{"meta":{"query_hash":"a16aae1eb9a4","filters":{"venue":"Rhetorica"},"cohort_total":37,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":37,"exported":37,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a16aae1eb9a4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Rhetorica"},"results":[{"id":"W2011739321","doi":"10.1525/rh.2006.24.1.1","title":"The Two Sophistics of Philostratus","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sophist; Opposition (politics); Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Credibility; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02418733743654154,"score_gpt":0.22520546273666944,"score_spread":0.20101812530012791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011739321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09404068,0.0065360796,0.03873047,0.043751746,0.0017156124,0.00007391967,0.000121310295,0.00018877847,0.8148414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97496915,0.00094951846,0.0032221696,0.0022529042,0.0005632271,0.000044715045,0.000028108281,0.00006627718,0.017903894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378645,0.004200911,0.00022947363,0.00035531778,0.0009292504,0.0004986106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950073,0.0027041952,0.00045890125,0.00045686855,0.001001997,0.00037071982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004396943,0.0003816259,0.000405777,0.0018516805,0.0034664155,0.007028915,0.0005188692,0.0019346025,0.0035532687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064781555,0.00037872925,0.00029512477,0.0006839386,0.02373267,0.008471822,0.005243983,0.004269564,0.0005368305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001476517,0.0000040147584,0.00026653084,0.00003397973,0.000003051938,0.000059738235,0.013452068,0.000035247544,0.00014246585,0.98172504,0.0020210582,0.0022421193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021283027,0.00012785304,0.002630582,0.0004122399,0.000025554835,0.000732758,0.017228616,0.00068910496,0.0008577084,0.5456708,0.4315511,0.00005251729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00163982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018354834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007028915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035594413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015769266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02582568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017755515","doi":"10.1525/rh.2004.22.4.349","title":"The Lady's Rhetorick (1707): The Tip of the Iceberg of Women's Rhetorical Education in Enlightenment France and Britain","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Ideology; Enlightenment; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Realm; Gender studies; Literature; History; Philosophy; Political science; Art; Epistemology; Law; Linguistics; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.006613232524921373,"score_gpt":0.21110059898625597,"score_spread":0.20448736646133459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017755515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16680282,0.1030912,0.002624404,0.17187993,0.0047163153,0.00007666667,0.00013255583,0.0002185572,0.5504575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81911945,0.0076974463,0.00093422754,0.00804761,0.0016204487,0.00003893591,0.00004379181,0.00015553183,0.16234252],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581546,0.0027592785,0.000067759516,0.00016235269,0.0007336063,0.0004615198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99498403,0.003592842,0.000289049,0.00008275259,0.00054243545,0.00050889247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051957057,0.00038661528,0.0004251593,0.0034982502,0.009856974,0.008649418,0.00046698935,0.0023158456,0.0065701543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051036617,0.0002761679,0.00014419082,0.0016409921,0.015426863,0.0027533704,0.00244504,0.0046267044,0.00079496216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069686335,0.000041244773,0.00078976713,0.00027307746,0.000007725932,0.00052393635,0.4388412,0.00008611829,0.0006967314,0.4052215,0.09049627,0.06295278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055201103,0.000032723532,0.0019485514,0.00033914266,0.0000027078445,0.000118432305,0.04104165,0.00003591647,0.00021817881,0.005448305,0.95079786,0.00001103769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063637875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09989897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063637875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019452214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077230306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14113635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073500416","doi":"10.1525/rh.2005.23.4.363","title":"The Open Use of Living: Prudence, Decorum, and the ‘Square Man’","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Medieval Philosophy and Theology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Decorum; Prudence; Politics; Order (exchange); Philosophy; Literature; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.06970670047220574,"score_gpt":0.2588773278390044,"score_spread":0.18917062736679868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073500416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28076,0.016478484,0.012866589,0.047046147,0.0014767896,0.000025130272,0.000051017258,0.00010509604,0.6411907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99216616,0.0005391394,0.00046737186,0.00080589013,0.00016471905,0.0000048959832,0.0000045433394,0.000013788719,0.0058335136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981687,0.001370442,0.00003425362,0.00010958482,0.00021560214,0.00010142056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977882,0.0016621388,0.00014164098,0.0001524434,0.0001532429,0.00010239134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002287183,0.00025603158,0.00021048871,0.0008483407,0.0047208196,0.0038426188,0.00052178575,0.0014111525,0.001754232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033528795,0.00015480588,0.000094907286,0.0007245395,0.03666304,0.0031523607,0.0018435295,0.002595691,0.0001877396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015216522,0.0000073664933,0.0001840068,0.00003265738,0.0000019688046,0.00016614594,0.12545656,0.000058559363,0.00018627314,0.8672228,0.0026884822,0.0039800107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022108037,0.000075818694,0.00271485,0.00051489274,0.000010450081,0.0007400041,0.08617985,0.00061684713,0.0011740959,0.30573723,0.6021803,0.000033554305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022783861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047249324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047208196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025409649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000951241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018436074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091124879","doi":"10.1525/rh.2006.24.1.37","title":"An Organon for Theology: Whately's <i>Rhetoric</i> and <i>Logic</i> in Religious Context","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Idolatry; Philosophy; Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Rhetoric; Epistemology; Christianity; Power (physics); Theology; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.015466635447373395,"score_gpt":0.2359901262769368,"score_spread":0.2205234908295634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091124879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06425996,0.012912913,0.06867289,0.1914627,0.00483819,0.000058233232,0.00008929278,0.00015649507,0.6575492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599905,0.0014805831,0.006972226,0.0068663973,0.0015214769,0.00005222638,0.000024189536,0.0001544001,0.022938062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947936,0.0042417124,0.00010244763,0.0002991708,0.00038130363,0.00018177408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869904,0.010270868,0.00062399876,0.0006579693,0.0010538824,0.00040294495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007983042,0.00031037073,0.0004567191,0.00206594,0.0056402134,0.008633948,0.00081900443,0.003201491,0.0040391786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012010886,0.00029232053,0.00033963466,0.0009984995,0.026248218,0.010550658,0.0033106569,0.004951708,0.0005481257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000090168605,0.000005291329,0.000059010217,0.000016818745,0.0000017446971,0.000038454527,0.0051112846,0.00003770694,0.0000829599,0.99014854,0.0028635242,0.0016255933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000275639,0.00003983129,0.00027252425,0.00040102273,0.000021705688,0.00021148523,0.012348913,0.00095546345,0.0009914292,0.71654373,0.26815456,0.000031794305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014969049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001842518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008633948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020678963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042218864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294773643","doi":"10.1525/rh.2015.33.3.294","title":"<i>De l'ire et comme il faut la