Process (computing); Political science; Work in process; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Operations management; Politics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.07644061034517834,"score_gpt":0.29066818111192455,"score_spread":0.2142275707667462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003533152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52187943,0.010385997,0.005361644,0.10050601,0.0044999523,0.002890838,0.00071528525,0.00039511968,0.35336572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972047,0.00060471176,0.00022295119,0.000587881,0.0011494065,0.00007201707,0.000014656479,0.0000059047425,0.00013774485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834824,0.00011154484,0.00031105307,0.00036971047,0.00045641977,0.00040305755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998661,0.00018491589,0.00019895245,0.00014262111,0.00063894835,0.0001735523],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036630107,0.00021510095,0.00034197705,0.00009084552,0.003144134,0.00016035806,0.0002593872,0.000111604626,0.00009379966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043097956,0.00020937424,0.00007503031,0.00031505822,0.010447509,0.00037497326,0.00010053506,0.00010697204,0.000007057404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017975826,0.000039825474,0.011938185,0.000028620114,0.0000829048,0.0000092173195,0.0053667105,0.000012212777,0.000037503833,0.980041,0.0016461095,0.0007797208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011362084,0.000098635755,0.012085872,0.0013569081,0.00023891023,0.0000671299,0.037676457,0.000028001163,0.00020934276,0.041053966,0.90490305,0.0011455286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15159851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56850773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9389871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022395192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00278531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010910867","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Reconciliation and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.018190510594717966,"score_gpt":0.2363692416486264,"score_spread":0.21817873105390845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010910867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35062155,0.0050731814,0.0003235836,0.011603458,0.001148307,0.0012036967,0.00009605016,0.000051336923,0.6298788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894404,0.00038501888,0.00010132575,0.0001820733,0.00017217941,0.000017756267,0.000006325834,0.0000013641505,0.00018992269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990968,0.000096874974,0.00022106932,0.00019450145,0.00019557419,0.00019514802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992389,0.00027356792,0.00009215216,0.00009524031,0.00018731177,0.00011283764],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057196635,0.000101986436,0.0002194183,0.00005787094,0.0014475932,0.000058668036,0.00010636039,0.00008927365,0.00013215379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019059192,0.00007582117,0.000048964914,0.00014093288,0.010425387,0.00017910724,0.000033727883,0.000096771466,0.00003488737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019892886,0.00000864798,0.012832677,0.000009305797,0.00004322081,0.0000013538956,0.0015641,0.0000126542955,0.000015307112,0.9850957,0.000086214604,0.00031094052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040349034,0.00006370768,0.023575576,0.00047746132,0.00019210296,0.000069887436,0.006268987,0.00034537935,0.00005105833,0.34475142,0.6195277,0.0006418128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23257208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5340602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64832246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103250575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068781775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010917512","doi":"","title":"UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Treaty Federalism in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Indigenous; Treaty; Federalism; Political science; Indigenous rights; Law; Public administration; Environmental protection; Human rights; Geography; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.015717865432685177,"score_gpt":0.220735898784385,"score_spread":0.20501803335169982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010917512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676482,0.00023681871,0.000011063172,0.0008647337,0.00018745671,0.00053965417,0.000021417078,0.000011640425,0.030478993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991467,0.00029745544,0.000039352748,0.00011346775,0.00006394558,0.000011974248,0.000008111829,0.0000041838143,0.0003148043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989337,0.00015483107,0.00023834137,0.00019505626,0.00022133639,0.00025678115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991871,0.00041519,0.00011226192,0.00016756232,0.0000621812,0.000055697477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030849993,0.00011595166,0.00020552815,0.000060489514,0.0010195326,0.000056585453,0.00016992186,0.00007483289,0.00017242372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042881373,0.00007696722,0.000035340792,0.00017839583,0.0003000613,0.000103943756,0.00001682055,0.000104828476,0.000010216955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012186351,0.000043122116,0.022592785,0.000019939276,0.000017389257,0.000008604552,0.029324044,0.00014569056,0.00003941749,0.9475379,0.000031465708,0.00022746234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004990285,0.0006559033,0.30802247,0.002092208,0.00024761536,0.00011333687,0.2263545,0.00057190465,0.0075029354,0.05279572,0.39374492,0.0029082065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93756497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8947422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003731428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026609122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78415227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010980273","doi":"","title":"Legal