{"meta":{"query_hash":"de61ba5dec0a","filters":{"venue":"Seattle University law review"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/de61ba5dec0a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Seattle+University+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1481897490","doi":"","title":"Power Without Property, Still: Unger, Berle, and the Derivatives Revolution","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Property (philosophy); Political science; Property law; Law and economics; Power (physics); Property rights; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Physics","score_opus":0.015351173172043249,"score_gpt":0.2082808429846635,"score_spread":0.19292966981262027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481897490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36824042,0.19236803,0.004296668,0.025792513,0.0013139903,0.004501986,0.00022376861,0.00029855198,0.4029641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840532,0.012718346,0.00066744594,0.00038142956,0.000025032365,0.0000019188487,0.000007148269,0.000012077142,0.0021334044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992083,0.00006247785,0.00021801553,0.00031245945,0.000042779877,0.00015596913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992195,0.00006743043,0.00018371586,0.00040787025,0.000075262935,0.000046239595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080809573,0.000112772366,0.00032599617,0.000041662297,0.00024022843,0.000031027274,0.00023120921,0.000058695347,0.0003586115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019665288,0.00008198384,0.00008324804,0.000250298,0.0007080867,0.00027504467,0.000107287575,0.00017561152,0.000082242404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010749191,0.00003325004,0.014970016,0.0001910183,0.000017165648,4.7576188e-7,0.00017584022,0.0000010978991,0.0000042336023,0.9834129,0.00039173063,0.00079149916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006400182,0.000023100842,0.042335015,0.00019966291,0.000027316162,0.000006532054,0.000016964264,0.00015706183,0.0000046038613,0.0104499785,0.945944,0.00019572472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039555927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002489695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.972963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052451393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019857887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39265442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483767843","doi":"","title":"Psychological Consequences of Adopting a Therapeutic Lawyering Approach: Pitfalls and Protective Strategies","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Therapeutic jurisprudence; Countertransference; Neutrality; Process (computing); Psychology; Psychotherapist; Burnout; Therapeutic relationship; Jurisprudence; Engineering ethics; Law; Mental health; Clinical psychology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.051051897712148846,"score_gpt":0.3095755052090106,"score_spread":0.25852360749686176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483767843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043571796,0.04582194,0.00021838577,0.0010052873,0.00004028734,0.0011431439,0.000009864191,0.00010059382,0.9080887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97681135,0.022474272,0.00024831507,0.00015960814,0.000030074576,0.0000014907637,6.311126e-7,0.000002967782,0.00027131644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913895,0.00025775214,0.00011248019,0.00018087955,0.00015624535,0.00015366616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967486,0.000051970877,0.00007434714,0.00007619274,0.000064974956,0.000057667337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004025165,0.00007634405,0.00024203585,0.000014348749,0.00035856708,0.000033059336,0.00015842963,0.0000583895,0.00018032994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019206818,0.00006567062,0.000049136277,0.00023248805,0.00085297873,0.00029501054,0.000017892728,0.000093943134,0.000006674909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002229115,0.00006880372,0.00011174209,0.0014116678,0.00003836044,0.000009221996,0.00250861,0.0000053415165,0.000104699015,0.96899337,0.000034489734,0.026691405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004677687,0.00029018158,0.0006880796,0.004282779,0.00019233841,0.000018270826,0.016148996,0.0000056863955,0.00006119655,0.00948219,0.96782184,0.00054068386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00812147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005771932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027913957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007022641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505790278","doi":"","title":"Salomon Redux: The Moralities of Business","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Commonwealth; Law; Institution; Colonialism; Corporate governance; Corporate law; Persona; Management; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Humanities","score_opus":0.048182382162363535,"score_gpt":0.2978198820948689,"score_spread":0.2496374999325054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505790278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075963787,0.03635335,0.000114984425,0.02857708,0.0001680306,0.0006439676,0.000048823786,0.00006274924,0.92643464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95144296,0.040753055,0.00011199273,0.0006004781,0.00011495726,9.3964394e-7,0.0000060896355,0.0000036958052,0.006965818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951667,0.00011592832,0.00006102734,0.00005223126,0.00012534845,0.00012879664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958825,0.000052931264,0.00005279858,0.00016325903,0.00009278266,0.000049966133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035158318,0.00003743091,0.00009819939,0.000007001307,0.00036591478,0.000006878382,0.00