{"meta":{"query_hash":"de61ba5dec0a","filters":{"venue":"Seattle University law review"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/de61ba5dec0a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Seattle+University+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1481897490","doi":"","title":"Power Without Property, Still: Unger, Berle, and the Derivatives Revolution","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Property (philosophy); Political science; Property law; Law and economics; Power (physics); Property rights; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Physics","score_opus":0.015351173172043249,"score_gpt":0.2082808429846635,"score_spread":0.19292966981262027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481897490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06751284,0.038925715,0.0062272428,0.2944057,0.0009404205,0.000018013152,0.000044550376,0.00007795657,0.59184766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132859,0.0076440005,0.00097471685,0.02473755,0.00068397674,0.000030272578,0.00001639328,0.00008105536,0.052546207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962972,0.0018724714,0.00006569684,0.0005167944,0.00061801437,0.00062985445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953367,0.0032951494,0.0003346273,0.00050653523,0.00023741847,0.0002896118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042475993,0.00034252816,0.00046490808,0.0009837473,0.007769005,0.012372079,0.0008238291,0.0059611504,0.0067075538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008709121,0.00026427364,0.00031787952,0.0012519498,0.035358828,0.020162815,0.0057140095,0.007278703,0.00086805254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009542884,0.000007700673,0.00007574684,0.000009125626,0.0000011443017,0.000060011724,0.002724183,0.00012122748,0.000025989479,0.98407745,0.008520119,0.004367639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013457521,0.000015671754,0.00031626958,0.000115148745,0.0000036847562,0.0000971979,0.0043889005,0.00027661366,0.00016063893,0.7888522,0.20573513,0.000025011957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053143017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006301503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012372079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076653957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031936427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055616617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483767843","doi":"","title":"Psychological Consequences of Adopting a Therapeutic Lawyering Approach: Pitfalls and Protective Strategies","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Therapeutic jurisprudence; Countertransference; Neutrality; Process (computing); Psychology; Psychotherapist; Burnout; Therapeutic relationship; Jurisprudence; Engineering ethics; Law; Mental health; Clinical psychology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.051051897712148846,"score_gpt":0.3095755052090106,"score_spread":0.25852360749686176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483767843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27184924,0.0074655027,0.041221272,0.5894289,0.0013434914,0.0004605185,0.000023698216,0.00035845334,0.08784893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97286284,0.0015333014,0.010809972,0.012393043,0.00025671758,0.00025003235,0.000005539597,0.00002703457,0.0018614668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95372885,0.03445717,0.0012567991,0.0013384243,0.0066599026,0.002558882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9657479,0.020413911,0.0040386445,0.0026795529,0.0029250002,0.0041949647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030326845,0.00064235175,0.0004683091,0.0017513786,0.012395249,0.0075444523,0.0025841123,0.008401644,0.00206804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060378637,0.0005625906,0.00056804885,0.0007573044,0.037055265,0.006138505,0.0099043595,0.0099693565,0.00043689876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097329925,0.0012308614,0.018374758,0.0005560125,0.00009155044,0.0041212677,0.2375237,0.0008235549,0.0021845696,0.5323352,0.01392733,0.18873394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024421146,0.00053141225,0.015172419,0.001815061,0.000099372846,0.010249126,0.34513062,0.0037597478,0.0018690311,0.5430891,0.07786938,0.00017060207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002726568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004649985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030326845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032231507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010321111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16038561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505790278","doi":"","title":"Salomon Redux: The Moralities of Business","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Commonwealth; Law; Institution; Colonialism; Corporate governance; Corporate law; Persona; Management; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Humanities","score_opus":0.048182382162363535,"score_gpt":0.2978198820948689,"score_spread":0.2496374999325054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505790278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03870351,0.010261056,0.008448492,0.20516579,0.0005305973,0.00003323826,0.000027236894,0.000052148986,0.73677784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89956015,0.0023887693,0.001500607,0.026861146,0.00037623665,0.000072171046,0.000008767374,0.00003547862,0.06919675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935359,0.0035374444,0.00009182536,0.00042115574,0.0014863032,0.00092748366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971277,0.0017374821,0.00026381027,0.00022577503,0.0003648402,0.00028049134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051382286,0.0002830345,0.0003010816,0.0011763838,0.009292731,0.