{"meta":{"query_hash":"06e5e346ffe2","filters":{"venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel"},"cohort_total":49,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":49,"exported":49,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/06e5e346ffe2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revue+nationale+de+droit+constitutionnel"},"results":[{"id":"W1032438667","doi":"","title":"Overview: Supreme Court of Canada Charter Decisions","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02848703536602217,"score_gpt":0.2689585937572918,"score_spread":0.24047155839126963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1032438667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004542294,0.38833004,0.0018295646,0.1368605,0.0069962163,0.0006023725,0.023354348,0.00038310423,0.43710157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.094311535,0.47073823,0.0056363144,0.12012997,0.011009797,0.00077190227,0.0179601,0.0004314069,0.27901083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906996,0.00094207,0.00031125097,0.00071053824,0.0051905345,0.0021461104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98318046,0.0042994465,0.0007199164,0.00041036328,0.010472825,0.00091701536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055475333,0.0015538936,0.001810137,0.022258202,0.00973724,0.014537034,0.004715871,0.009314737,0.021322653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01924,0.001482162,0.0015583475,0.043603245,0.0035986875,0.0040278,0.0018408779,0.0052681086,0.0027235758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029802053,0.000029523271,0.0007592978,0.0008529076,0.000036801714,0.000054029893,0.00037380488,0.00061394006,0.00005894935,0.063229285,0.90215784,0.03180387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032690124,0.000009991083,0.00801192,0.0018441251,0.000078563025,0.000038382153,0.0004825789,0.00024235235,0.00007790735,0.009972366,0.97914565,0.00006349275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97948164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98844355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11233724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11233724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18777898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8150675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1034034791","doi":"","title":"Canadian Leadership in Latin America: in Constitutional Terms","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07922056073633844,"score_gpt":0.2778791955390536,"score_spread":0.19865863480271517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1034034791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08575813,0.0071197487,0.00072369736,0.11949887,0.0004992616,0.00008313777,0.0007194862,0.000068844995,0.7855287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86389303,0.0035281535,0.00072572904,0.009249321,0.0001712576,0.00007196718,0.00024032684,0.00005418512,0.12206599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99501747,0.0007125232,0.000078211604,0.00038055892,0.0010616706,0.0027495364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960789,0.0006521703,0.00020972549,0.0001400452,0.0018573519,0.0010618569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027612823,0.00038115613,0.00039413295,0.0033124574,0.025161736,0.013066135,0.0014108515,0.0028001121,0.016993059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00955968,0.00026541267,0.00030228327,0.008862178,0.010280929,0.0025580006,0.0030526633,0.0046447925,0.00053771207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046188725,0.000028596638,0.005329092,0.00006617346,0.000011189862,0.0001764469,0.016617669,0.0002458708,0.00012686664,0.914858,0.04514666,0.017347313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054053424,0.00001945157,0.03713536,0.00030751387,0.0000368496,0.00008028431,0.036525387,0.00034739342,0.00020334712,0.033837136,0.8913877,0.00006550415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18746962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18746962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19175428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94242007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W104986285","doi":"","title":"Canadian Women and the \"Charter of Rights\"","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.010661464341784737,"score_gpt":0.23498223556295283,"score_spread":0.22432077122116809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W104986285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05975111,0.008325082,0.0008805068,0.17437187,0.0011777489,0.000054266293,0.0004102525,0.000046675745,0.7549825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8087596,0.003183251,0.0008267437,0.016656598,0.00034929928,0.000041038424,0.00011553235,0.000074178715,0.16999374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990408,0.0018824784,0.00013258899,0.00083146093,0.0026622561,0.004083177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995169,0.0012028384,0.00031319587,0.0003042601,0.0017888208,0.0012218747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00564501,0.00055150164,0.0006135079,0.0024962362,0.036446832,0.01547261,0.0020927347,0.006180872,0.01762765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01144981,0.00048303,0.00044543153,0.004683943,0.032405756,0.0036785123,0.0048146895,0.007438389,0.000599928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026057027,0.000009866816,0.00081776973,0.000030781222,0.0000059129825,0.00005727981,0.01693565,0.000088814646,0.000097955555,0.9343529,0.038570367,0.009006593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029726116,0.00001473177,0.008547845,0.00019984416,0.000023026318,0.000056835015,0.024549251,0.0001574455,0.0002459856,0.056012288,0.91007143,0.000091640286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99272436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1551045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1551045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19799243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.979959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W120985047","doi":"","title":"International Law and Canadian Courts: A Work in Progress","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Work (physics); Political science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.0124522136723284,"score_gpt":0.2618494991670113,"score_spread":0.24939728549468287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W120985047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033619605,0.1392715,0.0038114118,0.19073687,0.002194177,0.00013355608,0.0012213336,0.00013872492,0.6288729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6699485,0.17859106,0.01066684,0.026593782,0.0014883823,0.00018435226,0.0012413866,0.00017373906,0.11111199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98942214,0.0018185737,0.00029839086,0.00096481026,0.004789997,0.0027059948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810564,0.0049913814,0.00083822047,0.0006036298,0.010949223,0.0015612652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076428168,0.0010114161,0.0011947021,0.013589084,0.021269774,0.02262028,0.003114631,0.0050496743,0.02279109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024594544,0.0006071372,0.0012490085,0.034573123,0.013834832,0.011171603,0.00408479,0.0048097866,0.00064135954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005090046,0.00006967813,0.0067573246,0.00070856,0.00008061142,0.0001328969,0.010242169,0.0008238364,0.000115629984,0.7668734,0.101566695,0.11257828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035248773,0.000025106045,0.031136451,0.0024846762,0.00027387482,0.00012854484,0.03307968,0.0011747507,0.0003912961,0.100140385,0.83097446,0.00015554638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99352443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99523205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18931368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18931368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29975882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9402812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W129899286","doi":"","title":"Should Canada Follow International Law","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; International law","score_opus":0.02576789029707875,"score_gpt":0.27874764935070473,"score_spread":0.25297975905362596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W129899286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009475669,0.0033963444,0.0005206928,0.31068113,0.003449513,0.000097290795,0.0010770101,0.00013494486,0.6711674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16723128,0.0033554502,0.0012774126,0.3364262,0.0010038267,0.00016298103,0.00065223326,0.00024701047,0.48964363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98328054,0.0010271606,0.00038590384,0.0013866125,0.0060522505,0.007867658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811507,0.0020763627,0.0005611017,0.0011275512,0.012002973,0.0030812852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063893166,0.00057862035,0.00093751686,0.0025718403,0.019221898,0.019219566,0.003335997,0.02554689,0.043530215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030069644,0.0007109647,0.001318553,0.003561319,0.008654436,0.0076130247,0.004943499,0.015052608,0.006865157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054188684,0.000058213976,0.001887155,0.00010119822,0.000042365908,0.00017868774,0.0016298156,0.00021006798,0.00019132263,0.5846302,0.39787465,0.013142285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056891964,0.000017940407,0.003523588,0.00026202318,0.000063182524,0.000059370843,0.0033572214,0.00020836228,0.00037698157,0.041891247,0.9500882,0.000094911804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9726898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9773606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9288215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07117848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26203084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5164385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W162561870","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Section 15 on Canadian Society: Equality Rights: Beacon or Laser?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Political science; Law; Laser; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; Physics; Optics; Operating system","score_opus":0.01764727016560328,"score_gpt":0.2520280081384532,"score_spread":0.23438073797284995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W162561870","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017679978,0.008920837,0.00085267075,0.49270344,0.005604867,0.00010657474,0.0010656016,0.00010494207,0.4729611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36182523,0.007711974,0.0031033265,0.37673366,0.0026884372,0.00024700255,0.00059846917,0.0002760065,0.2468159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95153654,0.004002522,0.0015849709,0.0026413258,0.026497377,0.013737261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95014316,0.017553156,0.0019429553,0.001896844,0.021143688,0.00732012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021640977,0.0006532049,0.0013237378,0.0038816142,0.023731088,0.019362064,0.006369591,0.027220095,0.02966823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06180353,0.0011346515,0.0014180884,0.0051822467,0.021636298,0.0085061705,0.0067389645,0.02313169,0.0016739427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050353217,0.000045266603,0.0014892037,0.00013350147,0.000021853184,0.000121225115,0.0050756927,0.00013496092,0.00025031812,0.725471,0.25210837,0.015098253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008897371,0.000047912974,0.020469567,0.0012322515,0.00010650547,0.00013026009,0.010650878,0.00031511657,0.0006114861,0.073009916,0.8930306,0.0003066183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9711288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09387419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09387419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29425743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6811081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W182529916","doi":"","title":"\"Auton\" and \"Chaoulli\": Who Decides the Future of Health Care in Canada?