{"meta":{"query_hash":"ce7b95734ab8","filters":{"venue":"Schmalenbach Business Review"},"cohort_total":1,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1,"exported":1,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ce7b95734ab8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Schmalenbach+Business+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1558553756","doi":"10.1007/bf03396731","title":"Discussion of “The Effect of Sunk Costs on the Outcome of Alternating-Offers Bargaining Between Inequity-Averse Agents”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Schmalenbach Business Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Outcome (game theory); Economics; Microeconomics; Point (geometry); Focus (optics); Inequity aversion; Positive economics; Inequality","score_opus":0.06048597782086401,"score_gpt":0.37675219108202274,"score_spread":0.3162662132611587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558553756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16012949,0.0034208037,0.18171175,0.19048259,0.0030506232,0.00028370856,0.00076893833,0.00025929997,0.45989278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444675,0.0013865987,0.016267003,0.013078374,0.0011731426,0.00023285122,0.00007672389,0.00007795263,0.023239885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536777,0.0025736007,0.00018540453,0.00051093305,0.0008080363,0.0005542171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9644181,0.029463403,0.0020802768,0.0020928371,0.0013281801,0.00061725744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012541595,0.00044213628,0.0009732688,0.00059721037,0.002465133,0.0036824835,0.0038170896,0.0074717887,0.027556313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049594935,0.0005154757,0.0017452578,0.00082665496,0.005716443,0.0058899266,0.002245876,0.006896796,0.0011444902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010129728,0.000053928285,0.00063868513,0.00009086649,0.000039003407,0.00012728908,0.00020337227,0.004586189,0.00047645473,0.97816694,0.0074637323,0.00805229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050919276,0.00005545779,0.0019232339,0.00007763211,0.00006174403,0.00010549372,0.0002477024,0.010679518,0.00076904293,0.974708,0.011274942,0.00004639119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023241949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026781987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027556313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001980464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021685616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09218502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}