{"meta":{"query_hash":"af0fcc63c032","filters":{"venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},"cohort_total":68,"direct_labels_cover":48,"predictions_cover":68,"exported":68,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/af0fcc63c032","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Science+and+Engineering+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1547114668","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9524-1","title":"Sherry Turkle. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Public Relations and Crisis Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of technology; Philosophy of mind; Epistemology; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Engineering; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.03825495952327895,"score_gpt":0.30925669022062335,"score_spread":0.2710017306973444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547114668","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008547054,0.014555864,0.00019532067,0.97027266,0.005409011,0.00000434921,0.000031581287,0.000029255309,0.008647256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047414083,0.019483319,0.00086358865,0.75739,0.006074312,0.000052535157,0.00006180528,0.0002100713,0.16845022],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833894,0.0007902199,0.00005447642,0.00019798311,0.0004217455,0.00019652897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98837703,0.005880866,0.0005464567,0.00022792918,0.0025560851,0.0024115816],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023277192,0.0004590284,0.0003470514,0.0008399016,0.008424481,0.0051716375,0.0009509207,0.010865793,0.042510606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015022648,0.00044140627,0.00028861084,0.0007468933,0.0048139542,0.009270202,0.0027013174,0.012929281,0.0118889855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016638094,0.000018465162,0.000508338,0.000044464872,0.0000038702347,0.000072741685,0.0016742598,0.000008822852,0.000052789546,0.009145954,0.96786165,0.02059206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029563962,0.000021392476,0.0023259523,0.000508065,0.000011115313,0.0003499065,0.020031111,0.00009039216,0.00023859173,0.028341422,0.94801044,0.00004196488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01855321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06475074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99157554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026819485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039375573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1422121},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1968126248","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9259-1","title":"Fairness in Technological Design","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Computer science; Philosophy of science; Diversity (politics); Economic Justice; Distributive property; Design science; Abstraction; Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Sociology; Knowledge management; Economics; Law; Business; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.12719525819126157,"score_gpt":0.34581212421042873,"score_spread":0.21861686601916716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968126248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07875675,0.0066014263,0.27425137,0.0742293,0.0015762874,0.00025889327,0.00010730495,0.000107256965,0.5641115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625414,0.00060792663,0.013541495,0.0031030718,0.0006644356,0.0002795384,0.000026495467,0.000060345203,0.019175224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9615567,0.02765415,0.0009960057,0.0029945127,0.0047538346,0.002044907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9440369,0.041835435,0.001990756,0.0063998676,0.00439613,0.0013408174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035725117,0.00068953895,0.0013748936,0.0019346827,0.0067707417,0.008260059,0.0017797922,0.0071344846,0.0058726836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073024064,0.00054855214,0.0009178953,0.0014302881,0.030898826,0.008984894,0.0046844073,0.00584476,0.00069541665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009748294,0.000011142132,0.0002072903,0.000015347809,0.0000054020757,0.000011956534,0.00044737867,0.00042609047,0.000027288062,0.99562716,0.0006390265,0.0025720496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072845883,0.0000045546594,0.0000776979,0.000012006797,0.0000028747195,0.0000077544855,0.00008187796,0.0005159085,0.00003734801,0.9964116,0.0028382535,0.0000028770673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004250694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003073854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99322927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066788574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069625922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18893474},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1981764105","doi":"10.1007/s11948-002-0010-9","title":"Animal spare parts? A Canadian public consultation on xenotransplantation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Xenotransplantation and immune response","field":"Medicine","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Toronto General Hospital; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Animal welfare; Animal rights; Government (linguistics); Bioethics; Public relations; Political science; Public health; Engineering ethics; Public administration; Medicine; Law; Engineering; Nursing","score_opus":0.07493330756461404,"score_gpt":0.2848848608729474,"score_spread":0.20995155330833337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981764105","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051769237,0.0038085934,0.00034743728,0.9704823,0.0041249227,0.00003567352,0.000054418713,0.000028294617,0.015941417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.079211734,0.0045539476,0.0012516825,0.86954206,0.002558263,0.00005359923,0.000058703426,0.00009722854,0.042672783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717101,0.0044753486,0.0014344141,0.0015946911,0.010145047,0.010640443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94326705,0.025510564,0.001716284,0.0009074965,0.016662493,0.011936151],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028426096,0.00087886275,0.0014308147,0.0021015522,0.04266762,0.011748381,0.006500576,0.07045668,0.013728588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044529278,0.0015103424,0.0023582422,0.0024208631,0.017236913,0.004101343,0.0077280677,0.053801686,0.0008475516],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014467294,0.000097454875,0.0020976195,0.00026511174,0.00005294468,0.005136248,0.013709971,0.00063736126,0.0018227015,0.08624473,0.8711241,0.018667106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009408113,0.000037963455,0.0043066526,0.0005039478,0.00007571443,0.0009969729,0.011978489,0.00031744392,0.00042462326,0.0077143298,0.9733709,0.00017876753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9148075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9710929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9573324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12113627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34645286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8789093},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1982061847","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9265-3","title":"Those Who Have the Gold Make the Evidence: How the Pharmaceutical Industry Biases the Outcomes of Clinical Trials of Medications","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pharmaceutical industry; Conflict of interest; Publication bias; Clinical trial; Philosophy of science; Confirmation bias; Variety (cybernetics); Actuarial science; Public relations; Psychology; Positive economics; MEDLINE; Medicine; Economics; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.9134429979255221,"score_gpt":0.6818156810325046,"score_spread":0.23162731689301752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982061847","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06950191,0.017924119,0.024520047,0.8558548,0.0035415692,0.00031881055,0.00025787947,0.00009075232,0.027990054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6733643,0.0038429094,0.014381242,0.30050382,0.0051858085,0.00046939924,0.00008934111,0.00021133281,0.0019517682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.35323516,0.5375813,0.029053811,0.017512443,0.054654643,0.007962708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.081737496,0.82564294,0.038643647,0.026485272,0.021315154,0.0061755544],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5005953,0.0010052152,0.0036575608,0.0055699567,0.0058910293,0.016556686,0.003895226,0.024361052,0.0038298466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.79527557,0.0018016085,0.0021272465,0.004426127,0.038726147,0.015468033,0.008490528,0.019618478,0.0013150589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035955987,0.000631217,0.15690644,0.003138447,0.0076445136,0.0029447125,0.05580854,0.0021125665,0.0014054258,0.39298856,0.1108403,0.26198375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013436076,0.00048106207,0.035626583,0.005555678,0.0020969457,0.0021578313,0.012268761,0.0040755263,0.002924959,0.8366837,0.09633055,0.00045481173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071528596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009018971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9756389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073947706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018519348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.615855},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1985574895","doi":"10.1007/s11948-002-0048-8","title":"Funding, objectivity and the socialization of medical research","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Philosophy of science; Socialization; Medical research; Relation (database); Public funding; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Medicine; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.867341102438921,"score_gpt":0.7027063626572796,"score_spread":0.16463473978164145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985574895","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021646598,0.9539477,0.0030787108,0.017992323,0.00063313864,0.000024028059,0.000009970428,0.000011313762,0.022138242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.078435615,0.90851086,0.0027716735,0.0039524147,0.0019893162,0.00010900527,0.000022032431,0.0000111094105,0.0041979654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97637016,0.016535992,0.001048102,0.0006560964,0.0048685786,0.0005211283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95415694,0.039039865,0.003725288,0.0009956595,0.0015933255,0.0004889559],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019090857,0.0006783469,0.0017067321,0.003352615,0.0013770217,0.006483725,0.0013612458,0.004668465,0.0025860844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024409516,0.00036109038,0.00043762676,0.004941656,0.013088414,0.005675863,0.003000465,0.0026602815,0.00039310683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060468996,0.00006777065,0.00088904146,0.0066939504,0.00011841084,0.0003255963,0.0037983258,0.00048566132,0.00065191154,0.51869977,0.008462139,0.45974696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006248292,0.00008546016,0.0032098521,0.009944387,0.00009367818,0.001517782,0.002450888,0.00027963298,0.00063219207,0.40787414,0.5737968,0.000052721873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016294313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028645983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99862295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003364004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009583289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100963354},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1990854685","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9545-9","title":"A Room with a View of Integrity and Professionalism: Personal Reflections on Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research in the Neurosciences","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"University of Queensland; McGill University","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Engineering ethics; Set (abstract data type); Academic integrity; Scientific integrity; Philosophy of science; Psychology; Face (sociological concept); Reflection (computer programming); Research integrity; Scientific misconduct; Critical reflection; Medical education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Medicine; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.49807211554920583,"score_gpt":0.5166400519386172,"score_spread":0.018567936389411344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990854685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041457813,0.0058220853,0.009042982,0.8997309,0.014178788,0.00014072646,0.00002865834,0.00013264317,0.02946537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52841914,0.003940784,0.007945889,0.42656878,0.0054106647,0.00039998945,0.00002376539,0.00076733145,0.026523666],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8180731,0.1459295,0.0022804085,0.0067417105,0.011559233,0.015415974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74714196,0.19959268,0.0072227935,0.005894207,0.011710922,0.028437408],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.082601316,0.0020112253,0.0019468922,0.0019152372,0.07215928,0.035580903,0.009990001,0.062185995,0.0057083317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.180521,0.0022305674,0.0027963906,0.0018085997,0.1197738,0.025297614,0.029229509,0.15052566,0.001953601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068770976,0.00020606798,0.00038929985,0.00016295383,0.00003660967,0.0014431032,0.89191264,0.0002559915,0.0005340014,0.036975913,0.059729382,0.008285199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050539024,0.00009726353,0.00039015285,0.0007459616,0.000025768808,0.001203975,0.6964151,0.00025688828,0.0006919477,0.020738501,0.27923203,0.00015182029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014573147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02619064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.937814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02181099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024626426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43684274},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2016124933","doi":"10.1007/s11948-004-0071-z","title":"The biochemical bases of the placebo effect","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pain Management and Placebo Effect","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Placebo; Medicine; Chemistry; Computational biology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Biology; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.05390424995610835,"score_gpt":0.33151317964537846,"score_spread":0.2776089296892701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016124933","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000032403692,0.9987631,0.00017283692,0.00034507833,0.00012432058,0.0000020215102,0.0000031691104,0.0000014139346,0.000555687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011218494,0.9976948,0.00024550108,0.0003457514,0.00028827818,0.000008115892,0.0000047168332,9.629891e-7,0.00029001458],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993075,0.00027926857,0.000087695924,0.0001010018,0.0001919584,0.000032651962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981805,0.0014935163,0.00012649217,0.000042230884,0.00012960107,0.00002770919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020010048,0.0009944509,0.0026178306,0.0022476471,0.00046563963,0.001674051,0.0011197755,0.0031054546,0.0024229195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029819869,0.00040551423,0.0007078875,0.0020809607,0.0029262893,0.0020188265,0.00078803685,0.0033821838,0.00087490317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002887293,0.0001176705,0.00021783708,0.031420022,0.0002633143,0.0006654626,0.00014928964,0.00060734013,0.0018806616,0.04790881,0.01904506,0.8974357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017053558,0.00018041545,0.0012115675,0.0147797465,0.0003661081,0.0035726777,0.00017601963,0.00022478045,0.0013598889,0.06281555,0.9150802,0.00006234129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013398877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018457237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031054546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011357026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019730877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010582447},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2021748399","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9543-y","title":"Framework for the Analysis of Nanotechnologies’ Impacts and Ethical Acceptability: Basis of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Assessing Novel Technologies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; Institut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologique; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Judgement; Warrant; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Individualism; Emerging technologies; Computer science; Business; Political science; Epistemology; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.07420019703060639,"score_gpt":0.42383107335486736,"score_spread":0.349630876324261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021748399","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018508881,0.001163311,0.8407969,0.03049652,0.0002085462,0.0009912393,0.00015673255,0.00009642154,0.10758135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53556424,0.0009881968,0.4552366,0.0013814094,0.00018393478,0.0024397245,0.00010926268,0.000053771102,0.0040428857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97110814,0.020466903,0.001272442,0.0015399223,0.0046381024,0.0009744575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798322,0.013219561,0.0018036905,0.0013250218,0.0030418779,0.0007777013],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03372552,0.001811322,0.0012798504,0.009315032,0.0062595806,0.012502915,0.0045119897,0.0058978335,0.004077679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019940477,0.0007212809,0.0019178614,0.003764398,0.04894972,0.009389259,0.006972506,0.0064392374,0.0005494543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003057792,0.000034095625,0.00020649293,0.00003633239,0.000008128328,0.00007220757,0.0033252963,0.001168134,0.00009872872,0.9927181,0.00024211421,0.002087366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009241557,0.000016818836,0.00030595544,0.00010835529,0.000010364326,0.00007067475,0.003498209,0.0044114618,0.00014245996,0.98379123,0.0076173227,0.000017876366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004773992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040115183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99374044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011938915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010196809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17835969},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2022009738","doi":"10.1007/s11948-005-0042-z","title":"Intellectual property and the commercialization of research