{"meta":{"query_hash":"a4286213fdeb","filters":{"venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé"},"cohort_total":45,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":45,"exported":45,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a4286213fdeb","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revue+internationale+de+droit+compar%C3%A9"},"results":[{"id":"W105086239","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2011.20134","title":"L’autochtonie sur les territoires du Canada et de la France : analyse juridique comparée du droit des minorités culturelles","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Migration, Identity, and Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.03058091508029855,"score_gpt":0.28609877232491693,"score_spread":0.2555178572446184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W105086239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94491893,0.008913233,0.002699979,0.0032228206,0.0011242602,0.00026861284,0.00015830841,0.00006944941,0.038624376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650311,0.008571998,0.001591032,0.0005766698,0.0015447284,0.00004511679,0.00006568866,0.000030375775,0.022543313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707675,0.0006543723,0.00066833233,0.00044878258,0.00054992305,0.00060184434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977482,0.0006585309,0.00039211236,0.00025537252,0.0005692311,0.00037657787],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010660456,0.00029385387,0.0004834205,0.00014566835,0.00073574064,0.0002174181,0.0008477262,0.00023964098,0.000711626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004172201,0.00037510184,0.00022168642,0.00031966966,0.0006888443,0.00045898696,0.00007976485,0.0004587776,0.00003624525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016409675,0.00034851953,0.64760816,0.00018080772,0.00015450058,0.00009090392,0.019623913,0.00033714218,0.000028351898,0.3178479,0.012806459,0.0009569102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041747003,0.000040287494,0.71730834,0.00044818484,0.00012408254,0.00014249932,0.0016522658,0.0045130025,0.00018275155,0.047455575,0.22726668,0.00044887504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96645814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99187416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27039233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019574044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003207052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977413935","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2000.18068","title":"La surveillance vidéo et le droit à la vie privée au Canada et au Québec : l'impact des chartes des droits et l'exclusion de la preuve","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022798317141870098,"score_gpt":0.3155657898430508,"score_spread":0.2927674727011807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977413935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8444277,0.0022670894,0.00046927246,0.008310888,0.00024555484,0.00021492271,0.00018533977,0.000064989115,0.14381425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98258454,0.002420925,0.00041778391,0.0005522635,0.00041216894,0.000036787453,0.000054228418,0.00004736179,0.013473951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955698,0.0019188585,0.0005304776,0.0005125018,0.00066077727,0.00080757047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943568,0.0044186697,0.00025546103,0.00029791877,0.0002395972,0.00043154447],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032986132,0.00035237544,0.00047374205,0.00009130296,0.00059240364,0.0003127662,0.0008754074,0.00024609896,0.0006551982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010532252,0.00042936244,0.0002456905,0.0003296186,0.0011249216,0.00071657903,0.00014152951,0.00060297747,0.0000817151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001589049,0.0006680784,0.5612227,0.00038292643,0.00023039016,0.00035363948,0.03869292,0.010148887,0.00022396346,0.32819045,0.0032856914,0.056441486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000446404,0.000082800376,0.6714832,0.0014425219,0.000041097395,0.0004610331,0.00075612334,0.003296429,0.00010340384,0.018266661,0.30312407,0.00049622275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9843571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30992377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008087675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010601157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991407196","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2008.19628","title":"La cession de créances en droit international privé québécois","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024036278501408385,"score_gpt":0.29449140862774564,"score_spread":0.27045513012633726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991407196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8039161,0.0027811527,0.0053946497,0.012998102,0.003396992,0.00019435813,0.000069678645,0.00011951695,0.17112945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9092491,0.008933319,0.0011524239,0.00041111998,0.0030722246,0.000038296228,0.000054509233,0.00002998745,0.077059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748486,0.00036409052,0.00054142525,0.0004309498,0.0006995411,0.0004791372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822193,0.0006859175,0.00034075865,0.00021203818,0.00028299916,0.00025632433],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091048056,0.00022891114,0.00030962395,0.0002076358,0.0003797931,0.00013194788,0.0008996441,0.00030599727,0.0017213464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027568117,0.0003043314,0.0002681976,0.00027379248,0.0005003178,0.0005922309,0.00012818302,0.00049388484,0.00033624674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011624393,0.0010138291,0.19017819,0.000119026794,0.00041781043,0.0004989039,0.053526103,0.0013736193,0.0005179732,0.5841158,0.0090796575,0.15904282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049945625,0.00004655667,0.0986824,0.00047523933,0.000038628463,0.0004965334,0.000992795,0.010827196,0.00015238934,0.011310965,0.8761625,0.00031530927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014665745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0080616595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8670829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019450489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005938449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992384429","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2007.19506","title":"Pour une redéfinition du référendum consultatif","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Parliament; Political science; Doctrine; Order (exchange); Typology; Confusion; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.043133349117989876,"score_gpt":0.3094436782907793,"score_spread":0.2663103291727894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992384429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22277294,0.000107028405,0.006623987,0.0047134217,0.00058925105,0.00010934002,0.000023700666,0.000105138424,0.7649552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972237,0.00026559428,0.0011031777,0.00068139547,0.0011851509,0.000007533171,0.000036182377,0.000014207893,0.024469784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987809,0.000073224204,0.00032009036,0.00019918737,0.00036125226,0.00026533904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985663,0.0006529701,0.00015061698,0.00009340348,0.00042975473,0.000106928506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008457428,0.000097943084,0.0001360243,0.00012290194,0.00027718584,0.000073836905,0.00033814614,0.000043860335,0.00047993168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008183233,0.00011951037,0.00008981946,0.0001731276,0.00018725556,0.00016668622,0.0000435459,0.00013460881,0.000573232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025864001,0.00009322751,0.011711393,0.0000061167434,0.00005461022,0.0000566866,0.0021595564,0.000030400897,0.00021626809,0.9730464,0.009098962,0.0035004707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006797121,0.000034091066,0.117768504,0.00013837805,0.00002048172,0.000044817833,0.0021189977,0.00070232316,0.0004727225,0.060660582,0.8170718,0.0002875731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009804082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032962866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9123859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043401448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008599955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73679286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999097873","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2000.18137","title":"La modernité du droit commun des contrats dans le Code civil du Québec : Quelle modernité ?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Legislature; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Autonomy; Code (set theory); Civil procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; Commercial law","score_opus":0.020485015324057828,"score_gpt":0.2526800951280243,"score_spread":0.23219507980396648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999097873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54940766,0.00027859828,0.0036968575,0.0012123564,0.00008955106,0.00013730933,0.000046695146,0.00012639828,0.44500458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9472102,0.0007298552,0.00018915848,0.0007421683,0.00049659837,0.000033461147,0.000044061344,0.000044538556,0.050509956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780387,0.00048230993,0.00047304662,0.00033456215,0.0004968711,0.00040932623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826515,0.0007624231,0.00016494903,0.00027911292,0.0003042609,0.00022413114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008650917,0.00021075505,0.0002971655,0.00009869214,0.00066774664,0.0002752532,0.00112315,0.00010890715,0.0025147544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028892406,0.00026544015,0.00021194325,0.00011464235,0.00061906624,0.0004963911,0.00007171545,0.0003660638,0.0005521939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001314315,0.00069863856,0.036567762,0.00002430845,0.00020262011,0.00015041746,0.011589072,0.00446606,0.0006626854,0.9309982,0.0019945335,0.012514254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017824593,0.00007202088,0.037619952,0.00031315663,0.000050712933,0.00016228594,0.0017215258,0.10971137,0.00051755714,0.041889753,0.8054591,0.0007001007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04344876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21853341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8891085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008594476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046608673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010428341","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2003.5566","title":"Le régime québécois d'indemnisation des victimes d'accidents de la route est-il un exemple à suivre pour le droit français ?","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02534545545208815,"score_gpt":0.3240059237845318,"score_spread":0.29866046833244364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010428341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8755695,0.004162185,0.032467686,0.009233608,0.0012850981,0.0007993141,0.00016205452,0.00015851867,0.076162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602179,0.0016598211,0.009844455,0.0038933528,0.0010614012,0.00015926367,0.00016029568,0.000110774745,0.022892762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937719,0.002528554,0.0012817774,0.00063578965,0.0005612864,0.0012206584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99420094,0.0034593667,0.0005721468,0.00053651,0.0005499903,0.00068106997],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038504978,0.00040304396,0.00071765797,0.00022130302,0.0011614661,0.00008989192,0.00061048806,0.0011014694,0.0012818201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024357287,0.0005427518,0.00034886156,0.00039871733,0.00031636906,0.0005026756,0.00009955403,0.0022396196,0.00080489664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000600128,0.0013370356,0.4507617,0.001157979,0.00043108364,0.00013761724,0.09024895,0.0009453298,0.00026348527,0.42231393,0.01464953,0.017693343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004397293,0.00013901276,0.4803021,0.0023356,0.00016953851,0.00038647544,0.025298527,0.01011623,0.0005925418,0.11138537,0.3641396,0.0007377352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.199343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034143917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34949005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017053301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008736172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011695981","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2007.19537","title":"Le droit de vote des détenus en droits canadien, sud-africain et conventionnel européen","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Political science; Punishment (psychology); Democracy; Citizenship; Law; Warrant; Supreme court; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.033871886469537524,"score_gpt":0.31815675723698444,"score_spread":0.2842848707674469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011695981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8747483,0.00021534582,0.022352505,0.0034802721,0.00031294912,0.00018284286,0.000026077794,0.00010238373,0.09857934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98545843,0.00009231777,0.0013760378,0.0003649825,0.00040532943,0.0000124476355,0.000021338341,0.00002017136,0.012248959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982272,0.00020442912,0.00034852338,0.00028629578,0.00037040326,0.000563193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983493,0.0007507476,0.0001472255,0.00017219581,0.00026858677,0.00031195072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002501086,0.00012498969,0.00019102769,0.00015262977,0.00036543875,0.00012838014,0.0006265895,0.00008906562,0.00008823327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009773998,0.00017302025,0.00013115711,0.00023610587,0.00024944666,0.00030531472,0.00006528677,0.0002195959,0.00009083153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003181309,0.00010980859,0.038569383,0.00003318392,0.000041120264,0.0002050778,0.007384907,0.00023468942,0.00031313728,0.94740915,0.0010032379,0.0046644574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084865553,0.000113857575,0.36742026,0.0005594693,0.00007465607,0.00035652748,0.0052921167,0.002756509,0.00080815394,0.25893548,0.3621044,0.0007299494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085600354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31741798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6884737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010400712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047358856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9204887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017968145","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2002.17804","title":"Droit et langue","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lingua franca; Meaning (existential); Arbitration; Law; Negotiation; Political science; Linguistics; Frame (networking); Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06040469170150745,"score_gpt":0.330893359427849,"score_spread":0.2704886677263415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017968145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29858413,0.00053039246,0.0017689434,0.0054677688,0.00038968865,0.00012939767,0.000024283285,0.00010080021,0.6930046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9261973,0.0003818517,0.0003149091,0.0007424319,0.0005399332,0.000031066647,0.000014148391,0.000009535923,0.07176884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892515,0.00009149674,0.0002123003,0.00019624011,0.00035015398,0.00022465242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917114,0.00032052878,0.00009426032,0.0001154809,0.00021399949,0.0000845805],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029329563,0.00009339828,0.00015995838,0.00009623103,0.00020157594,0.0000814818,0.00038695286,0.000040392337,0.0029745314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023262836,0.000115224575,0.00010681926,0.00012343409,0.000119562086,0.0002144387,0.00005565414,0.00014111858,0.0008958498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039353145,0.000100119214,0.010158898,0.000004033592,0.00005700279,0.0000126532,0.0034256903,0.00007765992,0.000042023148,0.9621876,0.022098208,0.0018322017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029569774,0.000027609105,0.024937218,0.00007577108,0.0000116422225,0.000015429123,0.0008444937,0.005837905,0.000086311695,0.030653035,0.9369912,0.00022366049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015036676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048193787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9315345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003356283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026184845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027318412","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2002.17806","title":"Le partenariat civil, d'un continent à l'autre","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; General partnership; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03769913312653062,"score_gpt":0.2679104109691336,"score_spread":0.23021127784260298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027318412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43179196,0.03290138,0.0008510926,0.2800048,0.004977564,0.0006753639,0.00013366135,0.00023471702,0.24842948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84284234,0.00400798,0.0005571896,0.0005270747,0.0017615298,0.000057415036,0.00001871034,0.00002312358,0.15020463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757713,0.0002594461,0.0005338236,0.0004401582,0.0005363455,0.000653071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847853,0.00043365036,0.00030527482,0.0002055275,0.00032807386,0.00024894386],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036329296,0.00026612933,0.0004456187,0.000056803052,0.00065233605,0.0001799782,0.0006381322,0.00018809142,0.0040671704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003291793,0.00031394543,0.00032389566,0.00027637987,0.00054064055,0.00037355736,0.00015370821,0.00035974162,0.0018219445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015734584,0.0011101468,0.023029989,0.00012217769,0.0007430644,0.000132775,0.032561496,0.00093812076,0.00010665316,0.8123056,0.10212374,0.026810499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007656849,0.000040020637,0.017265348,0.0003201339,0.00008211329,0.000037875634,0.0023752272,0.016605254,0.000080590624,0.0067458414,0.95523286,0.00044905386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007813163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061903433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8531091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008516328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000493712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047781295","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2000.18139","title":"La civilisation du droit d'auteur au Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copyright law; Civilization; Law; Legislature; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Common law; Sociology; Commercial law; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.01452700932105409,"score_gpt":0.1930272280835563,"score_spread":0.17850021876250222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047781295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55594635,0.0000303823,0.0003759755,0.0005998874,0.00025384253,0.000084520136,0.00000465484,0.000059129947,0.44264525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810209,0.000021922286,0.00003805739,0.0014489691,0.0019601237,0.000017530338,0.00009836803,0.000022437616,0.015371651],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989931,0.0000137352445,0.00027279975,0.00023642537,0.00025613452,0.00022779792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943715,0.00012482537,0.00009228788,0.00016933553,0.00015500488,0.000021416114],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021639136,0.00013627305,0.0001597708,0.00011531873,0.000121420504,0.00019582569,0.00036891786,0.00004738028,0.016743591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014926352,0.00014568467,0.00007322293,0.00017701558,0.000034975048,0.0005538165,0.00005143578,0.00015639466,0.0007967319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023628776,0.00040297944,0.07890771,0.00032145818,0.00021603529,0.00019313401,0.000516712,0.0027857283,0.00026037,0.095233165,0.5457755,0.27515092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026173308,0.0000042850575,0.031503458,0.000074577954,0.000016111173,0.000029528303,0.000030697225,0.16307706,0.000042053347,0.0040765805,0.8006927,0.00019125987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38255522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4706518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4272736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005460246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018103451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085821400","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2005.19333","title":"L’élection de droit : comparaison québéco-européenne","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.045827258370571985,"score_gpt":0.32396173463188777,"score_spread":0.27813447626131577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085821400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60235244,0.012253299,0.01652486,0.032251514,0.0030356178,0.00041932202,0.00011226179,0.00019419634,0.3328565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8127434,0.0024025904,0.001181573,0.001158451,0.004404009,0.000048970604,0.0000459912,0.00003643611,0.17797855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968582,0.00033489146,0.00077510736,0.0005729507,0.000673321,0.00078552705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977464,0.00068832806,0.0004189965,0.0002621835,0.0005907292,0.00029332857],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075049355,0.00034314446,0.0005460096,0.00024256072,0.0005444604,0.0002100532,0.0008176471,0.0001729411,0.0024859053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026811686,0.0004858972,0.00036751587,0.00045913496,0.00052601815,0.0006593444,0.00013969757,0.00053872,0.0022018126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085687745,0.00065082917,0.013617309,0.00004600599,0.00035082098,0.000025209187,0.00525798,0.0062902514,0.00023509884,0.92284614,0.022887263,0.027707383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005450295,0.00010824726,0.029915547,0.00032092477,0.00007675308,0.00011426436,0.000536131,0.058759417,0.00038639968,0.025518527,0.8832691,0.00044967158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008319066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024890622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89732766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038472167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030006934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125509930","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2003.5577","title":"La