{"meta":{"query_hash":"5020f9849411","filters":{"venue":"Second language Research"},"cohort_total":60,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":60,"exported":60,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5020f9849411","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Second+language+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W1924016010","doi":"10.1177/026765830101700304","title":"Minimalism and beyond: second language acquisition for the twenty-first century","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Minimalism (technical communication); Second-language acquisition; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06635020138870559,"score_gpt":0.47460372842395343,"score_spread":0.40825352703524787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924016010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26812103,0.026257604,0.010623904,0.100509524,0.0006954285,0.000049126287,0.00019699166,0.00011845946,0.5934279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97791517,0.0021310195,0.0011922139,0.0018662278,0.00021218219,0.000033531236,0.000040545954,0.00002996053,0.016579209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982957,0.0007315408,0.00006307572,0.00024413905,0.00027990201,0.00038564822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551636,0.0025962188,0.00033129644,0.00038145695,0.00058066257,0.0005940109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029684305,0.00025354358,0.0005160474,0.0013978693,0.0039773914,0.0057090437,0.0007777116,0.0018166075,0.008634907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007907958,0.00015627354,0.00026049523,0.00084024615,0.020046804,0.007160334,0.003597325,0.0031654735,0.00036560238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032252952,0.000020273706,0.0004073376,0.00003850904,0.0000028647974,0.000057976747,0.004223409,0.00005746553,0.0001697558,0.9838216,0.0012315959,0.009937059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020485513,0.00005081744,0.0024095564,0.00019736767,0.000007002358,0.00017588076,0.0037566363,0.00024763576,0.0006933009,0.8762116,0.11621055,0.00001905149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009976291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011354877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009976291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007994784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067057624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058006525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970322091","doi":"10.1177/0267658314559573","title":"Perception of non-native consonant length contrast: The role of attention in phonetic processing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Contrast (vision); Consonant; Psychology; Perception; Speech perception; Linguistics; Duration (music); Task (project management); Phonetics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Vowel","score_opus":0.027002425356959136,"score_gpt":0.39383166758571053,"score_spread":0.3668292422287514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970322091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99940765,0.00003096498,0.00021721372,0.000008538969,0.0000012643817,0.0000032399796,0.000007062102,0.000002357178,0.00032171552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935216,0.000030789968,0.0002178466,0.000012646196,0.0000021315927,0.000004596646,0.000025281048,0.0000020574025,0.00035248886],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999838,0.00002523828,0.000011989902,0.000051240146,0.000047148256,0.000026264213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987872,0.0005981967,0.0002403685,0.00008331088,0.00014393743,0.00014689131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038749477,0.00023074112,0.00018087437,0.00026258008,0.00014685988,0.00053723797,0.00018344005,0.00035024987,0.0018440869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001987726,0.00011431189,0.00008995882,0.00007684764,0.00032044397,0.0005281684,0.00032961936,0.0002577716,0.00025911946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012703543,0.00025767862,0.086258225,0.00014095797,0.000018217595,0.00028877414,0.0033728313,0.00011295472,0.88278526,0.00019731186,0.000058605838,0.025238823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022941318,0.0008382684,0.95505023,0.0000072397443,0.000020822954,0.0003722833,0.0014317365,0.0006225316,0.04108498,0.00023810139,0.00029724435,0.000013634202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014492667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012057429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018440869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012820939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014994861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0061690807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994561365","doi":"10.1191/0267658306sr268oa","title":"Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: a prosodic approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":175,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Mandarin Chinese; Inflection; Interlanguage; Psychology; Morpheme; Syntax; Past tense; Computer science; Verb","score_opus":0.04400139966417754,"score_gpt":0.4134376580499297,"score_spread":0.36943625838575217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994561365","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31564274,0.0029198492,0.54438967,0.004178305,0.00011425873,0.00006105916,0.00017079418,0.00033071128,0.13219254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601105,0.00075991877,0.034820534,0.0002508868,0.00009096785,0.000071392766,0.0001068106,0.00008410271,0.0037048713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992675,0.00036030842,0.000041519543,0.00013239922,0.00012479685,0.00007330435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794394,0.0012139399,0.00017522844,0.00038117036,0.00018457384,0.000101041805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013999136,0.00033977084,0.00033612552,0.00077142444,0.000729415,0.0026167314,0.0014890693,0.0011363146,0.0047863163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004061916,0.0004916778,0.00045030293,0.00048448204,0.0033139926,0.005627087,0.0026338813,0.0020104456,0.0004896991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051150255,0.000039715043,0.003060786,0.000097909935,0.00001411261,0.0006219879,0.0043554385,0.0036462303,0.0068039233,0.94675934,0.00024728975,0.034302004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014285906,0.000085879,0.005401388,0.00005381674,0.000021951242,0.00044081247,0.0014946993,0.012205775,0.0021319725,0.9700337,0.008082638,0.00003308049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006084029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005417428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047863163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006375162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047694007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016011834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001740453","doi":"10.1191/0267658305sr251ra","title":"A survey of SLA doctoral programs in Canada and the USA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Second-language acquisition; Focus (optics); Linguistics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12294136162577034,"score_gpt":0.329385095634489,"score_spread":0.20644373400871863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001740453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66586,0.1067769,0.0012395981,0.052507095,0.0022081584,0.0010874157,0.016149588,0.0005742524,0.15359695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77334416,0.083834,0.0023265637,0.011478335,0.0003954112,0.0005681759,0.0061046695,0.00026773004,0.12168092],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499315,0.0004371832,0.00019930255,0.0003275163,0.0017648247,0.0022780113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713666,0.0014741637,0.0013526668,0.00018546783,0.009918204,0.015703043],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029077884,0.00039497585,0.00051607325,0.008929629,0.0068112435,0.0034261507,0.0020252264,0.0010327282,0.0162116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00855719,0.00041732992,0.0003966765,0.01703459,0.0018219122,0.0010050022,0.002933674,0.001385373,0.0026489988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004730928,0.0004996942,0.2545743,0.003111554,0.0000877688,0.0016236154,0.031918142,0.00036157275,0.0025550828,0.012648469,0.2482069,0.44393978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030921707,0.00015131857,0.47868654,0.0014328732,0.000024547784,0.00057265157,0.050366435,0.00017633526,0.00040290068,0.00044352713,0.46765617,0.0000558693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7875938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9208436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036416393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17146929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42731422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011950820","doi":"10.1177/0267658312447612","title":"Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax–discourse interface","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Clitic; Linguistics; Syntax; Dislocation; Focus (optics); Interface (matter); Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Comprehension; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04643461902383069,"score_gpt":0.39780498861883934,"score_spread":0.35137036959500867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011950820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962076,0.00010003154,0.00066748133,0.00031454818,0.000008486316,0.000027156311,0.000036344532,0.00004301683,0.0025953397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975567,0.00007272198,0.0005977279,0.0001636218,0.0000073241645,0.000029435228,0.00004368971,0.00003772306,0.0014909355],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989654,0.00027727394,0.000087142595,0.0002274316,0.00024990033,0.00019287095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649566,0.0015549201,0.00048643438,0.00075467717,0.0003381417,0.0003700654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019367749,0.0008142697,0.0008232382,0.0009069118,0.0011352726,0.001552303,0.0007180561,0.0029075297,0.0025306176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007890972,0.0004661839,0.00039579152,0.0004548669,0.0036749751,0.0011967118,0.002081759,0.0017314448,0.00060039875],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032340486,0.0059356806,0.27106175,0.0006811543,0.00016025481,0.204427,0.21032763,0.0021402314,0.18727428,0.01661634,0.002143877,0.0959978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016502548,0.0076667136,0.4309711,0.00026579437,0.0003070264,0.27211836,0.121675186,0.012204623,0.08721738,0.03986197,0.02543825,0.00062342215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01684568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011896348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01684568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009946645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016569826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033495247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025612520","doi":"10.1177/0267658310365783","title":"Deriving meaning through context: Interpreting bare nominals in second language Japanese","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Linguistics; Noun; Noun phrase; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Verb; Interpretation (philosophy); Second-language acquisition; Meaning (existential); Phrase; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04173028158679807,"score_gpt":0.33644485110724714,"score_spread":0.29471456952044905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025612520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992964,0.00013476839,0.0018271083,0.0001017947,0.0000086688115,0.000011551468,0.00001705265,0.000015763317,0.00491923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968636,0.000118815566,0.0020350409,0.000037149595,0.000004471182,0.000008604928,0.00003352635,0.000016215316,0.0008826243],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999302,0.0002473345,0.000043269625,0.00016864289,0.00017974229,0.00005893166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849653,0.0006833408,0.0002682422,0.00013396956,0.0002729629,0.00014492749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000990364,0.000537667,0.00035502072,0.00044664563,0.0014363765,0.002686577,0.00053375465,0.0007944605,0.0020662653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004471109,0.0004999888,0.0002707906,0.0003532897,0.0020218445,0.0031745892,0.0018861019,0.0010345002,0.0003723458],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003194621,0.00014636116,0.060432333,0.0003937854,0.0000363135,0.004511787,0.7483879,0.00042466953,0.14593741,0.008035383,0.00042631864,0.030948339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001201488,0.0011865705,0.27265444,0.00036761517,0.00017464715,0.00623454,0.61390364,0.0071851113,0.039266687,0.025751974,0.032774676,0.0003798992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00815594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017825924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00815594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005564629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071002217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016216934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040270703","doi":"10.1191/0267658303sr229oa","title":"Two textbook representations of second language acquisition and Universal Grammar: ‘access’ and ‘constraint’","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Generative grammar; Linguistics; Universal grammar; Grammar; Computer science; Metaphor; Second-language acquisition; Field (mathematics); Point (geometry); Constraint (computer-aided design); Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07882105166455719,"score_gpt":0.515108386857285,"score_spread":0.4362873351927278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040270703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07665944,0.051975016,0.046020497,0.11390067,0.0057479953,0.00016529483,0.00049927854,0.0002491151,0.70478266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6315512,0.025193904,0.026340742,0.01878551,0.0033539026,0.0005761819,0.0007429978,0.0002986417,0.29315698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940705,0.00023935482,0.00003635838,0.00006687507,0.00017332745,0.00007703097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971992,0.0018529866,0.00023881487,0.00014472842,0.00031335335,0.0002509764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010420777,0.0003944077,0.00039240802,0.0023176498,0.0013136056,0.0043903035,0.0008205773,0.0022360894,0.00515233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004412813,0.00019576389,0.0003312499,0.0022793012,0.006881089,0.0052704257,0.001947465,0.0038808417,0.00066503714],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014693208,0.000035917794,0.00032556689,0.000094407595,0.0000024721146,0.00008808009,0.008185855,0.0002438395,0.00020366831,0.94104505,0.028630326,0.021130197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001920499,0.00006658614,0.003360735,0.00039044386,0.000006880061,0.00027599107,0.005464524,0.00090028986,0.0005776578,0.2618692,0.72703886,0.000029565117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053041256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008944386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005700156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005700156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024731818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041357696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049648250","doi":"10.1177/0267658308100286","title":"Re-assembling formal features in second language acquisition: beyond minimalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Minimalism (technical communication); Constraint (computer-aided design); Second-language acquisition; Linguistics; Computer science; Language