{"meta":{"query_hash":"06e5e346ffe2","filters":{"venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel"},"cohort_total":49,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":49,"exported":49,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/06e5e346ffe2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Revue+nationale+de+droit+constitutionnel"},"results":[{"id":"W1032438667","doi":"","title":"Overview: Supreme Court of Canada Charter Decisions","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02848703536602217,"score_gpt":0.2689585937572918,"score_spread":0.24047155839126963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1032438667","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072418384,0.04603377,0.00493565,0.5682836,0.004599071,0.0009458749,0.009242671,0.00004919246,0.29349175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9368625,0.0021908546,0.00040948656,0.0071423533,0.0008655064,0.0000072670623,0.00002724091,0.000005753632,0.052488983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998299,0.0000827927,0.00040150544,0.00023122867,0.000546629,0.00043885363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847984,0.00039070335,0.00022829919,0.00019926172,0.00039504454,0.00030683633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045639704,0.00013054338,0.00023875058,0.00008432476,0.00042176712,0.000026558226,0.00028826046,0.00016637318,0.000848418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014445403,0.000183589,0.00012084092,0.0005759742,0.00052817777,0.00026884102,0.000012521592,0.00017935013,0.00003737143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045211123,0.000055962508,0.00018444652,0.000017273811,0.000018249197,0.000020709771,0.00054778456,0.000397294,0.000026065905,0.81725895,0.17785305,0.0036157141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034346947,0.000019303723,0.021703126,0.00042362747,0.00003616711,0.00006011193,0.00011180869,0.0010222936,0.000039534978,0.08378119,0.8922403,0.00021904992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6284774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90749806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8644442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020235407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008740318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1034034791","doi":"","title":"Canadian Leadership in Latin America: in Constitutional Terms","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07922056073633844,"score_gpt":0.2778791955390536,"score_spread":0.19865863480271517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1034034791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023350025,0.012389481,0.0052687298,0.050929338,0.0039784997,0.0007786948,0.0010934209,0.00006218767,0.9021496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97599,0.00036167595,0.0017124133,0.0038821704,0.0014577557,0.00007456105,0.00018392975,0.000011771463,0.016325744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964133,0.0003789596,0.00067464216,0.0003776083,0.00048300865,0.0016724904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785924,0.00071126944,0.00018796514,0.00018537696,0.00020078999,0.00085536315],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012441766,0.0002817898,0.00039141648,0.00071570196,0.0005366758,0.00006118478,0.0003289646,0.0004361074,0.001745123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012924392,0.0004062808,0.00014270438,0.0016039734,0.007878439,0.0009215172,0.000032122425,0.00067442696,0.00068458234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064621677,0.0001988284,0.18221791,0.000053619853,0.000019743224,0.00006080832,0.0012100111,0.0022930074,0.0000042360034,0.81180096,0.0008108517,0.0013235669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091672235,0.000019360436,0.067863755,0.0007194165,0.000046928642,0.0002459758,0.003515687,0.00093794457,0.0000051652773,0.019709114,0.90525264,0.00076731184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19342479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24291804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95263994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008662676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015428966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W104986285","doi":"","title":"Canadian Women and the \"Charter of Rights\"","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.010661464341784737,"score_gpt":0.23498223556295283,"score_spread":0.22432077122116809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W104986285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46633732,0.0054188315,0.0018929675,0.048029434,0.0014230619,0.00055371824,0.0002796777,0.000015302285,0.4760497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739833,0.00009958995,0.00014141307,0.00019474434,0.00051106245,0.000023741306,0.000019189829,0.0000028038562,0.025024172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905896,0.00012382443,0.00022124471,0.00013054704,0.00018480806,0.00028061593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992611,0.00020409195,0.0000952942,0.000086079795,0.00022520532,0.0001282261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061945064,0.00006707278,0.00011926164,0.00009648209,0.00052906945,0.00004348817,0.00010038512,0.000109739754,0.00025558833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000938951,0.00006316614,0.000050383966,0.00021118084,0.0016703331,0.0001202078,0.0000104037545,0.00008728017,0.000025992687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029914634,0.000022069655,0.0018456599,0.000021987931,0.00002161841,0.0000030809758,0.004726092,0.00038699148,0.000006338344,0.99193543,0.00082972547,0.00019800021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006701305,0.0000050988406,0.007498456,0.00003203616,0.00002684125,0.00003306313,0.0013566386,0.0018666696,0.000015742078,0.9208978,0.06750527,0.000092275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41554037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20237122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50764596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077139144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009814173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81218344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W120985047","doi":"","title":"International Law and Canadian Courts: A Work in Progress","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Work (physics); Political science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.0124522136723284,"score_gpt":0.2618494991670113,"score_spread":0.24939728549468287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W120985047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045684453,0.0040619243,0.00078638905,0.16910943,0.0030038632,0.0005539039,0.00024098663,0.0000507912,0.7765083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98458767,0.00049231073,0.0014906978,0.0028048176,0.0009813568,0.000024320578,0.00011953326,0.0000060802276,0.009493211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985374,0.0000907012,0.00032885905,0.0002902797,0.0003745073,0.00037826088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990638,0.00011752395,0.00011818988,0.00007983868,0.00038172345,0.00023894821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066235143,0.00013478348,0.00014667943,0.00026761307,0.0003930417,0.00016842928,0.00022810731,0.00024099156,0.00038501737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024784045,0.00019063069,0.000058343256,0.00039325558,0.00074687606,0.00062337954,0.000013821637,0.00024240738,0.00007884196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014609877,0.00010597405,0.006668908,0.000009478586,0.000020847476,0.000050364306,0.0011823898,0.00035928033,0.0000024999965,0.9825085,0.0006073402,0.0084698135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007210621,0.000026411311,0.05316363,0.0005660506,0.000024473758,0.00009181122,0.00025618804,0.002539565,0.000007278177,0.23491125,0.70736,0.00033224688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038801998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15772608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9389032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022897192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009937672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9675987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W129899286","doi":"","title":"Should Canada Follow International Law","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; International law","score_opus":0.02576789029707875,"score_gpt":0.27874764935070473,"score_spread":0.25297975905362596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W129899286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015935283,0.0012037832,0.034120925,0.04228645,0.015019752,0.00031853328,0.00046248361,0.000068831076,0.89058393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89598197,0.00016673181,0.0014917903,0.0036677257,0.0035853137,0.000014286405,0.0002812701,0.000014378513,0.09479652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973511,0.00008283638,0.0005554158,0.00035966907,0.0011203465,0.00053063716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997806,0.00052944553,0.000257498,0.00014187941,0.0010131729,0.0002519629],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014917683,0.00019235381,0.0001875424,0.00013202136,0.0007576386,0.000112199734,0.0004635495,0.00028869178,0.0015635295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067320553,0.00027136263,0.00015298437,0.0004103643,0.00068549794,0.00063722365,0.00004473376,0.0003391068,0.0001695737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020835589,0.00011495148,0.002378169,0.0000221785,0.00010295206,0.00009087404,0.00038964034,0.0010426206,0.000044714747,0.987275,0.0055931923,0.0029248563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005489445,0.00001152013,0.003820047,0.00016022658,0.000046225756,0.000098410295,0.00041008578,0.0015895108,0.00019049965,0.08600649,0.90679276,0.00032526624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57469994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9383122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90126854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055795047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031763513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W162561870","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Section 15 on Canadian Society: Equality Rights: Beacon or Laser?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Political science; Law; Laser; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; Physics; Optics; Operating system","score_opus":0.01764727016560328,"score_gpt":0.2520280081384532,"score_spread":0.23438073797284995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W162561870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6687894,0.00012459597,0.0020038446,0.0020176345,0.0006893048,0.00050843204,0.00010346551,0.0001392644,0.32562408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955992,0.000004362488,0.00006146396,0.00032960894,0.0013322158,0.000017186065,0.00014866084,0.0000061079913,0.0025011702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992065,0.000013566266,0.0002530464,0.00014983352,0.00018523057,0.00019181051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999174,0.00011773913,0.00023090541,0.00013006589,0.0003270638,0.000020217238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039911334,0.00010228786,0.00011161017,0.00014252812,0.00059529295,0.00015568532,0.00012174869,0.00008768477,0.00026783958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020536772,0.000077350895,0.00015097157,0.00039416863,0.0001334072,0.00042042657,0.000011313769,0.00011926284,0.00007774092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003327625,0.00006737387,0.005334462,0.00003167204,0.000037461887,0.0000026001217,0.00003464228,0.0069500636,0.00007672699,0.96728605,0.019676538,0.00046912144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015263013,0.000036797243,0.15289222,0.00017528114,0.00007954896,0.000022595412,0.00024959783,0.030027622,0.00035186336,0.08010423,0.73403704,0.00049691036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.264904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1772861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8871818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005128999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032570498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8377263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W182529916","doi":"","title":"\"Auton\" and \"Chaoulli\": Who Decides the Future of Health Care in Canada?