modérer</i>.","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09261448904381712,"score_gpt":0.332666394532409,"score_spread":0.24005190548859184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294773643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012530415,0.0046442035,0.0063047516,0.04941877,0.003644212,0.000059411395,0.000049530845,0.00021532748,0.9231335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25930804,0.0034555309,0.0025270742,0.01826465,0.0020650208,0.000112277565,0.000054234988,0.00043676398,0.7137764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687564,0.0011162085,0.000080043304,0.00041697497,0.0009397975,0.0005712875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779654,0.0006090313,0.0002457742,0.00025481055,0.0005414737,0.00055250706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002402636,0.00046228088,0.00036181542,0.00069896335,0.008180475,0.0105722,0.0009632518,0.002937885,0.02501537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044718175,0.00032602245,0.0003652025,0.00065667595,0.008215018,0.006658446,0.0058669876,0.009426133,0.00888016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004995799,0.000029614603,0.0011991211,0.0001971621,0.000012218122,0.00032323666,0.054600086,0.0000950892,0.001543762,0.78624356,0.12068134,0.035024893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037750663,0.000019984083,0.0008459474,0.0001528203,0.0000057003867,0.00011232876,0.0080880765,0.00007270273,0.0004471608,0.013072461,0.9771643,0.0000147715555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01587964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032278575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02501537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053045764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006859921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0836848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300827816","doi":"10.1525/rh.2015.33.3.260","title":"Philippe Desportes et l'éloquence royale","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.08673570891002205,"score_gpt":0.32780073029078044,"score_spread":0.2410650213807584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300827816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047761966,0.024240669,0.0060673784,0.064671084,0.0012445909,0.000037331047,0.00006843984,0.00014527037,0.8557633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78079873,0.005552062,0.0014107358,0.004219502,0.00055160286,0.00006151137,0.000021909118,0.00020517147,0.20717882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721885,0.0014843367,0.000053724747,0.00032695793,0.0006105571,0.00030559476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978484,0.0012164061,0.00022865208,0.00017294066,0.00038617232,0.00014746987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026137214,0.000580176,0.00031606545,0.00091761944,0.00727294,0.0053891637,0.0006495406,0.0019825972,0.008120436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047576874,0.00033852473,0.0002659791,0.0010392719,0.019043788,0.004209559,0.0034641859,0.005437516,0.0017124953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004331516,0.000009442076,0.00047605418,0.0001677683,0.000010136576,0.00036517138,0.0817989,0.0001271987,0.00050204195,0.88274,0.021517517,0.012242464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012723437,0.00003391994,0.001725703,0.00019468009,0.000015340152,0.0002747729,0.013498903,0.00014449334,0.0007566001,0.04560295,0.9377146,0.000025428764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021025512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029475711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021025512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008465244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004771978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061419964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317254636","doi":"10.1525/rh.2008.26.4.392","title":"L'interprétation de l'<i>ēthos</i> aristotélicien par al-Fārābī","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nautical Research Society","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.034344360738298926,"score_gpt":0.24406141687771712,"score_spread":0.2097170561394182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317254636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11928024,0.033693332,0.017023511,0.042390667,0.0022242933,0.00004853401,0.00015461513,0.00006543939,0.78511935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95253414,0.006250655,0.0024486578,0.003245705,0.00090949994,0.0000369144,0.000060686172,0.000042562675,0.034471083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992849,0.00036721563,0.000021297661,0.00007275118,0.0001610969,0.00009271145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992873,0.00041168346,0.00006209734,0.000028206705,0.00017281981,0.000037882353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016894902,0.0005159557,0.00031029026,0.0019642864,0.0033871632,0.002844968,0.0004347333,0.0011729889,0.0041337013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013825551,0.00017559649,0.00018269154,0.0012851285,0.008318543,0.0017245314,0.0014423371,0.002268019,0.00059886597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004105813,0.00001371889,0.00046561914,0.00009713442,0.000007162663,0.00009989471,0.0146256285,0.00012762455,0.00046628813,0.9611364,0.006573231,0.01634622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049359933,0.00008834195,0.0070230085,0.0005988439,0.00003651564,0.0005291148,0.015671909,0.0009571926,0.0018134676,0.32565555,0.64752114,0.000055525343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013627897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010477206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013627897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005523641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002355216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04007697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319134593","doi":"10.1525/rh.2011.29.3.293","title":"Aristotle and Anaximenes on Arrangement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Taxis; Literature; Epistemology; Linguistics; Art; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.146636314301686,"score_gpt":0.20311895108243172,"score_spread":0.05648263678074572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319134593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0359273,0.007286551,0.014754809,0.009446915,0.00045007415,0.000016444152,0.00005572245,0.00006950953,0.9319927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9028741,0.002487729,0.0031285174,0.0013106787,0.00044678472,0.000035635447,0.000040420822,0.000050352763,0.08962576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988765,0.0005680036,0.000022601133,0.00012339816,0.00026331295,0.00014614301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952364,0.00024258385,0.00004720532,0.00006936252,0.00008445729,0.000032803957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009788978,0.0002905512,0.00021994898,0.0012246666,0.0030990825,0.0027526033,0.00036234214,0.0011809348,0.004401713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014760358,0.00012721153,0.00016681573,0.0010143236,0.01249184,0.00308697,0.0011916606,0.0016826823,0.00081503973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045558727,0.0000016610767,0.000025537043,0.0000056722547,5.5640743e-7,0.000009845144,0.0009150881,0.000048318976,0.000035773795,0.9957802,0.0012056831,0.0019671342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014339227,0.000027190112,0.00046576816,0.000078383695,0.000003949117,0.00007238999,0.0018910795,0.0003331596,0.00025862487,0.8009367,0.19590974,0.0000086863465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033247136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005167513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004401713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027776037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014108293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020153046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327539988","doi":"10.1525/rh.2010.28.4.408","title":"Hélisenne de Crenne et l'infinie variété de la lettre invective","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Renaissance Literature and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Invective; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.008719732403539576,"score_gpt":0.2594255789974007,"score_spread":0.25070584659386114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327539988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02088402,0.0049770707,0.00887076,0.009886502,0.0010195456,0.000024904095,0.000042036103,0.00007210956,0.95422304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7077119,0.0021720706,0.002967868,0.002982395,0.0007399203,0.000064988446,0.000036784713,0.00022671733,0.2830974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726677,0.0014037415,0.000053600917,0.0003700441,0.0006360185,0.00026977118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801093,0.0011538884,0.00017202982,0.00022999595,0.00032091865,0.000112271024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028556637,0.0006625569,0.00034262758,0.0010560116,0.005191892,0.0048985067,0.00070670753,0.0020572608,0.009744867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004525232,0.00026069276,0.00038765735,0.00065881707,0.021607665,0.00465839,0.003043251,0.0050473297,0.0013200307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016765378,0.0000035006804,0.00014093239,0.00003617076,0.0000029633936,0.00007714162,0.017529888,0.000033605073,0.00018740956,0.9747898,0.0032097332,0.003972117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015780754,0.00004050551,0.0014296916,0.00024998013,0.000016319837,0.0004326146,0.012519814,0.00019921032,0.0010060536,0.15042885,0.83362854,0.000032555876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008220549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021210762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009744867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004437998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024308828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032599807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327893746","doi":"10.1525/rh.2015.33.3.245","title":"«Mourir à soy-mesme pour porter le diademe»: les leçons du mémoire autographe (BnF, ms. fr. 16512) de Henri III, préparatoire à la harangue des États Généraux de 