{"meta":{"query_hash":"ac8d0f485ba1","filters":{"venue":"Scientometrics"},"cohort_total":176,"direct_labels_cover":44,"predictions_cover":176,"exported":176,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ac8d0f485ba1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Scientometrics"},"results":[{"id":"W1172433429","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1660-0","title":"Global food allergy research trend: a bibliometric analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Science Citation Index; Social Sciences Citation Index; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Scientometrics; Citation; Food allergy; Scientific literature; Citation analysis; Population; Citation index; Environmental health; Social science; Library science; Medicine; MEDLINE; Political science; Allergy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.25255445713104036,"score_gpt":0.46594745442060165,"score_spread":0.2133929972895613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1172433429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8191123,0.019068226,0.006665485,0.0044199885,0.00047942498,0.00047291766,0.107931904,0.0009121553,0.040937513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94312763,0.0075207883,0.006077642,0.00016367956,0.0005626134,0.0003333123,0.040071975,0.000121626006,0.0020206938],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99020505,0.0018076827,0.0021178804,0.00082701305,0.004514509,0.000527827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609255,0.018723866,0.0062724804,0.0021552525,0.010865687,0.0010572382],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006111307,0.0005409518,0.0013974241,0.13693786,0.0011167252,0.0048654336,0.0006957607,0.0006516063,0.004485143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044585574,0.00022928012,0.0026665004,0.21127012,0.00053879153,0.0043661264,0.002263511,0.00061004004,0.0012419363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025323997,0.0001475781,0.78175855,0.0025839703,0.0022156741,0.00027883507,0.0016077128,0.0017638868,0.0009153044,0.0040869303,0.021360034,0.18302839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036435547,0.00017319944,0.95019776,0.00051922613,0.0015077844,0.00056339934,0.0034804214,0.005569827,0.0005016081,0.002679335,0.034712378,0.000058769652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008692242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010530293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020022343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004127787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032320082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1724869758","doi":"10.1023/a:1014256102041","title":"Collaboration and Cognitive Structures in Social Science Research Fields. Towards Socio-Cognitive Analysis in Information Systems","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Consolidation (business); Cognition; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Value (mathematics); Social network analysis; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Social science; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Business; Social capital","score_opus":0.09573227246461083,"score_gpt":0.44943950812195993,"score_spread":0.3537072356573491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1724869758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4703957,0.06777177,0.32032013,0.036668714,0.00080056104,0.00036527833,0.00093614485,0.00038328805,0.10235845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748512,0.0041323854,0.019334614,0.0002602053,0.0003168171,0.0001556315,0.00013576842,0.000020753994,0.0007927338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900663,0.00653338,0.0006136217,0.0006243625,0.0017605128,0.00040192396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93216014,0.054869365,0.0052968888,0.0031003873,0.002863632,0.0017096072],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011951589,0.00052695425,0.00079622894,0.010138784,0.0032904402,0.00917778,0.00095415924,0.0020714547,0.0036464615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06349547,0.00058550003,0.0007544075,0.01119718,0.011497896,0.019340552,0.0061516683,0.002026302,0.00037173307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013637594,0.00019170342,0.026506541,0.0015476921,0.00021458915,0.00017437042,0.028172586,0.0028402065,0.001530862,0.78806806,0.004199477,0.14641751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027762515,0.000038652364,0.02200663,0.00030459027,0.000060272916,0.00017518576,0.0103417,0.0059965407,0.00046009838,0.9510972,0.00945729,0.000034049714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033520784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004166086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030207585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034756812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06320685},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1766971555","doi":"10.1023/a:1016013912188","title":"Informetric analysis of a music database","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Scientific Research and Discoveries","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Zipf's law; Computer science; Poisson distribution; Information retrieval; Equivalence (formal languages); Informetrics; Database; Data mining; Statistics; Mathematics; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.08002575222830237,"score_gpt":0.32166463378928656,"score_spread":0.24163888156098418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1766971555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80860764,0.0033234595,0.12101661,0.0023656117,0.0002571335,0.00030254395,0.039610505,0.0029238814,0.021592585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8483283,0.0012492231,0.10744349,0.00014019378,0.0002734475,0.00012205664,0.037968785,0.000104352504,0.0043701227],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968786,0.00055039814,0.00048597297,0.00039443703,0.001438024,0.0002525955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909532,0.0044356026,0.00083619996,0.0012092686,0.002187707,0.00037808283],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020831632,0.00045029476,0.00073008996,0.020482842,0.001257434,0.0032047674,0.00097151176,0.0007794088,0.0040262244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016872425,0.0001708824,0.00070400094,0.021482157,0.00045810302,0.0022848174,0.0010803373,0.00040321142,0.0014643255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037800914,0.001042739,0.08057706,0.0010707296,0.00043009996,0.0020407217,0.0012276924,0.025722986,0.039167847,0.05105567,0.026654059,0.76723033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000381947,0.001073288,0.1420041,0.00019977533,0.000863714,0.0056920606,0.0043722065,0.6011562,0.08029961,0.06982318,0.09393849,0.00019544069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004566484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057532624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97951716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012884113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017111787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0134691},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1767272795","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5","title":"The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4652,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Directory; Computer science; Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Data science; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.6780420299185497,"score_gpt":0.6098436100295971,"score_spread":0.06819841988895259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767272795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97148997,0.011935128,0.00034766868,0.0005822236,0.00004496038,0.000012851376,0.0034959577,0.000035444522,0.012055792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953157,0.0022548512,0.00014342989,0.000038764705,0.00009108893,0.000007749902,0.0017460427,0.000014873945,0.00038747533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575174,0.0011626354,0.00055129745,0.00032749696,0.0018494801,0.00035737688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92209136,0.05161574,0.014096744,0.0015294672,0.008873878,0.0017928719],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003984022,0.00027803174,0.0008128308,0.032136608,0.0005098332,0.0034736854,0.0008115194,0.0006783728,0.0035057084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05544736,0.00021920637,0.0013891099,0.04098197,0.0007914339,0.0034053514,0.0016972868,0.000476078,0.0006250955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034501243,0.00006545372,0.9700466,0.0004774608,0.0010658667,0.00022403228,0.0007559252,0.00042643896,0.00040198295,0.0009192228,0.0011362352,0.024135752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001101186,0.000106386666,0.9932458,0.00014165361,0.0005618414,0.0005168041,0.001364813,0.0011487126,0.00023628611,0.00036604353,0.0022880798,0.000012597341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071754786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0080753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9678634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010365518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093684904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021069765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774927437","doi":"10.1023/a:1012761903614","title":"Investigating the concentration within a research community using joint publications and co-authorship via intermediaries","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quebec Statistical Institute; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Field (mathematics); Period (music); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Operations research; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.9143610746626762,"score_gpt":0.6578600446631518,"score_spread":0.2565010299995244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1774927437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817155,0.00051757094,0.00782329,0.00038867196,0.000018400448,0.00006512809,0.00027828253,0.000058941212,0.009134123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961319,0.00015678542,0.0028895354,0.00001507705,0.00003831087,0.00004812267,0.00014003275,0.0000102478425,0.00056986895],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98376715,0.007544897,0.0015137041,0.0018478635,0.0043925634,0.0009338257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.670562,0.26287675,0.03769881,0.009545233,0.01342135,0.005895843],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013443127,0.00066032,0.0011933623,0.016595831,0.0023744972,0.010146888,0.0016661533,0.0016845376,0.0051185223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10677086,0.00050584506,0.00090810674,0.022122024,0.0023676946,0.012258168,0.005053483,0.0013404059,0.0006939192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011465648,0.00072872307,0.83787227,0.0007461921,0.0012477996,0.0007767151,0.018645143,0.0044145854,0.0072429446,0.029740965,0.0008686999,0.09656941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036099085,0.0017478557,0.7313964,0.0005125166,0.0025086277,0.0016313059,0.04916204,0.09610481,0.024864323,0.08185908,0.009563627,0.00028849576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021974214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022412818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98340416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017538179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002136954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07109493},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1953706973","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-2157-1","title":"Neophilia ranking of scientific journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Aging; University of Illinois at Chicago","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; Information retrieval; Scientific literature; Computer science; Library science; Data science; Political science; Citation; Geology","score_opus":0.7322136034264928,"score_gpt":0.6133548832507849,"score_spread":0.11885872017570787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953706973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91287977,0.0035674449,0.021413019,0.001769551,0.00029071604,0.00010741486,0.0031338728,0.0003584262,0.05647981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922334,0.00039146622,0.00357503,0.000042539497,0.0001433355,0.000027622305,0.0009112667,0.000021755974,0.0026535627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546695,0.0016467802,0.00031750964,0.00039404116,0.0016798918,0.00049472525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793977,0.010548235,0.0023613207,0.0014749847,0.00461327,0.0016045063],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002776265,0.00029081557,0.0008347271,0.02462912,0.0016210427,0.004855945,0.00047265098,0.0005417996,0.007349263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024630079,0.00015929952,0.00055420015,0.012350434,0.0008260061,0.0020026565,0.0016956086,0.00051386416,0.0015813044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018595502,0.00032672274,0.47238308,0.0013296109,0.0010844425,0.0007058124,0.00143297,0.011459838,0.006481029,0.1190178,0.026010023,0.35790917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025916685,0.00068955356,0.6188802,0.00047001612,0.00063757383,0.0015916651,0.004073293,0.120961174,0.010127462,0.20783141,0.034329627,0.00014890429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011992434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002808124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018878612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019690318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024585724},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1965490711","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0100-6","title":"Why are hyperlinks to business Websites created? A content analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Web visibility and informetrics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Hyperlink; Competitor analysis; Link analysis; Context (archaeology); Link (geometry); Content analysis; Business information; Business; Sample (material); Computer science; World Wide Web; Marketing; Advertising; Web page; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.059049478563344755,"score_gpt":0.2712085113588207,"score_spread":0.21215903279547593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965490711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96236086,0.0014963608,0.006536565,0.0018319131,0.00008955349,0.00019196993,0.0023299549,0.0001798832,0.024982825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894517,0.0010114845,0.004295152,0.00023257622,0.0002013678,0.00014176713,0.0016822816,0.00011343133,0.0028702025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588877,0.0014210813,0.00039955354,0.00032015506,0.0016846798,0.00028575477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9043132,0.07465212,0.0069308784,0.0023906787,0.01065655,0.0010567365],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032666684,0.00024689155,0.00040833358,0.01937854,0.0014403407,0.0049640723,0.0005545314,0.00087588455,0.0035236697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046137746,0.0002560738,0.000558956,0.0156083545,0.0016855852,0.0065375986,0.0015924075,0.00073557044,0.00077973603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085463497,0.0006142636,0.51664,0.0020785285,0.00044667284,0.0010058376,0.039452966,0.0012915469,0.015366377,0.046279993,0.012401161,0.363568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088981695,0.00043851003,0.7608259,0.001623371,0.0012217978,0.0020494987,0.052963085,0.022225507,0.025636263,0.044012174,0.08878421,0.00013070634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019823434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019385953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98062146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016820033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015049329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017275989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967374088","doi":"10.1023/b:scie.0000013298.22207.2b","title":"Modelling the characteristics of Web page outlinks","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Web page; Negative binomial distribution; Poisson distribution; Computer science; Mandelbrot set; Distribution (mathematics); Frequency distribution; Gaussian; Mathematics; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Statistics; Physics","score_opus":0.03194412944867789,"score_gpt":0.28198450038848505,"score_spread":0.25004037093980713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967374088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9002855,0.0003360859,0.09504449,0.00041178992,0.0000270924,0.00008480626,0.0017384702,0.00047033673,0.001601466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873726,0.00017877095,0.010031389,0.000017230012,0.000025594096,0.000060061895,0.0010936228,0.00006869189,0.0011520567],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904746,0.0003325546,0.000072124116,0.00027344242,0.00016791988,0.00010648371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95886517,0.03125646,0.0050391126,0.0017257489,0.0024262976,0.00068720704],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002227724,0.00067948893,0.00061733153,0.004695579,0.00044072117,0.0019913758,0.00095601054,0.0015824761,0.0013894559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037233084,0.0005109225,0.0006747555,0.005892172,0.0004688172,0.003897806,0.0005507754,0.0011593534,0.00052298943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046648365,0.00037648279,0.24265762,0.00032174343,0.00025014867,0.00049301586,0.0007260037,0.6830128,0.0067345295,0.014760737,0.0023090115,0.0478914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007814005,0.000023495293,0.01599296,0.000008858912,0.000023706323,0.000087730004,0.000051113882,0.9767047,0.0005253697,0.006244977,0.00032018372,0.000009229451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008898867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012005139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001309254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007012536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017694116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975616173","doi":"10.1007/s11192-010-0317-2","title":"Intellectual structure of stem cell research: a comprehensive author co-citation analysis of a highly collaborative and multidisciplinary field","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Scientific Computing and Data Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Genome Canada","keywords":"Identification (biology); Citation; Multidisciplinary approach; Field (mathematics); Scopus; Citation analysis; Stem cell; Medical research; Data science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Library science; Social science; MEDLINE; Political science; Biology; Biotechnology","score_opus":0.2730697765223793,"score_gpt":0.4911885556865035,"score_spread":0.2181187791641242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975616173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97651696,0.004923298,0.006142598,0.00041365696,0.000023889072,0.00006535174,0.0038185173,0.00008183354,0.008013907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929096,0.0008819378,0.003580861,0.000019600888,0.000056564564,0.000027776427,0.0020793525,0.0000151131635,0.0004291752],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953076,0.0011496901,0.0007032051,0.00051786355,0.0019714213,0.00035016314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572224,0.022736743,0.0074827336,0.0032681162,0.007600598,0.0016893221],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005626102,0.00042156022,0.0011988094,0.055355765,0.0019106423,0.004517804,0.00087076146,0.0006954335,0.001825439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026086273,0.00020068628,0.0011833558,0.06421192,0.0010799057,0.0032497859,0.0023373798,0.0004955879,0.00030311267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022684553,0.00021005086,0.7931734,0.000756775,0.002066846,0.00047286652,0.004207296,0.0068372614,0.0053727785,0.012755845,0.002729926,0.17119011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022394484,0.00016798699,0.95544124,0.00016203956,0.0010670824,0.00045283014,0.0024877766,0.013290324,0.0023759436,0.01766134,0.006812843,0.000058181013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062530795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009960235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018579556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043803332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029753983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979812464","doi":"10.1007/s11192-010-0249-x","title":"Mathematics 1868–2008: a bibliometric analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Distribution (mathematics); Range (aeronautics); Mathematics; Bibliometrics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Statistics; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; History; Library science; Economics; Computer science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.040057207972988534,"score_gpt":0.25840684375512885,"score_spread":0.2183496357821403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979812464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55333215,0.036496814,0.025835669,0.012818627,0.0017934833,0.00032528868,0.063494675,0.00067650696,0.3052267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89892805,0.015784487,0.009388638,0.00033122214,0.0028049832,0.0001410726,0.019785328,0.00013144583,0.052704815],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979656,0.0002762143,0.0002153688,0.0002630259,0.0011233088,0.00015657015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99436885,0.0011133986,0.0010952137,0.00053346937,0.002604898,0.00028422015],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017853692,0.0004237159,0.0006093987,0.028157156,0.00086155144,0.0022819485,0.00048407417,0.00043255682,0.007663749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01411727,0.00015409484,0.000623026,0.030773045,0.00077118224,0.0019966082,0.0011493602,0.0005857144,0.0033549678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033403214,0.00020024476,0.13921207,0.0011738134,0.0005981104,0.0004561487,0.0011968154,0.016531244,0.0017155225,0.15198134,0.14090651,0.54569423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002643954,0.00013127155,0.39707822,0.00025453296,0.0002470882,0.0007746783,0.0004472664,0.007986407,0.0028437006,0.022749519,0.56740206,0.000058740523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013310662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010729842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035014967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022917425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02646637},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1982657965","doi":"10.1007/s11192-007-1731-y","title":"Direct interactions medical school faculty members have with professionals and managers working in public and private sector organizations: A cross-sectional study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Primary Care and Health Outcomes","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Santé Montérégie; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Multivariate analysis; Work (physics); Cross-sectional study; Psychology; Private sector; Medical school; Probit model; Public sector; Multivariate statistics; Medical education; Public relations; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.12241647269355602,"score_gpt":0.4864101305550571,"score_spread":0.36399365786150106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982657965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99926406,0.000080557875,0.000020644038,0.00007055276,0.0000071474497,0.000014418198,0.00016721376,0.0000016271383,0.0003737819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879694,0.00016744317,0.00005943023,0.00012320162,0.000025518828,0.0000360919,0.00031154422,0.000003628775,0.00047619946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965144,0.0011259386,0.0005196719,0.00035460872,0.000733893,0.0007514236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97325325,0.0059690606,0.008833853,0.0008859745,0.0022607113,0.008797213],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032724258,0.0004349569,0.0007876952,0.0038797413,0.003057328,0.0024190203,0.0008097146,0.0015804153,0.0037874323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013177622,0.001047449,0.0008752192,0.0032889675,0.0012138815,0.0027428365,0.0030383882,0.002410292,0.0012139139],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038403155,0.00024068929,0.99754155,0.000007738775,0.000019878884,0.000025110745,0.0014125186,0.000005924703,0.00004241617,0.000007786465,0.00007637474,0.0005816249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056852973,0.0002112702,0.9901612,0.0000076141273,0.000013989065,0.00007294886,0.009316586,0.000021670678,0.000024716259,0.000010074619,0.00014872287,0.000005486625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011287946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02339824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014796928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022684387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022444487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987570886","doi":"10.1007/s11192-010-0162-3","title":"The discipline dependence of citation statistics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Academy of Sciences; National Science Council","keywords":"Citation; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Value (mathematics); Index (typography); Citation index; Scientometrics; Computer science; Data science; Statistics; Library science; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5142649586072647,"score_gpt":0.6001517069820625,"score_spread":0.08588674837479782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987570886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60153407,0.023490947,0.26658088,0.014255741,0.0005893582,0.00012140825,0.0031005493,0.0017463984,0.088580646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970708,0.0067794775,0.008989283,0.000884798,0.0012175863,0.00006476603,0.0012853077,0.00037706835,0.0096938135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99185246,0.0039146934,0.00039808106,0.0012844395,0.0021129497,0.00043736037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6922049,0.255186,0.01601282,0.015688946,0.017917993,0.002989452],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0152023425,0.0005329359,0.001790772,0.011901399,0.0011808994,0.0035679012,0.0018037313,0.0024355461,0.006761391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1882225,0.00097003614,0.0014908804,0.0125535885,0.0033238146,0.006003823,0.0020274336,0.0033451747,0.0017808642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049697445,0.00026401138,0.12698796,0.0006196144,0.0005983858,0.00069587363,0.0015720716,0.048104092,0.0042719403,0.66026217,0.019843582,0.13628335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007473778,0.00018453306,0.16555005,0.00031545418,0.0004162095,0.0012050079,0.0005063659,0.20030604,0.0029106406,0.6141388,0.014174393,0.00021776605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058090826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00409335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9880986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019007492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019704415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08039862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990436954","doi":"10.1007/s11192-014-1386-4","title":"Forty years of gender disparities in Russian science: a historical bibliometric analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.4898121462066615,"score_gpt":0.5481804217127789,"score_spread":0.058368275506117395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990436954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86585766,0.082822606,0.0010080796,0.0052872226,0.00041205218,0.00002690374,0.0018396452,0.000029690227,0.042716153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723808,0.024044503,0.00036469803,0.00022040658,0.00028098954,0.000011627749,0.00052653404,0.000012278715,0.0021580502],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897313,0.00022531317,0.0001552081,0.00023149065,0.00025979654,0.00015509505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959965,0.0017723029,0.0009055384,0.00030017798,0.00081455946,0.00021100268],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026861131,0.0001747735,0.0003735012,0.009556131,0.0014261561,0.002089683,0.00029498158,0.0005553132,0.0024255014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006133698,0.0001698282,0.0003687218,0.0142478915,0.0016075983,0.0034614329,0.0014793257,0.00076442276,0.00029578616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003996533,0.00014655387,0.34335208,0.0023783597,0.0003857654,0.0013479954,0.06330414,0.0012111699,0.0022457691,0.18583305,0.0086550405,0.3907405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055517344,0.00015489369,0.7845485,0.0009872203,0.00017580668,0.00088415446,0.018047323,0.00039794671,0.0010618821,0.011557305,0.18213297,0.000046404995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008396628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009080728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99731386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002321312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025081746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016842425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993018298","doi":"10.1007/s11192-008-2064-1","title":"The relationship between reviewers’ quality-scores and number of citations for papers published in the journal Physics in Medicine and Biology from 2003–2005","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Juravinski Cancer Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Quality (philosophy); Statistics; Mathematics; Medicine; Psychology; Computer science; Library science; Biology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.8825900474161539,"score_gpt":0.626060316233719,"score_spread":0.25652973118243483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993018298","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39943096,0.55177945,0.0034641034,0.011143493,0.0043136817,0.00036504888,0.025467655,0.00032751402,0.0037080627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554112,0.029235005,0.002727238,0.0010538955,0.002140257,0.00032875894,0.007644003,0.00014188497,0.001317669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8185771,0.05973851,0.07015588,0.012353727,0.036339518,0.0028351855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20915225,0.4574013,0.18074499,0.0147778345,0.12982678,0.008096987],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16100053,0.0013926997,0.0063596126,0.05659248,0.0019936592,0.008538285,0.0036306025,0.005291708,0.0017644664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5586704,0.0015586754,0.014813738,0.051386543,0.0015994476,0.0050951466,0.0040693837,0.0026261278,0.00047203907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031106723,0.000072597606,0.8535087,0.020472312,0.07917909,0.0003109056,0.0019252345,0.0010474783,0.00045567035,0.00031243544,0.009097231,0.0305076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010150711,0.0006772874,0.93040884,0.0048193554,0.048465792,0.0015483921,0.0007498708,0.0015508438,0.0006118706,0.0010644379,0.008771971,0.00031635354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023359237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033805005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94340754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061588264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014136636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85146236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993126323","doi":"10.1556/scient.67.2006.3.7","title":"Indirect patent citations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; University of Ottawa; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Quality (philosophy); Citation; Measure (data warehouse); Variable (mathematics); Citation analysis; Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Data mining; Library science; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2538094299036781,"score_gpt":0.25225322252204485,"score_spread":0.0015562073816332567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993126323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2204307,0.01114334,0.03205743,0.0021360992,0.0020990858,0.0005910324,0.065969214,0.0015057618,0.66406745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8085765,0.0046364623,0.0100364145,0.00057336624,0.0024261975,0.0007745063,0.04325304,0.00038012353,0.1293433],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98972744,0.002379363,0.0012490128,0.0015022707,0.0043227016,0.0008192738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9575804,0.020858297,0.0060967314,0.004394088,0.009688453,0.0013820534],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00489916,0.0013682878,0.0013265762,0.0340324,0.0018241059,0.00847155,0.0014337405,0.0016436873,0.08113033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052194472,0.00043653575,0.0016885286,0.031437457,0.0011329412,0.00394326,0.0024020167,0.0014908101,0.022292528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000838589,0.0007767917,0.31314653,0.0043520303,0.0022586114,0.0007204327,0.0012380602,0.0032743006,0.003922214,0.14798069,0.0982435,0.42324826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026741446,0.000597224,0.3844898,0.0011657347,0.0031259297,0.00426807,0.0012004406,0.0127459075,0.017052822,0.13096397,0.44392532,0.00019737773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015718843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031004187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9659676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017089613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022998292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27140796},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1998258485","doi":"10.1023/b:scie.0000045122.93018.2a","title":"Exploring website features for business information","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Web visibility and informetrics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Webometrics; Ranking (information retrieval); Data collection; Business; China; Marketing; Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12208833343293496,"score_gpt":0.283840460132473,"score_spread":0.16175212669953803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998258485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846128,0.000742273,0.0027633097,0.0003838194,0.000017526816,0.000019207084,0.0011587259,0.00015945698,0.01014279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99721164,0.00014546985,0.0014936683,0.000016978456,0.000022132765,0.0000052202176,0.00052521616,0.000030706007,0.00054893206],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904865,0.00027224398,0.000075086326,0.00011220077,0.0003619658,0.00012997644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98467296,0.010158633,0.0025072747,0.00074808364,0.001227186,0.00068588497],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009538384,0.000257016,0.0002927771,0.008195522,0.0006169925,0.004522705,0.0003598123,0.0007014023,0.004808107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019534767,0.00016753274,0.0005456273,0.0113465665,0.000366209,0.0063843327,0.0010422813,0.00058453873,0.00086651667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000757273,0.0005144918,0.7250847,0.00069054664,0.00023521368,0.00044566215,0.0025461824,0.0020759376,0.009025275,0.014466504,0.005936396,0.2382218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040884275,0.0004483278,0.91233826,0.00021084424,0.00031536116,0.0009751069,0.005307579,0.03097166,0.0064604753,0.02875249,0.014096778,0.00008230247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020720558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004938869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070657965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044309406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016084671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999584965","doi":"10.1007/s11192-014-1258-y","title":"On the quality evaluation of scientific entities in Poland supported by consistency-driven pairwise comparisons method","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Dalhousie University; Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanislawa Staszica; Politechnika Wrocławska; Fayetteville State University; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Consistency (knowledge bases); Focus (optics); Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Parametric statistics; Quality (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Information retrieval; Operations research; Management science; Data mining; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.49126161277195085,"score_gpt":0.5458934524210635,"score_spread":0.05463183964911261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999584965","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26716575,0.001297175,0.7205546,0.00053646654,0.000058626883,0.00074951426,0.0003493589,0.00012854168,0.009159996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68798023,0.00042214364,0.31031498,0.000043453758,0.000031550724,0.00039667526,0.00027311454,0.000026929949,0.00051097653],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.95991075,0.025526207,0.002017331,0.0020868536,0.009837492,0.0006215136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9398295,0.042238187,0.0048417826,0.0022955604,0.010175833,0.00061920314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03399259,0.0008493925,0.0011455166,0.009602674,0.0012115943,0.0032744438,0.0014525778,0.0009305262,0.0016094369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08249019,0.00031215537,0.001135555,0.009682064,0.0014508809,0.0027768973,0.0025932784,0.00091565744,0.00019693455],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015962542,0.0005042755,0.04208766,0.0029499165,0.0010885902,0.0004893781,0.0048168055,0.10330575,0.008729585,0.088754356,0.0031016034,0.7425758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025988722,0.0015387723,0.056017105,0.00070759055,0.0008129501,0.0006165158,0.004258954,0.8009073,0.015987385,0.109720156,0.0088446755,0.00032870434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024043955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025955627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99039733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022912202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029695004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17977214},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2001213194","doi":"10.1007/s11192-010-0295-4","title":"Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia–Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Forschungszentrum Jülich; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"China; Regional science; Strengths and weaknesses; Citation; Library science; Citation impact; Citation analysis; Quarter (Canadian coin); Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Political science; Point (geometry); Geography; Computer science; Law; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5650881049249804,"score_gpt":0.5968205699851685,"score_spread":0.03173246506018812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001213194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8658307,0.010965445,0.0014969493,0.024761029,0.00021240594,0.00005930891,0.00059076643,0.000029492385,0.09605379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99593914,0.0020266133,0.00052984967,0.00039876497,0.00011042263,0.000019696294,0.00012872611,0.000009165045,0.0008375876],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485034,0.0014728945,0.00063773745,0.0005504602,0.001718161,0.0007704035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.945222,0.023234334,0.018588345,0.002274445,0.006465456,0.004215486],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010158188,0.00022961834,0.00065522006,0.007546537,0.0018440586,0.00779989,0.0010028606,0.001430013,0.008485757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03997784,0.0002448012,0.0006798646,0.01980637,0.0034229562,0.008101041,0.0036564732,0.001867582,0.0005054228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022962342,0.00014752331,0.83548063,0.00070382055,0.0003874206,0.00059043383,0.014849742,0.000264898,0.000429844,0.045587007,0.0035187977,0.09781033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026599535,0.000068259105,0.90054023,0.00082357996,0.000270488,0.0005490659,0.058508772,0.0006365572,0.00047838132,0.018180683,0.019880177,0.00003706875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069215475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0114198895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99245346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019226879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004386581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053722262},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2002166221","doi":"10.1007/s11192-014-1432-2","title":"The role of public funding in nanotechnology scientific production: Where Canada stands in comparison to the United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Position (finance); Quality (philosophy); Societal impact of nanotechnology; Political science; Order (exchange); Production (economics); Business; Economics; Nanotechnology; Physics; Finance","score_opus":0.3818642461742465,"score_gpt":0.49254159140057985,"score_spread":0.11067734522633332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002166221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59744,0.03705522,0.0009942045,0.13203779,0.0007028219,0.00007721764,0.0036029774,0.00010006028,0.22798966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874944,0.004314107,0.0003227904,0.0014483193,0.00006494688,0.000010397408,0.00027940777,0.000026428515,0.0060390453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920827,0.00070079294,0.00021052039,0.00041246772,0.003227213,0.0033662566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97569215,0.00352443,0.0021573396,0.00037378204,0.01276613,0.00548618],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033197997,0.0002649639,0.0007066682,0.007639368,0.009094396,0.01524341,0.0017216754,0.0014330333,0.0059579136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018345337,0.0002297136,0.0006059498,0.017885698,0.0061273645,0.0033546123,0.0036841913,0.0023025188,0.00037551986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006624419,0.00018209519,0.42197144,0.00083990156,0.00031359657,0.0010447113,0.018903602,0.0021242623,0.0010459012,0.31891072,0.07059358,0.16340783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008631053,0.00007395574,0.6952989,0.0020272583,0.00045828227,0.00032238223,0.086001806,0.0018744633,0.0012816021,0.014300231,0.19809313,0.00018172382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99322283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1301396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23836403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94423336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004098455","doi":"10.1007/s11192-013-1069-6","title":"Effect of collaboration network structure on knowledge creation and technological performance: the case of biotechnology in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Network structure; Productivity; Quality (philosophy); Production (economics); Knowledge management; Field (mathematics); Network analysis; Biotechnology; Business; Computer science; Data science; Engineering; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.11364746930551028,"score_gpt":0.46945445948011494,"score_spread":0.35580699017460465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004098455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97972417,0.00046924516,0.0001841408,0.0021136918,0.00000777356,0.000026500964,0.0005227789,0.000020096331,0.016931463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979704,0.00018199772,0.000117451105,0.000039093116,0.0000029171094,0.0000041872468,0.00012589926,0.0000023570003,0.0015556457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980388,0.00034225572,0.00006828051,0.00017822631,0.00050774426,0.0008646346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854917,0.0054636165,0.0015262594,0.0002688459,0.0038966371,0.0033528924],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020025221,0.00022113093,0.00051544816,0.003558956,0.0059433733,0.0053543346,0.0013782851,0.0011615775,0.0057622185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012307711,0.00020745677,0.00046881204,0.0066085435,0.0026869476,0.0016987191,0.0024669983,0.00114419,0.00036716857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074721675,0.00041977543,0.8588631,0.00024607434,0.00031075414,0.0018479608,0.007813633,0.032413937,0.0010101025,0.038333416,0.0085931355,0.049400873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026413225,0.00015030538,0.8973914,0.00020887467,0.000378234,0.00025695478,0.040652703,0.03622686,0.0010309676,0.006561502,0.016763136,0.000114945455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99347717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99799746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.064481094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08379865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46784526},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2017043167","doi":"10.1007/s11192-009-0069-z","title":"Applying the h-index in exploring bibliometric properties of elite marketing scholars","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Management and Marketing Education","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Prestige; Index (typography); Metric (unit); Sociology; Bibliometrics; Library science; Marketing; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Business; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.089740442885697,"score_gpt":0.2748107175528747,"score_spread":0.18507027466717768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017043167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9348879,0.0011255641,0.015389539,0.0005588638,0.00009563015,0.00018005178,0.0024974113,0.00027807106,0.0449869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966949,0.00014427827,0.0018170384,0.000029173309,0.00012151211,0.000051202605,0.0006936005,0.000021026415,0.0004271513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884024,0.0043063737,0.0012585716,0.000767304,0.004575007,0.00069033157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8440304,0.12645741,0.0103103975,0.009955431,0.0065402733,0.0027061435],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017181966,0.00038142988,0.0013999349,0.036906183,0.0016286621,0.0056324117,0.0009631449,0.0010906066,0.0046941126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.105435655,0.00021374892,0.001260882,0.05407901,0.0015606664,0.0047723926,0.0025950677,0.00076361786,0.0012095724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003537601,0.00035743258,0.8694444,0.0003277711,0.0010080104,0.00024894948,0.0020762675,0.00361515,0.0010029298,0.017925736,0.003467798,0.100171916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093601775,0.0006576635,0.92749816,0.00007920142,0.00030906338,0.00042751903,0.0047699637,0.025055878,0.0018087205,0.033090986,0.006114544,0.0000946616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003485802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002272162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.982818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015404562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018150053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090867996},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2017301591","doi":"10.1007/s11192-014-1274-y","title":"Extending citer analysis to journal impact evaluation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Informetrics; Scientometrics; Impact factor; Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Measure (data warehouse); Library science; Bibliometrics; Psychology; Information retrieval; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Data mining","score_opus":0.7601598960034236,"score_gpt":0.7056378674837388,"score_spread":0.054522028519684795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017301591","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087118976,0.004531033,0.8361112,0.0020059806,0.0006751197,0.0008105253,0.0046462934,0.008395701,0.05570524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61033237,0.0030873993,0.36416996,0.0004900887,0.001787903,0.00052055763,0.0035925598,0.0014255459,0.014593554],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98047763,0.008572438,0.0014283023,0.001723863,0.006963074,0.00083466485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93902,0.034257498,0.00452263,0.007987146,0.013073728,0.0011391245],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015377964,0.0018055394,0.0026610645,0.04259148,0.0014657611,0.009096111,0.0017718298,0.0014255478,0.012256967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085758545,0.0005308145,0.0032870532,0.030919857,0.0012600224,0.0069868667,0.002905605,0.0016090914,0.0073291315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019150681,0.00077259867,0.039392766,0.0011928028,0.0015941248,0.0003744424,0.0010081003,0.01530673,0.004835217,0.0536474,0.012388806,0.8692956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016203648,0.0006317167,0.084082164,0.00088759494,0.0016782439,0.00091739086,0.0020866832,0.36909539,0.01403828,0.45543203,0.070570864,0.00041761287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005305769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006065646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98462206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014289607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032762697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08132744},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2020164772","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0047-7","title":"Key