{"meta":{"query_hash":"f5ed463b6470","filters":{"venue":"Security Dialogue"},"cohort_total":84,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":84,"exported":84,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f5ed463b6470","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Security+Dialogue"},"results":[{"id":"W1913121976","doi":"10.1177/0967010615592111","title":"The gift of war: Cash, counterinsurgency, and ‘collateral damage’","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Ransom; Collateral; Law; Collateral damage; Law and economics; Bureaucracy; Population; Spanish Civil War; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Sociology; Criminology; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.04032868497184439,"score_gpt":0.3150336988347302,"score_spread":0.2747050138628858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1913121976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4826287,0.007094296,0.0146334665,0.14320257,0.00069866277,0.000036458732,0.000042154432,0.000064414795,0.35159934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960372,0.0003985877,0.00028873968,0.0009843967,0.00007642907,0.000006094766,0.0000025711915,0.000006599542,0.002199456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99422073,0.0046919202,0.0000919972,0.00016579487,0.0005084802,0.00032118693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903632,0.007116677,0.0011498918,0.0003908331,0.00040205618,0.00057723664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068294965,0.00032287947,0.00030750228,0.0013050945,0.008553864,0.007732743,0.00059729523,0.0031019093,0.0041249827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011410467,0.00020696937,0.00017495056,0.00080438936,0.06590714,0.0097200265,0.006261417,0.004391071,0.00022092905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026285285,0.00002460717,0.0008039428,0.00004170122,0.0000035335333,0.00024563618,0.16145691,0.000120921526,0.00019333196,0.83040905,0.0022053584,0.004468724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037771097,0.00011940365,0.0031373615,0.0006079982,0.00001338557,0.00088821445,0.28660664,0.0008031001,0.00050008687,0.48859492,0.21863607,0.000054961547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017707733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023453997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008553864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042461995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021690414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03611827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1955104829","doi":"10.1177/0967010615583039","title":"The cartographic ambiguities of HarassMap: Crowdmapping security and sexual violence in Egypt","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Harassment; Authoritarianism; State (computer science); Corporate governance; Sexual violence; Public space; Space (punctuation); Assemblage (archaeology); Sociology; Politics; Political science; Criminology; Geography; Law; Democracy; Engineering; Archaeology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.02364427214220529,"score_gpt":0.2866684634494053,"score_spread":0.2630241913072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1955104829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9211518,0.0010742715,0.010556782,0.0057506873,0.000065255175,0.0001384108,0.000523828,0.00009358057,0.06064545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934563,0.0003934178,0.0031174133,0.00013012165,0.000010413877,0.00004542322,0.00009520167,0.000023748224,0.0027279092],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998708,0.00081158994,0.000037834223,0.000090187714,0.00017339167,0.0001790348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760205,0.0014448205,0.0002600109,0.00027662708,0.0003258202,0.000090736576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032316656,0.00033874085,0.0002486503,0.004056133,0.0052775526,0.0051761684,0.0007841535,0.0008978252,0.0057388297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051629804,0.000260179,0.00021334109,0.0053227497,0.008521168,0.0032462997,0.0066137416,0.0007870383,0.0002965276],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017354143,0.0000291517,0.020211164,0.0004372845,0.000033631506,0.0016402041,0.77145946,0.0025754124,0.0020969608,0.081347,0.0064220936,0.11357411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060021293,0.000014527864,0.013350494,0.00031392442,0.0000138614205,0.00016468891,0.91812634,0.0015522233,0.0007835057,0.012644388,0.05300544,0.00002462164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038815096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05971847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038815096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041414956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029706017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0771783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963633791","doi":"10.1177/09670106030343009","title":"Securitization and the Boomerang Debate: A Rejoinder to Liotta and Smith-Windsor","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Securitization; Political science; Economics; Financial system; Environmental science","score_opus":0.00971467290166185,"score_gpt":0.27718200208117866,"score_spread":0.2674673291795168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963633791","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006000147,0.011248448,0.0005569697,0.93668586,0.0022022887,0.0000144235655,0.000039150676,0.000014865305,0.043237925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26328775,0.0081985025,0.0011319233,0.6607846,0.008493012,0.00012271061,0.000044949393,0.00014181928,0.057794765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298686,0.0037882314,0.00019931464,0.00075461617,0.0010721373,0.0011988819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836482,0.01311956,0.0005619705,0.00062919286,0.001185349,0.00085557654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015570354,0.0007220071,0.0014421407,0.0017582906,0.017358705,0.020356834,0.0033341676,0.06779531,0.0075182836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026920846,0.0005963368,0.0010689257,0.0031415576,0.035900578,0.019193014,0.008335002,0.030323915,0.0012032441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049517934,0.000021913662,0.00023050181,0.000056329223,0.000011748346,0.0001234225,0.012598278,0.00004791563,0.00008175666,0.87163264,0.110344626,0.0048014256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068948364,0.000019240813,0.0006954848,0.000674726,0.00002798286,0.0000722776,0.013987548,0.00018491018,0.00031116596,0.43660396,0.5473024,0.00005127132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04004558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06574826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06779531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008446793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014266857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08234489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964215845","doi":"10.1177/0967010610393549","title":"The ‘human’ as referent object?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Securitization; Conceptualization; Referent; Human security; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Normality; Human rights; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Law; Business; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.05513251277396593,"score_gpt":0.32743289259801567,"score_spread":0.27230037982404975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964215845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11178547,0.008253378,0.056539997,0.094573066,0.0025776757,0.00008760349,0.00011574054,0.00016860123,0.7258985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98777974,0.0008869057,0.0018400156,0.0017004231,0.00028966356,0.000028691713,0.000030617703,0.000058137215,0.0073857903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98932207,0.008370055,0.00023860979,0.00073916215,0.0008184643,0.0005116795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951857,0.002795086,0.0004924945,0.0008444866,0.00043044626,0.0002518764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007936236,0.00060877064,0.0006589825,0.0014244302,0.005729714,0.011787148,0.00133791,0.004210707,0.0056526135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008103372,0.00027599523,0.00034833484,0.0015243522,0.08407584,0.013721294,0.007728382,0.0047091944,0.0008411213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009478512,0.0000054726574,0.00016481447,0.000033470773,0.0000025078339,0.000065345055,0.05649745,0.00005482967,0.000106222404,0.9396831,0.0011000511,0.0022772686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016025597,0.00004667962,0.0005600452,0.0005460522,0.0000142147055,0.0003341823,0.110628955,0.00043941013,0.00077387865,0.6268852,0.25972193,0.000033385564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022871231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012798206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011787148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043322877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029009585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041971326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967283867","doi":"10.1177/096701060403500321","title":"A Concept Still on the Margins, but Evolving from Its Asian Roots","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018186669494838336,"score_gpt":0.24972196620943682,"score_spread":0.2315352967145985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967283867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26923472,0.032029696,0.020375201,0.09396869,0.0035337503,0.000058373644,0.0001279618,0.00011333079,0.5805582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96710604,0.0030973754,0.0023363978,0.0033885438,0.00043061687,0.000050522725,0.000029232084,0.000058213667,0.02350313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983095,0.00081074284,0.00007493231,0.00028907266,0.00023574012,0.00027993735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836725,0.0004976169,0.00021662368,0.00016348744,0.00038017443,0.00037495382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003459711,0.0007282017,0.00042055236,0.0012318146,0.008241109,0.008946267,0.0008191083,0.001945464,0.003718863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021433514,0.00017973522,0.00033098916,0.0024633268,0.030738607,0.008255471,0.003191465,0.005289098,0.00039887358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004508437,0.000019193392,0.0016912107,0.00014276402,0.0000112998605,0.000119688666,0.12669443,0.00006992999,0.00084556616,0.8549313,0.0038223965,0.01160732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023785604,0.00018326174,0.009903856,0.0005485696,0.000085026295,0.00047691088,0.23211958,0.0006594007,0.0010923982,0.2379957,0.51683915,0.000072463765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010840919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013344974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010840919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043638735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070965798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031662285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971042279","doi":"10.1177/0967010608094034","title":"Private, Armed and Humanitarian? States, NGOs, International Private Security Companies and Shifting Humanitarianism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forces College","funders":"","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); State (computer science); Order (exchange); Public relations; Business; Private security; Political economy; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Marketing; Finance","score_opus":0.02464037820315167,"score_gpt":0.2679278717387303,"score_spread":0.2432874935355786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971042279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3759437,0.01094182,0.0017421586,0.31113374,0.0007056681,0.000022205966,0.000032446434,0.000012148339,0.29946607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99111384,0.0013929576,0.00009749721,0.002916958,0.00014440807,0.000009862385,0.0000035477099,0.0000029211515,0.0043180757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963068,0.0027830082,0.000045865887,0.00011555077,0.0002653012,0.0004835668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99462175,0.0036012384,0.0005744788,0.00014339742,0.00021577107,0.00084340456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035591035,0.00014488089,0.00017873256,0.0009127168,0.0055244556,0.009348327,0.00049831613,0.002413812,0.005406336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003080025,0.0001231179,0.00010601661,0.0009829627,0.029540574,0.0067165536,0.005097494,0.0024086265,0.00016864824],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020490665,0.00007798885,0.0032925657,0.00006278011,0.0000037634493,0.0002450262,0.059090074,0.00015941118,0.00011788977,0.92000234,0.0074980194,0.009429681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018755152,0.000054606877,0.0061610895,0.0005596076,0.0000050714134,0.0003165651,0.59549,0.00040537125,0.00019442619,0.22286174,0.1739163,0.00001646192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042281854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074585113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009348327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041677044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003717146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030238986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976703951","doi":"10.1177/0967010614530457","title":"Governing immigration through probation: The displacement of borderwork and the assessment of desirability in Spain","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Universidade da Coruña","keywords":"Immigration; Discretion; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Sociology; Displacement (psychology); Political science; Latin Americans; Autonomy; Political economy; Law; Geography; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.011394485597451516,"score_gpt":0.30246749568601,"score_spread":0.29107301008855846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976703951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683196,0.00029411903,0.0012971287,0.0010668583,0.0000137063425,0.00004039005,0.000025782294,0.000009875208,0.028932564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865156,0.00006177199,0.0002604436,0.000025309215,0.000003686086,0.000012326895,0.0000082200295,0.0000022569411,0.0009744043],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334127,0.0041306773,0.00043053366,0.00045758838,0.00083772844,0.000802228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98342025,0.009388636,0.0036058237,0.0012176487,0.0015604204,0.0008072592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011487901,0.00019796663,0.00029744333,0.0016396951,0.0030223415,0.006519049,0.0009368771,0.0011499828,0.0017977426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020975167,0.00016363188,0.00016691294,0.0011837757,0.012149716,0.001560005,0.006303157,0.0009979123,0.00013684948],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005786337,0.0001703529,0.26444837,0.00030960908,0.000032021155,0.0017891589,0.552814,0.0022940645,0.0019973305,0.08601065,0.0012414713,0.088314265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032625037,0.00020196535,0.22625294,0.00057476497,0.000017374368,0.0004160613,0.70624435,0.0018434344,0.0009955893,0.024557792,0.038799454,0.000063606276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012347341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015747217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012347341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058684307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035035554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060754538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980507765","doi":"10.1177/0967010613499787","title":"Effective abandonment: The neoliberal economy of violence in Israel and the Occupied Territories","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Middle East Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sovereignty; Abandonment (legal); State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Monopoly; Power (physics); Political economy; Politics; State of exception; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.0047043862772460565,"score_gpt":0.2296098990497022,"score_spread":0.22490551277245613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980507765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5114669,0.0017256303,0.007635602,0.012903744,0.000083453786,0.000033636672,0.0000328776,0.000020010997,0.46609813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798965,0.00012792337,0.00012131795,0.00012378414,0.000016804108,0.0000052568757,0.0000032878936,0.0000034160134,0.0016085305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977634,0.0012358677,0.00004615069,0.00018614379,0.0003195334,0.00044898636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979225,0.0009624096,0.00044734395,0.00022836069,0.00020579596,0.00023373352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002547846,0.00015454084,0.00024212571,0.0010367552,0.00371495,0.008580057,0.0009861458,0.0018222947,0.0047442317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037850728,0.00021015805,0.00018671186,0.0008576734,0.039975077,0.00457396,0.005891753,0.0018378744,0.00023917254],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000175787,0.00002724302,0.0022468006,0.000015844045,0.00000634062,0.00022782691,0.014845106,0.0005889742,0.0001260291,0.9764499,0.0005003772,0.004948019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030954405,0.000057246492,0.00817141,0.00019418799,0.000010903138,0.00031130746,0.04758998,0.0032466154,0.00043853538,0.8692912,0.07062617,0.000031539832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005620375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005908164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008580057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062298095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017763316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045200586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983589418","doi":"10.1177/0967010602033004008","title":"Terrorism, Individual Security, and the Role of the Military: a Reply to Liotta","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of National Defence","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Terrorism; Political science; State (computer science); National security; Convergence (economics); Balance (ability); Law and economics; Computer security; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.013186540770644902,"score_gpt":0.25379718832527576,"score_spread":0.24061064755463085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983589418","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020301854,0.005754077,0.00006719352,0.9907347,0.0022858926,0.000001585581,0.000005212334,0.0000039609276,0.00094425265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015556892,0.009338448,0.00028079405,0.95898145,0.011550855,0.00002583644,0.0000072925636,0.000029872632,0.004228636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925816,0.0046255477,0.00033011445,0.0008797731,0.0009877264,0.0005951259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94888914,0.044875786,0.0011369588,0.0009421303,0.0025260078,0.0016300563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01635277,0.0010018336,0.0018108737,0.0016672044,0.008887125,0.0120824715,0.0043959455,0.06251802,0.0049929516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030457208,0.00087527005,0.0012263422,0.0020214587,0.030350693,0.020692868,0.006521566,0.05728586,0.0021695844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008519463,0.000038381226,0.0004056656,0.00028588367,0.000024730849,0.00042910327,0.006298511,0.00018255874,0.00011730483,0.17525263,0.8070083,0.009871688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007553043,0.00003602587,0.0009923847,0.0020046905,0.00003515192,0.000439442,0.0134067815,0.0005095259,0.00031546134,0.23479117,0.7472663,0.00012752575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01405781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017039405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06251802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008873644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08648276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986188220","doi":"10.1177/0967010611418717","title":"Securitization and the liberalism of fear","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Securitization; Liberalism; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.02587464654339565,"score_gpt":0.27327418246741764,"score_spread":0.24739953592402197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986188220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1581447,0.0040386403,0.0384393,0.06453293,0.00048644684,0.000041165258,0.000029473546,0.000058337082,0.73422897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99273914,0.00038996805,0.0007060911,0.0016425935,0.000086215616,0.000013735084,0.000005309764,0.00001181319,0.00440512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367887,0.004038838,0.00013446076,0.00044070368,0.001067665,0.0006395601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944734,0.003249231,0.00066596334,0.0006439621,0.00058007496,0.00038736517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065268083,0.00034183185,0.00043525678,0.0010044604,0.0034919626,0.007692557,0.0006039517,0.0024747609,0.003289646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059475247,0.00026019092,0.0005252791,0.00065801607,0.06776798,0.006196131,0.007704497,0.005491969,0.00034972257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066486127,0.000005211891,0.00016800838,0.000010267996,0.0000017307873,0.000031787375,0.005167169,0.000076749995,0.00011840409,0.9929509,0.000270491,0.0011925151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009213187,0.000019302506,0.00045404743,0.00009385199,0.0000044777476,0.000121671445,0.005790679,0.00048455747,0.00030132383,0.9577556,0.0349506,0.000014586536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019142694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013503206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007692557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045808298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031434502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034517527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986649087","doi":"10.1177/0967010613492838","title":"Writing as hope: Reflections on <i>The Politics of Exile</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Theatre and Performance Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Reflexivity; Politics; Narrative; Sociology; Reflection (computer programming); Space (punctuation); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Media studies; Political science; Social