{"meta":{"query_hash":"c17647b09f1a","filters":{"venue":"Rhetoric and Public Affairs"},"cohort_total":13,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"exported":13,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c17647b09f1a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Rhetoric+and+Public+Affairs"},"results":[{"id":"W1995207435","doi":"10.1353/rap.2013.0046","title":"Religious Conflict and Intellectual Agency: Robert Ingersoll's Contributions to American Thought and Culture","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric and Public Affairs","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Skepticism; Faith; Democracy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Political science; Law; Social science; History; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.011864552514871583,"score_gpt":0.28307671038380056,"score_spread":0.271212157868929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995207435","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066554636,0.09084508,0.0015242109,0.56538224,0.004318838,0.000015427322,0.000015245277,0.000058385132,0.27128595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93052465,0.018441366,0.0006931746,0.024210576,0.0026770877,0.000019698291,0.000006276193,0.000043820342,0.023383312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996563,0.002529214,0.00004045268,0.00014677696,0.0003649973,0.00035549115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961572,0.0028292697,0.00025634654,0.00011789124,0.00024052609,0.00039879335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003252408,0.00034627723,0.00022847357,0.0010459612,0.009429651,0.00805163,0.000769913,0.0023828424,0.0013818567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004769119,0.00017250954,0.00015542915,0.00088441756,0.024397574,0.004721949,0.0025954503,0.005955423,0.00025903573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021860096,0.00004061879,0.0003666791,0.00005603079,0.0000062569093,0.00023351172,0.11305538,0.00011715657,0.00017386828,0.797112,0.07276321,0.016053574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017275728,0.000020951931,0.00093662064,0.0003342563,0.000012425336,0.00023224067,0.06057962,0.00023418386,0.00031933276,0.2148009,0.7224755,0.000036609603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011619646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016414715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011619646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002996844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043675482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128275194","doi":"10.1353/rap.2010.0206","title":"Rhetoric and the Origins of the Canadian Medicare System","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric and Public Affairs","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Health care; Healthcare system; Political science; Key (lock); Sociology; Quality (philosophy); Public administration; Epistemology; Law; Art; Linguistics; Literature; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.007514705860659755,"score_gpt":0.17972090242647754,"score_spread":0.1722061965658178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128275194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095251076,0.013460462,0.0037109542,0.17602101,0.0010195455,0.000068174224,0.000233811,0.00008746333,0.7101476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691905,0.0034479871,0.0012530651,0.0054938514,0.00022756618,0.000023301152,0.000041852054,0.000036252626,0.020285724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922381,0.002305598,0.0001288906,0.00046662232,0.0033580072,0.0015027601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99110997,0.004403148,0.0005400823,0.00021613172,0.0030168076,0.00071384583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076076402,0.00048459496,0.0004017385,0.004921553,0.03901215,0.01875007,0.0015010765,0.0037672226,0.004357557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016376842,0.00039091063,0.0003077419,0.005443391,0.044412144,0.003952864,0.0037086073,0.0054062204,0.00033252532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016800652,0.000005102453,0.0007328309,0.00005358354,0.0000034187385,0.00014935121,0.051103346,0.00018973478,0.00017722504,0.92500585,0.013212863,0.009349994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023173869,0.000017054843,0.006022093,0.0005054383,0.000029447116,0.0001563803,0.07336957,0.0010601932,0.00058986526,0.11029604,0.8078347,0.00009606648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9518155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9501828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79417664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20582335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15005273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9211323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788766262","doi":"","title":"Book Review of The Rhetoric of Midwifery: Gender, Knowledge, and Power, M.M. Lay, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press: The Millenial Motherhood Dilemma","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric and Public Affairs","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Rhetoric; Power (physics); Sociology; Gender