méta-effectivité du droit uniforme : un exemple basé sur le développement régional au Québec","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.028405815522536917,"score_gpt":0.26312463746071935,"score_spread":0.23471882193818244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125509930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8484447,0.0006063432,0.012568025,0.019594925,0.0021331655,0.000411626,0.000112338406,0.0000811414,0.116047755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96040314,0.00029916,0.0011102362,0.000532153,0.001234304,0.0000931391,0.00012394933,0.000043994147,0.03615989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668056,0.0006471876,0.00064962014,0.00052269275,0.0008753136,0.00062465336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974455,0.0011414237,0.00039863976,0.00022855218,0.00053656654,0.00024930277],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017512026,0.00031923072,0.00038150238,0.00019886406,0.00058266846,0.00017557915,0.00061891036,0.00025802615,0.0014981787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006628464,0.00042760602,0.0003422232,0.00033588437,0.0003386481,0.0005794797,0.00008502021,0.0004288332,0.0005716136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028375869,0.000765117,0.090402946,0.000055911696,0.00022551237,0.000051525232,0.0028729176,0.001138602,0.000087426655,0.891948,0.0020970989,0.010326579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016795918,0.00009789804,0.19782454,0.00040985012,0.000079761376,0.00025303237,0.00046995239,0.00715515,0.0012715862,0.11353296,0.6765434,0.0006822474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.163125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1659907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.778415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005107616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026663968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255921133","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2015.20511","title":"Comparative overview on the transformative effect of acquisitive prescription and adverse possession : morality, legitimacy, justice","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse possession; Legitimacy; Medical prescription; Possession (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Medicine; History; Pharmacology; Land tenure","score_opus":0.10552151013526145,"score_gpt":0.3757852775835352,"score_spread":0.27026376744827374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255921133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89956677,0.0025385357,0.0012224807,0.014386679,0.00049789855,0.0010275317,0.00030407644,0.000024843963,0.08043117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568087,0.00063261326,0.00010406763,0.00024669355,0.00027917203,0.000084079686,0.000034285127,0.000008804151,0.0029294172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980721,0.0006944527,0.00036847644,0.00023058677,0.00041991347,0.00021447419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784696,0.0011989134,0.00029996719,0.00017044845,0.0003260966,0.00015758818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001079186,0.00017374686,0.00034620517,0.000055064473,0.00022738035,0.000059571943,0.00034104002,0.000084395826,0.00011472926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014623743,0.00014875176,0.00012321703,0.00023813812,0.0005276997,0.00044722253,0.00007549255,0.00026211576,0.000093238734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015484352,0.00020441906,0.0006844655,0.00023889655,0.00011308645,0.0000034982086,0.025466403,0.0014947548,0.00010769555,0.9665068,0.001883287,0.003141851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073265927,0.003027085,0.09250514,0.009167082,0.0022279005,0.00014460602,0.058819335,0.25908998,0.01621726,0.10362593,0.44606188,0.0017871992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016426959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032125422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8628809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004959188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013506557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60659206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266694311","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2015.20474","title":"Entre trust et fiducie, le malentendu québécois","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Order (exchange); Law; Civil code; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Express trust; Trust law; Code (set theory); Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Psychology; Commercial law; Computer science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.05126368018360599,"score_gpt":0.30311071963555736,"score_spread":0.25184703945195136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266694311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25721326,0.00019720517,0.0002935737,0.016614923,0.00063108624,0.00013541023,0.000030203704,0.0000999404,0.7247844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96918803,0.00005803671,0.00022041699,0.0010441506,0.0010722858,0.00001614961,0.000026408079,0.000011701011,0.028362805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988588,0.00013283515,0.00019536402,0.00019117593,0.00038522793,0.00023658546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923134,0.00010037939,0.00009376939,0.00011877461,0.00023945404,0.00021626224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049983826,0.00008926675,0.00015437753,0.00006812378,0.00016527399,0.000107052765,0.0004227692,0.00007314164,0.00016416243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003018722,0.00010781332,0.000113188435,0.00014036005,0.0001309723,0.0002773253,0.000054111366,0.00016329881,0.0004004097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012611079,0.00012324931,0.013053141,0.0000056829635,0.000029644474,0.000020818708,0.019029424,0.000061255276,0.000011315412,0.9612276,0.005349764,0.0010755119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044324363,0.000018088305,0.0042845844,0.0000368645,0.000009708986,0.000008411875,0.003289901,0.0003440414,0.000028946457,0.10094141,0.89041895,0.00017584137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031431336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018481279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8850692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004636249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006496185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291485883","doi":"","title":"Carmen Lavallée. L’enfant et ses familles et les institutions de l’adoption -Regards sur le droit français et le droit québécois","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02446359614199531,"score_gpt":0.2545087732835164,"score_spread":0.2300451771415211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291485883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7377135,0.009707394,0.006949931,0.021856006,0.0013629586,0.00036753563,0.0010964877,0.00016636669,0.22077978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91808504,0.0034852254,0.0005983759,0.0008525687,0.0006252871,0.000065758424,0.00036001287,0.000041264317,0.07588645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736255,0.00038619546,0.00059800246,0.0004961495,0.00057964586,0.0005774433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984585,0.00032643467,0.00030941423,0.00029342616,0.00035411766,0.00025808805],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010284215,0.00026167097,0.00041877033,0.0006025077,0.0009257414,0.0006129308,0.00063701975,0.00030864408,0.00034892143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021408117,0.00044312383,0.00037151334,0.0004091314,0.0009333883,0.00084857433,0.000091474234,0.0005699324,0.00019052079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014868964,0.00051832467,0.008454401,0.00009073024,0.00011402068,0.00007564022,0.007662665,0.0099843545,0.00015331051,0.954064,0.01653246,0.00233522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068662455,0.00003380091,0.10416474,0.00037357924,0.00007376425,0.000086210144,0.0016384552,0.001805558,0.000032422176,0.01688907,0.8737608,0.00045492867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98486745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9371749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003674624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006171111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320857469","doi":"","title":"Claude Emanuelli. Droit international privé québécois","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.023677426058207576,"score_gpt":0.29831138795038836,"score_spread":0.2746339618921808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320857469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5533377,0.0048412187,0.03139213,0.01844717,0.012139231,0.00042276332,0.00010882913,0.00018952256,0.37912145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8374785,0.002256342,0.0011887065,0.0008753478,0.00589774,0.000018404693,0.000102574166,0.000043010128,0.15213937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683,0.00010964025,0.0008559733,0.0005475673,0.000918263,0.0007385981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782693,0.0005137991,0.0004595146,0.00032287295,0.0004960145,0.00038086157],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016555878,0.00028134047,0.00035995117,0.00033429917,0.00030108073,0.00022844237,0.0010504713,0.00031608643,0.0032301035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021876063,0.00040968717,0.00036679668,0.0004009751,0.00041341854,0.00056192547,0.00013956455,0.000525781,0.001110237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076102435,0.00051453046,0.028811038,0.00005758705,0.00029653628,0.00015742719,0.007819373,0.0002751249,0.00020005407,0.81139153,0.0040388983,0.14636178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054042164,0.000059898026,0.048740808,0.00034918272,0.0000624101,0.0001313147,0.0010068703,0.004613411,0.00021131139,0.028729212,0.91515285,0.00040233854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014303284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042958718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9111139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002384565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029001408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332404594","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2004.19250","title":"Entre la reconnaissance et la protection : la situation de l’embryon et du foetus au Canada et au