Labs and Open Labs in the Chinese scientific research system: Their role in the national and international scientific arena","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Science Citation Index; Citation; Key (lock); Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Chinese academy of sciences; Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Public relations; History; Law","score_opus":0.5945123837319141,"score_gpt":0.593806149860948,"score_spread":0.0007062338709660221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020164772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8320903,0.017252592,0.00665206,0.011857239,0.0004544553,0.00015473842,0.00095696986,0.00021238565,0.13036922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99200284,0.0018173989,0.0006966593,0.00029705904,0.00020230023,0.00006291809,0.00013691907,0.00001632789,0.0047676084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99423665,0.0015950515,0.00037879078,0.0006489038,0.0018515923,0.0012891069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97587425,0.00917558,0.004483076,0.00084255514,0.0038913658,0.0057332194],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005785091,0.00040793928,0.0008314106,0.012319948,0.0035123075,0.009088034,0.0013617851,0.0010740167,0.012329171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018145453,0.00028873413,0.0005873218,0.020737953,0.0061552487,0.010158154,0.0057086106,0.0014306784,0.0006496524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007379841,0.00023239978,0.2673788,0.00088722125,0.00019257636,0.0006959309,0.008760228,0.0017294656,0.0022332857,0.55169535,0.010359764,0.15509693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025558998,0.00036755324,0.7571536,0.00047476054,0.0008620266,0.0004988092,0.023924246,0.008600395,0.0025998263,0.12943397,0.07564083,0.00018841712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019974971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02247934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009464545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01557537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06867039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027998681","doi":"10.1007/s11192-009-0424-0","title":"Citation structure of an emerging research area on the verge of application","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Machine Learning in Materials Science","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Commercialization; Demise; Citation; Bibliometrics; Nanotechnology; Data science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Political science; Library science; Materials science; Marketing; Physics","score_opus":0.12886906034911313,"score_gpt":0.39970770308237213,"score_spread":0.27083864273325897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027998681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9362638,0.0037929437,0.0038475299,0.0045246608,0.00014666417,0.00003247338,0.0075399834,0.00024255434,0.043609496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98932695,0.0008404194,0.0015185178,0.00010221926,0.00019876151,0.000023974175,0.004078394,0.000035255016,0.0038755117],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987471,0.00023375137,0.00016770184,0.00020368762,0.00045716634,0.00019051033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9578745,0.019608697,0.0062515335,0.0015513672,0.011623282,0.0030906114],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001827514,0.00019088213,0.00074945897,0.023022149,0.0013528314,0.0046870937,0.00070303516,0.0010873465,0.010407784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029048521,0.00014893133,0.0004510502,0.026110662,0.0012196696,0.0034703012,0.0015746932,0.0008039105,0.001577945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010913804,0.00034963808,0.58623856,0.0009933255,0.00045365782,0.00054915535,0.0017078582,0.013888874,0.013126508,0.22958685,0.025961978,0.12605229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014920518,0.00044116116,0.64319044,0.00033373982,0.0004743402,0.00094257604,0.002758982,0.06110372,0.0058881068,0.23358586,0.050995845,0.00013607265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002825231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003526817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9769778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013891383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001685805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034817457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035191842","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0133-x","title":"Comparing business competition positions based on Web co-link data: The global market vs. the Chinese market","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Web visibility and informetrics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Multidimensional scaling; Competition (biology); Similarity (geometry); Business; Competitive advantage; Link (geometry); Web site; Market share; Industrial organization; Marketing; Computer science; The Internet; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0310848158395885,"score_gpt":0.29805954544449237,"score_spread":0.26697472960490387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035191842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98797894,0.00042612373,0.00076368195,0.0001418829,0.000023432827,0.000015618683,0.0021235482,0.000023329745,0.0085034445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977976,0.000095601645,0.00018631214,0.000011696664,0.000023607461,0.0000074378304,0.0014812666,0.000006797897,0.0003897258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982145,0.0004575568,0.0001269153,0.0001809102,0.00075495505,0.0002651522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98855644,0.006430769,0.0018510249,0.0007056675,0.001778235,0.0006778841],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028458866,0.00040849968,0.00060389383,0.014384087,0.00057214673,0.0022338724,0.00059761753,0.00054517714,0.0041614478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011776916,0.00011389321,0.00064204086,0.020072605,0.0008174474,0.0026434448,0.001333664,0.00048291232,0.0009134454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010253806,0.00017836575,0.914834,0.00032053824,0.0007627226,0.0003080705,0.0013105271,0.004531789,0.0027325898,0.0065641818,0.0035555633,0.063876174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040085615,0.00018390892,0.9697239,0.00003484715,0.00035207922,0.00013866813,0.0024610357,0.019773643,0.0019184669,0.0018920646,0.0034327714,0.00004864015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017223136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022971746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009147906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077467057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03424579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035792097","doi":"10.1007/s11192-009-0008-z","title":"Discovery of factors influencing patent value based on machine learning in patents in the field of nanotechnology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Field (mathematics); Patent analysis; Value (mathematics); Data science; Computer science; Feature selection; Set (abstract data type); Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Knowledge management; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10528866240336661,"score_gpt":0.2640623858484547,"score_spread":0.1587737234450881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035792097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979405,0.00017786221,0.0006246431,0.00020736277,0.000006481962,0.0000084375115,0.00010790873,0.000007901841,0.0009189319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994723,0.000042271582,0.000265486,0.000011842968,0.00001244413,0.0000026190678,0.00008755085,0.0000021501744,0.00010339353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979868,0.0008404463,0.00022299512,0.00021332187,0.0004602807,0.00027614905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92650104,0.058667865,0.009005412,0.0013478419,0.0032796427,0.0011981748],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045090797,0.0003091505,0.00057187985,0.0049932124,0.0005809067,0.0022378168,0.0005944063,0.0010279523,0.0014513127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03887236,0.00015788591,0.0008529092,0.0054312814,0.0007671334,0.0017656763,0.0005849657,0.0010258367,0.00033024402],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014839944,0.0001866939,0.98105615,0.000023810167,0.00017186406,0.00008510225,0.000105749976,0.0017560745,0.0004421135,0.00057017786,0.00021891664,0.015234962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024366727,0.00015371428,0.96132624,0.000019847263,0.00017055983,0.00014673143,0.00037476118,0.033813518,0.0010313528,0.0025050677,0.0004142484,0.000019466463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006012537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063880268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010571923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001547715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023846567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038196424","doi":"10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3","title":"Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":266,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Bookmarking; Social media; Citation; Tracking (education); Scopus; World Wide Web; Download; Computer science; Internet privacy; Psychology; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.5482835610101827,"score_gpt":0.547941311386074,"score_spread":0.0003422496241086703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038196424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8042169,0.033892892,0.01612323,0.025296343,0.0006891582,0.00016589345,0.005058707,0.00081058306,0.11374634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98243964,0.0059226877,0.005323586,0.0009012857,0.0008805195,0.00005190237,0.0024124268,0.00019489216,0.0018731081],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9045132,0.033405636,0.008449059,0.008392426,0.042168092,0.0030716714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4140251,0.34176823,0.07502758,0.038901955,0.118974514,0.011302594],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08737023,0.0005578734,0.0011121994,0.08448674,0.0028719476,0.021635795,0.0032106782,0.002790762,0.00584476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38355172,0.000582247,0.0013469062,0.071302,0.0036945322,0.0162732,0.009176964,0.0026887716,0.0014200412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046713967,0.0002275907,0.57816684,0.0023833148,0.0009717767,0.0002982883,0.022064136,0.0013630175,0.0028614043,0.040280353,0.010211675,0.34070447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000949555,0.00037882288,0.7870881,0.0053941677,0.0012323633,0.0018187442,0.019676022,0.0125972275,0.0058775637,0.02455189,0.14104697,0.00024315169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067352983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065306774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9155133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057509146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066023134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4620635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044326206","doi":"10.1007/s11192-008-0220-2","title":"A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from web sources","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Library science; Citation analysis; Webometrics; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Scholarly communication; Computer science; Sample (material); Impact factor; World Wide Web; Political science; MEDLINE; Publishing","score_opus":0.5726813817650799,"score_gpt":0.5567807477511177,"score_spread":0.015900634013962134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044326206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5905818,0.13732405,0.01901542,0.061652426,0.002223657,0.000085206855,0.010037074,0.00050718617,0.17857315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538846,0.021749796,0.007078629,0.0035135383,0.003666196,0.000064126696,0.003234336,0.00022902714,0.006579754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99033535,0.0025745109,0.0013337879,0.0007921261,0.004573605,0.000390565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80295736,0.14790855,0.018865088,0.008409617,0.018796984,0.0030624215],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008835684,0.0005922791,0.001411922,0.050338976,0.0019466348,0.013379782,0.00147489,0.0024110945,0.011648217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085262746,0.0005054734,0.0014907952,0.051186573,0.0044607166,0.020826377,0.005228026,0.0030443163,0.0014093078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095905806,0.00032026414,0.5586047,0.0035597275,0.0025463053,0.0019143724,0.010519221,0.00040288517,0.0060778847,0.10847855,0.019055506,0.28756154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014526203,0.0005414673,0.6830616,0.0038991817,0.003147718,0.005374757,0.021137739,0.0015040328,0.0054953415,0.14179842,0.13362451,0.00026996495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002521014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005235863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014292363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015116582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046728134},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2046437697","doi":"10.1007/s11192-007-0205-6","title":"“The Triple-Helix collaboration: Why do researchers collaborate with industry and the government? What are the factors that influence the perceived barriers?”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Affect (linguistics); Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Knowledge production; Business; Marketing; Knowledge management; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03674851862201558,"score_gpt":0.28574997305715,"score_spread":0.2490014544351344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046437697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69124305,0.0035698246,0.042212576,0.21895556,0.0012504247,0.0003623638,0.00033177002,0.0002482314,0.041826054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98272884,0.0008102225,0.006314059,0.008444154,0.00027881135,0.0002343816,0.00010379544,0.00005013149,0.0010356369],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92015666,0.055345707,0.0039210296,0.0029622463,0.014301051,0.0033133375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.56553125,0.32958415,0.049383223,0.010281203,0.02744478,0.017775409],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08485159,0.00035775255,0.0006922174,0.0028421502,0.0069223573,0.009938994,0.0012469543,0.004366688,0.0044103437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28857788,0.00042878746,0.000452654,0.0050193802,0.006822497,0.014272927,0.0071072723,0.0036721306,0.0010653898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012175725,0.0006173103,0.22133067,0.0030853788,0.0006245959,0.0011801056,0.2554348,0.0013026508,0.0073490427,0.20236064,0.06949156,0.23600565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072529743,0.00091164967,0.16821079,0.00275603,0.0005384846,0.0023510912,0.27991366,0.009158948,0.008929384,0.3248333,0.20114663,0.00052482856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022214372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00331771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028462112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011685353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44874346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049647990","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0099-8","title":"Visualization of citation patterns of some Canadian journals","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Subject (documents); Visualization; Computer science; Information visualization; Citation analysis; Data science; Information retrieval; Informetrics; Information science; Order (exchange); Library science; Bibliometrics; Data mining","score_opus":0.5363669360498906,"score_gpt":0.5783523202939667,"score_spread":0.04198538424407605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049647990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9006504,0.0029150068,0.0031017584,0.0018097238,0.00015312526,0.00010665661,0.02694455,0.0021635569,0.062155183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654025,0.0018488445,0.010614131,0.00005058633,0.000049834704,0.000045182594,0.0075076376,0.0001678316,0.014313439],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993037,0.000038873837,0.00004386492,0.00007521057,0.0003412441,0.000197133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99459887,0.0008707075,0.00039635986,0.00012382702,0.0034872852,0.00052302715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005971239,0.00054167875,0.0003977379,0.029114489,0.0025646226,0.0033611774,0.0007450173,0.00047868927,0.00904304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049871276,0.00021279359,0.0006428993,0.041911248,0.0004563422,0.00077160343,0.00063897733,0.00042145277,0.0007509306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015283785,0.00017544064,0.3126207,0.0025376158,0.00049532496,0.001921266,0.011715004,0.011145112,0.033750813,0.03066383,0.08334497,0.51010156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006496798,0.0000816957,0.8658166,0.00023365118,0.00035959412,0.00044146742,0.0063903797,0.01996744,0.009083298,0.0030384727,0.09432976,0.00019272354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9159471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9358894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9994029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008858857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018510718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16909581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055778626","doi":"10.1007/s11192-009-0127-6","title":"Citer analysis as a measure of research impact: library and information science as a case study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Measure (data warehouse); Exploratory research; Information science; Citation analysis; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.5600534252037995,"score_gpt":0.6469165712479984,"score_spread":0.08686314604419887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055778626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.826115,0.0070369896,0.052432884,0.004579157,0.0002623105,0.00065908575,0.003012625,0.0005804684,0.105321564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96948034,0.0011100034,0.025828285,0.000072956034,0.00011128402,0.00018874888,0.00045247166,0.00008632164,0.0026696224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97212243,0.014277156,0.0014970894,0.0010000052,0.0103569,0.0007463603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8828311,0.09328696,0.0073590646,0.003070914,0.011453061,0.001998968],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020632071,0.0008557229,0.001405375,0.042790096,0.0026852703,0.009721202,0.0016545202,0.0025439712,0.0045994665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05741834,0.00031852722,0.0017710633,0.04877802,0.0026621672,0.0073921173,0.002386493,0.0013762605,0.00088515447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010384246,0.0036095923,0.46461362,0.0030321307,0.0013743305,0.0033894514,0.016344316,0.018878097,0.013383387,0.10466214,0.008537301,0.3611373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031316956,0.0039956146,0.5522988,0.0011617256,0.0026552223,0.0074448953,0.04930792,0.21230094,0.035582997,0.08529421,0.048817366,0.00082711666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057120514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00837749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00452494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036368677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10911411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057264385","doi":"10.1007/s11192-013-1171-9","title":"An overview of forestry journals in the period 2006–2010 as basis for ascertaining research trends","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Biological Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Ordination; Ecophysiology; Forest management; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Plant ecology; Plant science; Forest ecology; Biology; Forestry; Geography; Botany; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.1892962841462507,"score_gpt":0.43934751497824204,"score_spread":0.2500512308319913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057264385","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31343684,0.29699188,0.0025570034,0.0074640056,0.0016194887,0.00078061066,0.3366912,0.0007151245,0.03974373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4681559,0.23625456,0.020108001,0.0019959488,0.0021177034,0.0012902378,0.2583743,0.0002947449,0.01140859],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911069,0.0010550673,0.0041294205,0.00080822647,0.0022240405,0.0006762813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9148415,0.020210158,0.02997428,0.0018058105,0.02762425,0.0055439426],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062081106,0.00071267417,0.00083900936,0.15061337,0.0010013921,0.0037022596,0.0007779763,0.0007543097,0.004979547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02234986,0.0004194955,0.0011240939,0.17345288,0.00055821677,0.003435984,0.0018607554,0.00074804504,0.0018100757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008481674,0.0002876585,0.51024425,0.027651155,0.0010747813,0.00089341606,0.00486023,0.00085027434,0.0076967822,0.0057238773,0.09797585,0.34189358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014829827,0.000118715296,0.81775534,0.0034764176,0.00030565486,0.00086330366,0.002196599,0.00026815332,0.0008828582,0.00040787042,0.17366491,0.000045385503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013186542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03344174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024902925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068617235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032832026},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2058472726","doi":"10.1007/s11192-007-1707-y","title":"Why are Websites co-linked? The case of Canadian universities","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Web visibility and informetrics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Context (archaeology); World Wide Web; Sample (material); Set (abstract data type); Co-occurrence; Web page; Computer science; Information retrieval; Geography; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04234576219966546,"score_gpt":0.288850666366687,"score_spread":0.24650490416702153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058472726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65316486,0.0030650243,0.0014261567,0.050028943,0.00013081975,0.000101959704,0.00058787124,0.00008083334,0.29141364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889819,0.0007926274,0.00041560404,0.00079924037,0.000027643973,0.000013166906,0.000096901356,0.000014811718,0.008858119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98581356,0.00266757,0.00030434158,0.00090208394,0.0045790137,0.0057334593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9549149,0.017198913,0.0035987669,0.0020357636,0.0134775,0.008774084],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007862701,0.0003592815,0.00076397235,0.010837575,0.039323766,0.021302627,0.0031050676,0.007065006,0.008560685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04786731,0.00045090556,0.00083193637,0.028460765,0.010754945,0.0085119475,0.006669715,0.0030174202,0.0006544558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036289947,0.0002676057,0.15794829,0.00039997802,0.00016119661,0.011186702,0.14079419,0.0026220796,0.0010356467,0.5329869,0.051495742,0.10073877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114297254,0.00007944194,0.15289262,0.00091980945,0.0003695387,0.0025583238,0.4894328,0.005845465,0.0015221842,0.055351943,0.29061058,0.00030301214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98401594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98916245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086330496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09373247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6263745},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2058498906","doi":"10.1007/s11192-011-0369-y","title":"Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Productivity; Scientometrics; Political science; Regional science; Sociology; Economics; Economic growth; Social science","score_opus":0.872966831153213,"score_gpt":0.6254438142378042,"score_spread":0.2475230169154089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058498906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932714,0.0017678088,0.000109940695,0.00044827728,0.000013482675,0.00001980476,0.0016429813,0.000008212246,0.0027182119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99569404,0.00047883912,0.00009094507,0.000094402196,0.000009725724,0.00001564627,0.00068510254,0.00000837486,0.002922863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840397,0.0002666056,0.00007272782,0.00019226667,0.00056558946,0.0004989287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99064225,0.0025154813,0.0017171383,0.00023820835,0.0032202136,0.0016667942],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016477134,0.00020885283,0.00062989455,0.0040297364,0.0022131968,0.0018307772,0.0011065713,0.0006923441,0.0063206474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008983323,0.00020225668,0.0005782078,0.011604531,0.0006527941,0.0006133871,0.0006571872,0.00062028016,0.00043304762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016442372,0.000041173098,0.98512703,0.00002621695,0.00014282696,0.0000989022,0.0015367146,0.0001581567,0.00020035177,0.00028658315,0.0012955893,0.010922022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056578283,0.000014643652,0.9984806,0.00001009664,0.00001894856,0.000017080178,0.0006239515,0.00015870291,0.000024336814,0.000018698089,0.0006219919,0.0000053016224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9687973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98554534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019864382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015206056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14412683},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2059929112","doi":"10.1007/s11192-008-2139-z","title":"Increasing dominance of English in publications archived by PubMed","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); English language; Period (music); Civilization; History; Library science; Linguistics; Computer science; Biology; Art; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01977561581092457,"score_gpt":0.28266987312396274,"score_spread":0.26289425731303817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059929112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5235227,0.26825193,0.006579132,0.024636267,0.005057092,0.00021749047,0.100948535,0.0013852878,0.06940151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8059564,0.11360193,0.007175595,0.0050023687,0.006931166,0.00023434933,0.046898305,0.0009190815,0.013280928],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741061,0.005899411,0.006944477,0.003054707,0.0079840915,0.0020112493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7292669,0.13963996,0.06066059,0.010451072,0.04528766,0.014693864],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016784223,0.0011680017,0.002630563,0.11279484,0.0026678094,0.012051634,0.0012253235,0.0011507762,0.0103267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11534358,0.00046120456,0.001551502,0.14036903,0.0025738275,0.0062984135,0.00727833,0.0011208961,0.00333288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036842532,0.00027033876,0.38881433,0.038355224,0.004215888,0.0036982144,0.018231587,0.00051131303,0.029511789,0.013539116,0.10090117,0.39826673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002091203,0.00030627323,0.6054264,0.00711397,0.003433963,0.006967889,0.011485376,0.00048634215,0.0089189485,0.008759787,0.34671518,0.0001767764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00320317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056414353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98321575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001660208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057140696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08876449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064363624","doi":"10.1023/b:scie.0000034389.14825.bc","title":"Links to commercial websites as a source of business information","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Web visibility and informetrics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Webometrics; Hyperlink; Business; Revenue; Scopus; China; Link analysis; Profit (economics); Competitive intelligence; Business information; Marketing; World Wide Web; Computer science; Web page; Accounting; Economics","score_opus":0.020912191600320575,"score_gpt":0.2720124649186993,"score_spread":0.2511002733183787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064363624","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8883247,0.0067175226,0.005833188,0.0020368216,0.00013989587,0.00005668353,0.0047179908,0.00024332675,0.091929846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99118125,0.001778107,0.0018514406,0.00006150868,0.00017384159,0.000018774157,0.001826673,0.000051023133,0.0030573867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954265,0.0012859765,0.00026657185,0.00025783465,0.0024704314,0.00029278084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9437722,0.035995852,0.009972046,0.0021845095,0.005351294,0.002724176],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027576368,0.00030697798,0.0003786067,0.03449105,0.0012072572,0.010236841,0.0006510656,0.0014390553,0.0051935595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039511934,0.00027280877,0.00038545846,0.04192793,0.00079102896,0.0071968334,0.0024815553,0.0009658162,0.0014376548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045585274,0.0005465274,0.71533984,0.0012055597,0.00042366455,0.0005951701,0.0066315522,0.0023164842,0.0050571966,0.05594383,0.015304931,0.19617935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006727305,0.0002288738,0.8031439,0.0011492008,0.0008594001,0.002054144,0.011270513,0.029012315,0.012655865,0.06822609,0.07119215,0.00014016296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003101641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060098246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96550894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013184958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011011359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017374218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064596000","doi":"10.1007/s11192-013-1118-1","title":"The effect of characteristics of title on citation rates of articles","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Acronym; Information retrieval; Computer science; Sentence; Scopus; Citation analysis; Statistics; Library science; Mathematics; Natural language processing; MEDLINE; Linguistics; Biology","score_opus":0.037650109452268925,"score_gpt":0.277116055331689,"score_spread":0.23946594587942005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064596000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99376726,0.0021256867,0.00032473865,0.000391761,0.00013317986,0.000013610448,0.0014482824,0.00003971902,0.0017559257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99657947,0.0005196283,0.0001920922,0.000058938924,0.00022746233,0.000010721432,0.0011235072,0.00004658786,0.0012415606],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99345994,0.002708787,0.0013689225,0.0007350443,0.0012022394,0.00052499614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5269961,0.38845113,0.05296552,0.007888907,0.0114128785,0.0122853825],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011991109,0.00034670695,0.0010044139,0.004832454,0.00070947496,0.004411238,0.0007212222,0.0013483166,0.006254908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14379913,0.00024524855,0.001539773,0.0073510683,0.0005797513,0.0026531983,0.0008335627,0.0010931456,0.0014470057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043084216,0.00035729757,0.9715844,0.00028509807,0.001066528,0.000306496,0.00035917913,0.00064526615,0.004597346,0.00025151396,0.0008614694,0.015377087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101561585,0.0008613557,0.9932272,0.000047961665,0.00062751374,0.00035711238,0.00045179029,0.00102998,0.001942807,0.0004961259,0.0008251101,0.000031519674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017224663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001779567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99516755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046270125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010863282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063415825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065923934","doi":"10.1007/s11192-014-1489-y","title":"Prospective evaluation of the accessibility of Internet references in leading general medical journals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Health Literacy and Information Accessibility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; St Mary's Hospital Centre; Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Sample (material); Library science; Medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2332333098912759,"score_gpt":0.5662370323276832,"score_spread":0.3330037224364073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065923934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99782217,0.00014457983,0.000083990344,0.000031854306,0.000005518992,0.00003863152,0.00075996603,0.000008556807,0.0011047559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847597,0.00010123238,0.00012898534,0.000033434255,0.000015855476,0.000027519296,0.00081262836,0.0000043102177,0.00040006964],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619555,0.0013832946,0.0009642257,0.00043782755,0.00075530435,0.0002639163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607478,0.013929564,0.014700981,0.0018956854,0.0065410286,0.0021849587],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040965076,0.0003272316,0.0005130908,0.0060604336,0.0007707642,0.0018701552,0.0004820973,0.000943759,0.0033520067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03352366,0.00036772835,0.00083446945,0.0055732806,0.0005945431,0.002112992,0.0013857009,0.0006676666,0.0013889552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023873565,0.00024026322,0.99706143,0.00003194723,0.00005483123,0.00004380984,0.00037192102,0.00003468884,0.00007738787,0.000027235323,0.000100178106,0.001717517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021459302,0.00062723475,0.9978796,0.000012579821,0.000043630516,0.00012272908,0.00068972434,0.0001716028,0.000112271664,0.000044630782,0.00026650954,0.000008058228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051500914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050839647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047875725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006399384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021664679},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2067745687","doi":"10.1007/s11192-009-0126-7","title":"Patent activity on water pollution and treatment in China—a scientometric perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Innovation Policy and R&D","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); China; Patent analysis; Pollution; Scientometrics; Regional science; Geography; Sociology; Computer science; Data science; Social science; Biology","score_opus":0.08727446852174127,"score_gpt":0.28987522875459804,"score_spread":0.20260076023285678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067745687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89301246,0.04156473,0.002179043,0.0076098307,0.00018583951,0.00007157307,0.007451154,0.000071999246,0.047853444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879369,0.008061176,0.00027312766,0.00016379326,0.0004537649,0.000011788716,0.0015767878,0.0000033189124,0.0015192822],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976801,0.0004511494,0.00025490698,0.00028186364,0.0009942809,0.00033779687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875514,0.00442174,0.0033575683,0.00047897958,0.0032813577,0.00090905104],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004503993,0.00038585,0.0009268537,0.03723276,0.0009012217,0.002854199,0.0008667112,0.0008032179,0.0031467166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008915752,0.00016665501,0.00083182345,0.035839487,0.0012679561,0.0024850823,0.0010807712,0.00042783143,0.00022127393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003121752,0.00022928351,0.7091381,0.001569128,0.00069669285,0.000864126,0.0010257465,0.0122562,0.0021713458,0.07219152,0.011690069,0.18785559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019866684,0.00011413837,0.96640825,0.00012617314,0.00030258964,0.00010623496,0.0005121394,0.008899518,0.00089388236,0.009401549,0.013181045,0.000034668374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08079321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06039981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96276724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004670535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051495954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16064584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068893145","doi":"10.1007/s11192-012-0839-x","title":"Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology research in Pakistan","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; University of Karachi","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Index (typography); Citation index; Biotechnology; Citation; Science Citation Index; Scientometrics; Annual growth %; Library science; Political science; Biology; Agricultural economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08999657371647511,"score_gpt":0.44234703883899634,"score_spread":0.3523504651225212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068893145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93728983,0.008519784,0.00072642224,0.0015969903,0.00007260393,0.000075256336,0.02433336,0.00008373549,0.027301975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99322623,0.002082346,0.00024072695,0.000025688416,0.000054314165,0.00001739359,0.0037708643,0.0000033256642,0.00057914644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955948,0.0006196576,0.0008145995,0.00032149866,0.0021577845,0.000491624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98178434,0.0069768005,0.004470998,0.00047988477,0.005419265,0.00086871296],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025766299,0.00027226075,0.000864977,0.045613315,0.0014851297,0.002680987,0.00058507494,0.0003706206,0.004036258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014767324,0.00013083727,0.00064335996,0.10902226,0.00055089325,0.0012730531,0.001203396,0.00029019738,0.00055838865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021331929,0.00011118612,0.8973541,0.001637533,0.0004600836,0.0004422446,0.0012188561,0.002603375,0.0004658331,0.005297452,0.006741075,0.08345493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009262221,0.00004606285,0.98706156,0.00012290293,0.00014092626,0.00025818142,0.0015615583,0.0015222438,0.0003063984,0.0007641963,0.00818871,0.000018021758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064374626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03578137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9543867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053628003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010705563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12799984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070973569","doi":"10.1007/s11192-013-1203-5","title":"Trends in and contributions to entrepreneurship research: a broad review of literature from 1996 to June 2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social Sciences Citation Index; Citation index; Entrepreneurship; Citation; Categorization; Field (mathematics); Sign (mathematics); Web of science; Library science; Social science; Science Citation Index; Sociology; Period (music); Bibliometrics; Political science; Computer science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.14742338298890986,"score_gpt":0.424124825057443,"score_spread":0.2767014420685331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070973569","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026988278,0.99532497,0.000051593404,0.0006864457,0.00015383464,0.000010590424,0.00015707326,0.0000045714387,0.0009120353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0068965494,0.9921272,0.00015973188,0.00023933953,0.0001787316,0.0000148472645,0.00014318422,0.0000025556428,0.00023780853],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735475,0.000548139,0.0008130399,0.0003873508,0.00076906703,0.00012764474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98040444,0.010563882,0.004207588,0.00018878313,0.004155503,0.00047982397],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040103486,0.0006263694,0.0010135971,0.027118223,0.000551769,0.0024008546,0.00060649234,0.0009186845,0.0015660968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017460039,0.0006702959,0.00092987693,0.035945628,0.0005994976,0.0030890412,0.0010632707,0.0008948752,0.0004757226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019576478,0.000059226302,0.018337332,0.1057473,0.000601254,0.0006299139,0.0020841528,0.00025027522,0.0011773566,0.0018331975,0.016692039,0.8523922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002890902,0.00022466145,0.14391457,0.16721816,0.0024317538,0.0033188814,0.0045195604,0.00015461427,0.0013806085,0.0011333727,0.6755855,0.00008946706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065813055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018817712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9728818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025769842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006833362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021209002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075464897","doi":"10.1007/s11192-012-0859-6","title":"Characterizing a scientific elite (B): publication and citation patterns of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Publishing; Publication; Elite; Productivity; Citation analysis; Library science; Ecology; Political science; Sociology; Biology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.26447491485703406,"score_gpt":0.4612345109392629,"score_spread":0.19675959608222882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075464897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899093,0.0005724007,0.00144402,0.00024160238,0.000018341643,0.000022557486,0.0016418693,0.00003695001,0.0061130505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676263,0.00025177395,0.000720033,0.000049857495,0.00009506748,0.000013438851,0.0012035319,0.000014940624,0.0008887996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840087,0.00025888713,0.0002842167,0.00029030148,0.00049673277,0.00026889343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854833,0.0040759644,0.00466306,0.000884048,0.002851322,0.0020423306],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034083414,0.00032222387,0.00062183477,0.017258542,0.0010583864,0.00360312,0.0005927111,0.0010835051,0.0055278125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016769757,0.00014718271,0.00053820334,0.018366242,0.0005496798,0.0027296776,0.0017560835,0.00045937838,0.0017012383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035677952,0.00023363788,0.94720197,0.00017833694,0.00048565504,0.0001133129,0.0005911417,0.0006769756,0.005961523,0.0013882255,0.0015435469,0.04126893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027078877,0.00016998108,0.9893036,0.000039856284,0.00019665888,0.00028678248,0.0009898026,0.0030301914,0.0017900984,0.0022097903,0.0019357488,0.000020316453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023596988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002342661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004499309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006471497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0184924},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2076071133","doi":"10.1007/s11192-012-0822-6","title":"Do citations and impact factors relate to the real numbers in publications? A case study of citation rates, impact, and effect sizes in ecology and evolutionary biology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Harm; Impact factor; Proxy (statistics); Ecology; Value (mathematics); Metric (unit); Set (abstract data type); Biology; Psychology; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Social psychology; Library science; Economics","score_opus":0.37632678244284634,"score_gpt":0.5872092963679597,"score_spread":0.21088251392511337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076071133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69838315,0.08865081,0.05496348,0.03298509,0.001250042,0.00056007615,0.0073258975,0.00063559914,0.11524582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848764,0.005577533,0.0060859392,0.00033005315,0.0006620977,0.00014837003,0.00051980535,0.000073375406,0.0017265157],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9472044,0.0270126,0.0055955234,0.003843263,0.014883037,0.0014610834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3872016,0.5125375,0.059508126,0.016524253,0.02131917,0.0029093644],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050210685,0.00087020616,0.0016324106,0.04028644,0.0017086222,0.0085681835,0.0011187968,0.002309961,0.004641141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4177092,0.00036727116,0.0016541468,0.10709347,0.0064114775,0.015343044,0.0022729621,0.002185073,0.0009074407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058490015,0.00024756038,0.57310194,0.004081038,0.0021276437,0.0013607586,0.00845241,0.0068665794,0.0011237405,0.16196375,0.009919231,0.23017041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112843336,0.00061930396,0.6360449,0.0015971464,0.0008068351,0.0024140964,0.0063955565,0.0111967055,0.0015114002,0.29509205,0.04386616,0.0003429485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030084462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028156438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9597136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039577563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002800554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26554263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080497488","doi":"10.1007/s11192-014-1457-6","title":"Exploring the interdisciplinary evolution of a discipline: the case of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Variety (cybernetics); Interdisciplinarity; Identification (biology); Epistemology; Sociology; Data science; Engineering ethics; Biology; Social science; Computer science; Ecology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4283907410291913,"score_gpt":0.5475682690263628,"score_spread":0.11917752799717152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080497488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74864334,0.013583975,0.045146886,0.030104082,0.00017529265,0.00009034866,0.00043610105,0.00012520434,0.16169481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811476,0.0029104778,0.012683448,0.00035204898,0.00007203856,0.00002564788,0.000114592505,0.00003453255,0.0026595641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938059,0.0038612976,0.00018831046,0.000505753,0.0010434246,0.000595299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722821,0.02022944,0.0026031665,0.001303332,0.0017158695,0.0018661208],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073921774,0.00040854618,0.0007500388,0.014570921,0.004915513,0.012749071,0.0017262554,0.0027286056,0.0058893487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022861015,0.00042260517,0.0009106637,0.03797871,0.008491612,0.017103577,0.0062155495,0.0022811203,0.00053374853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018356409,0.00019013157,0.062033825,0.0006011521,0.00021354631,0.0027412504,0.035616737,0.009027052,0.001873704,0.785042,0.0031208305,0.09935611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054488253,0.00009213208,0.081133015,0.0006091113,0.00015225023,0.0016385161,0.08348007,0.028043928,0.0015953631,0.70674026,0.09636317,0.00009775782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020326765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021938538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063798786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062511005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046289444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093594766","doi":"10.1007/s11192-012-0640-x","title":"Exploring