009641249,0.0010925251,0.0067278086,0.0049010855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010435352,0.00022952334,0.00034337264,0.0008936108,0.02778323,0.005836576,0.005592184,0.00722386,0.00072645297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021408696,0.0000024924257,0.000065128224,0.000004506989,5.814225e-7,0.000050020284,0.0010502975,0.00003940158,0.000020030997,0.994393,0.0030027707,0.0013695982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010765999,0.000012345467,0.00035618138,0.00019576373,0.0000035556163,0.0001998896,0.0051918007,0.0005400217,0.00027821193,0.7804408,0.2127527,0.000017880886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012184976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012582845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012184976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008141796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00611027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05907315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514212257","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Nature of the Firm: The Corporation as a Governance Object","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Social contract; Contract theory; Corporation; Capitalism; Shareholder primacy; Law and economics; Theory of the firm; Project governance; Political science; Corporate law; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.02341011097736439,"score_gpt":0.26533910986231823,"score_spread":0.24192899888495384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514212257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045010507,0.12808263,0.04700831,0.3461089,0.0023008524,0.00007147799,0.000078214835,0.00004527772,0.43129387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9145797,0.040108465,0.0042907936,0.022498505,0.0016662944,0.00010552638,0.00003968975,0.00004233486,0.01666877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99269956,0.004236422,0.0002016919,0.00076378486,0.0015646924,0.00053389266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921143,0.005947433,0.00043851425,0.00056637265,0.0006384751,0.00029498377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0084062535,0.00028693397,0.00061450794,0.0019514812,0.0047307643,0.015226234,0.0014888516,0.0067207897,0.0018481611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072219083,0.00034256096,0.00033142298,0.002285511,0.050518665,0.02186496,0.0042015696,0.010697543,0.00026413836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.65209e-7,0.0000014135584,0.000041686635,0.000010335351,6.3693653e-7,0.000014472476,0.00043968705,0.00004435928,0.000011638469,0.99729913,0.0005279456,0.0016078261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009897173,0.000015199859,0.0006977664,0.0003772368,0.000007754183,0.00010477906,0.0021226958,0.00047181954,0.00008643147,0.8570835,0.13901082,0.00001201759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015674496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014684897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015674496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009297517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010254524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06745857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518645978","doi":"","title":"The Impact of the American Doctrine of Discovery on Native Land Rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Doctrine; Land rights; Native american; Political science; Geography; Law; Ethnology; History; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.040688476194232825,"score_gpt":0.2877428786015839,"score_spread":0.24705440240735105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518645978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17633674,0.017296042,0.0007421584,0.08954215,0.00041097446,0.000067923465,0.00014438349,0.000019199664,0.7154404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94308585,0.009002858,0.0005577777,0.015086882,0.00014125956,0.00004635551,0.00004568552,0.000015485804,0.03201781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898511,0.0012035766,0.00023093322,0.0006503452,0.0050103227,0.003053623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99330163,0.0024274797,0.00046782644,0.0001870161,0.0026652187,0.00095086324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004862948,0.00022436996,0.0003478152,0.0025928481,0.019360894,0.006711307,0.0013539528,0.0036504015,0.0023260866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01259068,0.0003040426,0.00041217153,0.0029744457,0.016941845,0.002573153,0.0039769365,0.007050871,0.00013374139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031790005,0.0000269202,0.003238557,0.00007157378,0.000022051185,0.00043109385,0.010812654,0.00026386342,0.00036592322,0.95532024,0.013961456,0.015453974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013533173,0.000086465574,0.07450751,0.0010381971,0.00019044036,0.0005292358,0.031719927,0.001330658,0.0013934681,0.15995279,0.72883713,0.00027877218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96988523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06780376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06780376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.121279135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49195302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542646315","doi":"","title":"Catholic Social Teaching and Global Migration: Bridging the Paradox of Universal Human Rights and Territorial Self-Determination","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Democracy; Globe; Immigration; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Emigration; Sociology; Christianity; Political