and development","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury; Barrie Urology Group","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Intellectual property; Openness to experience; Business; IP address management; New product development; Public good; Product (mathematics); Exclusive right; Industrial organization; Law and economics; Economics; Marketing; Computer science; The Internet; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.5396202251358568,"score_gpt":0.37944103345105296,"score_spread":0.16017919168480388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022009738","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007789266,0.9948782,0.00026582807,0.0014931647,0.0001788698,0.0000033505096,0.0000051765783,0.0000029146902,0.0030945982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033861457,0.99404234,0.0003142212,0.0006537494,0.0004888542,0.000009125667,0.0000117646505,0.0000019361669,0.0010918699],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614847,0.0013198922,0.0002969486,0.0002787151,0.001811163,0.00014477127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854124,0.011084229,0.0013655755,0.0002571201,0.0016066497,0.00027398232],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004215978,0.00086592865,0.001772708,0.006369015,0.0011249171,0.005118049,0.0011447525,0.00522776,0.0052818195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010335008,0.0004174437,0.00048347862,0.0103700105,0.00567154,0.0050313775,0.001745678,0.003886743,0.0011482288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039634382,0.00006365547,0.0004149431,0.011726444,0.00008918552,0.00032431254,0.00024173924,0.00051152805,0.00031628486,0.120374195,0.043203343,0.82269466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017804945,0.00003346664,0.0015865917,0.010610527,0.00007767326,0.0010155977,0.00027217338,0.00019007541,0.00022287607,0.070293695,0.91565573,0.000023790364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006681069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0133778695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99578404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042799436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009660002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031053305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022118021","doi":"10.1007/s11948-003-0005-1","title":"Implementing ethics in the professions: Examples from environmental epidemiology","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Emulation; Information ethics; Incentive; Public relations; Conflict of interest; Political science; Applied ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Psychology; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.29373125483262186,"score_gpt":0.5236246500689055,"score_spread":0.2298933952362836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022118021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1809776,0.02055558,0.10806,0.23018156,0.0010572292,0.000460421,0.000060413855,0.00013594828,0.4585113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88954276,0.011650519,0.049162563,0.024189454,0.00039089625,0.00045300848,0.00003584933,0.0001498375,0.02442516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93168867,0.058626685,0.0009557883,0.00075292663,0.004596705,0.0033792472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9068127,0.08140615,0.0018318841,0.0015824845,0.005258028,0.0031087636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04159287,0.0007954418,0.0008370541,0.0025162953,0.02181127,0.010397873,0.0022487747,0.013723346,0.001987587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052329022,0.0006289953,0.001197652,0.0034446418,0.03710064,0.005864499,0.011331636,0.011400596,0.0003982252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072756426,0.00048696704,0.0054378463,0.00052546995,0.00003568962,0.0032864385,0.18715048,0.0024716258,0.00058550236,0.7411902,0.015366151,0.043391023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011810682,0.00019426744,0.006568243,0.0015241924,0.000040045754,0.0022533087,0.15683696,0.0023047433,0.0014951574,0.40719852,0.4213676,0.000098826225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011543771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023390902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04159287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008259227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013449724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21996671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022321973","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9263-5","title":"Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Research England; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Université de Montréal","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Warrant; Multidisciplinary approach; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Business; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.9480796414119428,"score_gpt":0.7291269966411988,"score_spread":0.21895264477074394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022321973","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008391541,0.9779904,0.008234436,0.009633781,0.0009288227,0.00050416973,0.00006515732,0.000019136643,0.0017849413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031182943,0.91130537,0.046015378,0.006882259,0.0011253746,0.0027710241,0.00009491957,0.00007129128,0.00055147405],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.42331883,0.39137867,0.11584181,0.0075361314,0.059500743,0.0024237875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.16056925,0.74780166,0.041198216,0.014344538,0.03473373,0.001352599],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.41557795,0.0015794918,0.005822518,0.018793572,0.004710073,0.0108179385,0.0054116407,0.00778599,0.0018630471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6416853,0.00236545,0.004613814,0.02124575,0.014176064,0.012213182,0.00824588,0.0076298336,0.00055354234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031002358,0.00006990724,0.0028469327,0.13538824,0.001096611,0.00019478794,0.0073809666,0.00034764234,0.00024885876,0.050456353,0.020818893,0.7808408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000426295,0.00030768866,0.010326086,0.6461832,0.004305415,0.0020935184,0.0045469017,0.00074622745,0.0014603786,0.05359343,0.27570716,0.000303713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005618353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01525491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014312827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0486491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72069645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024048799","doi":"10.1007/s11948-006-0032-9","title":"On teaching computer ethics within a computer science department","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Teaching and Learning Programming","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Agency (philosophy); Computer ethics; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Information ethics; Computer science; Medical education; Sociology; Engineering; Meta-ethics; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.02297975660374577,"score_gpt":0.28088746312450524,"score_spread":0.25790770652075945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024048799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17591128,0.0056055486,0.03601129,0.12780678,0.0027572738,0.00017509465,0.00003173878,0.00008375151,0.65161717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81242186,0.010202459,0.01587422,0.015226587,0.00085746945,0.00028199633,0.000042406606,0.00012339983,0.14496955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944186,0.0037271422,0.00007479153,0.00022491225,0.0009567548,0.0005977454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875486,0.0076231016,0.000387162,0.00029186657,0.0012256757,0.0029235883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00427686,0.00034508586,0.0002700589,0.00086831226,0.009179726,0.0057837768,0.0012054741,0.0028235284,0.009473973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009512919,0.00023686391,0.00022797784,0.00096083054,0.007709095,0.0041678115,0.0063721268,0.0049464717,0.0012057635],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001385461,0.0014767747,0.0068645556,0.00032532495,0.000021574711,0.00091326213,0.057707343,0.002998436,0.0022503547,0.53490853,0.13996054,0.25243485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039956092,0.00035749012,0.006801662,0.0010460013,0.000022888946,0.0004940174,0.08165049,0.0028363473,0.0024169588,0.27304435,0.63124514,0.00004473176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066400785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02415725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009473973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069866544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012010185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050691903},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2031584713","doi":"10.1007/s11948-013-9437-4","title":"Ensuring PhD Development of Responsible Conduct of Research Behaviors: Who’s Responsible?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Focus group; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Pedagogy; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.49109875405317005,"score_gpt":0.5198793828953219,"score_spread":0.028780628842151823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031584713","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01781631,0.0019608787,0.03645683,0.92119765,0.0043426794,0.00060504157,0.00005781482,0.00021664717,0.017346142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68341756,0.002743091,0.069450654,0.22316551,0.0035453134,0.002311828,0.00013126439,0.00044173584,0.014793146],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.55018425,0.30787513,0.030289263,0.018980449,0.06570418,0.026966676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.22375199,0.38650307,0.047660884,0.056228112,0.14413972,0.14171621],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.41937554,0.0006367502,0.0019825208,0.0028158647,0.014525036,0.019916266,0.0055304444,0.020342162,0.0045487275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6397401,0.001550088,0.0015987334,0.0015674327,0.0210611,0.013358341,0.017940046,0.028998561,0.001833278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004913516,0.001969897,0.06893078,0.0021577533,0.0010664767,0.0014090065,0.10697144,0.0023171823,0.0059632226,0.16961785,0.20583111,0.43327388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007725448,0.0009305073,0.046222214,0.0057518454,0.00041351304,0.0021298265,0.076427,0.006312328,0.011376489,0.44983554,0.3990747,0.0007535479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010598123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016650785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9796578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016681286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2899823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7160133},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2033101023","doi":"10.1007/s11948-003-0024-y","title":"Masked ball: Ethics, laws and financial contradictions in hungarian health care","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Challenges","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Ball (mathematics); Health care; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11632966396564962,"score_gpt":0.43798260320039684,"score_spread":0.32165293923474725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033101023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44382083,0.0147378,0.005818936,0.43432984,0.0010198362,0.00004171688,0.0000880185,0.00004324965,0.10009987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98422813,0.0009800086,0.0005656831,0.009462936,0.00012326843,0.000016829421,0.000010648492,0.000010666605,0.0046017617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960898,0.0025460855,0.00014722892,0.00015043504,0.0003006958,0.0007658468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963762,0.002413061,0.0005388644,0.000108716915,0.00023500978,0.00032802348],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046889805,0.0001919502,0.00032649306,0.00084393803,0.0055099223,0.0061115324,0.00059989624,0.003533644,0.0044190204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009671769,0.00026076706,0.00020575477,0.0011826955,0.024310373,0.0033252903,0.0040339394,0.0031662858,0.00027336672],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011607806,0.000041891642,0.0047037513,0.00009078848,0.000015426012,0.0012359185,0.032407805,0.000668784,0.00018987291,0.92634255,0.01785018,0.016337043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010905175,0.00007535274,0.02688055,0.00063613657,0.000035987938,0.0017581574,0.11695941,0.002323895,0.0005859508,0.62540686,0.22512797,0.00010062274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014111723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010732479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007993354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0086810235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057996154},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2034782841","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9327-6","title":"Hype and Public Trust in Science","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Health Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Enthusiasm; Philosophy of science; Public trust; Public relations; Science communication; Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Science education; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.6613253772258837,"score_gpt":0.44825079581353794,"score_spread":0.21307458141234575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034782841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74119264,0.0020884871,0.014383495,0.061972864,0.00025377623,0.000042875214,0.00004651846,0.00004017622,0.17997915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900216,0.00007009845,0.0001415134,0.00032641567,0.000041890762,0.000007074563,0.0000026546568,0.0000054251145,0.00040273508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97952557,0.014350133,0.0006596357,0.0009498844,0.003012724,0.0015020779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.709529,0.22956768,0.033384517,0.010396777,0.010839317,0.006282685],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016412105,0.00020193662,0.00041258862,0.0013916602,0.0035452682,0.0075600776,0.0007338984,0.0069842166,0.006299691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12288047,0.00044623073,0.00033999895,0.0009819064,0.018884152,0.008077874,0.00436658,0.0067024217,0.0003545085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067218684,0.00052611023,0.07627483,0.00029401004,0.0002256572,0.0013883688,0.09859513,0.0025207717,0.001999573,0.7667964,0.00610094,0.04460592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017949873,0.00031606844,0.08417124,0.0002762729,0.000091463546,0.000852719,0.047266766,0.008331911,0.0013839359,0.8331864,0.023797972,0.00014579526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029228467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024207768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033234307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029283424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08679658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045243985","doi":"10.1007/s11948-003-0025-x","title":"The Olivieri Report — A compelling study of the growing tensions in clinical research","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8380770032814535,"score_gpt":0.6861455387462619,"score_spread":0.15193146453519157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045243985","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024805467,0.0043107863,0.0015499063,0.9684704,0.0034095044,0.000012218751,0.00002187844,0.000021542946,0.019723095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13869685,0.004441095,0.003245641,0.8153879,0.025420384,0.00012701927,0.000038040933,0.00014616274,0.012496926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91742635,0.0393266,0.003811292,0.008007766,0.027075931,0.004352078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57500654,0.36294276,0.02217301,0.014415214,0.014669266,0.010793176],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1077169,0.00061212655,0.0009987863,0.0022156737,0.00986073,0.015923537,0.002702889,0.034325827,0.004628817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26607695,0.00070021313,0.0010562867,0.0030041172,0.03836754,0.012511073,0.008319849,0.03778169,0.001130577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001408397,0.00005089136,0.0042647994,0.00026145778,0.00008736858,0.0008825669,0.0073874155,0.00018285954,0.0003001281,0.5832288,0.37426287,0.02894991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014479048,0.00009226819,0.0057951245,0.0008354514,0.00012635028,0.0018172531,0.006550052,0.00054293295,0.00079562044,0.29617515,0.686979,0.0001460692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003955225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009312247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96567416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052586617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00976993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56966823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046509340","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9623-z","title":"A Troubled Solution: Medical Student Struggles with Evidence and Industry Bias","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Context (archaeology); Empirical evidence; Pharmaceutical industry; Public relations; Psychology; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.6010384939624883,"score_gpt":0.5857342912477133,"score_spread":0.015304202714775061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046509340","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004753794,0.0013707774,0.004322379,0.9829227,0.0027268834,0.000016047343,0.000012555301,0.00006565896,0.0038092802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27223557,0.0032397187,0.027446402,0.6788422,0.009590625,0.00020466691,0.00004975109,0.000337664,0.008053415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8909678,0.07503561,0.0050053215,0.0061569912,0.018130615,0.004703598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6655187,0.21986306,0.01797554,0.012363396,0.040176462,0.04410283],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10887663,0.000802807,0.0014817796,0.003996558,0.016634358,0.018607445,0.004765449,0.02998516,0.011035037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3071695,0.0011577515,0.0013210638,0.0021211961,0.035264768,0.023462964,0.021551602,0.045481198,0.0026315828],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016906009,0.00058202434,0.012121629,0.0005315597,0.00032753687,0.0050965603,0.07262741,0.0004971602,0.0006692782,0.16122063,0.5702997,0.17585738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032843777,0.00029477477,0.003174945,0.003335862,0.00011362527,0.012819946,0.11898114,0.0022602654,0.0006326723,0.48378745,0.3739056,0.000365344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022497291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003738701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98336565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066557056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02320771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57580155},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2047915037","doi":"10.1007/s11948-002-0034-1","title":"Diverse