{"meta":{"query_hash":"e09eb779cce6","filters":{"venue":"Revue française d’administration publique"},"cohort_total":12,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"exported":12,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e09eb779cce6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revue+fran%C3%A7aise+d%E2%80%99administration+publique"},"results":[{"id":"W2618111936","doi":"","title":"Canadian Perspectives on a Few Stakes Relating to the Activity of Auditing, Counselling and Evaluation in Public Administration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue française d’administration publique","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Normative; Relevance (law); Accountability; Task (project management); Administration (probate law); Control (management); Political science; Public relations; Process management; Computer science; Business; Accounting; Management; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.18049504173587053,"score_gpt":0.42125903187336966,"score_spread":0.24076399013749913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618111936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061850302,0.03806466,0.0076098526,0.44373354,0.00094462495,0.00013145887,0.00062493957,0.000113662325,0.44692695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93077594,0.011438309,0.004211129,0.014351932,0.00023232044,0.00006790686,0.000096229836,0.00004668234,0.03877956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9688975,0.010400036,0.00087568234,0.0017415852,0.010474311,0.007610836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654168,0.016777234,0.0016419988,0.00089227833,0.011514429,0.0037572233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019238621,0.0007617743,0.00064034533,0.005695971,0.023749197,0.02182286,0.0024235628,0.007965035,0.010467832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030840816,0.00064168207,0.0007791574,0.009229611,0.024752703,0.0068494105,0.004885466,0.006988362,0.0004203732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072028444,0.000037546542,0.004171492,0.00038062932,0.00002097227,0.000616951,0.0403527,0.0009201203,0.00050238014,0.8712236,0.029630624,0.05207087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003226589,0.00007942455,0.04206192,0.0023784842,0.00007426085,0.0004972143,0.11643722,0.0012967074,0.0010479027,0.098767035,0.7369653,0.0003622994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98965734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7565674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24343258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22354533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87751096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2627383400","doi":"","title":"Redesigning the State: Description and Analysis of a Quebec Reform Inspired by Managerialism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue française d’administration publique","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Managerialism; State (computer science); Modernization theory; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Balance (ability); Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.015452152382150612,"score_gpt":0.27039157281155357,"score_spread":0.254939420429403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2627383400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41558582,0.014875805,0.009050792,0.04582281,0.00036394235,0.00042836825,0.0012466963,0.00014067336,0.51248515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564527,0.002666607,0.0020588597,0.0012158978,0.00005254269,0.00007247939,0.0001820954,0.00001969761,0.03727913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890053,0.0002770569,0.000023054752,0.00008024461,0.00032853163,0.00039050463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912506,0.00022139512,0.000113617825,0.00005790824,0.00036815688,0.00011390033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008393107,0.00022979618,0.00024691556,0.0018333461,0.005062027,0.0046114037,0.00094573345,0.001420635,0.0040081474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023095666,0.00013761368,0.00028497784,0.003470031,0.006292871,0.0012453644,0.0009616608,0.0014444655,0.00011644025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003215887,0.000041909407,0.00714368,0.00017213493,0.000020275227,0.00085854647,0.02170991,0.005215611,0.0006878535,0.9150035,0.01455362,0.034560874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036803,0.00009092964,0.11085903,0.0007088594,0.00005564299,0.0003363327,0.042978503,0.011362413,0.00080810813,0.044538878,0.7880992,0.00012510938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9722777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98028666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12123211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12123211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045958996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87960464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2662445259","doi":"","title":"Communication as a Governance Tool in PPPs: Some Lessons Learned from Bonjourquébec.com","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue française d’administration publique","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Communicative action; Agency (philosophy); Business; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Political science; Finance; Social science","score_opus":0.02438675455008674,"score_gpt":0.253438878525639,"score_spread":0.22905212397555227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2662445259","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13236049,0.13319117,0.008423223,0.45080313,0.0018121301,0.00015083424,0.0004302407,0.00014116033,0.27268755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84745735,0.08214987,0.00857868,0.012681521,0.00046066372,0.000099521356,0.00033392513,0.00007272394,0.04816578],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627846,0.0015683952,0.000071249364,0.00018375776,0.00089742127,0.0010007478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991089,0.003315258,0.00029600752,0.0002939399,0.004144624,0.0008612593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005251899,0.00049179385,0.00062033714,0.0013098202,0.006559388,0.006771762,0.001192856,0.0029181784,0.005620095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006072558,0.0002274427,0.00035943292,0.003987753,0.0076798922,0.0057387617,0.0024037608,0.0027564843,0.00039783158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014408519,0.00024435963,0.021741899,0.0012577609,0.00005067614,0.0054682777,0.08916185,0.0039420146,0.0007844859,0.27749792,0.12927486,0.4704318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003077578,0.00007223503,0.032558437,0.0028848154,0.000031837033,0.0007793077,0.08974958,0.0023405566,0.0005840954,0.02528227,0.84556085,0.00012534054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9516406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9579818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9516406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06590755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049995426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.478195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2693282047","doi":"","title":"Montreal