Québec","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02424565352314804,"score_gpt":0.2889736341763221,"score_spread":0.26472798065317404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332404594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85325146,0.0016386622,0.010921466,0.07852299,0.001114293,0.0007147091,0.000053039676,0.00014996808,0.053633448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992791,0.0008631966,0.0007985611,0.00092496525,0.0008778328,0.00018899953,0.000072413204,0.000038646816,0.0034444127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977997,0.0004672687,0.0004714576,0.00048060453,0.0003192468,0.0004617186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981912,0.00074013905,0.0002604536,0.00033868186,0.000289904,0.00017964744],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015416645,0.00023717816,0.00033948646,0.00017811256,0.00012147251,0.000052569514,0.00023124546,0.00024080877,0.00005567423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029806194,0.00028755795,0.00009483857,0.00020165918,0.00018064438,0.00023916781,0.000063767904,0.0008505393,0.000042289546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043252518,0.0009777123,0.1986909,0.0017678146,0.000349971,0.0007439235,0.007902626,0.017472286,0.0016024987,0.6471243,0.0027485455,0.12018688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025245827,0.00024265455,0.62153715,0.0033758325,0.00009233678,0.0031606264,0.0007233935,0.004273361,0.0038100341,0.018700397,0.34113827,0.0004213636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9037488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.948035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6284239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008447747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011155232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515375725","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2016.20603","title":"La résolution judiciaire du conflit (JDR) par les juges en Alberta : un modèle hybride","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03473260091732318,"score_gpt":0.2789906476953491,"score_spread":0.24425804677802593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515375725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8240276,0.0036578982,0.0069020544,0.089400545,0.0014019219,0.00023522366,0.000087746346,0.000072965115,0.07421406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94549924,0.0029572144,0.00031996085,0.0002372383,0.0013924247,0.00003187032,0.0000138111845,0.00002441661,0.049523808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977114,0.0004586316,0.0004695624,0.00043459472,0.00044278378,0.00048297894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662006,0.0024150196,0.00025363825,0.00024359091,0.00025244022,0.00021523792],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088196393,0.00022076273,0.00032029886,0.00008919158,0.00035593877,0.0001088754,0.00069484353,0.0001992796,0.0016890509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000854374,0.00022810289,0.00021706051,0.00015240672,0.0007269419,0.0005059642,0.00012744716,0.00021959748,0.001013825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004681773,0.00020507365,0.036016207,0.00008049409,0.00012244385,0.00008299627,0.0033691667,0.00014042838,0.00048211523,0.7860134,0.0076616937,0.16577914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044673128,0.00005926471,0.045546316,0.0015741093,0.00011302173,0.00020882036,0.00044521014,0.0033858833,0.00070494635,0.05069237,0.89641756,0.00040575993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021648034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0107545545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88875586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008862226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016879641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596434462","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2016.20740","title":"Étude franco-canadienne du principe légaliste : le processus qualitatif et interprétatif du texte pénal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Legislator; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Humanities; Philosophy; Legislation; History","score_opus":0.02902429272706703,"score_gpt":0.3096303512717241,"score_spread":0.2806060585446571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596434462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9121728,0.00013972493,0.011183338,0.029891703,0.00060674455,0.00022149799,0.000047378096,0.00010852454,0.045628313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991853,0.00014519878,0.000679954,0.0006088879,0.0005721371,0.000057022346,0.0000094380175,0.000019599469,0.0060547465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822605,0.00020065755,0.00040148434,0.00035241165,0.0003862822,0.000433093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980769,0.00087125564,0.00021384597,0.00019762098,0.00039145298,0.00024888737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013231974,0.00015156099,0.00023658856,0.00011156299,0.00026990497,0.00013557424,0.0007468009,0.00007161698,0.0004169114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013720627,0.00014524176,0.00012240365,0.0001569718,0.00026589708,0.0005264281,0.00009032704,0.00013473493,0.00024621614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008348318,0.0001649982,0.041058786,0.00007407929,0.000066287044,0.00007473907,0.031295575,0.00006860882,0.00047551244,0.9086491,0.0029892446,0.014999602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011394508,0.00013388756,0.10436444,0.0013298093,0.00004724072,0.000117521544,0.0054592015,0.0012665561,0.00038585646,0.07159969,0.8134348,0.0007215698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02061186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13327731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83704937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000563051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036504577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619387942","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2017.20809","title":"Les droits fondamentaux du travail et le développement économique du Québec : obstacles et perspectives","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outsourcing; Labour law; Globalization; Context (archaeology); Investment (military); Economics; Market economy; Welfare economics; Political science; Labour economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04726904213722096,"score_gpt":0.3139190557453579,"score_spread":0.26665001360813695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619387942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87301886,0.00023869204,0.0010111425,0.054503214,0.00021945346,0.00020306754,0.00004291015,0.000055847926,0.07070684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909024,0.00091607205,0.0004784655,0.00076072075,0.00029885865,0.00004892201,0.000016285176,0.000016875634,0.006561381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897915,0.00011785936,0.0002308695,0.00026990328,0.00017512344,0.00022711167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999029,0.00017089317,0.00023985383,0.00025089286,0.00019871345,0.0001106759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055756385,0.00012338143,0.00017441575,0.00007173977,0.000862724,0.00044789945,0.00070814294,0.000053316788,0.00045011166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030716378,0.00014329595,0.000107521555,0.00003166609,0.00024369376,0.00038897237,0.0001212284,0.00013445054,0.00002042361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008309079,0.000225878,0.13967104,0.000003346987,0.00007827824,0.0000074777,0.015141275,0.000065176886,0.00007271634,0.83881265,0.0017559628,0.004157867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005421267,0.00002257356,0.7769161,0.000061118226,0.0000115224475,0.0000032445876,0.008099307,0.00037934227,0.000090050344,0.0073846797,0.20630898,0.00018098809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22528307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43808478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.831428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091832015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060522807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7798758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622179869","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2017.20810","title":"L’avenir de la présomption de paternité : comparaisons franco-québécoises","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0463018400249588,"score_gpt":0.3390780308374323,"score_spread":0.2927761908124735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622179869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88943243,0.0029137884,0.0015684072,0.01485703,0.0016332908,0.00032150207,0.00011068413,0.000105356165,0.08905752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9572214,0.0018617489,0.001592391,0.00029664434,0.0021351867,0.000082637605,0.000020190866,0.000029667646,0.036760144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742806,0.0005149399,0.0004425484,0.0004077979,0.0004633102,0.00074332627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767363,0.0008315958,0.0005544721,0.00035642786,0.00027737353,0.00030651168],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095794915,0.0002909826,0.00045742225,0.000062742896,0.0016361462,0.0006303241,0.0012184486,0.00028767536,0.0005280304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009223425,0.00034456313,0.00031594624,0.00008290143,0.001341077,0.0005416156,0.0002211477,0.0005224481,0.00049113535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057709945,0.00063911366,0.6913961,0.00023388103,0.0005282765,0.00016154618,0.040803444,0.0015437324,0.00057725736,0.22968669,0.012870191,0.021502027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054667366,0.000030921474,0.608872,0.00054544216,0.00008912523,0.00006320968,0.0016017866,0.0077296915,0.00014871667,0.013658662,0.36634696,0.00036682084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06765593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019790549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35347676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032131353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002749162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624342807","doi":"","title":"Le mariage entre personnes de même sexe","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.03541616535378129,"score_gpt":0.27643486176875676,"score_spread":0.24101869641497548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624342807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84079695,0.007279032,0.0005465651,0.03619354,0.0015654854,0.00029340512,0.00007515024,0.00009549106,0.11315438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85626966,0.0024671706,0.0013155092,0.0004973352,0.0019805972,0.000034606313,0.000022416853,0.000020694943,0.13739203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979271,0.00025068852,0.000362209,0.0003699203,0.00046541487,0.00062464416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870145,0.00045972897,0.00020949583,0.00015009526,0.0002522979,0.00022690684],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003425651,0.00022870146,0.00036221824,0.000057318008,0.0009197975,0.00008922452,0.0005889165,0.00018227934,0.0012112795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037473053,0.00028012806,0.0002872953,0.00022933914,0.000739714,0.00035482546,0.00013886979,0.000334722,0.0007992629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042038286,0.00079915975,0.1636651,0.0001888896,0.0006837393,0.0005311184,0.18292624,0.0012571918,0.00057310046,0.5913683,0.05095482,0.0070103183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089919596,0.0000505511,0.11993073,0.0003379521,0.00008720659,0.0003200923,0.016243557,0.0075118076,0.00029379845,0.008180228,0.84547734,0.00066752516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022840792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006768304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7945225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015898328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030959194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625945188","doi":"","title":"Compte-rendu du XXXIIIe Congrès de l’IDEF, Le face à face droit civil/common law en droit des affaires. Cas du