{"meta":{"query_hash":"ca5068b3cda4","filters":{"venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles"},"cohort_total":83,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":83,"exported":83,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ca5068b3cda4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revue+d%27%C3%A9tudes+constitutionnelles"},"results":[{"id":"W1022707983","doi":"","title":"The Court's Mulligan: a commennt on Canada (attorney general) v. Hislop","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Dissent; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Political science; Majority opinion; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Mulligan; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027721448784000135,"score_gpt":0.25956184668630367,"score_spread":0.23184039790230354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1022707983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060125362,0.016903006,0.0020444319,0.44407466,0.0036092428,0.00021468867,0.0024311214,0.00017437045,0.47042307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46689624,0.004078596,0.0019913265,0.1906732,0.00055143057,0.00008863605,0.00043834845,0.00010053162,0.33518177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639255,0.00034492475,0.000052325635,0.00035785028,0.0014214639,0.001430903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981857,0.0005060461,0.000041819418,0.00006281192,0.00080220803,0.00040139887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001780227,0.0004776007,0.00045217984,0.0008775841,0.024891926,0.007596718,0.0025007662,0.010962493,0.0072294846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049806195,0.00053020194,0.0006919067,0.001308817,0.005428606,0.0017915231,0.001551782,0.0097473925,0.00071331527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008324585,0.000042033498,0.003088583,0.00007292477,0.000036760786,0.0010111325,0.006196563,0.00023149102,0.0009756789,0.48996565,0.48236987,0.015926015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008247995,0.000056682933,0.01604334,0.00034259283,0.00009140274,0.00024163429,0.009730482,0.0009491206,0.0016539121,0.044870954,0.9257496,0.00018789391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037013773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037013773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065783344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26855493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W163287952","doi":"","title":"From centralization to sovereignty-association: the canadian labour congress and the constitutional question","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Politics; Constitutional monarchy; Sovereignty; Law; Philosophy; Monarchy","score_opus":0.014777713453276537,"score_gpt":0.2264600803921833,"score_spread":0.21168236693890677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W163287952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08674738,0.02889445,0.0023163075,0.18189976,0.0008992574,0.00005500225,0.00043391867,0.00005826774,0.6986957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95428187,0.005067485,0.00051932305,0.0061290204,0.00021563949,0.00003108457,0.000086559,0.000029694844,0.033639293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938717,0.001084375,0.00010169069,0.00065204804,0.0015528614,0.0027372825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634665,0.001334057,0.00024005184,0.00022776992,0.0012420035,0.00060944626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004692988,0.00034861473,0.00045920085,0.0024547335,0.026923683,0.0145441815,0.0020664267,0.003761434,0.007814125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009040659,0.00034123924,0.0003402371,0.004314571,0.040448796,0.0043600737,0.0033303401,0.0052605127,0.00030758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000687082,0.0000032427085,0.00048964797,0.000017867977,0.0000026194123,0.000047012363,0.005521373,0.00017620064,0.000040020288,0.9830305,0.007124669,0.00353992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033173706,0.000016429836,0.013741528,0.0005605829,0.000029512932,0.00008345001,0.02679321,0.0008333538,0.00031506168,0.17701164,0.78047764,0.00010436753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9903591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7739511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22604889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2032752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8976736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W166688865","doi":"","title":"Sex work by law: Bedford's impact on municipal approaches to regulating the sex trade","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Law; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Economic Justice; Sex work; Sex offender; Criminology; Supreme court; Sociology; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.1187161819420112,"score_gpt":0.2926210342613091,"score_spread":0.1739048523192979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W166688865","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13033578,0.02079483,0.0030327337,0.5833808,0.0022330757,0.00030350094,0.00025404006,0.00012476435,0.2595405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73567635,0.006085259,0.0031656525,0.15309215,0.00092403614,0.00029356353,0.00010618042,0.00006380636,0.10059304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765237,0.0058166003,0.00081656635,0.0016501953,0.0069392184,0.008253691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97898877,0.012926971,0.0012563948,0.0009114388,0.003708971,0.0022074583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016034774,0.0004356856,0.00061408436,0.0016240042,0.031325992,0.0150878895,0.0034003705,0.01947362,0.0077401623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02859597,0.0009861055,0.0010967635,0.0022955276,0.020133594,0.0042889286,0.0064959554,0.012829666,0.00051369914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010886094,0.00011096801,0.008715992,0.00030285702,0.000055255972,0.0009960071,0.019685762,0.00068542984,0.0008236434,0.8471659,0.09204128,0.029308002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027752682,0.00025173038,0.042645104,0.0011006419,0.00025189776,0.00036568582,0.02480316,0.0015998613,0.0012370236,0.042369656,0.8847953,0.00030240213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9009565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9623737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9009565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0644371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08630255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46752608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17783591","doi":"10.1126/science.13.319.211","title":"Challenging English-Canadian Orthodoxy on Democracy and Constitutional Change","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Orthodoxy; Democracy; Elite; Conversation; Law; Humanities; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.07178905838013909,"score_gpt":0.3030945892290276,"score_spread":0.2313055308488885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17783591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040553734,0.02338598,0.0039496007,0.37561545,0.0016340901,0.00006028791,0.00019323896,0.00004972489,0.5545579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8813236,0.0076977205,0.001703306,0.036477562,0.00053177396,0.000044122327,0.000055919867,0.000053601423,0.072112344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98849523,0.0030559076,0.00020692228,0.0010499505,0.0036245873,0.0035673708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99307764,0.002988418,0.00027578278,0.00024633508,0.0024376165,0.0009741975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073743337,0.00039376097,0.0005053284,0.0016372926,0.027816478,0.013028821,0.0016955829,0.00479231,0.005262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00918311,0.00022915076,0.0003162216,0.0020215106,0.038846064,0.0038748863,0.003905035,0.0071870782,0.00029275115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000083704745,0.000006342998,0.00032745334,0.000026772133,0.0000024834492,0.0001263743,0.01050671,0.00012950721,0.000056149267,0.97263217,0.011984773,0.004192846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037977064,0.000016360358,0.0040463693,0.00049888005,0.000027464239,0.00015691774,0.044771206,0.0008435015,0.0003699362,0.19785163,0.75129163,0.000088143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9776698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9847178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15549423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15549423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13646133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97950697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W182430000","doi":"","title":"Manitoba and the (long and winding) road to the natural resources transfer agreement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Terminology; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Elite; Law and economics; Natural resource; Law; Political economy; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013617557659299733,"score_gpt":0.22702303567181079,"score_spread":0.21340547801251106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W182430000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46938345,0.0053646285,0.0018562615,0.04446442,0.0002752768,0.00015466359,0.00016753259,0.000057681238,0.47827598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93973505,0.0008251874,0.0009696332,0.0025807922,0.000016697151,0.000044775436,0.000029057706,0.000016799679,0.055782072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747974,0.00049139844,0.00004162136,0.00019077696,0.0004419464,0.0013544578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988005,0.00036996257,0.000077062454,0.00008564385,0.00032895958,0.0003378405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018954375,0.00027483306,0.00028474996,0.0012633277,0.033605553,0.005910596,0.0011813061,0.0026180183,0.0077827084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002629297,0.0004261043,0.00026085586,0.0026378566,0.013679149,0.0016119037,0.0054757707,0.0033508758,0.0003589008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106071675,0.000083671795,0.013270454,0.00013894806,0.000025818816,0.0044602174,0.10198718,0.00067389675,0.0017157282,0.83826756,0.013309116,0.025961349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045185458,0.000067253626,0.037438974,0.00037439974,0.000043076812,0.0009908469,0.10488791,0.00070312776,0.0011111107,0.024541756,0.8296815,0.00011480665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96490556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98798823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086209364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086209364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10229315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6254957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W190033593","doi":"","title":"\"A rather vexed question...\": the Federal-Provincial debate over the constitucional responsibility for Métis Scrip","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Political science; Obligation; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02413818042145314,"score_gpt":0.28353202520390886,"score_spread":0.2593938447824557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W190033593","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009472541,0.0045089433,0.0016226739,0.8723582,0.0021708745,0.000014652048,0.00010367533,0.00002943126,0.10971898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61306214,0.0036918519,0.001636541,0.2676596,0.0019580966,0.000050826708,0.00008046829,0.000099803554,0.1117607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483395,0.0016717411,0.00012981216,0.0006685233,0.0013415688,0.0013544288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970499,0.0012639615,0.0001918399,0.00016956571,0.0009988933,0.0003258253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006746392,0.00024455087,0.00037585976,0.00042010858,0.0180532,0.010686445,0.002014765,0.007387137,0.0038663705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009027349,0.00030949138,0.00033751607,0.0010945183,0.021873211,0.006675021,0.0025554602,0.012048125,0.00074608624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009832155,0.0000053188514,0.00030386922,0.00002385918,0.0000025066292,0.00003853687,0.009136761,0.000036564834,0.00007228945,0.9052683,0.08063683,0.0044654277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028095386,0.000016666743,0.0028780077,0.00044846217,0.00001476682,0.000101203266,0.026185201,0.00035468463,0.00049172685,0.17137781,0.79806,0.000043424287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45003262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54487073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5499674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019588789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033721905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8948263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W192887305","doi":"","title":"The Charter in the Administrative Process: Statutory Remedy or Refounding of Administrative Jurisdiction?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Jurisdiction; Law; Administrative law; Statutory law","score_opus":0.15176508418999007,"score_gpt":0.42895055652382563,"score_spread":0.27718547233383556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W192887305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034593545,0.012256069,0.0251351,0.2878387,0.004092783,0.00010369925,0.000120237724,0.0002306398,0.63562924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8333325,0.0035721213,0.005142018,0.038334183,0.0017316148,0.000097722885,0.00007343745,0.0001354474,0.11758093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849214,0.004893518,0.00047943878,0.0016107128,0.0038400432,0.0042549246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903965,0.0049318294,0.0007689502,0.0010974681,0.002239341,0.00056595274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010233064,0.0003715673,0.00051444146,0.0011087968,0.009533938,0.016054023,0.0025621026,0.0086190635,0.0044541885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022624087,0.00043932293,0.0005143348,0.001194874,0.04066013,0.009464799,0.0035168435,0.010465006,0.0009230773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005045817,0.000005008852,0.00011371104,0.000011770699,0.0000011404586,0.000052224957,0.0020458093,0.000078157376,0.00005617114,0.9879709,0.006834929,0.0028251198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059151538,0.00004233708,0.0021210362,0.00050862937,0.000026012642,0.0001501143,0.009513555,0.0011337745,0.0009219579,0.5446376,0.44080192,0.0000839403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31983578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30484578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31983578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024865974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03758684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6359483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21238772","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.073","title":"Dismembering Canada? Stephen Harper and the foreign relations of canadian provinces","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Massachusetts Dartmouth","keywords":"Federalism; Negotiation; Delegation; Autonomy; Political science; Decentralization; Cooperative federalism; Foreign policy; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.012183349458239923,"score_gpt":0.19819322550284704,"score_spread":0.18600987604460711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21238772","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021843003,0.07989416,0.00040371923,0.6197333,0.010448343,0.000031134452,0.00069847296,0.000083315994,0.26686454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3073826,0.058728695,0.00094749825,0.06470771,0.0014273019,0.00002269342,0.00032544916,0.00015672414,0.5663013],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851495,0.0001833732,0.000024537516,0.00013837921,0.00047195813,0.0006668561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771845,0.00024893848,0.00009082578,0.00006718029,0.00090638065,0.00096816913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012505535,0.00044477577,0.0004980298,0.0013981248,0.02137487,0.0050286693,0.00091372954,0.0019205046,0.025010852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00299997,0.00024739464,0.00020105574,0.0020125762,0.0060836687,0.002184964,0.0020364376,0.0030303781,0.001984671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037676535,0.000015419788,0.0051835733,0.00008634877,0.0000139236445,0.00038466035,0.008399985,0.00010070174,0.00012577484,0.09865348,0.8447781,0.042220376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034133368,0.0000033187318,0.005019293,0.0001435668,0.000005197034,0.00012617864,0.011126097,0.000037224454,0.00006873691,0.0019670825,0.981475,0.000024832947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9845882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047119554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047119554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08478011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34187794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219669053","doi":"","title":"Eagle soaring on the emergent winds of indigenous legal authority","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Environmental ethics; Economic Justice; Indigenous rights; Political science; Colonialism; Sociology; Order (exchange); Human rights; Law and economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.052145942076425984,"score_gpt":0.2883170905806425,"score_spread":0.2361711485042165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219669053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26726156,0.009601382,0.012147419,0.07385673,0.0005357192,0.00004385453,0.000047616395,0.00008333444,0.63642246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771731,0.0014396514,0.0021058067,0.0009847035,0.00008487178,0.000010663946,0.0000060941,0.000020204756,0.018174877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715036,0.0011628115,0.00006608528,0.00036479734,0.00072588335,0.00053004606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980782,0.00091248646,0.0001589987,0.0002492428,0.00035089368,0.0002502214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004132898,0.0001383307,0.00028089975,0.0011843342,0.007820116,0.006583014,0.0006310425,0.0013288928,0.0031270715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045215264,0.00019080826,0.00022958244,0.00091358076,0.03946705,0.006042732,0.0048215855,0.0033097505,0.00021999849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006075962,0.000004033938,0.000375864,0.000023062663,0.0000020315488,0.00015351851,0.07214681,0.00010590054,0.0001481473,0.9191031,0.0013496957,0.0065818136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012782365,0.000036610025,0.0033041034,0.00028474798,0.0000107551805,0.00030820986,0.093136854,0.00083031727,0.00037649355,0.56101424,0.34065217,0.00003267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067085095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089441165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067085095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007548967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006248278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13338923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W223141162","doi":"","title":"Failing to walk the rights talk? post-9/11 security policy and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Torture; Judicial deference; Deference; Deportation; Rhetoric; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013679765522098774,"score_gpt":0.26011318358274443,"score_spread":0.24643341806064567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W223141162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19557194,0.01969985,0.0012543742,0.34754005,0.0017472755,0.00012918291,0.0007600434,0.00011174347,0.43318552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86503726,0.0049159,0.0007785093,0.05371189,0.0003108524,0.00005151637,0.00013981316,0.000073077215,0.0749813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902237,0.0006185192,0.00016163035,0.00082391594,0.0029442569,0.0052280263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926887,0.0020916534,0.00041890732,0.00020491391,0.0028357287,0.0017599902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005024622,0.0003428864,0.0005039866,0.0016689737,0.0410393,0.020121885,0.0029620542,0.009991585,0.0071395976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011527443,0.0007246797,0.0005408219,0.0020048544,0.0152734285,0.002831202,0.003463356,0.012988664,0.00044909364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044668344,0.00004225945,0.0059883744,0.00007392571,0.00003097425,0.00084372173,0.013355888,0.00061665836,0.00044845766,0.88046885,0.08302847,0.0150576215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008715509,0.000046619087,0.030021913,0.00083747593,0.0001249922,0.00022607214,0.026809372,0.0015205605,0.0013038183,0.053359885,0.885281,0.00038103553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99571794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19781224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19781224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26115027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9304241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293334144","doi":"","title":"Natural resources transfer agreement, the transfer of authority, and the promise to protect the first nations' right to a traditional livelihood","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Jurisprudence; Ethnology; Context (archaeology); Livelihood; Law; Sociology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026181664907399205,"score_gpt":0.2113834170481368,"score_spread":0.18520175214073759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293334144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03186262,0.005124134,0.008859154,0.03512618,0.00073056726,0.00011115832,0.00026017075,0.00005295781,0.9178731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6406242,0.0020139148,0.0060800873,0.01584369,0.0002882252,0.00046437778,0.00017819807,0.000053561176,0.3344537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936958,0.0021105593,0.0003778289,0.0010770449,0.0014057907,0.0013329678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718374,0.0014903744,0.0003270406,0.00037969137,0.00047601465,0.0001431697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060537905,0.0003696108,0.00031676076,0.0008753447,0.007397868,0.0059301835,0.001238103,0.0077509917,0.00556345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006598643,0.0003399623,0.0005905576,0.0008675011,0.016997248,0.0037050676,0.0035219907,0.0060074837,0.0006327394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068212175,0.0000053205226,0.00018335474,0.000017056649,0.0000015966485,0.00007113494,0.003239612,0.00008087803,0.0001171137,0.9906324,0.0030768623,0.0025678521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002631402,0.000044109693,0.0036464932,0.00044416598,0.000015216597,0.00023622163,0.0031893167,0.00035096533,0.0007460952,0.21187222,0.7793644,0.00006436691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12811372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15129256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87188625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010567646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0155419195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.254736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233723973","doi":"","title":"Building Indigenous Governance from Native Title: Moving Away from 'Fitting In' to Creating a Decolonized Space","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Indigenous; Colonialism; Sovereignty; Transitional justice; Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Business; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.019532823961770095,"score_gpt":0.29038575393883803,"score_spread":0.27085292997706795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W233723973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32180843,0.004365274,0.050876502,0.036942393,0.0003821706,0.00023264837,0.000039065577,0.00014162202,0.585212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648445,0.00081754767,0.005782194,0.00134761,0.000052366555,0.00006486907,0.0000104339815,0.000031858635,0.027048597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962172,0.0016565974,0.00010312218,0.00043746328,0.0008036331,0.00078198407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967518,0.0012134139,0.00037157742,0.000606231,0.00044499166,0.0006120378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00674323,0.00016164473,0.00036828528,0.0007498472,0.0071661905,0.008357181,0.0011579059,0.0015919078,0.0030890515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00784908,0.00027834182,0.00031324173,0.00058011274,0.045886666,0.0062065367,0.009760026,0.0031593493,0.00028715288],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008015767,0.00001966244,0.0016555627,0.00007893222,0.0000057417756,0.0002283474,0.09717965,0.00032298724,0.000629976,0.87859654,0.0014874467,0.019787073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002990156,0.00015721822,0.01388332,0.0010129387,0.000031569212,0.00048256575,0.07847554,0.0017436171,0.0016431161,0.4067964,0.49565986,0.000083920924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122216694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21926132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122216694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012091724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022962162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24301064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W241631712","doi":"","title":"Les principles constitutionnels non écrits","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Legitimacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Supreme court; Constitutional interpretation; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Constitutional theory; Action (physics); Constitutional law; Sociology; Law and economics; Constitution; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06245597291703775,"score_gpt":0.27449069955288075,"score_spread":0.212034726635843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W241631712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077492795,0.016622437,0.014921089,0.030883597,0.0016194348,0.0001011343,0.00040752636,0.00019212575,0.9275033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56018114,0.020236066,0.022770746,0.018767003,0.0028070915,0.00096524943,0.0006160579,0.00033569476,0.37332094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813262,0.0054859444,0.0004877176,0.0018713385,0.0081962915,0.0026325176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958591,0.0016103601,0.00020596631,0.0007048836,0.0013715063,0.00024817899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009203772,0.0012651815,0.0011933652,0.0029496902,0.013884367,0.01710195,0.00211261,0.006675543,0.007701082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013172298,0.00078287866,0.0009817993,0.003432175,0.045937862,0.006709495,0.0034881034,0.012162617,0.0021834788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022552545,0.0000022885881,0.000026697464,0.000008840286,0.000001367517,0.000013906819,0.0004894484,0.000046867797,0.000032917393,0.996053,0.0017137408,0.001608681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028432325,0.0000088904835,0.00063500775,0.00013519541,0.000008090324,0.000088338784,0.0009140651,0.0002202924,0.00022726617,0.30507258,0.6926285,0.00003335867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.594266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5322804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.405734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05104265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046059184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81624687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508132334","doi":"","title":"Le transport interprovincial sur le territoire local: vers un nécessaire équilibre","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Constitution; Parliament; Balance (ability); Law; Jurisprudence; Administration (probate law); Public administration; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.03145731946424208,"score_gpt":0.2142368271095542,"score_spread":0.18277950764531212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508132334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13674267,0.007235034,0.025122643,0.07363973,0.00033284805,0.0000752054,0.0007131045,0.00017070252,0.75596815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9427121,0.002098919,0.0027942797,0.0013627851,0.00012791948,0.000047566416,0.00013214683,0.00005212111,0.050672136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972293,0.00039490894,0.00007587705,0.0004335386,0.0007657145,0.0011007555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836224,0.00027528618,0.00010695081,0.00017634116,0.00071023003,0.0003688246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017184976,0.0003257484,0.0005594368,0.0014048383,0.012006332,0.013218412,0.001682969,0.0026227129,0.010985731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031616883,0.00037186177,0.00048308683,0.0025613664,0.020209452,0.0053979224,0.0049147876,0.0031401287,0.000925202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070645906,0.0000045153315,0.0006289288,0.000017484828,0.0000031647426,0.00011567446,0.0011113823,0.00051066617,0.00011323024,0.99188215,0.0023142055,0.0032916989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004581305,0.0000451107,0.013753593,0.00052049494,0.00007033466,0.000523642,0.017713774,0.0026396182,0.00049245736,0.44760272,0.5164851,0.000107372805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8266515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84866637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17334849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05238472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04974061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3800795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581998729","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court in Canada's constitutional order","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Constitutional court; Majority opinion; Constitutional law; Original jurisdiction; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.027541976877775282,"score_gpt":0.249645461380737,"score_spread":0.22210348450296172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581998729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05927611,0.014671776,0.0018261505,0.08433701,0.00054887275,0.00003432595,0.00037326815,0.000053502186,0.8388789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341173,0.0035197681,0.00061364594,0.004725409,0.00015432332,0.000019973446,0.00008608888,0.00003398693,0.05672952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99410534,0.0011191409,0.000077485834,0.0005299336,0.0018640192,0.0023040406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746907,0.0008545745,0.00011397125,0.00012480686,0.0010407661,0.0003968821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030742078,0.00031084634,0.00046798823,0.0019207305,0.028090714,0.0155843925,0.0017004197,0.0038048178,0.005477921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006915388,0.00032952917,0.00027097706,0.0037306533,0.03305107,0.0031524114,0.002201906,0.005197057,0.00031381205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003291017,0.0000019035576,0.00020966753,0.000009003093,0.0000018452077,0.00004914554,0.0045543294,0.00013458669,0.0000352368,0.98539865,0.0070655677,0.0025368214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000317297,0.000015959522,0.009029264,0.0003947931,0.000038385402,0.00008164423,0.01805084,0.0011482054,0.00026261146,0.34111065,0.62974495,0.00009093145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98936915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99287426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15954743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15954743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16521603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97480583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625873439","doi":"","title":"Daviault Dialogue: The Strange Journey of Canada's Intoxication Defence","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03053669851787179,"score_gpt":0.26747058029491566,"score_spread":0.23693388177704386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625873439","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020144459,0.028703555,0.00092668855,0.7533693,0.0035420596,0.000037631165,0.00035361006,0.00007624895,0.19284645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4151885,0.011959919,0.001057918,0.3702594,0.0014181221,0.000048819176,0.00013831619,0.00021788574,0.19971116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98904306,0.001460389,0.00021356503,0.0013275414,0.004114277,0.0038412663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99287874,0.0023405848,0.00019921311,0.00021412557,0.0026946608,0.0016726695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00451494,0.00076005975,0.00092037366,0.0019073143,0.05669242,0.021480592,0.0034622948,0.02095096,0.00976346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011536178,0.00083903206,0.0008435112,0.002542517,0.022172105,0.0048687453,0.0049631232,0.022342293,0.0007554694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056716617,0.000035402096,0.0013093855,0.000105291736,0.00003246703,0.0011383459,0.025244173,0.00027866891,0.00053889805,0.62987447,0.32561392,0.015772244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027398382,0.000014234848,0.0021272846,0.00024309191,0.00002711598,0.00012096068,0.012062385,0.00022056901,0.0003790376,0.023087341,0.96156156,0.0001290271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99507314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19520713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19520713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.211467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93344563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626293412","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: Missing the Forest for the Trees in Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Causation; Law; Political science; Charter; Section (typography); Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04576770244883175,"score_gpt":0.28317856793729074,"score_spread":0.237410865488459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626293412","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08553623,0.0063578673,0.0015285512,0.45148513,0.004384626,0.00044006994,0.0012874516,0.00019609634,0.44878408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28132755,0.0022455598,0.0009118857,0.38193458,0.0006831959,0.00018832259,0.00030113387,0.00009091812,0.33231685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936666,0.00044394672,0.0001531371,0.00063359126,0.0019153622,0.0031872722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725765,0.0010078568,0.00012138537,0.00009563241,0.00090356887,0.00061386445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022192365,0.0005346628,0.00052388,0.0010294679,0.030861216,0.005520271,0.0030847874,0.025611367,0.0135204345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005525281,0.0009029214,0.0007912578,0.0015025303,0.0051420596,0.0017440493,0.001965996,0.013186227,0.0010674217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000811143,0.00010724409,0.0078077973,0.00009862137,0.000027495085,0.00549338,0.009648973,0.00045887879,0.0007579672,0.1948546,0.76857424,0.012089766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007189434,0.000061965795,0.018796315,0.00034227115,0.0000921945,0.0011893658,0.011732769,0.0009580103,0.0009668856,0.009633563,0.9559234,0.00023139885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9715828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04999614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04999614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07767392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36274904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736401150","doi":"","title":"Conceptual Precision and Parliamentary Systems of Rights: Disambiguating “Dialogue”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Parliamentary procedure; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.03630339283605489,"score_gpt":0.2698295430549229,"score_spread":0.23352615021886802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736401150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22388238,0.013259016,0.33913723,0.033501573,0.00065875036,0.000330149,0.00018472108,0.0002178174,0.38882834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98161316,0.00067715923,0.015448399,0.00044143718,0.00014925233,0.00010967155,0.000057222805,0.00004447405,0.0014592393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94052875,0.045820747,0.0023839688,0.0033829755,0.0063510085,0.0015324407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90840304,0.07136662,0.008387447,0.007502194,0.0035127553,0.0008279479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03879485,0.00054860424,0.0008871838,0.010679853,0.0059715887,0.01769592,0.0021071273,0.0040680566,0.0028946016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09580551,0.0006091752,0.00069996226,0.006943973,0.06411989,0.037569854,0.012377371,0.005249799,0.00034530705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014670307,0.00000567017,0.0003758879,0.000051363208,0.0000043417604,0.000021968639,0.026376743,0.00012916207,0.00012208892,0.96645355,0.00019638165,0.006248238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002987835,0.000031751,0.0017844981,0.00031456284,0.000022399094,0.00018724866,0.019878112,0.0018701978,0.0007353513,0.94335574,0.031753264,0.000037046975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002965278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018887807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03879485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01003252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005132436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2051692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737262796","doi":"","title":"Mutations et limites de l'identitaire au Québec","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Oppression; Identity (music); Sovereignty; Politics; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03343803331656561,"score_gpt":0.2515676503858552,"score_spread":0.2181296170692896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737262796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6087379,0.003450937,0.002570878,0.022447217,0.00012607542,0.000042832748,0.0002586838,0.00004378247,0.36232167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96181136,0.00057666196,0.00040618688,0.0003997519,0.000010606993,0.000014353642,0.000029826964,0.000014136717,0.0367371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807894,0.0003546476,0.00003951333,0.00024470277,0.0005366256,0.0007455689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998437,0.0003449214,0.00017740054,0.00010961835,0.00067031843,0.0002607544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013999003,0.00020426273,0.0003254442,0.0014316202,0.014957348,0.005833055,0.0008209618,0.0010671996,0.00816028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003031211,0.00022586361,0.00018882175,0.0020641908,0.011000531,0.0016127442,0.00270789,0.0022800246,0.00020449246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004633861,0.00002068067,0.00861203,0.000050273182,0.000014129,0.0003828605,0.05795494,0.00051248865,0.0008022809,0.8922995,0.0058846897,0.033419862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043779884,0.00005875909,0.12679358,0.000519981,0.0000736572,0.00045275374,0.08196483,0.0028874173,0.0017878526,0.06383941,0.72142094,0.00015685103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9786713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9888465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10187953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10187953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06246424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7391912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737595584","doi":"","title":"Liberty Rights, the Family and Constitutional Politics","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Law; Charter; Politics; Humanities; Family law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041895456404184336,"score_gpt":0.29038305600300246,"score_spread":0.2484875995988181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737595584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037656896,0.022361265,0.004886876,0.068734445,0.00038174933,0.000032551652,0.00017208465,0.000038959748,0.86573523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9137638,0.0047166226,0.0010993094,0.006146895,0.0003235629,0.000052405714,0.000066706285,0.000031603835,0.07379915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997703,0.00096070697,0.000051367235,0.0002694188,0.00036946722,0.00064602913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875605,0.00071463856,0.00008819522,0.00012452426,0.00019430919,0.00012223436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025817414,0.0002521937,0.00024918665,0.00084023416,0.007659367,0.007591551,0.00092233485,0.002608724,0.007122062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030489059,0.00017653377,0.00019599083,0.00080646045,0.032585446,0.00346645,0.0019288678,0.0032676912,0.00045015762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013156217,0.0000016675866,0.00004293284,0.000004491505,4.4133665e-7,0.000024916008,0.0008040375,0.000047389443,0.000017748194,0.99652267,0.0016356704,0.00089670386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013724107,0.000009358814,0.00096683257,0.00016613213,0.000005026324,0.00007278979,0.0032759358,0.00036908008,0.00019092498,0.70991766,0.28500015,0.000012328401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24036925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22560637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24036925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025886158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012363063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47794032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737671693","doi":"","title":"Jean Chrétien's Quebec Legacy: Coasting Then Stickhandling Hard","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Economic history; History; Political science","score_opus":0.03402436715252795,"score_gpt":0.2199523210745476,"score_spread":0.18592795392201966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737671693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076550715,0.0430636,0.0013627346,0.24153356,0.005187269,0.000054485525,0.0008721027,0.00014836699,0.6312271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33872005,0.011597668,0.00065121043,0.02514883,0.00049978634,0.00003648689,0.00016450582,0.00020812268,0.62297344],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858606,0.00025358255,0.000023261886,0.00017402697,0.00037508356,0.00058804353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879503,0.00022921017,0.000076128934,0.00007988903,0.00043809135,0.00038172872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010812181,0.00043957154,0.00043427973,0.0010817101,0.021834198,0.0071155946,0.0009793441,0.0026486863,0.029719021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029560514,0.0003207536,0.0002421975,0.002537595,0.008757876,0.0027262801,0.0023703428,0.0058012805,0.0013579159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000732589,0.000050411465,0.0047523114,0.00012254024,0.000025783778,0.0010092837,0.040365383,0.0003245707,0.00042083117,0.35772794,0.51324046,0.081887305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004820034,0.000005759079,0.0045229304,0.0001428714,0.000004827261,0.000108748274,0.0106230555,0.000051190254,0.00009926585,0.0039399597,0.98047376,0.000022782664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98375964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99343055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046837226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046837226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045503654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33982944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737906729","doi":"","title":"The