Web keyword analysis as an alternative to link analysis: a multi-industry case","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Web visibility and informetrics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Link analysis; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Web page; Word lists by frequency; Information retrieval; Visibility; Index (typography); World Wide Web; Business; Accounting; Natural language processing; Geography","score_opus":0.25821070208708496,"score_gpt":0.3850153108853049,"score_spread":0.12680460879821992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093594766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.966145,0.00053210836,0.014822466,0.00069287093,0.0000088223005,0.00009630162,0.00041215928,0.000054158972,0.017236095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98820996,0.00018979445,0.010332742,0.000024748138,0.000008550143,0.000026450643,0.00017215613,0.000014948107,0.0010205216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959584,0.0024123809,0.00017859008,0.00029912774,0.0007367463,0.00041487237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688486,0.02606696,0.0017312,0.0010309271,0.0017414931,0.00058086903],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00452935,0.0004347923,0.0005751235,0.0116101485,0.0014271969,0.004393137,0.0010341022,0.0021428273,0.004810175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019206133,0.00024432063,0.0009746589,0.015315592,0.0011400252,0.005545103,0.002020373,0.00082419504,0.000527261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019620399,0.0027289682,0.5828521,0.0015679996,0.0007395698,0.01337464,0.015172595,0.050454367,0.012749177,0.08820059,0.0038357768,0.22636217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036315396,0.001844386,0.24377806,0.0004971351,0.0012134674,0.0073895007,0.085260235,0.5187849,0.01687629,0.093434975,0.030204574,0.00035339303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014296958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020512719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98838985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012474878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011840374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028427482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097269731","doi":"10.1023/b:scie.0000027677.79173.b8","title":"The classification of biomedical journals by research level","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Citation; Science Citation Index; Information retrieval; Basic research; Data science; Library science","score_opus":0.9272708597111224,"score_gpt":0.7093757539334359,"score_spread":0.21789510577768656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097269731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7224741,0.048075177,0.08663456,0.01959398,0.0037436837,0.00092232076,0.027000628,0.0015763263,0.08997918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88823307,0.009036931,0.08028091,0.0012771422,0.0021740736,0.00026317046,0.011152152,0.00017665126,0.0074059805],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832947,0.0053525385,0.002511806,0.0012009772,0.006824457,0.0008154605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92344725,0.03519618,0.013430933,0.0061381403,0.018565707,0.0032217996],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010856066,0.0006549484,0.0014656088,0.053027608,0.0013235076,0.008685321,0.0015235106,0.0013435277,0.0068392195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07827959,0.00030702422,0.0015872756,0.04613135,0.0018137764,0.0047788993,0.0020088942,0.0013981941,0.0040586474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093446876,0.00042784138,0.44302097,0.0018823424,0.0012393639,0.00020227497,0.00125315,0.0013345338,0.0076536895,0.025964938,0.024512183,0.49157423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031894245,0.00087077846,0.80324,0.0010082714,0.0013052003,0.0012695594,0.0029227042,0.017464569,0.0054961494,0.10255588,0.063332096,0.00021585358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018906434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002138541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94697237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020039377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002359141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05741304},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2098507569","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1788-y","title":"Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: a case study on the registered output of a Dutch university","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Regional science; Sociology; Operations research; Computer science; Econometrics; Data science; Library science; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8230981755742243,"score_gpt":0.5877561517828117,"score_spread":0.23534202379141256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098507569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9633628,0.00089963916,0.0049349573,0.00038159767,0.00002262372,0.00011334029,0.0058833295,0.00009075563,0.024310838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854891,0.00076328707,0.0047553773,0.00001694377,0.000033968572,0.00008998446,0.0068724244,0.000068405796,0.0019105586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852632,0.0050007617,0.0016146019,0.00090289983,0.0066766255,0.0005418903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96506304,0.022235096,0.0051093763,0.0016218929,0.005585371,0.00038521862],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00873641,0.00042541392,0.0009773001,0.021343185,0.00072277366,0.0044124126,0.00091805804,0.0006834265,0.0026876274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042760346,0.00018768269,0.00076150434,0.06786996,0.00083013286,0.003341309,0.0018928536,0.00055104867,0.00057873066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041886358,0.00047053784,0.72971845,0.0026438553,0.0006601521,0.0038263593,0.019224573,0.018102078,0.0040783472,0.017561432,0.0047189454,0.1985766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032100885,0.00028327864,0.88200414,0.0004231772,0.00036336115,0.0012845082,0.027668076,0.031588398,0.005824989,0.003734006,0.04665732,0.00013662777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019920813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016325504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9786568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032477013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001977741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046203136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102705305","doi":"10.1007/s11192-008-0106-3","title":"The declining scientific impact of theses: Implications for electronic thesis and dissertation repositories and graduate studies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Altmetrics; Graduate students; Peer review; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.7238816379522245,"score_gpt":0.6807475618396931,"score_spread":0.043134076112531394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102705305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4986594,0.021280129,0.004985989,0.3060704,0.0014919915,0.00022686702,0.017107563,0.0010557035,0.14912187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495317,0.0076177614,0.0025173903,0.009743401,0.0024654763,0.00014000162,0.004599278,0.00025452347,0.023130558],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9602982,0.011219433,0.004175165,0.003017925,0.018906675,0.0023826142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34398898,0.3487595,0.1302826,0.03202207,0.1097451,0.035201773],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04902755,0.0005265729,0.001575425,0.027136251,0.0049235295,0.019746771,0.004903156,0.0033928505,0.07932422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39987418,0.00068739115,0.0013309885,0.054588422,0.004568963,0.016434666,0.007034578,0.00414852,0.009033242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006832891,0.00087887334,0.61374104,0.0013717625,0.0003677701,0.00031139975,0.00652529,0.0009847886,0.00066070264,0.07266164,0.058267005,0.24354637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001026534,0.0002721151,0.8827834,0.00093469303,0.00020792597,0.00061294896,0.01353969,0.0012558085,0.00093348016,0.040980764,0.058305286,0.00007120704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016019013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018260308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97286373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006006567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011267153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26536596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103013209","doi":"10.1007/s11192-009-0020-3","title":"Matrices of science and technology interactions and patterns of structured growth: implications for development","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Economic and Technological Innovation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Dimension (graph theory); Articulation (sociology); Computer science; Component (thermodynamics); Key (lock); Scientific literature; Regional science; Data science; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.059368761363235184,"score_gpt":0.2929687513041478,"score_spread":0.2335999899409126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103013209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.928749,0.0008673837,0.05169091,0.0030468886,0.000033771474,0.000072319715,0.0035472475,0.0002201404,0.011772249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99027467,0.00021824187,0.00794954,0.000043110736,0.000020900417,0.00003895169,0.00057974336,0.00001359425,0.0008613362],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985279,0.00057413866,0.00012542032,0.00033509082,0.00030101754,0.00013636377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95028406,0.033893388,0.008172912,0.0025127793,0.0034226405,0.0017142352],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020756233,0.00023724927,0.0005265054,0.0033808146,0.00064494816,0.0035200214,0.0005340967,0.0005700885,0.006812563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036225334,0.00030125215,0.00043172244,0.0051376196,0.0016584774,0.0030194921,0.0012548675,0.00062866654,0.00059603446],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033801552,0.00014862794,0.48843715,0.00027024793,0.0003780392,0.0002809006,0.0028656996,0.018616626,0.004371544,0.40887946,0.004430511,0.07098324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060942755,0.000074372416,0.25303864,0.00006615034,0.000067955116,0.0003005429,0.0028484368,0.04847578,0.0010012375,0.6882026,0.0058038,0.00005941894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044598565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007432772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99661916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013664835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011260669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022790313},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2109757953","doi":"10.1007/s11192-011-0515-6","title":"Exploring the web visibility of world-class universities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Web visibility and informetrics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Visibility; Proxy (statistics); The Internet; Computer science; World Wide Web; Test (biology); Corporate governance; Information retrieval; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.22676155982887738,"score_gpt":0.28013886868423954,"score_spread":0.053377308855362154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109757953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868335,0.00048381364,0.001284916,0.0002527821,0.0000075833223,0.000003930249,0.00031916884,0.000018300407,0.010796073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993212,0.00010577142,0.00014868697,0.000006214386,0.000015152595,8.5523175e-7,0.00013709224,0.0000047159924,0.00026025836],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987576,0.0003447874,0.00007107977,0.0001343474,0.0004699643,0.00022221378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724761,0.01656942,0.0058928886,0.0011816062,0.002300548,0.0015794622],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001879054,0.00014273015,0.00028728513,0.008519854,0.00074535393,0.0052156877,0.00039992618,0.000416328,0.0024649082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028636932,0.00012417669,0.00032646782,0.012166702,0.00065473,0.0049897237,0.0020840524,0.0005285464,0.00025209322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027482997,0.00015511848,0.8860245,0.0001613931,0.00022798267,0.00019612703,0.0064568357,0.0021271287,0.0017112404,0.030184986,0.0015450461,0.07093489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012422486,0.00008643382,0.94254327,0.000078122124,0.00012010532,0.00021988641,0.009968374,0.012132354,0.0017034963,0.022960726,0.010147383,0.000027452807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070404755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008834114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99812096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074225495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007449708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013998985},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2113501793","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1726-z","title":"Tree responses, tolerance and acclimation to stress: Does current research depend on the cultivation status of studied species?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Plant responses to elevated CO2","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Biological Sciences","funders":"Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja","keywords":"Biology; Abiotic component; Acclimatization; Abiotic stress; Ecology; Tree (set theory); Botany; Gene","score_opus":0.2472618973623742,"score_gpt":0.3793187442655228,"score_spread":0.13205684690314862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113501793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904433,0.004259073,0.0012299533,0.0003570873,0.00003307106,0.000010271764,0.0004542996,0.000017299903,0.0031956348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996521,0.0016800773,0.00045532963,0.00012305693,0.00008592906,0.0000070760707,0.0006103909,0.000018790866,0.0004984317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993247,0.00013497527,0.00007741131,0.00027471085,0.000112314745,0.00007584934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995891,0.0014412707,0.0011210964,0.00051030377,0.00062721665,0.00040914194],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017502744,0.00030511993,0.0007203247,0.0015949717,0.00052358577,0.0012561005,0.0007967064,0.00046256828,0.00365032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00273745,0.00017059618,0.00046122714,0.003202838,0.0011026411,0.0020300567,0.000592527,0.000356326,0.000543622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027117538,0.00010458672,0.9287263,0.0004361048,0.0004129906,0.00007115454,0.0010594649,0.00024759085,0.026067438,0.00037324865,0.00021519973,0.04201475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000113469,0.000039852875,0.9979506,0.000017497354,0.000041612824,0.00004721975,0.00044772617,0.00011468235,0.00047498825,0.00016826071,0.00069128344,0.0000051297993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004893278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073842704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99840504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034827608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039563363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012211502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114111800","doi":"10.1007/s11192-009-0035-9","title":"Why it has become more difficult to predict Nobel Prize winners: a bibliometric analysis of nominees and winners of the chemistry and physics prizes (1901–2007)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Fragmentation (computing); Attribution; Hierarchy; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Data science; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.2500444637851816,"score_gpt":0.4672281133466309,"score_spread":0.2171836495614493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114111800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9475361,0.0067383866,0.0010359904,0.026156383,0.0005376282,0.00001926961,0.003232609,0.00004469892,0.01469892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99177766,0.0022647313,0.0007727471,0.0007043189,0.0004897671,0.000016540442,0.0020760782,0.000033336983,0.0018647241],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967338,0.0009906954,0.00036214796,0.00040547297,0.001068943,0.00043901638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96134126,0.013703488,0.0104434425,0.0019044586,0.010428972,0.002178383],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01019639,0.00018849364,0.0005553055,0.009608462,0.0008544486,0.0033748464,0.0007018349,0.00084923394,0.0021842332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06711905,0.00018399832,0.00038245102,0.016521117,0.0008176305,0.0034825504,0.0011364899,0.0013080125,0.0010979683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027074234,0.000112246074,0.831085,0.00026740748,0.00043007632,0.00011655904,0.0028068558,0.0008008785,0.000300427,0.006915276,0.035761002,0.121133566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016790073,0.000044371114,0.9710269,0.0001660028,0.00010221831,0.00012614588,0.0036652964,0.0010081565,0.0003701426,0.0027910736,0.020646878,0.000036131438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02366875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037274227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99039155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014728892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019191416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053924322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115701185","doi":"10.1007/s11192-007-2036-x","title":"History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":332,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Bibliometrics; Computer science; Factor (programming language); Data science; Library science; Operations research; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6874658205142047,"score_gpt":0.5792682361347077,"score_spread":0.108197584379497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115701185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.720482,0.022669,0.026952658,0.022020904,0.0011592297,0.00021859533,0.0037361982,0.00073413487,0.2020273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914725,0.0025291238,0.0026912228,0.00038642946,0.0004225475,0.000026280772,0.00034953616,0.00008777794,0.0020345242],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631894,0.00080362556,0.00031620244,0.0009576237,0.001228546,0.00037503443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9078028,0.054217458,0.008898347,0.005080088,0.01909037,0.0049109454],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010166629,0.00048219317,0.0007389178,0.011676902,0.0024219838,0.008120441,0.0010664713,0.0018638481,0.0132419625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060715478,0.000786726,0.00057230244,0.010863333,0.0037702052,0.0070627183,0.0021600185,0.0032825228,0.0015720938],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013542036,0.0008155848,0.3313777,0.0011318864,0.00046383793,0.0009617832,0.0025267121,0.010773238,0.0071181944,0.25715804,0.015305559,0.37101328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081218684,0.0006939868,0.7153301,0.00076080166,0.00031789503,0.0012424989,0.0035082041,0.013314073,0.008931994,0.17053881,0.08482043,0.0004600038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057943873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050260834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98983335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004089085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019210185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053766906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121258465","doi":"10.1007/s11192-011-0423-9","title":"Bibliographical research in the study of Hebrew printing: a bibliometric analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hebrew; Bibliometrics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Field (mathematics); History; Period (music); State (computer science); Library science; Classics; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Archaeology; Algorithm","score_opus":0.2997094169988252,"score_gpt":0.3817411787088426,"score_spread":0.08203176171001741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121258465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66377866,0.09175572,0.009015614,0.0058008214,0.000692102,0.00055349414,0.0064351177,0.00018150115,0.22178692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94273293,0.032950275,0.007610636,0.00033446564,0.00086663157,0.00016102644,0.00222052,0.00007004259,0.013053551],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97948784,0.0062536974,0.0026105188,0.0010205153,0.010112374,0.00051513576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93788725,0.038136132,0.0068450165,0.0028413706,0.013015805,0.0012744983],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012625609,0.0005566815,0.0011459804,0.13854147,0.0034040082,0.013679451,0.0012489716,0.0008316459,0.0100382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07689982,0.0003707713,0.00088397105,0.25224075,0.0032977925,0.008884891,0.0028520813,0.0009459507,0.0017309347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030117424,0.0002802491,0.31925637,0.0048393644,0.00074775197,0.0007580768,0.021028299,0.0015508016,0.0014876284,0.0386532,0.009551064,0.60154605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004016048,0.00023754903,0.83989346,0.002732993,0.0010099305,0.0010076918,0.03322877,0.0032078389,0.003560393,0.011829933,0.103136644,0.000114752074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03152807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04314885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86145854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008110702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010824283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06677139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127199286","doi":"10.1007/s11192-010-0331-4","title":"Exploring the management information systems discipline: a scientometric study of ICIS, PACIS and ASAC","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Delegate; Loyalty; Political science; Maturity (psychological); Information system; Library science; Identity (music); Field (mathematics); Management; Law; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09714758848338591,"score_gpt":0.3650010739259219,"score_spread":0.267853485442536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127199286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.843082,0.008631486,0.0028701436,0.013332581,0.00020758837,0.00026144605,0.0015608303,0.00005048931,0.13000345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942275,0.002708221,0.0008764889,0.00033326412,0.00025142953,0.000085408785,0.0005604502,0.000016507962,0.0009406932],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845153,0.0044400976,0.001139785,0.0005217928,0.008455684,0.00092732516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9036323,0.050993446,0.0120788645,0.004100712,0.024796195,0.0043985704],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018210445,0.00031512367,0.0009927843,0.061250586,0.00478857,0.0134873465,0.0009992431,0.0010691095,0.0028707979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10588718,0.00027853984,0.00079280767,0.13538142,0.0035296872,0.008759317,0.0039642486,0.0016828714,0.0005438275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022309824,0.0004538193,0.5988388,0.001362232,0.00029599536,0.00036892624,0.02627983,0.0016303671,0.00069544686,0.114158295,0.02105956,0.23463362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024573883,0.00014965882,0.8570335,0.00074330973,0.00019839435,0.00028243597,0.05563184,0.004646512,0.00088375754,0.017727766,0.06261875,0.000059434864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023447711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019975793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009387218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014072932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09630716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127540269","doi":"10.1007/s11192-012-0729-2","title":"Counting citations in the field of business and management: why use Google Scholar rather than the Web of Science","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Web of science; Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Personalization; Scientometrics; Computer science; Library science; Data science; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.4692757887462023,"score_gpt":0.5425769812812546,"score_spread":0.07330119253505235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127540269","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2718603,0.14222394,0.06394572,0.4276739,0.018957138,0.00034921552,0.0031858918,0.002003183,0.06980084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82734704,0.037162565,0.07833862,0.035051633,0.011839968,0.00026691833,0.0014073879,0.0012114048,0.007374449],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94985956,0.018371224,0.005009729,0.005028661,0.02045392,0.0012769005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6821865,0.19493437,0.02108206,0.011816748,0.083454035,0.0065262816],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044639222,0.0009750396,0.0030382886,0.014005154,0.0031341757,0.013309203,0.003070371,0.004329376,0.0031578375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30654776,0.0005685195,0.0011403211,0.032444213,0.0040208604,0.015744356,0.0024783209,0.0046468233,0.00315547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004321421,0.0002790537,0.11493824,0.006742839,0.0016568283,0.00019328459,0.004546904,0.0011878429,0.0030406776,0.057357326,0.16722855,0.64239645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003450229,0.0005514129,0.21506727,0.015742363,0.0024084805,0.002171978,0.019570133,0.0146549465,0.011942394,0.35167378,0.36510548,0.0007667359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016600775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025934778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031381575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006543644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23607755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139085708","doi":"10.1007/s11192-011-0603-7","title":"ASEAN benchmarking in terms of science, technology, and innovation from 1999 to 2009","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Regional science; Scientometrics; Political science; Business; Data science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Library science; Sociology; Marketing","score_opus":0.06945695606174171,"score_gpt":0.26587844729325943,"score_spread":0.19642149123151773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139085708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9185343,0.0029873608,0.0025923534,0.0009844241,0.000064548105,0.000025835878,0.016946012,0.00022753066,0.057637665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825515,0.0011275394,0.0010819238,0.00006825629,0.000027270677,0.000022106382,0.011716357,0.000015804264,0.0033892298],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829227,0.00039886276,0.00016023501,0.00013935952,0.00082085514,0.00018842703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99337864,0.0010732211,0.002044385,0.00039453825,0.0028959278,0.0002131911],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034251479,0.00029009307,0.00023280666,0.0030600242,0.0004133636,0.0012348025,0.00039855012,0.00024705427,0.0010257326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007934461,0.00007534133,0.0002312543,0.010174675,0.00037468038,0.0011836924,0.0008923647,0.00040587274,0.0004291461],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038890404,0.00021800147,0.71725607,0.0003501223,0.0001798045,0.00045223974,0.0013277661,0.020153506,0.0012706453,0.012553054,0.03816668,0.2076832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054180905,0.00011037226,0.9462987,0.0000804183,0.000047977348,0.0002959413,0.0009402753,0.00656066,0.0018292277,0.00087076525,0.042930853,0.00002934209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03693071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050967455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99693996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019243163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014416565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07343149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139770987","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0127-8","title":"Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Humanities; Natural science; The arts; Citation index; Index (typography); Sociology; Social science; Citation; Library science; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.43608455016924813,"score_gpt":0.5388048553623775,"score_spread":0.10272030519312941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139770987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7971361,0.027595932,0.0048002144,0.008484713,0.00029851578,0.00036832117,0.04362488,0.00024796693,0.11744335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97210455,0.009189434,0.0036877098,0.00022709442,0.0000387018,0.000120547185,0.008479314,0.000057707326,0.0060949367],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535537,0.0005352806,0.00018772871,0.00046662593,0.0026363702,0.00081864325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801267,0.0034543236,0.0023863136,0.00048482986,0.011174635,0.0023732502],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036315566,0.00063888874,0.00074669044,0.032191977,0.008152015,0.0047024367,0.0018103592,0.00077465357,0.0074800146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026466431,0.00030647265,0.00088657625,0.08644978,0.0012735965,0.002440434,0.0031812496,0.0007378831,0.00046438057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070336735,0.00014581792,0.5542405,0.0032385013,0.0010041532,0.00072347303,0.027866608,0.0059078992,0.0012793505,0.130759,0.07623928,0.19789205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089957284,0.000046825397,0.8362703,0.0007341796,0.00066462404,0.00030639354,0.022377662,0.005203996,0.0006151881,0.0054557933,0.12809795,0.00013708505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99636847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07722927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12804164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56034017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140162241","doi":"10.1007/s11192-011-0589-1","title":"Author disambiguation using multi-aspect similarity indicators","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Genome Canada","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Recall; Precision and recall; Computer science; Task (project management); Measure (data warehouse); Information retrieval; Key (lock); Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.20036793714287734,"score_gpt":0.3850923397812263,"score_spread":0.18472440263834897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140162241","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2593812,0.00233163,0.71416986,0.0005065639,0.0002674919,0.00052259414,0.0043134317,0.009008055,0.009499171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5136863,0.0007228502,0.47793403,0.000044933266,0.00018256936,0.00028010109,0.0050258627,0.00042561052,0.0016978487],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99223095,0.0015767596,0.0014200117,0.0014213687,0.0030043693,0.00034656475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783392,0.009682412,0.0040027197,0.0027177758,0.004802476,0.00045540812],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005651432,0.0011261646,0.0017810812,0.038126208,0.0013586935,0.0049274648,0.00117234,0.0012350989,0.0016674418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037942942,0.00042952385,0.0012629132,0.032639205,0.00058969023,0.0054242057,0.0029008149,0.0008909502,0.0019427014],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000495093,0.00028547886,0.0906014,0.00076293555,0.00040016577,0.00032704195,0.0011640802,0.014824714,0.014622401,0.009140316,0.006980726,0.8603957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020040046,0.000609591,0.14619578,0.00033955916,0.00054563873,0.0024608728,0.0023563018,0.6328462,0.09661568,0.067694925,0.049699243,0.000435803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001413587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024078325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96187377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008656283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015976714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029887974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141246632","doi":"10.1023/a:1016007205344","title":"Contribution of Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine to the world's biomedical literature (1988-1997)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turkish; Science Citation Index; Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Citation; MEDLINE; Bibliometrics; Political science; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.38260139108866204,"score_gpt":0.5123331948262367,"score_spread":0.1297318037375747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141246632","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22852227,0.549052,0.0008446887,0.07276297,0.0070227887,0.00017341154,0.03524163,0.00017037106,0.10620993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57622,0.34386924,0.003957187,0.0032248031,0.004637309,0.00015831024,0.013486678,0.00009550258,0.054351028],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667066,0.0005618564,0.00027956953,0.00034406176,0.0017854982,0.00035839697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98541695,0.0039298697,0.0019636638,0.0004286231,0.0060093356,0.0022516258],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004998206,0.0003516298,0.00045099002,0.027317107,0.0014639895,0.0033581327,0.0008536311,0.0010744951,0.012681925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024404079,0.0003085904,0.0003219392,0.030475125,0.00075473177,0.0014552557,0.0030917267,0.0005923945,0.0019512409],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040359428,0.0000942369,0.13019761,0.003586937,0.0001761185,0.0007176878,0.003278132,0.00043531045,0.00072497106,0.0055016303,0.18523797,0.66964585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025026007,0.00003229304,0.50175637,0.0021519025,0.00011221687,0.000782053,0.001986538,0.00014393165,0.0010282977,0.0005876983,0.4913734,0.000020295805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05733196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08391295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00960106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022769649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113996506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142066148","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1676-5","title":"Benchmarking bibliometrics in biomedical research: research performance of the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Medicine, 2008–2012","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Benchmarking; Citation; Citation analysis; Web of science; Library science; Impact factor; Medical education; MEDLINE; Computer science; Medicine; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.8554237139510291,"score_gpt":0.6280879688612137,"score_spread":0.22733574508981547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142066148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8622803,0.02157226,0.0008297542,0.016392505,0.0003800794,0.00014340592,0.070628695,0.00044773007,0.027325269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97656983,0.002952608,0.00075409526,0.00021905822,0.00013788279,0.000028300738,0.013861532,0.000026898522,0.005449942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936348,0.0006220753,0.0007541457,0.0005890193,0.0035212946,0.0008786085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612766,0.0030456488,0.008086549,0.0012758421,0.018838108,0.007477281],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005457859,0.0005020854,0.00074165605,0.008238276,0.0014561961,0.0034878647,0.0013161823,0.00080551545,0.0022591883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030304529,0.0003569664,0.00052236475,0.031169534,0.00091120094,0.0014839993,0.0021126803,0.0007616836,0.0007027491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009515071,0.00009825069,0.7760272,0.0019236733,0.00063155295,0.00021849106,0.005318493,0.004281513,0.0016961753,0.0038119243,0.10048721,0.10455409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008478131,0.000023870249,0.9909356,0.000057513284,0.00005281024,0.000026715366,0.0006329165,0.0003324621,0.00022055296,0.00003186774,0.0076639275,0.000013146147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88921565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9326521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052763823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058582727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38283008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143612877","doi":"10.1007/s11192-011-0580-x","title":"Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":260,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Citation impact; Sample (material); Citation analysis; Web of science; Information retrieval; Scholarly communication; Impact factor; World Wide Web; Data science; Political science; MEDLINE; Publishing","score_opus":0.9469149544521874,"score_gpt":0.6472795575330219,"score_spread":0.2996353969191655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143612877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9146519,0.0007794899,0.038273636,0.0016538457,0.00038207253,0.00092055683,0.0024363059,0.0015240008,0.039378203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9387319,0.00028563116,0.047134183,0.0004967335,0.00031717416,0.0011985976,0.0029177978,0.00018916898,0.008728739],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95702046,0.01784567,0.0042367037,0.0029140883,0.01662222,0.0013609065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.807417,0.08184943,0.029542983,0.023020295,0.0534252,0.0047450336],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033172548,0.00069309,0.0007823675,0.007580075,0.0015768837,0.0075996025,0.002169634,0.0024792075,0.010517994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15839444,0.00038955835,0.00052814046,0.007810215,0.0007348582,0.007791086,0.0025653474,0.0011150902,0.008676208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067444536,0.0027450502,0.6375815,0.00035520404,0.00019704137,0.000106757376,0.002671621,0.0010946185,0.0066047567,0.007354011,0.016736217,0.32387885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062550406,0.005066344,0.7205945,0.00088633056,0.00084874267,0.0006143325,0.014586889,0.069534436,0.06949195,0.014627728,0.102871545,0.00025165227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014080261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002359415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016512517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003083745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1754353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145694442","doi":"10.1007/s11192-010-0278-5","title":"Is the academic Ivory Tower becoming a managed structure? A nested analysis of the variance in activities of researchers from natural sciences and engineering in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ivory tower; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Variance (accounting); Sociology; Natural (archaeology); Adaptation (eye); Institutional theory; Social science; Political science; Psychology; Geography; Law; Business","score_opus":0.3143140146529494,"score_gpt":0.4913641469124948,"score_spread":0.1770501322595454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145694442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968646,0.000097412136,0.00071085163,0.00030022964,0.00001106451,0.0000258278,0.00033695938,0.000010155893,0.0016428519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982748,0.000034982262,0.0004663141,0.000030112742,0.0000052859614,0.000010349508,0.0002083601,0.000009665515,0.0009602213],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939737,0.0017781324,0.00022111609,0.000955983,0.0012982633,0.0017727648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9681218,0.010622389,0.0043995604,0.0022011204,0.008214947,0.0064401934],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005474436,0.00030884263,0.0012347061,0.0031441255,0.0058020703,0.0043955115,0.002285411,0.0006978801,0.003002096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03151693,0.00035241627,0.00094946806,0.005655375,0.0046514682,0.0015789135,0.0030971488,0.0011938564,0.000245391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044461465,0.00012905798,0.9518384,0.000037823433,0.00030308752,0.00025361954,0.016146695,0.0017964186,0.0006278359,0.011747352,0.0020175462,0.014657482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003494528,0.0000885489,0.95298743,0.00006165177,0.00014698657,0.000035571295,0.03200144,0.0090749115,0.00024554448,0.002097437,0.0031756186,0.00004986964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97074336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99685585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029796476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06252902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21618956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153046986","doi":"10.1007/s11192-012-0891-6","title":"Discovering and assessing fields of expertise in nanomedicine: a patent co-citation network perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Patent analysis; Modularity (biology); Data science; Computer science; Patent office; Perspective (graphical); Patent visualisation; Intellectual property; Simple (philosophy); Business; Citation; Patent portfolio; Knowledge management; Industrial organization; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.239983206839301,"score_gpt":0.3122728714126446,"score_spread":0.0722896645733436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153046986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6372683,0.050223127,0.1358502,0.030426718,0.00032469447,0.0002407678,0.005881715,0.0004637728,0.1393207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700827,0.0071833814,0.019682555,0.00023302138,0.0004458045,0.000047463625,0.00072615646,0.000028469392,0.0015703832],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419314,0.0023460884,0.000504643,0.00066522794,0.0019696222,0.00032128798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91047335,0.06914389,0.010515353,0.0026346133,0.005333675,0.0018989994],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008392655,0.0008290629,0.0013264789,0.073112644,0.0018853113,0.01088299,0.0015030891,0.0025372163,0.0049021435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0636421,0.00030414204,0.00083512685,0.073777854,0.0031988197,0.013103298,0.0029266442,0.0011439904,0.000731965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028234354,0.000351702,0.28584647,0.002018283,0.0014946958,0.00048323348,0.0025223126,0.025384283,0.0038834696,0.28446198,0.009076937,0.38419437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004950973,0.00013758226,0.18717816,0.0010782346,0.00084443315,0.0008847959,0.005919857,0.08384421,0.0056107733,0.66903615,0.04527,0.00014636395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005454019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005802128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92688733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030659735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024986062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044385195},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2165122403","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0115-z","title":"Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":506,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Bibliometrics; Benchmark (surveying); Database; Bibliographic database; Computer science; Data science; Humanities; Library science; Geography; Management","score_opus":0.8593883432201264,"score_gpt":0.609782680977184,"score_spread":0.24960566224294234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165122403","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24078679,0.27474824,0.1460774,0.16705576,0.0032124873,0.00052920607,0.014713184,0.0024694288,0.15040751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81730694,0.05303284,0.110767595,0.0058230525,0.0038226822,0.0006143718,0.0058941375,0.00056886906,0.0021694882],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.76480365,0.1055339,0.026355881,0.013347108,0.08669557,0.003263902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.316423,0.5012513,0.036610804,0.068794526,0.06593689,0.010983456],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21179481,0.0014391855,0.0068805115,0.03238686,0.0038293737,0.04375171,0.011271657,0.004675381,0.0035346632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.50791675,0.0014131449,0.0018194339,0.06568196,0.010331809,0.047272075,0.01580384,0.0045851544,0.0014055369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064258184,0.00054178404,0.07119978,0.008204056,0.002585909,0.00015677864,0.003876196,0.009439403,0.0008997864,0.22571342,0.023739023,0.65300125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027885733,0.00041620096,0.058021866,0.0109275505,0.0014924108,0.00043085346,0.007455678,0.030480232,0.0025024817,0.7635346,0.12411304,0.00034618084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011797351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014049116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96761316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009074111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016329065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9719973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226524777","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1825-x","title":"How to boost scientific production? A statistical analysis of research funding and other influencing factors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Production (economics); Relation (database); Impact factor; Statistical analysis; Business; Marketing; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.7558819682205911,"score_gpt":0.6277056305859157,"score_spread":0.1281763376346754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226524777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90006524,0.00843443,0.0580521,0.010072165,0.0008180346,0.0007342566,0.002537368,0.00053630624,0.01875016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99021554,0.0005174462,0.0067040217,0.00032943557,0.000257957,0.00033349884,0.00034305625,0.00009378389,0.0012053471],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9360216,0.042069804,0.0047976887,0.0036459577,0.0107307555,0.0027341358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48326135,0.4494806,0.027308168,0.015370689,0.01833891,0.0062402585],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.072990805,0.00090888626,0.002204857,0.008181767,0.00140546,0.0050727134,0.001357792,0.0015022713,0.00529628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29522282,0.00035163082,0.0050073513,0.01791424,0.0031739948,0.0037884258,0.0023814416,0.0024312239,0.00072797964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029272225,0.00053264014,0.8267071,0.0012805997,0.009071062,0.00048956036,0.0013584926,0.0060698017,0.0019028266,0.01762031,0.005323319,0.126717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030634677,0.0029383765,0.8940915,0.00040600033,0.007937859,0.00051291566,0.003334938,0.03072362,0.0027201767,0.043256808,0.013596675,0.00017472717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003681827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029288144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99181825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002174372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008236639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3860169},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2264463174","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-1846-0","title":"Factors influencing research collaboration in LIS schools in South Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of South Africa","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Library science; Productivity; Medical education; Population; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Economic growth; Computer