knowledges and competing interests: An essay on socio-technical problem-solving","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Pragmatism; Philosophy of science; Mill; Cognition; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Management science; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05067765519325383,"score_gpt":0.2932575018799702,"score_spread":0.24257984668671634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047915037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01132991,0.021930635,0.047095273,0.7242902,0.003507027,0.0000727473,0.00004979962,0.000018344592,0.19170614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79611945,0.017756905,0.028209334,0.09831169,0.006562619,0.00055926054,0.00009828042,0.00016923377,0.05221321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833604,0.011714411,0.0005198563,0.0011794309,0.0019816458,0.0012441553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9408125,0.05370631,0.0012827173,0.0011932501,0.0018944374,0.0011108397],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026528701,0.00088842644,0.0013413191,0.0013798105,0.009204603,0.013043747,0.0031221316,0.022997247,0.003789196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040687073,0.0006903931,0.001176074,0.0023644418,0.06185498,0.023693133,0.010016043,0.015984325,0.0005426868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056834715,0.000019864563,0.00008229087,0.000050253344,0.000009697598,0.000107825006,0.011679006,0.00030795034,0.000031813826,0.9691106,0.0146049475,0.0039900998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000146381535,0.0000039017336,0.00007400622,0.00020043842,0.000004891687,0.000074349526,0.0047088033,0.0003720633,0.000046559457,0.94012535,0.05436358,0.0000114376335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030936468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042202645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058516436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008017658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14029884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051051418","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9262-6","title":"Framing Ethical Acceptability: A Problem with Nuclear Waste in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Harm; Engineering ethics; Precautionary principle; Ethical code; Philosophy of science; Corporation; Radioactive waste; Ethical issues; Responsible Research and Innovation; Social responsibility; Business; Political science; Public relations; Law; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03686041611524793,"score_gpt":0.2732054419422544,"score_spread":0.23634502582700645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051051418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67423373,0.0021288015,0.005855369,0.22144213,0.0004625738,0.00018179533,0.00018575025,0.000064629145,0.095445186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98169327,0.0005645355,0.0013998193,0.0066069206,0.00005636201,0.000038951304,0.0000336126,0.000048069003,0.00955846],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9620174,0.014109836,0.0010730972,0.002168691,0.0132931685,0.0073378114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89744264,0.052469738,0.0044311597,0.002286263,0.03438539,0.008984915],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031660996,0.00055247813,0.0012350226,0.0041671186,0.060899112,0.02335368,0.00552744,0.0094142305,0.00552964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081543006,0.000961873,0.0009171125,0.008144542,0.023289712,0.0054819337,0.008136892,0.01528165,0.00022525134],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027422252,0.0002967848,0.056540746,0.00024880227,0.0001390298,0.0024768887,0.53336436,0.0028047895,0.0008454962,0.26691535,0.051243883,0.08484971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010948246,0.000072063085,0.04962116,0.00081059337,0.00013435248,0.00049752253,0.69114435,0.0041530253,0.0014653902,0.049943484,0.20165643,0.00039224085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99742174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93910086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2610376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33906758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85709167},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2056397681","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9558-4","title":"Towards Improving the Ethics of Ecological Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; University of Otago","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Information ethics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Ecology; Management science; Epistemology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.08737308156140079,"score_gpt":0.3292215824416627,"score_spread":0.24184850088026194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056397681","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014293766,0.004334735,0.3565324,0.5597325,0.0015280722,0.00042375893,0.00005612772,0.00028231228,0.062816314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4644855,0.004286727,0.45635778,0.064214624,0.0017623355,0.0010227815,0.000116292074,0.00024624175,0.0075076655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6573074,0.25909102,0.011491171,0.010939425,0.054290943,0.0068800813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4681806,0.34043422,0.023198824,0.06256102,0.08690065,0.018724708],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.40824625,0.001142684,0.0016845586,0.006385718,0.011083234,0.029296644,0.0049420237,0.015954487,0.0023481539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35251033,0.0011081562,0.001408519,0.004218197,0.088388324,0.032422822,0.020290243,0.026707565,0.0013541849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013080049,0.000061793166,0.002021731,0.00017683698,0.000022047516,0.000049900285,0.0070852847,0.0012860607,0.00031667275,0.95763123,0.006018596,0.025316916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015631851,0.000025775635,0.00090027566,0.0003407305,0.000008282858,0.000059993283,0.0027385806,0.0015001082,0.00033078573,0.93444353,0.059604324,0.000031903815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013182045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010088224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40824625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018319918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0733345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72973776},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2059619485","doi":"10.1007/s11948-012-9426-z","title":"Conflict(s) of Interest in Peer Review: Its Origins and Possible Solutions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Universität Mannheim; Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Conflict of interest; Philosophy of science; Process (computing); Peer review; Cover (algebra); Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.8245981317172449,"score_gpt":0.5811456072251607,"score_spread":0.2434525244920842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059619485","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104479045,0.0337989,0.04162762,0.6909548,0.00857035,0.00031515583,0.00044017515,0.00010546507,0.11970853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9380648,0.004645974,0.009876183,0.031994067,0.008566579,0.00029143298,0.00014964206,0.000056553305,0.006354716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88650614,0.060670774,0.015205069,0.008968806,0.022201015,0.0064481273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44671884,0.42899936,0.057504945,0.014549615,0.03579681,0.016430378],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.093051925,0.00042348553,0.0011108948,0.0044503356,0.0043592104,0.012368374,0.004090814,0.016313318,0.008333681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36797994,0.00073911075,0.00076567347,0.006626272,0.01609708,0.00703682,0.0066692284,0.008040407,0.0008830206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014822563,0.0001678523,0.06304728,0.00110298,0.00024088117,0.002833318,0.010951646,0.00040064895,0.0004826276,0.7782592,0.036083367,0.10628204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014581654,0.00014093789,0.026317362,0.0033225375,0.0002246488,0.0105042895,0.015567691,0.0034849795,0.0010317772,0.8088237,0.13017575,0.00026049628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014932624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021413218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9069481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005383421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006657065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4921115},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2067553056","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9282-2","title":"More Education, Less Administration: Reflections of Neuroimagers’ Attitudes to Ethics Through the Qualitative Looking Glass","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Neuroimaging; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Neuroscience; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.3612291058175208,"score_gpt":0.4907204549936035,"score_spread":0.12949134917608268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067553056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8104342,0.0004624146,0.007051922,0.15133843,0.0009872364,0.0003183076,0.000090010064,0.00009422499,0.029223127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98042655,0.00016307567,0.0013405331,0.013805674,0.00008212592,0.00019007041,0.000014854702,0.00009066596,0.00388636],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93984026,0.049492512,0.0011118451,0.0016949031,0.003882172,0.003978224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80204856,0.1613592,0.009415872,0.004772032,0.011831992,0.010572359],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057938773,0.0005723831,0.0005793784,0.0018338846,0.018474262,0.011856293,0.0028071217,0.0068228403,0.0059287557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15419729,0.001175083,0.00065358134,0.0009723688,0.03807346,0.009156086,0.013964814,0.020559689,0.00058089837],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005094335,0.000058211037,0.0017764999,0.00006803327,0.0000071352642,0.0003041898,0.9843338,0.000028526933,0.00082874304,0.008419107,0.0016718094,0.0024529602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018470937,0.00004257715,0.0011460064,0.00011824832,0.0000064721576,0.00016981426,0.98031414,0.00009157586,0.0006136488,0.004393462,0.013055411,0.000030255882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010578621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014411937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94206125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014379936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013307349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30641317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072312658","doi":"10.1007/s11948-004-0068-7","title":"What does the public think of placebo use? The Canadian experience","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Autonomy; Placebo; Medicine; Work (physics); Alternative medicine; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07123401472073886,"score_gpt":0.26541191256078595,"score_spread":0.19417789784004708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072312658","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11525046,0.014786809,0.0013171757,0.5800872,0.0017834955,0.00008580681,0.00024597722,0.000074783304,0.2863684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86613816,0.011285779,0.0006847473,0.0617264,0.0004338565,0.00005641154,0.00007474755,0.00016566175,0.059434146],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9680332,0.011307543,0.0006916963,0.001779376,0.009151884,0.009036309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95917404,0.019798033,0.0019354506,0.0012957649,0.010932548,0.006864242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019597908,0.00081888307,0.0015248712,0.0031998265,0.085588664,0.024436112,0.0038028029,0.017449293,0.014040835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047733855,0.00087198947,0.0010521961,0.0066518732,0.06136367,0.0077247447,0.008007417,0.02346962,0.0009004875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002944713,0.00016479597,0.005985921,0.00033691828,0.000051105217,0.0013760411,0.4681283,0.00024484284,0.0007973209,0.4052293,0.088802226,0.028588826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007877088,0.00006613769,0.0066095064,0.00073755434,0.000062202635,0.00047833694,0.32791373,0.00014239059,0.0004646851,0.020688027,0.64251643,0.00024222495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99165475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21281356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21281356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27771512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91302466},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2073764531","doi":"10.1007/s11948-006-0030-y","title":"Teaching engineering ethics using role-playing in a culturally diverse student group","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Engineering Education and Curriculum Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Role playing; Engineering ethics; Group (periodic table); Cultural diversity; Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Epistemology; Anthropology; Chemistry; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02128178250837752,"score_gpt":0.28440436132920915,"score_spread":0.2631225788208316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073764531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947194,0.000035443292,0.0011050644,0.0005731888,0.000052195337,0.00015955254,0.0000043005134,0.000011554311,0.0033393295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913845,0.00011129151,0.0033558737,0.0004987868,0.00002058366,0.00017011735,0.000013717586,0.00001298423,0.0044322144],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640095,0.0019091709,0.000096540956,0.00030270623,0.00035743616,0.00093316234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917176,0.0017714141,0.00032726972,0.00031450446,0.00085010484,0.0050191456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058071166,0.00071712537,0.00047900746,0.0010622168,0.010900974,0.0053778198,0.0015307348,0.0016580438,0.0036937373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075068995,0.000498068,0.0004783467,0.00044242764,0.0034250745,0.0014149527,0.0053875027,0.0038573933,0.00081374217],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010406795,0.058661185,0.06349864,0.00016619451,0.000048840877,0.0043620043,0.71553725,0.00085185975,0.016008083,0.009610257,0.0050707716,0.12514429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062083476,0.008221431,0.03480387,0.0002907622,0.00006770175,0.0034012177,0.89261484,0.004422391,0.010212756,0.008748163,0.03643167,0.00016428283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002887061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009214707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010900974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017432392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005328686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030711353},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2074375570","doi":"10.1007/s11948-008-9083-4","title":"Good Ethics Can Sometimes Mean Better Science: Research Ethics and the Milgram Experiments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Milgram experiment; Philosophy of science; Soundness; Epistemology; Research ethics; Dishonesty; Applied ethics; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Obedience","score_opus":0.249268742446562,"score_gpt":0.48688726009228794,"score_spread":0.23761851764572595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074375570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21988511,0.010486354,0.053683653,0.33377177,0.0021427372,0.00012809133,0.00009750113,0.00012428401,0.37968054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97475725,0.0011649675,0.006099961,0.0108058425,0.00051577925,0.0001518003,0.000011386857,0.000048802664,0.006444269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844654,0.013556972,0.00017278265,0.0005904147,0.00081702217,0.00039741656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8967038,0.09298903,0.003163213,0.00434457,0.0015626936,0.0012366516],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022344293,0.0005018713,0.00066645554,0.0015176293,0.005333675,0.006581396,0.0006832477,0.006078804,0.006647344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078404345,0.00031839727,0.00043357175,0.0013324998,0.024271116,0.011512387,0.0037583853,0.005752425,0.0003958587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082057,0.000039411465,0.0005875851,0.00003832526,0.00001574503,0.000054999065,0.0017790925,0.00020710914,0.00008875202,0.9872578,0.0034516265,0.006397448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041609448,0.000023811743,0.0006436232,0.000055760156,0.00001027096,0.000038233407,0.00092601386,0.00049229915,0.00016168176,0.9883259,0.009268546,0.000012218651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010839599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015560922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022046787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021637206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11816931},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2087963666","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9260-8","title":"A Tale of Two Perspectives: Regulation Versus Self-Regulation. A Financial Reporting Approach (from Sarbanes–Oxley) for Research Ethics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Audit; Business; Accounting management; Misconduct; Accounting research; Accounting standard; Financial accounting; Scientific misconduct; Public relations; Accounting information system; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2612916037780104,"score_gpt":0.4272625517293991,"score_spread":0.16597094795138867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087963666","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005511034,0.046267133,0.074419186,0.8069276,0.0058937743,0.000070868155,0.00007747818,0.000079283156,0.060753625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56188166,0.05000969,0.083420575,0.25880986,0.020257877,0.0010000047,0.00014128031,0.00040274314,0.024076283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9549207,0.035347283,0.0012887893,0.0018850777,0.0054142848,0.0011438471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.925721,0.05851704,0.0031335359,0.0038132127,0.0062386123,0.0025766916],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049300924,0.0009485887,0.0014405005,0.00571785,0.004836508,0.0158186,0.0031255109,0.011111425,0.005439982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059115387,0.00060524704,0.0012063134,0.0042946483,0.069223434,0.031090895,0.008357692,0.020162635,0.00086715765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020850575,0.000016442475,0.00018615615,0.00011440673,0.000013213502,0.000052435294,0.0045934594,0.000069783324,0.000076413264,0.97120476,0.013474328,0.01017786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026399784,0.00003975596,0.00049915834,0.00059683464,0.000010561672,0.00016411152,0.004778625,0.00047712223,0.00018466623,0.910083,0.08309136,0.000048481124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002390821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022744301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98888856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006925679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004399779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26073134},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2089994419","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6","title":"Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Psychology; Survey research; Recall; Philosophy of science; Publication bias; Peer review; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Applied psychology; Law; Pathology","score_opus":0.22889669792562578,"score_gpt":0.44370391064431075,"score_spread":0.21480721271868497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089994419","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03464889,0.95966154,0.002207053,0.0009047021,0.00029573072,0.00064899726,0.0011085275,0.000026911479,0.00049764145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49031347,0.49532968,0.005950421,0.003674825,0.00039965523,0.0021742675,0.0017142384,0.000058565536,0.00038493233],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.8650335,0.08236447,0.032164328,0.008269098,0.010993759,0.0011748213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62402236,0.30792668,0.038947795,0.011250026,0.016467866,0.0013853037],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.107089475,0.0019694103,0.009765277,0.008283239,0.0009010869,0.0036141446,0.0026242686,0.0033000046,0.0019592703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3060481,0.001487448,0.018737907,0.011758007,0.0022254866,0.003950447,0.003097081,0.0026299811,0.00022424996],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029902537,0.00011556443,0.05505887,0.36550653,0.5075033,0.00012520295,0.001820293,0.0002484111,0.00019311722,0.00047283008,0.0023672457,0.06359848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018713489,0.00086800114,0.063740574,0.09531142,0.82642645,0.0003895979,0.001666912,0.000207284,0.0003630077,0.001338785,0.007677369,0.0001391842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005529081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014377469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029825142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007116292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56635004},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"meta_analysis","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"meta_analysis","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2090238704","doi":"10.1007/s11948-003-0017-x","title":"Patients’ health or company profits? The commercialisation of academic research","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Toronto General Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deferiprone; Drug trial; Academic freedom; Public relations; Clinical trial; Work (physics); Politics; Political science; Drug Company; Medicine; Business; Law; Economics; Management; Higher education","score_opus":0.8380988232874108,"score_gpt":0.6669507327016969,"score_spread":0.1711480905857139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090238704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013724885,0.010281655,0.002523046,0.85613537,0.0013131399,0.00002209057,0.000035998382,0.000030815074,0.11593305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85251,0.005447102,0.0013802561,0.12192936,0.0067776707,0.000089944704,0.00004159598,0.00006549854,0.011758596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95194525,0.03435058,0.0012844519,0.001976258,0.0068352865,0.0036081073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8150186,0.1380805,0.010477387,0.009998269,0.0107047595,0.01572056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053319506,0.00040110538,0.0009327466,0.0014482057,0.0051549748,0.020403516,0.0021581857,0.025973374,0.0122491075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14506619,0.0004666018,0.000733164,0.0014546806,0.043936234,0.018077262,0.0078077465,0.015370046,0.001576314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010210285,0.00008161789,0.0019696474,0.00008229992,0.000033472537,0.00021043318,0.0027009195,0.00015188071,0.00016403798,0.9036734,0.05475818,0.036071938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013628673,0.00010634559,0.0029292868,0.00082871295,0.000037720387,0.0007346146,0.006123479,0.0008138626,0.00041220547,0.8116437,0.17616822,0.00006562224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016692295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002409974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99484503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061354134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0110431425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28198385},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2090586051","doi":"10.1007/s11948-009-9165-y","title":"Between Same-Sex Marriages and the Large Hadron Collider : Making Sense of the Precautionary Principle","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Normative; Philosophy of science; Engineering ethics; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03642292715987023,"score_gpt":0.35066556771098073,"score_spread":0.3142426405511105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090586051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79850954,0.0012299587,0.024282672,0.043078296,0.00028830898,0.000034487344,0.000024322846,0.000015119403,0.13253723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99783343,0.0000952446,0.0005883251,0.0004315339,0.000025902107,0.0000051333423,0.0000024059375,0.0000035164048,0.0010145598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594194,0.0027471061,0.00006396118,0.00044444122,0.00033609202,0.00046643143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873055,0.008389094,0.0017181839,0.0010277827,0.00052452297,0.0010348534],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007096341,0.00025621057,0.00042014444,0.00075224094,0.005847648,0.0054823807,0.0013233633,0.0039402363,0.0049612653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028404716,0.00045012566,0.00027599893,0.00056675845,0.01700796,0.008270053,0.0053168205,0.0048037376,0.00018624157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024227923,0.0001568473,0.011717105,0.00003829242,0.000057804664,0.0011219215,0.075416595,0.0012893105,0.00042944183,0.8835419,0.0022953122,0.023693245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021287793,0.000029078987,0.0021334253,0.000031575903,0.00001559285,0.0001840748,0.033306684,0.001803395,0.00014370761,0.956936,0.0053756414,0.000019408484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005195292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006172068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99415237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011870561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018143593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03752947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092137306","doi":"10.1007/s11948-008-9063-8","title":"The Emergence and Evolution of the Expression “Conflict of Interests” in Science: A Historical Overview, 1880–2006","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Expression (computer science); Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Sociology; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Conflict resolution research; Relation (database); Environmental ethics; Political science; Social science; Conflict resolution","score_opus":0.44000607089454374,"score_gpt":0.4390712794931673,"score_spread":0.0009347914013764225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092137306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14940539,0.38177308,0.015272002,0.057767812,0.0020718118,0.00011536308,0.00034030745,0.000058752015,0.39319554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8927836,0.085432895,0.0025872428,0.004109403,0.0019751647,0.000087092434,0.00012053387,0.00006453842,0.012839467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961469,0.0018900398,0.00026968983,0.0007610492,0.0005586462,0.0003736557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906301,0.006710693,0.0009893248,0.00027860378,0.0011238771,0.00026739715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065584276,0.00049334415,0.0005679487,0.0056243734,0.0051164594,0.007031155,0.0009054797,0.004416604,0.0033292465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011857455,0.0005082822,0.00030293182,0.007761315,0.029702505,0.00770442,0.0034770526,0.0052224263,0.00036769855],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006220839,0.00002903185,0.0024732638,0.000310515,0.000017115875,0.00024743762,0.047879364,0.00039283463,0.00033545613,0.8892215,0.004682102,0.054349095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017216498,0.00006997904,0.013350181,0.0014109891,0.00002024869,0.001024761,0.015073648,0.000580446,0.0010233577,0.1690218,0.79831743,0.00008984526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014571784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01326428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99488354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013343379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00436486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09681344},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2114618638","doi":"10.1007/s11948-004-0003-y","title":"Strategies for consulting with the community: The cases of four large-scale genetic databases","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Public relations; General partnership; Confidentiality; Accountability; Scale (ratio); Political science; Public health; Business; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.47606435804122366,"score_gpt":0.5122928713138475,"score_spread":0.03622851327262383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114618638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47207922,0.0015733953,0.029396899,0.4056479,0.00032065363,0.0005557057,0.00024757217,0.00015767683,0.09002099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9506083,0.0005619288,0.01732842,0.024492353,0.000134047,0.00029422427,0.00009598828,0.00011574854,0.006369015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.89613366,0.07531019,0.0038771953,0.00405984,0.010850603,0.009768508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65578234,0.28096798,0.012280619,0.013331693,0.014465192,0.023172202],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.094689935,0.00046165095,0.00081425096,0.0041874284,0.036611333,0.017687825,0.006944792,0.02219697,0.006698522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23482846,0.0011237812,0.0010392829,0.0067434823,0.017243722,0.010935362,0.021569502,0.01296593,0.0007167319],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026328544,0.00041927618,0.048869733,0.0003792142,0.00018294247,0.06369183,0.36024538,0.0021411213,0.0013319397,0.3719855,0.060574938,0.08991481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002535497,0.00011962702,0.012999199,0.0011823429,0.00018522047,0.03291488,0.5073063,0.010353923,0.0012689007,0.20368153,0.22944734,0.00028721686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04990204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084172465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97780305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011238624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035923377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50077426},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2121935654","doi":"10.1007/s11948-005-0025-0","title":"Emotional engagement in professional ethics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy of science; Reputation; Professional ethics; Mechanism (biology); Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.21067526503025077,"score_gpt":0.3646740833459022,"score_spread":0.1539988183156514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121935654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5074445,0.0043361443,0.018148517,0.035248514,0.0006339258,0.00005603623,0.000023270572,0.000036867652,0.43407226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99472743,0.0003501936,0.0008427633,0.0015442345,0.00011657433,0.000031584743,0.0000065024833,0.000014044735,0.0023665968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936512,0.0046199723,0.00008332232,0.00029989757,0.0008704114,0.00047529556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899687,0.0064389706,0.0011424985,0.00041096675,0.00070949487,0.0013293036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00402062,0.00026123863,0.00023878815,0.00071467645,0.002847978,0.006404182,0.0005826923,0.0031503923,0.00361399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01936885,0.00020177917,0.00023158349,0.0004969557,0.008753047,0.0027064157,0.0033418855,0.0043496448,0.0003142108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040072118,0.0007252989,0.012895781,0.0004218239,0.000089242014,0.0013577371,0.20842391,0.0014263506,0.0074656676,0.66967565,0.009199569,0.08791816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013335799,0.00027968432,0.048057754,0.00036882455,0.000052240324,0.0013960272,0.0727453,0.0026972254,0.0017300667,0.81082356,0.061631203,0.00008473323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005387518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005493302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006404182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014747418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012536442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021263301},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2127227470","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9294-y","title":"Is Human Enhancement also a Personal Matter?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Human enhancement; Premise; Perception; Philosophy of science; Task (project management); Engineering ethics; Philosophy of technology; Subject (documents); Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Data science; Management science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.1784912865629168,"score_gpt":0.3496085142931931,"score_spread":0.17111722773027632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127227470","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02421131,0.018969191,0.012590783,0.6932002,0.004571481,0.000048145594,0.000032317384,0.00004278753,0.24633378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8057601,0.011521111,0.0057556187,0.14708583,0.0053513674,0.00014209987,0.000023585986,0.000060130555,0.024300138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851238,0.009576325,0.00038128623,0.001138704,0.002115939,0.001663884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96382284,0.023572786,0.0025373313,0.0026579266,0.0030656098,0.0043435562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024852352,0.00038629203,0.0007083086,0.00089508964,0.004148274,0.009105257,0.0012437991,0.011892481,0.009216651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038503245,0.00021764982,0.0005251339,0.00075000833,0.054784272,0.00989116,0.004555413,0.008358861,0.0010692894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042423268,0.00011514827,0.0014748567,0.00017007023,0.00003211166,0.0001784256,0.0034480598,0.00010722165,0.00020193969,0.95373297,0.012595428,0.027901359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041461448,0.000108885244,0.002121447,0.00088879,0.000033174187,0.00081698364,0.007133041,0.00023041664,0.0005246197,0.8490221,0.13903534,0.00004376171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001060894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015405428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024852352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024802021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007124616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13143337},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2161632738","doi":"10.1007/s11948-010-9234-2","title":"Patents, Innovation, and Privatization","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Constitution; Balance (ability); Philosophy of science; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13137791539734758,"score_gpt":0.2356368671332392,"score_spread":0.10425895173589161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161632738","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00322639,0.0049280673,0.0003245249,0.92465717,0.0035020043,0.000032442545,0.00012637515,0.0000237088,0.06317936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034194097,0.0019918322,0.00031232656,0.8863478,0.014505648,0.00011859035,0.00003834397,0.000026273648,0.06246504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899003,0.0034072713,0.0006702395,0.001263114,0.0026407598,0.0021183777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97426367,0.020462442,0.0013178283,0.00068625604,0.0017154913,0.0015542058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009215459,0.0009876136,0.0017054545,0.0016659208,0.016952094,0.018916387,0.0028745597,0.15160953,0.0059794346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036180183,0.0012603416,0.0013518088,0.0013204626,0.015852792,0.00926178,0.004356928,0.060943708,0.002229449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016629862,0.00012252774,0.0013711188,0.00009366929,0.0000454809,0.0014354176,0.0014895273,0.00041635142,0.00028192496,0.3304122,0.6543033,0.009862132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002669394,0.00009406515,0.005220803,0.00060367613,0.00009913226,0.0007619303,0.0033200148,0.002901539,0.0007945619,0.34689215,0.6388399,0.00020532124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077028625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20753556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15160953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016023178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016022326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15316057},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2335161676","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9777-y","title":"Ethical Risk Management Education in Engineering: A Systematic Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Risk management; Nexus (standard); Engineering education; Duty; Health systems engineering; Information ethics; Philosophy of science; Sociology; Engineering; Political science; Engineering