{"meta":{"query_hash":"6907142efd74","filters":{"venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6907142efd74","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Scandinavian+Political+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1925115143","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9477.2010.00254.x","title":"Political Attention and Public Policy: A Study of How Agenda Setting Matters","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Representation (politics); Public opinion; Public administration; Public policy; Danish; Quarter (Canadian coin); Policy studies; Political economy; Public relations; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07839401603066362,"score_gpt":0.4011233116740639,"score_spread":0.32272929564340025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1925115143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34458932,0.020413047,0.015960189,0.054477416,0.00044578922,0.000120597426,0.0003174398,0.00004386843,0.5636323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924233,0.0027867882,0.0005416982,0.0007053496,0.00021185345,0.000039004386,0.000054944656,0.000019826612,0.0032172268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.984928,0.010740318,0.0003240041,0.0008993285,0.0012989719,0.0018093348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9409672,0.05046086,0.0041834717,0.0011574003,0.0017009008,0.0015302496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011882455,0.00035301025,0.0008747923,0.004742845,0.0037439635,0.010403095,0.0009119674,0.0031945838,0.011799641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045858584,0.00034041476,0.00049412774,0.010748028,0.0099450685,0.0064900187,0.0043465486,0.0030798216,0.00073991134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001950881,0.00015016466,0.02224057,0.0007370831,0.00012588498,0.00024115635,0.036445886,0.0018109069,0.0005563323,0.86219347,0.005270623,0.07003288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013148354,0.0002003537,0.10340881,0.0011843843,0.00020659476,0.0001868216,0.03600797,0.0024005603,0.00062472606,0.687112,0.16846187,0.00007444671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0126724355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008512394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0126724355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076532327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004698555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06284118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940610975","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.12003","title":"The Effects of Human Interest and Conflict News Frames on the Dynamics of Political Knowledge Gains: Evidence from a Cross‐national Study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Dynamics (music); Political science; National interest; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.12867256770626137,"score_gpt":0.4496354592477289,"score_spread":0.3209628915414675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940610975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99625045,0.000156575,0.000043841388,0.00006321895,0.0000030659899,0.0000058818996,0.00004997198,6.278683e-7,0.0034262503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993956,0.00014951425,0.00003927553,0.00002506261,0.0000057634325,0.0000082020815,0.00007476343,0.0000013933269,0.00030052068],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963831,0.0020947696,0.00019750276,0.00042931247,0.00046731537,0.00042799898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92864275,0.052198477,0.012080129,0.0027524533,0.0025410603,0.0017851205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053253686,0.00019678402,0.00036121297,0.0016483574,0.001107829,0.0029090687,0.00037927047,0.00059545785,0.004479913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019575786,0.00024772863,0.00035236604,0.0022174793,0.0019501379,0.002077311,0.002473697,0.00087506784,0.00043843724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012389772,0.0013790138,0.915071,0.00018699517,0.000538266,0.0003018549,0.048695453,0.00028282104,0.0006965021,0.0019015439,0.0005155586,0.029192053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016272303,0.00018199772,0.9764538,0.000053402367,0.00011864534,0.000075392905,0.021189198,0.0001653091,0.00026047655,0.00021260935,0.0012606902,0.000012210192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070397155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010347447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070397155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069751043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048018392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028163552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061436017","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.t01-1-00077","title":"Introduction: Social Capital in Scandinavia","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":226,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Individual capital; Social mobility; Social reproduction; Welfare state; Social status; Political science; Political economy; Positive economics; Capital (architecture); Social position; Economic capital; Sociology; Politics; Development economics; Social change; Economic growth; Economics; Social science; Human