science","score_opus":0.7350202013577418,"score_gpt":0.6208490315127927,"score_spread":0.11417116984494913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264463174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99516195,0.00037368498,0.00008115166,0.0010811902,0.00000787172,0.000025006471,0.0000890765,0.0000050373096,0.0031750593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992919,0.00014746055,0.00010044837,0.000041792682,0.000004679146,0.000010898322,0.000017485216,0.0000013938946,0.00038392437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937828,0.0027351708,0.0006652871,0.0003756908,0.0008084579,0.0016326237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9474099,0.021236705,0.015947241,0.0006133553,0.0038085354,0.010984226],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004664981,0.00020880922,0.00040489947,0.005709658,0.004290346,0.0054594614,0.00057341106,0.00065318274,0.0062721726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03175328,0.00028771712,0.00023202,0.010002756,0.0013931108,0.0016218579,0.0030903383,0.0008638436,0.00041922068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019484024,0.0001719003,0.9207079,0.00035572847,0.000064339845,0.0014856778,0.050244566,0.0002585441,0.0009951853,0.0030043416,0.0009015204,0.021615505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000306232,0.00013298598,0.84167856,0.00039929006,0.000049537888,0.00056186406,0.14848363,0.00041710728,0.00038283985,0.000984446,0.0068539456,0.000025187506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02995496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059358466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99533504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005542067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022086129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059561253},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2270179582","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1828-7","title":"Automated Research Impact Assessment: a new bibliometrics approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration; National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Réseau Provincial de Recherche en Adaptation-Réadaptation","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Resource (disambiguation); Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Management science; Data science; Library science; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.6967903147110235,"score_gpt":0.6874424372991984,"score_spread":0.009347877411825078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270179582","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013001786,0.0018884751,0.95976424,0.0010176945,0.00024902364,0.000413443,0.002246946,0.0038833746,0.01753506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29060018,0.0018820922,0.69774306,0.00025531393,0.0011018639,0.0005683264,0.002592772,0.00039207598,0.0048643043],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97184396,0.0074793044,0.0022277476,0.0024529914,0.0154843,0.0005117692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621223,0.020764925,0.0038329945,0.0048360876,0.0078052212,0.00063844875],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010916188,0.0021721595,0.0037932985,0.046097446,0.0014569265,0.012164502,0.002425497,0.0016725615,0.005459386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05257709,0.0008214183,0.0022684562,0.035490002,0.0012597704,0.0074101267,0.0049391123,0.0018695579,0.0036245205],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115004295,0.00049788697,0.013316219,0.0010175135,0.0010746771,0.0001308104,0.00040140864,0.021043511,0.004399554,0.036681373,0.011521354,0.9098007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012802688,0.00031523622,0.028373562,0.00038055182,0.0010879856,0.0007011541,0.0004973125,0.6486671,0.008269526,0.26387158,0.04742148,0.00028637127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031072693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00455972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001928015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003908063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057731032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271548616","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-1852-2","title":"iSEER: an intelligent automatic computer system for scientific evaluation of researchers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Online Learning and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.21723149811846532,"score_gpt":0.42346161614393535,"score_spread":0.20623011802547003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271548616","genre_codex":"software","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04143976,0.0015892317,0.42661524,0.0007994841,0.0007008569,0.0018981644,0.02497391,0.48034903,0.0216343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26768774,0.0011020319,0.6303595,0.0011832992,0.0010193744,0.003521075,0.045229148,0.011312845,0.038584985],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952341,0.0011864698,0.0006628122,0.00083894545,0.0018549706,0.00022273236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871618,0.005234987,0.0012552375,0.0017788721,0.003652486,0.0009164668],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006184183,0.0017439905,0.0019067035,0.015111483,0.0006920145,0.0030463168,0.0014165,0.0010140386,0.028792424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017737363,0.0005214235,0.000773242,0.0059018717,0.00041958928,0.003438622,0.0026664864,0.0010009315,0.017795144],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023474027,0.00069617975,0.017204538,0.0010447821,0.00041295917,0.000212401,0.00038178184,0.002861371,0.027775485,0.006755786,0.19510624,0.7452011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013378967,0.0012942803,0.05793712,0.00042900667,0.00079244777,0.0009920355,0.0004711892,0.41802484,0.1743388,0.03761135,0.30623624,0.0005348594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016832912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026300289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99381584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011782056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019510606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09632021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280374399","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1807-z","title":"Quantifying the scientific output of new researchers using the zp-index","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Index (typography); Computer science; Metric (unit); Citation; Position (finance); Quality (philosophy); Bibliometrics; Scientific literature; Data science; Citation index; Operations research; Library science; Mathematics; Marketing; Economics; World Wide Web; Epistemology; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.9550993674466709,"score_gpt":0.6719727838580462,"score_spread":0.28312658358862475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280374399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62212455,0.010022886,0.22045095,0.002209489,0.0006105553,0.00056944625,0.019770943,0.0017510172,0.12249012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9311358,0.0039882194,0.05258229,0.000109099296,0.0004147675,0.00036802972,0.00651728,0.00011449756,0.004769952],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98907745,0.0018813123,0.0010865381,0.0007821783,0.0068544713,0.00031815402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668832,0.017894926,0.0057257633,0.0022052354,0.0063620107,0.0009289316],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008538757,0.00090045313,0.0014375568,0.03576131,0.0006860103,0.006213211,0.0014943179,0.0008706229,0.0041383556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053193524,0.00016684309,0.0010210415,0.04595055,0.001373849,0.005048364,0.0029101009,0.0007016273,0.002089454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004928955,0.00043162092,0.3539979,0.0056256335,0.0018094783,0.00029829014,0.0020968816,0.01776173,0.03107121,0.08156397,0.009065621,0.49578485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012853101,0.0012822322,0.57982284,0.00079040235,0.0016598414,0.0012007087,0.004693408,0.08814511,0.076632395,0.17780527,0.06747414,0.0003651221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095250655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001016656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012200995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019977156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04515779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287531290","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-1848-y","title":"The effect of holding a research chair on scientists’ productivity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Novelty; Matching (statistics); Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Computer science; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Social psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.7473508328001948,"score_gpt":0.6643655597955263,"score_spread":0.08298527300466851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287531290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98696136,0.0014468792,0.00033745106,0.004722118,0.0002774656,0.00002088282,0.00072707946,0.00005284591,0.005453853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972687,0.00022199216,0.00006537883,0.00016606161,0.00020883548,0.000009889638,0.0001978152,0.0000061286455,0.0018552005],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98813206,0.0055059986,0.0008395581,0.0009894699,0.0010698767,0.0034630569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7198836,0.18566152,0.04229266,0.0051107397,0.006409073,0.040642373],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013584246,0.00039477128,0.0011133628,0.0019617632,0.0015213753,0.0046792366,0.0016076908,0.0029965704,0.019407513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08350554,0.00040081432,0.0021481274,0.0036373744,0.0019209984,0.0022507238,0.0024453984,0.003557786,0.0022432841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008129628,0.0017161533,0.9566192,0.00021154612,0.0020811323,0.00064320565,0.00047151552,0.0036929275,0.0023522684,0.0015313694,0.0035960372,0.018954974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003700849,0.001878355,0.9885073,0.00003132128,0.0012876423,0.00018243364,0.0017770167,0.0014544843,0.0012216343,0.0014644731,0.0017616776,0.00006356029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024701364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021572461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99803823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002608028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052352548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07184118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2308596676","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-1923-4","title":"“Listing author contribution” does not alter the author inflation in the publications in basic research in four major gastroenterology journals in 10 years","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Hepatology; Listing (finance); Internal medicine; Medicine; Gastroenterology; Impact factor; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.3680554104418968,"score_gpt":0.5282761647174701,"score_spread":0.16022075427557325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2308596676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8866699,0.0021568607,0.0032606502,0.02144783,0.007105155,0.000115664814,0.034045495,0.0020879267,0.04311065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763861,0.00020713502,0.0017083947,0.0015523842,0.0009944625,0.000045102202,0.008689036,0.00012992996,0.01028748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98587775,0.004081424,0.0019412804,0.0015461297,0.0046815495,0.0018719083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8947995,0.04525034,0.024929687,0.010536744,0.0152424155,0.0092413835],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009170493,0.00035178958,0.00087061623,0.0048309136,0.0010739354,0.003042956,0.0011055397,0.0013519285,0.020839255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075295575,0.00021809292,0.0009795285,0.008694596,0.0011310972,0.0020018485,0.0016140454,0.001279639,0.008268355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041044685,0.0006456758,0.67064,0.0010731122,0.0012142126,0.0006594305,0.001215745,0.0012170426,0.0069346353,0.008791383,0.10104438,0.20245992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017482266,0.0005848824,0.94718176,0.00012195816,0.00032590205,0.00042096977,0.0010006803,0.0015672706,0.0039107366,0.0042503932,0.040365886,0.00009479081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034860473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004547055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99864805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016408617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028587636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06971419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340061204","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-1953-y","title":"Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in Web of Science","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Austrian Science Fund; Multiple Sclerosis Society; Impact Fund","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Citation; Computer science; Citation index; Library science; Science Citation Index; Bibliometrics; Index (typography); Scientometrics; Data science; Political science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.8693361966360683,"score_gpt":0.5759535144275153,"score_spread":0.293382682208553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340061204","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22543873,0.009634805,0.56212807,0.14295442,0.0011128936,0.0035326926,0.02056968,0.0027674688,0.0318613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51595354,0.0025856406,0.4634898,0.0024614902,0.0006441375,0.0017482701,0.009835994,0.0007218743,0.0025592311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8624039,0.06921809,0.029216433,0.006014586,0.02943402,0.0037129428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45850864,0.3694922,0.039355803,0.05993002,0.06686902,0.005844309],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16469558,0.0011525287,0.002132979,0.025773853,0.0045947446,0.03366101,0.0064830035,0.005318374,0.0029687057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45805377,0.0017420523,0.0024990006,0.040565226,0.006107618,0.035515457,0.004830148,0.00807985,0.0011729018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072224066,0.0005582044,0.18822394,0.0032849961,0.00037515545,0.00085348956,0.0065565356,0.008580989,0.0070307795,0.4102995,0.03156363,0.34195048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024199154,0.00052606984,0.11577949,0.011830906,0.0008020016,0.004059226,0.023946749,0.1318206,0.023083327,0.45203233,0.23502757,0.00084977853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015113875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020213518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084942505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013739568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87100387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489636575","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-2094-z","title":"Global neuroscience and mental health research: a bibliometrics case study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Toronto","funders":"Faculty of Arts and Sciences; University of Toronto","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Mental health; Citation; Public health; Citation analysis; Social network analysis; Psychology; Gerontology; Library science; Medicine; Sociology; Social science; Psychiatry; Computer science","score_opus":0.8921782491564988,"score_gpt":0.7000762143745934,"score_spread":0.19210203478190535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489636575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79982495,0.007861116,0.010638053,0.045380455,0.00034083117,0.00053899304,0.0028566609,0.00009393381,0.13246498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803761,0.004736382,0.008888817,0.00075067277,0.00030943792,0.0001962178,0.00064231467,0.000038002298,0.004061995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98676723,0.007955592,0.0007801154,0.0004553714,0.0030412152,0.0010003659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95586705,0.034136876,0.0033086687,0.001451347,0.003166353,0.0020696502],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012249435,0.00046584362,0.0008113041,0.017198458,0.0068495977,0.0077026812,0.0015391009,0.004200983,0.005295009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038093895,0.00025988917,0.00091992086,0.04488532,0.004786523,0.005365879,0.005136581,0.0015116595,0.0005297665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005102363,0.00199227,0.30979604,0.0035522692,0.0003907762,0.031207053,0.109549046,0.004058672,0.001125924,0.2756951,0.04039852,0.22172414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019512752,0.00055759953,0.20184278,0.0032517456,0.000584582,0.026623089,0.42378944,0.010996027,0.0025329476,0.10835903,0.221075,0.00019254336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023182943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034721684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069871773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007997799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06478202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517558721","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-2098-8","title":"University–industry R&D linkage metrics: validity and applicability in world university rankings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Directorate-General for Education and Culture; Newfoundland and Labrador; Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap; European Commission","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Linkage (software); Metric (unit); Computer science; Data science; Index (typography); Strengths and weaknesses; Information retrieval; Operations research; Data mining; Mathematics; Marketing; Psychology; Business; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05807529621679081,"score_gpt":0.25030281545862426,"score_spread":0.19222751924183346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517558721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70815355,0.012088146,0.14777292,0.0074109235,0.0007854858,0.0005868615,0.009225718,0.0008723508,0.11310403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698457,0.0008263723,0.02549363,0.00016412699,0.00020834956,0.00029412645,0.0022912826,0.00009318022,0.0007831666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91885775,0.041522555,0.0062966603,0.004603551,0.027550802,0.0011686165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6788627,0.22132002,0.03579567,0.023937577,0.037592303,0.0024916932],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07610092,0.00078358664,0.0013874955,0.033304233,0.0023725305,0.010611677,0.0018695706,0.0012915467,0.002428666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30993655,0.00032762086,0.0010550427,0.08095351,0.003839794,0.007770765,0.0069320607,0.0013451134,0.0008975348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002612962,0.00013829181,0.5613394,0.0012416139,0.0015832547,0.000108803724,0.0041739764,0.006578139,0.0006972422,0.08169506,0.01049157,0.33169135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008965978,0.00081678247,0.6727028,0.0015155576,0.0007705549,0.00045844485,0.011684431,0.063622296,0.0045611854,0.16779055,0.07562597,0.00036170954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00429656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050781597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9666958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036134664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027706916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.402465},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2524791359","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-2134-8","title":"The linguistic patterns and rhetorical structure of citation context: an approach using n-grams","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Citation; Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Linguistic context; Function (biology); Natural (archaeology); Natural language processing; Information retrieval; Linguistic analysis; History; Library science; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.08286568018633636,"score_gpt":0.31700194935228493,"score_spread":0.23413626916594857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524791359","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3768719,0.006962447,0.5785939,0.0026854863,0.0003745612,0.00074577396,0.007578831,0.0024654223,0.023721654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83181566,0.0016836083,0.15940082,0.00014144422,0.00040639684,0.00062012934,0.0029229422,0.00031841558,0.0026906165],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446565,0.0029269957,0.0005187229,0.0007337331,0.0011923534,0.0001624626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.958456,0.03586601,0.0023588357,0.001162005,0.0018167933,0.00034040652],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006477996,0.0009318867,0.0012683982,0.02799213,0.0019810512,0.005871946,0.0012719424,0.0017523484,0.0023252412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039522123,0.0006491996,0.0012569443,0.02988831,0.0013966445,0.007938967,0.0019417485,0.0015722293,0.0009922113],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009291704,0.00088047463,0.11300619,0.0026026124,0.0012989731,0.00082550436,0.0123678725,0.023675742,0.019417124,0.16183953,0.010990588,0.6521662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011022818,0.0002922655,0.057552304,0.0007052216,0.0011027681,0.0007625041,0.0051315357,0.5478707,0.008416861,0.341279,0.036535654,0.00024100214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033211506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064835465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.993522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015032729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021792578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03425932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2579971484","doi":"10.1007/s11192-017-2283-4","title":"How to reduce the number of rating scale items without predictability loss?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"European Social Fund","keywords":"Predictability; Rating scale; Receiver operating characteristic; Statistics; Scale (ratio); Reliability (semiconductor); Confirmatory factor analysis; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Structural equation modeling","score_opus":0.5004341825675646,"score_gpt":0.5355242632854347,"score_spread":0.03509008071787012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2579971484","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14422202,0.0018096187,0.8386591,0.0065535833,0.0006071032,0.0012146574,0.00069081044,0.0015369396,0.0047060633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31764925,0.00076722825,0.67660064,0.0007466176,0.00046272585,0.0017266283,0.00076505967,0.00025689873,0.0010249773],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.94372654,0.0338179,0.0047220057,0.0036021136,0.013484245,0.00064720266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7764635,0.14077026,0.018045105,0.030387308,0.033034228,0.0012996129],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041828047,0.0014255139,0.001883939,0.0030591732,0.0010336206,0.0020941375,0.0018119222,0.000905928,0.0022813026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21079612,0.0006665721,0.0015198874,0.0038331428,0.0013898675,0.003465684,0.0016724596,0.0016610317,0.002232612],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055189454,0.00048232172,0.041797087,0.0014200606,0.00039922452,0.00021994024,0.0026520195,0.0027924185,0.015006342,0.0061773425,0.0099454485,0.9185559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079541915,0.0059472844,0.43801603,0.0033801429,0.0022615534,0.0043530646,0.012121147,0.21280567,0.08032536,0.1245402,0.11441073,0.0010433331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015390993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020471078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95817196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008002235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002161032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22121054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585136728","doi":"10.1007/s11192-017-2252-y","title":"Development trend forecasting for coherent light generator technology based on patent citation network analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National University of Defense Technology; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Trademark; Computer science; Technology forecasting; Autoregressive integrated moving average; Citation; Network analysis; Development (topology); Patent office; Data science; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Time series; Engineering; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.36211515557363344,"score_gpt":0.4023682443934626,"score_spread":0.04025308881982914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585136728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89450234,0.0018369219,0.091048084,0.00054381025,0.00011289001,0.000066095105,0.0030034194,0.00060894224,0.0082774535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882018,0.00061847654,0.008498128,0.0000137865345,0.000050185758,0.000029225115,0.0013113855,0.000022827779,0.001254117],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964476,0.00004311637,0.000031624615,0.00009895599,0.0001424071,0.000039128357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777716,0.0010550064,0.0004627263,0.00012403498,0.0005153433,0.000065655586],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009479387,0.00046565896,0.0004973254,0.0077014575,0.00033776392,0.0013547408,0.00047641434,0.00078952964,0.0016930077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005054339,0.0001679369,0.0007570018,0.005523775,0.00014002368,0.0022678087,0.0003110061,0.00045956342,0.00051009574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000338299,0.00025935937,0.26386413,0.00036246073,0.00032607577,0.00038522232,0.00019733993,0.38319376,0.009785639,0.010236692,0.00544879,0.32560223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070952465,0.000033107182,0.02153241,0.000016905366,0.00007667955,0.000042810054,0.000032058877,0.97216445,0.0024184296,0.0025423141,0.0011146619,0.000019022991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072212955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005314647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99229854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008809411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058491214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0143585205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592688325","doi":"10.1007/s11192-017-2318-x","title":"Evolution monitoring for innovation sources using patent cluster analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo; National University of Defense Technology; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Trademark; Computer science; Data science; Key (lock); Cluster (spacecraft); Cluster analysis; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Patent analysis; Citation; Scale (ratio); Spectral clustering; Data mining; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web; Geography","score_opus":0.4820857377646642,"score_gpt":0.4696832937935274,"score_spread":0.012402443971136767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592688325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.827493,0.0012127741,0.15215573,0.00031444963,0.00011237514,0.0002967543,0.0068130186,0.0026272314,0.008974644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94452065,0.00026799043,0.049940053,0.000015436204,0.00007209193,0.0001084801,0.0032117877,0.00011825696,0.0017453545],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979278,0.0002910705,0.00015339405,0.00049414684,0.0009008181,0.00023290748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98694694,0.00468654,0.0022112674,0.0014880248,0.004210575,0.0004566288],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023892054,0.000716599,0.00090537925,0.02779977,0.0009814141,0.00268454,0.0010604807,0.0008187087,0.0020548247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01259394,0.0002806168,0.0012498373,0.017155664,0.0002917328,0.0021148256,0.0010008013,0.0006456904,0.0010663809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006393965,0.00054885587,0.38575277,0.000448893,0.00091240776,0.00029337764,0.000650713,0.041920215,0.026617715,0.0055706566,0.0071298387,0.5295153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044397922,0.00023087276,0.29841107,0.0000689376,0.00057944783,0.00036077484,0.0004962788,0.65335214,0.032279585,0.0073244567,0.006690433,0.00016154756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012138316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009198269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9722002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011594341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00145875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024135292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596958794","doi":"10.1007/s11192-017-2350-x","title":"The impact of individual collaborative activities on knowledge creation and transmission","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Knowledge creation; Scopus; General partnership; NetLogo; Data science; Collaborative network; Computer science; Loyalty; Business; Political science; Marketing; Geography","score_opus":0.0632680637246128,"score_gpt":0.42701903140369407,"score_spread":0.36375096767908127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596958794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9537975,0.00072441634,0.009519218,0.00063836516,0.000038801198,0.0000709904,0.00031792698,0.00008157141,0.034811266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979755,0.00013294662,0.0012439913,0.000013599392,0.000022795579,0.000022209557,0.00007112239,0.00001327636,0.0005045351],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827445,0.008462613,0.0008473963,0.0018226804,0.0046742586,0.0014486166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7141972,0.2402027,0.009637364,0.019702481,0.010089588,0.0061705927],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014020089,0.0003257829,0.00081664586,0.004111395,0.0020152319,0.008496633,0.0010508427,0.0015097319,0.0050051142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12515551,0.00029995674,0.00083355117,0.0054026474,0.0024375557,0.0068080444,0.0044706096,0.0011666807,0.0007837602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018520395,0.0014112245,0.51229346,0.0012757038,0.0013493871,0.00059878913,0.013936393,0.022236748,0.017319378,0.06335836,0.002248379,0.36212018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015137598,0.0009765755,0.77683365,0.00023716532,0.0011464881,0.00070350093,0.014428174,0.04420932,0.015843807,0.1347458,0.010556938,0.00016714967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023639773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002426227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016139201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023453003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07414621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605555090","doi":"10.1007/s11192-017-2387-x","title":"Western classical music development: a statistical analysis of composers similarity, differentiation and evolution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Music and Audio Processing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Scientometrics; Statistical analysis; Sound analysis; Classical music; Musical; Association (psychology); Order (exchange); Evolutionary biology; Computer science; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Literature; Art; Mathematics; Statistics; Philosophy; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.05810941451857577,"score_gpt":0.3146336132466485,"score_spread":0.25652419872807275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605555090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97282636,0.0004992504,0.020383988,0.0002375807,0.000021830665,0.000054532884,0.0006921352,0.000105748935,0.0051784976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947925,0.00008682494,0.0040640724,0.000017418328,0.000024070647,0.00003868053,0.00053006556,0.00001585101,0.0004304252],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968298,0.0013846164,0.00022233037,0.000662524,0.0007696935,0.00013100766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832412,0.010101907,0.0030587597,0.0017576133,0.0011102436,0.00073027686],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004855143,0.00021064795,0.00048026015,0.007450679,0.00066314475,0.0013371424,0.00044110656,0.00039626702,0.002370317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020230595,0.00012120267,0.0006903201,0.009277896,0.0015937786,0.0011596052,0.0011249669,0.0005607995,0.00033852117],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019854071,0.0000538012,0.90827787,0.000106365784,0.00071107753,0.0001673956,0.0018506885,0.0021752915,0.0023849995,0.009754197,0.0009626,0.073357284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066224666,0.00016087976,0.97998846,0.0000143789475,0.000107507956,0.00022380655,0.0011212741,0.010763354,0.00047195493,0.004978061,0.0021417888,0.0000218941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034866682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002423971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005204615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006231085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025676727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2719511526","doi":"10.1007/s11192-017-2438-3","title":"Online distribution channel increases article usage on Mendeley: a randomized controlled trial","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation; Institute for Work & Health; University of Toronto; University Health Network; Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; MaRS","funders":"Ontario Centres of Excellence","keywords":"Randomized controlled trial; Computer science; Control (management); Distribution (mathematics); Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Surgery","score_opus":0.06917204241122363,"score_gpt":0.3152505920396897,"score_spread":0.24607854962846606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2719511526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760227,0.008086821,0.0012764538,0.0015702244,0.0013282889,0.007706257,0.0005791832,0.0002204507,0.0032095662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97401947,0.0037729552,0.004822725,0.0013517536,0.0010229342,0.01186332,0.0003561398,0.00003293367,0.0027577968],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549556,0.002806676,0.00044406243,0.0005421804,0.0003713872,0.00034004825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99067616,0.0053265076,0.002211969,0.0004911,0.0003591349,0.00093507505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004402984,0.0012424854,0.002452286,0.00080770947,0.0006763345,0.0015974005,0.0010854376,0.0030530118,0.012631346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012559902,0.0007151183,0.002794637,0.00084431656,0.001496513,0.0022113454,0.000780514,0.0032214918,0.0010558451],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.9193243,0.03820049,0.0017008552,0.002704395,0.002098498,0.00004914981,0.00013664513,0.00017323451,0.00076634274,0.00022409725,0.0010607007,0.03356132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.8517008,0.13936813,0.0040170737,0.00033618356,0.0019952722,0.00003209223,0.000077678495,0.0005114294,0.0006003608,0.0003616272,0.00096546125,0.000033888355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073830085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001093231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009759974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014578631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042256117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2724711068","doi":"10.1007/s11192-017-2459-y","title":"The scaling relationship between degree centrality of countries and their citation-based performance on Management Information Systems","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Degree (music); Citation; Exponent; Scaling; Degree distribution; Power law; Citation impact; China; Computer science; Complex network; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics; Political science; Physics; Law; Library science","score_opus":0.0761607441796123,"score_gpt":0.3116552854228882,"score_spread":0.23549454124327587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2724711068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848454,0.0007702018,0.006621776,0.00043137767,0.000016940909,0.000017114435,0.0002255133,0.000059120503,0.007012573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923146,0.00011159164,0.0003985413,0.000008052824,0.000017860657,0.00000465577,0.000070729984,0.000006124414,0.0001509665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767655,0.00087163603,0.00018614675,0.00032997865,0.00073781604,0.00019789573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90544444,0.07642015,0.008783705,0.0031227076,0.004934616,0.0012944207],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044199857,0.00029261276,0.00035058163,0.0060604913,0.00046534344,0.0017865442,0.00040283453,0.0004540633,0.0018313401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07735772,0.00016963236,0.00036088907,0.0064941826,0.0012532467,0.0028041867,0.0010274359,0.00051559584,0.00032879767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014144463,0.00013691698,0.8549779,0.00020128964,0.0004651502,0.0003506318,0.0019565402,0.058496036,0.003317938,0.027230332,0.0013096825,0.051415995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017276561,0.00015418329,0.8296177,0.00007240829,0.00012930106,0.0005370912,0.0011901455,0.13158564,0.0019564175,0.0323317,0.0023325197,0.00007569835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028086584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018866423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010694942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051242835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023375392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734032589","doi":"10.1007/s11192-017-2452-5","title":"Tracking the emergence of synthetic biology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Gene Regulatory Network Analysis","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of Naval Research; Office of Defense Programs; National Key Research and Development Program of China; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; Directorate for Biological Sciences; National Institutes of Health; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Russian Foundation for Basic Research; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Wellcome Trust; Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India; U.S. Department of Energy; U.S. Department of Defense; European Commission; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Science Foundation; American Heart Association; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; Howard Hughes Medical Institute","keywords":"Synthetic biology; Systems biology; Domain (mathematical analysis); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Benchmark (surveying); Multidisciplinary approach; Data science; Biology; Computational biology; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.03642355739386737,"score_gpt":0.32851887235283084,"score_spread":0.29209531495896346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734032589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87783474,0.010553724,0.028472971,0.004886326,0.0001637935,0.00018592727,0.014483609,0.00053927285,0.06287972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96611583,0.0055876053,0.018209897,0.00017100436,0.00020587677,0.00017003367,0.0071926173,0.00011538006,0.0022318098],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928885,0.001714091,0.000706103,0.00088601443,0.003320421,0.00048488437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9402182,0.028619083,0.014459493,0.0038311428,0.010859471,0.0020125844],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008963114,0.0004441877,0.00093264977,0.048502933,0.0012511159,0.007173984,0.00082351913,0.0006606382,0.0027018765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06011544,0.0003297655,0.0006633846,0.08424673,0.0013803416,0.006449917,0.0036221724,0.0008035183,0.000560466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042310284,0.00010266414,0.5508071,0.0022679304,0.0004933794,0.00055887835,0.0041778097,0.014326142,0.0037771307,0.17889363,0.012902408,0.23126988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058112462,0.0002555112,0.67043453,0.00086152705,0.00022022505,0.0010078776,0.007361098,0.05793099,0.006654762,0.09496968,0.16009529,0.00015037935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061553866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006234392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004552426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002636847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047402024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775516587","doi":"10.1007/s11192-017-2593-6","title":"Assessing the effect of the United States’ “citation advantage” on other countries’ scientific impact as measured in the Web of Science (WoS) database","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Relation (database); Citation database; Visibility; Citation analysis; Computer science; Database; Citation impact; Data science; Political science; Regional science; Library science; Scopus; Sociology; Geography; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.4570312116954996,"score_gpt":0.6150197274678524,"score_spread":0.1579885157723528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775516587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931578,0.00065531774,0.00021134346,0.0005834924,0.00006495224,0.000009748305,0.0018835859,0.000022684106,0.0034110001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982218,0.00012210515,0.00014900789,0.000061416125,0.000047889716,0.0000070526266,0.0011021643,0.000006105007,0.00028255137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922726,0.0044037537,0.0006866388,0.0009808136,0.0010752465,0.0005809217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8907237,0.08838495,0.010680414,0.00246423,0.0043807067,0.0033660645],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010293605,0.0004351253,0.0007127193,0.004102619,0.0005755539,0.0025466634,0.00061522407,0.0008705591,0.0036028156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047302995,0.00013896715,0.0021449816,0.008047278,0.0007365591,0.0016887537,0.0016464619,0.0012319273,0.00052554405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012217977,0.00025389178,0.9843428,0.000116437965,0.0027814072,0.0001255114,0.00016470996,0.0010360272,0.00039992662,0.00054320734,0.0010818687,0.007932304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066828805,0.0005213202,0.9937543,0.000022089816,0.0016313442,0.00007328267,0.00045075582,0.0014598703,0.00057732494,0.0002281774,0.0011975612,0.000017148659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018190905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016651815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99589735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066366664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013987934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054438412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784275186","doi":"10.1007/s11192-018-2991-4","title":"Edge Factors: Scientific Frontier Positions of Nations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Frontier; Work (physics); Position (finance); China; Political science; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Data science; Sociology; Epistemology; Public relations; Computer science; Engineering; Business; Law; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.6933349039972806,"score_gpt":0.6011293296615132,"score_spread":0.09220557433576737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784275186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9105783,0.0016347907,0.0037123535,0.0014324907,0.000096372605,0.000018345998,0.0040856106,0.000060875936,0.0783808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630797,0.00024922605,0.0004796617,0.00003327476,0.000040650597,0.000005508289,0.00073452445,0.000010305602,0.0021389585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994917,0.00011676383,0.000032053144,0.00009956499,0.00012859833,0.00013129301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445575,0.002748924,0.0011012938,0.00018723842,0.0008005675,0.00070622284],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007656526,0.0002657905,0.00026844675,0.004134388,0.0005596493,0.0033583064,0.00023730243,0.00062943186,0.014394048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010924939,0.00007785306,0.00027368357,0.007166808,0.0005782601,0.003095246,0.00086157647,0.00067715714,0.0008787806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039261786,0.00013861932,0.7413422,0.00030069027,0.00036296985,0.0004296791,0.0026517822,0.006704005,0.0011528148,0.1329226,0.014744487,0.098857604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032170854,0.00015511322,0.86466765,0.00021066346,0.00023563956,0.00028459195,0.008412499,0.008169271,0.001246097,0.0923465,0.024186747,0.000053032683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055061816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064453078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067135296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066092855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048152864},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2795529249","doi":"10.1007/s11192-018-2732-8","title":"Can Twitter increase the visibility of Chinese publications?