acquisition; Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Mathematics; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.03508638679686819,"score_gpt":0.3318592681842706,"score_spread":0.2967728813874024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049648250","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03263603,0.009170004,0.107617535,0.66761196,0.004530738,0.00003812541,0.00011584511,0.00026526162,0.17801449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90601295,0.0038186582,0.018331818,0.039901573,0.0069022845,0.000110743706,0.00008012526,0.0003192847,0.024522545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973448,0.0011486281,0.00012713773,0.00044663667,0.000708856,0.00022397685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99366647,0.004261057,0.0002966019,0.00062647817,0.00097030326,0.00017908368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047909,0.00030095503,0.0005163456,0.00081851054,0.0021231954,0.0035760796,0.00221006,0.004465104,0.0029753041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011606881,0.0002267418,0.0004834466,0.00046583076,0.020985518,0.009866477,0.0029144902,0.006497463,0.00040056353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008812705,0.0000028770564,0.00006686076,0.000029891631,0.0000033399178,0.000053442458,0.0023543767,0.000116259565,0.00013490835,0.98673034,0.005893308,0.0046056905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008934611,0.000014553735,0.00026540444,0.000072597606,0.000004874319,0.000102263504,0.001111676,0.00063569687,0.00034144317,0.89261186,0.10481209,0.000018553032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005533178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008583123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005533178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002795299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023749028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02533704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053516573","doi":"10.1191/0267658305sr249oa","title":"Quelque chose … de remarquable in English-French acquisition: mandatory, informationally encapsulated computations in second language interpretation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Interlanguage; Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Second-language acquisition; Computer science; Grammar; Universal grammar; Semantic interpretation; English grammar; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019302113344900035,"score_gpt":0.30540447826960326,"score_spread":0.2861023649247032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053516573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859184,0.00007030554,0.0057213334,0.00031621673,0.0000028790405,0.0000063486,0.000020221307,0.000029523773,0.00791469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836093,0.000023882792,0.0010264494,0.000028904164,0.0000014026874,0.0000050739877,0.000018415827,0.0000072477465,0.00052768795],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989365,0.00047995057,0.000035695633,0.0001883186,0.0002280364,0.0001314356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974789,0.0015889329,0.00024514642,0.00027675286,0.00028607543,0.00012409656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001670713,0.00021038378,0.00021477282,0.00038057036,0.0007060637,0.002295306,0.00027956069,0.0008684091,0.0024069014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005262739,0.0003133343,0.00029057747,0.00018966007,0.0025764008,0.0022736962,0.0008505263,0.001145659,0.0001994996],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082264224,0.00050153316,0.23687378,0.00032647557,0.00013772263,0.0037362224,0.22165132,0.004643154,0.19847108,0.20197603,0.0010542038,0.12980592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015976344,0.0010325998,0.64474106,0.00018213115,0.0002236101,0.005268761,0.0666039,0.022736173,0.09010395,0.14117743,0.02745904,0.00031158983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011110811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011750542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011110811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009550497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061102316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022092283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068055792","doi":"10.1177/0267658308100289","title":"On parameters, functional categories and features … and why the trees shouldn't prevent us from seeing the forest …","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Novelty; Feature (linguistics); Focus (optics); Feature selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Generative grammar; Artificial intelligence; Value (mathematics); Linguistics; Natural language processing; Appeal; Psychology; Machine learning; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.043473391296474824,"score_gpt":0.29508835993768695,"score_spread":0.25161496864121213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068055792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054416742,0.024960222,0.21477035,0.1992707,0.0026535853,0.00007676156,0.00034338763,0.0006722146,0.502836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8852008,0.0051885135,0.035283115,0.015828792,0.0011099817,0.0001300611,0.00015653661,0.0004133753,0.056688864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976689,0.0011030678,0.000076318596,0.00050594774,0.00043201612,0.00021368999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996628,0.0018722261,0.00021969042,0.00055209786,0.00057647587,0.00015156767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036977371,0.00075775426,0.00067114603,0.0015518743,0.0034417526,0.0057905205,0.0016784007,0.004561677,0.0052895793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005793445,0.00054543436,0.00061262905,0.0010539648,0.04038606,0.016403332,0.002892425,0.006914648,0.0020655566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026177404,0.0000043528635,0.00016121409,0.000028529836,0.000006582677,0.000049064147,0.003957921,0.00012860981,0.00024072957,0.9800893,0.005795147,0.009512418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013878581,0.000028507813,0.0006131073,0.00013459583,0.000013935185,0.00016421141,0.0024845449,0.00051884935,0.0007206206,0.87223023,0.1230339,0.00004369366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075830882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009924656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075830882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026605267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015283499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019555748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090017400","doi":"10.1177/0267658313503467","title":"Bilingual word recognition in deaf and hearing signers: Effects of proficiency and language dominance on cross-language activation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Office of International Science and Engineering; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"American Sign Language; Psychology; Linguistics; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Word recognition; Sign language; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.05339823741544533,"score_gpt":0.4300048969502753,"score_spread":0.37660665953482997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090017400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996997,0.000016449432,0.000036191355,0.000004020801,0.0000010237532,0.0000035503856,0.000013926037,0.0000017533278,0.00022328734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991922,0.00003135473,0.00019042316,0.00001645956,0.00000225589,0.000016579434,0.00006089721,0.00000639149,0.0004834964],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967,0.000045531127,0.000038975642,0.00010165895,0.000070348375,0.0000734764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791044,0.000854653,0.00046234127,0.0001243849,0.00018847609,0.00045968706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069704064,0.00036955878,0.00035565963,0.00072167173,0.00024397657,0.00059759646,0.00015056023,0.00031012256,0.004210415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003609537,0.00018785025,0.00014299224,0.00014774925,0.0005952768,0.00068614754,0.0007635018,0.000308696,0.00042688247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010131477,0.00072615483,0.16993946,0.00016005403,0.00006703168,0.00088513264,0.005267811,0.00011392754,0.7871967,0.00018824582,0.00013983918,0.02518426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012811417,0.0016860628,0.9713705,0.000012097115,0.00004826835,0.0011071524,0.0017328336,0.0006363847,0.022708913,0.00028838642,0.00025533375,0.000026025318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020099871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035208347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004210415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021097374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028733062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014085233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095324656","doi":"10.1177/0267658308100294","title":"Some questions about feature re-assembly","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Linguistics; Computer science; Feature selection; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Second-language acquisition; Selection (genetic algorithm); Philosophy","score_opus":0.026190026469349086,"score_gpt":0.37926040457413995,"score_spread":0.35307037810479086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095324656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00081853033,0.0069591696,0.009186091,0.9582481,0.011974417,0.000012186647,0.00004110257,0.00007637173,0.01268403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.090153374,0.013411799,0.01381651,0.76033956,0.08952967,0.0001690844,0.00012317141,0.0003902943,0.03206657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215007,0.0027181616,0.00044026697,0.0017926432,0.0022491603,0.0006497466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789392,0.015413657,0.00054924504,0.00088017335,0.0037705791,0.0004472264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014744026,0.0006667801,0.00083024206,0.00091082376,0.0042130486,0.0040302514,0.0048648496,0.015894752,0.0037727065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031222733,0.00038857418,0.0010423616,0.0008725508,0.015381907,0.011736501,0.0020612068,0.019241262,0.0015716681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005151243,0.000014140612,0.00018858572,0.00017054808,0.000014471018,0.0002681911,0.0030496074,0.0002866974,0.0004893725,0.73018146,0.23489717,0.03038826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023330642,0.00003461036,0.00044137545,0.0002552844,0.000012202957,0.0002985599,0.0015935566,0.0009245792,0.0005941359,0.3353088,0.66046125,0.000052255647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010493615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010561416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015894752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034707482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036191414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0779748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098576193","doi":"10.1177/0267658310375753","title":"Experience, representations and the production of second language allophones","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Alternation (linguistics); Linguistics; Psychology; Second language; Production (economics); First language; Consonant; Second-language acquisition; Language proficiency; Stress (linguistics)","score_opus":0.08643860200490655,"score_gpt":0.4254092643691553,"score_spread":0.3389706623642488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098576193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991856,0.000045475834,0.00025521105,0.000008043713,0.00000114866,0.0000012117663,0.0000058608116,0.0000028644386,0.00049437943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914825,0.000050802006,0.00031880205,0.000009884484,0.0000019065028,0.0000029144924,0.000019629151,0.000005049295,0.00044290145],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997478,0.00006365913,0.000012969772,0.000061405975,0.00007503369,0.00003900846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799335,0.0009335909,0.00047055012,0.00014823329,0.00022020908,0.0002341631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042262732,0.00028573416,0.00017332123,0.00035298453,0.0002036989,0.001398051,0.00018131365,0.00030609887,0.0018639286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028837288,0.00023741674,0.00012105205,0.00017531561,0.0006153921,0.0004763535,0.0007900632,0.00040375412,0.00019352735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006870101,0.00016222819,0.25000867,0.00018152519,0.000056848043,0.0017380734,0.042871665,0.00027469307,0.66733944,0.0006412845,0.00008303889,0.035955533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028816892,0.0010824333,0.94712067,0.000039563572,0.00004359287,0.0022652186,0.016174851,0.00064469356,0.029739542,0.00071781495,0.0020865754,0.000056170767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010207983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015776722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018639286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001512763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017711021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0062354803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103289020","doi":"10.1177/0267658313510926","title":"Lexical encoding of L2 tones: The role of L1 stress, pitch accent and intonation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Mandarin Chinese; Prosody; Linguistics; Pitch accent; Stress (linguistics); Intonation (linguistics); Psychology; German; First language; Tone (literature); Stress (linguistics); Utterance; Syllable","score_opus":0.03911547804961463,"score_gpt":0.41338216288932406,"score_spread":0.37426668483970943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103289020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99897194,0.00004651883,0.00028680326,0.000014203269,0.0000017559406,0.000004074691,0.00002619301,0.0000049980367,0.0006435948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998701,0.000059249323,0.0004283136,0.000018685387,0.0000019728482,0.000007929686,0.00006268309,0.0000116919455,0.00070846995],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998714,0.000029781328,0.000009378022,0.000043135897,0.000020794763,0.000025564948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993224,0.00021355948,0.00017119237,0.00006480018,0.000093058195,0.0001350047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002623421,0.0003731064,0.00016553135,0.00020426742,0.00017962781,0.0010776633,0.000211143,0.0003135758,0.0017786718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014575786,0.00023605996,0.00008595449,0.000106625936,0.00033500887,0.0006667585,0.0005023475,0.0002628641,0.0002834147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007763177,0.00012856408,0.04072026,0.00012860566,0.000018768085,0.00025030752,0.0028647063,0.000107953456,0.9318871,0.00040401495,0.000075360345,0.022638118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007947897,0.0013361266,0.8496102,0.00008063317,0.00008533844,0.0006850748,0.0035852226,0.002369865,0.13981898,0.0011084878,0.0011745071,0.00006607431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00292643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033299064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00292643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021503674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002937521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0059502125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114558271","doi":"10.1191/026765800677556046","title":"Missing Surface Inflection or Impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":861,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Inflection; Linguistics; Psychology; German; Past tense; Second-language acquisition; Feature (linguistics); Language acquisition; Verb; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06885479596568268,"score_gpt":0.3685641880680884,"score_spread":0.2997093921024057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114558271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957159,0.0006260165,0.0008321592,0.00024995385,0.0000062575623,0.0000036643314,0.00007461052,0.000024292238,0.0024671583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988349,0.00025534735,0.0003623556,0.000058551712,0.0000075044886,0.000006602961,0.00006884999,0.0000064523415,0.00039943063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924916,0.00012697103,0.00012277358,0.0001519853,0.00023683292,0.000112291586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900197,0.0048378413,0.002128963,0.0015633923,0.0008429277,0.0006072713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022525126,0.00032600536,0.00046955288,0.0013927083,0.00028252415,0.0010238508,0.0005003392,0.0009454285,0.002312537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072981985,0.00028978655,0.00023027475,0.0005914696,0.0028436587,0.0029193815,0.0014468381,0.0007576066,0.0004201953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020648723,0.0006434979,0.7276186,0.00089597714,0.00020039594,0.005255862,0.045699567,0.0007218012,0.07108085,0.009884123,0.00058112823,0.13535334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051707,0.0012654284,0.9267379,0.00014744866,0.00011245719,0.014077864,0.0077931634,0.0009892398,0.031642795,0.013075667,0.0040308745,0.00007534008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001619568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001221595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002312537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022245772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003390696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011912584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123413683","doi":"10.1177/0267658314554939","title":"Long-distance