{"meta":{"query_hash":"fe5d5281f20a","filters":{"venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly"},"cohort_total":13,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"exported":13,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/fe5d5281f20a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Rhetoric+Society+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1506842823","doi":"10.1080/02773941003800063","title":"A Review of:The Rhetorical Power of Popular Culture: Considering Mediated Texts, by Deanna D. Sellnow","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Power (physics); Criticism; Literature; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Physics","score_opus":0.045910111602933665,"score_gpt":0.2972692920697946,"score_spread":0.2513591804668609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506842823","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000037638605,0.99712473,0.000040058938,0.0011390665,0.0005015045,0.0000023133282,0.000010081218,0.000002000328,0.0011426585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00075246353,0.99645555,0.000116869436,0.000945031,0.00055268087,0.0000075440203,0.000023587401,0.0000027824085,0.0011434379],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929476,0.00017934972,0.00007880081,0.00008155771,0.00032289076,0.000042681517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974216,0.0013108857,0.0002592642,0.000035457953,0.00084120245,0.00013161117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014016024,0.00076546695,0.0014557476,0.00426602,0.00070104474,0.00255494,0.0007666404,0.0014704297,0.006084967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004734515,0.000421591,0.00042916593,0.009106152,0.0010824049,0.0033882293,0.0010258299,0.0021119437,0.0034301402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029587329,0.00004400581,0.00024407348,0.028763477,0.00008219932,0.00010899077,0.00058078865,0.00010952226,0.0004831929,0.0066767614,0.34114185,0.6217355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059180343,0.000031790976,0.0010938346,0.011271568,0.000056806708,0.00029277653,0.0003485587,0.0000220259,0.00010897755,0.0013643099,0.98539066,0.000012771817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005002852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013378649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006084967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013886271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00412101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020356297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039256858","doi":"10.1080/02773940601173071","title":"Foreword to “Rudiments of Cognitive Rhetoric”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Cognition; Simple (philosophy); Philosophy; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Linguistics; Psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.01926521752181014,"score_gpt":0.31484580815904784,"score_spread":0.2955805906372377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039256858","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028779425,0.0363778,0.002009578,0.33788687,0.54795104,0.000034241984,0.0003461951,0.00017890909,0.07492751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015122099,0.029441103,0.0014221588,0.1869671,0.5271195,0.00011108681,0.0005768351,0.00049316906,0.23874696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992975,0.00019313279,0.00005521971,0.00010197183,0.0002923762,0.00005979096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946577,0.0025004756,0.00028147703,0.00019793108,0.0019297181,0.00043257838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009867474,0.0011372772,0.00079815736,0.001304568,0.0022082133,0.0036817344,0.0013217113,0.0031697978,0.06959089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076670866,0.00028011372,0.00046669925,0.0010163931,0.002179629,0.004068617,0.0012982375,0.008461774,0.043125298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009328675,0.0000049025007,0.000011954258,0.000056845085,0.0000012921709,0.000012901791,0.000042778785,0.00000874307,0.00004570193,0.0069359923,0.9887627,0.004106908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004994784,0.00000786448,0.00014766512,0.00014894111,0.0000022346878,0.00004576066,0.00010430659,0.00003415321,0.00008343629,0.0056859977,0.99373007,0.000004543086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003343808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004251021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06959089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001631016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001168684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23280472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063171179","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2013.768352","title":"Sick Stuff: A Case Study of Controversy in a Constitutive Attitude","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Public