management; Management; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.13938917651491306,"score_gpt":0.5482979568832049,"score_spread":0.40890878036829187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335161676","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008985866,0.9979219,0.00018565598,0.0002566063,0.00010391143,0.0003333042,0.00011835038,0.0000055470314,0.00017608762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01169391,0.985966,0.00094972673,0.00071383634,0.00006231017,0.0004347266,0.00006934325,0.0000043824234,0.00010561811],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.98845685,0.0041762167,0.0043858355,0.0007479882,0.0018671042,0.0003660509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636333,0.028110037,0.0050175516,0.0005000505,0.0022107335,0.00052827393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012442713,0.0016137263,0.007944801,0.010483747,0.0010096441,0.0038037768,0.00204442,0.0034902059,0.0042171096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052554395,0.0012218416,0.0063941497,0.010278395,0.0014278209,0.0037681155,0.0028861293,0.0024899596,0.0002533604],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012980272,0.000034102108,0.0006014973,0.95942765,0.005088893,0.0001015691,0.00037836688,0.00005764011,0.00010694585,0.0002201635,0.0012059783,0.032647487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002934902,0.00011671605,0.0023546082,0.9377864,0.04504383,0.0003293492,0.00067453895,0.000051948755,0.00010543763,0.00035334082,0.012848738,0.00004157109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008550925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04077771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012442713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004416124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019376155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065804124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344287662","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9779-9","title":"Principles of Public Reason in the UNFCCC: Rethinking the Equity Framework","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Technische Universiteit Delft; York University","keywords":"Pledge; Equity (law); Negotiation; Political science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.1481669360555741,"score_gpt":0.3185577087944827,"score_spread":0.1703907727389086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344287662","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026698222,0.0049149115,0.13755552,0.49356687,0.0028744738,0.00018491173,0.00026265671,0.00015089825,0.33379158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9090465,0.0013051904,0.021528693,0.05100259,0.003279343,0.0003996757,0.000079322686,0.00022328024,0.013135348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9467526,0.029600896,0.0016429231,0.004427178,0.012177951,0.0053983545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9459656,0.039429177,0.0020850813,0.0053833625,0.0053457525,0.0017910015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.064570405,0.00096310687,0.0017280468,0.0027908045,0.008294504,0.015660914,0.0048925574,0.029493436,0.006286806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0815008,0.0009035927,0.0017321217,0.0024026725,0.062170316,0.020435473,0.008380711,0.026417037,0.0006348883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004891724,0.000006517732,0.000046224628,0.0000076014417,0.0000041607796,0.000007974688,0.00031509818,0.00025850325,0.000013742384,0.9965867,0.001805723,0.00094282953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016143867,0.0000031344641,0.0000682815,0.00004880971,0.000006776663,0.0000057382845,0.00012318644,0.0004219595,0.000045414545,0.98947537,0.009775363,0.000009749828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032187838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026339494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064570405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014626717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025523042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34148502},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2508566205","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9811-0","title":"May Stakeholders be Involved in Design Without Informed Consent? The Case of Hidden Design","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Newfoundland and Labrador; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Deliberation; Stakeholder; Normative; Deception; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Normative model of decision-making; Research design; Stakeholder analysis; Psychology; Management science; Public relations; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2499441265217874,"score_gpt":0.3435066142269939,"score_spread":0.0935624877052065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508566205","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02840223,0.004389615,0.4450524,0.41646427,0.0020060388,0.0020239868,0.00010216176,0.00029890813,0.101260364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7013273,0.0022589162,0.20038027,0.07079122,0.0011646892,0.007586157,0.00010678014,0.00037763992,0.016006947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.41401386,0.49877426,0.016238455,0.02279802,0.04064252,0.0075328317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4281667,0.4587078,0.01945331,0.0709429,0.01732976,0.0053995294],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.4519376,0.0019395973,0.0022281215,0.0024781192,0.014215528,0.019609438,0.007347071,0.036151852,0.0060608992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45305482,0.00288562,0.0032607769,0.0026678918,0.09124872,0.04431872,0.021222398,0.030085346,0.0019438186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089194706,0.00006179386,0.0010417317,0.000502716,0.00007351953,0.0013414745,0.039353784,0.0008921789,0.00035067915,0.9268153,0.005099501,0.024378195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001561306,0.000119829885,0.00024419522,0.0011825432,0.00006361047,0.0014683704,0.009258385,0.0025673527,0.0010380629,0.87652373,0.10728022,0.000097530225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003670681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002257087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9857845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010880983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029373094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6758585},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2556066278","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9845-3","title":"Media Portrayal of a Landmark Neuroscience Experiment on Free Will","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Autonomy; Free will; Philosophy of science; Credibility; Agency (philosophy); Neuroethics; Psychology; Social media; Incompatibilism; Epistemology; Sense of agency; Social psychology; Compatibilism; Sociology; Political science; Law; Neuroscience; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05317736546638603,"score_gpt":0.2736203045722404,"score_spread":0.22044293910585439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556066278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19233967,0.0025505677,0.0024909824,0.20592713,0.0071722544,0.000060260256,0.00062582723,0.00021980988,0.5886136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8830661,0.0011865823,0.00052085443,0.028547287,0.006082855,0.000084340725,0.00018332274,0.00022646794,0.0801021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773943,0.0010046175,0.00004154209,0.0001676132,0.0006958521,0.0003510209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848247,0.012092524,0.0010814082,0.00038094114,0.00081413396,0.00080626365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003210021,0.0005131598,0.00023833732,0.0016926231,0.0073070205,0.008032439,0.0005886895,0.0058771227,0.009282271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013071117,0.0003020142,0.0002875907,0.0010133026,0.006534326,0.0036705222,0.0027532002,0.008229472,0.0012060519],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000976757,0.00015047457,0.004126656,0.00032021987,0.000054669363,0.003261345,0.13624817,0.000528388,0.007057702,0.43791214,0.3830131,0.026350483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075112825,0.00013063743,0.008398787,0.0003406846,0.000052460615,0.00051577104,0.037126563,0.00088538945,0.002748496,0.01829476,0.9313294,0.00010194021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012082478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018484555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036442447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010641189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031052232},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2559047598","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9833-7","title":"Who Should Decide How Machines Make Morally Laden Decisions?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Philosophy of science; Computer science; Decision maker; Management science; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.12366402640714318,"score_gpt":0.38834770878210706,"score_spread":0.26468368237496387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559047598","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11228397,0.0029498176,0.08884198,0.4046673,0.0018374749,0.00018135173,0.00016536414,0.00028636778,0.38878644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573313,0.0007420529,0.014597368,0.015862083,0.0006149418,0.00012387155,0.000043464344,0.00013581914,0.010549189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795776,0.013512523,0.00048047455,0.0013310631,0.0030335765,0.0020646458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94951874,0.03195125,0.0049660127,0.0033611164,0.006179525,0.004023217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02273575,0.00046146684,0.00081274996,0.0016385838,0.0037669935,0.011768806,0.0017281809,0.01015637,0.009854224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08719082,0.0006218914,0.000561058,0.00081145717,0.02049236,0.015291599,0.002081123,0.007278851,0.0028840455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010010907,0.00015362044,0.0060088187,0.0001271934,0.00012393881,0.00024284027,0.004444827,0.0017633493,0.0010733475,0.93491685,0.019328885,0.031716265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028006196,0.00001967151,0.0015626986,0.00010464676,0.000022486234,0.00010074238,0.0030036492,0.0026956832,0.00083732704,0.95647246,0.035115007,0.000037516766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033909238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038083186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02273575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036914723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006227752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120239556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566481544","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9861-3","title":"The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Slippery slope; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of science; Defeasible estate; Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Value (mathematics); Argumentation framework; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.04229210686061018,"score_gpt":0.3378338198720225,"score_spread":0.2955417130114123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566481544","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028254973,0.003965118,0.030617485,0.70114064,0.0021758573,0.000034725093,0.00007818297,0.00004058091,0.23369241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86480886,0.002250821,0.008879184,0.101656325,0.002894943,0.00014963644,0.00003194618,0.00013631767,0.019191882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98029894,0.011424967,0.0004221481,0.0018722735,0.0048884535,0.0010933896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96624213,0.02687644,0.0015041619,0.0018606168,0.0023981212,0.0011184348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026568482,0.00063595787,0.0010224199,0.0016907422,0.007119278,0.009021809,0.00216254,0.025645746,0.0061918744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06254102,0.0005506124,0.0007406563,0.0016395913,0.052577727,0.013356594,0.0056546913,0.020488601,0.0014730631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015710133,0.000005696419,0.00010053225,0.0000130235,0.0000058839278,0.000041234234,0.0007375628,0.00018554638,0.00005406736,0.993363,0.0038817269,0.0015960875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012103925,0.000005004897,0.000084519044,0.000046265515,0.000003142813,0.00002094063,0.00029974148,0.00022150464,0.00007636731,0.9875919,0.011632625,0.0000056721788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028849137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023514512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026568482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041230363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049514617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14050925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600935272","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-9883-5","title":"America COMPETES at 5 years: An Analysis of Research-Intensive Universities’ RCR Training Plans","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Los Angeles; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Stony Brook University; Oregon State University; Montana State University; Georgia State University; Dartmouth College; York University; University of Rochester; Georgetown University; University of Central Florida; Johns Hopkins University; Brandeis University; Colorado State University; University of Connecticut; Virginia Commonwealth University; Tulane University; Brown University; Arizona State University; State University of New York; Louisiana State University; George Washington University; California Institute of Technology; Georgia Institute of Technology; Ohio State University; Rice University; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Florida State University; Yale University; Vanderbilt University; University of Oklahoma; Washington University in St. Louis; University at Buffalo; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; City University of New York; Iowa State University; Carnegie Mellon University; North Carolina State University; Purdue University; Case Western Reserve University; National Science Foundation; Mississippi State University; Emory University; Harvard University","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Training (meteorology); Medical education; Business; Political science; Medicine; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23633687451139845,"score_gpt":0.45194323895380495,"score_spread":0.2156063644424065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600935272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899596,0.00024344954,0.00032897468,0.00081169815,0.000016446334,0.00009651291,0.0006101997,0.000029050152,0.007904086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770576,0.00010526892,0.00034197676,0.00012910936,0.000010061324,0.00008233352,0.0006350578,0.000009236068,0.0009810603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412054,0.001813021,0.00040219259,0.0004164456,0.0017648938,0.0014828243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97082245,0.008355191,0.009051165,0.0010967158,0.0034010431,0.0072734463],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007815272,0.00022407855,0.00024433227,0.003819865,0.0017517179,0.0029836104,0.0017166646,0.00072370865,0.0042477525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02386505,0.00026240665,0.0005477264,0.0026673006,0.0009276443,0.0018581287,0.0034120819,0.0010995875,0.00045229212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018772561,0.00054097397,0.92992026,0.0000975648,0.00008813446,0.00022492856,0.008516845,0.00110397,0.0003995124,0.004756697,0.005508003,0.048655443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015727535,0.00032520053,0.9541223,0.00008270992,0.000025046442,0.00008736499,0.030524557,0.001276079,0.0002318498,0.000495819,0.01277656,0.000036792193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023161463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031337924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99218476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047456343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005902795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04605329},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2606332673","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-9911-5","title":"Support for the Development of Technological Innovations: Promoting Responsible Social Uses","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologique; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of technology; Development (topology); Knowledge management; Business; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11976938545162855,"score_gpt":0.32976407341036745,"score_spread":0.2099946879587389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606332673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29688436,0.0007377878,0.32501453,0.038726494,0.00037613662,0.0012429028,0.000040366274,0.0005448883,0.33643252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724454,0.00013107601,0.023154998,0.0008041065,0.00004787618,0.0003507716,0.000007793169,0.00003738114,0.0030206938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9362757,0.04960418,0.0017912008,0.0018832724,0.008440922,0.0020047512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90095323,0.067662455,0.009001947,0.013700971,0.005381997,0.0032994002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038753983,0.0006798989,0.00047464023,0.0019232269,0.0056114625,0.008073974,0.0016160151,0.0049452772,0.0032037576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071017995,0.00039293338,0.0008072755,0.00086330296,0.022732196,0.008377481,0.010779274,0.0041566268,0.0007834746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007349528,0.00033009303,0.004075345,0.0003060705,0.000043994653,0.0005355361,0.07102269,0.0009258015,0.0040647583,0.8278916,0.0022250693,0.08850552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011039906,0.00068026927,0.003765773,0.00056969654,0.00006680752,0.0008560612,0.041547768,0.0041023022,0.009653185,0.7945047,0.14402702,0.00011598379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043852732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074565405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038753983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019615102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008024499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20495313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607780492","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-9902-6","title":"A New Science Publishing System for a Budding Science Publishing Crisis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Philosophy of science; Scientific publishing; Science policy; Political science; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17828636987509422,"score_gpt":0.42874400817412467,"score_spread":0.25045763829903045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607780492","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044112753,0.001855722,0.04743717,0.6582044,0.016422369,0.0005079536,0.0004307691,0.002985063,0.22804387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5714407,0.0014652929,0.083206154,0.100349426,0.020341806,0.0014177957,0.0006511798,0.0019357036,0.21919201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9630211,0.013004627,0.0034974753,0.004062332,0.013043374,0.003371082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8603612,0.033187017,0.006613139,0.023434136,0.03455502,0.041849475],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055275667,0.00053855433,0.0010530666,0.0038039556,0.012782224,0.053186998,0.004177185,0.016733386,0.03075321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09534567,0.0011451582,0.0013931898,0.0039191456,0.015138931,0.044103827,0.017985797,0.018713066,0.007707983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009041791,0.0001958025,0.0015633404,0.00007522527,0.000025909021,0.00027948275,0.0021520846,0.0005997004,0.0006017692,0.8544587,0.11369879,0.026258843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018407452,0.00013087464,0.0026879497,0.00020492643,0.000029528926,0.00033078634,0.0019408447,0.004139667,0.00057880563,0.3109271,0.6786782,0.00016724809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037112033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005370388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012145946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046522222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29232913},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2723878059","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-9928-9","title":"Keeping Disability in Mind: A Case Study in Implantable Brain–Computer Interface Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of Washington; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Brain–computer interface; Interface (matter); Computer science; End user; User experience design; Qualitative research; Neuroethics; User interface; Human–computer interaction; Psychology; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.18897882655772458,"score_gpt":0.4442515457961687,"score_spread":0.25527271923844413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2723878059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8835177,0.0029377833,0.0193944,0.04734914,0.0008287062,0.00034327223,0.0001146849,0.00009201754,0.04542233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97727615,0.0020766568,0.006998712,0.0027675347,0.00022078097,0.00012304448,0.000031218013,0.000053610398,0.01045229],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922311,0.0047132536,0.00039979545,0.00048662038,0.0010548311,0.0011144287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764534,0.015902506,0.0017712598,0.001095834,0.0013051922,0.0034716548],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007196571,0.00092236773,0.00066818536,0.0021230348,0.016097685,0.0057791173,0.002362736,0.01004744,0.004283467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033977248,0.00049363537,0.0009309345,0.0019555758,0.009246304,0.004477196,0.006021906,0.0067151925,0.000706714],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001882738,0.0014583782,0.023036351,0.0005251338,0.00007218363,0.51745,0.33966827,0.00086296897,0.00184693,0.049880628,0.011262851,0.053748056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004058256,0.0003221283,0.0053389412,0.0006829342,0.00005749218,0.57688266,0.32571256,0.001735463,0.0019361856,0.02125462,0.06590933,0.00012709179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032448329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007963264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98390234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035195618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004329444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038059592},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2765321797","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-9990-3","title":"The Dawning of the Ethics of Environmental Robots","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Robotics; Robot; Artificial intelligence; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.07036142559014377,"score_gpt":0.3729460915220945,"score_spread":0.30258466593195077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765321797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05045124,0.011395869,0.11162096,0.40462735,0.0016112035,0.0000670682,0.000056734592,0.00010540026,0.42006418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94478595,0.004216811,0.015088646,0.019114887,0.0010619854,0.00012504005,0.000023066534,0.00008959172,0.015494065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97203034,0.019949682,0.0005485817,0.0015701032,0.0048426,0.0010586722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97264117,0.01887592,0.0015483234,0.0023675514,0.003086659,0.0014803944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019430801,0.0004237694,0.00052892836,0.000997025,0.0064669047,0.008187565,0.0010142568,0.0074948934,0.0019090772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023020009,0.0003871311,0.00044734334,0.00063176523,0.065607816,0.008770258,0.005259517,0.009099086,0.00063013204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000491843,0.0000052995156,0.00014931444,0.000019289848,0.0000018435708,0.000022973003,0.0023101165,0.00023693578,0.00008416088,0.99092215,0.0019820216,0.0042609307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006138482,0.000016723243,0.00038137686,0.00013037951,0.000002703807,0.000085834225,0.0023568366,0.00075454096,0.000234292,0.87504804,0.120967224,0.00001592663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026404469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00202447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019430801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00485851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006202159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10276115},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2767664771","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-0001-5","title":"Embodiment and Estrangement: Results from a First-in-Human “Intelligent BCI” Trial","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet","funders":"Australian Research Council; University of Washington; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Brain–computer interface; Feeling; Perception; Categorization; Phenomenology (philosophy); Psychology; Preparedness; Identity (music); Distress; Computer science; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Artificial intelligence; Psychiatry; Neuroscience; Electroencephalography","score_opus":0.09202295995811535,"score_gpt":0.33600148698911386,"score_spread":0.2439785270309985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767664771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99187404,0.001269986,0.0013665002,0.0006086658,0.000103013524,0.0018540533,0.00025982896,0.000021813838,0.002642201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948284,0.00059371314,0.0010688013,0.0004029961,0.00006820051,0.0021251843,0.00023630515,0.00000937052,0.0006671261],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.98623335,0.010954234,0.0009060599,0.0006328325,0.00075390947,0.0005195605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97214377,0.019516919,0.0036709157,0.0024417439,0.001236831,0.0009897838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012489606,0.00060875935,0.0013281235,0.00031595668,0.0009916915,0.0012328107,0.00046531748,0.0017606171,0.0040876465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04759096,0.00023007371,0.0010895982,0.00057136937,0.001674562,0.0013973343,0.0009001515,0.0018533956,0.00064969854],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.42142424,0.09843228,0.04138577,0.006634834,0.0060884086,0.0012618755,0.019730512,0.002624177,0.0074633607,0.0034652252,0.0056945705,0.38579473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1298101,0.69497174,0.11557479,0.0010300368,0.0058298316,0.0015348644,0.0093802875,0.003005751,0.008643318,0.00788292,0.021966822,0.0003696453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068067596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008512358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012489606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060864066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010529346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06605214},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2789682559","doi":"10.1007/s11948-018-0044-2","title":"Empowering Engineering Students in Ethical Risk Management: An Experimental Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Engineering education; Ethical responsibility; Risk management; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Perception; Medical education; Engineering; Engineering management; Medicine; Management","score_opus":0.16439197985094858,"score_gpt":0.48543572884501396,"score_spread":0.3210437489940654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789682559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982482,0.0000106188945,0.00024691445,0.000104523046,0.000031170686,0.000500014,0.000015234149,0.000007573885,0.0008357056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892274,0.000091587295,0.003271344,0.00040854825,0.000056303437,0.0024727816,0.00006700458,0.000012880434,0.0043922784],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936982,0.0024656507,0.00035855098,0.0010697742,0.00090985023,0.0014979936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974495,0.0140918605,0.0021148417,0.002419669,0.0016642491,0.0052143172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010563848,0.0015644297,0.0014866883,0.0011282397,0.006019466,0.0060472237,0.0022887592,0.0051978235,0.011384088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025906311,0.0017008058,0.000823959,0.00065766304,0.004898551,0.002813616,0.0034897944,0.007520498,0.0020031226],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012520014,0.82232046,0.02027664,0.00041522755,0.000100187855,0.00083724665,0.08582287,0.0010575395,0.017962871,0.004524973,0.0014601575,0.03270174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.041213382,0.54082876,0.094652206,0.00058085757,0.0006725675,0.0015890215,0.2241202,0.009984229,0.03892848,0.017652854,0.029056344,0.0007211049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066907174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001084105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011384088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010962281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043153437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055867672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801725374","doi":"10.1007/s11948-018-0041-5","title":"Medicines Information and the Regulation of the Promotion of Pharmaceuticals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Business; Product (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Public relations; Marketing; Pharmaceutical industry; Government regulation; Advertising; Medicine; Political science; China; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.3931380139997239,"score_gpt":0.5420961286810932,"score_spread":0.14895811468136932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801725374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03850707,0.20201176,0.019145895,0.16330954,0.0038671738,0.00024459139,0.00019786245,0.00014357384,0.5725725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7988099,0.08558607,0.012172411,0.055095427,0.0068954886,0.00040700985,0.00014571003,0.00009254353,0.040795516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9680448,0.014885589,0.0017426823,0.0021133283,0.011627492,0.0015861675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94842815,0.036288045,0.0071676224,0.0024731623,0.004732158,0.00091081177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017062278,0.0003650413,0.0005742944,0.0020622106,0.0020241935,0.006898508,0.0011861371,0.0067238393,0.003160428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02668195,0.00046645684,0.00061924144,0.0019337161,0.016551439,0.0036327715,0.0032636824,0.005050743,0.0008309908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058036287,0.00012369142,0.0023476996,0.0015119499,0.000047183075,0.0005737626,0.0067992955,0.00057669444,0.0023124816,0.86170554,0.012932966,0.11101063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041102707,0.00018987691,0.008278264,0.0042915028,0.00006935629,0.000847819,0.0014900442,0.00046446724,0.0035184145,0.20633578,0.77439654,0.00007676763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031083212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024465828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017062278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037430248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070630363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090234995},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2898089001","doi":"10.1007/s11948-018-0072-y","title":"Challenges in Collecting Big Data in A Clinical Environment with Vulnerable Population: Lessons Learned from A Study Using A Multi-modal Sensors Platform","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University Health Network; Université TÉLUQ; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"Alzheimer Society","keywords":"Dementia; Anxiety; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Modal; Unit (ring theory); Medicine; Nursing; Applied psychology; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.5854542827328871,"score_gpt":0.48223631538063494,"score_spread":0.1032179673522522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898089001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67142814,0.0038736544,0.11871043,0.18209422,0.0012198077,0.0018350737,0.0010643817,0.00021487047,0.019559428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8962461,0.0024484098,0.085792735,0.012281679,0.00039981504,0.0013140979,0.00025689398,0.00012090927,0.0011393788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95163035,0.03845009,0.0022813242,0.0018440805,0.0040667797,0.0017273695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8080256,0.15163697,0.005839729,0.009112884,0.018338073,0.0070467186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.067752406,0.0004686226,0.00069300615,0.00084997143,0.0034578177,0.0069612935,0.0027339673,0.0023797443,0.0021663443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12710962,0.000559721,0.0006365142,0.0015279418,0.003983435,0.007779175,0.0053699445,0.00391718,0.00047642027],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001209849,0.0029832406,0.39158934,0.0036761211,0.00076404825,0.005919705,0.22889677,0.007943868,0.0068631256,0.028672969,0.035347037,0.2861339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026518173,0.0021906507,0.13513787,0.005228815,0.0003975392,0.0060627116,0.57735837,0.021445565,0.007482467,0.11622531,0.12773754,0.00046792452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009915486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021538248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9322476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002393928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0123256175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35831326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901233696","doi":"10.1007/s11948-018-0074-9","title":"Genetically Engineered Oil Seed Crops and Novel Terrestrial Nutrients: Ethical Considerations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Genetically modified crops; Nutrient; Genetically modified organism; Ecosystem; Biotechnology; Genetically engineered; Eicosapentaenoic acid; Docosahexaenoic acid; Biology; Crop; Natural resource economics; Business; Ecology; Polyunsaturated fatty acid; Transgene; Economics; Fatty acid","score_opus":0.05638867241707279,"score_gpt":0.2825569605316909,"score_spread":0.2261682881146181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901233696","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05682198,0.009887434,0.07078445,0.74992186,0.0073503656,0.0011154056,0.00019322344,0.0001349572,0.103790306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52859646,0.0067371586,0.08567511,0.33316323,0.0047401018,0.0033668817,0.0001335281,0.00013984153,0.037447743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95402986,0.029200291,0.002796029,0.0023768067,0.009611305,0.0019858035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8828502,0.08896598,0.004787974,0.010115495,0.008548044,0.004732314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07792721,0.0005886562,0.00085016177,0.00084291544,0.004338932,0.0067530414,0.002476491,0.020864004,0.0034076401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08611094,0.00054898555,0.00064273697,0.0006789102,0.01622716,0.004118606,0.003988664,0.015012358,0.0009959381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036030292,0.00043455604,0.0036953154,0.00036168427,0.00008476272,0.0021261189,0.009396527,0.00088613597,0.010662827,0.83967274,0.070335835,0.061983123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023788674,0.000348852,0.0024081795,0.002006319,0.00015558499,0.006259062,0.0070162676,0.0035864324,0.007754244,0.40040952,0.56966865,0.00014902254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012881143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031705059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028239554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012077839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41212338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918136568","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00097-0","title":"Solutions to Gender Balance in STEM Fields Through Support, Training, Education and Mentoring: Report of the International Women in Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Task Group","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Diversity and Career in Medicine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Balance (ability); Gender balance; Work (physics); Women in science; Philosophy of science; Medical education; Work–life balance; Working group; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Political science; Engineering; Sociology; Mechanical engineering; Physical therapy; Law; Gender studies; Systems engineering","score_opus":0.05462969082667192,"score_gpt":0.3207164155603712,"score_spread":0.2660867247336993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918136568","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24026915,0.009384445,0.0011887751,0.69932526,0.005122382,0.0002692318,0.00028029442,0.00004655365,0.04411394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8755591,0.009235724,0.0017106137,0.08785773,0.0023998898,0.00040816938,0.0002965997,0.000086637236,0.022445582],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886546,0.004204543,0.00040726594,0.00037233226,0.0023196298,0.0040414957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966412,0.0104136495,0.0030724735,0.00048538638,0.0039305626,0.01568589],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027028747,0.0005465486,0.00047341027,0.001346045,0.009367219,0.006234434,0.0015227536,0.0045251744,0.0071376716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03219656,0.00028994956,0.00048965315,0.0013478274,0.0035596783,0.0034283102,0.011430801,0.0052947477,0.0005907265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032903336,0.0010478104,0.117008165,0.00077629543,0.00011011812,0.0011204258,0.14237945,0.00038176816,0.0026351716,0.043495823,0.2666869,0.424029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020957681,0.00060596,0.11749283,0.0019329893,0.00010270611,0.0008115043,0.3616517,0.00039803455,0.002145515,0.0190949,0.49541408,0.00014015092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015721865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042219933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97297126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040262355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029943025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14294344},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2920377922","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3","title":"Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canadian