economy; Law; Geography; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.01273899358870661,"score_gpt":0.2861739003272085,"score_spread":0.2734349067385019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542646315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10433117,0.18666825,0.0021346933,0.22012438,0.0016414938,0.000034718454,0.00003247366,0.000018819997,0.485014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9269631,0.040543053,0.0003915844,0.015096435,0.0009551469,0.000026922982,0.000021701373,0.000012440213,0.015989669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738044,0.0016491087,0.00004518769,0.00012358217,0.00044164225,0.000360104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972976,0.001641245,0.00029473603,0.00012827186,0.00030847386,0.00032970705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003397263,0.00015782299,0.00027481627,0.0008196649,0.002819376,0.002657119,0.0005360898,0.0017776011,0.0035350984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036829398,0.00009283141,0.00015691262,0.00093532476,0.014090835,0.0025275936,0.0026726972,0.0027371242,0.00014073633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011460647,0.000041250525,0.0011669873,0.00030512438,0.000009454174,0.00013675958,0.0064860675,0.00019596485,0.00005678399,0.9363358,0.013332733,0.041921604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054663433,0.00009101572,0.011410845,0.001451886,0.000023489201,0.0003263625,0.020814143,0.0002872872,0.00017463912,0.25145137,0.7138969,0.000017362818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016822454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031153442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016822454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041374345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065139364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033449054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549083991","doi":"","title":"Application of Patent Law Damages Analysis to Trade Secret Misappropriation Claims: Apportionment, Alternatives, and Other Common Limitations on Damages","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Misappropriation; Damages; Trade secret; Context (archaeology); Scrutiny; Apportionment; Law; Intellectual property; Jury; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; History","score_opus":0.18463681906086457,"score_gpt":0.2388600642530556,"score_spread":0.054223245192191016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549083991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13821135,0.009749829,0.3641286,0.042289104,0.0012004412,0.00095888256,0.00049389683,0.00023784922,0.4427301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92576057,0.0022583874,0.049590312,0.0042433217,0.00080469623,0.00054857647,0.00006548941,0.000058659556,0.016669966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752255,0.0057419017,0.002274587,0.0033428364,0.01130254,0.002112648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96060216,0.028954852,0.0030211466,0.0038293903,0.003203653,0.0003888732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024673488,0.0010168392,0.0016433343,0.0044347546,0.005695682,0.011719219,0.004119645,0.015074491,0.005050997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04512054,0.001113149,0.0035517798,0.001823432,0.026621575,0.014933036,0.006389843,0.012444514,0.000684142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017263006,0.000030988154,0.00027151726,0.000052168554,0.000014829039,0.0003875184,0.00038279407,0.0021597403,0.00042038457,0.9915644,0.00071744533,0.003981019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030031177,0.00012451684,0.0010117956,0.00023663964,0.000057743797,0.00070109795,0.00040423023,0.0065105483,0.00204975,0.9644444,0.024317373,0.00011179813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035513279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003418996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024673488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007453542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00544666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13048744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557447601","doi":"","title":"Resolving the Softwood Lumber Dispute","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Pulp and paper industry; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.025815492344787385,"score_gpt":0.274102520784723,"score_spread":0.24828702843993564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557447601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051514782,0.008868045,0.005408482,0.072960675,0.001874837,0.00009055374,0.00010100323,0.00007850207,0.85910296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5246287,0.004424661,0.002714632,0.07693293,0.0011793831,0.00009680366,0.00015727867,0.00011905487,0.38974658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99466276,0.0011268987,0.000334424,0.0005382885,0.0023386548,0.0009990409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968459,0.0016661721,0.00021141961,0.00023108275,0.0008615721,0.00018383385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006265278,0.00023611286,0.0004558985,0.0013715416,0.0066828346,0.008785497,0.0019866999,0.009387072,0.016506843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072938995,0.00032313538,0.00065285043,0.0010582998,0.004642908,0.004324696,0.004012515,0.0055838744,0.0033268032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052700154,0.000038241036,0.0013951041,0.00021211102,0.000014540693,0.0016636238,0.00641467,0.00039707567,0.0013003069,0.90610564,0.06493997,0.01746604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046531604,0.00005458102,0.0022804153,0.0006304402,0.00002233292,0.00047981233,0.007486331,0.00066293933,0.0030401652,0.10318112,0.88205874,0.000056563134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02953465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081827044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02953465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008053218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00652499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058725476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951952528","doi":"","title":"The