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Operations research; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.013934871508507711,"score_gpt":0.2181913222740833,"score_spread":0.20425645076557558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W182529916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62960744,0.13721398,0.013171011,0.14577113,0.0011543992,0.0015940985,0.001766732,0.000041579595,0.06967966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758685,0.0006101987,0.0003251586,0.0011448573,0.00013828473,0.000024378269,0.000033211185,0.000004114178,0.00013293134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991372,0.000021431435,0.00046762294,0.0001594953,0.00004075502,0.00017347877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952614,0.00006773539,0.0002037931,0.00012047932,0.000047686735,0.00003414477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004212,0.000064305306,0.00019838364,0.00013304153,0.00012190543,0.000012533177,0.0000951681,0.0000390889,0.000016375216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058518144,0.000072493756,0.000026125688,0.00019214125,0.00006292151,0.00006260283,0.000019998204,0.000090326204,0.0000035526232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017612311,0.000009333933,0.045051932,0.00009880942,0.000005372237,0.0000014793966,0.00022405828,0.0010172153,1.5753426e-7,0.94995105,0.00066877576,0.002970055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005134419,0.000015157283,0.59051913,0.00008725068,0.0000023425675,0.000016303837,0.0010492413,0.0018541714,0.0000063762755,0.1208014,0.28497246,0.00016273977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7414566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90944916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82914966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011108161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009404473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29562098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W185958079","doi":"","title":"Federalizing Canada's Securities Regulatory Regime: Insights from the Australian Experience","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.025839973083845044,"score_gpt":0.2463340956138175,"score_spread":0.22049412252997247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W185958079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89909846,0.0017116953,0.00020973569,0.037200037,0.00067422754,0.00029444287,0.00047513063,0.000062844294,0.060273435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832348,0.00017780699,0.000090496316,0.0034878647,0.0007827799,0.000027975262,0.00001943325,0.0000046916825,0.012174101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887425,0.00008227708,0.00017842474,0.00019083623,0.00042087425,0.0002533342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914694,0.00028588693,0.00010145476,0.00017075575,0.00014247092,0.00015246379],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000112233225,0.00008541998,0.000101258294,0.000030021654,0.0020791027,0.000059076752,0.00029490018,0.00008465019,0.000131346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058466947,0.00009266064,0.000047726448,0.00022801117,0.0009741081,0.00025162124,0.000015702994,0.00014341326,0.00001022041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024196652,0.0000066990547,0.0020754577,0.0000028635902,0.000009950218,0.000042925538,0.014214666,0.000109526656,0.000017728613,0.90369457,0.0797513,0.000071895556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001661251,0.0000019205252,0.065251894,0.00007749634,0.0000060022558,0.000040055475,0.0028423986,0.000048191305,0.000087641856,0.015677335,0.9156239,0.00017705037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9390694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9752586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88801724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001239391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047126967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202561496","doi":"","title":"R. v. Kapp: Aboriginal Fishing, Andrews and Affirmative Action in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Supreme court; Law; Fishing; Political science; Action (physics); Physics","score_opus":0.024691001684359223,"score_gpt":0.2996355685379767,"score_spread":0.27494456685361746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202561496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90727675,0.0007100459,0.00044613655,0.0495238,0.00020205422,0.0005002019,0.000052885072,0.000022931466,0.041265223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988001,0.00027044825,0.00021343504,0.00029689353,0.00013523074,0.000012139472,0.000008303349,0.0000010342116,0.00026240828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911237,0.0001124691,0.00016867906,0.000108349086,0.00033902895,0.00015909031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935013,0.00025573143,0.00010013883,0.000045978504,0.00020760453,0.000040424995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005934087,0.0000629137,0.000112113456,0.000033291966,0.00051831955,0.000034141736,0.00012016456,0.000055265155,0.000016553264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006064408,0.000055625365,0.000023338922,0.00022836891,0.0002868537,0.0002474562,0.0000051517945,0.00013184428,9.617726e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000146624325,0.00007102188,0.012360368,0.000024209052,0.000021403588,0.000009094478,0.03309243,0.00059254654,0.00013011607,0.9440681,0.008163509,0.0014525633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092841237,0.00003808965,0.69696474,0.00016255943,0.00004080875,0.000031649186,0.03672913,0.00091155234,0.00011552498,0.020014472,0.24374923,0.00031383883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15781663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64199126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9240536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007223059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078514527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84779155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228178568","doi":"","title":"Canadian Citizens and the Others: The Failure of the Federal Court to Ensure the Respect of International Law for Non-Citizens","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Federal court; Political science","score_opus":0.01668669166852979,"score_gpt":0.24813042864691562,"score_spread":0.23144373697838583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228178568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20469682,0.00014443326,0.0055277497,0.21305992,0.0017045471,0.003119102,0.0012276404,0.00002839068,0.57049143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956393,0.000013331827,0.00033680146,0.0014600094,0.00032641488,0.00007526783,0.000010859407,0.0000051882835,0.0021327767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990178,0.00011889441,0.00023261273,0.00012399274,0.0003503743,0.00015636446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983373,0.0005951607,0.00016798127,0.00014529588,0.000704635,0.000049621172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012689742,0.00007241055,0.000102355814,0.000051366183,0.0010393,0.000058776604,0.00051329145,0.0000699908,0.000080533595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008824155,0.00004213129,0.00010722087,0.00016025848,0.0010639805,0.000088966386,0.00003149362,0.000112953196,0.0000034053912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034086133,0.000010681171,0.0018811513,0.000004617287,0.000052391384,2.80821e-7,0.0068933633,0.000086142674,0.00004956812,0.9898067,0.0011259475,0.00005504047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002980971,0.000057134053,0.07310854,0.0003360005,0.000162777,0.000061101186,0.014294818,0.002034289,0.0014875943,0.7213629,0.18373007,0.00038381014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04599325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3820735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79094255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026976256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006938712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9603596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230639928","doi":"","title":"Embedding Environmental Rights in Section 7 of the Canadian \"Charter\": Resolving the Tension Between the Need for Precaution and the Need for Harm","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Harm; Section (typography); Embedding; Law; Tension (geology); Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Business; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Advertising; Compression (physics)","score_opus":0.01332486221887336,"score_gpt":0.25128781255616484,"score_spread":0.23796295033729148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230639928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9436542,0.00018629289,0.0055941786,0.035662,0.00057960633,0.0034240065,0.00026145772,0.000018740595,0.010619544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998537,0.000014249979,0.00009504003,0.0003487456,0.00048329268,0.000119756056,0.000025555542,0.000003820456,0.00037254454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991285,0.00020225291,0.00018808673,0.00012532689,0.00017213517,0.00018369779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869436,0.0009959494,0.000121133795,0.000120328805,0.000024109888,0.00004414249],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015775531,0.00006904418,0.00009485585,0.000047524758,0.00230952,0.00005097946,0.00018208292,0.00009110214,0.000008897973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039331967,0.00004063763,0.00007429285,0.00010523491,0.00096025376,0.00011738172,0.000021418133,0.00011813908,0.0000012065151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022457418,0.000012069669,0.00851726,0.0000112745975,0.00001701234,4.5168573e-8,0.004589584,0.000961932,0.0002650074,0.98472226,0.00019410823,0.0006870189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052142474,0.00007471069,0.2822526,0.00030438782,0.00027263942,0.000024972356,0.004984257,0.06831763,0.0008812441,0.2850922,0.35211655,0.00046455063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032781567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12268426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050282874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013835703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247551692","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: Clemency and Death Row Inmates: Smith v. Canada","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Art; Philosophy; Criminology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.017972701801573798,"score_gpt":0.25739056347791955,"score_spread":0.23941786167634577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247551692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2865108,0.007099517,0.0062996,0.07268557,0.0069806064,0.0008687919,0.003180884,0.000115056086,0.6162592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98242116,0.00040997815,0.0023107782,0.0035519793,0.0011131456,0.000031225252,0.00006068093,0.000011279585,0.010089747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981615,0.00013429715,0.00040810485,0.00034315334,0.0003923871,0.0005605351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797297,0.000684426,0.00019865554,0.00019285547,0.0004599581,0.00049111416],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056822173,0.00021808423,0.00025004224,0.00008495616,0.0015042133,0.00009678142,0.00020266068,0.0002231223,0.0008108586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007359937,0.00028763802,0.00006977022,0.00033992078,0.0022458162,0.00034427064,0.000057671303,0.0005157569,0.00003092336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035919275,0.00008092661,0.0074089584,0.00007711548,0.00005318509,0.0008032228,0.00048201406,0.00011424159,0.000008411144,0.9855984,0.003915785,0.0014541915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042799703,0.000019558247,0.00062391907,0.00011323054,0.000108022796,0.006885794,0.0013289207,0.0009457527,0.000011151118,0.019124517,0.97001725,0.0003938603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54018736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.626779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9664738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010670469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015516707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254183191","doi":"","title":"The Contract Clause Comes to Canada: The British Columbia \"Health Services\" Case and the Sanctity of Collective