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Operations research; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.013934871508507711,"score_gpt":0.2181913222740833,"score_spread":0.20425645076557558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W182529916","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08592596,0.011048679,0.0006959233,0.83776516,0.0007078225,0.000029263816,0.0014080316,0.000025420526,0.0623937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9383095,0.005723271,0.0005410776,0.0387293,0.0005163828,0.00002004249,0.00028743,0.000030292622,0.015842581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99457365,0.0010349924,0.0001272365,0.00030589968,0.0013697777,0.0025885536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859481,0.0034606396,0.0010668281,0.00018408342,0.004928287,0.004411964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058436,0.0002915009,0.00072073843,0.0016972754,0.008980992,0.012385533,0.0016670291,0.006744431,0.008683995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020355675,0.00030781262,0.0005496227,0.0029181105,0.009129411,0.005357797,0.0020863672,0.007444806,0.00039434753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025463162,0.00007639801,0.050917022,0.00017508655,0.000089527595,0.0003586485,0.005570289,0.0032606823,0.00015063882,0.68597203,0.22139856,0.031776484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019969209,0.000056535304,0.13529682,0.0015270131,0.00025905884,0.00022359952,0.04100701,0.013096258,0.00064648985,0.30802807,0.4991775,0.00048202937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99263436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99590284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16345502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16345502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2486884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9702736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W185958079","doi":"","title":"Federalizing Canada's Securities Regulatory Regime: Insights from the Australian Experience","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.025839973083845044,"score_gpt":0.2463340956138175,"score_spread":0.22049412252997247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W185958079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5878174,0.0027730109,0.0009498142,0.103397675,0.00024013918,0.0001523695,0.0004783738,0.000047656493,0.30414364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9362452,0.0013147834,0.00042296146,0.008345636,0.00004434579,0.00003983776,0.00010264885,0.00002791061,0.0534568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98753554,0.0019153687,0.00020804252,0.00054114277,0.0044623786,0.0053374786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856118,0.0049655423,0.0006805223,0.0004651854,0.0052044913,0.0030724732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007752217,0.00025660955,0.00061175413,0.0019119587,0.035960518,0.015140246,0.0020940348,0.0064127897,0.0072195795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019544492,0.0004979439,0.00046140395,0.0061734836,0.009023109,0.002674125,0.0036981832,0.008159656,0.00030168786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019356869,0.00027640755,0.033963617,0.00021539528,0.00008642532,0.0014541235,0.19830783,0.0026986187,0.0014219155,0.6307108,0.075608864,0.055062532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000846928,0.00012109352,0.13883956,0.00039465993,0.00009436557,0.00022473795,0.112128906,0.0018840684,0.0010719675,0.020023296,0.7248992,0.00023348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99798065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21837804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21837804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28090343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9065707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202561496","doi":"","title":"R. v. Kapp: Aboriginal Fishing, Andrews and Affirmative Action in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Supreme court; Law; Fishing; Political science; Action (physics); Physics","score_opus":0.024691001684359223,"score_gpt":0.2996355685379767,"score_spread":0.27494456685361746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202561496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09677227,0.01541247,0.0016695717,0.2770466,0.0016082397,0.00020472628,0.0010617384,0.00011846936,0.60610586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6533332,0.0043771174,0.0013775253,0.095467485,0.00039445594,0.00015260173,0.0001335321,0.00006855895,0.2446955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947712,0.00063769403,0.00013020543,0.00041155034,0.0017001055,0.002349337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960311,0.0017455366,0.00014887739,0.00012237202,0.0012601577,0.00069192133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037715132,0.00044263198,0.0005422382,0.0009064556,0.032141272,0.009146693,0.0027955994,0.015191515,0.0072874594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009652035,0.0006088527,0.00058849686,0.0017147738,0.008081015,0.002095884,0.0026727887,0.011148408,0.00057507027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007502414,0.000041602514,0.0058670966,0.0001105849,0.000043167787,0.0012718241,0.015670521,0.00084602094,0.00060262287,0.7490119,0.21441616,0.012043416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017264478,0.00006034092,0.03006591,0.00092685333,0.00022555768,0.00051060354,0.029734896,0.0032338146,0.0016641227,0.10513627,0.82789844,0.0003706464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9887213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06286331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06286331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15468721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45610738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228178568","doi":"","title":"Canadian Citizens and the Others: The Failure of the Federal Court to Ensure the Respect of International Law for Non-Citizens","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Federal court; Political science","score_opus":0.01668669166852979,"score_gpt":0.24813042864691562,"score_spread":0.23144373697838583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228178568","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1618579,0.0044156555,0.0011339594,0.46916413,0.0014289311,0.000148869,0.0003771515,0.00007824193,0.3613951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88638437,0.0016767371,0.0011812472,0.057643175,0.0002736525,0.0000593604,0.00008674794,0.00009767146,0.052596975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97956526,0.0024256806,0.00041516908,0.0016283324,0.0067120437,0.009253596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97515136,0.0068533816,0.0011137542,0.0010669932,0.009971601,0.00584293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0125231715,0.0006103535,0.0008284671,0.0024662134,0.07012638,0.016586542,0.0051968,0.016490418,0.009780605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04085719,0.0007946342,0.001094727,0.0043380815,0.021451319,0.004823437,0.00520081,0.01897839,0.0005311501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013623641,0.00009612479,0.010304314,0.00010848555,0.00010841729,0.0011041245,0.047696948,0.0006253334,0.0005400241,0.6850784,0.21510632,0.039095264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018365053,0.00006966374,0.05191787,0.0006765136,0.00039906005,0.00047771254,0.090955235,0.001636725,0.0016039356,0.07075153,0.780628,0.0006999559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99845016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8077692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19223079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41461653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93689775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230639928","doi":"","title":"Embedding Environmental Rights in Section 7 of the Canadian \"Charter\": Resolving the Tension Between the Need for Precaution and the Need for Harm","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Harm; Section (typography); Embedding; Law; Tension (geology); Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Business; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Advertising; Compression (physics)","score_opus":0.01332486221887336,"score_gpt":0.25128781255616484,"score_spread":0.23796295033729148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230639928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03300413,0.0027289644,0.013497506,0.20553614,0.0022114017,0.00029053856,0.00072497997,0.00024670459,0.74175966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70356256,0.0022893844,0.033782635,0.097227514,0.0008394209,0.000423544,0.000421649,0.00031513715,0.16113816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9647847,0.006571223,0.0010216438,0.0028765865,0.0153076695,0.00943816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778504,0.0067322003,0.0009346613,0.0017373338,0.009847487,0.002897954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020466901,0.0009167779,0.0012243184,0.002723955,0.023871724,0.019357907,0.005936216,0.022659954,0.00746248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030379305,0.0011519837,0.0015002069,0.002867366,0.035276297,0.0069033084,0.006843706,0.021343276,0.0007742167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013320701,0.000018070685,0.00038670667,0.000039998235,0.000007908386,0.0000611222,0.0043360074,0.0005153255,0.00031532356,0.9650011,0.0244578,0.004847404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082116945,0.000049174705,0.005716434,0.00068497774,0.00010693351,0.00011500674,0.008194265,0.0018696744,0.0014517274,0.286294,0.6950339,0.00040178138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9755951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11361891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11361891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4188585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82436675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247551692","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: Clemency and Death Row Inmates: Smith v. Canada","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Art; Philosophy; Criminology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.017972701801573798,"score_gpt":0.25739056347791955,"score_spread":0.23941786167634577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247551692","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065683074,0.0018680431,0.0004821846,0.76144713,0.002421493,0.00019503995,0.00091534294,0.00012807852,0.16685966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23226725,0.0028556483,0.0005539856,0.5871829,0.00090909266,0.00012017969,0.00024885242,0.00007302877,0.17578913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754983,0.00017987206,0.00007156741,0.00026961646,0.00072280795,0.0012063085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685776,0.0009783503,0.00015478244,0.000072203475,0.0009425146,0.0009943979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015063536,0.0006107585,0.00057675684,0.0008205777,0.030074295,0.004390581,0.0036558094,0.024579415,0.013029428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007134604,0.0006910438,0.0006747613,0.0016311115,0.0051946365,0.0015762112,0.0016983157,0.015673164,0.0014610841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012225372,0.00008290154,0.014505464,0.000124935,0.000058774844,0.0043096086,0.012566369,0.0004578841,0.00078655465,0.05396374,0.902307,0.0107145505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018118734,0.000082107515,0.022169553,0.00052989676,0.0002755654,0.002089434,0.063004896,0.0011981401,0.0020969228,0.009961699,0.8981152,0.00029528653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97972476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99267936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046072215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046072215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13831532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33427888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254183191","doi":"","title":"The Contract Clause Comes to Canada: The British Columbia \"Health Services\" Case and the Sanctity of Collective