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Visibility; Social media; Citation; China; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Geography; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5383689152925458,"score_gpt":0.5912490065647195,"score_spread":0.052880091272173635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795529249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87274486,0.0057499264,0.0013130588,0.02612841,0.0008829494,0.000057883946,0.0022456846,0.00021875133,0.09065838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949934,0.001098383,0.00015354571,0.00038525293,0.00052875926,0.000013085793,0.0002049975,0.000016177826,0.0026063789],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975484,0.0007423538,0.00014901179,0.00030020592,0.0007465055,0.00051345467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9716395,0.013780363,0.006157314,0.0015420915,0.004176702,0.0027040879],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034385026,0.00033031488,0.00046135025,0.0050570876,0.0019715184,0.0060069086,0.0007313535,0.0013028589,0.013454439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027975326,0.00021493426,0.00051859923,0.00747478,0.0014891905,0.008483963,0.0025779083,0.0010489363,0.0011999427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087422185,0.00030417505,0.71404916,0.0010377187,0.00037993863,0.0011953323,0.018152352,0.0009025139,0.0028245104,0.035318363,0.03312455,0.19183716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015348147,0.00044969248,0.83813566,0.00057845085,0.0007258838,0.0004899522,0.02575452,0.008972548,0.004666322,0.025410658,0.09451679,0.00014599439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016066115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014163169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022526851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002883464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045009553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888141929","doi":"10.1007/s11192-018-2889-1","title":"Bibliometric study of family business succession between 1939 and 2017: mapping and analyzing authors’ networks","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Family Business Performance and Succession","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Scope (computer science); Ecological succession; Family business; Social network analysis; Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Data science; Citation impact; Sociology; Citation; Computer science; Knowledge management; Library science; Social science; Political science; Management; Social capital; Economics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.07934125063747188,"score_gpt":0.31367773812755384,"score_spread":0.23433648749008196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888141929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9637058,0.006602064,0.0005523622,0.00067458866,0.00009159804,0.000036551286,0.0136393905,0.000050506675,0.01464704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98515666,0.0027948339,0.0006370279,0.00003799138,0.0001274661,0.00003795987,0.008472789,0.000013839528,0.0027214263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979728,0.0003663912,0.00044238186,0.00024502698,0.00072413817,0.00024920056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98240227,0.005463286,0.0059060743,0.00077188195,0.004237437,0.0012191117],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002116529,0.00021684052,0.00041718455,0.047226276,0.0012947305,0.0018231961,0.00047669013,0.00047444616,0.0026234142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017774204,0.00012930541,0.00043980984,0.07281334,0.00054239767,0.001804078,0.0014276094,0.0003929212,0.0010265142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016563323,0.00007628584,0.90326935,0.0005947029,0.00027154564,0.0005996896,0.004976485,0.00070766313,0.0008232395,0.0029571294,0.008968504,0.0765899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043900286,0.00003408142,0.9616744,0.00018693636,0.00009690799,0.00046681063,0.0048583555,0.0007628279,0.0006644062,0.00046451867,0.030766819,0.000019586438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03424084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053431567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95277375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019373934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035795337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06808305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900764028","doi":"10.1007/s11192-018-2959-4","title":"Capturing the economic value of triadic patents","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Patent analysis; Cover (algebra); Test (biology); European patent office; Patent application; Business; Computer science; Regional science; International trade; Data science; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Machine learning","score_opus":0.17710943657854503,"score_gpt":0.26109806541647806,"score_spread":0.08398862883793304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900764028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8810865,0.0036733875,0.054157,0.0020189648,0.0002741336,0.000087124914,0.004075849,0.00041026695,0.05421674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99125075,0.0007941114,0.005095562,0.000045570723,0.00022950298,0.000026080168,0.0011613903,0.000031306827,0.0013657156],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970522,0.00094634295,0.00018409191,0.0004031246,0.0011215765,0.00029267895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709764,0.017786808,0.004383617,0.0029672158,0.0026212283,0.0012646617],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032866409,0.00055150635,0.0010084704,0.018699342,0.00096285634,0.006068792,0.0010152889,0.0012502231,0.0061012735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04273304,0.00016830255,0.0005940022,0.03367323,0.0011079488,0.008120222,0.0021237128,0.0012338925,0.0015466661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005986696,0.0005308695,0.2738397,0.0006746607,0.0005741574,0.0009315656,0.00089504773,0.05383338,0.0072566024,0.29793674,0.014166816,0.34876177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006836235,0.0002946349,0.2127849,0.00021972654,0.00031328562,0.0008913292,0.0021629618,0.29065338,0.004825473,0.4575128,0.03013733,0.00013581119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033623835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004088109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98130065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017117107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014671729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020410836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905418571","doi":"10.1007/s11192-018-2981-6","title":"An approach to conference selection and evaluation: advice to avoid “predatory” conferences","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Conferences and Exhibitions Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Hip and Knee Clinic; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Selection (genetic algorithm); Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.11067442992493984,"score_gpt":0.40623693506175124,"score_spread":0.29556250513681137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905418571","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18571697,0.0069902944,0.32446304,0.28113678,0.017460864,0.099611714,0.000822079,0.010189784,0.07360849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22863413,0.004191486,0.6428482,0.034307465,0.00521932,0.06308796,0.00058198354,0.0009345346,0.020194978],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.58097714,0.32781368,0.03909388,0.0052291453,0.041223273,0.0056629847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.41736013,0.26690018,0.056280773,0.030273905,0.19902001,0.030164976],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2654611,0.0018989235,0.002072906,0.008116225,0.010033084,0.011578023,0.007544788,0.0067739394,0.009605192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46742943,0.0017006018,0.00215888,0.0044959695,0.0044118846,0.00977778,0.0092391735,0.0091971,0.0071725785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019504678,0.0023050236,0.013503225,0.0031020427,0.00020591314,0.0017799124,0.06419802,0.001378585,0.006834335,0.0038162821,0.30954045,0.59138584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020392062,0.0065337415,0.04208672,0.011021391,0.00046759253,0.004131148,0.1458742,0.017773231,0.01528132,0.02995791,0.7227547,0.0020788035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003330972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007938749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99188375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00860595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02524563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9058173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906809950","doi":"10.1007/s11192-018-2987-0","title":"Publishing in English or another language: An inclusive study of scholar’s language publication preferences in the natural, social and interdisciplinary sciences","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Reputation; English language; Contrast (vision); Sociology; Linguistics; First language; Inclusion (mineral); Social science; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.061364195641559476,"score_gpt":0.3791982291499634,"score_spread":0.3178340335084039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906809950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914522,0.0006019445,0.00036500156,0.0009186027,0.00003144085,0.000019221916,0.00012662652,0.000005620087,0.006479344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857295,0.00034087783,0.00030107502,0.00016778795,0.00004561073,0.000017161816,0.00009014954,0.0000104097835,0.0004538755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824254,0.009688005,0.0024633678,0.00057673606,0.0038303225,0.0010162081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.821491,0.12242564,0.03306049,0.003820362,0.012332997,0.0068694386],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018827165,0.00016519803,0.00064991746,0.012703215,0.0029422557,0.009776506,0.00075293833,0.0008135643,0.0028538678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12175395,0.00018059966,0.00040024632,0.018517926,0.002192082,0.0089461105,0.0049340506,0.0011486805,0.00038565547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009888301,0.00041347265,0.65378416,0.00049695495,0.00028850872,0.00066656875,0.25855547,0.00013693717,0.0019681961,0.009380591,0.001683228,0.071637034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007373967,0.00052672205,0.46845165,0.00044244115,0.00024746885,0.0013975098,0.5006793,0.0010583081,0.0016547313,0.00638132,0.018966878,0.00011988995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016335665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034682525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99022347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012547689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027771946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099568784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909243384","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03011-4","title":"Bibliometric and text mining approaches to evaluate landfill design standards","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Municipal Solid Waste Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Index (typography); Per capita; Government (linguistics); Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Table (database); Statistics; Environmental science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Database; Sociology","score_opus":0.1828976481759,"score_gpt":0.32018661246674013,"score_spread":0.13728896429084012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909243384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65758663,0.007765344,0.1645256,0.0033748087,0.00044521628,0.0028452557,0.033676233,0.0026426148,0.12713829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86597687,0.002225977,0.10586665,0.00014870297,0.00036597924,0.0015172838,0.018867379,0.00016304765,0.0048681516],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9566229,0.010329471,0.0060294094,0.0014230051,0.024730362,0.0008647923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84788615,0.09031852,0.01667758,0.0073165675,0.03613731,0.0016638549],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023478407,0.00090876326,0.0016453664,0.11977614,0.0018818546,0.00792988,0.0016934759,0.0012517923,0.005314829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.112231344,0.00028171105,0.0018750919,0.107246056,0.001298562,0.0054605925,0.0025185128,0.0008420772,0.0013966324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007953101,0.0014661064,0.20377856,0.00445449,0.0012729428,0.00021207024,0.0021311245,0.016985629,0.006047905,0.04150668,0.015395105,0.7059541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051196717,0.0017935431,0.58241355,0.0016773235,0.002130771,0.0007277416,0.011839528,0.19498618,0.022410281,0.10009087,0.0810475,0.0003707866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066127796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010579479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8802239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004757254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076358914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124167144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921565448","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03066-3","title":"What characterises funded biomedical research? Evidence from a basic and a clinical domain","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada; National Cancer Institute; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; National Institutes of Health; Impact Fund; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; European Commission; National Research Centre; Nature","keywords":"Basic research; Public funding; Political science; Institution; Public domain; Public institution; Public relations; Public administration; Library science","score_opus":0.8248587450899906,"score_gpt":0.6784602035793619,"score_spread":0.1463985415106287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921565448","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41794065,0.43935397,0.010986593,0.07960161,0.0018726155,0.00057639705,0.006610511,0.00010006187,0.042957667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9406457,0.045885965,0.004179148,0.004656815,0.0015577008,0.00026491206,0.0021466585,0.00003831397,0.00062479725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.85014087,0.08150322,0.02850771,0.0066806856,0.029920017,0.0032474448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.30839399,0.53298074,0.098185115,0.019718772,0.032650612,0.00807076],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.114416,0.00091164245,0.0038847406,0.041868027,0.0014983816,0.0129702715,0.0036510348,0.0041587395,0.0056577083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38067406,0.00074071554,0.0039472813,0.054803524,0.008081115,0.009932451,0.0063027604,0.0020725026,0.0009707526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002898439,0.0004522898,0.675184,0.030464314,0.012047691,0.00050941424,0.004737148,0.0012479944,0.0004848367,0.034181662,0.008250018,0.22954217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057337835,0.00096565956,0.8356738,0.025763404,0.0077197165,0.00254721,0.010016715,0.0019073538,0.0009274532,0.06243085,0.05125981,0.0002146645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043503037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005798811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95813197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00689615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0124875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60509694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921935945","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03059-2","title":"The progressive substitution of hazard ratios for relative risks in biomedical research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Hazard ratio; Relative risk; Medicine; Hazard; Statistics; Confidence interval; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Demography; Mathematics; Business; Chemistry; Sociology","score_opus":0.9042976211939502,"score_gpt":0.6664328341718819,"score_spread":0.23786478702206826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921935945","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01511313,0.11434318,0.84337986,0.016189687,0.0033418927,0.0005813279,0.0018328484,0.0012457933,0.0039722384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41352886,0.046962403,0.519539,0.008150932,0.0038609148,0.0019860503,0.0007414179,0.00094355375,0.004286855],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.49509948,0.43909153,0.022516884,0.019501146,0.02265936,0.0011315503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.13718322,0.8032063,0.015087542,0.038171783,0.005768749,0.00058244215],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.36239827,0.004495165,0.013147038,0.016758628,0.0010641777,0.00896485,0.008204294,0.007104695,0.00617925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7360983,0.0039424133,0.016319761,0.021484895,0.011797367,0.017757928,0.008933014,0.012893336,0.0014611927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041893697,0.00016750171,0.04179287,0.047904845,0.11757025,0.001597248,0.0028823148,0.04486329,0.0015372455,0.27682826,0.014166943,0.44649985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001643489,0.001473696,0.011916975,0.0073346375,0.03508826,0.0028462838,0.0005734442,0.08065029,0.0016003662,0.84043866,0.015993398,0.00044056683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041543674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035575493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033634254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054513323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78627646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945259118","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03120-0","title":"Identifying emerging scholars: seeing through the crystal ball of scholarship selection committees","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Percentage point; Competition (biology); Psychology; Point (geometry); Selection (genetic algorithm); Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.5381788305996781,"score_gpt":0.5673536692852789,"score_spread":0.02917483868560078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945259118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46135178,0.005516664,0.13479385,0.10345023,0.0038342865,0.0013062166,0.0020734482,0.00089979166,0.28677374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9091627,0.0014545087,0.041506972,0.003543493,0.0009744969,0.0005430279,0.0011882513,0.0004555977,0.041171033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696704,0.015060917,0.001437579,0.0024370847,0.008974949,0.0024191155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87737614,0.059105914,0.011118845,0.008608853,0.033112746,0.010677476],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03195272,0.0004970223,0.0021194385,0.01013451,0.010842192,0.01712346,0.0027914762,0.0032422906,0.018938491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18135944,0.0007948773,0.0006555604,0.008907771,0.006694509,0.013188888,0.010301696,0.0035272143,0.004689581],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012135076,0.00028896803,0.088393934,0.0008298056,0.00014682056,0.0008982535,0.027821442,0.003050701,0.0019455471,0.37261984,0.19117747,0.31161368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022839522,0.00038720912,0.043960184,0.0010131788,0.000115061725,0.00078271446,0.07182003,0.031750448,0.003214146,0.5450954,0.30139953,0.00023377156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022311082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027887607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003959529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01017933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16898417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954205856","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03157-1","title":"How collaboration type, publication place, funding and author’s role affect citations received by publications from Africa: A bibliometric study of LIS research from 1996 to 2015","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Incentive; Library science; Political science; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Public relations; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.5915490014438257,"score_gpt":0.5835091969205798,"score_spread":0.00803980452324593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954205856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936109,0.0020943682,0.00008429544,0.0004030165,0.000014915855,0.0000066998687,0.0013752261,0.000003882904,0.0024066074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749714,0.0012100954,0.000096000185,0.000020018988,0.00001783549,0.0000065560434,0.00047350882,0.0000052372625,0.00067363644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983753,0.00045853877,0.00029835125,0.00019668914,0.0003196202,0.00035145684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97008735,0.013387554,0.012311834,0.00040232105,0.0028138282,0.0009971249],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029989462,0.00024288733,0.00035849848,0.011854422,0.0008138345,0.0033120844,0.00042576098,0.00055518566,0.0019904645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026864307,0.00017905989,0.00044598914,0.03885023,0.00068091863,0.0035208298,0.0014748977,0.0004817264,0.0005012326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014639032,0.000034063578,0.9684785,0.00037874776,0.00015770257,0.00035844193,0.008503473,0.0002652941,0.0003015206,0.0009838714,0.0009397235,0.01945221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056373974,0.000037986967,0.9820998,0.000305525,0.0001230744,0.0002511675,0.011801825,0.00022786511,0.00034275604,0.00020445554,0.004588941,0.0000110553965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018969836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029374385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99700105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016991227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022427763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037718832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955327859","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03111-1","title":"On the development of China’s leadership in international collaborations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"International Student and Expatriate Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"China; Political science; Regional science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.21961104703660078,"score_gpt":0.3793214619532546,"score_spread":0.15971041491665383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955327859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9549929,0.0010244496,0.0004574283,0.0041117757,0.00010495147,0.00003737851,0.0002449937,0.000015919368,0.03901016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863154,0.00019933018,0.00006941306,0.000055079807,0.00001947947,0.00000645948,0.000056089026,0.0000012580111,0.0009613168],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980598,0.00043828474,0.00011422116,0.00015917522,0.00044870362,0.00077977654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433374,0.0007915043,0.0009927191,0.00023697416,0.0014444996,0.0022006114],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002835323,0.00029035236,0.00029862762,0.0046722665,0.002984436,0.0038283567,0.0005281578,0.00048676392,0.0047245226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053916103,0.00008896573,0.00027543897,0.006256292,0.0014133885,0.0021191754,0.002578957,0.0006404021,0.00027273074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016469498,0.0001779029,0.729097,0.00027977725,0.00012206232,0.00083810044,0.013708641,0.0029455214,0.0012409638,0.10377141,0.013437774,0.1342162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001597338,0.00014689955,0.9454324,0.00013479682,0.000043943877,0.000085107604,0.01522492,0.0033475372,0.00049228396,0.008266463,0.026776705,0.000032968772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033423606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051343296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045130756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013171671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066458106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955873301","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03146-4","title":"The citation advantage of foreign language references for Chinese social science papers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Citation; Internationalization; Foreign language; Citation index; Impact factor; Scientific communication; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Social science; Consumption (sociology); Artifact (error); Scientometrics; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Computer science; Library science; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.34542183294758166,"score_gpt":0.5814282516665357,"score_spread":0.236006418718954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955873301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642742,0.011004146,0.0007115857,0.0006827139,0.0003927803,0.000016546464,0.003911747,0.000108063105,0.018898215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935596,0.0016741023,0.00032390567,0.00004847045,0.00039617537,0.000008892184,0.0016641822,0.000019376823,0.0023053875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972217,0.00036558392,0.0004476258,0.00046594304,0.0011415735,0.00035764804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98040384,0.008004749,0.0035153914,0.0009385447,0.0056736437,0.0014638366],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037118753,0.0004561404,0.00092703995,0.027055794,0.0012926605,0.0047832215,0.0007736175,0.0008365059,0.0069789905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022367356,0.0001257901,0.0010906642,0.028662166,0.0006717565,0.003162649,0.0014598679,0.00051563786,0.0013871586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010697162,0.00018961633,0.7911611,0.0019650855,0.0019960196,0.0018974141,0.0037939218,0.0014350736,0.011969581,0.012992573,0.007975752,0.16355407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000780219,0.00030973833,0.9603936,0.00016698713,0.0023853283,0.0013540806,0.002490756,0.003538411,0.004658825,0.0063562877,0.018156983,0.00011095462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0086230375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011148055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019888491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023564883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02334702},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2962062541","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03166-0","title":"Visualizing music similarity: clustering and mapping 500 classical music composers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Music and Audio Processing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Multidimensional scaling; Similarity (geometry); Cluster analysis; Dendrogram; Distance matrices in phylogeny; Canonical correlation; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Pattern recognition (psychology); Combinatorics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.06368608730831339,"score_gpt":0.28835309034117484,"score_spread":0.22466700303286147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962062541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9124632,0.0005889049,0.059895173,0.00021407135,0.000083416526,0.00023285675,0.0026279085,0.0014364144,0.022458006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90229756,0.0003198376,0.090585895,0.000016745926,0.000040980653,0.00012971749,0.0026332606,0.00021611946,0.0037599867],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992926,0.000128828,0.000056228484,0.0001498577,0.00031462955,0.00005790133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831414,0.000671433,0.0001742396,0.00016383242,0.00056053343,0.0001158219],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010016928,0.00039305422,0.00042656495,0.009199968,0.00082592387,0.001340768,0.0003334965,0.00039305683,0.0058303704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004775417,0.00015793002,0.0003401531,0.008086043,0.00045088536,0.0008719002,0.00088425196,0.00022949533,0.0009783258],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070977485,0.00021518493,0.059862804,0.000811294,0.00029060163,0.00053672935,0.016147774,0.0125659155,0.02877102,0.011501726,0.011814045,0.8567732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013627954,0.000537683,0.6474554,0.0002770339,0.0003873785,0.0018317889,0.039654393,0.16100568,0.031829122,0.024601657,0.09194544,0.00033826922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007118722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009792768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005294762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042417113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019504547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962098473","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03181-1","title":"Territorial innovation models: to be or not to be, that’s the question","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Regional Development and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"H2020 Societal Challenges; Eusko Jaurlaritza","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Field (mathematics); Regional science; Divergence (linguistics); Urban agglomeration; Computer science; Economic geography; Data science; Sociology; Knowledge management; Geography; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2503429839231957,"score_gpt":0.42876411249566576,"score_spread":0.17842112857247006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962098473","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045374677,0.01067573,0.024827415,0.82714665,0.0030461045,0.00004777378,0.0009538851,0.00025565378,0.087672025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9362254,0.0059419307,0.010173082,0.03371759,0.0031125667,0.00011714708,0.0005412764,0.00029406036,0.009876856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98555076,0.009079512,0.00035381073,0.002103654,0.0018116559,0.0011006125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9351584,0.036158007,0.0046827057,0.010383043,0.008595172,0.0050226552],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02885869,0.0005886722,0.0019121186,0.0022594538,0.0029626344,0.015010997,0.0027063154,0.005326892,0.011727689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090129934,0.00038627913,0.0008766401,0.004647298,0.019709209,0.028209861,0.003683761,0.0053899693,0.0033402024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070782844,0.00006559417,0.006908794,0.0003188278,0.00020164426,0.000031039683,0.0015352383,0.0011799049,0.00011268861,0.8860871,0.061801232,0.041687068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037306992,0.000019861194,0.002793644,0.00031703353,0.000041669875,0.00006746874,0.0040374734,0.002133118,0.0001468319,0.92488533,0.06548221,0.00003803098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011657218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013427226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99774057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063388017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0080702165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15262115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971101863","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03215-8","title":"Cooperation, scale-invariance and complex innovation systems: a generalization","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Generalization; Scale (ratio); Scale invariance; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Geography; Cartography; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03896026622934054,"score_gpt":0.2602012405683491,"score_spread":0.22124097433900855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971101863","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35785994,0.011655307,0.4319983,0.016370524,0.00050313,0.000324848,0.0005474305,0.00040724088,0.1803333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98307574,0.0015134915,0.011743231,0.00036389203,0.00030105098,0.00010539923,0.00006619711,0.000023154109,0.002807778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759585,0.00064162945,0.00013887437,0.0007372193,0.00054770155,0.00033861352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913822,0.0039175493,0.0018646873,0.0015243478,0.00069587165,0.0006154498],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004590513,0.0006798957,0.001056936,0.0019137466,0.0010578113,0.0031152335,0.00090084237,0.001209827,0.0051348247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009910464,0.00030258976,0.0018888831,0.0020214587,0.0073394873,0.004810709,0.0039642635,0.001759864,0.00062802434],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025788138,0.000044798733,0.005933705,0.0001919914,0.000099843106,0.00017297486,0.0011088994,0.015877744,0.0006595961,0.9501112,0.001528127,0.024245173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019153122,0.000053152664,0.004864312,0.000027715021,0.00002109238,0.00014287146,0.00024610755,0.01848719,0.00008527006,0.9706652,0.0053637177,0.00002428114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028032842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007273438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021134054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010866268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02427721},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2983983302","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03280-z","title":"Deep and narrow impact: introducing location filtered citation counting","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Information retrieval; Biomedicine; Data science; Citation analysis; Rank (graph theory); Scientometrics; Data mining; Mathematics; Library science; Bioinformatics; Biology","score_opus":0.35873592871164445,"score_gpt":0.5378950683652745,"score_spread":0.17915913965363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983983302","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028273132,0.0017331223,0.9548269,0.001150038,0.0005754488,0.00014798465,0.00074893405,0.0016672416,0.010877064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.530212,0.0022140348,0.44945827,0.0007961203,0.0025145775,0.00039221765,0.001768841,0.0011231584,0.011520857],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99072343,0.0026300102,0.0006505298,0.0016883713,0.0035858408,0.00072182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94698906,0.030169232,0.0048113097,0.007465737,0.008980441,0.0015843093],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010180747,0.0015239677,0.0030910333,0.01961381,0.0020582157,0.0095081,0.0038080092,0.0031437117,0.0048207366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.091649204,0.0010385202,0.0014935703,0.016630264,0.00215653,0.014690659,0.007893325,0.003734723,0.002068852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031745943,0.00042860437,0.018972619,0.00054628635,0.00039471214,0.0003258213,0.00066706626,0.0456023,0.0030093798,0.36443248,0.010243891,0.5550594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055776083,0.000091122616,0.0035940744,0.00024117464,0.000256925,0.00017838475,0.00022974725,0.44125295,0.0032950318,0.53344333,0.01724758,0.00011398358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043236245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006132678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021976703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003622463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05384153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986816625","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03285-8","title":"The national system of researchers in Mexico: implications of publication incentives for researchers in social sciences","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Science, Technology, and Education in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Incentive; Promotion (chess); SNi; Revocation; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Economics; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.3660182259990773,"score_gpt":0.5331802589625843,"score_spread":0.16716203296350696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986816625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9467487,0.0011574307,0.00080631213,0.032356072,0.000058792688,0.00009371903,0.0016022904,0.000028222978,0.017148444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996768,0.00029002715,0.0005221467,0.00073367805,0.000060491853,0.000068340385,0.00028771718,0.0000054642774,0.0012641809],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.988846,0.005865211,0.00086919364,0.0009902751,0.0012868901,0.002142421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90270466,0.0462084,0.027067754,0.0036984542,0.009115462,0.01120522],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014279618,0.00014088229,0.0007645153,0.0039826008,0.0042174095,0.005332969,0.0012539786,0.0014165875,0.008133521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069227844,0.0002739159,0.00029460917,0.006108394,0.0018758249,0.0029308496,0.0034964688,0.0009764512,0.00022455379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003358097,0.00023552292,0.9254226,0.00015748662,0.00014002423,0.0002017549,0.003511727,0.0007550993,0.0004302463,0.046338245,0.004468745,0.018002862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015229189,0.000094280134,0.9721747,0.00020003734,0.000083734296,0.00010790834,0.0063829003,0.0014277581,0.00021529176,0.009857462,0.009275395,0.000028193042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06357443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10198755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00672057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012550266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12640876},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2987668259","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03291-w","title":"Evaluating medical conferences: the emerging need for a quality metric","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Hip and Knee Clinic; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Scope (computer science); Quality (philosophy); Metric (unit); Publishing; Observational study; Computer science; Library science; Ranking (information retrieval); Political science; Medicine; Business; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.8632070423881478,"score_gpt":0.7154768984215607,"score_spread":0.14773014396658712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987668259","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08812633,0.2634358,0.3230178,0.24549869,0.008044943,0.0005731502,0.0032417118,0.0010686647,0.06699291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6723621,0.061392844,0.23986183,0.0075138886,0.012191145,0.0005961625,0.0021246471,0.00040555536,0.0035517407],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9123923,0.0390412,0.008899041,0.0034818847,0.035222717,0.00096288905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6291033,0.23071933,0.03911698,0.011591859,0.0789587,0.010509906],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09008127,0.001213188,0.0038828661,0.031239811,0.001719946,0.022863923,0.0032110906,0.0039354744,0.003465669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29894662,0.0003826401,0.0009471984,0.032144755,0.004259537,0.017944248,0.004328618,0.003433658,0.000848702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030164002,0.00040844697,0.054012805,0.0059015458,0.0007818431,0.00006779688,0.0008482517,0.006788179,0.0009568855,0.1781715,0.035237934,0.71652323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001928474,0.00133892,0.06524535,0.0071059475,0.0007836672,0.00066272874,0.007461706,0.07664776,0.0032199682,0.6886451,0.14824364,0.00045236776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035286208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004649257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9687602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0079839565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012048221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47640097},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2989484692","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03301-x","title":"Do articles in open access journals have more frequent altmetric activity than articles in subscription-based journals? An investigation of the research output of Finnish universities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Turun Yliopisto","keywords":"Altmetrics; Discipline; Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Social media; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.838152280754456,"score_gpt":0.6455667087672443,"score_spread":0.1925855719872117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989484692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99326444,0.0010676997,0.00030005226,0.00025024443,0.00003563472,0.000026342084,0.0007693393,0.000010322519,0.0042759487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983316,0.00040191837,0.00018815685,0.00002853516,0.00007264311,0.000019400679,0.0004634517,0.0000071426603,0.00048720487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99160695,0.0019151017,0.001827177,0.0011128639,0.0027279148,0.0008100394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9074108,0.05556415,0.025274768,0.0022608207,0.0065483116,0.0029411982],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008427206,0.00034334336,0.000693315,0.01350868,0.0011354105,0.005366983,0.0006843494,0.00089534046,0.0052178707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063900284,0.0002105929,0.0008833063,0.018014345,0.0011731354,0.003730272,0.0029875662,0.00041769666,0.0009842133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035258528,0.00010411146,0.9596991,0.0006300591,0.00024864508,0.000508191,0.015253242,0.00013283094,0.0011366385,0.00079670944,0.0004198752,0.020718029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009326968,0.00011982936,0.9823498,0.00009192167,0.00014745127,0.00026849326,0.013581686,0.00023175824,0.00047911066,0.00041786124,0.002282898,0.000019938047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004726922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032220185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012262786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001218159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044567823},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2998363348","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03339-x","title":"The role of Web of Science publications in China’s tenure system","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"China; Web of science; Political science; World Wide Web; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.40245736986760666,"score_gpt":0.5294233401406908,"score_spread":0.12696597027308415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998363348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9721614,0.0023755205,0.00042297962,0.0029353676,0.00008425253,0.000022346725,0.0005727888,0.000040117946,0.021385208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997908,0.00028663225,0.0000775164,0.000065742024,0.000054818574,0.0000050564777,0.00010901123,0.000004260821,0.0014890231],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732447,0.00052999955,0.00026163372,0.00027422694,0.00092286296,0.0006867874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98323154,0.004982883,0.0037193443,0.00060664304,0.0036285007,0.003831079],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030453727,0.00018781301,0.0004729696,0.010384246,0.0026374375,0.0061457735,0.00083381607,0.0007768839,0.0071341167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011950441,0.00015400157,0.00040642178,0.012082272,0.0015521011,0.003137837,0.0022461612,0.0005898457,0.0005770917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016249873,0.00011977105,0.8928798,0.00022477879,0.00021672707,0.000527448,0.0024954176,0.0011132018,0.0010600705,0.029106718,0.0045631193,0.067530565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019416852,0.00006174831,0.9826317,0.000063306376,0.000099591976,0.00008007677,0.0022011162,0.0028247247,0.00031253078,0.003929456,0.007752264,0.000023998573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031873427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04379569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046442347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00825647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06337583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000674115","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03340-4","title":"Mapping the dynamics of research networks in ecology and evolution using co-citation analysis (1975–2014)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Population ecology; Evolutionary ecology; Citation; Population; Taxon; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Biology; Geography; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.2390556245279027,"score_gpt":0.34205590808683334,"score_spread":0.10300028355893065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000674115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9336815,0.011146498,0.005522733,0.0011589931,0.00013378641,0.000049543858,0.03565231,0.00021187785,0.012442693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739741,0.0026770649,0.0052546337,0.000033918845,0.00012211896,0.00004821079,0.015363682,0.000037137565,0.0024891454],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817073,0.00031281202,0.00029408623,0.00033174607,0.0006174635,0.00027317792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98693764,0.0045621837,0.004094479,0.00084622734,0.0027018061,0.00085766363],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002958709,0.00038726063,0.0005097983,0.04794308,0.0007512269,0.0026367477,0.0006117646,0.00047836246,0.0024793055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023652168,0.00015804647,0.00089869084,0.06564951,0.00051638845,0.0026766083,0.0019578973,0.00064743124,0.00062166504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024855827,0.00009478514,0.7638336,0.0014301698,0.0014844214,0.00045753887,0.002925858,0.01143447,0.0030111526,0.017863218,0.015275423,0.18194097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010753227,0.00003501493,0.9473709,0.00027075573,0.00033588518,0.00034269653,0.0011062449,0.011235049,0.0010836987,0.0038545015,0.034305245,0.00004929808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061870806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0696622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95205694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022748942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041096797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123021364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014941759","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03434-4","title":"What motivates ‘free’ revealing? Measuring outbound non-pecuniary openness, innovation types and expectations of future profit growth","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Australian Research Council","keywords":"Openness to experience; Business; Variety (cybernetics); Profit (economics); Marketing; Open innovation; Product innovation; Industrial organization; Value (mathematics); Product (mathematics); Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04621886148311979,"score_gpt":0.2533953459324179,"score_spread":0.20717648444929812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014941759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871912,0.0006559176,0.0044419635,0.00041596475,0.00001583078,0.000113242466,0.00021581716,0.000014582635,0.006935523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833053,0.00017018309,0.001183648,0.00003351874,0.000012253089,0.00003980608,0.000078155645,0.0000039429483,0.00014810658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98949665,0.0054047527,0.0010412829,0.0005696787,0.0029227375,0.0005648667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78301865,0.14329104,0.051961314,0.009540256,0.008396045,0.0037927364],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017492674,0.00021208444,0.0005073434,0.0032060363,0.00059950986,0.003736089,0.00053082034,0.0010167006,0.0018582374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09819114,0.00019406174,0.00078189047,0.0036481544,0.0027063566,0.0031221965,0.0026107447,0.0007447753,0.0002107518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049037184,0.00028109888,0.8771199,0.0015263424,0.00029031883,0.0002497357,0.009868835,0.0011223679,0.00345536,0.010076536,0.00048069784,0.09503845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023289149,0.00031865097,0.9588274,0.00062967325,0.00021925513,0.000413029,0.013703146,0.0019335723,0.0037951926,0.015570887,0.004479887,0.00008613441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081127585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016356674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011355311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016755947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09251118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016661053","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03462-0","title":"Telescopic and panoramic views of library and information science research 2011–2018: a comparison of four weighting schemes for author co-citation analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Citation; Field (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Weighting; Information retrieval; Data science; Zoom; Citation analysis; Set (abstract data type); Citation impact; Co-citation; Rank (graph theory); World Wide Web; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.7748089364909767,"score_gpt":0.6271083223531914,"score_spread":0.14770061413778535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016661053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85548204,0.00853404,0.068072796,0.004193915,0.00061070675,0.00067769125,0.00985471,0.00039063708,0.052183613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95268697,0.0018010337,0.03963463,0.0001974056,0.00013203555,0.0002860063,0.003387586,0.00018462556,0.0016896112],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888186,0.0039368602,0.0015888514,0.00086903444,0.0039944733,0.00079217425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9615883,0.012528211,0.006915051,0.0033743782,0.0142544145,0.001339653],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017236685,0.0005435759,0.0008889545,0.021394162,0.001277809,0.005924829,0.0012099907,0.00090377696,0.0035118223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08453005,0.00041761503,0.0014404655,0.028068522,0.001066038,0.005228093,0.003821006,0.00092914235,0.00081165286],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027005847,0.00019928985,0.39387003,0.0028463101,0.0026446406,0.0001589823,0.014740255,0.005708492,0.007866555,0.09092531,0.022325097,0.45601442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005528534,0.0005747532,0.8237025,0.0014505916,0.0037188036,0.00040594503,0.028647125,0.02679619,0.0049317167,0.046740502,0.0621422,0.0003368276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020236505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048439387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97860587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002994121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035000574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09115738},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3033805182","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03537-y","title":"Gatekeepers in knowledge transfer between science and technology: an exploratory study in the area of gene editing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Betweenness centrality; Knowledge flow; Social network analysis; Knowledge transfer; Computer science; Data science; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Centrality; Social media","score_opus":0.042753495327502666,"score_gpt":0.33993385302328943,"score_spread":0.29718035769578677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033805182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8859415,0.00093820994,0.057873942,0.0026075335,0.0000558182,0.00017304746,0.00046316616,0.0003152918,0.051631384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942999,0.00017344748,0.004435234,0.000025840825,0.000012233518,0.00003587318,0.00007987327,0.00002238838,0.0009151453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.991424,0.0040772497,0.00034868426,0.00086246006,0.002469383,0.0008182263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9323169,0.049223706,0.007219276,0.0049861693,0.003170046,0.00308386],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012050162,0.00048608833,0.0009108555,0.006886269,0.002379278,0.007190985,0.0015063257,0.0011210333,0.004500866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06593075,0.0002140026,0.0007471136,0.012844216,0.0048626293,0.0052396394,0.0040682745,0.0012112706,0.0003631415],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089438853,0.0005924043,0.08981632,0.0008606051,0.00033761805,0.0006009324,0.0050933445,0.048084725,0.0070810555,0.6620548,0.002882149,0.18170175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014697047,0.00045240615,0.07904056,0.00021093867,0.00021491494,0.0004256205,0.0074233287,0.17102222,0.010150208,0.7107829,0.020008706,0.00012120839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004025115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002967533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006383314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062465407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06372815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037469314","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03590-7","title":"Coronavirus mapping in scientific publications: When science advances rapidly and collectively, is access to this knowledge open to society?