discourse; Phenomenon; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.036225289704673175,"score_gpt":0.2649978063844592,"score_spread":0.22877251667978601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063171179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8425878,0.0033069546,0.0044611483,0.043459423,0.0006733303,0.00014643716,0.00005004966,0.000068423804,0.10524641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98102784,0.0013135622,0.0016307076,0.003483474,0.00039116907,0.00007913653,0.000020934107,0.000061603976,0.0119915735],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879615,0.009138168,0.00026739496,0.00066435384,0.0010039846,0.0009645815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97755563,0.018148344,0.0013312459,0.0006728637,0.0007577947,0.0015340829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008439751,0.0006337729,0.00077578676,0.0028767884,0.051512882,0.009776806,0.0022223378,0.011543428,0.0032423462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026099814,0.0006366264,0.0005912021,0.003221959,0.027000071,0.006129996,0.007384396,0.008730598,0.00045687502],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036078833,0.000082811544,0.0018095156,0.00009012456,0.000006620707,0.020263804,0.9196981,0.000051370578,0.00042268902,0.050112817,0.0029127335,0.004513228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021866445,0.00009507467,0.0021317094,0.0002934637,0.000022620881,0.015072043,0.8481187,0.00034415003,0.0006906189,0.009936877,0.12323693,0.000035970417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012964856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028089395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051512882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007203207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040241117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05226314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072091286","doi":"10.1080/02773940701658104","title":"Rudiments of Cognitive Rhetoric∗","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Presupposition; Utterance; Reading (process); Sociology; Grice; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Linguistics; Philosophy; Pragmatics; Law","score_opus":0.01842934317265458,"score_gpt":0.3074355206646182,"score_spread":0.2890061774919636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072091286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018915713,0.06596691,0.116483994,0.14988528,0.0039612036,0.000060163045,0.00013106837,0.00060001377,0.6439957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84278077,0.020092497,0.033592697,0.008813124,0.006129179,0.00020737195,0.00010011789,0.00041704735,0.087867215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640167,0.0023484584,0.00012700963,0.0003734886,0.000603386,0.00014596358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902112,0.0077911573,0.00037821752,0.000934445,0.00048681383,0.00019812088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037870565,0.00058981,0.00037099054,0.0014182215,0.003089451,0.0063567962,0.0007984511,0.001904895,0.0042000357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010063749,0.00046631813,0.00035422674,0.0009450327,0.024592713,0.011615218,0.002731385,0.006037364,0.0014245285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010820934,0.0000062005192,0.000070378286,0.000052646894,0.000003669502,0.000044424123,0.0029462301,0.00012714097,0.000118408076,0.97751415,0.008768247,0.010337699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063434613,0.000009412143,0.00013088102,0.00007906904,0.0000022454708,0.00013146698,0.0006368414,0.00039400393,0.00020078501,0.83135474,0.16704607,0.000008101288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00104701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009876479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063567962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003048955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001298086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022121847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079137350","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2012.724514","title":"Stanley Fish is not a Sophist: The Difference between Skeptical and Prudential Versions of Rhetorical Pragmatism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sophist; Skepticism; Rhetorical question; Pragmatism; Philosophy; Fish ; Epistemology; Linguistics; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.03503770894047068,"score_gpt":0.2803586722369094,"score_spread":0.24532096329643874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079137350","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05341911,0.00944115,0.029248083,0.46448693,0.0016421169,0.000027955122,0.00005076459,0.00016883046,0.441515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951093,0.0024253605,0.0045307707,0.022992717,0.0009871563,0.000070963695,0.000019120906,0.00014070135,0.017740168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98809475,0.007511173,0.00025690792,0.0008247234,0.0028136827,0.000498853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96724755,0.026579216,0.001414033,0.001381024,0.002523235,0.0008550051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012702186,0.00027028995,0.0005666026,0.0018295593,0.0071136854,0.010360199,0.0010692843,0.0043853666,0.0024519758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031657204,0.00033191658,0.00029063178,0.0014227187,0.04396753,0.012632345,0.0038955903,0.00841999,0.00069553364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010843695,0.000007270399,0.000186409,0.00003222602,0.0000026852804,0.000034817833,0.01654598,0.00003940241,0.000060532057,0.9701488,0.008068029,0.0048629344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017133329,0.000019795936,0.000528932,0.00022258582,0.000008258166,0.00009785435,0.010573134,0.00032379158,0.00026101485,0.8748217,0.11310678,0.000018991454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044138622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049786777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012702186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006311104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00620412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06717634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612437179","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2017.1309904","title":"A