{"meta":{"query_hash":"6907142efd74","filters":{"venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6907142efd74","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Scandinavian+Political+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1925115143","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9477.2010.00254.x","title":"Political Attention and Public Policy: A Study of How Agenda Setting Matters","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Representation (politics); Public opinion; Public administration; Public policy; Danish; Quarter (Canadian coin); Policy studies; Political economy; Public relations; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07839401603066362,"score_gpt":0.4011233116740639,"score_spread":0.32272929564340025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1925115143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90491545,0.000038258408,0.0000074076315,0.090276904,0.00027596898,0.000389238,0.000017410708,0.000060045506,0.0040193405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798155,0.0000016793562,0.000040733346,0.00075359194,0.0007942125,0.000047866895,0.00000242597,0.000014932949,0.00036303556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706525,0.00039149242,0.00034757282,0.00030819274,0.0004925992,0.0013949237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998371,0.00043499944,0.00008970987,0.00018130663,0.000255814,0.000667179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006439614,0.00017696709,0.00037926104,0.00016511952,0.00067389046,0.00014492983,0.00014271797,0.000118810196,0.00002318788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001960133,0.00015225257,0.00007123107,0.00033888704,0.0012228963,0.00022980034,0.000109633984,0.000253031,0.000009435253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038395374,0.00012920742,0.31502268,0.000037836086,0.000051013176,0.0000027425442,0.001165216,5.026726e-9,0.00023728661,0.68278754,0.0002804345,0.00028217435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013537091,0.00081086345,0.79473776,0.00011334217,0.00018082002,0.00001183358,0.086200036,0.000015933701,0.00017204991,0.111690216,0.0041065663,0.00060688716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02911741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0139978845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5710974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020322106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011702634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9773478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940610975","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.12003","title":"The Effects of Human Interest and Conflict News Frames on the Dynamics of Political Knowledge Gains: Evidence from a Cross‐national Study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Dynamics (music); Political science; National interest; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.12867256770626137,"score_gpt":0.4496354592477289,"score_spread":0.3209628915414675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940610975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840685,0.0012708365,0.0000019058052,0.00863101,0.00041161868,0.00075198757,0.00003526282,0.000019384257,0.0048094997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862534,0.00013498747,0.0000052590367,0.00032254457,0.00045762522,0.00011333055,0.0000012720885,0.0000103711645,0.00032925027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975457,0.0006663864,0.00039287732,0.00022047093,0.00049337506,0.000681169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806099,0.018322082,0.0001054244,0.00019477305,0.0005092711,0.00025855354],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041136408,0.00017192349,0.00036725178,0.000041473653,0.00089023565,0.000112064256,0.00036772666,0.00009931375,0.000022830352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0131702,0.00010028464,0.00009265939,0.00015217748,0.005002541,0.00009445822,0.00018408037,0.00023838176,0.000014914956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068169657,0.000119699835,0.20977445,0.000030612406,0.0001172514,7.3869836e-7,0.01874735,7.523045e-9,0.000012613685,0.77060646,0.00037533976,0.00020862994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004231718,0.000734838,0.45746452,0.00048861053,0.00009655303,2.4546196e-7,0.21730287,0.000014168627,0.00031787346,0.32278156,0.00019594941,0.00017964157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025851618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007543994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44782493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030598586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012096294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061436017","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.t01-1-00077","title":"Introduction: Social Capital in Scandinavia","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":226,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Individual capital; Social mobility; Social reproduction; Welfare state; Social status; Political science; Political economy; Positive economics; Capital (architecture); Social position; Economic capital; Sociology; Politics; Development economics; Social change; Economic growth; Economics; Social science; Human