1576","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033955135391272664,"score_gpt":0.2389285506887267,"score_spread":0.20497341529745405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327893746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08020077,0.037844248,0.0019363844,0.038599152,0.0043160766,0.000059433725,0.00040116237,0.00015677616,0.8364859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25240964,0.004354131,0.00066838035,0.003768226,0.000598018,0.000039656326,0.000106302796,0.00019701835,0.7378586],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995802,0.000121640696,0.000008326525,0.000070204864,0.00011908528,0.000100571306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997631,0.0000823018,0.000029961153,0.000014527574,0.00006428053,0.00004599512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005802109,0.00034382584,0.00017191806,0.00069878553,0.0061138645,0.0026829229,0.00038082205,0.0012010861,0.012417585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010985202,0.0001935709,0.00011615016,0.0006962562,0.0028902804,0.0013299906,0.0012871056,0.002421736,0.0024323666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016070287,0.000021712998,0.0034892508,0.00029551497,0.0000130524795,0.0014505169,0.17339024,0.00015225957,0.0019074959,0.34453768,0.3826556,0.091925934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016934328,0.00000654326,0.00202403,0.000057746085,0.0000014451776,0.00008280537,0.0035560287,0.000013307311,0.00021845977,0.00080455974,0.9932279,0.000005391777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11441608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26305327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11441608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007826539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034464824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2275002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342008656","doi":"10.1525/rh.2015.33.3.230","title":"L'institution oratoire idéale d'Henri, roi de Pologne","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Historical Influence and Diplomacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07093596682445479,"score_gpt":0.35341077619728023,"score_spread":0.28247480937282543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342008656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032327764,0.00616105,0.015406884,0.03292317,0.00059290224,0.000041786334,0.00006617662,0.00016106374,0.9123192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8041434,0.0018151442,0.0026804418,0.0030482088,0.00030289614,0.000074352865,0.000027634516,0.00014125877,0.18776663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955745,0.0019259711,0.00009206863,0.0006652824,0.0009238624,0.000818348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981345,0.00074107276,0.00022912172,0.00025072045,0.0003272466,0.0003172781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036636754,0.0004395866,0.00033141128,0.0013498714,0.005571914,0.011753298,0.00063029694,0.0024988698,0.009910042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005428838,0.0003416191,0.00017947696,0.0012557439,0.015817812,0.0049108877,0.004450025,0.0035719716,0.0021893992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011203037,0.000003351453,0.00033266295,0.000025468915,0.0000024591131,0.00006118269,0.005400683,0.00007679564,0.00017166167,0.9828986,0.0047086375,0.0063073006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013808425,0.000034746805,0.0026429226,0.00024692135,0.000011060476,0.00020749503,0.0049058087,0.00029960205,0.0009805678,0.16505067,0.8255764,0.000030072719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014668616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021182256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014668616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011333238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008473081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08222884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510803583","doi":"10.1525/rh.2015.33.3.305","title":"Henri III, prince dévot?","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.044088251044545126,"score_gpt":0.24108034491969377,"score_spread":0.19699209387514865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510803583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11097729,0.01769547,0.0018293308,0.05728042,0.002407702,0.000059566362,0.00007484332,0.000048546182,0.80962694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5697265,0.0038986255,0.00043226735,0.009943349,0.00037242527,0.000034866156,0.000038756745,0.00003899205,0.41551423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931276,0.00027696302,0.000011299395,0.000093497445,0.000087621134,0.00021784757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975914,0.000050044157,0.000033538032,0.000021719177,0.000063233994,0.00007230073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079353555,0.000311962,0.00018381313,0.00029070745,0.0066997176,0.0035669957,0.00042050806,0.0013960659,0.008698752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010982942,0.00016656175,0.00014886659,0.00037964614,0.0071333535,0.0019034892,0.0022127063,0.0029170453,0.0013896815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065731845,0.000016104286,0.0022145035,0.000105418825,0.000010394942,0.000898959,0.11745911,0.00011666397,0.00037140917,0.7784478,0.06659715,0.033696808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072806424,0.000038201248,0.0036070165,0.00021035729,0.0000052344517,0.00026402005,0.034984253,0.0000582924,0.0003106941,0.018560426,0.9419352,0.000019057003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05600462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08196563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05600462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004720779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043381597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11135727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566121797","doi":"10.1525/rh.2015.33.4.333","title":"The king's speech: Philip's rhetoric and democratic leadership in the debate over the Peace of Philocrates","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Openness to experience; Silence; Democracy; Order (exchange); Persuasion; Philosophy; Literature; Law; Political science; Art; Psychology; Aesthetics; Theology; Linguistics; Social psychology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.18632929464062095,"score_gpt":0.33079811910668183,"score_spread":0.14446882446606088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566121797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29942435,0.013362034,0.00871376,0.14144123,0.0020483958,0.00005355316,0.000044493474,0.000071060786,0.5348412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98946637,0.00071675255,0.00023218365,0.001810095,0.00035324355,0.000012505143,0.0000042795455,0.000022200094,0.00738223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927026,0.0059928535,0.00008478443,0.00025977506,0.0004937767,0.00046622768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867683,0.011438913,0.0007416071,0.00024578688,0.0004762849,0.00032918502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067893597,0.00029500943,0.00029517233,0.0012248683,0.0075937817,0.008642989,0.0007119475,0.003035599,0.0023646904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012412451,0.00021039923,0.0001776384,0.0010157925,0.025481299,0.005527603,0.0043861996,0.004501259,0.0003866374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038684662,0.000012895449,0.00033002713,0.00008057112,0.00000473182,0.0003164913,0.25307247,0.00008009818,0.00023822855,0.7380104,0.0041385107,0.0036768347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053325664,0.00011550496,0.0030935798,0.0006628949,0.000030374691,0.0006692971,0.26442623,0.0009369863,0.0017452642,0.2780767,0.45013925,0.00005060452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034844573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032671324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008642989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042328574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019762265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035905957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602454681","doi":"10.1525/rh.2017.35.1.75","title":"A Figurative Mind: Gertrude Buck's The Metaphor as a Nexus in Cognitive Metaphor Theory","year":2017,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Philosophy; Literal and figurative language; Humanities; Rhetoric; Art history; Character (mathematics); Art; Theology; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03950292893463431,"score_gpt":0.3454271456226294,"score_spread":0.3059242166879951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602454681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032400005,0.11732256,0.04123237,0.22978656,0.0056787143,0.000033811295,0.00014924858,0.00016162619,0.5732352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8676941,0.023033476,0.014518417,0.030893832,0.0028869477,0.000101677404,0.00008050175,0.00022353709,0.06056758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851567,0.0009947323,0.000021394306,0.00018522213,0.00020321498,0.00007979953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982083,0.0012684464,0.000095073614,0.000119821074,0.00016033892,0.00014812955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017350197,0.0005787081,0.0003979928,0.0019738474,0.0031656497,0.005701102,0.0007913652,0.0030153594,0.0040678266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042594885,0.00024599655,0.00035367894,0.0016643347,0.025731765,0.010292934,0.0023347184,0.003203103,0.0011366344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016178214,0.000008427764,0.00014150827,0.000051575826,0.0000036512952,0.00009055068,0.014106235,0.000119584474,0.00012785035,0.961599,0.016479287,0.0072560026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000110200035,0.00001387927,0.00032548473,0.00015742918,0.0000051786783,0.00020132697,0.005595678,0.00027936566,0.00012178951,0.77417684,0.21909511,0.000017034487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047924803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053830305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005701102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028552671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012571051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020716548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806966099","doi":"10.1525/rh.2018.36.2.179","title":"Whately