Canada, de l’Afrique et du Monde Arabe (Montréal, 16 et 17 mai 2013)","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Humanities; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013141603172639653,"score_gpt":0.21890305900120668,"score_spread":0.20576145582856703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625945188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43164638,0.004301157,0.01798964,0.14341576,0.0019453372,0.0014629614,0.00035090328,0.00031670916,0.39857116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9392262,0.0011063924,0.00073277496,0.031307276,0.0013858605,0.00023821052,0.0008558526,0.00013113863,0.025016295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957686,0.00025189586,0.0011984025,0.00080123433,0.000904715,0.0010751337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965551,0.0006821137,0.0008380018,0.0005027083,0.0011686301,0.0002534293],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011308829,0.0007167473,0.0007610203,0.00033003226,0.0006481072,0.0017824594,0.0013698185,0.0003323642,0.0027587074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034231943,0.00094063446,0.00036956632,0.00030230358,0.00043469653,0.0033141312,0.0004324717,0.0008865308,0.00084428367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004650627,0.00050962425,0.017228218,0.00022252114,0.00034506593,0.00017613157,0.00050613,0.013131942,0.00023092712,0.7119597,0.25543463,0.00020858728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018385003,0.000042144187,0.03380042,0.0008086325,0.00012635782,0.00049095956,0.0005591536,0.21790835,0.0005367781,0.11562967,0.62724817,0.0010108453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8258709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9361648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59633005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042559137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079902366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746919872","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2017.20834","title":"Le co-emploi à l’épreuve du droit comparé","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04606465320607222,"score_gpt":0.2958011377998757,"score_spread":0.2497364845938035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746919872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3660125,0.0005703612,0.0034709843,0.011951594,0.001991185,0.00029233153,0.00015673407,0.00007541096,0.6154789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94733447,0.00076082913,0.00024341769,0.0004191188,0.0014792942,0.000039302296,0.00012554569,0.000028377597,0.049569655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978791,0.00011576491,0.00065357983,0.00040144223,0.00038124697,0.00056888734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980685,0.0003277599,0.0005763142,0.0005014447,0.00023275604,0.00029318468],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007781486,0.00025022877,0.00044222327,0.000121615514,0.0012355148,0.0011041617,0.0015403599,0.00024856674,0.00070784887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020821726,0.0003730045,0.00031684586,0.00009595875,0.0008289334,0.002501749,0.00009736047,0.00040359868,0.0023446886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002969465,0.0003632462,0.040500104,0.00009247181,0.00016241835,0.000030195086,0.0036028277,0.00058440823,0.0000059974577,0.9173534,0.0054882993,0.031786967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010359959,0.000061542276,0.071119644,0.00064716383,0.00005222875,0.00007013414,0.00090276485,0.010957319,0.00018528673,0.0844665,0.8299534,0.00054804794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030327109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004717731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8328869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067148136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004015458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768616452","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2017.20859","title":"La notion d’entreprise en droit québécois : aspects de droit positif et vision prospective","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011240435323076406,"score_gpt":0.24858769074980558,"score_spread":0.2373472554267292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768616452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80788755,0.0012188249,0.004514359,0.010862659,0.0014667517,0.00055617903,0.00006550196,0.00012891096,0.17329925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96876055,0.00060425425,0.0003817936,0.00085340545,0.0024167923,0.000055339264,0.00011737415,0.00007585414,0.026734613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757177,0.000073825766,0.00055521005,0.00071589043,0.0005193238,0.00056397653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971301,0.00027213205,0.0012134531,0.000752822,0.0005559598,0.000075536365],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092640246,0.00037210653,0.00046462196,0.00022902936,0.00043185434,0.001776859,0.0010628547,0.0002582062,0.0006256444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064177485,0.000519465,0.0003102795,0.0001673892,0.00019779343,0.002846142,0.0004995286,0.00061573595,0.0012350131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017885024,0.00075403857,0.20762554,0.0004748453,0.00023662027,0.00069728313,0.00079575565,0.0005022356,0.0006042331,0.7523227,0.003850026,0.031957887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013335539,0.00004118444,0.67326474,0.0020805118,0.000176171,0.00016687563,0.00016432864,0.025778038,0.00023618083,0.18709522,0.10909376,0.0005694264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01957855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017021619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56522745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001789095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002267208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768991967","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2017.20861","title":"Les paradoxes de la théorie de l’acte clair en droit civil et de la parol evidence rule en common law","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05564107603987563,"score_gpt":0.38116885433568065,"score_spread":0.32552777829580504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768991967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66011107,0.0041389624,0.0022854086,0.014538427,0.00060527853,0.00024478114,0.00012490105,0.000077270226,0.31787387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97216463,0.005427334,0.0010330167,0.0007438367,0.0014801794,0.00012254514,0.0000228411,0.000037393012,0.018968252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535745,0.0021977264,0.0005701876,0.0005043628,0.00063083076,0.0007394102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98979944,0.0085996045,0.00056410185,0.00046138492,0.00029908997,0.0002764018],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00386328,0.00035434487,0.000568461,0.00009841201,0.0011337318,0.0008560898,0.00197414,0.00032295994,0.00057166297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017004301,0.00044094157,0.00034794063,0.00009892978,0.0016550524,0.0009637268,0.00042309012,0.0008436417,0.00018307962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058436282,0.00027409435,0.21768121,0.00006350859,0.00028625637,0.00009711503,0.0070691993,0.00070940034,0.00017075831,0.76750135,0.0037290964,0.002359564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004239795,0.00006545306,0.2946453,0.0012776593,0.000094068695,0.0001321032,0.00057998835,0.0054721474,0.00046598326,0.39418086,0.3022598,0.000402638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032580804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04418163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3733205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026003942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059120107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789391118","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2017.20881","title":"Transsystémisme et droit commun. Une clé du droit occidental","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03818961777643389,"score_gpt":0.3131951954474215,"score_spread":0.27500557767098766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789391118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5214176,0.0011959168,0.00084628543,0.08155852,0.0046034902,0.00041172863,0.00020996157,0.0001099244,0.3896466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94346106,0.00100611,0.00019134367,0.0015257838,0.004166945,0.000038914695,0.0000711679,0.0000535517,0.04948511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996836,0.0003752954,0.00071355683,0.0005296895,0.00084707694,0.00069837534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975047,0.00042055748,0.0006417002,0.0007121716,0.0003215917,0.00039928476],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011602851,0.00035151004,0.00064017595,0.00011825972,0.0017341684,0.0008333386,0.0025456427,0.0003575916,0.00089796545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031098106,0.0004968929,0.00060562557,0.00018802973,0.0010383426,0.0012329273,0.00025451372,0.0008248659,0.0011983293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045417524,0.00051279797,0.021182247,0.00008427624,0.00025326418,0.00018822221,0.013135718,0.00007284183,0.000082395134,0.9543474,0.0024357478,0.0076597137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015853657,0.00013690368,0.093185395,0.0007748798,0.00015362186,0.00012317921,0.0012630093,0.0034617828,0.00008284024,0.67670673,0.22169107,0.0008351984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042210836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022665896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42204347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013547023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031158136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790475750","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2017.20890","title":"La liberté de religion face aux laïcités d’aujourd’hui. Étude comparative entre la France et le Québec, à partir du cas de l’école publique","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07236910920849755,"score_gpt":0.3755248447267597,"score_spread":0.30315573551826214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790475750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82890517,0.0018678579,0.0023207436,0.1263376,0.0006257957,0.00040528935,0.00012042175,0.000100779755,0.03931633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9108838,0.0011693418,0.0007706663,0.00434778,0.00085166085,0.00008077911,0.000057988702,0.000038438564,0.08179954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655926,0.0010292408,0.0006161436,0.00053650606,0.0005001073,0.00075872266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966518,0.0010658047,0.00070137414,0.0005072274,0.0006446375,0.00042911395],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011586219,0.0003601784,0.0004925736,0.00009935401,0.00084151345,0.0009159814,0.0012822656,0.00038688284,0.00020095748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009944384,0.00043644322,0.00027660406,0.000105551415,0.0011637653,0.0010492802,0.00019647134,0.00068165775,0.00019342765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027365611,0.00049081654,0.20775443,0.00007545639,0.00022373056,0.00009756852,0.15115292,0.006083384,0.00015579772,0.6037164,0.0297622,0.0004599256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008978306,0.000028010285,0.3019929,0.0003925135,0.000063950865,0.00019888172,0.006707541,0.028887786,0.0007280318,0.0041432357,0.6554707,0.00048855983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21913281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29520673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6257086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00242577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035504615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794076774","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2017.20886","title":"Les