capital; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.04154271721955423,"score_gpt":0.3567077175730661,"score_spread":0.31516500035351186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061436017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75140023,0.0030151247,0.000009141245,0.025731988,0.0023456796,0.0003435216,0.0000099174285,0.00014090145,0.21700346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920163,0.00015774343,0.00003485561,0.00033196603,0.0038281132,0.000043847216,0.0000024772978,0.0000136814815,0.0035709713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975229,0.00036260212,0.0002700239,0.0003378472,0.00038598067,0.0011206432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993464,0.00016955269,0.000043616477,0.00009163253,0.000113691174,0.0002351178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062876486,0.00017406793,0.0003441378,0.00008660716,0.0011012092,0.000062881714,0.00013842822,0.0001566585,0.0004903731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075812207,0.000167261,0.000114649345,0.00057011464,0.0013848564,0.00017816812,0.000042954933,0.00025976842,0.00012830054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011281127,0.000058575537,0.012586519,0.000008819123,0.000029121795,0.000013147966,0.028407346,1.6255e-7,0.000001917698,0.9481231,0.010201488,0.0005585077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090648746,0.00012460587,0.046485007,0.000041859348,0.00004776336,0.0000075713447,0.3108654,6.2303417e-7,0.00006589588,0.5235057,0.11732793,0.0006211503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011784866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020301333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4246174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007477083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008990138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8469722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073133299","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.12014","title":"Testing the Impact of <scp>P</scp>olitical Generations: The <scp>C</scp>lass of 94 and Pro‐feminist Ideas in the <scp>S</scp>wedish <scp>R</scp>iksdag","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Formative assessment; Core (optical fiber); General election; Test (biology); Sociology; Law; Computer science; Telecommunications; History","score_opus":0.07828450494638517,"score_gpt":0.36920252568723855,"score_spread":0.2909180207408534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073133299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9025421,0.0027563712,0.000033307748,0.0019965926,0.00036223186,0.0017045876,0.00018619916,0.00006695877,0.090351604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949854,0.00024621858,0.00014299042,0.0006447092,0.0010949264,0.00036497915,0.000017701486,0.000050169325,0.0024528832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929946,0.001284444,0.0012206156,0.000743872,0.0014143,0.0023421708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97260296,0.024723263,0.00046436998,0.00073769427,0.00087362685,0.000598111],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023156472,0.0005932054,0.0008868342,0.00020427955,0.0019963644,0.00055755244,0.0010319926,0.00032480093,0.000008071781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037877128,0.0003318686,0.000377936,0.0011000363,0.005028003,0.0003586835,0.00048288255,0.0007359795,0.000036242578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010647085,0.00047694473,0.28863797,0.00021917012,0.00049901986,0.000018621675,0.10643742,0.000047982252,0.0003804886,0.56456244,0.0384683,0.00025058124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006344411,0.00034934364,0.43730906,0.00017724415,0.00023522423,0.000037751437,0.38937148,0.000385616,0.00053000526,0.16735533,0.003550362,0.00006414217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015011819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008104257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39720714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035573592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005166373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767314214","doi":"","title":"The Future of Democracy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Economic history; Political science; Sovereignty; Alliance; Law; History","score_opus":0.016536788119028353,"score_gpt":0.3414726358173556,"score_spread":0.32493584769832723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767314214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5240889,0.012762635,0.0000021525939,0.08556716,0.0006431495,0.00024236471,0.000032561595,0.00007328637,0.37658778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98971254,0.0043398803,0.000025179583,0.00039870274,0.0004995262,0.0000037609118,8.03835e-7,0.000003792734,0.0050158245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877447,0.000113877046,0.0001630032,0.0001098147,0.00028355743,0.00055529055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993762,0.00023584354,0.000024314651,0.00012395832,0.00009733322,0.0001423501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002768632,0.0000775871,0.00015385504,0.000011684352,0.0011717175,0.00003247523,0.00021868284,0.00005582629,0.00011618116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014197278,0.000050134866,0.00007905234,0.00016620722,0.0012380595,0.00006274376,0.000030637028,0.00009663467,0.00005647547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009738475,0.000017921278,0.004262206,0.000005837142,0.000031432668,0.0000021272922,0.0026556964,1.9317456e-7,3.6020606e-7,0.9719158,0.00431019,0.01678853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014998368,0.000052429088,0.009478231,0.000027787017,0.00002824134,0.0000012753213,0.051326465,0.0000053968824,0.0000054375673,0.45116413,0.48763934,0.00012127873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009522743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029345504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52075166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001008034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041701227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90120226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380995288","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.12260","title":"A Sami land‐claims settlement? Assessing Norway's Finnmark Act in a comparative perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legislation; Human settlement; Political science; Supreme court; Settlement (finance); Indigenous rights; Law; Geography; Human