wh-movement and long-distance wh-movement avoidance in L2 English: Evidence from French and Bulgarian speakers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Movement (music); Linguistics; Second-language acquisition; Bulgarian; Psychology; Language acquisition; Meaning (existential); Computer science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.02627872574575491,"score_gpt":0.335994523507859,"score_spread":0.3097157977621041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123413683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99894935,0.00011145741,0.000053249245,0.000025756824,0.0000010949954,0.000003122441,0.000023449327,0.0000014416261,0.0008310612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936026,0.000072903356,0.000068041336,0.000026041287,0.0000020435862,0.0000062290464,0.00004584261,0.0000037099474,0.0004148819],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990055,0.00029459054,0.00005973861,0.0002197972,0.00021264645,0.00020768623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624276,0.0020879987,0.0005669902,0.00020360555,0.0006504234,0.00024823862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013533552,0.0005963623,0.00042927722,0.0012254694,0.0009562593,0.0019767438,0.00048067895,0.0009537521,0.0032891145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046522915,0.00047030294,0.00023034216,0.00060487655,0.0021171577,0.00073651096,0.0012702027,0.0006563147,0.00044206422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079348084,0.00027964372,0.526933,0.00031481695,0.00011413653,0.0027239914,0.3836511,0.00016517637,0.056665745,0.0008201831,0.00026726388,0.027271446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018199129,0.000318101,0.924058,0.000033544933,0.00003613376,0.0021386833,0.06911327,0.00014972757,0.0023102472,0.0001733263,0.0015965832,0.000054074764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08256709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08398449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08256709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000783612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006075424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.164173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136912484","doi":"10.1177/0267658309337641","title":"Quantitative analyses in a multivariate study of language attrition: the impact of extralinguistic factors","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Attrition; Psychology; German; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Predictive power; Language proficiency; Multivariate statistics; Language acquisition; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.4346352516203167,"score_gpt":0.6795897930404406,"score_spread":0.24495454142012396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136912484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97785723,0.00020665137,0.018996675,0.0001627574,0.000030216857,0.00027908167,0.0002664482,0.000035161283,0.0021657972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99536276,0.000046569246,0.0037274857,0.000032929736,0.000024034356,0.00032428504,0.00017058561,0.000016801774,0.00029441513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94536346,0.044524148,0.0019758565,0.0019734297,0.004965763,0.0011973025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8782082,0.097373724,0.011648911,0.008439011,0.0031839563,0.0011461931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0359568,0.0006248221,0.00059180846,0.0021075376,0.0010712398,0.0011884171,0.0007956976,0.00041035144,0.0022911634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10703493,0.00023060477,0.0011141856,0.0021777423,0.0020250056,0.0014029158,0.0014888743,0.00083741784,0.00024499616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007831181,0.0003656163,0.94876903,0.00021972005,0.0006576541,0.00017903995,0.008002009,0.00077373546,0.0014008549,0.0024121094,0.0004320652,0.036005184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016292208,0.0011586901,0.98404366,0.000060092018,0.00014735012,0.00018149472,0.005477711,0.0048227743,0.0008580496,0.0023480603,0.0008532978,0.000032522803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002279916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020057305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0359568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005742712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010119607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19016004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138273153","doi":"10.1177/0267658308100284","title":"Phonological feature re-assembly and the importance of phonetic cues","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Phonological rule; Distinctive feature; Linguistics; Computer science; Robustness (evolution); Phonology; Phonetics; Speech recognition; Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Biology","score_opus":0.0480349790245673,"score_gpt":0.4135032636770934,"score_spread":0.3654682846525261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138273153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8905469,0.0031489043,0.06331903,0.0015438567,0.00024131918,0.000041831212,0.00008764242,0.00065508526,0.04041548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909695,0.00041851116,0.0061326115,0.00015206408,0.00004506457,0.000010781595,0.00007933131,0.00011245088,0.002079809],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998789,0.00016982372,0.00006430953,0.0003610391,0.00038738883,0.00022841539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99031913,0.0058985245,0.0010498624,0.001450913,0.00088424183,0.0003973449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012236871,0.0004536759,0.00049749936,0.00073538045,0.0006175337,0.0037722227,0.0008157697,0.0014845252,0.0035344653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01204333,0.0007957079,0.0003954915,0.00038677623,0.0037081847,0.004714363,0.0020132659,0.0024758878,0.00087575224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015512706,0.00021169097,0.01817839,0.0004840052,0.00009225234,0.00333693,0.004672922,0.0047805402,0.71015143,0.08688663,0.0006946451,0.16895925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022066724,0.0018047009,0.28956887,0.00019808677,0.00025616214,0.0114815775,0.0037655367,0.051242407,0.36375916,0.26413482,0.013185257,0.00038273382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012931863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011135171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037722227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043343374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056352816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011823952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147248643","doi":"10.1177/0267658310397117","title":"The Aspect Hypothesis, defective tense, and obligatory contexts: Comments on Haznedar, 2007","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Argument (complex analysis); Turkish; Context (archaeology); Past tense; Psychology; Present tense; Counterexample; Verb; Philosophy; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09506371752583297,"score_gpt":0.313777610577532,"score_spread":0.21871389305169903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147248643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061050626,0.0071291467,0.0020536133,0.9561053,0.0069555906,0.000021072861,0.0002415777,0.000053596228,0.021335086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1052086,0.008114423,0.0044325576,0.8277935,0.034119338,0.00017142155,0.00021971596,0.00019087887,0.019749667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946602,0.0014105489,0.00046538265,0.0013523466,0.0017073358,0.00040422773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96551126,0.026852641,0.001030178,0.0011217757,0.0046936437,0.0007905567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010127854,0.000872156,0.0012015365,0.0016653277,0.0069589172,0.004926209,0.006721381,0.021540893,0.003952361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02218202,0.00060554966,0.0010065358,0.0014930619,0.026988106,0.0106449155,0.0048471275,0.025717441,0.002052152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009706044,0.00004705305,0.0011165608,0.00018320834,0.000025605928,0.0007392696,0.011880866,0.00028722466,0.000630391,0.5316375,0.44328755,0.010067709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007939071,0.000084467145,0.004220855,0.0012337063,0.00006033337,0.0010470719,0.010295171,0.0012416866,0.0014833276,0.27923337,0.70075303,0.00026765175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027559206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029238204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027559206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052421154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051826793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05479759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151328700","doi":"10.1177/0267658311413540","title":"The development of coda perception in second language phonology: A variationist perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Psychology; Vowel; Coda; Context (archaeology); Perception; Stress (linguistics); Foreign language; Consonant; History","score_opus":0.08345044034886046,"score_gpt":0.41967269623031495,"score_spread":0.3362222558814545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151328700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9418862,0.0011547786,0.04811911,0.00044810955,0.00003077375,0.00012807963,0.00022200779,0.000057168603,0.007953748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99360037,0.00014918807,0.005834872,0.00003668717,0.000011573519,0.000078235746,0.00006341103,0.000022790622,0.0002029389],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99458766,0.0027724968,0.00032369088,0.0009929792,0.0010708845,0.000252267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98596406,0.010708019,0.0010506873,0.0014989479,0.0005569984,0.00022130347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007548173,0.00026861214,0.00061782124,0.00208062,0.0005487671,0.002432591,0.0007696138,0.00047867562,0.001173792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017211348,0.00040947396,0.000435944,0.0013100461,0.0037928121,0.0013414628,0.0017954167,0.0008939029,0.00009039997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013805308,0.00046378063,0.45224142,0.0009919892,0.0005803298,0.0019191647,0.09063674,0.004517689,0.11889873,0.08878184,0.0005816141,0.2390062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048378814,0.0009805834,0.9150304,0.00013358289,0.00013453845,0.0019567567,0.012269139,0.011087574,0.010747081,0.042464446,0.0049765115,0.00017095228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030450833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028982535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007548173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000756346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007186627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03991902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159718161","doi":"10.1191/0267658304sr234oa","title":"Connectionism, HPSG signs and SLA representations: specifying principles of mapping between form and function","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Head-driven phrase structure grammar; Rotation formalisms in three dimensions; Connectionism; Computer science; Phrase structure grammar; Redundancy (engineering); Grammar; Phrase; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Function (biology); Artificial intelligence; Rule-based machine translation; Mathematics; Artificial neural network","score_opus":0.14162313432581106,"score_gpt":0.3418775068643475,"score_spread":0.20025437253853642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159718161","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06457911,0.00027908073,0.83019155,0.0024755232,0.000073231095,0.00010616953,0.0001510135,0.000448307,0.10169606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8605068,0.00021713166,0.13352679,0.00017097604,0.000044063603,0.00014489972,0.00010224188,0.00020457321,0.0050825994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987042,0.0006694126,0.00009526629,0.0001900561,0.00023357644,0.00010750435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998106,0.0008347315,0.00025230905,0.00053378736,0.00018990152,0.000083206025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020969103,0.00053270056,0.00038825185,0.0014478733,0.0010236055,0.005938231,0.0011489925,0.0016792885,0.00550044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060781157,0.00053651026,0.0007676021,0.0013482107,0.008259141,0.011458513,0.0026047146,0.0026488563,0.0006737415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054923003,0.000003338678,0.00017709262,0.000017466835,0.0000032788644,0.000034574074,0.00078466954,0.000839144,0.0004733045,0.991975,0.00017147587,0.0055152094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045365623,0.000009530237,0.00020446272,0.000015867641,0.0000048001452,0.0000691477,0.00023379833,0.006019574,0.00042768993,0.9897343,0.0032684007,0.0000078515395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001480759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019089137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005938231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016535305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012376392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018400788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167042673","doi":"10.1177/0267658312463375","title":"Introduction to the special issue: Aspects of word learning on first exposure to a second language","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Word (group theory); Language acquisition; Psychology; Word learning; Computer science; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education; Vocabulary; History","score_opus":0.01821692470773011,"score_gpt":0.33403440445909277,"score_spread":0.31581747975136265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167042673","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038611344,0.25709617,0.0076758103,0.082476005,0.6012599,0.00016170708,0.0006225261,0.0003348818,0.046511877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011008941,0.19264226,0.0022570565,0.023540795,0.702619,0.000205814,0.0007301703,0.00027977518,0.0667161],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995103,0.0000823116,0.000083581675,0.00012423348,0.0001430175,0.000056670266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965215,0.0018566768,0.00021834718,0.00016036347,0.000710501,0.0005326453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001225874,0.0011251587,0.001400083,0.0029004992,0.0012446523,0.0029016011,0.0012083368,0.003924872,0.026231194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004216865,0.00035926094,0.0010161129,0.0013874922,0.0013961177,0.0030255616,0.0021458808,0.0057600276,0.009513931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001125523,0.00022243547,0.0011112954,0.00211206,0.000035911216,0.0005953897,0.00063932367,0.0001485988,0.002781079,0.009661903,0.76740694,0.21517241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008309946,0.00020783287,0.003031189,0.0007866761,0.00002502081,0.0012990583,0.00023607688,0.000101809615,0.00047482108,0.006521833,0.987283,0.00002427377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075482274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011033572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026231194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092499785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011545396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087752104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167337955","doi":"10.1177/0267658307086302","title":"The acquisition of articles in child second language English: fluctuation, transfer or both?