023522366,0.000021012855,0.00020634744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027070299,0.000028184195,0.000049755286,0.00029168,0.0003339518,0.00019021417,0.000054435415,0.000043018757,0.000052232375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.203078e-7,0.000016674505,0.00021853257,0.00013138761,0.000004859717,1.2470171e-7,0.0005497046,3.514664e-7,0.000003963368,0.9951542,0.0032784364,0.0006411561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024988643,0.0000013804505,0.0010334534,0.00014852438,0.00003763453,2.0737676e-7,0.0006492721,1.9155149e-7,0.00001053079,0.00019424163,0.997862,0.000037609832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070799654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069067866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99495995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003940595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049471124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514212257","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Nature of the Firm: The Corporation as a Governance Object","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Social contract; Contract theory; Corporation; Capitalism; Shareholder primacy; Law and economics; Theory of the firm; Project governance; Political science; Corporate law; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.02341011097736439,"score_gpt":0.26533910986231823,"score_spread":0.24192899888495384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514212257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00881497,0.03668479,0.000012329884,0.06362703,0.00065277313,0.00073209446,0.000021190608,0.000026416406,0.88942844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97826254,0.01196581,0.00001267605,0.0060906177,0.00010228619,5.159318e-7,8.7516037e-7,0.000002088645,0.0035625857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991234,0.00040019496,0.00006939366,0.000067567365,0.00017270369,0.00016675223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993244,0.00023905322,0.00012042062,0.00022929715,0.000045806577,0.000041058818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008797952,0.00004877537,0.000097958575,0.0000023738207,0.00075980247,0.000011270761,0.00046043604,0.000068240995,0.0001634599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023647658,0.000025239919,0.00010415901,0.0001813445,0.0006478489,0.00023889521,0.00009313091,0.00024752397,0.000034919452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012411867,0.0000066673356,0.00015527202,0.000044878154,0.000006900227,2.0878105e-7,0.0010466564,1.2703345e-7,5.97186e-7,0.9951585,0.0030356993,0.0005432788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031936997,0.000003876357,0.0011217513,0.00025978003,0.000046955214,8.3377574e-7,0.00026967833,6.3713856e-7,0.000013140596,0.008183601,0.99003017,0.000037613576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002950024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020641903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008990921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011424126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58438635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518645978","doi":"","title":"The Impact of the American Doctrine of Discovery on Native Land Rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Doctrine; Land rights; Native american; Political science; Geography; Law; Ethnology; History; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.040688476194232825,"score_gpt":0.2877428786015839,"score_spread":0.24705440240735105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518645978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433712,0.0012007051,4.1113165e-7,0.0013445063,0.00005301759,0.0004072748,0.00005017358,0.0000038376957,0.05356887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831684,0.0033286968,0.0000034752418,0.000048063135,0.000014774138,9.1739174e-8,5.541958e-7,0.0000012037992,0.013434694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936354,0.00018415226,0.00008902456,0.000086254746,0.00014921244,0.00012780662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995717,0.000077511235,0.00012081789,0.00012937993,0.000041569627,0.00005904982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001647094,0.00006196285,0.00019505815,0.00001368577,0.00017359362,0.000006362533,0.0002306613,0.00001229625,0.00004236579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019339877,0.00002714,0.000056721492,0.00027614244,0.00061366137,0.00009704675,0.000037098896,0.000082359446,5.433381e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045524733,0.0001753242,0.11395158,0.00019340853,0.00024668287,0.000038082115,0.0048019527,0.0000035968098,0.000018988227,0.85631037,0.016747892,0.0070568807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039856552,0.0002290963,0.26598245,0.00076974224,0.00005418898,7.9219774e-7,0.0000854132,7.446611e-7,0.0001487848,0.0013614437,0.73083574,0.00013301433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99170786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85494894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011545649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030853492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22610609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542646315","doi":"","title":"Catholic Social Teaching and Global Migration: Bridging the Paradox of Universal Human Rights and Territorial Self-Determination","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Democracy; Globe; Immigration; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Emigration; Sociology; Christianity; Political