{"meta":{"query_hash":"075bd60c0591","filters":{"venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/075bd60c0591","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Semantics+and+Pragmatics"},"results":[{"id":"W1964688066","doi":"10.3765/sp.3.9","title":"Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Modal verb; Linguistics; Implicature; Politeness; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Modality (human–computer interaction); Modal; Variation (astronomy); Pragmatics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; History; Verb","score_opus":0.013453149543939818,"score_gpt":0.24769368818362358,"score_spread":0.23424053863968378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964688066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.832379,0.0007770505,0.0185149,0.0005554259,0.000049705694,0.000027693524,0.00018666862,0.00015196037,0.14735763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997577,0.00006834369,0.0013112399,0.00006283573,0.000014351829,0.000011113474,0.000040465387,0.000046225887,0.0008684593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989208,0.0005452455,0.000055138073,0.00021306587,0.00016205703,0.00010376131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976507,0.0013540242,0.00025582363,0.0003208992,0.00029119008,0.00012745318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014287845,0.00019266568,0.0002494755,0.0011505428,0.00085217395,0.0031995985,0.00041275914,0.00047890402,0.004636619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004275439,0.00028968405,0.00028342605,0.0008965215,0.0024167255,0.0023372588,0.0027051924,0.0009400428,0.00040422071],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089309225,0.00016918853,0.09694459,0.0004207142,0.00032045878,0.0014869724,0.103090584,0.001485259,0.15668933,0.45251715,0.0026871506,0.18329558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018439376,0.00053246156,0.5863072,0.00027679725,0.0003410885,0.0032739781,0.028842175,0.009119888,0.016708413,0.3082651,0.04583312,0.00031526762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015300886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019290311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004636619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009142748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002131831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015511036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166882240","doi":"10.3765/sp.5.1","title":"Two types of class B numeral modifiers: A reply to Nouwen 2010","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Numeral system; Semantics (computer science); Interpretation (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Programming language; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031071094998877894,"score_gpt":0.26356474226239224,"score_spread":0.23249364726351435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166882240","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019493153,0.0066610053,0.018887144,0.8545062,0.0036852364,0.000019509192,0.00019826862,0.00014716013,0.096402265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61661035,0.0049786214,0.018091759,0.29092458,0.006404936,0.00013926715,0.00019221047,0.00055096415,0.0621073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946449,0.0021652984,0.00031852434,0.0014811712,0.0010347991,0.00035536618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870558,0.008724844,0.00058914133,0.0017386681,0.0015549319,0.0003366482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008479224,0.0006575283,0.00080089254,0.0014411364,0.0037736653,0.0036741616,0.0024981273,0.014215843,0.008100931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021304263,0.0006344948,0.0007354026,0.0012789767,0.020775713,0.01778164,0.0057976516,0.011506533,0.002001617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037397116,0.000008477786,0.00015543676,0.000037646165,0.000005995482,0.000078310484,0.002778458,0.0000662521,0.00019775941,0.9548032,0.034035925,0.007795232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039119368,0.000011144215,0.0004387019,0.00015688121,0.000017925515,0.00034217187,0.0016596142,0.0006257774,0.00069604267,0.76052386,0.23542577,0.00006294173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058166934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067226994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014215843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034510067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019808966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04484296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2359014521","doi":"10.3765/sp.9.6","title":"How similar is similar enough?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual conditional; Counterfactual thinking; Triviality; Assertion; Context (archaeology); Similarity (geometry); Computer science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Statement (logic); Set (abstract data type); Possible world; Interpretation (philosophy); Truth condition; Utterance; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Theoretical computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.010354558840069528,"score_gpt":0.23645759333230923,"score_spread":0.2261030344922397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2359014521","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3968289,0.0037357348,0.46346664,0.037019193,0.0007869608,0.00029160568,0.0009458465,0.00041798363,0.0965071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96318287,0.00041206952,0.03263681,0.001048235,0.00019217201,0.00007523225,0.00027437214,0.000071975635,0.0021062708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883409,0.0067546917,0.0006148486,0.0029167081,0.0009302461,0.00044248017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664665,0.02589583,0.002715812,0.0022907958,0.0018075152,0.0008235751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009472286,0.00043469825,0.0007561208,0.002125765,0.0030734725,0.0048725866,0.0015257376,0.002485598,0.008932292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050480835,0.0003408819,0.00085263123,0.0019833501,0.00615396,0.014771667,0.0042300406,0.0021219067,0.0009799149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039377538,0.00009862266,0.011465682,0.0003106292,0.00016051851,0.00072110613,0.017584821,0.00086173834,0.002861036,0.9149264,0.0045596245,0.046055976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019346375,0.00007299651,0.0043052565,0.00012817005,0.00012496482,0.00073976634,0.011895348,0.008290535,0.0027262478,0.94902647,0.022604039,0.00006692636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020874229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023390795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009472286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017273395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008277648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050094783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801408078","doi":"10.3765/sp.11.6","title":"Reconstructing