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Second-language acquisition; Linguistics; First language; Language acquisition; Arabic; Narrative; Negative transfer; Transfer of training; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.034001033858260886,"score_gpt":0.3540529003377591,"score_spread":0.32005186647949824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167337955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999263,0.00014554324,0.0001245915,0.000024198584,7.967903e-7,0.000003879036,0.00004884935,0.0000044398607,0.00038460165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990971,0.00018626769,0.00027161144,0.000014435364,0.0000018082353,0.000015447766,0.00014338206,0.0000052706755,0.00026471855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999113,0.00023309204,0.00008327941,0.00018011322,0.00025959042,0.00013086405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99306905,0.003340968,0.0019949328,0.00059602264,0.00066875835,0.0003301953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019167765,0.00020383121,0.00028307876,0.0007418172,0.00035069342,0.0013316015,0.00040641674,0.0003804673,0.0008961995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011120403,0.0003963985,0.00017447228,0.000682419,0.0008844244,0.0016504052,0.0010851476,0.00055033824,0.00030330403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002554253,0.00011311828,0.9117361,0.0001070242,0.000032029886,0.0019685242,0.041667487,0.00012021286,0.013494915,0.00043662084,0.00014854928,0.029920017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043837877,0.00015558762,0.98047924,0.000030705174,0.000019190395,0.0021034507,0.012178728,0.00019437012,0.0033805342,0.00023004536,0.0012045334,0.000019188967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008402891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01237455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008402891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005879497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057424075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016707957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170929445","doi":"10.1177/0267658308098995","title":"Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: evidence from event-related brain potentials","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Syntax; Second-language acquisition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Contrast (vision); Language proficiency; Language acquisition; Event-related potential; Focus (optics); Affect (linguistics); Computer science; Cognition; Communication; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.04346752621197246,"score_gpt":0.37868794134619027,"score_spread":0.3352204151342178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170929445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814703,0.0047794455,0.008988226,0.0002666793,0.00002602423,0.000017345898,0.00041124906,0.00007505325,0.003965753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99421084,0.0021427316,0.0026431812,0.000079432844,0.000030598487,0.000026028105,0.00018440741,0.000018849958,0.00066395686],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986947,0.000021334214,0.000011492318,0.000041165586,0.00004236261,0.000014240657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984988,0.0007044453,0.00041065953,0.000079689584,0.00023109493,0.00007536466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000443082,0.00020605612,0.00018896241,0.0005632647,0.000091037706,0.0004334598,0.0001741799,0.00041683688,0.0014244865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024317722,0.00014710275,0.000115829294,0.00043417353,0.0003786224,0.00060778245,0.0004426086,0.0004919945,0.00031351182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011828425,0.00019956949,0.17323941,0.00066264765,0.00011716554,0.002867084,0.0012043428,0.00039785195,0.67065287,0.0020717338,0.00058255595,0.14682187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018989807,0.00037374216,0.9674008,0.000042109637,0.00003505558,0.0044250595,0.00025187785,0.0005481294,0.022037784,0.0031097727,0.001734649,0.000021974281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039856037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004502119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0014244865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117179174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012743346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0047653913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172185839","doi":"10.1177/0267658307076544","title":"Acceptable ungrammaticality in sentence matching","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of California, San Diego","keywords":"Linguistics; Sentence; Set (abstract data type); Matching (statistics); Freedman; Psychology; Computer science; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07067264863937919,"score_gpt":0.3647346799494767,"score_spread":0.29406203131009756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172185839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90664446,0.000253719,0.04403032,0.0011516936,0.00015053127,0.00013462621,0.00021776288,0.00044010964,0.046976734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99391794,0.00005857592,0.004694942,0.00031132245,0.000031879626,0.00005296862,0.00010768593,0.00013099423,0.0006936316],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799612,0.0119932415,0.0012172543,0.0024828045,0.0037644124,0.0005810727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460171,0.04089968,0.0032335455,0.0057518724,0.0034636795,0.0006341268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009022394,0.0005663346,0.0007180192,0.00072398904,0.0009919396,0.002319057,0.0010353867,0.0018863947,0.008185289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052225042,0.000529402,0.00036084984,0.00053816667,0.0030146255,0.0045657,0.002743824,0.0023406735,0.0007960082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029475524,0.0009542682,0.042313386,0.002033467,0.0002327083,0.004259796,0.062491145,0.0035690328,0.3716203,0.33892062,0.0047424817,0.16591527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000783359,0.002323432,0.08712555,0.00045498137,0.000362491,0.014701438,0.019479223,0.026770877,0.19290541,0.6142771,0.040350836,0.00046518963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005542263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004229582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009022394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006542949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073568145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047715604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208721842","doi":"10.1177/0267658312473471","title":"Learning exponents of number on first exposure to an L2","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Numeral system; Reduplication; Linguistics; Indonesian; Noun phrase; Second language; Language acquisition; Second-language acquisition; First language; Noun; Computer science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04552935394462438,"score_gpt":0.4080297272235361,"score_spread":0.3625003732789117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2208721842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960276,0.00003853943,0.00043904188,0.000024755233,0.00001162342,0.000014669648,0.000036904432,0.000023772978,0.0033830907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99107164,0.00012013737,0.0010146354,0.00006125574,0.000007258004,0.000036486163,0.00015787105,0.000033026845,0.00749771],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964356,0.000057920945,0.000022411501,0.000117461466,0.00011014255,0.00004847541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972567,0.0013992579,0.0003145067,0.00039069873,0.00037436548,0.00026445554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007210142,0.00053496176,0.00064148917,0.00030206202,0.00044646536,0.0012328682,0.0003981197,0.0005139293,0.007752844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046180473,0.00027328124,0.0002400125,0.00016939348,0.00088922126,0.0012891103,0.0013142927,0.0012023012,0.0015702426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001754258,0.0023986623,0.07156006,0.0005207044,0.000048996117,0.0026128546,0.035772134,0.00048192314,0.77149385,0.0027231853,0.0014935549,0.10913981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000163966,0.020984042,0.47388777,0.000365099,0.00012271963,0.005595284,0.020396171,0.00411782,0.43839002,0.008465172,0.027260115,0.00025185428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013623118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020125485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007752844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032663718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042007957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025935829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327399869","doi":"10.1177/0267658313518215","title":"Locatives and existentials in L2 Spanish: The acquisition of the semantic contrasts among <i>ser, estar</i> and <i>haber</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Centres de Recerca de Catalunya","keywords":"Locative case; Linguistics; Morpheme; Syntax; Existentialism; Semantics (computer science); Computer science; Cognate; Lexical semantics; Psychology; Lexical item; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027724810474021894,"score_gpt":0.2938114624024997,"score_spread":0.2660866519284778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327399869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99916136,0.000027752982,0.000097511496,0.000011150461,8.090072e-7,0.0000030713875,0.00000907282,0.0000025019926,0.00068676285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923146,0.000035204903,0.00016111763,0.000018809804,0.0000010772566,0.0000073265246,0.000029487206,0.000007630553,0.000507948],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956864,0.00012177254,0.00002406581,0.00011762372,0.00009510191,0.000072837865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980715,0.0009279969,0.0005122775,0.00012267639,0.00023210279,0.00013345177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091100996,0.0003992346,0.0002867666,0.00042848795,0.0003614515,0.0013328019,0.00022023059,0.0004123645,0.0015203485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033415314,0.00022458738,0.00011085213,0.00020725728,0.0010861616,0.0006440016,0.0012044568,0.00059046474,0.00031919265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016463808,0.0004590142,0.31112242,0.0003111021,0.000074368414,0.002898035,0.23222046,0.00030408532,0.39447162,0.001403814,0.00035225047,0.054736454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000676542,0.0010951862,0.8467389,0.000068031455,0.00005915791,0.0029487123,0.10645105,0.00086861965,0.033329375,0.0014647287,0.0068329037,0.000075772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036424552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003098642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036424552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003691493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037079165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0072425604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329620651","doi":"10.1177/0267658313519814","title":"<i>Wh-</i> questions in child L2 French: Derivational complexity and its interactions with L1 properties, length of exposure, age of exposure, and the input","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Psychology; Inversion (geology); Specific language impairment; Age of Acquisition; Second-language acquisition; Age groups; Language acquisition; Verb; First language; Developmental psychology; Linguistic sequence complexity; Demography; Cognition; Sociology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.05735394863006801,"score_gpt":0.3336542809895453,"score_spread":0.2763003323594773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329620651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995455,0.000040209576,0.000047549744,0.000009821057,3.2413644e-7,0.0000036332124,0.000031363816,0.000004332826,0.0003172074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930644,0.000042479343,0.0001704624,0.000017927632,0.0000013075801,0.0000131814295,0.00012487765,0.0000066296325,0.00031680416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998259,0.0005618921,0.00014307363,0.0003448808,0.00042216404,0.00026896346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903993,0.004896612,0.0029212025,0.00040589826,0.00084919465,0.00052780745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018083259,0.0005057602,0.00045753983,0.0010265294,0.00039836115,0.0018735148,0.00034564213,0.00074597495,0.0030165135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008630467,0.00032100047,0.00045077878,0.0004968972,0.00088856916,0.00090989645,0.0012428972,0.00059254305,0.000508219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009288759,0.0003952625,0.90674794,0.00016817266,0.00010094763,0.0019334424,0.033725206,0.00031941742,0.038456965,0.00022304768,0.00014141705,0.016859317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008925205,0.00031496267,0.9917001,0.000016431188,0.00002583301,0.00079205586,0.0043259836,0.00021009368,0.0019474754,0.000090905996,0.0005464169,0.000020798581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016950632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014103777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016950632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001006916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064855587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033703923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2400694300","doi":"10.1177/0267658315589656","title":"Exploring the potential relationship between eye gaze and English L2 speakers’ responses to recasts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Gaze; Psychology; Eye tracking; Prosody; Intonation (linguistics); Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Fluency; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.2834098163506495,"score_gpt":0.4224880641932162,"score_spread":0.13907824784256673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2400694300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988794,0.00006702967,0.00037759714,0.000028649716,0.0000021366543,0.0000089353625,0.000040294024,0.00000611207,0.00058990496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916434,0.000045260786,0.0003308602,0.000016264245,0.0000025037905,0.000017476934,0.00003695649,0.0000044569597,0.00038186385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999318,0.00026827454,0.000037762427,0.00015760085,0.00013072349,0.00008770913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936515,0.003681696,0.0014956186,0.00023509846,0.00073389953,0.00020219496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011789454,0.00026903607,0.00021446955,0.0005545452,0.000280692,0.0009186928,0.00018188558,0.0004224487,0.0019836258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010210471,0.0001794282,0.00017571442,0.00029061877,0.00033094117,0.000570676,0.0005683909,0.000397544,0.00023017266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007542926,0.000191827,0.86263573,0.0002367871,0.000109488654,0.0006822171,0.041410517,0.00023618087,0.0643456,0.00025321502,0.00029571724,0.028848404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057383972,0.00018644317,0.9887995,0.000025551371,0.000019627216,0.00025592186,0.008099738,0.00044363836,0.0016236007,0.00013352705,0.00039083164,0.00001588745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053132637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007419511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053132637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024339734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002674805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010564685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465030266","doi":"10.1177/0267658316649998","title":"Prosody–syntax integration in a second language: Contrasting event-related potentials from German and Chinese learners of English using linear mixed effect models","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Centre for Research on Brain Language and Music","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Prosody; German; Syntax; Linguistics; Psychology; Categorical variable; Language proficiency; Sentence processing; Sentence; Psycholinguistics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Cognition","score_opus":0.03335397762517796,"score_gpt":0.36705929458406966,"score_spread":0.3337053169588917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465030266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98852754,0.00010444814,0.010569345,0.000063902684,0.000011435246,0.00006425131,0.00023105922,0.0000477846,0.00038031337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929254,0.000063759915,0.005509719,0.000029692714,0.00000824367,0.00021546101,0.0003716286,0.000030708914,0.0008453868],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999469,0.00020608207,0.000028227198,0.00017345115,0.000054371896,0.00006891959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912554,0.00067056064,0.000055608903,0.00006728171,0.00004422355,0.000036812737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021663825,0.00066481443,0.00054861075,0.00038315277,0.00022263936,0.00086721923,0.00060140074,0.00044054852,0.0028955168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030538726,0.00024078196,0.0011756988,0.00034545982,0.00043894388,0.0005256079,0.0005124474,0.00053886476,0.0002085442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014278261,0.0023331908,0.35762292,0.0013274958,0.007712748,0.0032928754,0.009592916,0.03387779,0.38481322,0.009834501,0.0016993355,0.17361484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038612916,0.0021306882,0.80760753,0.000054766486,0.0026469026,0.0005499735,0.001350286,0.15232012,0.025599845,0.0045208884,0.0026877164,0.00014525389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006534168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005611901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006534168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029875632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044776208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012992263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552285053","doi":"10.1177/0267658316678286","title":"Bilingualism