science; Literature; Law; Pedagogy; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03979158647224429,"score_gpt":0.26898075531273313,"score_spread":0.22918916884048884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986649087","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20314847,0.006931493,0.01091357,0.4074605,0.007480536,0.00012664624,0.000077778575,0.00020071394,0.36366022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97374105,0.0012510666,0.00069799024,0.008441438,0.0008383479,0.000070378606,0.000011147816,0.00013104414,0.0148175815],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9531521,0.038982544,0.0006588893,0.0011169069,0.0028488403,0.0032406917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9503222,0.040431183,0.0026365921,0.0017461295,0.001746675,0.0031171748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033843055,0.0009515456,0.00084299286,0.0020937328,0.03110329,0.027580975,0.003167296,0.008082606,0.0055886847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04635204,0.0007196667,0.0007611572,0.0017004561,0.088113494,0.015786212,0.018818464,0.024108289,0.0008454299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024956358,0.000024639865,0.00016017245,0.0000569053,0.0000037412287,0.00059746136,0.8240578,0.000063719664,0.00018886772,0.16400313,0.008095198,0.002723278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012395751,0.000027946993,0.00019115122,0.0003412488,0.0000047454164,0.0003739566,0.81235254,0.00013592995,0.00043522767,0.032966692,0.15313135,0.000026919945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048503783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049709664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033843055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009434449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059410324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1789813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000302975","doi":"10.1177/0967010608100849","title":"Argument and Identity Change in the Atlantic Security Community","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Identity (music); Security community; Politics; Political science; Cold war; Reflexivity; Action (physics); Sociology; North Atlantic Treaty; Political economy; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.04014515734747326,"score_gpt":0.3579533258986859,"score_spread":0.31780816855121263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000302975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43358192,0.0014045326,0.013843636,0.13536383,0.0010607034,0.000080709724,0.000024251209,0.00005106524,0.41458932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994925,0.00006529688,0.00038382635,0.0011145584,0.000044584012,0.000011789142,0.0000032813598,0.000009634607,0.0034419673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97863847,0.015669094,0.0003660128,0.0011656248,0.002229364,0.0019315684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98009026,0.013561654,0.001761222,0.0010741613,0.0019784216,0.0015344147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023668338,0.00041372038,0.00048541278,0.0024330171,0.03167649,0.013971054,0.001980221,0.008056247,0.004188518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023725469,0.00027177966,0.00039715026,0.0015062346,0.06497701,0.008965376,0.017632019,0.009155073,0.00035916557],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020520349,0.000026879916,0.00068465684,0.00001882396,0.0000037731668,0.00025811497,0.21877629,0.000109680564,0.00018167206,0.7752178,0.002001394,0.002700475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006464667,0.000051206585,0.0013106742,0.00032820523,0.000023920502,0.00019893407,0.34846509,0.0021604295,0.0010396733,0.44587478,0.20043178,0.000050671202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016715618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014127526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03167649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021549178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009536312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15635097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007457185","doi":"10.1177/096701060403500315","title":"A Challenge to the Power over Knowledge of Traditional Security Studies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Intelligence, Security, War Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.07419149713081682,"score_gpt":0.35248686261546724,"score_spread":0.2782953654846504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007457185","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034388748,0.013454869,0.017838133,0.91933113,0.0032183575,0.000038476675,0.00017761174,0.00012532553,0.042377137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6162402,0.020118266,0.03573209,0.2669079,0.03902907,0.0008951477,0.00025735542,0.00044988838,0.020369973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96481895,0.021439262,0.0012133161,0.0039325655,0.0076342663,0.0009616078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63771474,0.30255508,0.008360335,0.02365982,0.01979234,0.007917765],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10046082,0.0009922978,0.0032234401,0.008530785,0.012330292,0.021943899,0.005752968,0.013677848,0.011758201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15506408,0.0007557696,0.0010840369,0.0047415732,0.1316817,0.044276956,0.014841351,0.03110873,0.0030896668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056761313,0.000043328837,0.0003503658,0.00024405883,0.00004994115,0.000057121895,0.008130591,0.00015795734,0.000084368854,0.95242816,0.026419604,0.011977723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049525628,0.000015000575,0.00018940301,0.00037500833,0.000009039281,0.00005892379,0.0027391424,0.00026772768,0.00005602198,0.94204974,0.054161113,0.000029298837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058967574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006694941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9876697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064109946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011771268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.531294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009755815","doi":"10.1177/0967010609342880","title":"Managing Urban Security: City Walls and Urban Metis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Securitization; Metis; Ethnic group; Political science; Sociology; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.0214967796458668,"score_gpt":0.29019887366592534,"score_spread":0.2687020940200585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009755815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24146159,0.0050834534,0.007973129,0.05627323,0.00048294186,0.000051622286,0.000077734345,0.00006903728,0.68852735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869464,0.0008644607,0.00053304806,0.000279883,0.000054928474,0.000018195467,0.000010506544,0.000012849042,0.011279726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987639,0.0008104902,0.000019475736,0.00006686914,0.00011153901,0.0002276281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929726,0.00020513182,0.00016091923,0.000049155307,0.00009889876,0.00018867754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010679358,0.00026179143,0.00013324457,0.00075593346,0.007634334,0.011288687,0.000663716,0.0012665434,0.0075737783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012791466,0.00024695206,0.00014319664,0.0008005846,0.01944854,0.0042828647,0.004301293,0.0016976263,0.0003472892],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000124975495,0.000020439362,0.0016578281,0.00003560832,0.0000038083615,0.00018270785,0.0341006,0.00071740535,0.000109425884,0.9497908,0.007058723,0.006310142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022027974,0.00006280544,0.005950649,0.00044225133,0.000015508847,0.00019525143,0.30094072,0.0015616488,0.00048972375,0.21821289,0.47206876,0.000037855636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011966199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025686225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011966199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005305173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035165476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038491905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032225500","doi":"10.1177/0967010614533243","title":"Border security as practice: An agenda for research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université de Montréal; International Centre for Comparative Criminology","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Critical security studies; Security studies; Order (exchange); Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Power (physics); Field (mathematics); Securitization; Public administration; Law; Business; Cloud computing security; Network security policy","score_opus":0.06647316359300616,"score_gpt":0.4703362369716973,"score_spread":0.40386307337869115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032225500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020324742,0.15471305,0.008919753,0.73819965,0.0049019493,0.00015519028,0.0001000143,0.000096717966,0.072588935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7263963,0.21726452,0.012032981,0.027921693,0.006321219,0.0009932693,0.00016992664,0.0001006115,0.008799425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782242,0.017732989,0.0004885137,0.0009946646,0.00090105203,0.0016585761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93142736,0.054348506,0.0029455344,0.0026269504,0.0033916058,0.0052601155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037248917,0.0010683185,0.0030014052,0.006540523,0.011476151,0.044498857,0.0043755034,0.019066215,0.013188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022994386,0.0007419618,0.0010604771,0.008979948,0.061057877,0.06347498,0.017265126,0.014559579,0.0016072715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004484084,0.00020829722,0.0012195801,0.001304077,0.000016726772,0.00022169486,0.046236314,0.00029245618,0.00008637851,0.9165574,0.013594161,0.020218052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029257564,0.000096382304,0.0010540576,0.007034631,0.000020903575,0.00021545222,0.34544265,0.0009136744,0.00009883689,0.5230749,0.12197598,0.00004323229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003912212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004172653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044498857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013692413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030549653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19699347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033712542","doi":"10.1177/0967010607075974","title":"Security, Critique, Europe","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Security studies; Public administration","score_opus":0.022136624513297877,"score_gpt":0.33241814808493303,"score_spread":0.31028152357163513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033712542","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00967039,0.076102525,0.0009992772,0.52850026,0.003359728,0.00001553158,0.000067523266,0.000027446848,0.38125727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62807155,0.025031377,0.0010070335,0.20894672,0.00977121,0.00012324244,0.00009906473,0.00014905028,0.12680075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916215,0.0053754747,0.00019406025,0.00079127133,0.0009994478,0.0010181838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939957,0.004529998,0.0002603256,0.00041632107,0.00046242523,0.00033519368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010797979,0.00091864506,0.0010858487,0.0035933496,0.010872073,0.019600904,0.001501649,0.020391695,0.010011178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019011673,0.00027343738,0.00077843125,0.0039476147,0.042805076,0.008887654,0.006791473,0.011940164,0.0009015563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011671901,0.000012022234,0.00010056997,0.00003533612,0.000005365714,0.00003860824,0.0029262535,0.000068041525,0.000020414167,0.97217137,0.021354795,0.0032554588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028579456,0.000014612683,0.00070063164,0.0005844237,0.000011224542,0.00009275211,0.0067401645,0.00013179063,0.000083309926,0.5773221,0.41427684,0.000013526554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022181144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013344584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022181144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012885036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0112768775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09348792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041330643","doi":"10.1177/0967010608096148","title":"Sovereign Power and the Biopolitics of Human Security","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Human security; Sovereignty; Power (physics); Sociology; Security studies; Dual (grammatical number); Critical security studies; Political science; Political economy; Law; Politics; Social science; Network security policy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023604520158640806,"score_gpt":0.2989377129069495,"score_spread":0.2753331927483087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041330643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10129946,0.01699754,0.036769014,0.060400646,0.00051980396,0.00002733148,0.00004277436,0.000056501798,0.7838869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919008,0.0015691034,0.0010446707,0.00079191366,0.00014050264,0.000017157008,0.000009007681,0.000010901665,0.004515959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99584204,0.002980468,0.00007222766,0.0002711852,0.000540718,0.00029337048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964888,0.002357472,0.0003424347,0.00036950636,0.00025489583,0.00018689685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005187062,0.0003510018,0.00036205797,0.0015005128,0.0037444902,0.007314499,0.00052023085,0.0023742476,0.003620724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042281128,0.00018452169,0.0002524379,0.0010133287,0.08211895,0.006166788,0.0066237743,0.0036007415,0.00032425157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022146262,0.000002065428,0.000043605956,0.000008424202,9.718457e-7,0.000016603011,0.0038076178,0.00007325208,0.000038374885,0.99460703,0.000290004,0.0011099648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064637807,0.000016263073,0.0002680171,0.00015995275,0.00000302291,0.00008720382,0.0050482745,0.00030139377,0.0001597861,0.9347757,0.059165973,0.000007955334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001604931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012302762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007314499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029202118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023994425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027432144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041378898","doi":"10.1177/0967010612444150","title":"‘This is how we survived’: Civilian agency and humanitarian protection","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Scholarship; Political science; Peacebuilding; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.04566043971158852,"score_gpt":0.2937588835896009,"score_spread":0.2480984438780124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041378898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44399396,0.012266493,0.014811473,0.14531063,0.0005980796,0.00006822175,0.00005058335,0.000053860284,0.38284662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960865,0.000463116,0.00035204552,0.000941068,0.000030396533,0.0000088924335,0.0000038938,0.00000578831,0.0021083325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867387,0.01073894,0.00014399743,0.0004958078,0.0004912438,0.0013913577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99244046,0.0038215541,0.0012303981,0.0008099876,0.00071551127,0.0009820877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008558383,0.0003603136,0.00036630084,0.0014463726,0.012406246,0.012162818,0.0010547165,0.0033399216,0.00558461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0126039665,0.0002548409,0.00025835104,0.0012831056,0.060242712,0.009572835,0.01086872,0.004300748,0.00048465963],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038250826,0.000044082473,0.004821539,0.000094150564,0.000021132333,0.00049299106,0.33325714,0.00035591167,0.00015654297,0.6362873,0.0059329416,0.018498152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020431486,0.00008077365,0.0047041,0.0006991764,0.000019471034,0.00082027545,0.41543406,0.00056971255,0.0003987647,0.3130283,0.26417357,0.000051335956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004436966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054254867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012406246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048822192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037214132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045261562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049879527","doi":"10.1177/0967010606069178","title":"Wartime Sexual Violence: Assessing a Human Security Response to War-Affected Girls in Sierra Leone","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sierra leone; Human security; Empowerment; Sexual violence; Human rights; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Criminology; Economic growth; Law; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.022636673061055775,"score_gpt":0.32097539341557574,"score_spread":0.29833872035451997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049879527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999119,0.00005689957,0.00002242742,0.00004583679,0.0000029155635,0.00003168688,0.000019056299,5.448109e-7,0.0007017923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993345,0.00013298145,0.00009081279,0.000024067102,0.000002766615,0.000055189274,0.000026125988,6.7439817e-7,0.00033288915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913615,0.00041774436,0.000058628215,0.000051994106,0.00009732704,0.00023825589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889874,0.00028486052,0.0003934661,0.000035802186,0.00011503372,0.00027205312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018817461,0.00047113645,0.00033974703,0.0012297642,0.0028297214,0.00200445,0.00062022515,0.0008842999,0.002173003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028643557,0.0003276499,0.00033209476,0.00065232086,0.0019592394,0.0007158653,0.0027987876,0.0010115245,0.00016102615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096843185,0.0003287831,0.73995656,0.0001541487,0.00003899497,0.0014090063,0.2457762,0.00010148101,0.0016143427,0.0005238135,0.00027373325,0.009726094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000078146295,0.00041587735,0.4228908,0.00008368077,0.000018626686,0.0005655494,0.5727525,0.00007805643,0.00058040064,0.00012243386,0.0024723927,0.000011868683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010217398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024333768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010217398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012898749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009750596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020315826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051726327","doi":"10.1177/0967010609350632","title":"Beyond the ‘Salvation’ Paradigm: Responsibility To Protect (Others) vs the Power of Protecting Oneself","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Responsibility to protect; Resistance (ecology); International community; Intervention (counseling); Power (physics); Face (sociological concept); Political science; Affect (linguistics); Sociology; Collective responsibility; International law; Law; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Criminology; Politics; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.013972620766517018,"score_gpt":0.29116958624408373,"score_spread":0.2771969654775667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051726327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039085954,0.006465842,0.054994065,0.34203777,0.0013541437,0.000054500426,0.000033189543,0.00006671879,0.55590785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750089,0.0017392851,0.00250196,0.010782652,0.00055301626,0.000069285925,0.000013505831,0.000045738634,0.009285636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98600835,0.010525362,0.00024542245,0.0009439675,0.0013428209,0.00093409035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98760104,0.007418194,0.0012722777,0.0012169875,0.0011885188,0.0013029277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019280486,0.00067984546,0.0008361576,0.0013777346,0.007020805,0.013205494,0.0021433798,0.0074962205,0.005017216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009528843,0.00029687953,0.0006954614,0.00095339457,0.11106868,0.015255196,0.011233482,0.010496631,0.0008948356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007744067,0.000008286775,0.000082451406,0.000029281211,0.0000036589317,0.000044455664,0.007306741,0.00009855567,0.000048357793,0.9893454,0.00132552,0.001699637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001129095,0.000027338605,0.00021006973,0.00016041732,0.0000064171877,0.00008649458,0.007724055,0.00041464082,0.0001571709,0.94862026,0.042569205,0.000012690277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021493623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017903262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019280486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047239726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006064925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10196614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060114434","doi":"10.1177/0967010611399617","title":"Financializing security","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Securitization; Terrorism; Politics; Economics; Finance; Political risk; Futures contract; Financial market; Political economy; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0445945896464875,"score_gpt":0.21765861509532683,"score_spread":0.17306402544883934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060114434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012490399,0.0035681056,0.012585116,0.037942033,0.0009965732,0.00005505186,0.00022680033,0.00017034514,0.93196553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81405663,0.007891874,0.0062520076,0.017184306,0.0017659419,0.0002139713,0.0004049151,0.00019015689,0.15204012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811244,0.00066298596,0.00006861443,0.00032159348,0.0004969076,0.0003374861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984207,0.00056022743,0.00021769608,0.0002776005,0.00033894778,0.00018479484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021926975,0.00072500645,0.0003093439,0.0012547857,0.0026340683,0.008800861,0.0007905614,0.0030622825,0.03249436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005399036,0.00018438978,0.000351665,0.0011444286,0.013402498,0.0077739093,0.004875173,0.005011007,0.0036453237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004356203,0.000003357825,0.00007989663,0.000012466699,9.762699e-7,0.000015246896,0.00024683017,0.000109330475,0.00004867212,0.99080384,0.004229183,0.004445849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010954216,0.00003188359,0.0003691505,0.000206781,0.000004815079,0.00010462864,0.00078445784,0.00047766496,0.00037980903,0.57865477,0.4189617,0.000013333664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031750544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019030692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03249436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00483884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00401832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10870451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063038608","doi":"10.1177/0967010605057907","title":"The