{"meta":{"query_hash":"aa8796e52502","filters":{"venue":"Rutgers computer & technology law journal"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/aa8796e52502","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Rutgers+computer+%26+technology+law+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W118201152","doi":"","title":"Balance of Privacy vs. Security: A Historical Perspective of the USA PATRIOT Act","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rutgers computer & technology law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patriot Act; National security; Law; Legislation; Political science; Information privacy; Terrorism; Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.010536900195893251,"score_gpt":0.25522731378729446,"score_spread":0.2446904135914012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118201152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06634725,0.19877017,0.005121187,0.09632397,0.0023608094,0.000055474655,0.00041635448,0.00003398188,0.63057077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83221835,0.11908521,0.0019415393,0.0131926825,0.0031843474,0.000111755675,0.0001968526,0.00004939328,0.03001979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772006,0.001212147,0.00009969551,0.00028303056,0.00043486737,0.00025019317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709713,0.0019012488,0.0003694204,0.00008028389,0.00041256612,0.00013938382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015555604,0.00039148456,0.00019883,0.0031514422,0.0032018942,0.006056402,0.00047527338,0.0028757642,0.0028002744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033576984,0.00024791292,0.00024235944,0.0040731677,0.011039815,0.006590659,0.0015992898,0.0039614327,0.00041487065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019002073,0.000021901164,0.0022987328,0.00011905021,0.00000685926,0.0002327691,0.011642318,0.00023173606,0.00012161286,0.9287686,0.019656196,0.036881294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004145789,0.00006249477,0.014562411,0.0016822062,0.000010428348,0.00052464445,0.014127962,0.000539057,0.00034348335,0.09264509,0.8754589,0.000039111063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0135585265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014923157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0135585265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007866719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022955243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05707735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W191193321","doi":"","title":"Back to the Future: Crime and Punishment in Second Life","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rutgers computer & technology law journal","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Dance; Visual arts; Clothing; Advertising; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.008088813390812421,"score_gpt":0.25018194913980724,"score_spread":0.24209313574899483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W191193321","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06942825,0.0672396,0.0009776686,0.5255843,0.008454975,0.000059700247,0.00018019302,0.00009455094,0.3279808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80930126,0.03749651,0.0004264707,0.076760486,0.0036472876,0.00017559534,0.0001603659,0.00017078353,0.07186132],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995738,0.002696285,0.000073924864,0.00025166507,0.00047925772,0.0007607619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99520004,0.001568134,0.00051355164,0.00020867297,0.00048668392,0.0020228887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002924306,0.00050614576,0.0006772462,0.0013446612,0.018198982,0.012899151,0.0011799616,0.0058782063,0.01883356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070597264,0.00036871317,0.00038796864,0.0015837068,0.019894572,0.015364821,0.0074549927,0.012579628,0.0020968267],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037329046,0.00014757279,0.0054556318,0.0002391139,0.000017908606,0.0014567656,0.28227952,0.00008588231,0.000042979485,0.19967839,0.45270103,0.057857823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015842343,0.000048415975,0.00814332,0.0018497296,0.0000072856806,0.0022246726,0.4797484,0.00014916698,0.000060732393,0.05219807,0.45550042,0.000054014297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023177788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047300268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023177788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009961264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060766838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07227433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030890","doi":"","title":"Reviving the World Wonder: Why Rooftop Gardens Should Cover Urban Landscapes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rutgers computer & technology law journal","topic":"Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Square (algebra); Incentive; Procurement; Agricultural economics; Public administration; Geography; Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.034468932453965616,"score_gpt":0.2531578718872417,"score_spread":0.21868893943327608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070212945,0.029083947,0.010281287,0.2555198,0.008921861,0.00016396264,0.00036808275,0.0006479112,0.6248001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7611921,0.01752987,0.010269165,0.04431307,0.0021757402,0.00013866785,0.0001954583,0.00058803445,0.16359787],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989353,0.0004104134,0.000025916124,0.00016596027,0.0002499023,0.00021248292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982797,0.0004903181,0.00016300855,0.00016243625,0.00040146956,0.0005029615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017619755,0.0002951698,0.00020612215,0.00048439243,0.0041891686,0.0070636347,0.0011583345,0.0029264037,0.032696705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035289594,0.00018731922,0.00027448186,0.0005948095,0.009273098,0.006889328,0.003594311,0.0030928748,0.0052691507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008821347,0.00011207381,0.007531642,0.00085991004,0.000019052864,0.00092995027,0.030262226,0.00036101943,0.0012845306,0.30250016,0.49148655,0.16456473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000725122,0.000029449755,0.0025956216,0.0005440332,0.0000054078723,0.00036719546,0.020817973,0.00013282828,0.00035194785,0.024406537,0.95072436,0.00001747588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006357624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01976699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032696705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038161054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019696464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10938132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192338577","doi":"","title":"The