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; Comunidad de Madrid","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Coronavirus; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Open science; Data science; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; Virology; Medicine; Physics; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.45005805485460654,"score_gpt":0.5235256239953888,"score_spread":0.07346756914078229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037469314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43932682,0.35218462,0.024834216,0.05203557,0.006362748,0.0010833892,0.04110705,0.0014296795,0.08163585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82928854,0.1025723,0.03471642,0.003889674,0.0040176893,0.00069853035,0.014875932,0.00055433536,0.009386424],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9650543,0.0104385745,0.008548581,0.0036556614,0.010751664,0.0015513396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71627283,0.17632864,0.06742885,0.014110132,0.02109627,0.004763285],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024278559,0.0006469008,0.0012585908,0.049912397,0.0025175365,0.016918847,0.0011145655,0.0013891053,0.008502194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12567218,0.00048415977,0.0010583204,0.118638575,0.0032873878,0.014602162,0.0046093883,0.0013904778,0.0023388157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033244875,0.00010869675,0.33585468,0.028123274,0.0009613028,0.0017092304,0.03308477,0.0005364317,0.003716147,0.027199501,0.03942545,0.5289481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004811612,0.00016294184,0.46843377,0.020116786,0.0011272937,0.0035525511,0.041728072,0.000871895,0.0029873499,0.039288294,0.42148745,0.00019548995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002087412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003045645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99888545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023792316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006243043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12839884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045327594","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03744-7","title":"Understanding the temporal evolution of COVID-19 research through machine learning and natural language processing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"COVID-19 diagnosis using AI","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Research and Productivity Council; University of New Brunswick; Concordia University; National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Similarity (geometry); Contagious disease; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Outbreak; Diversity (politics); Data science; Disease; Computer science; Geography; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Sociology; Virology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Pathology","score_opus":0.3378602076196574,"score_gpt":0.4903504625910624,"score_spread":0.152490254971405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045327594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8807926,0.018182795,0.031329475,0.01558064,0.00036801468,0.00021088286,0.035887547,0.00060642447,0.017041553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9556536,0.0053252503,0.018647853,0.00054167426,0.00051916786,0.00020356207,0.01757909,0.00007113696,0.0014586254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973636,0.0008226515,0.0004240867,0.0005522847,0.0006142981,0.00022300001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966212,0.022233402,0.006956101,0.001067714,0.002841378,0.00068928645],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048486805,0.00033874507,0.00042168403,0.021291455,0.0007244912,0.0035952812,0.0004785399,0.0006654543,0.0012108393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025657075,0.00016775525,0.0006318998,0.023221849,0.00080720277,0.0043314053,0.0013094466,0.00084983255,0.0006735374],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002826968,0.00020631043,0.6996317,0.0025535887,0.00040367627,0.0009358744,0.0062129833,0.007974966,0.005917814,0.016397398,0.019357746,0.24012522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034796893,0.00014673782,0.79565334,0.0007165982,0.00022751225,0.0008507578,0.008331116,0.08315089,0.0025049904,0.04256683,0.06568919,0.00012723563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00753953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009275158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99515134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015490723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014607823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025642574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3062515517","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03671-7","title":"Vocabulary sharing among subjects belonging to the hierarchy of sciences","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Vocabulary; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Data science; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11905871706491908,"score_gpt":0.29160392100640864,"score_spread":0.17254520394148956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3062515517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726333,0.0012723493,0.00411972,0.00032624163,0.00004592812,0.000067642395,0.0016962456,0.00008548484,0.019753091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923369,0.0003850864,0.0023492093,0.00007394131,0.000047097546,0.00004098733,0.002821792,0.000055350603,0.0018896718],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996089,0.0013043395,0.0004951083,0.00055277057,0.0010091369,0.0005496879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749262,0.014924122,0.00253374,0.0018458742,0.0040790183,0.0016911124],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023948972,0.00031045152,0.00084778096,0.014328145,0.0021084754,0.005681803,0.00063718937,0.00079861574,0.0067578633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028463472,0.0002009967,0.0005864506,0.01285047,0.0012286502,0.004738386,0.00282246,0.0007902428,0.0013137638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010569046,0.0003313391,0.68133914,0.0010244086,0.0006693977,0.00058632845,0.06308218,0.0006465517,0.03831233,0.039239615,0.00554964,0.16816217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011766883,0.0003743283,0.7838062,0.000528,0.0007830022,0.0012934059,0.07192437,0.0062068887,0.007655949,0.08428884,0.04289426,0.00012713853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006114937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005435714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085542654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020056092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022607267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082051346","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03675-3","title":"Publishing volumes in major databases related to Covid-19","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Scopus; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Web of science; Publishing; Pandemic; Library science; China; MEDLINE; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Bibliometrics; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Analytics; History; Medicine; Database; Computer science; Political science; Disease; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Virology; Pathology","score_opus":0.2913286398736232,"score_gpt":0.4731993666241887,"score_spread":0.18187072675056554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082051346","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004990388,0.029164817,0.0005318701,0.0020717543,0.00077134883,0.00041181582,0.9441121,0.0011450145,0.016800852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029848233,0.07518923,0.007773052,0.0014216998,0.0022218765,0.0024099306,0.87097406,0.0008901136,0.009271831],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95448166,0.0039889542,0.026769038,0.0032512806,0.00983375,0.0016754044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81232095,0.0854467,0.0539315,0.0072311973,0.031968996,0.009100664],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009847582,0.0030033619,0.0063186176,0.15573372,0.0019140242,0.016425427,0.0021764776,0.0023479806,0.051930152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14040332,0.00087688357,0.0025374964,0.31022954,0.0015186794,0.0068975016,0.0053173704,0.002376469,0.022647837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012594176,0.00008988823,0.023331104,0.15793021,0.00189329,0.0009857082,0.0022732094,0.00059740007,0.0011928731,0.01711329,0.65480274,0.13853084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031419433,0.000092730304,0.04229163,0.025963603,0.0009913065,0.0013445374,0.0015562474,0.00037500088,0.0010463048,0.007998092,0.91783196,0.00019437801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005621353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049021365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039159395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01337286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1737237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085773434","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03701-4","title":"Classifications of science and their effects on bibliometric evaluations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Bibliometrics; Discipline; Computer science; Order (exchange); Scientometrics; Data science; Management science; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.7109975348963583,"score_gpt":0.6052004678785627,"score_spread":0.10579706701779557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085773434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93935025,0.009932089,0.007051562,0.003965358,0.0006917418,0.00024619952,0.0034253127,0.00045134706,0.034886163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939721,0.0009236734,0.0019679435,0.000149774,0.00022893371,0.00012355206,0.00075606,0.00015498025,0.0017229284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8992841,0.07408002,0.0063214176,0.0044122003,0.012293461,0.003608681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.07682848,0.8797772,0.020961761,0.0075825686,0.011180652,0.003669314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09189851,0.0014865715,0.0023749028,0.012635242,0.0022104483,0.012292353,0.0017421162,0.003253034,0.012269038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5658939,0.0005292338,0.003245524,0.015349392,0.004169274,0.0065329424,0.0047043697,0.0049436796,0.0016612271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01760007,0.0022029872,0.83757037,0.0018811288,0.004006881,0.0004571428,0.0026825068,0.010507368,0.003312023,0.018715536,0.00604687,0.09501714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007869804,0.0019006259,0.93036777,0.0008428256,0.005888468,0.00043318278,0.0033065036,0.02035755,0.0036570542,0.026938325,0.0052479063,0.00027291692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00799349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005691784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98736477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037491536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004473187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48601156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092009239","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03718-9","title":"Navigation-based candidate expansion and pretrained language models for citation recommendation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Benchmark (surveying); Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Vocabulary; Domain (mathematical analysis); Task (project management); Information retrieval; Artificial intelligence; Language model; Machine learning; Natural language processing; World Wide Web; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06364737314638658,"score_gpt":0.31168752864163235,"score_spread":0.24804015549524577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092009239","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11115035,0.0058788774,0.86421907,0.0026196633,0.00059926754,0.00025698508,0.003628862,0.007662918,0.003983981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73483866,0.0026766455,0.23262276,0.00084557297,0.0014558915,0.00069436664,0.011815393,0.00068537967,0.014365306],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808085,0.0007723055,0.00018914719,0.00043410665,0.00030446606,0.00021912914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907673,0.0068277344,0.000337206,0.00061879057,0.0011594144,0.000289421],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035690896,0.0015197905,0.002557183,0.0058532176,0.0011926129,0.0021473067,0.0029142268,0.0029115041,0.0045795557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016086888,0.00075264275,0.0023656378,0.006114601,0.00064951123,0.00400384,0.0017666767,0.0030284626,0.004379843],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012859902,0.0011338298,0.008003539,0.0005970355,0.00054447266,0.0003927727,0.00034628532,0.26799837,0.0063639614,0.014617704,0.033464987,0.665251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027534745,0.000034459918,0.00037054365,0.000015934096,0.000053878135,0.000041954132,0.000019684107,0.99274534,0.0006637817,0.0052971332,0.000711868,0.0000179703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021008493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031167516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99414676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011835418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028121676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041772425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095982673","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03727-8","title":"Mapping computer science research in Africa: using academic networking sites for assessing research activity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cégep de Sorel-Tracy; McGill University; Concordia University; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scopus; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Productivity; Regional science; Citation; Database; Library science; Data science; Computer science; Geography; Political science; MEDLINE; Economic growth","score_opus":0.9631006661554827,"score_gpt":0.7125945034653474,"score_spread":0.25050616269013537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095982673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749332,0.0014021714,0.0048368275,0.00038112534,0.000027419821,0.00014310033,0.0019396849,0.000056019602,0.016280504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98666334,0.000962652,0.010597791,0.000018921739,0.000016175996,0.00008640351,0.0005712076,0.000010792382,0.0010725412],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847883,0.0007242446,0.000107238666,0.00013239277,0.0003587735,0.00019854693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915503,0.0041014645,0.002141242,0.00026379176,0.0014034567,0.00053973665],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019702278,0.00044953177,0.00028115025,0.017572125,0.00080185436,0.002442744,0.00040858475,0.0005624233,0.0020350805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013527866,0.00015276935,0.00024039591,0.019024843,0.0003471591,0.0023900864,0.0010905956,0.000280051,0.0004191847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019410379,0.00019060544,0.69249004,0.0008942358,0.00013996207,0.00033079533,0.0043237368,0.0026052278,0.0055412087,0.0038045344,0.0014774477,0.2880082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048251055,0.00043826527,0.88438654,0.0009560559,0.0004202109,0.0014183816,0.031564184,0.023120118,0.011986626,0.006079612,0.039503608,0.000078163175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072976737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013935587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99802977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008409275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016288171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014510393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125340956","doi":"10.1007/s11192-021-03868-4","title":"Tracking developments in artificial intelligence research: constructing and applying a new search strategy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Research Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Profiling (computer programming); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Multidisciplinary approach; Benchmark (surveying); Domain (mathematical analysis); Applications of artificial intelligence; Data science; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.44533367302389276,"score_gpt":0.44675477312989736,"score_spread":0.0014211001060046025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125340956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4915149,0.0046281954,0.45102564,0.006796658,0.0001541983,0.0022738567,0.0037365474,0.0016092781,0.03826069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68272823,0.0016343088,0.31047645,0.00032759042,0.00009707706,0.0012940604,0.0018787382,0.000111682064,0.0014518276],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804254,0.011379647,0.0024589507,0.0017744347,0.003445932,0.00051563646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9256614,0.056016237,0.006316201,0.0049096257,0.0060398034,0.0010568334],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021281244,0.0008301558,0.0017884192,0.04046053,0.0013969371,0.0102142645,0.0017628538,0.0019112043,0.0018968596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10934284,0.0005213256,0.0011582044,0.041283507,0.0028238813,0.011172683,0.0037609537,0.0009638824,0.0007606036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043480154,0.0006409068,0.27313203,0.0020611065,0.00090688857,0.0003251278,0.007570685,0.016731912,0.0034983063,0.17133474,0.005017534,0.518346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044921626,0.001908653,0.14896104,0.0013138037,0.0012600516,0.0011482653,0.017694764,0.4712196,0.0061732084,0.3036068,0.04580617,0.00045842017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008804182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010390241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97871876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003368954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005929706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11254734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133429097","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03840-8","title":"Mapping the intellectual structure of GIS-T field (2008–2019): a dynamic co-word analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Data Quality and Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Computer science; Geographic information system; Data science; Geography; Cartography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15018153582932317,"score_gpt":0.4231165180604795,"score_spread":0.2729349822311563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133429097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95745116,0.0033157754,0.008527798,0.0022280507,0.00008912976,0.0005480949,0.013718732,0.0000708683,0.014050257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809379,0.0011590254,0.010156855,0.00005927125,0.000041417203,0.0006624482,0.0057879803,0.00003028296,0.0011649823],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933089,0.0018294615,0.0014215816,0.00082525547,0.002214434,0.0004003937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.950762,0.02811279,0.009033076,0.0014655684,0.0098289475,0.00079769816],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007720663,0.00028963573,0.0005901862,0.05135373,0.0013258071,0.004499315,0.00069964916,0.00049864064,0.0027986905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038346317,0.00016772775,0.00061081146,0.079470284,0.001821484,0.00326457,0.0036704123,0.0005194328,0.00038269593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005337101,0.00013525924,0.5362998,0.0078857355,0.00065097347,0.0019805771,0.12523828,0.0021583003,0.0042749327,0.051095787,0.013641021,0.25610563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004807019,0.00018182844,0.67662865,0.002354192,0.00041725909,0.0009097871,0.21158396,0.00853506,0.0030683042,0.018237775,0.07792501,0.00011006021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011647005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008072225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94864625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005298702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062268344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040831268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135175820","doi":"10.1007/s11192-021-03911-4","title":"Digital technology helps remove gender bias in academia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Diversity and Career in Medicine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Meritocracy; Gender bias; Altmetrics; Metric (unit); Gender disparity; Productivity; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Library science; Social psychology; Gender studies; Marketing","score_opus":0.14776339979880546,"score_gpt":0.3722449533529507,"score_spread":0.22448155355414526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135175820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83604157,0.003886332,0.03135788,0.02519791,0.0026717705,0.00024209822,0.0029810488,0.00055875076,0.09706263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97809726,0.0006999173,0.009710665,0.002130833,0.0010958655,0.000115814975,0.0005520565,0.00014166717,0.0074558444],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98470473,0.006487811,0.0013668595,0.0016976331,0.0047305976,0.0010122829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8800156,0.0790465,0.0134846615,0.011975287,0.011887212,0.0035907144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021791324,0.00041031954,0.0007185418,0.0054119155,0.002367332,0.0046128486,0.0010146835,0.0012334214,0.01506916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13068756,0.00024199809,0.0007626347,0.0083995275,0.0013707757,0.004402961,0.0037835247,0.0008514216,0.0025338854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066357607,0.00057071616,0.3761347,0.001020025,0.00039004156,0.00033840426,0.007830255,0.0012187068,0.0043553654,0.029117297,0.027211277,0.5511496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028094006,0.00072210963,0.7200807,0.0012672589,0.0008790285,0.0005089535,0.016258754,0.0044283113,0.013966753,0.08135785,0.16011393,0.00013537856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003250388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056256913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012921023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004689829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115244925},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3162449416","doi":"10.1007/s11192-021-04042-6","title":"Correction to: Prevalence of potentially predatory publishing in Scopus on the country level","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Russian Science Foundation; University of Waterloo; Russian Foundation for Basic Research","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Library science; Bibliometrics; Geography; Political science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.1781125987131383,"score_gpt":0.4081491312190696,"score_spread":0.23003653250593128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162449416","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013657889,0.0011179358,0.0007863646,0.086988755,0.88593906,0.000056978268,0.014914924,0.0010824781,0.007747659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10852473,0.0085062375,0.00786155,0.07270503,0.3056664,0.0006678058,0.030815639,0.006099474,0.45915318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848298,0.0017489399,0.0033608945,0.0020775762,0.006420888,0.0015618555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.800994,0.040338196,0.016344361,0.018452227,0.11203645,0.01183475],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077222087,0.0019070866,0.0021101055,0.012280926,0.003739669,0.008084196,0.0043237745,0.0058524264,0.13689214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16925044,0.0012554486,0.001298839,0.01634387,0.002747788,0.0044153943,0.0038715475,0.0071583684,0.059780676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046843572,0.000008032606,0.00078358344,0.0002841896,0.000027154269,0.00020683062,0.000089027104,0.00005525815,0.000047489088,0.0009477242,0.99144125,0.006062685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011396651,0.00003780504,0.01213169,0.0011108685,0.00008062283,0.0009518477,0.0006234514,0.0005904692,0.00052690494,0.0028714915,0.98081094,0.00015001031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029002817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03398304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004575369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009324352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45794982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179761068","doi":"10.1007/s11192-021-04022-w","title":"Who profits from the Canadian nanotechnology reward system? Implications for gender-responsible innovation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Productivity; Gender equality; Work (physics); Gender gap; Field (mathematics); Reward system; Gender disparity; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Economic growth; Economics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.7142155899698618,"score_gpt":0.5720511809625689,"score_spread":0.14216440900729288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179761068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14588547,0.0058184336,0.0035171108,0.35985732,0.0012553831,0.0001289964,0.0008331931,0.00014012311,0.48256394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9510036,0.0019975505,0.0011283498,0.0120527595,0.00023681458,0.000035618443,0.000110827226,0.000059851554,0.033374593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97876465,0.0028397324,0.00033559676,0.0014520736,0.0087582525,0.007849702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9451349,0.012540665,0.0028971182,0.0015556682,0.02417748,0.01369415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014820226,0.0004935598,0.0008785571,0.00431645,0.015943427,0.015915716,0.0027649044,0.003710331,0.017806467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06476711,0.00030934712,0.00068418274,0.004978477,0.012441413,0.00526575,0.0043127793,0.003977675,0.0009686729],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016812685,0.00009288708,0.047730368,0.00021084394,0.00007750806,0.0003960609,0.009663534,0.0011678622,0.0006287774,0.73957247,0.10317412,0.09711747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014819285,0.00008417501,0.19207177,0.001134965,0.00025060071,0.00035833652,0.05336391,0.004408339,0.0016974743,0.22137724,0.5246897,0.00041533564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9659029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9861033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99568355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12492411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25488415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9063921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184001797","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04418-2","title":"Reproducibility of COVID-19 pre-prints","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Reproducibility; Code (set theory); Sample (material); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Underpinning; Parsing; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Computer science; Information retrieval; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Medicine; Statistics; Chemistry; Virology; Engineering; Chromatography; Pathology","score_opus":0.26096079931966837,"score_gpt":0.4948671563696969,"score_spread":0.23390635705002855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184001797","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20800494,0.008051826,0.02224621,0.010532829,0.006491189,0.0011738157,0.65149117,0.01313508,0.07887297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29195696,0.0019211534,0.024293695,0.0023921207,0.0022548058,0.0019431174,0.63812405,0.00792426,0.029189836],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8842826,0.024672726,0.018946623,0.022132836,0.04531541,0.0046497555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49731618,0.2445113,0.053186495,0.10560761,0.09288689,0.0064915405],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0688307,0.0011775941,0.0017732691,0.026389789,0.0028716705,0.013827066,0.0030301951,0.0021462403,0.024244152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33763295,0.00092985266,0.0016593065,0.027106443,0.0034309847,0.006182454,0.0066006933,0.002482338,0.029252369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002416696,0.0005565323,0.22628357,0.0061077173,0.0010104757,0.00081669475,0.005829536,0.0023643759,0.0066748024,0.02144118,0.5917966,0.13470177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002177469,0.0001837974,0.19530909,0.0016326519,0.00027830314,0.0008196941,0.00303742,0.0030402497,0.012968349,0.0114934305,0.770646,0.00037324845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035507441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046060965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029066147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054869037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36401588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190254501","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04408-4","title":"A systematic method for identifying references to academic research in grey literature","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Optics and Image Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Newcastle University; University of Oxford; Queen's University Belfast; University College London; University of Warwick; University of Southampton; Queen's University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Queen Mary University of London","keywords":"Grey literature; Government (linguistics); Computer science; Heuristics; Bibliometrics; Scientific literature; Information retrieval; Matching (statistics); Metadata; Legislation; Library science; Operations research; Political science; Statistics; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.22978697577162527,"score_gpt":0.4608031597729013,"score_spread":0.23101618400127605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190254501","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05158589,0.010803647,0.7587016,0.004041017,0.0015236303,0.10215215,0.040010083,0.007506605,0.023675373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028060077,0.0013687623,0.92261565,0.00034136206,0.00009582948,0.0380631,0.0057042623,0.00021965269,0.0035313778],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9188486,0.025498789,0.028903086,0.006678106,0.01906459,0.0010068566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6813541,0.15011422,0.030599706,0.026640445,0.107531734,0.0037598314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06390261,0.0019064313,0.0033424303,0.11669526,0.006097851,0.008136038,0.0033177796,0.0028089841,0.012506066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22912993,0.0015696483,0.0031328634,0.05679092,0.002823307,0.005600596,0.010009799,0.0020951838,0.0043739625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010558778,0.0004708383,0.015841354,0.039767433,0.001152294,0.0010751778,0.02895585,0.0007289337,0.021142684,0.03313741,0.03931671,0.81735533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019969824,0.001296292,0.05277887,0.03597662,0.007170526,0.0032273983,0.04289838,0.013253663,0.047975514,0.087586336,0.7038391,0.0020002874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00946357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035430305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9360974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040936605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04528693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33795327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195597029","doi":"10.1007/s11192-021-04118-3","title":"A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Private Equity and Venture Capital","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vlaamse regering; Thompson Rivers University","keywords":"Economic Justice; Publishing; Credit rating; Quality (philosophy); Actuarial science; Business; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05810792340576652,"score_gpt":0.28104658239953,"score_spread":0.22293865899376347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195597029","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33542275,0.0016998575,0.37147117,0.0063462947,0.0021632062,0.0041513657,0.011873468,0.0049608545,0.26191112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7920806,0.0005996899,0.18873282,0.000624178,0.0006818006,0.00080926844,0.0036501796,0.00018447991,0.012636917],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898088,0.0032636411,0.0016989582,0.0008577929,0.004014527,0.00035624055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460554,0.016525598,0.011031563,0.004484705,0.019684784,0.0022178956],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012912429,0.00067185896,0.0005589107,0.0076751444,0.0011004206,0.0044881054,0.0013345998,0.0013175494,0.010899818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07044773,0.00028244793,0.00039768708,0.006349638,0.0013049049,0.0047845654,0.0018395835,0.0013527496,0.005287184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010242781,0.00047265962,0.30226764,0.00078775856,0.0002085469,0.0003561706,0.0019459788,0.0030712772,0.0097163,0.06205355,0.06759285,0.550503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035065654,0.0019402202,0.57071465,0.0008732657,0.00027008555,0.0028843777,0.0045525245,0.09826978,0.011974518,0.068930894,0.2385878,0.000651176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002160368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036995644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011983156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013804007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06828821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205605438","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04351-4","title":"Return migration of German-affiliated researchers: analyzing departure and return by gender, cohort, and discipline using Scopus bibliometric data 1996–2020","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Spatial and Panel Data Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Max-Planck-Institut für demografische Forschung; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Scopus; German; Emigration; Demographic economics; Tracking (education); Bibliometrics; Construct (python library); Political science; Sociology; Geography; Library science; Economics; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.18269089971254934,"score_gpt":0.35642126913825983,"score_spread":0.1737303694257105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205605438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9738408,0.003386296,0.0006165148,0.0010197045,0.000046893143,0.00004635858,0.017969033,0.000029477085,0.00304493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874709,0.0015663465,0.0004950683,0.00010392586,0.00005195978,0.000076781034,0.009319302,0.000014507468,0.0009012421],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958456,0.00072400225,0.0011178565,0.000528628,0.0010846939,0.00069929863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9500191,0.011517545,0.02838549,0.0021083634,0.006060181,0.0019092809],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006939437,0.00030231354,0.00057056174,0.016861094,0.00086860073,0.002705726,0.0007830995,0.00055062765,0.0023512868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037400737,0.00018018685,0.0007927683,0.029927345,0.00058396236,0.0020609098,0.0022157677,0.00059154624,0.00086875254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007798949,0.000021976935,0.98594934,0.000258549,0.0002343444,0.00014547833,0.0010701551,0.00027905786,0.000111321286,0.00081412593,0.0020872543,0.008950354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007916318,0.000034987475,0.9885492,0.00025891204,0.00011099916,0.00014074052,0.0041387957,0.000580354,0.00022600073,0.0005260526,0.005410461,0.000015538219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02652024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026990678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014191273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002374774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052731752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206649023","doi":"10.1007/s11192-021-04154-z","title":"Time series-based bibliometric analysis of a systematic review of multidisciplinary care for opioid dose reduction: exploring the origins of the North American opioid crisis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Opioid Use Disorder Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; Western University; Institute for Work & Health; Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Metric (unit); Citation; Opioid; Health psychology; Chronic pain; Phenomenon; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Medicine; Psychology; Psychiatry; Public health; Sociology; Social science; Data mining; Computer science; Epistemology; Economics; Nursing; Library science","score_opus":0.08741432870258167,"score_gpt":0.39051394589559163,"score_spread":0.30309961719300993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206649023","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31234044,0.61138266,0.0142578315,0.011056453,0.0011166158,0.0034609393,0.028777106,0.00039425536,0.017213717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7862976,0.17096949,0.024856761,0.0010779598,0.000635178,0.003923343,0.011137281,0.00007413278,0.0010283914],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9457602,0.025726113,0.014769118,0.0023269777,0.0106651625,0.0007524349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75002056,0.18802029,0.037679505,0.0069882227,0.016236495,0.0010549084],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04086627,0.0007931137,0.00325871,0.09932343,0.0012245837,0.0043975925,0.0010695562,0.00090075814,0.0017711772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21469079,0.00044340166,0.0034060355,0.17585042,0.0010959134,0.0029177342,0.0027494482,0.00077860814,0.0002325575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007534069,0.00015079876,0.22783518,0.26253876,0.035817284,0.0020554957,0.015057896,0.008323095,0.0022831066,0.023066495,0.026926918,0.39519155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026049925,0.0006134376,0.6658909,0.09144434,0.035821863,0.0022346063,0.018853446,0.020274164,0.001955105,0.02519199,0.13706796,0.00039173895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01132794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024157155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95913374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057593067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012855836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21612406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212870265","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04285-x","title":"Size of science team at university and internal co-publications: science policy implications","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie","keywords":"Science policy; Scientometrics; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Public administration","score_opus":0.4464727771215093,"score_gpt":0.578309172696832,"score_spread":0.13183639557532273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212870265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56851447,0.0053404975,0.005337592,0.34101516,0.00088392757,0.00012920133,0.0023204875,0.00020516085,0.07625348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907079,0.00064502214,0.00039368056,0.0033771645,0.0006807648,0.00005836569,0.0001787568,0.000022588583,0.003935802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98662007,0.005171054,0.0007884161,0.001639994,0.0022957337,0.0034848126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7113181,0.20508802,0.031598084,0.0038521811,0.012680959,0.035462715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014254215,0.00033133454,0.0015438969,0.004369616,0.0028166762,0.012245789,0.0019354783,0.00643466,0.025327856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09175562,0.0004692551,0.001180725,0.008219258,0.0045681903,0.008486117,0.003325826,0.0049311672,0.0012238486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029806574,0.0019009773,0.43640283,0.0006345227,0.0011854353,0.00070253207,0.0027075948,0.012707644,0.0018757547,0.44656217,0.032551188,0.059788752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011765703,0.00072360237,0.57037324,0.000582564,0.0008914091,0.0003462113,0.016679455,0.017843388,0.005440699,0.35509014,0.030633923,0.00021879029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020474238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02013092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009520646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012941951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08473015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214582452","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04305-w","title":"Retracted articles in oncology in the last three decades: frequency, reasons, and themes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Clinical Oncology; Oncology; China; Bibliometrics; Editorial board; Radiation oncology; Medicine; Library science; Cancer; Internal medicine; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06008256517620937,"score_gpt":0.3581804415893788,"score_spread":0.2980978764131694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214582452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60334915,0.18882623,0.0017907141,0.15994373,0.010818933,0.000291492,0.005528598,0.0003573738,0.029093865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8969381,0.060862347,0.0016983153,0.013278152,0.0121268695,0.00020428575,0.003495684,0.0002395578,0.011156661],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9617645,0.008807644,0.008587192,0.0027511541,0.015102348,0.002987288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.55312604,0.18966256,0.12683082,0.017048711,0.08421647,0.029115379],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03779422,0.0005647261,0.0012005154,0.033147357,0.004183694,0.009458346,0.0031480303,0.0037025076,0.005858006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32256225,0.0004751006,0.0011094644,0.048479415,0.003820612,0.0063013034,0.00716172,0.003488581,0.0014474487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008952749,0.0003024968,0.53495806,0.008560711,0.0005331344,0.004324418,0.054930713,0.00037149596,0.0015308016,0.008380542,0.08307218,0.30214027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004958111,0.00025218033,0.6991026,0.0072456677,0.0002354683,0.007207247,0.04870646,0.00033060747,0.0013565741,0.002848975,0.23256692,0.00009778145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010037825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0113618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007150679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010988834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19987732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220877524","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04338-1","title":"Interdisciplinarity and impact: the effects of the citation time window","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Window (computing); Citation analysis; Scientometrics; Computer science; Bibliometrics; Data science; Citation impact; Statistics; Data mining; Mathematics; Library science; Political science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.2744588650714582,"score_gpt":0.5399536004006232,"score_spread":0.265494735329165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220877524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94662327,0.009711983,0.01006535,0.0042857626,0.0005085387,0.00005644378,0.0009975221,0.00027161313,0.027479498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956802,0.0012305006,0.0005579129,0.00009557352,0.00029071112,0.000016119451,0.00020086797,0.00008252667,0.0018455796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969747,0.0010350087,0.00028173934,0.0005855132,0.000721801,0.00040122552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7951998,0.17541324,0.013157785,0.005458707,0.0042320103,0.0065385024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012467988,0.0005266191,0.001440115,0.0036008388,0.0010136516,0.0077808197,0.0010543007,0.0018570104,0.010069493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13644318,0.00036210922,0.00095354405,0.008150267,0.0011479509,0.009881978,0.0026063405,0.0025524963,0.0011616079],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009082827,0.001856961,0.56646246,0.0012283996,0.0025345823,0.001829209,0.004556459,0.033569068,0.013976797,0.13761805,0.008517084,0.21876813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045228127,0.0008998658,0.7614185,0.00030135078,0.0023177587,0.00059823575,0.0030508086,0.041864127,0.0045578615,0.17438501,0.009971966,0.00018222693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002678023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001426982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99639916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006388653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015693741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06593788},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4221058759","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04331-8","title":"Music information visualization and classical composers discovery: an application of network graphs, multidimensional scaling, and support vector machines","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Music and Audio Processing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Multidimensional scaling; Computer science; Visualization; Pairwise comparison; Similarity (geometry); Music theory; Musical; Musicology; Realm; Musical composition; Classical music; Artificial intelligence; Art; Machine learning; Visual arts; History","score_opus":0.01655784240464562,"score_gpt":0.2749442264079385,"score_spread":0.25838638400329283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221058759","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1463885,0.0011703885,0.83778226,0.0023961568,0.0001605661,0.00022003407,0.0015990755,0.006111904,0.004171215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46294585,0.00040906022,0.5352931,0.000049293238,0.000067990804,0.00013445693,0.00053039513,0.00012703445,0.00044272176],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980933,0.0010789731,0.00012705005,0.00022586588,0.00042006184,0.000054822216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98883665,0.008614822,0.00080471725,0.00066883204,0.0008720781,0.00020290942],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030330368,0.0010190882,0.00070738513,0.009784624,0.000638808,0.0028129457,0.00063290825,0.00067379995,0.0016757383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014488512,0.00032526927,0.00074616226,0.007448383,0.00078025146,0.0017666052,0.0011664329,0.0007809265,0.0002575193],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004477534,0.0003415086,0.027635174,0.0005518294,0.00042106147,0.0004589295,0.0021748794,0.21807174,0.0066690324,0.053847823,0.010379169,0.67900115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022401176,0.000047448528,0.0048467224,0.000037177375,0.000026207215,0.00008819734,0.0004672866,0.9610222,0.0023257888,0.027706545,0.003373461,0.000036552126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067200605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045947116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99021536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095501053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072272273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016040444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240546189","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0097-x","title":"Preface","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Interpretation (philosophy); Citation; Macro; Data science; Citation analysis; Computer science; Scientometrics; Epistemology; Sociology; Management science; Social science; Library