and working memory capacity: A comprehensive meta-analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":270,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Working memory; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Psychology; Moderation; Cognitive psychology; Flexibility (engineering); Cognitive flexibility; Cognition; Task (project management); Short-term memory; Developmental psychology; Population; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3460702399124849,"score_gpt":0.41293100968192464,"score_spread":0.06686076976943972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552285053","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039346993,0.95744604,0.0011343703,0.00025954295,0.000112978334,0.00011823589,0.0010618775,0.000056580317,0.00046333618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6177466,0.37428027,0.0041585425,0.000700938,0.00021518907,0.0005567183,0.0018208174,0.00007694704,0.00044407346],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669904,0.0014212293,0.0008366677,0.0006128403,0.0003059541,0.0001241742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866295,0.00989635,0.0019382174,0.0006866631,0.0006254903,0.00022387294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007161781,0.0019097659,0.008197356,0.0038453632,0.00061249384,0.0022406804,0.0013060594,0.0014245462,0.0027162163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016499756,0.0010290345,0.02378491,0.0045555662,0.0006371087,0.0009976033,0.001101555,0.0011814676,0.00025779125],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002924655,0.000046654048,0.024469068,0.089708604,0.8654187,0.0002191781,0.00015837124,0.00050094083,0.00058668863,0.00014680243,0.00071277807,0.015107532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045295755,0.00019697564,0.01707277,0.005918485,0.9744152,0.00016791162,0.000040277813,0.00015440387,0.0002243099,0.00020410215,0.001132867,0.000019595833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048604426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011852997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008197356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011497315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013404947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037875593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884320097","doi":"10.1177/0267658318782357","title":"The acquisition of object movement in Dutch: L1 transfer and near-native grammars at the syntax–discourse interface","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Syntax; Linguistics; German; Computer science; Rule-based machine translation; Object (grammar); Interface (matter); Semantics (computer science); First language; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Programming language","score_opus":0.0382337861115435,"score_gpt":0.33875795235696105,"score_spread":0.30052416624541756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884320097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99735814,0.00005168223,0.00031845464,0.000027865428,0.0000019045831,0.0000069784055,0.00004436402,0.000008383835,0.002182196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997948,0.00006619197,0.00036174225,0.000020031186,0.0000014892452,0.000017240252,0.000097806536,0.00002186811,0.001465557],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915683,0.00019763483,0.000060878217,0.00027304862,0.0001999437,0.00011165963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981127,0.001109053,0.00026214757,0.00017480737,0.00020258313,0.0001387649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001114941,0.00034355847,0.00042782468,0.00046519286,0.0005333852,0.0012661483,0.0002778619,0.00049602106,0.003319306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004363838,0.00026972644,0.0001511882,0.00025144077,0.00086201244,0.0016109577,0.0014969648,0.0007267344,0.0005917695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012114106,0.0017126814,0.13718289,0.0006087441,0.00008836448,0.005148655,0.20140985,0.0007621564,0.53023934,0.00875571,0.0008751013,0.11200511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013537993,0.0020709338,0.8115531,0.00012443888,0.00009298983,0.009912849,0.058740076,0.0025701602,0.090824164,0.0090107955,0.014774849,0.0001902901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008237851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009016313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008237851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006678145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064898346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016379774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884625867","doi":"10.1177/0267658318787231","title":"Input effects across domains: The case of Greek subjects in child heritage language","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Heritage language; Syntax; Linguistics; Realization (probability); Subject (documents); Categorical variable; Psychology; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Phenomenon; First language; Pragmatics; Test (biology); Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021468812795264147,"score_gpt":0.39458637041131384,"score_spread":0.3731175576160497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884625867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976247,0.00007634178,0.00014678443,0.00004182024,0.0000017113948,0.0000064042956,0.000023808192,0.0000087943,0.0020697524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867046,0.00008454099,0.00038147368,0.000025802286,0.0000023807104,0.000011007117,0.000030295523,0.000010649902,0.00078334886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914014,0.000216218,0.000061741826,0.00019618576,0.0001898314,0.00019589598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790716,0.0012386431,0.00021386762,0.00029541526,0.00013725017,0.00020763386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009313662,0.0006186497,0.0007860186,0.0014153908,0.0014832562,0.0017363828,0.000497419,0.0008340441,0.0033974196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044198213,0.0004939102,0.0004033008,0.0009940185,0.0039000006,0.0011009313,0.0023316306,0.0010344544,0.00034495856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012067796,0.00087432,0.5613455,0.00035358433,0.00010672862,0.06050081,0.2516635,0.0006468068,0.060670957,0.005794053,0.00054567796,0.05629131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009267,0.0011682677,0.8482253,0.000110523426,0.00013234244,0.034043144,0.09206703,0.0012716972,0.013751518,0.0052394294,0.0038081016,0.00008997436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023174997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027324354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023174997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001290874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001102733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04608023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885637145","doi":"10.1177/0267658318789223","title":"Reassembly of plural and human features in the L2 acquisition of Chinese by adult Korean speakers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Plural; Mandarin Chinese; Grammaticality; Linguistics; Psychology; Feature (linguistics); Realization (probability); Language proficiency; Second-language acquisition; First language; Grammar","score_opus":0.020849370511398024,"score_gpt":0.3245268834582856,"score_spread":0.3036775129468876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885637145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997106,0.000011346177,0.000038200484,0.0000053500817,4.0118877e-7,0.0000024016022,0.0000034432217,0.0000012732608,0.00022699889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989699,0.00003345258,0.00029460923,0.000012642662,8.2567266e-7,0.0000052639016,0.00001773408,0.0000031554462,0.00066240696],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996,0.00007852603,0.00003104256,0.00010124153,0.000117205134,0.00007192394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981665,0.00061375985,0.00043866932,0.00018834941,0.00033409538,0.00025859915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014859055,0.00041151175,0.00026410058,0.0004125491,0.0006711582,0.0010278127,0.00035824295,0.00037645194,0.0013160338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035444028,0.0003389308,0.00018681408,0.00019111579,0.0013166537,0.00097110786,0.0011105711,0.0006730327,0.00025014143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068940053,0.00056807074,0.42115235,0.0001416254,0.00004291316,0.0032789551,0.3463065,0.00030503253,0.16724765,0.0010497025,0.00031666286,0.058901146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044270033,0.0022351823,0.8362163,0.000036389847,0.00004843101,0.003591513,0.11452093,0.0010210278,0.037576154,0.00065533246,0.0039544473,0.0000999879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008229152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011221977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008229152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036756642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006409911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016362548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000021897","doi":"10.1177/0267658319896829","title":"Exploring the effect of eye gaze cues on novel L2 morphosyntactic pattern learning","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Gaze; Eye tracking; Psychology; Eye movement; Cognitive psychology; Cue-dependent forgetting; Noun; Vocabulary; Generalization; Sensory cue; Communication; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.14104874491116012,"score_gpt":0.40972920371605104,"score_spread":0.2686804588048909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000021897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99896216,0.0000445987,0.00035306878,0.000016402626,0.0000026583177,0.000012386689,0.000019904499,0.000009309329,0.00057955895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99843067,0.00008570493,0.00060985616,0.000015563823,0.0000023049238,0.00002943883,0.000033061708,0.00000591575,0.0007874897],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997323,0.00006174126,0.00001600473,0.00007677532,0.000066769615,0.000046467747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988937,0.00064361555,0.00022011997,0.000066420565,0.000086471104,0.000089643356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029138784,0.0003002377,0.00021730602,0.00019087922,0.00017874959,0.0003524334,0.00018193813,0.00030338732,0.002382932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021094258,0.00012428401,0.00013969254,0.000104562125,0.0003031225,0.0003822323,0.0004991269,0.00036672343,0.00019916015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016805959,0.001093143,0.028429816,0.00021440444,0.000025975878,0.00021778891,0.0025238444,0.00025851285,0.9102063,0.000107546024,0.00013886347,0.055103205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010329568,0.0074672317,0.7642298,0.0000620167,0.000074447154,0.0003033653,0.0025902148,0.0017547234,0.22097218,0.0004059236,0.0020039426,0.000032862652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024529637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041262624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024529637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025030033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027768922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007971704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002700516","doi":"10.1177/0267658319897786","title":"Acquisition of L2 Japanese WH questions: Evidence of phonological contiguity and non-shallow structures","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Contiguity; Phrase; Computer science; Word order; Second-language acquisition; Interlanguage; Rule-based machine translation; Phrase structure rules; Sentence; Psychology; Natural language processing; Grammar","score_opus":0.10821886451432389,"score_gpt":0.4432651106258548,"score_spread":0.3350462461115309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002700516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979321,0.000035529592,0.000559039,0.000031782773,0.0000011294782,0.000004170201,0.000026602622,0.000013823678,0.0013958744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834573,0.000050902312,0.0007563772,0.000052740023,0.0000025153636,0.000019312878,0.000083580846,0.000025274841,0.0006634724],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994259,0.00010561275,0.00004864981,0.00020505319,0.00014451309,0.00007036031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941695,0.003082542,0.0010621456,0.00087707315,0.00043088853,0.0003778436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011459073,0.00034111188,0.00028324936,0.00039765678,0.00040099776,0.000927587,0.00039897815,0.0005250583,0.0038084576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043329624,0.0005485051,0.00017030608,0.00029415954,0.0015810303,0.0012962106,0.0016086815,0.00095165207,0.0004069372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012680386,0.00073801633,0.29679173,0.0006885884,0.00011268004,0.0034861506,0.05899906,0.00042467334,0.55969846,0.004372054,0.00044035903,0.0729803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052565636,0.00082186435,0.9418918,0.000033201428,0.00006352211,0.002233227,0.0075642387,0.0009357072,0.040070653,0.003738256,0.0025334454,0.00006158794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004957679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072211353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004957679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018531954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047673236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012740612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012970202","doi":"10.1177/0267658320914962","title":"Visual cues during interaction: Are recasts different from noncorrective repetition?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Gaze; Corrective feedback; Eye tracking; Fluency; Repetition (rhetorical device); Intonation (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Communication; Computer science","score_opus":0.11610809310580125,"score_gpt":0.3925278262213133,"score_spread":0.27641973311551205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012970202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99397594,0.00066824653,0.0012749939,0.00016678631,0.000019256386,0.000024797288,0.000044922563,0.00003286849,0.003792144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978537,0.0003303446,0.00090823806,0.0000520983,0.0000132865425,0.000016407988,0.000038630234,0.000028436705,0.00075885473],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844533,0.00064721925,0.00009875811,0.00030939488,0.00034173095,0.00015751744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99542516,0.0021160801,0.0012889357,0.00031374473,0.00064684247,0.00020925791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001239031,0.00030709535,0.00030595242,0.0006293182,0.00043383287,0.0017041431,0.00033036902,0.0007329502,0.001468593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014345038,0.00028687323,0.00017391454,0.00035518387,0.0011346175,0.0017406722,0.0008561287,0.0004229812,0.00022962403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002754923,0.00013425027,0.13158187,0.0018010343,0.00011068652,0.0027330539,0.29523155,0.0003295903,0.36731926,0.0019487684,0.0009182661,0.19513674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033752625,0.0008286707,0.85276115,0.0003748307,0.00008286868,0.0026209985,0.1132218,0.0005990601,0.021908287,0.0009454866,0.006491483,0.00013164988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004127362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005327281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004127362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038997378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031545406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0082066655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035501132","doi":"10.1177/0267658320927761","title":"Activation of L1 orthography in L2 word reading: Constraints from language and writing system","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Character (mathematics); Reading (process); Orthography; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Pinyin; Writing system; Chinese