economy; Law; Geography; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.01273899358870661,"score_gpt":0.2861739003272085,"score_spread":0.2734349067385019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542646315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6713761,0.0075187027,0.00034877684,0.019736651,0.0005300451,0.0013088124,0.000038735077,0.0002328451,0.29890934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806315,0.0012863786,0.00012925171,0.00009599422,0.00026427378,1.2890679e-7,0.000006887594,0.0000013392463,0.00015260532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917316,0.00032744545,0.000088198125,0.00012495978,0.00018317583,0.0001030593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997159,0.000033486387,0.00008936158,0.00006323632,0.000055760273,0.00004220668],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039471372,0.00006656847,0.00013299557,0.000018895444,0.0016172631,0.000036061218,0.00011363976,0.00004968686,0.0000033884655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001457825,0.000058308447,0.00004379465,0.00010054512,0.00023327893,0.00027005642,0.000022927488,0.00007428725,7.082237e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004868955,0.000028901073,0.00014684309,0.0000966679,0.0000070125448,0.0000044794406,0.006430781,1.17946904e-7,0.000014714406,0.9814905,0.0018491874,0.009925909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012522119,0.00017767493,0.0098497905,0.00083816063,0.0006372094,0.00001286564,0.00198842,0.00007139045,0.000020832547,0.024580956,0.9601533,0.00041722902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018155418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010793569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95830405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115002644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029857554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549083991","doi":"","title":"Application of Patent Law Damages Analysis to Trade Secret Misappropriation Claims: Apportionment, Alternatives, and Other Common Limitations on Damages","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Misappropriation; Damages; Trade secret; Context (archaeology); Scrutiny; Apportionment; Law; Intellectual property; Jury; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; History","score_opus":0.18463681906086457,"score_gpt":0.2388600642530556,"score_spread":0.054223245192191016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549083991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15414327,0.008798301,0.023655703,0.024260014,0.00028525692,0.0065135355,0.00032878912,0.00042760067,0.78158754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922328,0.002334791,0.00011332253,0.004713943,0.000036968806,0.000003795848,0.0001086183,0.000009998519,0.00044577813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992596,0.000047608464,0.00018050916,0.00022555148,0.00017669327,0.000110036555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948925,0.00004328274,0.00017876584,0.00020820647,0.000059587266,0.000020921922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017101217,0.00011859996,0.00024222596,0.00013582931,0.00018900004,0.000034440225,0.00015398276,0.00003664151,0.0003152006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015895095,0.00010781923,0.00009040713,0.000557342,0.00007185244,0.0003103395,0.000058241858,0.00007111904,0.00011817047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013781952,0.0010510876,0.009187581,0.003808433,0.0013732284,0.000011364213,0.0010432911,0.0012447265,0.00056586636,0.901232,0.01181339,0.06853119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041153602,0.00005935744,0.004881452,0.00043459042,0.0012491454,5.1755876e-7,0.00019346796,0.0075726216,0.00015215267,0.00042064936,0.98432535,0.0002991659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010968519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004807909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97251195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003285325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000018037944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43967405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557447601","doi":"","title":"Resolving the Softwood Lumber Dispute","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Pulp and paper industry; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.025815492344787385,"score_gpt":0.274102520784723,"score_spread":0.24828702843993564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557447601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025183815,0.011405187,0.00012714992,0.03059618,0.00013034709,0.00045119564,0.0000030992696,0.00012037737,0.9569146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6988317,0.13412625,0.000915189,0.042318575,0.00060459843,0.0000012968886,0.000013132175,0.000028882663,0.12316039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873203,0.00040898236,0.000095327094,0.00018626208,0.00028272148,0.00029466048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993357,0.00013564494,0.000047344347,0.00028177068,0.00010644999,0.000093088966],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006354616,0.000091559494,0.0001681973,0.000013915404,0.0012177402,0.000044055934,0.00056319794,0.000052198502,0.00096713717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019774957,0.000067306195,0.00013082322,0.00036650963,0.0003820834,0.00024936153,0.00006736787,0.00017576742,0.0005398347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059626414,0.000030623105,0.000010303962,0.00007063083,0.000015890071,0.000019002531,0.0013685148,5.999154e-7,0.0000108138365,0.89269745,0.091994144,0.013776065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059456746,0.00001973591,0.000035708992,0.00041789658,0.000048965394,0.0000016252561,0.00016935948,0.0000028006373,0.000010364013,0.0006363243,0.998493,0.000104743194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018920028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033670545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90649885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015042191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000094036695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951952528","doi":"","title":"The