Sound of Silence: Why and How the FCC Should Permit Private Property Owners to Jam Cell Phones","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rutgers computer & technology law journal","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Silence; Business; Internet privacy; Advertising; Commission; Computer security; Telecommunications; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.02820450413870265,"score_gpt":0.25403940933289715,"score_spread":0.2258349051941945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192338577","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009019688,0.007818678,0.004600826,0.70575213,0.006826001,0.00017515755,0.00015521134,0.00014026549,0.26551202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27201658,0.006488205,0.0042357505,0.54653424,0.005065982,0.00029746117,0.000102375816,0.0001877102,0.16507171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914465,0.0023879788,0.00029489346,0.00074911094,0.0035194855,0.0016021014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880363,0.007073439,0.00042127105,0.00036411048,0.0037974105,0.0003073372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009823959,0.00055600354,0.00045149305,0.0008065596,0.012327167,0.0090184,0.0027898983,0.028391171,0.006351314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02327569,0.00044275753,0.00092305744,0.00074955105,0.014540656,0.005517549,0.0014767409,0.012271871,0.0023750407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047180627,0.000052254687,0.0008868754,0.00008297874,0.000011687506,0.0009481427,0.007845001,0.00038128707,0.000956864,0.5488689,0.42359334,0.016325388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038186452,0.000050525377,0.001652779,0.0004879184,0.000041146708,0.00032192378,0.010396555,0.0007288082,0.0014526739,0.046224996,0.938482,0.000122608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.378252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28637838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.378252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018200131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018954583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75210065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W256246592","doi":"","title":"Upgrading the National Power Grid: Electric Companies Need an Economic Incentive to Invest in New Technology","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rutgers computer & technology law journal","topic":"ICT Impact and Policies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blackout; Deregulation; Electric power industry; Electricity; Electric power transmission; Electric power system; Incentive; Electric power; Monopolistic competition; Telecommunications; Grid; Economics; Power (physics); Business; Engineering; Electrical engineering; Market economy; Monopoly","score_opus":0.008286794144528247,"score_gpt":0.2298936566255809,"score_spread":0.22160686248105266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W256246592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062452494,0.027854905,0.004846148,0.22669645,0.012804568,0.00007654981,0.00042658145,0.00060835667,0.72044116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18532623,0.07719717,0.009193758,0.08222032,0.0098950425,0.00013350787,0.0011245965,0.00024683794,0.6346625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926406,0.00010063657,0.000029057725,0.0000769516,0.000438904,0.00009034711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989267,0.00021401081,0.00009604393,0.00005655767,0.00047866075,0.00022790069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007608609,0.00031497443,0.00015874472,0.00041183396,0.0013093749,0.005631616,0.0006930798,0.0032844706,0.0431629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002425521,0.00017231883,0.00015664459,0.0013724648,0.0009531098,0.006200182,0.0012930076,0.0032204264,0.010420536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023094906,0.00003124991,0.0013254281,0.00024181233,0.0000039770443,0.00018232493,0.00023580046,0.00023051878,0.00043077752,0.08224784,0.73422503,0.18082209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003698472,0.000010325848,0.00061837543,0.0002230946,0.000002258051,0.000098682984,0.00036320963,0.00012669225,0.00007800454,0.011120799,0.98734784,0.000007000291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030119254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062942933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0431629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001741699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023274978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14439434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265608184","doi":"","title":"Going Where No Taxman Has Gone Before: Preliminary Conclusions and Recommendations Drawn from a Decade of Debate on the International Taxation of E-Commerce","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rutgers computer & technology law journal","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Tax revenue; Recession; Taxpayer; Tax reform; Economics; Business; State (computer science); Economic policy; Finance; Market economy; Public