studies; Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.03242326068953962,"score_gpt":0.2655776404262634,"score_spread":0.2331543797367238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788766262","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024668092,0.9000075,0.0003596742,0.07190826,0.009930175,0.00001056741,0.000067246016,0.000019205272,0.017450742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008139742,0.89670694,0.00086716906,0.027489148,0.01841531,0.000056239245,0.00013629999,0.000073983,0.04811525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987072,0.0004118223,0.00007190221,0.00008769775,0.0006549596,0.000066465574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918384,0.00580789,0.00032810905,0.000089007146,0.0017525175,0.00018407039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025385926,0.00091231376,0.0012034556,0.0051276293,0.001964366,0.004353461,0.0016109247,0.0029119002,0.010430281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069033676,0.00058216986,0.00047862518,0.006038168,0.0047600972,0.0043962062,0.00100726,0.004687908,0.0045335074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019202364,0.000018860215,0.00008405473,0.0009855666,0.000012901721,0.00006818446,0.0005932554,0.00010891607,0.00011488185,0.024168277,0.89555717,0.07826873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006149177,0.000011515234,0.00034257033,0.001581203,0.000009109831,0.00012548981,0.00044875,0.000043693253,0.00007549288,0.0057944944,0.991552,0.000009570585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014665957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039346144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014665957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041184654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005211657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034892738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2870648053","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.21.2.0279","title":"The Mountaineering and Wilderness Rhetorics of Washington Woman Suffragists","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric and Public Affairs","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mountaineering; Wilderness; Frontier; Suffrage; Politics; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; History; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.006915207011453431,"score_gpt":0.19316281715542263,"score_spread":0.1862476101439692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2870648053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32683074,0.008124821,0.0023723254,0.05808732,0.0014324838,0.00003491435,0.000041235668,0.000060470815,0.6030158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97649664,0.0006977175,0.00022832594,0.0019669773,0.00017538559,0.00001932848,0.0000074471254,0.000022451772,0.020385696],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806255,0.0014130063,0.000030650313,0.00014308681,0.00014080305,0.00020993545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802125,0.0015527278,0.0001339694,0.000065756634,0.00011693915,0.00010940929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024009242,0.00050679146,0.00022037195,0.0015541872,0.015594587,0.0062470143,0.0004722499,0.00269159,0.0043300875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003007444,0.00024219311,0.00012487631,0.0007909155,0.016071703,0.0047721076,0.0032413353,0.0037197256,0.00038917104],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005608897,0.000030129822,0.0012026136,0.00008552,0.0000073575106,0.0007085697,0.49507323,0.000048057864,0.00068377843,0.47528997,0.016695682,0.010118926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024267252,0.00006917238,0.0019670664,0.00068736955,0.000020132942,0.00026035917,0.36439526,0.00030074033,0.0011254873,0.0299552,0.60116136,0.000033613625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011477552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023809839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015594587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006091615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012809791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044197917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210250299","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.3.0559","title":"Race, Nation, and Refuge: The Rhetoric of Race in Asian American Citizenship Cases","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric and Public Affairs","topic":"Asian American and Pacific Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Race (biology); Rhetoric; Gender studies; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02050879952940584,"score_gpt":0.27395087926058065,"score_spread":0.25344207973117483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210250299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1985832,0.0029287701,0.0023869958,0.21547882,0.0012225824,0.00004380504,0.000042902095,0.00003321882,0.5792798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859999,0.00037014767,0.0001950465,0.008019611,0.0003283943,0.00003198283,0.000008109788,0.000023278482,0.0050236084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836674,0.012150874,0.0003518704,0.0006496087,0.0009908684,0.0021893787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96303666,0.03237567,0.0014441401,0.00073167763,0.0010508952,0.0013609432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026636617,0.00050918874,0.0007582996,0.0032634824,0.036298897,0.018809557,0.0025716166,0.012183121,0.0072201816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031342406,0.0006563487,0.00049652724,0.0030007702,0.058963075,0.015291786,0.012347725,0.018488135,0.00034441162],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000278088,0.00003304349,0.0010500528,0.00005162691,0.000007850613,0.000494365,0.1714824,0.000047397025,0.00008360254,0.81677276,0.007037224,0.0029119675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059219168,0.000050507795,0.0024717343,0.00083001796,0.0000845756,0.00050520536,0.5305028,0.0006071594,0.0008399762,0.29459715,0.16937813,0.00007358828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022266677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030567406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036298897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010932635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00913565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14086956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231835419","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.19.1.0115","title":"The Rhetoric of Pregnancy. By Marika Seigel. Foreword by Jane