Mythical Power of Myth? A Response to Professor Dauer","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Impartiality; Criticism; Law; Mediation; Jurisprudence; Power (physics); Viewpoints; Empathy; Political science; Discretion; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.024637198689653358,"score_gpt":0.3113668690754152,"score_spread":0.28672967038576186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1951952528","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010693688,0.002823244,0.00006576495,0.9935774,0.0027335559,0.0000011573799,0.0000024749304,0.0000056612507,0.00068378897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008984365,0.0029499037,0.0003276672,0.97457564,0.0075753652,0.000022533353,0.000004766679,0.000028274855,0.005531542],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98600245,0.007973199,0.0005218151,0.0017064713,0.0029549561,0.0008411631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96201897,0.026461715,0.0018534531,0.000985345,0.0060999594,0.0025806152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016076967,0.0007453795,0.0019064815,0.0011474655,0.007991291,0.011535253,0.004710234,0.030574828,0.0043787514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04975969,0.0005613458,0.0009889129,0.0011904116,0.02837125,0.016021065,0.00563391,0.04856807,0.0018190234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022599965,0.00002224426,0.00016968185,0.000097897144,0.000011900465,0.00015172921,0.0034280194,0.000075279204,0.000097354445,0.12459605,0.8645692,0.006758083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003160682,0.00003394741,0.0003232078,0.00053104456,0.000009747621,0.0003274758,0.0073711686,0.00029101782,0.0001690097,0.057401422,0.93344057,0.0000697815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011332886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016973998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030574828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008407657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010819669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08502412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117899123","doi":"","title":"BERLE’S CONCEPTION OF SHAREHOLDER PRIMACY: A FORGOTTEN PERSPECTIVE FOR RECONSIDERATION DURING THE RISE OF FINANCE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Praise; Positive economics; Shareholder primacy; Opposition (politics); Shareholder; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Philosophy; Corporate governance; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.017043199730879036,"score_gpt":0.2191669421413415,"score_spread":0.20212374241046246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117899123","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032455362,0.028909817,0.025147917,0.51807225,0.002038429,0.000030931842,0.00006622225,0.000064330416,0.39321464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8943798,0.0052559497,0.005513125,0.05885596,0.0022545867,0.00010091152,0.000021767111,0.000075648684,0.0335423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942988,0.0029704196,0.0001331134,0.00077422796,0.0011275765,0.0006958825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99390656,0.0046089157,0.0003282706,0.00034394785,0.00054058834,0.0002715931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007578435,0.00041910162,0.00065772823,0.0014015243,0.006971315,0.009946157,0.0013026946,0.011627282,0.0026544705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013120407,0.00034419348,0.0003951408,0.0009933681,0.03606954,0.015149583,0.0041525466,0.012491276,0.00042414083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004683218,0.0000033151016,0.00004819479,0.0000054328243,6.452718e-7,0.000034696095,0.0014640243,0.000022813356,0.000024285246,0.9929803,0.004200939,0.0012108124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013198996,0.00001427883,0.00030590902,0.00013550605,0.000002721952,0.00012182382,0.0011696402,0.00023517811,0.00017241281,0.83797956,0.15983154,0.00001806842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055910647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007168688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011627282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007337254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003207039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05323577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605847761","doi":"","title":"A Critical Canadian Perspective on the Benefit Corporation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Corporate law; Fiduciary; Shareholder; Supreme court; Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Law; Shareholder primacy; Corporate social responsibility; Best interests; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Duty; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.03939928957750191,"score_gpt":0.2442858631282594,"score_spread":0.20488657355075748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605847761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0098549705,0.018020697,0.0021635164,0.27680582,0.0014549126,0.000055497178,0.00021731817,0.00003450058,0.6913927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6625365,0.02230768,0.0030122455,0.13496159,0.0013039006,0.00012316766,0.0001501512,0.00007941615,0.1755253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940801,0.0010189635,0.00007330934,0.0005294415,0.002337395,0.0019607758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965063,0.0010309044,0.00011634814,0.00009823842,0.0016650461,0.00058330066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036753453,0.00045292423,0.00033546364,0.0024191858,0.03174006,0.013397104,0.001735042,0.006725107,0.007716715