the syntax of focus operators","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music","keywords":"Proposition; German; Focus (optics); Scope (computer science); Syntax; Argument (complex analysis); Linguistics; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Programming language; Physics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.02263468582616712,"score_gpt":0.24029698908542993,"score_spread":0.2176623032592628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801408078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47664735,0.0013655992,0.39740732,0.0028395432,0.00014923073,0.000056557503,0.00074068084,0.00088876224,0.11990498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770493,0.0004108273,0.01823124,0.00019101873,0.00005531774,0.00002552151,0.00023963414,0.00039932394,0.0033977125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989268,0.000461339,0.0000635521,0.00025649532,0.00020601704,0.000085709915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831784,0.0009080034,0.00011951055,0.00038820898,0.00021862754,0.00004782385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021180876,0.0004871227,0.00031487082,0.0012462634,0.0010349666,0.0028677627,0.0007694458,0.00093282043,0.004692079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044709304,0.0007056036,0.00042589026,0.0010065646,0.004498369,0.010574155,0.0031226198,0.0015692015,0.00050626736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041586067,0.000008984188,0.00080385274,0.00007098939,0.000011409512,0.00022640366,0.01019509,0.0005382764,0.007783614,0.962873,0.0006354785,0.016811403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038715007,0.000041119343,0.0033762776,0.00007131286,0.000040326864,0.00065495644,0.0040740934,0.0063636005,0.008305465,0.9312313,0.04574514,0.00005772745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032624882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024142484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004692079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016555074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008287245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015696585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160867475","doi":"10.3765/sp.15.11","title":"Two paths to habituality: The semantics of habitual mode in Tlingit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Linguistics; Verb; Semantics (computer science); Sentence; Variety (cybernetics); Adverb; Covert; Lexical semantics; Morphology (biology); Computer science; History; Lexical item; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025202069812822074,"score_gpt":0.26611239951799964,"score_spread":0.24091032970517756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160867475","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37409955,0.00082445936,0.3996163,0.0028398908,0.00018667997,0.00020850157,0.00086267607,0.0017128072,0.21964908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98153275,0.000101646714,0.014102288,0.00015815343,0.0000268763,0.000064381034,0.00021566848,0.00024747886,0.0035506352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992119,0.0002348487,0.00008832093,0.00017852364,0.00014990964,0.00013641398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904495,0.0003177296,0.0001346444,0.00019749797,0.00022952656,0.000075550495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010114826,0.00051348296,0.00035703392,0.0011321089,0.002116357,0.004032656,0.0011624553,0.0011253608,0.0039268727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017204179,0.0005224339,0.0010217885,0.0011198438,0.009141717,0.009664739,0.00328638,0.0020134836,0.0005107579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003629744,0.000015337122,0.0018552955,0.000072132745,0.000013207562,0.00038280163,0.015268547,0.00059359375,0.0019450592,0.9736517,0.0004655018,0.0057006283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027272352,0.00008847491,0.0066145696,0.00015896061,0.00007842338,0.0010316637,0.016643703,0.014204825,0.0053322376,0.90726584,0.04843591,0.00011806507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013199946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01070519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013199946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031310383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012245155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02624625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283396670","doi":"10.3765/sp.15.6","title":"Keep only strong","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Meaning (existential); Inference; Operator (biology); Scope (computer science); French horn; Linguistics; Extension (predicate logic); Computer