Agreements","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012828651370049361,"score_gpt":0.2437861796722954,"score_spread":0.23095752830224606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254183191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9022113,0.002058944,0.00040401256,0.016693337,0.0006751845,0.001786433,0.00041931996,0.000027838372,0.075723626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887205,0.000591372,0.000026715805,0.0033374056,0.00013734183,0.0000337621,0.0000062664226,0.0000038206786,0.0071428306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986407,0.00034186937,0.0002787329,0.00013863418,0.00040764027,0.00019240144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976934,0.0012924059,0.00019926888,0.00011780136,0.0005969658,0.000100161444],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001250282,0.000055906,0.00013717554,0.000013989938,0.0053360993,0.00028000976,0.00026950357,0.000029626408,0.00004103305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008659902,0.00005118693,0.000044147804,0.0002345192,0.0010395867,0.00010292792,0.00003663438,0.00014090171,0.0000026157038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007697044,0.00008186005,0.02310566,0.000027630076,0.00017999717,0.0002180936,0.0071690003,0.00020898564,0.0000034108639,0.954438,0.012735081,0.0017553649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034409303,0.000055497,0.4459824,0.0002574922,0.000060537008,0.0020393648,0.0070339465,0.0015367254,0.0000049228966,0.009058975,0.530226,0.00030322865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9070381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94537896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007261462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030570484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262202671","doi":"","title":"Whose \"Charter\" is it anyways?: An examination of \"Charter\" litigation as it relates to the Chinese Canadian community","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.041886250380761145,"score_gpt":0.33740659393089667,"score_spread":0.2955203435501355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262202671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80213517,0.000079532925,0.0018167164,0.018583989,0.000281442,0.0004321141,0.00012211618,0.000026026033,0.17652287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99455225,0.000032834,0.00020262186,0.0023165313,0.00033719858,0.000035093886,0.000106272295,0.000005708057,0.0024114952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984039,0.00029302397,0.00037242885,0.000177483,0.00048881065,0.0002643462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975868,0.00059421256,0.00015856234,0.00020915392,0.0012389906,0.00021226738],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002989474,0.00012003899,0.00015549453,0.0002718998,0.0021093555,0.00009237327,0.00038705286,0.0001094269,0.0003389621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015567042,0.00011890472,0.000072770265,0.00059491716,0.00047219868,0.00050430075,0.000033272958,0.0002499977,0.00013518802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001268072,0.000106810854,0.009087494,0.000011263228,0.000045054447,0.0000027478907,0.07184831,0.00016662812,0.00015874923,0.9149708,0.0020937815,0.0014956625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005725152,0.00016966113,0.7418551,0.00023707109,0.000046719746,0.000027029313,0.029244749,0.0013285632,0.00048559118,0.059360262,0.16622725,0.0004455364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103170015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82075715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85561055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091945264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067911256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268499598","doi":"","title":"Whether the \"Constitution Act\" has made a difference for First Nations?: Impact of the 1982 Constitution on First Nations: Reflections on Section 35","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05504278559855365,"score_gpt":0.2897075039663778,"score_spread":0.23466471836782415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268499598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12945186,0.0008054643,0.0335705,0.033761382,0.007052461,0.0064035654,0.0024145588,0.000418726,0.7861215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935281,0.0005359882,0.00012379704,0.00018197396,0.00063863304,0.00035891624,0.00006402984,0.000008368336,0.004560158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982206,0.00016482502,0.00040741282,0.0003400766,0.0005524437,0.00031463045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696916,0.001619971,0.000338615,0.00033503282,0.0006188641,0.00011833562],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060377293,0.00017241984,0.00019354571,0.0009604523,0.017991064,0.00019646529,0.0003720802,0.00024243553,0.00018064519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005308001,0.00016364601,0.0003758695,0.0014358534,0.0038447508,0.00033989083,0.000020661832,0.00032633383,0.000040114395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004473087,0.00020308679,0.001013237,0.00003640698,0.00006418303,0.0000012447765,0.0028414452,0.016528802,0.000103786035,0.97577345,0.0032740596,0.00011558889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017188013,0.00019526013,0.05181343,0.0008961919,0.00017025109,0.0001851735,0.0008785992,0.0013796905,0.00012774032,0.016519662,0.9255401,0.0005751236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037131216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7294463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9592538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005609948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005065281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270387197","doi":"","title":"The Role of Dissenting and Concurring Reasons in The Supreme Court of Canada's \"Charter\" Jurisprudence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Charter; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.008489126006916854,"score_gpt":0.24523691085189267,"score_spread":0.23674778484497583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270387197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9080365,0.0012192064,0.00015199783,0.0061954507,0.0002646187,0.00024711975,0.00004624952,0.0000083518025,0.08383053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959356,0.00012428174,0.00006415137,0.00003961691,0.000114042,0.00001709025,0.0000018142791,0.0000013011233,0.000044126744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991497,0.000060981594,0.0002054919,0.0000961175,0.00032694516,0.00016077925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873626,0.0007975247,0.00011637463,0.00007058975,0.00024542978,0.000033818564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010481119,0.00005054358,0.00009635494,0.0000287052,0.00081492437,0.000022322794,0.00020653417,0.000039336875,0.000008674217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016176874,0.000040933814,0.00002762539,0.00019452527,0.0012313991,0.00007809857,0.000026084495,0.00014404475,3.6359063e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026174478,0.000014274413,0.054688968,0.000004296218,0.000008713251,0.000001349202,0.0013472692,0.000015311743,0.0006557813,0.94257975,0.00004115702,0.00064052886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061506144,0.000017065804,0.4939505,0.00037323282,0.00006826571,0.00007083473,0.03769789,0.0010999785,0.0009250634,0.36910382,0.095710814,0.0003674832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15395126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74953955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59558827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007214324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014549111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85168266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273359719","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Bill of Rights as an Effective Manner and Form Device: An Analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in \"Authorson v. Canada (Attorney General)\"","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.012501353211383789,"score_gpt":0.2754712596877646,"score_spread":0.2629699064763808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273359719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99377936,0.00017847192,0.00002939652,0.0025541384,0.00010994111,0.00025818826,0.00012526805,0.0000019452932,0.0029632663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995419,0.00002015456,0.00013281558,0.000093504445,0.00005173451,0.000010459213,0.000012669408,0.0000022838215,0.00013449979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867743,0.00014553554,0.00030046512,0.0001621218,0.0005103724,0.00020410011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984938,0.0004914376,0.00016499862,0.00017558064,0.0005026826,0.00017150438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001026345,0.00007362682,0.00018465967,0.00013788993,0.0006774175,0.000019329917,0.00028108133,0.00007091199,0.000026583079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006695476,0.00005298693,0.000044775166,0.00063198846,0.00037711672,0.00020394444,0.00001493291,0.00008931771,1.1177083e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029009616,0.000038228176,0.073169425,0.000015690943,0.00009209195,0.0000052497026,0.002577966,0.014505632,0.00006306814,0.9073275,0.00042456904,0.0017515685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038734335,0.000038136397,0.91006047,0.00018303406,0.00032710982,0.000011352939,0.002485555,0.0231154,0.0007886273,0.02354696,0.03879849,0.00025754486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99978334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88378054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002012112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073508327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275501760","doi":"","title":"Dismantling the Clash between the Prerogative Power to Conduct Foreign Affairs and the \"Charter in Prime Minister of Canada et al v. Omar Khadr\"","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Prerogative; Charter; Law; Political science; Power (physics); Physics; Politics","score_opus":0.015561468967686242,"score_gpt":0.22946856155152814,"score_spread":0.2139070925838419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275501760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18270893,0.00010308019,0.0024520557,0.2225074,0.0002990227,0.0016670654,0.000051016355,0.000025111643,0.5901863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9425631,0.0000032352266,0.00007824719,0.056890897,0.00013937464,0.00004247878,0.000030052166,0.000004226064,0.00024835498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990905,0.000035812398,0.00028640943,0.00015325409,0.00027889395,0.00015510892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991825,0.00030377792,0.00016108293,0.00012136092,0.0002176132,0.000013652387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006573674,0.00010087576,0.00012772718,0.00007505659,0.00022921388,0.00010570661,0.00021405319,0.000027978578,0.000055755285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034446426,0.000062299405,0.000045205798,0.00019923391,0.00024767776,0.00036823956,0.000041778123,0.00013845034,0.0000070643455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002596631,0.00001711874,0.0014600543,0.0000052440087,0.000022786182,0.0000013628322,0.0002275975,0.00028501858,0.000030664774,0.99432784,0.0035371692,0.000059145303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004883178,0.000045708668,0.16561188,0.0003973734,0.00013233152,0.000034776403,0.004071208,0.025604011,0.00041927802,0.37968054,0.4184938,0.0006258934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026316175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009936708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7598542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011813432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020941283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55449164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279648004","doi":"","title":"The \"Charter\", Poverty Rights and the Space Between: Exploring Social Movements as a Forum for Advancing Social and Economic Rights in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Poverty; Space (punctuation); Political science; Social rights; Sociology; Law; Public