Nutrition Society","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine","keywords":"Scientific integrity; Transparency (behavior); Engineering ethics; Best practice; Publication; Harmonization; Scientific misconduct; Research integrity; Process (computing); Philosophy of science; Academic integrity; Scientific evidence; Data integrity; Research ethics; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.15591522983758016,"score_gpt":0.3841029606226381,"score_spread":0.22818773078505794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920377922","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006370453,0.011837323,0.024648136,0.9310342,0.011978668,0.0019017498,0.0004043508,0.00080183643,0.016756665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014281153,0.027525963,0.38304693,0.5405444,0.005240227,0.008384462,0.0021613133,0.001028651,0.017786946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6184418,0.18256451,0.05261779,0.013719657,0.11213776,0.02051848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.32004505,0.2414827,0.03023568,0.033631824,0.32228127,0.052323453],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4186075,0.004601844,0.0063649425,0.019364534,0.016740339,0.049559858,0.025259579,0.08201861,0.009587427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49925342,0.0045429645,0.01114611,0.01801512,0.0251396,0.047382504,0.03261385,0.08316102,0.014511562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018639216,0.0012617898,0.0018995363,0.0037523066,0.00020095895,0.00081606774,0.0047711483,0.0023365454,0.0006193137,0.12816092,0.73691535,0.119079664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050173106,0.00024896537,0.0016964554,0.021302167,0.0003096386,0.0004180418,0.0056560254,0.0022174516,0.0011549299,0.13376342,0.83215654,0.0005747133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04050354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033216245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9179814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026369661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2695974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71696043},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2948251768","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00112-4","title":"Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Psychology; Multidisciplinary approach; Hostility; Research integrity; Social psychology; Social science; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.037397476199452065,"score_gpt":0.3625665209387409,"score_spread":0.32516904473928887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948251768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96806586,0.001576205,0.0044979304,0.01193266,0.0001352626,0.00015871196,0.00012399176,0.00004883144,0.013460637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982698,0.00015029898,0.0007021149,0.00030496402,0.000080975355,0.000054002314,0.000033086155,0.000010678635,0.00039409386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.79758745,0.15128063,0.018186629,0.0060810074,0.021616913,0.005247393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.0779978,0.75594527,0.113607645,0.019293936,0.025865495,0.00728989],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11900774,0.00033247017,0.0008147524,0.008871816,0.00861712,0.006068826,0.0024946148,0.006953667,0.0051339213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.67088354,0.00057369046,0.00094860996,0.006320048,0.0075760046,0.0076381387,0.006884156,0.008075938,0.0005983742],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010047049,0.0009047429,0.86433715,0.00037593383,0.00033624895,0.0020267714,0.050827526,0.0014811776,0.000262334,0.02057462,0.0043051564,0.053563572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026917318,0.00091373804,0.6886446,0.0018901881,0.000627404,0.008479569,0.08884228,0.022733083,0.0020969827,0.17299862,0.012190991,0.00031337744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032318055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036323348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99304634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050220266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008259609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6293806},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2948845587","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00113-3","title":"Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Psychology; Mentorship; Productivity; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Medical education; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.6652650663412806,"score_gpt":0.638300049848536,"score_spread":0.02696501649274452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948845587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97666806,0.00034853755,0.002452559,0.006757701,0.0001378233,0.00009554237,0.00001944852,0.000019117479,0.013501257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985592,0.00007281075,0.0004950899,0.00033385697,0.00003162587,0.00004731347,0.00000975157,0.000007995304,0.00044228463],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.80366296,0.14733717,0.0144187845,0.0038742586,0.023350932,0.0073558884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38009593,0.44678137,0.07572265,0.011771274,0.04745822,0.038170546],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.109976396,0.00033484504,0.00064795377,0.0063716406,0.01075801,0.016050529,0.0014962956,0.003157456,0.0034175422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36728528,0.00052073214,0.0007490277,0.0034737266,0.009673578,0.0063631455,0.010911382,0.004165993,0.00037736315],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063887436,0.00078026403,0.27917027,0.00033548145,0.00022365217,0.0007755169,0.6527548,0.0005112282,0.001499464,0.018242365,0.0025946172,0.04247343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002623688,0.00046360973,0.10687008,0.0005310185,0.00010941833,0.00085471,0.85502124,0.0021048235,0.0010434369,0.019270385,0.013318298,0.00015062233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002863407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035529549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99684256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007151499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0124559505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5816177},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3033000849","doi":"10.1007/s11948-020-00226-0","title":"Back to Basics: Application of the Principles of Bioethics to Heritable Genome Interventions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Bioethics; Genome editing; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Genome; Psychology; Genetics; Biology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Gene","score_opus":0.12490325266984065,"score_gpt":0.35111512672586886,"score_spread":0.22621187405602822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033000849","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010066839,0.025890248,0.21659568,0.39663476,0.0069013466,0.00019440273,0.0002484055,0.00015231934,0.343316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6268334,0.017339526,0.12482842,0.13543448,0.0071071796,0.00089653715,0.0001930821,0.0004585654,0.086908825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890644,0.006764276,0.00033964764,0.00079054607,0.0025073253,0.0005337777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98846465,0.008730014,0.0003643677,0.0011610987,0.0009983503,0.0002814912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015174533,0.00087805715,0.0011510574,0.0013329332,0.0033398387,0.00672282,0.0019276738,0.009891818,0.0067180744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026182499,0.00063300715,0.0010681587,0.0008351667,0.051471524,0.010458471,0.0049192393,0.016299695,0.0013498939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067061274,0.00000770682,0.000038631533,0.000028074954,0.000005338133,0.000020998234,0.00045433157,0.00016104241,0.00006921111,0.9925929,0.0029641455,0.0036510571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008077898,0.000007230382,0.00007995793,0.00009249868,0.0000030680658,0.00003316268,0.000109605375,0.00019775101,0.00012877012,0.97487384,0.024457963,0.000008222998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058283033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00458594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015174533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064877775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058294944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080251575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081821133","doi":"10.1007/s11948-020-00255-9","title":"Should Moral Machines be Banned? A Commentary on van Wynsberghe and Robbins “Critiquing the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Philosophy of science; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.3487814574918423,"score_gpt":0.3689617999310956,"score_spread":0.020180342439253318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081821133","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000097061085,0.0022306154,0.00014924537,0.98892725,0.0073438906,0.0000033429294,0.000021610196,0.0000070359047,0.0012198379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030931414,0.0007927543,0.00021571285,0.98274165,0.011494815,0.000027199843,0.000009037181,0.000027376547,0.0015983226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97425973,0.01062561,0.0017296722,0.004104997,0.006705663,0.0025743719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88568664,0.0931401,0.0035863752,0.0017470298,0.012507185,0.0033327104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023289517,0.0015041592,0.00279969,0.0021304444,0.009442125,0.009794401,0.009968246,0.12431053,0.0085152555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11469717,0.0019171478,0.0026161913,0.0024643324,0.02885926,0.020758234,0.005286063,0.12605979,0.0053345375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058450383,0.000012126705,0.00007311951,0.00013250427,0.000027297763,0.00013108112,0.0017335735,0.000066492445,0.00007623534,0.06441426,0.9298814,0.0033933744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014763213,0.000028623945,0.0005607469,0.001759848,0.00009171033,0.00023875784,0.0032936127,0.00032500466,0.00046708234,0.17635639,0.8165519,0.00017859231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046100255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0741757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12431053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010036409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013181809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12316823},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3130901445","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00286-w","title":"Domain Experts on Dementia-Care Technologies: Mitigating Risk in Design and Implementation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Delphi Technique in Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Dementia; Philosophy of science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10676325342302637,"score_gpt":0.45107570898735305,"score_spread":0.34431245556432666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130901445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51553136,0.0031030101,0.30650568,0.060718484,0.000752384,0.010615157,0.0001350645,0.0003063503,0.102332495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8380501,0.0020719587,0.14201647,0.0069781872,0.00007282048,0.0053902175,0.000064706386,0.00006426624,0.005291199],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.742431,0.23280141,0.0054165064,0.0026386755,0.010287907,0.006424603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86782056,0.0984487,0.0052557867,0.0056937346,0.016705118,0.0060760253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16546462,0.0011845812,0.0006240806,0.0028370533,0.0073652053,0.007886032,0.0020741976,0.0038754314,0.0049251784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11794286,0.001276573,0.00075621484,0.0013678396,0.009201841,0.009975405,0.013096479,0.0042920415,0.0012443229],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003055303,0.00077612995,0.017938126,0.003261317,0.00011612885,0.0010645927,0.6996201,0.0043099644,0.0066984156,0.049800154,0.009059957,0.20704964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001461008,0.0012332071,0.007815378,0.0047383206,0.000087751105,0.00094585377,0.77820337,0.0057775644,0.004805119,0.053757153,0.14223312,0.00025714023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027692544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033316414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16546462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006832855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01848611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87507105},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3138108488","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00294-w","title":"Cognitive Enhancement: Unanswered Questions About Human Psychology and Social Behavior","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Clinical Research Institute; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Universität zu Köln; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Flourishing; Neuroethics; Psychology; Cognition; Autonomy; Mental health; Human enhancement; Social cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Psychotherapist; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.12690128501384007,"score_gpt":0.41846459536611763,"score_spread":0.29156331035227756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138108488","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01666465,0.35907468,0.014169636,0.5613316,0.0052666375,0.000065844964,0.00019224908,0.0001298031,0.0431049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5420487,0.27156094,0.010513796,0.14865388,0.019604465,0.00040068265,0.00019536179,0.00014636513,0.0068758493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940041,0.003366455,0.00018043496,0.0011403405,0.0009796446,0.00032912477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96496457,0.02850503,0.0012691302,0.00252962,0.0016734045,0.0010582004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014509762,0.00082485075,0.0018053056,0.001476369,0.002276724,0.005615319,0.0023618056,0.00672205,0.0066577904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016738527,0.0002991896,0.0009292915,0.0010446277,0.043132544,0.013276873,0.0043291952,0.008920931,0.0014415729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002094201,0.0002668093,0.004717142,0.0031456023,0.00024772866,0.00029581538,0.012543756,0.0005922424,0.0009996126,0.60891235,0.031355023,0.33671448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003089759,0.00021269318,0.0076415804,0.002343791,0.00004973014,0.00037596482,0.0071667326,0.0004006394,0.00024696477,0.85830504,0.123140186,0.000085894186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020065878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013008472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014509762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002412562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003127846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076735914},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3170023695","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00315-8","title":"A Politics of Objectivity: Biomedicine’s Attempts to Grapple with “non-financial” Conflicts of Interest","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto","keywords":"Conflict of interest; Objectivity (philosophy); Credibility; Scrutiny; Politics; Biomedicine; Public interest; Political science; Public relations; Accountability; Sociology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.5250798463940783,"score_gpt":0.543444059475554,"score_spread":0.018364213081475622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170023695","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046954076,0.0038604399,0.011355059,0.9024017,0.004276891,0.000041213658,0.000014064857,0.00003513779,0.07332003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53418744,0.001758679,0.008433714,0.4311132,0.011490654,0.00033248652,0.000018300227,0.00019348598,0.012472074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8066171,0.14527974,0.0069159353,0.009594296,0.021984173,0.009608708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6428283,0.2885977,0.016668087,0.01653619,0.018120382,0.01724933],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20111582,0.0012059342,0.0020822247,0.00422343,0.022837492,0.043095175,0.0060058045,0.061762627,0.0046064444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2528538,0.0015552405,0.0015979199,0.0027114335,0.18330842,0.030505428,0.02103829,0.060728643,0.0011402518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013037367,0.000015050289,0.00020213297,0.000037961083,0.00002788468,0.00012768368,0.0090441145,0.000070616865,0.00007624909,0.97185206,0.01544788,0.0030854242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004237269,0.000016237993,0.00015332013,0.00031896765,0.000020459476,0.00023275973,0.004265746,0.0003099755,0.00017018334,0.910965,0.08345429,0.000050676237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024164577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003175863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93823737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011685166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02960535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98516643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189026556","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00327-4","title":"Ethical Considerations Associated with “Humanitarian Drones”: A Scoping Literature Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation","funders":"Vrije Universiteit Brussel; McGill University; Universität Zürich; Universität St. Gallen; World Health Organization","keywords":"Drone; Humanitarian aid; Harm; Public relations; Economic