{"meta":{"query_hash":"24b75780f28f","filters":{"venue":"Santander Art and Culture Law Review"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/24b75780f28f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Santander+Art+and+Culture+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2591808235","doi":"10.4467/2450050xsr.16.034.6142","title":"What does heritage change? A Review of the Third Biennial Conference of the Association of Critical Heritage Studies (ACHS), Montreal, 3-8 June 2016","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Santander Art and Culture Law Review","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"History; Association (psychology); Cultural heritage; Environmental ethics; Anthropology; Sociology; Archaeology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13824616742581222,"score_gpt":0.32767714839951345,"score_spread":0.18943098097370123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591808235","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000052016843,0.99269617,0.000024173154,0.004943967,0.00075285684,0.000020728576,0.00010111309,0.0000024085812,0.0014066976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012608863,0.99349785,0.00011886925,0.0035906003,0.00051772955,0.000036963836,0.00012655629,0.0000023569376,0.0008481877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994699,0.001349554,0.0007060251,0.00036997552,0.002472595,0.00040286224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98242134,0.00700363,0.001942494,0.00029632222,0.0072211856,0.001115023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011149128,0.0012155471,0.0020269232,0.014496351,0.0019435253,0.005658398,0.0019872398,0.0037604584,0.005917099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020802883,0.00084379327,0.0011914711,0.016965179,0.0024624646,0.004420105,0.0028136603,0.0044985744,0.000977322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007987335,0.00007986909,0.00088015164,0.06421954,0.00023729356,0.00010371433,0.0009735578,0.00015477194,0.00029827183,0.011471835,0.48509723,0.4364039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013140332,0.000025299054,0.0024642847,0.052167233,0.00014080165,0.00007611902,0.00047654557,0.00002081508,0.00006684797,0.00085530407,0.943672,0.000021570755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12266758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29108167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12266758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017127594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05657934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24390715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127708375","doi":"10.4467/2450050xsnr.20.016.13019","title":"Democratizing Museum Practice Through Oral History, Digital Storytelling, and Collaborative Ethical Work","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Santander Art and Culture Law Review","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Museology; Digital storytelling; Museum informatics; Storytelling; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Sociology; Institution; Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Visual arts; Media studies; Art; Social science; Narrative; Pedagogy; Engineering; Literature","score_opus":0.08096882758724917,"score_gpt":0.3902368831116509,"score_spread":0.30926805552440173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127708375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11472319,0.018871333,0.018482111,0.15206723,0.00058553874,0.00039254676,0.000034408404,0.00013706318,0.69470656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546431,0.0063098976,0.009490964,0.006705961,0.0002479305,0.00021429377,0.000019509725,0.000042932224,0.022325452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9647787,0.02705035,0.00094837515,0.0012918003,0.0036060254,0.0023246773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95758736,0.03216458,0.0023734835,0.0037003402,0.0016090645,0.0025651732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03574908,0.000294974,0.00030497246,0.0030844677,0.015134098,0.01754775,0.002547343,0.0047149486,0.005608084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025472699,0.00037556837,0.00039593567,0.0017761623,0.061446432,0.011392698,0.01851726,0.0048311157,0.0005352673],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013712068,0.000112367714,0.002192491,0.00042417206,0.000015416585,0.00044249024,0.1607826,0.00046594362,0.00039240913,0.72146714,0.014708154,0.098983094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027519478,0.00006828105,0.0030197299,0.0014351384,0.000014681339,0.00047206864,0.20482899,0.0003343867,0.0007619997,0.13253638,0.6564522,0.00004866145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017130123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047080826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03574908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010260827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031074498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18906146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309783982","doi":"10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.001.16391","title":"Sytuacja prawna wraku RMS Titanic","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Santander Art and Culture Law Review","topic":"Maritime and Coastal Archaeology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Convention; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Political science; Law of the sea; History; Archaeology; International law; Municipal law","score_opus":0.018075029580679143,"score_gpt":0.22699279915551543,"score_spread":0.2089177695748363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309783982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21074642,0.01483619,0.008225866,0.004984129,0.0009328582,0.00022529939,0.0020111648,0.0005169822,0.7575212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4479182,0.007226644,0.00469555,0.0013534164,0.00018821053,0.00014654483,0.0013288505,0.0002670256,0.53687555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965346,0.000027293263,0.000025681398,0.000088203524,0.00011401709,0.000091226466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99989665,0.000014137714,0.00002139633,0.000018579527,0.000028599825,0.000020614321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021186798,0.0002712216,0.00029886345,0.00086329685,0.0021231398,0.0024221048,0.00031625535,0.0005679197,0.019708743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044839,0.00029872844,0.00019408802,0.00096550514,0.0017887683,0.0010380761,0.002052874,0.0018630091,0.004693398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022037113,0.00013730829,0.015328606,0.0009772207,0.000056112138,0.00465316,0.014718145,0.001812682,0.024679186,0.50696826,0.086676106,0.34377283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008942093,0.00004072418,0.026332615,0.0001948228,0.000012724036,0.0011367095,0.0022712098,0.00019541975,0.0020206578,0.0051848856,0.96257585,0.000025440804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028888747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06503467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028888747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017412374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031019535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06593233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320013241","doi":"10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.015.17028","title":"Repatriation of Indigenous Peoples’ Cultural Property: Could Alternative Dispute Resolution Be a Solution? Lessons Learned from the G’psgolox Totem Pole and the Maaso Kova Case","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Santander Art and Culture Law Review","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Repatriation; Cultural heritage; Mandate; Negotiation; Cultural property; Intellectual property; Alternative dispute resolution; Totem; Political science; Law; Sociology; Dispute resolution; Anthropology","score_opus":0.1323171592905816,"score_gpt":0.2972027811041874,"score_spread":0.1648856218136058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320013241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43975666,0.0068682344,0.011116059,0.0574147,0.00050973915,0.00042126796,0.00004598506,0.00002251349,0.48384482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98373127,0.0013603813,0.0021014973,0.0017113589,0.00010094461,0.00015602211,0.000019503757,0.000012707531,0.0108062485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98208916,0.010307881,0.0007000728,0.0010874617,0.0021242304,0.0036911531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98732126,0.009691937,0.0007924021,0.0006827058,0.00075864047,0.00075294136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016685696,0.00046499094,0.0010487535,0.0015071428,0.018531224,0.018534737,0.0039996947,0.014246124,0.007963049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020517254,0.0005563794,0.0008680666,0.0019365242,0.02394159,0.014815152,0.010480695,0.007785765,0.0005875186],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026544201,0.000084639425,0.0012353846,0.00017019658,0.000011392874,0.008063752,0.084244326,0.00046126996,0.0002081946,0.8977786,0.0015993546,0.006116277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011417787,0.000113539405,0.0030625162,0.001543009,0.000048136215,0.006293498,0.58242,0.0030389705,0.00049083255,0.23919694,0.16359022,0.00008820442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020558644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035502173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020558644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009313229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007520394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088243425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}