as a Political Laboratory: A City Confronted with Agglomeration","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue française d’administration publique","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Politics; Government (linguistics); Local government; Public administration; Political science; Economy; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.015358740978656372,"score_gpt":0.28641238678836195,"score_spread":0.2710536458097056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2693282047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3213611,0.0044122655,0.005440575,0.20334962,0.00069372955,0.00016455646,0.00030093212,0.0002703686,0.46400684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469484,0.0008637275,0.0010641471,0.004654877,0.00015285645,0.00005070853,0.000055563356,0.000057742316,0.046151936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997276,0.0007983515,0.000019163423,0.00024925155,0.00047980621,0.0011774007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797934,0.00037152198,0.0001515324,0.00012153649,0.00028821136,0.0010877512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020838026,0.00032971048,0.00029167856,0.001009484,0.027071206,0.014065234,0.002069479,0.002663189,0.008938538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002903565,0.00041842376,0.0002692619,0.0018293642,0.021861468,0.0033824875,0.0060023945,0.0033930193,0.0004066483],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006446709,0.0000461378,0.0050987527,0.00005364537,0.000026290281,0.0018967232,0.038808398,0.0011008412,0.0007924632,0.8794683,0.05890095,0.013743022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010009207,0.000060309525,0.020481674,0.000120915334,0.000041751413,0.0004344937,0.07012625,0.0026942373,0.0008365993,0.057096247,0.84787774,0.00012968783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.911177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9687089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08882302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07433066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052394398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5393092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734068311","doi":"","title":"Administrative Reform, Social Structures, and Collective Representation in Quebec","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue française d’administration publique","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Politics; Representation (politics); Public administration; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.0486180845276334,"score_gpt":0.33468928097343453,"score_spread":0.28607119644580115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734068311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82465583,0.0047157737,0.000809731,0.027589677,0.0001271166,0.00008031492,0.00069848826,0.000045710985,0.14127731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840316,0.00044857155,0.00014277484,0.00051819196,0.000012658412,0.000016828117,0.0000994769,0.0000049738974,0.014724873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980531,0.00040248584,0.00003219756,0.00014910735,0.00039722616,0.0009658246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713564,0.0005455393,0.00039347008,0.00012520318,0.0008497916,0.00095033564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015678186,0.00016861335,0.00027672193,0.001380826,0.009706001,0.004333285,0.0010463084,0.00097106805,0.008161905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028775586,0.00014045199,0.00019888574,0.003145405,0.0053462493,0.0010381943,0.0017736871,0.0012393113,0.00023380389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028660407,0.00042019135,0.22027457,0.00028297803,0.00016028839,0.0011279111,0.085806206,0.006362718,0.0013773005,0.446424,0.087198295,0.15027897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061325685,0.000092990784,0.7056532,0.0003456815,0.00005486797,0.00010557405,0.04426844,0.00429195,0.0003701581,0.009140242,0.23551832,0.00009725566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99554056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.865003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13499698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061504662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9794762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735978979","doi":"","title":"Online Public Administration in Canada: Terminology and State of Reflection","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue française d’administration publique","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Normative; Government (linguistics); Praise; Political science; Democracy; Terminology; Public relations; Public policy; Citizen journalism; Public administration; State (computer science); Politics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.033029583865146296,"score_gpt":0.3165227556547322,"score_spread":0.2834931717895859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735978979","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08138021,0.11306273,0.011537419,0.49057248,0.0027209187,0.00017846652,0.0012896584,0.00029578473,0.29896235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86783564,0.05435636,0.005890935,0.025980381,0.0007951423,0.00015275908,0.00040758096,0.00025361206,0.044327565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97446525,0.006214917,0.0011321184,0.0026288384,0.010183349,0.005375437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94455224,0.022538338,0.0029934943,0.0023638227,0.023158489,0.00439357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024885036,0.00051222346,0.0009162862,0.007992947,0.022856388,0.03274191,0.0052291416,0.0059242393,0.0072590383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049135175,0.0006564069,0.00047994388,0.026547967,0.042235192,0.010976171,0.0068305666,0.008009694,0.00064552005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004986065,0.000068206624,0.0031334874,0.00049349,0.000013949112,0.00017833934,0.10435518,0.0007056172,0.00029215575,0.7244202,0.05767383,0.10861577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012332424,0.000023003733,0.010544927,0.0020820496,0.000014974953,0.0000914082,0.09246215,0.0011303689,0.0005491521,0.037195195,0.8557479,0.00014663445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9749484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31376433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31376433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4390468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7959361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738546127","doi":"","title":"The Experience of the