structural conception of rights and judicial balancing","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Rhetoric; Adjudication; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027079022674977072,"score_gpt":0.26357582417521647,"score_spread":0.23649680150023938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737906729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009942534,0.002806976,0.05742956,0.029034298,0.00047028068,0.000055971206,0.000088622204,0.000074307936,0.9000975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8652762,0.0023622394,0.012329802,0.0057488983,0.0012555862,0.00032610458,0.00010629972,0.00012844149,0.112466395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931162,0.0031044707,0.00026158436,0.0009948441,0.0014806624,0.0010422224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965293,0.0017978566,0.00034190595,0.0005600071,0.00062102114,0.00014985404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059731714,0.00060521445,0.00041898177,0.0018106332,0.005368816,0.010130708,0.0019065711,0.005500897,0.011530976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007678486,0.0004769378,0.00069228635,0.0014491694,0.03465264,0.012417889,0.003915906,0.0057574674,0.0015992464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.7806593e-7,7.940393e-7,0.000005747472,0.0000022175582,2.5974026e-7,0.0000043207847,0.00013340957,0.000036780788,0.000009918588,0.99923944,0.0002529538,0.00031352465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011611248,0.000006123694,0.000049468214,0.00004840498,0.000002879711,0.000021134374,0.00023738631,0.00043137625,0.00012091019,0.9540125,0.045053937,0.000004257224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071765324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060457224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012165115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012165115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070615113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088264465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738154899","doi":"","title":"The Partial Commencement of Acts: A Constitutional Criticism of the Lieutenant Governor in Council's \"Line-Item Veto\" Power","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Separation of powers; Supreme court; Veto; Legislation; Legislature; Doctrine; Political science; Democracy; Enumerated powers; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Compromise; Politics; History","score_opus":0.04802638586106917,"score_gpt":0.27901913326385525,"score_spread":0.23099274740278608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738154899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11780345,0.0023852065,0.024225049,0.07477521,0.0008022058,0.00015309051,0.0002624079,0.00019391693,0.7793996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9380948,0.00039932833,0.0040251133,0.009393355,0.0003182134,0.00011237602,0.000054310876,0.000054503686,0.047547966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889819,0.0033304286,0.00053791824,0.0014748016,0.0037433251,0.0019315775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98201376,0.011050261,0.0009223216,0.0027390446,0.0024948714,0.0007796778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009591285,0.0002870281,0.0005457321,0.00075215095,0.011262356,0.009984442,0.0027368744,0.0075118574,0.0021913073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024965301,0.00063660456,0.0004369046,0.0012157967,0.030491952,0.005135317,0.00408435,0.010461629,0.000353715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011183793,0.0000048291313,0.00020707755,0.000009015925,0.0000020768587,0.0000317042,0.003963887,0.00010477609,0.000120074605,0.99081844,0.002214782,0.0025121032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015020049,0.00012645821,0.0066751507,0.00025255402,0.00008219146,0.00025954493,0.007905795,0.002750496,0.0025754615,0.49653557,0.4825686,0.000118006195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22970946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.312114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22970946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016194293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026648851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4567448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738171322","doi":"","title":"Mondialisation, démocratie et Questions Nationales Candiennes","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Globalization; Federalism; Democracy; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Multinational corporation; Political economy; Nation state; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.06083005922536525,"score_gpt":0.29806957259860073,"score_spread":0.23723951337323548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738171322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038269784,0.03835902,0.004674992,0.10843447,0.0014685389,0.000016036243,0.00022201371,0.00010563432,0.8084495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8412046,0.01549143,0.00279664,0.0073594255,0.0012819394,0.00008176312,0.00020459961,0.000099850826,0.13147978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957616,0.0015126402,0.000078786536,0.0006235878,0.0009334444,0.0010898728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986162,0.0004931945,0.00012983705,0.00026705445,0.00026018263,0.00023339844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035247514,0.0005807603,0.00080612476,0.001455921,0.011402784,0.015467902,0.00097074284,0.003243849,0.009069266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041873707,0.00029640328,0.0006086105,0.0025536376,0.029901005,0.006625971,0.0035520447,0.007982589,0.00075743225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005444742,0.0000040972623,0.000140142,0.000008520831,0.0000025151257,0.000015006498,0.0009381325,0.00005969893,0.000029811785,0.9939387,0.0025247834,0.0023330306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002279751,0.0000063494927,0.003017734,0.000112419584,0.000005252521,0.00008832435,0.0031949906,0.00027875585,0.00016498296,0.28571823,0.70736957,0.000020628071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38141078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.420672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6185892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04346207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01499841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7583814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738323090","doi":"","title":"Searching for Multinational Canada: The Rhetoric of Confusion","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Solidarity; Political science; Neutrality; Rhetoric; Sociology; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.031797257178273024,"score_gpt":0.25730782732754776,"score_spread":0.22551057014927472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738323090","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028302377,0.014946063,0.0050614392,0.5042953,0.002863523,0.00005285543,0.00011806103,0.00010760216,0.44425273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8357666,0.005782189,0.0023769648,0.10359348,0.0013547199,0.00009890192,0.000056419456,0.00028832967,0.050682325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98768413,0.004493767,0.0002609915,0.0014645149,0.004142644,0.0019538982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98743945,0.007073219,0.0007301485,0.00046812868,0.0032516303,0.0010373645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010057405,0.00071469037,0.00073613523,0.0032273035,0.040998586,0.018466843,0.0032914618,0.010756681,0.006602179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02582627,0.000608784,0.00049326516,0.0056586093,0.05588642,0.011772094,0.008238634,0.014174039,0.00067112397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104288965,0.000003675468,0.0003261868,0.00004106078,0.000004556643,0.00019180552,0.03238396,0.00006659847,0.000045119374,0.9319995,0.030729469,0.0041976385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023444036,0.000010756478,0.0009292848,0.0006151137,0.000025390518,0.00027451094,0.062411938,0.0010127662,0.0002903423,0.17625344,0.75806874,0.0000843215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79958975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7841241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20041025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09458132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065794244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68623877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738553523","doi":"","title":"Speculation: Alternatives to secession","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"European Socioeconomic and Political Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatism; Political science; Secession; Humanities; Alliance; Speculation; Ethnology; Economy; Economic history; Economics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.07868492630212694,"score_gpt":0.24686569204326642,"score_spread":0.1681807657411395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738553523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06941988,0.004249361,0.017682098,0.28043386,0.0011941888,0.00007213978,0.0005475812,0.000086466,0.62631446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94770926,0.0016433526,0.0015651061,0.008131145,0.0011526506,0.000044383087,0.00015410809,0.00002776485,0.039572082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981681,0.0006071613,0.000060223152,0.00032553097,0.00031981242,0.00051909086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550194,0.0020229728,0.0005861955,0.0005894652,0.0010118253,0.00028754855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029261755,0.00032629454,0.00052181084,0.000898765,0.0029920621,0.0046422407,0.0011839067,0.0056220884,0.036742385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011207617,0.0002133714,0.0006838764,0.00100145,0.00731631,0.0062524066,0.0018410339,0.0036687737,0.002333365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002380228,0.0000050122353,0.0002567393,0.000013414077,0.0000031276722,0.00007870684,0.00018527436,0.00018839439,0.000028407623,0.9937976,0.0034463988,0.0019731647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044680728,0.000012456404,0.00074404915,0.00006503506,0.000007743013,0.000068381174,0.0009838886,0.0015267523,0.00010155481,0.95547163,0.04096077,0.000013149195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026726142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024739042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036742385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055023786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039925226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122915566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738620536","doi":"","title":"Anti-terrorism, the Charter, and International Law","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Charter; Political science; International human rights law; Law; Fundamental rights; Terrorism; Reservation of rights; Guard (computer science); Duty; Ex post facto law; Right to property; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04597458160345978,"score_gpt":0.297171645317838,"score_spread":0.2511970637143782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738620536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009927779,0.046834163,0.0048187505,0.08216428,0.0026615069,0.00005866525,0.0002732115,0.00004609464,0.8532156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8487176,0.039695214,0.009398666,0.03364797,0.004016744,0.00022370898,0.00038786975,0.0000818208,0.06383037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870003,0.0063171196,0.000460605,0.0011460839,0.003592043,0.0014838919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898808,0.005981543,0.0013147955,0.0011360834,0.0011987898,0.000488045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00829457,0.00040735657,0.00046805138,0.0020759373,0.005259048,0.013217946,0.0009693197,0.0073652016,0.0058475873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019097462,0.0003388633,0.00039351126,0.0037058,0.02868805,0.007944411,0.002836688,0.00814128,0.0007955369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040830146,0.00000447071,0.00014472334,0.000018293165,0.0000013332284,0.000017266038,0.00059939723,0.000049890095,0.00001015942,0.98942786,0.006322073,0.0034004315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014731076,0.00002808502,0.0025383618,0.0010489727,0.000013854914,0.00014467169,0.002621502,0.00023572093,0.0001287725,0.4943895,0.4987996,0.000036236874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06404059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066262424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06404059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00869419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012054603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12733567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739100633","doi":"","title":"La Nation Quebecoise et la Minorite Nationale Canadienne-Francaise","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"French; Humanities; Vision; Political science; Dynamism; Theme (computing); Sociology; Ethnology; Art; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.02715354916946068,"score_gpt":0.23343761441735328,"score_spread":0.2062840652478926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739100633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119164325,0.016132377,0.0015604103,0.077108495,0.0013325664,0.000041047286,0.0010074306,0.00007222768,0.783581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75940466,0.0041686366,0.0006845685,0.0053377585,0.00011615914,0.000042646247,0.00034405247,0.000038109658,0.22986338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864954,0.00025156516,0.000021621872,0.00016147207,0.00027868358,0.0006370291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872166,0.00014606422,0.0000801692,0.00005022174,0.00054427166,0.00045754417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008829933,0.00046598422,0.00029180734,0.0009860815,0.014068203,0.006615151,0.00065491913,0.0016371842,0.01659836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013372934,0.00013692494,0.00027632856,0.0016858709,0.0063790563,0.0020795895,0.0020348644,0.0026553897,0.00092179317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005668146,0.000030209649,0.01042833,0.00011604068,0.000037148155,0.00059061777,0.05284294,0.00016442874,0.0005797692,0.81980485,0.08400286,0.03134614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000891519,0.000017180282,0.027748134,0.00023298043,0.000017655797,0.00018191506,0.026666917,0.00013397862,0.00015858593,0.0067986683,0.93798816,0.00004699487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98558205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95109844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048901536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046802934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35480714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740039160","doi":"","title":"We Are All Potential Terrorists Now: The Reconstituitive Effects of the Anti-Terrorim Act and the USA Patriot Act","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Politics; Prison; Legislation; Patriot Act; Terrorism; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01746272603832043,"score_gpt":0.2771627599884758,"score_spread":0.25970003395015534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740039160","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23765492,0.024769431,0.0006312417,0.37240127,0.003029807,0.0000539899,0.00017312237,0.00003483075,0.36125147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89535147,0.013163153,0.00027836816,0.04669973,0.0009813458,0.000052314954,0.00005955771,0.00002926618,0.043384835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595356,0.0025864334,0.00007134278,0.00017861032,0.00057359855,0.0006364525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99308866,0.0045683095,0.00087373576,0.00031642258,0.000718229,0.000434685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031506063,0.00031445533,0.000227488,0.0005513962,0.0059301415,0.005561464,0.00071388547,0.0033048198,0.0059315413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010379103,0.00025141586,0.00039550636,0.00055119005,0.009995128,0.0033872728,0.002667723,0.0050214166,0.0005897375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004933614,0.00031047632,0.015683904,0.0003612011,0.00008144292,0.001513654,0.050353713,0.00065548066,0.000773438,0.5782019,0.23432432,0.11724717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011799631,0.00030708328,0.06358267,0.0012208915,0.00018709803,0.0005329734,0.113991216,0.0006473441,0.0014937633,0.04943371,0.768394,0.00009123058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06506482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098624595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06506482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043831854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042108367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12937218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740105340","doi":"","title":"Federalism, Pluralism, and Constitutional Faith: Canada in Question","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Humanities; Federalism; Ethnology; Political science; Politics; Nothing; Pluralism (philosophy); Faith; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Law; Anthropology; Theology","score_opus":0.02056909318842353,"score_gpt":0.22311052790483904,"score_spread":0.2025414347164155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740105340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07279306,0.020691732,0.0016749238,0.33241406,0.00075035426,0.000044104465,0.00027929683,0.00003722866,0.5713152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9045357,0.005978541,0.00076081144,0.029109856,0.00018115943,0.0000381269,0.00007771066,0.00003484343,0.059283324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964818,0.0007244053,0.00005913791,0.00033340877,0.0007891788,0.0016120587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979297,0.00081598567,0.000120257384,0.00010760225,0.00056041457,0.0004659811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002568171,0.00024547946,0.00038544377,0.0011303579,0.024285268,0.012800584,0.0016682827,0.006341803,0.0063004405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00504966,0.00022001966,0.00036057903,0.0027369615,0.023935461,0.0045636958,0.0038439587,0.006271795,0.00022000875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008149822,0.0000069884854,0.00070147606,0.000019283465,0.000003725941,0.000083734245,0.0068398104,0.00012461809,0.00003494619,0.9769018,0.011536441,0.0037389656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041376694,0.000013993932,0.010192572,0.00045759074,0.000028716366,0.00010544478,0.03516828,0.0007006358,0.00025719407,0.26150948,0.6914369,0.00008779184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97559017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9844387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11312671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11312671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11156949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82079554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740259405","doi":"","title":"Les Procédures de modification constitutionnelle dans les fédérations","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Political science; Law and economics; Democracy; Normative; Law; Authoritarianism; Public administration; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05856938562781288,"score_gpt":0.3098007958848562,"score_spread":0.2512314102570433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740259405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14316677,0.0153170135,0.36170223,0.025206255,0.0024505586,0.00095685426,0.0006380902,0.0013138191,0.44924837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78970796,0.007886738,0.13096775,0.0018436662,0.00097154017,0.0013656442,0.00042018434,0.00025392816,0.06658257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9388106,0.03240586,0.0029736098,0.0049197515,0.017318062,0.0035721723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97368085,0.014319129,0.00287433,0.005366218,0.0031735776,0.0005858518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035047006,0.0010503023,0.0012050638,0.003002754,0.010260648,0.013187603,0.0020307987,0.0053501106,0.0043976633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047820088,0.0010012544,0.0024719764,0.0040030563,0.018909639,0.008337638,0.0037426173,0.012843897,0.0016249206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003751041,0.000036150104,0.00064179784,0.00005629229,0.000017275095,0.00014031213,0.0039198305,0.0015938503,0.00070452556,0.9578036,0.0021943206,0.03285445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016935168,0.000182751,0.0094279405,0.00061485544,0.00005082271,0.00064010714,0.0042814915,0.0053792996,0.004140934,0.35036913,0.6244491,0.00029423775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07942101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048632793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07942101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01793939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023937436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18534851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740690038","doi":"","title":"Some