Agreements","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012828651370049361,"score_gpt":0.2437861796722954,"score_spread":0.23095752830224606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254183191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12865041,0.003831468,0.0012986688,0.14828658,0.00043487805,0.00010060993,0.00031338088,0.000031277166,0.71705264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9103016,0.001664161,0.0004912083,0.020548098,0.00016562942,0.00008887514,0.00007362641,0.00004841403,0.06661847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836073,0.0025239603,0.000275991,0.0009642725,0.0037888284,0.008839611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98764616,0.005450319,0.00060278975,0.0005209964,0.0030806009,0.0026992064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007233486,0.0007419399,0.0014687106,0.002691453,0.054122802,0.023399156,0.0049218563,0.028669221,0.012559122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0217658,0.0012496957,0.0010097264,0.005734761,0.03458081,0.0066005816,0.007998597,0.021745134,0.00073239516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004482486,0.000037763166,0.0019144143,0.00003643137,0.000021512127,0.00053664634,0.008176503,0.00049135805,0.0000803521,0.95913815,0.025688274,0.003833776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004161646,0.000066313645,0.018906763,0.0014697537,0.000421348,0.00063582405,0.1000401,0.0044351304,0.0007889542,0.45220563,0.42012402,0.00048995507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99422014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15171856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15171856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27642092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98388624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262202671","doi":"","title":"Whose \"Charter\" is it anyways?: An examination of \"Charter\" litigation as it relates to the Chinese Canadian community","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.041886250380761145,"score_gpt":0.33740659393089667,"score_spread":0.2955203435501355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262202671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57538766,0.003840379,0.0010419728,0.067380376,0.00022136177,0.00017902709,0.00021139918,0.000038999555,0.35169888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773742,0.0013159753,0.00017721653,0.0048080585,0.000044117183,0.000036370322,0.000037805665,0.000020913385,0.016185384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.983907,0.0023996849,0.0003078284,0.0009247979,0.004242416,0.008218314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98615855,0.005167711,0.0016474184,0.00045416268,0.003987192,0.002584903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00902958,0.00039968087,0.0006145024,0.006872521,0.08787017,0.018408349,0.0047229775,0.007890741,0.007860373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026935792,0.0004636578,0.00062329473,0.015723512,0.039280985,0.0055766637,0.008210477,0.0080560455,0.00029241588],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034331457,0.00005776168,0.018392397,0.00010205957,0.000018075574,0.00089408935,0.28180644,0.00025825272,0.00019976884,0.6598254,0.022598077,0.015813462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003278771,0.00004337498,0.077314794,0.000508649,0.000113501905,0.00033505043,0.6964712,0.0010548889,0.00040348497,0.02959024,0.19395342,0.0001785663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16624747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16624747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.321588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96703476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268499598","doi":"","title":"Whether the \"Constitution Act\" has made a difference for First Nations?: Impact of the 1982 Constitution on First Nations: Reflections on Section 35","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05504278559855365,"score_gpt":0.2897075039663778,"score_spread":0.23466471836782415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268499598","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027560618,0.015594279,0.0003483842,0.6626204,0.0038123075,0.000038161048,0.00031555732,0.000017838536,0.2896924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50805336,0.007793565,0.0007010841,0.38511008,0.00254801,0.00012781912,0.00014880457,0.0001068841,0.09541048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863312,0.0024812634,0.00030799,0.0013237689,0.0030378313,0.006517979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98705345,0.0073799375,0.0007926179,0.000458106,0.0027955708,0.0015202278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014827015,0.0004182766,0.0009857593,0.0016791391,0.022557009,0.0151223885,0.0030454134,0.023651276,0.012432821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028364822,0.0005821552,0.0009845443,0.0028013785,0.030580144,0.010557778,0.005772803,0.022858262,0.0007429722],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025025887,0.00002409851,0.0007101496,0.00005558037,0.000011030829,0.00010248095,0.010456677,0.00006982358,0.00006659754,0.93631434,0.047269072,0.0048951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008239981,0.000036520196,0.013414271,0.0009789952,0.0000794344,0.00009103379,0.023132158,0.00013592106,0.0005614763,0.12815003,0.8331979,0.00013993814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8588982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8890254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14110178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06611481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14250234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47969878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270387197","doi":"","title":"The Role of Dissenting and Concurring Reasons in The Supreme Court of Canada's \"Charter\" Jurisprudence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Charter; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.008489126006916854,"score_gpt":0.24523691085189267,"score_spread":0.23674778484497583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270387197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29337877,0.0041249646,0.009122294,0.17644955,0.0021410626,0.0002987905,0.00041399698,0.00008331203,0.51398724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741812,0.00035709632,0.0017438259,0.010316127,0.00019482551,0.00007388433,0.000030253988,0.000044319502,0.013058478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94319886,0.01714466,0.0015335176,0.004810226,0.01762361,0.015689036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8724134,0.09919873,0.0034165073,0.0028365524,0.016398106,0.0057367403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04827767,0.000643662,0.0015032986,0.0047505964,0.039720148,0.028422214,0.005387886,0.019769711,0.0046002697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12912048,0.001163132,0.0009081777,0.0048159966,0.035092093,0.004965453,0.004374315,0.016400771,0.00037327147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006403041,0.000029153944,0.003278995,0.00003812493,0.000034105287,0.00025796064,0.023469256,0.0003335961,0.00020970391,0.9528285,0.013205922,0.006250562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004332293,0.00007341549,0.048484746,0.0010364086,0.00054449565,0.00028112318,0.078388646,0.007206413,0.0035062572,0.61753464,0.24192747,0.00058316835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8277406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9356264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17225939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0780552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19028547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5663328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273359719","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Bill of Rights as an Effective Manner and Form Device: An Analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in \"Authorson v. Canada (Attorney General)\"","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.012501353211383789,"score_gpt":0.2754712596877646,"score_spread":0.2629699064763808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273359719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044349458,0.003652818,0.0048487047,0.056360863,0.00040989698,0.00034038594,0.001200498,0.000060962186,0.88877636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81904036,0.0035292003,0.0055503137,0.018816676,0.00030264692,0.000276149,0.00034408574,0.00012923707,0.15201142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838874,0.0011957623,0.00024726856,0.0009292343,0.009013984,0.0047264593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418795,0.0013872747,0.000182819,0.00030358208,0.003330393,0.0006078829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004579517,0.0008298114,0.0010588116,0.004165928,0.02154346,0.01536884,0.004251808,0.009672504,0.01092566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015292719,0.0009036357,0.0014860309,0.0053484133,0.018144958,0.003691627,0.0030615984,0.010532569,0.0008023538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000085443735,0.0000057336374,0.00023725945,0.000013010214,0.0000048097413,0.000044284257,0.00063471944,0.00016672618,0.000048284393,0.98603755,0.010666834,0.0021320852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021586889,0.000050910698,0.015234783,0.0005399016,0.0003570196,0.00017602078,0.006717233,0.0044715474,0.0012072008,0.4580678,0.51267695,0.00028481436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98938507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99384224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14991418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14991418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20191732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9859791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275501760","doi":"","title":"Dismantling the Clash between the Prerogative Power to Conduct Foreign Affairs and the \"Charter in Prime Minister of Canada et al v. Omar Khadr\"","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Prerogative; Charter; Law; Political science; Power (physics); Physics; Politics","score_opus":0.015561468967686242,"score_gpt":0.22946856155152814,"score_spread":0.2139070925838419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275501760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030271342,0.0040321527,0.0061920155,0.3542775,0.004976877,0.00020497807,0.0003199858,0.00038712154,0.5993381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5322041,0.0013503945,0.0057887724,0.23772424,0.0012761998,0.00014039021,0.00010997391,0.00018934748,0.2212166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991882,0.0012661185,0.0002683547,0.00078366976,0.0036087406,0.0021910444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99480987,0.0018174932,0.00035290918,0.0003442312,0.0021254437,0.00054991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007993366,0.0005437909,0.00050573127,0.00077083946,0.013707046,0.009295888,0.0020547172,0.01165243,0.0029182741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014741981,0.00045297126,0.00047155676,0.0010557948,0.012015233,0.002524358,0.002993734,0.015698167,0.00090362807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027046066,0.0000148613335,0.00033356642,0.00003841419,0.000008047698,0.00011228257,0.004912875,0.00013054542,0.0003760332,0.8593199,0.12720148,0.0075248787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064588006,0.000035386376,0.003394513,0.00019459557,0.000048021215,0.0002023665,0.0027887586,0.0005646738,0.0016019373,0.061849076,0.92916226,0.000093896066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67233884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8379652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32766116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024466472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091602705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6591816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279648004","doi":"","title":"The \"Charter\", Poverty Rights and the Space Between: Exploring Social Movements as a Forum for Advancing Social and Economic Rights in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Poverty; Space (punctuation); Political science; Social rights; Sociology; Law; Public