High-Level Panel and the Security Council","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Security council; Public administration; Political science; Security studies; Panel data; Politics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.044023743364233175,"score_gpt":0.2596975788556316,"score_spread":0.21567383549139843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063038608","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003973135,0.007516793,0.0010098049,0.8863209,0.019300846,0.00038465206,0.0008026082,0.000051246825,0.08064011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07453672,0.0055915173,0.00488539,0.7055973,0.007877285,0.0013818366,0.0011637409,0.00021256023,0.1987537],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97549045,0.009798776,0.0010802395,0.0017231684,0.006936816,0.004970618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645789,0.014758794,0.0015698409,0.0018093167,0.012274301,0.0050089336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032909058,0.00089898973,0.0007950705,0.0015004999,0.01342026,0.014050799,0.0036576318,0.04419319,0.014803909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067419834,0.0010812243,0.0014322835,0.0038006126,0.004364379,0.008076331,0.005257402,0.034698352,0.0042213243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008605604,0.000051477837,0.0007775913,0.000111287496,0.000012429108,0.00009410681,0.0010107753,0.00013345714,0.00019932295,0.026668621,0.96203,0.008824904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004572434,0.000019566496,0.00528679,0.00036897272,0.000023370865,0.00001702108,0.0022916284,0.000117391595,0.00024197451,0.0051484625,0.9863762,0.00006297113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14634249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21671201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14634249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012798204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04324685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29098135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066382075","doi":"10.1177/096701060403500323","title":"A Signifier of Shared Values","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.026652703931242392,"score_gpt":0.22837706071197011,"score_spread":0.20172435678072773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066382075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036642686,0.003191597,0.031259444,0.092377886,0.0020202305,0.00007535232,0.000060265647,0.00014699718,0.83422554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95966923,0.00034164204,0.0026976322,0.00426977,0.0004917201,0.0000878507,0.00001990914,0.00010455786,0.032317698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843848,0.010455821,0.00035463032,0.001315139,0.0020969794,0.0013926702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876052,0.006561227,0.00088404486,0.0020343233,0.0012507527,0.0016643758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013092744,0.0008242991,0.0008182668,0.0021181048,0.01711344,0.022039268,0.0020195367,0.008745103,0.008547895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015050849,0.00052822655,0.0004337063,0.0014925778,0.11144864,0.014673758,0.014993331,0.016526425,0.0009238903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004700863,0.000005457488,0.00004733381,0.000011091075,0.000003264071,0.000027303786,0.018757718,0.000028105107,0.000068502224,0.9782005,0.00151075,0.0013353191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019595998,0.000024024544,0.0001777703,0.00013648813,0.000008670499,0.00015509661,0.02147857,0.00019127963,0.00028743938,0.8449016,0.13259663,0.000022853745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020080388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026968943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022039268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065612397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075455946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06924188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069768043","doi":"10.1177/0967010614543582","title":"Iterations of Olympic security: Montreal and Vancouver","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Peacetime; Terrorism; Context (archaeology); Security studies; International security; Political science; Event (particle physics); Computer security; Public administration; Law; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.017284949762102375,"score_gpt":0.3024364176849835,"score_spread":0.28515146792288115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069768043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9351552,0.0003200163,0.00016820274,0.0023109943,0.0000649749,0.00006976595,0.00025865805,0.00001924369,0.06163296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99287754,0.00021965809,0.00008384196,0.00012460814,0.000005521351,0.000013773153,0.000096694974,0.0000109345265,0.006567496],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982474,0.00039295538,0.000026924658,0.00013138354,0.00041559414,0.0007858227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967449,0.00039245843,0.00021624217,0.00007754087,0.00092224043,0.0016465136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010340139,0.00035364385,0.0003035158,0.0018428303,0.019604001,0.0065432475,0.0013817692,0.0007464247,0.006662819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047705565,0.00038342553,0.0001640537,0.0031442614,0.0063213487,0.0010983344,0.0036734894,0.0019750935,0.0002248994],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029762374,0.0002700722,0.1823021,0.00014300062,0.000059323593,0.0018757563,0.6933271,0.0008420891,0.0015556529,0.028215325,0.030528821,0.060583062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010808534,0.00005871146,0.17620885,0.00009730065,0.000008205332,0.000103177714,0.74931437,0.00020496416,0.00022011809,0.00044713993,0.07327259,0.000053757638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98341066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99531883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057592396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057592396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04372599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41786402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076536682","doi":"10.1177/096701060403500308","title":"A New Scientific Field and Policy Lens","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"International Science and Diplomacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Lens (geology); Political science; Physics; Optics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020087073823283404,"score_gpt":0.33572161956527946,"score_spread":0.31563454574199606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076536682","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024829728,0.012740311,0.016672593,0.7651102,0.013776823,0.000041971136,0.00013277582,0.00012484059,0.18891747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5558486,0.02352495,0.022134177,0.22122984,0.080957755,0.0010645211,0.0002058921,0.00069950725,0.09433476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781805,0.014245341,0.0006392019,0.0018862897,0.0034953814,0.0015532466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9456598,0.03842662,0.0026963975,0.0033811382,0.0040125027,0.0058234986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034986794,0.002362843,0.0031402705,0.015563275,0.01764334,0.05270055,0.0050715343,0.03328366,0.026345763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03308446,0.001215895,0.0013331592,0.009992996,0.10985224,0.06830896,0.015523887,0.0327872,0.0023546796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018783767,0.0000055786995,0.000010072667,0.000011059001,0.0000010431464,0.0000063682373,0.0003506289,0.000025101906,0.00000761236,0.99551815,0.003532125,0.00053037185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011525383,0.000007431538,0.000031278578,0.00008992577,0.0000032093865,0.000020907004,0.0016129694,0.00020592991,0.000024159355,0.91878176,0.079202004,0.000008895099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069256816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061846636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05270055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0286735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027526278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20804179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077103657","doi":"10.1177/096701060403500310","title":"An Idea that Works in Practice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Educational Leadership and Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.052511844259297336,"score_gpt":0.382814331345329,"score_spread":0.33030248708603166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077103657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03555621,0.0013427672,0.14303331,0.2961338,0.003322278,0.00042487454,0.000065559216,0.00067637477,0.51944476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87739044,0.00046306747,0.058929913,0.020902382,0.00064435694,0.001095015,0.000049489317,0.0003598017,0.04016551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95571643,0.03145227,0.0012272032,0.0039641797,0.0053484584,0.002291421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94321233,0.029733898,0.0029332873,0.011045497,0.0076414617,0.005433381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030206611,0.0013094379,0.0009916249,0.0048042005,0.017912094,0.023899546,0.0042362674,0.019965343,0.019249989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043831736,0.0013021866,0.0015079841,0.002701486,0.10979515,0.03232789,0.0147451535,0.014774534,0.0044768746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021444794,0.00007797646,0.0008405146,0.000100158424,0.000018471696,0.0001289636,0.044614326,0.0001202003,0.00012744534,0.9407158,0.0055705803,0.007664293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009191229,0.00007524218,0.00037348582,0.00032717767,0.00003266908,0.00029052922,0.033579763,0.0007157505,0.00024598575,0.90045816,0.06376942,0.000039853156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030064334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003006083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030206611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073605347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015946792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15974969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084582294","doi":"10.1177/096701060403500309","title":"A Concept in Need of a Global Policy Response","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01629667357123479,"score_gpt":0.3152231337116032,"score_spread":0.29892646014036844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084582294","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003111303,0.0044061854,0.009217986,0.9103069,0.011590952,0.0000682703,0.000046628502,0.00008583929,0.06116598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43451974,0.005476161,0.032065123,0.46011487,0.020763488,0.0008524013,0.00016758418,0.0002971706,0.045743488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98201996,0.009727069,0.0007595285,0.0017909819,0.003403003,0.002299506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702774,0.015334487,0.0015575672,0.002581312,0.004444177,0.005805065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03664008,0.0014686085,0.0027048935,0.004196509,0.018805403,0.024434062,0.004825731,0.0567727,0.016567878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027589772,0.0007883004,0.0017828912,0.003149696,0.09316819,0.03942052,0.017740112,0.052380808,0.0019212251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010523619,0.000024930734,0.00004139857,0.000074558084,0.00000469461,0.00007858323,0.0017895724,0.000077934004,0.00010972663,0.9794292,0.016103787,0.0022550186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002895421,0.000030375832,0.00012383042,0.00029421743,0.000008740975,0.0001237434,0.0072714733,0.0002597703,0.00009243564,0.84497714,0.14675528,0.00003407458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039211544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004123941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0567727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012340161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037937302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19377357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087373523","doi":"10.1177/0967010604044975","title":"The ‘New Wars’ Debate: A Historical Perspective is Needed","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":237,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Scrutiny; Perspective (graphical); State (computer science); Sovereignty; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Social conflict; Political economy; Social science; Law; History","score_opus":0.020296215527396445,"score_gpt":0.30441518202604595,"score_spread":0.2841189664986495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087373523","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035900056,0.25252363,0.009119402,0.48864114,0.011054339,0.00002822043,0.000117791526,0.00004622466,0.2025692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8240533,0.11159591,0.0020112656,0.033094592,0.015290515,0.00006336845,0.00013380384,0.00007606839,0.013681189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491715,0.0035233751,0.00017092343,0.00045613715,0.0005094667,0.0004229758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895783,0.008127164,0.00081517466,0.00040209419,0.0006159758,0.00046123107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00751094,0.00050957093,0.00058821705,0.002698262,0.0069081876,0.017007107,0.001774116,0.005850934,0.0062282328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00936876,0.00029916366,0.00038551728,0.0039374637,0.03104828,0.025448201,0.0040134294,0.012329641,0.00058226835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014479585,0.000025908983,0.0003217948,0.00016562175,0.0000071595928,0.000098080585,0.011262607,0.00019800848,0.00006441944,0.9669731,0.010739223,0.010129433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006830762,0.000039657138,0.000975761,0.0010847213,0.000008284912,0.00035881627,0.02983109,0.0004763259,0.00019914226,0.26257744,0.7044138,0.000028075541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030406278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029433486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017007107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067543145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018877616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049006164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090083391","doi":"10.1177/0967010613519162","title":"Drone strikes, <i>dingpolitik</i> and beyond: Furthering the debate on materiality and security","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Politics; Publics; Scholarship; Critical security studies; Conversation; Sociology; Security studies; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Media studies; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.014149262463106436,"score_gpt":0.27049390796542183,"score_spread":0.2563446455023154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090083391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31150493,0.018856747,0.0074981065,0.23589481,0.0010971412,0.000045648194,0.000098326374,0.00004012791,0.4249641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899997,0.0020770852,0.00042636195,0.0032447772,0.00016310802,0.000014703525,0.000014578865,0.000013379339,0.0040462804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554825,0.00333237,0.000071960516,0.00030947843,0.00026881695,0.00046914848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99162954,0.0065415967,0.0005946333,0.0005598419,0.00032104595,0.00035332033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077915327,0.0004911211,0.0004869846,0.002680119,0.01256554,0.017720679,0.0010076151,0.0051940107,0.0055570058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051197587,0.00029941616,0.00035630714,0.0018672148,0.08361522,0.015443929,0.010810813,0.007012347,0.00031239982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003277254,0.0000201827,0.0010585343,0.00010617127,0.0000064052438,0.0003821423,0.12781456,0.000094491676,0.0002706392,0.8623232,0.002729747,0.005161192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002121112,0.00004617144,0.0027961151,0.0010119603,0.0000136255185,0.00035204962,0.40885592,0.0002802351,0.0009367281,0.29084504,0.29480094,0.000039977225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00646878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010883796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017720679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009832483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042972225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071340024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096434561","doi":"10.1177/0967010611431079","title":"Cyclones in cyberspace: Information shaping and denial in the 2008 Russia–Georgia war","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Denial; Information warfare; Political science; Cyberwarfare; Internationalization; Rhetoric; Computer security; Political economy; Public relations; Law; Sociology; The Internet; Business; International trade; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.019035530055639176,"score_gpt":0.28089471455644954,"score_spread":0.26185918450081036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096434561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97229373,0.00027300234,0.00021267244,0.0025321138,0.000015306268,0.000005494844,0.000012086957,0.0000024469998,0.024653167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994887,0.000105938976,0.00002340748,0.00006981042,0.0000039581123,0.0000016721145,0.0000042307424,9.88763e-7,0.0003013135],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987587,0.00072420307,0.000039339386,0.000096533055,0.00015703583,0.00022422337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791664,0.0011992346,0.00050967885,0.00010581533,0.00012468282,0.000143982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001339063,0.00014673866,0.00021440064,0.000986675,0.0031459075,0.004729572,0.00029362857,0.0009825897,0.0018344817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032091832,0.00015349653,0.00010369372,0.00133105,0.008521857,0.0025524646,0.003979933,0.0017631374,0.00009601374],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029920336,0.00017518863,0.087452866,0.00018603011,0.000045028817,0.002329385,0.6097236,0.0024413315,0.002282607,0.24988088,0.0044690506,0.04071491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023757737,0.00011213402,0.15599512,0.0002915061,0.00002308497,0.0009073069,0.7173472,0.0020967552,0.0011030299,0.044637475,0.077406615,0.000055962762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01219411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01781544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01219411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00421757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012739968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030600727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100012957","doi":"10.1177/0967010606066168","title":"Surveillance Strategies and Populations at Risk: Biopolitical Governance in Canada’s National Security Policy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; National security; Corporate governance; Public administration; Population; Accountability; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Critical security studies; Security studies; Political economy; Law; Economics; Network security policy; Cloud computing security","score_opus":0.017099017377802287,"score_gpt":0.29639638581276767,"score_spread":0.2792973684349654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100012957","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23501897,0.005529747,0.007770968,0.39397755,0.0003407652,0.00020148007,0.00032825867,0.00006506024,0.35676718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975605,0.0010570793,0.001563648,0.008171963,0.00004524565,0.000034269786,0.00004972477,0.00000977466,0.013463385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922909,0.0017963429,0.00014555367,0.00046262,0.002336313,0.0029682573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909526,0.002985445,0.000640193,0.00025454292,0.0027804608,0.0023867972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005669844,0.00027841213,0.00023554241,0.0021389888,0.018111495,0.010508912,0.0013430268,0.0030724078,0.0034778374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009098702,0.00035598254,0.0003422228,0.0022687595,0.017852819,0.0021165775,0.0040989597,0.0035127902,0.00009267848],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023556278,0.000032452805,0.0084534325,0.000070079346,0.000016994625,0.00023122049,0.023530088,0.0030199273,0.00045900748,0.93136346,0.016547577,0.016252104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079433434,0.00008108815,0.07282468,0.00082535495,0.00007524472,0.00017216266,0.06026055,0.008981827,0.001152916,0.22135301,0.63388294,0.00031078278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99203306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99353164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20371306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20371306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30565754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102007479","doi":"10.1177/0967010609336198","title":"The Responsibility To Protect and the Conflict in Darfur: The Big Let-Down","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Responsibility to protect; Political science; Action (physics); Politics; International relations; Order (exchange); Law; International law; Business","score_opus":0.015143198276820391,"score_gpt":0.2925384400323547,"score_spread":0.2773952417555343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102007479","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21943015,0.025324015,0.014097058,0.42922023,0.0019254069,0.0000609711,0.00004663377,0.00005751899,0.3098381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846941,0.001771012,0.000891002,0.007746385,0.00013031882,0.000026257088,0.000006253555,0.000015100022,0.0047195246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932595,0.0049100835,0.00012025523,0.00031330224,0.0005604537,0.00083638466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996748,0.0021970128,0.00030678636,0.000179366,0.00030377772,0.00026498592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007195518,0.00058858184,0.00043197483,0.0013087551,0.009516874,0.010536724,0.0008455056,0.0042656087,0.0033280442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006026249,0.0002801693,0.00036528675,0.0010054465,0.030232118,0.007807973,0.009906273,0.006934165,0.00029613692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019131672,0.000013245628,0.00040224887,0.00005517433,0.0000049916466,0.00027218147,0.04143491,0.00029914474,0.00022526017,0.94087005,0.004543835,0.011859809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017542443,0.000078153455,0.001911588,0.00087480195,0.000012044426,0.0006897627,0.14944723,0.00075472106,0.0006928031,0.37248638,0.47296587,0.000069167465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074354117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078021553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010536724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008465281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049865525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061420143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107468170","doi":"10.1177/0967010612457972","title":"Settler