Pincus","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric and Public Affairs","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Icon; Citation; State (computer science); Download; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; World Wide Web; Computer science; Philosophy; Algorithm; Theology","score_opus":0.021327573636317754,"score_gpt":0.21656238308580056,"score_spread":0.1952348094494828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231835419","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000071051465,0.87356573,0.00024256176,0.07161939,0.020419031,0.000011797083,0.00009176356,0.000051263356,0.03392749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040015383,0.7295274,0.00036340705,0.058635842,0.027647132,0.00006845651,0.00022186172,0.00015440927,0.17937994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989122,0.00031904635,0.00006443337,0.00014710653,0.00047097396,0.00008625938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979594,0.0011158544,0.0001826817,0.00005576506,0.00050863525,0.00017773858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00124546,0.0012614742,0.0008698352,0.0029253408,0.0013678812,0.0042592497,0.0012444385,0.0029635925,0.04146034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064896895,0.00064007234,0.00062916195,0.0028989273,0.002699702,0.005696077,0.0017822024,0.0069105695,0.038635764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005937093,0.000002571729,0.00001862178,0.0002296116,0.000002391368,0.000014478446,0.00013058793,0.00001087953,0.00002442207,0.0036633948,0.96986157,0.026035594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018170148,0.0000033024173,0.00008425884,0.00086428627,0.0000027461524,0.00008747632,0.00011946691,0.0000058598716,0.000019701713,0.0014246369,0.99738234,0.0000040358855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068862066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009755938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04146034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033378934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041506523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13869864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251440790","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.4.0719","title":"Religious Conflict and Intellectual Agency: Robert Ingersoll's Contributions to American Thought and Culture","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric and Public Affairs","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Skepticism; Faith; Democracy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Religious conflict; Sociology; Political science; Law; History; Social science; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011864552514871583,"score_gpt":0.28307671038380056,"score_spread":0.271212157868929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251440790","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07615243,0.06300291,0.0016224975,0.4922259,0.0044055516,0.000020923446,0.000021227175,0.00008107718,0.36246753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516888,0.008745858,0.0005741815,0.015862854,0.0021865563,0.000018328199,0.000005148839,0.000039830255,0.020878445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953166,0.0035544853,0.000056080225,0.00019392317,0.0004329603,0.00044587936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949327,0.0037117724,0.00034548691,0.00016551724,0.00032409356,0.0005203358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044302368,0.00038857345,0.00027799598,0.0013963996,0.010138266,0.009903167,0.0009111376,0.0029352433,0.002159324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005540262,0.00018292895,0.0001706157,0.00093493314,0.029189438,0.004915124,0.0034256314,0.005712106,0.00029511127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001888267,0.000037366728,0.00025898893,0.00004539889,0.0000049530618,0.0002476608,0.11696898,0.000097761025,0.00014489373,0.8271204,0.045450393,0.009604238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017534265,0.000023977014,0.00071131415,0.00036457053,0.000013214105,0.0002783111,0.07908523,0.00027810098,0.000363897,0.2214071,0.69741684,0.000039835573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011155075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015090357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011155075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007481154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003333979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054279864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312977299","doi":"10.2307/41940502","title":"Rhetoric and the Origins of the Canadian Medicare System","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric and Public Affairs","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Metis; Healthcare system; Health care; Key (lock); Sociology; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Public administration; Law; Epistemology; Linguistics; Literature; Art; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.007450658730877407,"score_gpt":0.20410739653036183,"score_spread":0.19665673779948442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312977299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110873036,0.01033325,0.003547982,0.20312129,0.0011047367,0.000065028005,0.00025021768,0.000081538354,0.67062294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784661,0.0017264263,0.0007344109,0.004489655,0.00015688731,0.000012761376,0.000027748485,0.000024208754,0.014361849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.991759,0.0025062202,0.00013470191,0.00052819296,0.003221302,0.0018505652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98984617,0.0047948747,0.00060316303,0.0002229759,0.0036242283,0.00090847624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008838716,0.00041023624,0.00039257173,0.0046003093,0.039716728,0.015627056,0.00152299,0.003693197,0.0046402775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