administration; Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.02994539334027635,"score_gpt":0.2542416446116925,"score_spread":0.22429625127141617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279648004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979313,0.00013126933,0.000404964,0.010224708,0.00039686414,0.00065454136,0.000049241404,0.000014755957,0.008810661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821025,0.00005712289,0.000099962424,0.0002500851,0.0003807676,0.00013203494,0.000008150463,0.0000032294017,0.00085837266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901646,0.000068266345,0.00023053846,0.0001812664,0.0001978269,0.00030565998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992161,0.0005085266,0.00010074356,0.000043501546,0.00006656451,0.000064564476],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055104826,0.00008975975,0.00015563965,0.000043358472,0.0049263565,0.00006413572,0.00011984318,0.000046362315,0.000015289856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007016455,0.0000655251,0.00003634607,0.000060154623,0.0005100316,0.00024046858,0.000027634404,0.00009332477,0.0000022283523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018659453,0.0000048819115,0.0028941077,0.00000470352,0.000023090723,0.000003387771,0.006984611,0.000014841052,6.625984e-7,0.9886415,0.0011026858,0.00030687227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002972573,0.00000958364,0.033580396,0.000038435817,0.000019789712,0.000013092668,0.004008607,0.0006454497,0.000027294907,0.6175019,0.34088144,0.0003014093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3702646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92311287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5528482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015104153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018675984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286880886","doi":"","title":"\"Render Unto Caesar…\": Using the Freedom of Conscience and Religion to Challenge Canadian Taxes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.054099726095320703,"score_gpt":0.3027252114588052,"score_spread":0.2486254853634845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286880886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42067438,0.0015543266,0.02127848,0.021928323,0.0011567535,0.0013939526,0.00056530075,0.00006748876,0.531381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971024,0.000036085214,0.0015667109,0.00049251755,0.00024162531,0.0000128536,0.0000045438846,0.0000032561954,0.0005399993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989056,0.000108562715,0.00019354382,0.00017758018,0.00035121365,0.00026350308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998604,0.00021644523,0.0000823638,0.00012770915,0.0005576427,0.00041185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008853614,0.00007694971,0.000121173565,0.00015372067,0.00069659227,0.000044925568,0.00020831898,0.0000655986,0.00001971403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014178129,0.0000768459,0.000029780165,0.0003878582,0.0018451014,0.00015767978,0.00002895566,0.00008975996,0.000008037832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030413776,0.000022069977,0.0037583492,0.0000035466662,0.000008575364,0.000005468379,0.002857682,0.0031591225,0.000011399254,0.989697,0.0003914062,0.00008235854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013159508,0.00019719815,0.006115659,0.00024162889,0.00016140599,0.00025274433,0.041384317,0.004039375,0.000040198138,0.08970076,0.85566777,0.0008830183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3314601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33064294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8999962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066129456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0088873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288138134","doi":"","title":"Federal Court of Appeal De-Rails Equality Rights for Persons With Disabilities: \"Via Rail v. Canadian Transportation Agency\" and the Important Duty Not to Create New Barriers to Accessibility","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Duty; Law; Federal court; Political science; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.01623098254764939,"score_gpt":0.28325350965874707,"score_spread":0.2670225271110977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288138134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91592896,0.000020876429,0.061891846,0.012385286,0.000115751536,0.0012296464,0.00093344285,0.000024166757,0.0074700518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581075,0.000002330111,0.0018801518,0.00045337586,0.00022502137,0.000092969385,0.00013091973,0.00000488534,0.0013995845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987052,0.00009156958,0.0003630385,0.00024768876,0.0003295801,0.00026289985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998637,0.00037287257,0.00013042767,0.00009731149,0.00040991738,0.00035244584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012866647,0.000101831756,0.00016741041,0.00008611634,0.0009728242,0.000079710604,0.00015578239,0.00008287267,0.00010042642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073602685,0.00008998155,0.0000791643,0.0001920055,0.0004412543,0.00023048314,0.0000036875956,0.00006669645,0.0000015933332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001702465,0.000020020047,0.046087295,0.000023252891,0.000022576834,8.750411e-7,0.009431373,0.0010230241,0.00005927862,0.94276476,0.00031110898,0.00008620423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038982956,0.00011954168,0.57020634,0.00020369662,0.00016589162,0.000013799526,0.0056321668,0.003323637,0.0007140018,0.39422604,0.020829726,0.00066685525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41446093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80328757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5485387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008050906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025792802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74822754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296872476","doi":"","title":"Should the Law Society of Upper Canada Give Its Blessing to Trinity Western University Law School","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blessing; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.06374453824057522,"score_gpt":0.28782632109302614,"score_spread":0.22408178285245092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296872476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26337448,0.0009209922,0.0059999814,0.048254266,0.0012452307,0.0012237146,0.00039626448,0.000117413765,0.67846763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961704,0.00001552678,0.0001307691,0.0014048363,0.00032504945,0.000003182854,0.000005661069,0.0000032071591,0.0019413778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989551,0.00010201939,0.00016120986,0.00014562602,0.00045464715,0.00018140377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863774,0.00016943108,0.000104877014,0.00008963183,0.0007879068,0.00021040005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075119303,0.00006753537,0.00013419625,0.000017243474,0.0008392705,0.000053367272,0.00025314285,0.000086883556,0.00002700522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041909862,0.00006785074,0.000058920443,0.00034235936,0.00038229683,0.00031125295,0.00004194917,0.00013512085,0.000012942888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008648159,0.00002032199,0.0035128284,0.000025476076,0.000021457456,0.0000026771484,0.002705467,0.00066653837,0.000025777399,0.9902837,0.0026917525,0.00003529975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060977833,0.000015809423,0.0026133945,0.00019212316,0.00004510395,0.000009399577,0.01642786,0.0001536536,0.0002606676,0.008877761,0.97054565,0.0002488036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70060325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84845513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011905849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050575966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89719594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299835984","doi":"","title":"Defining Access to Justice: The Charter and the Courts (and the Law Commission of Ontario)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Commission; Law; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.06012035141865464,"score_gpt":0.33140635452712414,"score_spread":0.2712860031084695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299835984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023061274,0.0030709568,0.0026735633,0.43194908,0.0018475085,0.00096258,0.000041414118,0.000015569598,0.536378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98214746,0.00023898778,0.0006065481,0.0064943386,0.00023424852,0.00008373412,0.000006130996,0.0000046197356,0.010183922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869,0.00038599526,0.00033353738,0.00015816171,0.00026563441,0.00016664239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967231,0.0022441961,0.0002685622,0.00018638404,0.00049837504,0.00007933939],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028301869,0.00009759245,0.00015508533,0.0000487279,0.0018518494,0.0002411616,0.00033758002,0.00009516053,0.0006265714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018949172,0.000062313964,0.000050875642,0.00034732968,0.0038336082,0.0006717225,0.00008516223,0.00041084064,0.000028688864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074608986,0.000048743277,0.0005829337,0.000026786207,0.000037153735,4.996008e-7,0.08492319,0.000035813664,0.0000010403011,0.91136134,0.0019913996,0.00091650157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018410722,0.00001581006,0.012453416,0.00021269375,0.00043777694,0.000089915375,0.008351503,0.0007291695,0.00001669358,0.2509798,0.7247043,0.00016778849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06687157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03426669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023894952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016761185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300581667","doi":"","title":"Benefits Provided, Hidden and Denied: A Critique of the Supreme Court of Canada's Test in \"Auton v. British Columbia\"","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.017167560847835696,"score_gpt":0.24367490213500673,"score_spread":0.22650734128717104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300581667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.959971,0.01580859,0.000038457492,0.012058932,0.00070388656,0.00050943845,0.0005511596,0.000007625384,0.010350879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453264,0.0005543323,0.00023687552,0.00016930877,0.00021513988,0.000025137844,0.000006079092,0.000005885605,0.004254604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846154,0.0001292643,0.0004264725,0.0001787249,0.00044617124,0.00035782644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983086,0.00076163566,0.0002105923,0.00012383302,0.0004548814,0.00014047368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009280361,0.00008302168,0.0002267838,0.000033228866,0.00031034875,0.000055407327,0.00023386235,0.00015653449,0.00013370762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030388706,0.00013006484,0.000058769783,0.0004068015,0.000986685,0.00040396125,0.000058388934,0.00018038925,0.0000011282602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043974796,0.00021138712,0.4516424,0.0005249834,0.000012325218,0.0000062100776,0.0011681647,0.00012321817,0.000067523724,0.5403299,0.0034037677,0.002505752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058580993,0.000028526832,0.9588847,0.0030778006,0.000101548576,0.00035360508,0.0017671408,0.00033066343,0.0001858995,0.015217812,0.019181497,0.0002849573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8863876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52511203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076219626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034122933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6053262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510209270","doi":"","title":"Noting the Obvious: A Reflection on the Supreme Court of Canada’s Application of Judicial Notice under Sections 7 and 15 of the “Charter”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Reflection (computer programming); Computer science","score_opus":0.029353216067322264,"score_gpt":0.2720005618493013,"score_spread":0.24264734578197905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510209270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88085526,0.00016528959,0.0074529336,0.08915531,0.00050450943,0.0010794781,0.00011952339,0.000023536382,0.020644143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993054,0.0000326493,0.0000413218,0.00015637788,0.00015998902,0.000031445947,0.0000010560268,0.0000025285167,0.0002691944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990247,0.000143257,0.0002304028,0.00010958831,0.0003774706,0.0001145973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981196,0.000971865,0.0002737111,0.00011147102,0.00050091796,0.000022446293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006454012,0.00005895758,0.00010228178,0.000022127926,0.0009999636,0.0000085639695,0.00016072074,0.000057067824,0.00001439349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001500915,0.000031703024,0.000048928185,0.00024254648,0.0008901143,0.00007118606,0.000026662088,0.00009121208,7.5543153e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010783992,0.00003300383,0.004380999,0.000016353331,0.000050415612,5.397821e-8,0.0039639557,0.00073089224,0.0041135564,0.9857401,0.00054664916,0.00041320582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00226922,0.00012919804,0.7788185,0.0011335223,0.00046746706,0.000032419568,0.052914575,0.0039308243,0.015970357,0.10740785,0.03619898,0.00072707445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08711749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4155096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87833226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049589976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000618286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91896147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543676754","doi":"","title":"Qualifier