Pluralism and Caron v Alberta: A Canadian Case Study in Constitutional Interpretation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional interpretation; Pluralism (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Legal pluralism; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Linguistics","score_opus":0.022329250960339067,"score_gpt":0.29011812915191926,"score_spread":0.2677888781915802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010980273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622471,0.00039273678,0.00001695718,0.0018739174,0.0005696077,0.0012444613,0.000025061772,0.000033119813,0.033597067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883497,0.000037034584,0.00008959409,0.00013006643,0.00010365086,0.00008955681,0.000010526932,0.000004858412,0.00069972116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847674,0.00026253532,0.0002991688,0.0003666303,0.00022710724,0.00036780725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992409,0.00024181235,0.0000822176,0.00011793709,0.00012318828,0.00019397981],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004321017,0.00017150208,0.0002695577,0.00015999225,0.0013914842,0.00013832178,0.00014111697,0.000088100045,0.00008898629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026747963,0.00017060248,0.000053892487,0.0002791566,0.0012560427,0.0004109627,0.00007923077,0.00022741825,0.000046103956],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019230021,0.00010136982,0.20101409,0.000020026775,0.00006595158,0.000767984,0.069983535,0.0010740227,0.000018415674,0.72634,0.00009531811,0.0005000515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003448111,0.00023680157,0.027521068,0.0003556854,0.0001524376,0.0018288939,0.81685555,0.0018031851,0.0000062490067,0.00044580447,0.14607781,0.0012684204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86075026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96629953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.746872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009221509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089703634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121691978","doi":"","title":"Conceptual Metaphors for an Unfinished Constitution","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Humanities; Elaboration; Narrative; Philosophy; Metaphor; Political science; Sociology; Law; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07686921584781906,"score_gpt":0.31981230334428523,"score_spread":0.24294308749646618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121691978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26744482,0.051877655,0.096710786,0.051072218,0.0347977,0.008821117,0.0012484085,0.0015116187,0.48651567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98331225,0.0016451188,0.0073294905,0.00047389275,0.0026705891,0.00021492579,0.000111675196,0.000021609721,0.0042204424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962725,0.00074279297,0.0007665828,0.00085381116,0.00042866686,0.0009356229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714655,0.0010035693,0.00038930846,0.00037332525,0.00063351175,0.00045371134],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013935283,0.00052237127,0.0008116688,0.000082897255,0.0031405094,0.00024449936,0.00053801667,0.0005193486,0.0003529785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020740186,0.0005153728,0.00043942095,0.0004806971,0.012650796,0.001058627,0.000105303654,0.00032039915,0.0002732288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004104097,0.00026193427,0.00059495587,0.0001196324,0.0002377223,0.0000028903842,0.011519038,0.0009728695,0.000244242,0.9760524,0.0026699302,0.007283342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012609499,0.0003120813,0.00027692708,0.00031953483,0.00048116405,0.000015401574,0.0248251,0.0013932919,0.00021063689,0.0054732333,0.9646528,0.0007788968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002912396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050290534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97057915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005507809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048939534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121707458","doi":"","title":"Drawing Lines in the Sand: Parliament's Jurisdiction to Consider Upstream and Downstream Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions in Interprovincial Pipeline Project Reviews","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Parliament; Greenhouse gas; Context (archaeology); Upstream (networking); Statutory law; Downstream (manufacturing); Legislation; Law; Energy law; Statutory interpretation; Government (linguistics); Political science; Economics; Business; Environmental