administration; Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.02994539334027635,"score_gpt":0.2542416446116925,"score_spread":0.22429625127141617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279648004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45455214,0.0028837675,0.0032409742,0.12409681,0.00030015173,0.00018649611,0.00030947736,0.00004849066,0.4143817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96113294,0.00074853096,0.0007756618,0.0022917697,0.000020216186,0.000043895936,0.000033625096,0.000032112042,0.034921233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99454063,0.0012183093,0.00006811313,0.00034737343,0.00092998665,0.002895519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960194,0.0014648634,0.00022470269,0.00011766614,0.0006295155,0.0015438811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003378229,0.00039068874,0.0005345005,0.0019143651,0.051031016,0.02278963,0.002620693,0.0054988205,0.0123702735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070927,0.00043994904,0.0004653896,0.004469271,0.034580853,0.0055945814,0.009291274,0.006971753,0.00028629453],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041851916,0.000060336,0.0049493946,0.00007681289,0.000011477818,0.00027400878,0.12726346,0.0008182786,0.00024140338,0.83039194,0.014075793,0.021795183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006113835,0.000038833634,0.017610125,0.00034579608,0.000043023916,0.00007955828,0.4612876,0.001890926,0.00044256388,0.11567759,0.40241402,0.00010885845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99448884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17681742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17681742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3872112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9547751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286880886","doi":"","title":"\"Render Unto Caesar…\": Using the Freedom of Conscience and Religion to Challenge Canadian Taxes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.054099726095320703,"score_gpt":0.3027252114588052,"score_spread":0.2486254853634845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286880886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08250895,0.001443644,0.0031982963,0.12699495,0.00079023535,0.00008838901,0.00018073502,0.00008159724,0.78471315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8758216,0.00052817503,0.0015319127,0.01681183,0.000112325,0.000060795355,0.000040872983,0.00007023484,0.105022326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99420667,0.00094600103,0.00007060624,0.0004207632,0.0019293765,0.0024265307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955102,0.0015086016,0.00013438713,0.00036010466,0.0017221208,0.0007646202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045303237,0.0004321482,0.00037746967,0.0011854401,0.030539153,0.010949606,0.0020983266,0.007499361,0.01004009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019199407,0.00036197633,0.0006236679,0.0012749133,0.020182315,0.004028449,0.0042794254,0.008523988,0.00063660817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003930224,0.000023475131,0.0010936963,0.000021077396,0.000008623204,0.00009087725,0.010727868,0.00053997437,0.0001772837,0.93821955,0.039615083,0.009443145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013017107,0.000047139125,0.0096760215,0.000267216,0.000108338696,0.00008546333,0.032887165,0.0024980027,0.0013035985,0.28831747,0.66448194,0.00019743864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092955455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.092955455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15037243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6744422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288138134","doi":"","title":"Federal Court of Appeal De-Rails Equality Rights for Persons With Disabilities: \"Via Rail v. Canadian Transportation Agency\" and the Important Duty Not to Create New Barriers to Accessibility","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Duty; Law; Federal court; Political science; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.01623098254764939,"score_gpt":0.28325350965874707,"score_spread":0.2670225271110977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288138134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05595902,0.0032254818,0.0026460642,0.16039954,0.0029753223,0.0006829696,0.0040863464,0.0002643388,0.7697609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43861535,0.0017815196,0.0025730955,0.12534957,0.0006581058,0.0004580879,0.00091065,0.000086888984,0.42956674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911012,0.0005821614,0.0002793734,0.00061862136,0.0033130138,0.004105573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954941,0.0012240185,0.000121127276,0.00025777498,0.0023877276,0.0005151939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004917993,0.0006793795,0.0008650269,0.0016097624,0.018115012,0.006734567,0.0032840988,0.019734195,0.011553896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011573266,0.00089766737,0.0011976236,0.0015530924,0.0046245903,0.0018800398,0.0029719353,0.01077699,0.001472789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097817436,0.00009304458,0.0034906417,0.000101746926,0.000032800814,0.00056395365,0.005411266,0.0003800412,0.0010814251,0.6118762,0.36363232,0.0132387895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016438849,0.00006805566,0.022146378,0.00044107178,0.00020431181,0.00023348945,0.004384715,0.001293942,0.0015351874,0.025685834,0.943615,0.00022759961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96369773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04316815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04316815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11724972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31320834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296872476","doi":"","title":"Should the Law Society of Upper Canada Give Its Blessing to Trinity Western University Law School","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blessing; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.06374453824057522,"score_gpt":0.28782632109302614,"score_spread":0.22408178285245092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296872476","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002931726,0.002006317,0.00025065968,0.9369838,0.010527098,0.000046322035,0.0002794762,0.00013634878,0.046838216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05038715,0.0022351285,0.001716739,0.6670072,0.003212,0.00007805424,0.00027895736,0.00023188654,0.27485296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.979076,0.0014714056,0.00054435915,0.001533359,0.0072527663,0.010122019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9088765,0.0064419177,0.0015338298,0.0024980635,0.04480901,0.03584071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01272837,0.00073936087,0.0015498284,0.0024199502,0.036028173,0.023937535,0.0055329315,0.04909398,0.03503398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05480888,0.0009783603,0.0015295438,0.002769834,0.0158964,0.008960318,0.006097198,0.026107905,0.008236819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042463897,0.000057636393,0.0017741632,0.00006345689,0.000038165075,0.000115970826,0.0010959365,0.00011993638,0.00016372313,0.05797939,0.9276898,0.010859328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000380483,0.000019697884,0.00347819,0.00022896529,0.000040754287,0.000028218743,0.004727585,0.00023845321,0.00020241585,0.010810223,0.98006254,0.00012487687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9648668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9830881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06779373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06779373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3753239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49188024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299835984","doi":"","title":"Defining Access to Justice: The Charter and the Courts (and the Law Commission of Ontario)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Commission; Law; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.06012035141865464,"score_gpt":0.33140635452712414,"score_spread":0.2712860031084695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299835984","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08576065,0.024639308,0.0047343755,0.5841986,0.0016764373,0.00024840335,0.0012957259,0.00006886626,0.2973776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8294109,0.0093752965,0.0051354947,0.029119631,0.00083703944,0.00018787869,0.0002332244,0.00014551962,0.125555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864029,0.0026522884,0.0007141554,0.0012772349,0.005063555,0.003889902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799951,0.006392067,0.0016042619,0.000877413,0.0068562157,0.0042750244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011143315,0.00042695447,0.000706884,0.0023578014,0.023411844,0.0195424,0.0023355025,0.010859035,0.007599606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033011276,0.00077873986,0.0005573111,0.0041241036,0.032169357,0.01090096,0.006635399,0.008854475,0.0003950043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031525422,0.000014771285,0.0043038707,0.00010025095,0.000014059714,0.00014368205,0.026206953,0.00025662998,0.00014034293,0.8977685,0.05705899,0.013960355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058947266,0.000033602042,0.038700692,0.0009105116,0.00007171266,0.00012169893,0.028057985,0.00063716597,0.0003060862,0.232304,0.6985385,0.0002590958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9895509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8294061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17059393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31070155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96199346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300581667","doi":"","title":"Benefits Provided, Hidden and Denied: A Critique of the Supreme Court of Canada's Test in \"Auton v. British Columbia\"","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.017167560847835696,"score_gpt":0.24367490213500673,"score_spread":0.22650734128717104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300581667","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04351227,0.009162737,0.0055290842,0.5399894,0.0019909136,0.00015757573,0.0013039185,0.00011746407,0.3982366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8000338,0.0030934543,0.0035835332,0.14096302,0.0012890125,0.00016990324,0.0002132882,0.00016819676,0.050485723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804561,0.003267736,0.00066327525,0.0019478332,0.0095363185,0.0041287495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97269857,0.014642414,0.0005980974,0.00081638765,0.009749743,0.00149483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016562028,0.0008354345,0.0017174926,0.0042063165,0.022392197,0.018473666,0.0091605205,0.028746678,0.005604703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04982969,0.0010052995,0.0012228523,0.005281692,0.032525513,0.0048121084,0.004160037,0.026271813,0.00059630576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005371183,0.000014635958,0.0011261763,0.00007470352,0.00004359259,0.00026898924,0.006386743,0.00040806425,0.00012406548,0.8992158,0.08366428,0.008619242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029040914,0.000041044634,0.010307332,0.001988396,0.0005242924,0.00027139543,0.014153304,0.003592275,0.0010857298,0.5275043,0.43981305,0.00042839334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.967839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09603207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09603207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16201502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6967647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510209270","doi":"","title":"Noting the Obvious: A Reflection on the Supreme Court of Canada’s Application of Judicial Notice under Sections 7 and 15 of the “Charter”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Reflection (computer programming); Computer science","score_opus":0.029353216067322264,"score_gpt":0.2720005618493013,"score_spread":0.24264734578197905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510209270","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02924044,0.0024208128,0.002089772,0.889051,0.0050311317,0.00014141161,0.00034063694,0.000085713815,0.071599014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15689388,0.0008332588,0.0015408382,0.78922343,0.0013091955,0.00010790437,0.00007801074,0.00021549195,0.049797937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9348227,0.01165915,0.002264671,0.009292069,0.017880322,0.024081018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94205374,0.02659703,0.002033818,0.0014635329,0.020110333,0.0077416603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04132385,0.0010335797,0.0017778202,0.0027319854,0.0722796,0.03991724,0.013574696,0.08693731,0.009294878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085489295,0.0026561753,0.0030384548,0.0043784957,0.042240538,0.010606786,0.007920024,0.093293495,0.0009189397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090303954,0.000093110546,0.0025569117,0.00009977584,0.00013638755,0.0013925068,0.06002546,0.0008090801,0.0011119648,0.47032133,0.4561746,0.007188521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018753397,0.00006461424,0.007187427,0.0008432532,0.00021100619,0.0001987753,0.06196414,0.0012823138,0.0014791377,0.05660155,0.8690438,0.00093647226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98277205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99082804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18295579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18295579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3190867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9476555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543676754","doi":"","title":"Qualifier