ou Graduer?: L’application de la “Charte canadienne des droits et libertés” aux Universités","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01727183472408289,"score_gpt":0.25584756283914983,"score_spread":0.23857572811506694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2543676754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25372818,0.0079977745,0.10937073,0.10832136,0.0023810344,0.0008765988,0.0018549316,0.00025048302,0.5152189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7959736,0.0024183705,0.00048436,0.00059289165,0.0004957057,0.00003526814,0.00004194769,0.000016758344,0.1999411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817264,0.00038490465,0.0002698797,0.0003678488,0.00025259634,0.00055213354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812454,0.0005868019,0.00016862902,0.00020687877,0.00040177203,0.00051139336],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013580386,0.00014634065,0.00018490353,0.00048538914,0.0015138115,0.0001782658,0.00031634254,0.00034345585,0.0009027875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008313029,0.00020810172,0.00014527017,0.000652929,0.0037414809,0.00075002713,0.000029182656,0.00020908914,0.00041458034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008044351,0.00007768763,0.0007210853,0.00004942572,0.000048562593,0.00003964008,0.0054401793,0.00010218806,0.00031201483,0.9612897,0.0062325904,0.025678884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044627406,0.000011653342,0.0045688185,0.00021114614,0.00007374679,0.0000976787,0.000503684,0.00015579101,0.000010819157,0.18283492,0.8108335,0.00025193073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3544449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8442178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80460095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010104357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005970303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557656702","doi":"","title":"The Political Safeguards of Canadian Federalism: The Intergovermental Safeguards","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016452807828137076,"score_gpt":0.26154799314444654,"score_spread":0.24509518531630947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557656702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060604945,0.00036546556,0.0018992044,0.21753863,0.0011249589,0.00049755396,0.0007265774,0.000037487338,0.71720517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917611,0.00008020814,0.000030515568,0.0008191981,0.0005029936,0.000025010839,0.0000024916542,0.0000040272434,0.0067744893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985654,0.00013920723,0.000261003,0.00013226992,0.0004031619,0.00049898087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985277,0.0007455728,0.00008912486,0.00015531507,0.00022748324,0.0002548099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078841887,0.00007200008,0.00010512377,0.00006173882,0.0010882601,0.00006193565,0.00034553514,0.00008736056,0.00012906246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020815802,0.00004316347,0.000095172676,0.0002429251,0.0014679901,0.00013308502,0.000024873265,0.000084151696,0.000048342874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041707776,0.000010519485,0.0020350555,0.0000037649336,0.000016349519,0.0000024853607,0.00023686832,0.0000014297603,0.000054330583,0.9940391,0.0028673157,0.00072856963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029204233,0.000012083154,0.020759547,0.0001256669,0.00001250075,0.000031375293,0.0010712859,0.000025895255,0.00013260846,0.13387375,0.84354097,0.00012225959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3106643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4632815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9311561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016082852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020873593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8370127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560432532","doi":"","title":"Devolution, Evolution, Confusion: the Constitutional Status of the Canadian Territories and its Potential Implications for the Duty to Consult","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Devolution (biology); Duty; Law; Political science; Operations research; History; Psychology; Mathematics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02392565925271303,"score_gpt":0.2796583328803652,"score_spread":0.2557326736276522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560432532","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09323459,0.007184437,0.089701176,0.7775282,0.0042030914,0.00785224,0.007170124,0.00014777722,0.012978342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997374,0.00022154047,0.00027601107,0.00041680256,0.0004658687,0.00032279975,0.000013042421,0.000003806191,0.000906146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861765,0.00012523065,0.00029730436,0.00022171345,0.0003219217,0.00041618504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646133,0.0010697942,0.00015258079,0.00017253154,0.0019367425,0.00020703464],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067964435,0.00011488596,0.00012979428,0.000052323,0.0063943984,0.00007261297,0.0003624984,0.00011560179,0.000048106238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063102436,0.000062780346,0.00009534027,0.00036466523,0.0040248656,0.00018902452,0.00006890826,0.00010076243,0.000009051111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007904924,0.000012584349,0.018320788,0.0000068285212,0.000047754118,1.1115495e-7,0.0012978397,0.00016366458,0.00027939334,0.97729576,0.0022203003,0.00034706344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006759922,0.000012931433,0.58406675,0.000096217555,0.00011050858,0.000028536155,0.001931424,0.0001693939,0.000065652974,0.04085584,0.37177292,0.00021380004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05456127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34045905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93643993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018107134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036121644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590765334","doi":"","title":"Addressing the Elephant in the Room: Spending Power in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.05216058820681362,"score_gpt":0.29245360035080836,"score_spread":0.24029301214399473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590765334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7228772,0.00071957224,0.00076423155,0.1451692,0.0005537405,0.00057528965,0.0002864531,0.000014625365,0.12903969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689364,0.000056241795,0.000016507784,0.001883216,0.00016487644,0.000020242927,0.0000011849202,0.0000021920991,0.00096190255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990847,0.00012208112,0.00015059384,0.00011114506,0.00027732635,0.0002541498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991158,0.00063967984,0.0000665902,0.000098828,0.00003503524,0.000044050517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085084233,0.000048804148,0.0000641142,0.000055857014,0.0003181304,0.000038382077,0.0002782499,0.000035545763,0.00014306375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012549778,0.00003335418,0.000023316503,0.0003332184,0.00018244129,0.00016337745,0.000010075003,0.00010483373,0.000011590502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002956679,0.000007532457,0.016319003,0.000002139602,0.0000022706936,0.00003290485,0.0019310251,0.00010161368,0.00001904499,0.97663474,0.0039173677,0.0010294062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067863753,0.000003996355,0.5097073,0.0004336497,0.00000631351,0.000059117516,0.0034963696,0.00017979341,0.000035851313,0.04819832,0.43695676,0.000243946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9228234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9284364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025907352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003936847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6983798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W279420640","doi":"","title":"Canada's Supreme Court, Constitutional Principles, Federalism, and the 1998 Quebec Secession Reference Case: Toxic Wine in a Very Old Bottle?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Secession; Supreme court; Law; Wine; Bottle; Political science; Art; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02029996763542845,"score_gpt":0.24584536359248738,"score_spread":0.22554539595705891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W279420640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85514396,0.0014565019,0.0020703063,0.052409872,0.0007192823,0.0016545578,0.0005756959,0.0000756186,0.08589418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99163055,0.000075905176,0.0001139059,0.0010337095,0.00033845956,0.000115140945,0.0000278914,0.0000036688682,0.0066607716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983425,0.00019661387,0.0003667204,0.00025747527,0.00046873456,0.00036791866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986829,0.00065668795,0.00014028508,0.00013365959,0.00019956384,0.00018686638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080449315,0.00012280926,0.00020944908,0.00004977901,0.00081877864,0.00015064691,0.00018140368,0.00013119378,0.00013106548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012057038,0.00010747542,0.00003659183,0.0002141888,0.0018328048,0.00035594753,0.0000473154,0.00023262974,0.000019871079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008914969,0.000024066436,0.0039438684,0.000024431927,0.000009922589,0.00008324507,0.00030147636,0.00018025353,0.000018036852,0.9928801,0.0024143204,0.00011134754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034024857,0.000012521641,0.08576244,0.000678632,0.00003302125,0.0014495807,0.0013364708,0.0070214327,0.000021801483,0.04439793,0.8552648,0.0006188731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97173595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9745121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94848216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015974434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004633169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8219043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802592240","doi":"","title":"What Should Canada’s Promised New National Accessibility Law Include?: A Discussion Paper","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Operations research; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.04145766638207853,"score_gpt":0.3177230709955922,"score_spread":0.2762654046135137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802592240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34084132,0.00081211084,0.007982762,0.11280608,0.005779637,0.0025552774,0.00034227822,0.0005060091,0.52837455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868726,0.000022167593,0.0005882054,0.0028024048,0.001628516,0.00003336999,0.000113548245,0.00000866345,0.0079305135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757236,0.00011263469,0.000426656,0.00047604626,0.0010400797,0.00037220985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998259,0.00016350315,0.00016149183,0.00021305059,0.0008838337,0.0003191225],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011146914,0.00015431985,0.00019317995,0.00007044028,0.0014632473,0.00027925445,0.0004533828,0.00019033495,0.001699296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007756327,0.00013953957,0.0000944245,0.0004290832,0.0010326474,0.0022641504,0.000044452336,0.00021056377,0.000030126803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005713237,0.00017867755,0.031172683,0.000037689646,0.000033624285,0.0000075582684,0.0024494946,0.000036757097,0.00026267083,0.9570429,0.0067353486,0.0019854845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001494923,0.000025795727,0.1587348,0.00027940734,0.000055913548,0.000006370519,0.0014829452,0.0004677311,0.0005959161,0.34342247,0.49278075,0.00065298256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21889766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9298012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7109036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020035242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013216201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2861617510","doi":"","title":"The