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005948156,0.00031100935,0.0004184094,0.003245428,0.027667938,0.005549849,0.0027900164,0.008808227,0.0005322402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023447049,0.0000027594565,0.000117549105,0.0000118632,7.5356724e-7,0.000043728243,0.001687341,0.000050947987,0.000020352672,0.9702721,0.025803499,0.0019867814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009508791,0.000006545844,0.0012696411,0.00021264402,0.000008771387,0.00008085873,0.008103172,0.0002728269,0.000098421995,0.11939448,0.8705059,0.000037160884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97408175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9791901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1349423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1349423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15895629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9790794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611895100","doi":"","title":"Benefit Corporations and Public Markets: First Experiments and Next Steps","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Corporate governance; Commit; Business; Voting; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Duty; Dual (grammatical number); Accounting; Public relations; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.102877705392649,"score_gpt":0.2438008351177593,"score_spread":0.14092312972511029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611895100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055347156,0.06013939,0.017802801,0.31662607,0.0032736713,0.00093731715,0.00029873336,0.00019790663,0.5453771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81261593,0.036086157,0.020314999,0.051392287,0.0027628804,0.002284057,0.00021287701,0.00015225347,0.07417858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928221,0.0042286636,0.00017078227,0.0005531731,0.0010313888,0.0011939061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96685547,0.02663129,0.0012839485,0.0021168047,0.0015979623,0.0015145125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016186964,0.0012417034,0.001527157,0.0015798137,0.0058996337,0.016292341,0.0024800722,0.01484688,0.038075957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020627003,0.00073071435,0.0013782425,0.0015722106,0.017556861,0.047456365,0.00752206,0.013978806,0.0026256246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011090356,0.00034080376,0.00022666242,0.00013753882,0.000008776988,0.00006356266,0.00032824028,0.00022112924,0.00012347846,0.98450226,0.00534335,0.00859328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020362507,0.0002704028,0.0006974239,0.0006135928,0.000024267742,0.000081863414,0.0027186477,0.00131293,0.0007346775,0.91203064,0.08125354,0.00005837718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00565737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004443789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038075957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009815507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051737083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12737674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124450235","doi":"","title":"Hostile Takeovers and Overreliance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Context (archaeology); Breach of contract; Law; Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Economics; Investment (military); Payment; Business; Sociology; Political science; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.03759961539685073,"score_gpt":0.20188994138421887,"score_spread":0.16429032598736815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124450235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13487282,0.015433816,0.012211905,0.14324006,0.0012422693,0.00015238518,0.00036647558,0.00025381029,0.69222647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9124983,0.0031133387,0.0011074372,0.055649027,0.0011536459,0.00012792715,0.000070307186,0.00006624379,0.026213827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9656385,0.011734767,0.0020930527,0.005229649,0.010134484,0.0051694834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542598,0.024533162,0.007816999,0.006518955,0.0057253367,0.0011456659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02287695,0.0004263253,0.0007018694,0.0016709992,0.0034909823,0.005895337,0.0027987463,0.013172949,0.008102095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0516644,0.0004965613,0.001092432,0.0013838948,0.0162601,0.0070823818,0.0051086443,0.009844849,0.0012234884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004777944,0.000054187894,0.005318135,0.00015079089,0.000077149285,0.0008206858,0.0025657588,0.0006882539,0.00043106647,0.93078816,0.039558623,0.01949957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013756742,0.00031422614,0.03216299,0.0016909548,0.00019397867,0.0020855886,0.004033934,0.0021077814,0.0038992772,0.46406868,0.4890671,0.00023791006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059813876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006100675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02287695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036876076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032256395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12098628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W400786494","doi":"","title":"An Unfinished Joruney: Arctic Indigenous Rights, Lands, and Jurisdiction?