ou Graduer?: L’application de la “Charte canadienne des droits et libertés” aux Universités","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01727183472408289,"score_gpt":0.25584756283914983,"score_spread":0.23857572811506694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2543676754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061924357,0.0092418585,0.0060535586,0.39476806,0.003679603,0.00013588512,0.00056146487,0.00012089584,0.52351433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82613933,0.0036926132,0.004798473,0.023027679,0.00060378783,0.00013304788,0.00016944308,0.0001258966,0.14130974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908456,0.002289916,0.00026793935,0.00090056285,0.0026118376,0.003084178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942251,0.0018132585,0.00031818624,0.00031854692,0.002195954,0.001128975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078621395,0.00045629,0.0005527947,0.0020677014,0.025188785,0.01416042,0.0023169485,0.0062463568,0.011386084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017209211,0.00043323133,0.00046468698,0.0048961714,0.026726829,0.006580118,0.004866214,0.008747712,0.0008571089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017381511,0.000009924081,0.0017357527,0.000051112296,0.0000032909516,0.00006144424,0.031084338,0.00012158165,0.000081582475,0.9103112,0.039922018,0.016600406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022290678,0.000022510285,0.012413455,0.00040333305,0.000021105316,0.000093099705,0.046381846,0.00036314345,0.00034764095,0.055134,0.8846996,0.00009797793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9589656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97690725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88343155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11656844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19718054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84576714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557656702","doi":"","title":"The Political Safeguards of Canadian Federalism: The Intergovermental Safeguards","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016452807828137076,"score_gpt":0.26154799314444654,"score_spread":0.24509518531630947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557656702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05718474,0.010763945,0.008439521,0.14473982,0.0008606796,0.00007591205,0.00054341095,0.0001269365,0.777265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469996,0.0031441362,0.0037087915,0.0053314865,0.00023044358,0.000036214213,0.00012016157,0.00005705429,0.04037218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98982656,0.0016024334,0.00017177268,0.00078016863,0.0045403684,0.0030786723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918972,0.0016837615,0.00049549184,0.0011593106,0.0036981548,0.0010660187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006623376,0.00051812886,0.000579253,0.002531422,0.01585643,0.01342581,0.0021217968,0.0036028428,0.008262282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019721607,0.00042259853,0.00085866573,0.003087318,0.025283804,0.005096807,0.003948609,0.0070227673,0.00039724266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014332001,0.000006408176,0.00054890243,0.000022606097,0.0000074983927,0.000016346445,0.0012729646,0.0003958612,0.000055772638,0.9794764,0.0066777696,0.011505105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033931974,0.000020327705,0.012665582,0.00036901215,0.000058678364,0.00004456549,0.0053006355,0.0020176922,0.000521219,0.6364492,0.34241882,0.00010034947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9597481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9748804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104996465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.104996465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21790774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76180625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560432532","doi":"","title":"Devolution, Evolution, Confusion: the Constitutional Status of the Canadian Territories and its Potential Implications for the Duty to Consult","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Devolution (biology); Duty; Law; Political science; Operations research; History; Psychology; Mathematics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02392565925271303,"score_gpt":0.2796583328803652,"score_spread":0.2557326736276522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560432532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40066797,0.007212014,0.0020227546,0.12531734,0.00029653238,0.00006659846,0.00038893745,0.00002533227,0.46400252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854438,0.00094996125,0.00050661043,0.0022704965,0.0000407832,0.000017003498,0.000033507666,0.000015129052,0.010722638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925156,0.0015522295,0.0001508152,0.0007471632,0.0018050855,0.0032290798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99136305,0.0028788121,0.00057701353,0.0005102374,0.0030601034,0.0016107121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074736667,0.00024397121,0.0004937605,0.0031640292,0.030012023,0.01671586,0.0030588096,0.0040859855,0.0068365703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016772076,0.0003548664,0.0004194819,0.0062226662,0.04993321,0.0056360317,0.0057208785,0.004410124,0.00018381559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024785102,0.000012609567,0.0037193508,0.000029974364,0.000008485767,0.00009928281,0.035611104,0.00019857386,0.00015876109,0.9422707,0.0042477697,0.013618632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057643334,0.000032154905,0.07724061,0.0007392586,0.00009126196,0.00026304042,0.23050113,0.0014303715,0.00058653456,0.27137604,0.41741437,0.00026754785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98848873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1318607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1318607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21970971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9567208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590765334","doi":"","title":"Addressing the Elephant in the Room: Spending Power in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.05216058820681362,"score_gpt":0.29245360035080836,"score_spread":0.24029301214399473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590765334","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27590024,0.013951318,0.0010592174,0.49528813,0.0013003243,0.00012602351,0.0015470609,0.0000851905,0.2107425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89719075,0.005128689,0.00080939586,0.032051805,0.00025070424,0.000070204434,0.00024289172,0.00010071226,0.06415486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98896015,0.00089937646,0.00019358502,0.00061748375,0.002476773,0.006852655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868282,0.0018007759,0.00056938245,0.0002473538,0.003290015,0.0072643356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045550824,0.0004807619,0.0011710614,0.0025980326,0.028872242,0.017428353,0.003432994,0.007833365,0.013604585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012796042,0.0006268271,0.0009989486,0.0057222545,0.00965147,0.0038370881,0.0063515697,0.009698826,0.0004464262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018569156,0.0001527744,0.0357014,0.0003833596,0.00016723378,0.00085691863,0.023881184,0.002900904,0.00074702717,0.714874,0.17378128,0.04636814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001524475,0.00007111325,0.10727086,0.0010685682,0.00018916138,0.00017153478,0.049223427,0.0027884496,0.00070634077,0.047577184,0.7903626,0.00041828473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99752456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99902415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23438759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23438759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.51649874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88800186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W279420640","doi":"","title":"Canada's Supreme Court, Constitutional Principles, Federalism, and the 1998 Quebec Secession Reference Case: Toxic Wine in a Very Old Bottle?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Secession; Supreme court; Law; Wine; Bottle; Political science; Art; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02029996763542845,"score_gpt":0.24584536359248738,"score_spread":0.22554539595705891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W279420640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22167334,0.0090240715,0.0011208695,0.33136144,0.0008324286,0.000115048315,0.00197029,0.00005968855,0.43384287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8369222,0.0023865565,0.00073287747,0.037979636,0.00023065777,0.0000921128,0.000285514,0.00004270444,0.121327646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958199,0.0005717571,0.00007898277,0.00037584387,0.0013257187,0.0018277139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344206,0.0024670153,0.00034406266,0.00024028058,0.0025451363,0.00096150546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004420686,0.0003974434,0.0007761395,0.001528352,0.026344981,0.012789471,0.0034164381,0.011905644,0.0108039975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011819719,0.00054707396,0.0005833738,0.0034053477,0.009050952,0.003188196,0.0016380129,0.010475757,0.00045201436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011795042,0.000079651014,0.008396077,0.00006656043,0.000036903577,0.00052793825,0.0063795415,0.0008135327,0.0002716366,0.82051307,0.15087557,0.011921628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039920403,0.00007463851,0.086338416,0.00086339645,0.0003249451,0.00020171126,0.02671955,0.0041327034,0.0013316594,0.104447246,0.77472097,0.0004456251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85805154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14194849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18553412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802592240","doi":"","title":"What Should Canada’s Promised New National Accessibility Law Include?: A Discussion Paper","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Operations research; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.04145766638207853,"score_gpt":0.3177230709955922,"score_spread":0.2762654046135137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802592240","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015716298,0.006743908,0.00071706594,0.8397526,0.0029100082,0.00009968656,0.0007840514,0.000031850675,0.1332446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4088038,0.007389988,0.0025452394,0.51159066,0.002508573,0.00022043762,0.00052681257,0.0001356244,0.06627886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96542716,0.004408424,0.0010975465,0.0021457341,0.015966672,0.010954394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9337078,0.02928445,0.001544019,0.0014744054,0.028593177,0.005396104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02800732,0.0006922395,0.0015761273,0.00275164,0.024084331,0.03170402,0.0072808424,0.040228404,0.013787641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05566365,0.00092662673,0.0017071211,0.0043146675,0.011609316,0.013805534,0.005195196,0.025358204,0.0011823986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011418135,0.00014107826,0.004413818,0.00051602174,0.00009254344,0.00036013644,0.011399273,0.0008050354,0.00035750086,0.5204334,0.44632185,0.015045084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000972448,0.00003702546,0.011962473,0.0016602611,0.0002887526,0.000092847935,0.036785442,0.0010251346,0.00083637127,0.038823422,0.9081311,0.0002599303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9646037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97598845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84974414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15025584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32558563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98558277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2861617510","doi":"","title":"The