law; Engineering; Politics; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.03909174575767575,"score_gpt":0.328515197735583,"score_spread":0.28942345197790725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121707458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9292699,0.0025531005,0.00072294293,0.032238204,0.0006630053,0.0030302727,0.0001694383,0.000093752096,0.03125936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99456334,0.00216172,0.00031756857,0.0015474712,0.00092482206,0.000089384754,0.0000042894076,0.0000071389018,0.0003842787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984526,0.00028521323,0.00042881817,0.00032507416,0.00016261866,0.00034567737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992621,0.00021651581,0.00012667301,0.0002188874,0.000056932557,0.00011888854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092120003,0.00016339245,0.0002634511,0.00019096147,0.00051349436,0.00012514982,0.00022351345,0.000104271334,0.000040727315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014058312,0.00012994002,0.000058969697,0.0005765526,0.0008082273,0.00022349003,0.00005096004,0.00018049245,0.000026457788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037520737,0.0009299738,0.08519257,0.0003115394,0.000051800806,0.00020431375,0.26832268,0.00015791104,0.00076655793,0.27971613,0.17947485,0.18449645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052609236,0.000087298984,0.0022457181,0.0012049486,0.000026706832,0.000031906256,0.0054832497,0.00013378597,0.00007317509,0.0006999475,0.98920214,0.00028503532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07336305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57585895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8097273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019806044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006686234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9328075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123045901","doi":"","title":"Socrates, Odysseus, and Federalism","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Dual federalism; Sovereignty; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Solidarity; Law and economics; Sociology; Autonomy; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01836034113240403,"score_gpt":0.2200242575580009,"score_spread":0.20166391642559686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123045901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0958478,0.20466426,0.0004674309,0.09927699,0.007754608,0.0011667251,0.0001544685,0.00021198986,0.5904557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81302756,0.028375868,0.00059787324,0.00080933963,0.0012169122,0.00004303248,0.000015630087,0.000016534392,0.15589726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859464,0.0001427943,0.00028866075,0.00035350345,0.00017210722,0.00044826863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990677,0.00011111651,0.000110591995,0.0001841924,0.00014042955,0.00038592718],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021007276,0.00017701423,0.0002615238,0.00022308837,0.0024975976,0.0012139863,0.00019651056,0.0002490413,0.005715691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012309704,0.00024847078,0.0001036009,0.0003107957,0.005390102,0.00060457306,0.000060792117,0.00021792941,0.0020108316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013222324,0.00004271917,0.00031205366,0.00011497569,0.00004210057,0.000023460785,0.0031319286,0.000012714275,0.00006673374,0.90806836,0.072540246,0.015643397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020383178,0.000018932127,0.0007854992,0.00028702492,0.000061532766,0.000049241884,0.0027967833,0.00010576323,0.000002723868,0.013661346,0.9817137,0.0003136267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3702619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48254168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9091734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006891522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010823178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123088121","doi":"","title":"Marital rape, polygamy, and prostitution: tradibg sex equality for agency and choice?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Autonomy; Law; Charter; Criminology; Doctrine; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0365480915880803,"score_gpt":0.2997919318510741,"score_spread":0.2632438402629938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123088121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9112532,0.013578084,0.0021831142,0.0069590956,0.0008734174,0.0024635626,0.000024790941,0.0002841911,0.062380515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99334675,0.0019241791,0.0013639225,0.00010716232,0.0004736208,0.00011348391,0.000015552941,0.000008190671,0.0026471221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987797,0.00010103104,0.00027462552,0.0003581144,0.00014620682,0.00034029875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991602,0.00029905475,0.00008535188,0.00014224241,0.00011145506,0.00020170509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040360435,0.00016566564,0.00023674234,0.0000718974,0.0011256657,0.00024850128,0.00013207697,0.00021573821,0.0001535566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033411282,0.00015258757,0.000065547574,0.0001823702,0.0016067219,0.000413988,0.00004488829,0.00013223029,0.000022442111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015480085,0.00013255596,0.028047103,0.00017373,0.00010899383,0.000004524647,0.022143546,0.0000124298085,0.00048602538,0.92606235,0.0009995914,0.021813681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027010092,0.00023779544,0.041417547,0.0005805023,0.00028097187,0.00008816623,0.030818122,0.0009099788,0.0003201475,0.04617708,0.87509024,0.0013784459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013612799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027702018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87988526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050829745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019445767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8657824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123992025","doi":"","title":"Meaningless