Observations on the Queen, the Crown, the Constitution, and the Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Commonwealth; Parliament; Law; Majesty; Throne; Monarchy; Political science; Separation of powers; Dominion; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Politics; History","score_opus":0.06133075550446539,"score_gpt":0.29283464028520007,"score_spread":0.2315038847807347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740690038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051386982,0.03900991,0.0020409452,0.23450288,0.0013650649,0.000036767877,0.00073490787,0.000033678956,0.6708889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7808478,0.035285152,0.0014894455,0.044974837,0.0018273048,0.00004047663,0.00046987692,0.00007662158,0.13498843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756765,0.00055205746,0.00006523666,0.00025523335,0.00074996543,0.0008097268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970584,0.0016888488,0.00021129675,0.00012034023,0.0006491336,0.0002720374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016771131,0.00032187137,0.00027876647,0.0012023454,0.01843554,0.008270557,0.0013539683,0.0041623707,0.006496497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043581384,0.00032820858,0.00029123342,0.0032469926,0.029035224,0.005783821,0.0018816136,0.008149208,0.00054155436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017332675,0.00001272056,0.00087234663,0.00005780551,0.0000030826973,0.00027670988,0.046846095,0.00008689527,0.00014644396,0.8967074,0.050736662,0.0042363796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013298934,0.000012441684,0.007880293,0.00038612902,0.000008079653,0.0001365672,0.042255886,0.00013936238,0.00026034014,0.10165535,0.84721106,0.000041254178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8521742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9049305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8521742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028843846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017104933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29739267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740894130","doi":"","title":"Post-Colonial Federalism: Social Citizenship and New Identities","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Citizenship; Political science; Federalism; Sociology; Ethnology; Politics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05106684700111322,"score_gpt":0.24331366476908672,"score_spread":0.1922468177679735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740894130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35255992,0.0075156796,0.0028900239,0.050656423,0.0002613277,0.000017927223,0.000060875376,0.000019958563,0.5860177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97438884,0.0009193774,0.00015674067,0.0008028479,0.00005221847,0.000008358517,0.0000147698,0.000005381585,0.023651399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990627,0.0003822617,0.00001735895,0.00008205189,0.00009995171,0.00035567663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938273,0.0002992062,0.00010750632,0.000059802107,0.0000710692,0.00007969079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012316029,0.00013534361,0.00016881654,0.0006827068,0.004196172,0.0038220698,0.00041851212,0.0012732568,0.00490169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010883347,0.00007171575,0.00018643933,0.0010481398,0.01061931,0.0029953613,0.0030079058,0.0014244376,0.00025078907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007832966,0.000013860194,0.0010874696,0.0000149884,0.0000016009506,0.00007866471,0.018204737,0.00007266899,0.000047025147,0.97164,0.0018853827,0.006945755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020056557,0.000040353905,0.023937183,0.00034759284,0.000011850049,0.00021863871,0.06086065,0.000885562,0.0005092003,0.44886634,0.46428245,0.000020074047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034336943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047334734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9656631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00822825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027693638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0682742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741181913","doi":"","title":"Citoyenneté incorporée et nouvel espace des nations","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Political science; Phenomenon; Globalization; Theme (computing); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04091930509820593,"score_gpt":0.24445210784344948,"score_spread":0.20353280274524355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741181913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014627373,0.019304996,0.004846145,0.025466045,0.0017599117,0.000022887201,0.0001263224,0.000094254385,0.93375206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60647076,0.020021465,0.0052805855,0.004777771,0.001121175,0.00007511709,0.00016622232,0.00017737545,0.36190957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747854,0.00066371454,0.000048285114,0.0003169617,0.0009542349,0.00053831376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988337,0.000335535,0.00011102103,0.0001637149,0.00041306205,0.00014296391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014678471,0.00053704676,0.00044054788,0.0021721656,0.0094578555,0.012023925,0.00076420314,0.0017034546,0.010807595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031425864,0.00021766248,0.00041510537,0.0026240142,0.016798189,0.003996281,0.0035109862,0.004240264,0.0010404142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004794692,0.0000017994024,0.00019196328,0.0000188144,0.0000024313103,0.000058551235,0.004094433,0.000026887745,0.000073129675,0.98433506,0.0036203268,0.007571748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003931072,0.000005047851,0.0013898005,0.000108177395,0.000005836292,0.00013802678,0.0028425718,0.00005373628,0.0001322435,0.03910243,0.95620775,0.000010528153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51920503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55859905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48079497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02756616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02077437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9672529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741567171","doi":"","title":"Citizen Supplicants?: Alain Carins' Citizens Plus and the Politics of Aboriginal/Constitutional Scholarship","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Politics; Scholarship; Humanities; Political science; Context (archaeology); Elaboration; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03733390591740756,"score_gpt":0.29782038788227494,"score_spread":0.2604864819648674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741567171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16113125,0.05710643,0.0005859254,0.3727353,0.0010258971,0.000018802246,0.000051854455,0.000049599865,0.40729496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242377,0.006261869,0.00026256082,0.0120297205,0.0002970291,0.000014301627,0.00001187131,0.000034373254,0.05685047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984238,0.00073612644,0.000022302629,0.00015729174,0.0002456383,0.00041487158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972566,0.0017229146,0.00018386872,0.00012011268,0.00032690735,0.00038957875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002407031,0.00018094837,0.00029911543,0.000740118,0.016013565,0.009093661,0.0008621402,0.00252155,0.004453273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027496822,0.0001321115,0.00011093462,0.0013813792,0.02830871,0.0032201293,0.003143332,0.0029714182,0.00026679743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022989803,0.000012716557,0.0009039876,0.00006890094,0.0000027901183,0.00024224444,0.10747639,0.00005371535,0.00008714723,0.8546362,0.027147798,0.009345014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015776863,0.000021066904,0.0056194784,0.0003933929,0.0000110360215,0.00015462721,0.1572202,0.0001379668,0.0002840701,0.06561415,0.7704963,0.000031942374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5418651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6762468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4581349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02342939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021857012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9216659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741982816","doi":"","title":"La Cas Du Québec à la Lumière du débat Taylor-Habermas","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02625474254448615,"score_gpt":0.2543178263570074,"score_spread":0.22806308381252124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741982816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21073157,0.014318177,0.0041838717,0.12490711,0.0013594608,0.000065895554,0.0007077849,0.00014192789,0.6435842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8119032,0.0024506876,0.0009340768,0.006120789,0.00007215102,0.000023732238,0.00013207248,0.000035922065,0.17832747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987785,0.00019625845,0.000020319183,0.00019210672,0.0002758586,0.00053682097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988508,0.0001287103,0.000095868534,0.00007283416,0.0006044534,0.0002473863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000723498,0.00023884415,0.0002804927,0.0007494158,0.011884208,0.004213025,0.00068528234,0.0018176525,0.015904361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021117448,0.00021527204,0.00021840027,0.001364633,0.004395394,0.0016508735,0.0014375513,0.0027305174,0.00066561665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008206809,0.00003972988,0.016402017,0.000136429,0.000035148038,0.0016049063,0.01645715,0.0004131151,0.0010475214,0.80707043,0.11229803,0.04441347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027982353,0.000035763835,0.031088347,0.00034861153,0.00005269949,0.00044455132,0.0152552575,0.00071118335,0.000887339,0.01965729,0.93141454,0.000076424636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9826633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99355763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046962366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046962366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044216238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3407374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742216822","doi":"","title":"The Nisga'a Treaty: What Future for the Inherent Right to Aboriginal Self- Government?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Humanities; Political science; Indigenous; Ethnology; Government (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014206437386537119,"score_gpt":0.24348467876509064,"score_spread":0.22927824137855352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742216822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13557225,0.009717721,0.001361896,0.09658626,0.0004949226,0.00003736743,0.00012971337,0.000029255329,0.7560706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9209055,0.002984648,0.00045443268,0.0031652167,0.00009694869,0.000028025608,0.0000572968,0.000020539514,0.07228746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974595,0.0007599644,0.000031894273,0.0001620125,0.00047130013,0.0011153381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992207,0.00018016133,0.000068805355,0.00010243689,0.00024358883,0.00018422665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017914198,0.00017514033,0.00026244193,0.0006295017,0.008806297,0.007956742,0.0008206227,0.001832547,0.0065874504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023345128,0.00011020879,0.0002074914,0.0011364628,0.015621644,0.0033449428,0.0020171632,0.0032424387,0.00037105224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015040019,0.000007676967,0.0011303059,0.00005461004,0.0000042514826,0.00018967569,0.039447792,0.00010320822,0.00012980604,0.944308,0.0063140336,0.008295668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000115825305,0.000017209668,0.016658392,0.0007305788,0.000017138535,0.00013132146,0.13911797,0.00027431152,0.0002005488,0.12181225,0.72099334,0.00003530659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6834241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7522461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31657588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029112745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035000354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6368805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742267879","doi":"","title":"The Purpose of Canadian Equality Rights","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Fundamental rights; Identity (music); Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07338972501701502,"score_gpt":0.29192099156510964,"score_spread":0.21853126654809463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742267879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036826062,0.004188373,0.0023307484,0.03694074,0.00128364,0.00007396552,0.0005467606,0.00007498486,0.95087826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24963458,0.0048749247,0.0049386816,0.022758828,0.0006181924,0.000162538,0.00072967546,0.0001859756,0.7160966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892948,0.0011908894,0.00026358958,0.0015490062,0.0045081964,0.0031934641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99391454,0.0008848319,0.00022261425,0.000581646,0.0035741508,0.0008221335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039764377,0.00078548625,0.00056554645,0.0024475255,0.025754636,0.016201168,0.0024279833,0.005014991,0.027269812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009816377,0.00051799824,0.0005815978,0.0035268352,0.0153914355,0.0048149894,0.004982111,0.006839475,0.002826446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000573547,0.0000044245776,0.00024278817,0.000022687122,0.0000019742452,0.00004061857,0.0018964988,0.000051225194,0.000053942607,0.9432204,0.045053914,0.009405892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007660769,0.0000048062875,0.001449994,0.00012854366,0.000008241796,0.00004682535,0.0016442803,0.00013803838,0.00019719286,0.03902477,0.9573239,0.000025729161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.967837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9685116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89775455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.102245435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15505219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.741846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742655197","doi":"","title":"The construction of Nunavut and its impact on collective identity in the canadian eastern arctic","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Collective identity; Government (linguistics); Arctic; The arctic; Sociology; Political science; Geography; Gender studies; Genealogy; Ethnology; History; Law; Politics; Aesthetics; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.050447222636410556,"score_gpt":0.3472969963767047,"score_spread":0.29684977374029414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742655197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8256188,0.0027450428,0.00084132026,0.008377043,0.00023669004,0.000031148375,0.000067867826,0.000022883743,0.16205917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891515,0.00063299335,0.0002556014,0.00017747846,0.000008223302,0.000007878304,0.000014227411,0.000011455893,0.009740667],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769765,0.0005308212,0.00003893281,0.00018040021,0.00049117004,0.0010610588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846977,0.00030861297,0.00015802024,0.00006300224,0.0005036232,0.000496886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022162527,0.00032623232,0.00033547962,0.0015052975,0.03873702,0.007564075,0.0013660926,0.0007399825,0.0030339614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003360682,0.00022025958,0.00027698244,0.0022439428,0.018575324,0.0012306595,0.0065959897,0.0013579063,0.00013945617],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006492543,0.000031418564,0.033388656,0.000080228194,0.000019937645,0.0008366678,0.7919543,0.0006282352,0.00062535104,0.14003347,0.0054063885,0.026930382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052989576,0.00001653992,0.04548243,0.00016018515,0.000022972734,0.00015649087,0.8566004,0.00028238047,0.00030970483,0.0059344275,0.09097861,0.000050526836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08351481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08443291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6059452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743130901","doi":"","title":"Cultural Myths and Political Realities or Why Québec Will Never Separate","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Mythology; Politics; Compromise; Political science; History; Art; Law","score_opus":0.04169517575311155,"score_gpt":0.2592332488909252,"score_spread":0.21753807313781365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743130901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061965305,0.009129882,0.00078283425,0.2979952,0.0010271549,0.00002337129,0.00016443936,0.00003519666,0.6288766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.818414,0.0033077346,0.00031604114,0.038773112,0.00018552809,0.000040607956,0.0000781769,0.000056813107,0.13882796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979826,0.00044045688,0.00002325608,0.00019492832,0.0003094498,0.0010493159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986332,0.00023897226,0.00009863568,0.00008682979,0.00044026892,0.0005020511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016674402,0.0003357569,0.00025410333,0.0010726899,0.022754142,0.008062621,0.0013887085,0.0028297848,0.015374665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027333626,0.00018389431,0.00024012511,0.0014125569,0.026056541,0.0046152114,0.0029248875,0.005756979,0.00075081893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025985308,0.000025436768,0.002984222,0.000056403263,0.00001598257,0.00022283495,0.04352922,0.00013316973,0.00011461331,0.8562238,0.078356765,0.018311592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002325236,0.000012397391,0.011168933,0.00061605574,0.000018453078,0.000096927346,0.13303429,0.0002870737,0.00020176863,0.08427029,0.77021414,0.00005633297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9349499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96441156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065050125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05064339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034171283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36744517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743247351","doi":"","title":"Capturing Proceeds from Criminal Notoriety: A Case Study","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Parliament; Law; Legislation; Political science; Mandate; Criminal law; Legislature; Cabinet (room); Constitution; History; Politics","score_opus":0.06359759635595999,"score_gpt":0.30414136980302,"score_spread":0.24054377344706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743247351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8958316,0.0049824547,0.0019087609,0.011443329,0.00020074313,0.0006731056,0.00018093617,0.000015110193,0.08476395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94313395,0.012003644,0.0022204139,0.007862777,0.00020003402,0.0004849684,0.00011917178,0.00003279444,0.033942256],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599457,0.0018747093,0.00020765592,0.00024689373,0.00065387494,0.0010222449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99341244,0.0045340587,0.00074558024,0.0002694972,0.0005289555,0.0005094523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004539097,0.00069300155,0.00058712816,0.0020919284,0.014856725,0.003671091,0.0021222644,0.006545281,0.0045843516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00997067,0.00067957863,0.00070322445,0.0025759547,0.0046574413,0.0028371746,0.0036232946,0.004552605,0.00062659354],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019441977,0.0033854258,0.06067156,0.0008436351,0.0000724178,0.5119525,0.2358465,0.0008033671,0.0011991536,0.10941937,0.029722426,0.04588925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013532833,0.0007063794,0.046941373,0.002306358,0.00018052003,0.17852148,0.52129066,0.0014727997,0.0020432011,0.010756562,0.23545751,0.00018781885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.079867125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24752265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079867125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007928758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063223136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15880448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743531098","doi":"","title":"Canada, Criminal Appeals and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in the 1880s","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Dominion; Law; Criminal justice; Administration of justice; Humanities; Judicial review; Administration (probate