characters","score_opus":0.04993025680329947,"score_gpt":0.3775444352111251,"score_spread":0.3276141784078256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035501132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962482,0.00006270979,0.00046131125,0.000050896473,0.000003784114,0.000015388081,0.000051734074,0.00001570052,0.0030903143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979127,0.00006520311,0.000646861,0.00006994271,0.00000500288,0.000040288523,0.00010494961,0.000037415295,0.0011176341],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997385,0.000050784143,0.000015324655,0.00009812883,0.000038045324,0.000059131675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917465,0.00042066595,0.00015108855,0.00007882997,0.000084051986,0.00009074659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028332422,0.00032811626,0.00032988781,0.00033344308,0.00039213744,0.0010302999,0.00026938308,0.0005388932,0.00392424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015735443,0.00035961252,0.00019840467,0.00023466146,0.0008129586,0.0008445104,0.0008363903,0.00062608614,0.00041596798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058429054,0.000089263376,0.011818363,0.0001660453,0.000019156741,0.00025975847,0.0023541038,0.00011213148,0.97388464,0.00045052925,0.00010377649,0.010157961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017268931,0.00054621283,0.8485881,0.0000511959,0.00009255936,0.00062468846,0.002752724,0.00242722,0.14153242,0.001715481,0.0014376552,0.00005911851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030347793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005297943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00392424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045256448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052895665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013127923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039717457","doi":"10.1177/0267658320941036","title":"Turtles all the way down: Micro-cues and piecemeal transfer in L3 phonology and syntax","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Phonology; Syntax; Learnability; Property (philosophy); Parsing; Phrase structure rules; Computer science; Theoretical linguistics; Grammar; Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07132191421363875,"score_gpt":0.38956276275921636,"score_spread":0.3182408485455776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039717457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814673,0.00043241176,0.00691232,0.0008873465,0.000045560093,0.0000059565305,0.0000393116,0.00011651654,0.010093274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99757606,0.00008499387,0.0011907604,0.00018406712,0.000007743324,0.0000040402592,0.000020550695,0.000032031767,0.0008997357],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998659,0.000035930614,0.0000050967014,0.000049069804,0.000018822175,0.000025192285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994849,0.0002250338,0.00009319972,0.00006599378,0.00005329375,0.000077557175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045089523,0.00017894211,0.00017537328,0.000314972,0.00035440442,0.00095526077,0.00030439094,0.00068131165,0.0039840597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002103325,0.0002871655,0.0002100745,0.00014545298,0.002298243,0.0016450258,0.001433109,0.000980308,0.0005226501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023472633,0.00026424447,0.21699584,0.00045904092,0.00020355107,0.0035938085,0.021840433,0.009504205,0.4066467,0.10025978,0.003479824,0.23440532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062484854,0.00093798095,0.84700996,0.000116710355,0.00011873699,0.0015199176,0.00715501,0.014298344,0.03734288,0.083251745,0.00797919,0.00020700597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033419954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004594522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039840597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030406434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003423987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013328016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041989936","doi":"10.1177/0267658320941047","title":"Choosing between theories: Can L3 acquisition really decide?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Property (philosophy); Transfer (computing); Linguistics; Transfer of training; Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09721731650290089,"score_gpt":0.39287826710995427,"score_spread":0.2956609506070534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041989936","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025837102,0.0052282657,0.004023236,0.9619193,0.009467645,0.000011618499,0.000064579326,0.000045816407,0.016655816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17342623,0.009171452,0.006097423,0.75716615,0.0420025,0.00010444706,0.00017533863,0.00022851462,0.01162794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99379504,0.0023353845,0.00038660303,0.0013166779,0.0013200386,0.00084630924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97287536,0.020276992,0.0012802345,0.0008719537,0.0038250298,0.00087042083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016865022,0.00052598957,0.001091946,0.0009950546,0.0028926134,0.005427708,0.0047322595,0.014352307,0.005958501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04451756,0.000399695,0.000968972,0.00063377747,0.020143285,0.01638982,0.004153387,0.022057697,0.0024492992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019181869,0.000034789056,0.0011825041,0.00038735915,0.00006180487,0.0006202424,0.0072325305,0.00022582698,0.000627579,0.7488755,0.20851861,0.032041453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043188815,0.00003696655,0.0008278891,0.0006395052,0.000034151904,0.00033231796,0.0047112377,0.00075039495,0.00078691955,0.7386641,0.25309077,0.00008245383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006998064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007929906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016865022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034126348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049913363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089191854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3058304167","doi":"10.1177/0267658320941560","title":"Lexical fixedness and compositionality in L1 speakers’ and L2 learners’ intuitions about word combinations: Evidence from Italian","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies; Victoria University; Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington; Victoria University of Wellington","keywords":"Principle of compositionality; Linguistics; Verb; Noun; Sentence; Psychology; Lexical density; Computer science; Lexical item; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.13876739052095385,"score_gpt":0.4391235601719682,"score_spread":0.3003561696510143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3058304167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975261,0.000056846526,0.0002726984,0.000033558616,0.0000013834305,0.000008802627,0.00001632663,0.000006876407,0.0020772836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991303,0.000062736006,0.0003357422,0.00003606534,0.0000025197612,0.000016483878,0.000040743555,0.00001129326,0.00036408292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975278,0.00082317303,0.00016610269,0.00052196573,0.0007691117,0.00019185863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819878,0.012143252,0.0030397112,0.0012807172,0.0008949374,0.0006536104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039439267,0.0007828149,0.0005050248,0.00085319404,0.00061679195,0.0037967311,0.00063743204,0.0009388931,0.00394901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01752295,0.00076062564,0.0005761467,0.0005012259,0.0028785616,0.0019062936,0.002217743,0.0013695927,0.0005909117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00269423,0.00082789554,0.409646,0.0011506678,0.00035807161,0.002677145,0.35667163,0.0015315644,0.16294518,0.003314966,0.00082058983,0.057362113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002082237,0.0014432886,0.8772489,0.00019692483,0.0002508658,0.0027058178,0.08177507,0.0051844376,0.021222778,0.0047636204,0.0046353885,0.00036480362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053346967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043370887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053346967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061952655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004553174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020857692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087656491","doi":"10.1177/0267658320956704","title":"L2 transfer of L1 island-insensitivity: The case of Norwegian","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Norwegian; Restructuring; Dependency (UML); Linguistics; Filler (materials); Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07042306849621273,"score_gpt":0.31627774836816047,"score_spread":0.24585467987194776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087656491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97078896,0.00006909468,0.002573469,0.000663784,0.000012957967,0.00002540567,0.00006400192,0.000022784901,0.025779594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998326,0.000027964941,0.00055540935,0.00008685218,0.000004585218,0.000012319562,0.000036747515,0.00002548151,0.0009245622],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995084,0.002544417,0.00023270801,0.0007379973,0.0009501954,0.00045069781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98486054,0.010342956,0.001086512,0.0021833929,0.0011282066,0.00039834483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052705705,0.00043723543,0.00050046464,0.0004516801,0.0014611448,0.0021351562,0.00068675535,0.0009972507,0.005821734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020563364,0.00038179857,0.0004183514,0.00041158218,0.0045040357,0.0039045543,0.0027427436,0.0020034495,0.0005182983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008933491,0.00044168482,0.14143445,0.00041897214,0.00011844647,0.012864657,0.6649641,0.0023659593,0.063588336,0.05456001,0.0019575548,0.056392528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026235133,0.001043001,0.3656857,0.00050411315,0.00022066759,0.017167626,0.417239,0.017242502,0.036835145,0.08606461,0.05720414,0.0005311032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020485716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016598633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020485716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015416743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001159078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04073298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088014222","doi":"10.1177/0267658320958742","title":"Intervention in relative clauses: Effects of relativized minimality on L2 representation and processing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; McGill University","keywords":"Relative clause; Plural; Linguistics; Reading (process); Psychology; Representation (politics); Contrast (vision); Intervention (counseling); Object (grammar); Subject (documents); Noun; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.100782982714866,"score_gpt":0.4282594826092548,"score_spread":0.32747649989438876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088014222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965224,0.000070364214,0.0013398941,0.00005799617,0.000010452525,0.00006846463,0.00004010131,0.000058968777,0.0018313264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940153,0.00006645183,0.004470092,0.00013616761,0.000013212229,0.0001201896,0.00010384317,0.00008467095,0.0009901974],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985819,0.00042820312,0.00015619872,0.00040295764,0.00032405986,0.00010673303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942105,0.0037712061,0.0010138324,0.00057089294,0.00021065323,0.00022297146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009436628,0.00067850045,0.000501612,0.00020542859,0.0003531353,0.0009932847,0.00060294574,0.00054066104,0.004992139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006862884,0.00039608817,0.00027295342,0.00013015389,0.0010581888,0.0009169613,0.001297887,0.0011260493,0.0003479155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053346884,0.0019101048,0.0067233443,0.0005668847,0.00006215322,0.00056749105,0.0068982625,0.00024085934,0.95020527,0.0022799682,0.00015922672,0.02505161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00251283,0.03284014,0.25226396,0.00020427634,0.00060283625,0.004323163,0.0070652864,0.005257162,0.6703866,0.010486934,0.01378558,0.0002713106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009208158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007730077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004992139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004955813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036731508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016700327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187831919","doi":"10.1177/02676583211030604","title":"Spoken word recognition in a second language: The importance of phonetic details","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; University of Toronto Mississauga; University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Nasalization; Nasal vowel; Vowel; Phonetics; Psychology; Linguistics; Duration (music); Word recognition; Vowel length; Mid vowel; Mandarin Chinese; First language; Audiology; Speech recognition; Computer science; Formant; Acoustics; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.0694202554861688,"score_gpt":0.412672592986506,"score_spread":0.3432523375003372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187831919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99667954,0.000114253395,0.001683885,0.000029916326,0.000008019873,0.000008867714,0.000050098362,0.000028450606,0.0013969599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976815,0.00006534466,0.0010397054,0.000049626153,0.0000046351356,0.00000708742,0.00010906592,0.000017875605,0.0010250462],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996463,0.000035998,0.000017219205,0.00013983576,0.00010169233,0.000059038037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993303,0.000206091,0.000113422015,0.00010705992,0.00014176306,0.00010140204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035081344,0.00032571144,0.00031581245,0.00025982526,0.00033636144,0.0017577843,0.00020671949,0.00048133376,0.0019755843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019293507,0.00018425182,0.00017236221,0.00017982213,0.00060867314,0.00092762406,0.00068448536,0.0003658557,0.00035129423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047890496,0.000039729985,0.022472644,0.000092735994,0.000032960597,0.00015876465,0.0021480357,0.00029727383,0.9516071,0.00024116204,0.000094513925,0.02233611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003162056,0.00079446373,0.8564138,0.000026249463,0.000071634415,0.00059295085,0.0019453636,0.003768046,0.13360147,0.00069774664,0.0019680504,0.00008866962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02186965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02498734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02186965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045503993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005384968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043484747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200439699","doi":"10.1177/02676583211044953","title":"L1 phonological effects on L2 (non-)naïve perception: A cross-language investigation of the oral–nasal vowel contrast in Brazilian Portuguese","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Nasal vowel; Vowel; Contrast (vision); Psychology; Consonant; Feature (linguistics); Brazilian Portuguese; Focus (optics); First language; Second-language acquisition; Portuguese; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04105719442720392,"score_gpt":0.41517377329741867,"score_spread":0.37411657887021477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200439699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989743,0.00001825172,0.00009322454,0.000009278456,0.0000010375696,0.000004644622,0.000010364694,0.00000205896,0.0008867973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992586,0.000031160365,0.0001843679,0.000028637069,0.0000017550698,0.000008618644,0.000027023765,0.0000068395557,0.00045294157],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997516,0.00005375062,0.000013734087,0.000070986214,0.000063548854,0.00004642842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989717,0.0004719766,0.00014276592,0.00008114257,0.0002057944,0.00012665185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048244072,0.00038298825,0.00026678853,0.00031960465,0.0004810876,0.00076561765,0.00024070828,0.000451044,0.002614834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002405313,0.0002572278,0.00018682209,0.00014392131,0.0005937093,0.00032289117,0.0009455943,0.00044199973,0.00036063837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012330917,0.00036426037,0.054193012,0.00022432466,0.000035282184,0.0012103433,0.027969515,0.00008243664,0.89878255,0.00021435911,0.00007121613,0.015619606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005172899,0.0017046767,0.93875694,0.000051455965,0.000058804977,0.0015994647,0.016213149,0.00065268425,0.039001565,0.00022741553,0.0016270482,0.000054971722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012673019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01669599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012673019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028498625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025804702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02519852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200176888","doi":"10.1177/02676583211066413","title":"Phonological