mantra: substantive equality after Withler","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mantra; Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Substantive due process; Relevance (law); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09327847133984746,"score_gpt":0.3019885457289145,"score_spread":0.20871007438906702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123992025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6361338,0.0016576113,0.0012882618,0.00080014626,0.0008435977,0.0006847677,0.000036828744,0.00032694032,0.35822803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964315,0.00046071564,0.001764954,0.00012120029,0.00032244317,0.0000760437,0.000004134568,0.0000106206335,0.0008083846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981907,0.00024814915,0.00033299506,0.00040087572,0.00033183012,0.0004954549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906224,0.00013598547,0.00014473737,0.0002010085,0.00028803208,0.00016798358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000565028,0.0002248821,0.00031520546,0.000046316134,0.0012032959,0.00008417672,0.00030446096,0.00015820643,0.0006097624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032558278,0.00019301588,0.00015450701,0.00028258163,0.002094587,0.0004165058,0.000096804564,0.00019102881,0.00022267492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056507546,0.00012646546,0.025637439,0.000034960904,0.00011680737,0.00003995446,0.08202897,0.000005164645,0.000052392435,0.89122844,0.0001338168,0.00053910975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023960515,0.00018239331,0.27852872,0.0012238884,0.00061052316,0.000032937958,0.2612691,0.000050116367,0.0023197345,0.014691545,0.43552807,0.003166943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039726966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010693301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87653685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002577253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014920863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9254901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124744549","doi":"","title":"Bedford, Substantive Rationality, and Participatory Democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Democracy; Substantive due process; Proportionality (law); Arbitrariness; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.14809269231020933,"score_gpt":0.3561527374694569,"score_spread":0.2080600451592476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124744549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9252752,0.0035610916,0.0006986262,0.012115682,0.0006218874,0.0006153915,0.000026474894,0.00020931527,0.05687631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745023,0.0004738021,0.0010370108,0.00013590477,0.00033608364,0.000032415253,0.000008270566,0.0000052629157,0.0005210027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987028,0.00020732902,0.00023657642,0.00025390257,0.00030385584,0.00029550475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989992,0.00023583559,0.00009551515,0.000102377155,0.00031713123,0.0002499677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067948014,0.00013583519,0.00020911518,0.00003230192,0.0012703004,0.0001142185,0.00013627947,0.00009198767,0.000050789447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011443221,0.00012201222,0.000054647666,0.00018793713,0.0017703623,0.00040914473,0.00008443744,0.000108825356,0.00006841177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013794668,0.000045374174,0.04785086,0.0000142225945,0.00004883835,0.000008478656,0.018769346,0.000049985592,0.000040174753,0.9316727,0.0009892066,0.00049699744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002235936,0.00010604872,0.06200072,0.00028255992,0.000254726,0.000024186496,0.13857433,0.00032436047,0.00030641214,0.05186423,0.7427824,0.0012440972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012194846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041389707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8798085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023233674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035408966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97702515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W317032748","doi":"","title":"The Role of International Law in Shaping Canada's Response to