Survivors of the Neoliberal Reforms of the Civil Service in Quebec","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue française d’administration publique","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Feeling; Political science; Work (physics); Mental health; Overwork; Civil service; Service (business); Trade union; Public administration; Public service; Public relations; Psychology; Nursing; Social psychology; Medicine; Business; Psychiatry; Economics; Labour economics; Law","score_opus":0.013115546160363409,"score_gpt":0.2712167111431573,"score_spread":0.2581011649827939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738546127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9593415,0.0008177297,0.00013562934,0.025957463,0.00013291676,0.000023507584,0.00013737226,0.000015968266,0.01343788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888226,0.00045631424,0.000044782704,0.0018732743,0.000034711225,0.000011449714,0.00004478873,0.000009485387,0.008702592],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658054,0.0010099411,0.000042375672,0.000112151174,0.00046003424,0.0017949253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942483,0.00075889233,0.000805225,0.00013413142,0.0012481582,0.002805236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020388074,0.00029870335,0.00045444304,0.0005524539,0.020363316,0.0053628506,0.0016931124,0.0028926947,0.0055430895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004733857,0.00032764956,0.00028320888,0.0015284751,0.009386017,0.0020032036,0.0036635082,0.004881216,0.00035630187],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017905713,0.0001595819,0.060789715,0.00011033715,0.000041783114,0.0031580455,0.865447,0.00044962118,0.0009190866,0.0054086973,0.03415638,0.029180672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009241721,0.00008871506,0.04853251,0.00008312974,0.000010855481,0.00035424388,0.9050798,0.000180235,0.00015085214,0.0002642795,0.045198288,0.000047954265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94108135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.976599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058918655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039279215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02420846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28499198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740071804","doi":"","title":"The Quality, Efficiency, and Effectiveness of E-Government in the Network Era: The Example of Quebec","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue française d’administration publique","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Government (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Corporate governance; ICTS; State (computer science); Business; Public administration; Information and Communications Technology; Political science; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.02258078451429516,"score_gpt":0.3132216671899039,"score_spread":0.2906408826756087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740071804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.740176,0.0057850378,0.0018949803,0.021390846,0.00009363117,0.00010031422,0.0008214997,0.000068576934,0.22966911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861519,0.00092231255,0.0004674621,0.00034435114,0.000009653743,0.000009781448,0.0000876741,0.000010483338,0.011996539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986424,0.00036997028,0.000026441254,0.000085643354,0.00032234905,0.00055313733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968268,0.00075459114,0.00021562751,0.0001435162,0.001634116,0.00042524352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013287188,0.00016691629,0.00025474714,0.00089395227,0.006094381,0.0037957227,0.0007518217,0.00077754783,0.005372841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040398748,0.00010229828,0.00019607344,0.0029975933,0.0023410232,0.0013837261,0.0012304514,0.0008526114,0.00023497267],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007849897,0.0004900189,0.2372226,0.0007912864,0.00026444346,0.0041067987,0.043672282,0.016858594,0.0022007658,0.39533213,0.0835335,0.21474256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025063293,0.0002235351,0.51183003,0.0009094926,0.00026219126,0.0007406551,0.07016685,0.020431902,0.0018107673,0.017338067,0.3758322,0.00020371357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99474597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9211757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0788243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033721346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.571913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788813988","doi":"","title":"Partnership Capacity, the Key Factor Determining the Success of a PPP: Results of a Canadian Study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue française d’administration publique","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Key (lock); Interpersonal communication; Business; Process management; Public relations; Knowledge management; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Finance; Computer security; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0646393151894637,"score_gpt":0.2717582936560009,"score_spread":0.2071189784665372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788813988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97994256,0.0005341884,0.00020132266,0.001241117,0.000017553219,0.00017782055,0.0009867416,0.000007249838,0.016891582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953258,0.000913002,0.0003276186,0.00018172103,0.0000050537496,0.000047125293,0.00034844098,0.00000952091,0.0028416084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970849,0.00042973185,0.00011358887,0.00021095102,0.0010757296,0.0010850541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98952127,0.0016210666,0.00089229137,0.00031045798,0.0055461703,0.0021088382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003979657,0.00039272854,0.0005770131,0.0016904428,0.009472183,0.0030721975,0.0012303507,0.00069190544,0.0038826044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010979235,0.00040050322,0.00066959136,0.006173086,0.002163947,0.0014267585,0.0024872487,0.0015851868,0.00035716346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005792907,0.00086196803,0.8302897,0.00041885636,0.00011857651,0.0009737011,0.08254082,0.0010260347,0.0005699176,0.007750136,0.012820959,0.062050007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058070018,0.00015841846,0.88410205,0.00023296336,0.000101396225,0.00017781953,0.09706678,0.001080666,0.00021951793,0.000577524,0.016138671,0.000086084154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99733514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041348055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041348055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09368974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30000252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798208657","doi":"","title":"Representative