{"meta":{"query_hash":"af0fcc63c032","filters":{"venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},"cohort_total":68,"direct_labels_cover":48,"predictions_cover":68,"exported":68,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/af0fcc63c032","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Science+and+Engineering+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1547114668","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9524-1","title":"Sherry Turkle. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Public Relations and Crisis Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of technology; Philosophy of mind; Epistemology; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Engineering; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.03825495952327895,"score_gpt":0.30925669022062335,"score_spread":0.2710017306973444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547114668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.919326,0.0024297594,0.015689285,0.058194384,0.00024244854,0.00009707613,0.0000070654683,0.00019006139,0.0038239048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939647,0.00062386453,0.004886773,0.00036494902,0.00007797289,0.000008977269,0.0000017198394,0.0000068740956,0.00006420401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908596,0.00005002281,0.00009943339,0.00021884918,0.00034969585,0.00019601683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918664,0.00030928775,0.00003204409,0.00028202875,0.00010767267,0.00008231964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015479347,0.00007321988,0.00009792748,0.00016744217,0.0006155222,0.00019518462,0.0003895366,0.00022722434,0.000012881864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007995024,0.00006771434,0.0000114801405,0.0006326495,0.0007825716,0.0003712319,0.00010514648,0.00041971085,0.0000025786687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061416617,0.000069133705,0.019863516,0.000023683053,0.000043685886,0.0000011690784,0.18946745,0.0008858808,0.03513597,0.64381504,0.00072344515,0.10996488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005351422,0.000056663157,0.021331642,0.0002319807,0.000035816138,0.0000018426871,0.046478476,0.0548427,0.0018507816,0.07655996,0.7973286,0.0007464372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038115392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048326195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7966051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035127996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096723845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5761933},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1968126248","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9259-1","title":"Fairness in Technological Design","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Computer science; Philosophy of science; Diversity (politics); Economic Justice; Distributive property; Design science; Abstraction; Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Sociology; Knowledge management; Economics; Law; Business; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.12719525819126157,"score_gpt":0.34581212421042873,"score_spread":0.21861686601916716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968126248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8676148,0.0001239556,0.10460268,0.0038119338,0.0009214654,0.0008720531,9.099799e-7,0.000677362,0.02137481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709195,0.000010264354,0.0027553276,0.00004479615,0.000026896729,0.000015608543,1.02748054e-7,0.000003890239,0.000051191582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987476,0.00007543051,0.00014166944,0.00021275134,0.000485123,0.0003374475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992896,0.00018196691,0.000024065843,0.00013347038,0.00031679595,0.00005410546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012615398,0.00006689781,0.00008343344,0.00026307313,0.00041913826,0.000064087464,0.0003353749,0.0001425849,0.000008428064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006541488,0.000061287006,0.000008480705,0.0015892399,0.0013167072,0.0003385213,0.00006188328,0.00045236465,0.0000025225543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013937704,0.000016349899,0.0047224658,0.000030262283,6.8839955e-7,0.0000055206206,0.037700374,0.00030885774,0.0003277493,0.95606804,0.0000074311342,0.0008108875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001055494,0.00041437714,0.36894807,0.0004933419,0.000018123284,0.000031761687,0.14933734,0.04312587,0.006423082,0.39441833,0.033230375,0.0025038465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012478009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023016722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5616497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017791176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004886749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7831245},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1981764105","doi":"10.1007/s11948-002-0010-9","title":"Animal spare parts? A Canadian public consultation on xenotransplantation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Xenotransplantation and immune response","field":"Medicine","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Toronto General Hospital; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Animal welfare; Animal rights; Government (linguistics); Bioethics; Public relations; Political science; Public health; Engineering ethics; Public administration; Medicine; Law; Engineering; Nursing","score_opus":0.07493330756461404,"score_gpt":0.2848848608729474,"score_spread":0.20995155330833337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981764105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744207,0.00018029257,0.00055874843,0.020854857,0.00020152619,0.00022228417,0.00002433317,0.0001062237,0.0034310252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99814117,0.00031298966,0.0002796778,0.0011066706,0.000020565825,0.0000054812913,0.000012359513,0.000006850461,0.00011422017],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915296,0.000012730011,0.00009681999,0.00015322362,0.0003472009,0.00023709417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993089,0.00013375698,0.000013370433,0.00008577116,0.00020184914,0.00025636196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000553364,0.000073787276,0.00007368886,0.00028297075,0.00022987196,0.000065468914,0.000048580903,0.000078156125,0.000049027865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007615371,0.00006876098,0.000010771697,0.00048101717,0.00013060065,0.0001798326,0.000002320368,0.00030095343,0.00003349023],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009224613,0.00044014916,0.013298359,0.0025945765,0.00015595816,0.0008262931,0.13453026,0.007077086,0.5576181,0.2371753,0.0021642703,0.04319723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005763888,0.0020058623,0.431392,0.0013613311,0.0001731962,0.001236293,0.0025514585,0.36161864,0.037707172,0.00006249378,0.15480737,0.0013202704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006743735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008626934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5199109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074754236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032450605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28039914},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1982061847","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9265-3","title":"Those Who Have the Gold Make the Evidence: How the Pharmaceutical Industry Biases the Outcomes of Clinical Trials of Medications","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pharmaceutical industry; Conflict of interest; Publication bias; Clinical trial; Philosophy of science; Confirmation bias; Variety (cybernetics); Actuarial science; Public relations; Psychology; Positive economics; MEDLINE; Medicine; Economics; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.9134429979255221,"score_gpt":0.6818156810325046,"score_spread":0.23162731689301752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982061847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60193825,0.0068991636,0.00018956733,0.384563,0.0030734057,0.0015502761,0.00014161284,0.00006791423,0.0015767907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867684,0.004027227,0.000042699758,0.008489669,0.00030521967,0.00006155359,7.458273e-7,0.000009915242,0.00029454756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487424,0.002605508,0.00095930946,0.0002938275,0.0007704407,0.0004966851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952047,0.045824457,0.00048329894,0.00069308997,0.0005633905,0.00038875014],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.067366965,0.00019574372,0.00045987565,0.00006110235,0.0008433067,0.00004464372,0.0015097391,0.0008422631,0.00013502252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042899705,0.00007780184,0.00016903772,0.0006497464,0.006290933,0.00016238363,0.00031170665,0.008171551,0.0000028596342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009185898,0.001235306,0.33577147,0.0010914985,0.0024816403,0.000035946632,0.10099049,0.002930545,0.015934318,0.2917632,0.026035488,0.22081152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023802067,0.00049999374,0.48464465,0.0010786206,0.003005575,0.00010574014,0.022644876,0.11495035,0.07003601,0.0029552907,0.2968113,0.00088736415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005528724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017351926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38483015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020506463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008238252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99641335},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1985574895","doi":"10.1007/s11948-002-0048-8","title":"Funding, objectivity and the socialization of medical research","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Philosophy of science; Socialization; Medical research; Relation (database); Public funding; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Medicine; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.867341102438921,"score_gpt":0.7027063626572796,"score_spread":0.16463473978164145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985574895","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010058003,0.9942598,0.00003580115,0.0036205053,0.00066822127,0.0004061705,0.000018220433,0.000028697632,0.00086204574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00386973,0.9954391,0.000011876095,0.00027035334,0.00025951586,0.000035855344,0.0000022905858,0.000012398531,0.00009888363],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644643,0.0011638101,0.00034959632,0.0003174603,0.0012049896,0.0005177104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936052,0.0054305014,0.000093514216,0.0001476128,0.0003123546,0.00041080092],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03508635,0.00017009732,0.0005649715,0.00022822856,0.00087296515,0.000052317544,0.00051110884,0.0016739317,0.00011152044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077416813,0.00011425975,0.000058202782,0.0011118333,0.0042970716,0.00009980352,0.00033131626,0.00871792,0.0000054296306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010179615,0.00003869577,0.00001820036,0.015035566,0.000055178574,0.000008615328,0.0025761074,0.000012622734,0.0000054881802,0.1470963,0.0005081871,0.83463484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024426996,0.000020333193,0.000008769983,0.001517406,0.00011335639,0.000033147193,0.00006695248,0.006924376,0.000010717365,0.00030493454,0.9906348,0.00012095393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004790562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000073704746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011543205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996221},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1990854685","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9545-9","title":"A Room with a View of Integrity and Professionalism: Personal Reflections on Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research in the Neurosciences","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"University of Queensland; McGill University","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Engineering ethics; Set (abstract data type); Academic integrity; Scientific integrity; Philosophy of science; Psychology; Face (sociological concept); Reflection (computer programming); Research integrity; Scientific misconduct; Critical reflection; Medical education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Medicine; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.49807211554920583,"score_gpt":0.5166400519386172,"score_spread":0.018567936389411344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990854685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98356235,0.000015871341,0.0004966334,0.014864556,0.00021787449,0.00018297869,0.000003751888,0.000015971982,0.00064003264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99842644,0.00003358467,0.0006644012,0.00080238265,0.000013748413,0.000013749727,1.1323097e-7,0.0000040417685,0.00004156752],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741185,0.0004757739,0.00018594015,0.00033799015,0.0013471501,0.00024130536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550647,0.0040172166,0.000055739696,0.00018009264,0.00019747592,0.000042988635],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01373179,0.00007422366,0.000108350556,0.0004757547,0.0005584136,0.000058604626,0.0003560163,0.000060035458,0.0000015520029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015319981,0.000045829012,0.000008023543,0.002132823,0.0028759227,0.00021688917,0.0001019991,0.0023664155,3.2335214e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000129619675,0.00005795336,0.00006085068,0.00011161008,3.3740272e-7,0.0000013870758,0.0055045118,0.00003605915,0.7330731,0.2607932,0.000012397503,0.00033560663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018134281,0.0072816703,0.039564908,0.006838949,0.000023537581,0.00027066842,0.015850578,0.06487569,0.77775365,0.06343151,0.021249568,0.0010458115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047370995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002020598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19736171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019419955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004371241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993515},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2016124933","doi":"10.1007/s11948-004-0071-z","title":"The biochemical bases of the placebo effect","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pain Management and Placebo Effect","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Placebo; Medicine; Chemistry; Computational biology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Biology; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.05390424995610835,"score_gpt":0.33151317964537846,"score_spread":0.2776089296892701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016124933","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000095904295,0.9970585,0.00017246223,0.00029029674,0.0009465313,0.0008617398,0.000009367152,0.00006202287,0.000503147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019019067,0.99783516,0.000023198363,0.00005928831,0.000044500383,0.00003729826,4.119898e-7,0.000014917121,0.00008330289],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799037,0.00040795156,0.00019820296,0.0003422356,0.00073817745,0.00032305002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871505,0.012235058,0.00010178207,0.00042564177,0.00002864216,0.000058366673],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010656672,0.00021698617,0.0003387209,0.000095617346,0.00044631824,0.0001289601,0.0010613517,0.00016620963,0.0000010353335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023759589,0.00010230113,0.00013252861,0.0011057658,0.001043135,0.00007455505,0.00031859166,0.0009813822,0.0000059400636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020357551,0.000034393463,0.000008107156,0.09053722,0.000043882043,0.000016052452,0.00065213337,0.0009478293,0.0112973815,0.040491447,0.0008599164,0.8550913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099554,0.00003666086,0.0000028911313,0.00954475,0.00011042731,0.000017145487,0.0000039221263,0.0012103234,0.0060309675,0.000068390065,0.9826297,0.0002452482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004627798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.285839e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064919404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040769676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844637},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2021748399","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9543-y","title":"Framework for the Analysis of Nanotechnologies’ Impacts and Ethical Acceptability: Basis of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Assessing Novel Technologies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; Institut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologique; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Judgement; Warrant; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Individualism; Emerging technologies; Computer science; Business; Political science; Epistemology; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.07420019703060639,"score_gpt":0.42383107335486736,"score_spread":0.349630876324261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021748399","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40289393,0.00003103316,0.5849254,0.011593705,0.00007386588,0.00018560952,0.0000032757262,0.00010313513,0.00019002691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90405554,0.00009426724,0.095726416,0.00009553528,0.000008858087,0.000014348121,3.2289626e-7,0.0000029076073,0.0000018130621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990025,0.000025611213,0.00014896558,0.00023021911,0.00039230371,0.00020036513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986185,0.0008411056,0.00005284678,0.0002660322,0.00017010898,0.00005141224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006558309,0.000068353474,0.00016980666,0.0003490524,0.0005079694,0.00011266401,0.00043109516,0.00030231348,0.0000010733156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008020937,0.000048605973,0.000035493715,0.0017391685,0.0015011096,0.00016621931,0.00036763167,0.00043550137,4.198388e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007759145,0.00005754175,0.0006376802,0.00019443363,0.00006898981,3.565288e-8,0.060363248,0.012602017,0.008380616,0.75209856,0.0000080086365,0.1655811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022422298,0.00028644592,0.17369252,0.00018329638,0.00045925318,6.7448406e-7,0.31784487,0.4761793,0.00411029,0.02349986,0.0030229778,0.000496274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009716783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010780325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7285987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034682973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078298355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9602391},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2022009738","doi":"10.1007/s11948-005-0042-z","title":"Intellectual property and the commercialization of research and development","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury; Barrie Urology Group","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Intellectual property; Openness to experience; Business; IP address management; New product development; Public good; Product (mathematics); Exclusive right; Industrial organization; Law and economics; Economics; Marketing; Computer science; The Internet; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.5396202251358568,"score_gpt":0.37944103345105296,"score_spread":0.16017919168480388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022009738","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014369003,0.9965521,0.00028695277,0.0004093548,0.00020680236,0.0005772934,7.5217184e-7,0.000031054908,0.0017920097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016874326,0.9975949,0.00013908157,0.00013948226,0.00018502303,0.000019883557,0.0000042373736,0.000014826648,0.00021513714],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987926,0.000024798683,0.00024287609,0.00022807652,0.0004913112,0.00022037521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879235,0.00058768835,0.000061404215,0.000110712914,0.00043347556,0.000014387628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058819815,0.00014161854,0.0003262482,0.00036961155,0.00055074523,0.0002913547,0.00024576896,0.0001452331,0.000008993837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003198514,0.00006814186,0.000015244313,0.000827406,0.0012134751,0.00029154908,0.00042075518,0.0007149907,0.000010436905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000113478745,0.000013282466,0.0000030439965,0.012994196,0.000017280272,5.131553e-7,0.0030590198,0.000010140166,0.0000019466224,0.00997286,0.00029329638,0.9736231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086398475,0.000007063886,0.0000031855675,0.002697713,0.00002107954,0.000004541841,0.000088226225,0.0029548253,0.0000025145341,0.00004433794,0.9939768,0.00011332318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010371703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015213084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9936835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025396972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002312073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44710997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022118021","doi":"10.1007/s11948-003-0005-1","title":"Implementing ethics in the professions: Examples from environmental epidemiology","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Emulation; Information ethics; Incentive; Public relations; Conflict of interest; Political science; Applied ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Psychology; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.29373125483262186,"score_gpt":0.5236246500689055,"score_spread":0.2298933952362836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022118021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433344,0.00047259012,0.0009696059,0.051951814,0.0013038119,0.00042375238,0.000015277203,0.000038869126,0.0014898552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825019,0.0005129592,0.0019470076,0.014719159,0.0001649903,0.0000820466,0.000010459336,0.000008375271,0.000053059208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724853,0.0009678743,0.0003813526,0.0002267971,0.00030733304,0.00086812297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904627,0.009048858,0.000089514535,0.00023423249,0.000041635256,0.00012304791],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034408506,0.00008700358,0.00012892083,0.000103697945,0.0019829539,0.000012832796,0.00023022194,0.00027652734,0.000056469224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017400704,0.00006080464,0.000011623043,0.00032779295,0.00023304192,0.00016617392,0.00009532894,0.0026338887,0.000013746644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026256707,0.00005353488,0.15888591,0.00028926233,0.000005248536,0.0000010866977,0.34574023,0.00016735279,0.002355801,0.4890145,0.0018113517,0.0016730828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022778378,0.000025181056,0.30733445,0.00020834083,0.000004845561,0.0000026283603,0.08625762,0.001643451,0.000022752516,0.008775274,0.59532344,0.00017424635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020742922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027442962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59351206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014876932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001014458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022321973","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9263-5","title":"Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Research England; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Université de Montréal","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Warrant; Multidisciplinary approach; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Business; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.9480796414119428,"score_gpt":0.7291269966411988,"score_spread":0.21895264477074394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022321973","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002163252,0.99205005,0.000058451667,0.004974781,0.00012513867,0.002510247,0.000009884815,0.000023830104,0.00003129118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010942563,0.97954744,0.018725239,0.00017223897,0.000031243984,0.00028279555,0.0000017204945,0.000026243546,0.00011880146],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917159,0.00131759,0.0019066375,0.0013710223,0.002510998,0.0011778361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82298464,0.16476233,0.0011046275,0.0019668953,0.00764312,0.0015383867],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33378315,0.00029477887,0.0018701084,0.0014973974,0.0003504329,0.000054785272,0.00066038023,0.0008636344,0.0000011090151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.66652995,0.00022018795,0.00010179096,0.004171376,0.004977546,0.00017127102,0.00053854496,0.008108822,5.954828e-7],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018374694,0.000067211506,0.0001359718,0.915095,0.000013462511,0.0000043296186,0.0060687647,0.000001405063,0.000004581558,0.03413899,0.000014427201,0.044437524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029292572,0.0009200322,0.0005296283,0.9600006,0.00003994636,0.000020669268,0.00070442486,0.0003945808,0.0000066111547,0.0138254855,0.02294702,0.00031810682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021472647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009791714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33274683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041313132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018901218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024048799","doi":"10.1007/s11948-006-0032-9","title":"On teaching computer ethics within a computer science department","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Teaching and Learning Programming","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Agency (philosophy); Computer ethics; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Information ethics; Computer science; Medical education; Sociology; Engineering; Meta-ethics; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.02297975660374577,"score_gpt":0.28088746312450524,"score_spread":0.25790770652075945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024048799","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120576985,0.00003301583,0.8747137,0.0025181957,0.0013193501,0.000109322755,5.6309426e-7,0.0005615997,0.00016727012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66729206,0.0000017083104,0.33173165,0.00078197755,0.00015654856,0.0000046380305,6.66351e-7,0.000009573157,0.000021205746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629784,0.00009967131,0.00026162376,0.00085048395,0.0017640331,0.0007263781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981131,0.0007694099,0.00008551217,0.00055916543,0.00025186237,0.00022094745],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014235465,0.00023113549,0.00017079168,0.00046773322,0.0021022635,0.0014524341,0.001346949,0.00015583694,4.9475375e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092671363,0.00020557913,0.0000360239,0.0010612216,0.0008114761,0.00089108763,0.000558044,0.0030547697,0.000014827952],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016700913,0.00006227328,0.00016138605,0.000048760638,0.0000037198104,0.000016879236,0.0083270455,0.20019576,0.0013695348,0.74587953,0.00008102099,0.043852422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020625569,0.00025564313,0.0037222095,0.00021989914,0.0000043450423,0.00006308519,0.000023825154,0.98053306,0.00078970555,0.0012160533,0.012516081,0.00044981996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000107699074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005996601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78033733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017441515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006660938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958414},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2031584713","doi":"10.1007/s11948-013-9437-4","title":"Ensuring PhD Development of Responsible Conduct of Research Behaviors: Who’s Responsible?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Focus group; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Pedagogy; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.49109875405317005,"score_gpt":0.5198793828953219,"score_spread":0.028780628842151823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031584713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925345,0.00018055963,0.000069589805,0.006188673,0.000070724556,0.00032174695,0.0000014357743,0.00002095901,0.0006118033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98815405,0.00017345072,0.011081459,0.00016994837,0.000028201372,0.000019375393,8.0295064e-7,0.00000995929,0.00036276976],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963547,0.00007528382,0.0003329571,0.00021578938,0.002195712,0.00082554214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934618,0.0016215233,0.000046276604,0.00036189778,0.00213277,0.0023757366],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021222461,0.0000804601,0.00022635965,0.0007380206,0.00017619836,0.000022121661,0.00017352591,0.00014810565,0.000033881126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090843216,0.0000639599,0.000016545608,0.001349098,0.0009469472,0.00019002969,0.00013400477,0.0011194783,0.000008382549],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007131728,0.000057262747,0.0008273108,0.0014239898,0.000006396087,0.000010474148,0.006879364,0.000014147437,0.97885925,0.0015279853,0.00058489153,0.009737615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008984155,0.0007989227,0.105209604,0.0031112013,0.000009355357,0.00003690249,0.0017068515,0.0015549598,0.8707335,0.00027279553,0.015479405,0.00018806335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015681321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000069824137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108125724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013875027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021471476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98407584},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2033101023","doi":"10.1007/s11948-003-0024-y","title":"Masked ball: Ethics, laws and financial contradictions in hungarian health care","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Challenges","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Ball (mathematics); Health care; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11632966396564962,"score_gpt":0.43798260320039684,"score_spread":0.32165293923474725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033101023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7297965,0.027665658,0.0047978726,0.20846349,0.010190477,0.0034767971,0.00012065213,0.00064665405,0.01484184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950039,0.0014295661,0.00072557887,0.002623717,0.00010496464,0.00003722484,0.0000014510991,0.0000120152545,0.00006158855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807554,0.0003229105,0.00033311656,0.0003002326,0.00036990395,0.00059831294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986077,0.0006165273,0.00005501927,0.00016551303,0.00025724125,0.00029801865],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007045624,0.00011437515,0.0002167734,0.00016676552,0.00139945,0.000021322843,0.000091450354,0.00047479113,0.000004126519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034001498,0.00010817995,0.000012168319,0.00037923528,0.00020215687,0.00012867943,0.00003477251,0.0030928568,0.000003120704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052133087,0.000023199596,0.006520748,0.0029967825,0.000003579142,0.000007835494,0.34865233,0.00010421958,0.00024499686,0.63862735,0.0002674094,0.0025463554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021209973,0.0003618649,0.1617198,0.002905014,0.000008442131,0.000023724877,0.11705002,0.0014771229,0.00003531133,0.0014732386,0.71208835,0.00073608774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017778768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008554092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71182096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022348453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037047921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999006},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2034782841","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9327-6","title":"Hype and Public Trust in Science","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Health Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Enthusiasm; Philosophy of science; Public trust; Public relations; Science communication; Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Science education; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.6613253772258837,"score_gpt":0.44825079581353794,"score_spread":0.21307458141234575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034782841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688164,0.00011327162,0.000057941616,0.0027756472,0.0001759052,0.00006250061,6.22652e-7,0.000048781512,0.02794894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967835,0.002153619,0.0008571849,0.00015557924,0.000016720454,0.0000033089877,1.8628157e-7,0.0000021147735,0.000027795539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991554,0.000019413206,0.000066477805,0.00014684391,0.00036206865,0.00024980574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950796,0.00006750127,0.000013665534,0.00012324925,0.00014913631,0.00013847748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047545214,0.00003963702,0.000043505686,0.00024727712,0.0006680953,0.00015532775,0.0002950186,0.00005498855,0.000029701889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017540588,0.000039336308,0.000004197614,0.0011400401,0.0021248914,0.0006467108,0.00010667192,0.00022603328,0.0000035002222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023208484,0.00003752726,0.03820661,0.000034967896,7.259819e-7,0.0000012020306,0.3823628,0.000005839375,0.012129757,0.5364542,0.0000111313,0.03075291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038861253,0.00007913704,0.83294487,0.00015116733,0.0000053103436,0.000009423421,0.08164751,0.01440393,0.0005092125,0.0055203196,0.06370569,0.00063482526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092223735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013059201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79473823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071117014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031716013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78292507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045243985","doi":"10.1007/s11948-003-0025-x","title":"The Olivieri Report — A compelling study of the growing tensions in clinical research","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8380770032814535,"score_gpt":0.6861455387462619,"score_spread":0.15193146453519157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045243985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99251014,0.00042665136,0.000007707034,0.004797135,0.0012321316,0.0003358863,0.000001036746,0.000013931432,0.0006753907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879205,0.0004258929,0.00003979687,0.00058961473,0.000054878277,0.0000132193,9.456692e-8,0.0000056616254,0.0000787945],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698824,0.0011633968,0.000484559,0.0002691984,0.0005724089,0.0005221804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99475116,0.004288293,0.000059282822,0.00028922988,0.00039674548,0.00021530392],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042416986,0.00008270218,0.00014392586,0.00008413215,0.0013282851,0.000029879517,0.0003951797,0.0002919857,0.000006342211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0114709325,0.0000511744,0.000028220842,0.0011925828,0.0012855494,0.00013446853,0.00016204017,0.0063223667,0.0000018224947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015516342,0.0019381283,0.6291412,0.00042653646,0.00012904045,0.0005280017,0.028001755,0.029890168,0.043186743,0.25049347,0.0005789323,0.015530842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002851241,0.00068037055,0.31676573,0.00047958674,0.0001107371,0.0004433896,0.030344252,0.07700086,0.015670326,0.003808035,0.5511527,0.00069275615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042292773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55057377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048154187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006004418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046509340","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9623-z","title":"A Troubled Solution: Medical Student Struggles with Evidence and Industry Bias","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Context (archaeology); Empirical evidence; Pharmaceutical industry; Public relations; Psychology; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.6010384939624883,"score_gpt":0.5857342912477133,"score_spread":0.015304202714775061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046509340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97511095,0.00069113786,0.0004842758,0.022481197,0.00045322583,0.0001618159,0.0000037714697,0.00010133487,0.00051231263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99519897,0.00043974863,0.00026645945,0.0038032494,0.00020116927,0.000017109458,6.5871666e-7,0.000008553319,0.00006407133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980536,0.00018086088,0.00019261902,0.00034935854,0.0007174795,0.0005060879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974194,0.0012980079,0.000041650168,0.00013224901,0.00019719734,0.00091146014],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067839622,0.00015749902,0.00017150672,0.00009525955,0.00057988847,0.00007145213,0.00028543637,0.0009205313,0.00009955796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002463116,0.00012564297,0.000012449199,0.00040977428,0.0011602202,0.00029831883,0.00016355533,0.004988372,0.0000052386094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007407044,0.0008322834,0.48116648,0.0036019352,0.00035026402,0.00036037748,0.027746145,0.009540203,0.04866516,0.24429695,0.0030758353,0.17962366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055738417,0.0019802751,0.26001978,0.0026875057,0.0003873189,0.0010958504,0.0029596826,0.4988348,0.017934557,0.0011841395,0.20510773,0.0022345313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022425085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013719395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4892946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053726963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053391745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973072},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2047915037","doi":"10.1007/s11948-002-0034-1","title":"Diverse