Rhetorical Bestiary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Metis; Bestiary; Literature; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07141585429859594,"score_gpt":0.2915769428938861,"score_spread":0.22016108859529016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612437179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005521197,0.02126073,0.014136764,0.15820342,0.0057262005,0.000031481653,0.00008519232,0.00019359426,0.79484135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6557811,0.011286155,0.010530323,0.055851147,0.009689805,0.00014357272,0.00012775126,0.0006816527,0.25590846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904022,0.005369137,0.00023101707,0.00090639055,0.002536948,0.0005541299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898808,0.005856627,0.0005878554,0.0013692393,0.0016764962,0.0006290231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076820627,0.0005910238,0.0005988996,0.0024484885,0.011746848,0.015220971,0.0011073775,0.004676908,0.014142517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016876152,0.00039149632,0.00045082736,0.001637861,0.030455556,0.016346497,0.005778019,0.008440389,0.004847698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009251097,0.0000066823677,0.000051388877,0.000041316587,0.000002457293,0.000037135153,0.004000898,0.000018424234,0.00009014326,0.9589472,0.029351832,0.0074433577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010173802,0.000018666855,0.00015716797,0.00031483202,0.000005905026,0.00016373835,0.0036341324,0.00013404895,0.00026455344,0.3057962,0.68948895,0.000011639719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014601948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024772203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015220971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058273696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046540713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047311425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206809120","doi":"10.1080/02773940409391297","title":"Reviews","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Logos Bible Software; Power (physics); State (computer science); Rhetoric; Identity (music); Theology; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.05384353033119784,"score_gpt":0.26296279256102106,"score_spread":0.20911926222982322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206809120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006617567,0.3607403,0.002541766,0.040828295,0.06332547,0.00030866556,0.006255592,0.0011737455,0.5241644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005760571,0.27055833,0.003023732,0.026438875,0.026242038,0.00034581192,0.0076544797,0.00073157996,0.65924454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979354,0.00030495954,0.00017782282,0.00037628095,0.0010328856,0.00017268282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967373,0.00065724266,0.0002086858,0.00035865788,0.0016027138,0.00043541376],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012021988,0.001087877,0.0013548783,0.0035606613,0.0011965225,0.005842464,0.0026631749,0.003203686,0.36980358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067099053,0.00042654562,0.0008324403,0.003427429,0.0010512938,0.0041507,0.0026275883,0.0023257989,0.28652787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027329845,0.00002136192,0.000079588295,0.001279897,0.0000103343145,0.000089936184,0.00009551159,0.000045777084,0.00017051012,0.0058459225,0.8494023,0.14293155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024202302,0.0000042056918,0.000072544964,0.0003599553,0.000002744199,0.00006704426,0.000029789806,0.0000045151087,0.000021483307,0.0007278512,0.99870527,0.0000022619756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028941678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004437505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63019645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023416914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047864504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240880042","doi":"10.1080/02773940409391291","title":"Reviews","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Rhetoric; Classics; Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy; Art; History; Theology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.051382484805217156,"score_gpt":0.24469147641036346,"score_spread":0.1933089916051463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240880042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037049406,0.3767035,0.0019871888,0.055841632,0.14985198,0.00028067248,0.005580375,0.001155267,0.40822893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040049027,0.32939374,0.0018463982,0.04121601,0.063824974,0.00031535278,0.006727863,0.00066300726,0.5520077],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972759,0.00035271185,0.00022051421,0.00046722987,0.0014642063,0.00021943758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942135,0.0010479226,0.00035746017,0.0006145187,0.0029617895,0.000804729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018112392,0.001150682,0.0013577583,0.003982395,0.0011435722,0.0055803303,0.002744826,0.0036657702,0.34308916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010110158,0.00047434127,0.0008555406,0.0033687556,0.0010906403,0.0039576357,0.0026272247,0.0029928687,0.324952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016309672,0.000011682394,0.00003605387,0.00079214043,0.000007714319,0.00003417446,0.000033876546,0.000025527524,0.00012904259,0.0024470696,0.9187068,0.077759616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022749634,0.0000036383155,0.00004462362,0.0003286484,0.0000026438154,0.000035406934,0.000013467091,0.00000306478,0.000022763386,0.0004614492,0.9990802,0.0000019047627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002325957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003491785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34308916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026450155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005632797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302007442","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2022.2061582","title":"Chronotopic