science; Mathematics; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04381410208818345,"score_gpt":0.25551493596452984,"score_spread":0.2117008338763464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283396670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04392212,0.0017250864,0.23779435,0.019088458,0.0019041831,0.00027339224,0.0022569105,0.003175826,0.6898597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7530841,0.0015488641,0.056440677,0.011238787,0.0015847499,0.0004813717,0.0019714672,0.0030438812,0.17060597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654263,0.0006996206,0.00024310354,0.0011888163,0.0007514127,0.0005745172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99435127,0.0013634476,0.00025924522,0.0022210365,0.001592911,0.00021214338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034202116,0.0010451458,0.0010341204,0.0014662197,0.004015778,0.0047528557,0.0016019904,0.0025912148,0.03738095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009287228,0.0012337851,0.0014063142,0.00078483537,0.0061717345,0.020618351,0.008197507,0.005965249,0.0107435165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008043747,0.000022834234,0.0005241244,0.00015736175,0.000048594804,0.00019625848,0.0021226138,0.0002136928,0.0030578205,0.9602926,0.009868026,0.02341578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002993304,0.000066305,0.0007095523,0.0001248506,0.000096324,0.00040467107,0.0009304337,0.0011078744,0.004351616,0.7270724,0.26504678,0.000059274655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023909449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027101624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03738095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024084123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016214735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1250518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380052746","doi":"10.3765/sp.16.2","title":"Pair-list answers to questions with plural definites","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Plural; Linguistics; Semantics (computer science); Parsing; Computer science; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.026323884190438955,"score_gpt":0.24464612422921236,"score_spread":0.2183222400387734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380052746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22630589,0.00126835,0.3349431,0.007155064,0.0006611911,0.00029266876,0.0017346543,0.0022860433,0.4253531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95083517,0.00032094138,0.027497334,0.0007908632,0.0003705807,0.00016751964,0.0010419616,0.0005442868,0.01843139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945803,0.0033122904,0.000368858,0.0007372986,0.0007246224,0.00027650158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802663,0.015384542,0.0008707819,0.0014957233,0.0017214562,0.0002611972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054495386,0.0008497301,0.00059056375,0.0016847935,0.0019191735,0.0042718593,0.0012308006,0.0026593148,0.027260296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025431143,0.0006168534,0.0005897521,0.0012907032,0.004828908,0.017438726,0.007163145,0.0027163827,0.0034553602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029174605,0.000051601735,0.0015269921,0.00034483685,0.000028135597,0.0003808295,0.020158393,0.00040943964,0.0053255316,0.93898916,0.006651073,0.025842328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011273144,0.00010179543,0.0023767366,0.00018634583,0.000049445105,0.0009351885,0.009798908,0.005256407,0.0058449125,0.8812889,0.0939416,0.00010699839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006111291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007027076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027260296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013451377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004405989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09119481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387324408","doi":"10.3765/sp.16.4","title":"Probabilities and logic in implicature computation: Two puzzles with embedded disjunction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation; European Commission","keywords":"Implicature; Probabilistic logic; Utterance; Computer science; Ignorance; Sentence; Inference; Deviance (statistics); Context (archaeology); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Pragmatics; Machine learning; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04579230929807469,"score_gpt":0.2880126100749286,"score_spread":0.24222030077685391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387324408","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22071522,0.0028142089,0.68947315,0.034051437,0.00015488028,0.00007660888,0.00036395394,0.0005272746,0.051823363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9385035,0.0005306163,0.058294594,0.000649698,0.00028248332,0.00006549586,0.00008970253,0.00011399032,0.0014699392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906481,0.005397431,0.0005318517,0.0015254128,0.0014926736,0.00040443245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9500647,0.04187583,0.0024484335,0.0035416272,0.0011827026,0.00088671234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012463872,0.0006268573,0.0010625836,0.0025285075,0.0019788616,0.008268195,0.0021965476,0.0032110158,0.006000662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052409146,0.0011535711,0.0014428521,0.0020509143,0.020937594,0.029990481,0.0052702758,0.0057423706,0.00046501955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004494767,0.000020328673,0.00083975226,0.000042592586,0.000014993855,0.000063118125,0.0010343166,0.0019394354,0.00021075562,0.989106,0.00030263144,0.0063812463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007813882,0.0000058561686,0.00027253592,0.000010793437,0.0000036944011,0.00003084385,0.000115937386,0.004994234,0.00009337907,0.9941016,0.00035533216,0.000008010818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015349779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001175644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012463872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002098766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012485737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387334457","doi":"10.3765/sp.16.3","title":"Context Dynamics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Computer science; Generalization; Conversation; Natural (archaeology); Context (archaeology); Simple (philosophy); Sentence; Natural language; Artificial intelligence; Dynamics (music); Natural language processing; Linguistics; Epistemology; Psychology; Programming