knowledges and competing interests: An essay on socio-technical problem-solving","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Pragmatism; Philosophy of science; Mill; Cognition; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Management science; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05067765519325383,"score_gpt":0.2932575018799702,"score_spread":0.24257984668671634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047915037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68479425,0.00023451645,0.29887974,0.0091084605,0.00074766745,0.00034893473,0.0000036189408,0.0012848639,0.0045979554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9346095,0.000020522157,0.06503741,0.00025039483,0.000037465736,0.0000043056975,2.653111e-7,0.000007004237,0.00003317117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987534,0.000025413652,0.00014493594,0.0003917047,0.0003956671,0.0002888371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998964,0.00036935983,0.000036188325,0.0002939628,0.0002137736,0.00012267665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019656385,0.00011388792,0.00009906507,0.000190339,0.0005421446,0.00048642067,0.0006277193,0.000093815455,0.000003828756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010018894,0.000106296866,0.000011339209,0.00078726246,0.00038086332,0.00094931934,0.000468607,0.00064395356,0.0000088727],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019332936,0.00017947,0.0036164457,0.00020739222,0.000012004842,0.000025125355,0.0672561,0.004678987,0.021143386,0.81972784,0.00030821297,0.08284309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004645268,0.00045077028,0.014282142,0.0007366458,0.0000101693695,0.00011109048,0.0021070405,0.9702746,0.0012825814,0.0037013309,0.005607753,0.0009713438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008425883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007932999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007600481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068085355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46905658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051051418","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9262-6","title":"Framing Ethical Acceptability: A Problem with Nuclear Waste in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Harm; Engineering ethics; Precautionary principle; Ethical code; Philosophy of science; Corporation; Radioactive waste; Ethical issues; Responsible Research and Innovation; Social responsibility; Business; Political science; Public relations; Law; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03686041611524793,"score_gpt":0.2732054419422544,"score_spread":0.23634502582700645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051051418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668968,0.000015223805,0.00053221243,0.0056387833,0.00019640588,0.00020732441,6.944389e-7,0.00006775315,0.026444819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953338,0.000075323136,0.0038639419,0.000666447,0.000016554766,0.0000047074664,7.160739e-8,0.0000045029046,0.000034651617],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881834,0.000030180496,0.00008576484,0.0001838696,0.00059703016,0.00028482956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963385,0.000052315274,0.000014888223,0.000093505834,0.000079320096,0.000126098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024911591,0.0000561792,0.000066504974,0.00007312682,0.00030114115,0.000059429716,0.00019896774,0.00008540118,0.00006606051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003087867,0.00004873959,0.000005764532,0.0005098022,0.00040169916,0.00019393966,0.00005783849,0.00063848053,0.0000017919342],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017325381,0.000041677984,0.01881358,0.00019441197,0.000008396967,0.000031475447,0.5069612,0.0023886322,0.000519558,0.44665682,0.00023358004,0.024133297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078714,0.00020405128,0.33875212,0.00036229467,0.000024562994,0.0000060226207,0.2971431,0.028330961,0.00019766157,0.0027807052,0.33010173,0.0013096597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.782448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9224896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44387615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028531786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015076536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27739155},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2056397681","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9558-4","title":"Towards Improving the Ethics of Ecological Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; University of Otago","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Information ethics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Ecology; Management science; Epistemology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.08737308156140079,"score_gpt":0.3292215824416627,"score_spread":0.24184850088026194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056397681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9345171,0.00008147244,0.0030423263,0.031655483,0.00041022658,0.00026034933,0.00000294554,0.00006773343,0.029962357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972636,0.00007201933,0.0019162043,0.0006474836,0.000045830944,0.0000062361382,1.9629576e-7,0.000006678941,0.000041731088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971655,0.00014589472,0.00014851226,0.0002919992,0.0018772058,0.00037087256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980913,0.001404862,0.00003153673,0.00029760567,0.00006116463,0.00011354628],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025805974,0.00009002722,0.0000921141,0.00003736742,0.0007512836,0.000051654923,0.0005595642,0.0002480522,0.000040757102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008157734,0.000060628005,0.000021929123,0.0005567885,0.0038755157,0.00020689626,0.00069202465,0.0025272088,0.000026957556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019374822,0.00017147457,0.0059142774,0.0003468951,0.000010625125,0.000004740559,0.031665664,0.03958968,0.44371453,0.45742953,0.0002841152,0.020849096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008138239,0.0015578913,0.41429663,0.00025430162,0.00004432827,0.00007040373,0.002634786,0.23114765,0.078794554,0.17246217,0.09651346,0.0014100269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023400613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029580544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40838236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016282096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001253699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999774},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2059619485","doi":"10.1007/s11948-012-9426-z","title":"Conflict(s) of Interest in Peer Review: Its Origins and Possible Solutions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Universität Mannheim; Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Conflict of interest; Philosophy of science; Process (computing); Peer review; Cover (algebra); Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.8245981317172449,"score_gpt":0.5811456072251607,"score_spread":0.2434525244920842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059619485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96842396,0.011252237,0.001054736,0.016950278,0.00038176848,0.00032475594,0.00001451143,0.000018893656,0.0015788618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99257094,0.006036194,0.0006138901,0.00021974067,0.000011608544,0.00000844451,3.795758e-7,0.0000033785352,0.00053541997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952165,0.00003537156,0.00036126026,0.00035684902,0.0036274844,0.00040254885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98974574,0.002354812,0.00008495802,0.00037249055,0.0070824376,0.00035956656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037300754,0.000077975186,0.00018607863,0.012317161,0.00015077418,0.00070871395,0.0008152829,0.00008396127,0.00005645334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10009887,0.000055453103,0.000020679376,0.057805482,0.00044790405,0.00086977275,0.00047512047,0.00047675002,0.000030077432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008385509,0.0003341664,0.08476622,0.0018065519,0.000024645584,0.000020771065,0.00706814,0.0013027369,0.18486027,0.49436894,0.053657286,0.1717819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066221476,0.00030048063,0.5518294,0.0011830438,0.000010127535,0.000044472923,0.001018207,0.2435316,0.0062401057,0.007649929,0.18685174,0.00067866896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020780016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025376465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48671898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053565775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029044703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988774},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2067553056","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9282-2","title":"More Education, Less Administration: Reflections of Neuroimagers’ Attitudes to Ethics Through the Qualitative Looking Glass","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Neuroimaging; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Neuroscience; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.3612291058175208,"score_gpt":0.4907204549936035,"score_spread":0.12949134917608268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067553056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7253383,0.00008661264,0.13469452,0.120314166,0.004860836,0.0012576649,0.000056489826,0.00042357188,0.012967875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864148,0.000048163252,0.0063310647,0.0069292434,0.00006300377,0.000039076298,7.5717696e-7,0.000013261851,0.00016066362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787724,0.00013685494,0.0003233264,0.00043189674,0.00095476484,0.00027592565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715734,0.0015427046,0.00011452862,0.00037273075,0.0007108274,0.000101855054],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002546766,0.00013469168,0.000116241354,0.00017749237,0.0008875479,0.00010283946,0.00055026886,0.0001181361,0.000010229324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015515895,0.000111847585,0.000023204462,0.0020250578,0.0022691407,0.0004692756,0.00014891481,0.001382981,0.0000049724013],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007302485,0.000101304715,0.000019111802,0.00011811078,0.0000034150519,0.0000017285139,0.18378146,0.00010781209,0.30374467,0.5117861,0.000121380275,0.00020757216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022014529,0.00066216063,0.0046396926,0.00045569285,0.00003547404,0.000058740858,0.034316555,0.00063454855,0.9207957,0.022803728,0.014702381,0.0006752234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007870168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041168314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.617051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004909158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012603226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072312658","doi":"10.1007/s11948-004-0068-7","title":"What does the public think of placebo use? The Canadian experience","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Autonomy; Placebo; Medicine; Work (physics); Alternative medicine; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07123401472073886,"score_gpt":0.26541191256078595,"score_spread":0.19417789784004708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072312658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719277,0.00014306462,0.000014782576,0.025076946,0.0015682556,0.000119871314,0.0000057256025,0.000019457937,0.0011241751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989076,0.00013445187,0.000011861601,0.0006091595,0.000062783954,0.000005005071,2.4083363e-7,0.0000033439649,0.00026553968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999258,0.000011997272,0.00008278344,0.00010481321,0.0003362856,0.00020611071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993724,0.0001263379,0.000021414331,0.00016181378,0.00023979569,0.00007824278],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012087602,0.000059083166,0.000050194813,0.00006374293,0.0013708778,0.0014535164,0.00029580604,0.00003146907,0.000028012733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004956462,0.000027724996,0.000014435887,0.00011955042,0.0015042836,0.000986587,0.00004496565,0.00028769133,0.0000023380976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.8753586e-7,0.0000030558858,0.00008800187,0.000008431724,0.0000030292647,8.034112e-7,0.13316153,0.0002150158,0.0002633372,0.8660811,0.000030333787,0.00014494524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035738334,0.00008689598,0.010580319,0.00025166277,0.000018930463,0.000013832334,0.09465159,0.003618898,0.0043323915,0.020211138,0.8653498,0.00052713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035361264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6691628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8653195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054690518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005171405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999292},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2073764531","doi":"10.1007/s11948-006-0030-y","title":"Teaching engineering ethics using role-playing in a culturally diverse student group","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Engineering Education and Curriculum Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Role playing; Engineering ethics; Group (periodic table); Cultural diversity; Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Epistemology; Anthropology; Chemistry; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02128178250837752,"score_gpt":0.28440436132920915,"score_spread":0.2631225788208316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073764531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98629946,0.0005248267,0.01030715,0.00020099145,0.0012176886,0.00018755776,0.0000031132552,0.000611806,0.0006474196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809902,0.00007216257,0.01862484,0.00006510678,0.00014735054,0.000021338641,0.0000051504167,0.000044691922,0.000029158386],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977953,0.00001978689,0.0003610893,0.0003632677,0.0008049062,0.00065564143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930006,0.00018775676,0.000029450333,0.00020219442,0.00011404243,0.00016651874],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024044323,0.00031105557,0.00022393694,0.0005026819,0.0003167792,0.00022732536,0.00034076706,0.00025583163,0.0000036772221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032387805,0.00032584518,0.00003661879,0.00081768376,0.000078466226,0.000540579,0.00011473831,0.0020993454,0.0000044419826],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.9553283e-7,0.000031111824,0.0023284047,0.0002753175,0.0000109041275,0.000011611139,0.007900018,0.8643621,0.11122669,0.013460707,0.000017592303,0.00037483702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035981162,0.000018722898,0.05434232,0.0005491077,0.000017341026,0.000051294122,0.0017905377,0.93498516,0.0012266446,0.000058095236,0.0057089133,0.0008920532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003420823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060531664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11000005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005244842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013730607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991935},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2074375570","doi":"10.1007/s11948-008-9083-4","title":"Good Ethics Can Sometimes Mean Better Science: Research Ethics and the Milgram Experiments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Milgram experiment; Philosophy of science; Soundness; Epistemology; Research ethics; Dishonesty; Applied ethics; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Obedience","score_opus":0.249268742446562,"score_gpt":0.48688726009228794,"score_spread":0.23761851764572595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074375570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87085813,0.0009042914,0.0001024336,0.117845654,0.0010314378,0.00041067376,0.0000042267784,0.00014475264,0.008698417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99188024,0.0020928734,0.0015841086,0.003936225,0.00020640169,0.000028211156,2.8134755e-7,0.000013342456,0.0002582987],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99311966,0.00071487995,0.00023904211,0.0006517507,0.004123963,0.0011507216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931456,0.0045878366,0.000059461156,0.0003925534,0.0014034831,0.0004111077],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06775386,0.00016989448,0.00020686368,0.00040105754,0.013955383,0.00044662136,0.0013568944,0.00062115135,0.000007357158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02463844,0.00013719258,0.00003325067,0.0029172471,0.0571587,0.0006744761,0.000402023,0.006544351,0.000008813584],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009027212,0.000023479783,0.0013331895,0.000027833203,0.0000092718665,0.00000879477,0.7586863,0.000042564723,0.0065168836,0.23264691,0.00017927219,0.00051643414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070258016,0.00089640403,0.14659637,0.0014307018,0.00011674725,0.00025386308,0.4092879,0.005903016,0.030954022,0.13862568,0.25393716,0.0049723415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036984768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048722615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34939843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023141572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004027742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99574757},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2087963666","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9260-8","title":"A Tale of Two Perspectives: Regulation Versus Self-Regulation. A Financial Reporting Approach (from Sarbanes–Oxley) for Research Ethics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Audit; Business; Accounting management; Misconduct; Accounting research; Accounting standard; Financial accounting; Scientific misconduct; Public relations; Accounting information system; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2612916037780104,"score_gpt":0.4272625517293991,"score_spread":0.16597094795138867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087963666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8420334,0.00064357696,0.11197131,0.0037880274,0.0017425778,0.0012751239,0.000035631885,0.0003431195,0.038167227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545411,0.000071763505,0.044944037,0.000023733444,0.00029536372,0.000016680246,0.0000034766651,0.000007724298,0.000096111326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974667,0.00015274591,0.0003573449,0.00035217474,0.0012640296,0.00040704416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99600196,0.0018783492,0.00022025876,0.00016954241,0.0016185287,0.000111386296],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029709386,0.00008819889,0.00014788544,0.00020342549,0.001253991,0.00006339454,0.00031037946,0.0007139884,0.000009860878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045118097,0.00008958717,0.00003939952,0.0009416218,0.001181622,0.00045324588,0.00006552156,0.0024272203,9.362047e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028777524,0.00002511399,0.00020440842,0.000059020647,0.0000073091746,4.616278e-7,0.4054803,0.00037521595,0.0021385741,0.59130144,0.00007045017,0.00030894164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003307957,0.0007793473,0.04550539,0.0010376659,0.00019897282,0.000014228094,0.3073009,0.30693126,0.019187814,0.27685645,0.036892474,0.0019875504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041198456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023781965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31444496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018177023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018279458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987423},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2089994419","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6","title":"Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Psychology; Survey