{"meta":{"query_hash":"fdd551b79148","filters":{"venue":"Science Editing"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/fdd551b79148","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Science+Editing"},"results":[{"id":"W2122939648","doi":"10.6087/kcse.52","title":"One event, several perspectives: a reflection on the 2015 Council of Science Editors annual meeting","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Editing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Reflection (computer programming); Political science; Computer science; Library science; Physics; Programming language","score_opus":0.19563391752472162,"score_gpt":0.42791184527885584,"score_spread":0.23227792775413422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122939648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011385202,0.0038437997,0.00026512885,0.8588657,0.13291645,0.000027180175,0.000056218443,0.000029867017,0.0028571328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03499707,0.010831482,0.0018098105,0.779727,0.14831458,0.00019122037,0.00015637315,0.00036659537,0.023605851],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9229862,0.024965119,0.004928525,0.0061042174,0.030926622,0.010089316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7951026,0.053633906,0.015485541,0.0057828994,0.05971074,0.07028435],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08816702,0.0023150677,0.002003934,0.0030767298,0.025984168,0.04426826,0.005783659,0.03606557,0.00861624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17590022,0.0018319556,0.0032311683,0.0038471334,0.01354177,0.025069432,0.015354085,0.08590689,0.0033574975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007281443,0.000074498035,0.00037064575,0.00021357147,0.000031525084,0.00071864924,0.008513405,0.00006981051,0.00023323426,0.0046701757,0.9780805,0.00695116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029905588,0.000032355394,0.0005823568,0.00036161946,0.000016748243,0.00018080533,0.010667118,0.000052012325,0.0000953337,0.0015621737,0.986331,0.00008851781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011072479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022397745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95573175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018624991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03558386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46627736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292510728","doi":"10.6087/kcse.277","title":"Charting variety, scope, and impact of open access diamond journals in various disciplines and regions: a survey-based observational study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Editing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration","keywords":"Directory; Library science; Scope (computer science); Publication; Variety (cybernetics); Publishing; Audience measurement; Scopus; Diamond; Diversity (politics); Bibliometrics; Political science; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.8758646529958605,"score_gpt":0.6987223672361662,"score_spread":0.17714228575969426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292510728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864157,0.0017514257,0.00038701727,0.00039003053,0.000018395645,0.00013140727,0.009085401,0.000024187493,0.0017965666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939288,0.001012747,0.0007502295,0.000111452915,0.000032581625,0.00010724979,0.0036977844,0.00001496586,0.00034406758],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99328554,0.0016504107,0.0016439026,0.00085106614,0.0020927254,0.00047639152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9153932,0.018964898,0.046666335,0.0019643095,0.0116489595,0.0053623193],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007102573,0.00022896686,0.00062985014,0.012141883,0.0007535456,0.002648233,0.000980614,0.0005522712,0.002563615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033027846,0.00034027442,0.00052710425,0.014493898,0.0009717344,0.0033731705,0.0020086477,0.0007099369,0.00090128917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007397906,0.00005010086,0.9925869,0.00024265012,0.000058868798,0.00008811308,0.0014724936,0.000053940534,0.00011396006,0.00010403538,0.0010886415,0.004066333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006721814,0.00010055695,0.99021393,0.00014580623,0.00003182331,0.00040003157,0.00604378,0.00018613542,0.000093100774,0.00008962453,0.002665287,0.000023299357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007408342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009501299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012872062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020033037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03756249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292510811","doi":"10.6087/kcse.285","title":"Improving Journal Article Tag Suite for multilingual articles","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Editing","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. National Library of Medicine; Canadian Medical Association","keywords":"Suite; Computer science; Variety (cybernetics); Set (abstract data type); World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Library science; Data science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Law","score_opus":0.015362391554324064,"score_gpt":0.2954643337713264,"score_spread":0.28010194221700235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292510811","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015236262,0.0007245102,0.8062707,0.005849253,0.0041557276,0.0028717637,0.006581593,0.14695325,0.011357033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030616535,0.00077556097,0.8972658,0.0019007624,0.001148345,0.0009400282,0.026310263,0.024167843,0.016874753],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96466684,0.010519863,0.009254289,0.0029231668,0.0113452,0.0012906863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69888264,0.0616348,0.018137762,0.068464115,0.14303279,0.009847932],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044559997,0.0023035037,0.0021132042,0.020748999,0.0038885155,0.014322166,0.003780182,0.0026153005,0.019373981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16243066,0.0027624352,0.0024661594,0.012458086,0.00204044,0.022018516,0.0072965827,0.006073353,0.04148195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090326346,0.00074926065,0.009069917,0.0017713954,0.00021521821,0.0011812169,0.0034370425,0.0035799437,0.060935866,0.020061685,0.25602895,0.6420663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002105895,0.0005222978,0.005631893,0.00062741275,0.00025488768,0.0015400263,0.0021335625,0.03241908,0.08382942,0.013985834,0.85822666,0.0006183466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061075804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00835843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98567784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033227657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009386496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23565865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401981553","doi":"10.6087/kcse.345","title":"Our journey as intern junior editors at the <i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Editing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Experimental psychology; Mathematics education; Applied psychology; Neuroscience; Cognition","score_opus":0.3165060921893268,"score_gpt":0.5587387415186065,"score_spread":0.24223264932927968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401981553","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017174693,0.03443379,0.010634881,0.36540923,0.5015222,0.0003451949,0.0022124215,0.0033261226,0.0649416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057525195,0.024961637,0.020705625,0.05479954,0.15294343,0.00043882197,0.0025662817,0.004247309,0.68181205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99434197,0.00086187513,0.00037190382,0.00093587564,0.0026628613,0.0008253818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9080083,0.0028377988,0.00375537,0.0030648855,0.016965315,0.065368354],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016478373,0.0013129758,0.0013567267,0.003932849,0.0035720717,0.01176743,0.0014392957,0.0026523871,0.08597368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023744138,0.0010156909,0.00085616857,0.0022999167,0.0021448233,0.0079973,0.006268925,0.0071864966,0.08842741],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005678377,0.00008633531,0.0013175196,0.00017155391,0.000012079648,0.0001559395,0.0005018259,0.000028386457,0.00076116284,0.001260027,0.93480736,0.060841046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014874371,0.00008885439,0.0037881911,0.00015169602,0.000016166685,0.00037289556,0.0011845208,0.00009288409,0.00037809403,0.0019580198,0.9919234,0.000030494944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010367556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040259394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98352164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008948363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2876106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}