law); Art","score_opus":0.03505024835232204,"score_gpt":0.2223802239238744,"score_spread":0.18732997557155237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743531098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1106435,0.049373277,0.0008182897,0.1647012,0.002582075,0.00014844639,0.0013837874,0.000107097854,0.6702423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64576256,0.011262968,0.00052831986,0.023721946,0.00061380636,0.00005225605,0.0003124677,0.0000958453,0.3176499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225837,0.0005621407,0.00014295742,0.00063049723,0.0022998212,0.004106118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949911,0.0009421558,0.0003293935,0.00013004731,0.0021671308,0.001440072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002671551,0.00051902106,0.00049779867,0.0033272663,0.039388407,0.012755627,0.0020331037,0.00869772,0.011540447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010579638,0.0011974719,0.0004076901,0.004573287,0.022305716,0.0026095232,0.0028835575,0.008980521,0.0008373441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072160285,0.000036861915,0.0068168677,0.00012490257,0.000029017863,0.00075150875,0.026490651,0.0005121781,0.00024013822,0.7304322,0.21079081,0.023702737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033092445,0.000016124062,0.029648213,0.00036085636,0.000032234737,0.00011619139,0.009882717,0.00024408089,0.00021080353,0.010667336,0.94869757,0.000090856156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99717355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2742903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2742903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24579847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8417204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743980511","doi":"","title":"Adverse Effect Discrimination: Proving the Prima Facie Case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Prima facie; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04223672470172506,"score_gpt":0.32492945458745726,"score_spread":0.2826927298857322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743980511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1995808,0.0030379398,0.018734219,0.05475626,0.0007730739,0.00020552649,0.00036203745,0.00004027094,0.72250986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9423755,0.0018277692,0.0029360838,0.012552644,0.0005332071,0.00012202922,0.000084609914,0.000013970058,0.039554212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965861,0.0009110388,0.00013326385,0.00050088146,0.0007771429,0.0010916401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98978174,0.006343788,0.001023958,0.0011564569,0.0012420225,0.00045215135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057332874,0.00052498624,0.0006142878,0.001790138,0.0040962026,0.0035055352,0.0014858752,0.0054048365,0.014754537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012623642,0.00032362554,0.0014891054,0.00095518713,0.0066622635,0.003978578,0.005421086,0.005327814,0.0013019132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082705286,0.00009074438,0.0068534375,0.00007564434,0.00004589715,0.002455358,0.0010749763,0.00045555332,0.0003937676,0.9753361,0.0040850146,0.009050939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003836961,0.00027827435,0.012904395,0.0004932825,0.00028836838,0.0026491764,0.004461899,0.004774303,0.0029954114,0.8541667,0.11654139,0.00006312661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020149145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01747698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020149145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00314039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003713297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049358845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744442049","doi":"","title":"La Politique De la Reconnaissance et Les Nationalismes Au Canada","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Confusion; Meaning (existential); Foundation (evidence); Restructuring; Political science; Character (mathematics); Multinational corporation; Sociology; Political economy; Epistemology; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.02759956260623948,"score_gpt":0.25314730151036485,"score_spread":0.22554773890412538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744442049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10478536,0.033332113,0.002705872,0.08197641,0.0005470885,0.000036454363,0.00032608447,0.00012438942,0.77616614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8872273,0.008703616,0.0012944089,0.0025267217,0.00011071656,0.000022932985,0.000081051956,0.00005047555,0.09998283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735117,0.0003868326,0.00003522821,0.00022075325,0.0008768979,0.0011292627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986022,0.0004060125,0.00009748407,0.000066423476,0.00049131917,0.00033653935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013206336,0.0004148615,0.00047502224,0.0016562303,0.017759517,0.010836676,0.0007942856,0.0020349962,0.0074411565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029352254,0.00031297008,0.0002822229,0.0029537305,0.018832644,0.0021974933,0.0017233053,0.0042410935,0.00033524752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013401889,0.000006204099,0.0007683305,0.000027646565,0.0000047823337,0.00009065868,0.0063879914,0.00031262555,0.00014449464,0.9705364,0.009835905,0.011871537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027706064,0.000012098598,0.014125391,0.00023174874,0.000015788488,0.00017204245,0.012407717,0.0008119041,0.00029709828,0.05954905,0.9122775,0.00007197902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99468344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99464744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17323837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17323837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16070142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9589263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744841385","doi":"","title":"A Passive Internationalist: Jean Chretien and Canadian Foreign Policy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign policy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.014585884640393992,"score_gpt":0.24136722598770813,"score_spread":0.22678134134731415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744841385","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013332301,0.05080724,0.000496199,0.7310482,0.0029747915,0.000017665503,0.00015075596,0.000034469358,0.20113829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5743951,0.050419122,0.0010961402,0.091548875,0.0030284256,0.000059700524,0.00011510694,0.00019973298,0.2791377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99431026,0.0011619182,0.000102334016,0.0005601142,0.0015839261,0.002281452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943831,0.001998628,0.00021700229,0.00020555007,0.0016897368,0.0015058693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056459894,0.00090456527,0.0010488713,0.003113476,0.044701736,0.025142983,0.0028370451,0.014980787,0.013947589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012156157,0.0007188826,0.00050395774,0.006735391,0.03337827,0.009975363,0.0043318,0.012683142,0.00067687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030409914,0.000015897054,0.00048069292,0.000060844053,0.000009310951,0.00010047133,0.008794402,0.00025426023,0.00005475988,0.8496631,0.13312885,0.007407098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003242036,0.000007727738,0.0020220617,0.00037633447,0.000020136673,0.000068938156,0.026532818,0.00023658236,0.000120356024,0.094096296,0.87639076,0.000095604606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98525465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1599566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1599566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21604688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97433126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745694497","doi":"","title":"The Judicial Conceptualization of Culture after Delgamuukw and Van der Peet","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Sovereignty; Law; Politics; Conceptualization; Context (archaeology); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Political science; Sociology; Legal culture; History; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.013735468596793558,"score_gpt":0.2657368160699835,"score_spread":0.25200134747319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745694497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03488779,0.13734798,0.013214039,0.26898202,0.0048324177,0.00007713382,0.00017273078,0.000048855516,0.540437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82207656,0.033491556,0.003037561,0.048259873,0.0008965506,0.00013904068,0.00009263768,0.00007618292,0.091929965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995613,0.0012110738,0.00009523516,0.00037566383,0.0016339535,0.0010710789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977843,0.0010121317,0.0001318372,0.00009551789,0.0007905654,0.00018578449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002473744,0.00045818754,0.00040299722,0.0013558723,0.00951434,0.009448318,0.0022902372,0.0033467617,0.0021597287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060613556,0.0002939824,0.00030850302,0.0030638347,0.03322425,0.0044014105,0.0019715484,0.006203435,0.00024214048],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043733235,0.0000035608552,0.00017407448,0.000025833917,0.0000026795285,0.000054460823,0.0075309626,0.00007931374,0.000044480414,0.97758204,0.009028737,0.0054694633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017447825,0.000017767876,0.0027605826,0.00070763717,0.000020600386,0.00012055176,0.01735732,0.00028858776,0.00033250666,0.39025173,0.5880657,0.000059556405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72823036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7586096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27176964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035866447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037987668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5467403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746322026","doi":"","title":"Legal Modesty and Political Boldness: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in Chaoulli V. Quebec","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Victory; Law; Politics; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Health care; Dispose pattern; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology","score_opus":0.019684977224863873,"score_gpt":0.2691515264457322,"score_spread":0.24946654922086833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746322026","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14803387,0.012768129,0.00088486064,0.48016483,0.001286189,0.00007808447,0.0004152411,0.00004733904,0.3563215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.904695,0.0023380131,0.00034838583,0.05837357,0.00026766292,0.000042033313,0.00006329342,0.000030335894,0.03384171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99264574,0.0012282572,0.00009953718,0.00052931806,0.0019765785,0.0035204778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354833,0.002654435,0.00027437243,0.00015035114,0.0018213522,0.0015510953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056638625,0.00032419807,0.00054505037,0.0013715926,0.04719704,0.014606341,0.002405924,0.010336983,0.005391102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013818206,0.0005076559,0.00051012344,0.001987603,0.018629048,0.002346356,0.0030448532,0.012887359,0.00027294873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006139341,0.000033795128,0.0048435293,0.00004468383,0.000035087593,0.00081390206,0.015292154,0.000458085,0.0004986221,0.8816161,0.08797313,0.008329482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030797796,0.000084114225,0.050620787,0.0009195356,0.00021429334,0.00033896643,0.042518653,0.002666452,0.0016389212,0.15471523,0.7454902,0.00048486397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15483469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15483469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18368968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98027194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747512870","doi":"","title":"Royal succession, abdication, and regency in the realms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abdication; Parliament; Dominion; Law; Humanities; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.04576666992306225,"score_gpt":0.33130244826572774,"score_spread":0.2855357783426655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747512870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11263133,0.008520312,0.0029371958,0.0168525,0.0004191691,0.00006494156,0.00004830288,0.00004002395,0.8584863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89577425,0.0020769374,0.0007203196,0.0029798828,0.00016175574,0.000025789435,0.000016207978,0.000017704799,0.098227136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951723,0.0011503211,0.00025358575,0.0004375731,0.0012913147,0.0016948519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975007,0.0010307396,0.0002868543,0.00017121618,0.0004985586,0.0005119132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027179243,0.00021682048,0.0002726504,0.00082844065,0.01050846,0.0057616774,0.0008299331,0.0028135679,0.0069991313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008430674,0.00032192998,0.00030461125,0.0006994032,0.026424557,0.0029046421,0.004798545,0.0045182994,0.0005590879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000149333755,0.000011936429,0.001008885,0.00002847288,0.0000033033796,0.0004882449,0.011104071,0.00016698157,0.00019225253,0.97583413,0.0044147507,0.0067320024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004823817,0.00006692673,0.021534063,0.0006192507,0.000027431493,0.0010423107,0.03129216,0.0008325986,0.0009669401,0.18149307,0.7619709,0.00010625407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33916965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5408141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33916965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01771966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017420571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6743909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748666452","doi":"","title":"An Elusive Search for Community: Globalization and the Canadian National Identities","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Humanities; Political science; Ideology; Welfare state; National identity; Ethnology; Politics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048764536349920666,"score_gpt":0.28166993655341666,"score_spread":0.23290540020349598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748666452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2544793,0.012560697,0.00089637307,0.071012385,0.00038192671,0.000054076878,0.00043580643,0.00003755915,0.66014194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94718826,0.004378135,0.00048934756,0.002119285,0.000040179202,0.000020655281,0.0000945192,0.00002694902,0.045642585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678755,0.0005400398,0.000042043805,0.00030791413,0.00085615605,0.0014662868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972434,0.00041592063,0.00019777699,0.00014327375,0.0008327644,0.0011668815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026508514,0.00040210903,0.00047282895,0.0032697732,0.037036013,0.013446821,0.0015775235,0.0020092556,0.010906004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004028175,0.00025018054,0.00035306852,0.0052544707,0.02965492,0.0045170044,0.006168185,0.002291122,0.00042746862],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054936423,0.000022835982,0.009243719,0.00009843197,0.000011015276,0.00024419808,0.1550841,0.00022363914,0.00014691097,0.77599233,0.024637777,0.034240115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001854767,0.000014394704,0.03499727,0.00046181286,0.000026561343,0.00014279898,0.31849778,0.0003852232,0.00018552454,0.06290649,0.58226055,0.00010309063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99261886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17385001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17385001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16445164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9582169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750460237","doi":"","title":"Obsèques Prématurées: la Disparition des Minorities Francophones et Autres Illusions Nationalists","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Ethnology; Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.029742632846835704,"score_gpt":0.2478335561691683,"score_spread":0.2180909233223326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750460237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8222122,0.008180613,0.00017692785,0.097473435,0.0005985672,0.00001121926,0.000100680736,0.000019115589,0.07122724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753517,0.0011582073,0.000045476474,0.0069486666,0.00014301112,0.0000088328725,0.00001767632,0.0000099097515,0.016316518],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982855,0.0006277918,0.00002907809,0.00015854591,0.00028863872,0.0006105501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975781,0.00066781434,0.0004004684,0.00010443246,0.00053968164,0.0007094597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025415258,0.0003442959,0.00027699908,0.0008612018,0.017765839,0.004967321,0.00069690845,0.0024876145,0.0035312925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002185874,0.00017381308,0.0002078502,0.0006651769,0.015303776,0.002035059,0.0030328755,0.0030783054,0.0002829015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008647209,0.00005053054,0.034896646,0.00006750117,0.00002601546,0.0012047181,0.8675188,0.000060236987,0.0007101319,0.04698632,0.03093495,0.017457757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000144571295,0.00006410215,0.073996596,0.0003215043,0.000022571261,0.00057993346,0.6590742,0.00011927645,0.000326077,0.002709921,0.26268482,0.000086534725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66508836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70289963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01628231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060560005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.673768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760854242","doi":"","title":"Enduring Eliminatory Logics, Market Rationalities, and Territorial Desires: Assesing the Harper Government´s Legacy Concerning Aboriginal Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Marketization; State (computer science); Treaty; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Context (archaeology); Colonialism; Sociology; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law; Politics; China; Public administration","score_opus":0.024365008147911628,"score_gpt":0.28572592786791196,"score_spread":0.2613609197200003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760854242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56723076,0.0069257254,0.0048239324,0.055986412,0.00017149199,0.000024432002,0.000021126882,0.00003652156,0.36477962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993887,0.0005303513,0.00023221958,0.00057154027,0.00001778396,0.000004219913,0.000001775582,0.0000053551144,0.004749731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638003,0.001841689,0.000042760847,0.0002871393,0.00057166093,0.0008766742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971103,0.0018552297,0.00022615833,0.00021523678,0.00036804206,0.00022510998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005589239,0.00021602315,0.00026747645,0.0008155727,0.017961515,0.008555434,0.00086504495,0.0016592733,0.0016544423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040374566,0.00019603306,0.00016452694,0.00076176925,0.08925782,0.0031435038,0.0044395803,0.0032952982,0.000084228646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010083349,0.000005030309,0.0006806485,0.000020691208,0.0000029472278,0.00017714532,0.27291685,0.00008465542,0.00017077151,0.7201303,0.0008500859,0.0049507325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015330574,0.000038401606,0.0057291095,0.00028398822,0.00002954293,0.00030831073,0.53928393,0.0005036839,0.001005082,0.24532168,0.20741512,0.0000658083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44423872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57857496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5557613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022686856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020124039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8833059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762342677","doi":"","title":"a Failed Discourse of Distrust Amid Significant Procedural Change: The Harper Government´s Legacy in Immigration and Refugee Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Immigration; Refugee; Immigration law; Government (linguistics); Immigration policy; Political science; Law; Politics; Sociology; Public administration; Political economy","score_opus":0.02491421388405214,"score_gpt":0.2832272938847591,"score_spread":0.25831308000070696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762342677","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2955178,0.019165603,0.0041636573,0.4462901,0.0015986871,0.000029457598,0.00005495118,0.00011227479,0.23306745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96637875,0.0016620139,0.00039419613,0.02244285,0.0002323527,0.000014044341,0.000010905684,0.00005215439,0.008812843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828251,0.008695393,0.00028954237,0.0010987421,0.0035970185,0.003494252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821797,0.011620847,0.0010918571,0.0008490087,0.0023721938,0.0018865392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015085773,0.00048380066,0.00073843775,0.0024820725,0.05591432,0.026564427,0.0032370784,0.009238432,0.002149618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018215049,0.0006154663,0.0004704422,0.002758366,0.12768385,0.009806561,0.009803756,0.016445022,0.00031246565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018070723,0.000014801974,0.0009439013,0.000037521906,0.0000063935504,0.0004475732,0.4607901,0.0000778605,0.00010140649,0.5181121,0.012202615,0.0072476794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023412125,0.000028090746,0.0025691497,0.0007754348,0.000024626464,0.0005024712,0.5689574,0.00039175284,0.00040181784,0.06979213,0.35642755,0.00010606758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7336369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7150647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26636308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07499703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06300606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5441441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767351204","doi":"","title":"Harper's