{"meta":{"query_hash":"26242569634f","filters":{"venue":"Saint Louis University public law review"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/26242569634f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Saint+Louis+University+public+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W2217286220","doi":"","title":"The 'Bipartisan Trade Deal,' Trade Promotion Authority and the Future of U.S. Free Trade Agreements","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Saint Louis University public law review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free trade; Negotiation; International trade; Trade promotion; Context (archaeology); International free trade agreement; Trade barrier; Promotion (chess); Free trade agreement; Politics; Commercial policy; Economic integration; International trade law; Political science; International economics; Business; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.02377169219623829,"score_gpt":0.2403373263957575,"score_spread":0.2165656341995192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217286220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005950591,0.06962961,0.0011770973,0.15070169,0.0016125409,0.000024797959,0.00018014808,0.000038601273,0.77068496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5633214,0.056479592,0.001704907,0.11953157,0.003008156,0.00021326555,0.00031585313,0.0000750892,0.25535026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944062,0.0020626385,0.00014136298,0.00038963513,0.0018581556,0.001141961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499524,0.0022520605,0.00052730995,0.0003636916,0.0013547174,0.00050692813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006211615,0.00032318375,0.00025692952,0.0015321426,0.0057042628,0.01164813,0.0008337768,0.008741111,0.01302375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007822936,0.00028086762,0.0003889919,0.002655857,0.0069419374,0.006601219,0.0019110407,0.005682837,0.0021303005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006388922,0.000013262479,0.0003274758,0.000040442857,0.0000027553906,0.000037448965,0.0003121957,0.000058856866,0.000026050311,0.9303975,0.05929476,0.009482829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000098861765,0.000015818508,0.00187608,0.000513804,0.000005983097,0.000056416637,0.0005858519,0.00013773136,0.00005665431,0.108646624,0.88808346,0.000011699474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03508524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04830994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03508524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071165822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01226094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06976205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254494288","doi":"","title":"Domestic Violence and the Construction of 'Ideal Victims': Assaulted Women's 'Image Problems' in Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Saint Louis University public law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Agency (philosophy); Acknowledgement; Context (archaeology); Ideal (ethics); Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Poison control; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Computer security; Medicine","score_opus":0.01368615533496723,"score_gpt":0.25549906045984383,"score_spread":0.2418129051248766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254494288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61286336,0.17091736,0.0010562186,0.0926809,0.00087147177,0.00006318878,0.000083708495,0.000016510194,0.121447355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691685,0.026498545,0.00020166134,0.0017461125,0.0001712307,0.000024716395,0.000026635587,0.000008638077,0.0021539652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932547,0.0051138336,0.00013802631,0.00016524942,0.0009307358,0.00039737625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922484,0.0038076248,0.0018803552,0.00024008985,0.0014055918,0.00041785333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005267404,0.00020663062,0.00040807133,0.0022433514,0.0029632235,0.005048982,0.00095475354,0.0014510978,0.0023007898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01780505,0.00024252033,0.0001641086,0.002037785,0.017099656,0.003211286,0.0023391128,0.0021470585,0.00020234831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001280368,0.0002940885,0.06402049,0.0016376179,0.00008922933,0.0011355105,0.30356783,0.00023721985,0.00036843753,0.39963686,0.04359624,0.18528849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066312,0.00021730087,0.2104625,0.0036672761,0.00009657756,0.0029172243,0.51930046,0.00027019606,0.000644226,0.06711741,0.1951642,0.00007631969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015779814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03308371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015779814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003633262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048095747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031375945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108871197","doi":"","title":"Evaluating the NAFTA and Commission for Environmental Cooperation: Lessons for Integrating Trade and Environment in Free Trade Agreements","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Saint Louis University public law review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Free trade; Negotiation; Commission; Free trade agreement; Liberalization; International trade law; Trade barrier; Trade agreement; International economics; Rules of origin; International free trade agreement; Business; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.08141534988904153,"score_gpt":0.30750939171766983,"score_spread":0.2260940418286283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108871197","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044033498,0.046205416,0.009207132,0.6804958,0.0053812386,0.00023424141,0.0003157236,0.00012936785,0.21399757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8559274,0.02143829,0.01994547,0.08772472,0.0025693113,0.0003341571,0.00042271154,0.0001755922,0.011462221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9236834,0.0476361,0.0027208345,0.0030491697,0.016784241,0.006126235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80527234,0.12693238,0.004723259,0.0049665063,0.051438022,0.0066675167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14201234,0.0012340753,0.0018111452,0.0057520377,0.01211607,0.04969014,0.0041934038,0.020893935,0.00570502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19735269,0.00061277853,0.0011664218,0.008239799,0.026764512,0.045161936,0.008608028,0.018066946,0.00063371495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094921765,0.00012901975,0.0060321568,0.00028983495,0.0000680439,0.000283216,0.0038728707,0.0060658697,0.00006638929,0.85696155,0.06737445,0.05876171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012355819,0.0001828623,0.0057524876,0.00376016,0.00015869559,0.00007780962,0.0169782,0.0057525425,0.000393651,0.67975336,0.2868327,0.00023405849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19068308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19088753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80931693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057322647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0896215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.751042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}