rights; Business; Archaeology","score_opus":0.1707908798207829,"score_gpt":0.5151480573596158,"score_spread":0.3443571775388329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380995288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8975952,0.0005234345,0.000004138995,0.013748751,0.00088384585,0.0010428687,0.00016604454,0.00014541946,0.085890286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951965,0.00016388316,0.00005384797,0.001452121,0.0004366841,0.00044446942,0.000024545057,0.000023471095,0.002204449],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554354,0.0005002733,0.00054125977,0.00045957134,0.00023417083,0.0027212044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975297,0.0016627391,0.0001118921,0.00019566936,0.0003130537,0.0001869783],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077759026,0.00027990786,0.0008029583,0.00024131808,0.0035542299,0.000018026007,0.00015514302,0.00015854219,0.00036415595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040435913,0.00022458368,0.00009718553,0.00060043763,0.0003564202,0.00011191326,0.000537285,0.00068625517,0.0018745854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086877866,0.00013647517,0.6836108,0.00022052128,0.00039421028,0.00012754422,0.21991985,0.0000110319825,0.0000064926408,0.072329536,0.023052497,0.00010414265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009863889,0.00017405397,0.4024533,0.00019360287,0.00003383981,0.0000018149028,0.58135045,0.000055786033,0.0000027106885,0.012041084,0.002476221,0.00023076839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032388347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029441135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3614306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024859733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023408956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392287653","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.12267","title":"Understanding institutional layers and modes of change for energy transitions: Analysis of Norway's electricity sector reforms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Restructuring; Electricity; Layering; Hierarchy; Institutional change; Economic system; Energy transition; Transition (genetics); Business; Energy (signal processing); Scale (ratio); Energy sector; Institutional analysis; Industrial organization; Political science; Economics; Market economy; Sociology; Public administration; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.20422163097002027,"score_gpt":0.3276976676948605,"score_spread":0.1234760367248402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392287653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98285556,0.0028547898,0.008375778,0.001721036,0.00007097783,0.00024490405,0.0007054858,0.000026659363,0.0031448244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993702,0.0002882747,0.00009977798,0.000084874635,0.000029152787,0.00006057641,0.000009933238,0.000004896412,0.00005231274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999097,0.000017699947,0.00019028358,0.00022023603,0.00018193059,0.0002928843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999635,0.00016827213,0.000032352644,0.00007593829,0.000020106467,0.000068341265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013864438,0.00010076111,0.00027294707,0.00010013815,0.00013248489,0.000009746927,0.000057157817,0.000043958597,0.00007855408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000630718,0.00007822169,0.00012221397,0.0006193204,0.00074052083,0.00015947958,0.00004715416,0.000040829684,5.038687e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006137625,0.00006785465,0.009498243,0.00043869278,0.0006327803,0.0000032913144,0.0039835875,0.00010289724,0.00052191026,0.9841533,0.00006847368,0.00046765167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012523729,0.0012009086,0.14848882,0.00064843934,0.0034607325,0.000013739185,0.07878226,0.038367413,0.0090337265,0.7164517,0.0013619217,0.00093795685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008272048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009847392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26770154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084535073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011230146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3189788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413312480","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.70017","title":"Institutional Responses to Threats and Harassment of Academics: Evidence From a Survey Among Political Scientists in Norway","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Politics; Political science; Survey research; Criminology; Sociology; Law; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.07943937622692158,"score_gpt":0.3724547074165243,"score_spread":0.2930153311896027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413312480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98508793,0.0016517284,0.0083690155,0.0033078715,0.00040750933,0.00023282129,0.000055854154,0.00003262452,0.0008546405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971454,0.000080112135,0.0019067636,0.00039643366,0.000032030002,0.00003068402,0.0000014499038,0.0000031878717,0.0004039325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790037,0.00023913044,0.00036351915,0.00052105886,0.00033412027,0.0006417986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982548,0.0010203889,0.000035372155,0.0002602363,0.00015276964,0.0002764756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007741314,0.00015806322,0.0003258984,0.000305963,0.00019138456,0.00007988047,0.0003656158,0.0000875794,0.0000040447353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001765068,0.00013927824,0.000039763538,0.0007190037,0.00066025526,0.00027696558,0.0005651905,0.00019462511,0.00001281159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006543699,0.00004136766,0.64958435,0.00003084365,0.000036493813,0.000017042625,0.00032285124,0.0000014037292,0.00026417058,0.34709924,0.00011645513,0.0024203123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023927032,0.00009969551,0.961634,0.00077146903,0.000009609672,0.0000033040412,0.000117616895,0.00018877232,0.002822824,0.0339341,0.000048980775,0.00013037451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039846636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011547995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31316516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039158127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016851841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6023646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}