Expertise: Enacting Water Ontologies in a Wind Energy Debate in Ontario, Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Sociology; Technoscience; Appropriation; Ontology; Foregrounding; Resource (disambiguation); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025284406809527496,"score_gpt":0.20433786784472754,"score_spread":0.17905346103520003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302007442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51283246,0.0033142366,0.0041678087,0.10080098,0.00062682683,0.00014399675,0.00019014034,0.000062541614,0.37786108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755972,0.00075187936,0.0007661738,0.0026650403,0.000035015175,0.000020207428,0.000031840354,0.000031142015,0.02010148],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949157,0.0014542389,0.00017251595,0.00054599677,0.0017104313,0.0012010538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898234,0.0052878545,0.0004956135,0.0002514986,0.0030248896,0.0011167575],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006241522,0.00033924633,0.00045755986,0.002293698,0.051097754,0.009085222,0.0015082324,0.0034573607,0.0038693375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112069715,0.00040758456,0.0002411162,0.003794526,0.02834067,0.0047530723,0.006046416,0.0045235935,0.00020091009],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005858482,0.000022501343,0.0046321386,0.00011626829,0.000012463558,0.0017321721,0.73509175,0.00043328034,0.0010748318,0.22405638,0.018379267,0.014390419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024540615,0.000017241699,0.007294165,0.00025640358,0.000023945287,0.0001408864,0.54875493,0.0008423152,0.00070929516,0.016661087,0.4252025,0.00007260973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98523915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94890225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20500024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16163667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9220871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377100510","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2023.2185019","title":"Vaccine Rhetorics Vaccine Rhetorics , by Heidi Yoston Lawrence, The Ohio State UP, 2020, 176 pp., $29.95 (paper), ISBN: 9780814255704","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Image (mathematics); Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm","score_opus":0.014532962227833256,"score_gpt":0.2701678609121427,"score_spread":0.25563489868430944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377100510","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00069559086,0.5306481,0.00039236774,0.20288767,0.03338596,0.000029119346,0.0009632916,0.00030131225,0.2306967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009996614,0.23768215,0.0007257328,0.03939098,0.009385242,0.00007510904,0.00082586077,0.00027153044,0.70164675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994791,0.00013182445,0.000028311733,0.000057496705,0.00024799674,0.000055324213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921525,0.00034838732,0.00007335814,0.00001968881,0.00018803823,0.00015521374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012110705,0.00094630494,0.00036444445,0.0012084743,0.0018559067,0.0053495825,0.00049964146,0.0023407056,0.09118674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031135133,0.0006202807,0.00029389607,0.0018229914,0.0010438215,0.0071718483,0.0014677542,0.002929593,0.051650207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040441655,0.0000032202765,0.00003095048,0.000060227812,7.997659e-7,0.000004804526,0.00009498671,0.0000052509563,0.000025939604,0.0009929078,0.9814465,0.017330324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016325899,0.0000030026838,0.00023787642,0.0001906628,0.0000012704224,0.000014702759,0.00024558944,0.000010291417,0.000022876056,0.00081774005,0.9984518,0.0000023953803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01165641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03012558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09118674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025933809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032600793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30505002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399614158","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2024.2343266","title":"Sex after Technology: The Rhetoric of Health Monitoring Apps and the Reversal of Roe