{"meta":{"query_hash":"fe5d5281f20a","filters":{"venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly"},"cohort_total":13,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"exported":13,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/fe5d5281f20a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Rhetoric+Society+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1506842823","doi":"10.1080/02773941003800063","title":"A Review of:<i>The Rhetorical Power of Popular Culture: Considering Mediated Texts</i>, by Deanna D. Sellnow","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Power (physics); Criticism; Literature; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Physics","score_opus":0.045910111602933665,"score_gpt":0.2972692920697946,"score_spread":0.2513591804668609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506842823","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000025890704,0.9929355,0.000014797522,0.00022795978,0.0018402855,0.0008763157,0.00026428234,0.00008071548,0.0037575606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00005029521,0.9943626,0.000091731425,0.00038897153,0.0003445045,0.00016305913,0.00011720281,0.000076813216,0.004404806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962919,0.0003746215,0.0017819381,0.0004689439,0.00066732644,0.00041526632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995797,0.00030641898,0.0018315255,0.0014438155,0.00050545315,0.0001158105],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005992502,0.000681008,0.00268885,0.00003851497,0.00046880805,0.000056467314,0.0012075981,0.00044598643,0.00033129627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013467393,0.00043347303,0.0023913735,0.0003795889,0.00065677025,0.0001318156,0.00015785889,0.0011615475,0.00006302979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016594881,0.00022050372,0.0000029385176,0.043346405,0.00083623885,5.1450854e-7,0.037610315,4.2529287e-9,0.0000030156461,0.008902228,0.78848207,0.1205941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014820193,0.00011679731,1.9330903e-7,0.023596963,0.0008386134,0.000008990994,0.0019498697,4.8245806e-7,6.412319e-7,0.000107869135,0.972795,0.0004363708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046861373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000127045405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18431292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014436748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002671591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039256858","doi":"10.1080/02773940601173071","title":"Foreword to “Rudiments of Cognitive Rhetoric”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Cognition; Simple (philosophy); Philosophy; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Linguistics; Psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.01926521752181014,"score_gpt":0.31484580815904784,"score_spread":0.2955805906372377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039256858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9216076,0.00056784,0.04945077,0.00007725514,0.0029509591,0.000605796,0.00008460629,0.00014164163,0.024513543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99304664,0.0000062965414,0.00089551497,0.0006853928,0.00059974665,0.0000650251,0.00004395644,0.000040288825,0.0046171094],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979376,0.00007420835,0.0005015532,0.0004588457,0.00042259783,0.00060516084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986354,0.0003663035,0.00020447138,0.00032235755,0.0002536601,0.00021777576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066320406,0.0002463982,0.00034604862,0.00008905473,0.00011166633,0.0000145705,0.00020351916,0.00023969045,0.00076540734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003689523,0.0002378221,0.00037523985,0.0006900719,0.00006551229,0.00011053885,0.000018022534,0.00021344287,0.00077006745],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008181378,0.0019971218,0.007970977,0.00010609701,0.0017542937,0.0000735811,0.41226736,3.4526605e-7,0.004716177,0.017076889,0.08304141,0.47017762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01610692,0.013803775,0.41738993,0.0006524118,0.0014341233,0.00013627888,0.4911042,0.000045778568,0.0125982575,0.011855967,0.031511966,0.0033604146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017630952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024691135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4668172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120478806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000312122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98979163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063171179","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2013.768352","title":"Sick Stuff: A Case Study of Controversy in a Constitutive Attitude","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Public