Legacy on Federalism: \"Open Federalism\" or Hidden Agenda?","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Cooperative federalism; Charter; Dual federalism; Public administration; New Federalism; Government (linguistics); Political science; State (computer science); Open government; Political economy; Sociology; Politics; Law; Open data","score_opus":0.09872695523220752,"score_gpt":0.3350872457046306,"score_spread":0.23636029047242307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767351204","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02183922,0.016534965,0.007250505,0.75409836,0.0030612086,0.000019501305,0.00009786511,0.00007510272,0.1970234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8099594,0.008676325,0.002462047,0.1374749,0.0019803583,0.00005586089,0.000049471982,0.00008584427,0.039255876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99229324,0.0036769963,0.00014674163,0.0008760325,0.0017207607,0.0012861026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939535,0.003894607,0.00033603786,0.0005499027,0.0006348553,0.0006310642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074400264,0.00025750976,0.0004236161,0.0010560413,0.01224301,0.0104338005,0.0010478272,0.003880827,0.003486657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012837446,0.0002993214,0.0002550587,0.0016659533,0.027974702,0.007731202,0.003984468,0.010704598,0.00039275814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010977265,0.0000055921987,0.00017931091,0.000014408304,0.0000035122105,0.000031412637,0.0030747566,0.000049090348,0.00003142837,0.95291287,0.037384275,0.0063023763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016385802,0.000015105262,0.0010600257,0.00018405828,0.0000072102794,0.00006776349,0.0038552373,0.00020792021,0.0002376576,0.46749228,0.52682495,0.00003139431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05106371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074778356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9489363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01248747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011671115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101532996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909059062","doi":"","title":"An Autonomy-Based Approach to Section 15(1) of the Charter","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Charter; Section (typography); Plaintiff; Law; Test (biology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.031028321625016623,"score_gpt":0.26764931251597757,"score_spread":0.23662099089096095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909059062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041646156,0.0037167454,0.08606877,0.1550109,0.0057955533,0.0007781663,0.00044688457,0.00028408045,0.70625275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8019172,0.001356345,0.052591912,0.0653568,0.0015716257,0.0010833372,0.00020379556,0.000081707,0.0758372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782639,0.0077186287,0.0011939146,0.0024206452,0.006451017,0.0039519514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874681,0.0074030906,0.001276818,0.0008289134,0.002384291,0.00063861546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0155938035,0.0004888002,0.0006346651,0.0019384974,0.00636285,0.008987191,0.0037670902,0.011989505,0.00338143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020279447,0.0004527045,0.001712674,0.0011786186,0.022451641,0.0042049265,0.004333973,0.0128237,0.0007204016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047674453,0.000014774752,0.0002912711,0.000012876695,0.0000024131543,0.000060122155,0.0017301465,0.000133346,0.0001091213,0.9919912,0.0036295578,0.002020494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052033236,0.00019905712,0.005631706,0.00056176685,0.000051019128,0.00044359834,0.0036082643,0.0015653544,0.0013577726,0.6535163,0.33279684,0.00021629916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070389934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.101030864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9296101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013738728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030134505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13996041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909747325","doi":"","title":"Th e Protective Function of the Constitutional Amending Formula","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Parliament; Legislature; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Politics; Power (physics); Enumerated powers; Interpretation (philosophy); Separation of powers; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.05151756309056284,"score_gpt":0.29775353075041033,"score_spread":0.2462359676598475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909747325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03565921,0.0038988586,0.0400225,0.053099625,0.0023146195,0.00018055255,0.00012817375,0.00024514992,0.86445135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92141306,0.0016754494,0.014787096,0.013121227,0.0013302624,0.00022272191,0.00007776809,0.00008923974,0.047283154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834381,0.0059357923,0.00086422986,0.0022466688,0.0054291463,0.0020860443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98344904,0.007269313,0.001131912,0.0044375923,0.00330009,0.000412077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010680575,0.00039799258,0.0006738526,0.0019770814,0.0045542154,0.008674071,0.0019802917,0.0058333254,0.004507648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032865748,0.0004965544,0.0007038376,0.0013812963,0.030176898,0.004915609,0.0036659702,0.009417455,0.0007001157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030474075,0.0000029614955,0.000054026277,0.000006803801,0.0000013231119,0.000016576822,0.00039864547,0.000039742106,0.00007565058,0.9954692,0.0010150139,0.0029169905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007069573,0.000105948275,0.0021860993,0.00024415104,0.00006678621,0.00025876248,0.00123065,0.0012457327,0.0024041028,0.71360654,0.27850112,0.00007946715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02440772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021282101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02440772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072348733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015503968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056484938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911083342","doi":"","title":"Spending Power, Social Policy, and the Principle of Subsidiarity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; Welfare state; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); State action; Social policy; Action (physics); Public administration; Economics; Welfare; Law; European union; Economic policy; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05304713381432047,"score_gpt":0.34606081555692536,"score_spread":0.2930136817426049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911083342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03762421,0.0040555527,0.061518595,0.05852958,0.00041173407,0.00006290457,0.000091206,0.00006296873,0.8376434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676138,0.001826426,0.005419638,0.0026524183,0.0003508345,0.00013399744,0.000038064623,0.000036168254,0.02192858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512607,0.0020915712,0.00013959869,0.00054697174,0.0010868438,0.0010088742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780077,0.0012730306,0.00022151026,0.00028701665,0.00026329717,0.0001543671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043246406,0.0004581377,0.00059968216,0.0017823695,0.0045783515,0.005553737,0.0009425788,0.0027459778,0.0038159364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055264337,0.0003265908,0.00064279884,0.001693401,0.042269208,0.005736058,0.0040419437,0.0040799375,0.00037402625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.9549567e-7,6.94994e-7,0.000014662297,0.000001832802,4.308794e-7,0.0000024115336,0.00008279574,0.00004359248,0.0000068354643,0.9994325,0.00012646003,0.0002872616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006715753,0.0000034627872,0.00012977814,0.000021012373,0.0000023947352,0.00000927797,0.00012828808,0.00016831579,0.00005069865,0.9826093,0.016868282,0.0000025914505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024396954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01864472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024396954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014123788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010140908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10247576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911163197","doi":"","title":"Placing Vulnerability at the Centre of Section 15(1) of the Charter: A Case Comment on Inglis V British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Charter; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Section (typography); Law; Order (exchange); Vulnerability assessment; Political science; Public administration; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Psychological resilience; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.059604692739547493,"score_gpt":0.2800088711088762,"score_spread":0.22040417836932868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911163197","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18213883,0.007833836,0.0023786563,0.51523197,0.001961936,0.00021495785,0.00033129528,0.000120677694,0.2897878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72467005,0.0021318712,0.0010587036,0.182009,0.00021833378,0.00010927308,0.00006790448,0.00005138571,0.08968356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886076,0.0021623939,0.00026863473,0.000889806,0.00336469,0.0047070156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950236,0.002651974,0.00022391314,0.00014719075,0.0011942508,0.00075902726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006051542,0.0006323255,0.0007125699,0.0012712023,0.05672798,0.011006042,0.004379556,0.022524029,0.0034193536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012383271,0.00082748244,0.0007455322,0.0022798162,0.018466499,0.0025846262,0.0052296603,0.023163782,0.0003685278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008435563,0.00006355934,0.00747572,0.00026517035,0.00002915233,0.008148757,0.16115133,0.0014598774,0.0015473852,0.5866736,0.20998254,0.023118528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000743257,0.00010220183,0.029957388,0.0015275249,0.00014687382,0.0015597948,0.2286497,0.0022039658,0.0020769765,0.047629435,0.6852935,0.00077831215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9860255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1105535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1105535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14364928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8021256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911209324","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of the \"No Hierarchy of Constitutional Rights\" Doctrine","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Constitution; Hierarchy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.019014728724406037,"score_gpt":0.2685540167596146,"score_spread":0.24953928803520856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911209324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021994239,0.0047940062,0.039143756,0.07326412,0.000538107,0.00012507463,0.00017367111,0.000043117874,0.85992396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132527,0.0029131905,0.010148427,0.016841432,0.00060667086,0.00018663569,0.00010877469,0.00004171385,0.055900384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922029,0.002023475,0.00018715608,0.0006859504,0.003514909,0.0013856766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949098,0.0027411585,0.00048630536,0.0003694254,0.0012137205,0.00027949296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062572467,0.00033765205,0.00043880934,0.002072697,0.0067092576,0.005694978,0.0019685996,0.004144856,0.0059672007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009788376,0.00033901838,0.00056421716,0.0016445647,0.036022443,0.005635236,0.0022917097,0.0064461785,0.0005796573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.199238e-7,0.0000010766961,0.000024696086,0.0000034863601,3.9674688e-7,0.000007586844,0.0001785076,0.000031269734,0.000013404563,0.9985268,0.0006162687,0.00059593684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012026589,0.00001073665,0.00062013825,0.0000828394,0.0000055374117,0.00004020146,0.0005349763,0.00060384796,0.00016419087,0.9309348,0.06697957,0.000011124686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14811176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16222277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14811176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019519284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020458097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29449934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912097679","doi":"","title":"\"Providing Essential Services of Reasonable Quality to All Canadians\": Understanding Section 36(1)(c) of the Constitution Act, 1982","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Underpinning; Law; Section (typography); Order (exchange); Political science; Quality (philosophy); Sanitation; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.110776023013309,"score_gpt":0.2567147494172821,"score_spread":0.14593872640397312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912097679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13994019,0.00799796,0.006246895,0.33500937,0.00082115806,0.00017813542,0.0025637108,0.00009518004,0.50714743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8928618,0.0038804542,0.005150125,0.05163337,0.00033156533,0.00012230384,0.0003085353,0.000027754155,0.04568409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945005,0.00076757144,0.00016929414,0.0003903155,0.0022785072,0.0018938585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581146,0.0016342349,0.00048614724,0.00024240032,0.001341575,0.000484239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004167196,0.00026248698,0.0003081641,0.0014694793,0.010878325,0.0073411446,0.0014251046,0.00692496,0.0034256198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014012359,0.00034442198,0.0003980195,0.0021552683,0.015412558,0.002462931,0.0020171134,0.004409259,0.00031030417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007139335,0.000009618301,0.0015699245,0.000031165582,0.0000030837014,0.00007636141,0.0033891455,0.00033060138,0.000111369234,0.9706826,0.020439725,0.0033493096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006893958,0.000053995827,0.04426704,0.00080862065,0.00007155563,0.00021400819,0.014583041,0.0025363707,0.000837011,0.3187214,0.6176099,0.00022812425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9653881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97612584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046188444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046188444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13443024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33512217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913374802","doi":"","title":"All I Really Needed to Know about Federalism, I Learned from Insurance Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Constitution; Public law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06509475405411932,"score_gpt":0.3207575643447488,"score_spread":0.2556628102906294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913374802","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01112342,0.06598193,0.022125969,0.70836,0.0043172645,0.00004701898,0.0004616048,0.00016129078,0.18742158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62819016,0.11907969,0.03226638,0.14406289,0.005937918,0.00007761092,0.000387535,0.00024045851,0.069757335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961826,0.0009929438,0.000119468496,0.0005662946,0.0015761572,0.0005625005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99415237,0.003023273,0.00025319227,0.00046947147,0.0016442353,0.0004574546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005009198,0.00048955256,0.00066549866,0.0027190503,0.010370892,0.008307088,0.0014874515,0.003078955,0.007189525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011503421,0.00031908645,0.00057416223,0.0033103374,0.04101174,0.009016682,0.0024535062,0.010376595,0.0009898023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000150466085,0.000013174006,0.0012620696,0.00025753968,0.000017662189,0.00013654029,0.011101723,0.00030723063,0.00021163472,0.8661378,0.07741238,0.04312725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000770748,0.000021722879,0.002492232,0.00078226044,0.000019364723,0.00017343294,0.0070157293,0.0003932001,0.00037378864,0.30955443,0.67910075,0.00006527279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7379874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7526593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7379874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035506673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027719365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5271113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952624205","doi":"","title":"Reframing the Constitutional Questions on the 2008 Prorogation: Debates, Dialogue, and Boundary Drawing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02362546378898004,"score_gpt":0.2682723839868981,"score_spread":0.2446469201979181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952624205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30332616,0.011405157,0.008907314,0.24575949,0.00094610953,0.000096807446,0.00016831541,0.00006495719,0.42932576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96694046,0.001305657,0.0013065956,0.009512038,0.00017688371,0.000043590935,0.00003081474,0.000029917355,0.020653939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816024,0.009504067,0.00058844365,0.0015454239,0.0031591235,0.0036005317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98655057,0.009404344,0.0007059813,0.0007128101,0.001873955,0.0007523493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019658059,0.00029873697,0.00048625792,0.0018357395,0.021142662,0.013510002,0.0026942447,0.0065064454,0.0029791966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024221253,0.0005675921,0.00036370085,0.0019038119,0.03655967,0.0073155095,0.0055958685,0.010085539,0.00029606887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032083866,0.000010636052,0.0010035172,0.00006191946,0.0000049275977,0.0003859216,0.17691638,0.00024378518,0.00048556016,0.80302185,0.007989617,0.009843839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028983217,0.00003529012,0.0066791247,0.0006243814,0.000021267762,0.00017620996,0.2875582,0.00057622173,0.0012367883,0.09335366,0.6095959,0.0001140018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5180327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5769154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48196727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06635854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048257615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96961135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978324001","doi":"","title":"Is Originalism Bad for Women? the Curious Case of Canada's \"Equal Rights Amendment.