capital; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.04154271721955423,"score_gpt":0.3567077175730661,"score_spread":0.31516500035351186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061436017","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024723908,0.5688874,0.0014972705,0.121575445,0.09810004,0.000046577363,0.0018755316,0.00009603119,0.18319786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30070904,0.46290234,0.0014895658,0.023255859,0.08562335,0.00017438097,0.003765045,0.00017404984,0.121906385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998973,0.0003344728,0.00010949598,0.00019937458,0.00023409944,0.00014957407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972963,0.0016547692,0.00030504251,0.00010970027,0.00037754234,0.00025665067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001003578,0.00078491686,0.00076531345,0.0031299312,0.0028808399,0.008946478,0.000630311,0.0030970576,0.016291196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028368577,0.00022556534,0.0003341932,0.0051173186,0.0020783758,0.002868375,0.0018439912,0.0018859573,0.0021213596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010428454,0.00005448485,0.008123455,0.0021982444,0.000067595975,0.00056848634,0.008940446,0.0008829013,0.0003460876,0.1351027,0.7338567,0.10975458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005946062,0.000032253487,0.011033154,0.0019876114,0.000017969824,0.00023692462,0.0027435343,0.00010321569,0.00006210208,0.01056117,0.97319406,0.00002217898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006702177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008219525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016291196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018686178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021539582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054499507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073133299","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.12014","title":"Testing the Impact of Political Generations: The Class of 94 and Pro‐feminist Ideas in the Swedish Riksdag","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Formative assessment; Core (optical fiber); General election; Test (biology); Sociology; Law; Computer science; Telecommunications; History","score_opus":0.07828450494638517,"score_gpt":0.36920252568723855,"score_spread":0.2909180207408534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073133299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99194676,0.00008181331,0.0001518281,0.00035611467,0.000016552445,0.000026253505,0.00007397352,0.000002131682,0.0073446385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881494,0.00003912161,0.00009371057,0.000069691414,0.0000095826645,0.000034575572,0.00008556467,0.0000039642277,0.00084880827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98829365,0.0076707215,0.00025925844,0.0010806979,0.0016084273,0.0010872317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9569544,0.030942976,0.006776128,0.0018618606,0.0013301442,0.0021344472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010218658,0.00035157634,0.00031739197,0.0006542453,0.0013956651,0.0026436145,0.001127537,0.00074354484,0.008512083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026712408,0.00031835202,0.0007230855,0.0010138873,0.0040228586,0.0024781593,0.0037074941,0.001923406,0.0006139582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026796008,0.0019580827,0.882246,0.0001660508,0.00058085244,0.0007672833,0.053712007,0.0009792332,0.001292504,0.013030009,0.0014683779,0.041119885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008376428,0.0011365335,0.95291066,0.000047042115,0.00017181269,0.000061551575,0.037941415,0.0007108884,0.0010657739,0.0012833853,0.004566622,0.000020412457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025942527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024361994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025942527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026859909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023180842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0540421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767314214","doi":"","title":"The Future of Democracy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Economic history; Political science; Sovereignty; Alliance; Law; History","score_opus":0.016536788119028353,"score_gpt":0.3414726358173556,"score_spread":0.32493584769832723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767314214","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026501687,0.41891694,0.004559326,0.23153047,0.0064233425,0.000027050375,0.00029117413,0.00013492799,0.33546656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38270015,0.37536177,0.008768896,0.033658843,0.011805599,0.00025498998,0.00036318612,0.0002745122,0.18681197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963167,0.0016693415,0.00014185302,0.00063987053,0.0007791648,0.0004530927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976439,0.0009319596,0.00019279076,0.00046781925,0.00037345375,0.00039013277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003801364,0.0008821053,0.00091576553,0.0019099631,0.004157509,0.011502178,0.0010495906,0.004464979,0.019797342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043513137,0.00038574042,0.0004709005,0.001936445,0.01778742,0.012811513,0.0046004034,0.005905681,0.005239182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001062005,0.0000123172995,0.00016874049,0.0001116753,0.0000074372592,0.000036811893,0.0013932872,0.00017025332,0.000056231678,0.8700261,0.08115377,0.046852734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042312913,0.000008546962,0.00022254982,0.00048838,0.0000020125437,0.000050271385,0.0007024649,0.000069923764,0.00003251695,0.35944155,0.6389698,0.000007782335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036485167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062771793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019797342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008102298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070675286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06622875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380995288","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.12260","title":"A Sami land‐claims settlement? Assessing Norway's Finnmark Act in a comparative perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legislation; Human settlement; Political science; Supreme court; Settlement (finance); Indigenous rights; Law; Geography; Human