science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.6899883062376743,"score_gpt":0.6221987966117799,"score_spread":0.06778950962589436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240546189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001562943,0.008898262,0.008277313,0.039281245,0.22699466,0.00068074197,0.019927785,0.0019132474,0.6924637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00500361,0.0032468818,0.002381822,0.005250013,0.02129841,0.00029547958,0.008637436,0.0008050726,0.9530812],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991111,0.00012689151,0.000055698383,0.00014384658,0.00049278006,0.00006967831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928598,0.0010267388,0.00023535604,0.00066280336,0.004373312,0.00084186316],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015654205,0.00086579,0.00062369794,0.004145858,0.0027239344,0.0036520357,0.0011638447,0.00090133556,0.46118814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014645085,0.00027061612,0.0005186536,0.002798966,0.00054843636,0.0023126295,0.0019780782,0.0024333051,0.3087502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019970283,0.00001344516,0.00008596213,0.000059957638,0.0000014130003,0.00002602962,0.00004851939,0.00004091029,0.00008872089,0.0041047623,0.9629893,0.032520976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035983057,0.000006419043,0.0002485507,0.000073142444,0.0000014747108,0.000021597578,0.00005722267,0.000025883995,0.0000818147,0.0022869094,0.9971898,0.0000035527128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00708656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008368637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99585414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024754733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026026058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240741669","doi":"10.1556/scient.67.2006.2.7","title":"Preface","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Interpretation (philosophy); Citation; Scientometrics; Citation analysis; Macro; Computer science; Data science; Epistemology; Sociology; Library science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6899883062376743,"score_gpt":0.6221987966117799,"score_spread":0.06778950962589436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240741669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001562943,0.008898262,0.008277313,0.039281245,0.22699466,0.00068074197,0.019927785,0.0019132474,0.6924637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00500361,0.0032468818,0.002381822,0.005250013,0.02129841,0.00029547958,0.008637436,0.0008050726,0.9530812],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991111,0.00012689151,0.000055698383,0.00014384658,0.00049278006,0.00006967831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928598,0.0010267388,0.00023535604,0.00066280336,0.004373312,0.00084186316],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015654205,0.00086579,0.00062369794,0.004145858,0.0027239344,0.0036520357,0.0011638447,0.00090133556,0.46118814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014645085,0.00027061612,0.0005186536,0.002798966,0.00054843636,0.0023126295,0.0019780782,0.0024333051,0.3087502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019970283,0.00001344516,0.00008596213,0.000059957638,0.0000014130003,0.00002602962,0.00004851939,0.00004091029,0.00008872089,0.0041047623,0.9629893,0.032520976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035983057,0.000006419043,0.0002485507,0.000073142444,0.0000014747108,0.000021597578,0.00005722267,0.000025883995,0.0000818147,0.0022869094,0.9971898,0.0000035527128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00708656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008368637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99585414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024754733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026026058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248757258","doi":"10.1556/scient.67.2006.1.1","title":"Key Labs and Open Labs in the Chinese scientific research system: Their role in the national and international scientific arena","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Science Citation Index; Citation; Key (lock); Library science; Chinese academy of sciences; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; History; Law","score_opus":0.5945123837319141,"score_gpt":0.593806149860948,"score_spread":0.0007062338709660221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248757258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8320903,0.017252592,0.00665206,0.011857239,0.0004544553,0.00015473842,0.00095696986,0.00021238565,0.13036922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99200284,0.0018173989,0.0006966593,0.00029705904,0.00020230023,0.00006291809,0.00013691907,0.00001632789,0.0047676084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99423665,0.0015950515,0.00037879078,0.0006489038,0.0018515923,0.0012891069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97587425,0.00917558,0.004483076,0.00084255514,0.0038913658,0.0057332194],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005785091,0.00040793928,0.0008314106,0.012319948,0.0035123075,0.009088034,0.0013617851,0.0010740167,0.012329171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018145453,0.00028873413,0.0005873218,0.020737953,0.0061552487,0.010158154,0.0057086106,0.0014306784,0.0006496524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007379841,0.00023239978,0.2673788,0.00088722125,0.00019257636,0.0006959309,0.008760228,0.0017294656,0.0022332857,0.55169535,0.010359764,0.15509693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025558998,0.00036755324,0.7571536,0.00047476054,0.0008620266,0.0004988092,0.023924246,0.008600395,0.0025998263,0.12943397,0.07564083,0.00018841712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019974971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02247934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009464545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01557537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06867039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254187858","doi":"10.1556/scient.67.2006.2.10","title":"Why are hyperlinks to business Websites created? A content analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Hyperlink; Competitor analysis; Link analysis; Context (archaeology); Content analysis; Link (geometry); Business information; Business; Computer science; Sample (material); World Wide Web; Marketing; Advertising; Web page; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.06684286375822009,"score_gpt":0.2673774425083551,"score_spread":0.20053457875013503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254187858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9516839,0.0015801667,0.0066846414,0.0023187562,0.00013931874,0.00033389515,0.0052043977,0.0002976005,0.031757407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97741514,0.0018068122,0.007572676,0.000544467,0.00027364795,0.00042845498,0.0057302047,0.0002976202,0.0059309485],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491113,0.0019313163,0.00054492534,0.000409846,0.0018608375,0.00034182568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8734943,0.100510575,0.006951595,0.0025497873,0.015228773,0.0012648874],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034946762,0.00026313745,0.00040666203,0.02171976,0.0018443319,0.005260206,0.00053228205,0.0010215513,0.004075989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055161785,0.00030487683,0.0004805915,0.019198539,0.0015810595,0.007261186,0.0018687992,0.00079945824,0.0010105892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089680176,0.00070994534,0.43189302,0.003754144,0.00042687444,0.0014577563,0.07225404,0.0010938329,0.01712689,0.030722506,0.029826231,0.409838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009955694,0.00039816284,0.63976145,0.003407898,0.0014725166,0.0026084266,0.085039295,0.017740162,0.026488267,0.025484532,0.1973053,0.00019438766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025505242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029351711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97828025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016644464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001669305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01848185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281255308","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04387-6","title":"Measuring the disparity among scientific disciplines using Library of Congress Subject Headings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Library of congress; Computer science; Information retrieval; Bibliometrics; Scientific literature; Library science; Data science; Scientific communication","score_opus":0.6099867867029692,"score_gpt":0.5220149078759858,"score_spread":0.08797187882698343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281255308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791364,0.0013401757,0.0028747017,0.00043508637,0.00005894063,0.0000745046,0.0045718825,0.000063571584,0.011444757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941393,0.00042625336,0.0018781639,0.0000615143,0.00008203435,0.000053966603,0.0029431742,0.000012059816,0.00040356125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98836726,0.0030918154,0.0017571866,0.00096452597,0.0051247287,0.00069449283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9508976,0.024693575,0.011281314,0.003097896,0.0086761955,0.00135361],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00905817,0.000318356,0.0007619849,0.028528076,0.0008269196,0.004264819,0.0004934448,0.0005896189,0.0024995916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082309864,0.00015548297,0.0005827675,0.042428747,0.00061271543,0.0026409996,0.0028739145,0.00058845896,0.00072237744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013134861,0.00007891841,0.9460102,0.00019334561,0.00029918866,0.000037194186,0.0014974256,0.00043305155,0.0013236069,0.0034722183,0.0013968134,0.045126677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018350225,0.00010537392,0.9811446,0.00008319585,0.00016486295,0.000117045456,0.0038351112,0.0020103639,0.0015573575,0.0045254207,0.006410291,0.000027829912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009133617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066255876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9714719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001250363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002409132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04790473},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4285490980","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04466-8","title":"Scientometric portraits of recognized scientists: a structured literature review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"Macquarie University","keywords":"Portrait; Scientometrics; Data science; Library science; Sociology; Information retrieval; History; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.4423497706215747,"score_gpt":0.5649995372104198,"score_spread":0.12264976658884513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285490980","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03977888,0.8299387,0.013566956,0.045562588,0.0015784306,0.00040051402,0.0039740535,0.00012979135,0.06507011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2392446,0.7262555,0.019602465,0.005213398,0.0018534998,0.0004043664,0.0029574556,0.000083332074,0.0043853954],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99154377,0.0031644024,0.0011628366,0.00074694114,0.0030789822,0.00030296386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9472717,0.03642162,0.005779069,0.0012366745,0.008665223,0.0006257683],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011263212,0.0006056923,0.00080938835,0.076338746,0.0020916169,0.007469592,0.0012725785,0.0017175875,0.0030899828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04682267,0.00046509225,0.0010407938,0.067611024,0.0021694542,0.009373881,0.0022454048,0.0020767713,0.0008977191],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016465619,0.00007386916,0.0140138045,0.029257657,0.000718251,0.0010509352,0.020804735,0.001716004,0.0035363233,0.10420129,0.05950034,0.764962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029089488,0.00015181207,0.051137216,0.06443088,0.00096321787,0.0022245215,0.027908616,0.0015843057,0.0020805714,0.060825855,0.7885423,0.0001215959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036731423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012059056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92366123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004943159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008451982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05956626},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4298394588","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04510-7","title":"Identifying science in the news: An assessment of the precision and recall of Altmetric.com news mention data","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Hyperlink; Recall; Information retrieval; Precision and recall; Data science; World Wide Web; Web page; Psychology","score_opus":0.7616169543367562,"score_gpt":0.6597713076679573,"score_spread":0.10184564666879892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298394588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8969305,0.008396987,0.050741274,0.0015023965,0.0006599506,0.0015886527,0.013850669,0.002327451,0.024002185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88960123,0.0016416495,0.08885735,0.00064128224,0.00050234597,0.001286035,0.013888953,0.0004421142,0.0031389976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9002556,0.039125264,0.01882472,0.011080769,0.029401725,0.0013119299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45667374,0.3844621,0.05593044,0.034457676,0.06669451,0.0017815167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11862915,0.001036808,0.001800332,0.03740576,0.0015233938,0.0061341138,0.002243092,0.0022448718,0.001303348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32151672,0.00072358036,0.002074314,0.019180033,0.0017980285,0.005945188,0.0043352647,0.0010918321,0.0015714002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014054362,0.00043290292,0.7375831,0.004032589,0.0029510239,0.00052544713,0.013828719,0.0024795774,0.0059833857,0.002245238,0.01337837,0.21515425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021799398,0.0010657652,0.84247047,0.0020490037,0.003199127,0.0024648642,0.010602639,0.038212214,0.027288571,0.0050080335,0.06680412,0.0006172983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032932519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003969311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9625943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013046482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009602467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6273784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298620868","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04511-6","title":"Different measures of international faculty and their impacts on global rankings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regional science; Political science; Econometrics; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.07138703678488607,"score_gpt":0.37155696008756645,"score_spread":0.3001699233026804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298620868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718839,0.00039100615,0.0013565607,0.00046086434,0.00007766265,0.000024803143,0.0009134231,0.000043075288,0.024848625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983151,0.00007674834,0.00031764284,0.00001778378,0.000025989555,0.000007731552,0.00030488652,0.000011300932,0.0009228594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567455,0.0017615985,0.00026476217,0.00036718015,0.0013212606,0.0006105472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98312217,0.005679825,0.00473402,0.001140975,0.0033446425,0.0019782505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00540828,0.0003940845,0.00046117132,0.0056036613,0.0007326831,0.0031664816,0.00035469478,0.00014766533,0.0057578874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02372919,0.00007838989,0.000441518,0.009632087,0.0010666029,0.0014359341,0.0021524972,0.0005151095,0.00042205784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001324871,0.00006651896,0.9478275,0.000068035195,0.00011728654,0.000048769547,0.0013096206,0.0009760958,0.00035512,0.0034684835,0.0013120802,0.044317916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004955087,0.00013294621,0.98970103,0.000041235315,0.00003955409,0.000030145564,0.0043675145,0.00077891967,0.00056902773,0.00091504655,0.0033989628,0.000020712636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006446612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011731087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013751226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010241151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028602123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304145111","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04537-w","title":"Global impact or national accessibility? A paradox in China’s science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Political science; Visibility; International community; Scientific communication; Scientific publishing; Regional science; Sociology; Library science; Geography; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6015316297703749,"score_gpt":0.6593529174440662,"score_spread":0.057821287673691324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304145111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8557665,0.008504869,0.0019686022,0.02543378,0.00018479634,0.000018399154,0.00045553225,0.00006270355,0.10760491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851483,0.0005128475,0.00008836821,0.000206102,0.00006230812,0.0000032706077,0.000035914727,0.000003577827,0.00057289144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845016,0.00030698456,0.00010227808,0.00024343861,0.00059338904,0.0003038111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99100447,0.0038188333,0.001215807,0.0006178591,0.0020337938,0.0013091235],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033869282,0.00018102482,0.00081606786,0.005939346,0.0018610442,0.0049251644,0.0006643419,0.000930383,0.0059107947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009658761,0.00013657442,0.000326409,0.010082017,0.0038015712,0.0069902977,0.002835195,0.0011730454,0.0002539987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036246056,0.00020812363,0.24195276,0.00081139314,0.0002484983,0.0010404028,0.010689829,0.0038029328,0.0011271334,0.5694513,0.012459286,0.15784596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011979177,0.00019043236,0.54724413,0.00036348865,0.0002789235,0.00042230112,0.013962787,0.0072049177,0.0010873687,0.36940184,0.059604917,0.00011920942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02398084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025196455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99406064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046815025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038742628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047682464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306385889","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04542-z","title":"Evaluating the online impact of reporting guidelines for randomised trial reports and protocols: a cross-sectional web-based data analysis of CONSORT and SPIRIT initiatives","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Cross-sectional study; Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; Web application; Psychology; Medicine; Data science; Family medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Computer science; World Wide Web; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.9616850912565456,"score_gpt":0.7406745301888077,"score_spread":0.22101056106773787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306385889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6657665,0.015028974,0.16709252,0.0044176844,0.000910677,0.09510866,0.033177447,0.0018427499,0.01665476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6627353,0.002482514,0.17118865,0.0014641483,0.00028593963,0.14958903,0.009978023,0.0007880201,0.0014883211],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.42159104,0.35086867,0.13374528,0.015702212,0.07480978,0.0032830408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.07870569,0.72045493,0.113348044,0.03521134,0.05058159,0.00169843],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4590303,0.0015643374,0.0027912653,0.034086872,0.0021020724,0.007580907,0.002291918,0.0019011887,0.005399566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7855298,0.0015809587,0.0063262386,0.030901583,0.0044780695,0.009237044,0.011036812,0.0033614407,0.0014767064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005919848,0.0023515841,0.47413245,0.057721917,0.014786102,0.00050965766,0.059214573,0.0026410744,0.0027068646,0.019972064,0.01665778,0.3433862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031995766,0.010017438,0.7407965,0.036387175,0.015290325,0.0013277252,0.037687924,0.0135966735,0.014697005,0.024736486,0.10129191,0.0009712493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015157171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018755348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9659131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005692764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012729112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.667112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309043512","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04546-9","title":"Researcher geographic mobility and publication productivity: an investigation into individual and institutional characteristics and the roles of academicians","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Spatial and Panel Data Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Productivity; Institution; China; Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Association (psychology); Regional science; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Economic growth; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07782835240499963,"score_gpt":0.2776165607269312,"score_spread":0.19978820832193156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309043512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99537224,0.0009824962,0.0004477276,0.0006906916,0.000014565567,0.000008134561,0.00060736504,0.000012642576,0.0018641241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985985,0.0002637304,0.0001948807,0.000034181387,0.000033060296,0.0000062932863,0.00023820718,0.000005677101,0.00062545214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99560577,0.002300872,0.00054058246,0.00042409808,0.0007143758,0.00041429125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9000506,0.05386393,0.028464682,0.005588154,0.005168486,0.0068642613],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007858249,0.00017545273,0.00053440116,0.0067757983,0.00091198436,0.0031566084,0.0009342208,0.00075473427,0.0050563915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047070246,0.00014800405,0.0007894596,0.016547581,0.00089365465,0.0026430541,0.0018127485,0.0005413649,0.0008916499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008790193,0.000032702275,0.992394,0.00002661355,0.00012602686,0.0000652736,0.0012898303,0.00012085974,0.00009624786,0.0004399248,0.0001954468,0.005125216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020483649,0.00012428102,0.98767465,0.000039421713,0.00013869046,0.00025590952,0.008128485,0.0007543955,0.0002244356,0.00095073716,0.0016748804,0.000013617361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005728063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006341658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068869995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001739746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04155886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311046123","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04565-6","title":"Retraction of Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences lacks justification","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Bibliometrics; Library science; Data science; Political science; Regional science; Computer science; Geography; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.7729591827362152,"score_gpt":0.6206454994995081,"score_spread":0.15231368323670713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311046123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6718189,0.03676087,0.0042710854,0.14338058,0.0073012128,0.00031620477,0.0052576796,0.00028143835,0.13061208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749383,0.005310865,0.0016617511,0.008656539,0.00293969,0.000081688464,0.0015235916,0.00010506286,0.00478251],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9251544,0.021342576,0.013920871,0.006237131,0.029440358,0.0039047427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.23093642,0.45099044,0.18393011,0.052325156,0.07263839,0.00917954],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07542236,0.00049718365,0.0011048918,0.014112141,0.003462114,0.010412205,0.0031371894,0.0044823037,0.010611672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49321115,0.0005008598,0.0012238625,0.025391517,0.0066745086,0.0072817113,0.004903984,0.0047527947,0.0019316843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014716256,0.00023614238,0.67179453,0.003780383,0.0026169694,0.0024141024,0.014664162,0.0006814203,0.00096364686,0.05970917,0.068454355,0.17321345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003604637,0.00041387437,0.79882777,0.004748033,0.0015151851,0.0031537726,0.016915545,0.001254749,0.0027547728,0.036149252,0.13369511,0.00021135711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005966587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006534933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025124983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052289334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39887637},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4311696862","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04601-5","title":"Women and key positions in scientific collaboration networks: analyzing central scientists’ profiles in the artificial intelligence ecosystem through a gender lens","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada; Concordia University","funders":"National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Key (lock); Set (abstract data type); Social network analysis; Computer science; Knowledge management; Data science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Social media; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.48391299523641157,"score_gpt":0.5021268655735966,"score_spread":0.01821387033718508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311696862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889608,0.00067843887,0.0009080074,0.00075282954,0.000028881246,0.000018082128,0.00034555237,0.0000043208256,0.008303082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989899,0.0001179752,0.00016427948,0.000030194291,0.0000106217885,0.000010024134,0.000069352514,0.000002486671,0.0006052479],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975204,0.0010233053,0.00016229783,0.00036167743,0.00053417933,0.00039815812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98403394,0.007895257,0.0047951187,0.00043721194,0.0012488032,0.0015895865],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035687522,0.00020317362,0.00024988115,0.0024458463,0.0012535505,0.0029958098,0.00038244427,0.00045121988,0.0063858908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018905172,0.00010858024,0.000266563,0.0032055823,0.0010437503,0.00254457,0.002081438,0.0004755485,0.00059348607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015948086,0.000060664097,0.9490418,0.00009992209,0.00007796544,0.00018558487,0.021947155,0.00013685501,0.00040284466,0.005369941,0.000878011,0.021639654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008737232,0.00007893556,0.9114415,0.00020458206,0.00006718618,0.00025334454,0.074266516,0.0011596957,0.00041247683,0.004021347,0.008059425,0.00002625206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049595637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008564588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010918916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011636025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02136296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311809706","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04599-w","title":"Self-citation behavior within the health allied professions’ scientific sector in Italy: a bibliometric analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Citation; Multivariate statistics; Psychology; Multivariate analysis; Significant difference; Health science; Statistics; Actuarial science; Library science; Medicine; Medical education; Political science; Economics; Computer science; MEDLINE; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5549541081458416,"score_gpt":0.5712223387063445,"score_spread":0.016268230560502972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311809706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98954517,0.001704985,0.00021946144,0.00066960783,0.000023365814,0.000018986872,0.002302295,0.00003299781,0.005483013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962255,0.0004939842,0.00021665552,0.000051442727,0.00008898124,0.000021339252,0.001856876,0.000011882678,0.0010334927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685466,0.0010572787,0.00047313885,0.0004939466,0.0007676521,0.00035336587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97751176,0.010712087,0.006215709,0.001291557,0.0031021128,0.0011667404],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00373711,0.0001970358,0.0005412752,0.01712611,0.00054190727,0.0020328958,0.0005612356,0.00075694657,0.0035468235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020512138,0.00012796585,0.0007665224,0.018896269,0.0005370611,0.0009639072,0.0011885603,0.00036219176,0.00093633943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057152127,0.00006713672,0.9833054,0.00010937796,0.00012483685,0.000053392592,0.0011312373,0.0002089392,0.00013812816,0.0003963661,0.0012803284,0.013127527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030203198,0.00002240994,0.9979976,0.000017598673,0.000037340375,0.00006142822,0.00038605495,0.00040702237,0.00004395875,0.000080764505,0.00093905436,0.0000036846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02002721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018756058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014495972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018109513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039821327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311812368","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04589-y","title":"Measuring h-index and scholarly productivity in academic dermatology in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Diversity and Career in Medicine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Alberta; University of Saskatchewan; Université de Montréal; Université Laval; University of Toronto; University of British Columbia; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases","keywords":"Quartile; Index (typography); Productivity; Medicine; Logistic regression; Ranking (information retrieval); Demography; Family medicine; Psychology; Sociology; Internal medicine; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.09083608700775822,"score_gpt":0.3045341623938356,"score_spread":0.21369807538607735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311812368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810433,0.0015802466,0.00040534386,0.0021039555,0.000057214074,0.000052311017,0.003476165,0.00003951988,0.011241837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963329,0.0004985923,0.0003425699,0.00009872639,0.000012324398,0.000011183084,0.0006163601,0.000009100007,0.0020781325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968258,0.0003362976,0.00017888614,0.00024546625,0.0013903523,0.0010232386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839109,0.0015797691,0.0014259821,0.0001995204,0.008888512,0.00399521],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024935815,0.00028733473,0.0006147244,0.00584003,0.004084687,0.0036576474,0.00196928,0.00059316657,0.0041571143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016565066,0.00023036501,0.0006339236,0.013135203,0.0010879402,0.00073600165,0.0014599325,0.001048742,0.00039306676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011368533,0.00010253917,0.96375906,0.00008337695,0.00007945164,0.00009962664,0.0011326361,0.0012289649,0.00013375032,0.0012264792,0.0041506253,0.027889835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011623914,0.000027163256,0.9916294,0.0000643983,0.00003313411,0.0000575045,0.0031240368,0.0016055243,0.00018304511,0.00020288142,0.003039219,0.000021976048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99750644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08189187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12384789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59416986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313400493","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04627-9","title":"An artificial intelligence-based framework for data-driven categorization of computer scientists: a case study of world’s Top 10 computing departments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Context (archaeology); Cluster analysis; Metric (unit); Rank (graph theory); Artificial intelligence; Categorization; Rand index; Data mining; Index (typography); Artificial neural network; Machine learning; Information retrieval; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6906770264083343,"score_gpt":0.6059824450165449,"score_spread":0.08469458139178943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313400493","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043632884,0.00033824384,0.9362899,0.004702513,0.000085233645,0.00096255715,0.0020604408,0.0011721549,0.010756084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22314209,0.00011840476,0.77246994,0.00025279008,0.000029012348,0.0003231892,0.0019495441,0.000062597326,0.0016524893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450463,0.0024833297,0.00046502636,0.0008365056,0.0014588236,0.00025168053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910013,0.005356305,0.00058547326,0.000747511,0.0018973259,0.00041209732],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008770975,0.0005176658,0.0006014428,0.0083216755,0.0019529846,0.0065155663,0.002726101,0.0016655449,0.0032062652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01569603,0.00031091328,0.0013850454,0.0076755984,0.0016898819,0.004214345,0.0023349016,0.0013189964,0.00086019916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003542264,0.0012189319,0.04319157,0.0009659029,0.0003345136,0.0017160089,0.007455666,0.08782403,0.0111055,0.43804893,0.016624542,0.3911603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048588947,0.00012463599,0.009254722,0.00021621083,0.000090004585,0.00058299146,0.0026489163,0.7392063,0.0048345774,0.19886991,0.044027023,0.000096050266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026007444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034970917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038056471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060004466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051712155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321611868","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04657-x","title":"Research mobility to the United States: a bibliometric analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"China; Presidency; Political science; Politics; Cohort; Demographic economics; Medicine; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.8030659521882623,"score_gpt":0.6690166332988601,"score_spread":0.1340493188894022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321611868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751057,0.0038713408,0.00054555124,0.0008761604,0.0000446682,0.000032933942,0.003958453,0.00002280084,0.0155424345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99302906,0.0021432485,0.0005811572,0.000089952984,0.00006425671,0.000025155612,0.0030215017,0.000009079152,0.001036676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832946,0.00046828226,0.00021146909,0.00022727123,0.0005636858,0.00019990506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99300957,0.0022948864,0.0018934933,0.0002137502,0.002158438,0.00042979902],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017768296,0.00022317749,0.00056507124,0.021461751,0.0011620091,0.002747954,0.0005104817,0.0005201914,0.0023528524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012653208,0.00010271451,0.0007186962,0.045890424,0.00047216192,0.002340207,0.0020918886,0.00043973225,0.00043379294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012723127,0.00009015176,0.9493944,0.00021319914,0.00043769658,0.00021208439,0.0016022449,0.001563678,0.00025254217,0.0031454747,0.0047564874,0.03820482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001142636,0.00008186329,0.9740105,0.00017280929,0.00037477832,0.00022538926,0.0062512998,0.0031484722,0.00026897236,0.00078767445,0.014650395,0.000016276492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06479662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07043247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9785383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001803786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022210851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12883896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366824053","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04696-4","title":"Scientific production of an oral implantology journal: a 5-year bibliometric study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Observational study; Impact factor; Scope (computer science); Scopus; China; Library science; European union; Citation; Demography; Geography; Social science; Medicine; MEDLINE; Regional science; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Pathology; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.11277669678380281,"score_gpt":0.4224531671033209,"score_spread":0.3096764703195181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366824053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9240284,0.035141733,0.00091305276,0.00097190286,0.000184172,0.00058655045,0.029937169,0.00021152347,0.00802539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639608,0.013499115,0.0017056182,0.00010871102,0.00030142866,0.0006219843,0.01877737,0.00004979674,0.0009751603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847542,0.0017240038,0.005819074,0.0008354618,0.0061959997,0.0006712356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93723726,0.023067975,0.023121813,0.0017945381,0.012671218,0.0021072105],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009483804,0.00066449575,0.0023010701,0.108909786,0.0014009639,0.0044250283,0.0010621282,0.0010328365,0.0037382303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04103124,0.00039065545,0.00394766,0.12780914,0.00097147154,0.0042614206,0.002930508,0.00066017243,0.0009885055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036941413,0.00016567876,0.948878,0.0062842155,0.0019289816,0.00041449428,0.001701099,0.00048885914,0.00034659123,0.00037822285,0.003104598,0.035939902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036418212,0.00022585245,0.9859926,0.0008454461,0.0011914449,0.0011047537,0.0022898952,0.0009099142,0.00025411102,0.00026148147,0.0068254336,0.00006274394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005447717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054238145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8910902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003151198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038094078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0501557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378838751","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04729-y","title":"Assessing the quest of SMEs in pivoting for new technological ventures: comparing the patenting indexes of seven developed cities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan","keywords":"Commit; Business; Upgrade; Silicon valley; Industrial organization; Cluster (spacecraft); Competitive advantage; Marketing; Sorting; Entrepreneurship; Computer science; Database; Finance","score_opus":0.1530829460319046,"score_gpt":0.34833974741526863,"score_spread":0.19525680138336404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378838751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987447,0.00004053633,0.000087540604,0.000019982206,6.759035e-7,0.0000035847856,0.000086933615,0.000001952251,0.0010140571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995042,0.000032242468,0.00007493288,0.0000032619216,9.546716e-7,0.0000020886412,0.00020586266,0.0000012610922,0.00017516983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931765,0.00013498255,0.00006795024,0.000092546645,0.0002019911,0.00018483355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99408543,0.0021412438,0.0013784275,0.00034407832,0.0013915704,0.0006592181],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014924407,0.00023698635,0.00042559762,0.0045084525,0.00061768206,0.0031689962,0.00044414616,0.0005043477,0.0011843804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060942513,0.00014601523,0.00044057204,0.006464191,0.00095309666,0.0012926463,0.0017254599,0.00036992258,0.0002603805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003783555,0.00008919246,0.98065233,0.000057205132,0.00020070541,0.0001479126,0.0016474952,0.0016267074,0.0014642873,0.0025158175,0.00020212434,0.011017854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016733837,0.00008131381,0.9916747,0.000013033196,0.0000791892,0.000027816483,0.004147064,0.0018797815,0.00079645496,0.00049775746,0.0007754813,0.000010665704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027130911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060129527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99549156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011953264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013608186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05394596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379015792","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04741-2","title":"Letter to the editor: Laxdal (2023) “The sex gap in sports and exercise medicine research: who does research on females?”