v. Wade","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.012019727073897465,"score_gpt":0.2716246617896202,"score_spread":0.2596049347157227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399614158","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022675429,0.005088151,0.024827244,0.4891805,0.0064727683,0.00011781262,0.0000698684,0.0001831152,0.45138508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7604695,0.0022231443,0.008915602,0.13511801,0.0027194563,0.00039164445,0.000053559455,0.00033184368,0.08977729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815917,0.013322078,0.0005237245,0.0015865366,0.0021558602,0.0008200726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626902,0.032406785,0.0010726987,0.0014672236,0.0018063259,0.00055677176],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02276729,0.0007104218,0.00046139403,0.0020663126,0.013120129,0.014612807,0.0017573092,0.012771909,0.004165429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03215756,0.0005952933,0.00066736125,0.000914449,0.056754686,0.014479957,0.007129066,0.017995968,0.0011379746],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001014837,0.0000070187125,0.000106816355,0.000035866047,0.0000026541534,0.000080274745,0.02627395,0.00003406176,0.00013029655,0.9595096,0.009672374,0.0041369433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026147987,0.00006935439,0.0003132698,0.00071191334,0.000025158868,0.00027218196,0.025630385,0.0005036671,0.0012307283,0.23817016,0.7329988,0.000048238846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007278403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005744276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006386992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004821398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12040639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402216286","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2024.2387507","title":"Nestwork: New Material Rhetorics for Precarious Species","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Sociology; Rhetoric; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03331352049615477,"score_gpt":0.3212884107069616,"score_spread":0.28797489021080686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402216286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026057055,0.0124258865,0.017534833,0.17289749,0.004527767,0.00006638493,0.00028147173,0.00034820853,0.765861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.788093,0.008973305,0.013715083,0.018070932,0.0029182972,0.00013960469,0.00033974432,0.00089516334,0.16685496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981824,0.00095927075,0.000044101605,0.00012093219,0.0005031567,0.00019010542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935428,0.0043231547,0.00028961632,0.00036234115,0.00092209096,0.0005600306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00340411,0.00062305265,0.00030712844,0.0021470934,0.013328239,0.007795965,0.0011887024,0.003031156,0.012389769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073501877,0.0003295848,0.00030218877,0.0013857966,0.019945797,0.010894828,0.004795172,0.0050256923,0.0013905115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027164226,0.000018149198,0.0005012715,0.00015879553,0.000005387667,0.00029593467,0.18151389,0.00012511534,0.0005113113,0.6212051,0.16522673,0.0304112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008588332,0.000007278681,0.0004488788,0.00023119217,0.0000056528033,0.00011865656,0.03509009,0.00022169063,0.00021794061,0.041707832,0.9219286,0.000013642999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10438995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28991735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10438995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015863553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008702894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20756471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412708738","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2025.2533751","title":"Empathy as Bug: The Rhetoric of MAGA’s “Battle”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Battle; Empathy; Literature; Psychology; Philosophy; History; Art; Social psychology; Linguistics; Ancient history","score_opus":0.011940734110853796,"score_gpt":0.3019329431486792,"score_spread":0.2899922090378254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412708738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060012426,0.019938085,0.0328679,0.32030696,0.009223921,0.00005262969,0.000034272147,0.0003129585,0.5572509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95286995,0.0016562911,0.0022638708,0.017358817,0.0016669709,0.000037871938,0.000011087251,0.00011598099,0.024019184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901956,0.007592801,0.00013272562,0.00042876485,0.0010235468,0.0006267025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99256176,0.005831633,0.00042726423,0.00027890273,0.00051108404,0.00038937107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00691458,0.00053848943,0.00044510912,0.0022812441,0.012583183,0.008054579,0.0010205247,0.0049629794,0.0046992796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021396497,0.00025954423,0.00036735518,0.0008490583,0.028187966,0.012188493,0.007165037,0.007140122,0.00094642444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030514228,0.000010523534,0.00016722675,0.00006202343,0.000005561126,0.00018429746,0.06110813,0.0000738511,0.00021218881,0.9171464,0.012497859,0.0085014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022346549,0.00007137732,0.00046095456,0.0004977704,0.000023390014,0.0005613844,0.042451885,0.00096639805,0.00081969285,0.32812852,0.62596244,0.000033841377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001542725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017550013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012583183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045935367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021857542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036568284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}