016748715,0.0003240788,0.00029689196,0.005310676,0.04663273,0.0031697978,0.0037287218,0.005594372,0.0002866004],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015371574,0.000005014473,0.00080085144,0.00004183547,0.0000039423667,0.00013620753,0.056655828,0.00018956767,0.00014639254,0.920971,0.0135731,0.007460792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002448634,0.000017965764,0.005190556,0.00047860865,0.000033084518,0.00012364652,0.08079311,0.0010398187,0.0005997964,0.09360077,0.8179945,0.00010360751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9595969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9560601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78514576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21485421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1526973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9106578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360924219","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.25.3.0181","title":"Arguing with Numbers: The Intersection of Rhetoric and Mathematics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric and Public Affairs","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Intersection (aeronautics); Mathematics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Geography","score_opus":0.0183531246859141,"score_gpt":0.2212876216758424,"score_spread":0.2029344969899283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360924219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028520908,0.092208244,0.05410631,0.16025087,0.007673848,0.00005146664,0.00006879639,0.00020507904,0.65691453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89752144,0.027069023,0.013614217,0.010936883,0.010260896,0.00015592022,0.000069934904,0.00036225584,0.040009372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98848236,0.008961593,0.00021971927,0.0003961092,0.0015129432,0.0004273508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97731817,0.019651793,0.0008103924,0.00064671604,0.0010775687,0.0004953909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074127335,0.0006075051,0.00080680754,0.00343128,0.0076643587,0.017147014,0.00128224,0.002718457,0.004665076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018082652,0.0003577759,0.000598927,0.002521946,0.02900267,0.021772314,0.004389739,0.006442704,0.0010748314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000126336,0.000004451565,0.000078337755,0.00006479321,0.000003185768,0.000054695247,0.012241449,0.00008019151,0.00007815732,0.9737177,0.0071008177,0.006563605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010253474,0.000025748042,0.0002507463,0.000495379,0.000008212837,0.00018687054,0.009188688,0.0005382804,0.0001898365,0.7529431,0.23614477,0.000018086734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011939654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011704788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017147014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056732614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002803012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04116255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392842774","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.26.2.0139","title":"No Future in This Country: The Prophetic Pessimism of Bishop Henry McNeal Turner","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric and Public Affairs","topic":"Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Economics; Political science; Economic history; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019160043959927993,"score_gpt":0.21620530105978825,"score_spread":0.19704525709986026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392842774","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019408233,0.07185434,0.0017336856,0.6058711,0.017651318,0.0000390584,0.000036544112,0.00005668641,0.28334907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53464085,0.030841187,0.0014647495,0.29453322,0.009544455,0.00009839176,0.000025295207,0.00024458935,0.12860727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637574,0.0018525621,0.000060399063,0.00028553975,0.0009628488,0.00046283985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961378,0.002659718,0.00017579511,0.00008166848,0.00046034082,0.00048462176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00448585,0.0004461669,0.00033013007,0.0010887329,0.023712562,0.0079537025,0.0010932987,0.004713857,0.0045507103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007901036,0.0004879806,0.0001500317,0.0005636909,0.031065425,0.0063289427,0.0045014834,0.016620712,0.00071940274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033791042,0.000018778155,0.0002484604,0.0001049376,0.0000070424667,0.0006098331,0.15650612,0.00010068324,0.0003073639,0.44798496,0.37879637,0.015281668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012147322,0.00002075869,0.00031300227,0.00079617,0.0000068145373,0.0002703389,0.04453579,0.00009812171,0.00027027036,0.031425294,0.92221504,0.00003632585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060640886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093673766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060640886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011266461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00699758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120575786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392842787","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.26.2.0144","title":"Fragments of Truth: Indian Residential Schools and the Challenge of Reconciliation in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric and Public