{"meta":{"query_hash":"2f21f9911e75","filters":{"venue":"Revue de droit canonique"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2f21f9911e75","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revue+de+droit+canonique"},"results":[{"id":"W16013960","doi":"10.1517/14622416.6.3.293","title":"Les procédures administratives dans l'Église catholique : Les initiatives en droit particulier et le code de 1983","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit canonique","topic":"Theology and Canon Law Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Conciliation; Art; Law; Arbitration","score_opus":0.019655053813607975,"score_gpt":0.2751697229395556,"score_spread":0.2555146691259476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W16013960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50064236,0.021012692,0.002472969,0.034446888,0.000354364,0.0008512237,0.0011727329,0.00030947037,0.43873727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91671807,0.0039470545,0.001068778,0.001026366,0.0016096118,0.0004589252,0.000047629328,0.000092575836,0.07503102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657,0.0010046094,0.00065296073,0.00061825395,0.00015902829,0.0009951647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982138,0.00059203926,0.00031777952,0.00039604984,0.00020994565,0.00027034906],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008430208,0.0005621526,0.00070464815,0.00011951642,0.0012280318,0.00020994597,0.00041502394,0.0005070085,0.000968368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027479272,0.0006417784,0.00029757567,0.0000930934,0.0019748714,0.00055918447,0.00012690008,0.00093794434,0.000059992595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011829171,0.00049855997,0.0027871218,0.00041597977,0.00030392272,0.00019757479,0.12234091,0.00020037114,0.00040493632,0.8683756,0.0012173692,0.0031393615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008937381,0.0005551122,0.020119632,0.00085651496,0.00036004177,0.00042011516,0.02693128,0.00016067077,0.015921524,0.0317112,0.9009137,0.0011564484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038870168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10301518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89969635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062025216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001428279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747817968","doi":"","title":"Les conséquences de la mise en œuvre du motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus par les tribunaux ecclésiastiques au Canada, RDC 67/1, 2017","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit canonique","topic":"Theology and Canon Law Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Appeal; Political science; Status quo; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012390191841874863,"score_gpt":0.2399928694582698,"score_spread":0.22760267761639494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747817968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6371199,0.01872561,0.00011401858,0.016017819,0.0018757985,0.0007226242,0.0015783316,0.0001282202,0.3237177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9192855,0.0069584604,0.00028364232,0.0003428462,0.0029691977,0.00023290286,0.000030966865,0.0000702847,0.06982623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648005,0.00084160035,0.00061937154,0.00064992,0.00022668559,0.0011823593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968994,0.00094708207,0.0006295059,0.00083213416,0.00034687805,0.00034498025],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011104937,0.00061900937,0.0009201336,0.00009189539,0.0049430546,0.000566773,0.0010428063,0.00066649634,0.00095311826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008242346,0.0006650127,0.0002865137,0.000028121172,0.004612352,0.00033444396,0.00023088993,0.0007415842,0.000022991877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021732804,0.00017815788,0.038787443,0.0009048858,0.0006491524,0.003233501,0.023953712,0.000029135761,0.00015465998,0.88375187,0.029155387,0.018984748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010276084,0.0002241154,0.0647541,0.0012577311,0.00045796696,0.0013895663,0.0038791967,0.00005600341,0.0020224021,0.016744971,0.9071416,0.0010447268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91664755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9787972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87798625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023347728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076810108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}