Justice; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.09185619438386419,"score_gpt":0.4230454729892827,"score_spread":0.33118927860541847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189026556","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004874624,0.9772241,0.002625052,0.0073693045,0.00086176116,0.0012369116,0.00025305524,0.000015757687,0.00553939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03651304,0.95294815,0.004070116,0.0032600733,0.00033130628,0.002044917,0.0002588929,0.000015945587,0.0005575677],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9398099,0.033439074,0.01436717,0.0019892957,0.009178329,0.001216337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7035759,0.25637707,0.016355306,0.002182708,0.020559384,0.0009496838],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049319543,0.0014650074,0.0030085149,0.038882088,0.0040650843,0.009423992,0.0021704815,0.0055972324,0.0024471995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19193985,0.0014435449,0.0039299307,0.030863302,0.0059672426,0.008105702,0.0056698867,0.0033180632,0.0004106428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012001198,0.000085544954,0.0035527886,0.5581226,0.001487229,0.0026848488,0.03384403,0.0011935836,0.0004836686,0.024101093,0.016636234,0.35768837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013068023,0.000042083717,0.0015440097,0.9061298,0.0011925584,0.0008724362,0.017083826,0.00016544257,0.00021217593,0.0036273764,0.06907229,0.000044945133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008826505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018782998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009835013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03582482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2608298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194337055","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00329-2","title":"Ethics and Values in Design: A Structured Review and Theoretical Critique","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's College Hospital; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Normative; Agency (philosophy); Vision; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Philosophy of science; Research design; Inclusion (mineral); Management science; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09348655421781756,"score_gpt":0.4123572479356579,"score_spread":0.3188706937178404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194337055","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008302721,0.9711936,0.0056137303,0.016778357,0.001687011,0.0005412317,0.00010810356,0.000027621734,0.0032200606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017939733,0.9562793,0.012588862,0.008937519,0.0010323708,0.00226144,0.00012809322,0.000042311374,0.00079033134],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8913568,0.065200664,0.015940556,0.004665847,0.0214441,0.0013920576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7378235,0.21300514,0.013490214,0.0049393927,0.029699275,0.0010424722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.072709456,0.0018140009,0.0039295685,0.028257828,0.002826958,0.010890405,0.0032695213,0.0061594336,0.002293851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16608262,0.0015290697,0.0038430023,0.022778794,0.01091627,0.011393279,0.0057898783,0.006061767,0.00085929065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013731905,0.000088627465,0.0009177244,0.30600345,0.0006399924,0.00054245157,0.016652934,0.001593191,0.001165798,0.11867982,0.038660623,0.5149181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000704826,0.00011397984,0.0011201041,0.6231885,0.00065818016,0.0006709955,0.007261231,0.00052626047,0.00047412273,0.0335389,0.33229697,0.000080332306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067385975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010666501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072709456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017158566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049849886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38452893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200063599","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00338-1","title":"Touching at a Distance: Digital Intimacies, Haptic Platforms, and the Ethics of Consent","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Haptic technology; Informed consent; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Engineering; Epistemology; Philosophy; Simulation; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.06301642748980016,"score_gpt":0.3519940393426723,"score_spread":0.2889776118528722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200063599","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17603761,0.0121529,0.110911176,0.37444517,0.0015147848,0.00037957518,0.000068389665,0.00010329989,0.3243872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773333,0.001584121,0.006177495,0.008690211,0.00028258123,0.00018393209,0.000011209834,0.00002832578,0.0057088323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8887124,0.0947324,0.0029957006,0.003182466,0.007824823,0.0025521375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8740643,0.104367346,0.0058408366,0.00911487,0.0037571439,0.0028554741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06489722,0.00044707928,0.0005989405,0.001634065,0.010195586,0.01570031,0.0015916638,0.010663698,0.0032700326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09264219,0.00049237075,0.0004660815,0.0014504885,0.1212068,0.018719815,0.012499525,0.009510763,0.0005843187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017437087,0.000019012374,0.0006987828,0.00005914697,0.0000048538195,0.00034090658,0.06261005,0.00011834782,0.00020747982,0.92408,0.0014252728,0.010418603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002605375,0.00006024678,0.0008744859,0.00076707033,0.00000865924,0.0011243634,0.056427225,0.0005921211,0.00062774395,0.8468494,0.09257267,0.00006987016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018933222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001318617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06489722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042833774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076963357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34321338},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4281716895","doi":"10.1007/s11948-022-00379-0","title":"Tech Ethics Through Trust Auditing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Champion; Audit; Ethics of technology; Work (physics); Subject (documents); Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Information ethics; Business; State (computer science); Applied ethics; Public relations; Public sector; Business ethics; Political science; Accounting; Law; Engineering; Meta-ethics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10329691540250505,"score_gpt":0.39602978342129636,"score_spread":0.2927328680187913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281716895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06519687,0.0026627954,0.32448983,0.19264072,0.0015408183,0.0009678927,0.0001574481,0.0014937904,0.41084984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479225,0.0010898961,0.030494114,0.0054713883,0.00034203875,0.000372251,0.000052263942,0.00015138916,0.014104074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90521175,0.06803403,0.0034424274,0.004257289,0.014497073,0.004557441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8004135,0.0954107,0.023832966,0.042870037,0.02651594,0.010956825],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060522273,0.0005787715,0.0005279331,0.002684281,0.007280181,0.01625551,0.0017829108,0.0051972265,0.004941726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15717088,0.0006496341,0.00077537366,0.0024493143,0.027365554,0.01954284,0.014056759,0.009021793,0.001725939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055964083,0.00013295354,0.00802736,0.0002657782,0.000044879464,0.0002735761,0.016300267,0.0019460821,0.0006230786,0.805233,0.025670195,0.14142689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041187275,0.00010780816,0.0028740852,0.0008101312,0.0000403181,0.0003320054,0.008300163,0.005239155,0.0018219064,0.76335114,0.21697445,0.00010770108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004926165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005056708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068943216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02644238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32007623},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4307449677","doi":"10.1007/s11948-022-00397-y","title":"Equity in AgeTech for Ageing Well in Technology-Driven Places: The Role of Social Determinants in Designing AI-based Assistive Technologies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität für Gesundheitswissenschaften","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Ageing; Equity (law); Philosophy of technology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Knowledge management; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03575920895952774,"score_gpt":0.3446988846284218,"score_spread":0.3089396756688941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307449677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37634388,0.009299297,0.14142697,0.18145683,0.0010545325,0.00047643806,0.00012633053,0.00010185849,0.28971383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863282,0.0010603905,0.006387646,0.0027761504,0.00014749626,0.00011759764,0.000017377708,0.000024709894,0.003140413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722571,0.020204706,0.0008649626,0.0016345887,0.0035926197,0.0014459816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9637203,0.023660602,0.003499302,0.0032478503,0.0034702495,0.002401778],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03005706,0.00041490165,0.00039721103,0.0011180552,0.0045393235,0.009317445,0.0010315365,0.0025813866,0.0033822272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03761913,0.0002206884,0.00043782266,0.000702635,0.02682139,0.0076500173,0.008046299,0.0030988012,0.0004907973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003606745,0.00013803208,0.014855295,0.00028846515,0.00003372105,0.000224823,0.039060075,0.0010355462,0.0008669964,0.88350904,0.0028448477,0.05710705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020148234,0.00018032269,0.012417236,0.00096391735,0.000038957744,0.0003765631,0.03270115,0.0019155467,0.0017996958,0.8439491,0.10557418,0.000063258005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022862963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030521788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004495972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006940998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1589588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311350785","doi":"10.1007/s11948-022-00424-y","title":"Correction: Equity in AgeTech for Ageing Well in Technology-Driven Places: The Role of Social Determinants in Designing AI-based Assistive Technologies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Philosophy of science; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Public relations; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.032124317178405325,"score_gpt":0.34162313165275116,"score_spread":0.30949881447434585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311350785","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002738596,0.00079371757,0.0013390899,0.13194634,0.85583013,0.000033956992,0.0021697439,0.000539001,0.007074108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031414144,0.009663468,0.013574281,0.20223157,0.25380248,0.00054444774,0.004639773,0.0043213265,0.47980848],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933903,0.0011214961,0.0013075393,0.0007985491,0.0029347087,0.00044745146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9444663,0.015002748,0.0025767232,0.0027684493,0.033761315,0.0014244369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00532645,0.0025800008,0.0015520465,0.0028426272,0.0050972207,0.005197752,0.00349143,0.009055012,0.056924988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09517359,0.0010853347,0.0013062821,0.0028089094,0.0037786788,0.0032819163,0.0028161337,0.017695714,0.039663903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015098579,0.0000026205385,0.00005119629,0.000063189684,0.0000037795903,0.00015182578,0.00008629118,0.000029445011,0.000024664128,0.0014324081,0.9950041,0.003135356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002292498,0.0000094366,0.0005282308,0.00042356102,0.000017199205,0.0005068634,0.00028063144,0.00025591534,0.00030170594,0.002581264,0.9950289,0.000043354776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03872159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035931665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056924988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060445163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010358142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19043303},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4384120711","doi":"10.1007/s11948-023-00449-x","title":"A Comparative Defense of Self-initiated Prospective Moral Answerability for Autonomous Robot harm","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Sophistication; Harm; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Blame; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.18108919342845872,"score_gpt":0.4189919699886226,"score_spread":0.23790277656016387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384120711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20417008,0.0005902075,0.11958118,0.013507879,0.00022259112,0.0001651893,0.00017426166,0.00010590116,0.6614827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98833895,0.00007384406,0.0038955878,0.00037220807,0.000052810068,0.00006778276,0.000028645847,0.000026880478,0.007143414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921061,0.004067011,0.00022032588,0.0009571433,0.0018053347,0.00084408093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699024,0.019053023,0.0028044474,0.0044517894,0.0028091106,0.0009793232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010094532,0.00042197114,0.0006040009,0.0015100943,0.0028490953,0.0054553463,0.0026032126,0.0057884343,0.024937581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04559551,0.00050269143,0.001176895,0.0007674269,0.015864,0.010015717,0.0043788264,0.0047236253,0.0009354745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004428904,0.000029068739,0.00047968753,0.000021361398,0.00000689065,0.000041763644,0.0007425717,0.00050989137,0.00019370262,0.9948657,0.00028397734,0.0027811436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004510366,0.000095414456,0.0024617347,0.00004652431,0.00002283287,0.00015666088,0.0016696166,0.0055103973,0.0005808558,0.98337317,0.006013768,0.0000239475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017216663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014299178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024937581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029827666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022488912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08342451},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4403865951","doi":"10.1007/s11948-024-00516-x","title":"Authorship and Citizen Science: Seven Heuristic Rules","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Philosophy of science; Subject (documents); Heuristic; Research integrity; Political science; Citizen science; Term (time); Scientific misconduct; Public relations; Medical research; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Computer science; Library science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.03919945871547186,"score_gpt":0.29018179500242125,"score_spread":0.2509823362869494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403865951","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07077343,0.0058698547,0.3335048,0.26561508,0.0024914972,0.0035525714,0.0010250323,0.0005255259,0.31664214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7494274,0.0018280414,0.21347609,0.021266319,0.0013337587,0.0030440975,0.00046232622,0.00020451198,0.0089575155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85045207,0.09512671,0.012313613,0.010031554,0.025932768,0.006143331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5783059,0.36156204,0.015142408,0.019301852,0.01939653,0.0062912223],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.111011535,0.0012220162,0.0027441464,0.01104893,0.01099055,0.02244994,0.005885051,0.019283826,0.010703236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26636478,0.0015052567,0.0020262287,0.008625312,0.04716356,0.025075557,0.009941218,0.012772402,0.0014618718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065714434,0.00005895313,0.0021317545,0.0002129964,0.000043231103,0.00020095427,0.0019281207,0.00072535203,0.000036419653,0.97468907,0.0072601684,0.01264732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085089705,0.000016827153,0.00050118373,0.00022840653,0.00003384544,0.00014584596,0.0011246633,0.0027035638,0.00010439427,0.9844915,0.010520366,0.000044248358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054923054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006964389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98071617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009908668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010400857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58709216},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","open_science"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4404923040","doi":"10.1007/s11948-024-00521-0","title":"Editorial: Topical Collection “Ethical and Societal Implications of AgeTech”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität für Gesundheitswissenschaften","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Emerging technologies; Ethical issues; Philosophy of science; Quality of life (healthcare); Robotics; Wearable technology; Quality (philosophy); Wearable computer; Psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Nursing; Robot","score_opus":0.01731668271249683,"score_gpt":0.3350054145677926,"score_spread":0.3176887318552958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404923040","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026156025,0.0034654064,0.00008854961,0.03143694,0.96059686,0.00002603165,0.00005124174,0.00004227905,0.0042665713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00026964638,0.0027932923,0.0000770134,0.017072977,0.9664429,0.000036681853,0.000033354485,0.00005315001,0.013220967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923218,0.0012964865,0.0007094742,0.00071577146,0.0045496486,0.0004067521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97161114,0.0122107435,0.0017078384,0.00062176544,0.010762947,0.0030855227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072022625,0.0035056653,0.0034716406,0.004499394,0.0053763585,0.010863349,0.0029184378,0.014321877,0.033075485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034462187,0.0009294119,0.0024374374,0.0018807556,0.0032258632,0.005985905,0.0022891804,0.017163785,0.027567124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007803993,0.000005685642,0.0000088261895,0.00011986531,0.000003644256,0.00004118473,0.000016948617,0.000009572975,0.00002150229,0.00019274042,0.99730253,0.0022697067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020506443,0.000011545628,0.000088662506,0.00052495266,0.000016398506,0.00014958013,0.000053833537,0.000047704194,0.000052472067,0.0007870191,0.9982362,0.000011205325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017915589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004642046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033075485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004162325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055945553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11064851},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"}]}