redeployment and the mapping problem: Cross-linguistic E-similarity is the beginning of the story, not the end","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Mandarin Chinese; Parsing; Linguistics; Equivalence (formal languages); Similarity (geometry); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Phonological rule; Construct (python library); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Phonology; History","score_opus":0.09682539906898296,"score_gpt":0.41992826972980507,"score_spread":0.3231028706608221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200176888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62488925,0.0022002906,0.30783036,0.017467171,0.00036763216,0.00014640688,0.0003190007,0.00051600824,0.04626386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97712827,0.00032353023,0.019123515,0.000790952,0.0000714964,0.00006912639,0.00016036004,0.00007932449,0.002253464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568886,0.0017627405,0.00029678666,0.0014761883,0.0005793614,0.00019615894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96075857,0.028558904,0.0020606727,0.006514365,0.0014016858,0.000705877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008374428,0.00058396184,0.0011854757,0.0013333185,0.0010376811,0.0038419361,0.0021951662,0.0020822731,0.008841909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055393927,0.00065230223,0.0006625487,0.0014833566,0.005780236,0.019313514,0.004373979,0.0045455336,0.00083763216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094243773,0.00048523967,0.094600976,0.0007001806,0.00034876767,0.0009451475,0.011949062,0.009222163,0.011481037,0.46105358,0.0043997345,0.4038717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006220933,0.00024380547,0.049744498,0.000109799126,0.000053119853,0.00089633436,0.0055031558,0.040652145,0.0035956337,0.8944981,0.0045290333,0.000112221394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022262724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096785935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008841909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006312828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071868935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044288695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308434418","doi":"10.1177/02676583221131256","title":"Can adult learners sense L2 emotional words automatically? The role of L2 use on the emotional Stroop effect","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Automaticity; Stroop effect; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Connotation; Task (project management); Cognition; Linguistics","score_opus":0.040608353867849216,"score_gpt":0.3379087411937315,"score_spread":0.29730038732588226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308434418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980421,0.00013605159,0.0003636321,0.00004685662,0.0000067938854,0.000007145725,0.00002650461,0.00000912322,0.0013617479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980142,0.0001690296,0.0005324236,0.00006205515,0.000007973075,0.000015191614,0.00003287274,0.000008456632,0.0011578009],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997205,0.0000744838,0.00002127196,0.000069649635,0.00007320872,0.000040967367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891853,0.00046192732,0.00027764222,0.00008589987,0.00013661475,0.000119362565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047092943,0.00034050093,0.00022825801,0.00029408105,0.00017474116,0.0007306527,0.00017613948,0.0003338518,0.0029557394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022798749,0.00014665975,0.00013448887,0.00011191445,0.00045109406,0.00069981517,0.00049573317,0.00036271056,0.00049948884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012944922,0.0008175854,0.22521144,0.00050637766,0.000087487664,0.0021764499,0.01238157,0.00011241933,0.66502106,0.00103131,0.0005508595,0.09080894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059920283,0.001880946,0.88213223,0.00007836438,0.00009876961,0.0026816567,0.008274099,0.0007280457,0.09822897,0.0015807538,0.004201441,0.00005493028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006169748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008160888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029557394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009316947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018241061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009887934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318218501","doi":"10.1177/02676583221137713","title":"Syllable position effects in the perception of L2 Portuguese /l/ and /ɾ/ by L1-Mandarin learners","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Universidade de Lisboa","keywords":"Mandarin Chinese; Coda; Syllable; Syllabic verse; Perception; Psychology; European Portuguese; Linguistics; Portuguese; Identification (biology); First language; Acoustics","score_opus":0.03251380321091307,"score_gpt":0.4094158506988522,"score_spread":0.37690204748793915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318218501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995448,0.000015589365,0.000038731298,0.0000047418494,8.4493956e-7,0.0000016446827,0.000008237581,0.0000023899659,0.00038309698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991685,0.00003230238,0.0001299298,0.000012982483,0.0000015520928,0.000004916672,0.000025004401,0.00000653842,0.000618257],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996877,0.00006564969,0.000025331608,0.00007379842,0.00009814593,0.000049349226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983182,0.00089279545,0.00031754782,0.00007693427,0.00016336236,0.0002312286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043996834,0.000305108,0.00024742295,0.0002584927,0.00021129768,0.0006985861,0.00017733444,0.00038394003,0.0029974265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002363025,0.00020694076,0.00016062697,0.00011935773,0.00037188374,0.0002910849,0.00045711693,0.00044795012,0.0006263046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021288304,0.00047755233,0.13089713,0.00022451192,0.000046080586,0.0012022833,0.017675111,0.00024860047,0.8177665,0.00022857221,0.00014256046,0.028962228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043996908,0.0026436176,0.93243057,0.000026269798,0.000050495884,0.0011878469,0.0066783996,0.00068465964,0.055029783,0.00014431796,0.0010266007,0.000053424086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017396915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017382271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029974265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013580098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018614215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010027409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377242234","doi":"10.1177/02676583231156307","title":"Feature reassembly and L1 preemption: Acquiring CLLD in L2 Italian and L2 Romanian","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Clitic; Romanian; Feature (linguistics); Linguistics; Second-language acquisition; Syntax; Computer science; Language transfer; First language; Psychology; Natural language processing; Natural language; Comprehension approach","score_opus":0.07231710467685623,"score_gpt":0.44764330634798083,"score_spread":0.3753262016711246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377242234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980221,0.00003311124,0.00017729671,0.000028147895,7.4764915e-7,0.0000061236788,0.00002099018,0.000007815427,0.0017036471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806064,0.0000491089,0.0004042623,0.000028740029,0.0000015708628,0.00000993171,0.000089292946,0.00001849012,0.001338057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994967,0.0001310626,0.00003136022,0.00012843302,0.00010782365,0.00010457476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998978,0.00027934904,0.00035380494,0.00016616962,0.00012871131,0.0000938895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089324685,0.00043586674,0.00035878998,0.00046631612,0.00047144527,0.000988961,0.00040161252,0.0005142694,0.0023424479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028145516,0.0003084489,0.00031865932,0.00030277012,0.0011279585,0.0005732824,0.0011272008,0.00087496697,0.0007653014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015702303,0.0010089821,0.477221,0.00034011036,0.00008510044,0.004833948,0.110242926,0.0005199898,0.33968478,0.0026973027,0.0005845396,0.061211042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059455557,0.001198352,0.9347165,0.000049212234,0.00005842492,0.005391378,0.015208785,0.0011429455,0.032657273,0.00061899284,0.008811429,0.00008731496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007649836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00924768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007649836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006603619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0152106285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383535794","doi":"10.1177/02676583231172918","title":"Filler–gap dependencies and islands in L2 English production: Comparing transfer from L1 Norwegian and L1 Swedish","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Norwegian; Linguistics; Restructuring; Dependency (UML); First language; Filler (materials); Production (economics); Computer science; Natural language processing; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06969445365370415,"score_gpt":0.36278713248026634,"score_spread":0.2930926788265622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383535794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970444,0.000055777407,0.0002524097,0.00002604008,0.00000498541,0.0000201388,0.000055281733,0.000009234074,0.002531785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805,0.00005841594,0.00048675676,0.00006829593,0.0000046943874,0.00008040676,0.00018086209,0.00004124139,0.0010295017],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980446,0.0006945146,0.00018543708,0.0004939338,0.00038184336,0.00019966894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874834,0.008729856,0.0014488958,0.0007078612,0.0011042787,0.00052574236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030563925,0.000686612,0.00043124182,0.0006880803,0.0005663119,0.0018524273,0.00059263845,0.0009800812,0.004791966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01723562,0.00070235046,0.0002842899,0.00030042755,0.0015536702,0.0021030246,0.0022617844,0.001222266,0.0007856794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040890505,0.0021120713,0.24127337,0.0011281451,0.00019681158,0.0030888412,0.4630992,0.001176535,0.22671376,0.0025013268,0.0008444744,0.053776342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028476436,0.0019515625,0.8739278,0.00021956483,0.0001472168,0.0025459242,0.08518109,0.002109381,0.02515797,0.0030515844,0.0052171764,0.00020611873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077119474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006686289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077119474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067348155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056291296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016163945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386001447","doi":"10.1177/02676583231191611","title":"Orthographic influence in the distributional learning of non-native speech sounds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University","keywords":"Orthography; Orthographic projection; Contrast (vision); Linguistics; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.05258751661107422,"score_gpt":0.44853497525362923,"score_spread":0.395947458642555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386001447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989575,0.000050366285,0.0003546488,0.0000061587275,0.0000024786073,0.0000026806063,0.000003795545,0.0000046529053,0.0006177248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99909985,0.00005993326,0.00041183335,0.0000075638527,0.0000019549468,0.0000027704425,0.000011514836,0.0000041936487,0.00040042383],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996412,0.00007945373,0.00002844638,0.00009227242,0.00012762517,0.000030920568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985713,0.0006453826,0.00027179567,0.00010918401,0.00020205384,0.00020037784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036016523,0.0002722579,0.00022451267,0.00023364923,0.00016022206,0.00047945534,0.0001814937,0.00019136725,0.0018391256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021044882,0.00014848112,0.00011215514,0.00008835742,0.00045374222,0.00039596568,0.0005197324,0.00034591908,0.00027733282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050641515,0.00018006813,0.024785744,0.0000721668,0.0000104362,0.0002744219,0.0009851715,0.00006720819,0.9550607,0.00017234425,0.000017891705,0.017867366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045657842,0.00350564,0.6947334,0.000029264358,0.00007004346,0.0012371438,0.0027468577,0.0012155707,0.29425776,0.0008732688,0.0012476223,0.000037743903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039927132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007843725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018391256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010916286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028281196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0061525106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392645363","doi":"10.1177/02676583241232221","title":"Activation and local inhibition in the bilingual child’s processing of codeswitching","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Linguistics; Psychology; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Communication; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03574130961768521,"score_gpt":0.4040461112119235,"score_spread":0.3683048015942383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392645363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969779,0.00004677988,0.00033877286,0.000018279266,0.0000014350222,0.000003930231,0.00004293181,0.000013084937,0.0025568514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979906,0.000071957926,0.000596845,0.000019373181,0.0000014787552,0.000015454574,0.00010600438,0.00003115902,0.0011671791],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995472,0.00006465795,0.00001768763,0.00012685855,0.00015400986,0.00008951895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986498,0.0006056166,0.00034220598,0.000099548124,0.00016424862,0.00013854935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004337758,0.00027004705,0.00033217712,0.00044709397,0.00022865814,0.0010153358,0.00017255296,0.00026267898,0.0036006987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019368285,0.00021783376,0.00017835292,0.00023057136,0.000670928,0.00048390555,0.0006029035,0.0005125475,0.00039726158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093287096,0.00017131412,0.12029938,0.00022411758,0.00003035721,0.0015103886,0.016676415,0.00025558422,0.83389527,0.0013911632,0.00024029157,0.024372851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032679913,0.00029657362,0.95001954,0.000030151281,0.000031929212,0.0012975414,0.005384308,0.0007881922,0.03998643,0.0009023122,0.0011977829,0.000032577842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069141802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009586259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069141802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057353295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061702746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013747871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398238048","doi":"10.1177/02676583241249348","title":"The effects of incidental learning and input frequency on the perception of non-native speech","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Brock University","keywords":"Psychology; Perception; Speech perception; Audiology; Task (project management); First language; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.018236207708783477,"score_gpt":0.39337422363214186,"score_spread":0.3751380159233584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398238048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992724,0.000032440195,0.00036884166,0.0000043291184,0.0000034936647,0.000005413406,0.0000044773633,0.0000054462575,0.000303127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988201,0.000060681235,0.0007292472,0.000014684075,0.0000068770387,0.00001074485,0.00002227742,0.000005476687,0.00032981983],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994247,0.0001222587,0.000062561594,0.00012453421,0.00019431693,0.00007169905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99377644,0.004082417,0.00078179373,0.0005652175,0.00033446332,0.00045978578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004855979,0.0003326084,0.0003317053,0.00020028082,0.00018587681,0.00041061756,0.0002731057,0.00026623052,0.0017046486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005429502,0.00022878114,0.00017432279,0.00007825679,0.00053754146,0.0003726185,0.00070311123,0.0005135006,0.00016537642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006411925,0.001895449,0.04746039,0.00024093656,0.00006179341,0.00042710284,0.00094098307,0.00022161513,0.89761037,0.00012469525,0.000038230413,0.04456647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014740923,0.019993603,0.7430123,0.000049673075,0.0001926413,0.0015814,0.001212712,0.0012853724,0.23088384,0.00062361156,0.0009695702,0.000047846093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000340815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000699045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017046486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011244481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002180875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0057026744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407231470","doi":"10.1177/02676583241311789","title":"Activating L1-attrition: A priming experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Attrition; Estonian; Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Morpheme; Representation (politics); Cognitive psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.12575643204572262,"score_gpt":0.4587950215324075,"score_spread":0.33303858948668486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407231470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943116,0.00006581813,0.00074265053,0.000106921536,0.0000290849,0.0002116665,0.000066064145,0.00003232027,0.004433918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914691,0.00009833151,0.0028781374,0.00042507722,0.000044720422,0.00056314416,0.0001352159,0.00007198569,0.0043144054],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871767,0.00030258828,0.00011837442,0.00042848033,0.00022891129,0.0002040125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491006,0.0031974008,0.00048356171,0.0006389519,0.00037179742,0.0003982859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002049915,0.0007191847,0.0009975001,0.0002711135,0.0012333773,0.0009738977,0.0010256828,0.0015226222,0.0067498824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060236645,0.00063127506,0.0002714681,0.00033178087,0.0013079484,0.0014944416,0.0021253605,0.002825509,0.001278945],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020519314,0.012809342,0.009348257,0.00090168463,0.000077638404,0.0016093396,0.028604282,0.00027521292,0.88892335,0.0058003864,0.0010981469,0.03003307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00960036,0.09686692,0.2556904,0.00033589176,0.0010042987,0.010629458,0.016736222,0.0072367736,0.5440057,0.026123732,0.031228682,0.0005416349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016131379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016652952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067498824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048748546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009269455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022580564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410717443","doi":"10.1177/02676583251336582","title":"Assessing L1 Mandarin and L2 English influence on the L3 production of French obstruent coda voicing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Obstruent; Coda; Voice; Mandarin Chinese; Linguistics; Production (economics); Psychology; Economics; Geology; Philosophy; Seismology","score_opus":0.05157344518867355,"score_gpt":0.4342347385115203,"score_spread":0.3826612933228467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410717443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995571,0.000015724238,0.00008082694,0.000003698034,4.3729037e-7,0.000004349308,0.0000130033095,0.0000025088316,0.0003223641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990544,0.00002757429,0.0002814952,0.000013551064,0.0000013732306,0.000020853844,0.00004303629,0.000008103525,0.0005496554],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994523,0.00017093336,0.00004242501,0.00014213508,0.00012185675,0.00007037685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709797,0.0014129006,0.00053402694,0.00013301555,0.00048142593,0.0003406393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012101261,0.00055923604,0.00033173373,0.00035985204,0.00030619284,0.00082012545,0.0002570258,0.00045114543,0.0025548977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032963443,0.0002195019,0.00024085818,0.00014795327,0.00039507603,0.00028610352,0.00063249335,0.0003913995,0.0005791727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022062047,0.00068009924,0.38385954,0.00024504407,0.000151996,0.0010067768,0.02138307,0.00039888386,0.561492,0.00026705835,0.00010395301,0.02820537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043312808,0.0021396622,0.94528943,0.00001672594,0.00009259031,0.00051152706,0.005106661,0.000805549,0.045182403,0.000098689685,0.0006788871,0.00003450413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004846716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005519509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004846716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027475262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042837177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009636998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412474939","doi":"10.1177/02676583251334518","title":"A role for features in speech perception","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Linguistics; Perception; Grammar; Feature (linguistics); Psychology; Representation (politics); Phonology; Phonotactics; Indirect speech; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.036584508670334887,"score_gpt":0.45861040490856475,"score_spread":0.42202589623822984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412474939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5917649,0.0066619813,0.13862121,0.025206193,0.000406907,0.000073096475,0.00039975625,0.0009144326,0.23595145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909657,0.00051730464,0.004815693,0.0006236025,0.00007638004,0.000017587961,0.000026584094,0.000032180775,0.0029249701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992466,0.00019915681,0.000032758013,0.00021981796,0.00022852633,0.00007317499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983936,0.0010950378,0.00014060616,0.00019579795,0.00012049862,0.000054584038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081520475,0.00032340997,0.0002953201,0.0005676159,0.0006843562,0.0043577827,0.0007463632,0.001897618,0.0022849133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022577753,0.00020631643,0.00035021798,0.00023905674,0.005257153,0.0029248025,0.0020384067,0.0015795097,0.00026789118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000520581,0.00006439474,0.011359402,0.0006291141,0.00006054457,0.0011817757,0.05753704,0.0031489746,0.054635193,0.6861608,0.002782324,0.18191996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068871625,0.00043892767,0.061130155,0.00032890047,0.000109586916,0.0017684188,0.010302803,0.009322233,0.019231662,0.8065267,0.090529814,0.00024198554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027067016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019187105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043577827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009046036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005904321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007643819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412474950","doi":"10.1177/02676583241270763","title":"Waiting in the wings: The place of phonology in the study of multilingual grammars","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Linguistics; Rule-based machine translation; Phonology; Theoretical linguistics; Optimality theory; Grammar; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07255020060419382,"score_gpt":0.46817657960757025,"score_spread":0.39562637900337644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412474950","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23320015,0.18539374,0.119721614,0.2978903,0.004470805,0.000058538844,0.0002430674,0.0005985726,0.15842326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9350186,0.02865934,0.016411971,0.007014033,0.003989442,0.000081410144,0.00005159783,0.00026681172,0.008506838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989742,0.00069359597,0.00002499167,0.00012553563,0.00010407012,0.00007755275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937298,0.0050918977,0.00020029736,0.0004906736,0.00016047216,0.0003268017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035975797,0.0003387893,0.00068127207,0.0016160635,0.0021702193,0.005643158,0.0011206121,0.002106539,0.002114223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005777553,0.0004669885,0.00040221502,0.002210387,0.019526664,0.008932521,0.0024642244,0.0046703196,0.00043101766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005581137,0.000030980398,0.001873981,0.00014251363,0.00002154145,0.00022482248,0.008771808,0.0012157689,0.000660865,0.94684285,0.005306906,0.034852166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071916697,0.000018832341,0.0008361751,0.000085702915,0.0000057329667,0.00007034021,0.0015206308,0.0011720166,0.00013735089,0.97374094,0.022383297,0.00002185496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00303681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026739433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005643158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018267323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010493911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019025981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412474964","doi":"10.1177/02676583251339901","title":"Such sweet thunder","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Linguistics; Restructuring; Phonology; Rule-based machine translation; Theoretical linguistics; Natural (archaeology); Phonetics; Hierarchy; Mental representation; Computer science; Variation (astronomy); Psychology; Cognition; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.06980783914374228,"score_gpt":0.4824396888164842,"score_spread":0.4126318496727419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412474964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027957275,0.0070060054,0.003974752,0.62390846,0.10076414,0.00005399868,0.0003067226,0.0005339045,0.26065633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05814976,0.004332826,0.002267564,0.4324892,0.022041192,0.0000838428,0.00025046285,0.0007097696,0.47967544],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850404,0.00051859155,0.0000619608,0.0002481533,0.00039203928,0.00027507672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760073,0.00081897684,0.00012601943,0.00039460266,0.0006714966,0.00038818832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025483936,0.000702062,0.0005215871,0.0006681055,0.0073043993,0.0055957222,0.0012686949,0.0059680827,0.08358224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010311755,0.00024184053,0.0005350362,0.0005347303,0.005332921,0.009560795,0.004812506,0.013497566,0.028295109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003723622,0.000013160866,0.00017723489,0.000055056138,0.000007021009,0.00026909725,0.0017858469,0.000028822753,0.00019504395,0.16085267,0.8165642,0.020014662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031691063,0.000008176504,0.00011890045,0.000066413384,0.0000019872239,0.00012461552,0.0015776767,0.0000291019,0.00009640199,0.009863203,0.9881017,0.000008688616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027288406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066208574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08358224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015469629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011906328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27961046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412474993","doi":"10.1177/02676583251321795","title":"On the poverty of the stimulus in phonology","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Phonology; Linguistics; Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04630600809305277,"score_gpt":0.42928282581886656,"score_spread":0.3829768177258138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412474993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09364273,0.012566982,0.23457903,0.15988341,0.0028841228,0.00006886462,0.00036749884,0.0006441031,0.4953633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96860236,0.0024156284,0.010956562,0.0040654503,0.00077988335,0.000059254482,0.000059894493,0.00017650031,0.012884593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975387,0.0012276007,0.00008600451,0.0003717704,0.00058814295,0.00018784199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968645,0.0021335077,0.0001037366,0.00040439822,0.00038009378,0.000113833965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035802294,0.00049838267,0.0005659849,0.0010032285,0.0022642983,0.0046508233,0.0011267087,0.002280774,0.0041266424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007458239,0.0003662261,0.00043892083,0.0006570754,0.020802129,0.009592503,0.0041450723,0.0059564705,0.0007193876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024293397,0.0000039628317,0.00014750022,0.000033008248,0.000002906481,0.00007580781,0.0017863433,0.00015912572,0.0002844283,0.99067795,0.0013160049,0.005488628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007405253,0.000019532696,0.00045515056,0.000050059567,0.0000047701556,0.00012959202,0.0006998053,0.00095505884,0.000655625,0.96693736,0.030072596,0.000013177668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025716703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002226854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046508233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002366786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017624199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01893425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416102852","doi":"10.1177/02676583251393995","title":"Linguistic distance and crosslinguistic influence: Commentary","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Categorization, perception, and language","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Closeness; Context (archaeology); Grammar; Linguistic description; Construal level theory; Raising (metalworking); Language transfer; Pragmatics; Indo-European languages","score_opus":0.022083749877505134,"score_gpt":0.4303926142307033,"score_spread":0.4083088643531982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416102852","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044848543,0.01422471,0.0001511337,0.940762,0.040240195,0.000004943008,0.0000310873,0.0000134083275,0.004124097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018877482,0.013724853,0.00024591127,0.8436789,0.11872391,0.000053862845,0.00003346293,0.000081813094,0.0045799557],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842402,0.0051323916,0.0014009612,0.0028223863,0.005041505,0.0013626851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8402499,0.13306645,0.0042306944,0.001713097,0.01762153,0.0031183641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016349304,0.00096933026,0.001748301,0.0040136087,0.008292567,0.006763396,0.008163882,0.042817466,0.007497633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09732202,0.0006800901,0.0016885985,0.003762122,0.018361446,0.012538376,0.0063554924,0.034515943,0.0029346868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007979684,0.00001936247,0.0002083308,0.0008946266,0.000039677336,0.00079273665,0.0064519383,0.00006309572,0.00017749787,0.03974033,0.9379834,0.013549165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037649188,0.000026075697,0.00082419586,0.0036265724,0.000051744784,0.0005833771,0.006991728,0.00014070628,0.00022931136,0.020667436,0.9667514,0.000069895075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033445552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036180727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042817466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013615481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012272472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098787725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}