governmentality in Canada and the Algonquins of Barriere Lake","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Carleton University","funders":"Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada","keywords":"Governmentality; Colonialism; Sovereignty; Indigenous; Corporate governance; Political science; Decolonization; Political economy; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.009122276692597363,"score_gpt":0.2498528551732413,"score_spread":0.24073057848064394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107468170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9406875,0.00055295485,0.00023036062,0.004052946,0.000025807323,0.000033075816,0.00007071749,0.000012292175,0.054334298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933209,0.00019611935,0.00010722836,0.0002471737,0.000002706924,0.0000057377442,0.000019718467,0.0000036320023,0.006096691],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870944,0.00017365237,0.000017360775,0.00009595886,0.0002773216,0.0007262623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998637,0.0002965629,0.00016933974,0.000049518017,0.0003948766,0.0004527378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086878403,0.00014685538,0.00021731181,0.0009621997,0.020627774,0.0038113298,0.0009519459,0.00096789113,0.0038194258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019945863,0.00014283716,0.00014274349,0.0017698482,0.010667845,0.00062284106,0.0030942217,0.0014385668,0.00009251495],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009498264,0.00007623937,0.07466171,0.00013998048,0.00002452884,0.003992155,0.7188064,0.00050244667,0.0019260996,0.155955,0.009624329,0.034196064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014117048,0.000033436296,0.13783586,0.00016611777,0.000024514364,0.00033760254,0.70452905,0.00045602935,0.00052095036,0.0028881896,0.15313415,0.000060042476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99750036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06954927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06954927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061405692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50461763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108215043","doi":"10.1177/0967010602033004004","title":"Greek-turkish Dilemmas and the Cyprus EU Accession Process","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Cyprus History, Politics, Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Accession; Incentive; Political economy; Compromise; Politics; Resizing; Champion; Foreign policy; Turkish; Settlement (finance); Political science; Conditionality; Leverage (statistics); Foreign direct investment; Economy; Economics; European union; International trade; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.02876627710231876,"score_gpt":0.294939948229891,"score_spread":0.26617367112757223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108215043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6686685,0.0012853035,0.0014471203,0.016299782,0.00016970448,0.00004794401,0.00002228615,0.000023109109,0.3120362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99625224,0.00010644951,0.00011571282,0.0004591747,0.000017197965,0.000012585011,0.0000034426903,0.0000035333776,0.0030297528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930883,0.0043794857,0.00024328953,0.00043963644,0.00048096097,0.0013682958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449605,0.0038219371,0.0006042767,0.0002670748,0.00033781235,0.00047291038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008867403,0.00030181676,0.0004555197,0.0011994758,0.008543449,0.010107934,0.0008449861,0.0053529735,0.006587063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117174685,0.00022018042,0.00036354276,0.0011770984,0.012387453,0.0039850646,0.0074843774,0.0027238245,0.00049228297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002132778,0.000050734063,0.0025202364,0.000060765906,0.000018757451,0.0024644958,0.030563094,0.0021943355,0.00041856008,0.9498987,0.0027441452,0.008852884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036211114,0.0003595372,0.028968547,0.0006088727,0.00009547889,0.0022502742,0.22057603,0.010550054,0.0026382047,0.50251895,0.23087882,0.00019322798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071670087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005009963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010107934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009647037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035554187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06999451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111644171","doi":"10.1177/0967010608088775","title":"Securing the Political Imagination: Popular Culture, the Security Dispositif and the Biometric State","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Biometrics; State (computer science); Referent; Sociology; Politics; Corporate governance; Political science; Public relations; Law; Computer security; Computer science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.018150263032731456,"score_gpt":0.29705713239470616,"score_spread":0.27890686936197473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111644171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6643946,0.004281065,0.0038481478,0.07204895,0.0003109365,0.00001395425,0.000027595526,0.000015803433,0.25505888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838996,0.0003333998,0.000073895324,0.00041518765,0.00004761913,0.000002789134,0.0000016232115,0.0000026425735,0.00073296076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947127,0.004184205,0.000075902855,0.00020282189,0.000444906,0.0003795058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98937523,0.0077958987,0.0012560918,0.00040500882,0.00064366753,0.0005241873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055480227,0.00029055504,0.0002189908,0.0016192371,0.005362151,0.011135546,0.00052807934,0.0022385719,0.0033743796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007489926,0.00017814097,0.00014334309,0.0011992606,0.042452745,0.0059249434,0.003941288,0.0024018784,0.00021115126],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031502404,0.000055722125,0.004989788,0.000052662395,0.000010663535,0.00028862763,0.20019528,0.00013922795,0.000349579,0.78092074,0.00174226,0.011223914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022637001,0.00009046592,0.010023267,0.00041493372,0.000017603068,0.0003622647,0.6041718,0.0010570795,0.0009724463,0.2793137,0.103501156,0.00005253612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023863544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022523606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011135546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028566944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016427977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029341042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113112222","doi":"10.1177/0967010606064137","title":"Lines of Insecurity: International, Imperial, Exceptional","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Exceptionalism; Modernity; Law; Politics; Internationalism (politics); Skepticism; Sociology; Sovereign state; International relations; State (computer science); Constitutionalism; State of exception; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.015480351548915229,"score_gpt":0.2992175608441761,"score_spread":0.28373720929526086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113112222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44071147,0.0047518015,0.008845019,0.02584312,0.00033238853,0.00002719418,0.000052625368,0.00005222644,0.5193842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778265,0.00032597026,0.00019411353,0.00023907496,0.000060378192,0.000008781745,0.000007591796,0.000008865734,0.0013724535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650514,0.0022753063,0.0001321142,0.00028638085,0.00047764136,0.00032344175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99300545,0.0038565043,0.001497334,0.00057700044,0.0004748309,0.0005889104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002997451,0.0003125425,0.00037829604,0.0020047496,0.0045414786,0.012983664,0.0007147317,0.003033976,0.0039173756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075676125,0.00020848376,0.00018388694,0.0021059336,0.04717824,0.011768362,0.008122929,0.004498538,0.0002501629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027297689,0.000017935843,0.0017460827,0.000050709892,0.0000037992218,0.00023798061,0.09948762,0.00009017465,0.00013414986,0.8906395,0.0014674934,0.006097398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002547072,0.000062498475,0.0068751834,0.00076640747,0.000013992933,0.0011186791,0.3297364,0.0006973509,0.00041491972,0.52647024,0.13378158,0.000037252303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011197221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012924843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012983664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033804898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010833829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024527311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114765413","doi":"10.1177/0967010606069063","title":"Double Standards, Distance and Disengagement: Collective Legitimization in the Post-Cold War Security Council","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Collective security; Security council; Representativeness heuristic; Cold war; Political science; Public administration; Disengagement theory; Law; International security; Sociology; International relations; Politics","score_opus":0.014385451608350803,"score_gpt":0.2534012460715153,"score_spread":0.2390157944631645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114765413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74587584,0.0010530126,0.0038745445,0.031129753,0.0001920179,0.00005086978,0.00002903317,0.000033671004,0.21776131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997827,0.0000759103,0.00010635708,0.00016197377,0.000025166726,0.000011050967,0.0000038522426,0.000004642054,0.0017838803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863675,0.0077316673,0.00037282455,0.0009991619,0.0019985868,0.0025301636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98107326,0.010775781,0.0032676142,0.0014556533,0.0018246357,0.001603043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012929969,0.00022847204,0.00040491417,0.0033474297,0.016125562,0.014885281,0.0012536388,0.0033011246,0.003602037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02386829,0.00023893321,0.00029228124,0.0036016856,0.056800574,0.008560997,0.013653188,0.0046880436,0.00021325098],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004519103,0.00005521639,0.0059051253,0.00004139668,0.000009953715,0.00042083263,0.30805737,0.0003640388,0.00020356562,0.6702948,0.0022341644,0.012368299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005160978,0.00013840423,0.03201963,0.00032011917,0.00001636547,0.00024623904,0.5184268,0.0015009852,0.0005724951,0.24726693,0.19935128,0.00008915593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027378973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029552776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027378973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016337024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008671627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11853397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126232071","doi":"10.1177/0967010608096149","title":"Microbes, Mad Cows and Militaries: Exploring the Links Between Health and Security","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical security studies; Rigour; Securitization; Normative; Security studies; Human security; Political science; Human rights; International security; Public health; Relevance (law); Sociology; International relations; Public relations; Public administration; Network security policy; Politics; Business; Law; Medicine; Cloud computing security; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06377450231297081,"score_gpt":0.302291825961485,"score_spread":0.2385173236485142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126232071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5983544,0.048635885,0.0068805697,0.15806732,0.00053784496,0.00008435565,0.00015440174,0.00002044495,0.18726481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98450536,0.009433123,0.0009084619,0.0026027397,0.000134357,0.000022128044,0.000015673591,0.0000034236439,0.0023747128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855703,0.0011554593,0.000012716733,0.000058603346,0.00006437988,0.00015176159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618465,0.0031100751,0.00031808205,0.000043600834,0.00012479744,0.00021878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023996218,0.00038325854,0.00037831784,0.001463404,0.0028099688,0.007600401,0.0006381348,0.0027116037,0.0061837435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026179014,0.00018809078,0.0003396557,0.0011961078,0.017463049,0.0049951454,0.0045134956,0.0021207107,0.00020619095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012020978,0.00021687485,0.025322407,0.0006211954,0.00004978674,0.0011124534,0.13425502,0.000936467,0.0005663422,0.8021786,0.0044939728,0.030126713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024901907,0.00022140497,0.023255369,0.0010501321,0.00005002996,0.00045770028,0.5068405,0.0011306216,0.00038744995,0.3919064,0.07463902,0.000036421807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045349305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009080664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007600401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002806724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002880622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020686686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127589986","doi":"10.1177/0967010608088777","title":"Imagining Numbers: Risk, Quantification, and Aviation Security","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Airport security; Civil aviation; Aviation; Invocation; Sovereignty; Computer security; Critical security studies; Political science; Business; Public administration; Security service; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Network security policy; Politics; Information security","score_opus":0.02739781343141426,"score_gpt":0.304750195297281,"score_spread":0.27735238186586675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127589986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10797015,0.018698748,0.16305475,0.14441955,0.0013335785,0.00006744272,0.000116599935,0.00010053987,0.5642386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98485804,0.002360585,0.007058261,0.0013735433,0.0002496294,0.000032690332,0.000014709612,0.000019198493,0.004033316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937588,0.005151984,0.00009408358,0.00029770724,0.0005093656,0.0001880589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906707,0.0074444804,0.00060508336,0.00046955107,0.0005845054,0.00022572932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008331558,0.0008452688,0.0004046637,0.0025108485,0.002597484,0.008610633,0.0010033905,0.0028371247,0.004502505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010483115,0.00027038454,0.00041548826,0.001100069,0.055608973,0.014878563,0.004580415,0.0037972177,0.00029912058],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043555688,0.000002590971,0.00011330357,0.00001681732,0.0000014266625,0.000020018351,0.0032157146,0.00022592365,0.000041334104,0.99401927,0.00044697896,0.0018921624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036048427,0.000008504038,0.0001268102,0.00007813869,0.0000024388912,0.000044656244,0.0044014975,0.0005181655,0.00007049299,0.98034817,0.014390304,0.000007157295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022801254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00192552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008610633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004362684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014359013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04406196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134884343","doi":"10.1177/0967010614543584","title":"The contemporary fictional police detective as critical security analyst: Insecurity and immigration in the novels of Henning Mankell and Andrea Camilleri","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Crime and Detective Fiction Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Università degli Studi di Siena; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Portrait; Narrative; Sociology; Status quo; Securitization; Critical security studies; Immigration; Law; Aesthetics; Political science; Criminology; History; Literature; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.024461023563094368,"score_gpt":0.264393344799778,"score_spread":0.23993232123668362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134884343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39225382,0.018712163,0.003836755,0.16081093,0.0057827313,0.00005768053,0.00007347898,0.00013189335,0.41834062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96817243,0.0026655188,0.00038628257,0.0042791828,0.0011976277,0.000034232806,0.000013533729,0.000059458802,0.023191737],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721235,0.0019570503,0.000040186253,0.00015870704,0.00033177002,0.0002999869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506515,0.003802947,0.00045722333,0.00014097842,0.00018736851,0.0003463684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028753811,0.00053844525,0.0003208857,0.0012839864,0.012236819,0.008212609,0.00096772873,0.0025571296,0.0027485157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055026733,0.00024608453,0.0001847083,0.00061562355,0.029223027,0.0037107328,0.0044540004,0.0047147875,0.00038838695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005980199,0.0000637282,0.0006241107,0.0001603553,0.0000067443752,0.0015245357,0.5785683,0.00015665425,0.00051670644,0.37187278,0.037087888,0.009358353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015137351,0.00006093294,0.0010583187,0.0004906015,0.000007703817,0.0010680085,0.34873366,0.00020900533,0.0008638326,0.019089628,0.6283756,0.00002755614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003729551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006742339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012236819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005095968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016721531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036974072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136883953","doi":"10.1177/0967010614521266","title":"The mercenary moniker: Condemnations, contradictions and the politics of definition","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; State (computer science); Law; Epistemology; Vocabulary; Identity (music); Morality; Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01126517577989086,"score_gpt":0.25162359007697627,"score_spread":0.2403584142970854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136883953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14452031,0.020594113,0.073208705,0.11852285,0.0018256938,0.00007792275,0.00008161321,0.00016301524,0.64100575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98957217,0.0008494429,0.002188641,0.0017896069,0.00024589148,0.000043768,0.00001722359,0.0000539618,0.0052393433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97682345,0.018132458,0.00055277743,0.0013808358,0.002149864,0.0009607142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841021,0.011703252,0.0013521122,0.0014118721,0.0010283982,0.00040230522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01818884,0.0005004606,0.00090763526,0.0031000888,0.009927669,0.015403009,0.002369128,0.004803286,0.0031305605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019041998,0.00041138608,0.0005444849,0.003036338,0.093439214,0.0152376,0.011354748,0.0073376875,0.00035410386],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035955327,0.0000020518207,0.000036797122,0.000011476905,0.0000010698125,0.000025915775,0.010162414,0.000022188637,0.000022878641,0.9886417,0.00047649135,0.0005934491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011585987,0.0000158368,0.00025996263,0.0002944246,0.000006675925,0.00015008038,0.023263754,0.0005842512,0.00025490316,0.8875483,0.08758842,0.000021788293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019389375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001959175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01818884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008759288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034776488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0961929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139657184","doi":"10.1177/0967010607075976","title":"On Exactitude in Disciplinary Science: A Response to the Network Manifesto","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Historical Geography and Geographical Thought","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Manifesto; Discipline; Geography; Point (geometry); Cartography; Art history; History; Archaeology; Sociology; Law; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.015238797069946368,"score_gpt":0.32341475140048465,"score_spread":0.3081759543305383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139657184","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019368725,0.0046979855,0.0016099097,0.80606616,0.0023767862,0.000024407203,0.00009020316,0.000033336808,0.1657325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7793431,0.003917718,0.00087404676,0.16246414,0.0045761545,0.0001347081,0.0000958643,0.00014905268,0.048445158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769893,0.012531284,0.00091082376,0.0024238792,0.0049753846,0.0021692854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95155054,0.03836312,0.0020284615,0.0022426336,0.0027138537,0.0031013761],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043319277,0.0005020502,0.0005827053,0.0017070961,0.017036531,0.018991873,0.0018142512,0.01553181,0.007752312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048726168,0.0003699649,0.00035772266,0.0030612724,0.040663257,0.022786576,0.01829525,0.017388377,0.00068082876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001670198,0.000012721863,0.00045917867,0.000034766992,0.0000024475248,0.00008072589,0.023266248,0.00011404398,0.000070753944,0.93346155,0.038097,0.0043839607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039505725,0.000018993924,0.0017144026,0.0002906522,0.0000045021,0.000076058925,0.022340475,0.00045067054,0.00017267541,0.24850374,0.7263473,0.00004101831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040634423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058782566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98296344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024624836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017827526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22909695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141180246","doi":"10.1177/0967010614525001","title":"The