research; Recall; Philosophy of science; Publication bias; Peer review; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Applied psychology; Law; Pathology","score_opus":0.22889669792562578,"score_gpt":0.44370391064431075,"score_spread":0.21480721271868497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089994419","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013827498,0.98156,0.014715602,0.00065295043,0.0006509732,0.00036663323,0.00008786611,0.00007212668,0.00188004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000695914,0.99588114,0.0024475977,0.00019674166,0.00012624271,0.000025763538,0.000011088223,0.000017943219,0.0005975979],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954641,0.0007758982,0.0005951638,0.00061312556,0.0019536158,0.0005980919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99532026,0.003020309,0.00026688716,0.00035367606,0.00065724726,0.0003816001],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.077644095,0.0002697625,0.002180726,0.001514805,0.00074182736,0.00021944978,0.0011309673,0.0015556592,0.00004745154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019768897,0.00021740992,0.00069699634,0.0073510897,0.0009652114,0.00021091208,0.00021974975,0.0034030871,0.000014005302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012916861,0.00005101263,0.000024163619,0.014556647,0.040513,0.000011353629,0.06918689,0.0021949462,0.0000129708205,0.29221573,0.00096979516,0.5802622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010231945,0.000010669393,0.00000955829,0.0003944373,0.04345205,9.02896e-7,0.00013793638,0.0005644653,0.0000014228272,0.000047267622,0.95508534,0.00028572645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018189802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000548003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9541155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001429828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017713733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974054},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"meta_analysis","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"meta_analysis","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2090238704","doi":"10.1007/s11948-003-0017-x","title":"Patients’ health or company profits? The commercialisation of academic research","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Toronto General Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deferiprone; Drug trial; Academic freedom; Public relations; Clinical trial; Work (physics); Politics; Political science; Drug Company; Medicine; Business; Law; Economics; Management; Higher education","score_opus":0.8380988232874108,"score_gpt":0.6669507327016969,"score_spread":0.1711480905857139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090238704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9630033,0.0009334996,0.0001112981,0.032456774,0.0012571706,0.0007656642,0.000031452768,0.000054447526,0.0013864283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99567646,0.0007418906,0.000096212294,0.0033283671,0.00006163335,0.000018010467,0.0000021378323,0.0000065751474,0.00006873229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977484,0.00068435405,0.00027017624,0.00019270692,0.00056436716,0.0005400105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974105,0.0015604986,0.0000612024,0.00013326472,0.0005262721,0.00030829626],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017202398,0.00008874799,0.00013443183,0.00012047727,0.0010091559,0.000018197768,0.00030466085,0.00035038326,0.00005301538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037792155,0.00006036611,0.000014104047,0.0009411712,0.001230388,0.00014797712,0.00006929395,0.0050125006,0.0000060581774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003219425,0.00046808194,0.10221937,0.0022231084,0.000066216606,0.000005257283,0.04854763,0.0041815247,0.024777213,0.7433287,0.013264595,0.060596395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016261872,0.00066676026,0.074614994,0.00027321934,0.00003300196,0.000019802506,0.0031065857,0.01882441,0.04709065,0.0023757778,0.8509291,0.0004395383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038556274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008918912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8376645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104700295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010634414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997283},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2090586051","doi":"10.1007/s11948-009-9165-y","title":"Between Same-Sex Marriages and the Large Hadron Collider : Making Sense of the Precautionary Principle","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Normative; Philosophy of science; Engineering ethics; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03642292715987023,"score_gpt":0.35066556771098073,"score_spread":0.3142426405511105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090586051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93000114,0.0002893028,0.0026367588,0.05564946,0.00041655265,0.0005953718,0.000008466481,0.00008780579,0.010315162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817353,0.00028714,0.00032793646,0.00054880505,0.00005188412,0.0000023597702,1.5997287e-7,0.0000018942502,0.0006062767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990857,0.00006665356,0.00009015833,0.00011793326,0.0004640486,0.00017547891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999573,0.00017873489,0.000032628523,0.00011647873,0.00006162631,0.000037519338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00431704,0.000048888836,0.00007040958,0.00003813555,0.00078785367,0.00007721396,0.00015597173,0.0000533261,0.000005987094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065777596,0.000030141377,0.000017523136,0.00031759302,0.00071607926,0.00013042393,0.00008921282,0.00019765762,5.8988076e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075757134,0.000018702673,0.004860894,0.000051282925,0.000010646663,9.876507e-7,0.110458605,0.0014039589,0.00082048384,0.87446964,0.0003505202,0.0075467248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006645432,0.0000418963,0.6640715,0.00016854962,0.000039888597,0.0000026669732,0.011128255,0.009515333,0.00022108687,0.008688513,0.30519179,0.0002659725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007293887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006528357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8657811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031667478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010037829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6059613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092137306","doi":"10.1007/s11948-008-9063-8","title":"The Emergence and Evolution of the Expression “Conflict of Interests” in Science: A Historical Overview, 1880–2006","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Expression (computer science); Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Sociology; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Conflict resolution research; Relation (database); Environmental ethics; Political science; Social science; Conflict resolution","score_opus":0.44000607089454374,"score_gpt":0.4390712794931673,"score_spread":0.0009347914013764225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092137306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994907,0.0016295725,0.00008142174,0.0021888758,0.0003080449,0.00008293323,9.2442804e-7,0.000008907877,0.00079230935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898457,0.0099825645,0.00008888071,0.000018284913,0.000013269005,0.0000028108072,5.507757e-8,0.0000014032789,0.000047067522],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904865,0.000050283583,0.00013437594,0.00010252003,0.0005252242,0.00013896888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993503,0.00017813258,0.000053109612,0.00018004968,0.00019558625,0.00004283898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033753572,0.000037599006,0.00005691745,0.00008802145,0.0008923708,0.000017781305,0.000408336,0.00004917824,0.0000030519789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001812136,0.00002455608,0.000012311639,0.0010156921,0.0022485051,0.00020522869,0.00015691765,0.00020660803,1.7813126e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014361599,0.00006743037,0.08190805,0.00013482367,0.0000016528932,3.391228e-7,0.36189345,0.00045481394,0.4236152,0.12565602,0.00028815196,0.005965715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002143495,0.000057593526,0.9249945,0.00047498778,0.0000049320606,0.00000543626,0.01606561,0.009146501,0.0038132733,0.00093280926,0.04407537,0.00021457675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014334519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008210458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8430865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018932552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032112922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8284711},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2114618638","doi":"10.1007/s11948-004-0003-y","title":"Strategies for consulting with the community: The cases of four large-scale genetic databases","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Public relations; General partnership; Confidentiality; Accountability; Scale (ratio); Political science; Public health; Business; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.47606435804122366,"score_gpt":0.5122928713138475,"score_spread":0.03622851327262383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114618638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9577484,0.000251374,0.02777363,0.01364371,0.000050002687,0.00029534067,0.000023351095,0.0000243688,0.00018978096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871483,0.00019795868,0.012066047,0.0005165161,0.0000297141,0.000013992756,0.0000011627169,0.000007082774,0.000019247696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987952,0.00003200996,0.00012316726,0.00011145734,0.0007124756,0.00022570584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98072463,0.01801266,0.000034594224,0.0004209288,0.0007406626,0.000066491986],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009773234,0.00006135531,0.000100067344,0.000037520418,0.0006197151,0.00005311804,0.00027105346,0.00006862495,8.847134e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019698635,0.000030296838,0.000016242524,0.0003239569,0.0016358614,0.00008201428,0.00013270162,0.001912548,2.6990008e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025935113,0.00034177315,0.0058566118,0.0069345357,0.00012922449,0.0000622298,0.07135526,0.05941913,0.06312023,0.7906761,0.00013085605,0.0017146937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01258575,0.008458259,0.14169571,0.013357907,0.0007494979,0.0019112774,0.55703,0.099635884,0.071743436,0.07095308,0.02022082,0.0016583569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027349486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013961924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71972305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018876053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016422197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885589},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2121935654","doi":"10.1007/s11948-005-0025-0","title":"Emotional engagement in professional ethics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy of science; Reputation; Professional ethics; Mechanism (biology); Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.21067526503025077,"score_gpt":0.3646740833459022,"score_spread":0.1539988183156514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121935654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9358295,0.000041778556,0.00038563236,0.060493346,0.0013291581,0.00011468007,0.0000041731687,0.00006752742,0.0017341626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99241555,0.00008224362,0.0016284382,0.005424054,0.00009717377,0.000008696236,6.1290956e-7,0.0000046794935,0.0003385401],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983668,0.000058676593,0.00013644273,0.00032251398,0.0008268021,0.00028882088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927384,0.00045212617,0.000020175876,0.00009685491,0.00006092205,0.000096064075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034683202,0.000086003805,0.00006761009,0.00017205815,0.0003385343,0.00003525934,0.00022707024,0.00012554042,0.000028890889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002234441,0.000075547876,0.000013291168,0.00040195545,0.00038807897,0.00028725556,0.00010930662,0.0014394682,0.000032504813],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019309471,0.00031759863,0.0012859007,0.00011479849,0.0000023509187,0.000023294557,0.00911804,0.0286096,0.5191344,0.43383735,0.00092653057,0.006610822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002337853,0.00030711305,0.40075162,0.001015673,0.00001029681,0.0002485125,0.00064681034,0.16097887,0.12769294,0.01299442,0.29150504,0.0015108711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000041403546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054325947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42084295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077566096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024845303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62538534},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2127227470","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9294-y","title":"Is Human Enhancement also a Personal Matter?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Human enhancement; Premise; Perception; Philosophy of science; Task (project management); Engineering ethics; Philosophy of technology; Subject (documents); Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Data science; Management science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.1784912865629168,"score_gpt":0.3496085142931931,"score_spread":0.17111722773027632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127227470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97492003,0.000022959293,0.006659371,0.0052676704,0.00091414206,0.00024487375,0.000013857395,0.00018566371,0.011771406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98984975,0.00003051198,0.0010160359,0.00836568,0.00005037847,0.000019562358,4.685934e-7,0.000013702059,0.00065389],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978586,0.000020846492,0.00021969483,0.0005212713,0.0009398879,0.0004397031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992696,0.00013511615,0.00005559395,0.00023722422,0.0001443631,0.00015807332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012052929,0.00014347033,0.000105760875,0.00023848437,0.0006141626,0.00010071183,0.0004190543,0.00009423474,0.0005161888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008998719,0.00013801781,0.00002212445,0.0008216691,0.0013471763,0.00033629092,0.00018715786,0.00076756824,0.00012260846],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012742012,0.00003969744,0.00008869869,0.000047956193,0.0000015076034,0.000005315158,0.0071524647,7.438789e-7,0.9612042,0.03090954,0.0003771581,0.00017144976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016768673,0.00012523195,0.0032454785,0.000079592835,0.0000064177198,0.0000161204,0.00012574991,0.0015196959,0.9853775,0.002824931,0.0062067835,0.0003047922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021979911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016198132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02808461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005507282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013645628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56519055},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2161632738","doi":"10.1007/s11948-010-9234-2","title":"Patents, Innovation, and Privatization","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Constitution; Balance (ability); Philosophy of science; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13137791539734758,"score_gpt":0.2356368671332392,"score_spread":0.10425895173589161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161632738","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05111893,0.00013486654,0.0056251003,0.9295618,0.0047387774,0.0005828652,0.000007729021,0.00042031554,0.007809644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12150738,0.000048744394,0.0005021614,0.87292594,0.0041129575,0.000012712665,0.000119457756,0.00004688538,0.00072376826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988368,0.0000024392825,0.00016069546,0.0002775129,0.00048159756,0.00024091473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990122,0.0000558466,0.00007676922,0.00013342085,0.00071550073,0.000006291943],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011096811,0.00015151818,0.000109543755,0.0005262363,0.0003429574,0.0005632205,0.0002041549,0.00070080184,0.000020239537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019914492,0.00012739784,0.000008314864,0.001095163,0.00018676979,0.00078347675,0.0001612813,0.0029175077,0.000024433402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010617283,0.000027078013,0.0021445213,0.005853792,0.000041323663,0.000048919603,0.0014628713,0.0003716405,0.013200609,0.114640705,0.8519029,0.010295035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057020432,0.000004123012,0.000493359,0.000111330635,0.000010195356,0.0000033973722,0.000006375245,0.016284274,0.00009182593,0.00095283607,0.98176324,0.000222012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008680881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022059721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12986037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012883509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000691922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993828},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2335161676","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9777-y","title":"Ethical Risk Management Education in Engineering: A Systematic Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Risk management; Nexus (standard); Engineering education; Duty; Health systems engineering; Information ethics; Philosophy of science; Sociology; Engineering; Political science; Engineering