discourse; Phenomenon; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.036225289704673175,"score_gpt":0.2649978063844592,"score_spread":0.22877251667978601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063171179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98400724,0.0005614611,0.000042907566,0.0001599876,0.0004184448,0.0007956983,0.000008242538,0.00005904725,0.013946963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795157,0.00003669234,0.00006257618,0.00007888965,0.0001368231,0.00023869312,0.0000016266183,0.000010870332,0.0014822581],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987767,0.00010283242,0.00044982048,0.00021585045,0.00022315278,0.00023167375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988337,0.0002753257,0.0001847008,0.0003847457,0.00027169246,0.000049839746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017144514,0.00017778201,0.00038850887,0.00004149948,0.0003065151,0.00008098976,0.0001981222,0.00004312345,0.0003146802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011672411,0.00015250179,0.00014481298,0.00010526792,0.00030618356,0.0002922703,0.000040338276,0.00017909144,0.00008546917],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000087666085,0.001515058,0.0046632946,0.000024572648,0.00033086573,0.00003742231,0.9511987,0.0000024060078,0.00000913382,0.02734417,0.012169342,0.002696251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024043515,0.0009111797,0.0013283797,0.000021381979,0.00004781599,0.000021372949,0.9838824,0.0001233421,8.227728e-7,0.00041924385,0.010632139,0.00020755533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014153021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025573683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032683697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101747995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046713187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072091286","doi":"10.1080/02773940701658104","title":"Rudiments of Cognitive Rhetoric∗","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Presupposition; Utterance; Reading (process); Sociology; Grice; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Linguistics; Philosophy; Pragmatics; Law","score_opus":0.01842934317265458,"score_gpt":0.3074355206646182,"score_spread":0.2890061774919636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072091286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9103244,0.0014437039,0.0199693,0.000040545576,0.0034583025,0.00042228523,0.000047508584,0.00016524312,0.064128704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949576,0.000016849493,0.00037874948,0.00028486043,0.000574314,0.00003333613,0.00005413499,0.000034582245,0.0036655637],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981143,0.000086645014,0.00047976623,0.00039827495,0.000397913,0.0005231412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987077,0.00038696907,0.000258123,0.0002882946,0.00022157028,0.00013730761],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066578813,0.00022604344,0.00031843517,0.000064553155,0.0001113652,0.000016081382,0.00017311655,0.00025152764,0.0010695053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025153418,0.00021634532,0.000390639,0.0004977257,0.000104026,0.00012063183,0.000012273756,0.00023117897,0.0005687188],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069427287,0.0032542062,0.013703763,0.00015657445,0.0028768408,0.00012454335,0.45235655,1.7284141e-7,0.007425834,0.026268307,0.058843534,0.4342954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019735452,0.008681312,0.37067634,0.00050780363,0.001709055,0.00019449677,0.54571164,0.000039451388,0.01260531,0.014932871,0.022196697,0.003009544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016360218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000100891975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43128586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095675394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003191252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079137350","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2012.724514","title":"Stanley Fish is not a Sophist: The Difference between Skeptical and Prudential Versions of Rhetorical Pragmatism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sophist; Skepticism; Rhetorical question; Pragmatism; Philosophy; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Epistemology; Linguistics; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.03503770894047068,"score_gpt":0.2803586722369094,"score_spread":0.24532096329643874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079137350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97721845,0.001736014,0.0008811599,0.0051575713,0.0014897444,0.0003760489,0.00032726044,0.000106394764,0.012707382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943221,0.00008289364,0.00014158622,0.00030834906,0.0017862936,0.000021789287,0.000010552142,0.000017413713,0.0033090087],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984145,0.00007980709,0.00035323898,0.00022335142,0.0005309006,0.00039816825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988962,0.0003938765,0.00016276643,0.00031796235,0.00011354652,0.000115669485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029221651,0.00020756216,0.000379319,0.000028834165,0.0005758931,0.00011639493,0.00025109347,0.000078646,0.00068075076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028485134,0.0001390037,0.00031243154,0.00008536647,0.0007232224,0.0002572875,0.0000765617,0.00023262225,0.000034334345],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012436123,0.00029665956,0.0059991847,0.00009877177,0.0011784717,0.0000013035368,0.7639332,6.226413e-8,0.00010844596,0.12408474,0.08893433,0.01535238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032117516,0.0020137047,0.20356715,0.00032196703,0.005356278,0.000015563777,0.5013774,0.00031989595,0.0004502612,0.009092661,0.27196562,0.0023077177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017142484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061633764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26255578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060571943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025373427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7453743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612437179","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2017.1309904","title":"A