Terrorism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025092937728276223,"score_gpt":0.27907163330456053,"score_spread":0.25397869557628433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W317032748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6634737,0.006949868,0.000061319355,0.00964703,0.0014430638,0.00033414763,0.00003143535,0.000027966293,0.31803143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990362,0.0001922371,0.00012897329,0.00014546038,0.00020023843,0.000016359627,0.0000010729672,0.0000022681318,0.00027722397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910975,0.00016664792,0.00019937931,0.000095991294,0.00019474115,0.0002334967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992337,0.00047993442,0.000042757318,0.000105593856,0.00006171636,0.0000762612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009841003,0.00006333384,0.00010203826,0.000040297837,0.0005609219,0.000015125632,0.0002048305,0.00003111955,0.000029285451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074916275,0.00005300164,0.000031784348,0.0001452275,0.00043297774,0.0001218203,0.00006485639,0.00006608289,0.0000071382387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086208805,0.000022890908,0.019894967,0.0000029453088,0.000018143357,0.000002027144,0.011153693,0.00007798657,0.00021470689,0.96768606,0.00017466357,0.0006657143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010194228,0.000008131936,0.011242029,0.00007064407,0.0000053046037,0.0000021797111,0.043844633,0.000014310271,0.00015057203,0.0014133519,0.94305116,0.00009576529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26886043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8898912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9662727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001830861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033018703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7360083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35712514","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2022.912935","title":"The Power of a Single Feather: Meech Lake, Indigenous Resistance and the Evolution of Indigenous Politics in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; National Institutes of Health; Jiangsu Province's Key Provincial Talents Program; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Ethnology; Political science; Colonialism; Resistance (ecology); Geography; Humanities; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Art; Ecology","score_opus":0.013923392017161168,"score_gpt":0.1929432388257847,"score_spread":0.17901984680862354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35712514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8991809,0.013442859,0.00006401442,0.00039317922,0.0003491563,0.00055434427,0.00009313107,0.000011146275,0.08591126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984067,0.0006823405,0.000050398554,0.000019140603,0.000024619723,0.000008979654,8.3441944e-7,0.0000036413448,0.00080331234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906427,0.00014923165,0.0002648662,0.00010906648,0.00018502978,0.00022755517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992807,0.00020621323,0.0001693342,0.00017782724,0.00010813547,0.00005781542],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004612466,0.000063770734,0.00016487496,0.000113650116,0.0009488171,0.000035003362,0.00024030142,0.0000528756,0.000027230471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002417728,0.000055085173,0.000039274848,0.0002654628,0.002905765,0.000070751434,0.000023262768,0.00008785759,9.336772e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003277119,0.000038842427,0.0063111302,0.000031017385,0.00002346526,0.000007819139,0.08559378,0.000006211071,0.000022225226,0.9076171,0.0001079761,0.00020767252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022344934,0.0001015578,0.07828926,0.0006573737,0.00016842231,0.00003095138,0.28403318,0.000005631447,0.00021614297,0.038669586,0.59494156,0.00065182644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99996287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8689475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016778824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063156034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W565867575","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalizing everything: the role of \"Charter values\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Normative; United Nations Charter; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.025182750580389688,"score_gpt":0.26079776554921974,"score_spread":0.23561501496883006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W565867575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08339204,0.008288904,0.0015778465,0.008560182,0.0010990459,0.0011207142,0.000033922333,0.00019301064,0.8957343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979061,0.000528467,0.00037068245,0.00029174262,0.0004988735,0.0000856136,0.0000057970724,0.0000049541295,0.00030776832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846244,0.00015565059,0.00038497362,0.00024615123,0.0004088519,0.00034196113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870694,0.00039621172,0.0001669693,0.00020346137,0.00042450498,0.000101904974],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004888314,0.0001609409,0.00025004102,0.00007352541,0.002020662,0.00009458917,0.00038388208,0.0000999589,0.0005695989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050086697,0.00012326444,0.00016306812,0.00032795066,0.0050305463,0.00039902536,0.000101095146,0.00015924334,0.00030318912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042221463,0.00005575601,0.0070278617,0.0000075983285,0.00007368562,0.0000015895431,0.0025587836,0.000087843626,0.000502948,0.9873807,0.0006198103,0.0016792093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034733463,0.000028432387,0.0048104567,0.00029188895,0.00010955431,0.000028033632,0.033637375,0.000118100776,0.0004897665,0.36608928,0.59361815,0.00043159275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070969253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007510457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91451406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108353335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068151474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W590513691","doi":"","title":"The