on Authority, Deference, Presumption and Burden of Proof","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Presumption; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Argumentation theory; Fallacy; Dialectic; Burden of proof; Persuasion; Serendipity; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07185462328303666,"score_gpt":0.3775306845842566,"score_spread":0.30567606130121994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806966099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04446366,0.024681885,0.21831307,0.10468978,0.003628124,0.00013039271,0.00017410642,0.00014006946,0.60377896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90957594,0.0074398695,0.03998705,0.011849412,0.0020973098,0.0002217495,0.00007381081,0.00016202914,0.0285927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896466,0.0064061303,0.0005330376,0.0010046661,0.0018516699,0.0005579786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97234976,0.022623302,0.0012766365,0.0013765857,0.0019009288,0.00047269126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012209547,0.00066682085,0.0009541629,0.0028705334,0.0041199718,0.007838148,0.0011938688,0.0045913677,0.0046279277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02924562,0.0003323932,0.0007872878,0.0015086763,0.03146841,0.017624406,0.004854196,0.006972324,0.001026328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008426911,0.0000025601337,0.000037132413,0.000030155665,0.0000023761058,0.00003496864,0.0011691763,0.00008378036,0.000050409715,0.9954993,0.000604064,0.0024775397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008248201,0.000020104475,0.000086985085,0.0001742271,0.000009777837,0.000075505515,0.0005623377,0.00028865685,0.00027552235,0.9534349,0.045049593,0.0000141712435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010074654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081931666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012209547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027191448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022166534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06457102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128286846","doi":"10.1525/rh.2021.39.1.121","title":"Review: <i>Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Thomas Hobbes</i>, by Timothy Raylor","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Theology","score_opus":0.03096362036852181,"score_gpt":0.24400880224809934,"score_spread":0.21304518187957752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128286846","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033626657,0.90621406,0.000041449828,0.062242527,0.030175539,0.0000076140354,0.000051320316,0.000008070774,0.0012258332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012631556,0.8419926,0.00010003027,0.08253731,0.06766686,0.000057293306,0.0001035384,0.000019073443,0.006260183],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795985,0.0006419156,0.00018237994,0.00036184798,0.00066948973,0.00018452751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933013,0.0034266207,0.0005512911,0.0001599142,0.00188267,0.0006782733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030999784,0.0019104569,0.0030898345,0.0046589444,0.0020410023,0.007223477,0.0024651706,0.008049474,0.011035848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012631162,0.0008961342,0.0009908613,0.007512995,0.005043777,0.00628582,0.0028526154,0.009612071,0.0060215294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020422849,0.0000063662387,0.000028494165,0.0016162201,0.000018277757,0.00001232079,0.00005141482,0.00001714464,0.000027949116,0.0014775955,0.97998387,0.016739845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003279407,0.000017229113,0.00035572564,0.00505817,0.000047122598,0.00009100746,0.00016510722,0.0000229934,0.000029613077,0.0024962064,0.9916677,0.000016243395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011723809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02363902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011723809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048312005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008858472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03691864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238474219","doi":"10.1525/rh.2015.33.3.276","title":"La rhétorique de l'exemple dans les <i>Harangues militaires</i> de François de Belleforest","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03166706429870773,"score_gpt":0.28634642375342406,"score_spread":0.2546793594547163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238474219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11432215,0.01594906,0.005236543,0.034179986,0.00208586,0.000044532815,0.00017520877,0.00011749753,0.82788914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70886266,0.0025921857,0.0012438843,0.0022602666,0.000361408,0.00003725027,0.0000516797,0.000113590715,0.28447706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992624,0.00034085498,0.0000136319495,0.00009467449,0.00013243983,0.00015604823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942076,0.0002820064,0.0000684433,0.000039211096,0.00011934402,0.00007033472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009147744,0.0005519797,0.0001796893,0.00067198614,0.007984225,0.0038269076,0.00046586693,0.0012293169,0.009622231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001305603,0.0001918545,0.00015096707,0.00061927445,0.008632475,0.0018990863,0.0014657988,0.0022257597,0.0011056467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010322197,0.000018971406,0.0018203782,0.0001608955,0.000008763355,0.000782057,0.22309367,0.00015543096,0.0018566512,0.66084504,0.080152355,0.031002525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004427657,0.000020925436,0.0024675115,0.00019408324,0.000005197826,0.00018751512,0.021693362,0.00008878688,0.0006234181,0.005488996,0.96920985,0.000015894733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08051708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15865111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08051708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007332445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025732804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16009682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317708081","doi":"10.1353/rht.2021.0022","title":"Nostalgic Design: Rhetoric, Memory, and Democratizing Technology by William C. Kirlinkus","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Context (archaeology); Aesthetics; Sociology; Rhetorical question; Democracy; Constructive; Value (mathematics); Law; Media studies; Literature; Philosophy; History; Art; Politics; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.02948287524332374,"score_gpt":0.23021474276529227,"score_spread":0.20073186752196853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317708081","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036313965,0.39859292,0.005061505,0.23474288,0.019393332,0.00006796672,0.00007449031,0.00016518519,0.33827034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16382033,0.34902295,0.005249441,0.040997244,0.016534427,0.00037091208,0.00016992178,0.0005980831,0.4232368],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733716,0.0014159419,0.00007235307,0.00022091676,0.0008115692,0.0001420327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970925,0.0019618236,0.0001452458,0.00009565031,0.0004919073,0.00021293972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025603191,0.0008239175,0.0004888915,0.0015684293,0.0051101693,0.008617267,0.00087620167,0.0025258523,0.012166491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072590173,0.00035762004,0.00022622375,0.002217553,0.010262333,0.010167426,0.0033472835,0.0066574463,0.0039962223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028023442,0.000039421444,0.00009878646,0.00042689347,0.000004828793,0.000068718335,0.011030063,0.00021299064,0.00023348651,0.36189198,0.54925466,0.07671015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003592314,0.000008704761,0.000100704805,0.0005935951,0.0000021657183,0.00005159012,0.0017829103,0.000076238495,0.00007573138,0.039081834,0.9582124,0.0000105883455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056119384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006238571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012166491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048772665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00397745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040700972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323287787","doi":"10.1353/rht.2022.0024","title":"Robert Burton’s Rhetoric: An Anatomy of Early Modern Knowledge by Susan Wells","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Scholarship; Rhetorical question; Discipline; Enlightenment; Humanism; Sociology; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Theology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.030033912987981325,"score_gpt":0.2799175967827149,"score_spread":0.24988368379473355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323287787","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002082496,0.5902722,0.0057661994,0.14314465,0.010711988,0.000050081977,0.00007814705,0.00007615092,0.2478181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.123760134,0.38077125,0.008341929,0.033452492,0.009392302,0.00021024919,0.00013623902,0.0004003554,0.44353512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811375,0.00085196114,0.00007631848,0.00023813198,0.0006059962,0.00011394086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983891,0.00093507784,0.00011921946,0.000054689044,0.00035321285,0.0001486455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017557616,0.00082743703,0.00044597196,0.002742427,0.002974471,0.005340983,0.00073512923,0.0027717906,0.01196988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004462883,0.00038220483,0.00025650876,0.0024720235,0.009659651,0.008954167,0.0026102555,0.004118532,0.0044484744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023533012,0.000016006865,0.00012015676,0.0004927939,0.0000054400552,0.00016017011,0.017108545,0.00013437348,0.0004779772,0.48301765,0.4140063,0.084437005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015162753,0.0000040830573,0.00008375073,0.0005075862,0.0000011794966,0.00011768303,0.0015610115,0.00001803317,0.0000463148,0.021052927,0.9766005,0.000005522196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073349373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008735197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01196988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045758965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004114956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040043294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005064","doi":"10.1353/rht.2000.0015","title":"The