Rhetorical Bestiary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Metis; Bestiary; Literature; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07141585429859594,"score_gpt":0.2915769428938861,"score_spread":0.22016108859529016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612437179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102911666,0.004267996,0.0015750065,0.014111245,0.011573249,0.0006402049,0.00005431131,0.0010458443,0.8638205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673612,0.00020392788,0.00037437349,0.00030328633,0.0020593137,0.00006898002,0.0000067490637,0.000026838832,0.029595338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873424,0.00003818827,0.0002901307,0.00028482176,0.00031191876,0.00034068094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811494,0.00010904032,0.000246166,0.0012449747,0.000179217,0.00010564459],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021762957,0.00021404642,0.00028156932,0.00001836063,0.0035891891,0.0006402913,0.00085328287,0.000076090284,0.000517286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030151272,0.00018510896,0.00034061007,0.000022787612,0.0005190423,0.0005051405,0.00009953588,0.0002421144,0.0006146029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011980449,0.00021420758,0.0012956896,0.000027499076,0.0002678106,0.000004188687,0.19920118,2.078941e-7,0.000022733188,0.4406673,0.31464636,0.043640845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047167184,0.00020602111,0.0030894799,0.000020886524,0.000046894114,0.0000035419314,0.020244608,0.0001292028,0.000004057171,0.005682897,0.96975136,0.00034936398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003454385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006305056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8644495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009594612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043317268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206809120","doi":"10.1080/02773940409391297","title":"Reviews","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Logos Bible Software; Power (physics); State (computer science); Rhetoric; Identity (music); Theology; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.05384353033119784,"score_gpt":0.26296279256102106,"score_spread":0.20911926222982322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206809120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052110504,0.06697282,0.007694447,0.016324166,0.009188592,0.0016881372,0.000035368463,0.0016489748,0.844337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9594729,0.0038108139,0.0017893459,0.0019071123,0.0022222188,0.00019526924,0.000015941547,0.000036383128,0.030550031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999145,0.000029815666,0.00028637785,0.00016971157,0.00015763943,0.00021146794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993245,0.000034558398,0.00010815812,0.000397154,0.00008326613,0.00005234242],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018910193,0.00014581822,0.0002301998,0.000013799091,0.00057529897,0.00010001289,0.00024170059,0.000036220925,0.00040961456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000068186514,0.000117402036,0.00028926067,0.000063187435,0.00015481353,0.00019424343,0.000019018442,0.00013346263,0.0012131371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021430922,0.00010190569,0.000022441805,0.000024901456,0.00006701753,4.6432183e-7,0.35990041,7.4713273e-7,0.000016562555,0.48863876,0.12890926,0.022315394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029928805,0.000118111406,0.00005853762,0.000022593225,0.000018374707,0.0000012802193,0.022379398,0.000002625153,0.000003202224,0.007914935,0.96901983,0.0001618444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012912591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000510216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9073624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108756474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028137909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240880042","doi":"10.1080/02773940409391291","title":"Reviews","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Rhetoric; Classics; Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy; Art; History; Theology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.051382484805217156,"score_gpt":0.24469147641036346,"score_spread":0.1933089916051463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240880042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16036308,0.005083256,0.00026455362,0.0012937705,0.0042363848,0.00064190006,0.000042586234,0.0005777382,0.8274967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482239,0.00014429209,0.0002764647,0.0017422567,0.0024051405,0.000054073447,0.000024240666,0.000035758403,0.047093906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990061,0.00001639916,0.0002801802,0.00020712952,0.00019195856,0.00029824994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995063,0.00002206134,0.000081345395,0.00024164132,0.000063094856,0.00008554763],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019869236,0.0001697863,0.00021610956,0.00001755577,0.00039802332,0.00056218926,0.00020428823,0.000044389355,0.0013534557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000068283243,0.00014140215,0.00037957018,0.00003895046,0.0001438498,0.0006717339,0.000010336689,0.00016713994,0.0013039983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000266221,0.00009128445,0.000009615515,0.00003974418,0.000029276158,0.0000028003549,0.15983053,4.992462e-7,0.000011156886,0.7716572,0.051993534,0.016331678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032274998,0.00026641876,0.00003211373,0.000039386417,0.000014297934,0.000002942453,0.012384764,0.000001256159,0.0000042093143,0.0294893,0.95722854,0.00021401838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008944053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001311564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.905235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110758905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003043446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302007442","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2022.2061582","title":"Chronotopic