Disappearance of the Four Equality Rights and Systemic Discrimination from Canadian Equality Jurisprudence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Gender equality; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.036820963814294165,"score_gpt":0.3031002468661284,"score_spread":0.26627928305183424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2861617510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11391208,0.0059276805,0.0059111766,0.19681159,0.0013188273,0.00007875201,0.00030181103,0.00010130569,0.67563677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9212749,0.001432925,0.0033944694,0.016171582,0.00026978302,0.000046214373,0.00007628129,0.00007211169,0.05726171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845691,0.0015255664,0.00037168103,0.0018230679,0.008495742,0.0032149386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892294,0.0030286654,0.00045371725,0.0010501712,0.005204591,0.0010334295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008539286,0.00044934222,0.0009065605,0.0029039835,0.026120067,0.010488443,0.0020448228,0.005756744,0.005870832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016491307,0.0005412313,0.0008738826,0.0037567697,0.040649567,0.004198408,0.0048497524,0.012309659,0.00031858307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018267812,0.000009321276,0.00048208697,0.000042456762,0.0000074769955,0.000042364263,0.007826287,0.00013378962,0.00022506648,0.96686333,0.010346707,0.0140027115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008723072,0.000038553702,0.02654231,0.0004866112,0.0000968935,0.0002071705,0.015137356,0.0011472345,0.0012974386,0.3697326,0.58499146,0.00023521791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9726606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9845046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11852436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11852436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17433612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8599584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964917791","doi":"","title":"Complementarity: The Constitutional Role of the Senate of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.013618278548489715,"score_gpt":0.2266752809809839,"score_spread":0.2130570024324942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964917791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14906542,0.0056642084,0.0012902711,0.034432184,0.00020485088,0.000048195954,0.0006239694,0.00002252207,0.80864835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704706,0.0010427154,0.00027320394,0.0021286511,0.00006564552,0.000019766305,0.000061616534,0.000019459821,0.025918359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929328,0.001465537,0.00010276612,0.0007556524,0.0013947239,0.0033485873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99345833,0.0023370192,0.00035285798,0.00037897317,0.0027267158,0.0007461442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036574355,0.00033813476,0.000869273,0.002940361,0.024078168,0.011245101,0.0015803394,0.0027967948,0.013530277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011823406,0.0003590548,0.00039514498,0.005911887,0.016425103,0.0042965105,0.004627673,0.0035678977,0.00035868137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004212,0.000008302054,0.0020624762,0.000024883597,0.000018829003,0.000067764144,0.003054308,0.0002397659,0.00006663274,0.9823745,0.007006349,0.0050340653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013800764,0.000055791297,0.0529238,0.0006743551,0.00035307775,0.0001925155,0.03887953,0.0020607337,0.0011707436,0.40007484,0.5032438,0.00023273837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9752181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9887433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076017186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076017186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12455006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55154586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035635063","doi":"","title":"Telling Stories: The Crown, Parliament and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Art; Law; Politics; Materials science","score_opus":0.017905112771342352,"score_gpt":0.21295948555785132,"score_spread":0.19505437278650897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035635063","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099864386,0.03081826,0.00051731674,0.55318165,0.002946164,0.000040982522,0.0005082509,0.000045631234,0.3120773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8787171,0.010058066,0.00025179467,0.036656145,0.00057954126,0.000029662708,0.000104976854,0.0001044739,0.0734982],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934263,0.0015955284,0.00009595249,0.000484381,0.001423493,0.0029743214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900969,0.0042005354,0.0005158857,0.00025337702,0.0020247798,0.0029084927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004272697,0.0004923801,0.000699011,0.002502299,0.06495418,0.025114024,0.0027288508,0.010098501,0.014335696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018941056,0.000587466,0.00030470104,0.005837924,0.043474115,0.009007501,0.0066843955,0.014049174,0.00068916514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007728243,0.00002592709,0.0025826008,0.00014436316,0.000023482531,0.00066479674,0.4379098,0.00017097361,0.00012966573,0.30508602,0.23378977,0.019395368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000146012835,0.0000060531174,0.0032404747,0.00031452283,0.00002195766,0.00010655407,0.36247686,0.000097729724,0.00011636336,0.017580917,0.6159507,0.00007321252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98927593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8584215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14157851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18791634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99564725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041932618","doi":"","title":"Ontario's Human Rights Tribunal Bungles the School Boards' Human Rights Duty to Accommodate Students with Disabilities: \"J.F. v. Waterloo Cathofic District School Board\" - An Erroneous Rejection of a Student's Request to Bring His Autism Service Dog to School","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Duty; Human rights; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03166711377603512,"score_gpt":0.31535381446435784,"score_spread":0.2836867006883227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041932618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038402524,0.0037502267,0.0012287295,0.45649916,0.008282045,0.0001620515,0.000865729,0.00027719582,0.49053237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20381282,0.0019045533,0.0013547624,0.12562571,0.0005907854,0.00007103793,0.00016302294,0.00017529987,0.6663019],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934175,0.00056287734,0.0002034243,0.0004204615,0.0032158052,0.0021799293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99363303,0.0020592292,0.00026980106,0.0002540553,0.0024095387,0.0013743482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030222982,0.00040706928,0.00046039428,0.00070929417,0.030670004,0.009290958,0.001671954,0.013590464,0.015222909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01030491,0.00082494185,0.0005510111,0.0010988697,0.00949857,0.0018675518,0.002409911,0.011890308,0.0020829025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043067754,0.000024451898,0.004128728,0.00007972202,0.000014215491,0.00051966944,0.011073882,0.00008690215,0.0006130015,0.13033576,0.84085053,0.012229997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023078725,0.000015948917,0.0070808823,0.000115877534,0.000025658182,0.00009003319,0.0050695757,0.00009523421,0.0003778592,0.0024073115,0.9846469,0.000051640458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9802813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99602854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05391083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05391083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.123381816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39115226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31139685","doi":"10.1002/acn3.770","title":"The Rule of Law in Canada: a Global Template?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; National Institute of Mental Health; National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health; Massachusetts General Hospital","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.012092292387988273,"score_gpt":0.24761362788356642,"score_spread":0.23552133549557813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31139685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011920052,0.018681103,0.0016043088,0.8858675,0.0059605883,0.00010873268,0.0017324544,0.00010392357,0.074021295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44754797,0.04446205,0.010235586,0.4048139,0.002848409,0.00027970035,0.0023141704,0.00041876305,0.087079495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98595434,0.0012252419,0.00064510934,0.0014935423,0.0061820154,0.0044997637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97683036,0.0028056095,0.0010086357,0.0009330233,0.012233713,0.006188559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010374896,0.00077848055,0.0013184745,0.0027849888,0.017183118,0.017249541,0.004066519,0.009674532,0.011705569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027901415,0.000531302,0.000932445,0.005869705,0.017168958,0.006920237,0.0050955447,0.01531867,0.0010976697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075987926,0.0001202209,0.015579341,0.00032996386,0.000049287766,0.0007843112,0.0070448527,0.0007092652,0.0003450696,0.36823526,0.5023972,0.10432928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004455143,0.000046063153,0.026759,0.0015374643,0.000053634634,0.00034327392,0.016768934,0.0009603229,0.0002643103,0.047196526,0.905788,0.00023795174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99140656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8463148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1536852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43276185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98160523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123230603","doi":"","title":"Dismantling Regulatory Structures: Canada's Long-Gun Registry as Case Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deregulation; Legislation; Law; Repeal; Gun control; Federalism; Parliament; Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.01987016449860858,"score_gpt":0.2900390755757322,"score_spread":0.27016891107712365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123230603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5686098,0.0058347476,0.005537396,0.13109079,0.00089753215,0.0005316655,0.0010044217,0.00013376423,0.28636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9182339,0.003679656,0.0027761583,0.016114935,0.00012636255,0.00015992654,0.00028014445,0.00007714286,0.05855192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891272,0.0016735217,0.000257761,0.00063797337,0.003020798,0.0052827117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99194556,0.002421288,0.0005979715,0.00040782118,0.002331003,0.0022962717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006327279,0.0005208987,0.00051105715,0.0019255156,0.035622403,0.0070835277,0.0039122733,0.0091208145,0.0052551483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012817617,0.00053906225,0.0007248393,0.0053953347,0.009305524,0.0022078825,0.004720208,0.0073203626,0.0004228234],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015613316,0.00029929192,0.048454493,0.00041871736,0.0000743608,0.073636584,0.10016771,0.003293186,0.0010688137,0.5725127,0.14566341,0.05425461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009194228,0.0001807269,0.03600238,0.00088375475,0.00014168408,0.016724847,0.1956572,0.002449359,0.0017895658,0.014630793,0.7311882,0.00025963146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9731352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09685224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09685224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1574634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7027155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123288322","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Title in Recent Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence: What Remains of Radical Crown Title?