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Opposition (politics); Arctic; Indigenous rights; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Federal jurisdiction; Geography; Public administration; Oceanography; Ecology; Geology","score_opus":0.015594197472244243,"score_gpt":0.3093551494202659,"score_spread":0.29376095194802165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W400786494","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031753704,0.11227738,0.0012072147,0.4494575,0.003986479,0.0000200507,0.000052498905,0.000020562396,0.40122458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68359536,0.07387203,0.0011722192,0.1702854,0.0043574334,0.0000657858,0.000054904904,0.000039756993,0.06655715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993993,0.003170288,0.00014342272,0.00033566475,0.0011822404,0.0011754411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953159,0.0028856762,0.00020086496,0.00017549218,0.00080670684,0.000615394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007788805,0.00018226403,0.00038209537,0.0009284547,0.014894283,0.010188044,0.0013363194,0.00552439,0.002635953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068347766,0.00026458045,0.0003259022,0.0009025025,0.024404703,0.0062644146,0.004040412,0.006804108,0.00036862164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011255191,0.000017305927,0.001051463,0.000110726614,0.0000070726587,0.00033275931,0.02624245,0.00009713112,0.00008680007,0.9138691,0.041698053,0.0164759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012562682,0.00003806314,0.004045804,0.0015474352,0.000023354945,0.0004068902,0.07585851,0.00013684978,0.00017453545,0.117866024,0.7998434,0.000046542897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2721074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3624302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2721074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092293015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025654707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5410471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030308966","doi":"","title":"The Mythical Power of Myth? A Response to Professor Dauer","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Reproductive Physiology in Livestock","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Jurisprudence; Criticism; Power (physics); Empathy; Unilateralism; Constitutional law; Adversarial system; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.01636689355576902,"score_gpt":0.23950974797039792,"score_spread":0.2231428544146289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030308966","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013168494,0.0025679902,0.000087962515,0.9937942,0.00214323,0.0000015074128,0.0000026519829,0.000006127958,0.0012646288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010396741,0.0022424476,0.00033100005,0.9748765,0.005849674,0.000023504064,0.000004379718,0.000024299985,0.0062514422],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985775,0.00788488,0.00047448234,0.0017708725,0.0031237106,0.00097096997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96818596,0.02281222,0.0014307883,0.00082943816,0.004761854,0.001979686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015795937,0.0006976743,0.0017355195,0.0011153605,0.009548624,0.012244568,0.0046063485,0.03592987,0.004553744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04600085,0.0005839958,0.0009946858,0.0010854919,0.034330048,0.015009157,0.005510439,0.051484127,0.0016927755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019788973,0.000023622806,0.00016457308,0.00007645415,0.000011187789,0.00017947212,0.0039455486,0.000090790854,0.00011161822,0.22491838,0.76420486,0.006253625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033794444,0.000032243624,0.0003033774,0.00046555587,0.00000894124,0.00029650913,0.0074223704,0.00032566304,0.0001733583,0.0817576,0.9091114,0.00006929872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0139341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02042509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03592987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009548029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0113267815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08353788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7060960786","doi":"","title":"Panelist Biographies, Editor's Note","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisprudence; Object (grammar)","score_opus":0.008217772754344817,"score_gpt":0.23896332526966968,"score_spread":0.23074555251532486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7060960786","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001254212,0.004785136,0.0006914224,0.7946405,0.11212431,0.00058779394,0.0016696797,0.00040915346,0.08383784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0059049744,0.0025071192,0.0008309721,0.72723585,0.038398746,0.0012567592,0.0004526987,0.00015422766,0.22325873],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591774,0.00044755705,0.00029684894,0.0009142418,0.0015291531,0.00089455897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98715603,0.007355952,0.0005167909,0.00036649333,0.0037378771,0.00086681906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069074878,0.0016371562,0.0021262344,0.003808072,0.013001551,0.009666295,0.005856967,0.054280587,0.038342346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031701636,0.0021931317,0.002267677,0.003300006,0.0018616988,0.0049246456,0.0022799552,0.033032566,0.0231953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001593726,0.000018909112,0.000060923747,0.000031084208,0.000006429834,0.00007786553,0.000044242348,0.000027664832,0.000063701445,0.0014754303,0.9962148,0.0019629532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001090066,0.000039073617,0.0015079179,0.00033747067,0.000077192795,0.0000630919,0.00028974793,0.00033386014,0.0003148894,0.002743239,0.9941251,0.000059348837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060762286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14019309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060762286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006987078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018449161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12826794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}