crown's powers of command-in chief: interpreting section 15 of Canada's constitution act, 1867","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Constitution; Parliament; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Inherent powers; Executive power; Enumerated powers; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Power (physics); Politics; Physics; Business","score_opus":0.01650949747553831,"score_gpt":0.2627808881610433,"score_spread":0.24627139068550497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W590513691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74637383,0.00050879066,0.00048757694,0.0073635387,0.0017202914,0.00094053586,0.000041605745,0.000043184595,0.24252066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922836,0.00018589008,0.00006948729,0.00007474938,0.00011798368,0.000017600514,0.000005052379,0.0000041896633,0.00029669263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985474,0.00018914467,0.00050687377,0.00016116237,0.00023761082,0.00035784516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879736,0.00041452414,0.00027552882,0.00020076368,0.00020256331,0.00010925266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058383454,0.00011901484,0.00023518178,0.00007881325,0.00078082964,0.00007146563,0.00026996745,0.000103349324,0.000078289544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045067686,0.00010481455,0.00007552769,0.00022474256,0.0014455863,0.00016528048,0.00004432401,0.00020242055,0.0000021623123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015574642,0.000041068768,0.009598274,0.000053017648,0.000024893774,0.000003219339,0.0023953684,0.00028455767,0.00021248289,0.9849427,0.0015527199,0.00087614945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031713378,0.00028227974,0.116369136,0.0036723618,0.00015901953,0.000100378056,0.0985001,0.0026924692,0.0041691912,0.026399335,0.7426806,0.0018037774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63910884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8349705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95854336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030949936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016762597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60055894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70434532","doi":"","title":"Unseating horseman: commercial harvesting right and the natural resources transfer agreements","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extinguishment; Treaty; Proposition; Ethnology; Political science; Law; Humanities; Geography; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017433605808106906,"score_gpt":0.2720837140977891,"score_spread":0.25465010828968215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W70434532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7899931,0.0013616902,0.0006475326,0.0028823654,0.00032658776,0.00041079705,0.000008445719,0.000065342974,0.20430411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971311,0.00024138595,0.00031762602,0.00041939926,0.0006298168,0.0000072984008,0.0000051817888,0.000006530056,0.0012416792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877286,0.00019698597,0.00026231917,0.00019804004,0.0002279777,0.00034179582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915916,0.00054223236,0.00005328511,0.00011952962,0.000019731924,0.00010607262],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012814731,0.00013111772,0.00017039661,0.000045926292,0.0021194043,0.00012497813,0.00020806523,0.00007727428,0.000072813134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017491591,0.0000973242,0.00007420068,0.00014933005,0.0027222675,0.00019901466,0.00004747659,0.00019435708,0.000018164888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004180059,0.00002472786,0.006703403,0.000016345366,0.000027090779,0.000010006808,0.012898341,0.00001330002,0.00012314669,0.9749647,0.00004422121,0.005132923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036438685,0.000053639713,0.03765934,0.00049578224,0.00019114024,0.000058396494,0.020244246,0.00011236253,0.0006319517,0.004000975,0.93213755,0.0007707563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026389004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015226147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9709637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007088135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004428739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71561623","doi":"","title":"A strategic approach to judicial legitimacy: Supreme Court of Canada and the Marshall