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Element (criminal law); Assertion; Negotiation; Doctrine; Sovereignty; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01471896982157139,"score_gpt":0.2902955722324222,"score_spread":0.2755766024108508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123288322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16131067,0.03127628,0.0035889468,0.24565482,0.0022045241,0.00011145847,0.0005007743,0.000115508294,0.55523705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9073428,0.00415846,0.0017854169,0.03675143,0.0005068276,0.00004834741,0.00010118721,0.000049699313,0.049255904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99139166,0.0009771626,0.00023421127,0.0011624463,0.0034328848,0.0028016563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922091,0.003472113,0.00030869493,0.00033571114,0.002711519,0.0009628945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068468447,0.0002740815,0.000674329,0.0014267395,0.0279482,0.016488314,0.0037517403,0.008731845,0.0030610296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014522198,0.00042682223,0.0005425618,0.0027489355,0.026513819,0.00347639,0.0032669152,0.010944288,0.00020933109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011225294,0.000008078979,0.0007899887,0.000038357142,0.000008687828,0.00018335646,0.010264023,0.00016477965,0.00013676003,0.97191554,0.011921826,0.004557225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006949701,0.00003544766,0.012475887,0.000767479,0.0001216936,0.00022110782,0.01868278,0.0017757306,0.00086716027,0.26259834,0.702125,0.00025975314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99018586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13881291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13881291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16277693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99885494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123325995","doi":"10.1016/j.ad.2022.12.004","title":"In Defence of the Courts: A Balanced Judicial Role in Canada's Constitutional Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Democracy; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Power (physics); Balance (ability); Judicial restraint; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.010140629026976109,"score_gpt":0.2447480423113869,"score_spread":0.2346074132844108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123325995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17058887,0.0076781977,0.006870406,0.21196495,0.00043337757,0.00010770104,0.00023142561,0.00008304288,0.602042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734631,0.0013189844,0.0011859094,0.0066697383,0.000082908606,0.000024163171,0.000022910786,0.000016427375,0.017215915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98757046,0.0029832353,0.00022183807,0.0010185408,0.0048418115,0.0033642326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98637474,0.00520288,0.0006644717,0.0004115593,0.0048494255,0.0024969452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074839587,0.00023986494,0.00047080935,0.0017855596,0.023242364,0.016077269,0.0016526097,0.0036451262,0.005224421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017594859,0.00030202945,0.00026469675,0.0025997148,0.022800872,0.0026958995,0.0038399876,0.006274447,0.0003145387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018884308,0.000013812523,0.0030895688,0.000046432207,0.000012628005,0.0001410827,0.013769018,0.0005894856,0.00042946273,0.9564342,0.0083809,0.017074624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016335178,0.000064212436,0.03903297,0.00082018785,0.00011581729,0.00019077917,0.047627795,0.003017851,0.001378898,0.3135716,0.593842,0.00017454535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96224916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.986937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91303253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08696744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24806398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63099587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123444135","doi":"","title":"Adjudication of Social and Economic Rights in South Africa: Beyond the Rhetoric of Illegitimacy and Excessive Complexity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Social rights; Charter; Political science; Human rights; Law; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Constitution; Social equality; Cultural rights; Right to property; State (computer science); Linguistic rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04127155449291715,"score_gpt":0.28347438003571174,"score_spread":0.2422028255427946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123444135","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07802366,0.023540813,0.04198245,0.45192406,0.002776062,0.00044615762,0.00011367338,0.000044881093,0.40114823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89083743,0.008537308,0.013573824,0.0530747,0.0014777597,0.00040141103,0.000038766186,0.00006990548,0.031988967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729954,0.015841445,0.0014323308,0.0018494244,0.0046728295,0.0032085336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731477,0.021407219,0.0011570556,0.0010694196,0.0025377877,0.0006808394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03884812,0.00071969035,0.00088498107,0.0029326587,0.022656415,0.015184947,0.0022405942,0.011999466,0.0025739316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03864401,0.000681137,0.0007673074,0.002794111,0.066985235,0.013183534,0.012844169,0.017857902,0.00028142676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066102307,0.000004107581,0.00023919287,0.000043925815,0.000005221125,0.0001967029,0.0122583015,0.00009256714,0.0001468627,0.980437,0.002649383,0.003920188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043400094,0.00002050091,0.0011576387,0.0010676851,0.000039535193,0.00023415018,0.01634112,0.00080489664,0.0009185426,0.78582937,0.1934791,0.00006404326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1361309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1749167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1361309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022259323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039182734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27067703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124689136","doi":"","title":"Travelling in Constitutional Circles: The Paradox of Tribunal Independence","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Separation of powers; Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Sociology; Constitution; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03010718239465562,"score_gpt":0.26895739826666126,"score_spread":0.23885021587200564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124689136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22815196,0.005659491,0.02840788,0.1982578,0.0005517777,0.00009513061,0.00014358363,0.00011794693,0.5386144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800253,0.0009176142,0.0022757014,0.009224245,0.0002738504,0.000048337875,0.00003241036,0.00006381987,0.0071387477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98346543,0.0072455555,0.00043439804,0.00198733,0.004352139,0.002515241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96840334,0.02093479,0.0016479668,0.002651558,0.0036957422,0.0026665702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01565504,0.0002834804,0.001022564,0.0028258357,0.017787213,0.01828035,0.002970431,0.009521999,0.005085499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043931425,0.0006846837,0.0008601676,0.0028579726,0.067213565,0.017352315,0.010623869,0.016235001,0.00068672554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010200553,0.000010444085,0.00030561382,0.000012099289,0.000004281966,0.00016355178,0.006898766,0.00016799603,0.000062478925,0.9861128,0.0024688109,0.0037830179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050685554,0.000009991997,0.0007929015,0.000056604356,0.0000096852855,0.00010022551,0.007898205,0.0007390059,0.00015803573,0.9610013,0.029150138,0.000033181324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059082545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043417882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059082545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014931128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014366366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1174773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124916167","doi":"","title":"Clarifying the Matter: Modernizing Peace, Order, and Good Government in the \"Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act\" Appeals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Federalism; Constitution; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Separation of powers; Jurisdiction; Parliament; Commerce Clause; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03183355028587525,"score_gpt":0.20068434169436386,"score_spread":0.1688507914084886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124916167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09569808,0.0070128883,0.024115933,0.30178705,0.0022135978,0.00018149648,0.0001395843,0.00015670493,0.5686948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92203784,0.001602988,0.003782738,0.048165306,0.0009803715,0.0000679032,0.000036805068,0.00007071888,0.02325542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98572046,0.004028878,0.00038039777,0.0011596682,0.0050976817,0.003612957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892385,0.007621704,0.00038689008,0.00042560243,0.0018291218,0.0004981306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013511922,0.00037973718,0.0005475899,0.0017407674,0.02301,0.0182729,0.0030072408,0.015921468,0.0034492824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029754255,0.0005866273,0.000626627,0.0021801477,0.044451173,0.008984087,0.006098137,0.020211874,0.0004569327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057903712,0.000005414774,0.00023843748,0.000008450174,0.0000026289426,0.0001528438,0.007183718,0.00011874688,0.00012084138,0.9838007,0.0056674774,0.0026950096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044664735,0.000025243547,0.0024736756,0.00026801325,0.000058074802,0.00016290683,0.01604573,0.0019765187,0.0008450765,0.6668739,0.3110919,0.00013426547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6385495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74537724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94555527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054444738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06038446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7271583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125777417","doi":"","title":"Canadian Climate Federalism: Parliament’s Ample Constitutional Authority to Legislate GHG Emissions through Regulations, a National Cap and Trade Program, or a National Carbon Tax","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Parliament; Carbon tax; Constitution; Jurisdiction; Greenhouse gas; Commerce Clause; Emissions trading; Legislature; Law; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Cooperative