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Sex and Gender in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care","keywords":"Sports medicine; Sports science; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Physical therapy; Physiology","score_opus":0.4665820957653342,"score_gpt":0.5100070099196117,"score_spread":0.04342491415427746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379015792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001326898,0.00086024456,0.00002925876,0.95309854,0.04461674,0.000009487946,0.0000595329,0.000014811661,0.0011787222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009982346,0.00062136,0.000060255905,0.9495076,0.04464039,0.00003205347,0.000016865752,0.00001599201,0.004107252],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994451,0.0013860415,0.00089832017,0.0007538019,0.0016735633,0.0008372491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772043,0.011568498,0.0019190392,0.0005015429,0.0047727586,0.0040337937],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007878894,0.0010704064,0.0022354438,0.0013666423,0.0059315413,0.006444737,0.0020117632,0.061313294,0.009839129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057731044,0.0013601065,0.0016803258,0.0013099144,0.0027418714,0.0044697635,0.0022358247,0.043140337,0.009386975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024169523,0.000009868832,0.00023504374,0.000031395764,0.0000064971355,0.0003002591,0.000057741625,0.000011321515,0.000029673278,0.0004521766,0.9965934,0.002248516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001239341,0.000044318876,0.0017517044,0.00076155615,0.000046679314,0.0011215607,0.00063197565,0.00021387954,0.00014209576,0.0042256773,0.9908568,0.00007986563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011515719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019480923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047055865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011200501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041668117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381053087","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04758-7","title":"The marginalizing effect of journal submission fees in Accounting and Finance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University; Saint Mary's University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Accounting; Elite; Unintended consequences; Business; Quality (philosophy); Principal (computer security); Finance; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012715760344684279,"score_gpt":0.255071190898144,"score_spread":0.24235543055345973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381053087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9203217,0.003791699,0.021787101,0.009516052,0.00050206087,0.000066227796,0.0004929442,0.00064434257,0.04287791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935453,0.00028636554,0.0011096769,0.00029363297,0.00028808106,0.0000126518225,0.000066499124,0.00010656764,0.00429119],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789069,0.013507548,0.00096019,0.0020915105,0.0025421719,0.0019916825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.41075644,0.5248548,0.017913831,0.021981152,0.013316577,0.011177183],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021802975,0.00092987966,0.0020343221,0.0024512704,0.0020639934,0.00664257,0.0015725138,0.002291751,0.016312161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2606235,0.0005428968,0.0014129975,0.0038890552,0.0046745175,0.005294755,0.0032543903,0.0034401566,0.0014202928],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005949804,0.001740507,0.45376664,0.0010447366,0.0012373492,0.001984847,0.004281427,0.03524809,0.011823107,0.25348708,0.01585148,0.21358503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031910368,0.0010896851,0.6903894,0.00030754352,0.0016177945,0.0011220518,0.0030723584,0.053380895,0.014492781,0.22369067,0.010243633,0.00027405735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012682258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008967159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99754876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021711013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062140943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115306556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381682726","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04768-5","title":"On the lack of women researchers in the Middle East and North Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Diversity and Career in Medicine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Middle East; Seniority; Productivity; Political science; Gender equality; Publication; Geography; Economic growth; Development economics; Demographic economics; Sociology; Gender studies; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.5835821107292325,"score_gpt":0.3947975949750255,"score_spread":0.18878451575420702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381682726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9295737,0.018883185,0.0004904251,0.019327873,0.00026626748,0.00004578081,0.0012118092,0.000022266613,0.030178707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898801,0.0059677134,0.00030738438,0.0013194082,0.00008842123,0.000036300185,0.00015774698,0.0000095890255,0.0022333108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959777,0.001538694,0.0003867712,0.0004939047,0.00082601217,0.0007769544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981417,0.0064081703,0.0069822823,0.00069702294,0.0021685031,0.0023269881],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006333179,0.00024289382,0.0004712027,0.003951851,0.0026853522,0.0033483685,0.0006894026,0.00050277,0.006754916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01660694,0.00024658313,0.00021837027,0.007471615,0.0014578542,0.00273714,0.0025021276,0.00053618796,0.00064206717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003037929,0.00007814007,0.66769856,0.0031775224,0.000265417,0.0018863057,0.118354775,0.00015346149,0.00242461,0.01686077,0.013789405,0.17500727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026495814,0.000101042286,0.70576316,0.0031457942,0.00014118619,0.0011135305,0.16806467,0.00015956376,0.0010474582,0.0032871307,0.11710618,0.00004368488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018166462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029160859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99604815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017150996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006334487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036121428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386402131","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04818-y","title":"The Matthew Effect in China’s social sciences and humanities research: a comparative analysis of CSSCI and SSCI","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science","keywords":"Elite; China; Humanities; Social science; Citation analysis; Political science; Sociology; Citation; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.8933759979167228,"score_gpt":0.6993538977340414,"score_spread":0.1940221001826814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386402131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97014743,0.0035951156,0.0009362575,0.0010528022,0.00006818038,0.000030516036,0.0011100355,0.00008637444,0.022973161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989367,0.00027582308,0.00015756657,0.000017355802,0.00004715232,0.0000055694954,0.00022633308,0.000005787874,0.00032775616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748296,0.0005211221,0.0002509925,0.0003364014,0.0011048849,0.00030364766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96004474,0.022692004,0.007790168,0.0019751564,0.0050098766,0.0024880925],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003954055,0.00022035892,0.00069686456,0.016517438,0.0011502616,0.0020432353,0.00062776543,0.0003316044,0.0037187184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027218329,0.00011289982,0.000763743,0.02006832,0.0024266439,0.002019402,0.0018571165,0.00054805074,0.00027730296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007810246,0.000020822066,0.96041024,0.00020800326,0.0002545145,0.00020424504,0.0010199886,0.0006354549,0.00019690272,0.0134429755,0.0018303955,0.021698419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008750542,0.00004046391,0.9917657,0.00004350104,0.00019450982,0.0000855607,0.0014627523,0.0014106521,0.00016982575,0.0019094888,0.0028944358,0.000014423876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037097733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038664494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99604595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002759111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00459288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07376355},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4387014740","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04837-9","title":"An analysis of international mobility and research productivity in computer science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regional science; China; Scopus; Economic geography; Demographic economics; Political science; Geography; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.707261089982269,"score_gpt":0.6701808773690084,"score_spread":0.037080212613260555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387014740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914328,0.00078447175,0.0017280605,0.00034278992,0.000012033958,0.000012167569,0.0011723421,0.000025128544,0.004490184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989041,0.0001624427,0.00023476673,0.0000051955394,0.000011428753,0.0000066457596,0.00041108156,0.0000034722984,0.00026079285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907047,0.00030610728,0.000087257205,0.00013715736,0.00019238052,0.00020660725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98685986,0.004991467,0.0053820983,0.00055290596,0.0012039564,0.0010096974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014532882,0.00020432252,0.00033859623,0.0072822105,0.00057069905,0.0017237862,0.0003791938,0.0003490128,0.0028982137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013593584,0.00008844728,0.00039469523,0.014594335,0.0005998983,0.0017661933,0.0016852467,0.00042496176,0.00047466872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001568575,0.0000519972,0.95959646,0.000092219954,0.00020102524,0.0002737695,0.001641746,0.005394323,0.0003365313,0.0052349027,0.001309832,0.025710428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012210123,0.00012692662,0.9651339,0.00010611451,0.00009320611,0.0003880399,0.0077216583,0.013318115,0.00045875908,0.0048909388,0.0077210222,0.000029152978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070026717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050602215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000831327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005278785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013923824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387937804","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04846-8","title":"Interdisciplinarity affects the technological impact of scientific research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Scope (computer science); Balance (ability); Term (time); Technological change; Scientific literature; Computer science; Psychology; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Biology","score_opus":0.8337135587900643,"score_gpt":0.7017474832136088,"score_spread":0.13196607557645545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387937804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9595787,0.0016210881,0.0026925304,0.0011689691,0.000028725348,0.000036568992,0.0001596747,0.000060434835,0.034653287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985581,0.00027444618,0.00039340058,0.000041744315,0.000029497363,0.000008775154,0.000049144295,0.0000095305,0.00063529366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98743767,0.0051565887,0.0008893992,0.0011760914,0.0045400145,0.0008002024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7713343,0.15393285,0.035196193,0.009843133,0.020766396,0.00892721],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010869181,0.0003001945,0.0005899494,0.0059886244,0.0013362749,0.009910679,0.0007691764,0.001895118,0.0066628726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09189845,0.0003148084,0.0006264876,0.006841555,0.0018167598,0.0048811655,0.0035757413,0.0015538527,0.0016527537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006381955,0.0008782921,0.8768485,0.00033270652,0.0006827287,0.0009707419,0.00304751,0.00569342,0.009302886,0.018369613,0.0009974468,0.08223791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007862852,0.0004197,0.93649083,0.00009810146,0.00028862205,0.0006246115,0.004695638,0.005845483,0.004325749,0.042217877,0.0048322584,0.00008247871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009548773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097429304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016471839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017112114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05748236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388106222","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04854-8","title":"Publish and flourish: investigating publication requirements for PhD students in China","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"China; Publication; Index (typography); Citation; Science Citation Index; Library science; Sample (material); Citation index; Order (exchange); Publishing; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Business; Law","score_opus":0.7616037686334712,"score_gpt":0.6142861649481008,"score_spread":0.1473176036853704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388106222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99554354,0.00027674032,0.00010193308,0.0006297418,0.000010640092,0.000020884127,0.0003252859,0.000009546926,0.0030815771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983525,0.0000931881,0.00007606248,0.00004780937,0.000023627392,0.000011576633,0.00027281008,0.0000049027385,0.0011175275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944131,0.0008371205,0.0006549413,0.00046161588,0.0025309895,0.0011022867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93757665,0.019500734,0.015669238,0.0016058485,0.010322684,0.015324948],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00835312,0.00025940768,0.0005850089,0.0072774454,0.0017625609,0.0035882744,0.0011916454,0.0008910537,0.0035504268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034696132,0.00024253187,0.00047817169,0.0076279608,0.0008519032,0.0022566263,0.0021757497,0.00076979713,0.0005837526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029890955,0.0001903318,0.95455104,0.00018509234,0.000055928158,0.00035643202,0.0049427813,0.00029477928,0.0010167151,0.0013642199,0.0019672906,0.034776527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015803793,0.00010675515,0.9928646,0.000015974672,0.000020179537,0.00006938142,0.0038921398,0.00074368314,0.00026022192,0.0003966817,0.001602253,0.000012347226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019305332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029508611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032800355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013323048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044176042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389686822","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04876-2","title":"The oligopoly of open access publishing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Publishing; Oligopoly; Open access publishing; Business; Computer science; Political science; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.9066864170215745,"score_gpt":0.7241775974229555,"score_spread":0.18250881959861898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389686822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20705366,0.004043217,0.12557876,0.014831856,0.00038182418,0.00022375134,0.0015844927,0.00047169364,0.64583075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9463512,0.0017337396,0.010278345,0.0007498403,0.00036154108,0.00011098616,0.00017809299,0.0000985817,0.04013768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571735,0.0016777924,0.00018676679,0.0006511674,0.0012674187,0.00049949024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977862,0.013274781,0.0022937167,0.0022686746,0.0019097453,0.0023910105],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027870145,0.00032556773,0.0012125624,0.0030072895,0.0035944309,0.012726476,0.0008942394,0.001966873,0.0320272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01813951,0.0007296893,0.0007559367,0.0043024123,0.0074024918,0.007835734,0.00230501,0.002019992,0.0024272732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048409947,0.00002928935,0.0008112095,0.0000639385,0.00001611279,0.00008374244,0.00014264167,0.0019848214,0.00023850858,0.985954,0.002908604,0.007718877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032934968,0.000017803364,0.0011631283,0.000041746258,0.000011006203,0.00007077628,0.00014493322,0.004998911,0.00012404424,0.9799401,0.013438448,0.00001610893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081589725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011794688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99910575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004272208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050178207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10714173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390694881","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04904-1","title":"Country names in journal titles: shaping researchers’ perception of journals quality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Charles Sturt University","keywords":"Audience measurement; Publishing; Mainstream; Quality (philosophy); Internationalization; Perception; Diversity (politics); Scope (computer science); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Psychology; Law; Business","score_opus":0.8876352380282057,"score_gpt":0.7020697218535584,"score_spread":0.18556551617464723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390694881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876243,0.002160042,0.0013459775,0.0019675791,0.0001912572,0.00007509874,0.00018904844,0.00002474227,0.0064220135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763143,0.0005385175,0.00091958354,0.00030407542,0.000079999256,0.00003592805,0.00006698002,0.00001199947,0.00041132106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9699589,0.017232064,0.004365004,0.001357239,0.006026592,0.0010603627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6911482,0.16499333,0.09113558,0.007052202,0.0315845,0.014086165],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035853073,0.00026231707,0.0005642806,0.004176479,0.0019693822,0.0066864765,0.00071846787,0.0009929294,0.0034518861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16014424,0.0004476912,0.00048527188,0.004361044,0.002876232,0.004179211,0.0035909074,0.0009935522,0.00060527824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062564213,0.00020811564,0.82885873,0.0014566106,0.00026043697,0.0006978175,0.11961496,0.00022058062,0.0035213386,0.0015960251,0.0024130365,0.040526636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077812205,0.0007641171,0.7824232,0.0013625135,0.00017677213,0.0010345358,0.19182417,0.0007220709,0.0016896655,0.0027149338,0.017040348,0.00016988114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015803342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022915918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015406001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018785641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18961143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391175495","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-04930-7","title":"Exploring relationships among eminent psychologists using co-occurrence analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Mental Health Research Topics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Data science; Computer science","score_opus":0.7976071504131107,"score_gpt":0.5730943597756223,"score_spread":0.2245127906374884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391175495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98108035,0.0005333369,0.010317755,0.00059274945,0.00009727345,0.00015544785,0.0021633098,0.00008419519,0.0049754204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918777,0.00023309978,0.005543511,0.000038616326,0.000084132516,0.00016118734,0.0012554605,0.000011884261,0.000794292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994313,0.0022538851,0.0008152443,0.0005775773,0.001524315,0.00051598216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9062328,0.07231601,0.009061868,0.002290372,0.006983226,0.0031156978],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005220958,0.00027122907,0.000513107,0.01326139,0.0018798779,0.0022291266,0.0007548383,0.0005343069,0.0037681172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062424112,0.00017325183,0.00071741996,0.019583099,0.00042769196,0.0018995238,0.0020146077,0.00094192155,0.0005115609],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012714697,0.00014836832,0.95583916,0.00016028126,0.00020850402,0.00016830314,0.00453637,0.00021698113,0.00039255302,0.0016709155,0.0013681997,0.03516308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021154849,0.00016519033,0.95917,0.00012343298,0.00023309815,0.0006653924,0.019606717,0.008277243,0.00065756415,0.004643886,0.006401171,0.000035213878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01073258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019898891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9867386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009311763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020258846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027611434},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4392109487","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-04948-x","title":"Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Scientometrics; Data science; Regional science; Bibliometrics; World Wide Web; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; Sociology; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.5043046486588112,"score_gpt":0.5676367040364447,"score_spread":0.06333205537763353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392109487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988118,0.0013538008,0.00020756536,0.000901548,0.00002389704,0.0000068543127,0.0042810254,0.00001974523,0.0050874157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998004,0.00020206581,0.00007241553,0.00005888206,0.000022479842,0.0000035592643,0.0012133897,0.000009170027,0.0004140767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998243,0.00040356338,0.00022727474,0.00038183478,0.00029302435,0.00045140093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819781,0.0069216643,0.006630583,0.0012468974,0.0022003548,0.0010224152],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002271252,0.00013888409,0.00047783973,0.0032173144,0.00034968555,0.0015205526,0.0005943508,0.0005111714,0.006912026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016135983,0.00015190101,0.0008487429,0.0061897947,0.00052252656,0.0011713615,0.0014210282,0.00053011905,0.00080546364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018633525,0.000030449479,0.9888391,0.00009218504,0.0003592977,0.000084367435,0.0011911294,0.0002093348,0.0007138673,0.0016214049,0.0010347359,0.0056376955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031116847,0.00001432186,0.997951,0.000020424732,0.000053455897,0.000060775936,0.00084133993,0.000084248924,0.00008332841,0.00022198731,0.0006610457,0.0000049744353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023133676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032050632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99678266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043898236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069722865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045998037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394768444","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-04981-w","title":"Is interdisciplinarity more likely to produce novel or disruptive research?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"Novelty; Scopus; Computer science; Data science; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Creativity; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Social psychology; MEDLINE; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.89847556445197,"score_gpt":0.7359858661900647,"score_spread":0.1624896982619053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394768444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9089454,0.007082843,0.012918822,0.021625604,0.0005220407,0.00018289458,0.00061011035,0.00015252279,0.047959745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99343127,0.0012888362,0.0025023322,0.0010583479,0.00042397002,0.00006624769,0.00026339813,0.000033810527,0.000931825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97267985,0.010093061,0.002722904,0.003528118,0.009013627,0.0019623565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.681436,0.16015357,0.094770275,0.022775868,0.024057321,0.016807035],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02822958,0.00042771993,0.0010090581,0.008621292,0.00198568,0.007569002,0.0013997363,0.0030780858,0.0078164805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15182531,0.00034931602,0.0011028107,0.009500761,0.0034942015,0.0058774874,0.004244706,0.0022610903,0.0016557658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007943477,0.00068769656,0.8204942,0.0010957096,0.00106182,0.0012283074,0.0042710784,0.0006625384,0.003770218,0.031528763,0.0028245412,0.13158071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031059945,0.0013588317,0.7297847,0.0008725058,0.0010939458,0.0043653753,0.019499587,0.0027953607,0.006308223,0.19471389,0.038761895,0.000135119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069340254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010825451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002052124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031020094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14929408},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4396237870","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05017-z","title":"CFMf topic-model: comparison with LDA and Top2Vec","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Computer science; Topic model; Data science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.08423497244561039,"score_gpt":0.45627159766623665,"score_spread":0.37203662522062625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396237870","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34119245,0.023168277,0.5492099,0.003117439,0.0032395332,0.0010006109,0.025903717,0.030936377,0.022231795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72024125,0.0054151807,0.21465173,0.0004380302,0.0011723156,0.00068056805,0.044907343,0.0021228844,0.010370646],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974137,0.0013220118,0.00014854516,0.00043643118,0.0004907686,0.00018855049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932869,0.003920843,0.00017023164,0.000853373,0.0015244833,0.00024404681],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056627514,0.001582748,0.0014517101,0.0057478403,0.0012653881,0.002206641,0.0011786709,0.0014547851,0.006297775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013831391,0.00027354897,0.001375929,0.0043178336,0.00033730714,0.0038511357,0.001096023,0.0013114418,0.0042519597],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032933683,0.0010778194,0.016563945,0.0012113998,0.0013050188,0.00010494859,0.0003344045,0.06694724,0.0036361944,0.0051073893,0.07525824,0.8251601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022980126,0.0005426885,0.008341214,0.00011642385,0.00049131893,0.0002687766,0.00027790497,0.96534246,0.003012289,0.006543935,0.014726698,0.00010647808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025304213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026029484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99425215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009614684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027554347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05031383},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4399053656","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05047-7","title":"Visualizing hidden communities of interest: A case-study analysis of topic-based social networks in astrobiology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Social network analysis; Data science; Computer science; Astrobiology; World Wide Web; Social media; Biology","score_opus":0.733346814239927,"score_gpt":0.5580407318549871,"score_spread":0.17530608238493983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399053656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97713715,0.0008780071,0.017341893,0.00062530825,0.000028024611,0.000085932224,0.0012048639,0.00012604613,0.0025726887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825326,0.00022559862,0.015767656,0.000020385714,0.000027459355,0.000040126026,0.0007435584,0.000038123828,0.00060455536],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998355,0.0009016782,0.00008060072,0.00023430114,0.00029378082,0.00013470279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829485,0.0140334135,0.0011319261,0.000683649,0.0007677022,0.0004348323],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025961392,0.00031819788,0.00029701032,0.006281762,0.0015729609,0.0023444234,0.00080168364,0.0012472139,0.0013845606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011125009,0.00018687607,0.00066226145,0.005572472,0.0008445969,0.003000586,0.0015624053,0.00060341484,0.00019418407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009286768,0.0006564515,0.56180835,0.0019919153,0.0007178623,0.0067203166,0.122641765,0.030898469,0.025016127,0.039419226,0.011732001,0.19746888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092886316,0.0003438843,0.4130786,0.0007197831,0.00057487196,0.0039718975,0.11541529,0.3524779,0.010875296,0.052861106,0.04943165,0.00015682125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008611146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016394833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99371827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007638642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006342041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01712203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400867599","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05078-0","title":"Navigating geopolitical storms: assessing the robustness of Canada’s 5G research network in the wake of the Huawei conflict","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Geopolitics; Wake; Storm; Robustness (evolution); Political science; Regional science; Computer science; Sociology; Meteorology; Geography; Politics; Engineering; Law; Aerospace engineering","score_opus":0.07914980132810835,"score_gpt":0.4294486770892403,"score_spread":0.35029887576113194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400867599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853644,0.00033438826,0.0003787499,0.0024240476,0.000028040911,0.00003523887,0.0038396167,0.000016032453,0.0075793588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970246,0.0001818594,0.00026737186,0.000118658885,0.000009706445,0.000009712566,0.001588144,0.000005884781,0.00079394295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985789,0.00019711668,0.00007523017,0.00021885932,0.000508968,0.00042087625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98657376,0.003181018,0.0024001924,0.00051901216,0.005359523,0.0019664809],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002675678,0.00021576337,0.00035453335,0.0031041617,0.0026334783,0.003922837,0.0012213099,0.0007546555,0.0013536292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02680367,0.00016287582,0.00025146475,0.008814178,0.0016247148,0.001364497,0.0019764542,0.0009174651,0.00016579326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002227046,0.00005204844,0.95380545,0.000047184913,0.00023287196,0.00018266794,0.0033861834,0.012520794,0.00022853861,0.0055800625,0.0066751107,0.017066339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018158273,0.00004197063,0.9532747,0.00005452281,0.00009769786,0.00003461205,0.014332458,0.019783542,0.00024286346,0.0013504697,0.010726252,0.00004271463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9851112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98815155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99732435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01738951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026472827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12617028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403143722","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05145-6","title":"Interdisciplinarity and expert rating: an analysis based on faculty opinions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"Sociology; Computer science; Data science; Psychology; Management science; Engineering","score_opus":0.23329725374897026,"score_gpt":0.5451679613832665,"score_spread":0.31187070763429625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403143722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774458,0.0006861195,0.011222983,0.0001982678,0.000056998564,0.00025835703,0.0011253002,0.00006782135,0.008938411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952441,0.00017863906,0.0028021256,0.000027250313,0.000053151194,0.00014721605,0.0009528867,0.000026786243,0.00056785706],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94224614,0.027483882,0.0062259063,0.0024537493,0.02007436,0.0015158688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5158108,0.4095325,0.02494029,0.008731673,0.036906295,0.0040785177],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039960146,0.0004728389,0.0014424449,0.014411558,0.0011558237,0.0024165462,0.0011757778,0.0008918857,0.0030205343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22559218,0.0002709404,0.0023699878,0.0128879715,0.0008241609,0.002050884,0.0018910608,0.00089866726,0.0008304557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016802828,0.00032290854,0.9186291,0.00045783632,0.0013267049,0.00022045801,0.003522286,0.002622399,0.0010422964,0.0008222996,0.0018628103,0.067490496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008221158,0.0006816337,0.9704499,0.00012312642,0.0005965187,0.00055020524,0.0038087917,0.0188338,0.0008996141,0.001490099,0.0023815122,0.000102607795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026777415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003198587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98558843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012205761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012095666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21133196},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4403437307","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05163-4","title":"Open access improves the dissemination of science: insights from Wikipedia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Open science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Scholarly communication; Information Dissemination; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; Mathematics; Publishing","score_opus":0.059974193410401964,"score_gpt":0.49664389550811855,"score_spread":0.4366697020977166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403437307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93921804,0.009327829,0.008754553,0.0065496354,0.00014404437,0.00007133346,0.0032114051,0.00025513113,0.032468017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963535,0.0012558989,0.0009310077,0.0001082873,0.00014820116,0.0000117035515,0.0005030079,0.00003454929,0.00065389916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745053,0.0012210655,0.00017197324,0.00034473345,0.0006269507,0.00018469663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9213329,0.056170814,0.012543205,0.002124477,0.0052703763,0.002558284],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033348002,0.0002642555,0.0006429845,0.0087398095,0.0009166979,0.005109054,0.00053627614,0.0007256354,0.004155954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05881674,0.00014629269,0.0004889663,0.009576082,0.0013044676,0.005869171,0.0022594354,0.0008033629,0.0006080038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064923224,0.0005484128,0.6852838,0.0026275658,0.00091259164,0.001727907,0.009648453,0.019283054,0.0030363868,0.10549462,0.023761503,0.14702654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001346088,0.0003908672,0.6530441,0.0012095264,0.0008259301,0.001183786,0.011969936,0.07984188,0.002797661,0.1789987,0.06941793,0.00018493712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064309016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004291575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99946374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009448679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013018226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017636359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403560014","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05168-z","title":"Systematic bias in citing practices: evidence from accounting journal additions to the FT list","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Accounting; Bibliometrics; Library science; Information retrieval; Computer science; Political science; Econometrics; Economics","score_opus":0.09018432702100378,"score_gpt":0.3219311249758001,"score_spread":0.23174679795479636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403560014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95540327,0.010903921,0.0013327147,0.0036599503,0.00042574902,0.000114877104,0.0040303534,0.000117882955,0.02401127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881478,0.003650097,0.0010031991,0.00053357455,0.0007661003,0.000068463305,0.0026755356,0.00004923239,0.0031058828],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9415846,0.015692715,0.011921811,0.005097014,0.024269173,0.0014347299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.15511493,0.5432298,0.17676592,0.05566244,0.06362334,0.005603537],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042886812,0.00041084524,0.0010760982,0.036947034,0.0034081342,0.006393889,0.002350834,0.0027369591,0.0067898324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4890224,0.00050139695,0.00070419256,0.040409107,0.0027458915,0.0051542902,0.0037934084,0.0013851686,0.0019102823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084721483,0.00016351602,0.89766353,0.0011198552,0.0006704172,0.00039981047,0.008588197,0.00030819094,0.00051787874,0.0021838436,0.009340064,0.07819756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011281824,0.00017938265,0.96455884,0.0010654161,0.0010384109,0.0005791454,0.005137797,0.00067980256,0.001767786,0.0033832064,0.021423243,0.000074128555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022659123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027803607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022295627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003932481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22680986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405389827","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05215-9","title":"The use of emotion words by the sciences and other subjects","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Amusement; Pleasure; Salient; Psychology; Affective science; Discipline; Social science; Multidisciplinary approach; Social psychology; Sociology; Cognitive psychology; Emotion classification; History","score_opus":0.18986084024820976,"score_gpt":0.4081956613056643,"score_spread":0.21833482105745455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405389827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98280716,0.00068817206,0.00074464484,0.0004293674,0.000099051715,0.000023550458,0.00074055424,0.000024477347,0.014443015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971704,0.00033077953,0.0003970727,0.00011442015,0.00009446745,0.000023517365,0.0005294184,0.000020338613,0.0013195388],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961164,0.0017752214,0.00058765506,0.00023383331,0.0010053933,0.00028140526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9617734,0.021353403,0.010793833,0.0015326662,0.00264133,0.0019052755],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025509961,0.00029165883,0.0003904553,0.00521383,0.00065203215,0.0027191937,0.0002683211,0.000672251,0.004596664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042683747,0.00008792465,0.00048855983,0.0049321475,0.0007349629,0.0016377611,0.0014846814,0.00074733613,0.0008072044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000693808,0.00020321184,0.9224927,0.00041336857,0.00035289946,0.0001709532,0.0069563133,0.00024375471,0.0059926803,0.003849963,0.002161664,0.056468643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016147673,0.00011607512,0.98166955,0.000102988204,0.000115912626,0.0005243597,0.006480582,0.00062626734,0.0010538808,0.0022886104,0.006977016,0.00002862444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017723258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022100885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000672998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005253662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015377343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409158554","doi":"10.1007/s11192-025-05296-0","title":"Examining the role of co-first authorship in scientific collaboration: a quantitative study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Scientific communication; Scientific literature; Sociology; Data science; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.6419803795842838,"score_gpt":0.6109582313954125,"score_spread":0.03102214818887128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409158554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98821545,0.00097084185,0.001805176,0.00062248943,0.00004095173,0.000106040134,0.0004804971,0.0000135757255,0.007744919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980914,0.00018075664,0.0009374443,0.000030874988,0.00004162584,0.00008432075,0.00012896542,0.0000057456064,0.0004987302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9609129,0.02213052,0.0038962069,0.00206822,0.009554455,0.0014377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44632742,0.44014746,0.06082474,0.009709211,0.029810408,0.013180703],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02901873,0.00031033967,0.00083182653,0.010533896,0.0030364548,0.0054853633,0.0013140424,0.0014312316,0.0038070178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17808601,0.00020975685,0.0008468598,0.017067948,0.0020500636,0.0059689065,0.004850551,0.0013337675,0.00053256325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031371161,0.00049916934,0.93174994,0.00069949374,0.00025739736,0.00028465842,0.031044342,0.00034741868,0.0008956812,0.0023444814,0.0005143126,0.031049471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006586394,0.0005979639,0.9072884,0.0003824076,0.00026976698,0.0011039991,0.07713509,0.0022629907,0.0011264919,0.005035911,0.004659022,0.00007220809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016592235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023716493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98946613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019246773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005497697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15346754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411174920","doi":"10.1007/s11192-025-05339-6","title":"Mapping the unseen in practice: comparing latent Dirichlet allocation and BERTopic for navigating topic spaces","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Latent Dirichlet allocation; Topic model; Computer science; Data science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.1049383044834109,"score_gpt":0.4485186821781035,"score_spread":0.3435803776946926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411174920","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41224155,0.0055577066,0.57150096,0.0016430218,0.00023866302,0.00042429916,0.0011825707,0.002560852,0.0046503604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8682662,0.0010573622,0.12549417,0.00020052954,0.00014451386,0.0003351706,0.0025167074,0.0004617503,0.0015236705],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877117,0.009398458,0.00048399967,0.0014251552,0.00069394085,0.00028668033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8546899,0.13393337,0.00162218,0.0062689087,0.0022120457,0.0012736242],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02142833,0.0014393444,0.0017325198,0.007230429,0.0016025673,0.004057971,0.0028614916,0.003307279,0.0029589662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13334651,0.00070001965,0.0017334495,0.0036154394,0.0021141225,0.01245547,0.006525296,0.003588392,0.000978166],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009958333,0.0018274148,0.042964756,0.002833538,0.0019642364,0.00015268505,0.006855904,0.3216303,0.0026498027,0.0412706,0.007914989,0.5599775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020951379,0.00046517342,0.004302834,0.0001277809,0.00021908726,0.00007269226,0.001143955,0.9307411,0.0011032101,0.06000768,0.001516865,0.000090140755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014494122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012546308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021529817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022471072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11332518},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4415960658","doi":"10.1007/s11192-025-05453-5","title":"A method for assessing interdisciplinarity through co-authors of scientific publications","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Discipline; Diversity (politics); Scope (computer science); Interdisciplinarity; Work (physics); Broad spectrum; Sociology of scientific knowledge","score_opus":0.29238629110060305,"score_gpt":0.6097440840706423,"score_spread":0.31735779297003924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415960658","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24081516,0.0022619592,0.68919754,0.0009711277,0.0009217679,0.0040623965,0.019289115,0.003881397,0.038599502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37953427,0.00059645344,0.6026947,0.000067052555,0.0002710052,0.0045415442,0.0064828256,0.00026389127,0.005548305],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9450829,0.017056407,0.007953888,0.0053708693,0.023333235,0.001202713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83883154,0.097803585,0.0147928605,0.013951434,0.032079518,0.0025411025],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027000906,0.0014594627,0.0016754981,0.050371334,0.0023736684,0.00798863,0.0022383854,0.0017080755,0.005971889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12911265,0.00065403996,0.0023824954,0.058870338,0.0012791296,0.0052221217,0.0035405953,0.0013475034,0.002843198],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011375202,0.00067544857,0.2681983,0.0020323978,0.0022122157,0.00028403525,0.0082598375,0.0031047307,0.010971521,0.021007935,0.01346903,0.66864705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008887982,0.0014022018,0.5493132,0.0011732831,0.003168266,0.0029397088,0.01794577,0.1201171,0.038536392,0.10114449,0.16192557,0.0014453485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043528224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069683017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015416523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052008354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14279616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415963683","doi":"10.1007/s11192-025-05454-4","title":"Exploring citation behavior of national self-references","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; China Association for Science and Technology","keywords":"Scarcity; Diversification (marketing strategy); Citation; Norm (philosophy); Scientific communication; Scientific literature; Process (computing); Citation analysis","score_opus":0.9021341018802934,"score_gpt":0.6353747233350729,"score_spread":0.26675937854522047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415963683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99100566,0.0001755987,0.0005686479,0.00014174718,0.000006543025,0.0000054214984,0.0005645338,0.00003666934,0.007495252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656785,0.000076841956,0.00041285198,0.000011942941,0.0000070527285,0.0000064458427,0.00069463043,0.000018131337,0.0022043616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889934,0.00034454773,0.00010590539,0.0001990616,0.00034679848,0.00010441731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635546,0.020959722,0.004721275,0.0019393933,0.0077605597,0.001064414],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023703226,0.00011919019,0.00028382626,0.0063826847,0.00073487323,0.0023863951,0.00054732565,0.0006233425,0.0048762504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04326629,0.00010425081,0.00030226796,0.0075296853,0.0003086978,0.002356679,0.00066653616,0.00042119774,0.001224519],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025438546,0.00019494312,0.93018365,0.00011029612,0.00019401763,0.00015005836,0.0032045012,0.002825058,0.0028777155,0.011502825,0.0014056541,0.047096852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012512913,0.00016178317,0.9500718,0.000054749828,0.000113134534,0.00030107328,0.004258167,0.02874065,0.004006563,0.0061426414,0.006097842,0.000039068913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009201637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009480406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010499166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000598959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018296182},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4415966073","doi":"10.1007/s11192-025-05467-z","title":"Research evaluation metrics comparison: does citation or citation context count differ from citation context similarity metric?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Context (archaeology); Similarity (geometry); Weighting; Citation analysis; Metric (unit); Rank (graph theory)","score_opus":0.7775964114144409,"score_gpt":0.6498567782278969,"score_spread":0.12773963318654402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415966073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81174207,0.048769113,0.07335991,0.019115282,0.0022715083,0.0007466704,0.0030775948,0.0009116191,0.04000622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98413956,0.0013111489,0.011425906,0.00057730806,0.00043028055,0.00020954966,0.00083341845,0.0001231738,0.0009495544],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9347349,0.035407633,0.0067157284,0.0042046863,0.017798252,0.0011388845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8224162,0.10953101,0.021889815,0.006789425,0.035630617,0.0037429743],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050628886,0.0007435048,0.0016879282,0.011521197,0.0012331535,0.0075575807,0.0016035129,0.0019375068,0.0035014132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24436216,0.00024928266,0.0015274617,0.011020424,0.001426012,0.0098587,0.0019762225,0.0012125815,0.0013596099],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028041883,0.0006392432,0.44004852,0.0036433425,0.0046963035,0.0001361422,0.0021694996,0.0015087622,0.005488096,0.019430118,0.012318658,0.5071172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009307216,0.0060059275,0.7908117,0.0037021495,0.0077589066,0.0013146987,0.009493166,0.04774439,0.015264142,0.071262576,0.045303874,0.0004076596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017298713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027515434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002518109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030686785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26775432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417456948","doi":"10.1007/s11192-025-05508-7","title":"Data as scholarly output: addressing challenges in data citation tracking through natural language processing automation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Citation; Python (programming language); Tracking (education); Automation; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.5489135483319633,"score_gpt":0.5066334825260266,"score_spread":0.042280065805936684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417456948","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019336425,0.0025095518,0.9407412,0.016846487,0.0006060281,0.00026855938,0.0030782043,0.00853762,0.008076045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2811778,0.0035950746,0.7025041,0.0017764859,0.0010941796,0.0004581976,0.005250464,0.0016658488,0.0024777679],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.92791104,0.037834823,0.0082259765,0.007470728,0.017738024,0.00081953744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5430458,0.33142963,0.024064574,0.059960626,0.03985238,0.0016469661],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056518454,0.0009950858,0.0026062797,0.012621098,0.0031382588,0.029870315,0.0043593533,0.0025391597,0.0023498824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29923862,0.0012027291,0.0014396557,0.027298665,0.004290226,0.02934875,0.007442734,0.006610857,0.0026709284],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028153972,0.00035992995,0.01696445,0.0016813349,0.00021870762,0.0002346406,0.004231796,0.01391051,0.003933373,0.19831336,0.022034915,0.7378354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000649834,0.00009484605,0.005095651,0.0007145594,0.00016536997,0.00028826186,0.0021559703,0.24104385,0.015860917,0.63548696,0.09884537,0.00018324524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007100855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067566633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029075244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010258575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29890174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W654809136","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1610-x","title":"Statistical tests for ‘related records’ search results","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Statistics Education and Methodologies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Information retrieval; Subject (documents); Set (abstract data type); Measure (data warehouse); Negative binomial distribution; Raw data; Statistics; Data mining; Mathematics; Library science","score_opus":0.7040664114245264,"score_gpt":0.5759315830768087,"score_spread":0.12813482834771772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W654809136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79066974,0.004459434,0.11937528,0.003599465,0.0032680663,0.002766719,0.045467816,0.0038738027,0.02651972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94801915,0.00029143007,0.027158713,0.0010208244,0.00063727854,0.0041530346,0.014779193,0.00074776047,0.003192592],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.83504,0.07891934,0.029246088,0.01640695,0.034499623,0.005888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24018538,0.7095034,0.023510572,0.016234513,0.008114897,0.0024511982],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057287082,0.0011791711,0.0030123177,0.012325577,0.0017474795,0.0041687237,0.004400445,0.004093027,0.03525657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45910174,0.00046913567,0.007040412,0.015624547,0.0036698563,0.0065319054,0.0029498376,0.0044772956,0.004622931],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.034870934,0.0034109124,0.5315172,0.019844532,0.03316208,0.0038722737,0.0067370394,0.005364834,0.0074645514,0.033177808,0.061197102,0.25938067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006856514,0.034092776,0.61999774,0.0039037685,0.021870734,0.014199624,0.017976688,0.07189208,0.017504748,0.110813364,0.0799232,0.0009686567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013159973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002195577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9876744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013809628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003672207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30296665},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"}]}