Disappearance of the Four Equality Rights and Systemic Discrimination from Canadian Equality Jurisprudence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Gender equality; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.036820963814294165,"score_gpt":0.3031002468661284,"score_spread":0.26627928305183424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2861617510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80932736,0.00030792216,0.009070513,0.012505451,0.0012535213,0.0007240175,0.00033873183,0.000052732248,0.16641976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977688,0.000037218873,0.0000895241,0.00019943094,0.00029332293,0.000023616783,0.000011076936,0.0000033847487,0.0015736236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982054,0.00049443037,0.00034825105,0.00021956803,0.00047874945,0.00025359076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983565,0.00046644715,0.00021837525,0.00025653004,0.0005559585,0.00014618733],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020086472,0.00008746057,0.00012464727,0.000047856756,0.0022394138,0.00012228939,0.00040878356,0.00010694284,0.000041941403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00135105,0.00006855376,0.00006533479,0.00029397203,0.0021625631,0.00028035507,0.000038860937,0.000113495575,0.000021339032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000556429,0.0000150971355,0.005263324,0.00001868226,0.000012523388,3.141367e-7,0.006472991,0.000007097301,0.000047980626,0.9872268,0.0001305601,0.00079907815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045075346,0.00001494288,0.23540558,0.00043114932,0.00006812827,0.000010286566,0.0032957948,0.0009470608,0.00028274473,0.7184555,0.0403414,0.00029667618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19154711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6493362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45778912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005365511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008838908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99905956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964917791","doi":"","title":"Complementarity: The Constitutional Role of the Senate of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.013618278548489715,"score_gpt":0.2266752809809839,"score_spread":0.2130570024324942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964917791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33532053,0.022256186,0.00079365494,0.06770664,0.007478121,0.0016901878,0.0021845459,0.000024435245,0.5625457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99506485,0.00021764936,0.000085041596,0.0006428024,0.00033314808,0.00001882346,0.000017164733,0.0000035902137,0.003616925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977346,0.00021365345,0.0005546743,0.00022586352,0.00091620936,0.0003549849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793303,0.0005464846,0.00042921506,0.00022037028,0.00079484563,0.00007603639],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000784541,0.00015680745,0.00030080555,0.00004332998,0.0010868433,0.000016765765,0.0005321466,0.00010796246,0.00067247485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004592576,0.00013092224,0.00020035902,0.0006641949,0.007829288,0.00015467597,0.00014303783,0.0002626536,0.000021556321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010950341,0.00008976754,0.030652784,0.000054697684,0.00017270967,0.0000012221055,0.0005956607,0.0027725415,0.00026994816,0.9638319,0.0011964511,0.00035135128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008122998,0.00002221166,0.036490135,0.0007519056,0.00021785357,0.000076465,0.005992257,0.001161657,0.0009248072,0.3606402,0.59256727,0.00034294277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34735453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4438328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6597443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010976138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010449174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99516064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035635063","doi":"","title":"Telling Stories: The Crown, Parliament and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Art; Law; Politics; Materials science","score_opus":0.017905112771342352,"score_gpt":0.21295948555785132,"score_spread":0.19505437278650897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035635063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23697059,0.0120522035,0.01872754,0.32593086,0.0034873313,0.001583844,0.0005771439,0.00025207445,0.4004184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99335015,0.00033520145,0.00011330215,0.0025861294,0.0005437273,0.000013183591,0.000006488648,0.0000029407997,0.0030488805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942654,0.0000348076,0.00009627901,0.00011152957,0.00020918588,0.00012165943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995458,0.00012160155,0.000040964424,0.00004795327,0.00009890901,0.00014478207],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021294865,0.000035979207,0.000057205718,0.00003745375,0.001380976,0.00015145926,0.00010940848,0.000034059893,0.00018400302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058023154,0.00004527087,0.000019607389,0.00013688518,0.00052446633,0.000094720956,0.000010340369,0.00009160628,0.000010683792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031443344,0.000005068818,0.00079266867,0.000016406784,0.000012564566,0.000011606689,0.0078508025,0.00038462714,0.000011618793,0.9654001,0.024623543,0.0008878691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007545237,0.000002419644,0.00075043534,0.000011182535,0.000010066196,0.000003808427,0.002945532,0.00018847329,0.0000020823556,0.0013682914,0.9945776,0.000064695756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9574251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.969954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015413095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047799987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041932618","doi":"","title":"Ontario's Human Rights Tribunal Bungles the School Boards' Human Rights Duty to Accommodate Students with Disabilities: \"J.F. v. Waterloo Cathofic District School Board\" - An Erroneous Rejection of a Student's Request to Bring His Autism Service Dog to School","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Duty; Human rights; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03166711377603512,"score_gpt":0.31535381446435784,"score_spread":0.2836867006883227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041932618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850435,0.000038073085,0.00045372488,0.008276867,0.00023470564,0.0026623525,0.00016801755,0.00019008438,0.0029326652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952008,0.0000027525534,0.0007909891,0.0006896993,0.00064741104,0.00032708352,0.00010650429,0.000020096897,0.002214649],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958359,0.00037048478,0.00080333237,0.0008718959,0.0014508006,0.0006675688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969867,0.00020543253,0.00027523318,0.00045271884,0.0009384246,0.00114151],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008855423,0.0004051605,0.000572128,0.00016816494,0.004371339,0.0005494099,0.0012853292,0.0001864646,0.00045698264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065338553,0.0003303893,0.00015132246,0.0010386336,0.0004218808,0.0008951847,0.00032562783,0.0005512821,0.00024974014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050353975,0.0018787025,0.49111316,0.00032579037,0.0010166846,0.00009930672,0.27587432,0.014050991,0.0029848896,0.2073016,0.004725301,0.00012569186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025079576,0.0008116861,0.9117185,0.0007571956,0.0004097844,0.00002865739,0.017505119,0.000048493148,0.00037217463,0.004900925,0.059530325,0.0014092029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3510974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7336094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4206053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055841557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049020746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31139685","doi":"10.1002/acn3.770","title":"The Rule of Law in Canada: a Global Template?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; National Institute of Mental Health; National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health; Massachusetts General Hospital","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.012092292387988273,"score_gpt":0.24761362788356642,"score_spread":0.23552133549557813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31139685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45621628,0.00020684056,0.0008834801,0.01260869,0.0005500779,0.00041816087,0.00009091913,0.00001856689,0.529007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988655,0.000025361715,0.00017625344,0.00022679145,0.000091719565,0.000032728756,0.000012203412,0.0000013764496,0.0005680873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924004,0.00004541208,0.0001985649,0.000079816506,0.00029249128,0.00014368104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992408,0.00021227878,0.000084597064,0.000054865857,0.00036789934,0.000039517992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030610242,0.000039222858,0.00006180733,0.000018673461,0.00031844253,0.00003202991,0.00016124152,0.00003810094,0.000115487324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036429186,0.000038847098,0.000026178579,0.00014980882,0.00021764796,0.00017747594,0.000011048742,0.000054361444,0.000024662906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001777372,0.000011304283,0.013087272,0.000003240143,0.0000057241314,0.0000011784823,0.00014062463,0.0004704006,0.000011632592,0.9855723,0.00028314075,0.000411438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051995815,0.000006757751,0.24070786,0.000101874386,0.000008827845,0.000015105847,0.000963318,0.0021452177,0.00010733968,0.6294934,0.12573919,0.0001911372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9623196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9812388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5426492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001870466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029368845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5209907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123230603","doi":"","title":"Dismantling Regulatory Structures: Canada's Long-Gun Registry as Case Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deregulation; Legislation; Law; Repeal; Gun control; Federalism; Parliament; Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.01987016449860858,"score_gpt":0.2900390755757322,"score_spread":0.27016891107712365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123230603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665439,0.0002159533,0.002445458,0.0019403935,0.00059103296,0.00034654088,0.000017583525,0.00007081281,0.027828332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675,0.000016164762,0.00019172911,0.00026165522,0.0006651206,0.00002158674,0.000012304442,0.0000072882763,0.0020741725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983784,0.00016689539,0.00026331758,0.0003063311,0.000554975,0.00033010702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986702,0.0004038136,0.00013450762,0.00025614546,0.00029816208,0.00023717104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086866564,0.000114194816,0.0001565661,0.000067131245,0.0013091823,0.000096381955,0.00025900058,0.00009556804,0.00014182283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023840931,0.00013869791,0.000052971453,0.00021505497,0.00041193268,0.00020963389,0.00003233105,0.00018286162,0.000014334908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009113521,0.000059954433,0.019657178,0.000036552236,0.000024061823,0.0012821002,0.0024982875,0.0013332794,0.000008796794,0.9722489,0.0012609985,0.0015807635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033165854,0.00024037057,0.10525083,0.0008088815,0.0006332341,0.018261606,0.14017522,0.0044069136,0.0001470558,0.18978196,0.5342231,0.002754271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61147314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9083562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78246695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010636018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029736883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123288322","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Title in Recent Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence: What Remains of Radical Crown Title?