{"meta":{"query_hash":"4affd1c6ba0f","filters":{"venue":"Revue internationale de droit economique"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4affd1c6ba0f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revue+internationale+de+droit+economique"},"results":[{"id":"W2629377882","doi":"","title":"Consumer Protection Through Competition Law: Civil and Practical Analysis of Canadian and European Positions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit economique","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition law; Law; Public law; Commercial law; Consumer protection; Private law; Municipal law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Comparative law; Criminal law; Economics; Law and economics; Monopoly","score_opus":0.03813035169598293,"score_gpt":0.2737427678353659,"score_spread":0.23561241613938294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2629377882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100943565,0.0025010754,0.0014941051,0.0073693763,0.00006879887,0.00007511453,0.0002948106,0.000024114493,0.8872291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.881548,0.0029288013,0.0025475842,0.0019963789,0.000046660814,0.000039932846,0.0003129531,0.00003312956,0.110546544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481237,0.0004514389,0.00007536455,0.00031139227,0.0023538582,0.0019954182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99396175,0.001375532,0.00024443094,0.00019181853,0.0036194054,0.00060709176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002774539,0.00046454262,0.0003823125,0.007269984,0.019284759,0.007715207,0.0017607773,0.0028352248,0.012110011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0090120565,0.0003561879,0.0007490591,0.009557264,0.007536081,0.002309628,0.002248446,0.002230125,0.0005270218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019915155,0.0000295137,0.0053080274,0.000036196197,0.000007328403,0.00033768985,0.0075276583,0.0004684469,0.00010588935,0.95733166,0.008809154,0.020018468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004937293,0.00006889461,0.093424365,0.00054779084,0.00013477118,0.0007136467,0.049166966,0.007206666,0.00085186545,0.11221339,0.7354295,0.00019277007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98360485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99059665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11642128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11642128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08144453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8446995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953687145","doi":"","title":"The tobacco exception clause in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: A victory for public health?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit economique","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; General partnership; Political science; International trade; Position (finance); Free trade; Repeal; Victory; Trade agreement; Stalemate; Negotiation; Politics; Public administration; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.07551145126710943,"score_gpt":0.31248082507566616,"score_spread":0.23696937380855673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953687145","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030412078,0.005986035,0.0007407397,0.9388746,0.00655265,0.000016064912,0.000037486145,0.000030710715,0.044720527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10434628,0.0064788163,0.0010827282,0.82483727,0.008033336,0.00008583552,0.00012478196,0.00008282399,0.054928128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849107,0.0059111286,0.0005643586,0.0014435659,0.0035709764,0.0035991897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98428345,0.0089917295,0.0006883647,0.00087975623,0.0012617378,0.0038949307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025453577,0.0004220721,0.00071245484,0.00068158866,0.010957623,0.019330466,0.0029095348,0.03351873,0.010248892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031641573,0.00058212137,0.00089641346,0.0012126855,0.018371783,0.019253807,0.00994021,0.03937528,0.0020247435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095700096,0.00008033158,0.0009902541,0.00011416526,0.000016471993,0.00077948486,0.0038073694,0.00012827796,0.00023041286,0.72995996,0.23078127,0.03301624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085967986,0.00006725828,0.001511489,0.0007066966,0.000021238286,0.0002459652,0.0049611316,0.00019002586,0.00027844677,0.14751734,0.84435177,0.000062650855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023337848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0329558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97666216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070184623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02830884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13461304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122543399","doi":"","title":"Arbitration Procedures in the Investment Agreements of the European Union. The Stakes of Transatlantic Treaties","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit economique","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; European union; Arbitration; Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; Liberalization; Damages; International trade; Treaty of Lisbon; Law; Member state; Political science; Commission; Law and economics; European Union law; Economics; Member states","score_opus":0.031334924342334834,"score_gpt":0.21297413427481734,"score_spread":0.1816392099324825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122543399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01187111,0.021948844,0.1637938,0.025371077,0.0032009992,0.00072513503,0.0002919546,0.00025589988,0.7725412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54558,0.012472073,0.15399386,0.016322123,0.0032416536,0.0023326566,0.0004553088,0.00039310573,0.2652093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.954273,0.025534712,0.0039352495,0.0045167883,0.00906541,0.002674925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884418,0.008097622,0.0009536054,0.0014334357,0.0008507887,0.00022276533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03220468,0.0011122825,0.0009948883,0.0021009052,0.007107202,0.016978115,0.002755271,0.014216738,0.009433206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039265346,0.0009050093,0.001629654,0.0033731177,0.017249446,0.010618718,0.0063338084,0.009522463,0.003643381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008130581,0.000003635485,0.000026507034,0.00001760159,0.0000025910354,0.000040290746,0.0005939426,0.00017755966,0.000056435525,0.99313617,0.0017673414,0.0041697645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027032422,0.00002433344,0.00022100087,0.00022765377,0.000015115665,0.000119330216,0.00029664618,0.00073887425,0.00034581148,0.8029375,0.19500618,0.000040459985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049926676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048459684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03220468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005923997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009317959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17031664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137634056","doi":"","title":"Geographical indications and generic names in international trade law: A conditio sine qua non?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit economique","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sine qua non; Negotiation; Political science; International trade; China; Intellectual property; International law; Law; Business","score_opus":0.01818839345784482,"score_gpt":0.23701472451618066,"score_spread":0.21882633105833585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137634056","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019403609,0.0709768,0.05913134,0.43293512,0.009954656,0.000079253994,0.00033437228,0.00026331397,0.40692148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6906095,0.059970763,0.03183483,0.15402983,0.017859114,0.000412973,0.00047558683,0.00048410517,0.04432323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822266,0.0089824,0.0011542852,0.0020580417,0.0044235913,0.0011551683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821249,0.011985212,0.002004485,0.0017927813,0.0016721209,0.00042047136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013980575,0.00075995,0.0011513765,0.002212982,0.004509673,0.022865718,0.0024444703,0.012970332,0.0059031057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025840832,0.0006434357,0.0009054719,0.006373323,0.040665302,0.036137693,0.006091303,0.016652634,0.0020656118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004401484,0.0000022218676,0.00007675575,0.000030215395,9.601123e-7,0.000020243566,0.00077154883,0.00004659629,0.000025749805,0.9910396,0.0036441337,0.004337631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015452253,0.000028979111,0.00046129027,0.0005870361,0.000009428673,0.00019809692,0.0018521206,0.00036654543,0.00010878994,0.63684696,0.35948685,0.000038547885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006588867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053716865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022865718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005936312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005896458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0739373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}