Mythical Power of Myth? A Response to Professor Dauer","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Impartiality; Criticism; Law; Mediation; Jurisprudence; Power (physics); Viewpoints; Empathy; Political science; Discretion; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.024637198689653358,"score_gpt":0.3113668690754152,"score_spread":0.28672967038576186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1951952528","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14481243,0.03641388,0.0000052950227,0.45578846,0.00033593786,0.0030846999,0.00005688946,0.0001738109,0.3593286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60527444,0.14246868,0.0006286799,0.014336426,0.00014485657,0.000011060452,0.000004299008,0.000024966374,0.23710662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998178,0.00091268483,0.00013104605,0.00016472767,0.00035260466,0.00026095143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990463,0.00040948897,0.000048483136,0.00020136693,0.00016685938,0.00012746429],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010865919,0.00008902629,0.00022908651,0.000007810563,0.001238217,0.000017118144,0.0003946929,0.000053937572,0.0009951137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003739536,0.00006045776,0.00012976643,0.000358044,0.0006262281,0.0001148157,0.000088601126,0.0001346168,0.00036719596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018477495,0.00031858875,0.00034818013,0.00081363117,0.00035975134,0.000087220425,0.06428366,0.000003863503,0.0001483124,0.5557925,0.33376604,0.042230487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108325185,0.00003346025,0.0007616939,0.0003793065,0.000035675872,3.1905552e-7,0.002060234,1.0519583e-7,0.000006122903,0.000041079085,0.99648684,0.00008681941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014855274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014066008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6627208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017675484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076120414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117899123","doi":"","title":"BERLE’S CONCEPTION OF SHAREHOLDER PRIMACY: A FORGOTTEN PERSPECTIVE FOR RECONSIDERATION DURING THE RISE OF FINANCE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Praise; Positive economics; Shareholder primacy; Opposition (politics); Shareholder; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Philosophy; Corporate governance; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.017043199730879036,"score_gpt":0.2191669421413415,"score_spread":0.20212374241046246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117899123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660828,0.0062938826,0.00060941675,0.0066938335,0.00038415217,0.002369596,0.00019616392,0.000053107655,0.017317027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639696,0.0021299124,0.00022325048,0.00037175504,0.00014602243,0.0000042313663,0.00001001853,0.000008556981,0.0007093171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951017,0.000008062068,0.00013882575,0.00015545529,0.000091152244,0.000096321404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896044,0.000033769637,0.0003955483,0.00020691265,0.00039953456,0.0000037855843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016712747,0.0000818009,0.00020022104,0.000025042535,0.00014964686,0.000012363066,0.00015883971,0.00003218246,0.00009414596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006597851,0.00006990207,0.00011084317,0.00020452456,0.00012163838,0.00061808544,0.000049737908,0.00008463382,0.000010593535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001327362,0.000110087014,0.009734066,0.0056841536,0.00005135969,0.0000046348273,0.00013338399,0.00003084144,0.0023026166,0.96668226,0.010841521,0.0042923423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012938214,0.000024552437,0.060458023,0.0019028258,0.00025155573,0.0000025321917,0.00018839714,0.00018847286,0.0006508344,0.002779976,0.93200064,0.00025837583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082751544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001323822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9639023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029134002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030255149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28505236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605847761","doi":"","title":"A Critical Canadian Perspective on the Benefit Corporation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Corporate law; Fiduciary; Shareholder; Supreme court; Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Law; Shareholder primacy; Corporate social responsibility; Best interests; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Duty; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.03939928957750191,"score_gpt":0.2442858631282594,"score_spread":0.20488657355075748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605847761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044307606,0.00056966767,0.000008763685,0.06992592,0.0002782595,0.00043771017,0.000015462341,0.000049528237,0.9242839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98595923,0.00037516496,0.000009570647,0.009773446,0.0003635018,9.306623e-7,0.000016324766,0.000009885134,0.00349195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994363,0.000010145826,0.00006380991,0.0001928089,0.00012684135,0.00017006141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999086,0.000031407937,0.000097450014,0.00046733677,0.00028887345,0.00002890257],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015272255,0.000103268554,0.00014051255,0.00004399549,0.0020367962,0.00035875637,0.00044215872,0.00003273957,0.0011225122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005