Bureaucracy in Multinational States","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue française d’administration publique","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Bureaucracy; Representation (politics); Multinational corporation; State (computer science); Political science; Unitary state; Ethnic group; Immigration; Political economy; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01588718844008519,"score_gpt":0.30637326038771,"score_spread":0.2904860719476248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798208657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9427572,0.0003980051,0.001063681,0.00064039096,0.000025392552,0.00003015325,0.00004707884,0.000013765644,0.05502446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769324,0.00011626941,0.00016804975,0.00005390929,0.0000051510337,0.000014798302,0.000029437097,0.0000041843755,0.0019150793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952062,0.001492952,0.00022351256,0.0003704843,0.00078936614,0.0019174811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99512684,0.0010517155,0.001368446,0.0006244691,0.0007808697,0.0010476741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030648324,0.00009361619,0.00027388326,0.0020575547,0.004906735,0.003598995,0.00035161,0.00041845712,0.0047979145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007334243,0.00017990684,0.00022303496,0.0032683033,0.0042591044,0.001588939,0.002876746,0.0008182283,0.00024291211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031295678,0.00031360585,0.20990162,0.00017940976,0.00008016099,0.0009875855,0.07973908,0.0037551553,0.0014868097,0.6323756,0.00443251,0.06643552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008168642,0.00029021176,0.6971855,0.0004504504,0.0000569982,0.0005536061,0.11014955,0.004821683,0.00095621176,0.03769264,0.147691,0.000070394926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019465188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03790802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019465188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058199624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041188425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04222697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803214581","doi":"","title":"Quebec’s Pay Equity Act: An Innovative Policy for Reducing the Gender Pay Gap","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue française d’administration publique","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Pay Equity; Equity (law); Gender pay gap; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Public administration; Social equality; Public economics; Business; Political science; Public relations; Economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Finance; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.10290187470442087,"score_gpt":0.3845612825656735,"score_spread":0.28165940786125265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803214581","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087030485,0.0065165935,0.012088082,0.53104025,0.0055121887,0.001024362,0.001529284,0.0006588836,0.35459986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48202124,0.0018791873,0.011830407,0.15515296,0.0009619599,0.0006602919,0.0005288857,0.00013200384,0.34683308],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99395835,0.0012391174,0.00011522751,0.00029830963,0.0023247546,0.00206427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928886,0.0016099703,0.0004237437,0.00037536456,0.0017257385,0.0029765724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060710073,0.00048795596,0.0003542742,0.0014572346,0.0075491597,0.006736973,0.0022718345,0.010200962,0.008951172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012123686,0.00041185104,0.0007529168,0.0015552945,0.0034306913,0.002040435,0.0033143123,0.0054171337,0.00073742575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100123165,0.00022815446,0.012175932,0.00019536453,0.000056457542,0.0007532584,0.004466336,0.001622212,0.0013598407,0.38491675,0.51530844,0.07881708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009896936,0.00007141451,0.033684514,0.00023388019,0.000029298984,0.00013270366,0.0017099923,0.0015736265,0.00046157622,0.008643316,0.9532799,0.000080897706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94091034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9641187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.942936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057064008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18327264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4140303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885130275","doi":"","title":"Life with the Boys in Blue: A Professional Experience in the Montreal Police","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue française d’administration publique","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Ethnic group; Public relations; Conflict resolution; Order (exchange); Political science; Criminology; Conflict management; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Business","score_opus":0.03067124851093787,"score_gpt":0.3407729316531643,"score_spread":0.3101016831422264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885130275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86571467,0.008234647,0.0014731911,0.06502506,0.0036681665,0.00051504694,0.00024486752,0.00018394398,0.054940317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91486955,0.005553776,0.0013083258,0.010998674,0.00068488566,0.00019017827,0.0000872134,0.00023302241,0.06607441],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856383,0.0073250914,0.00014049427,0.00062875275,0.0015329937,0.0047342745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819078,0.0026563678,0.0010927963,0.00021500365,0.0016013213,0.012526756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074825,0.002202235,0.0013241727,0.0020898907,0.078571,0.01087198,0.006638232,0.0060390467,0.010740167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013500181,0.0020629978,0.0007037568,0.002938955,0.029302273,0.005499011,0.013105098,0.011998992,0.0012997604],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022783484,0.00010091784,0.001706855,0.000056097717,0.0000055390483,0.002421886,0.98205227,0.000030873656,0.00021079127,0.0008680049,0.008636118,0.0038878564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037859197,0.00009571638,0.0018432545,0.0000659144,0.0000034587695,0.0004349201,0.9625024,0.000023827826,0.00005691548,0.00007290501,0.03487082,0.000026083835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6517812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8549979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3482188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033802163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033361617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70053905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}