Expertise: Enacting Water Ontologies in a Wind Energy Debate in Ontario, Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Sociology; Technoscience; Appropriation; Ontology; Foregrounding; Resource (disambiguation); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025284406809527496,"score_gpt":0.20433786784472754,"score_spread":0.17905346103520003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302007442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98205626,0.0011135506,0.0000068091604,0.0010787738,0.0012244013,0.00011942728,0.0000058048317,0.000050507115,0.014344455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98720616,0.000033805598,0.000015064598,0.0005706055,0.00009343634,0.00020484408,0.000023189743,0.000013742248,0.011839152],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985871,0.00010698546,0.00037711457,0.00025043523,0.0002688517,0.00040956517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994713,0.00010089957,0.00007599439,0.00028624176,0.000033020104,0.000032546115],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016776256,0.00017186035,0.0002943224,0.000051428236,0.0006408528,0.00006122409,0.0003092373,0.00003143578,0.001714938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000033702725,0.00014748101,0.00009639744,0.000074927295,0.00006297664,0.00015718176,0.00010480518,0.00033744777,0.0000029832345],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017227521,0.00013477959,0.009523994,0.000009056955,0.00010145008,0.000021672642,0.9542663,0.000071983464,0.000036217476,0.008232366,0.020117538,0.0074673793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005560922,0.00012815231,0.008009591,0.000011117798,0.000009855844,0.0000028412417,0.24714072,0.00027673016,0.000011295085,0.0003206155,0.74324375,0.000289265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98527354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7231262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029345998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000325194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377100510","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2023.2185019","title":"Vaccine Rhetorics <b>Vaccine Rhetorics</b> , by Heidi Yoston Lawrence, The Ohio State UP, 2020, 176 pp., $29.95 (paper), ISBN: 9780814255704","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Image (mathematics); Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm","score_opus":0.014532962227833256,"score_gpt":0.2701678609121427,"score_spread":0.25563489868430944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377100510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71837527,0.07937551,0.0020248056,0.12837344,0.038877524,0.006132704,0.0008253533,0.0069371792,0.019078244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.736593,0.14943853,0.00035729687,0.005015219,0.010348777,0.0005548366,0.00044646938,0.00046353322,0.09678233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99255586,0.0005683992,0.0012866324,0.0013507974,0.0019871346,0.0022511939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566585,0.0010272426,0.0006409734,0.0013641277,0.0006287972,0.0006730383],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025837389,0.00088104507,0.0009996073,0.000057450095,0.0030902496,0.0006425017,0.0018043076,0.0006192005,0.00080611405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025118393,0.0007393645,0.00094868056,0.004921204,0.00007829805,0.0013516166,0.00017718757,0.0011870328,0.0017852037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005235998,0.00015872328,0.0031959168,0.00005735152,0.00019753134,0.000029920777,0.041451126,0.000014915893,0.00084829127,0.002734406,0.9413861,0.009873361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019342476,0.00066501816,0.0072735543,0.00007035284,0.00015843837,0.000011118891,0.01783349,0.0003308186,0.00008254046,0.0040474245,0.96645665,0.0011363538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019897793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012608096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12335822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009045701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006664222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399614158","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2024.2343266","title":"Sex after Technology: The Rhetoric of Health Monitoring Apps and the Reversal of <i>Roe