Affairs","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.02025275245193524,"score_gpt":0.2676476596497352,"score_spread":0.24739490719779994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392842787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20982212,0.027448643,0.0033529957,0.18663715,0.0019266114,0.00014873911,0.00029764496,0.00022136325,0.5701447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95387125,0.006264466,0.0012381483,0.008132065,0.00018265075,0.000037761336,0.00007502487,0.00010888148,0.030089788],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902293,0.002789811,0.00016560679,0.00064193015,0.0027636322,0.0034096118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318224,0.0030694343,0.0003019996,0.00044832914,0.0015707095,0.0014272146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056745093,0.0004388213,0.00063857855,0.0027242764,0.08064646,0.026779551,0.0044068005,0.005728508,0.0059083346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010748073,0.00057300896,0.00050889037,0.0067817722,0.06807284,0.008027547,0.012286786,0.011290357,0.0004238411],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026568143,0.000013534641,0.00070621213,0.00008567946,0.000005919047,0.00079759024,0.55830383,0.00017775764,0.00011059075,0.3991045,0.024546918,0.016120888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009360975,0.0000137586785,0.0017904026,0.00038187442,0.00001663191,0.0003278402,0.5409016,0.00025854984,0.00029876118,0.030119905,0.4258078,0.000073473064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.962371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9814843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17518483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17518483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18416075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9566687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401116072","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.26.3.0143","title":"The Rhetoric of Official Apologies: Critical Essays","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric and Public Affairs","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0336856338236393,"score_gpt":0.3223264189098184,"score_spread":0.2886407850861791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401116072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041644037,0.08499518,0.012250699,0.3477401,0.042348545,0.00023618723,0.000121074,0.00022257738,0.4704416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76854753,0.03453155,0.005071968,0.05274485,0.02816817,0.00062961766,0.00012446876,0.00059201225,0.109589815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877077,0.008936325,0.00030317638,0.0006735516,0.0016493992,0.0007299016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96563804,0.028808594,0.0012252782,0.0006453801,0.0029944894,0.0006882496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011295996,0.001238526,0.00070928974,0.0038209427,0.015063174,0.013768183,0.0020298692,0.0068877265,0.003374309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036625788,0.00044992467,0.00042538048,0.0022603816,0.03688272,0.012231903,0.0040757298,0.0093133915,0.0007930479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042238404,0.000062163155,0.00014394094,0.00028878255,0.0000074991913,0.00042085248,0.15484035,0.00009766738,0.00019995678,0.641247,0.19156297,0.011086654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018114522,0.000027160126,0.000267244,0.0013897726,0.0000070070473,0.00032098228,0.07340599,0.00024165557,0.0003160398,0.07965682,0.84432644,0.000022742206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039175916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048479764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015063174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012561967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051167067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09114385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401122028","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.26.3.0151","title":"When the Medium Was the Mission: The Atlantic Telegraph and the Religious Origins of Network Culture","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric and Public Affairs","topic":"Media, Religion, Digital Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Telecommunications; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.02592804402467006,"score_gpt":0.22811590234026874,"score_spread":0.20218785831559868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401122028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29068846,0.0049428064,0.0047960076,0.07115561,0.0007779022,0.000020974894,0.000047172365,0.00003350788,0.62753755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99129593,0.0008424945,0.00019443901,0.0013572905,0.000115170435,0.0000072680496,0.0000056314757,0.000017479928,0.0061642216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988669,0.0006626692,0.000016277618,0.00007674618,0.00016339871,0.00021401903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983858,0.000829729,0.00022859639,0.0001320502,0.00015406596,0.0002698079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001544288,0.00014925092,0.000075949574,0.0006918761,0.006759592,0.007678817,0.00057318213,0.0013958897,0.003382706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024729194,0.000101947706,0.00008080126,0.0007109346,0.017616177,0.009347307,0.0027051086,0.0029407484,0.00027365278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016555088,0.000018783288,0.0013736201,0.000018121342,0.0000018659035,0.00019736402,0.13898583,0.000059562153,0.00010600466,0.8442368,0.0063179983,0.008667424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001851421,0.000053795713,0.008064038,0.00046603242,0.000012227651,0.00040166403,0.33598006,0.00070721796,0.00048395555,0.18637627,0.46740764,0.000028555243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014338163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02641506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014338163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006499079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019190009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047154367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}