\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Ratification; Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Constitution; Political science; Law; Original meaning; Meaning (existential); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027682851914534415,"score_gpt":0.29895921376263684,"score_spread":0.27127636184810244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978324001","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042791307,0.01368666,0.0021974763,0.4769487,0.0021988451,0.000045842597,0.00019127606,0.000055958848,0.461884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7628673,0.0056500053,0.0011622793,0.10000591,0.00068297004,0.00005557434,0.000060594408,0.00008541922,0.12943007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928054,0.0017093819,0.00006964264,0.0006889906,0.0024597005,0.002266927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736553,0.0010822061,0.00017140649,0.00014557767,0.0007615516,0.00047367124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004261133,0.00039088103,0.00033642544,0.0010123401,0.035366405,0.009982623,0.0013520103,0.0046792943,0.0036554919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007395743,0.00021577034,0.00038224927,0.0015264838,0.042086497,0.003796594,0.0035124412,0.0072157225,0.00030674244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014489222,0.0000061300584,0.00063579116,0.000027919496,0.0000043551363,0.0002701369,0.030788088,0.000054688742,0.00007825669,0.9108506,0.047435064,0.009834488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020285548,0.00001276135,0.0030503226,0.00028875316,0.000021948137,0.00024399985,0.047401153,0.0001902603,0.00035467726,0.11060054,0.83776325,0.000052056002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.927012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95992565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07298797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060510986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0776518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993318716","doi":"","title":"The Charter at 30: A Reflection","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitutionalism; Transformative learning; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Politics; State (computer science); Constitutional law; Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.05762100584181712,"score_gpt":0.3022370486789722,"score_spread":0.2446160428371551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993318716","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062800962,0.0066610533,0.0020814699,0.6234328,0.010005463,0.00009706084,0.00037236154,0.00009235731,0.35097724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24350856,0.0053445967,0.0022721954,0.32844123,0.0026067859,0.00011316728,0.00021484797,0.00020318599,0.4172955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368346,0.0010361732,0.0001094155,0.00084468274,0.0025751395,0.0017511331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970521,0.0006226015,0.0000849481,0.00016313262,0.0014890562,0.0005881319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052852733,0.00060713285,0.0003482608,0.0009887283,0.01350464,0.009569848,0.0021122652,0.008608423,0.010675763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010669837,0.00033240172,0.00056592666,0.0011551661,0.019344868,0.0061877477,0.002743178,0.01566884,0.0018485027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014645794,0.000010352789,0.00013483598,0.000024927593,0.0000017511502,0.00013705654,0.0057982113,0.00009814437,0.00020470054,0.676901,0.31005624,0.006618192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054829306,0.0000053010226,0.00044491823,0.000059428035,0.0000023579903,0.0000292504,0.0030214388,0.00006950909,0.00012721983,0.01624889,0.97996545,0.00002070411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91060203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91636693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91060203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04845562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07650797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35157174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994570748","doi":"","title":"Between Despair and Denial: What to Do About the Canadian Senate","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Institution; Oligarchy; Clientelism; Politics; Law; Art; Democracy","score_opus":0.024725012347201834,"score_gpt":0.2565780905670746,"score_spread":0.23185307821987275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994570748","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12271556,0.037100643,0.00057229004,0.47467217,0.0012881292,0.000050005812,0.00055545487,0.000051100946,0.36299458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9144675,0.014534254,0.0003677844,0.03342431,0.0003003649,0.00003185578,0.00012450936,0.000054452554,0.036695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948961,0.0009938949,0.00006033451,0.0002960152,0.00092522,0.0028283922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99599516,0.00062195363,0.00018669992,0.0001501026,0.0017814189,0.0012646201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034630995,0.0005181632,0.00057880546,0.00242345,0.046667483,0.012989581,0.0025623816,0.004444038,0.008689181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005971272,0.00031016307,0.0005840712,0.004574618,0.041660078,0.006105543,0.0047571003,0.007036723,0.0006287969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009996651,0.000033849192,0.010517304,0.00028153227,0.00004592549,0.0007467796,0.20414263,0.00026660852,0.00023995384,0.6381125,0.10796127,0.03755178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019600284,0.000017061713,0.021397848,0.0012217808,0.00005204732,0.00021030002,0.3702661,0.0001816015,0.00019872125,0.035612583,0.57065856,0.00016381049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99498546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16466509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16466509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21401131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9688701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003446422","doi":"","title":"“Our Time has Come”: Reconciliation in the Wake of Manitoba Metis Federation Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Wake; Law; Political science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.04242219489150786,"score_gpt":0.21400494660337582,"score_spread":0.17158275171186796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003446422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07886349,0.009276817,0.002250148,0.6168241,0.0053121652,0.00018580342,0.00043816294,0.00014950783,0.2866998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53123873,0.0023763413,0.0022939923,0.29132462,0.0008038595,0.00016377117,0.00023443617,0.00018966798,0.17137468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894791,0.002040899,0.00031195508,0.00079765276,0.0031566317,0.004213776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99238867,0.0011487588,0.00030160462,0.0004799882,0.004042207,0.0016387377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010477195,0.00038792426,0.0005432167,0.0013125157,0.050251763,0.015549785,0.0051174667,0.017662283,0.0065840087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019737162,0.00057852495,0.0007884755,0.0033632896,0.018942203,0.0055382494,0.008937925,0.018649725,0.0007457859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006674266,0.000059847473,0.0048070913,0.00008650603,0.000039848725,0.001244551,0.05518865,0.00039911238,0.00052642345,0.5310847,0.38070878,0.025787758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005853787,0.000028444754,0.0091436915,0.00032239614,0.00006538292,0.00022336308,0.05580609,0.00033274083,0.00071148446,0.035384383,0.89781415,0.00010936272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9412281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9754039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07772892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07772892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23669326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56396544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003533152","doi":"","title":"Seven Conceptions of Federalism Guiding Canada’s Constitutional Change Process — How Do They Work, and Why So Many?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Work (physics); Process (computing); Political science; Work in process; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Operations management; Politics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.07644061034517834,"score_gpt":0.29066818111192455,"score_spread":0.2142275707667462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003533152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13860092,0.006771356,0.06665376,0.3484735,0.0007171162,0.00065289286,0.0009744891,0.00034247802,0.43681347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96387935,0.0012998502,0.021380557,0.005261079,0.000097998374,0.00018655532,0.0001354869,0.00008856752,0.007670572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98131573,0.0066295555,0.00053125963,0.0012216403,0.005803117,0.004498726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96989226,0.0101702,0.0019352458,0.002050471,0.011140715,0.0048110564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022345128,0.00053711684,0.0010089187,0.0044336137,0.02161501,0.028474538,0.0046246164,0.005614137,0.004951297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04388336,0.0005108533,0.0009191008,0.0067282645,0.054818854,0.007884648,0.0034361815,0.009675218,0.00029700153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009833659,0.000014711672,0.001434367,0.000023655728,0.000010925615,0.0000109397315,0.0039874017,0.00029108825,0.000027516176,0.98474425,0.0040877587,0.005357572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006885256,0.000019361802,0.011469404,0.00040398262,0.0000950063,0.000031429645,0.022243299,0.0051281042,0.00049113994,0.885791,0.074149,0.00010937848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87541276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9399738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.837644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16235603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25201693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97154826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010910867","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Reconciliation and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.018190510594717966,"score_gpt":0.2363692416486264,"score_spread":0.21817873105390845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010910867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036639474,0.008834258,0.006340588,0.094906904,0.0012588905,0.00016122751,0.0005014811,0.00015812251,0.8511991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87679285,0.003780871,0.006840125,0.009275865,0.00049496454,0.00012883508,0.00019252894,0.00014845183,0.102345355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97764754,0.0045250533,0.00055474555,0.0025416932,0.008990316,0.0057406235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98625934,0.0038348956,0.0005472264,0.0014553991,0.006788429,0.001114779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014386433,0.0007828197,0.0013300083,0.0060179774,0.035268955,0.021103475,0.004318668,0.008155265,0.011852076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033475585,0.00081837917,0.00091436226,0.008257907,0.042460836,0.0057961233,0.0059178537,0.011935855,0.0005178193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009296407,0.0000051034835,0.000095678595,0.0000134518,0.0000036959518,0.000019283945,0.0013513204,0.0002844881,0.000027382408,0.9843704,0.00874173,0.0050783176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104827646,0.000018311624,0.0047120266,0.0003183305,0.00006470019,0.0000713635,0.0040472476,0.001798022,0.00037113306,0.45817897,0.5301334,0.00018157379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9854477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9887466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18954197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18954197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31034812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94001645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010917512","doi":"","title":"UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Treaty Federalism in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Indigenous; Treaty; Federalism; Political science; Indigenous rights; Law; Public administration; Environmental protection; Human rights; Geography; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.015717865432685177,"score_gpt":0.220735898784385,"score_spread":0.20501803335169982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010917512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053124614,0.014371226,0.0024147234,0.10370173,0.003520499,0.0005379894,0.004706758,0.00026370698,0.81735885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27255216,0.005854353,0.005273862,0.038940888,0.0004967999,0.00043650813,0.001044384,0.00016708023,0.675234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98890185,0.0008762182,0.00041031346,0.00063537294,0.0047838176,0.004392393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926886,0.0020165248,0.00026143482,0.00039597566,0.0033004319,0.001336998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00593326,0.0006459428,0.0010408463,0.0018515624,0.020438977,0.010164931,0.003300039,0.00884674,0.00973194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013527318,0.0011063126,0.0008966295,0.003369305,0.0062200776,0.0020370248,0.0035076628,0.012162228,0.0006535075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008909728,0.000098611075,0.0025417425,0.00017856907,0.000034396315,0.0003343502,0.009429153,0.0007718,0.0007052798,0.7747399,0.1926638,0.01841328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007714855,0.000017973047,0.013026514,0.00048546746,0.00004519747,0.000072557836,0.003128123,0.0006526974,0.00054024096,0.01713109,0.96469384,0.0001290579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098311484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098311484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41533458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7133031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010980273","doi":"","title":"Legal Pluralism and Caron v Alberta: A Canadian Case Study in Constitutional Interpretation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional interpretation; Pluralism (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Legal pluralism; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Linguistics","score_opus":0.022329250960339067,"score_gpt":0.29011812915191926,"score_spread":0.2677888781915802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010980273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5517377,0.005427677,0.0010003916,0.06344546,0.00024108056,0.00017509471,0.00028078532,0.00003283932,0.37765893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94481194,0.0021541645,0.0008783247,0.00730922,0.00004469568,0.000054367127,0.000062110885,0.0000318326,0.044653337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98972243,0.0016329663,0.0001474395,0.00071220665,0.0025624002,0.0052225674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914756,0.004524317,0.00047483784,0.00029642193,0.0018066892,0.0014222133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066156844,0.0005568272,0.00069800083,0.0029065127,0.07215599,0.011480621,0.0040741563,0.013128121,0.006575083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014771439,0.0008497459,0.0006848661,0.0070595792,0.025870083,0.0031142416,0.0063351654,0.012208235,0.00026422576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023951002,0.0002033967,0.02496969,0.0001968227,0.000057256555,0.011851671,0.24131788,0.0016055639,0.00068636175,0.63840026,0.049328286,0.031143354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015002691,0.00006435026,0.04466572,0.00072471,0.00018794382,0.0029784373,0.5003238,0.0019945318,0.0010085532,0.044436153,0.40316045,0.00030543059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99898785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20579515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20579515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29623225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92116505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121691978","doi":"","title":"Conceptual Metaphors for an Unfinished Constitution","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Humanities; Elaboration; Narrative; Philosophy; Metaphor; Political science; Sociology; Law; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07686921584781906,"score_gpt":0.31981230334428523,"score_spread":0.24294308749646618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121691978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06689058,0.009853923,0.058454268,0.04540693,0.0012082228,0.00009902773,0.00049769797,0.00023423473,0.81735504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616082,0.002143574,0.007706552,0.001479861,0.000112476766,0.00007501147,0.00013850721,0.00007795102,0.026657956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733955,0.0011935428,0.000055750144,0.0002104448,0.00072595116,0.0004747642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986247,0.0004920936,0.00013718496,0.00014461705,0.0004620641,0.00013947174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021233452,0.00081523083,0.00032939442,0.0029169049,0.008952019,0.007439822,0.0016432522,0.0017337797,0.008072833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033122497,0.0002866247,0.00039458898,0.0035311247,0.03842283,0.0047841137,0.002336217,0.0034926098,0.00054522103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028417094,0.0000015086707,0.000039973776,0.000014561551,8.962547e-7,0.00003543372,0.0073496667,0.000064815686,0.000072923736,0.99026686,0.0012180959,0.00093236327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026240108,0.000015800479,0.0010515309,0.0002676921,0.000017438006,0.00026696717,0.036733974,0.0011216801,0.00037371102,0.47610185,0.48397774,0.000045390974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44670752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48929217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44670752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03934883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02197336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88821477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121707458","doi":"","title":"Drawing Lines in the Sand: Parliament's Jurisdiction to Consider Upstream and Downstream Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions in Interprovincial Pipeline Project Reviews","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Parliament; Greenhouse gas; Context (archaeology); Upstream (networking); Statutory law; Downstream (manufacturing); Legislation; Law; Energy law; Statutory interpretation; Government (linguistics); Political science; Economics; Business; Environmental law; Engineering; Politics; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.03909174575767575,"score_gpt":0.328515197735583,"score_spread":0.28942345197790725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121707458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18808518,0.015586549,0.03441111,0.16767986,0.0025635224,0.00041937327,0.0003936226,0.00031162216,0.5905492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9324646,0.0021782974,0.004728148,0.013203023,0.000534981,0.00012705424,0.00009453655,0.00016463017,0.046504658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97101486,0.013755615,0.0011698651,0.0021213128,0.0068414416,0.00509699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96546936,0.020976208,0.0015411074,0.0016011554,0.008494242,0.001918003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022416124,0.00023649338,0.00063629734,0.0016399856,0.01165567,0.012303927,0.0028987897,0.008044706,0.004869314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05745032,0.0006578285,0.00075921643,0.0022021532,0.007987319,0.0058998493,0.0056652166,0.006033145,0.0007760138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012330667,0.000040158688,0.0030823436,0.00029461124,0.00004639261,0.0018058069,0.037436362,0.0023222435,0.0020459574,0.8506933,0.043799113,0.058310427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004570666,0.00009393552,0.004559756,0.00061159267,0.00015794285,0.00039952132,0.01805669,0.0019572112,0.0022507852,0.10001087,0.8716847,0.0001712241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13334605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17700207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8666539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01610512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036081187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26513976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123045901","doi":"","title":"Socrates, Odysseus, and Federalism","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Dual federalism; Sovereignty; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Solidarity; Law and economics; Sociology; Autonomy; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01836034113240403,"score_gpt":0.2200242575580009,"score_spread":0.20166391642559686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123045901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025433123,0.013623406,0.008311706,0.030641003,0.0007216176,0.000035702582,0.00012411116,0.000052180465,0.9210572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9200016,0.007816821,0.0025206322,0.0025299112,0.00050787366,0.000053848587,0.00007166372,0.000043082644,0.06645442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868196,0.00028917968,0.000026466167,0.00016139401,0.0003789128,0.0004620245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993868,0.00021742345,0.000063598585,0.00007544133,0.00015665086,0.00010002314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016955353,0.0003503272,0.00033246825,0.0021400657,0.01059255,0.00489685,0.00067204883,0.001201849,0.0045483955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002208996,0.00017223932,0.00033526862,0.0020032427,0.036211442,0.0029654838,0.0022192292,0.0021228348,0.0002953353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001128372,7.4369035e-7,0.000035652756,0.000003801354,3.415758e-7,0.0000057174575,0.00061939965,0.000028917539,0.000004139424,0.99762434,0.00089443766,0.00078146043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009341918,0.000004655418,0.0010594551,0.00009879615,0.0000058368864,0.000047981444,0.0022332266,0.00023726378,0.00007657191,0.74970317,0.24651237,0.000011313405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56612074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59446704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43387926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02886207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022216907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8728689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123088121","doi":"","title":"Marital rape, polygamy, and prostitution: tradibg sex equality for agency and choice?