Changing Tradition: Women in the History of Rhetoric ed. by Christine Mason Sutherland and Rebecca Sutcliffe","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Scholarship; Power (physics); Politics; CLARITY; Sociology; Political rhetoric; Field (mathematics); Media studies; Gender studies; History; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.02315727814842709,"score_gpt":0.20843087662265836,"score_spread":0.18527359847423128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005064","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050646364,0.94123584,0.00012203539,0.032989938,0.004747552,0.000006068598,0.000015965268,0.000013469874,0.020362718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021488551,0.9046389,0.00044592982,0.011284091,0.010855732,0.000051040435,0.00004472716,0.00007335216,0.051117674],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997678,0.0010693292,0.00009232292,0.00023632392,0.00067877286,0.00024538834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683964,0.0021283366,0.0002290898,0.00011397832,0.0003984313,0.00029045407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022920673,0.0011498826,0.0011697214,0.0040806625,0.004986922,0.009616394,0.0014419876,0.0042392476,0.010780316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039344784,0.000757503,0.0005444662,0.005785409,0.01026302,0.008554015,0.0032395136,0.0049844803,0.0035939116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042941378,0.00006445723,0.0004015645,0.002622298,0.000020474006,0.0002448137,0.026375724,0.000112104295,0.00032131348,0.08485302,0.66200995,0.22293139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033041804,0.000013324904,0.00053470785,0.003213191,0.0000059111203,0.00011643251,0.0041857823,0.000016367809,0.000048064147,0.0062608994,0.98559386,0.0000081562175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013111939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024725955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013111939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075557926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068909954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05482143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005265","doi":"10.1353/rht.2005.0010","title":"La rhétorique épistolaire de Rabelais par Claude La Charité, and: La lettre familière au XVIe siècle. Rhétorique humaniste de l’épistolaire par Luc Vaillancourt","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Renaissance Literature and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008766627076327749,"score_gpt":0.22594087712043087,"score_spread":0.21717425004410312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005265","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005907839,0.8353607,0.0007483194,0.03713383,0.0030299393,0.000029997902,0.0002812116,0.000053610624,0.11745455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20966782,0.48437855,0.001354559,0.010816091,0.0031518552,0.000085179134,0.00052185066,0.0002043008,0.28981984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993753,0.00018067168,0.000018532086,0.00008181624,0.0002454172,0.00009823108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917054,0.00026973637,0.00006812515,0.000033600798,0.00036987802,0.00008816453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009518126,0.000668869,0.00040923848,0.0018768132,0.0047764825,0.0033275795,0.00066557864,0.00122649,0.011539391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016767731,0.000334689,0.00020956314,0.0031388346,0.0054098214,0.0021335364,0.00093542284,0.0021707583,0.002005826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005335374,0.000016472779,0.0010130194,0.0015607942,0.000021052154,0.00034634786,0.034334138,0.0002534411,0.00069757056,0.12121046,0.71630085,0.12419253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030696262,0.0000037467007,0.003606911,0.0006915867,0.0000053411663,0.0001103871,0.0034238033,0.000039454288,0.000083519066,0.0017476449,0.99027413,0.000010404773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78890467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8800587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78890467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033545263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019542852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.424677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005337","doi":"10.1353/rht.2001.0016","title":"The Waning of Medieval Ars Dictaminis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Scholarship; Rhetoric; Vernacular; Eleventh; History; Classics; Middle Ages; Conversation; Variety (cybernetics); Literature; Art; Ancient history; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.024697739087134876,"score_gpt":0.2216575101053373,"score_spread":0.19695977101820242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15529771,0.18376833,0.0007404495,0.15335977,0.006627467,0.000018904811,0.000214634,0.00011987288,0.49985287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91517776,0.019334735,0.00021355259,0.004615092,0.0023816188,0.000012629166,0.000055411587,0.00010101479,0.058108274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980544,0.0006819058,0.00007529068,0.0002744682,0.0005359087,0.00037807264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979571,0.000847952,0.00030428116,0.00022003923,0.00041311872,0.00025741488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025300966,0.0003214534,0.0004965906,0.0012356867,0.006749377,0.005789736,0.00070748926,0.001442473,0.006843408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005190799,0.00037718783,0.00012302848,0.000816073,0.013247626,0.003803504,0.003738484,0.0046815,0.001253766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020911956,0.000024779929,0.0021498995,0.0005117589,0.000027611784,0.00065575854,0.2608082,0.000085381864,0.0013344206,0.5564081,0.11608141,0.06170348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006168213,0.00002249913,0.0029476138,0.0003818927,0.0000054501506,0.00023985958,0.012123321,0.000020800753,0.00042186453,0.006334734,0.97748375,0.000012085256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016072985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031851407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016072985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077928337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021054908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056541204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005344","doi":"10.1353/rht.2010.0019","title":"The Eloquence of Mary Astell by Christine Mason Sutherland, and: Rhetoric, Women and Politics in Early Modern England ed. by Jennifer Richards, Alison Thorne, and: Rhetoric (The New Critical Idiom) ed. by Jennifer Richards","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Scottish History and National Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Silence; Politics; Humanism; Sociology; Virtue; Publishing; Subject (documents); Classics; Media studies; Law; Philosophy; Theology; History; Literature; Art; Aesthetics; Political science","score_opus":0.007753276903229501,"score_gpt":0.2236674667454728,"score_spread":0.2159141898422433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005344","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011224563,0.85045004,0.0004239947,0.084374115,0.009952904,0.000022249764,0.000079692465,0.000027170501,0.05354743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041838188,0.57615876,0.0012152455,0.0405211,0.015600365,0.00020352716,0.00027701637,0.00017479411,0.32401094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889046,0.0004318551,0.000036507496,0.00012927747,0.0004134146,0.00009840156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831533,0.0010164331,0.00015099402,0.000047359066,0.00030234293,0.00016745407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015115546,0.0012950617,0.0007022654,0.0023049507,0.0038928993,0.0068168845,0.0012104288,0.0038976672,0.016370237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004053718,0.0005668565,0.0003279011,0.004049302,0.005675118,0.006748217,0.0028567757,0.0051029236,0.006553117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021139313,0.000019442252,0.00016635464,0.0005285378,0.0000058393093,0.00015656465,0.010271213,0.000046439145,0.00014346179,0.030277839,0.912774,0.04558916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031636516,0.0000054166685,0.0004610744,0.0010199681,0.0000033580106,0.00011690608,0.0033119062,0.000016927323,0.000051079598,0.0057656155,0.98923653,0.00000807651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029857501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05245261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029857501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060481383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063201203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059367478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005362","doi":"10.1353/rht.2012.0031","title":"The Imperfect Friend. Emotion and Rhetoric in Sidney, Milton, and Their Contexts by Wendy Olmsted","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Historical and