field of border control in Mauritania","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"European External Action Service","keywords":"Border Security; Straddle; Terrorism; Agency (philosophy); Irregular migration; Political science; Field (mathematics); Sociology; European union; Political economy; Economy; Public administration; Social science; Law; International trade; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.004529031015376769,"score_gpt":0.29828485597823623,"score_spread":0.29375582496285946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141180246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8609818,0.01674518,0.0009017836,0.008711061,0.00017447062,0.00006581248,0.00003466004,0.000013612435,0.11237155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673516,0.0015197031,0.00010509162,0.00011086261,0.00001702801,0.000012976531,0.000006011098,0.0000011414322,0.0014919646],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948597,0.00021974024,0.00002355126,0.00004833575,0.00003569865,0.00018662919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993131,0.00035124444,0.00016373131,0.000044460354,0.000051032803,0.00007647616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009974588,0.00028383872,0.00019272008,0.0011162322,0.0042031915,0.0031171294,0.0005816608,0.00062078546,0.0035770973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013839033,0.00015265316,0.0001408616,0.0015569562,0.006887677,0.001543866,0.0030441815,0.0009786232,0.000130697],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008729202,0.00010480597,0.036767785,0.00072964124,0.00004217581,0.0044866,0.4685927,0.0005722695,0.0036819566,0.33596805,0.0028676786,0.14609893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002485458,0.00028000365,0.20030478,0.0016837801,0.00004703885,0.0019091013,0.4681724,0.00092285714,0.0017603289,0.02621625,0.29861975,0.00005884204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022379912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021144059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022379912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056287386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034587346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044499278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142490811","doi":"10.1177/0967010603344003","title":"Discriminating Tastes: ‘Smart’ Bombs, Non-Combatants, and Notions of Legitimacy in Warfare","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Technological determinism; Legitimacy; Revolution in Military Affairs; Context (archaeology); Political science; Witness; Political economy; Cyberwarfare; Politics; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Military science; Social science; History","score_opus":0.018245693215277428,"score_gpt":0.3093873285356091,"score_spread":0.29114163532033166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142490811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66739273,0.0025768317,0.006902032,0.052630343,0.00024717313,0.000024691974,0.000031323165,0.000018071547,0.27017677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897134,0.000091282964,0.000096762866,0.0003588966,0.000028111595,0.0000029697778,0.0000024224892,0.000002521846,0.00044577292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99178505,0.0054309396,0.0002008216,0.00064360246,0.0012401271,0.0006994405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822749,0.012049478,0.002583147,0.00086721865,0.0010743602,0.0011508793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011611287,0.00036149408,0.0005155474,0.0029274654,0.0057152533,0.011937458,0.00085890596,0.0054536154,0.0038840927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015814397,0.0002761005,0.00026836744,0.0019211904,0.094135396,0.0099047525,0.0058923503,0.0043520327,0.0002657064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005427224,0.000045547997,0.0034811404,0.000037776466,0.000008182318,0.0001465528,0.05919461,0.0001751714,0.00024855285,0.93182373,0.00080654107,0.003977978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049772196,0.000100140496,0.0101139955,0.00024014073,0.000014190811,0.00032542314,0.08212159,0.0009860898,0.00025268405,0.8820547,0.023685439,0.000055965775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031023237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027302927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011937458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004239642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014828368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06140709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143723938","doi":"10.1177/0967010608094039","title":"Human Security: Toward an Opening","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human security; Computer security; Political science; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.046626699618090114,"score_gpt":0.32559903479850744,"score_spread":0.2789723351804173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143723938","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060293037,0.09092652,0.013005334,0.59447,0.020846887,0.00006691866,0.00010305261,0.00010663215,0.27444524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5636542,0.09494157,0.013066648,0.16673632,0.05854421,0.00056663697,0.00017324569,0.0005652854,0.10175181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491227,0.002668456,0.00018079107,0.0007174234,0.0009392499,0.0005818258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924103,0.00473708,0.00026366624,0.00081548654,0.00078950543,0.0009839236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014204667,0.0011681708,0.0013783802,0.0021957867,0.009159348,0.022088138,0.0020425422,0.016175743,0.013486611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010803875,0.0006521536,0.0010440885,0.0011711111,0.04955294,0.040457495,0.017598223,0.026064027,0.001882031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010733987,0.000021162907,0.000054751243,0.000055723558,0.0000021971352,0.000039535065,0.0026054268,0.00009040204,0.000047658385,0.9756623,0.014783429,0.0066266577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008156055,0.000028131855,0.00014319505,0.00052950985,0.0000036879683,0.000066731045,0.0064276694,0.00020260288,0.00006404457,0.6222807,0.37022886,0.000016750948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031219264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020309116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022088138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075085973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009282749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07512236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144678946","doi":"10.1177/0967010611425367","title":"Ethical interventions: Non-lethal weapons and the governance of insecurity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Office of Science; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Citizenship; Corporate governance; Politics; Variety (cybernetics); Criminology; Political science; Psychological intervention; Sociology; Law; Environmental ethics; Medicine; Management","score_opus":0.05830726150345595,"score_gpt":0.3260791099432556,"score_spread":0.2677718484397997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144678946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21159324,0.005014838,0.1255457,0.16059498,0.00068225834,0.00031802146,0.000039746676,0.00011434205,0.49609685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931238,0.0004345114,0.0031683634,0.0013126201,0.0000518938,0.000082623,0.0000034299264,0.00001039335,0.0018124371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96193707,0.033947416,0.00038188108,0.0010574099,0.0014757141,0.0012005174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722884,0.019520842,0.003547697,0.0021163772,0.0011436603,0.001383069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021818703,0.00053982064,0.00040260438,0.002004177,0.0062829107,0.008343141,0.0015823428,0.0040237564,0.0050158952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027143408,0.00026231908,0.00034011694,0.0009095009,0.07397147,0.005673385,0.008681138,0.0039438256,0.0002217111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000650577,0.00003547854,0.0005593385,0.000052477204,0.0000043369278,0.00007717535,0.014325997,0.00033799582,0.00012586766,0.97845036,0.00059982715,0.0054246695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024241937,0.00006249642,0.0013816883,0.00044199015,0.000008428533,0.00015244888,0.036578782,0.001138828,0.0005657894,0.9048196,0.05480616,0.000019664152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011943614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019254615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021818703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005132939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072328565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115389705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144705421","doi":"10.1177/0967010610388210","title":"The Public, the Private and the Evolution of Security Studies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Structuring; Security studies; State (computer science); Politics; Field (mathematics); Political science; Public security; Critical security studies; Key (lock); Sociology; Public administration; Law; Computer security; Network security policy; Computer science; Cloud computing security","score_opus":0.019474890768571354,"score_gpt":0.30943221455866915,"score_spread":0.2899573237900978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144705421","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25512803,0.047469586,0.010654758,0.34759888,0.0012412245,0.00006400464,0.00017521893,0.00009561307,0.33757272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935306,0.0024786803,0.00048894656,0.0014068122,0.00025968248,0.000019443152,0.00001184231,0.000025681267,0.0017783663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9708164,0.023445342,0.0005379284,0.0015508946,0.0022861513,0.0013632699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9392973,0.04778918,0.002801867,0.0045353766,0.0025556874,0.0030205152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04054241,0.00027136618,0.00059372373,0.007384012,0.007936905,0.021955809,0.0012874459,0.003838441,0.0068525076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02867755,0.00042280622,0.00026255805,0.0050573586,0.07296185,0.02414934,0.013104087,0.005641299,0.00024752464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012463529,0.00002283241,0.001057163,0.00005134349,0.000004483504,0.000035842164,0.028355112,0.000071738184,0.000075902615,0.9585425,0.0017429572,0.010027558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002293771,0.000054575474,0.0061769933,0.001091062,0.000011073826,0.00017438304,0.124541655,0.0008114852,0.00034564084,0.6037747,0.262958,0.000037449303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040792557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034699715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04054241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011985664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068348576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21441132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156214380","doi":"10.1177/0967010615582125","title":"Social sorting as ‘social transformation’: Credit scoring and the reproduction of populations as risks in South Africa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Legislation; Sociology; Capitalism; Politics; Social transformation; Political economy; Democracy; Social reproduction; Social change; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Social science; History; Social capital","score_opus":0.10930587630702181,"score_gpt":0.28493627845643144,"score_spread":0.17563040214940961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156214380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71991706,0.0024306965,0.025273716,0.023350203,0.00011446893,0.00005429007,0.00006800642,0.0000256431,0.22876601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823797,0.00015226782,0.00035363797,0.00008036356,0.000016223757,0.0000069468224,0.000003252456,0.0000019303343,0.0011475569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756444,0.0016898576,0.000057577716,0.00011060906,0.00028772553,0.0002897779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966191,0.0018949596,0.00072253245,0.000297754,0.0002773613,0.0001881909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032407409,0.00021365884,0.00021204301,0.001428156,0.002535701,0.0049029505,0.0005599369,0.00094550324,0.004230342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078060995,0.00011217087,0.00015963404,0.0019236057,0.023883883,0.0034403054,0.0050939447,0.0014038138,0.00013457109],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001977845,0.000018930503,0.004454891,0.000024906683,0.000003651587,0.0002009533,0.013867002,0.0010811833,0.00020306882,0.9671317,0.0005809993,0.012412951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001782236,0.00007469381,0.02347226,0.0002818447,0.000008783016,0.00025095488,0.032102287,0.0039129667,0.0008441479,0.86865103,0.070342086,0.000041296047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006638908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062137237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006638908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048389253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001764483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035109043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156681803","doi":"10.1177/0967010607078528","title":"Grave Misgivings: Allegory, Catharsis, Composition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Photography and Visual Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Catharsis; Allegory; Colonialism; Prison; Civilization; Narrative; Legitimacy; Law; Gulag; History; Art; Sociology; Literature; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.020398292613581316,"score_gpt":0.2487792302749493,"score_spread":0.228380937661368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156681803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35158795,0.0034266417,0.0036994691,0.022797992,0.0012283702,0.00003532348,0.00008877544,0.0001762464,0.61695915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97516114,0.00063455146,0.0005156786,0.0005596942,0.0001592041,0.000015742922,0.0000152182365,0.00006914373,0.02286963],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985526,0.0010069155,0.0000321244,0.00009834501,0.00017112771,0.00013880129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981438,0.0010978675,0.00021015226,0.00020172824,0.00016565633,0.00018086529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015703904,0.00030135672,0.00017384226,0.0009209342,0.00747999,0.004890362,0.00043389117,0.00080027344,0.009256431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005395424,0.00020055084,0.00009186931,0.000686752,0.013999183,0.0029757002,0.004290988,0.0024134482,0.0006565934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006476246,0.000037538084,0.0018692946,0.00012108778,0.000008321912,0.0006002111,0.6325055,0.00008196319,0.002012005,0.29886165,0.031746764,0.0320909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009615885,0.000043885535,0.0065797805,0.0002315971,0.000009480934,0.0008847364,0.37751693,0.00020477851,0.0016923593,0.012446241,0.60035306,0.000027514221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005189083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010846366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009256431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022426697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008340569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030965805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162044261","doi":"10.1177/0967010615584256","title":"Police work and new ‘security devices’: A tale from the beat","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Typology; Ethnography; Mobile phone; Sociology; Computer security; Public relations; Coping (psychology); Internet privacy; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.08070917116374164,"score_gpt":0.3493779550303772,"score_spread":0.26866878386663556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162044261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7788731,0.008924464,0.0063576577,0.09360025,0.0012461467,0.00007674326,0.00006119055,0.0000729497,0.110787585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98750496,0.0028139388,0.0005455436,0.0026315397,0.00028059422,0.000023312527,0.0000120729555,0.00003837608,0.0061495085],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926605,0.0052259443,0.00011992808,0.00031217025,0.00097040134,0.0007110442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941141,0.0037735873,0.00051175524,0.00027128452,0.00046076602,0.0008685593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005136513,0.0009466084,0.0005383085,0.0028917252,0.021962104,0.013310931,0.0011233558,0.0033352454,0.0031417515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00827589,0.00061630626,0.00037581872,0.0018658716,0.033047557,0.010410612,0.0112853125,0.0064813728,0.0005863503],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001696876,0.000017136885,0.00081192533,0.00005480232,0.0000031719885,0.00043331124,0.976254,0.000021370459,0.00027934488,0.013543089,0.0024896702,0.0060753585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022714266,0.000033482942,0.00081623835,0.00016306687,0.0000029016794,0.00023839813,0.95120615,0.000038102393,0.00009861421,0.0020871293,0.04530259,0.000011142884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008758369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009677165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021962104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036765363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023002406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027164817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166072062","doi":"10.1177/0967010615570109","title":"The difference homeland security makes: Comparing municipal corporate security in Canada and the United States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Winnipeg","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Federation of Canadian Municipalities","keywords":"Homeland security; Public administration; Corporate security; National security; Security studies; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Terrorism; Business; Critical security studies; Network security policy; Political science; Cloud computing security; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.07022140458626289,"score_gpt":0.2975087504686083,"score_spread":0.22728734588234542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166072062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98746544,0.0004983758,0.00009538366,0.0015304806,0.000015264193,0.00002213005,0.00028754328,0.0000046764258,0.010080631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984546,0.00028372393,0.00006480803,0.00014080033,0.000002226467,0.000008294494,0.00017029484,0.0000044958883,0.00087074906],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672014,0.00044717154,0.00008277548,0.00020428187,0.00082579185,0.0017197494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467885,0.0007438983,0.000768254,0.00013909405,0.0022783636,0.0013914985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014795328,0.00023477424,0.00057293114,0.0032860832,0.011431269,0.0057406505,0.001351951,0.00072616804,0.0030177096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008342127,0.0002469099,0.0003132429,0.009363353,0.0048651127,0.0013637261,0.0038276443,0.0014225012,0.00011144014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032599692,0.00018364665,0.6694554,0.00017088359,0.00014611891,0.0007601148,0.24617895,0.0009855547,0.0007124211,0.02935146,0.0086595295,0.04306988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010830901,0.000027807899,0.52979094,0.00018183386,0.00003748012,0.00006849872,0.44973686,0.00061841763,0.00022375718,0.0007384822,0.018518232,0.000046876656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9041914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.095808655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09117584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6951437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168650854","doi":"10.1177/0967010615586964","title":"Questioning security devices: Performativity, resistance, politics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent","keywords":"Performativity; Agency (philosophy); Analytics; Politics; Computer security; Critical security studies; Resistance (ecology); Computer science; Sociology; Data science; Information security; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; Security service; Law; Social science; Network security policy","score_opus":0.03842120072267711,"score_gpt":0.3261206274716272,"score_spread":0.28769942674895005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168650854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35227415,0.01157478,0.042205308,0.16506745,0.00089330395,0.00009579544,0.00013112841,0.00012341868,0.42763475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99440587,0.0011153911,0.00079357147,0.0013148708,0.00015193301,0.000023961838,0.000012068296,0.000032506523,0.0021497165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96716565,0.026387032,0.00057628547,0.0017176189,0.0026630985,0.0014902934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97104734,0.023393469,0.001912138,0.0019182604,0.0010109226,0.0007179512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022334125,0.0006457142,0.00080466113,0.0038718989,0.010321428,0.024106666,0.0015031062,0.0061666886,0.005284055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017170448,0.00048719675,0.0005552597,0.0035043943,0.1554372,0.019692972,0.013230016,0.006076972,0.0005202953],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000115654475,0.000009445133,0.00074800046,0.00004232265,0.0000072026855,0.00008845158,0.12739252,0.00014931451,0.00017012862,0.86676127,0.0010549683,0.0035649252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013065089,0.000044217933,0.0019021634,0.0004928062,0.000014191625,0.00023835516,0.2597908,0.00060712546,0.00048234596,0.61818945,0.11817441,0.000051112977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025144373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013013986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024106666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070921932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003291887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118115544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170730795","doi":"10.1177/0967010610370228","title":"Multilateralism, Intervention and Norm Contestation: China’s Stance on Darfur in the UN Security