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Autonomy; Law; Charter; Criminology; Doctrine; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0365480915880803,"score_gpt":0.2997919318510741,"score_spread":0.2632438402629938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123088121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14033973,0.03502048,0.0038821972,0.21051772,0.0010458871,0.000030856965,0.00004975279,0.00001502296,0.60909826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774303,0.005677158,0.0003220876,0.0050636046,0.00035817013,0.000020975867,0.000008767038,0.0000065794593,0.011112405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972396,0.0013187667,0.000064141095,0.00023908389,0.00041857932,0.0007197455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849033,0.0008948744,0.00018548452,0.00013918393,0.00010583295,0.00018437502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023270792,0.00022552749,0.00038294736,0.0008481701,0.006228785,0.008532435,0.0008084552,0.003571785,0.004519715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003227828,0.00020331469,0.0003392512,0.00088497775,0.053115606,0.006059156,0.0045281053,0.0027124947,0.00028548256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043001246,0.000007727183,0.00038739986,0.000009799305,0.000001623233,0.00005593701,0.006895485,0.000016948126,0.000020986143,0.9885102,0.0006900626,0.0033994815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024004941,0.00003656939,0.0038084418,0.000260706,0.000010733852,0.00030500977,0.04345148,0.00013534371,0.00021237375,0.8290023,0.122730516,0.000022607897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031925246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0376571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031925246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005259879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067092506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06347889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123992025","doi":"","title":"Meaningless mantra: substantive equality after Withler","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mantra; Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Substantive due process; Relevance (law); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09327847133984746,"score_gpt":0.3019885457289145,"score_spread":0.20871007438906702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123992025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05194759,0.005913338,0.020392481,0.08798637,0.0016902159,0.00011857744,0.00008366326,0.0001251409,0.8317426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8564104,0.0013421215,0.003795216,0.03491636,0.00041088325,0.00008669227,0.000037184713,0.00010477138,0.10289631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98612833,0.003942983,0.00026672758,0.0019785427,0.0044773743,0.0032060908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951492,0.0030058867,0.00022868125,0.00037822366,0.0010091035,0.00022885817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007257516,0.0004376637,0.0006862669,0.0012584734,0.018038038,0.012413838,0.0020857241,0.006916358,0.0049509117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013518248,0.00028136745,0.00061455567,0.0010944789,0.039954808,0.0070651034,0.0068812487,0.009127362,0.0004050483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053387175,0.0000035533556,0.00010621009,0.0000115532375,0.0000017849494,0.00007990854,0.003002243,0.000041202886,0.00005412537,0.99057454,0.002847976,0.0032715371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003705586,0.000059272046,0.0012029244,0.00029739874,0.000054333745,0.00036402003,0.013330439,0.00048296846,0.001961174,0.5125305,0.46957123,0.000108665685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41356656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56290483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41356656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022205407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027362095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8223187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124744549","doi":"","title":"Bedford, Substantive Rationality, and Participatory Democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Democracy; Substantive due process; Proportionality (law); Arbitrariness; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.14809269231020933,"score_gpt":0.3561527374694569,"score_spread":0.2080600451592476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124744549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03925701,0.008175138,0.028493023,0.10775665,0.00047941165,0.000115294635,0.00010203098,0.000067471876,0.81555396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401076,0.0014980732,0.0063045053,0.011305349,0.00020199644,0.00018448375,0.00003729239,0.00003553839,0.040325195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98600775,0.006983897,0.00029066482,0.0013252052,0.0026679023,0.0027245462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917129,0.0056591975,0.000538571,0.00085903006,0.00081812247,0.000412198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011534896,0.00045239824,0.00064125535,0.0012567873,0.016277187,0.009866249,0.0018714073,0.006631959,0.003958243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012367774,0.0004591096,0.00064468046,0.0016122052,0.07777622,0.0053188936,0.0063251057,0.008499336,0.00040776064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014149629,0.0000018185194,0.000036429614,0.000004013823,6.3258074e-7,0.000012921807,0.00088515313,0.000057022873,0.000012755111,0.9976829,0.0006328713,0.00067205133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012820629,0.0000046257555,0.0003103146,0.000056282875,0.00000415942,0.000022945002,0.0009947958,0.00021934473,0.00009661801,0.9659076,0.032361392,0.000009177323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28409374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29939038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28409374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02726159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03197432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56488025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W317032748","doi":"","title":"The Role of International Law in Shaping Canada's Response to Terrorism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025092937728276223,"score_gpt":0.27907163330456053,"score_spread":0.25397869557628433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W317032748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23963687,0.0042888275,0.0014478825,0.17539597,0.00095559744,0.0001285941,0.00038628536,0.000065090426,0.57769483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95745313,0.00092701823,0.00037313436,0.011720956,0.00010106317,0.000026951602,0.000043856882,0.000051583764,0.029302383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98481435,0.001980067,0.00024756385,0.00085388956,0.00396996,0.00813418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98270977,0.0057973624,0.0008564714,0.000383529,0.007216386,0.0030364217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00805171,0.0004148198,0.0005563961,0.0034502987,0.027241359,0.024885891,0.0032574215,0.007860123,0.010276916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026521567,0.0005615459,0.0005608388,0.004078657,0.024211675,0.0030614282,0.0044161845,0.01020337,0.00041952851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010418303,0.00006465726,0.013690084,0.00011545644,0.00007488431,0.00043498742,0.033773925,0.0020226708,0.00055204565,0.8739923,0.05354221,0.02163257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001032649,0.00007889969,0.063312165,0.00074174034,0.00018898987,0.00011749766,0.09383741,0.002307175,0.0012301407,0.07897887,0.7588131,0.0002907718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99620867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24332325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24332325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35227886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87763774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35712514","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2022.912935","title":"The Power of a Single Feather: Meech Lake, Indigenous Resistance and the Evolution of Indigenous Politics in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; National Institutes of Health; Jiangsu Province's Key Provincial Talents Program; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Ethnology; Political science; Colonialism; Resistance (ecology); Geography; Humanities; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Art; Ecology","score_opus":0.013923392017161168,"score_gpt":0.1929432388257847,"score_spread":0.17901984680862354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35712514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9123574,0.0052569746,0.0005107095,0.02367425,0.00028379096,0.000047339192,0.0013803899,0.000056787696,0.056432277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725605,0.0022880915,0.00038099615,0.0013961183,0.000023677658,0.000008720789,0.00022516707,0.000036035835,0.023080807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937135,0.000046500078,0.000012315702,0.00008341399,0.0001524567,0.0003340071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993492,0.000042232612,0.00006890771,0.000018075132,0.00018959049,0.0003321168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033000574,0.00017715193,0.00029550373,0.00092255714,0.0119467145,0.002819336,0.0007872345,0.0006832656,0.008505173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011228252,0.00018545106,0.000240633,0.0018282719,0.0029315446,0.00084201386,0.0016798506,0.0013914143,0.00036425292],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005349147,0.00018982992,0.54215884,0.0004757185,0.00018158113,0.0073234094,0.12384114,0.00054320134,0.004814152,0.059391454,0.06336036,0.19718531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022070495,0.00005611036,0.5777441,0.00033811716,0.00007971392,0.001600835,0.13632885,0.0008764205,0.00075328315,0.0032610723,0.2788161,0.0001233434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99271107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99774843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046678595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046678595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06513861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33867848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W565867575","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalizing everything: the role of \"Charter values\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Normative; United Nations Charter; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.025182750580389688,"score_gpt":0.26079776554921974,"score_spread":0.23561501496883006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W565867575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06554018,0.010712548,0.05724557,0.14497957,0.0010111956,0.000072966366,0.00011365789,0.000102232276,0.72022206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800325,0.0020662309,0.00568536,0.00530881,0.00044071875,0.0000720296,0.000033642762,0.000049049184,0.00631166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798023,0.013435655,0.0004268466,0.001696705,0.003002024,0.0016365098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771871,0.016551366,0.001312381,0.0027086737,0.0014644691,0.00077597884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02313225,0.0004323382,0.00071820733,0.0019723019,0.009950454,0.01595621,0.0021805677,0.005289986,0.0023993452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03022665,0.00033380536,0.0004854225,0.0022257122,0.10176687,0.016536845,0.0056595625,0.010752039,0.00022695506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.573193e-7,0.0000010986404,0.000031194384,0.0000028891816,5.514178e-7,0.0000039740157,0.0008635594,0.000028461893,0.00000838175,0.99808913,0.0002585076,0.0007114049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008813125,0.000007967167,0.00023996973,0.00009164318,0.0000061453106,0.000019868203,0.0020898797,0.00016377144,0.00010779757,0.96628124,0.030973196,0.000009848267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02004442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020685546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02313225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011388859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013577909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12233651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W590513691","doi":"","title":"The crown's powers of command-in chief: interpreting section 15 of Canada's constitution act, 1867","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Constitution; Parliament; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Inherent powers; Executive power; Enumerated powers; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Power (physics); Politics; Physics; Business","score_opus":0.01650949747553831,"score_gpt":0.2627808881610433,"score_spread":0.24627139068550497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W590513691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05375775,0.030310813,0.0049533662,0.052967813,0.0015332153,0.00009170871,0.0009946189,0.00010255482,0.8552882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9115241,0.0121866325,0.004000472,0.010570858,0.0003604346,0.000051949257,0.00027635822,0.000109676286,0.060919426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99437606,0.00084242545,0.000122657,0.00036978326,0.0023601814,0.0019288184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966822,0.0013350779,0.00012870929,0.00008055612,0.0015354756,0.00023804545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038662436,0.00053193286,0.00046226132,0.0033719013,0.016440587,0.014257774,0.001640579,0.0037123938,0.0029918756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009258478,0.0004431363,0.00034336466,0.0037388327,0.026154732,0.002242022,0.0018044586,0.0042707664,0.00042800582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001012733,0.0000028709812,0.00087937235,0.000042242387,0.000004740152,0.00018873066,0.015181092,0.00025053328,0.00010281453,0.9549441,0.02285225,0.005541205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020093014,0.00001406877,0.010134747,0.0008150517,0.00005852145,0.00013142562,0.026463104,0.00087189354,0.00048581942,0.104604036,0.85630316,0.0000980293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99249774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17410958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17410958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21626645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95791584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70434532","doi":"","title":"Unseating horseman: commercial harvesting right and the natural resources transfer agreements","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extinguishment; Treaty; Proposition; Ethnology; Political science; Law; Humanities; Geography; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017433605808106906,"score_gpt":0.2720837140977891,"score_spread":0.25465010828968215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W70434532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027036492,0.009175718,0.0036652605,0.13619159,0.00062805583,0.00009214648,0.00018477789,0.000044668046,0.82298124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60723096,0.0047978666,0.0016956441,0.12315604,0.0008438364,0.00019129766,0.00011167087,0.00004310398,0.26192957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942028,0.0013612881,0.00014540553,0.0008447269,0.001666955,0.0017788407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973412,0.0015719904,0.00023991548,0.00013310027,0.00056821574,0.00014558328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044550407,0.0004325859,0.00031269182,0.00079858414,0.015196676,0.009516905,0.0021433493,0.013045167,0.0061638546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078110243,0.00046147782,0.000523594,0.0011377215,0.013421958,0.0065120235,0.0025615431,0.008653728,0.00066447613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009282973,0.000008476645,0.00032317764,0.0000145269205,0.000002419443,0.00015484598,0.0023445596,0.00007691955,0.00006557247,0.9719642,0.022741819,0.002294242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070644026,0.00006082941,0.0047400845,0.00057266647,0.0000530513,0.00024224832,0.006799931,0.000866889,0.00074177096,0.2907922,0.694947,0.000112647926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52120745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65163314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52120745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014756332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024703467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96322453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71561623","doi":"","title":"A strategic approach to judicial legitimacy: Supreme Court of Canada and the Marshall Case","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03383723725556665,"score_gpt":0.2559929142548845,"score_spread":0.22215567699931787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71561623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16305916,0.0050454023,0.0037359253,0.12446581,0.00026082792,0.00008893306,0.00024749446,0.00004539645,0.7030511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818954,0.00083502685,0.00048478338,0.0027127888,0.00009848023,0.000026778727,0.000025184852,0.000019801177,0.01390182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897209,0.001767931,0.00014103761,0.00072447467,0.0025997178,0.0050459513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98999816,0.0048733754,0.0005643284,0.00042341487,0.0025090042,0.0016315841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005739551,0.0006069246,0.001203897,0.0047888793,0.027885672,0.023026042,0.0037227345,0.012072276,0.010211792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021759188,0.00063363975,0.00069751445,0.0062525193,0.038941775,0.0067826556,0.0053566764,0.009216399,0.00041511707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010670564,0.000011592412,0.00065181777,0.000009729131,0.0000071459385,0.00010401202,0.0023659642,0.0002721553,0.000032620177,0.99084806,0.003992544,0.0016936995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013335409,0.000018093062,0.005521326,0.00019280336,0.00010056836,0.00010045563,0.016873332,0.002205979,0.0002920022,0.90788573,0.0665687,0.00010770658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96570766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9810492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10471457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10471457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21590367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.759761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85021076","doi":"","title":"The Post-9/11 National Security regime in Canada: strengthening security, diminishing accountability","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; National security; Business; Public administration; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.02910280110150013,"score_gpt":0.2801687870571302,"score_spread":0.25106598595563007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W85021076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71967214,0.0023877786,0.0006797728,0.1293912,0.00040501112,0.00009097785,0.0006207251,0.000042588355,0.14670971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697826,0.0005614294,0.00025418054,0.004564322,0.00003666074,0.000023908071,0.00006524672,0.000021644963,0.024689993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99011606,0.0008829458,0.00014452901,0.00043069542,0.001957083,0.006468588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99024945,0.0016680922,0.0007935506,0.00033288996,0.0030393647,0.003916719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051950035,0.00022950495,0.0005649291,0.0014392403,0.025558537,0.013065109,0.0020874657,0.005489243,0.00866873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011264024,0.0004758119,0.00050206983,0.0025490592,0.013675726,0.0029766837,0.004214077,0.008120376,0.00034981023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032839773,0.00024467858,0.066856675,0.00017596598,0.00008052162,0.0010058576,0.053855527,0.0018791985,0.0011568279,0.7704604,0.056522775,0.04743314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020403301,0.00014464754,0.3866153,0.0006631551,0.00011176632,0.0002019662,0.10258208,0.0029745928,0.0015749489,0.050170846,0.45439392,0.0003626904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7306707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2693293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44569778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84747446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W999925103","doi":"","title":"Indigenous cultural rights and identity politics in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Jurisprudence; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law; Citizenship; State (computer science); Scholarship; Constitution; Identity (music); Sociology","score_opus":0.015619502280686004,"score_gpt":0.25723317626074477,"score_spread":0.24161367398005876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W999925103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26008162,0.008494906,0.0010402154,0.0908923,0.00054780795,0.00010608243,0.00038299148,0.000054476102,0.6383996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9070462,0.0028209868,0.0005809951,0.0066605895,0.00005696865,0.000028724093,0.00010619177,0.000036821595,0.082662545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476236,0.00038099143,0.00007012622,0.00038157502,0.001376004,0.0030289043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962692,0.0006151087,0.00014096215,0.000116347976,0.0011734682,0.0016847994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022743326,0.00025422595,0.00052537024,0.001967181,0.047822516,0.0109735625,0.002045206,0.0029113644,0.011758572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049643177,0.00036727186,0.00038793165,0.0037892195,0.016357811,0.0027893332,0.0065331804,0.004589139,0.00037666355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004189688,0.000057862373,0.00916593,0.00009572328,0.000019927578,0.00081785274,0.06128379,0.00055855216,0.00028466876,0.8606413,0.03423103,0.03280142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071606424,0.00003474635,0.052640714,0.00052176847,0.000064932996,0.0002974813,0.14917889,0.0017619968,0.0005294925,0.08512616,0.7095906,0.00018153046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99854314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25040114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25040114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31366485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8694284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}