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Element (criminal law); Assertion; Negotiation; Doctrine; Sovereignty; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01471896982157139,"score_gpt":0.2902955722324222,"score_spread":0.2755766024108508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123288322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06768602,0.0015307425,0.000837437,0.013375364,0.0015899404,0.00030420313,0.000046547135,0.00002386992,0.91460586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99331564,0.00084967044,0.000513995,0.00008753796,0.00019586805,0.000004196167,0.0000048159122,0.0000018992389,0.005026406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995346,0.000028702867,0.00010398854,0.000056549165,0.00019854301,0.000077594595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996693,0.000081158825,0.00004382311,0.000035337773,0.00014202174,0.000028356402],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023702251,0.000027660053,0.00007281976,0.000020538853,0.00007128008,0.0000064759884,0.000067953835,0.000038567458,0.00096183777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003157148,0.000028561632,0.000016828342,0.00010656188,0.00021187769,0.000069146095,0.0000043195373,0.00005010794,0.000027347915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002370209,0.000021317932,0.0012922889,0.00001955122,0.000008156908,0.0000015266371,0.0007557252,0.00005071596,0.000047925674,0.96641356,0.03075806,0.0006287746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103024846,0.0000029700495,0.0039329436,0.00006362701,0.000004831069,0.0000012548903,0.0002769885,0.0001248599,0.000088878616,0.002860363,0.99248934,0.000050910483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014924334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07725878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96355325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003564344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000653765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123325995","doi":"10.1016/j.ad.2022.12.004","title":"In Defence of the Courts: A Balanced Judicial Role in Canada's Constitutional Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Democracy; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Power (physics); Balance (ability); Judicial restraint; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.010140629026976109,"score_gpt":0.2447480423113869,"score_spread":0.2346074132844108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123325995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73991066,0.0012482846,0.004824765,0.009961266,0.0014570167,0.00080217543,0.00016357035,0.00002802708,0.24160421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998778,0.00007721413,0.00018894338,0.00060360105,0.00024211037,0.000019599536,0.000005431379,0.0000024062897,0.00008270233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819595,0.00008710843,0.0004906593,0.00021258157,0.0006213661,0.00039231678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881,0.0005232868,0.00017204107,0.00009981986,0.00031358242,0.00008130283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011250959,0.000105879815,0.0002130125,0.0001506141,0.000560601,0.00001174845,0.00030900052,0.00009161428,0.000082109946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017287179,0.00011164133,0.00006745409,0.0008113754,0.0021808727,0.00019842133,0.000049316543,0.00023116462,0.000006092492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018437247,0.000048280028,0.21938065,0.000004750354,0.000008229967,0.000019219191,0.0004014029,0.0013483512,0.00008877521,0.778339,0.00010986637,0.00023302207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094556523,0.000006113723,0.5803856,0.00028758004,0.00001688965,0.00003664812,0.002989679,0.00027213778,0.00020363358,0.40157077,0.013015212,0.00027016518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.720235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97201574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37676823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029584349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012483246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99311507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123444135","doi":"","title":"Adjudication of Social and Economic Rights in South Africa: Beyond the Rhetoric of Illegitimacy and Excessive Complexity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Social rights; Charter; Political science; Human rights; Law; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Constitution; Social equality; Cultural rights; Right to property; State (computer science); Linguistic rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04127155449291715,"score_gpt":0.28347438003571174,"score_spread":0.2422028255427946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123444135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88002664,0.0009846715,0.00045999675,0.00090774504,0.00013533651,0.00037007628,0.00013521734,0.000016963611,0.116963364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991199,0.000040436404,0.00047001702,0.000015062747,0.00013790432,0.000019284242,0.000008398011,0.0000023409639,0.00018665052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991602,0.00010736622,0.0002681678,0.00015465301,0.00017891606,0.00013072879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992132,0.0002735172,0.00023777626,0.00007495215,0.00015705466,0.00004350696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042375788,0.00006436915,0.00017160956,0.00011093296,0.0005179337,0.000011668549,0.00013901362,0.00008111885,0.000044007433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028252313,0.00006468864,0.000033128694,0.00021947538,0.0026359695,0.00018458313,0.000034043165,0.00009689532,0.000003943408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000797438,0.000024782801,0.0076952684,0.000013138041,0.00001029677,0.0000013774401,0.096361704,0.000032109834,0.00001202239,0.8957478,0.000055064975,0.0000384705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030750665,0.000057344845,0.35128257,0.00012295031,0.00010951097,0.000043350614,0.011188481,0.0025351916,0.00020651158,0.575095,0.055677384,0.0006066328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056116184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059672154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3435873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023828243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003821228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97123396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124689136","doi":"","title":"Travelling in Constitutional Circles: The Paradox of Tribunal Independence","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Separation of powers; Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Sociology; Constitution; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03010718239465562,"score_gpt":0.26895739826666126,"score_spread":0.23885021587200564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124689136","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20104606,0.075011514,0.30526856,0.14190692,0.00824134,0.0023769557,0.00229134,0.00014365179,0.26371366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99203867,0.0045493725,0.00033942235,0.00028744704,0.0009070491,0.00006633704,0.000010261463,0.0000056302033,0.0017958338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970356,0.00030250818,0.00080369285,0.0004117017,0.00088944053,0.00055703346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693245,0.001733474,0.0003430901,0.00017807854,0.0006764902,0.0001364155],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019862652,0.00021860577,0.0003807899,0.00019873823,0.0008587202,0.00003317015,0.00048821236,0.00032274643,0.0006032251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001829159,0.00018553209,0.00022245961,0.00112944,0.014675211,0.0004920072,0.00006643144,0.00034140574,0.0001626364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035306148,0.00020522732,0.016812166,0.000033888045,0.00007944942,0.000027851169,0.001008845,0.0009165278,0.0001670829,0.9698457,0.0002042796,0.0106636705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019538316,0.000048467366,0.05050155,0.0023351342,0.00013114691,0.00024737892,0.0020438263,0.0004106213,0.00024591148,0.8610071,0.0805144,0.00056061737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00179416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020567477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79099256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012383513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036657276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9880063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124916167","doi":"","title":"Clarifying the Matter: Modernizing Peace, Order, and Good Government in the \"Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act\" Appeals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Federalism; Constitution; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Separation of powers; Jurisdiction; Parliament; Commerce Clause; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03183355028587525,"score_gpt":0.20068434169436386,"score_spread":0.1688507914084886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124916167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33226016,0.026407225,0.19149673,0.20424534,0.0005008553,0.0018265,0.0006480948,0.00013263221,0.24248244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99452794,0.00061564904,0.00046871544,0.0039905338,0.0001920918,0.000061140556,0.000010800326,0.000007173555,0.0001259681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891156,0.000033568944,0.00040937038,0.0003018578,0.00012326785,0.00022038349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944943,0.00014009916,0.00019503318,0.00012554182,0.000043006625,0.00004690418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006011187,0.00012912646,0.00020168995,0.000051134608,0.00053234724,0.00011727345,0.00021925427,0.00007252547,0.000037358917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035427563,0.00011328847,0.0000611079,0.0003437548,0.000209158,0.00025487356,0.00007903299,0.00028316712,0.00011535795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001054248,0.000045636643,0.05711899,0.000040016428,0.000035324516,0.0000055568676,0.0013134582,0.0034376516,0.000019703071,0.9371505,0.00030600966,0.0005166431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041317134,0.00012701971,0.3748477,0.00037298878,0.00010840526,0.00047633218,0.0044561676,0.115850344,0.000058052374,0.2265852,0.27159804,0.0013880222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017925413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010074934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71056527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003245006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007335682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.461977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125777417","doi":"","title":"Canadian Climate Federalism: Parliament’s Ample Constitutional Authority to Legislate GHG Emissions through Regulations, a National Cap and Trade Program, or a National Carbon Tax","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Parliament; Carbon tax; Constitution; Jurisdiction; Greenhouse gas; Commerce Clause; Emissions trading; Legislature; Law; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Cooperative federalism; Economics; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0417525047389458,"score_gpt":0.31877501783052564,"score_spread":0.2770225130915798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125777417","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05123697,0.00059905974,0.007370384,0.64577824,0.0014731813,0.004404652,0.027629973,0.0005026049,0.26100492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98208445,0.00017919186,0.0044062864,0.0045373426,0.0008529487,0.00037968578,0.00012890283,0.000013437047,0.0074177757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729496,0.00013943459,0.00043381038,0.000502308,0.00092344027,0.0007060698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979041,0.00045365727,0.00017608174,0.00013098962,0.0005727379,0.0007624038],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094911986,0.00020678368,0.00022447295,0.00029561738,0.0020044753,0.00020257215,0.00023909383,0.00024152618,0.00032749856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033281792,0.00020638689,0.000088253066,0.000631134,0.0012344613,0.00058496353,0.000034760807,0.00016932555,0.00003101184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025470652,0.000058632417,0.0020832547,0.000015564143,0.000034414286,0.000014773275,0.0011253712,0.00012945128,0.000057331206,0.9687426,0.026766436,0.0009467086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000870432,0.000027351321,0.013046145,0.00025378258,0.000023899285,0.00013822991,0.00019519794,0.000484609,0.000019923065,0.09210322,0.8924106,0.00042660726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21482246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6624242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93084747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004700302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0136873275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W603411450","doi":"","title":"Dirty