management; Management; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.13938917651491306,"score_gpt":0.5482979568832049,"score_spread":0.40890878036829187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335161676","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.0306386e-7,0.99333644,0.00029547498,0.0007805278,0.00077601394,0.0038341861,0.000020475765,0.00005639455,0.00089997594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000038290773,0.99659675,0.0006033912,0.00055782107,0.00011619414,0.001726346,0.000010754606,0.000028834615,0.0003560477],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614465,0.0005401359,0.0010512393,0.0004591201,0.0010863615,0.0007184737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944395,0.004117462,0.0002481815,0.0004901707,0.00036770283,0.00033698432],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01927967,0.000265906,0.0011517723,0.0006761315,0.00040634486,0.000019745363,0.00047870105,0.0007758079,0.000017800083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013216366,0.0001794133,0.00008047043,0.0013198605,0.00009963849,0.00011046406,0.00022059047,0.005423445,0.00020150693],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.509971e-7,0.000007105812,0.0000042631373,0.93498904,0.0000077167,0.0000016037234,0.00007713463,0.0000016919945,1.983993e-8,0.013914746,0.000112453956,0.050883707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042477004,0.000009460553,0.000034854107,0.66151243,0.0000774912,0.0000032186429,0.000013665858,0.00012052146,3.85168e-9,0.000037559483,0.3380054,0.00014289634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031209773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000571756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33789295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007289776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006286316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344287662","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9779-9","title":"Principles of Public Reason in the UNFCCC: Rethinking the Equity Framework","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Technische Universiteit Delft; York University","keywords":"Pledge; Equity (law); Negotiation; Political science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.1481669360555741,"score_gpt":0.3185577087944827,"score_spread":0.1703907727389086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344287662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722217,0.00018917763,0.0062071597,0.017945467,0.00018718764,0.00014961656,0.0000030763656,0.000040795432,0.0030558202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875057,0.00026079046,0.00075313926,0.00017462336,0.000027488015,0.000007796469,1.4434862e-7,0.0000049285727,0.000020515641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986734,0.000028870649,0.00013705646,0.00018156717,0.00065562286,0.0003234957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988379,0.00077596103,0.000035253077,0.0002839109,0.000019778674,0.000047214442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006970188,0.000080416066,0.00007278394,0.000046210225,0.00017597106,0.000062643194,0.000601378,0.0000822048,0.000026342856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022953653,0.000037977003,0.000016739848,0.00073087856,0.00054154184,0.00027447857,0.0004040146,0.00038813002,0.0000056592544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008514594,0.00009198352,0.07731491,0.00025328607,0.000012396076,0.000017703142,0.10362606,0.014125459,0.1275472,0.562819,0.000111451795,0.11407203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005512218,0.00021108509,0.80796677,0.0018106234,0.000026976812,0.00008182354,0.004921311,0.052155204,0.01060896,0.03275877,0.08784603,0.0010611962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006965567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010968909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73065186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075334356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002766683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27479327},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2508566205","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9811-0","title":"May Stakeholders be Involved in Design Without Informed Consent? The Case of Hidden Design","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Newfoundland and Labrador; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Deliberation; Stakeholder; Normative; Deception; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Normative model of decision-making; Research design; Stakeholder analysis; Psychology; Management science; Public relations; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2499441265217874,"score_gpt":0.3435066142269939,"score_spread":0.0935624877052065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508566205","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20942844,0.000016611173,0.7850908,0.0049031377,0.00023132228,0.00018797618,7.4125074e-7,0.0000786558,0.00006233364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96013016,0.000024488785,0.039568912,0.00022763152,0.0000061014093,0.000013570722,5.076805e-8,0.0000040595314,0.000025049972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990334,0.00005321147,0.00019521241,0.00021277276,0.0002497492,0.00025567625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770325,0.0016012233,0.00007520689,0.0003201161,0.00026699633,0.000033221168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003317987,0.000096178584,0.00009851021,0.0003425517,0.00014511803,0.00006530814,0.000549323,0.000102395104,0.0000013607591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029824527,0.000058962636,0.000010246888,0.0009403041,0.00083177123,0.0007729723,0.00013965546,0.0003620569,0.0000016943366],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003289327,0.000049616778,0.0013503835,0.00014939063,0.000030467707,0.00027830646,0.026960628,0.00392551,0.33181685,0.6132076,0.0005833348,0.021615075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001967649,0.00068227947,0.0043313312,0.0011841467,0.000016884353,0.0013453499,0.0045364527,0.3298982,0.6370329,0.016527195,0.0014543077,0.0010232425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005446322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009998299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75070167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010111472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007124521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35704902},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2556066278","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9845-3","title":"Media Portrayal of a Landmark Neuroscience Experiment on Free Will","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Autonomy; Free will; Philosophy of science; Credibility; Agency (philosophy); Neuroethics; Psychology; Social media; Incompatibilism; Epistemology; Sense of agency; Social psychology; Compatibilism; Sociology; Political science; Law; Neuroscience; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05317736546638603,"score_gpt":0.2736203045722404,"score_spread":0.22044293910585439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556066278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910651,0.00006330968,0.0013759215,0.003985022,0.0012975596,0.0001109527,0.000026149062,0.00010738669,0.0019686432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990422,0.000108170054,0.0002761117,0.00043301866,0.00004269827,0.0000049809273,4.8674742e-8,0.0000070241836,0.000085732325],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823886,0.00001780004,0.00014738989,0.0003926846,0.00088097027,0.0003223197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989415,0.00047748897,0.000040391747,0.00033092065,0.000058239806,0.00015149631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008769624,0.00010889204,0.00010698608,0.00014264387,0.00015161792,0.00003255248,0.00055212784,0.00005635473,0.000009608469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007374048,0.00006794428,0.00002228874,0.0005200252,0.000859784,0.00035656136,0.00013733913,0.00019002953,0.000003594132],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034934603,0.000016647104,0.00007697582,0.000010656207,1.4810564e-7,0.0000069370226,0.00048137602,0.00006337003,0.9666475,0.03148432,0.000044422275,0.0011641739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028317425,0.0001774966,0.0055414904,0.00013975683,0.0000020539032,0.000018646135,0.000026798874,0.0011853398,0.9861451,0.00086971396,0.0054081497,0.00020229036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007749188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001474491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030614607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023910165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013494068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88279563},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2559047598","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9833-7","title":"Who Should Decide How Machines Make Morally Laden Decisions?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Philosophy of science; Computer science; Decision maker; Management science; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.12366402640714318,"score_gpt":0.38834770878210706,"score_spread":0.26468368237496387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559047598","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47076836,0.00049150846,0.010556572,0.5014008,0.0017105395,0.00029266078,0.000022321632,0.00038832286,0.014368846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932547,0.0016502223,0.0019386356,0.00147073,0.00026038784,0.000003866971,2.3709816e-7,0.000012927275,0.0014082472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770385,0.000052527783,0.00011732905,0.0002782196,0.0013202075,0.00052787794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997221,0.0015473027,0.0000385161,0.00019272888,0.00063395343,0.00036647773],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006435114,0.00011883125,0.00014287073,0.0001483854,0.0012420445,0.0006176784,0.00051393686,0.00028704034,0.000012177202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021542072,0.00008333897,0.000037319827,0.0006144163,0.0013670943,0.00084338314,0.00012732299,0.0005203647,0.000007727929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006621341,0.000020137519,0.0030197932,0.000021875821,0.0000137720335,0.000015905702,0.02771175,0.00007848584,0.0151046915,0.89322585,0.0016715458,0.059109583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012704597,0.00030080788,0.09921926,0.0017220068,0.000059907332,0.00001722211,0.009468492,0.0028138733,0.0026816232,0.21062487,0.66950834,0.0023131478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047137972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012744849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.682601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100742334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076181197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566481544","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9861-3","title":"The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Slippery slope; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of science; Defeasible estate; Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Value (mathematics); Argumentation framework; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.04229210686061018,"score_gpt":0.3378338198720225,"score_spread":0.2955417130114123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566481544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8261869,0.0002964119,0.0009532864,0.16723959,0.0008234253,0.00028651438,0.0000031205143,0.000055309873,0.004155422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754417,0.0012549805,0.00018244538,0.00086500956,0.000095764444,0.000007372206,4.4781487e-8,0.0000059295007,0.000044306544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981562,0.00009323005,0.00016640544,0.0001593784,0.0010181372,0.00040666468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968844,0.0026069793,0.00003378939,0.00018472776,0.00019980733,0.000090293026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010879127,0.000084008796,0.00009089197,0.00007778998,0.00079472666,0.00017875782,0.0005461002,0.00023015798,0.00000210923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008107865,0.00004322876,0.000027351622,0.0004587968,0.0010771946,0.00014011806,0.00005211979,0.00093942694,0.000002194062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004515558,0.000019466228,0.0003013587,0.00002813974,0.0000064438764,0.0000048340967,0.0655739,0.0015262559,0.008649843,0.9182774,0.000091437476,0.005516448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002352396,0.0014419856,0.37838313,0.0036276982,0.00008378742,0.0000155422,0.04412191,0.012004467,0.009210818,0.12736876,0.4186142,0.0027752703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032116988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004400333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7909086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000805909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043039862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9706457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600935272","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-9883-5","title":"America COMPETES at 5 years: An Analysis of Research-Intensive Universities’ RCR Training Plans","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Los Angeles; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Stony Brook University; Oregon State University; Montana State University; Georgia State University; Dartmouth College; York University; University of Rochester; Georgetown University; University of Central Florida; Johns Hopkins University; Brandeis University; Colorado State University; University of Connecticut; Virginia Commonwealth University; Tulane University; Brown University; Arizona State University; State University of New York; Louisiana State University; George Washington University; California Institute of Technology; Georgia Institute of Technology; Ohio State University; Rice University; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Florida State University; Yale University; Vanderbilt University; University of Oklahoma; Washington University in St. Louis; University at Buffalo; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; City University of New York; Iowa State University; Carnegie Mellon University; North Carolina State University; Purdue University; Case Western Reserve University; National Science Foundation; Mississippi State University; Emory University; Harvard University","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Training (meteorology); Medical education; Business; Political science; Medicine; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23633687451139845,"score_gpt":0.45194323895380495,"score_spread":0.2156063644424065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600935272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968814,0.000015267595,0.0000946418,0.00020612363,0.00013267974,0.000034272565,0.00000875803,0.000017377479,0.0026094595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999228,0.000014532883,0.00026947964,0.000051241856,0.000025711739,0.0000014799987,0.0000090140375,0.0000036792112,0.00039684714],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900043,0.000031964835,0.00008456288,0.00017614356,0.0004796765,0.00022724725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904054,0.00018705108,0.00004883738,0.00026654723,0.00038528597,0.00007171042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002482126,0.000050522627,0.00011704371,0.0005143341,0.0005780847,0.00006614458,0.00030946813,0.00006273286,0.00010173418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032555783,0.000051173454,0.000018295674,0.00039227845,0.0009269785,0.000193104,0.000088703564,0.00028660017,0.000009575394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005064521,0.000023291062,0.044425912,0.000048676236,0.00030236036,0.000024928338,0.9087532,0.0113055995,0.0077853724,0.019543838,0.00021092633,0.007525239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014028193,0.00008267967,0.88617945,0.00003742521,0.000046329296,0.0000016546904,0.04754082,0.06162584,0.00010719444,0.000026352816,0.004100545,0.00011140234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015478578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007487998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8612124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006437402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013791455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44462186},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2606332673","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-9911-5","title":"Support for the Development of Technological Innovations: Promoting Responsible Social Uses","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologique; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of technology; Development (topology); Knowledge management; Business; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11976938545162855,"score_gpt":0.32976407341036745,"score_spread":0.2099946879587389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606332673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9216101,0.000028020793,0.04454348,0.026879188,0.0005696553,0.0007700848,0.0000024361823,0.00030812848,0.0052889087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833513,0.0000017030704,0.01630755,0.00018863042,0.000058428126,0.000054307257,0.0000011551838,0.0000051379516,0.000031805233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992361,0.000001601077,0.00018240116,0.00014642665,0.00024283296,0.00019061164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909645,0.00010973531,0.00014736969,0.00013922704,0.000504402,0.0000028047377],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058351313,0.00007123305,0.00008755204,0.00017360071,0.0028399422,0.0001682614,0.0005087617,0.00013658762,0.0000017352863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058744815,0.000052267605,0.00001154639,0.0004972451,0.0011418923,0.00040811094,0.00038983006,0.00029304504,0.0000012097595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003561839,0.000010569062,0.00116963,0.00009950399,0.00000860407,1.8160314e-7,0.0009170666,0.0000031716347,0.004582352,0.9771317,0.000034992703,0.016038626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010039478,0.00004437637,0.46835202,0.00027776154,0.000056656696,0.0000038875123,0.0073624975,0.01347305,0.08148599,0.09647668,0.33037004,0.0010931211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002976499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000045887964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88065505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024192683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002678675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607780492","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-9902-6","title":"A New Science Publishing System for a Budding Science Publishing Crisis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Philosophy of science; Scientific publishing; Science policy; Political science; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17828636987509422,"score_gpt":0.42874400817412467,"score_spread":0.25045763829903045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607780492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42298815,0.0006714088,0.35540825,0.14768331,0.024246292,0.0016067094,0.000093362054,0.0012108894,0.046091624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97766376,0.000012956812,0.020787062,0.00063573837,0.00058133114,0.000019551302,6.450141e-7,0.000021778655,0.00027717804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854397,0.00003806217,0.0008098156,0.0020798487,0.009886706,0.0017458684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98462236,0.002789848,0.00086205074,0.0027949968,0.0070849727,0.0018457784],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13726453,0.00031346874,0.00044026683,0.0024724659,0.01226418,0.20272706,0.02235004,0.000357181,0.000005274261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38437232,0.00025144094,0.00008520428,0.0067016208,0.0039544776,0.11646003,0.0041796383,0.002066854,0.000009914175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034651657,0.00002752824,0.0075704935,0.00024941322,0.00001639181,0.000017494609,0.019438198,0.004062352,0.058096223,0.7595386,0.031842828,0.11910586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025526076,0.00021468296,0.062414497,0.0019750467,0.00008034311,0.000328587,0.04050496,0.68557453,0.04812724,0.042861003,0.11214079,0.0032256877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012317477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035305344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71667755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006550423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008413378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999938},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2723878059","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-9928-9","title":"Keeping Disability in Mind: A Case Study in Implantable Brain–Computer Interface Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of Washington; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Brain–computer interface; Interface (matter); Computer science; End user; User experience design; Qualitative research; Neuroethics; User interface; Human–computer interaction; Psychology; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.18897882655772458,"score_gpt":0.4442515457961687,"score_spread":0.25527271923844413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2723878059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99765813,0.000013261007,0.00035645408,0.0011253717,0.00037574288,0.00026547778,0.0000020693824,0.000023509274,0.00017998426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992656,0.000005194152,0.0005420978,0.00010208449,0.000046533267,0.0000117078425,4.0224368e-8,0.0000075080825,0.000019197498],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775136,0.00014536842,0.00024439124,0.0006816943,0.00058475084,0.0005924384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777657,0.0014580569,0.000038108312,0.0005484113,0.00006909329,0.0001097399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009039242,0.00012415572,0.000173282,0.00025653682,0.0006663946,0.0006985244,0.0008284457,0.00008290769,0.0000016697667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038863514,0.00011326675,0.000013499686,0.00048979325,0.0009131065,0.0007557122,0.00081812567,0.0013000657,0.000004029027],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008438994,0.001534013,0.2945203,0.00066775887,0.0000092849605,0.0073272265,0.21186984,0.035684045,0.38608536,0.0021235433,0.00021173521,0.059882525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016698521,0.0008634177,0.119461894,0.0008614515,0.0000036146912,0.0025986359,0.00804598,0.78089947,0.08284598,0.0005288391,0.0012933391,0.0009275146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015111845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018230284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7452154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012996372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001249218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6735887},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2765321797","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-9990-3","title":"The Dawning of the Ethics of Environmental Robots","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Robotics; Robot; Artificial intelligence; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.07036142559014377,"score_gpt":0.3729460915220945,"score_spread":0.30258466593195077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765321797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8417525,0.0005692156,0.0002728233,0.13763782,0.0022629702,0.00027424193,0.000014233117,0.000030429193,0.017185725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859804,0.0009449953,0.00015543193,0.00012981241,0.000050764796,7.4798885e-7,3.6598454e-8,0.000003455255,0.000116699724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985157,0.000060618935,0.00011443941,0.00009618167,0.0009933291,0.00021972033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984072,0.00094178907,0.000127354,0.0002996098,0.00015704751,0.00006699593],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010795123,0.000050322546,0.000073468036,0.000018795634,0.005174836,0.00023426028,0.00090042915,0.00017791087,0.0000014812688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016405242,0.00003201807,0.00003107669,0.000102120495,0.0057295575,0.00032179448,0.00022174303,0.0009246177,3.0172987e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020963366,0.000013594196,0.003121011,0.00004195371,0.000010149153,3.5215328e-7,0.13209364,0.0005699058,0.022971809,0.8381523,0.000024740883,0.0029984727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000628843,0.00019677155,0.70478135,0.0010255252,0.000083060564,0.0000033527351,0.06359109,0.004994088,0.026092852,0.11085488,0.08681688,0.0009313349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007931157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044228724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7272974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034204455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006188426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99697626},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2767664771","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-0001-5","title":"Embodiment and Estrangement: Results from a First-in-Human “Intelligent BCI” Trial","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet","funders":"Australian Research Council; University of Washington; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Brain–computer interface; Feeling; Perception; Categorization; Phenomenology (philosophy); Psychology; Preparedness; Identity (music); Distress; Computer science; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Artificial intelligence; Psychiatry; Neuroscience; Electroencephalography","score_opus":0.09202295995811535,"score_gpt":0.33600148698911386,"score_spread":0.2439785270309985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767664771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958855,0.00003933334,0.00019373209,0.0023075785,0.0006629853,0.00016507469,0.000013901939,0.000036511112,0.0006954077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999224,0.000115039504,0.00035119156,0.0001606568,0.00008141277,0.0000055464934,4.6449287e-7,0.0000053338636,0.0000563204],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986561,0.000014649659,0.0001831654,0.0004657638,0.00041137464,0.00026895455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991586,0.00032122128,0.000057600253,0.0003310615,0.000026758244,0.00010475517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012224062,0.00011145827,0.000114465845,0.000095297306,0.0006349099,0.00051982776,0.000470332,0.00006749937,0.0000026034204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001513201,0.00009787859,0.0000151028025,0.00008339292,0.00043372184,0.00032808262,0.00023139948,0.00035155646,0.0000027042527],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002432392,0.0005148324,0.0013492825,0.0003824376,0.00002731278,0.0002882078,0.061301548,0.014925594,0.82447684,0.07189725,0.00059395784,0.02181032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025319038,0.0011869759,0.023413964,0.0011674463,0.000027034852,0.000022851746,0.00038069885,0.16110192,0.75295866,0.0050212,0.028104328,0.0012958891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027936618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000077597506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14617632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031438216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044264583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5012711},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2789682559","doi":"10.1007/s11948-018-0044-2","title":"Empowering Engineering Students in Ethical Risk Management: An Experimental Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Engineering education; Ethical responsibility; Risk management; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Perception; Medical education; Engineering; Engineering management; Medicine; Management","score_opus":0.16439197985094858,"score_gpt":0.48543572884501396,"score_spread":0.3210437489940654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789682559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958516,0.000049911338,0.0017344379,0.00028617223,0.0014644994,0.00019923029,0.0000010629083,0.000067721936,0.00034539017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958798,0.00003530068,0.0037090995,0.0001644814,0.00014313156,0.000022569742,3.542638e-7,0.0000144555315,0.000030781444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954185,0.00008746281,0.00042329202,0.00071736425,0.0029222718,0.00043112566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793935,0.0007686827,0.00006983624,0.00057017914,0.00045882794,0.00019311544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023137357,0.00017134476,0.00018352277,0.00074044685,0.00048822068,0.0008327116,0.0011738809,0.00021872016,0.000019657755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006416325,0.0001508871,0.000019516474,0.0021431828,0.00040375654,0.00077562785,0.000493997,0.0014533031,0.000023107852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087005086,0.0026771803,0.42022339,0.00016850511,0.000059105565,0.00010181877,0.3990993,0.03757235,0.021802317,0.107388005,0.00014820082,0.010672831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009935825,0.0007373789,0.8664213,0.000231656,0.000018518254,0.000014606167,0.037629496,0.08433054,0.0026560947,0.0036331906,0.0024977273,0.00083593617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001078179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000088702865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4461979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011202712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012988965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8029857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801725374","doi":"10.1007/s11948-018-0041-5","title":"Medicines Information and the Regulation of the Promotion of Pharmaceuticals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Business; Product (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Public relations; Marketing; Pharmaceutical industry; Government regulation; Advertising; Medicine; Political science; China; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.3931380139997239,"score_gpt":0.5420961286810932,"score_spread":0.14895811468136932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801725374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96032107,0.00034029977,0.00036545857,0.036268666,0.0010254006,0.00044623984,0.000012022675,0.00002552336,0.0011953494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983329,0.00021314659,0.00006382479,0.0012785456,0.00008729702,0.000005624335,5.9096567e-7,0.0000020214927,0.00001605863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912304,0.00012511414,0.00023248927,0.00007807059,0.00028553457,0.00015576783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884355,0.00046754663,0.000091931965,0.00009675422,0.00041106183,0.00008918314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050440286,0.00006323598,0.00009982125,0.00005534951,0.0003179066,0.000010530613,0.00016180429,0.00018433988,0.000026841397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016423684,0.000035461988,0.000014698867,0.00041660125,0.0032027755,0.00024668284,0.00008279063,0.0007959483,0.0000010396938],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004973093,0.00009458651,0.011536817,0.0018429308,0.00007820577,3.0527957e-7,0.031547997,0.0013488404,0.428528,0.45176876,0.0007561353,0.07200012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027044057,0.00020591012,0.081613354,0.00026504416,0.00018444522,0.00003686181,0.000647675,0.30902904,0.5347555,0.005816931,0.06452757,0.00021324356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011344102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019927888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44595182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015432499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015675173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950993},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2898089001","doi":"10.1007/s11948-018-0072-y","title":"Challenges in Collecting Big Data in A Clinical Environment with Vulnerable Population: Lessons Learned from A Study Using A Multi-modal Sensors Platform","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University Health Network; Université TÉLUQ; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"Alzheimer Society","keywords":"Dementia; Anxiety; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Modal; Unit (ring theory); Medicine; Nursing; Applied psychology; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.5854542827328871,"score_gpt":0.48223631538063494,"score_spread":0.1032179673522522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898089001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982371,0.00008598315,0.0004447129,0.0007744953,0.000066968954,0.00030897363,0.000002976499,0.000014470554,0.00006434384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970324,0.00021770436,0.0025965013,0.00002875682,0.00008441452,0.000007972008,0.0000040452796,0.000008756969,0.000019458319],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983562,0.00005887026,0.00021123816,0.0004810278,0.00059280393,0.00029982443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925137,0.00026866933,0.000029192937,0.00028765196,0.00006041923,0.00010272361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056668576,0.00009299802,0.00017846543,0.00023112934,0.00018330911,0.00004736037,0.00013286277,0.00007382993,0.0000045505803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011342653,0.00007671412,0.000007836944,0.00044495097,0.00021316874,0.00019748679,0.00020552662,0.0007659072,0.0000015101065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015798576,0.00060498394,0.9572346,0.00005820432,0.000030067555,0.00009868773,0.008474607,0.00080967287,0.002053764,0.000025980144,5.008284e-7,0.03045093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017103726,0.00047177283,0.82982785,0.00020560672,0.000015684946,0.000008394433,0.004500272,0.16300346,0.00009008477,0.00001417137,0.000056486675,0.00009587355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009255843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014746796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16219379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098725635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023548387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33275285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901233696","doi":"10.1007/s11948-018-0074-9","title":"Genetically Engineered Oil Seed Crops and Novel Terrestrial Nutrients: Ethical Considerations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Genetically modified crops; Nutrient; Genetically modified organism; Ecosystem; Biotechnology; Genetically engineered; Eicosapentaenoic acid; Docosahexaenoic acid; Biology; Crop; Natural resource economics; Business; Ecology; Polyunsaturated fatty acid; Transgene; Economics; Fatty acid","score_opus":0.05638867241707279,"score_gpt":0.2825569605316909,"score_spread":0.2261682881146181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901233696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863366,0.000045937755,0.0008986541,0.012100779,0.00023094112,0.00008169265,0.000014422857,0.00007867695,0.0002123351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99393445,0.000060151277,0.0050712824,0.00059515686,0.00029463603,0.0000064296096,0.0000024820974,0.0000017737218,0.00003366098],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831307,0.00002708055,0.00017015709,0.00039072902,0.0006687731,0.00043016908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985936,0.00066424714,0.000016576247,0.0000797097,0.0003269054,0.00031892772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014661797,0.00012758945,0.000119124794,0.00003934019,0.0005588825,0.0003171629,0.0001991837,0.00031679572,0.000042116084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003974832,0.000062601146,0.00001676406,0.0004890225,0.001156739,0.00009287618,0.00020072554,0.0007875258,0.000010079437],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005845182,0.000017916429,0.000087238426,0.000008130329,0.0000032325909,0.0000015879841,0.00029775914,0.000030177547,0.9852324,0.01215872,0.000027882343,0.0021290702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025145747,0.002684025,0.5737503,0.00027612987,0.00006739722,0.00033911096,0.0009195663,0.12405288,0.24658355,0.008654464,0.037926544,0.0022314475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000071176146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008760414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7386489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022941338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011644605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47585326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918136568","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00097-0","title":"Solutions to Gender Balance in STEM Fields Through Support, Training, Education and Mentoring: Report of the International Women in Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Task Group","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Diversity and Career in Medicine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Balance (ability); Gender balance; Work (physics); Women in science; Philosophy of science; Medical education; Work–life balance; Working group; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Political science; Engineering; Sociology; Mechanical engineering; Physical therapy; Law; Gender studies; Systems engineering","score_opus":0.05462969082667192,"score_gpt":0.3207164155603712,"score_spread":0.2660867247336993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918136568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917674,0.00005146045,0.0010150607,0.0047833794,0.0010735276,0.00009736668,0.0000017101132,0.0000108480945,0.0011992503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999261,0.000088972934,0.00019723785,0.00027891144,0.000068099944,0.0000052641362,7.043189e-7,0.0000018628159,0.00009792038],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862325,0.000012776261,0.000114799834,0.00015081743,0.000875809,0.00022253014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999641,0.000097615935,0.000022069655,0.00007035963,0.00004760853,0.00012135982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040081567,0.000045212284,0.00008198543,0.00006947032,0.000072413626,0.00003221362,0.00022858288,0.000085690146,0.000008181703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008012988,0.00003986396,0.000006662018,0.00039948098,0.00025708563,0.00019023845,0.00013972216,0.0002808262,2.0421116e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000602533,0.00010577432,0.078959286,0.00023276763,0.000016173311,0.000019913261,0.7742243,0.0008979862,0.0025894323,0.1319098,0.00029961136,0.01073897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021232187,0.0003909607,0.3745424,0.0024912017,0.000032908538,0.00016365686,0.34354237,0.036246356,0.00038979773,0.007780652,0.23112361,0.0011728776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022298077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006605606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43068188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010564249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050471514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16256051},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2920377922","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3","title":"Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canadian