liens de l’adopté en droit civil et common law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Jurisdiction; Common law; Comparative law; Black letter law; Private law; Legal profession; Sources of law; Public law; Legal history; Sociology","score_opus":0.031158604476215837,"score_gpt":0.3047123496290892,"score_spread":0.2735537451528734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794076774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43251982,0.00014222733,0.00025915558,0.0028565915,0.00038667265,0.0000856134,0.000047307283,0.000049282342,0.56365335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96396714,0.0002015696,0.00018187174,0.0004193386,0.0004749791,0.000012922163,0.000013859077,0.00001192213,0.03471637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907786,0.00009889718,0.00016267784,0.00016693438,0.00024025585,0.00025335912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991347,0.00017681275,0.00015556096,0.0002790036,0.00008340225,0.0001705094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058652315,0.00006900431,0.00014779512,0.00014168497,0.0012503772,0.0007830055,0.00082867383,0.0000909594,0.0006253372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020063466,0.00011429937,0.00010596851,0.00003425213,0.0004465839,0.00027967224,0.000069345406,0.0002111174,0.00018970422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005067362,0.000048671915,0.016000845,0.000013192442,0.000025689309,0.000044847882,0.0064913114,0.00006468925,0.00003006274,0.96792126,0.005506961,0.0038474302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016786509,0.000009385892,0.0696827,0.000083553474,0.000014038464,0.000016532622,0.00035101664,0.00037940164,0.000013538648,0.03971133,0.8894245,0.00014615094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5207554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97312635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9282099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001970361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003083567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9617017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913809600","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2018.20995","title":"La réforme du Code de procédure civile du Québec : une nouvelle culture de l’exécution ?","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021109636610618657,"score_gpt":0.28794609108785985,"score_spread":0.2668364544772412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913809600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81550616,0.0023044352,0.009033742,0.06188749,0.0010755385,0.0002941969,0.000088750836,0.00011926737,0.10969044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95215005,0.0009836546,0.0007256994,0.0008529722,0.0032556828,0.000039181068,0.000024226834,0.000022961221,0.041945554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814105,0.00020355587,0.00036051773,0.00035683622,0.00038203405,0.00055598136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985211,0.00035602693,0.00022720518,0.00018662788,0.000449916,0.00025915264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009055195,0.00020691771,0.0002536793,0.00006639754,0.0005151036,0.00015873449,0.0006831616,0.0002652799,0.001231737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043793547,0.00024423253,0.00018184798,0.00030815566,0.00080793304,0.00041276513,0.000100828125,0.0003593041,0.0007553511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018799554,0.0007787876,0.10138926,0.00040810255,0.0001918279,0.00020274542,0.12373368,0.0007163736,0.0010097318,0.5353562,0.22087975,0.015145508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002823583,0.00011974514,0.017780429,0.0007189167,0.000086947904,0.0004967072,0.00377034,0.013756143,0.00044660713,0.008578379,0.9536603,0.00030313365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.105489254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3055157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7327805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024378262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012583743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916704305","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2018.20994","title":"La réforme du droit français du contrat : innovations et aspects comparatifs avec le droit québécois","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; French; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.02041917515113117,"score_gpt":0.27390510215501246,"score_spread":0.2534859270038813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916704305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4907664,0.0008124329,0.0095054,0.015550327,0.00226596,0.0003713566,0.00021051064,0.00015231119,0.4803653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479107,0.00060932664,0.0005306867,0.004436576,0.0039239973,0.000047118807,0.00019912116,0.000076741446,0.042265687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600405,0.0005642845,0.0011274385,0.0006944381,0.00088535075,0.00072444644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995667,0.0012238397,0.00063681003,0.00042656623,0.0017027901,0.00034303268],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016824843,0.00043298144,0.00061647675,0.0003516197,0.00065156014,0.0005595092,0.0013687696,0.0002793927,0.0026531587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008080277,0.00058891106,0.00035625615,0.00074781687,0.0014311215,0.001274661,0.00018086037,0.00076638703,0.002886183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060011993,0.00070145854,0.008279503,0.000036241785,0.00031038787,0.00013536202,0.009310385,0.00016755582,0.00017049223,0.9699234,0.007980158,0.0029250896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013813552,0.00017564362,0.070714116,0.00048733517,0.00006874116,0.00025956187,0.00062055833,0.02123993,0.00026488217,0.06380641,0.84033835,0.00064311747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027111065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06930757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90611696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012175634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010546346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967921731","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2019.21096","title":"RSE, droits de l’homme et multinationales : la doctrine du forum non conveniens est-elle un obstacle à une judiciarisation du contentieux ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Doctrine; Derecho; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01570613354380771,"score_gpt":0.2662690895572305,"score_spread":0.25056295601342277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967921731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90443665,0.0007257305,0.0062335506,0.025516676,0.0017680324,0.00066933513,0.00012781333,0.00008130528,0.06044088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95282286,0.00067980733,0.000680805,0.00080207206,0.0007881915,0.000051468825,0.00041623437,0.00003516562,0.043723393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973191,0.00036334127,0.0006825776,0.00047976262,0.00059915346,0.00055605825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974218,0.00095130573,0.00052700803,0.00024801755,0.0006511365,0.00020072778],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00112092,0.0002831835,0.00042043655,0.00021761944,0.0003806628,0.0002599659,0.00052050553,0.0002527222,0.0013285625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002891751,0.00033885296,0.00024748224,0.0003648425,0.00028307567,0.00078517594,0.0000928152,0.00037835844,0.00082272745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042386764,0.0006436034,0.077836,0.00006498121,0.0001569872,0.00003621991,0.010639096,0.0024549768,0.0003850165,0.89890546,0.004125616,0.00470969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026969276,0.00020128989,0.17561567,0.0006120641,0.00012500591,0.00014980136,0.0033991453,0.20193124,0.0006386377,0.094568424,0.5193952,0.0006666447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006951723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010473917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.804337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009058655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003306169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048146594","doi":"","title":"L’illusion de la meilleure méthode d’interprétation des lois: Réflexions sur les droits canadien, canonique et musulman","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Humanities","score_opus":0.04708499213975878,"score_gpt":0.3083492740386541,"score_spread":0.2612642818988953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048146594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5187271,0.0027083221,0.06370677,0.039840445,0.00072290475,0.00031184385,0.0006413585,0.0001378313,0.3732034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97102976,0.001082699,0.004125306,0.0044333227,0.0009175991,0.000030736286,0.00011170692,0.000032809236,0.018236052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742484,0.00080419995,0.00045424452,0.00038521003,0.0003739538,0.0005575552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973158,0.0012762139,0.00025717536,0.00014427838,0.00042889712,0.00057761045],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070014485,0.00024625604,0.0003223038,0.00010493854,0.0004977925,0.00014716596,0.00053145457,0.00022098563,0.00060888554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010847991,0.00032745194,0.00020078546,0.00033891667,0.0014012028,0.00034553665,0.00010468049,0.0004997219,0.00008557201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025146128,0.000107385335,0.008127056,0.00010032043,0.000091620735,0.00012589213,0.012468873,0.004628089,0.00015922645,0.96936744,0.0017181084,0.0030808551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005084847,0.00013987611,0.01153825,0.000943257,0.00012634264,0.00037305968,0.0031072986,0.02336988,0.00014154796,0.058335036,0.9007992,0.00061773136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1103209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07866868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9110324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002788093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029044615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094489456","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2019.21118","title":"Nouvelles lois en Australie en termes d’esclavage moderne : Où en est le Canada ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.009485084627739275,"score_gpt":0.21948908630222555,"score_spread":0.21000400167448627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094489456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90378153,0.0021465225,0.000105679406,0.016679132,0.003070822,0.00027218962,0.00040999334,0.000034111607,0.07350004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63959515,0.0005040234,0.000097684875,0.00028322576,0.0007394226,0.000009899156,0.000042319978,0.000018208539,0.35871005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980313,0.00017795432,0.0003771381,0.00038520884,0.0004884714,0.00053992413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998641,0.0004739815,0.00018033861,0.00026118863,0.000117944655,0.00032551843],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043160544,0.0001821123,0.00032483845,0.0002561509,0.00029014968,0.00029099942,0.0008438301,0.0001943175,0.0034538836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001278679,0.0003010291,0.00016019017,0.00017862565,0.00026549812,0.00033948588,0.00008952851,0.00038229986,0.00087677804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003950704,0.00043701055,0.032659817,0.000537785,0.00053060433,0.000495163,0.062375747,0.009135381,0.00056717615,0.67654204,0.19249724,0.024182515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029837227,0.00001936428,0.025967248,0.00023910854,0.00003572279,0.00003876747,0.0028853845,0.003061984,0.000044358458,0.0019204953,0.9651499,0.00033931204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99367076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7726526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010881965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053724195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106462259","doi":"","title":"La religion et le contrat au Québec","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02999950838237228,"score_gpt":0.2939109685289615,"score_spread":0.26391146014658917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106462259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09313151,0.003028129,0.007961169,0.21347737,0.0007044407,0.00012968348,0.00013360422,0.000065946886,0.6813681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96690655,0.0004880983,0.00041795333,0.009089012,0.0014113664,0.000010603453,0.000031714968,0.000013747641,0.021630937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859905,0.000294308,0.00029642312,0.0002351217,0.0002695788,0.0003055044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984979,0.0007944247,0.00015717429,0.000095521886,0.00015371243,0.0003012441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029705605,0.0001319872,0.00022836338,0.000030826184,0.00020776369,0.000073671625,0.00035928495,0.00011218223,0.00024142161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038001075,0.00017917252,0.00015706719,0.00015337503,0.0009498202,0.00020004292,0.00005310688,0.00029594018,0.00044632182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014998801,0.00008829724,0.0067978264,0.000033310604,0.00005842435,0.000052349293,0.003128003,0.00068112585,0.000022307506,0.9795729,0.007481135,0.0020693226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002962196,0.000037106172,0.0019677808,0.00013335061,0.00002975455,0.0000603118,0.0006684993,0.002294936,0.00002343939,0.0053385654,0.9889584,0.00019164025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22593772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06645986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98147726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096151215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063913325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206341563","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2018.20968","title":"L’intelligibilité de la loi dans un contexte de diversité de styles législatifs : cas du Cameroun","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0217049325807221,"score_gpt":0.30439488024139116,"score_spread":0.28268994766066907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206341563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8313551,0.0024697178,0.032021474,0.0039643142,0.00085335603,0.00022637911,0.00017099982,0.00007252523,0.12886614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95996815,0.0014334223,0.001187953,0.0007230821,0.0022695533,0.000033435932,0.000021841124,0.000030311547,0.034332264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969378,0.00074643246,0.0005418891,0.0005207894,0.0005117386,0.00074134377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643224,0.0019702304,0.000326568,0.00025889388,0.000725345,0.00028671048],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014542537,0.00032639172,0.00045148595,0.0001268707,0.00087496697,0.00023584795,0.0010105635,0.00020062647,0.0012614015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007744887,0.0004096037,0.00032333992,0.00029064046,0.0021737013,0.0003777521,0.00027670132,0.00040560748,0.0005044584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073130475,0.00036163742,0.2936815,0.00003154227,0.0005067511,0.000103848055,0.051821742,0.00028946844,0.00042242123,0.64125305,0.0058001103,0.005654804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008045555,0.00022594567,0.31789443,0.00053039024,0.00018648074,0.0003443947,0.009294306,0.024304075,0.0025592127,0.12709434,0.5161279,0.000633982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029659476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02412833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51415867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034231097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047950045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243613482","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2013.20297","title":"Cour suprême du Canada, Rachidi Ekanza Ezokola c/ Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration du 19 juillet 2013, 2013 CSC 40","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.008568020698143788,"score_gpt":0.24803149796125576,"score_spread":0.23946347726311196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243613482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73781484,0.0036924365,0.0006473307,0.23322554,0.0012524953,0.00037637385,0.0012714867,0.000039194583,0.021680305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87641716,0.0038896014,0.0003848311,0.007249207,0.0025939257,0.00008934643,0.00010794634,0.00003780995,0.109230205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705094,0.00062047975,0.00053860166,0.00042673116,0.00054519984,0.0008180269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695635,0.0013595261,0.00043179898,0.000294372,0.00027865826,0.00067929184],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088527653,0.0003015452,0.0003620838,0.00010916391,0.00036186242,0.0003560122,0.0008212935,0.0002789221,0.0019697242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062763423,0.0004105665,0.00019133338,0.00025415455,0.00038398334,0.0004840235,0.00007025927,0.00048366046,0.00035967774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016503145,0.00011392752,0.02338496,0.000055461598,0.00008633401,0.00012605304,0.0040138424,0.0014458367,0.00004356437,0.14888796,0.8205804,0.0012451241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042210496,0.000025941079,0.11280783,0.00019144516,0.000037622707,0.00033699235,0.0005101127,0.020454021,0.000028682747,0.007036656,0.8577688,0.00037983715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99124295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98865384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22597633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038992967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004010894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409417523","doi":"10.3917/ridc.732.0080","title":"État des lieux du financement participatif sous forme d’investissement au Canada et au Québec","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.055007354674044655,"score_gpt":0.25809324936288985,"score_spread":0.2030858946888452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409417523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9386503,0.007484954,0.0027822268,0.02397718,0.002130744,0.00017309122,0.000333467,0.000018518258,0.024449512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95768136,0.0030000987,0.0010679048,0.0012323612,0.00042311262,0.000061407816,0.00021591622,0.00003241639,0.036285404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795777,0.00007803714,0.0008698464,0.0003328185,0.00012144688,0.00064010924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998431,0.00041090016,0.00040622533,0.00033699803,0.0001974805,0.00021739515],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055693707,0.00024096855,0.0005042288,0.00010331571,0.00039770492,0.00017071352,0.00043044382,0.00009152617,0.0010403316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067329407,0.0003880006,0.00016919889,0.00021963957,0.00012560333,0.00025076314,0.0002349147,0.00029747616,0.00017270762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013417587,0.00042585962,0.79633003,0.00019121681,0.00036080313,0.00013058937,0.011633996,0.0026728655,0.000004978914,0.1553153,0.0058124536,0.0271085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052377157,0.000044696953,0.58542347,0.0003820751,0.00002472994,0.000047742153,0.0005796516,0.0070173787,0.00010646221,0.011989941,0.39347008,0.00039002532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9397923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99573314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3876576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012082556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050376793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409417579","doi":"10.3917/ridc.734.0070","title":"Le régime québécois de l’administration du bien d’autrui : un modèle pour la gouvernance des communs urbains ?","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03072643805858679,"score_gpt":0.27280329285286264,"score_spread":0.24207685479427585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409417579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83955157,0.0058634593,0.010950708,0.04854322,0.00094630354,0.000145407,0.00014900588,0.000066920365,0.09378343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94122076,0.0033081884,0.0032947955,0.0006380093,0.0009529712,0.000029342198,0.000020456331,0.000022289583,0.05051317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975259,0.0005182516,0.00042553977,0.00041422513,0.0005283469,0.0005877785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812245,0.0005940672,0.00039056112,0.00025969045,0.0003814939,0.00025173876],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083242124,0.00020197884,0.00030311945,0.00004051125,0.0006831313,0.00029985458,0.0008689026,0.00020091348,0.00043039807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006211164,0.00028302643,0.00024616678,0.0005711276,0.00076265406,0.0005372785,0.00013298157,0.00032867398,0.00013050699],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015055651,0.000630988,0.08425632,0.000047395184,0.000084060695,0.0001992789,0.024607027,0.0008337586,0.00036724133,0.86138606,0.0042742067,0.02329863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070509297,0.000059258222,0.3386243,0.00054324296,0.00005888158,0.00028473075,0.010703201,0.022505613,0.0011193731,0.13217802,0.4926646,0.0005537019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1522944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2975946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.729208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013037453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033436932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409423569","doi":"10.3917/ridc.753.0100","title":"Titres détenus par les intermédiaires du marché financier en droit