Linguistic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Rhetoric; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.012409626903321577,"score_gpt":0.2684235713980281,"score_spread":0.2560139444947065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02994637,0.09019012,0.0020413788,0.1911264,0.0039004637,0.00002730592,0.00006887377,0.000046719266,0.6826524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8251992,0.01364949,0.0012158008,0.01861472,0.0013161729,0.00008425145,0.000030789975,0.00013014706,0.13975944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659485,0.002609475,0.00006032478,0.00019991107,0.00031803313,0.00021731578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976121,0.0017344248,0.00016699592,0.000077249904,0.00016880833,0.00024046013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023946613,0.0005943502,0.00037535824,0.0011265138,0.013199076,0.008310727,0.00071149546,0.0034674036,0.005227071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005201385,0.00030728598,0.00016013088,0.0012570496,0.028575335,0.008578199,0.0040586106,0.00495106,0.00081830897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022489443,0.000012515146,0.00020426093,0.00006793685,0.0000025172271,0.00019591626,0.16219276,0.00003375447,0.000074079355,0.7739685,0.055782035,0.00744332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015067846,0.000015995874,0.00072916184,0.00058030704,0.0000051542597,0.00025887418,0.09034331,0.00013573251,0.00013090255,0.17143826,0.7363256,0.00002159784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014932055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026490197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014932055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006821515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028521477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04949379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005384","doi":"10.1353/rht.2013.0005","title":"A New History of the Sermon: The Nineteenth Century ed. by Robert H. Ellison","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sermon; Rhetorical question; History; Surprise; Subject (documents); Literature; Classics; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.016879393460475716,"score_gpt":0.18822836079870822,"score_spread":0.17134896733823252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005384","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003171339,0.95280117,0.00016058174,0.012895405,0.007982542,0.000004172795,0.000020437185,0.000019531524,0.025799029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024937661,0.8544142,0.00045777715,0.010216163,0.020705093,0.000024067103,0.00006737329,0.00008733131,0.089090385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998587,0.0005803051,0.00008400696,0.00018190934,0.00041198998,0.00015480493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872106,0.0005784774,0.00012833494,0.000066951776,0.00032299513,0.00018210562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014902232,0.001089237,0.0007489599,0.003969179,0.0027264669,0.00784297,0.0007712811,0.0031069398,0.01550677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025422669,0.00059205777,0.0004488082,0.003275186,0.0043630223,0.005738558,0.002198509,0.0044608223,0.006484431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059597765,0.000047788555,0.00033972182,0.0018097577,0.000016442536,0.00032721087,0.009265614,0.00009389521,0.00023843462,0.084527135,0.67761767,0.22565675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017606737,0.000005643884,0.00021260478,0.0012304098,0.0000024022722,0.00009559453,0.0006798585,0.0000067276314,0.00002108136,0.0029594155,0.99478096,0.0000034317432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00595013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008745698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01550677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004114626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039029932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051875353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005429","doi":"10.1353/rht.2003.0004","title":"Episodes in the Rhetoric of Government-Indian Relations by Janice Schuetz","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Scholarship; Government (linguistics); Appeal; Scope (computer science); History; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Social science; Law; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02423556957828069,"score_gpt":0.2269617000477655,"score_spread":0.20272613046948482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005429","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003793513,0.6849724,0.0005541285,0.09523448,0.014191027,0.000051173636,0.00016333327,0.000103022336,0.20093682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08860357,0.67229116,0.001215585,0.028369674,0.018506836,0.00013576237,0.00045529657,0.00032473414,0.19009733],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920696,0.00031481357,0.000033083656,0.0000804662,0.0002634674,0.00010124419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881554,0.00072812324,0.000093459756,0.000035109,0.00022304857,0.0001048118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068524806,0.00064070465,0.0003812421,0.0021434268,0.0036899315,0.0068029067,0.0007756031,0.0014514759,0.005726838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023519068,0.0004528271,0.0002201246,0.0038792286,0.0033559133,0.0052227736,0.0017657182,0.0044647097,0.0028097243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020437363,0.000028321967,0.0002826672,0.00045394214,0.0000066619305,0.00012867889,0.013216191,0.00018321707,0.00011430136,0.092490345,0.8481813,0.044893917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016895235,0.0000046984055,0.0005434556,0.00075779407,0.0000037283853,0.00008540975,0.003207974,0.000030326955,0.00004365745,0.0049163443,0.9903984,0.000006572941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022795958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030640528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022795958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003823472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039150896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04532653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005624","doi":"10.1353/rht.2015.0009","title":"Henri III à l’école de la rhétorique: Liminaire","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.025762912345194587,"score_gpt":0.24397246587887758,"score_spread":0.218209553533683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013313854,0.027852643,0.0033500132,0.13960761,0.0018352481,0.00002957563,0.000044331096,0.00011019681,0.8138566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40951124,0.011584067,0.0017146027,0.027091196,0.0016565934,0.0001017621,0.00004448015,0.0002553513,0.5480407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793905,0.001085497,0.000037656268,0.0002414624,0.00040638162,0.0002898914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842215,0.0007771318,0.0001324388,0.000098130186,0.00031716502,0.0002529615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021759733,0.00037165443,0.00025283193,0.001060361,0.008007599,0.008094036,0.0006357233,0.0023099566,0.013462581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004073139,0.0002013072,0.00021213136,0.00092814467,0.011469019,0.004950557,0.00408079,0.0041801874,0.0025594353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037443635,0.000013251842,0.0005299989,0.00011611899,0.0000055679466,0.0002543097,0.032372013,0.00007845047,0.00031136358,0.8409969,0.10305168,0.022232933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003878938,0.000009391379,0.00067399803,0.00025051142,0.0000025012585,0.00006389591,0.0061616753,0.00007608834,0.00022049694,0.019421674,0.97310793,0.000007939226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03419625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05530872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03419625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013980056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073216204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10143286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005637","doi":"10.1353/rht.2003.0005","title":"Orthodoxy and Enlightenment: George Campbell in the Eighteenth Century by Jeffrey M. Suderman","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Orthodoxy; Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Classics; George (robot); History; Scottish Enlightenment; Colonialism; Sociology; Literature; Philosophy; Art history; Epistemology; Art; Theology","score_opus":0.012830900069673018,"score_gpt":0.27032131860425096,"score_spread":0.25749041853457794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005637","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016423771,0.33746445,0.0010517907,0.41873413,0.006457618,0.0000591329,0.00006712967,0.000034224868,0.21970773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54248834,0.21890514,0.0032204064,0.051373173,0.007351281,0.0001643877,0.00004016667,0.000103837534,0.17635329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674594,0.0020433422,0.00006742879,0.00019263817,0.00072590384,0.00022486145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99557495,0.002609635,0.0002678065,0.00008514149,0.0010408256,0.0004215527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003946888,0.00037526165,0.00043995594,0.0022324668,0.013595612,0.0059054424,0.0008170611,0.0039108447,0.0019189562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074387654,0.00040161615,0.00013794305,0.0022169107,0.017848998,0.0041726176,0.0020906625,0.007184653,0.0004502819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025202444,0.00003840115,0.00054348964,0.00021396739,0.0000060310817,0.00042708023,0.13685502,0.00012290548,0.0002639889,0.5820624,0.25753364,0.021907816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052906607,0.000008688685,0.00074485794,0.00076606194,0.0000053106387,0.00015987134,0.0197285,0.00004135837,0.00015123835,0.024239618,0.9541296,0.000019628527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10100815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15573172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10100815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019389054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014608763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20084041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005644","doi":"10.1353/rht.2008.0001","title":"L’interprétation