Nutrition Society","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine","keywords":"Scientific integrity; Transparency (behavior); Engineering ethics; Best practice; Publication; Harmonization; Scientific misconduct; Research integrity; Process (computing); Philosophy of science; Academic integrity; Scientific evidence; Data integrity; Research ethics; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.15591522983758016,"score_gpt":0.3841029606226381,"score_spread":0.22818773078505794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920377922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709828,0.00035146583,0.00067432,0.017510792,0.0037934468,0.00030334987,0.00006362767,0.00012104207,0.00619914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900523,0.0003720737,0.0062828152,0.00023894788,0.00014524125,0.000008995726,0.00001734199,0.000008881978,0.0028734296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971929,0.00017259705,0.00026537446,0.00071548385,0.0011320555,0.00052159705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965155,0.0017835483,0.0001942748,0.00032333282,0.000876499,0.00030683124],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018736294,0.00015330283,0.00018073451,0.00028733842,0.002647763,0.001970425,0.00059439085,0.00063722924,0.000107042724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020652505,0.00014367273,0.0000288933,0.0012088075,0.0036439802,0.0017970683,0.00024186628,0.0044708205,0.00007452969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018047362,0.00015944349,0.025925012,0.0001849126,0.00003438337,0.0000049202863,0.15840957,0.00010148952,0.026330441,0.77855486,0.0019656664,0.008311264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021448951,0.00005091704,0.002869517,0.0004159062,0.00003523625,0.000006819417,0.030127564,0.015194519,0.00121075,0.0057052197,0.9436748,0.00049425865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006098246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027359123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94170916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015200271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019954955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906754},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2948251768","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00112-4","title":"Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Psychology; Multidisciplinary approach; Hostility; Research integrity; Social psychology; Social science; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.037397476199452065,"score_gpt":0.3625665209387409,"score_spread":0.32516904473928887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948251768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903194,0.00007497041,0.000020985528,0.0047257906,0.00048041766,0.00023644266,0.0000032483556,0.000028733364,0.0041100564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983009,0.000067550725,0.00080330204,0.0002412898,0.000014522681,0.0000046871755,2.8122255e-7,0.0000034852862,0.0005639857],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981682,0.000051181174,0.00013187368,0.000342516,0.00087063015,0.00043562296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911755,0.0002280847,0.000024365152,0.000102097976,0.00026502647,0.00026285258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011432629,0.000082942635,0.00010277072,0.00028102245,0.0005252549,0.00018605986,0.0003505719,0.0003082743,0.00001737405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004117061,0.00007853215,0.0000064226797,0.002440132,0.0012448475,0.0006901373,0.000102272985,0.0013359953,0.000016772434],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010375163,0.000026316347,0.04812482,0.000053262906,0.000003333169,0.0000072463313,0.46540692,0.00050611404,0.09536622,0.38735974,0.00009150758,0.0030441512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022604265,0.0007538129,0.5986566,0.0022994662,0.00005511915,0.000029092811,0.20680311,0.019450387,0.026726404,0.026231153,0.113220505,0.003513903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006809524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020912479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5505318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015077807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009801249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5804309},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2948845587","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00113-3","title":"Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Psychology; Mentorship; Productivity; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Medical education; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.6652650663412806,"score_gpt":0.638300049848536,"score_spread":0.02696501649274452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948845587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902124,0.0001494009,0.00095855456,0.0062316023,0.00022741422,0.0002695744,0.00003266694,0.000012716016,0.0019057193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99866116,0.0001876591,0.00061997736,0.000031429423,0.000019063278,0.00000895633,0.000002343059,0.00000505187,0.00046434504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811432,0.0006162938,0.00047977464,0.00071418576,0.01617103,0.0008755482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96892035,0.01672061,0.000075268734,0.00073310605,0.012970797,0.0005798555],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21793297,0.000089407826,0.00021661965,0.02189431,0.0003291951,0.0009881103,0.0015942464,0.0004426679,0.0000812314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24522078,0.00006818251,0.000031374322,0.20437072,0.0016232283,0.000575219,0.00074763095,0.0037833352,0.00008458319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008980125,0.0002899559,0.30975446,0.00018918964,0.000011332811,0.000018086655,0.028278407,0.0061942358,0.23208155,0.3857255,0.0036375942,0.033729874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052319636,0.00052259275,0.84047383,0.00013741461,0.0000015595601,0.000005326934,0.014074828,0.1084145,0.004155393,0.01883186,0.012554756,0.0003047152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002371044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043070482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5307194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033883672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019364725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851495},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3033000849","doi":"10.1007/s11948-020-00226-0","title":"Back to Basics: Application of the Principles of Bioethics to Heritable Genome Interventions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Bioethics; Genome editing; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Genome; Psychology; Genetics; Biology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Gene","score_opus":0.12490325266984065,"score_gpt":0.35111512672586886,"score_spread":0.22621187405602822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033000849","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2398106,0.00031312418,0.3779967,0.3794368,0.00035427004,0.001049584,0.00003228473,0.000044204677,0.00096242636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98955685,0.000022445072,0.009313445,0.0010228272,0.000028899618,0.0000044178096,0.0000011918812,0.0000046277164,0.000045291203],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918276,0.000007407149,0.00017428656,0.00013064679,0.00041012024,0.00009475989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993144,0.000051292405,0.000035136007,0.00014645216,0.00029674516,0.00015594182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010722647,0.000044642613,0.00009778123,0.00005785414,0.00005722568,0.000008439215,0.00013700107,0.00009907461,0.00000466405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079150236,0.000031237752,0.0000323499,0.00090606743,0.0005914822,0.000033904853,0.00012719187,0.00030395086,0.0000031587108],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013313469,0.00004646317,0.0006773505,0.00264328,0.000013526094,1.782841e-7,0.009948866,0.012313203,0.7973182,0.17420195,0.000015353713,0.0028082903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012852785,0.0019742914,0.2397144,0.0045394194,0.000196122,0.000017501472,0.0029370536,0.29507452,0.22506505,0.0016404724,0.22679558,0.0007602873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023283761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007874182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74974626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019574989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018929955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21793409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081821133","doi":"10.1007/s11948-020-00255-9","title":"Should Moral Machines be Banned? A Commentary on van Wynsberghe and Robbins “Critiquing the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Philosophy of science; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.3487814574918423,"score_gpt":0.3689617999310956,"score_spread":0.020180342439253318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081821133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5410623,0.000053242944,0.0018101587,0.45569316,0.000628854,0.0002797113,0.000057571007,0.000100269535,0.00031470656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9359599,0.000033544336,0.00068957784,0.06308804,0.0001873423,0.00001500122,0.0000020719665,0.000010297035,0.000014273556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986979,0.000033104945,0.00013065545,0.00039980217,0.00040851964,0.000330013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993321,0.00036159274,0.000028396205,0.00011521114,0.000034055858,0.00012865193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079469255,0.00013656367,0.00010931854,0.000058029727,0.0007320829,0.00013100533,0.0002744733,0.00006872081,0.0000055927244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091055763,0.0001020237,0.000030912106,0.00026444165,0.00047909093,0.00020421074,0.00012839324,0.00050574983,0.0000015830487],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004406209,0.0003630087,0.00269101,0.0005092018,0.000037401707,0.0000952273,0.021261645,0.060639575,0.42216542,0.42823288,0.04096498,0.02259904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011029118,0.0014427692,0.0123724,0.00038775528,0.00006825646,0.000105278246,0.0011368812,0.8951082,0.025367495,0.01476932,0.047058217,0.0010804889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011064078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000059155523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83446866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023499655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029713507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56306636},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3130901445","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00286-w","title":"Domain Experts on Dementia-Care Technologies: Mitigating Risk in Design and Implementation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Delphi Technique in Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Dementia; Philosophy of science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10676325342302637,"score_gpt":0.45107570898735305,"score_spread":0.34431245556432666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130901445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96741253,0.0009666762,0.023227168,0.0066762064,0.0001387193,0.00040998068,0.0000030968756,0.00029229195,0.0008733588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95417994,0.00090618094,0.04481289,0.000048066013,0.000010751259,0.000033941757,4.671979e-7,0.0000044080803,0.0000033584824],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986913,0.000089877576,0.00009933928,0.00023231012,0.0005918577,0.00029526625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991987,0.00047111724,0.000021436783,0.00010431641,0.00015609476,0.000048380043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004468122,0.000056289522,0.00005791113,0.00017407132,0.0005030393,0.00016201346,0.00015973827,0.000105292645,0.0000038070214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002276865,0.000058362235,0.000006890571,0.000802375,0.00043901964,0.00019893951,0.000102934115,0.00036055228,4.2668108e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009190744,0.000045818564,0.03326295,0.0002506336,0.000018627736,0.000113729366,0.327876,0.0031300397,0.11250458,0.2658816,0.0003144078,0.2565924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005180379,0.00016904165,0.008270762,0.00046826436,0.000009112092,0.000006003968,0.83923864,0.0037711698,0.1104288,0.021066343,0.015510254,0.0005435604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025820412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029838347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5113626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119251505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035642515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38690224},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3138108488","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00294-w","title":"Cognitive Enhancement: Unanswered Questions About Human Psychology and Social Behavior","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Clinical Research Institute; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Universität zu Köln; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Flourishing; Neuroethics; Psychology; Cognition; Autonomy; Mental health; Human enhancement; Social cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Psychotherapist; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.12690128501384007,"score_gpt":0.41846459536611763,"score_spread":0.29156331035227756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138108488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98418677,0.00008442701,0.006165747,0.006898414,0.0007470483,0.00020750103,0.00003710847,0.00014095074,0.0015320453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949558,0.00020992279,0.0004139972,0.004060447,0.000069183865,0.00004476247,0.000004920648,0.000012208641,0.00022879904],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822867,0.000055146775,0.00022026047,0.0005703014,0.0005603606,0.0003652832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990476,0.00031061872,0.000054541502,0.00014299016,0.0003412635,0.00010297948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008278402,0.00012954004,0.00012595634,0.00017962763,0.0010978892,0.00015387911,0.0001770419,0.00014649559,0.000043208456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026541466,0.00014102606,0.000016396765,0.0008947569,0.0021512383,0.00025199054,0.00016094223,0.00090317335,0.000008071408],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010079428,0.000056215453,0.000031154002,0.000030959214,0.0000014885219,0.0000183681,0.0011222439,7.537651e-7,0.9135589,0.0837193,0.000028620963,0.0014310095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011127649,0.00030792892,0.028575169,0.00025508268,0.00006587521,0.00012845368,0.00039830306,0.00054653647,0.9504957,0.0068550794,0.010492591,0.0007664985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005370465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008415734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07686421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003014256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021091523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8444187},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3170023695","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00315-8","title":"A Politics of Objectivity: Biomedicine’s Attempts to Grapple with “non-financial” Conflicts of Interest","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto","keywords":"Conflict of interest; Objectivity (philosophy); Credibility; Scrutiny; Politics; Biomedicine; Public interest; Political science; Public relations; Accountability; Sociology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.5250798463940783,"score_gpt":0.543444059475554,"score_spread":0.018364213081475622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170023695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99246174,0.0002070297,0.0006302246,0.0055964147,0.00044253256,0.00014605765,0.000048689497,0.000022316177,0.00044500915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699944,0.00009223829,0.0004666631,0.0022648894,0.00007582937,0.0000077696195,0.0000023515724,0.000007885972,0.000082957835],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988353,0.000057670943,0.00023008896,0.00023928242,0.00025143888,0.0003861961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829835,0.00043838721,0.00005440884,0.00015296268,0.00060380896,0.0004521121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017523936,0.00011980538,0.0002448602,0.00017012272,0.00016706222,0.000009524877,0.00017359007,0.00030641817,0.000024590125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012252607,0.00010661263,0.00002071546,0.0010203006,0.00076066947,0.00008753343,0.00010983282,0.0013429245,0.000001934765],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104858045,0.00024469942,0.011143635,0.0018272197,0.00006269917,0.00008847845,0.009513686,0.0012757237,0.9089642,0.061757784,0.00045491644,0.004562065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090235536,0.00048672612,0.020224337,0.0004736625,0.00007847971,0.000077318095,0.0006592936,0.0036045765,0.9127776,0.00043748572,0.059983496,0.00029467506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006750021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041303232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0613203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039422823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093044445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5834413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189026556","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00327-4","title":"Ethical Considerations Associated with “Humanitarian Drones”: A Scoping Literature Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation","funders":"Vrije Universiteit Brussel; McGill University; Universität Zürich; Universität St. Gallen; World Health Organization","keywords":"Drone; Humanitarian aid; Harm; Public relations; Economic