Council","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Peacekeeping; China; Sovereignty; Humanitarian intervention; Intervention (counseling); Political science; Norm (philosophy); Normative; Multilateralism; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political economy; International law; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.016556942120122133,"score_gpt":0.27767315759893546,"score_spread":0.2611162154788133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170730795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89561605,0.00056569476,0.002123255,0.018583233,0.00011064106,0.00003635374,0.000015118966,0.00001870263,0.082930885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786395,0.000033351367,0.00009130456,0.00028960934,0.000011501974,0.00000754564,0.0000020233263,0.0000015070123,0.0016991192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960373,0.0019065585,0.00013190617,0.00038399204,0.00051851856,0.0010217059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706334,0.0014474182,0.00042981107,0.00028302014,0.00036233614,0.00041411372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067213653,0.00025311823,0.00031469617,0.001071349,0.010859696,0.0053925104,0.00077822275,0.002383213,0.0023587157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046605305,0.00016762989,0.00025442528,0.0011248077,0.022294395,0.0019454844,0.0045144986,0.0033456758,0.000056159257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008825201,0.0000484454,0.01046236,0.000043235676,0.000020755388,0.00058670953,0.088557616,0.0013681273,0.0011368548,0.8851459,0.0016488448,0.010892912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022141382,0.000588084,0.10198945,0.00053993985,0.000141539,0.00032306378,0.19078453,0.020855552,0.008119114,0.43143916,0.24462424,0.00037396187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053287208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06189833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053287208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01596169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010692738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11581069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171337986","doi":"10.1177/0967010613515016","title":"Beyond the erotics of Orientalism: Lawfare, torture and the racial–sexual grammars of legitimate suffering","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; Interrogation; Sociology; Scholarship; Law; Orientalism; Criminology; Human rights; Gender studies; Political science; History","score_opus":0.0069039172747517325,"score_gpt":0.24429641344830516,"score_spread":0.23739249617355343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171337986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19476986,0.008044476,0.012307579,0.039433748,0.00051843206,0.000030963016,0.000049262268,0.000055556447,0.7447901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99466777,0.0005419125,0.0005505345,0.0007566859,0.000090636444,0.000013320986,0.000005528184,0.000018923984,0.0033546446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99486345,0.00418156,0.00006735961,0.00026331717,0.00030455182,0.00031974126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972767,0.001617586,0.00036288056,0.00038868224,0.00018483624,0.00016932952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004729388,0.00057714974,0.0003469604,0.0018737671,0.008062579,0.009066897,0.0008925224,0.0024628113,0.0030982357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039285067,0.00019473124,0.00030837423,0.0011664463,0.10869185,0.006960014,0.0050029443,0.0026595325,0.00025115756],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011512599,0.0000067109754,0.00027555635,0.000021948754,0.0000024705305,0.00012153414,0.09392937,0.000042462143,0.00013598762,0.902913,0.0006206342,0.0019188582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026014706,0.000047626378,0.0018261019,0.00039404642,0.000018011819,0.0005064001,0.23020613,0.0003239857,0.00073439593,0.5263,0.23958632,0.000030989188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00556317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041699633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009066897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038129792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015991642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027665257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266292988","doi":"10.1177/0967010615620972","title":"Exception and governmentality in the critique of sovereignty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Sovereignty; Politics; Sociology; State (computer science); Popular sovereignty; Relation (database); Power (physics); Population; Political philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017778093708406086,"score_gpt":0.3101915019225172,"score_spread":0.2924134082141111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266292988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1496304,0.018662909,0.057624612,0.17820743,0.0009834224,0.000030335974,0.00006658844,0.0000908219,0.5947035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99212086,0.00102708,0.00097579096,0.0016917238,0.00029032739,0.000022966642,0.00001147388,0.000028256485,0.0038315086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912582,0.0063392674,0.00018576803,0.0006308265,0.0011491608,0.00043680225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939586,0.0046109743,0.00032785852,0.00047348248,0.0004629613,0.00016616994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054040723,0.00032748375,0.0006182772,0.0017816128,0.004713441,0.0072205644,0.0010447935,0.0036301524,0.0016566362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009069493,0.0001975371,0.00047059174,0.0015715754,0.055524368,0.0074736094,0.0050770785,0.0057952907,0.00015816589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019805407,0.0000010921991,0.000037871847,0.0000076082943,0.0000010956837,0.000016238644,0.0025840264,0.00012981621,0.000020519507,0.9963965,0.000356869,0.00044643675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051228503,0.000004762637,0.00012277933,0.00008481923,0.0000029895173,0.000028796845,0.0019624273,0.00042333166,0.00006201319,0.96535456,0.0319435,0.0000050186895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037754888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00272967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072205644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00618101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032656295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044846594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313351671","doi":"10.1177/0967010613502377","title":"Geopolitics, insecurity and neocolonial exceptionalism: A critical appraisal of the UN Special Tribunal for Lebanon","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Middle East Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Université Libanaise","keywords":"Tribunal; Exceptionalism; Geopolitics; Sovereignty; Law; Political science; International law; Genocide; Context (archaeology); Colonialism; Sociology; Politics; Political economy; History","score_opus":0.017288405620260013,"score_gpt":0.30767564708818534,"score_spread":0.29038724146792533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313351671","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29122898,0.10886567,0.003435245,0.30153757,0.0095806625,0.00025298737,0.0001364174,0.000041084688,0.28492132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96413124,0.010717504,0.0004899923,0.013816298,0.0021309757,0.00007630643,0.000030618565,0.000037203863,0.008569769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934097,0.0045313016,0.00017347309,0.0003073431,0.0005596699,0.0010184976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98574185,0.011200472,0.00072835543,0.00027811347,0.0013675016,0.0006837498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015316037,0.0009998607,0.0005856228,0.0053763716,0.022428231,0.019525276,0.0019848647,0.0077241967,0.0031373864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011694466,0.00042137183,0.00036029748,0.0040901303,0.05088042,0.009415449,0.00851645,0.009908864,0.00020540292],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025817497,0.000029742861,0.0008786504,0.00022900701,0.000010666142,0.0024111948,0.36129484,0.00022358721,0.00019177949,0.6066017,0.018056488,0.010046472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007617472,0.000035026605,0.0023439392,0.002048716,0.000007750117,0.0003091938,0.6382864,0.000275,0.0003259104,0.06141194,0.29489604,0.00005256853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037514698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055751093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037514698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026972648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010417577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19570118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324279649","doi":"10.1177/0967010613492839","title":"Go west, go east: War’s exilic subjects","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Critical Theory and Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Displacement (psychology); Focus (optics); Dual (grammatical number); Sociology; Analytics; History; Literature; Political science; Art; Law; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.02903913096618762,"score_gpt":0.299902729622868,"score_spread":0.2708635986566804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324279649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42553157,0.010486465,0.0013798027,0.026773058,0.0012346492,0.000026273627,0.0000753485,0.000027869828,0.5344651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98203367,0.0010708568,0.00008068993,0.001068784,0.000112521135,0.000012303013,0.000015480697,0.00002803898,0.015577761],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998708,0.00073461264,0.000019486499,0.0000998086,0.00008370923,0.0003543316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991375,0.0005545202,0.000072540315,0.00006235947,0.00005695389,0.00011613752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017457671,0.0005108256,0.0003168426,0.0010490132,0.015421019,0.0083287135,0.0005932805,0.0020127045,0.005503524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019543124,0.00017087343,0.00012992672,0.001257891,0.02437756,0.0045915376,0.005976706,0.004930184,0.00037616873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052333988,0.000019478295,0.0009687778,0.000059648562,0.0000051208604,0.00044154216,0.5875535,0.000045895144,0.00036975846,0.3977127,0.0068493905,0.005921972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009122076,0.000025856596,0.0026653328,0.00034828612,0.0000067322617,0.0002810308,0.6339361,0.000046259243,0.00051588466,0.023523573,0.33862764,0.000014160896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016967835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02673413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016967835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004802133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019663984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034842134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338427390","doi":"10.1177/0967010615574766","title":"Learning to feel, learning to fear? Emotions, imaginaries, and limits in the politics of securitization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Securitization; CONTEST; Sociology; Politics; Emotional contagion; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0303801801177747,"score_gpt":0.31818672055450475,"score_spread":0.28780654043673004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338427390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6750909,0.007900714,0.0093365675,0.057147123,0.00052576547,0.000027500368,0.000023253853,0.000051440646,0.2498968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971697,0.00060530956,0.00021432372,0.0005951657,0.000055991695,0.000005690108,0.000002673972,0.0000067527703,0.0013444449],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961423,0.0028733977,0.00007205663,0.00019729785,0.0004007407,0.0003141969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948742,0.0034076856,0.00072866824,0.00029533813,0.00025347082,0.00044065097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005458695,0.00029912658,0.0002972273,0.00063798996,0.0031155148,0.007969369,0.0004304617,0.0019783531,0.0028461274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00912031,0.00020791007,0.00025240926,0.00034369624,0.046464905,0.0070791664,0.004684263,0.00443567,0.0003128436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080169615,0.00009282896,0.006909234,0.00016570155,0.000015993666,0.0005439112,0.55976284,0.00026057527,0.0019112773,0.40885365,0.0026453605,0.018758452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001820504,0.000119279655,0.012035623,0.0006642868,0.000019107418,0.0008868732,0.6440685,0.00093391456,0.0015757825,0.26792693,0.07168221,0.00006927805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010128625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000880196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007969369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001940773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011590867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028868675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523662733","doi":"10.1177/0967010616665957","title":"Arctic (in)security and Indigenous peoples: Comparing Inuit in Canada and Sámi in Norway","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Universitetet i Tromsø","keywords":"Indigenous; Arctic; Politics; Circumpolar star; Political science; Security studies; Ontological security; Autonomy; Securitization; Environmental security; Geography; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Ethnology; Public administration; Ecology; Law","score_opus":0.013493591361045592,"score_gpt":0.2529975738104898,"score_spread":0.23950398244944424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523662733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99336666,0.00033113195,0.00007523967,0.0003684226,0.000017402785,0.000028778612,0.00023098577,0.000002171076,0.005579114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972524,0.00047645415,0.0001539075,0.000119456585,0.0000046650916,0.000024775229,0.00017163827,0.0000050835583,0.0017917018],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880064,0.00014632952,0.000046144592,0.0001380909,0.00026409543,0.0006046773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822444,0.0002499103,0.00025136815,0.000042107382,0.0007086856,0.0005235586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011448686,0.0003605658,0.0005203789,0.002089288,0.010221676,0.003154966,0.0013530034,0.0005542524,0.0035157474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023757967,0.00022921608,0.00039743318,0.0044025867,0.0035049971,0.0011087693,0.0031187898,0.0010201178,0.00017079296],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009817525,0.00007412332,0.3386924,0.00021962936,0.00004653131,0.0013290315,0.6409178,0.00012289849,0.0008549848,0.0028588213,0.001276799,0.013508871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017334766,0.000023728562,0.24128245,0.00013361486,0.000016455477,0.00012637016,0.75366163,0.00009750974,0.00011533357,0.00013724744,0.0043808683,0.000023132297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9876645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02638252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02638252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029035656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19141948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538153175","doi":"10.1177/0967010616672150","title":"Agents without agency: Assessing the role of the audience in securitization theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Securitization; Argument (complex analysis); Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Empirical research; Epistemology; Law and economics; Business; Social science; Finance; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017401900760442148,"score_gpt":0.3186050415778557,"score_spread":0.30120314081741356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538153175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45089787,0.049323548,0.12987491,0.023693383,0.00063234556,0.0005610371,0.00019570581,0.00007187832,0.3447494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99022627,0.0034012515,0.0049113473,0.00043052898,0.00006411257,0.0001509055,0.000034012937,0.00002180345,0.0007597491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9509811,0.04311717,0.0010978006,0.0014580706,0.0025674845,0.0007782956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.871037,0.11446185,0.005389834,0.0036069246,0.004538245,0.00096616655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05389512,0.0007390991,0.0010483629,0.008340052,0.0037938643,0.01034687,0.0013757737,0.0019792975,0.0050205616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05350478,0.00045829391,0.00093135773,0.0051792827,0.030610325,0.02390554,0.008629263,0.0035088346,0.00033368604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007110323,0.000047373906,0.005987047,0.0016014156,0.00009861016,0.00013890225,0.1856929,0.0004437151,0.0002538926,0.78148854,0.00046759736,0.0237089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006720549,0.00020757347,0.009211381,0.009720347,0.00042750526,0.00037827686,0.3444123,0.0044909967,0.001517691,0.5664411,0.0630624,0.0000631401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017117881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016489397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05389512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006510157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043098987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28502804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573836431","doi":"10.1177/09670106030343013","title":"Plus Ça Change...","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06587036705654502,"score_gpt":0.31720095497061335,"score_spread":0.2513305879140683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573836431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00397156,0.0036720699,0.0024735762,0.16740546,0.00877455,0.000078243815,0.0007018632,0.0006706023,0.812252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18020973,0.0036472324,0.00459112,0.05718251,0.0037719687,0.0001300316,0.0008091028,0.00031989237,0.7493384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804556,0.00046903483,0.00007065104,0.00035027953,0.0006486046,0.00041573646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733377,0.00041585855,0.00017589325,0.00047119576,0.0008562511,0.00074716815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002093155,0.0004718526,0.00032523207,0.00090411893,0.003057353,0.0059798453,0.0008683946,0.0033583862,0.10639645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056061517,0.000170315,0.00045907698,0.0007342205,0.0016788153,0.0039384253,0.0037223399,0.0035478352,0.03278172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116691575,0.000085117856,0.0011456859,0.00026128264,0.000022197228,0.000112185764,0.0011660018,0.00031014884,0.00077186216,0.20903394,0.64660406,0.14037088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009276217,0.0000115845705,0.00050697743,0.000036914797,0.0000040521463,0.000028058696,0.00026421662,0.00006236116,0.00012118242,0.008593932,0.9903554,0.000006211777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016954208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02513329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10639645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034989847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064127534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35593158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753922236","doi":"10.1177/0967010617712683","title":"Security, economy, population: The political economic logic of liberal exceptionalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"U.S. Department of the Treasury","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Politics; Political economy; Population; American exceptionalism; Political science; Skepticism; Sociology; Economic system; Economics; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0354955695673904,"score_gpt":0.3449194123599067,"score_spread":0.3094238427925163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753922236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13863784,0.003016471,0.06354981,0.16265512,0.000708941,0.00004301852,0.000064350235,0.00008418441,0.63124025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99379563,0.00027629817,0.0014945024,0.0018568058,0.00017053369,0.00002226544,0.0000060356206,0.000014188599,0.0023638369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99440324,0.004027953,0.00009622123,0.00042873796,0.00059185084,0.0004518671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491405,0.0032735677,0.00045138213,0.0004719292,0.0004435936,0.00044545336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006052087,0.00023322411,0.00033889528,0.0014352464,0.004504324,0.0071711116,0.000772377,0.0020361005,0.0021849496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006243466,0.00015845013,0.00033355373,0.0008531835,0.06600764,0.005445227,0.0047263387,0.0047523235,0.00016882428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019045556,0.000001920057,0.00008109513,0.0000025804443,6.521809e-7,0.000012503581,0.00054874306,0.000070268856,0.000007425385,0.9985734,0.00028925223,0.00041024218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036982644,0.0000036595454,0.00019194635,0.000024457946,0.0000012669625,0.000020684764,0.0006663387,0.0003498196,0.000040827184,0.98889625,0.009797044,0.000004178435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026889264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021697122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071711116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005261022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028769486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03817153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765865900","doi":"10.1177/0967010617721872","title":"Tracing and explaining securitization: Social mechanisms, process tracing and the securitization of irregular migration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Securitization; Process tracing; Process (computing); Mechanism (biology); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Sociology; Business; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Finance; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.018801432279302983,"score_gpt":0.3064865328590351,"score_spread":0.2876851005797321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765865900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59240276,0.003862772,0.15324397,0.04196059,0.00023775047,0.0003777498,0.00011570983,0.00015579638,0.20764284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500424,0.0003772432,0.0031623035,0.000108622,0.000014128129,0.00003756687,0.000011564675,0.000011398201,0.0012729936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518675,0.0036643774,0.0001426397,0.0002469741,0.00041496527,0.00034433015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98585576,0.01066568,0.0015359363,0.0012208879,0.00054132805,0.00018052684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010451179,0.000689039,0.00028575514,0.0031897267,0.0034322485,0.0063442998,0.0014713837,0.002721983,0.0037428504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011784444,0.00036721688,0.00064550067,0.0018350694,0.04602804,0.010287486,0.004903867,0.0022797468,0.00018293769],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001723478,0.000025304173,0.0026439847,0.000078716155,0.00000813979,0.00043524062,0.10144341,0.001098493,0.00019446146,0.8894712,0.00023080363,0.0043529943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026893375,0.00004195259,0.0031525884,0.0004978612,0.000019055424,0.00040984296,0.13369334,0.007670707,0.0011554173,0.8250615,0.028241238,0.000029597923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060734046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033269897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010451179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061220936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004143124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055271804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781791841","doi":"10.1177/0967010617742243","title":"Return of the generals? Global militarism in Africa from the Cold War to the present","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Militarism; Securitization; Politics; Political economy; Political science; Context (archaeology); International security; Sociology; Law; History; Economics","score_opus":0.027920970404936598,"score_gpt":0.2970533242697413,"score_spread":0.2691323538648047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781791841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6906436,0.034489203,0.0010611187,0.08049941,0.00080209505,0.000028584296,0.0001791111,0.000026328842,0.19227058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891433,0.0061826017,0.00009093696,0.0014976544,0.0001379469,0.0000059917625,0.000024008388,0.000010329849,0.002907187],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999574,0.00015682117,0.000009576969,0.00004151145,0.000027835467,0.00019023978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955136,0.00017746951,0.00013346128,0.000031720847,0.000036087076,0.000069918475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093560596,0.00032719228,0.00024217601,0.0010728678,0.0024461185,0.0038604122,0.0002791098,0.0011758792,0.0050405455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013667322,0.00011526912,0.00014717206,0.0015166028,0.00807003,0.0046929633,0.0028385483,0.0022703812,0.00022873121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024103878,0.00007550829,0.017236188,0.000706889,0.000032531625,0.0029698652,0.49263966,0.00043895087,0.0020273598,0.38171175,0.013919883,0.088000335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013560311,0.000149763,0.060356274,0.0012556101,0.000026075095,0.0015988463,0.408427,0.00013002034,0.0009695958,0.04809669,0.47893128,0.000045310317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069719288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011225486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069719288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028007939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001164895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02032125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782183768","doi":"10.1177/0967010617730948","title":"Varieties of militarism: Towards a typology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Militarism; Typology; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.02459543120367634,"score_gpt":0.3274306713008696,"score_spread":0.30283524009719326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782183768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39361563,0.010549206,0.10459409,0.032933567,0.0008683795,0.00075820653,0.00057362695,0.0002059837,0.45590138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794384,0.001838554,0.014559509,0.0006942949,0.00015400484,0.00051612395,0.00020376056,0.00006375988,0.0025315788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414283,0.0040328954,0.00032755922,0.00047948209,0.00063103694,0.00038610818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898783,0.0065092584,0.0011454476,0.0010479508,0.00077330915,0.0006457384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063984348,0.00068620674,0.00069652364,0.010982193,0.005844126,0.014035086,0.001794833,0.0029359832,0.004151845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007060796,0.000442291,0.00057870336,0.008365053,0.045521207,0.022340883,0.008383517,0.0040977336,0.0003506914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010700507,0.000015558564,0.0021625403,0.000076314,0.000004246961,0.00012535413,0.059471775,0.00018023112,0.00009377245,0.93334043,0.0008692025,0.0036498092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000132488385,0.00002614282,0.00248436,0.00050789176,0.000008458492,0.00044828028,0.1717709,0.0015960118,0.000150089,0.7547354,0.06822394,0.000035295718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016023398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00180518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014035086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064542154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024580364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046828806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782441418","doi":"10.1177/0967010617739534","title":"Militarism and its limits: Sociological insights on security assemblages in the Sahel","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Militarization; Militarism; International security; International relations; Political science; Human security; Sociology; Political economy; Security studies; Criminology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.04299214793791604,"score_gpt":0.337773564195385,"score_spread":0.29478141625746895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782441418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78704745,0.011028295,0.009676966,0.01646546,0.00018953708,0.000065812215,0.00007148659,0.000035667752,0.17541938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983038,0.0007381478,0.0003615435,0.00011758247,0.000019234501,0.0000106913085,0.000007640179,0.0000057163015,0.000435673],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962127,0.0028932828,0.00008185474,0.00017989994,0.00020936796,0.0004229869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971002,0.0021277948,0.00036184845,0.0001308812,0.0001348613,0.0001444077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00401052,0.00054837833,0.0005222258,0.004623732,0.010871113,0.00826685,0.00088738755,0.0018068469,0.003919136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042679566,0.00032358698,0.00020986269,0.0031450537,0.06602484,0.00707592,0.00987904,0.0023565455,0.0001643189],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002772904,0.000012968705,0.0016334396,0.00012206073,0.000007382182,0.0006451144,0.5719236,0.00025335315,0.0004100868,0.4202386,0.00032362732,0.004402089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010179413,0.000028900717,0.0034126302,0.00043212652,0.0000098700275,0.00037706675,0.8226692,0.00039674283,0.00024126148,0.12661146,0.045791566,0.000019038225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008809951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007851523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010871113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068251346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023191948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049520075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783234813","doi":"10.1177/0967010617748541","title":"From protection to coordinated preparedness: A genealogy of critical infrastructure in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Critical infrastructure; Declaration; Corporate governance; Preparedness; Emergency management; Software deployment; Power (physics); Political science; Civil defense; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.015117412203180629,"score_gpt":0.30182642245038754,"score_spread":0.2867090102472069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783234813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4662454,0.0071336045,0.018234447,0.049345024,0.00025960535,0.000261084,0.0015469424,0.00025932683,0.45671466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98521197,0.0011092859,0.0012050018,0.0005821268,0.000011048879,0.0000152205885,0.000089054694,0.00003576438,0.011740499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978636,0.0002709971,0.000033584027,0.00024222762,0.0005249354,0.0010647012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726737,0.000443035,0.00020608376,0.00016008943,0.0011011394,0.0008223674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010026991,0.00026160202,0.00030796084,0.002568849,0.0116982795,0.0065605687,0.0013782445,0.0008961585,0.0066825054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043446464,0.00027690004,0.00024798763,0.00399228,0.015976746,0.0014468046,0.0026630813,0.001732115,0.00020575536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007383519,0.000025226982,0.03258474,0.00009915551,0.0000366228,0.00088041456,0.04538293,0.00582258,0.00085288443,0.8432566,0.021541858,0.049443148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038551898,0.000055421737,0.10463612,0.00052151515,0.00007492056,0.0005460834,0.06815664,0.007797656,0.0012621426,0.09419493,0.7224816,0.0002344305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99795926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8248229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17517713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16972135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9566776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954541945","doi":"10.1177/0967010619850332","title":"The futures of anticipatory reason: Contingency and speculation in the sting operation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Speculation; Contingency; Futures contract; Securitization; Conceptualization; Epistemology; Vision; Sociology; Flexibility (engineering); State (computer science); Law and economics; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.017038342944384492,"score_gpt":0.31282562665706626,"score_spread":0.29578728371268176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954541945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20150687,0.012623208,0.10574761,0.12796621,0.0011489027,0.00007530725,0.00014705014,0.00018797966,0.55059683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99356353,0.00093852595,0.002207888,0.0006450542,0.00010707866,0.000016130345,0.0000119593315,0.000023835513,0.0024860012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99445796,0.0039479895,0.00012436094,0.00040496307,0.0006263882,0.00043835165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868699,0.009818361,0.00096006325,0.0010912569,0.00081830245,0.00044206943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012035105,0.0004149446,0.0003793444,0.0019783946,0.006106426,0.011095063,0.0010653472,0.0037791657,0.0051559974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011980589,0.00041765507,0.0004985713,0.0012109956,0.068508916,0.01926947,0.00690734,0.005460919,0.00037240633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020684854,0.0000048599773,0.00024602827,0.00002593522,0.0000022337426,0.00011080134,0.030196756,0.00026267715,0.00009250809,0.96582043,0.00064254383,0.0025746892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010035399,0.000023192173,0.00041644517,0.00031182615,0.0000073844694,0.00017513194,0.034938764,0.0010843991,0.00028221696,0.9157616,0.046963733,0.000025304556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031665945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033126525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012035105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005497624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004752414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06364846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955565934","doi":"10.1177/0967010619850336","title":"The authoritarian surveillant assemblage: Authoritarian state surveillance in Turkey","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Turkey's Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Dissent; State (computer science); Sociology; Turkish; Political science; Law; Politics; Democracy; Computer science","score_opus":0.007768849484020847,"score_gpt":0.27120635881866917,"score_spread":0.2634375093346483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955565934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.932627,0.0012417202,0.0033439496,0.0014339417,0.00006811047,0.000041725205,0.000051540806,0.000022959559,0.061169054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876803,0.00007868803,0.00031670625,0.000033802946,0.0000044159033,0.000004070073,0.000016667827,0.0000014020086,0.0007762068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989108,0.0004640369,0.00007505921,0.00016201801,0.00015569829,0.00023241586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992262,0.00018877788,0.00031336353,0.000056332734,0.00011908899,0.00009617236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012159032,0.00019472696,0.0001536875,0.0012249524,0.0028524108,0.002459206,0.00039824573,0.0005056939,0.0017845749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094297575,0.000147841,0.00013174705,0.00093029573,0.0033830001,0.0016966042,0.0026245036,0.00069676334,0.00013520056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026444532,0.000092152935,0.13921809,0.00037056865,0.000047721718,0.00365989,0.19213392,0.0039021347,0.004346227,0.5051848,0.0075068497,0.14327312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032628857,0.00030109938,0.35796413,0.00059871393,0.000067086134,0.0031958541,0.30144814,0.012053388,0.0032337536,0.044481043,0.27647805,0.0001460494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009584357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010514679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009584357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042335247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019932303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030716538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994843356","doi":"10.1177/0967010619887850","title":"Everyday secrecy: Oral history and the social life of a top-secret weapons research establishment during the Cold War","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Negotiation; Perspective (graphical); Everyday life; Neglect; Sociology; State (computer science); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03893543171805457,"score_gpt":0.3286690718620997,"score_spread":0.2897336401440451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994843356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9118312,0.0046793353,0.0009051506,0.016398283,0.00054493913,0.000027075223,0.000103672806,0.00003261102,0.065477684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942187,0.0009530658,0.00007146773,0.00040932978,0.000070430826,0.000007326179,0.000017854993,0.000023740264,0.0042281053],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98926824,0.007857999,0.0002781884,0.00046378444,0.00094827556,0.0011834768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794677,0.01379752,0.002888494,0.0008750111,0.0008043372,0.0021669252],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01078323,0.00054359087,0.0007341498,0.0028140375,0.025169663,0.016030854,0.0010230386,0.0023900156,0.006734775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01543265,0.0006598086,0.00022218004,0.0023862612,0.05077397,0.0090171425,0.013040992,0.005835619,0.0007174128],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016758471,0.000008549029,0.0012128776,0.00002814769,0.000002875558,0.0003076389,0.98944396,0.00001881062,0.0001537695,0.006427415,0.00062592316,0.0017532456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002097381,0.000027045013,0.0017755349,0.0001461606,0.000003662718,0.00027450445,0.96790355,0.000023253308,0.00015567652,0.0010231021,0.028645476,0.00001999249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011485671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016266486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9748303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007572208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039655175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057027817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000380946","doi":"10.1177/0967010619895660","title":"Becoming war: Towards a martial empiricism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Empiricism; Epistemology; Sociology; Normative; Spanish Civil War; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05324324232438839,"score_gpt":0.3371697359936869,"score_spread":0.2839264936692985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000380946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12297053,0.007853061,0.13245086,0.31195462,0.0020722346,0.00019965961,0.000095245916,0.00024565333,0.42215818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779726,0.0012835304,0.00940251,0.004553009,0.00029170673,0.00010289177,0.000024734467,0.00008892905,0.0062799742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830755,0.0135661615,0.0002875504,0.0009339843,0.0014835355,0.00065320055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96999973,0.021030936,0.0013252273,0.0034703445,0.002290919,0.0018827663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029818859,0.0005817575,0.0007230903,0.0027971752,0.0068153637,0.02036678,0.0022452297,0.0039645103,0.0048618037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020975297,0.0005407311,0.0003927819,0.001341577,0.09524057,0.019369833,0.011402628,0.00865098,0.0007379639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007829089,0.000016489896,0.00018608154,0.000024287703,0.0000024257643,0.000023278799,0.019791504,0.00017472659,0.00005225322,0.97510886,0.0015623493,0.0030499783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001175044,0.000021645326,0.00024197211,0.0002236223,0.000003922332,0.00004104773,0.023155162,0.0014268863,0.000256644,0.9063656,0.06823691,0.000014936364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022787936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027602739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029818859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006818447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069266916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15769911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164969537","doi":"10.1177/09670106211024413","title":"A call for abolition: The disavowal and displacement of race in critical security studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Race (biology); Critical security studies; Critical theory; Politics; Critical race theory; Sociology; Security studies; Power (physics); Position (finance); Displacement (psychology); Critical legal studies; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Social science; Psychology; Business; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05672503781004968,"score_gpt":0.4160493563516335,"score_spread":0.3593243185415838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164969537","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041990103,0.0052373004,0.0056039183,0.9735858,0.0038861283,0.00002738357,0.000008693004,0.00003406244,0.0074176653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5256322,0.007525822,0.023415668,0.42140797,0.011503685,0.00071475096,0.000028836948,0.0003901455,0.009380969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.80616266,0.15758744,0.0059574074,0.009727028,0.014480223,0.0060853125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68398964,0.25408736,0.010345284,0.021175584,0.018084161,0.012317977],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20743266,0.0011765491,0.0030160677,0.003652881,0.026565887,0.03421335,0.0072706207,0.034123506,0.0039701066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17040665,0.0010081587,0.0017163483,0.0017924092,0.21025792,0.055665545,0.032276854,0.06447466,0.0010720785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003358481,0.000030131823,0.00027335377,0.00015441765,0.000010824464,0.00015933411,0.07527635,0.00008554127,0.00017941858,0.8954943,0.021298004,0.007004698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003789079,0.00005270779,0.00029906238,0.001214186,0.000014669179,0.00026968596,0.05024566,0.0003574718,0.00037454863,0.7494476,0.19758935,0.00009713065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006307137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076638646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20743266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015583069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02479886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97737664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197737768","doi":"10.1177/09670106211027464","title":"Threats, deportability and aid: The politics of refugee rentier states and regional stability","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Somali; Political science; Internally displaced person; Development economics; Leverage (statistics); Negotiation; Diplomacy; Palestinian refugees; Politics; Economic growth; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.025002739399809702,"score_gpt":0.29297712247480473,"score_spread":0.26797438307499505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197737768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60380435,0.0037273963,0.002025477,0.07965326,0.0002455942,0.00003378028,0.00004123238,0.000024802866,0.31044412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971462,0.00029107978,0.000071983624,0.00072723214,0.000018554732,0.0000045983948,0.000002238731,0.0000039723895,0.0017342125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574727,0.0028465013,0.000067382294,0.0001815755,0.0002141789,0.00094311545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964689,0.002058538,0.00050789595,0.000118088494,0.0002170698,0.00062949065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004915779,0.000259014,0.00022255509,0.0014118623,0.01520235,0.010676468,0.0006205711,0.0025246895,0.0065152915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051471824,0.00022476926,0.00023069361,0.0011371451,0.031540487,0.004302878,0.009745915,0.004076283,0.00025025068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003738471,0.000030512598,0.006203127,0.00007331273,0.000015370522,0.00086777937,0.21547988,0.00038341133,0.0003412652,0.761967,0.004269582,0.010331439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022672488,0.00006706773,0.010232336,0.0005398187,0.000021408598,0.00038316826,0.7197378,0.0005710797,0.00048201033,0.06808997,0.19979496,0.000057564404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024436839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032800667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024436839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070359935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043505165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051050007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209104565","doi":"10.1177/09670106211038787","title":"Race and racism in critical security studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Race (biology); Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Computer security; Gender studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.05287851577825305,"score_gpt":0.4035723657019007,"score_spread":0.35069384992364766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209104565","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19113901,0.040187728,0.0037040068,0.5857705,0.004136582,0.00014209325,0.00007105202,0.000023234432,0.17482582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97767055,0.0040062205,0.0005517991,0.012512206,0.0013152951,0.00019712433,0.000010372997,0.000021901385,0.003714538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.969764,0.026465906,0.0003301087,0.00076875644,0.0008017042,0.0018695147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90568703,0.08273373,0.0028118978,0.001513917,0.002336773,0.004916624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0499164,0.0008886238,0.0010681333,0.0075773457,0.033368878,0.017953385,0.0022041365,0.010857416,0.007393587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051431775,0.0006573422,0.00041299712,0.0045589847,0.08975141,0.01662522,0.012525638,0.012553329,0.00025307047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029976405,0.00009520605,0.0016358534,0.00019176566,0.00001475363,0.00019534625,0.21402027,0.000092927905,0.000052678257,0.7687754,0.007931569,0.006964292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040947474,0.000043617212,0.0024969096,0.0015462599,0.000025814094,0.00015565426,0.39566407,0.00026879387,0.00016265016,0.5347775,0.064780734,0.000037050297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01888983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030700361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0499164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012598876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017498044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2639863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213435735","doi":"10.1177/09670106211064040","title":"Memoirs of women-in-conflict: Ugandan ex-combatants and the production of knowledge on security and peacebuilding","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; Alborada Trust","keywords":"Peacebuilding; Memoir; Sociology; Narrative; Transformative learning; Politics; Disarmament; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Political economy; Pedagogy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.021010110681790838,"score_gpt":0.2785133946739838,"score_spread":0.25750328399219297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213435735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93992627,0.0033225187,0.0043253857,0.0063730823,0.0005788561,0.00014033334,0.00021110737,0.000054743687,0.04506772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99059427,0.0011155109,0.0009662762,0.00031462405,0.000069072616,0.00009564045,0.00003165344,0.00004608852,0.006766755],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585575,0.0033000684,0.000121902885,0.00016957983,0.00024172546,0.00031096887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881561,0.009400816,0.00086719583,0.000549919,0.00054056675,0.00048545314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006766911,0.0012072559,0.00064110255,0.0023448574,0.012733517,0.0059595685,0.0012818151,0.0020817441,0.005019359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016657883,0.000577382,0.00024625938,0.0019544675,0.021299724,0.005359235,0.007054821,0.0032816697,0.0004655746],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020274916,0.0000061292626,0.0003102216,0.000089794405,0.0000019030282,0.0004891362,0.9935129,0.000024936004,0.00037722636,0.003090057,0.0004551256,0.0016223901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021087005,0.000021811422,0.00059354794,0.00029407788,0.0000031929492,0.00042131622,0.96215147,0.000044477987,0.00058992754,0.00092256744,0.034945566,0.000009871247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002800883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004816399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012733517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027149597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00145103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035787284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233488909","doi":"10.1177/0967010609343301","title":"Guest Editors’ Introduction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.008800775462554257,"score_gpt":0.278053254261361,"score_spread":0.26925247879880676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233488909","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011276892,0.003468304,0.0002070073,0.038273454,0.9485697,0.000033562443,0.00010998909,0.00008382488,0.009141482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025709234,0.004271781,0.0002991287,0.035152875,0.8464253,0.000106250176,0.00016061837,0.000136034,0.110877186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746525,0.00043459176,0.00026687284,0.00044468252,0.0010455502,0.00034309304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98480576,0.0032690875,0.001026329,0.0007195752,0.0068344395,0.0033448713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004805429,0.0014492238,0.0012213658,0.002653029,0.0020144745,0.005858639,0.0022253362,0.0056579416,0.09662764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022409394,0.0005268481,0.0011008605,0.0011113436,0.0010699154,0.0029630822,0.0027207965,0.007784771,0.042601172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019869332,0.000008727899,0.000039224953,0.000116745585,0.00000253852,0.00005483734,0.000025455563,0.000014640446,0.000058791775,0.00061972457,0.9895691,0.009470301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015082339,0.000019711604,0.00024899523,0.00016013926,0.00000670369,0.00010623026,0.000055921304,0.000046237863,0.00009529478,0.0005756802,0.9986619,0.000008043155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009143044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018135726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09662764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014466956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022162746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32325166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244998647","doi":"10.1177/0967010620916150","title":"Editorial Note","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"editorial","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.008600864341498964,"score_gpt":0.265928578728314,"score_spread":0.257327714386815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244998647","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000041292067,0.0023514526,0.000099939345,0.084888905,0.89047676,0.000078767654,0.00022938693,0.00016059486,0.021673013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008910697,0.0026706217,0.00021689349,0.08704193,0.76291025,0.00015706925,0.00026322468,0.00020465015,0.1456443],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992281,0.0013741978,0.00058989535,0.00077960145,0.0041895043,0.0007858279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754464,0.0058556814,0.0015809102,0.0009130809,0.011494821,0.004709147],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060102576,0.0030118865,0.0027211625,0.004864568,0.0050294134,0.013794761,0.0029039683,0.020342952,0.18263258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047515716,0.0012033776,0.002475032,0.0019212965,0.0020487683,0.0036193565,0.0029847042,0.0148089025,0.14072838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008991081,0.0000027263934,0.000005895691,0.00003191344,0.0000018051303,0.00002867083,0.0000041325875,0.0000029922678,0.000008755305,0.000098096076,0.99797136,0.0018345568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039787417,0.000008596987,0.00008339907,0.00023229749,0.000011262289,0.00007946953,0.000034156088,0.000036410496,0.000041458665,0.0007185056,0.99870396,0.00001060718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034285593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008878322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81736743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041229385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006680313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61096686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245168017","doi":"10.1177/0967010606064133","title":"Editor's Introduction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.010386169071591149,"score_gpt":0.27199203617749734,"score_spread":0.2616058671059062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245168017","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007946142,0.0038854973,0.00014969987,0.06499612,0.9226166,0.000043067495,0.0002144411,0.000080825674,0.007934283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017798404,0.0041747587,0.00043341538,0.14414936,0.7273314,0.000117756164,0.00022551932,0.00011062759,0.12167736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963626,0.0005861945,0.00035906883,0.0005717,0.001699292,0.0004210871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843778,0.0036910851,0.0015165805,0.00091437565,0.0068858406,0.0026143505],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004842424,0.002154731,0.0019966548,0.0033721162,0.0027764272,0.0052581206,0.0035867556,0.0114771845,0.10600577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02161861,0.0007820808,0.0022185906,0.0014743339,0.001445298,0.0024985727,0.002229623,0.009120352,0.04696525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021202277,0.000007815257,0.000027079592,0.00015798498,0.0000077152545,0.000080727084,0.0000099878525,0.000014687872,0.000050528895,0.00024462913,0.9940745,0.005303196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020941101,0.000013923385,0.00025641613,0.00019071864,0.000016442722,0.00011008512,0.000032437274,0.000033467393,0.00007975631,0.00033307154,0.9989033,0.000009454641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001772557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004312048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8939942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021157719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030878787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35462463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285729701","doi":"10.1177/09670106221090830","title":"‘How dare she?!’: Parrhesiastic resistance and the logics of protection of/in international security","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Duty; Power (physics); Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02509994234105224,"score_gpt":0.25692999450630843,"score_spread":0.2318300521652562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285729701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26002908,0.007272391,0.014251386,0.10150976,0.0008726137,0.000073333336,0.00003939633,0.00014639382,0.6158056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917277,0.00032419458,0.00041416587,0.0017425681,0.00006069279,0.000016044778,0.000004281144,0.000031457323,0.0056789205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876171,0.009590271,0.00017161366,0.0009806465,0.00071276043,0.0009276532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99412787,0.0036880132,0.0007231764,0.0006062535,0.00043504985,0.00041972977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010171025,0.0005309537,0.0005305545,0.0011636391,0.009588531,0.015467975,0.0013689082,0.0040642177,0.00384369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009282911,0.00038584817,0.00038133317,0.00077976985,0.08606421,0.0095565105,0.008195189,0.0060488204,0.0006405798],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023593027,0.000015111639,0.00029825422,0.00004167685,0.0000069153475,0.0002499145,0.21782842,0.000119397344,0.00023002065,0.7760938,0.002184213,0.0029087362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036327172,0.00007805642,0.0009968921,0.0006437562,0.000018545294,0.0005957156,0.30161765,0.0009199948,0.0006953574,0.43419808,0.2601267,0.00007292921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004935746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042735147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015467975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008027433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032779223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058243394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389679315","doi":"10.1177/09670106231210472","title":"Insecurity, deportability and authority","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Sociology; Framing (construction); Politics; Mistake; Premise; Statelessness; Criminology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.035730955632262744,"score_gpt":0.3384479694954896,"score_spread":0.30271701386322686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389679315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.427986,0.027927475,0.0063228207,0.102852,0.001947248,0.000041527765,0.000108396394,0.00004919336,0.43276542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99172676,0.0035764775,0.00015965065,0.00071975595,0.00030083288,0.0000088934385,0.00001246713,0.000009090943,0.0034860787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965469,0.0022392874,0.00013383415,0.00025666092,0.00047967883,0.0003436052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99398214,0.0033972403,0.0010031282,0.00051697635,0.00047922521,0.0006213089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028245903,0.00027018713,0.00030315487,0.001616706,0.0047631226,0.007851679,0.00079315226,0.0016419736,0.0042588576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073106224,0.00016566273,0.00019976113,0.0015491799,0.038679633,0.0063214237,0.0052416576,0.0033291946,0.00035575134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025129284,0.00002182835,0.0031636814,0.00012019822,0.000009325756,0.0003456953,0.123128474,0.00020275722,0.00011994676,0.85514045,0.007486263,0.01023631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011503614,0.00006931139,0.010767151,0.0012775358,0.000016122813,0.0007937558,0.20336084,0.0005001047,0.0002899878,0.51281124,0.27006042,0.000042067557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026794332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021507782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007851679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026391714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019061791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019148648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394010989","doi":"10.1177/09670106241230431","title":"Police work and the politics of expendability in India","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Criminology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.014890100053608595,"score_gpt":0.28927400554436955,"score_spread":0.27438390549076097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394010989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7706323,0.0009228402,0.0009110569,0.016279684,0.00014745517,0.000019961923,0.00005986632,0.000046001587,0.21098074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972299,0.00012762427,0.00003283234,0.0002419037,0.000021393487,0.0000042826487,0.000005131387,0.000007247134,0.0023298122],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659604,0.0013535948,0.000083080864,0.00016866681,0.0005091296,0.0012895395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664116,0.0013948361,0.00064973225,0.0004869631,0.00026594003,0.00056136306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016386096,0.00025753528,0.00020996075,0.0022824046,0.013171864,0.009667344,0.0010768063,0.00095653353,0.005010688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035269193,0.00035681788,0.00023034897,0.0026418124,0.031940833,0.0021989315,0.011635033,0.0029578747,0.00042508208],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008555796,0.00007174895,0.026158534,0.000116765885,0.000023819182,0.0015167152,0.5694646,0.00036249685,0.0008940298,0.37102708,0.005559478,0.024719192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014487362,0.00008625924,0.056942806,0.00034365113,0.000026328713,0.000691254,0.74397016,0.00030345217,0.0006841506,0.033539873,0.16332516,0.000072370116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033513557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035060145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033513557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069196895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044280267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06663698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394685362","doi":"10.1177/09670106241229889","title":"Contesting colonial beachheads: Settler colonial (in)security professionals and Indigenous peoples’ energy infrastructure","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Brock University","funders":"British International Studies Association","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Colonialism; CONTEST; Political science; Sociology; State (computer science); Commission; Politics; Law; Political economy; Public administration","score_opus":0.008539774623132405,"score_gpt":0.29394070734118377,"score_spread":0.2854009327180514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394685362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87395525,0.0012680689,0.00090502406,0.03533552,0.00013373456,0.000026688971,0.000013320372,0.000010541061,0.088351734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955485,0.0002849375,0.00011335047,0.0009538479,0.000012845608,0.0000039541546,0.0000021003464,0.0000031251345,0.003077281],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953745,0.0022506404,0.000085556916,0.00025749757,0.00049118814,0.001540557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946221,0.0031361617,0.000416928,0.00016409102,0.00057463266,0.0010861461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067050764,0.00021145832,0.0002961976,0.0012624845,0.026672255,0.008867284,0.0009726088,0.0029413705,0.005149214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008085576,0.00027827654,0.00014687542,0.0011945576,0.03765162,0.003387284,0.008729501,0.0040223673,0.00018766048],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042921797,0.0000060793004,0.0013497337,0.000016236934,0.0000010541114,0.00030529953,0.96865034,0.000015927926,0.00012084986,0.026449734,0.00075414707,0.002326212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016425548,0.000007136416,0.0015577396,0.00009101786,0.0000022629974,0.000083366074,0.96914643,0.000040863382,0.00005147828,0.0022791538,0.02673037,0.0000086503205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45221636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59143156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45221636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018095773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022234073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8991683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403541476","doi":"10.1177/09670106241265637","title":"Demystifying trauma in international relations theory: From incomprehensibility to the liberatory <i>real</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.020924802843555013,"score_gpt":0.3274280193801034,"score_spread":0.3065032165365484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403541476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18069817,0.03259901,0.049060203,0.19788142,0.0018441431,0.000116611904,0.000104815736,0.00011694992,0.53757864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876952,0.004547925,0.0011685452,0.0020396172,0.00027005235,0.00004772156,0.000016455571,0.000020442974,0.0041940385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592185,0.0031141571,0.00007444994,0.0002234017,0.00032094034,0.0003452855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938822,0.0040607485,0.000654583,0.0005263515,0.00043431603,0.00044177606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055673374,0.0006755193,0.00045533545,0.0028248255,0.008381112,0.012981453,0.0015848624,0.0030490956,0.0043402836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064540496,0.00028261196,0.00040391355,0.00205381,0.10598722,0.013874273,0.008711376,0.0063774157,0.0002704312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000639104,0.000009915095,0.00023976462,0.000038736478,0.0000021340015,0.00008234179,0.04786655,0.00013012723,0.00003481361,0.9488209,0.00073147967,0.0020368528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000108864715,0.000025052295,0.00056967174,0.00043502427,0.000008006713,0.00024840428,0.1137703,0.0006212359,0.00014948208,0.84066606,0.043478735,0.000017110693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005371972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036322316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012981453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009029927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048905434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06551701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410075611","doi":"10.1177/09670106241300282","title":"Firearms analogies and settler colonialism in US nuclear deterrence strategy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Gun Ownership and Violence Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Deterrence (psychology); Colonialism; Deterrence theory; Political science; Nuclear weapon; Nuclear strategy; Criminology; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.027454324877876742,"score_gpt":0.35307944212376097,"score_spread":0.3256251172458842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410075611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5161945,0.0059986883,0.010763743,0.032105397,0.0003781235,0.000021447175,0.00003521369,0.000030303918,0.43447262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975986,0.00041313062,0.00028304357,0.00031392757,0.000027785944,0.0000030656802,0.0000024773135,0.0000041382477,0.0013537882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969644,0.0022796895,0.00009282666,0.00022184657,0.00026200133,0.00017916728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900439,0.008032194,0.0007492914,0.0004997348,0.000510363,0.00016450173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004066575,0.000216631,0.00022211946,0.0017645486,0.0041078124,0.0062263617,0.0005674517,0.0017873436,0.004069755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010684823,0.00016527963,0.00013349687,0.0015394782,0.03073341,0.0050925775,0.003215049,0.0024702144,0.0001177785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011341461,0.000011021376,0.0007974066,0.00002628793,0.00000396123,0.000115944655,0.052127153,0.00017962346,0.000116135896,0.93921727,0.00072086824,0.006672969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024338737,0.000089429726,0.006113689,0.0006536199,0.000027040836,0.0005810871,0.12715153,0.0025576663,0.0013455197,0.6755644,0.18583988,0.00005197287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060436423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008871116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062263617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048512346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012299113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03519833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}