rights; Business; Archaeology","score_opus":0.1707908798207829,"score_gpt":0.5151480573596158,"score_spread":0.3443571775388329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380995288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69921196,0.0053202263,0.00044515127,0.007952587,0.00022605689,0.000046162833,0.00030666837,0.000007763043,0.2864834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952779,0.00064830045,0.0002082237,0.00048457042,0.000013596511,0.0000144107435,0.00006575523,0.0000055726155,0.0032816709],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915536,0.0027300077,0.0003720388,0.00066214445,0.0022441177,0.0024381562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899421,0.0052168267,0.00130379,0.00029615205,0.0023148777,0.0009263082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010791951,0.00026566332,0.00054639654,0.00400066,0.013570906,0.009252662,0.001573584,0.0024751872,0.0064801015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012185842,0.0002495916,0.00031487294,0.005273937,0.017014993,0.0036764962,0.0048121223,0.0020018027,0.00020939417],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014732037,0.000086135835,0.06766037,0.00044436357,0.00005640991,0.0027303414,0.47218633,0.00081623317,0.0004777889,0.42526346,0.0076209945,0.022510318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009367242,0.000057424666,0.095486544,0.0011129578,0.00004003054,0.00022954801,0.8113097,0.0002842322,0.00021239198,0.0044777347,0.08672547,0.000054556393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90243393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95697594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90243393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07695742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054332737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5583677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392287653","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.12267","title":"Understanding institutional layers and modes of change for energy transitions: Analysis of Norway's electricity sector reforms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Restructuring; Electricity; Layering; Hierarchy; Institutional change; Economic system; Energy transition; Transition (genetics); Business; Energy (signal processing); Scale (ratio); Energy sector; Institutional analysis; Industrial organization; Political science; Economics; Market economy; Sociology; Public administration; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.20422163097002027,"score_gpt":0.3276976676948605,"score_spread":0.1234760367248402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392287653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9569041,0.0005939784,0.0040231505,0.0021530637,0.000025394947,0.0000697693,0.00017405828,0.000015190272,0.036041357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874425,0.000104823004,0.0005425683,0.00002833331,0.0000020041462,0.000010757363,0.000029952436,0.0000029126138,0.0005343015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888915,0.00045442727,0.0000665321,0.0000945491,0.00018436549,0.00031099413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969476,0.001590234,0.0007461812,0.00014986147,0.00034246204,0.00022358871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026435405,0.000088732144,0.00017777311,0.001385926,0.001248861,0.0033832977,0.00038084073,0.0005087997,0.0028213728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00548808,0.00011938675,0.00035365584,0.0015587748,0.0039226017,0.0027358255,0.0015037339,0.0006277155,0.00008529492],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027693488,0.00013870421,0.2520507,0.00030299107,0.00006911477,0.0018229742,0.069794595,0.048454177,0.002554232,0.56915474,0.002998781,0.052382093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039937808,0.00011410723,0.633424,0.00067541754,0.00006066481,0.00020576964,0.15707968,0.045614507,0.0013245775,0.09603966,0.06533349,0.00008828967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11431447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.151196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11431447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01349613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063570794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22729814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413312480","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.70017","title":"Institutional Responses to Threats and Harassment of Academics: Evidence From a Survey Among Political Scientists in Norway","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Political Studies","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Politics; Political science; Survey research; Criminology; Sociology; Law; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.07943937622692158,"score_gpt":0.3724547074165243,"score_spread":0.2930153311896027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413312480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99758434,0.0003519967,0.00012153392,0.00030573795,0.000018785173,0.000025758745,0.00016413363,0.0000023069729,0.0014254474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988096,0.00047257709,0.00006549352,0.00016600444,0.000018400819,0.000033789267,0.00009063474,0.0000021498472,0.0003413676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191624,0.003862236,0.0009031709,0.00063190307,0.0015083364,0.0011780722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9588505,0.01423343,0.017054422,0.0013644722,0.0039930744,0.0045042057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009200059,0.00023424481,0.0005583195,0.002667614,0.0021541896,0.003025189,0.0006976364,0.0008464249,0.002726704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022356708,0.00031389584,0.0002857543,0.0029711823,0.002877367,0.0011690676,0.002888371,0.0009856528,0.0004776735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009453094,0.00012096712,0.92460465,0.00018211066,0.00002659323,0.00043318523,0.06496143,0.000046366855,0.0004952396,0.0002512248,0.0007468267,0.008036831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007874022,0.00016461038,0.8747414,0.00022071924,0.000014207844,0.00018160668,0.11969136,0.00007699925,0.00021205988,0.00020340281,0.0044615674,0.000024204663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029231448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036571626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023913987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004351072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058122635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}