Justice; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.09185619438386419,"score_gpt":0.4230454729892827,"score_spread":0.33118927860541847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189026556","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16741747,0.109052695,0.027921142,0.58087534,0.0054901633,0.0070190076,0.000116064926,0.0019480638,0.10016003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8239378,0.019487882,0.005734438,0.1450895,0.0002469019,0.0003148181,0.00006433884,0.00006303382,0.0050613214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986623,0.00017969946,0.0001836101,0.00023734434,0.0004317789,0.0003052988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982776,0.00077258155,0.000041240663,0.0001997845,0.0005988659,0.000109937544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033840581,0.00009045886,0.00015172303,0.00007558248,0.0009252511,0.000083032595,0.000074410804,0.00018761556,0.00004639142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007311769,0.00007393643,0.000013956042,0.00064341,0.00013561056,0.0001752198,0.000117412324,0.0017418531,0.00000980036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010277422,0.00006644882,0.00026559914,0.01486109,0.000071780116,0.00043734562,0.053560328,0.00023880931,0.0024618034,0.91979766,0.007874785,0.0003540958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002858976,0.00041052618,0.013564456,0.7961791,0.0004203377,0.00018567778,0.010477203,0.0054541198,0.0003259717,0.0099047925,0.15813415,0.0020846599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000049518453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001683682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90989286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006300775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012068904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87533987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194337055","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00329-2","title":"Ethics and Values in Design: A Structured Review and Theoretical Critique","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's College Hospital; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Normative; Agency (philosophy); Vision; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Philosophy of science; Research design; Inclusion (mineral); Management science; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09348655421781756,"score_gpt":0.4123572479356579,"score_spread":0.3188706937178404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194337055","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000062036997,0.93990237,0.05729094,0.002185911,0.00022424049,0.00028586597,0.000001769264,0.00007431604,0.000028407678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00015333174,0.97436523,0.024670118,0.00074065337,0.00001868019,0.000032639608,0.0000012603392,0.0000119721235,0.0000061261017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796593,0.00031187315,0.00034920705,0.0006682768,0.00039500513,0.000309721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974203,0.0016523547,0.00008557277,0.00037703483,0.000394025,0.00007072991],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007637224,0.00026827614,0.0007339239,0.00041892676,0.00023297478,0.00026435943,0.0005507657,0.0006626494,0.0000023810367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008207904,0.00022565834,0.000029499153,0.0014272024,0.0012068893,0.00043896207,0.00051604945,0.004511776,6.6803284e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.2372858e-7,0.0000037595082,3.172831e-7,0.0138814645,0.000008273829,0.000021109252,0.000795589,0.00000267031,0.000013766415,0.8943632,0.000021460672,0.09088823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038366308,0.0003875163,0.00006282511,0.28874326,0.0005346007,0.0042940797,0.00022563993,0.022637662,0.00027953324,0.097195484,0.58212125,0.0031344807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000031572713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018388471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7971677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077867147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99778485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200063599","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00338-1","title":"Touching at a Distance: Digital Intimacies, Haptic Platforms, and the Ethics of Consent","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Haptic technology; Informed consent; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Engineering; Epistemology; Philosophy; Simulation; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.06301642748980016,"score_gpt":0.3519940393426723,"score_spread":0.2889776118528722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200063599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.845032,0.0031843965,0.0048213117,0.12397357,0.0011260475,0.00031905805,0.000037524962,0.00011613941,0.021389995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964885,0.0022339702,0.00030297675,0.0006599762,0.00004881167,0.0000016359677,8.6919096e-7,0.000005192333,0.00025806768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843144,0.000039189283,0.0001541461,0.00017707449,0.0009117596,0.00028637899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960671,0.0030265239,0.000052646526,0.00012870118,0.00058132707,0.00014369219],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006573248,0.00008081736,0.00014409386,0.00003894837,0.0015739411,0.00050549855,0.00018998623,0.00020051537,0.00000381751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026431121,0.000060885173,0.00002892,0.00042721367,0.0046163737,0.0005217683,0.00020089206,0.0010155318,6.3616864e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056543977,0.000005822529,0.00018824477,0.000087194305,0.0000063646085,0.0000033584442,0.10989384,0.00006526502,0.0005415935,0.8887102,0.000026538784,0.0004659383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035116319,0.00019651138,0.005627941,0.002009556,0.00016252701,0.00008313656,0.17346846,0.021424334,0.0035507246,0.5576998,0.23030758,0.0019577877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003635405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090188213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33101037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078226774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015369394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997259},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4281716895","doi":"10.1007/s11948-022-00379-0","title":"Tech Ethics Through Trust Auditing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Champion; Audit; Ethics of technology; Work (physics); Subject (documents); Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Information ethics; Business; State (computer science); Applied ethics; Public relations; Public sector; Business ethics; Political science; Accounting; Law; Engineering; Meta-ethics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10329691540250505,"score_gpt":0.39602978342129636,"score_spread":0.2927328680187913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281716895","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3142408,0.0010861905,0.0048150993,0.48016268,0.0066562197,0.0007563681,0.000055620323,0.0012187429,0.19100825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934281,0.00043570713,0.0015130978,0.0040038694,0.00023038776,0.000013409986,0.0000010144121,0.000012777991,0.00036164853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969144,0.00013517137,0.00014270561,0.00026964265,0.0019896936,0.00054839824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803925,0.0010954366,0.000054975113,0.0001523698,0.00048684148,0.00017114547],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01781732,0.00009615685,0.00011350687,0.00010215255,0.0075240135,0.0003721566,0.0005151483,0.00022095503,0.000048616046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016390815,0.000106842606,0.000030912637,0.0012218216,0.0013600013,0.0007019585,0.00028369355,0.0033849746,0.0000032190035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011132156,0.000011778143,0.00010544432,0.00002569485,0.000003653293,0.0000048243405,0.18196586,0.001107782,0.0012158795,0.81477064,0.00023273952,0.00055460207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020609991,0.00011952219,0.0008706806,0.00006394074,0.000016030355,0.000008181588,0.07729235,0.00258207,0.00035525343,0.074900195,0.8429829,0.00060280424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018932685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019376344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84275013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025617902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022425638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891424},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4307449677","doi":"10.1007/s11948-022-00397-y","title":"Equity in AgeTech for Ageing Well in Technology-Driven Places: The Role of Social Determinants in Designing AI-based Assistive Technologies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität für Gesundheitswissenschaften","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Ageing; Equity (law); Philosophy of technology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Knowledge management; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03575920895952774,"score_gpt":0.3446988846284218,"score_spread":0.3089396756688941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307449677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99244344,0.00023211027,0.0010812822,0.005140658,0.0001050896,0.0005505757,0.00000799339,0.00025310184,0.00018574065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977074,0.000018629215,0.002040682,0.00003688472,0.0000044745616,0.00018149888,2.3441228e-7,0.000007085559,0.0000030609515],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984212,0.000060537852,0.00022005747,0.00029252976,0.0004439612,0.00056172104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991564,0.00052987185,0.00007888897,0.00013922309,0.00007821852,0.000017374956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048392853,0.00009699054,0.0001772957,0.00095213443,0.0006723156,0.000032449272,0.0008830639,0.0002876479,0.000001030904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037383179,0.000094280505,0.000019497551,0.0028988535,0.0015133119,0.00016682857,0.0004306049,0.0012431741,1.4194795e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012535088,0.00032755267,0.38754383,0.00039829215,0.000015090432,0.00012227388,0.14239113,0.062058333,0.10338861,0.1095338,0.000022443595,0.19407329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030166558,0.0005643769,0.09020971,0.0009489454,0.000026988715,0.000008110817,0.35506552,0.29759863,0.16545771,0.075352974,0.010339348,0.0014110225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004032696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048563494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29733413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043458116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069623446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5575861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311350785","doi":"10.1007/s11948-022-00424-y","title":"Correction: Equity in AgeTech for Ageing Well in Technology-Driven Places: The Role of Social Determinants in Designing AI-based Assistive Technologies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Philosophy of science; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Public relations; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.032124317178405325,"score_gpt":0.34162313165275116,"score_spread":0.30949881447434585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311350785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58689326,0.027980916,0.0244847,0.120351076,0.14057483,0.028932432,0.00060922053,0.01456986,0.05560373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979229,0.0002541526,0.0010964336,0.000041584703,0.000046268022,0.0003456099,0.0000029674961,0.000024016808,0.00026604743],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974429,0.00008933453,0.00038743205,0.0005532274,0.00072458794,0.0008025183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848366,0.0008571824,0.00020728444,0.00024793824,0.00017757028,0.000026378933],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00519271,0.00022383656,0.000407743,0.0018932124,0.0008005832,0.00007254728,0.0014068388,0.0014857204,0.000002782593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009128434,0.00022057733,0.00004416229,0.0041361405,0.002482873,0.00021436503,0.0005424258,0.0044485372,2.8035697e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000339866,0.0008590716,0.12910062,0.003651635,0.000101323174,0.0005520325,0.24272661,0.04742128,0.013416831,0.044643037,0.016858365,0.5003293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026804137,0.0007845508,0.031134062,0.0072895414,0.00009712901,0.000016979164,0.25975809,0.30198452,0.02338654,0.027857395,0.34189776,0.0031130298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008221941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018158223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4972163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009750247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023382423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998106},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4384120711","doi":"10.1007/s11948-023-00449-x","title":"A Comparative Defense of Self-initiated Prospective Moral Answerability for Autonomous Robot harm","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Sophistication; Harm; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Blame; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.18108919342845872,"score_gpt":0.4189919699886226,"score_spread":0.23790277656016387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384120711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98001873,0.000067189045,0.001160287,0.009599607,0.00072388083,0.0009398684,0.00005690022,0.00058312656,0.006850433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979655,0.0000692959,0.0017345725,0.00010627305,0.00005701256,0.000019919547,0.0000017348673,0.0000059833233,0.000039684663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998641,0.000048550024,0.00015218447,0.00022878122,0.00054264313,0.0003868345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975893,0.0009326749,0.000051492527,0.00010122048,0.0011697607,0.00015557057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062592914,0.00008774591,0.00018849898,0.00012080266,0.0008784854,0.00013515695,0.00020600908,0.00016617731,0.0000020753841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044410923,0.00008708067,0.000038686856,0.0010958348,0.0011363837,0.00042129,0.000048356094,0.0004014386,0.0000020007408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001557154,0.00006336829,0.0017800205,0.00015042107,0.00003102231,0.0000018460539,0.43942788,0.0035380074,0.003318016,0.5513814,0.00012947757,0.00016296409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027836605,0.0017547504,0.28808227,0.0005129837,0.00018778937,0.0000041490425,0.12462157,0.20373562,0.017763574,0.34234557,0.015777942,0.0024301333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005528773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002585991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3148063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013102088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012812469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67566884},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4403865951","doi":"10.1007/s11948-024-00516-x","title":"Authorship and Citizen Science: Seven Heuristic Rules","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Philosophy of science; Subject (documents); Heuristic; Research integrity; Political science; Citizen science; Term (time); Scientific misconduct; Public relations; Medical research; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Computer science; Library science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.03919945871547186,"score_gpt":0.29018179500242125,"score_spread":0.2509823362869494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403865951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848421,0.0003296843,0.00033209208,0.0026205238,0.00046524234,0.00006869284,0.00002096069,0.0001650259,0.011155662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991693,0.00015555538,0.00025242593,0.00015273987,0.00002351866,0.000004525029,0.0000016444427,0.000005879769,0.0002344313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856824,0.000006630984,0.00008177029,0.0003472127,0.000653988,0.00034218622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995431,0.00009452352,0.000008573084,0.0001154802,0.000025276233,0.00021308607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024383294,0.000088553126,0.00006270203,0.00009559607,0.00042465024,0.00044524667,0.00021818947,0.00006349651,0.0006148808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000744106,0.00007658186,0.000010621779,0.00091580447,0.001912566,0.00041498637,0.0002559549,0.00032302458,0.00013556743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007482853,0.000042519532,0.0051091616,0.0005917557,0.000010944054,0.00007514331,0.027190622,0.0005874352,0.31764266,0.6214191,0.0047691627,0.02255405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037775497,0.00021158629,0.5352676,0.000452345,0.000053688287,0.00036040775,0.004072126,0.15477344,0.01115879,0.01967937,0.27199093,0.0016019865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041766347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008485812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6017397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002382223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008322357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7046929},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","open_science"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4404923040","doi":"10.1007/s11948-024-00521-0","title":"Editorial: Topical Collection “Ethical and Societal Implications of AgeTech”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität für Gesundheitswissenschaften","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Emerging technologies; Ethical issues; Philosophy of science; Quality of life (healthcare); Robotics; Wearable technology; Quality (philosophy); Wearable computer; Psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Nursing; Robot","score_opus":0.01731668271249683,"score_gpt":0.3350054145677926,"score_spread":0.3176887318552958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404923040","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005454229,0.000274922,0.00019669751,0.010904249,0.9871987,0.0001611313,0.00003122411,0.00028479818,0.00040283825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010999783,0.002241442,0.0010203123,0.000051323383,0.98531103,0.000032314805,0.0000060734396,0.000022464836,0.000315247],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976504,0.00003730283,0.00020315973,0.00043293028,0.0013069996,0.00036919914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759775,0.0013377046,0.000055172815,0.00018738954,0.0006717273,0.00015027767],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034554154,0.0001390134,0.00021065414,0.00023253824,0.0005901708,0.0001624203,0.00037163103,0.0030555332,0.0000017879606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016567681,0.0001407734,0.00003784436,0.0009502969,0.0024240601,0.00013401435,0.00020204965,0.0040247715,0.0000018188919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001189216,0.0000053937993,0.000008011146,0.00015697967,0.000008830892,4.3413218e-7,0.005120717,0.0000024223773,0.00055714685,0.024819858,0.96888393,0.00043507194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006243841,0.000040591236,0.000067732144,0.00012693994,0.000027355896,7.075599e-7,0.00026756694,0.00007948585,0.00005540806,0.0034405442,0.9956838,0.00014743132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057384383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004617912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026799854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021007321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025216213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99827296},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"}]}