Puddles and Safety Valves: The Path from Fact to Remedy in \"Canada (A.G.) v. PHS Community Services Society\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Path (computing); Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.012049421718789442,"score_gpt":0.2346356043731855,"score_spread":0.22258618265439606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W603411450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93948305,0.00069741753,0.002970507,0.011341843,0.00039419407,0.0005834824,0.00024733332,0.00005184105,0.044230316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977201,0.00013548331,0.00022738098,0.0014449462,0.0003018639,0.00002520197,0.000034070996,0.0000045946094,0.00010634276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986777,0.0003409841,0.00025472546,0.00016460234,0.0003458135,0.0002161799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849963,0.0009450054,0.00010139263,0.0001515686,0.00018759177,0.00011481738],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013879167,0.00009299252,0.00017094842,0.00002725024,0.0013282129,0.00009847089,0.000322421,0.00007546589,0.000032260214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006870629,0.000085386266,0.00004400877,0.00029494002,0.00022631286,0.00023528363,0.00005925272,0.0002436352,0.00000698236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022503571,0.00008161185,0.12084972,0.00016507601,0.00006049079,0.0000026815953,0.043349504,0.0011015997,0.00016386506,0.827926,0.0008598157,0.0054171416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011831425,0.000031766303,0.4105629,0.00089292263,0.000057542613,0.000007313224,0.08245016,0.0035314648,0.000079623285,0.17690161,0.323613,0.00068857643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9602954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98014975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6510244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074461557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016536396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64516891","doi":"","title":"Canada, Secularity and a Constitutional Monarchy","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularity; Monarchy; Constitutional monarchy; Law; Political science; Ancient history; Philosophy; History; Politics","score_opus":0.014295475353889893,"score_gpt":0.24910537313183617,"score_spread":0.23480989777794628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64516891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021321882,0.030181978,0.088396594,0.16139121,0.0026760683,0.00074097153,0.0041918266,0.000115014445,0.6909844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9526752,0.0009035108,0.005219388,0.005243757,0.002359919,0.000033526452,0.00012224661,0.000009052439,0.033433404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745244,0.00021458734,0.00048575088,0.00045379382,0.0007036734,0.0006897427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783766,0.0006281385,0.00018726474,0.00017784779,0.0005886054,0.0005804645],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006558966,0.00026072387,0.00031421648,0.000113955866,0.0013817818,0.000085132444,0.00025208824,0.00027675077,0.0010122849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007833941,0.0003679673,0.00011656798,0.00044100088,0.019517891,0.0005118554,0.000070278,0.0004444928,0.00009255979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009009087,0.000119208205,0.002802098,0.000061399114,0.00008642991,0.000059430302,0.00020878384,0.002770802,0.000008881095,0.98089796,0.00960722,0.0033687775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046806733,0.000012959774,0.001597532,0.00015053054,0.00009620463,0.0007098338,0.00025503314,0.0026015968,0.000010105916,0.023094317,0.9705862,0.00041764916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29070798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37391242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9609789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035625533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040054135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W76925935","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Cases in Ontario, 2008","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03716799095065223,"score_gpt":0.27175120293319277,"score_spread":0.23458321198254053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W76925935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07928018,0.026498403,0.00614613,0.046274893,0.0046007824,0.0008856652,0.00032146333,0.00014220852,0.8358503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813999,0.0011225005,0.0010245442,0.0018967522,0.0011298583,0.000043760174,0.00008870453,0.000004413984,0.013289569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971421,0.00017707291,0.0006885639,0.00054197677,0.0006740796,0.0007762547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983341,0.00050510553,0.00020238015,0.0001630306,0.0005230968,0.00027227987],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008435062,0.0003070566,0.00043938064,0.00022231527,0.0012549063,0.000088855224,0.00031679604,0.00038567878,0.0021261934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011182548,0.0004180748,0.00023090986,0.0009925908,0.006247823,0.00072518503,0.000040913554,0.0006254327,0.00052806345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034724773,0.0005116413,0.02226015,0.000012671181,0.00005142216,0.00045688957,0.0011469373,0.0024829523,0.000013251518,0.9660558,0.002768393,0.0042051394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010350839,0.000076729164,0.092646144,0.0006373881,0.00008708326,0.0008358476,0.00062300486,0.00021033651,0.0000092871005,0.46589813,0.43733135,0.000609614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12979563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.415454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9021197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005295714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006500386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W968103359","doi":"","title":"Trends in Applications for Leave to Intervene in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.024246183324486775,"score_gpt":0.28773757305374237,"score_spread":0.26349138972925557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W968103359","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037616797,0.0034484095,0.018656157,0.855216,0.0005775796,0.0019083184,0.0051550805,0.000011277228,0.077410355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854588,0.000048868595,0.00035022525,0.0041027344,0.000311225,0.00014155726,0.000029383038,0.0000027031258,0.009554527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989536,0.00006348138,0.000319299,0.00016493294,0.00021700303,0.000281714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992291,0.00031408516,0.00010905747,0.00012556862,0.00013390317,0.000088314766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006592725,0.00007584385,0.00014595207,0.00017718959,0.00014434056,0.00001650229,0.0002901012,0.00008270207,0.00006242892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044439023,0.00009327503,0.00006729134,0.0011067182,0.00019661034,0.000103031176,0.000006148654,0.00011557057,0.0000026529053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007612105,0.00008049856,0.00037067544,0.000021456997,0.000004665834,0.000003379545,0.0019706155,0.0032414517,0.0000081289345,0.9528974,0.03051304,0.010881024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051423896,0.000037086007,0.06328408,0.00022741883,0.000014886798,0.000016809487,0.0007058328,0.0012300853,0.000025967958,0.06699353,0.8667755,0.00017456063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6258057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.947842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017680747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021981855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4623454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98050972","doi":"","title":"\"Bruker v. Marcovitz\": (Get)ting Over Freedoms (Like Contract and Religion) in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.008248387706292095,"score_gpt":0.24244917824185155,"score_spread":0.23420079053555945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98050972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48151755,0.0017196957,0.0041366387,0.012939404,0.0007743022,0.00060009013,0.00019795026,0.000093215625,0.49802116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943896,0.00018934166,0.0006676361,0.0035240427,0.00032400133,0.000010132333,0.000026425889,0.0000041144863,0.0008647322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985984,0.00008906216,0.0003041689,0.00023929426,0.00037896738,0.00039011898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893624,0.0004634442,0.00011386463,0.00010327135,0.00018156161,0.0002016207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004629596,0.00011635692,0.00018647026,0.00010935843,0.00047827966,0.000052594267,0.00014138728,0.000091895214,0.000119631935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000786387,0.00014697958,0.00004291595,0.00028548998,0.00062881823,0.00026416554,0.00001489266,0.00020673918,0.000008276332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007956893,0.000023848263,0.03722524,0.0000056433996,0.0000075909234,0.000046661884,0.00017880101,0.00044514242,0.000020259395,0.96028405,0.0007964114,0.00095839816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001838163,0.000034556622,0.3084912,0.00029150187,0.000051631614,0.00019951134,0.0011593982,0.0025949914,0.00001371129,0.07744089,0.60705125,0.000833195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7370432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8058044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88284314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001981904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011649986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99395305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W999539695","doi":"","title":"Does Canada Need a Permanent Military Court","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.007870559035556541,"score_gpt":0.22333350763623977,"score_spread":0.21546294860068324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W999539695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45714137,0.0041063586,0.0014853314,0.02959207,0.0020749194,0.0006374984,0.00043958312,0.00019346243,0.5043294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98960453,0.00015275039,0.00031492545,0.00043795575,0.00075807195,0.000029895291,0.000063134634,0.0000038020582,0.008634917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988769,0.00007274135,0.0002128606,0.00019403186,0.00037689842,0.0002665427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992985,0.00021842455,0.00003835838,0.00010321724,0.00025902988,0.00008244745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003647829,0.00008937284,0.00012890866,0.000060363654,0.00097479916,0.000012689792,0.00012862094,0.00006193674,0.00021574262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035738634,0.0000817961,0.000060504677,0.00019635959,0.00042051953,0.00013954191,0.000018914938,0.00009580779,0.000020808238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008381178,0.000048849146,0.016420735,0.000022679184,0.000023203791,0.000038877493,0.0009805688,0.0014328829,0.000024310479,0.94573617,0.035149306,0.000114047274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061074184,0.000011435644,0.07472504,0.00008113437,0.000052326584,0.000030010027,0.005953107,0.00077374605,0.000027560722,0.117005095,0.8002798,0.000450009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7535683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82873106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008402591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018594547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74974656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}