137461,0.000068467765,0.00007977231,0.00006582431,0.0002219957,0.00084695476,0.000081962535,0.00011317463,0.0011639926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041405506,0.000010922608,0.00007545347,0.00009782196,0.000007765305,0.00003810128,0.000006177497,2.3170224e-7,4.327925e-7,0.98927665,0.01029137,0.00019096132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097960336,0.000006256444,0.0014820383,0.0005141956,0.00008829537,8.923861e-7,0.000046954625,0.00002525393,0.0000010908403,0.12215834,0.8754497,0.00012902383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1682327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45045203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98152846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015328331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004731431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611895100","doi":"","title":"Benefit Corporations and Public Markets: First Experiments and Next Steps","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Corporate governance; Commit; Business; Voting; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Duty; Dual (grammatical number); Accounting; Public relations; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.102877705392649,"score_gpt":0.2438008351177593,"score_spread":0.14092312972511029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611895100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04204504,0.32097384,0.00039400626,0.03406776,0.00041555104,0.00090693805,0.00035410066,0.00008176468,0.600761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78866506,0.20589148,0.00034237164,0.00083229545,0.000021938205,0.0000028375257,0.000011635698,0.0000075336206,0.0042248387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956495,0.000005403113,0.00011284457,0.00019829973,0.000017685694,0.00010082557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994012,0.000013447938,0.00022517967,0.0002671955,0.000027729802,0.00006524422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000861944,0.00007384278,0.00021392874,0.00002890283,0.00085735176,0.00012220338,0.0001442952,0.000023178527,0.0002459561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036513622,0.00008750298,0.000033107914,0.000038052654,0.00015614768,0.0005042542,0.00016021653,0.000039198578,0.000094728384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027998203,0.000024357743,0.044578306,0.00025088448,0.00003909625,0.000002594677,0.00006156347,5.4620795e-8,2.769829e-7,0.9506769,0.0025751705,0.0017879948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024623243,0.000010259061,0.06278812,0.00016056227,0.000008686007,0.0000015292043,0.000070084716,0.000012528985,5.100449e-7,0.001245245,0.93534994,0.00010628112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002216824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030229194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94943166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032372667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000044897724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6594143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124450235","doi":"","title":"Hostile Takeovers and Overreliance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Context (archaeology); Breach of contract; Law; Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Economics; Investment (military); Payment; Business; Sociology; Political science; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.03759961539685073,"score_gpt":0.20188994138421887,"score_spread":0.16429032598736815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124450235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057520986,0.030577978,0.000091303584,0.0045295893,0.0006753407,0.00080752635,0.000017781147,0.00035719742,0.9054223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9070009,0.021694979,0.00047974472,0.032708127,0.0015679806,0.0000022575719,0.00017576726,0.00007362626,0.03629662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946797,0.000007868563,0.00007276359,0.00018700461,0.0001293265,0.00013507587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960476,0.0000096759995,0.00007790112,0.00017114,0.00010641238,0.000030119643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011908352,0.000102395315,0.00017793714,0.000035417972,0.00014131324,0.00005951186,0.00014260407,0.000027384693,0.0002524781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007831944,0.00009502778,0.000043274293,0.00018073404,0.00010028714,0.0007667409,0.00012873011,0.000063276755,0.00060698384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010107639,0.000016924409,0.00042551316,0.0007199579,0.000009291683,0.00004448965,0.0000064491223,8.3621546e-7,0.0000017157708,0.91695046,0.080977514,0.0008367321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030279873,0.0000052399446,0.0002854359,0.0004633949,0.000071500755,0.0000018879535,0.000017373462,0.00002314023,0.0000010560218,0.0049385293,0.99375427,0.00013536365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006047638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004169497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91277677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032545122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020038071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7801752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W400786494","doi":"","title":"An Unfinished Joruney: Arctic Indigenous Rights, Lands, and Jurisdiction?