de l’ēthos aristotélicien par al-Fārābï","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nautical Research Society","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.03797350105122197,"score_gpt":0.24690796603747892,"score_spread":0.20893446498625695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13071968,0.042179253,0.025540031,0.043303806,0.002112967,0.000059391496,0.00019673098,0.00006812056,0.75582004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9217439,0.008525106,0.005058546,0.0043747574,0.0010494619,0.00006343286,0.00008199449,0.000059598635,0.059043184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992042,0.00038018663,0.000022138995,0.00009316075,0.00018744887,0.00011275977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942976,0.00032412013,0.000050101913,0.000028687764,0.00013445703,0.00003268375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017316929,0.0005980514,0.0003457575,0.0016751058,0.0032604823,0.0029313706,0.0004783857,0.0015172543,0.004363571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015032478,0.00019490549,0.00023650602,0.001186718,0.007840662,0.002039379,0.0014311383,0.002432988,0.00081759423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003165687,0.000012619209,0.00043837368,0.000064194996,0.00000633664,0.00008671967,0.010353221,0.00011833285,0.00041678693,0.9682505,0.004896834,0.0153244035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041402698,0.00008271885,0.0070614126,0.00035151906,0.000030282312,0.00051056396,0.00944778,0.0010922758,0.0017216858,0.3346462,0.6449572,0.000056992107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01279223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011332069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01279223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004437381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021207812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032195628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005799","doi":"10.1353/rht.2019.0007","title":"Classical Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: The Medieval Rhetors and Their Art 400–1300, with Manuscript Survey to 1500 CE by John O. Ward","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Persuasion; Argumentative; Literature; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Fable; Divinity; Classics; Art; Linguistics; Theology","score_opus":0.035927149938686544,"score_gpt":0.20744508395996353,"score_spread":0.171517934021277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005799","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016881946,0.7636348,0.00026902533,0.029966565,0.0047335476,0.000012841949,0.00011126151,0.00003131145,0.19955239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060920835,0.57966423,0.0005291774,0.009762979,0.0097306045,0.00004850486,0.00014809966,0.00012811397,0.33906746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992248,0.0002054768,0.000034611672,0.000084613894,0.00038738563,0.00006311238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991066,0.00039637482,0.00007918098,0.00006956525,0.00020844642,0.00013979572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010144472,0.0004080828,0.00030105433,0.0020070795,0.0020010048,0.0044398624,0.00045041132,0.0012353949,0.021467922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002368632,0.00027448792,0.00013860651,0.0023531534,0.0050835614,0.0026976587,0.0016137402,0.0021115579,0.0051322845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003555188,0.000043868615,0.0003511255,0.0012300822,0.0000111276295,0.0001347586,0.010084605,0.00008150465,0.00046524953,0.19981341,0.59489226,0.19285645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016120847,0.0000056844606,0.0010263656,0.0007619203,0.0000016561462,0.000049851362,0.001031207,0.000008823927,0.00005086398,0.007208665,0.9898503,0.0000030149863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011143525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0284294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021467922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052715857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003828786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07181734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005814","doi":"10.1353/rht.2016.0002","title":"El comentario de Alardo de Amsterdam a los Progymnasmata de Aftonio traducidos al latín por Rodolfo Agrícola","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Historical Studies in Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Imitation; Philosophy; Cola (plant); Art; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.03229750570336667,"score_gpt":0.27862511123306377,"score_spread":0.2463276055296971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08422499,0.028085716,0.0074866386,0.23222989,0.015247857,0.0000419996,0.0002194316,0.00023943721,0.6322241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80248994,0.0053686895,0.0015162729,0.011029028,0.0026861487,0.000054301556,0.00008382987,0.00052966224,0.17624219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984402,0.0009091216,0.00003932639,0.00024192326,0.00025092164,0.000118635326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800974,0.0012797372,0.00020161307,0.00011223095,0.00028407472,0.000112506576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015264156,0.00043568062,0.00025182607,0.00091429305,0.003501227,0.0044656997,0.0005654492,0.0021970952,0.0066927364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054360307,0.00019266053,0.00020661802,0.0009873431,0.0054334975,0.0025904053,0.0022444616,0.0038281698,0.0010926042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002389762,0.00001824431,0.0013378394,0.00054260605,0.000019548103,0.0020690751,0.1851986,0.00015298327,0.0040380843,0.6179758,0.16187984,0.026528409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053178237,0.000008233264,0.00051958807,0.00022804136,0.0000058570586,0.00016895248,0.013017654,0.00007103359,0.00075457065,0.0047899736,0.9804217,0.000008921336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008139882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013176979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008139882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040308926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011538683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02924633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005825","doi":"10.1353/rht.2015.0027","title":"The Politics of Eloquence: David Hume’s Polite Rhetoric by Marc Hanvelt","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Politeness; Persuasion; Politics; Rhetorical question; Passions; Philosophy; Appeal; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Literature; Sociology; Law; Political science; Theology; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.039356968981239054,"score_gpt":0.2500566498624168,"score_spread":0.21069968088117777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005825","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047895202,0.84722316,0.0009461805,0.08289567,0.005272536,0.000007925782,0.000027648819,0.000025539124,0.063122556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07232725,0.72877485,0.0014245568,0.039178055,0.028242277,0.00007815957,0.0000841534,0.00021506258,0.12967561],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647,0.0017718042,0.000097376345,0.00031706062,0.0010333911,0.00031037914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708813,0.0020064497,0.00015821718,0.000097573175,0.0004697303,0.00017993462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023971698,0.0006819392,0.0007783956,0.0031980933,0.0039401036,0.008808814,0.00088961876,0.0037023474,0.00561184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006802559,0.0005553018,0.00037692147,0.003459959,0.010008689,0.008617935,0.0024120926,0.0069657345,0.0037665674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002058498,0.000033251363,0.0001243655,0.0005703767,0.000011879633,0.00008866928,0.0061726673,0.00019665311,0.000103303784,0.38703918,0.52576923,0.07986982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030913698,0.0000047923513,0.00012577268,0.000675712,0.0000022648674,0.00005467286,0.0005305439,0.00003710636,0.00004084021,0.033015653,0.9655016,0.000007977839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014318363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0119067775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014318363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009380073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045847497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06805748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324006002","doi":"10.1353/rht.2014.0034","title":"Metamorphoses of Rhetoric. Classical Rhetoric in the Eighteenth Century ed. by Otto Fischer, Ann Öhrberg","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Historical and Literary Analyses","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Poetics; Rhetorical question; Humanism; Style (visual arts); Literature; Classics; Philosophy; Art