Case","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03383723725556665,"score_gpt":0.2559929142548845,"score_spread":0.22215567699931787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71561623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.491708,0.00050396804,0.00031648835,0.006209901,0.0007443586,0.0007913981,0.00008045584,0.00004037474,0.49960503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985661,0.00009626566,0.00048642338,0.00024226385,0.00045380695,0.000049760954,0.0000032139171,0.0000042335596,0.00009791703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878216,0.00009845161,0.00027678785,0.00024291959,0.0003026597,0.000297043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908507,0.00028830068,0.000094109135,0.00015107915,0.0002213248,0.00016011631],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006565731,0.00014002138,0.000284395,0.000045761975,0.0015123935,0.0000630673,0.00022387147,0.000073645446,0.000040678202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003885518,0.00010781582,0.000062342835,0.0002559656,0.003513054,0.00008842848,0.00009006618,0.000202365,0.0000030420213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041240382,0.000044168024,0.00071935443,0.000013436974,0.000048478207,0.00005680486,0.0018844906,0.000077017816,0.00005674767,0.9965205,0.0003596259,0.00017811322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008414347,0.00019372188,0.0068114554,0.00054151326,0.00096410565,0.004536693,0.18098612,0.0014917027,0.00024086612,0.40042084,0.39247236,0.0029262572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7425453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95591736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5960997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006498783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002168043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85021076","doi":"","title":"The Post-9/11 National Security regime in Canada: strengthening security, diminishing accountability","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; National security; Business; Public administration; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.02910280110150013,"score_gpt":0.2801687870571302,"score_spread":0.25106598595563007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W85021076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.899788,0.0032826269,0.000009287811,0.0034780726,0.00094418676,0.0003359183,0.00006874112,0.000050244336,0.092042886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987451,0.00042133135,0.000056305176,0.00017097876,0.0005222307,0.000030925625,0.000010671209,0.0000050358462,0.000037458736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979421,0.0003427133,0.00038670737,0.0002424064,0.0005286719,0.0005573964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997441,0.0018544706,0.000117049385,0.00018818029,0.00026164745,0.00013765608],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021806096,0.00015602118,0.00020833313,0.00004526109,0.001993956,0.00007617532,0.000314822,0.000076947166,0.00006981001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003238208,0.0001326743,0.000074493924,0.00028524615,0.00084339216,0.00057598803,0.0001330994,0.00025266883,0.000010232524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013792043,0.00005193145,0.15132342,0.000020804131,0.000021712509,0.0000029002165,0.017918171,0.000048076792,0.0000031185907,0.8297104,0.0007097558,0.00017589373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000681997,0.000023267105,0.07406719,0.00029450614,0.000057955946,0.00002899769,0.2830831,0.0002937615,0.000048547954,0.043675497,0.59685296,0.00089222647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7813904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99432135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78603494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001012556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027590236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W999925103","doi":"","title":"Indigenous cultural rights and identity politics in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Jurisprudence; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law; Citizenship; State (computer science); Scholarship; Constitution; Identity (music); Sociology","score_opus":0.015619502280686004,"score_gpt":0.25723317626074477,"score_spread":0.24161367398005876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W999925103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96032614,0.00053398043,0.000030324796,0.00041796023,0.00034126523,0.00045712522,0.000016171387,0.00003103683,0.037846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983185,0.00025579965,0.00016039648,0.00013120478,0.00021552011,0.000020344238,0.000009021903,0.0000043711075,0.00088482787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870133,0.000090004054,0.000252391,0.00021792251,0.0002325749,0.0005057474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994016,0.000086899236,0.00007071696,0.00012622039,0.00013003625,0.0001844744],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017042432,0.00013051605,0.0001986514,0.000066199784,0.0015477736,0.00020683973,0.00021504675,0.00008537031,0.00026452923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004714183,0.000107664004,0.00003197435,0.00019880208,0.0005893737,0.0006243281,0.000036828307,0.00013637972,0.000042252497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7833513e-7,0.000030965963,0.016424583,0.000020562307,0.0000130794415,0.000032670087,0.022118105,0.000021447337,0.000013495225,0.9608816,0.00023882114,0.00020378617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012483712,0.00006134595,0.098528825,0.00036740422,0.00006630979,0.00012455706,0.07407889,0.00014021221,0.00018383625,0.10400407,0.71961373,0.0015824605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99922913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85687757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009201852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028876495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}