v. Wade</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.012019727073897465,"score_gpt":0.2716246617896202,"score_spread":0.2596049347157227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399614158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5737851,0.25203773,0.03278545,0.104496606,0.021549016,0.004722051,0.00011624687,0.0014905806,0.009017195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99466395,0.0025856567,0.00022787385,0.00007056688,0.0007553707,0.00005250981,6.5935996e-7,0.000017307724,0.0016260884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810743,0.00026290058,0.00043400464,0.000283429,0.00051377155,0.00039844494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887115,0.00046315236,0.00017257434,0.0003456881,0.00008284755,0.000064567925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001812594,0.00015536945,0.00037257606,0.000038927887,0.0005512739,0.000073321426,0.0004056092,0.00019496483,0.000014634061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026145812,0.00008790417,0.00026728827,0.00089233776,0.007792423,0.00017381186,0.0000355864,0.00032366894,0.000006962177],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024874296,0.00006225627,0.0025306048,0.00024832026,0.0002627031,0.0000023326352,0.44957754,7.515691e-7,0.00011733322,0.48724848,0.00877197,0.051152833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003304331,0.001200197,0.0018219544,0.00091564,0.00042865938,0.000023033774,0.42375267,0.00049077335,0.00049445924,0.15410054,0.4124787,0.000989037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052310363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031459796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42087886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015253146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002588768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402216286","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2024.2387507","title":"Nestwork: New Material Rhetorics for Precarious Species","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Sociology; Rhetoric; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03331352049615477,"score_gpt":0.3212884107069616,"score_spread":0.28797489021080686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402216286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5657931,0.015813177,0.01624242,0.048544224,0.2108354,0.008046304,0.0007344452,0.010970791,0.12302016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9176175,0.0003132857,0.003938497,0.00016341674,0.011242928,0.00014098876,0.00004453107,0.00006971024,0.06646911],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793005,0.000064660344,0.00034881613,0.00047846785,0.00048073696,0.0006972416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883157,0.0004279438,0.00008164695,0.000257266,0.00015913183,0.00024241715],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000438319,0.00024216935,0.00025649273,0.00008763202,0.0009930849,0.0010616669,0.00041184286,0.00024770977,0.00096796977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052907933,0.00024938164,0.0006949294,0.00071171,0.00022297654,0.0006308527,0.000022211005,0.00023794957,0.00021700075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025168312,0.00006452706,0.000102818325,0.00006574092,0.00020847603,0.0000042230977,0.16101886,0.000005246819,0.0004493593,0.080345176,0.75027126,0.007439126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001866584,0.00036819288,0.0004654355,0.00005123772,0.00009951731,0.0000032044645,0.030934485,0.00014105557,0.000030757914,0.010428071,0.9569451,0.00034627732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021470003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029716892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35182443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036745437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036382888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412708738","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2025.2533751","title":"Empathy as Bug: The Rhetoric of MAGA’s “Battle”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Battle; Empathy; Literature; Psychology; Philosophy; History; Art; Social psychology; Linguistics; Ancient history","score_opus":0.011940734110853796,"score_gpt":0.3019329431486792,"score_spread":0.2899922090378254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412708738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9577471,0.0025698226,0.0008442823,0.01501865,0.00459493,0.0005812559,0.00000608064,0.00012712601,0.018510776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98531663,0.00020639923,0.00031316542,0.002388743,0.00055123,0.00005940982,0.000020535164,0.000016605974,0.011127285],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984859,0.00006225122,0.00042159765,0.00028131524,0.00044160767,0.00030732053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860483,0.00036695422,0.00013411054,0.0005434336,0.00020227273,0.00014838095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047203383,0.0001776507,0.0003486035,0.000047637037,0.00014586106,0.000015930174,0.00019998,0.00020307828,0.00022562627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022058851,0.0001221543,0.00039915935,0.000730823,0.0001810239,0.00007131594,0.000017176768,0.00038468037,0.00008085846],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001670503,0.0014615358,0.0023743715,0.0008834062,0.0006857311,0.000010408435,0.42738876,0.0000013427428,0.0029963232,0.014521603,0.43971437,0.1097951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007686369,0.004699688,0.1456859,0.0012518842,0.0017179991,0.00013435876,0.4895399,0.000636985,0.0060358285,0.012319619,0.32942504,0.0008664541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000089273715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026967803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14331152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018218263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064238487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4981308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}