history; Art; Theology; Poetry","score_opus":0.01827315577515622,"score_gpt":0.22335113030749956,"score_spread":0.20507797453234333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324006002","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004272809,0.9487335,0.00032127602,0.008831663,0.002289703,0.000005873034,0.000029687104,0.000019259014,0.039341703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03781538,0.85249597,0.00086751883,0.0045590145,0.0076273503,0.000042532552,0.00009298809,0.00006779346,0.0964314],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873513,0.00037090664,0.00008551664,0.00016956728,0.0004923086,0.00014656602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896276,0.0005385082,0.000103379956,0.000052619645,0.00022277299,0.000119965625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013392818,0.0009790158,0.0006717338,0.0042162244,0.002545794,0.0057603857,0.00073048664,0.0024216082,0.010720451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00215155,0.0006690533,0.0004411701,0.0035108475,0.0070781475,0.00656405,0.0018674583,0.0035514797,0.0041860924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049912476,0.00006011965,0.00043196042,0.0016525732,0.00001604675,0.00023120567,0.01217936,0.00019786805,0.00028224135,0.3125373,0.4491972,0.22316411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035894432,0.0000062856866,0.00041131806,0.0011122553,0.0000024885433,0.00012552098,0.000963304,0.000018493329,0.000038169856,0.016952097,0.9803603,0.0000060186953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008986541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014052683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010720451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068283128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005939008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049543083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324006007","doi":"10.1353/rht.2011.0006","title":"Oral Traditions and Gender in Early Modern Literary Texts ed. by Mary Ellen Lamb, Karen Bamford","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Spanish Literature and Culture Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Studio; Visual arts","score_opus":0.047087792243111916,"score_gpt":0.21934211728596925,"score_spread":0.17225432504285734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324006007","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012514875,0.65036666,0.00080973207,0.07283941,0.0043815235,0.000021437812,0.00009349473,0.000044989334,0.25892785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2960956,0.27693057,0.0010000435,0.009302276,0.0065730447,0.00010588288,0.00010032804,0.00022852879,0.40966377],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993198,0.0003624759,0.000028956547,0.0000827478,0.00014086673,0.000065198605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877983,0.0008340386,0.00011328951,0.00004376368,0.000121922225,0.000107067404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011506584,0.00067592954,0.0005608259,0.0016940758,0.004510912,0.006016914,0.00054132286,0.0019939828,0.010962834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023731717,0.0004931293,0.00018826894,0.0018619027,0.007641783,0.005554851,0.0019753068,0.0031314832,0.0028432289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119355755,0.000056458386,0.0016053914,0.00090176414,0.00002106475,0.00050381746,0.20289929,0.00010666533,0.0006157226,0.31237006,0.3622674,0.11853308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010197929,0.000023715553,0.0044585564,0.0016305915,0.000008448319,0.00033938792,0.029225027,0.00005039353,0.00013700812,0.026597552,0.9375017,0.000017370834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010616108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025243485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010962834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002719795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015535487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03667438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324006202","doi":"10.1353/rht.2014.0025","title":"Between Worlds: The Rhetorical Universe of Paradise Lost by William Pallister, and: Milton and the Art of Rhetoric by Daniel Shore","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Literature; Paradise; Philosophy; Erasmus+; History; Art; Art history; Theology; The Renaissance","score_opus":0.025515320401331216,"score_gpt":0.2318754741764288,"score_spread":0.20636015377509756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324006202","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006184226,0.5173002,0.0025982873,0.27091488,0.010910405,0.000049830025,0.00008445227,0.00007473884,0.19188295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23769003,0.23228662,0.0036360198,0.061429746,0.024159126,0.00022219888,0.0001298949,0.0003236161,0.44012278],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988827,0.0005896058,0.00003621755,0.00014859876,0.00025275574,0.000090056325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872154,0.0007875805,0.00011500914,0.000059463502,0.000160222,0.00015615413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019120796,0.0008150801,0.0003940875,0.0017430203,0.004049498,0.0059895893,0.0009711925,0.0030230195,0.0063683446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042874427,0.00044587546,0.0002945682,0.0018186442,0.011796901,0.011550602,0.0034092127,0.0065118815,0.0023622336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000411967,0.000029587023,0.00020352102,0.00026212612,0.0000071930144,0.00020756145,0.025182571,0.00013325257,0.00019880362,0.29278633,0.6439442,0.037003763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046793825,0.000012910853,0.0002939926,0.0005026629,0.0000029956134,0.00019447113,0.005796475,0.000082245686,0.000080252175,0.04057647,0.95243865,0.000014330413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069547566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010921946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069547566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00505244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025313748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03665811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324006239","doi":"10.1353/rht.2018.0014","title":"L’écriture des traités de rhétorique des origines à la Renaissance éd. par Sophie Conte, Sandrine Dubel","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Vernacular; Literature; Rhetorical question; Poetry; Narrative; Prologue; Philosophy; Criticism; Art; Classics; History; Humanities; Theology","score_opus":0.038198782484454886,"score_gpt":0.3040360005338297,"score_spread":0.26583721804937477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324006239","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049835495,0.636022,0.0037019022,0.13942517,0.008670702,0.000015104623,0.00006611405,0.00012944725,0.20698607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24857223,0.25774035,0.004420914,0.014535136,0.015404797,0.0000854681,0.000079655,0.00046302957,0.45869848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982613,0.0009902314,0.000035356254,0.00021872755,0.00039811997,0.000096320044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983057,0.0011201852,0.00011278029,0.0000812408,0.00027252035,0.000107511274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017046811,0.0007878288,0.0005454126,0.0016316086,0.0030668292,0.0056148344,0.00053966657,0.0020932916,0.0071067302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034851944,0.00044121823,0.00036407585,0.0009815056,0.0061525716,0.0047146333,0.0014786306,0.005677766,0.0023723554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004925062,0.00002625665,0.00038132275,0.0002273272,0.0000137142915,0.00020159174,0.013125804,0.00020848108,0.0005949856,0.64974755,0.27116635,0.06425736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003180323,0.000008049529,0.00034821325,0.0002114487,0.0000020735888,0.0001374391,0.00085041876,0.00009687744,0.0001468311,0.015633028,0.9825555,0.0000070026085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012386531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015670393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012386531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005611888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025534495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040717244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389951131","doi":"10.1353/rht.2023.a915455","title":"Translation and the Rediscovery of Rhetoric by Michelle Bolduc (review)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Translation (biology); Literature; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics; Chemistry; Biochemistry","score_opus":0.04695400945226419,"score_gpt":0.26639057729494786,"score_spread":0.21943656784268367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389951131","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000036777794,0.99415106,0.000025116926,0.003659494,0.0014752113,0.0000025156633,0.00000711735,0.0000029017774,0.00063988235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013007172,0.98839486,0.000082145,0.0052769836,0.002708085,0.000017999952,0.000040481318,0.0000070440506,0.002171682],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987256,0.000470793,0.00012313832,0.00015238623,0.00042472652,0.00010347553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972205,0.0014410678,0.0003846367,0.000049075188,0.0007081261,0.00019644646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018201096,0.0009028749,0.0012910579,0.0030151012,0.0007029397,0.0035684127,0.0010379476,0.002169731,0.007023338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006279866,0.00041810898,0.0004974645,0.005023654,0.0017257187,0.0041905832,0.0014869219,0.0029448099,0.0034947628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044559645,0.000016006981,0.00014436802,0.017815027,0.00006848283,0.00016217266,0.0007575346,0.00009205954,0.00017762127,0.0056957994,0.7169114,0.25811502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009127779,0.000018768897,0.0004971302,0.01516434,0.000027521139,0.00045261285,0.00034137763,0.000018733845,0.000052403557,0.0007391499,0.9826644,0.000014457271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005446446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075473594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007023338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024930513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050009014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023495376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}