economics","score_opus":0.01417269080050393,"score_gpt":0.2226181474236636,"score_spread":0.20844545662315966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W265608184","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071576955,0.055882458,0.001515243,0.88411975,0.012176056,0.00026411604,0.000468978,0.000042961678,0.03837269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25089303,0.22973157,0.007028304,0.4655156,0.011041132,0.00089242746,0.0012256253,0.00011492626,0.033557337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99354124,0.002638828,0.0005031579,0.00061715674,0.0015220181,0.0011775407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95390105,0.030762784,0.0019188246,0.00059657876,0.010852795,0.0019679412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016380943,0.0009846124,0.0014175687,0.005791602,0.008230514,0.018011473,0.003517799,0.017190069,0.017641308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05060606,0.00041360105,0.0013209997,0.012061646,0.0072517437,0.01993722,0.0043852106,0.013529654,0.0037881178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033877176,0.00039040556,0.0109783355,0.004136289,0.00006601179,0.0011944387,0.013127968,0.0006199992,0.00027294003,0.3447478,0.45547813,0.16864894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006276787,0.00015488818,0.014080604,0.022172414,0.00017051875,0.0003722288,0.1782811,0.0010429673,0.0005466918,0.1098312,0.67314035,0.00014423982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024365671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038806997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024365671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012364169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02092466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089708686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W266006277","doi":"","title":"Google and Ye Shall Be Found: Privacy, Search Queries, and the Recognition of a Qualified Privilege","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rutgers computer & technology law journal","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Subpoena; Personally identifiable information; The Internet; Government (linguistics); Popularity; Privacy law; Information privacy; Business; Privacy policy; Law; World Wide Web; Computer security; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.036554930350327156,"score_gpt":0.30515777829387825,"score_spread":0.2686028479435511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W266006277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05831262,0.05828889,0.0024683634,0.21438006,0.0019766607,0.000080719954,0.0010052627,0.00020800972,0.66327935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89523584,0.027571823,0.00077460264,0.015475833,0.0020777716,0.000068930436,0.00044756255,0.00007536426,0.058272254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969946,0.0010623345,0.00013084814,0.00036015562,0.00094786164,0.00050426077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908551,0.0055224616,0.001392055,0.0006076846,0.00082092406,0.0008017797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024664656,0.00027745712,0.00042020614,0.0023052327,0.0037338536,0.012048414,0.0009984733,0.006190599,0.021983165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011617275,0.00025974822,0.00031673722,0.0055493144,0.01128593,0.014050675,0.003832287,0.002525523,0.002409227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011945763,0.000047322595,0.008010601,0.00029873935,0.0000116910105,0.0005140644,0.0057596155,0.00037690008,0.00014100538,0.8000192,0.12055498,0.064146474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002591174,0.00005543517,0.021039715,0.0013778287,0.000033036755,0.0013877779,0.017573448,0.002490568,0.00025953958,0.42812082,0.527537,0.00009909823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033617515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027381925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033617515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060033454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040092324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073541045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W97818279","doi":"","title":"Robin Hood versus the Bullies: Software Piracy and Developing Countries","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rutgers computer & technology law journal","topic":"ICT Impact and Policies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Multinational corporation; Globalization; Enforcement; International trade; Politics; Sovereignty; TRIPS architecture; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.008391814535292997,"score_gpt":0.2266740926468907,"score_spread":0.2182822781115977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W97818279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29653192,0.11105243,0.0018428654,0.24207595,0.0011267612,0.0000911863,0.001198442,0.000073906216,0.34600657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93102926,0.047600072,0.0004350409,0.0069083343,0.0007918586,0.00005223008,0.00014593644,0.000019745508,0.013017485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898046,0.0005257054,0.00005956077,0.0001101034,0.00015128047,0.00017288573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915354,0.005141898,0.0020607715,0.00015785955,0.0005092339,0.0005948253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016876768,0.00030165623,0.0003885931,0.0032347422,0.0027878375,0.0047948076,0.0005851053,0.0023169904,0.018123625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066481344,0.00014683732,0.00020302547,0.0065212324,0.008329328,0.00570439,0.0035216627,0.0021506678,0.0006139407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013771902,0.000164149,0.13551275,0.0015433525,0.00005068565,0.0033074007,0.111224905,0.0004492189,0.0001483012,0.5485404,0.08639072,0.112530366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032116608,0.00018072926,0.12764357,0.007178093,0.000059059203,0.0028444135,0.30795005,0.00080634153,0.0002680304,0.1343261,0.41862884,0.000082589366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014799633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012652268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018123625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023353915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024142943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060629547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}