federalism; Economics; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0417525047389458,"score_gpt":0.31877501783052564,"score_spread":0.2770225130915798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125777417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075315796,0.0062382454,0.005282183,0.097847044,0.00060379645,0.000053461397,0.00052719295,0.00012481214,0.8140076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414252,0.0026509138,0.0021171772,0.007658346,0.000121153964,0.000026793023,0.00021132627,0.000043110293,0.045745973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931606,0.00057180016,0.00006996358,0.00061592093,0.003346297,0.0022353465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977598,0.0004145775,0.00013145506,0.00017191701,0.0011556462,0.0003665608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024290993,0.0003165718,0.00034224693,0.0014431841,0.019369869,0.008235027,0.0013616456,0.002809676,0.0040134713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006443662,0.00035057825,0.0005807669,0.0024765863,0.011864944,0.0022914077,0.0022415111,0.0039350954,0.00032877384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017786311,0.000005176008,0.0010801898,0.00003409594,0.000012761955,0.00011206262,0.0043005357,0.00050528115,0.0002278531,0.9668422,0.016968315,0.009893808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040808583,0.000020858535,0.027175464,0.00026470292,0.00012113159,0.00015652215,0.009142586,0.0026138586,0.00077555864,0.18095861,0.7785876,0.00014228553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98827994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12335774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12335774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17420448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8950273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W603411450","doi":"","title":"Dirty Puddles and Safety Valves: The Path from Fact to Remedy in \"Canada (A.G.) v. PHS Community Services Society\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Path (computing); Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.012049421718789442,"score_gpt":0.2346356043731855,"score_spread":0.22258618265439606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W603411450","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14639585,0.00878766,0.003995774,0.49834514,0.00093535497,0.00026290547,0.0005349392,0.000077362056,0.34066498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.873199,0.0023317935,0.001534718,0.067504026,0.00021770106,0.000076685414,0.00006926391,0.000037483893,0.05502939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868325,0.0030994883,0.00036648766,0.0010884819,0.0038035146,0.004809545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927424,0.0038157366,0.00056577724,0.00025590966,0.00179152,0.00082857424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009774516,0.00036964583,0.00050825824,0.001373161,0.03388837,0.014643288,0.004047762,0.023362415,0.004424892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019857071,0.00060350343,0.00069130724,0.0017818775,0.02832484,0.006327537,0.004895832,0.017353566,0.00021973035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016884502,0.000025154404,0.0013523501,0.000045739005,0.000008763868,0.00037726967,0.022214811,0.00026636987,0.00011243444,0.93507934,0.034769446,0.005731453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013777179,0.000077492565,0.015766315,0.0011910192,0.00017541151,0.00045461112,0.10160483,0.0024170156,0.0017746413,0.30140436,0.5746953,0.00030120832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.964653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92318004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07681996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20570977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5573704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64516891","doi":"","title":"Canada, Secularity and a Constitutional Monarchy","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularity; Monarchy; Constitutional monarchy; Law; Political science; Ancient history; Philosophy; History; Politics","score_opus":0.014295475353889893,"score_gpt":0.24910537313183617,"score_spread":0.23480989777794628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64516891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046588786,0.007967992,0.0007736111,0.071228236,0.00031041462,0.000036374113,0.000545133,0.000054546497,0.87249494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8734935,0.0036968596,0.0006161944,0.007413952,0.00019538667,0.000032498367,0.00014197883,0.000059568432,0.11435007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611795,0.00044572452,0.00007665761,0.00040782968,0.001203271,0.0017485846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567765,0.0010351399,0.00023326912,0.00023698213,0.0018295444,0.0009874076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024312446,0.00028043066,0.0006450947,0.0019631276,0.018934544,0.012380356,0.0013975857,0.00337032,0.016966308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009253322,0.00034343437,0.00033255544,0.0040426594,0.0160497,0.0029415202,0.0026659945,0.00543249,0.000653604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014287657,0.0000052803216,0.0007000502,0.000015945145,0.00000539166,0.000031013937,0.0008481242,0.00015893155,0.000029405468,0.9810176,0.013926989,0.0032470108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083128965,0.000018057355,0.0140079055,0.00030001355,0.00006688722,0.000078543635,0.0063290903,0.00088029786,0.0002494708,0.3886759,0.5892356,0.00007511731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9814123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98981714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10374623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10374623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16861661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7527351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W76925935","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Cases in Ontario, 2008","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03716799095065223,"score_gpt":0.27175120293319277,"score_spread":0.23458321198254053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W76925935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43371603,0.007629968,0.0005299018,0.07037962,0.0004880898,0.00044631696,0.011712787,0.000100988575,0.47499627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64294416,0.0035301729,0.00078719464,0.010571099,0.00016524685,0.0003493851,0.0014502094,0.000050202398,0.34015235],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455947,0.00035721052,0.00020524097,0.00036291068,0.0020930236,0.002422146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918922,0.0023764828,0.0008298201,0.00040344935,0.0026252924,0.0018726967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023621842,0.00027044385,0.0005190149,0.001983789,0.029873293,0.0057168445,0.001984518,0.004373941,0.010686385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0128223905,0.0011600361,0.00052757876,0.005442963,0.0048447223,0.0016175722,0.0029658882,0.004424644,0.00057092676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041923267,0.00018031799,0.085833505,0.000570207,0.00015622054,0.0037912226,0.048928678,0.0013206817,0.0012033925,0.39871636,0.42667964,0.032200567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013882073,0.000039410486,0.28902626,0.00033349704,0.00011144405,0.0003189482,0.025181973,0.00055416825,0.0005649409,0.008646774,0.67497426,0.00010950981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8558218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14417821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22890274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W968103359","doi":"","title":"Trends in Applications for Leave to Intervene in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.024246183324486775,"score_gpt":0.28773757305374237,"score_spread":0.26349138972925557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W968103359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.516783,0.014991116,0.0017599093,0.22820024,0.0011809225,0.00021089337,0.006059551,0.00033870692,0.23047563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94625336,0.003678506,0.00045380555,0.015366854,0.0003213285,0.000056316574,0.0014243909,0.0001411191,0.032304317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97526497,0.0015244996,0.0006301552,0.0022383328,0.010837542,0.009504499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90823793,0.018633554,0.008328817,0.0016313004,0.037588675,0.025579719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007247498,0.00034208468,0.001201236,0.0070889397,0.013513124,0.014416347,0.004592466,0.0060620597,0.009653144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045896,0.00069888047,0.0009310498,0.011446815,0.005947451,0.0022746269,0.0031440358,0.0118403435,0.00081377634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005891136,0.00032127192,0.2730282,0.0006113731,0.0002732031,0.0011781537,0.028289968,0.0027001842,0.0020237123,0.24677376,0.32251367,0.12169744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082002145,0.000076770746,0.67250043,0.0006449273,0.00010850846,0.00027267943,0.022843247,0.0017677888,0.0007728095,0.0069612274,0.293772,0.00019767354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98542655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8601527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1398473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19874066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98050972","doi":"","title":"\"Bruker v. Marcovitz\": (Get)ting Over Freedoms (Like Contract and Religion) in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.008248387706292095,"score_gpt":0.24244917824185155,"score_spread":0.23420079053555945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98050972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14996982,0.009162414,0.001536731,0.35051566,0.0016287982,0.00018292692,0.00137265,0.000106261636,0.48552474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69872016,0.0029114555,0.00069889694,0.06769736,0.00023524086,0.00008332794,0.00017422972,0.0000853398,0.22939402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951443,0.00044265992,0.000088347355,0.00040952335,0.0013759765,0.002539157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967975,0.00075499393,0.00012211665,0.000098146505,0.0011030443,0.001124106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029176706,0.00044991844,0.0004338198,0.000987807,0.03437359,0.008286584,0.0021555175,0.010142842,0.010126639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00964557,0.000589679,0.0005086627,0.0018374387,0.009077447,0.0024948877,0.00385285,0.011231521,0.0005258697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082198065,0.000034988792,0.0078654885,0.00008475711,0.000026085758,0.0006049451,0.011183676,0.00058537954,0.00046650608,0.7864196,0.17908458,0.013561869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016850856,0.000041403793,0.029690852,0.00043936336,0.00013427642,0.00023916001,0.02195532,0.001786064,0.0015897457,0.06048112,0.88320863,0.00026552676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10806595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10806595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29953778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.784077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W999539695","doi":"","title":"Does Canada Need a Permanent Military Court","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.007870559035556541,"score_gpt":0.22333350763623977,"score_spread":0.21546294860068324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W999539695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19248395,0.005879561,0.00037875323,0.31163123,0.0013051998,0.000098857316,0.0031961787,0.000059289592,0.484967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87174875,0.0031050148,0.00047370503,0.041515864,0.0002356634,0.00004908405,0.0007478427,0.00006557488,0.082058474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99142694,0.0006030314,0.00016478969,0.0005059395,0.0020438945,0.005255465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752294,0.003864004,0.001389049,0.000680759,0.01097483,0.007861949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035649014,0.0002130506,0.0007148396,0.0021292446,0.018300667,0.012500961,0.0028817235,0.0068907635,0.04571324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020894272,0.00046594266,0.0005784935,0.0046252618,0.0057416926,0.0051331636,0.0025478727,0.0058122287,0.0019866934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036250765,0.00017415948,0.062417824,0.0003668894,0.00012931343,0.0007172787,0.0066322945,0.00058935117,0.00044595325,0.5233073,0.3521226,0.052734524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023728157,0.000080325415,0.10613043,0.0012958451,0.00019595894,0.00028062705,0.051083125,0.000656199,0.00065549975,0.030261474,0.8089015,0.00022169531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99249035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99753237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8905656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10943443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2860904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7940061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}