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Opposition (politics); Arctic; Indigenous rights; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Federal jurisdiction; Geography; Public administration; Oceanography; Ecology; Geology","score_opus":0.015594197472244243,"score_gpt":0.3093551494202659,"score_spread":0.29376095194802165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W400786494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39800417,0.03891015,0.00054425886,0.008877651,0.0028244709,0.0074112704,0.00021586184,0.0008539489,0.5423582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9271299,0.058516975,0.0003474315,0.009124737,0.0003973803,0.00001214816,0.00013281616,0.000032189222,0.004306409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820817,0.0005995335,0.0002009843,0.0002842701,0.000103337996,0.00060372823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990577,0.00013635051,0.00012521012,0.00032997434,0.00017955898,0.00017121287],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068778347,0.00014119464,0.00043252922,0.000043807093,0.005096474,0.0000054016314,0.00017200025,0.00013866035,0.0007881787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002446265,0.00012381515,0.000055424942,0.00014269991,0.00011742723,0.00012255061,0.00013154866,0.0003316707,0.00041710926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018301253,0.0008173624,0.24786516,0.02397324,0.0006668699,0.00016184118,0.053720664,0.0000051756715,0.000017751288,0.6184313,0.045985818,0.008171788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004954252,0.00019992942,0.00931538,0.00051867886,0.00015051197,0.0000054442985,0.00062968256,0.000005434638,3.9244208e-7,0.00046863512,0.9880501,0.0001603573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011762321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03670436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9420643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021372434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010642083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030308966","doi":"","title":"The Mythical Power of Myth? A Response to Professor Dauer","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Reproductive Physiology in Livestock","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Jurisprudence; Criticism; Power (physics); Empathy; Unilateralism; Constitutional law; Adversarial system; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.01636689355576902,"score_gpt":0.23950974797039792,"score_spread":0.2231428544146289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030308966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9408487,0.0035036167,2.4202845e-7,0.046611983,0.000055189535,0.0005950701,0.00002795393,0.0000290463,0.008328174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527199,0.01132093,0.0001846029,0.0077946675,0.00012217414,0.0000073305055,0.000016241642,0.0000024319895,0.027831675],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876416,0.0005487495,0.00011793421,0.00025656272,0.00013424139,0.00017836732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925905,0.00035596747,0.0000458738,0.00016714634,0.00009587797,0.00007606421],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047935857,0.00008881694,0.0001973448,0.00000301651,0.00027774856,0.000005967714,0.00039700983,0.000041655858,0.0010160283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104852275,0.000030834708,0.00010608772,0.0003158355,0.00026441045,0.0000709563,0.000090353096,0.00011854691,0.0003086033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009869642,0.0011448865,0.00061689253,0.00066409993,0.00039621437,0.00009315574,0.0009868199,0.00001557273,0.39158374,0.1568049,0.24375075,0.19407332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049775535,0.00040619634,0.020519795,0.00020601168,0.000018969275,0.0000039602814,0.0000602787,1.2597262e-7,0.0001605355,0.00022362852,0.97826564,0.0000850803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052163618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023144836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7345149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026317794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011582596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7060960786","doi":"","title":"Panelist Biographies, Editor's Note","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisprudence; Object (grammar)","score_opus":0.008217772754344817,"score_gpt":0.23896332526966968,"score_spread":0.23074555251532486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7060960786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017318745,0.0036776005,0.0004886198,0.01038829,0.0003582524,0.0005594199,0.00006678163,0.00005929701,0.98422855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49212453,0.13322842,0.0072632334,0.019926025,0.016872933,0.000016594588,0.0018413297,0.00011468366,0.32861224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992355,0.00005758912,0.00009906251,0.00019347057,0.00020622203,0.00020815854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994326,0.000029818648,0.000042091768,0.0002941712,0.0000834875,0.0001178286],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000113665425,0.00010607114,0.00018154237,0.000054898686,0.0001586069,0.000020354519,0.00026258428,0.000020769516,0.061343707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000030061278,0.00010474712,0.00014046997,0.00039609542,0.00008170779,0.000033006098,0.000068669135,0.00012342591,0.00022528449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068823106,0.00011455069,0.00018638765,0.00016861463,0.000021347454,0.000010374624,0.000008878609,2.7656563e-7,0.000092679584,0.16358809,0.6282797,0.20752224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020169222,0.000041047602,0.00035881065,0.00026760594,0.000040984396,2.065153e-7,0.00001787144,0.0000079716065,0.000025156995,0.000113970964,0.9988118,0.000112890826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00117516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057388505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6556163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008147981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040519404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93951434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}