language","score_opus":0.050413288795176224,"score_gpt":0.26466510428716916,"score_spread":0.21425181549199293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387334457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02806098,0.002789606,0.27715093,0.009599085,0.00062319636,0.00017832575,0.00063415134,0.0005091865,0.68045455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82975286,0.0019768367,0.062688485,0.0013879942,0.00040215987,0.00038231246,0.00058840326,0.0003787495,0.10244208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985538,0.0004469342,0.00006556248,0.00048118326,0.00028289692,0.00016954928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849963,0.00054679695,0.00009517631,0.00040368945,0.0002547264,0.00019993514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014084915,0.0006672327,0.00054985983,0.0013813232,0.0029643646,0.0048565897,0.0016662222,0.0018830451,0.044736844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005623027,0.0005258156,0.000825129,0.0010539517,0.0032985809,0.012436838,0.0057515604,0.002299595,0.0046663005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007275944,0.0000043006085,0.00010828699,0.00001555684,0.0000041947883,0.00006178569,0.0003917389,0.00047437943,0.00019146656,0.994769,0.00090854376,0.003063658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012151798,0.000012148437,0.00018122875,0.000042021067,0.000010960743,0.00016229755,0.00072142354,0.00500538,0.00029533487,0.9135719,0.07997033,0.000014824413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038620096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036282835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044736844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025426913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014868419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14965963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401028365","doi":"10.3765/sp.17.12","title":"Modal indefinites and semantic variation: Lessons from Chuj","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Modal; Philosophy; Linguistics; Humanities; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03053780618516145,"score_gpt":0.2576224180814286,"score_spread":0.22708461189626716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401028365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4610028,0.0104625225,0.1095942,0.014678895,0.00024559099,0.000040211784,0.00048568108,0.0004210827,0.40306905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870307,0.0010469506,0.0071489243,0.00052810047,0.00017964904,0.000018179,0.00015695306,0.00021450095,0.0036760292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904865,0.00035430305,0.000049169143,0.00025437545,0.00019544085,0.0000980485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603695,0.0024853328,0.00025363668,0.00061925274,0.00047491526,0.00012989975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014394514,0.00031161957,0.0006297502,0.0016806265,0.0017016084,0.0047261976,0.0010101185,0.0013428982,0.0036818096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005681396,0.0004142322,0.00048696692,0.0018258742,0.009938788,0.013475704,0.0036812641,0.0029590644,0.0003101489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004132891,0.000013195171,0.001944775,0.000069614915,0.000014704521,0.00020448673,0.010475338,0.0004280893,0.0005495758,0.9691816,0.00094741496,0.016129894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020765161,0.000023880639,0.008793994,0.000104099745,0.000027337333,0.00060370675,0.0088943,0.0054419073,0.00071140146,0.92429537,0.05102159,0.00006156945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007650879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007091542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007650879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002354001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007918092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017079532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410122768","doi":"10.3765/sp.18.4","title":"Existential free choice items: The case of Farsi yek -i DPs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semantics and Pragmatics","topic":"Ancient Near East History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Existentialism; Natural language processing; Computer science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017076522388417774,"score_gpt":0.24006733399300068,"score_spread":0.2229908116045829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410122768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56504965,0.001074019,0.10181955,0.0023142477,0.000121217476,0.0001667518,0.00080682326,0.0002278753,0.3284198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98142666,0.00017591921,0.010781385,0.0001200719,0.0000251845,0.000054356722,0.00017267828,0.00007340079,0.007170453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979138,0.0007113729,0.0001909164,0.00054041983,0.00030670877,0.00033682378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997472,0.0011924122,0.00021429877,0.00057420955,0.000383561,0.00016344275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027473215,0.0006993342,0.0008695294,0.0017043273,0.0029913168,0.0047251545,0.0010837358,0.0019802144,0.00961867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005220752,0.0007663866,0.00081361586,0.002099758,0.009811138,0.012410804,0.005986708,0.0033229287,0.0006485098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034756362,0.000009395659,0.000945282,0.00003161469,0.0000068355193,0.0007111701,0.004690539,0.00012549726,0.00056939694,0.9899771,0.00025253513,0.0026458954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090181224,0.000055803575,0.0047432254,0.00014625565,0.00005342786,0.0037854027,0.01373631,0.0036435889,0.002495355,0.9179895,0.05316813,0.00009288616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003260264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028152112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00961867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024732584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007077128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032177627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}