québécois","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.019074255938709372,"score_gpt":0.2231706814497943,"score_spread":0.20409642551108492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409423569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94486094,0.0049153487,0.0007737331,0.016897086,0.0031799662,0.0003301504,0.00013822057,0.00028991615,0.02861464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8874261,0.0018619715,0.00013745949,0.0011494304,0.0047077504,0.00007674953,0.00028469533,0.000080484584,0.10427537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771225,0.00003957602,0.0006222535,0.00055699534,0.00042726783,0.00064167107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983108,0.00035495724,0.0005034357,0.00039712654,0.0003814816,0.000052208354],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051217066,0.00035342472,0.00044799474,0.00042091374,0.00023691893,0.0004631628,0.0009094163,0.0001784086,0.0014057811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004693574,0.0004572127,0.0003270241,0.0006969755,0.00020237175,0.0010636145,0.00051787606,0.00038842205,0.005114507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010005045,0.0003157583,0.39227048,0.0012311427,0.0002798773,0.0010791908,0.00046532124,0.0010023547,0.00021972874,0.22331175,0.26204884,0.11767552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041357323,0.000015362171,0.3199303,0.0011149641,0.00006907845,0.000046539102,0.00014767422,0.025008293,0.000055453398,0.0185392,0.63428855,0.00037104834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02390252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013375041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37223968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044022073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015338122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409423580","doi":"10.3917/ridc.752.0292","title":"Sénat - Législation comparée","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nat; Computer science; Computer network","score_opus":0.16413937648873067,"score_gpt":0.4549199311624997,"score_spread":0.290780554673769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409423580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62653345,0.006657815,0.003959261,0.15528749,0.023005364,0.0017715582,0.0006416909,0.00068775093,0.18145564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76414984,0.001547503,0.0006639014,0.0010767812,0.0040204152,0.00013131826,0.00038201,0.00006606755,0.22796217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946441,0.0020486994,0.0012937135,0.0005144013,0.0005413232,0.0009577352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99280196,0.005002646,0.0007693213,0.00048490637,0.00053845905,0.00040272097],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035344479,0.00027836233,0.0005585454,0.00045496452,0.00054620474,0.00009328508,0.00050463027,0.0005240754,0.0038035985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013686564,0.0003616579,0.00020123618,0.0007296429,0.000098871846,0.00056864606,0.00018185128,0.0014064066,0.02355349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095317184,0.0002536742,0.12586771,0.0033402776,0.00029682345,0.00026643742,0.015006113,0.0025004423,0.0001241458,0.45205304,0.32345495,0.07674106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005653058,0.000052996187,0.11487321,0.0021186438,0.000037449397,0.00009305438,0.0016617945,0.06877684,0.000010788376,0.013014893,0.7985101,0.00028492688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039295424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025181905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47505516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013458333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000642338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415011605","doi":"10.3917/ridc.773.0213","title":"Écoblanchiment et droit canadien de la concurrence : haro pour la RSE","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Identification (biology); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.012798754141689022,"score_gpt":0.2707392901943746,"score_spread":0.2579405360526856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415011605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34661812,0.006122254,0.012982994,0.024245927,0.0021225277,0.0003644669,0.000076938944,0.0001574681,0.60730934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8636627,0.00020963808,0.00054499,0.0029132804,0.00066454516,0.000038425547,0.00007621585,0.000020783877,0.1318694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857944,0.00011348404,0.00040032773,0.00033636612,0.00020467685,0.000365693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861205,0.0005229076,0.0003040615,0.000215252,0.0002949965,0.000050735],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074206747,0.00021736254,0.0002783761,0.00032330476,0.0001075064,0.0006565422,0.0005055122,0.00013216404,0.0010743558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005208546,0.00029559678,0.0001348058,0.00028744093,0.0001241391,0.00054995,0.0001589017,0.00039245177,0.0005695615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017416296,0.00021928438,0.08917359,0.00034721135,0.00013207887,0.00011558816,0.0003520703,0.0010160216,0.000084094456,0.8617696,0.037223157,0.0095498515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006487405,0.0000051091533,0.0743813,0.0012377098,0.00007898311,0.000036096026,0.00018109166,0.047499288,0.00007729759,0.026692033,0.848915,0.0002473549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018494284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006263868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8350776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000685739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002799307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W51094152","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2013.20266","title":"L’ordre public international québécois et les dissolutions de mariage prononcées en pays musulmans","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09855649702833562,"score_gpt":0.36155101156371544,"score_spread":0.2629945145353798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W51094152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6950024,0.001853979,0.007180724,0.23245835,0.0029159368,0.0008940722,0.00048185003,0.00020750581,0.05900521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84043586,0.0016516176,0.002795854,0.003178176,0.0020073066,0.0002568998,0.0004748875,0.000047259688,0.14915214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651223,0.0006919537,0.00075110106,0.00054181647,0.0006578556,0.0008450653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971294,0.00077903044,0.0003905213,0.00033852842,0.0009348603,0.00042766507],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008358822,0.00034255313,0.0003362069,0.00020977549,0.00041346118,0.00066466926,0.0012127211,0.0003426425,0.0051485933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010931783,0.00040715336,0.00030746768,0.00022622295,0.0007361623,0.0013782543,0.00021309336,0.00057696603,0.0008822764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004775579,0.0004897188,0.0862449,0.0000595991,0.0003277142,0.000013015358,0.037175238,0.00070766895,0.00018459228,0.83289325,0.03572524,0.006174279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041093418,0.000023885628,0.23399778,0.00017140263,0.00005767802,0.00008538599,0.012502971,0.027400931,0.000043361073,0.007580419,0.71726847,0.00045678305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11985237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11616203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82531285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054731066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012917125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083422930","doi":"10.3917/ridc.772.0242","title":"Royaume-Uni, Cour suprême du Royaume-Uni, 12 février 2025, Royal Bank of Canada v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2025] UKSC 2","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Payment; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.015832306432167403,"score_gpt":0.26896407692775753,"score_spread":0.2531317704955901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083422930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76847386,0.089964636,0.004238111,0.05040333,0.0144862635,0.003333172,0.006890681,0.000092129776,0.062117804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6487313,0.0011811054,0.00065610756,0.0009783923,0.0010619566,0.00013308263,0.0003087634,0.000045380097,0.34690392],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718916,0.00013863738,0.00092762517,0.0005622925,0.00053205,0.00065024255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967855,0.0013261918,0.00036445938,0.0004363665,0.00062782626,0.00045963764],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004917992,0.00040061423,0.0009882837,0.00032614247,0.00018275234,0.00005178336,0.0004497489,0.00023867312,0.0014001516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010608421,0.00044635363,0.00025375545,0.00044851933,0.00020221698,0.000093981405,0.00017318658,0.00041276976,0.00001889459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025473263,0.00145012,0.2936036,0.0039956993,0.0031688523,0.00043961834,0.0006438595,0.0025953052,0.00025025394,0.03314058,0.5752352,0.082929574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0079454435,0.00033129958,0.05497982,0.0036051502,0.0008486194,0.000068721354,0.00028215133,0.01925733,0.0009306282,0.0030096637,0.90830684,0.00043436306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19770414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1485723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33307162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023786991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017170656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W979273561","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2014.20340","title":"L’acculturation de la fiducie en droit civil québécois","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016716535394639853,"score_gpt":0.27743451228107197,"score_spread":0.2607179768864321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W979273561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44101432,0.001127162,0.005335064,0.020724418,0.0017891945,0.000221787,0.00004583318,0.00011161699,0.5296306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341702,0.00045842165,0.00045708398,0.0010852509,0.0056223096,0.00003011528,0.00004114705,0.000024170304,0.058111332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975294,0.0008183505,0.0003951186,0.00034789494,0.0004621925,0.00044708553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803317,0.0010847576,0.00023126174,0.00018649745,0.00022824759,0.0002360429],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013751027,0.00019618674,0.0002984194,0.00008580574,0.00034795044,0.00025705248,0.000631398,0.00031923986,0.0006160217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078738935,0.0002528263,0.0002588957,0.00027230164,0.00046960084,0.00046138797,0.00007236243,0.00044175275,0.00058294483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001081078,0.00019642888,0.0050996207,0.000052411364,0.00007885907,0.000013291725,0.017350927,0.00040550993,0.00013819589,0.95990956,0.0030975991,0.013646801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030449187,0.00003944696,0.013303513,0.00017421674,0.00004806506,0.000028316013,0.0004603602,0.006809461,0.00006931573,0.34780118,0.6306846,0.0002769913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021785501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016817058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.627587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017494854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035577183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}